HHLA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Contents 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Abführungskontrolle Positivliste 2017
ver.di Abführungskontrolle Seite 1 von 29 Positivliste 2017 (Stand: 24.08.2020; Nachveröffentlichungen siehe am Tabellenende) Nr. Nachname Vorname Unternehmen 1. Abel Wolfgang Hamburger Hafen- und Logistik AG 2. Adam Annette Verwaltungsgesellschaft Otto mbH 3. Adams Michael AVU Aktiengesellschaft für Versorgungs-Unternehmen 4. Ahrweiler Elina Basler Lebensversicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft 5. Ahting Detlef Bremer Straßenbahn AG Kraftverkehrsgesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Braunschweig (KVG Braunschweig) Norddeutscher Rundfunk (Rundfunkrat) 6. Albrecht Rosemarie Kasseler Sparkasse 7. Albrecht Wilfried Avacon AG 8. Alex Hendrik Klinikum Region Hannover GmbH 9. Alpers Udo Sparkasse Stade-Altes Land 10. Althoff Claudia WBO Wirtschaftsbetriebe Oberhausen GmbH 11. Altmann Dieter Securitas Holding GmbH STRÖER Dialog Group Verwaltung Hamburg GmbH (Avedo) 12. Amier Claudia Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide 13. Amthor Jens PSD Bank Nord eG 14. Angerer Manfred e-netz Südhessen AG ENTEGA AG 15. Angermaier Benno Stadtwerke München GmbH SWM Services GmbH 16. Angst Roland Telekom Deutschland GmbH 17. Anscheit Heike Commerzbank AG 18. Anthonisen Holger swb AG 19. Antoni Yvonne Helios Klinikum Erfurt GmbH 20. Apsel Horst OIE AG 21. Arndt Norbert Energie- und Wasserversorgung Mittleres Ruhrgebiet GmbH 22. Arslan Aydogan Bochum-Gelsenkirchener Straßenbahnen AG (BOGESTRA) 23. Aufderstroth Andrea Stadtwerke Gütersloh GmbH 24. Backmann Renate Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe GmbH Bahn Andreas HGV Hamburger Gesellschaft für Verm.- u. Beteiligungsmanagement mbH 25. 26. Baier Rainer Bausparkasse Schwäbisch Hall AG 27. Balder Janine MEDIAN Kliniken GmbH 28. Ball Mira Kölner Verkehrs-Betriebe AG üstra Hannoversche Verkehrsbetriebe AG 29. Ballhause Torsten Hamburger Hafen- und Logistik AG HGV Hamburger Gesellschaft für Verm.- u. Beteiligungsmanagement mbH 30. Balzer Bernd Transdev GmbH 31. Bandosz Oliver Charles Vögele Deutschland GmbH 32. -
Automation in the Container Terminals of the Port of Hamburg
Number 4, Volume XIX, December 2019 AUTOMATION IN THE CONTAINER TERMINALS OF THE PORT OF HAMBURG Andrej Dávid1, Jiří Tengler2 Summary: The port of Hamburg is the largest German seaport lying on the banks of the Elbe River, 115 kilometres from its estuary into the North Sea. Within container transhipment, it is on the third rank among European ports beyond the Dutch port of Rotterdam, and the Belgium port of Antwerp. Hamburg belonged to the first European ports that started handling containers at the end of the 1960s. In 1990, the port handled 1.696 mil. TEUs, in 2017, it was already 8.815 mil. TEUs. The port of Hamburg has four container terminals, two of which are automated or semi- automated terminals. The terminals differ in technical equipment, transhipment technology, handling systems. Key words: port of Hamburg, container terminals, handling systems, automated terminals INTRODUCTION The port of Hamburg is one of the oldest European ports which began transhipping containers in the late 1960s. The first container ship, the American Lancer, entered the port of Hamburg on 31 May 1968. This ship had already had a cellular structure of cargo hold. Between 1968 and 2017, a total of 186 million of standardized containers were handled in the port. Nowadays, Hamburg is the third largest European seaport in the transhipment of containers after the port of Rotterdam and the port of Antwerp. In 2017, 8.815 million TEUs were handled in the port that represents a decrease of 1.03% compared to 2016. Among the twenty world container ports, Hamburg was nineteenth in the transhipment of containers. -
Staffeleinteilung Herren Spieljahr 2021 / 2022
Staffeleinteilung Herren Spieljahr 2021 / 2022 Oberliga Hamburg 01 Oberliga Hamburg 02 Bramfeld 1. Buchholz 1. BU 1. HEBC 1. Concordia 1. HSV III Curslack-Neuengamme 1. Niendorf 1. Dassendorf 1. Rugenbergen 1. Hamm United 1. Süderelbe 1. Lohbrügge 1. TuS Osdorf 1. Meiendorf 1. Union Tornesch 1. Paloma 1. Victoria 1. Sasel 1. Hier könnt ihr die regionale Einteilung der Oberligen in einer Grafik anschauen. Landesliga 01 Landesliga 02 Landesliga 03 Altenwerder 1. Altengamme 1. Ahrensburg 1. Halstenbek-Rellingen 1. ASV Hamburg 1. Bergstedt 1. Harburger TB 1. Dersimspor 1. BU 2. Harksheide 1. Düneberg 1. Condor 1. Inter Eidelstedt 1. FC Bingöl 12 1. Eimsbüttel 1. Niendorf 2. FC Türkiye 1. Eintracht Lokstedt 1. Nienstedten 1. Kosova 1. Hansa 11 1. Nikola Tesla 1. Oststeinbek 1. Rahlstedt 1. Rantzau 1. SVNA 1. Sternschanze 1. Rasensport Uetersen 1. Voran Ohe 1. TuS Berne 1. VfL Pinneberg 1. Vorw. Wacker 1. Victoria 2. Hier könnt ihr die regionale Einteilung der Landesligen in einer Grafik anschauen. Staffeleinteilung Herren Spieljahr 2021 / 2022 Bezirksliga 01 Bezirksliga 02 Bezirksliga 03 Blau-Weiß 96 1. ASV Bergedorf 85 1. BU 3. Egenbüttel 1. Barsbüttel 1. Eilbek 1. FC Elmshorn 1. Börnsen 1. Farmsen 1. Heidgraben 1. ETSV Hamburg 1. Fatihspor 1. Hetlingen 1. FSV Geesthacht 1. HT 16 1. Hörnerkirchen 1. Glinde 1. Inter 2000 1. Kummerfeld 1. Hamwarde 1. Paloma 2. Lieth 1. MSV Hamburg 1. Sperber 1. Roland Wedel 1. SC V. M. 2. UH-Adler 1. SC Pinneberg 1. SC Wentorf 1. VfL 93 1. TBS-Pinneberg 1. Schwarzenbek 1. Wandsetal 1. Bezirksliga 04 Bezirksliga 05 Bezirksliga 06 1. -
From Hamburg Port to the World
The impact of SMART Technology on skills demand – from Hamburg Port to the world Henning Klaffke, Maciej Mühleisen, Christoph Petersen, Andreas Timm‐Giel 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Objective of study .................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Methods of study ................................................................................................................... 5 2 Research Methods .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Qualitative Interviews ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1.2 Extrapolation of results .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Analysis of a Study to Identify Skill Demand of the Logistics Sector .................................... -
Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in Germany
Copyright © Development International e.V., 2019 ISBN: 978-3-9820398-1-7 Authors: Chris N. Bayer, PhD Gisella Vogel Sarah Kaltenhäuser Katherine Storrs Jiahua (Java) Xu, PhD Juan Ignacio Ibañez, LL.M. Title: A New Responsibility for Sustainability: Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in Germany Date published: May 6, 2019 Funded by: iPoint-systems gmbh www.ipoint-systems.com Executive Summary Germany's economy is the fourth-largest in the world (by nominal GDP), and with 28% of the euro area market, it represents the largest economy in Europe.1 Considering the supply chains leading to its economy, Germany's cumulative environmental, social and governance performance reverberates globally. The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) is the impetus behind this study – a new regulation that seeks to “increase the relevance, consistency and comparability of information disclosed by certain large undertakings and groups across the Union.”2 Large undertakings in EU member states are not only required to report on their financial basics, now they are also required by Article 1 of the Directive to account for their non- financial footprint, including adverse impacts they have on the environment and supply chains. In accordance with the Directive, the German transposition stipulates that the non-financial declaration must state which reporting framework was used to create it (or explain why no framework was applied), as well as apply non-financial key performance indicators relevant to the particular business. These requirements are our point of departure: We systematically assess the degree of non-financial transparency and performance reporting for 2017 applying an ex-post assessment framework premised on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the German Sustainability Code (Deutscher Nachhaltigkeitskodex, DNK) and the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC). -
THE PORT of HAMBURG FIGURES the Port of Hamburg Is Germany’S Largest Universal Port and a Major Hub for World Trade
FACTS AND THE PORT OF HAMBURG FIGURES The Port of Hamburg is Germany’s largest universal port and a major hub for world trade. Every day, Germa- ny’s imports of goods and services are worth around 3.5 billion euros and its exports are worth around 4.2 billion euros. Foreign trade ensures our prosperity and contributes decisively to economic growth. The Port of Hamburg plays a crucial role: it is the “Gateway to the World” for the economy in Germany and many neigh- boring countries. Around 156,000 jobs depend on the port. It is also Hamburg’s biggest taxpayer, contributing over 910 million euros. Seaborne cargo Seaborne container throughput in 2018 throughput in 2018 How is cargo transported in millions of metric tons in millions of TEU between the Port of Hamburg DID YOU KNOW? Total 135,1 Total 8,7 and the hinterland? • 500 companies from the port services and industry sectors are located in the port Imports 79,7 Loaded containers 7,6 • 212 cruise ships carrying more than 900,000 passengers called at the three cruise terminals in Hamburg in 2018 Exports 55,4 Imports 4,6 48,4% • 2,100 container train connections per week link the Port of Hamburg with all parts of General Cargo 90,9 Exports 4,2 by rail Germany and important regions of Europe Bulk cargo 44,2 • One out of every eight freight trains in Germany has the Port of Hamburg as its destination or origin Only cargo handled between a seagoing vessel and land is counted as 41,4% seaborne cargo. -
Hamburg – Policy Challenges in an Urban Node
Hamburg – Policy Challenges in an Urban Node Dr. Sicco Rah 23.11.2016 Overview Hamburg on the TEN-T Core Network Some Facts about Hamburg Major challenges for the City Challenges relating to the Port of Hamburg Hamburg´s Transport Policy – which Answers does it provide? Input for Discussion + 6000 each year 1,9 million in 2030 BWVI bewegt! 2 Hamburg on the TEN-T Core Network Hamburg: At the crossroads of three TEN-T-Corridors: North Sea-Baltic Corridor, Orient- East Med Corridor & Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor, listed as core network node + 6000 each year 1,9 million in 2030 BWVI bewegt! 3 Some Facts about Hamburg ▶ Northern Germany, 100 km to the North Sea along the River Elbe ▶ One of the great hubs of the European economy with the third largest container port in Europe ▶ World’s third largest location for civil aircraft construction, a media city, a hub for logistics and transport. ▶ Hamburg is Germany’s leading international trading centre, with more than 36,000 trading companies and over 125,000 jobs in this sector. BWVI bewegt! 4 Some more Facts about Hamburg ▶ Area: 755 km² ▶ Port area 74 km². ▶ ~80 km federal state motor highways, including a link to Scandinavia ▶ Inhabitants Hamburg: 1.8 million Metropolitan region: 4.3 million ▶ Inner city airport with 14.5 million passengers per year ▶ Inner city harbour with 9 mio. TEU per year ▶ Main train station: 170 national connections, 210 regional connections and 2.400 urban connections per day BWVI bewegt! 5 Major Challenges for the City ▶ Hamburg is growing ▶ Number of commuters is (still) increasing: more than 300.000 commute into Hamburg on a daily basis ▶ Overall constant volume of motor traffic Congestion; conflicting use: freight traffic v. -
WOMEN-ON-BOARD-INDEX II Aufsichtsräte Anteilseignerseite Und Vorstände Powered by Fidar
WOMEN-ON-BOARD-INDEX II Aufsichtsräte Anteilseignerseite und Vorstände powered by FidAR Weibl. Weibl. Zahl Zahl Anteil Zahl Zahl Anteil WoB-Index Posit AN- AR Unternehmen Notierung AR- Frauen Frauen Vorst. Frauen Frauen AR AE-Seite ion Vertr. Ant.eigne Mitgl. AR AR o. AN mitgl. Vorst. Vorst. + Vorst. im AR rseite 1 GfK SE SDAX 10 3 1 2 20% 6 3 50% 35,00% 2 Deutz AG SDAX 12 1 1 0 0% 2 1 50% 25,00% 2 Gerry Weber AG SDAX 6 1 0 1 17% 3 1 33% 25,00% 2 SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG SDAX 6 1 0 1 17% 3 1 33% 25,00% 5 Q-Cells SE TecDAX 8 2 1 1 13% 4 1 25% 18,75% 6 Centrotherm photovoltaics AG TecDAX 3 1 0 1 33% 5 0 0% 16,67% 6 MorphoSys AG TecDAX 6 0 0 0 0% 3 1 33% 16,67% 8 C.A.T. Oil AG SDAX 3 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Gildemeister AG MDAX 12 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Phoenix Solar AG TecDAX 6 0 0 0 0% 4 1 25% 12,50% 8 Siemens AG DAX 20 4 3 1 5% 10 2 20% 12,50% 12 Douglas Holding AG MDAX 16 8 7 1 6% 6 1 17% 11,46% 13 Axel Springer AG MDAX 9 2 0 2 22% 4 0 0% 11,11% 13 Sky Deutschland AG MDAX 9 2 0 2 22% 4 0 0% 11,11% 15 E.ON AG DAX 20 2 1 1 5% 6 1 17% 10,83% 16 Drägerwerk AG & Co. -
CCP Instruments As of 2003 03 27 Engl
First introduction sequence of CCP instruments as of March 27, 2003 CCP Instruments DAX Block Crossing DAX (Xetra XXL) + corresponding instruments 1 DE0008232125 LHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 1 BC0008232125 BCLHA LUFTHANSA AG VNA O.N. 2 DE0007172009 SCH SCHERING AG O.N. 2 BC0007172009 BCSCH SCHERING AG O.N. CCP Instruments MDAX + corresponding instruments Block Crossing MDAX (Xetra XXL) 1 DE0002457561 HEIJ HEIDELBERGCEMENT O.N. NST 2 DE0005072102 BZL BERU AG O.N. 1 BC0005072102 BCBZL BERU AG 3 DE0005085906 AWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 2 BC0005085906 BCAWD AWD HOLDING AG O.N. 4 DE0005200000 BEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 3 BC0005200000 BCBEI BEIERSDORF AG O.N. 5 DE0005245500 BOS HUGO BOSS AG ST O.N. 6 DE0005245534 BOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 4 BC0005245534 BBOS3 HUGO BOSS AG VZO O.N. 7 DE0005278006 BUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 5 BC0005278006 BCBUD BUDERUS AG O.N. 8 DE0005408116 ARL AAREAL BANK AG 6 BC0005408116 BCARL AAREAL BANK AG 9 DE0005408884 LEO LEONI AG NA O.N. 7 BC0005408884 BCLEO LEONI AG 10 DE0005421903 DGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 8 BC0005421903 BCDGX DEGUSSA AG O.N. 11 DE0005439004 CON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 9 BC0005439004 BCCON CONTINENTAL AG O.N. 12 DE0005471601 TNH TECHEM O.N. 10 BC0005471601 BCTNH TECHEM O.N. 13 DE0005591002 DYK DYCKERHOFF ST O.N. 14 DE0005591036 DYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 11 BC0005591036 BDYK3 DYCKERHOFF VZO O.N. 15 DE0005753008 CZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 12 BC0005753008 BCCZZ CELANESE AG O.N. 16 DE0005773303 FRA FRAPORT AG FFM.AIRPORT 13 BC0005773303 BCFRA FRAPORT AG 17 DE0005785604 FRE FRESENIUS AG O.N. -
AMTLICHER ANZEIGER TEIL II DES HAMBURGISCHEN GESETZ- UND VERORDNUNGSBLATTES Herausgegeben Von Der Justizbehörde Der Freien Und Hansestadt Hamburg Amtl
C 1160 B 2369 AMTLICHER ANZEIGER TEIL II DES HAMBURGISCHEN GESETZ- UND VERORDNUNGSBLATTES Herausgegeben von der Justizbehörde der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg Amtl. Anz. Nr. 77 DIENSTAG, DEN 25. SEPTEMBER 2018 Inhalt: Seite Seite Bekanntgabe des Ergebnisses einer allgemeinen Vor- Beabsichtigung einer Widmung von Wegeflächen prüfung zur Feststellung, ob eine Verpflichtung – Pillauer Straße – .......................... 2375 zur Durchführung einer Umweltverträglichkeits- Bekanntgabe des Ergebnisses einer allgemeinen Vor- prüfung besteht............................. 2369 prüfung des Einzelfalles zur Feststellung, ob eine Erneute öffentliche Auslegung des Bebauungsplan- Verpflichtung zur Durchführung einer Umwelt- Entwurfs Osdorf 47/Iserbrook 25/Lurup 64 ..... 2370 verträglichkeitsprüfung besteht ............... 2376 Entwidmung von öffentlichen Teilwegeflächen im Verzeichnis der zur Abgabe von Verpflichtungser- Stadtteil Rothenburgsort – Billstraße (vor Haus- klärungen berechtigten Personen des Statis- nummer 125-133) –.......................... 2375 tischen Amts für Hamburg und Schleswig-Hol- Teilflächige Widmung im Bezirk Eimsbüttel stein – Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts – (Statistik- – Garstedter Weg – .......................... 2375 amt Nord) ................................. 2376 BEKANNTMACHUNGEN Bekanntgabe des Ergebnisses nicht beeinträchtigt. Infolge der Vollversiegelung der bean- spruchten Fläche stehen in dem von der Maßnahme bean- einer allgemeinen Vorprüfung spruchten Raum keine geeigneten Habitatstrukturen zur zur Feststellung, -
Reference Projects
REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Locations around the World © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH On the following pages, you will find a comprehensive list of the projects HPC has conducted ever since our foundation in 1976. 22/07/2021 HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH 1/94 REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Title Client, Location Start Date Construction Supervision for Six Automated Victoria International Container Terminal 2021 Container Carriers in Melbourne, Australia Ltd. PR-3241/336003 Melbourne; Australia Application for Funding of 5G Campus HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Network Hamburg; Germany PR-3240/331014 Simulation Analysis Study for CTA with Fully HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Automated Truck Handover Hamburg; Germany PR-3238/331013 Initial Market Study for a New "Condition EMG Automation GmbH 2021 Monitoring & Predictive Maintenance" Wenden; Germany PR-3239/332005 Business Model Support with Funding Applications for the B- HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 AGV System at Container Terminal Hamburg; Germany PR-3233/331011 Burchardkai HPC Secondment BHP Safe Mooring IPS Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd 2021 Melbourne; Australia PR-3236/336002 Brazil, Sagres Implementation of OHS Sagres Operacoes Portuarias Ltda 2021 Recommendations Cidade Nova Rio Grande RS; Brazil PR-3234/334002 IT Management Support for a German CHI Deutschland Cargo Handling GmbH 2021 Cargo Handling Company Frankfurt/Main; Germany PR-3235/332004 PANG Study on the Ability of Ports on the Puerto Angamos 2021 Western Coast of Latin America to Handle -
Vollständigen Women-On-Board-Index 185 III Als
WoB-Index 185 III AN-Seite Women-On-Board-Index 185 III Frauenanteil auf Arbeitnehmerseite des Aufsichtsrats der 160 im DAX, MDAX und SDAX und der 26 paritätisch mitbestimmten, im Regulierten Markt notierten Unternehmen zum Gesamtaufsichtsrat (Stand 15.01.2021 - aktualisiert zum 22.03.2021) Anteil Gesamt Zahl Anteil Ges.zahl Frauen Position Frauen AN- Unternehmen zahl AR- Frauen Frauen Arbeitneh AN- 22.03.2021 Seite z Mitgl. AR AR merseite Seite Notierung Ges-AR 1 CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA SDAX 12 7 58,33% 6 4 33,33% 1 Gerry Weber International AG Reg. Markt 12 6 50,00% 6 4 33,33% 1 Hannover Rück SE MDAX 9 5 55,56% 3 3 33,33% 4 Infineon Technologies AG DAX / TecDAX 16 8 50,00% 8 5 31,25% 5 Deutsche Telekom AG DAX / TecDAX 20 9 45,00% 10 6 30,00% 6 SAP SE DAX / TecDAX 18 8 44,44% 9 5 27,78% 7 Amadeus Fire AG SDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Beiersdorf AG MDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Bilfinger SE SDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 BREMER LAGERHAUS-GESELLSCHAFT Reg. Markt 16 6 37,50% 8 4 25,00% 7 CompuGroup Medical SE & Co. KGaA MDAX / TecDAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Covestro AG DAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 DMG MORI AG Reg. Markt 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA DAX 12 5 41,67% 6 3 25,00% 7 GEA Group AG MDAX 12 6 50,00% 6 3 25,00% 7 Hapag-Lloyd AG Reg.