Move cursor here to read speaker notes; right click to see entire note

The Benefits of U.S. Crude Exports IPAA Annual Meeting Ryan Lance, Chief Executive Officer November 13, 2014 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated revenues, earnings, business strategies, competitive position or other aspects of our operations or operating results or the industries or markets in which we operate or participate in general. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are difficult to predict such as oil and gas prices; operational hazards and drilling risks; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects; unsuccessful exploratory activities; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing, maintaining or modifying company facilities; international monetary conditions and exchange controls; potential liability for remedial actions under existing or future environmental regulations or from pending or future litigation; limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets; general domestic and international economic and political conditions, as well as changes in tax, environmental and other laws applicable to ConocoPhillips’ business and other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors affecting ConocoPhillips’ business generally as set forth in ConocoPhillips’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are only as of the date of this presentation or as otherwise indicated, and we expressly disclaim any responsibility for updating such information.

Use of non-GAAP financial information – This presentation may include non- GAAP financial measures, which help facilitate comparison of company operating performance across periods and with peer companies. Any non- GAAP measures included herein will be accompanied by a reconciliation to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure in an appendix.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves. We use the term "resource" in this presentation that the SEC’s guidelines prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the oil and gas disclosures in our Form 10-K and other reports and filings with the SEC. Copies are available from the SEC and from the ConocoPhillips website. Substantial Growth in Total U.S. Oil Production Projected U.S. Crude, Condensate and Natural Gas Liquids Production U.S. Department of Energy Forecast 18

16 High Resource 14 Case

12 "Peak Oil"

10 U.S. Tight Oil 8

6 Conventional Production 4 Million Barrels Million Barrels per Day 2 Alaska Crude NGLs 0

Liquids production has returned to levels not seen since 1972

Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA, Annual Energy Review 2013, Table 5.1b. Forecast from EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014, Various forecasts 3 U.S. Tight Oil: The Biggest Driver Behind the Oil Renaissance

OPEC Members 2010 2011 2013 2014 4.2 MMBO Saudi Arabia per Day Iraq Kuwait UAE 3.1 MMBO Iran per Day Venezuela Nigeria 1.3 MMBO Angola per Day Algeria .8 MMBO Libya per Day Qatar Ecuador

U.S. tight oil production alone is larger than production in most OPEC nations OPEC Production ranked from highest (Saudi Arabia) to lowest per 2013 IEA reported production volumes. OPEC Neutral Zone production split between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Sources: IEA for OPEC production; EIA Annual Energy Outlook and Rystad Energy for U.S. Tight Oil. NOTE: Tight oil production includes liquids from tight natural gas plays. 4 Tight Oil Quality vs. U.S. Refining Configuration: The “Mismatch”

Product yields differ significantly Blending U.S. tight oil into larger world Distillation Yields (%) pool is a more efficient allocation 100 NGLs Distillation Capacity versus Heavy Oil Coking Capacity, MMBD 90 90 Naphtha, Crude Distillation 80 77.2 80 Gasoline Coking 70 70

60 60 The U.S. has two- 50 Middle 50 Distillates thirds of the world’s coking 40 40 capacity 30 30 Vacuum 20 Gas 20 18.3 Oil 10 10 Residual Fuel Oil 2.7 1.5 0 0 WTI/40° Maya/22° Eagle Ford U.S. Rest-of-World ° = API Gravity Cond./55° Exporting U.S. LTO enables a more optimal global allocation of crude oils among refiners

Source: Haverly Systems Source: Bloomberg 5 U.S. Light Crude Oil Production vs. Light Refinery Runs

Light Crude Runs w/o substantial refinery investment Light Crude Production 8.5

8.0

7.5

7.0

6.5

6.0

Million Barrels Million Barrels per Day 5.5

5.0

4.5 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Light crude production will eventually exceed refiner ability to process it without substantial refining investments or crude exports

Source: Turner, Mason and Co., November, 2013, higher production case 6 Changing Pattern of U.S. Crude Imports

U.S. Crude Imports  Declining light, sweet crude (Million Barrels per Day) 10 imports, with year-round exports needed by 2017 8 . Condensates and super-light crudes Light Sweet are already in surplus . Seasonal exports needed before 6 Light Sour then during U.S. refinery

Medium turnarounds / outages 4  Eventual reductions in light,

2 Heavy sour and medium crude imports  U.S. likely to maintain heavy 0 Light Sweet crude imports that better match Exports and/or refinery additions required domestic refinery configuration (2) 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Light, sweet crudes are already in surplus seasonally

Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA; Turner, Mason & Co. 7 Crude Oil Futures Price Outlook

Brent Price Outlook WTI-Brent Price Differential (2014 $ per Barrel) (2014 $ per Barrel) 140 5

120 0

100 (5)

80 (10)

60 (15)

40 (20) 2005 2010 2015 2020 2009 2012 2015 2018

Discounted domestic prices threaten investment in U.S. crude production Brent ICE and NYMEX WTI Futures as of 11/6/2014 8 Ability to Export Crude Would Increase U.S. Oil Production

 Lifting the ban on crude exports Incremental U.S. Crude Production would increase U.S. production from Lifting Export Ban in 2015 by 1.5 to 3.0 MMBD by 2020 Million Barrels per Day 3.5 . 10-20% increase Reference High Resource 3.0

 Removing domestic crude price 2.5 discounts caused by the ban would increase investment in 2.0

new production 1.5 . More wells and plays would become economic 1.0 . Increased cash flow to invest 0.5

0.0 2015 2020 Increased production would have significant economic benefits to the U.S.

Source: NERA prepared for Brookings Institution, “Economic Benefits of Lifting the Crude Oil Export Ban,” Sept. 9, 2014. 9 Benefits of U.S. Crude Oil Exports

 Would lower consumer fuel costs at the pump by $18 billion annually

 U.S. economy could gain $135 billion and about one million jobs at its peak

 Reduce nation’s oil import bill by $67 billion annually

 Increase government revenues by $1.3 trillion between 2016-2030

 Strengthen U.S. geopolitical position

More jobs & economic development would result from continued growth in U.S. oil production

Source: IHS Global Inc., “U.S. Crude Oil Export Decision: Assessing the Impact of the Export Ban and Free Trade on the U.S. Economy,” May 29, 2014 10 Gasoline Prices Are Set Globally by International Crude Prices

Spot Gasoline Prices U.S. Gasoline Prices vs. International ($/Gallon) & Domestic Crude Prices ($/BBL) 4.0 140 U.S. Gulf U.S. Gulf

New York New York Brent N.W. Europe 120 3.0 WTI Singapore

100 2.0

80

1.0 60 Refined product prices around the world Refined product prices more closely track each other, demonstrating that U.S. track international crude prices (Brent) gasoline prices are set globally. than U.S. domestic crude prices (WTI). 0.0 40 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

U.S. crude exports should lower U.S. gasoline prices

Source: Bloomberg 11 U.S. Unemployment Rate vs. Oil and Natural Gas Employment

Oil and Gas Sector Expanded While U.S. Unemployment Rate Other Sectors Lagged Index of Job Growth: Jan. 2007 = 1.0 10% 1.7

1.6 9% Oil and Gas Sector 1.5 Jobs +65% 8% 1.4

7% 1.3

1.2 6% 1.1 Total Private 5% Sector +2% 1.0

4% 0.9 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Energy production prevented U.S. downturn from being worse, and spurred recovery

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (Total Private Sector Jobs, NAICS 211000 and 213112). 12 North Dakota Employment and Economic Growth

State of North Dakota Employment The State Economy More than Up Over 40% as Bakken Developed Doubled in a Decade Gross State Product, Billion $ 1.5 1,200 $60 Crude Oil Production,day Thousand per barrels Crude Oil

1,000 1.4 $50

800 1.3 $40

600

1.2 $30 400

Employment 1.1 $20 Employment Index (Jan. 2003 = 1.0) = 2003 (Jan. Index Employment 200

1.0 0 $10 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013

State employment and economic growth tied to Bakken oil production

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis 13 Growth in Production Restored U.S. Role as Oil Powerhouse

Crude, Condensate and NGLs Production for Top 10 Countries, 2014

12 11.4 11.1 10.9 NGLs Crude Oil & Condensate 10

8

6

4.2 4.1 4 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.9 Million Barrels per Day per Barrels Million 2

0 Saudi United Russia China Canada Iran Iraq UAE Mexico Kuwait Arabia States U.S. will likely surpass Saudi Arabia over the next year OPEC Neutral Zone production split between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait Source: Rystad Energy, November 2014 14 Global Crude Supply Disruptions vs. U.S. Tight Oil Growth

Growth in Global Supply Disruptions Growth in U.S. Tight Oil Production (MMBD) (MMBD) 4.0 4.0 Increase in losses since 2009 Increase in production since December 2009 3.5 3.5

3.0 3.0

2.5 2.5

2.0 2.0

1.5 1.5

1.0 1.0

0.5 0.5

0.0 0.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

U.S. tight oil production growth has offset most of the global supply disruptions

Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA 15 U.S. Oil Production Prevented Higher Prices in Recent Years

Brent Crude Oil Prices Would Have Been U.S. Consumer Gasoline Prices Would Have $12 to $40 per Barrel Higher in 2013 Been $0.30 to $0.94 per Gallon Higher in 2013 Real 2014 $/barrel Real 2014 $/gallon $170 $5.0

$160 $4.5 $150 Gasoline Prices Without U.S. $140 Brent Prices Shale Without U.S. Renaissance Shale $4.0 $130 Renaissance $120 $3.5 $110 Actual U.S. Consumer Actual Brent Prices Gasoline Prices $100 $3.0 $90

$80 $2.5 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013

Rising U.S. production has enhanced global oil security and affordability

Source: ICF International for American Petroleum Institute, October 30, 2014 16 U.S. Crude Oil Exports – Summary

 New abundance of light, low-sulfur tight oil production in the U.S.

 Offers tremendous economic and security benefits to the country

 Mismatch with U.S. refinery configuration presents a challenge

 Threatens to stunt tight oil development and its benefits to the U.S.

 U.S. crude exports provide a solution

17

The Benefits of U.S. Crude Exports IPAA Annual Meeting Ryan Lance, Chief Executive Officer November 13, 2014