DOCSLIB.ORG

Iran: a Revolutionary Republic in Transition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iran: a Revolutionary Republic in Transition Iran: a revolutionary republic in transition in republic a revolutionary Iran: This Chaillot Paper examines recent domestic developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The volume presents an in-depth assessment of the far- reaching changes that the Iranian state and Iranian society have undergone since the 1979 revolution, with a particular focus on the social and political turmoil of the past five years. IRAN: It is clear that in many ways the Islamic Republic is in the throes of a transition A REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLIC where many of its fundamental tenets are being called into question. Profound and ongoing internal transformations in Iranian society already affect the country’s foreign policy posture, as some of its domestic and external issues IN TRANSITION converge and will most likely continue to do so. Pertinent examples are the nuclear issue and the socio-political upheaval in neighbouring Arab countries. Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi, the volume features contributions from five authors who are all specialists in various aspects of Iranian politics and society. Each Edited by Rouzbeh Parsi by RouzbehEdited Parsi Chaillot Papers | February 2012 author explores some of the most crucial variables of the Iranian body politic. Their focus on distinct dimensions of Iranian society and culture casts light on the changes afoot in contemporary Iran and how the political elite controlling the state respond to these challenges. ISBN 978-92-9198-198-4 published by phone: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 30 ISSN 1017-7566 the European Union fax: + 33 (0) 1 56 89 19 31 QN-AA-12-128-EN-C Institute for Security Studies e-mail: [email protected] doi:10.2815/27423 100, avenue de Suffren www.iss.europa.eu PAPER CHAILLOT 75015 Paris - France 128 128 CHAILLOT PAPERS BOOKS In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) became an 127 120 2010 QUELLE DÉFENSE EUROPÉENNE autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union. Following an EU Council Dec 11 THE EU-US SECURITY AND JUSTICE Apr 10 NUCLEAR WEAPONS AFTER En 2020 ? Joint Action of 20 July 2001, modified by the Joint Action of 21 December AGENDA IN ACTION THe 2010 NPT REVIEW CONFERENCE Claude-France Arnould, Juha Elaine Fahey, Eva Gross, Daniel Ian Anthony, Camille Grand, 2006, it is now an integral part of the new structures that will support the Auvinen, Henri Bentégeat, Nicole Hamilton, Xymena Kurowska, Łukasz Kulesa, Christian Mölling, Gnesotto, Jolyon Howorth, F. further development of the CFSP/CSDP. The Institute’s core mission is to Maria Grazia Porcedda, Mark Mark Smith; edited by Jean Pascal Stephen Larrabee, Tomas Ries, provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to Rhinard, Thorsten Wetzling, Sarah Zanders Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Stefano Wolff; edited by Patryk Pawlak; the formulation of the European security and defence policy. In carrying Silvestri, Alexander Stubb, Nuno with a preface by Gilles de Kerchove 119 Severiano Teixeira, Álvaro out that mission, it also acts as an interface between European experts and Nov 09 BACK FROM THE COLD? de Vasconcelos, Alexander Weis et decision-makers at all levels. 126 THE EU AND BELARUS In 2009 Richard Wright; Jun 11 THE WESTERN BALKANS AND THE Margarita M. Balmaceda, Préface de Catherine Ashton EU: ‘THE HOUR OF EUROPE’ Sabine Fischer, Grzegorz Sous la direction d’Álvaro de Chaillot Papers are monographs on topical questions written either by a member Morton Abramovitz, Florian Gromadzki, Andrei Liakhovich, Vasconcelos of the EUISS research team or by outside authors chosen and commissioned Bieber, Dejan Jovic, Robert Astrid Sahm, Vitali Silitski and Manchin, Alina Mungiu-Pippidi, Leonid Zlotnikov; edited by Sabine by the Institute. Early drafts are normally discussed at a seminar or study 2009 THE OBAMA MOMENT – Sašo Ordanovski, Momčilo Fischer EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN group of experts convened by the Institute and publication indicates that the Radulović, Denisa Sarajlić-Maglić, PERSPECTIVES paper is considered by the EUISS as a useful and authoritative contribution to Igor Štiks, Veton Surroi, Jovan 118 Alexandra Bell, John Bruton, Teokarevic; edited by Jacques Oct 09 GLOBAL SECURITY IN A the debate on CFSP/CSDP. Responsibility for the views expressed in them lies Tom Cargill, Joseph Cirincione, Rupnik MULTIPOLAR WORLD exclusively with authors. Chaillot Papers are also accessible via the Institute’s James F. Dobbins, Nikolas Foster, Feng Zhongping, Robert Hutchings, Daniel S. Hamilton, Bruce Jones, website: www.iss.europa.eu 125 Radha Kumar, Elizabeth Erik Jones, Ibrahim Kalin, Apr 11 THE G-20: A PATHWAY TO Sidiropoulos, Paulo Wrobel Andrew C. Kuchins, Michael EFFECTIVE MULTILATERALISM? and Andrei Zagorski; O Hanlon, Rouzbeh Parsi, Juha Jokela edited by Luis Peral with an Glen Rangwala, Pawel Swieboda, introduction by Álvaro de Vasconcelos Álvaro de Vasconcelos, Alex Vines, 124 Marcin Zaborowski; Dec 10 EUROPEAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE 117 edited by Álvaro de Vasconcelos ARAB-ISRAELI CONFLICT Jul 09 EU SECURITY AND DEFENCE. and Marcin Zaborowski Muriel Asseburg, Michael Bauer, CORE DOCUMENTs 2008 Agnès Bertrand-Sanz, Esra Bulut VOLUME IX 2009 EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE Aymat, Jeroen Gunning, Christian- compiled by Catherine Glière POLICy – THE FIRSt 10 yEARS Peter Hanelt, Rosemary Hollis, (also published in French) (1999-2009) Daniel Möckli, Michelle Pace, edited by Giovanni Grevi, Nathalie Tocci; 116 Damien Helly and Daniel Keohane edited by Esra Bulut Aymat Jun 09 WAR CRIMES, CONDITIONALITY AND EU INTEGRATION IN 2009 WHAT AMBITIONS FOR EUROPEAN 123 THE WESTERN BALKANS DEFENCE In 2020? Nov 10 L’UE ET L’AFRIQUE : LES DÉFIS Judy Batt, Vojin Dimitrijevic, Claude-France Arnould, DE LA COHÉRENCE Florence Hartmann, Dejan Jovic, Juha Auvinen, Henri Bentégeat, Damien Helly Tija Memisevic and Nicole Gnesotto, Jolyon Howorth, Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik; F. Stephen Larrabee, Tomas Ries, 122 edited by Judy Batt and Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Oct 10 ViOLENCE POLITIQUE ET PAIX Jelena Obradovic-Wochnik Stefano Silvestri, Alexander Stubb, DANS LE MONDE ARABE Nuno Severiano Teixeira, Abdallah Saaf 115 Álvaro de Vasconcelos, Avr 09 MAGHREB : VAINCRE LA PEUR Alexander Weis and 121 DE LA DÉMOCRATIE Richard Wright; Sep 10 CHINA’S FOREIGN POLICY DEBATES Luís Martinez edited by Álvaro de Vasconcelos; Zhu Liqun preface by Javier Solana IRAN: A REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLIC IN TRANSITION Farideh Farhi, Azadeh Kian, Rouzbeh Parsi, Evaleila Pesaran, Paola Rivetti; edited by Rouzbeh Parsi CHAILLOT PAPERS February 2012 128 Acknowledgements The editor would like to thank the authors for their valuable work, and the two peer reviewers, Esra Bulut-Aymat and Sabine Fischer, for their contributions to enhancing the quality of this Chaillot Paper. In addition he owes a great debt to Gearóid Cronin and Sabine Fischer for all their insights and help, which went far beyond the call of duty. Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris Director: Álvaro de Vasconcelos © EU Institute for Security Studies 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the EU Institute for Security Studies. ISBN 978-92-9198-198-4 ISSN 1017-7566 QN-AA-12-128-EN-C doi:10.2815/27423 Published by the EU Institute for Security Studies and printed in Condé-sur-Noireau (France) by Corlet Imprimeur. Graphic design by Hanno Ranck in collaboration with CL Design (Paris). Contents Executive Summary 5 Introduction: Iran at a critical juncture 9 1 Rouzbeh Parsi History of a Republic 10 Factionalism and networks 10 Rewriting the revolutionary ethos 14 The nuclear issue as foreign policy 17 The way forward? The EU, Iran and the international community at a crossroads 20 Factional politics and the Islamic State 23 2 Farideh Farhi Introduction 23 The Islamic Republic’s evolving factional politics 25 Repercussions of the 2009 presidential election 26 Reshaping of the factional politics of the Islamic Republic? 29 Conclusion 38 Challenges facing the Iranian economy 41 3 Evaleila Pesaran Introduction 41 The economic system of the Islamic Republic 42 Post-war economic programmes 45 Policies under Ahmadinejad 48 Conclusion: looking to the future 58 Gendered citizenship and the women’s movement in Iran 61 4 Azadeh Kian Introduction 61 The legal status of women under the Shah and in the Islamic Republic 62 Patriarchy and modernity 63 Women’s press: a forum for social activities 68 Gender-conscious readings of Islamic laws and traditions and feminist social struggles 69 The persistence of patriarchy 74 Conclusion 78 Contents Student movements in the Islamic Republic: shaping Iran’s politics 5 through the campus 81 Paola Rivetti Introduction 81 Historical background: student politics and the revolution 82 Universities as the site of power and factional struggle 87 Politics from abroad? The post-2009 electoral crisis, migration and regime stability 95 Conclusion 97 Annexes 101 A About the authors 101 Abbreviations 103 Executive Summary This Chaillot Paper examines recent domestic developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran. It presents an in-depth assessment of the profound changes that the Iranian state and Iranian society have undergone in the past three decades, with a particular focus on the last tumultuous five years. In its exploration of this theme it not only shows the growing rift between the official discourse and self-image of the ruling elite and the society they govern, but also highlights the fact that external observers have many misperceptions about Iran. As is often the case, now that public protests and demonstrations of dissent following the controversial presidential elections in 2009 have died down, there is a perception that the ruling elite have re-established control over society. While this may be the case in the sense of the regime having a monopoly on state violence and control of the public space, there are several important ongoing trends in Iran that warrant a closer look at societal developments in the immediate and medium-term future.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Iranian Regime and the New Political Challenge
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org June 2011 ~MIDDLE EAST MEDIA MONITOR~ AN ENEMY FROM WITHIN: THE IRANIAN REGIME AND THE NEW POLITICAL CHALLENGE By Raz Zimmt Middle East Media Monitor is an FPRI E-Note series, designed to review once a month a current topic from the perspective of the foreign language press in such countries as Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Turkey. These articles will focus on providing FPRI’s readership with an inside view on how some of the most important countries in the Middle East are covering issues of importance to the American foreign policy community. Raz Zimmt is a Ph.D. candidate in the Graduate School of Historical Studies and a research fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. He is the editor of the weekly “Spotlight on Iran,” published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, www.terrorism-info.org.il/site/home/default.asp . On May 11, 2011 hardliner cleric, Ayatollah Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, held a meeting with members of the conservative Islamic Coalition Party. Mesbah-Yazdi warned his audience against the strengthening of deviant religious thought in Iranian society. He claimed that it jeopardizes the concept of “the Guardianship of the Islamic jurist” ( Velayat-e Faqih ), upon which the Iranian regime has been based since the Islamic Revolution (1979). “If this current continues and one day we will see another Seyyed Ali Mohammad Bab 1...we should not be surprised.” 2 A few days later, Ayatollah Seyyed Mohammad Sa’idi, the Friday prayer leader in Qom, warned the “deviant currents” to stop their conspiracies or the people will annihilate them, as they did to [Abolhassan] Banisadr, 3 “the hypocrites” [a reference to Iranian opposition organization, the Mojahedin-e Khalq ] and “the leaders of the sedition” [a reference to the reformist opposition].
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Asaadi, Department of Political Science, Portland State
    “Institutional Power Sharing in the Islamic Republic of Iran” Robert Asaadi, Department of Political Science, Portland State University 2021 Western Political Science Association Panel: Governance, Identities, Religion and Politics *Please do not cite or circulate without the permission of the author Keywords: Iran; Middle East; Comparative Politics; Political Institutions 1 The Constitution of the Islamic Republic establishes a semipresidential system, where executive power is divided between the supreme leader and the president. Prior to the 1989 constitutional amendments, the system also included a third executive—a prime minister; however, this position was abolished by the amendments, and the office of the presidency was strengthened in its wake. According to the language of the Constitution, the supreme leader’s position (referred to in the text of the Constitution as the “Leader”) is considered separate from the executive, legislative, and judicial branches (which the Constitution refers to as the “three Powers”). Although the supreme leader takes on a number of functions that are commonly associated with these branches of government elsewhere in the world, the position of the “Leader or Council of Leadership” is conceptually distinct from the “three Powers,” and, in fact, is tasked with resolving disputes and coordinating relations between the three branches.i Along with this dispute resolution power, article 110 outlines the ten additional express powers of the Leader: determining the general policies of the political system
    [Show full text]
  • IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY the Islamic Republic of Iran
    IRAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is a constitutional, theocratic republic in which Shia Muslim clergy and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate the key power structures. Government legitimacy is based on the twin pillars of popular sovereignty--albeit restricted--and the rule of the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution. The current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was chosen by a directly elected body of religious leaders, the Assembly of Experts, in 1989. Khamenei’s writ dominates the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. He directly controls the armed forces and indirectly controls internal security forces, the judiciary, and other key institutions. The legislative branch is the popularly elected 290-seat Islamic Consultative Assembly, or Majlis. The unelected 12-member Guardian Council reviews all legislation the Majlis passes to ensure adherence to Islamic and constitutional principles; it also screens presidential and Majlis candidates for eligibility. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was reelected president in June 2009 in a multiparty election that was generally considered neither free nor fair. There were numerous instances in which elements of the security forces acted independently of civilian control. Demonstrations by opposition groups, university students, and others increased during the first few months of the year, inspired in part by events of the Arab Spring. In February hundreds of protesters throughout the country staged rallies to show solidarity with protesters in Tunisia and Egypt. The government responded harshly to protesters and critics, arresting, torturing, and prosecuting them for their dissent. As part of its crackdown, the government increased its oppression of media and the arts, arresting and imprisoning dozens of journalists, bloggers, poets, actors, filmmakers, and artists throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting 15.11.2011 B7-0598/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for the debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 122 of the Rules of Procedure on Iran - recent cases of human rights violations Véronique De Keyser, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Kathleen Van Brempt, Pino Arlacchi, Corina Creţu, Kristian Vigenin on behalf of the S&D Group RE\P7_B(2011)0598_EN.doc PE472.810v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B7-0598/2011 European Parliament resolution on Iran - recent cases of human rights violations The European Parliament, - having regard to its previous resolutions on Iran, notably those concerning human rights and, in particular, those of February 2010 and January 2011, - having regard to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to all of which Iran is a party, - having regard to Rule 122(5) of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas the multi-faceted human rights crisis is gripping Iran, including the persecution and prosecution of civil society actors, political activists, journalists, students, artists, lawyers, and environmental activists; as well as the routine denial of freedom of assembly, women’s rights, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, and the skyrocketing rates of executions; B. whereas recent deaths of two human rights defenders, Haleh Sahabi and Hoda Saber, for which the officials were responsible, illustrate the existential threats to jailed human rights defenders and dissidents in Iran; C.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardian Politics in Iran: a Comparative Inquiry Into the Dynamics of Regime Survival
    GUARDIAN POLITICS IN IRAN: A COMPARATIVE INQUIRY INTO THE DYNAMICS OF REGIME SURVIVAL A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Payam Mohseni, M.A. Washington, DC June 22, 2012 Copyright 2012 by Payam Mohseni All Rights Reserved ii GUARDIAN POLITICS IN IRAN: A COMPARATIVE INQUIRY INTO THE DYNAMICS OF REGIME SURVIVAL Payam Mohseni, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Daniel Brumberg, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The Iranian regime has repeatedly demonstrated a singular institutional resiliency that has been absent in other countries where “colored revolutions” have succeeded in overturning incumbents, such as Ukraine, Georgia, Serbia, Kyrgyzstan and Moldova, or where popular uprisings like the current Arab Spring have brought down despots or upended authoritarian political landscapes, including Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Libya and even Syria. Moreover, it has accomplished this feat without a ruling political party, considered by most scholars to be the key to stable authoritarianism. Why has the Iranian political system proven so durable? Moreover, can the explanation for such durability advance a more deductive science of authoritarian rule? My dissertation places Iran within the context of guardian regimes—or hybrid regimes with ideological military, clerical or monarchical institutions steeped in the politics of the state, such as Turkey and Thailand—to explain the durability of unstable polities that should be theoretically prone to collapse. “Hybrid” regimes that combine competitive elections with nondemocratic forms of rule have proven to be highly volatile and their average longevity is significantly shorter than that of other regime types.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Iranian Foreign Policy Since the Iranian Islamic Revolution: 1979–2006
    Iranian Foreign Policy since the Iranian Islamic Revolution • 147 VI. Iranian Foreign Policy since the Iranian Islamic Revolution: 1979–2006 Eva Patricia Rakel Abstract This chapter analyzes Iranian foreign policy since the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979. The main questions to be dealt with are: what in uences has the Iranian Islamic revolution had on foreign policy orientation and formulation of the Islamic Republic of Iran? What in uences has Shi’ism had on foreign policy for- mulation in Iran? What impact have Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the three presidents Hojjatoleslam Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Khatami, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had on foreign policy orientation? Have there been major shifts in foreign policy orientation during their tenures or has the overall foreign policy approach that was introduced by Khomeini after the revolution in 1979 remained the same? The chapter will rst discuss the history of Shi’ism in Iran and its impact on politics since the introduction of Islam as state religion in the beginning of the sixteenth century by the Safavid Empire. It will then give an introduction to power relations in Iran since the Iranian Islamic revolution and ana- lyze foreign policy orientation in Iran in four phases: (1) from 1979 to 1989, when Khomeini was the Supreme Leader; (2) from 1989–1997, during the presidency of Rafsanjani; (3) from 1997–2005, during the presidency of Khatami; and (4) since Ahmadinejad’s presidency began in 2005. INTRODUCTION This chapter analyzes the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) since the Iranian Islamic revolution of 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss
    Part Two Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account of Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran As at the end of 1390 (March 19, 2012) EXECUTIVE BOARD Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor Seyyed Hamid Pour Mohammadi (as of 18.07.1388) Deputy Governor Seyyed Mahmoud Ahmadi (as of 09.10.1388) Secretary General Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (as of 21.04.1390 Vice-Governor for Foreign until 28.08.1390) Exchange Affairs Minoo Kianirad (as of 28.08.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Hossein Ghazavi (as of 29.07.1388 Vice-Governor for Economic Affairs until 23.08.1390) Bahman Mesgarha (as of 09.10.1388) Vice-Governor for Administrative and Training Affairs Hossein Habibi (as of 19.03.1388) Vice-Governor for Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Ebrahim Darvishi (as of 10.09.1390 Vice-Governor for Banking Supervision Affairs Hamid Borhani (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for International Affairs 138 MONEY AND CREDIT COUNCIL Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor of the Central Bank Seyyed Shamseddin Hosseini (as of 23.04.1388) Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance Ebrahim Azizi (as of 07.07.1388) President Deputy for Strategic Planning and Control Abdolreza Sheikholeslami (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare Mehdi Ghazanfari (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Industry, Mine, and Trade Sadeq Khalilian (as of 11.08.1390) Minister of Jihad-e Agriculture Kurosh Parvizian (as of 08.05.1390)
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the American Citizens Held in Iran June 1, 2007
    June 1 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 And so I want to thank you all for joining and finger-pointing. And we’ll spend energy on a really important piece of legislation. and time and effort to help you advance It’s the right thing to do. It’s the right a really important piece of legislation for approach to take. It is right to address a the good of this country. problem. It is right to work with people I’ve come by to say thanks. Chertoff and in both political parties. It is right to argue Gutierrez can tell you how the bill has got- for what you believe and recognize that ten this far and what we see in the future. compromise might be necessary to move But I’m looking forward to signing a bill, the bill along. And it is right to take polit- and I think we will. I truly believe that ical risk for Members of the United States when people with good will and good heart Congress. and with focus on helping this country I say—I don’t think this is risky, frankly. come together, that we can get a good I don’t view this as risk reward. I frankly piece of legislation out. And I’m looking view it as doing what you ought to do. forward to signing it. I hope you’ll be there See, people ought to be running for office when I do. to do what’s right for the United States God bless.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program
    Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Robert E. Ebel E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org March 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-600-1 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066001zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Geopolitics of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Program But Oil and Gas Still Matter A Report of the CSIS Energy and National Security Program author Robert E. Ebel March 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decision- makers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: the Rise of the Revolutionary Guards
    Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh Political Succession in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Rise of the Revolutionary Guards Ali Alfoneh February 5, 2018 Issue Paper #1 2019 The Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington (AGSIW), launched in 2015, is an independent, nonprofit institution dedicated to providing expert research and analysis of the social, economic, and political dimensions of the Gulf Arab states and how they impact domestic and foreign policy. AGSIW focuses on issues ranging from politics and security to economics, trade, and business; from social dynamics to civil society and culture. Through programs, publications, and scholarly exchanges the institute seeks to encourage thoughtful debate and inform the U.S. policy community regarding this critical geostrategic region. © 2019 Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. All rights reserved. AGSIW does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of AGSIW, its staff, or its board of directors. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from AGSIW. Please direct inquiries to: [email protected] This publication can be downloaded at no cost at www.agsiw.org. Cover Photo Credits: Khamenei.ir/Wikimedia Commons About the Author Ali Alfoneh is a senior fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington. He is the author of Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards are Transforming Iran from Theocracy into Military Dictatorship, published by AEI Press in April 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Soft Aw R Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 2012 Iran and the Soft aW r Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Price, M. (2012). Iran and the Soft aW r. International Journal of Communication, 6 2397-2415. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Iran and the Soft aW r Disciplines Communication | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Social Influence and Political Communication This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 International Journal of Communication 6 (2012), Feature 2397–2415 1932–8036/2012FEA0002 Iran and the Soft War MONROE PRICE University of Pennsylvania The events of the Arab Spring instilled in many authorities the considerable fear that they could too easily lose control over the narratives of legitimacy that undergird their power. 1 This threat to national power was already a part of central thinking in Iran. Their reaction to the Arab Spring was especially marked because of a long-held feeling that strategic communicators from outside the state’s borders were purposely reinforcing domestic discontent. I characterize strategic communications as, most dramatically, investment by an external source in methods to alter basic elements of a societal consensus. In this essay, I want to examine what this process looks like from what might be called the “inside,” the view from the perspective of the target society.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining 10 Warning Signs of Iran Nuclear Weapons Development
    International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) President: Dr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras Rue d’Arlon 63, B-1040 Brussels Belgium Tel : +32 2 400 1071 [email protected] www.isjcommittee.com EXAMINING 10 WARNING SIGNS OF IRAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 20,2014 Dr. Alejo Vidal Quadras, Former Vice‐President of European Parliament, Professor of Atomic and Nuclear Physics: “An objective, thoroughly researched report on the core issue of the nature of Iranian nuclear program and its status”. Bob Jospeh, Former US Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, Senior White House Security Council staff on weapons of mass destruction: “A critically important report at a critically important time”. John Bolton, former US Ambassador to the UN, former Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security: "A timely and well document report with alarming findings on Iran's nuclear program." Contents Executive summary Chapter 1: SPND (organ in charge of weaponization) Chapter 2: Procurement of dual purpose equipment and its possible use for military dimensions of nuclear program Chapter 3: Secret enrichment of uranium Chapter 4: Enrichment using laser technology Chapter 5: High explosives tests and trigger mechanism Chapter 6: Neutron initiator Chapter 7: Manufacturing uranium metal (uranium hemisphere) Chapter 8: Hydro-dynamic tests and explosion vessels at Parchin site Chapter 9: Research on nuclear warhead Chapter 10: Key scientists and researchers engaged in possible military dimensions of nuclear program International Committee In Search of Justice (ISJ) was initially formed in 2008 as an informal group of EU parliamentarians to seek justice for the Iranian democratic opposition.
    [Show full text]