Iran's Nuclear Future: Critical U.S. Policy Choices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Iran’s Nuclear Future Critical U.S. Policy Choices Lynn E. Davis, Jeffrey Martini, Alireza Nader, Dalia Dassa Kaye, James T. Quinlivan, Paul Steinberg Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited PROJECT AIR FORCE The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-5175-2 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R ® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2011 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface U.S. decisionmakers will confront a series of critical policy choices as Iran’s nuclear program continues to evolve. The purpose of this study was to define these choices, describe the underlying complex consid- erations, assess their potential effectiveness, and uncover where policy trade-offs will be required. Given that the U.S. Air Force will be called on to carry out the military tasks associated with the policy choices, this study suggested ways in which the Air Force can prepare. The research reported here is the product of a fiscal year 2010 RAND Project AIR FORCE research project, “Aligning Nuclear Forces for the New Strategic Environment.” The project was sponsored by the Assistant Chief of Staff for Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear Integration, Headquarters U.S. Air Force (AF/A10); the research was conducted in the Strategy and Doctrine Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE. This monograph will be of interest to anyone concerned about how Iran’s nuclear program may develop and what this could mean for future security in the critical region of the Middle East. RAND Project AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Cor- poration, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and devel- opment center for studies and analyses. PAF provides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the devel- opment, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future aerospace forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Force iii iv Iran’s Nuclear Future: Critical U.S. Policy Choices Modernization and Employment; Manpower, Personnel, and Train- ing; Resource Management; and Strategy and Doctrine. Additional information about PAF is available on our website: http://www.rand.org/paf Contents Preface ............................................................................. iii Figures ............................................................................. ix Tables .............................................................................. xi Summary .........................................................................xiii Acknowledgments ............................................................ xxiii Abbreviations ................................................................... xxv CHAPTER ONE Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Study Objectives and Scope ...................................................... 1 Analysis Framework for the New Strategic Environment ..................... 2 Step 1: Conduct Regional Analyses ............................................ 2 Step 2: Define Ways to Achieve U.S. Goals for Nuclear Dissuasion, Deterrence, and Reassurance .............................................. 3 Step 3: Define and Assess Critical U.S. Policy Choices ..................... 4 Step 4: Describe U.S. Air Force Contributions............................... 4 How Our Analytical Approach Differs from Others .......................... 4 Organization of This Monograph ................................................ 5 CHAPTER TWO Influencing Iran ................................................................... 7 Iran’s National Security Interests ................................................. 7 Ensuring Regime Survival ...................................................... 7 Protecting the Homeland Against All External Threats .................... 9 Expanding Regional Influence ................................................. 9 Can Iran Be Expected to Act Rationally? ......................................10 v vi Iran’s Nuclear Future: Critical U.S. Policy Choices Iran’s Nuclear Program: Prospects and Uncertainties ........................12 Internal Debate on the Future of Iran’s Nuclear Program ...................14 CHAPTER THREE Dissuading Iran from Nuclear Weaponization ............................19 Iranian Actions That the United States Wishes to Dissuade .................19 Current U.S. Policies Toward Iran’s Nuclear Program ...................... 20 Critical U.S. Policy Choices .....................................................21 Raise Costs ......................................................................21 Provide Incentives .............................................................. 28 Conclusion .........................................................................29 CHAPTER FOUR Deterring a Nuclear-Armed Iran ..............................................31 Iran’s Military Behavior and Planning .........................................31 Historical Military Behavior ...................................................31 Military Doctrine ...............................................................32 Conventional Capabilities .....................................................33 Military Exercises .............................................................. 36 Paths to Conflict ..................................................................37 Conflict in Response to International Pressures and Actions Perceived as Acts of War ..................................................37 Conflict in Response to a U.S. or Israeli Attack Against Iran’s Nuclear Facilities .......................................................... 38 Conflict to Expand Regional Influence or Consolidate Domestic Power ....................................................................... 38 Iran’s Potential Use of Nuclear Weapons .......................................39 Current U.S. Policies and Capabilities ..........................................41 Policy Choices for Deterring Iran’s Use of Nuclear Weapons Against U.S. Military Forces ........................................................ 43 Deter by Managing Conflict Escalation .................................... 43 Deter by Raising the Costs of Using Nuclear Weapons by Threat of Retaliation ................................................................. 44 Deter by Denying Iran the Benefits of Using Nuclear Weapons ..........47 Contents vii Policy Choices for Deterring Iran’s Use of Nuclear Weapons Against U.S. Regional Partners ..................................................... 48 Conclusion .........................................................................49
Recommended publications
  • PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate

    PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate

    PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 AND 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Committee: Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Dr. John Makay Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Ron E. Shields Dr. Don McQuarie © 2007 Bradley C. Klypchak All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Between 1984 and 1991, heavy metal became one of the most publicly popular and commercially successful rock music subgenres. The focus of this dissertation is to explore the following research questions: How did the subculture of heavy metal music between 1984 and 1991 evolve and what meanings can be derived from this ongoing process? How did the contextual circumstances surrounding heavy metal music during this period impact the performative choices exhibited by artists, and from a position of retrospection, what lasting significance does this particular era of heavy metal merit today? A textual analysis of metal- related materials fostered the development of themes relating to the selective choices made and performances enacted by metal artists. These themes were then considered in terms of gender, sexuality, race, and age constructions as well as the ongoing negotiations of the metal artist within multiple performative realms. Occurring at the juncture of art and commerce, heavy metal music is a purposeful construction. Metal musicians made performative choices for serving particular aims, be it fame, wealth, or art. These same individuals worked within a greater system of influence. Metal bands were the contracted employees of record labels whose own corporate aims needed to be recognized.
  • The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions As Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts

    The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions As Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts

    The Legitimacy of Economic Sanctions as Countermeasures for Wrongful Acts Lori Fisler Damrosch* INTRODUCTION This essay offers aN iNstallmeNt of what would have beeN a coNtiNuiNg conversation with David D. Caron, a close colleague in the field of international law, oN themes that eNgaged both of us across multiple phases of our intersecting careers. The issues are fundamental ones for both the theory and the practice of internatioNal law, involving such core coNcerns as how iNterNatioNal law caN be enforced in an international system that is not yet adequately equipped with institutioNs to determine the existeNce aNd coNsequeNces of violatioNs or to impose saNctioNs against violators; aNd how to eNsure that self-help enforcement measures iN a largely deceNtralized aNd still iNcomplete system are coNsisteNt with the priNciples aNd values uNderlyiNg the iNterNatioNal legal order. David CaroN was uNiquely positioNed to speak aNd write oN these issues, Not oNly with a mature scholar’s authority, but also with the authoritativeness conferred by the judicial appointmeNts he held in receNt years aNd the cases oN which he would have deliberated and rendered judgments, but for his untimely death. Without his eloquent voice to provide wisdom aNd reach decisioNs iN the coNtext of coNcrete disputes, I venture still-evolving thoughts on what may well seem unanswerable questions. The topic of ecoNomic saNctioNs as couNtermeasures for iNterNatioNally wroNgful acts provides the opportuNity to revisit questioNs that I eNcouNtered for the first time as a braNd-new international lawyer in the Office of the Legal Adviser of the U.S. DepartmeNt of State; these questioNs would later eNgage David CaroN’s iNterest as well.
  • The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’S Revolutionary Guard

    The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’S Revolutionary Guard

    The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi: Decision-Making and Factionalism in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard SAEID GOLKAR AUGUST 2021 KASRA AARABI Contents Executive Summary 4 The Raisi Administration, the IRGC and the Creation of a New Islamic Government 6 The IRGC as the Foundation of Raisi’s Islamic Government The Clergy and the Guard: An Inseparable Bond 16 No Coup in Sight Upholding Clerical Superiority and Preserving Religious Legitimacy The Importance of Understanding the Guard 21 Shortcomings of Existing Approaches to the IRGC A New Model for Understanding the IRGC’s Intra-elite Factionalism 25 The Economic Vertex The Political Vertex The Security-Intelligence Vertex Charting IRGC Commanders’ Positions on the New Model Shades of Islamism: The Ideological Spectrum in the IRGC Conclusion 32 About the Authors 33 Saeid Golkar Kasra Aarabi Endnotes 34 4 The IRGC in the Age of Ebrahim Raisi Executive Summary “The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps [IRGC] has excelled in every field it has entered both internationally and domestically, including security, defence, service provision and construction,” declared Ayatollah Ebrahim Raisi, then chief justice of Iran, in a speech to IRGC commanders on 17 March 2021.1 Four months on, Raisi, who assumes Iran’s presidency on 5 August after the country’s June 2021 election, has set his eyes on further empowering the IRGC with key ministerial and bureaucratic positions likely to be awarded to guardsmen under his new government. There is a clear reason for this ambition. Expanding the power of the IRGC serves the interests of both Raisi and his 82-year-old mentor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic.
  • The International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use

    The International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use

    The International Emergency Economic Powers Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use Updated July 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45618 SUMMARY R45618 The International Emergency Economic Powers July 14, 2020 Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use Christopher A. Casey, The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) provides the President broad Coordinator authority to regulate a variety of economic transactions following a declaration of national Analyst in International emergency. IEEPA, like the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) from which it branched, sits at Trade and Finance the center of the modern U.S. sanctions regime. Changes in the use of IEEPA powers since the act’s enactment in 1977 have caused some to question whether the statute’s oversight provisions Ian F. Fergusson are robust enough given the sweeping economic powers it confers upon the President during a Specialist in International declared emergency. Trade and Finance Over the course of the twentieth century, Congress delegated increasing amounts of emergency power to the President by statute. TWEA was one such statute. Congress passed TWEA in 1917 Dianne E. Rennack to regulate international transactions with enemy powers following the U.S. entry into the First Specialist in Foreign Policy World War. Congress expanded the act during the 1930s to allow the President to declare a Legislation national emergency in times of peace and assume sweeping powers over both domestic and international transactions. Between 1945 and the early 1970s, TWEA became the central means Jennifer K. Elsea to impose sanctions as part of U.S. Cold War strategy. Presidents used TWEA to block Legislative Attorney international financial transactions, seize U.S.-based assets held by foreign nationals, restrict exports, modify regulations to deter the hoarding of gold, limit foreign direct investment in U.S.
  • Encontros E Diálogos Entre O Thrash Metal E As Perspectivas Ecologistas Em Educação

    Encontros E Diálogos Entre O Thrash Metal E As Perspectivas Ecologistas Em Educação

    REXE. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación ISSN: 0717-6945 ISSN: 0718-5162 [email protected] Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Chile Depois do holocausto: encontros e diálogos entre o thrash metal e as perspectivas ecologistas em educação Barchi, Rodrigo Depois do holocausto: encontros e diálogos entre o thrash metal e as perspectivas ecologistas em educação REXE. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, vol. 17, núm. 33, 2018 Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Chile Disponível em: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243155021008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20181733rbarchi9 PDF gerado a partir de XML Redalyc JATS4R Sem fins lucrativos acadêmica projeto, desenvolvido no âmbito da iniciativa acesso aberto Estudios y Debates Depois do holocausto: encontros e diálogos entre o thrash metal e as perspectivas ecologistas em educação Rodrigo Barchi [email protected] Universidade de Sorocaba, Brasil Resumo: Este ensaio busca promover e construir uma série de encontros e convergências entre as perspectivas ecologistas de educação e os discursos sobre as hecatombes ambientais e o im do mundo, presentes nas letras e capas das bandas de thrash metal, especialmente o conjunto estadunidense Nuclear Assault. Os aspectos libertários, nômades e dialógicos das perspectivas ecologistas em educação, cujo escopo teórico é fortalecido, principalmente, pelas contribuições do pensamento de Felix Guattari, Paulo Freire e Marcos Reigota, são desenvolvidos na primeira parte do texto, e possibilitam desvelar as potencialidades educativas e transformativas dos discursos ecológicos e REXE. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, vol. 17, núm. 33, 2018 catastroistas das bandas de thrash metal, que são apresentados e discutidos na segunda parte.
  • Vox Humana Delivered to YOUR Home? Simply Fill out and Send the Following Form To: WTUL, Tulane University Center New Orleans, LA 70118

    Vox Humana Delivered to YOUR Home? Simply Fill out and Send the Following Form To: WTUL, Tulane University Center New Orleans, LA 70118

    Do You want the Vox Humana Delivered to YOUR home? Simply fill out and send the following form to: WTUL, Tulane University Center New Orleans, LA 70118 Your Name: ________________________ Your Address: ____________ Which times you tune in WTUL:-------- do occur after all. While we are on However, with the shift in Ameri­ ..!W.!._!T~U~L!.....;E~x:.!:::e:.!::c~u~tl~·v:.....!e~S~ta=f:..::f"---_ Editor's fore ward: the subject.. .. can thinking towards th e right s ince A . K yle Berman the 1980 election, the re had been Chris Lidy General Manage r Anyway, have a nice Novermber , growing pressure on the FCC to Mark Meister Program After thinki ng long and hard, and don't forget that we have a update and make more s tringent James Lien Music doing library research , exten­ couple shows coming up on De­ their rules on obscenity. This pres­ " Ranger" Gill Creel Music sive questionares, and public cember seventh and nineth. sure first became tangible in 1985 Sus an E s tes Ass t.Music s urvey t ype things , I realized • Missing them would be a mistake during the congressional hearings Mark Vic knair Classical that not all of these magaz ine/ very hard to correct. •• on pornographic music, lead by Brian Goldberg Jazz literary works are prefaced with r-----------------, Tipper Gore (and parodied in Frank Jordan Rosen berg Sports an 'editor' s note ' or anything Mondays at Tipitinas, Zappa's album, Frank Zappa Meets Suzanne Kais er Community Events by the pers on res ponsible , in the Mothers of Prevention).
  • Containing Iran: Strategies for Addressing the Iranian Nuclear Challenge Met Through Patient and Forward-Looking Policymaking

    Containing Iran: Strategies for Addressing the Iranian Nuclear Challenge Met Through Patient and Forward-Looking Policymaking

    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Corporation View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Containing Iran Strategies for Addressing the Iranian Nuclear Challenge Robert J. Reardon Supported by the Stanton Foundation C O R P O R A T I O N The research described in this report was supported by the Stanton Foundation.
  • Thesis Reference

    Thesis Reference

    Thesis The role of national courts in applying international humanitarian law: from apology to judicial activism WEILL, Sharon Abstract My PhD aims to set a method of analysis evaluating the manner in which national courts enforce international humanitarian law in light of the core principles of the international rule of law (which require courts to be independent, impartial, accessible and effective). This methodology offers a useful tool for understanding the function of national courts and provides a mapping of courts' rulings, within which each category can then be legally (and politically) justified or delegitimized in light of the principles of the rule of law. The scale according to which the court's function is assessed varies from apology to judicial activism, and it identifies four functional roles: (1) the apologist role of courts, in which they serve as a legitimating agency of the state's actions; (2) the avoiding role of courts, in which they, for policy considerations, avoid exercising jurisdiction over a case; (3) the normative application role of courts, in which they apply international humanitarian law as required by the rule of law. In that category, a deferral technique is identified – courts may defer back to the other branches of [...] Reference WEILL, Sharon. The role of national courts in applying international humanitarian law: from apology to judicial activism. Thèse de doctorat : Univ. Genève, 2012, no. D. 852 URN : urn:nbn:ch:unige-235753 DOI : 10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:23575 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:23575 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.
  • Timeline: Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament in the Middle East Compiled by Amanda Tapp

    Timeline: Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament in the Middle East Compiled by Amanda Tapp

    Timeline: Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament in the Middle East Compiled by Amanda Tapp 1949: The Israel Defense Forces find 1960s: Steps to establish a nuclear sources of uranium in the Negev desert. weapons-free zone in the Middle East begin. The Committee for the 1950s: Iran’s nuclear program begins Denuclearization of the Middle East (a with U.S. assistance as part of the “Atoms group of Israeli intellectuals) proposes for Peace” program, which began under the idea first in 1962, publicly stating U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s that the development of nuclear weapons administration. This collaboration “constitute[s] a danger to Israel and to would come to a halt with the toppling peace in the Middle East,” urging the of the Shah of Iran in the 1979 Iranian United Nations to intervene “to prevent Revolution. military nuclear production”. 1953: Iran launches a civilian nuclear May 1961: The U.S. Atomic Energy program initiative with the aim of Commission (AEC) sends inspectors reaching nuclear cooperation agreements to Dimona. The results affirm that with other nuclear-capable states. Dimona only had a research reactor and was not capable of producing weapons- 1955: The United States agrees to sell grade plutonium. This is reaffirmed by a Israel a small nuclear research reactor. second inspection in September 1962. 1957: Israel begins work on the Negev 1963: Israel agrees to buy 100 tons of Nuclear Research Facility, a large reactor uranium ore from Argentina in a secret in the desert near Dimona, which would agreement in response to rising tensions become the foundation for Israel’s between the United States and Israel.
  • Rising up for Freedom

    Rising up for Freedom

    IRAN RISING UP FOR FREEDOM 1,000 International Dignitaries, Iranians, in 30,000 locations from 102 countries join Free Iran Global Summit at Ashraf 3, Albania, online. Maryam Rajavi #FreeIran2020 Special Report Sponsored The by Alliance Public for Awareness Iranian dissidents rally for regime change in Tehran BY BEN WOLFGANG oppressive government that has ruled Iran from both political parties participating has proven it can’t deliver for its people. tHe WasHInGtOn tImes since the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Leaders represented a who’s who list of American “The Iranian people want change, to of the NCRI, which is comprised of multiple “formers,” including former Sen. Joseph I. have democracy, finally to have human Iran’s theocracy is at the weakest point other organizations, say the council has seen Lieberman of Connecticut, former Penn- rights, to finally have economic wealth, of its four-decade history and facing un- its stature grow to the point that Iranian sylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, former Attorney no more hunger. The will of the people precedented challenges from a courageous officials can no longer deny its influence. General Michael Mukasey, retired Marine is much stronger than any oppressive citizenry hungry for freedom, Iranian dis- The NCRI has many American support- Commandant James T. Conway and others. measure of an Iranian regime,” said Martin sidents and prominent U.S. and European ers, including some with close relationships Several current U.S. officials also delivered Patzelt, a member of German Parliament. politicians said Friday at a major interna- to Mr. Trump, such as former New York remarks, including Sen.
  • Metaldata: Heavy Metal Scholarship in the Music Department and The

    Metaldata: Heavy Metal Scholarship in the Music Department and The

    Dr. Sonia Archer-Capuzzo Dr. Guy Capuzzo . Growing respect in scholarly and music communities . Interdisciplinary . Music theory . Sociology . Music History . Ethnomusicology . Cultural studies . Religious studies . Psychology . “A term used since the early 1970s to designate a subgenre of hard rock music…. During the 1960s, British hard rock bands and the American guitarist Jimi Hendrix developed a more distorted guitar sound and heavier drums and bass that led to a separation of heavy metal from other blues-based rock. Albums by Led Zeppelin, Black Sabbath and Deep Purple in 1970 codified the new genre, which was marked by distorted guitar ‘power chords’, heavy riffs, wailing vocals and virtuosic solos by guitarists and drummers. During the 1970s performers such as AC/DC, Judas Priest, Kiss and Alice Cooper toured incessantly with elaborate stage shows, building a fan base for an internationally-successful style.” (Grove Music Online, “Heavy metal”) . “Heavy metal fans became known as ‘headbangers’ on account of the vigorous nodding motions that sometimes mark their appreciation of the music.” (Grove Music Online, “Heavy metal”) . Multiple sub-genres . What’s the difference between speed metal and death metal, and does anyone really care? (The answer is YES!) . Collection development . Are there standard things every library should have?? . Cataloging . The standard difficulties with cataloging popular music . Reference . Do people even know you have this stuff? . And what did this person just ask me? . Library of Congress added first heavy metal recording for preservation March 2016: Master of Puppets . Library of Congress: search for “heavy metal music” April 2017 . 176 print resources - 25 published 1980s, 25 published 1990s, 125+ published 2000s .
  • Best Options for the Nuclear Posture Review

    Best Options for the Nuclear Posture Review

    Best Options for the Nuclear Posture Review Anna Péczeli Abstract The Obama administration’s 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) represented a significant departure from previous reviews. It explicitly included the goal of “global zero,” added nuclear security to the scope of the review, declared a negative security assurance with fewer excep- tions than any previous administration, and reduced the role of nuclear weapons to a narrow range of contingencies. It is essential for the Trump administration to follow its predecessor and live up to US obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by recommitting to global zero as a long-term goal. At the moment, concerns of allies are still over- riding the chances of a posture that would further limit the role of nuclear weapons by implementing a “sole purpose” posture or a “no-first-use” declaration. But these policies should remain long-term goals, and the administration should continue to work to create the conditions for im- plementation. This includes improving regional security architectures and increasing reliance on conventional capabilities. Strategic stability should remain the organizing concept toward Russia and China, and negative security assurances should be maintained to advance non- proliferation objectives. Altogether, continuity in declaratory policy is still in the best interests of the United States as it would strengthen rela- tions with allies, mitigate the fears of Russia and China, and pave the way toward a more cooperative relationship based on dialogue instead of threats. ✵ ✵ ✵ ✵ ✵ Since the Obama administration issued its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the security environment has significantly deteriorated. The 2010 NPR stated, “Russia and the United States are no longer adversaries, Anna Péczeli, PhD, is a recent Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University and a Research Fellow at the Centre for Strategic and Defence Studies, National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary.