Hamburg Port Railways Harald Kreft, Head of HPR, B-1
1 Railway infrastructure of HPR in the Port of Hamburg
Mühlenwerder
Waltershof Hamburg Süd
Alte Süderelbe
Hohe Schaar
Hausbruch
2 Railway infrastructure of HPR principle sketch of the net
River Elbe (north) CTB TCT CTS HBS
EUK Rethe- bridge WHO HP Rethe
CTA Kattwyk- HOS bridge ASE Reiherstieg
River Elbe (south)
Hausbruch main marshaling yards of HPR infrastructure of DB AG main container terminals infrastructure of HPR
3 Statistical dates Hamburg Port Railway
rail infrastructure 281 (+ 289 km private sidings) bridges 73 switches 881 (+ 800 on private tracks) switching and marshaling yards 3 systems with 7 railway control centres trains per day 220 freight cars per day > 5.500 rail transport companies 57
4 Liberalisation of the rail market
yesterday • net and transportation in charge of the HPR
today • only one owner and operator of the net = HPR • many several railways for transportation
Today 57 different rail transport companies are using the infrastructure of the HPR.
5 Freight Transport Volume main hinterland routes
Norway: 32 trains/week Sweden: Port of Hamburg: 22 trains/week Europe‘s major cargo-rail reloading point! More than 1.300 trains a week! Denmark: 14 trains/week Lithuania: 10 trains/week Russia: 16 trains/week
Netherlands: Poland: 6 trains/week 56 trains/week Czech Republic: 24 trains/week
Switzerland: Slovakia: Ukraine: 40 trains/week 30 trains/week 12 Züge/Woche Austria: 54 trains/week
Hungary: 43 trains/week Quelle: HHM Planmäßige wöchentliche Italy: intermodale Verbindungen 42 trains/week von/nach Hamburg (Containerzüge)
6 Quayside railway key data
230 freigth trains every day
60 direct trains to / from Hamburg
≈ 160 trains in Railion administration
≈ 70 trains in private rail transport companies
port total HPR 30 % total come up of the port
port total HPR 55 % of Hinterland transportation
port total HPR 75 % in long distance traffic (> 150 km)
7 Port of Hamburg main hinterland routes
rail water ways feeder ferries
8 Cargo handling Port of Hamburg total
20,0 18,1
15,0 12,9 doubling of container handling from 9,9 2006 to 2015 10,0 8,1 8,9 7,0 5,4 6,1 4,3 4,7 5,0
0,0 container handling in Mio. TEU
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2010 2015 250 total 221,6 200
150 total 134,8 172,8 100 92,1 50 bulk goods bulk commodity 42,7 48,8 total cargo handling in Mio. t 0 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 9 Port of Hamburg development paths
1. new handling areas are generated by redeployment of areas not being used efficiently anymore
poured since 1962 2. improvement and customization of existing areas
Spur 18 m Verkehrs- und Lagerbereich Straddle Spur 35 m Verkehrsbereich Lagerbereich mit
ca. Straddle Carrier Stapelkranen
10 m Carrier 15,1 m 15,1 Kai-Vorschuhung
3. extension into the port expansion areas
10 Cargo and Wagon Handling prognosis Masterplan 2015
19 container transport PoH (in Mio. t) container transport HPR (in Mio. TEU) 17
15 4,5
13 4 3,5 11 3 9 2,5 7 2 5 1,5
3 1
1 0,5
-1 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2015 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2015 220 freight trains 400 freight trains per day (2007) per day (2015)
Îdoubling of container handling in total from 2006 to 2015 Îtriplication of container transport on rail from 2006 to 2015
11 Masterplan 2015 expansion of the rail system
to Hamburg main to Lübeck station
adjustment and modernisation of Waltershof and Mühlenwerder adjustment of Hamburg Süd development of the HABIS-IT-system
connecting tracks to Berlin Waltershof 2nd track northern extension of connection station Ross enlargement Alte Süderelbe (northern part) station fly-over Altenwerder East Wilhelmsburg
Kattwykbridge adjustment of Hohe Schaar southern connection projects of HPR (total) Altenwerder direct connection Waltershof new crossing of main infrastructure- - Seehafenbahnhof southern River Elbe projects of HPR main-line railway HPR connection Seehafenbahnhof connections to DB Netz to Stade/Cuxhaven connection southern connection to main-line railway DB HPA – DB Netz DB Netz
to Hannover/Bremen Hausbruch
Unterelbekreuz 12 HABIS IT-system for the Port of Hamburg and HPR
13 HPR changes in the facility condition
Altona Altstadt tracks switches tracks switches 15%
E L B E 30 % 18 % 15 % 31 % K 44 % 46 % Ö NO 10 % H R D E 11 % L R E L B E B 71 % 75 % 25 % 30 % R A Mühlenwerder
N D tracks switches 5% 2% Waltershof 5 % 2 % 30 % Bf HamburgHamburg Süd Süd 255 n . B er 62 % lin 8 % 93 % Alte üderelbeS Peute R Billwerder Hansaport E T H E Altenwerder Wilhelmsburg 0% 0% Alte 0% 0%
Süderelbe R E
I H
E R reconditioned Hafenerweiterungsgebiet S Zone II T 100 % 100 % E Hohe 7 G facilities in 2008 S 1 Ü
D Schaar E 15 % tracks switches R 22 % E L 13 % B WGL [m] E 16 % caption 72 % 62 % Who 2 5 600 Legende: Ct 12 8 5870 actually not reconditioned Hausbruch tracks switches AS 7 11 7150 Grün:conversion bis 2007 volume erneuert 2008 Hos 25 13 11361 Blau:conversion Erneuerung volume innerhalb 2005 - 2008 Hbs20117820 2007 66 48 32801 02Rot:13 Noch zu erneuern km nach 2008
14 Charging System basics 1. basic components for allocation of infrastructure 2. components for individual usage of infrastructure a. usage-dependent components for the use of service facilities (tracks of categories I – III, marshaling humps, customs) b. time-dependent components as incentive for the effective use of facilities (exceeding standing times on tracks of categories I – III)
15 Charging System principals / time flow
• the use of the infrastructure incurs a fee • if freight cars are using the infrastructure longer than the standard time, they are charged additional time-dependent fees
16 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials RTC with obviously better development than the average
• average standing times of freight cars on category I are strongly decreasing – reach a level far below the average • hardly ideal split-up of freight cars on all categories - short standing times on category I - categories II and III used for average and long standing times
average standing time per freight car in category I - HHO dispersal of standing times (week 14) 16,0h 1000 25 h 23,2 h 900 14,0h 800 20 h
12,0h freight cars 700 10,0h all 600 15 h RTC-Z 8,0h 500 linear (all) 6,0h linear (RTC-Z) 400 10 h 524 300 6,0 h 4,0h 200 5 h
2,0h 2,1 h 100 286 0,0h 0 194 0 h KW-1 KW-2 KW-3 KW-4 KW-5 KW-6 KW-7 KW-8 KW-9 KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- KAT-1 KAT-2 KAT-3 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 HHO 17 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials adjustment of standing times from extreme timeouts
• the best 95 % of freight cars in category I reach standing times < 5 h 12,0h
11,0h
10,0h
9,0h
8,0h 7,0h 100% of freight cars 6,0h 95% of freight cars 5,0h
4,0h
3,0h
2,0h
1,0h 0,0h KW-1 KW-2 KW-3 KW-4 KW-5 KW-6 KW-7 KW-8 KW-9 KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- KW- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 If the cycle of 5 % of the freight cars was designed like the cycles for the other 95 %, the standing times in 2009 will stick to the average.
18 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials structure of standing times in track category I - HHO
7.304 cars 42.806 cars 5% • 63 % of freight cars very good 32% (ø 2,3 h) to the standard stan-
56,6 h ding time (5 h) • share on time allocation ≈ 20 % 413.638 h 42% 192.777 h 20% 84.813 cars • heavy trial by 5 % of freight 63% 376.842 h 38% cars total standing • produce 42 % of temporal rail times gathered freight cars occupancy (ø 56,6 h)
<=5h • 1/3 of freight cars (32 %) 5h … 22h reaches average timeouts >22h
2,3 h • temporal rail occupancy 8,8 h ≈ 38 % <=5h 5h … 22h >22h average standing time per freight car
19 Masterplan 2015 coordinated solutions and results
1. implementation stage – short-term / to be realised promptly, examples: • three track extension Stelle/Lüneburg • extension of Hausbruch • outrun tracks for rail freight transport Hamburg / Berlin Neumünster
2. implementation stage – realisation until 2015 Bad Oldesloe Lübeck necessary, examples: • new buidling Y-Trasse Hamburg / Bremen / Güter- Hannover Umgehungsbahn • two track extension Uelzen/Stendal Hamburg Maschen Lüneburg 3. implementation stage – long-termlang / beyond Buchholz 2015, examples: • three to four track extension Stelle/Uelzen Bremen Uelzen • extension Harburg/Lauenbrück
Hannover
20 Thank you for your attention! Harald Kreft Head of HPR Hamburg Port Authority AöR Hafenbahn B-1 Alter Wandrahm 14 / 15 20457 Hamburg
www.hamburg-port-authority.de
21 Development in Shipping Modal Split 2007
container development (TEU) total traffic (t)
17 % 30 %
40 % 9 % 45 %
1 %
24 % 34 % road Î slightly decreasing rail Î increasing inland navigation Î steady feeder Î slightly increasing
22 Port of Hamburg multimodal logistics hub
Of 100 containers, going through the Port of Hamburg...
10 containers 45 containers 15 containers 30 containers
are loaded or un- are being transported are being transported are transit cargo to loaded in the port either from Hamburg to to the economically the area around the (LCL). the hinterland or from important area of baltic sea or to the hinterland to the Hamburg. Scandinavia. Port of Hamburg. (80 % by trucking) (ca. 80 % by feeder) (70 % by train in long distance transports)
© Hafen Hamburg Marketing 23 Cargo handling reference period January – April 2007 / 2008
Port of Hamburg total
Cargo handling total TEU total 2007 2008 2007 2008
+1,5 % +5,2 % 46.322.809 t 47.005.968 t 3.142.023 TEU 3.306.416 TEU Hamburg Port Railways
Cargo handling total TEU total 2007 2008 2007 2008
+2,7 % +12,9 % 12.974.592 t 13.320.700 t 571.854 TEU 645.717 TEU
24 Adjustment of rail share reason: doubling of cargo handling by 2015
seagoing vessel / feeder inland water vessel
2006: 8,9 Mio. TEU 2006: 0,1 Mio. TEU 2015: 18.1 Mio. TEU 2015: 0,5 Mio. TEU
Hafen
road rail
2006: 3,4 Mio. TEU 2006: 1,6 Mio. TEU 2015: 4,7 Mio. TEU 2015: 4,5 Mio. TEU
25 Port of Hamburg extension of terminal capacities
CT CT Burchardkai Tollerort
westward enlargement CT Eurogate
CT free-port Eurogate central area
CT Altenwerder available
extension, redeployment Moorburg future possibilities
26 Organisation chart Hamburg Port Authority
City of Hamburg
27