<<

Syntactic variation in the German abroad Riograndese Recipient passive and final infinitive constructions: Methodology and selected results Mateusz Maselko 16th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology∣ Tachikawa, Tokyo (JPN) ∣ August 8th, 2017

Linguistic-historical overview Recipient passive Final infinitive constructions

1824–1935: ACTIVE main clause subjunction “connector” infinitive various waves of [Ich trainiere,] um/für (zu) [gewinnen] migration, Der VaterSU schenkt dem KindIO ein Fahrrad especially from Hunsrück and Ø Syntactic incoherent phrases functioning as a subordinate clause, which are introduced with the (Central West RECIPIENT PASSIVE (bekommen/kriegen/erhalten + past participle) ) subjunction and end with (zu +) infinitive Hunsrück: transition speech area between Das KindSU bekommt (vom Vater)PP ein Fahrrad geschenkt Ø Semantic function of the subjunction: indicating the West and purpose or intention of an action (Palatine, Hessian) Ø Semantic-pragmatic perspective: focus on the recipient role, i. e. somebody, who either gets one transferred object or gets influenced through one action in a positive or negative way (beneficiary/ Comparison of methods and results maleficiary) and marginalization of the agent’s role Ø Syntactic perspective: change of roles (indirect Translation Photo and Portuguese ➝ phrase object becomes the subject of the passive sentence) Hunsrik complementing

New Non-complex phrase, i. e. without other constituent(s): Riograndese Areal-horizontal variation 100% 100% Hunsrik in 80% 80% contact with 60% 60% Portuguese 40% 40%

20% 20%

0% 0% OC YC YP OC YC YP

Speech FER SE [INF] FER [INF] UM SE [INF] FER SE [INF] FER [INF] UM SE [INF] General research questions Questionnaire production test UM [INF] FER UM SE [INF] ZUM [NOUN] UM [INF] FER UM SE [INF] ZUM [NOUN]

KRIEGEN- 75,0% 74,2% Which relation can be seen passive Complex phrase, i. e. with other constituent(s): Which syntactic 100% 100% between the syntactic phenomena characterize 80% 80% variation of Hunsrik in 60% 60% Hunsrik and what does its and present West Central 40% 40% areal-horizontal distribution 20% 20% spoken in the 0% 0% look like? European region of origin? OC YC YP OC YC YP FER SE ... [INF] FER ... SE [INF] FER ... [INF] FER SE ... [INF] FER ... SE [INF] FER ... [INF] UM ... SE [INF] UM ... [INF] FER UM ... SE [INF] UM ... SE [INF] UM ... [INF] FER UM ... SE [INF] To which extend can the ... [FIN] ... [FIN] To which degree can 100% intra-individual and intra- 80% Translation 60% contact ➝ situative variation data Portuguese 40% Multiple choice phenomena with the Hunsrik results be compared to the 20% be 0% European variation within Translation Multiple choice noticed? “dialect-standard-spectra”? Varying distribution FER SE ... [INF] FER ... SE [INF] FER ... [INF] UM ... SE [INF] UM ... [INF] OTHERS 100%

80% Steering factors: Which theses can be made 60% valence, lexical with the collected 40% aspect, semantic Areal and social variation information based on the 20% roles, “movement 50 % intra- and inter-individual 40 % 0% direction”, focus, variation, regarding the pouring water taking away Repairing car reading aloud making a move 30 % book letter on Julia tangibility 20 % apparent time-hypothesis? KRIEGEN-passive WERDEN-passive GEBEN-passive 10 % SEIN-passive Active KRIEGEN-active 0 % OC YC YP

FER SE … [INF] FER … SE [INF] FER … [INF] Use in three related varieties UM … SE [INF] UM … [INF] UM SE … [INF] Multivariate research setting UM FER … SE [INF] UM FER … [INF] 100% Hunsrik West Central German

80%

60%

2 research stays: 2015, 2016 40%

16 places 20%

questionnaire: 0% six various 190 informants task types

speech production 1 research stay: 2016 test: two test 6 places Select bibliography Conference rounds and informal talk interview: nine parts amongst semi- 48 informants ALTENHOFEN, CLÉO VILSON (1996): Hunsrückisch in . Ein Beitrag zur Beschreibung einer deutschbrasilianischen notice friends: controlled by Dialektvarietät im Kontakt mit dem Portugiesischen. Stuttgart: Steiner (Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 21). without “Variation (linguistics) interrogator BECKERS, HARMUT (1980): Westmitteldeutsch. In: ALTHAUS, HANS PETER / HENNE, HELMUT / WIEGAND, HERBERT ERNST (ed.): Lexikon der interrogator Germanistischen Linguistik. 2nd completely revised edition. Vol. 3. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 468–473. meets contact ∣ KALLENBORN, TIM (2016): Regionalsprachliche Syntax. Horizontal-vertikale Variation im Moselfränkischen. Doctoral thesis. University of (linguistics)” Monte Vienna. Verità Congress Manual High ∣ Focused groups Autochthony Age High school ENZ LEXANDRA Centre, Ascona (SUI) L , A N. (2009): On the Perspectivization of a Recipient Role. Crosslinguistic Results from a Speech Production Experiment. th rd profession mobility In: Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 49, 125–144. 2018, May 20 –23 ∣ “old – 60+ – + – ENZ LEXANDRA as part of the conservative” L , A N. (2013): Vom ›kriegen‹ und ›bekommen‹. Kognitiv-semantische, variationslinguistische und sprachgeschichtliche Perspektiven. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter (Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 53). conference series “young – + – + – “Variation (linguistics) conservative” MASELKO, MATEUSZ (in print [2018]): Alter und Dialektalität: Zu (jugend)altersspezifischen Markern im Bereich der mundartlichen 20–35 IEGLER RNE meets …” (No. 2) “young – (Morpho)Syntax am Beispiel des Hunsrückischen in Südbrasilien. In: Z , A (ed.): Jugendsprachen. Aktuelle Perspektiven + – + internationaler Forschung. Berlin: de Gruyter. progressive”

FACULTÉ DES LETTRES DÉPARTEMENT DE LANGUE ET DE LITTÉRATURE ALLEMANDES