This page intentionally left blank.
ii HPD-10041 REV D
REVISIONS LTR DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVAL REV Original Release of Sea Launch User's 26 March Tom Alexander New Guide 1996 System Engineering A This document supersedes the Sea Launch July 1998 Dennis D. Smith User's Guide in its entirety - Rev New, Chief Engineer March 26, 1996. B This document supersedes the Sea Launch July 2000 Marc Nance User's Guide in its entirety - Rev A, July, Mission Design and 1998. Integration C This document supersedes the Sea Launch February Marc Nance User's Guide in its entirety - Rev B, July, 2003 Mission Design and 2000 and incorporates ADRN 01 Integration D This document supersedes the Sea Launch ______John Steinmeyer User's Guide in its entirety - Rev C, __ Director, Mission February, 2003. Integration
REV D HPD-10041 iii
ACTIVITY RECORD PAGE Section Revision Level Revision Type Numbers
1-12 Appendix D Administrative Major A, B
Appendix C D New Section
iv HPD-10041 REV D
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS...... xiii 1.0 INTRODUCTION...... 1-1 1.1 Overview of the Sea Launch System...... 1-1 1.2 Sea Launch Organization...... 1-5 2.0 VEHICLE DESCRIPTION...... 2-1 2.1 Zenit Stage 1...... 2-3 2.2 Zenit Stage 2...... 2-7 2.3 Block DM-SL—Upper Stage...... 2-8 2.4 Payload Unit...... 2-9 3.0 PERFORMANCE...... 3-1 3.1 Launch Site...... 3-2 3.2 Ascent Trajectory...... 3-3 3.3 Payload Capability...... 3-7 3.4 Coast Phase Attitude...... 3-21 3.5 Spacecraft Separation...... 3-21 4.0 MISSION INTEGRATION...... 4-1 4.1 Management Structure...... 4-1 4.2 Mission Analysis and Operations Planning ...... 4-3 4.3 Mission Documentation...... 4-5 5.0 SPACECRAFT ENVIRONMENTS ...... 5-1 5.1 Structural Loads...... 5-2 5.2 Random Vibration...... 5-6 5.3 Acoustics...... 5-7 5.4 Shock...... 5-10 5.5 Electromagnetic Environment ...... 5-16 5.6 Spacecraft Thermal and Humidity Environments...... 5-26 5.7 Payload Unit Ascent Venting...... 5-32 5.8 Contamination...... 5-35 6.0 SPACECRAFT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS...... 6-1 6.1 Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits...... 6-3 6.2 Modal Frequencies...... 6-7 6.3 Electromagnetic Compatibility ...... 6-7 6.4 Spacecraft Design Verification Requirements...... 6-10 6.5 Horizontal Handling...... 6-14 6.6 Pressurized Systems...... 6-15 6.7 Ordnance Systems...... 6-15 6.8 Multiple Manifests and Secondary Payloads...... 6-15 7.0 INTERFACES...... 7-1 7.1 Mechanical Interfaces...... 7-1 7.2 Electrical Interfaces ...... 7-11 8.0 SPACECRAFT INTEGRATION AND LAUNCH OPERATIONS ...... 8-1 8.1 Phase I⎯Spacecraft Processing in the Payload Processing Facility ...... 8-5
REV D HPD-10041 v
8.2 Phase II⎯Mating to the Launch Vehicle and Integrated Testing on the Assembly and Command Ship...... 8-14 8.3 Phase III⎯Transit and Launch Operations on the Launch Platform...... 8-17 8.4 Flight Operations...... 8-26 9.0 HOME PORT FACILITIES AND SEA LAUNCH VESSELS ...... 9-1 9.1 Home Port Facilities ...... 9-5 9.2 Assembly and Command Ship...... 9-10 9.3 Launch Platform...... 9-21 10.0 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SYSTEMS...... 10-1 10.1 Mission Support Systems...... 10-1 10.2 Telemetry Assets...... 10-6 11.0 SAFETY...... 11-1 11.1 Safety Integration Approach...... 11-1 11.2 Safety Assessment Phases...... 11-2 11.3 Launch Licensing and Flight Safety ...... 11-7 11.4 Safety of Operations ...... 11-9 12.0 MISSION ASSURANCE...... 12-1
APPENDIX A. CUSTOMER INPUTS ...... A-1
APPENDIX B. SEA LAUNCH STANDARD OFFERINGS AND NONSTANDARD SERVICE OPTIONS...... B-1 Standard-Offering: Hardware and Software Services ...... B-1 Standard-Offering Launch Services...... B-5 Standard-Offering Facilities and Support Services ...... B-9 Nonstandard Options ...... B-15
APPENDIX C. WEATHER HISTORY AT THE LAUNCH SITE ...... C-1 Station 51028 ...... C-1 Historical Weather Data...... C-1
vi HPD-10041 REV D
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Generic Integration Timeline...... 1-4 Figure 1-2. Sea Launch Partner Locations ...... 1-5 Figure 1-3. Payload Fairing ...... 1-7 Figure 1-4. Block DM-SL...... 1-8 Figure 1-5. Zenit 2 Launch Vehicle...... 1-9 Figure 1-6. Launch Platform and Assembly and Command Ship...... 1-10
Figure 2-1. Zenit-3SL Launch Vehicle...... 2-1 Figure 2-2. Stage 1, Zenit-3SL ...... 2-3 Figure 2-3. RD-171M Stage 1 Engine...... 2-4 Figure 2-4. Zenit Stage 1 and Stage 2 Configuration ...... 2-6 Figure 2-5. Stage 2, Zenit-3SL ...... 2-7 Figure 2-6. Block DM-SL...... 2-8 Figure 2-7. Sea Launch Payload Unit...... 2-10 Figure 2-8. Payload Fairing ...... 2-11 Figure 2-9. Payload Unit Interface Skirt...... 2-12
Figure 3-1. Launch Site Location ...... 3-2 Figure 3-2. Typical Flight Profile—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission ...... 3-5 Figure 3-3. Typical Groundtrack—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission ...... 3-6 Figure 3-4. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Injection Schemes ...... 3-9 Figure 3-5. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Synchronous Apogee ...... 3-10 Figure 3-6. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Sub/Supersynchronous Apogees...... 3-12 Figure 3-7. Circular Orbit Payload Capability ...... 3-13 Figure 3-8. Elliptical Orbit Payload Capability...... 3-15 Figure 3-9. Molniya and Tundra Transfer Orbit Payload Capability ...... 3-17 Figure 3-10. High-Energy and Earth Escape Payload Capability ...... 3-19
Figure 4-1. Management Structure...... 4-1 Figure 4-2. Mission Documentation and Related Products...... 4-5
Figure 5-1. Transportation and Handling Limit Load Factors ...... 5-3 Figure 5-2. Integrated Launch Vehicle Horizontal...... 5-3 Figure 5-3. Integrated Launch Vehicle Vertical...... 5-3 Figure 5-4. Typical Quasi-Static Load Factors for Flight ...... 5-5 Figure 5-5. Sinusoidal Vibration at the Spacecraft Interface ...... 5-6 Figure 5-6. Random Vibration Environment During Flight...... 5-7 Figure 5-7. Acoustics During Flight⎯1/3-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels ...... 5-9 Figure 5-8. Acoustics During Flight⎯1-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels ...... 5-10
REV D HPD-10041 vii
Figure 5-9. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA1194VS Spacecraft Adapter, Radial Axis...... 5-12 Figure 5-10. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA1194VS Spacecraft Adapter, Axial Axis ...... 5-12 Figure 5-11. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter...... 5-14 Figure 5-12. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA702+ and SCA702+GEM Spacecraft Adapters ...... 5-15 Figure 5-13. Typical Electromagnetic Environment in Payload Processing Facility⎯Encapsulation Cell, 15 kHz to 18 GHz...... 5-17 Figure 5-14. Typical Measured Electromagnetic Environment at the Sea Launch Home Port Pier, 15 kHz to 18 GHz ...... 5-18 Figure 5-15. Typical Measured Electromagnetic Environment at the Sea Launch Home Port Pier, 18 GHz to 40 GHz ...... 5-19 Figure 5-16. Predicted In-Flight Electromagnetic Environment at the LV/SC Interface...... 5-20 Figure 5-17. Payload Unit Air-Conditioning Venting Scheme ...... 5-28 Figure 5-18. Maximum Internal Payload Fairing Surface Temperatures...... 5-31 Figure 5-19. Payload Unit Ascent Venting Scheme...... 5-32 Figure 5-20. Payload Fairing Internal Pressure During Ascent...... 5-33 Figure 5-21. Maximum Ascent Depressurization (pressure decay rate vs. pressure) ...... 5-34
Figure 6-1. Zenit-3SL Coordinate System...... 6-2 Figure 6-2. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA1194VS...... 6-6 Figure 6-3. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter...... 6-6 Figure 6-4. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA702+ Spacecraft Adapter...... 6-7 Figure 6-5. Maximum Spacecraft Intentional Radiated Emissions at the Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft Interface...... 6-8 Figure 6-6. Lightning and Weather Services Used to Determine or Forecast Lightning During Launch Campaign...... 6-9 Figure 6-7. Electrical and Mechanical Mates...... 6-14
Figure 7-1. Spacecraft Static Envelope ...... 7-1 Figure 7-2. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA1194VS Adapter...... 7-2 Figure 7-3. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA1666 Adapter...... 7-2 Figure 7-4. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA702+ Adapter ...... 7-3 Figure 7-5. Spacecraft Envelope SCA937S Adapter...... 7-3 Figure 7-6. Payload Fairing Locations for Access Doors...... 7-5 Figure 7-7. SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter...... 7-7 Figure 7-8. SCA702+ Spacecraft Adapter...... 7-8 Figure 7-9. SCA1194VS Spacecraft Adapter...... 7-10 Figure 7-10. SCA937S Spacecraft Adapter...... 7-11 Figure 7-11. Umbilical Configurations During Launch Processing Flow...... 7-15 Figure 7-12. Re-Radiation of Spacecraft Signal Through Fairing ...... 7-18
viii HPD-10041 REV D
Figure 7-13. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Signal Between Vessels...... 7-19 Figure 7-14. Sea Launch External Communications Network...... 7-20
Figure 8-1. Spacecraft Processing Flow ...... 8-2 Figure 8-2. Nominal 55-Day Processing Schedule...... 8-3 Figure 8-3. Nominal Campaign Timeline...... 8-4 Figure 8-4. Payload Processing Facility at Home Port...... 8-5 Figure 8-5. Fit Check on Adapter Support Stand ...... 8-6 Figure 8-6. Strongback Assembly Vertical Mating Position...... 8-8 Figure 8-7. Strongback Assembly Horizontal Raised Position ...... 8-8 Figure 8-8. Strongback Assembly Rotating to Horizontal With Pathfinder Structure...... 8-9 Figure 8-9. Encapsulated Payload Transportation Mechanical Equipment With Encapsulated Spacecraft ...... 8-10 Figure 8-10. Scaffolding Around Encapsulated Spacecraft ...... 8-11 Figure 8-11. Access to Encapsulated Spacecraft...... 8-11 Figure 8-12. Payload Unit Exiting the Payload Processing Facility ...... 8-12 Figure 8-13. Payload Unit in Transit to the Assembly and Command Ship ...... 8-13 Figure 8-14. Payload Unit on Stern Ramp of the Assembly and Command Ship...... 8-13 Figure 8-15. Payload Unit Mating to the Zenit-3SL...... 8-14 Figure 8-16. Integrated Launch Vehicle in the Assembly and Command Ship ...... 8-15 Figure 8-17. Integrated Launch Vehicle Ready for Lifting...... 8-16 Figure 8-18. Lifting of Integrated Launch Vehicle ...... 8-16 Figure 8-19. Launch Platform Sailing for the Equator...... 8-17 Figure 8-20. Assembly and Command Ship Sailing for the Equator ...... 8-18 Figure 8-21. Zenit-3SL Transporter/Erector...... 8-19 Figure 8-22. Launch Operations at the Launch Site...... 8-21 Figure 8-23. Assembly and Command Ship and Launch Platform Connected by Link Bridge...... 8-22 Figure 8-24. Liftoff from the Launch Platform ...... 8-24 Figure 8-25. Launch Control Center on the Assembly and Command Ship...... 8-25
Figure 9-1. Sea Launch Home Port Complex...... 9-2 Figure 9-2. Sea Launch Vessels...... 9-3 Figure 9-3. Home Port Location and Vicinity...... 9-4 Figure 9-4. Payload Processing Facility—Interior and Exterior Views...... 9-6 Figure 9-5. Building 3, Sea Launch Office Facility ...... 9-9 Figure 9-6. Assembly and Command Ship...... 9-11 Figure 9-7. Launch Vehicle Processing—Main Deck...... 9-12 Figure 9-8. Launch Vehicle Transfer from Assembly and Command Ship to Launch Platform at Home Port ...... 9-12 Figure 9-9. Launch Control Center—Shelter Deck...... 9-13 Figure 9-10. Launch Control Center...... 9-13 Figure 9-11. View of Launch Control Center Consoles and Front Wall (Boeing/Customer Side of Room) ...... 9-14 Figure 9-12. Customer Work Area on First Bridge Deck ...... 9-15 Figure 9-13. Assembly and Command Ship Satcom Radome ...... 9-16
REV D HPD-10041 ix
Figure 9-14. Launch Platform Satcom Radome ...... 9-17 Figure 9-15. Spacecraft Customer Accommodations – First and Second Bridge Decks ...... 9-18 Figure 9-16. Assembly and Command Ship Customer Cabin Accommodations ...... 9-18 Figure 9-17. Main Dining Hall ...... 9-19 Figure 9-18. Assembly and Command Ship Facilities ...... 9-20 Figure 9-19. Launch Platform During Final Countdown ...... 9-22 Figure 9-20. Spacecraft Contractor Work Areas on Launch Platform, 38500 Deck Level ...... 9-23
Figure 10-1. Weather Office...... 10-2 Figure 10-2. On-Site Meteorological Buoy...... 10-3 Figure 10-3. Sea Launch Bell 230 Helicopter ...... 10-4 Figure 10-4. Optical Tracker ...... 10-5 Figure 10-5. Proton Tracking Antenna...... 10-6 Figure 10-6. S-Band System Radome ...... 10-7 Figure 10-7. Nuku Hiva Ground Station ...... 10-8
Figure 12-1. Sea Launch Mission Assurance ...... 12-2 Figure 12-2. Sea Launch Hardware Certification and Acceptance Process ...... 12-4
Figure C-1. Historical Air Temperatures ...... C-2 Figure C-2. Historical Wind Gusts...... C-3 Figure C-3. Historical Atmospheric Pressure at Sea Level...... C-4 Figure C-4. Historical Water Temperatures...... C-5 Figure C-5. Historical Average Wind Speed...... C-6
x HPD-10041 REV D
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Zenit Specifications ...... 2-5 Table 2-2. Block DM-SL Specifications...... 2-9
Table 3-1. Typical Flight Timeline—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission ...... 3-4 Table 3-2. Maximum Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability...... 3-8 Table 3-3. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Synchronous Apogee...... 3-11 Table 3-4. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯ Sub/Supersynchronous Apogees...... 3-12 Table 3-5. Circular Orbit Payload Capability ...... 3-14 Table 3-6. Elliptical Orbit Payload Capability...... 3-16 Table 3-7. Molniya and Tundra Transfer Orbit Payload Capability ...... 3-18 Table 3-8. High-Energy and Earth Escape Payload Capability ...... 3-20 Table 3-9. Typical Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Injection Accuracy (2.3σ)...... 3-22
Table 4-1. Mission Team Roles and Responsibilities ...... 4-2
Table 5-1. Spacecraft Fatigue Environment for Transportation and Handling...... 5-4 Table 5-2. Motions During Transit to Launch Site ...... 5-4 Table 5-3. Acoustics During Flight⎯1/3-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels ...... 5-8 Table 5-4. Acoustics During Flight⎯1-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels ...... 5-9 Table 5-5. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA1194VS Spacecraft Adapter...... 5-13 Table 5-6. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane Using SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter ...... 5-14 Table 5-7. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane Using for SCA702+ and SCA702+GEM Spacecraft Adapters...... 5-16 Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies ...... 5-20 Table 5-9. Payload Processing Facility Thermal Environments ...... 5-26 Table 5-10. Payload Unit Environmental Control—Air-Conditioning Inlet Conditions ...... 5-29
Table 6-1. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits ...... 6-4 Table 6-2. Factors of Safety and Test Options...... 6-10 Table 6-3. Sine Vibration Test Levels and Duration...... 6-13 Table 6-4. Spacecraft Acoustic Margins and Test Duration ...... 6-13
Table 7-1. Umbilical Configurations...... 7-13 Table 7-2. In-Flight Telemetry, Command, and Separation Breakwire Interfaces...... 7-21
REV D HPD-10041 xi
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ACS assembly and command ship ADRN Advance Document Revision Notice AST U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation BCSC Boeing Commercial Space Company BR9DM Zenit-3SL telemetry system C3 velocity squared at infinity CAD computer aided drawing CCAM contamination and collision avoidance maneuver CCTV closed-circuit television CDR critical design review CG center of gravity CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CLA coupled loads analysis CPSP customer prelaunch safety package DBTM Design Bureau of Transport Machinery EDC effective date of contract EGSE electrical ground support equipment EMC electromagnetic compatibility EMI electromagnetic interference EPTME encapsulated payload transportation mechanical equipment FAA Federal Aviation Administration FMH free molecular heating FPR flight performance reserve GEO geosynchronous Earth orbit GORR ground operations readiness review GOWG ground operations working group GSE ground support equipment GTO geosynchronous transfer orbit ha height of apogee hp height of perigee HP Home Port IC instrument compartment ICD interface control document I/F interface ILV integrated launch vehicle IPT integrated product team IRD interface requirements document IS interface skirt ISPS interface skirt and payload structure ITRR ILV transfer readiness review
xii HPD-10041 REV D
KNSG (automated countdown validation) K.O. kickoff LAN local area network LCC launch control center LEO low earth orbit LOX liquid oxygen LP launch platform LRR launch readiness review LSA Launch Services Agreement LSE launch support equipment LV launch vehicle MD Mission Director MEM mission equipment manager MRR mission readiness review NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NDBC national data buoy center NRZL non-return to zero level OASPL overall sound pressure level OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PBX private branch exchange PCM pulse control modulated PLA payload accommodations PDR preliminary design review PLF payload fairing PLS payload structure PLU payload unit PPF payload processing facility PS payload structure PSM process safety management RF radio frequency RH relative humidity RMP risk management plan RR readiness review SBA strongback assembly SC spacecraft SCA spacecraft adapter SCC spacecraft contractor SCR Spacecraft Control Room SCRFSS Spacecraft Radio Frequency Support System SL Sea Launch SLS Sea Launch System STA station TDRSS Tracking Data Relay Satellite System
REV D HPD-10041 xiii
TIM technical interchange meeting TM telemetry VTC video teleconferencing WX weather
xiv HPD-10041 REV D
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Purpose The purpose of the Sea Launch User’s Guide is to describe, on a general basis, the Sea Launch system and associated services. This document is the starting point for understanding how the capabilities of the Sea Launch system and spacecraft integration process come together in delivering satellites to desired orbits. Further information is readily available by contacting Sea Launch directly.
1.1 Overview of the Sea Launch System
What the System The Sea Launch system includes: Includes • The Zenit-3SL launch vehicle • The Launch Platform (LP) • The Assembly and Command Ship (ACS) • Spacecraft and launch vehicle processing facilities • Tracking and communications assets Sea Launch Standard Offerings and Options (Appendix B) describes the hardware, launch services, facilities, support services, and optional services provided by the Sea Launch Company, L.L.C. The Launch Platform and the Assembly and Command Ship are located at Sea Launch Home Port, in the Port of Long Beach in Southern California. The Payload Processing Facility (PPF), which accommodates a state-of-the-art, full range of spacecraft electrical and mechanical processing, testing and fueling capabilities, is also based at Sea Launch Home Port.
REV D HPD-10041 1-1 Sea Launch’s The unique attributes of the Sea Launch system offer satellite operators a Unique Attributes multitude of benefits when considering launch vehicle providers. and Advantages Beginning with a foundation based upon the use of the robust and flight- proven Zenit-3SL integrated launch vehicle (ILV) and its associated
launch support systems, combined with the expertise and experience of our people, Sea Launch’s objective is to utilize these attributes to assure mission success for our customers. Sea Launch advantages include: • Mission Assurance and Reliability • Led by Boeing, the Sea Launch Mission Assurance organization represents the blending of the best practices of U.S. companies, European companies, and companies from Russia and Ukraine • Utilizes an integrated set of systems and processes that ensures mission success and ever-increasing product reliability • The demonstrated Zenit-3SL flight-history is comparable to the new-generation of heavy-lift vehicles • Built-in Schedule Assurance • The use of a dedicated Zenit-3SL Launch Vehicle that is free of co-passenger constraints • Launching from an equatorial launch site with no significant weather-related restrictions • Optimized Performance • Sea Launch provides an optimized mission design, based on full vehicle capability to ensure maximum performance to GTO • Lift capability exceeding 6,000 kilograms to GTO • Industry’s most direct route to GTO • From our equatorial launch site, Sea Launch offers simplified mission profiles with shorter mission durations, fewer staging events and correspondingly less risk • Increased on-orbit maneuvering lifetime (OML) or greater spacecraft mass to orbit when compared to other, non-equatorial, launch sites • Experienced Personnel • Extensive integration experience with all major spacecraft platforms affords Sea Launch’s customers strong confidence for mission success. • A staff and management team consisting of highly knowledgeable technical and managerial personnel with long-term industry experience. • Direct interaction with English speaking technical specialists facilitates efficient integration and verification of compliance to spacecraft requirements.
1-2 HPD-10041 REV D Mission Timeline The first launch of a new spacecraft type (i.e., a spacecraft never integrated by Sea Launch) can be accomplished within eighteen months after contract signature. Repeat missions of spacecraft previously integrated by Sea Launch can be completed within twelve months after contract signature. Sea Launch is capable of reducing the time required for integrating and launching spacecraft. Deviations from the standard eighteen-month and twelve-month flows may be accommodated on a case-by-case basis, recognizing factors such as, but not limited to, previous flight experience. Some generic timelines for missions are shown in Figure 1-1. For a two- cycle mission, a Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and a subsequent Critical Design Review (CDR) are necessary to demonstrate compliance with spacecraft requirements. Both reviews are typically conducted near the end of the Preliminary and Final Design Cycles. For a single-cycle mission, only a CDR is conducted. For more information on these reviews, refer to Section 4. Similarly, the standard mission cycle time is fifty-five days between launches. Sea Launch has committed to reducing launch cycle time with a commensurate reduction in spacecraft processing time. Companies considering the Sea Launch system should review the initial information that will be required by Sea Launch (Appendix A) and be prepared to deliver that information as soon as possible after contract signature. Sea Launch will use this information to begin the integration process.
REV D HPD-10041 1-3 Months L-21 L-20 L-19 L-18 L-17 L-16 L-15 L-14 L-13 L-12 L-11 L-10 L-9 L-8 L-7 L-6 L-5 L-4 L-3 L-2 L-1
EDC/Cust K.O. Customer Data 18-month mission from EDC/ Delivery Preliminary Design Cycle 15-month integration plan Final Design Cycle Flight Task/Simulation Campaign
EDC/Cust K.O. 15-month mission from EDC/ Customer Data Delivery 12-month integration plan Final Design Cycle Flight Task/Simulation Campaign
EDC/Cust K.O. Customer Data Delivery 10.5-month mission from EDC/ Final Design Cycle 9-month integration plan Flight Task/Simulation Campaign
EDC/Cust K.O. Customer Data Delivery 8-month mission from EDC/ Final Design Cycle 7-month integration plan Flight Task/Simulation Campaign
SHG0681874-073.1 Figure 1-1. Generic Integration Timeline
1-4 HPD-10041 REV D 1.2 Sea Launch Organization
Overview Sea Launch Limited Partnership is an exempt Cayman Islands entity that acts through its sole general partner, Sea Launch Company L.L.C. which is a Delaware limited liability company. The limited partners of Sea Launch Limited Partnership consist of: • Boeing Commercial Space Company (BCSC) • RSC Energia • SDO Yuzhnoye/PO Yuzhmash • Aker Partner locations and operating centers are shown in Figure 1-2. Each partner is also a supplier/contractor to the company, capitalizing on the strengths of these industry leaders. The Boeing, Energia, Yuzhnoye/Yuzhmash, and Aker team of contractors has developed an innovative and successfully proven approach to establishing Sea Launch as a reliable, cost-effective and flexible commercial launch service provider.
Aker, Oslo RCS Energia, Moscow BCSC, Seattle Boeing SDO Yuzhnoye/ Corporate PO Yuzhmash, Sea Launch, Dnepropetrovsk Long Beach
Launch Site
SHG0681874-017 Figure 1-2. Sea Launch Partner Locations
REV D HPD-10041 1-5 Sea Launch The Sea Launch Company, headquartered in Long Beach, California, is Company populated by selected representatives of the partner companies. Charged with managing the overall program, Sea Launch responsibilities include: • Overall operations management • Business management • Supplier management • Marketing and sales • Customer relations • Communications • Insurance and financing • Chief Systems Engineering Office • Mission Management Sea Launch is organized to ensure mission success by having segment managers responsible for the hardware acquisition, acceptance, and operational support of each program element.
1-6 HPD-10041 REV D
The Boeing The Boeing Company brings expertise in space systems integration, a Company reputation for product integrity and dedication to customer service. Boeing responsibilities include: • Designing and manufacturing the payload fairing (Figure 1-3) and adapter • Managing Home Port operations • Integrating the spacecraft with the payload accommodations and the Sea Launch vehicle • Performing mission analysis and analytical integration • Leading mission operations • Securing launch licensing • Providing range services
265807J6-251/R1 Figure 1-3. Payload Fairing
REV D HPD-10041 1-7 RSC Energia RSC Energia, the premier Russian space company, brings its well-known experience in space exploration and launch system integration to the Sea Launch System. Energia is a joint stock company established under the laws of the Russian Federation, with its principal place of business in Korolev (six kilometers northeast of Moscow), Russia. Energia has overall responsibility for: • Manufacturing the Block DM-SL upper stage (Figure 1-4) • Developing and operating the automated ground support equipment • Integrating the Block DM-SL with the Zenit 2S and launch support equipment • Managing the launch support equipment on board both the Launch Platform and the Assembly and Command Ship • Developing flight design documentation for the flight of the upper stage • Performing launch operations and range services
265807J6-252 Figure 1-4. Block DM-SL
1-8 HPD-10041 REV D SDO SDO Yuzhnoye and PO Yuzhmash, the leading Ukrainian aerospace Yuzhnoye/PO companies, are established under the laws of Ukraine, with their Yuzhmash principal place of business in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine. They are also contractors to the Sea Launch Company, L.L.C. As a principal designer of ballistic missiles and launch vehicles, they have conducted hundreds of successful launches over the past four decades. SDO Yuzhnoye designs and PO Yuzhmash manufactures the Zenit two- stage launch vehicle derived from the heritage Zenit 2 rocket illustrated in Figure 1-5, which comprises the first two stages of the Sea Launch vehicle. Yuzhnoye/Yuzhmash are responsible for: • Producing the first and second stages of the Zenit 2S launch vehicle • Integrating the launch vehicle flight hardware • Developing flight design documentation for launch, with respect to the first two stages • Supporting Zenit processing and launch operations Several significant configuration modifications were made to allow the basic Zenit design to meet Sea Launch’s unique requirements. For example, the base of the launch vehicle was stiffened to provide greater structural strength required on a dynamic launch platform.
265807J6-253 Figure 1-5. Zenit 2 Launch Vehicle
REV D HPD-10041 1-9 Aker Aker, based in Oslo, Norway, is one of Europe’s largest ship builders, with extensive experience in developing offshore oil platforms designed for operations in the harsh North Sea environment. During development, Aker (formerly Kvaerner) was responsible for: • Designing and building the Assembly and Command Ship (Figure 1- 6) • Designing and reconstructing the Launch Platform • Integrating the marine elements Barber Moss Ship Management is responsible for marine operations and maintenance of both vessels.
SHG0681874-001 Figure 1-6. Launch Platform and Assembly and Command Ship
1-10 HPD-10041 REV D
2.0 VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
Overview The Zenit-3SL is a liquid propellant launch vehicle capable of transporting spacecraft to a variety of orbits. Figure 2-1 shows the Zenit- 3SL principal components: • Zenit Stage 1 • Zenit Stage 2 • Block DM-SL upper stage • Payload unit
Payload Block Stage 2 Stage 1 Unit DM-SL 10.4 m 32.9 m 11.39 m 4.9 m (34.0 ft) (108.0 ft) (37.4 ft) (16.1 ft)
4.15 m 3.7 m 3.9 m 3.9 m (13.6 ft) (12.1 ft) (12.8 ft) (12.8 ft) 2P341004.1 Figure 2-1. Zenit-3SL Launch Vehicle
Design The original two-stage Zenit was designed by SDO Yuzhnoye to reconstitute military satellite constellations quickly. The design emphasizes robustness, ease of operation, and fast reaction times. The result is a highly automated launch capability using a minimum complement of launch personnel.
Flight History The Zenit launch vehicle was first launched in 1985 from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. As of the time of publishing, the Zenit 2 and Zenit 2SLB vehicles have successfully completed 32 missions in 37 launch attempts. The Zenit first-stage booster also served as a strap-on for the Energia launch vehicle and logged an additional eight successes in two flights in this capacity. The Block DM-SL is a modification of the existing Block DM developed by RSC Energia. It has a long and successful history as the fourth stage of the Proton launch vehicle.
REV D HPD-10041 2-1
With the addition of an upgraded avionics and guidance suite, the Block DM superseded the Block D upper stage in 1974 and has since flown 239 successful missions as of the time of publishing. Primary missions have been geosynchronous transfer orbit; geosynchronous Earth orbit; and interplanetary, including missions to Halley’s Comet, Venus and Mars. Significant configuration differences between the Zenit-3SL and its predecessor are: • New navigation system • Next-generation flight computer • Stiffened first stage • Fueling lines modified for third stage In addition, several enhancements have been made to the Zenit-3SL to upgrade the performance capability from 5,250 kilograms to over 6,000 kilograms to GTO. These changes fall into three categories: • Energy increase (includes Block DM-SL engine extended nozzle, second-stage main engine thrust increase from 87 tons force to 93 tons force, and the addition of propellant for all three stages) • Mass reductions across all three stages and payload accommodations • Optimization of the propellant usage in all three stages The current flight history of the Zenit-3SL is shown on the Sea Launch web page at http://www.sea-launch.com/history.htm.
Payload Payload accommodations were developed by The Boeing Company Accommodations specifically for the Sea Launch Company. The design is based on launch experience that extends back over three decades. The payload accommodations design protects the spacecraft from transportation, handling, launch and flight environments. The design features: • Streamlined operational flows • Flexibility to accommodate varied spacecraft models
2-2 HPD-10041 REV D
2.1 Zenit Stage 1
Stage 1 Primary The Zenit Stage 1 primary structure is aluminum with integrally Structure machined stiffeners (Figure 2-2). It is based on the same engine and core fuselage that was also used for the four strap-on boosters for the Russian Energia heavy-lift Buran launch vehicle. There have been two such Energia launches, both successful.
265807J6-231 Figure 2-2. Stage 1, Zenit-3SL
RD-171M Engine The RD-171M engine, which powers Stage 1, burns liquid oxygen and kerosene (Figure 2-3). It provides an impressive 740,000 kgf (1.6 million lbf) of thrust at liftoff and is one of the most powerful engines in the world. The four thrust chambers are fed by a single, vertically mounted turbopump, powered by two gas generators feeding hot oxidizer-rich gas to a single turbine. Four differentially gimbaled thrust nozzles provide directional control during Stage 1 flight.
REV D HPD-10041 2-3
SHG0681874-019 Figure 2-3. RD-171M Stage 1 Engine
2-4 HPD-10041 REV D
Overall Zenit specifications and performance parameters are shown in Table 2-1. Specifications and Stage 1 and Stage 2 configurations are shown in Figure 2-4. Configurations Table 2-1. Zenit Specifications Zenit Stage 1 Stage 2 Length 32.9 m (108 ft) 10.4 m (34 ft) Diameter 3.9 m (12.8 ft) 3.9 m (12.8 ft) Weight (fueled) 354,582 kg 90,757 kg (781,719 lb) (200,085 lb) Thrust (sea level) 740,000 kgf Not applicable (1.63 million lbf) Thrust (vacuum) 806,400 kgf main - 93,000 kgf (1.78 million lbf) (205,026 lbf); vernier - 8,100 kgf (17,900 lbf) Fuel (kerosene) 88,768 kg (195,700 22,832 kg lb) (50,336 lb) Oxidizer (LOX) 233,512 kg (514,805 58,908 kg lb) (129,869 lb)
REV D HPD-10041 2-5
Block DM-SL interface plane
Liquid oxygen tank
Kerosene tank Stage 2 Solid-propellant 10.4 m (34 ft) separation thrusters (4) Interstage frame Separation plane
Electric/pneumatic connector plate Main Steering thruster engine 3.9 m nozzle (12.8 ft)
Liquid oxygen tank
Stage 1 Kerosene tank 32.9 m (108 ft)
Solid- propellant separation thrusters (4)
Single turbopump Solid- Main propellant engine separation View A-A nozzle (4) thrusters (4)
A A 265807J6-257 Figure 2-4. Zenit Stage 1 and Stage 2 Configuration
2-6 HPD-10041 REV D
2.2 Zenit Stage 2
Stage 2 Primary The Zenit second stage also uses integral stiffened aluminum Structure construction (Figure 2-5). Stage 2 propellants are liquid oxygen and kerosene. The lower kerosene tank is toroid-shaped, and the liquid oxygen tank is a domed cylinder. The stage is powered by a single- nozzle RD-120 engine, which produces 93,000 kgf (205,026 lbf) of thrust in flight.
265807J6-258 Figure 2-5. Stage 2, Zenit-3SL
Three-Axis The RD-8 vernier engine mounted in the aft end of Stage 2 provides Control three-axis attitude control. The RD-8 uses the same propellants as the single fixed-nozzle RD-120, with one turbopump feeding four gimbaling thrusters. The RD-8 produces 8100 kgf (17,900 lbf) of thrust in flight.
REV D HPD-10041 2-7
2.3 Block DM-SL—Upper Stage
Configuration The Block DM-SL is a restartable upper stage capable of igniting up to five times during a mission. Avionics are housed in a sealed toroidal equipment bay at the front end of the upper stage. An interstage cylinder of aluminum skin and stringer construction encloses the Block DM-SL. The configuration of the Block DM-SL is shown in Figure 2-6.
Propulsion Propulsive capability for the upper stage is provided by the 11D58M engine, which operates on a combination of liquid oxygen and kerosene. The kerosene is contained in a toroidal tank that encircles the main engine turbopump. The spherical liquid oxygen tank is located above the fuel tank. The 11D58M has a single gimbaling nozzle that provides directional control during propulsive phases.
PLF Avionics/ interface equipment plane bay Middle adapter separation LOX tank plane
Upper adapter
ø3.7 m (ø 12.1 ft) 5.6 m (18.4 ft) Kerosene tank Middle adapter (interstage) 11D58M engine Stage II separation Attitude plane control Lower engines adapter Block DM-SL (without interstage) (two places)
ø 3.9 m (ø 12.8 ft) SHG0681874-020 Figure 2-6. Block DM-SL
2-8 HPD-10041 REV D
Attitude Control Three-axis stabilization of the Block DM-SL during coast periods is provided by two attitude control/ullage engines. Each engine has four nozzles that are grouped in clusters on either side of the main engine nozzle. The attitude control system uses the hypergolic propellant nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH). Overall specifications for the Block DM-SL are shown in Table 2-2. Table 2-2. Block DM-SL Specifications Length1 5.6 m (18.4 ft) Diameter (primary) 3.7 m (12.1 ft) Weight (fueled)2 19,711 kg (43,455 lb) Thrust (vacuum) 8103 kg (17,864 lb) Fuel (kerosene) 4560 kg (10,053 lb) Oxidizer (LOX) 11,290 kg (24,890 lb) Note 1: The bottom of the payload unit interface skirt overlays the top of the Block DM-SL by 1.1 m (3.6 ft). Note 2: Includes the Block DM-SL lower and middle adapters.
2.4 Payload Unit
Components and The payload unit consists of the spacecraft integrated with the payload Construction accommodations. The payload accommodations consist of the spacecraft adapter, payload structure, interface skirt, payload fairing, and flight avionics and instrumentation. Figure 2-7 shows the arrangement of the major payload accommodations components. The construction is aluminum honeycomb and graphite/epoxy for the fairing, nosecap and payload support structure. The payload fairing is 11.39 m (37.4 ft) long and 4.15 m (13.6 ft) in diameter. These elements are integrated in a class 100,000 clean facility during ground processing in the PPF at Home Port. The standard spacecraft adapters are procured from the industry standard supplier, Saab Space AB.
REV D HPD-10041 2-9
Spacecraft adapter
Payload structure
Interface skirt
Nosecap (composite)
Payload fairing (graphite/epoxy composite)
Longitudinal separation system
11.39 m 3.9 m (37.4 ft) (12.8 ft)
4.15 m (13.6 ft)
Spacecraft I/F plane Spacecraft adapter (aluminum) Payload support structure Closeout membrane
Block DM-SL I/F plane Circumferential separation system
Interface skirt (aluminum) Block DM-SL (partial view) SHG0681874-077- Figure 2-7. Sea Launch Payload Unit
Payload Fairing The payload fairing (Figure 2-8) provides environmental protection for spacecraft from encapsulation through launch and ascent. It can accommodate a wide range of payload designs.
2-10 HPD-10041 REV D
265807J6-261 Figure 2-8. Payload Fairing
Access Access to the spacecraft before rollout to the launch pad can be gained Characteristics through doors in the payload fairing. The standard offering includes two payload fairing access doors approximately 610 mm (2 ft) in diameter. These doors are located on opposite sides of the payload fairing longitudinal separation plane and at least 17 deg from the separation plane. Within certain payload fairing structural constraints, variations in the number, location, and size of the doors can be accommodated (Figure 7- 5).
Cooling Air From encapsulation to launch, conditioned air is provided to the payload fairing volume. The cooling air flows from an entry on the side of the payload fairing to the aft end, where it exits through one-way valves on the payload structure. Conditioned air capabilities are described in detail in Section 5.
REV D HPD-10041 2-11
Thermal External thermal insulation protects the payload fairing structure and Insulation limits the interior payload fairing surface temperatures. Payload fairing jettison is constrained to a time sufficient to ensure that the maximum dispersed free molecular heating never exceeds spacecraft requirements. The customer can tailor the time of payload fairing jettison (and associated maximum free molecular heating). The thermal environments are described in Section 5.
Interface Skirt The interface skirt joins the payload fairing to the Block DM-SL and also supports the spacecraft loads through the spacecraft adapter and payload structure. The interface skirt is constructed of aluminum with integral stiffeners (Figure 2-9). The interface skirt is 0.81 m (2.6 ft) long and accommodates the transition from a 3.7 m (12.1 ft) diameter on the Block DM-SL to a 4.15 m (13.6 ft) diameter on the payload fairing.
265807J6-262 Figure 2-9. Payload Unit Interface Skirt
Spacecraft The spacecraft adapter mechanical interface with the spacecraft can be Adapters either a bolted or a typical clampband (Marmon-type) interface. The specific spacecraft interface information for the bolted and clampband based adapters is provided in Section 7. Spacecraft separation is achieved by redundant initiation, which causes the separation of the retaining bolts or clampbands.
2-12 HPD-10041 REV D
Payload Structure The payload structure acts as a physical support for the spacecraft during horizontal and vertical operations and functions as an environmental barrier. It is a graphite/epoxy composite structure. One-way valves in the payload structure allow airflow out of the payload unit and prevent backflow of air from the Block DM-SL cavity. The closeout membrane, located at the upper diameter of the payload structure, provides a barrier that limits thermal and contamination exchange between the Block DM-SL and the spacecraft.
Future 5-m Sea Launch is assessing customer interest in a 5-m diameter payload Capability unit. If sufficient interest exists, Sea Launch will consider offering this capability to our customers. The Sea Launch 5-m design would provide a payload static envelope 4.57 m in diameter. The design will provide encapsulated operations similar to our baseline payload unit operations, as well as similar avionics and structural interfaces.
REV D HPD-10041 2-13
This page intentionally left blank.
2-14 HPD-10041 REV D
3.0 PERFORMANCE
Overview The Zenit-3SL can deliver spacecraft to a wide variety of orbits, includ- ing geosynchronous transfer, medium Earth, highly elliptical, and Earth escape orbits. The data presented in this section assumes a generic set of spacecraft requirements. Please contact Sea Launch for a performance quote for specific mission requirements. With a standard flight performance reserve, the maximum geosynchro- nous transfer orbit (GTO) payload capability with one or two Block DM- SL main engine burns is 6160 kg and 6090 kg, respectively. A reduced flight performance reserve option is also available, which provides 55 kg of additional payload capability and increased dispersions on the orbital parameters. Characteristics of performance are covered in Sections 3.1 through 3.5, including: • Launch site • Ascent trajectory • Payload capability • Coast phase attitude • Spacecraft separation
Trajectory Design Trajectory design is part of the overall mission analysis process de- Process scribed in Section 4. Boeing Commercial Space Company (BCSC) flight design engineers work with each spacecraft customer to optimize the mission design and coordinate all customer requirements with the Rus- sian and Ukrainian partners. The Sea Launch Russian and Ukrainian partners generate the final trajectory and perform software and hardware simulations to verify the mission design. Finally, BCSC verifies that all customer requirements are satisfied.
REV D HPD-10041 3-1
3.1 Launch Site
Site Location Figure 3-1 shows the location of the Sea Launch launch site. Located on the equator at 154° W in the Pacific Ocean, this site was chosen based on a number of factors, including stage impact zones, weather, and vessel transit times. Sea Launch may select an alternate launch site for inclined missions considering range safety factors (e.g., a population center lo- cated along the ascent groundtrack).
30° N
20° N
10° N Launch Site 0° N, 154° W
0° N
10° S
160° W 140° W 120° W 100° W 80° W SHG0681874-021
Figure 3-1. Launch Site Location
3-2 HPD-10041 REV D
Performance The equatorial launch site enables the launch vehicle to efficiently de- Benefits liver a geostationary spacecraft to a zero degree orbital inclination. This saves the spacecraft from having to perform a plane change maneuver, typically resulting in a longer on-orbit maneuvering lifetime (OML). For a typical geostationary spacecraft, the circularized GEO spacecraft mass is 10% higher when launched from the equator compared to a launch originating from Cape Canaveral. For missions requiring non-zero inclinations, a wide variety of orbital inclinations are possible, due to the lack of population centers downrange of the launch site.
3.2 Ascent Trajectory
Stage 1 Flight The Zenit Stage 1 engine provides the thrust for the first 2.5 min of flight. A 10-second vertical rise is followed by a roll to the appropriate mission launch azimuth. The pitch profile is designed to minimize the lateral loads during the periods of highest dynamic pressure. When the axial acceleration reaches 4.0 g’s, the engine is gradually throttled to 50%, which is then maintained until Stage 1 separation.
Stage 2 Flight The Zenit Stage 2 main and vernier engines provide the thrust from 2.5 to 8.5 min after liftoff. The vernier engine ignites prior to Stage 1 sepa- ration and Stage 2 main engine ignition. The payload fairing is jetti- soned based on a free molecular heating constraint, and typically occurs three to four minutes after liftoff. Prior to Stage 2 main engine shut- down, the engine is throttled to 80%. After main engine shutdown, the vernier engine operates for another 1.3 min until Stage 2 separation.
Block DM-SL Immediately after Stage 2 separation, the middle adapter surrounding the Flight Block DM-SL is jettisoned. Block DM-SL main engine ignition occurs ten seconds later. Depending on the mission requirements, the Block DM-SL performs one or more main engine burns. Most missions utilize two burns of the Block DM-SL, as this usually provides a higher perigee, and may also be used to target additional orbital parameters (e.g, apogee longitude, argu- ment of perigee). For missions with multiple burns, the initial burn es- tablishes a stable parking orbit. The parking orbit coast duration is at least thirty minutes to allow sufficient cooling prior to engine restart.
REV D HPD-10041 3-3
Flight Timeline Table 3-1 lists the times when the main flight events occur for a two- burn 6090-kg geosynchronous transfer orbit mission.
Table 3-1. Typical Flight Timeline—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission Time, min:sec Event 0:00 Stage 1 engine ignition 0:04 Liftoff 0:11 Begin pitchover 1:06 Maximum dynamic pressure 1:56 Maximum axial acceleration 2:15 Stage 1 engine throttled to 50% 2:25 Stage 2 vernier engine ignition 2:27 Stage 1 engine shutdown 2:30 Stage 1 separation 2:33 Stage 2 main engine ignition 3:51 Payload fairing jettison 7:13 Stage 2 main engine shutdown 8:31 Stage 2 vernier engine shutdown 8:31 Stage 2 separation 8:32 Block DM-SL middle adapter jettison 8:41 Block DM-SL main engine ignition 1 13:12 Block DM-SL main engine shutdown 1 43:30 Block DM-SL main engine ignition 2 50:35 Block DM-SL main engine shutdown 2 61:15 Spacecraft separation
3-4 HPD-10041 REV D
Flight Profile Figure 3-2 shows a flight profile with key trajectory events and parameters labeled for a two-burn, 6090-kg geosynchronous transfer orbit mission.
Apogee • t = 6:03:08 • h = 35786 km • hp = 219 km • ha = 35786 km Block DM-SL shutdown 1 Stage 2 separation • t = 13:12 Spacecraft separation • t = 8:31 • h = 181 km • h = 180 km • t = 1:01:15 • hp = 180 km • h = 2095 km • hp = -2266 km Fairing jettison • ha = 207 km • h = 183 km • t = 3:51 a • h = 118 km Block DM-SL shutdown 2 • Dispersed FMH < 1,135 W/m2 • t = 50:35 • h = 334 km • hp = 214 km Stage 1 separation • ha = 35963 km • t = 2:30 • h = 69 km
Max acceleration • t = 1:56 • Accel = 4.0 g Stage 2 impact Max Q • Range = 4490 km • t = 1:06 • Q = 5400 kgf/m2 Fairing impact Liftoff • Range = 1050 km • t = 0:04 • Accel = 1.6 g Stage 1 impact • Range = 770 km
SHG0681874-022 Figure 3-2. Typical Flight Profile—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission
REV D HPD-10041 3-5
Groundtrack Figure 3-3 shows the Zenit-3SL ascent groundtrack and indicates the location of the major events for a two-burn, 6090-kg geosynchronous transfer orbit mission.
60 N
30 N
0 Stage 1 & 2 Block DM-SL Block DM-SL Spacecraft Apogee Ascent Burn 1 burn 2 separation Latitude, deg Latitude,
30 S
60 S
150 W 120 W 90 W 60 W 30 W 0 30 E 60 E 90 E 120 E 150 E Longitude, deg SHG0681874-023 Figure 3-3. Typical Groundtrack—Two-Burn, 6090-kg Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Mission
3-6 HPD-10041 REV D
3.3 Payload Capability
Ground Rules This section presents the payload capability for a wide variety of mis- sions, based on the following set of generic ground rules: • Payload capability is defined as the separated spacecraft mass, and assumes an 1194, 1666, or 937 spacecraft adapter. For a 702 adapter, subtract 15 kg from the payload capability values in this section. • Sufficient flight performance reserves are maintained to reach the specified orbit with a confidence level of 2.7σ. • At the time of fairing jettison, the free molecular heating is less than 1,135 W/m2 with a confidence level of 3σ. • Orbital heights are specified with respect to an Earth radius of 6,378 km. • For elliptical orbits (including GTO and Molniya/Tundra transfer), the orbital parameters correspond to the osculating orbital elements at first apogee passage. • For circular orbits and Earth escape, the orbital parameters corre- spond to the osculating orbital elements at Block DM-SL main en- gine shutdown. • The maximum separated spacecraft mass is assumed to be 7300 kg based upon the Zenit-3SL structural capability specified in Section 6.1. Refer to this section for more details on the structural capability of the Zenit-3SL using current SC adapters and associated payload support structure. • For missions with multiple Block DM-SL engine burns, the mini- mum parking orbit perigee height is 180 km. For missions with a sin- gle Block DM-SL burn, the minimum final orbit perigee height is 200 km. • Missions requiring longer durations (over 2 hr at spacecraft separa- tion) or higher altitudes (over 15,000 km at spacecraft separation) may require additional analyses due to battery life and radiation con- siderations.
Reduced Flight All of the data in this section corresponds to a standard flight perform- Performance ance reserve on the Block DM-SL. A reduced flight performance reserve Reserve Option option is also available, which provides 55 kg of additional payload ca- pability and increased dispersions on the orbital parameters. Please con- tact Sea Launch for more detailed information.
REV D HPD-10041 3-7
Geosynchronous The Zenit-3SL can deliver large satellites to a variety of geosynchronous Transfer Orbit transfer orbits. For a mission with one Block DM-SL burn, the maxi- mum payload capability is 6160 kg. For a mission with two Block DM- SL burns, the maximum payload capability is 6090 kg. The orbital pa- rameters for these cases are shown in Table 3-2.
Table 3-2. Maximum Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability One Block Two Block Orbital parameter DM-SL burn DM-SL burns Perigee height 200 km 220 km Apogee height 35786 km 35786 km Inclination 0 deg 0 deg Maximum 6160 kg 6090 kg spacecraft mass For lighter spacecraft, the excess Zenit-3SL performance may be used to raise the perigee height. Either one or two Block DM-SL burns may be used but, for most cases, two burns provide the maximum perigee. A one-burn mission is optimal only for the heaviest spacecraft, and may be selected if other spacecraft requirements do not necessitate the use of two burns.
For two-burn missions, there are two types of GTO injection schemes: “perigee inject” and “post-perigee inject.” These have different intermedi- ate parking orbits and placement of the second burn, which are illustrated in Figure 3-4. Perigee inject is optimal for the lower perigees and post- perigee inject is optimal for the higher perigees, with the crossover occur- ring near a perigee height of 2000 km. Injection at apogee is generally not desirable due to a minimum propellant constraint at the start of a Block DM-SL main engine burn, plus it greatly extends the mission duration.
Figure 3-5 and Table 3-3 show the geosynchronous transfer orbit payload capability for a synchronous apogee. Figure 3-6 and Table 3-4 show the geosynchronous transfer orbit payload capability for subsynchronous and supersynchronous apogees.
All of the geosynchronous transfer orbit data in this section assumes an orbital inclination of 0 deg. A small non-zero inclination can be accom- modated with minimal performance loss. Additional constraints (e.g., apogee longitude, argument of perigee, right ascension of the ascending node) can also be accommodated, but the performance loss depends on the specifics of the mission.
3-8 HPD-10041 REV D
One Block DM-SL Burn Ascent + DM burn Hp > 200 km
GTO
Two Burn Perigee Inject DM burn 2 Hp = 220 - 2000 km Ascent + DM burn 1
GTO
Ascent + DM burn 1
Two Burn Post-Perigee Inject Hp > 2000 km
DM burn 2 GTO
SHG0681874-024 Figure 3-4. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Injection Schemes
REV D HPD-10041 3-9
Apogee height = 35786 km Inclination = 0 deg 6000
5000 Two Block DM-SL Burns Payload capability, kg capability, Payload 4000 One Block DM-SL Burn
2000 4000 6000 8000 Perigee height, km SHG0681874-025 Figure 3-5. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Synchronous Apogee
3-10 HPD-10041 REV D
Table 3-3. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Synchronous Apogee
Perigee Spacecraft Payload capability, kg height, ΔV to GEO, One Block Two Block km mps DM-SL burn DM-SL burns 200 1477 6160 ⎯ 220 1475 6123 6090 250 1472 6055 6072 300 1466 5940 6033 400 1456 5704 5953 500 1446 5463 5873 600 1436 5218 5795 700 1426 4970 5720 800 1416 4718 5645 900 1406 4463 5574 1000 1397 4206 5504 1250 1373 3568 5339 1500 1349 2957 5186 1750 1327 2370 5048 2000 1304 ⎯ 4921 2100 1296 ⎯ 4887 2250 1283 ⎯ 4869 2500 1261 — 4795 3000 1220 ⎯ 4614 3500 1180 ⎯ 4455 4000 1142 ⎯ 4314 4500 1106 ⎯ 4187 5000 1070 ⎯ 4072 6000 1003 ⎯ 3873 7000 941 ⎯ 3704 8000 882 ⎯ 3559 9000 827 ⎯ 3431 10000 775 ⎯ 3319
REV D HPD-10041 3-11
Inclination = 0 deg Two Block DM-SL Burns Perigee height, km
220 6000 500
1000 5500 Payload capability, kg capability, Payload
5000 2000
32000 34000 36000 38000 40000 Apogee height, km SHG0681874-026
Figure 3-6. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯Sub/Supersynchronous Apogees
Table 3-4. Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Payload Capability⎯ Sub/Supersynchronous Apogees* Payload capability, kg Apogee Perigee ht Perigee ht Perigee ht Perigee ht height, km 220 km 500 km 1000 km 2000 km 30000 6414 6192 5818 5227
32000 6292 6071 5699 5111
34000 6182 5962 5592 5006
35786 6090 5873 5504 4921
38000 5991 5773 5406 4825
40000 5907 5690 5324 4746
42000 5831 5615 5250 4673 *Two Block DM-SL burns.
3-12 HPD-10041 REV D
Circular and The Zenit-3SL can deliver satellites to a variety of circular and elliptical Elliptical Orbits orbits. Figure 3-7 and Table 3-5 show the payload capability for a range of circular orbit heights and inclinations. Figure 3-8 and Table 3-6 show the payload capability for a range of elliptical orbit apogees and inclinations.
Two Block DM-SL Burns 7000
6000 Orbital inclination, deg
0
5000 45
90 4000 Payload capability, kg capability, Payload
135 3000
5000 10000 15000 Circular orbit height, km SHG0681874-027 Figure 3-7. Circular Orbit Payload Capability
REV D HPD-10041 3-13
Table 3-5. Circular Orbit Payload Capability* Payload capability, kg Height, Inclination, Inclination, Inclination, Inclination, km 0 deg 45 deg 90 deg 135 deg 1000 7300 7300 7300 5466 2000 7300 7300 6617 4712 3000 7300 7300 5851 4061 4000 7300 6990 5203 3510 5000 6949 6334 4656 3045 6000 6347 5776 4192 2651 7000 5829 5297 3795 2315 8000 5377 4882 3455 2027 10000 4631 4203 2903 1561 12000 4041 3675 2480 1206 14000 3565 3255 2147 ⎯ 16000 3173 2914 1882 ⎯ 18000 2846 2634 1668 ⎯ 20000 2568 2398 1494 ⎯ 22000 2329 2197 1350 ⎯ 24000 2123 2024 1231 ⎯ 26000 1942 1873 1132 ⎯ 28000 1782 1738 1048 ⎯ 30000 1641 1616 ⎯ ⎯ *Two Block DM-SL burns.
3-14 HPD-10041 REV D
Perigee height = 200 km 7000 One Block DM-SL Burn
Orbital inclination, deg 0 6000 45
5000 90
Payload capability, kg capability, Payload 135 4000
3000
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Apogee height, km SHG0681874-028
Figure 3-8. Elliptical Orbit Payload Capability
REV D HPD-10041 3-15
Table 3-6. Elliptical Orbit Payload Capability*
Apogee Payload capability, kg height, Inclination, Inclination, Inclination, Inclination, km 0 deg 45 deg 90 deg 135 deg 10000 7300 7300 6854 5552 12500 7300 7300 6341 5102 15000 7300 7300 5944 4756 17500 7300 7022 5627 4481 20000 7300 6716 5367 4258 22500 7085 6462 5152 4072 25000 6854 6248 4970 3915 27500 6657 6064 4814 3781 30000 6485 5906 4679 3665 32500 6333 5767 4562 3563 35000 6200 5646 4458 3474 37500 6080 5538 4366 3395 40000 5974 5441 4284 3324 42500 5878 5354 4211 3261 45000 5791 5275 4144 3203 47500 5712 5203 4084 3151 50000 5640 5137 4029 3104 52500 5574 5076 3978 3060 55000 5513 5021 3932 3020 57500 5457 4969 3889 2983 60000 5406 4922 3850 2949 65000 5314 4836 3779 2888 70000 5233 4762 3718 2835 *One Block DM-SL burn, perigee height 200 km.
3-16 HPD-10041 REV D
Molniya and Figure 3-9 and Table 3-7 show the Zenit-3SL payload capability for Tundra Transfer transfer to 12-hr Molniya and 24-hr Tundra orbits. All cases have an or- Orbits bital inclination of 63.4 deg and argument of perigee of 270 deg.
Inclination = 63.4 deg Argument of Perigee = 270 deg 5000 Apogee height, km Two Block DM-SL Burns
35000 4500 40000
45000 4000 50000
3500 Payload capability,kg 3000
2500
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Perigee height, km SHG0681874-074 Figure 3-9. Molniya and Tundra Transfer Orbit Payload Capability
REV D HPD-10041 3-17
Table 3-7. Molniya and Tundra Transfer Orbit Payload Capability*
Perigee Payload capability, kg height, Apogee ht, Apogee ht, Apogee ht, Apogee ht, km 35000 km 40000 km 45000 km 50000 km 213 5135 4940 4782 4652 300 5089 4894 4737 4608 400 5020 4825 4668 4539 500 4950 4756 4600 4471 600 4882 4689 4533 4405 700 4817 4624 4469 4341 800 4755 4563 4407 4280 900 4695 4504 4349 4222 1000 4639 4448 4293 4166 1250 4509 4319 4165 4039 1500 4381 4203 4053 3927 1750 4229 4068 3932 3816 2000 4102 3918 3795 3689 2500 3893 3711 3563 3441 3000 3711 3531 3385 3265 3500 3551 3374 3229 3110 4000 3411 3235 3092 2973 4500 3287 3113 2971 2854 5000 3177 3004 2863 2747 6000 2992 2822 2683 2568 7000 2843 2675 2538 2424 8000 2722 2556 2421 2289 9000 2623 2459 2325 2213 10000 2540 2379 2247 2136 *Two Block DM-SL burns, inclination 63.4º, argument of perigee 270º
3-18 HPD-10041 REV D
High-Energy Figure 3-10 and Table 3-8 show the Zenit-3SL payload capability to high Orbits and Earth energy orbits and Earth escape. These are presented as a function of C3 Escape (velocity squared at infinity) and declination of the outgoing asymptote.
6000 Perigee height = 200 km One Block DM -SL Burn
5000 Declination, deg
0
4000 30
3000 Payload capability,kg
2000
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
2 2 C3, km /sec SHG0681874-030 Figure 3-10. High-Energy and Earth Escape Payload Capability
REV D HPD-10041 3-19
Table 3-8. High-Energy and Earth Escape Payload Capability* Payload capability, kg 2 2 C3, km /s Declination = 0 deg Declination = 30 deg –18 6403 6132 –16 6114 5855 –14 5832 5585 –12 5557 5322 –10 5292 5066 –8 5035 4818 –6 4788 4579 −4 4550 4348 –2 4320 4125 0 4098 3911 2 3885 3704 4 3679 3504 6 3480 3312 8 3289 3126 10 3104 2947 12 2926 2774 14 2753 2607 16 2588 2446 18 2427 2290 20 2273 2140 22 2123 1995 24 1979 1854 26 1840 1719 28 1705 1587 30 1574 1461 *One Block DM-SL burn, perigee height 200 km
3-20 HPD-10041 REV D
Low Earth Orbit In order to maximize the payload capability to low Earth orbit (LEO), a two-stage version of the Sea Launch System could be developed. This could deliver as much as 15,000 kg to LEO, or 12,000 kg to the Interna- tional Space Station orbit. Higher LEO altitudes can be achieved by ex- tending the duration of the Stage 2 vernier engine burn. Since develop- ment work would be required for a two-stage vehicle, contract lead times would be much longer than those set forth in this document. Please con- tact Sea Launch to discuss this option. The maximum LEO capability of the three-stage Zenit-3SL is 7300 kg, due to structural limitations.
3.4 Coast Phase Attitude
Three-Axis The Block DM-SL can accommodate three-axis attitude pointing (includ- Pointing ing sun pointing) while coasting between Block DM-SL main engine burns. Attitude accuracy depends heavily on spacecraft mass properties but, for preliminary purposes, may be assumed to be ±3 deg (2.3σ) in all three axes.
Roll Maneuvers For missions with lengthy coasts between Block DM-SL main engine burns, continuous rolls for spacecraft thermal control and battery charg- ing are supported. For a roll rate of 5 deg/s, the roll-axis pointing accu- racy is ±4 deg, and the attitude rate accuracy is ±0.2 deg/s in all three axes (2.3σ). For preliminary planning purposes, it may be assumed that 40 min of each coast phase is reserved for other Block DM-SL attitude maneuvers (e.g., reorientation to/from the roll attitude).
3.5 Spacecraft Separation
Separation Spacecraft separation typically occurs 10 to 11 min after the final Block Timeline DM-SL main engine shutdown. This allows for engine cooling and reori- entation to the required spacecraft separation attitude. Several hours after separation, the Block DM-SL performs a contamina- tion and collision avoidance maneuver (CCAM), which prevents future contact with the spacecraft. The Block DM-SL then vents all residual propellant and gases and depletes any remaining charge in its batteries.
REV D HPD-10041 3-21
Injection The injection accuracy at spacecraft separation is a function of the injec- Accuracy tion orbit and the mission flight duration. Table 3-9 shows the injection accuracy (2.3σ) for a typical geosynchronous transfer orbit mission using both standard and reduced Block DM-SL flight performance reserves. Table 3-9. Typical Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit Injection Accuracy (2.3σ) Injection accuracy Orbital parameter Standard FPR Reduced FPR Perigee height ± 10 km ± 10 km Apogee height ± 80 km +80/-1000 km Inclination ± 0.25 deg ± 0.25 deg
Separation The Zenit-3SL can provide the following spacecraft separation modes: Capabilities • Transverse spin—Two sets of springs with differing energies are used to impart a relative separation velocity as well as the desired angular velocity about a specified spacecraft axis. • Longitudinal spin—Before the separation event, the Block DM-SL rotates to achieve the desired angular velocity about the lon- gitudinal axis. Uniform separation springs impart relative separation velocity to the spacecraft. • Three-axis stabilized—Uniform separation springs impart relative separation velocity while the Block DM-SL minimizes pre-separation rotational rates about each axis. The tolerances of the separation parameters associated with each of the different spacecraft separation events heavily depend on the spacecraft mass properties and their associated uncertainties. Sea Launch works closely with the spacecraft customer to understand and define separation requirements that ensure mission success.
3-22 HPD-10041 REV D
4.0 MISSION INTEGRATION
Overview This section details the mission integration process, the mission management structure and the roles and responsibilities of mission personnel. It also defines baseline and mission-specific documentation. The following characteristics of mission integration are covered in Sections 4.1 through 4.3: • Management structure • Mission analysis and operations planning • Mission documentation
4.1 Management Structure
To provide the customer with an efficient mission integration and launch operations process, Sea Launch provides direct lines of contact between the customer and the Sea Launch organization. Figure 4-1 illustrates this management structure for both the planning phase and the launch campaign.
Sea Launch/Boeing Sea Launch partner Spacecraft Mission Integration Team mission integration customer team
Spacecraft PLU Mission manager interface control document Mission integrator interface control document • Spacecraft • LV to PLU interface information • Mission design • Mission details • Flight software • Operational development requirements • Requirements • Requirement verification verification BCSC technical specialists Sea Launch/Boeing Flight design, operations team coupled loads, shock, thermal, Spacecraft campaign document vibration, acoustics, contamination, • SC to PLU interface electrical interfaces • Mission-specific operational requirements • Operational constraints Mission Integration SHG0681874-011.1 Figure 4-1. Management Structure
REV D HPD-10041 4-1
Mission Manager For each mission, Sea Launch assigns a mission manager to be and Team responsible for all mission-related customer support through launch and post-launch reporting. The mission manager leads a mission team comprised of analysts, operations and contracts personnel. The mission team is responsible for all mission analyses, operations planning and integration activities.
Mission Team The mission manager acts as the primary point of contact with the Roles and customer throughout the integration and launch process. When the Responsibilities spacecraft arrives at Home Port, the focus shifts from analytical integration to the physical integration of the spacecraft to the launch vehicle and the launch campaign, with other mission team members, including the mission director, taking a more active role. Table 4-1 shows mission team roles and responsibilities. Table 4-1. Mission Team Roles and Responsibilities Title Roles and Responsibilities Customer focal point • Works closely with the mission manager and the payload integration manager • Has a direct line of contact with the mission director during operations • Is empowered to make relevant commitments on behalf of the customer Sea Launch Mission • Primary customer interface during payload Manager integration and mission analysis • Leads the mission team Sea Launch Mission • Coordinates BCSC analytical and integration Integrator activities • Creates mission specific documentation • Coordinates Yuzhnoye and Energia analytical and integration activities Sea Launch Mission • Directs the operations phase and the launch Director campaign Sea Launch Payload • Primary operations customer interface Integration Manager • Responsible for planning and integrating all spacecraft operations at Home Port, and on board the Assembly and Command Ship and Launch Platform
4-2 HPD-10041 REV D
4.2 Mission Analysis and Operations Planning
Mission Analysis Mission analysis begins following a contractual commitment between Sea Launch and the customer and continues until submittal of the final post-launch report to the customer. Mission analysis is conducted by Boeing, Energia and Yuzhnoye specialists. The mission analysis process assures compatibility of the spacecraft with the launch vehicle and with the overall Sea Launch system. These tasks encompass: • Interface requirements development and documentation • Requirements verification planning • Requirements verification • Performance, interface, and environmental analyses • Flight trajectory design and flight software development
Mission Specialists Boeing, Energia, and Yuzhnoye mission analysis personnel include specialists in: • Systems engineering • Electrical and mechanical interface design • Structural loads and dynamics analysis • Mass properties • Thermal analysis • Electromagnetic interference and compatibility • Communications • Venting analysis • Trajectory and orbit design • Spacecraft separation systems • Contamination control Boeing mission analysis personnel conduct the analyses required to verify compatibility of the spacecraft with the Zenit-3SL launch vehicle and the Sea Launch system. Energia mission analysis personnel conduct the analyses required to develop and implement the Block-DM flight data and integrated vehicle flight software. Yuzhnoye mission analysis personnel conduct the analyses required to develop and implement the Zenit booster flight data and flight software.
REV D HPD-10041 4-3
Mission Design The Preliminary Design Review (PDR) is an Interface Control Document Reviews (ICD) review held early in the integration cycle (for first-of-type SC) to provide a detailed evaluation of the mission requirements documented in the preliminary spacecraft to Sea Launch ICD. The purpose of the meeting is to assure that the ICD requirements are understood and that there is a plan established for meeting those requirements. The Mission Manager conducts this review. All requirements from the preliminary ICD will be addressed along with the preliminary design, analyses and planning that ensures requirements will be met. The Critical Design Review (CDR) is an ICD review to provide a detailed review of the mission requirements documented in the final spacecraft to Sea Launch ICD. The purpose of the meeting is show that the ICD requirements have either been satisfied or that that there is a plan in place for satisfying the requirements. The Mission Manager conducts this review.
Operations Operations planning focuses on tailoring the baseline operations process Planning and products to accommodate each specific mission. The mission- specific spacecraft campaign documentation is used to document all of the planning and products. These operations products include: • Operations flows • Timelines and checklists • Operations policies • Detailed procedures Operations planning also addresses mission-specific requirements for personnel training and certification, readiness reviews and rehearsals.
4-4 HPD-10041 REV D
4.3 Mission Documentation
Overview Sea Launch has developed baseline documentation for a generic mission, which is used as a template for each mission. This proven process assures consistency and repeatability across missions. This generic documentation includes: • Mission analysis documentation that defines the spacecraft interfaces and the initial mission integration process • Operations plans and products that define and support the actual mis- sion conduct Mission-specific documentation is also defined in this section. Figure 4-2 illustrates the documentation set that supports each mission.
Generic Integration Analysis and Operations
Sea Launch SC/SLS ICD Analysis plan Safety Plan Facilities Handbook Safety SC ICD Contamination Regulations verification control plan Manual plan EMI/EMC SL facilities control plan handbook for customers
SL facilities spacecraft cable diagrams Customer input Generic • IRD/draft ICD • Spacecraft schedule Mission • Spacecraft operations specific plan
Mission integration Launch operations SC/SLS ICD schedule schedule
Mission specific SC ICD Readiness analysis reports verification Review packages • Coupled loads matrix • Venting Operational • Clearance Verification documentation task sheets • SC separation • Campaign schedules • PLF separation • Launch commit criteria • Thermal • Launch definition document • EMI/EMC • SC test requirements • Contamination • SC operations • SC campaign requirements document Mission design • Master countdown procedure reviews packages • Training material Training • Certifications Postflight report • Rehearsals SHG0681874-018.2 Figure 4-2. Mission Documentation and Related Products
REV D HPD-10041 4-5
Integration The Statement of Work, which is part of the Launch Service Agreement, Documentation defines integration inputs, analyses and deliverables to be provided by Sea Launch and the customer. At the beginning of the integration process, the customer will receive the generic documentation used for spacecraft integration on all Sea Launch missions. These documents allow the customer to understand the generic integration process. This documentation includes: • Mission integration schedule • Contamination control plan • Electromagnetic interference and electromagnetic control plan • Sea Launch System Safety Plan and the Sea Launch Safety Regula- tions Manual If the customer provides an interface requirements document, it will be the basis for generating the mission-specific spacecraft interface control document. The interface control document allows the customer to define unique interfaces between the spacecraft and the Sea Launch system.
Spacecraft/Sea The spacecraft/Sea Launch system interface control document defines all Launch System spacecraft and spacecraft ground support equipment to Sea Launch Interface Control environmental, orbital and operational interfaces. It also contains the Document mission-unique facility interfaces. (Standard facility interfaces are described in the Sea Launch Facilities Handbook)
4-6 HPD-10041 REV D
Mission-Specific The customer-provided deliverables (Appendix A) and/or spacecraft Documentation IRD, as well as the generic integration schedule template are used to define the specific documentation for each mission. A generic mission integration schedule is shown in Figure 1-1. The mission-specific integration documentation consists of: • Unique mission integration schedule • Mission-specific spacecraft/Sea Launch system interface control doc- ument • Verification matrix • Mission design and analysis reports
The mission-specific operations documentation consists of: • Spacecraft Test Requirements Document • Spacecraft Operations Requirements Document • Spacecraft Campaign Document • Tailored operations procedures • Launch Commit Criteria • Master Countdown Procedure • Training materials Following the mission, a post-launch report is generated for the cus- tomer.
REV D HPD-10041 4-7
Mission The Tier I mission integration schedule will be developed after a contract Integration is signed resulting in a customer spacecraft launch commitment on the Schedule Sea Launch manifest. The Tier I integration schedule is produced by the mission integrator and coordinated between the mission manager and the customer. This schedule includes: • Spacecraft integration milestones • Data deliverables (spacecraft models and analysis reports) • Reviews • Integration activities • Schedule of customer reviews • Hardware need dates • Spacecraft integration milestones A separate schedule for the launch campaign will be provided by the payload integration manager. This schedule delineates: • General operations flow • Overall training and rehearsal requirements • Integrated schedules for processing and launch operations • Key Home Port, Assembly and Command Ship, and Launch Platform events
4-8 HPD-10041 REV D
Analysis The Statement of Work lists the analysis plan for the specific mission. This includes: • Each of the specialty areas where analyses are performed • Inputs required from the customer • Tasks to be accomplished • Specific deliverables to be provided to the customer The plan covers analyses in the areas of: • Thermal • Shock and vibration • Acoustic • Flight design • Radio frequency links • Separation clearances • Contamination • Electromagnetic interference and • Loads electromagnetic compatibility • Venting
Spacecraft A spacecraft verification matrix defines the process by which the inter- Verification face control document requirements and functions are verified before and Matrix during launch processing. The matrix is included in the interface control document.
Operations The generic operations documentation available to the customer for Documentation understanding the operations details consists of: • Sea Launch Facilities Handbook • Sea Launch safety documentation • Training, certification and rehearsal documentation • Sea Launch security documentation
REV D HPD-10041 4-9
Operations The operations planning process defines the detailed plans and processes Planning for all Sea Launch operations activities, which include: • Operations phases • Rehearsals • Concepts and activities for • Readiness reviews each phase • Management team • Operations products • Support facilities and • Overall control processes capabilities • Personnel training and certifi- cation processes
Sea Launch The Sea Launch Facilities Handbook describes those portions of the Sea Facilities Launch Home Port, Payload Processing Facility, Assembly and Handbook Command Ship and Launch Platform required by the customer during spacecraft processing and launch operations. Any modifications made to standard facility interfaces will be included in the mission-specific spacecraft/Sea Launch system interface control document.
4-10 HPD-10041 REV D 5.0 SPACECRAFT ENVIRONMENTS
Overview This section describes the major environments the spacecraft is exposed to from the time of its arrival at Home Port until its separation from the launch vehicle, including: • Transportation and handling at sea • Thermal • Structural loads • Humidity • Random vibration • Pressure • Acoustics • Venting • Shock • Contamination • Electromagnetic radiation
Ground and Flight For each of the above environments, the levels are generally categorized Environments by time of occurrence. The levels designated as “ground transportation and handling” cover the period of time from the arrival of the spacecraft at Home Port until Stage 1 ignition. The levels designated as “flight” cover the period of time from Stage 1 ignition (liftoff) through spacecraft separation from the launch vehicle, and end with the completion of the Block DM-SL contamination and collision avoidance maneuver (CCAM). Although the Sea Launch system has a unique processing flow, every effort has been made to ensure that the environments experienced by the spacecraft will be less than or comparable to those provided by other launch systems. More information on environments that apply to ground support equipment is located in the Sea Launch Facilities Handbook. Please contact your Sea Launch representative for more detailed information.
REV D HPD-10041 5-1 5.1 Structural Loads
Overview The structural loading environments on all spacecraft primary and secondary structure are examined for: • Ground transportation and handling • Flight • Spacecraft sinusoidal vibration testing Compliance requirements of the spacecraft to these environments are discussed in Section 6.
Quasi-Static Load The Sea Launch system will not induce loads on the spacecraft that Factors for exceed the load factor envelope shown in Figure 5-1 during spacecraft Ground Handling ground and sea transportation, handling or processing. and The load factor levels are applied quasi-statically at the spacecraft center Transportation of gravity. The (x,y,z) load factor components are contained within a sphere with radius 0.5 g centered about the 1.0 g contribution due to gravity. The load factor envelope in Figure 5-1 includes all contributions generated from the Launch Platform motion (angles, rates, and accelerations) during ocean transport. In particular, angle changes of the spacecraft as a result of the pitch and roll of the Launch Platform are included. The quasi-static load factors in Figure 5-1 also determine the maximum change in angle of a fluid’s free surface in a tank to be 30 deg for spacecraft slosh frequencies ≥0.25 Hz. The load factors in Figure 5-1 envelop all ground transportation and handling events from arrival at Home Port to Stage 1 ignition and apply to all orientations of the spacecraft. The orientation of the spacecraft when the Zenit-3SL is horizontal or vertical is shown in Figures 5-2 and 5-3, respectively.
5-2 HPD-10041 REV D
Vertical g
1.5 R 0.5 g
1.0
0.5
-0.5 Horizontal g 0.5 265807J6-249 Figure 5-1. Transportation and Handling Limit Load Factors
Vertical
Horizontal
Horizontal 265807J6-265 Figure 5-2. Integrated Launch Vehicle Horizontal
Vertical
Horizontal Horizontal
265807J6-266 Figure 5-3. Integrated Launch Vehicle Vertical
REV D HPD-10041 5-3 Fatigue The fatigue loads during ocean transit are usually less than those experienced during rail transport at other launch sites. Table 5-1 depicts fatigue loads on the spacecraft for Sea Launch, covering ocean transit and all ground handling operations at Home Port.
Table 5-1. Spacecraft Fatigue Environment for Transportation and Handling Load, g 0.39 0.37 0.33 0.29 0.25 0.22 0.18 0.14 0.10 Number of 1 5 21 92 387 1,569 6,086 21,842 1.0E+08 cycles Notes: • Vertical loads are in addition to gravity: g (vertical) = 1.0 ± load (g). • Environment covers three trips (1.5 round trips) between Home Port and the equatorial launch site. • Loads act uniformly along the length of the spacecraft. • The dynamic loads act in all directions simultaneously.
Pitch and Roll Table 5-2 depicts the maximum pitch and roll motions during transport between Home Port and the launch site. Launch Platform motions apply to spacecraft and ground support equipment while Assembly and Command Ship motions apply only to ground support equipment. The quasi-static load factors for ocean transport in Figure 5-1 account for Launch Platform motions. In particular, the effect of the Launch Platform pitch and roll motions on spacecraft fluid slosh is taken into account in Figure 5-1.
Table 5-2. Motions During Transit to Launch Site Maximum Assembly and Motions Command Ship Launch Platform Pitch 8 deg 8 deg Pitch rate 5.5 deg/s 5.5 deg/s Roll 25 deg 10 deg Roll rate 21 deg/s 7.5 deg/s
5-4 HPD-10041 REV D Coupled Loads Determining the ability of the spacecraft primary and secondary structure Analysis Required to withstand the dynamic loading events from flight requires a coupled to Determine Qua- loads analysis. Sea Launch performs a coupled loads analysis for all si-Static Loads for critical flight events to determine the accelerations, loads and deflections Flight of all primary and secondary structure of the spacecraft caused by the coupled elastic behavior of the Zenit-3SL launch vehicle and the spacecraft. The results determine the interface loads of the spacecraft with the spacecraft adapter. The resulting equivalent spacecraft quasi- static load factors at the spacecraft center of gravity are then determined for a specific spacecraft with given mass and stiffness properties.
Flight Quasi-Static The quasi-static limit load factors for flight that envelop the loads over a Load Factors for wide range of spacecraft are set forth in Figure 5-4. These factors are to Primary Structure be used as a guide only. Limit load factors for spacecraft with specific mass and stiffness properties will be defined in the spacecraft interface control document after a coupled loads analysis has been performed. Lateral load factors ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 g have been calculated for spacecraft with unique mass and/or stiffness properties.
Axial load factor, g 5 (–0.7, +4.5) (+0.7, +4.5) 4 3 (–2, 2.5) (+2, +2.5) 2 Lateral load 1 factor, g (–2, 0) (+2, 0) 0 –4 –2 2 4 –1
(–1, –2) –2 (+1, –2) –3 Notes: • Positive axial acceleration results in compression at the SC-LV separation plane. • Guide only. Specific values determined after spacecraft CLA. 265807J6-058R4 Figure 5-4. Typical Quasi-Static Load Factors for Flight
REV D HPD-10041 5-5 Sinusoidal The low-frequency sinusoidal vibration environment generated at the Vibration During spacecraft separation plane during launch and flight will not exceed that Flight defined in Figure 5-5. A coupled loads analysis performed by Sea Launch determines the minimum sinusoidal vibration environment for all flight events. The results of the coupled loads analysis determine the maximum notching that can be used during the spacecraft sinusoidal vibration testing.
1.2 1.0 0.8
0.6 Axial and lateral 0.6 (5-100 Hz) 0.4
0.2 Axial and lateral g acceleration, base 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Frequency, Hz 265807J6-059R2 Figure 5-5. Sinusoidal Vibration at the Spacecraft Interface
5.2 Random Vibration
Random Vibration The random vibration environment for flight measured at the spacecraft for Components interface is depicted in Figure 5-6. Near Spacecraft Maximum values occur during liftoff and are closely correlated with the Interface acoustic environment. The environment in Figure 5-6 applies to components within 0.5 m from separation plane along any structural path. This environment is not to be applied to the complete spacecraft as a rigid base excitation.
5-6 HPD-10041 REV D
0.1
0.01 6.8 grms Acceleration power spectral density spectral power Acceleration 0.001 10 100 1000 10000 Frequency, Hz 265807J6-269 Figure 5-6. Random Vibration Environment During Flight 5.3 Acoustics
Space Average The space average sound pressure levels internal to the payload unit are Sound Pressure depicted in Table 5-3 (Figure 5-7) for 1/3-octave band center frequencies Levels and Table 5-4 (Figure 5-8) for the equivalent 1-octave center band frequencies. The values for the “Reference SC” apply to a spacecraft with an equivalent radius that result in a spacecraft-to-payload fairing gap of 43 cm (1.5 ft). The values for “Typical SC” apply to a larger, rectangular spacecraft that fits within the static envelope. Higher acoustic levels are generally expected for spacecraft that exceed the static envelope.
Fill Effects to be The equivalent radius of the spacecraft is defined as the radius of a circle Considered with a cross-sectional area equal to the spacecraft cross-sectional area. The envelope of the internal maximum expected sound pressure levels also can be provided after clocking and fill effects for a specific spacecraft are determined. Section 6 defines the compliance requirements of the spacecraft to the internal acoustic environment.
REV D HPD-10041 5-7 Table 5-3. Acoustics During Flight⎯1/3-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels Sound pressure levels, dB Typical SC con- 1/3-octave band center Reference SC tained within static frequency, Hz with 43 cm gap envelope 31.5 119 123 40 121 123 50 123 124 63 125 125 80 127 127 100 129 129 125 130 130 160 131 131 200 133 133 250 134 134 315 133 133 400 131 131 500 129 129 630 127 127 800 125 125 1,000 122 122 1,250 121 121 1,600 120 120 2,000 119 119 2,500 118 118 3,150 117 117 4,000 115 115 5,000 114 114 6,300 113 113 8,000 111 111 10,000 110 110 OASPL 141.6 141.7 • Reference SC has 43 cm clearance between SC and the payload fairing • Reference: 2 x 10-5 Pa (2.9 x 10-9 psi)
5-8 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-4. Acoustics During Flight⎯1-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels Sound pressure levels, dB Typical SC con- 1-octave band center Reference SC tained within static frequency, Hz with 43 cm gap envelope 31.5 125.2 127.6 63 130.1 130.3 125 134.8 134.8 250 138.1 138.1 500 134.1 134.1 1,000 127.8 127.8 2,000 123.8 123.8 4,000 120.3 120.3 8,000 116.3 116.3 OASPL 141.6 141.7 • Reference SC has 43 cm clearance between SC and the payload fairing • Reference: 2 x 10-5 Pa (2.9 x 10-9 psi)
140
Typical SC 135 Reference SC
130
125
120
115 (Ref:micropascal) 20
110 1/3 Octave Band Sound Pressure Level - dB 105
100 10 100 1000 10000 1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency – Hz SHG0681874-031 Figure 5-7. Acoustics During Flight⎯1/3-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels
REV D HPD-10041 5-9 140
135 Typical SC Reference SC
130
125
120
115
110 1 Octave Band SPL (dB) Ref. 20 micropascal
105
100 10 100 1000 10000 1 Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) SHG0681874-032 Figure 5-8. Acoustics During Flight⎯1-Octave Band Sound Pressure Levels
5.4 Shock
Overview Shock environments are provided for the three spacecraft adapter types: • The SCA1194VS: has a diameter of 1194 mm and a Marmon clamp separation system. • The SCA1666: has a diameter of 1666 mm and a Marmon clamp separation system. • The SCA702+ and SCA702+GEM: have diameters of 1663 mm and four-bolt separation systems. The maximum shock environments for these systems are consistent with industry standards. Check with Sea Launch for environments associated with other spacecraft adapters.
5-10 HPD-10041 REV D
SCA1194VS Sea Launch, together with Saab Space, has developed a low-shock, 1194-mm spacecraft separation system (designated the SCA1194VS) for the Zenit-3SL. In addition to reduced shock environment, the SCA1194VS provides the ability to accommodate spacecraft weighing up to 8 metric tons by using a 60-kN clampband tension (for structural capability of the Zenit-3SL launch vehicle, see Section 6.1). The only significant difference for the SCA1194VS from the previous Saab 1194- mm adapter is the use of a fast-acting clampband opening device in place of bolt cutters to release the clampband tension, which results in a lower spacecraft shock environment. The shock spectra shown in Figures 5-9 and 5-10 and Table 5-5 describe the maximum expected shock environment in the radial and axial directions for a spacecraft adapter having a diameter of 1194 mm and a low-shock Marmon clamp separation system. The shock spectrum is defined for a location 4.0 cm from the separation plane on the spacecraft side of the interface. The shock environment is the maximum expected levels for all shock generated by the integrated launch vehicle, which includes payload fairing separation, second stage staging from Block DM-SL, and spacecraft separation events. For the SCA1194VS, the shock levels from spacecraft separation are lower than those from payload fairing separation and second stage staging from Block DM-SL shock events. Spacecraft compatibility to the radial and axial shock levels from all shock events must be considered and evaluated by Sea Launch. The shock spectrum corresponds to a tension of 40 kN to 60 kN in the spacecraft adapter clampband. The shock levels are generated using conservative shock transmission losses at the spacecraft interface. Actual shock levels on the spacecraft side of the interface may be lower using actual transmissions losses unique to the spacecraft bus. The actual losses for a spacecraft bus are determined during matchmate testing (see Section 6.4).
REV D HPD-10041 5-11 10000
1000
100
10
SCA1194VS spacecraft separation shock, radial axis
All other ILV shock events - radial axis Acceleration Shock Response Spectra, gpeak (Q=10) (Q=10) gpeak Spectra, Response Shock Acceleration 1 100 1000 10000 Frequency - Hz
Figure 5-9. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane using 1194VS Spacecraft Adapter, Radial Axis
10000
1000
100
10
SCA1194VS spacecraft separation shock, axial axis
All other ILV shock events - axial axis Acceleration Shock Response Spectra, gpeak (Q=10) (Q=10) gpeak Spectra, Response Shock Acceleration 1 100 1000 10000 Frequency - Hz
Figure 5-10. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane using 1194VS Spacecraft Adapter, Axial Axis
5-12 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-5. Payload Shock Environment 4.0 cm Above the Separation Plane using 1194VS Spacecraft Adapter Frequency, Hz Spacecraft Separation Shock - Radial Axis, g 200 60 1200 1400 5000 1400 Frequency, Hz All Other ILV Shock Events - Radial Axis, g 100 20 1000 1400 5000 2000 Frequency, Hz Spacecraft Separation Shock - Axial Axis, g 200 20 2000 700 5000 700 Frequency, Hz All Other ILV Shock Events – Axial Axis, g 100 20 1000 1000 5000 2000
SCA1666 The shock spectrum shown in Figure 5-11 and Table 5-6 represents the maximum expected shock environment for the spacecraft adapter with a diameter of 1666 mm and a Marmon clamp separation system. The shock spectrum corresponds to a tension of 30 kN in the spacecraft adapter clampband and is defined for a location 12.7 cm (5 in) from the separation plane on the spacecraft side of the interface.
REV D HPD-10041 5-13 10000
1000
100
10
All SCA1666 shock events - radial and axial axes Acceleration ShockResponse Spectra, gpeak(Q=10) 1 100 1000 10000 Frequency - Hz
Figure 5-11. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane using 1666 Spacecraft Adapter
Table 5-6. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane using 1666 Spacecraft Adapter Frequency, Hz All Shock Events - Radial and Axial Axes, g 100 50 800 3000 3000 3000 5000 3500
SCA702+ and The Sea Launch system generated separation shock spectrum using the SCA702+GEM SCA702+ and SCA702+GEM spacecraft adapters will not exceed that defined in Figure 5-12 and Table 5-7, as measured 12.7 cm (5 in) from the separation plane on the spacecraft side of the interface on the spacecraft attachment fittings. Section 6.1 sets forth the strength capabilities of the SCA702+ and SCA702+GEM spacecraft adapters.
5-14 HPD-10041 REV D 10000
1000
100
10
SCA702+ spacecraft separation shock - radial and axial axes
All other ILV shock events - radial and axial axes Acceleration ShockResponse Spectra, gpeak(Q=10) 1 100 1000 10000 Frequency, Hz
Figure 5-12. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane using 702+ and 702+GEM Spacecraft Adapters
REV D HPD-10041 5-15 Table 5-7. Payload Shock Environment 12.7 cm Above the Separation Plane using 702+ and 702+GEM Spacecraft Adapters Spacecraft Separation Shock - Radial and Axial Freq axes, g 100 30 2000 1000 5000 3000
Freq All Other ILV Shock Events - Radial and Axial axes, g 100 30 500 424 1000 650 1500 650 3000 1400 5000 1400
5.5 Electromagnetic Environment
Overview The electromagnetic radiation environment experienced by the spacecraft will be less than 10 V/m at frequencies between 15 kHz and 40 GHz. This applies to: • Processing cells in the Payload Processing Facility (Figure 5-13) • The Home Port pier (Figures 5-14 and 5-15) • The launch vehicle assembly compartment on board the Assem- bly and Command Ship • The Launch Platform hangar • The spacecraft while erected on the Launch Platform Note: Some levels shown exceed 10 V/m, but suppression and operational constraints are used to keep all levels impinging on the spacecraft below 10 V/m.
5-16 HPD-10041 REV D 120
Legend: Inside encapsulation cell
100
80 V/m μ
60 Electric field, dB field, Electric 40
20
0 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.00E+10 1.00E+11 Frequency, Hz 265807J6-273 Figure 5-13. Typical Electromagnetic Environment in Payload Processing Facility⎯Encapsulation Cell, 15 kHz to 18 GHz
REV D HPD-10041 5-17 140
120
100 V/m
μ 80
60 Electric field, dB field, Electric
40
20
0 1.00E+04 1.00E+05 1.00E+06 1.00E+07 1.00E+08 1.00E+09 1.00E+10 1.00E+11 Frequency, Hz 265807J6-274 Figure 5-14. Typical Measured Electromagnetic Environment at the Sea Launch Home Port Pier, 15 kHz to 18 GHz
5-18 HPD-10041 REV D 140
120
100 V/m μ 80
60 Electric field, dB field, Electric 40
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Frequency, GHz SHG0681874-035 Figure 5-15. Typical Measured Electromagnetic Environment at the Sea Launch Home Port Pier, 18 GHz to 40 GHz
Radiated There are six telemetry transmission systems and two command-receive Environment systems mounted on the launch vehicle, as follows: • The Sirius and Zenit telemetry systems are located on the Zenit second stage, and transmit at 211.3, 219.3, 1010.5, 1018, and 2211.0 MHz. • The Kvant and BR9DM systems are located on the interface skirt. The Kvant system transmits at 922.76 MHz, and the BR9DM transmits at 166 MHz. • The payload unit telemetry system transmits at 2272.5 MHz using several antennas that are mounted on the interface skirt. Figure 5-16 shows the in-flight electromagnetic environment, produced by the launch vehicle transmitters, predicted by analysis to be present at the LV/SC interface.
REV D HPD-10041 5-19 180 Kvant 160 922.76 MHz, Sirius TM System Sirius TM System 140 dBuV/m 1010.5 MHz, 1018 MHz 140 211.3 MHz, 127 dBuV/m 219.3 MHz, 120 126 dBuV/m PLU TM System BR9DM 100 2,272.5 MHz 166.0 MHz, 140 dBuV/m 129 dBuV/m 80
60 Unintentional Radiated Emissions < 70 dBuV/m Electric Field (dBuV/m)
40
20
0 10 100 1000 10000 100000 Frequency (MHz) SHG0681874-036 Figure 5-16. Predicted In-Flight Electromagnetic Environment at the LV/SC Interface
Electromagnetic Table 5-8 shows the electromagnetic environment generated by the Sea Environment Launch transmitters at Home Port and on the Assembly and Command Ship, Launch Platform, and launch vehicle.
Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency PLF Surface Comments on Transmitter (MHz) Location Vessels at HP Vessels at LS Predicted Levels Non- 0.19-0.535 LP 116 116 Worst case levels Directional Beacon MF-HF 1.6-30 ACS 123 89 Worst case levels MF-HF 1.6-30 LP 127 127 Worst case levels VHF/AM 118-137 ACS 103 68 Worst case levels Fixed 1 (heli- copter) VHF/AM 118-137 ACS 104 68 Worst case levels Fixed 2 (heli- copter)
5-20 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies (continued) Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency Comments on Transmitter Location PLF Surface (MHz) Predicted Levels Vessels at HP Vessels at LS VHF/AM 118-137 LP 103 103 Worst case levels Fixed (heli- copter) VHF/AM 118-137 LP 101 103 Worst case levels Handheld (helicopter) Homing 121.5 ACS 88 53 Worst case levels transmitter Homing 121.5 LP 86 86 Worst case levels transmitter VHF Lifeboat 150.8- ACS 99 64 Worst case levels 163.6 VHF Lifeboat 150.8- LP 97 97 Worst case levels 163.6 VHF Duplex 155-158 ACS 112 78 Worst case levels (ship-to-ship) VHF 1 (ship- 155-163.6 ACS 113 78 Worst case levels to-ship) VHF 2 (ship- 155-163.6 ACS 113 78 Worst case levels to-ship) VHF 1 (ship- 155-163.6 LP 114 114 Worst case levels to-ship) VHF 2 (ship- 155-163.6 LP 114 114 Worst case levels to-ship) VHF DSC 156.525 ACS 113 78 Worst case levels (continuous) VHF DSC 156.525 LP 114 114 Worst case levels (continuous) VHF AIS 156-162 ACS 82.2 82.2 Worst case levels VHF AIS 156-162 LP 116 116 Worst case levels BR9DM 116 ILV 116 129 Transmit power limited at HP to comply with FCC license Sirius-LV 211.3 ILV 107 126 Transmit power limited at HP to comply with FCC license
REV D HPD-10041 5-21 Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies (continued) Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency Comments on Transmitter Location PLF Surface (MHz) Predicted Levels Vessels at HP Vessels at LS Sirus-LV 219.3 ILV 106 125 Transmit power limited at HP to comply with FCC license EPIRB 406.025 ACS 105 70 Worst case levels EPIRB 406.025 LP 103 103 Worst case levels RM/C/C- 420.8 LP 78 96 Transmit power SVET limited at HP to comply with FCC license RM/C/C- 421 LP 78 96 Transmit power SVET limited at HP to comply with FCC license R/M/C/C- 425.8 ACS 80 68 Transmit power LUCH limited at HP to comply with FCC license R/M/C/C- 426 ACS 80 68 Transmit power LUCH limited at HP to comply with FCC license UHF Port- 430-470 ACS 102 70 Worst case levels ables UHF Remote 433.2- ACS 80 44 Worst case levels Crane OP 433.7 UHF Remote 441.725 LP 95 95 Worst case levels Crane OP UHF Port- 457.525- LP 106 107 Worst case levels ables 470 Boeing Two- 476.85 ACS 98.2 63.8 Worst case levels Way Radio SCRFS over 480-712 LP and 127 93 Worst case levels the water and 826- ACS 890 SCABS over 480-712 ACS and 124 85 Worst case levels the water and 826- LP 890
5-22 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies (continued) Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency Comments on Transmitter Location PLF Surface (MHz) Predicted Levels Vessels at HP Vessels at LS Kvant-ACS 768.97 ACS 85 117 Transmit power limited at HP to comply with FCC license Kvant-DM 922.76 ILV 118 127 Transmit power limited at HP to comply with FCC license Sirius-LV 1010.5 ILV 118 127 Worst case levels Sirus-LV 1018 ILV 127 112 Worst case level Inmarsat B1 1626.5- ACS 129 95 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Inmarsat B2 1626.5- ACS 131 95 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Inmarsat C 1626.5- ACS 118 84 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Inmarsat B1 1626.5- LP 135 131 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Inmarsat B2 1626.5- LP 135 131 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Inmarsat C 1626.5- LP 120 120 Based on an- 1646.5 tenna gain in SC direction Zenit Teleme- 2211.0 ILV 134 134 Antenna gain in try direction of PLF surface factored in PLU Teleme- 2272.5 ILV 134 134 Antenna gain in try direction of PLF surface factored in S-band Bea- 2272.5 LP 116 115 Worst case levels con WiFi over the 2412-2808 LP and 112 110 Worst case levels water ACS
REV D HPD-10041 5-23 Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies (continued) Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency Comments on Transmitter Location PLF Surface (MHz) Predicted Levels Vessels at HP Vessels at LS Helicopter 2475.5 LP and 88 88 Worst case levels Data Link ACS S-band Radar 3005 ACS 133 133 ACS navigation radars turned off when ILV is erect and vessel separation <5 km S-band Radar 3050 LP 133 133 Navigation ra- dars turned off when ILV is erect Helicopter 4200-4400 LP and 81 81 Worst case levels Radar Altime- ACS ter Weather Ra- 5620 ACS 89 98 Sector blanked dar so that ILV not directly illumi- nated SATCOM 6262-6298 ACS 112 73 Antenna gain in direction of erected ILV PLF SATCOM 6262-6298 LP 110 93 Antenna gain in direction of erected ILV PLF LOS Radio 7194.5 ACS 84 86 Antenna gain in T1 direction of erected ILV PLF LOS Radio 7355.5 LP 107 127 Antenna gain in T1 direction of erected ILV PLF LOS Radio 7494.5 ACS 84 87 Antenna gain in T2 direction of erected ILV PLF LOS Radio 7655.5 LP 107 127 Antenna gain in T2 direction of erected ILV PLF Radar Trans- 9200-9500 ACS 94 59 Worst case levels ponder Life- boat
5-24 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-8. Predicted E-Field Levels From Sea Launch Transmitters at Their Operation Frequencies (continued) Predicted E-Field (dBµV/m) at Frequency Comments on Transmitter Location PLF Surface (MHz) Predicted Levels Vessels at HP Vessels at LS Radar Trans- 9200-9500 LP 92 92 Worst case levels ponder Life- boat Helicopter 9375.0 ACS and 109 109 Worst case levels Radar LP X-band Radar 9410 ACS 136 136 Navigation ra- dars turned off when ILV is erect and separa- tion distance <5 km X-band Radar 9410 LP 136 136 Navigation ra- dars turned off when ILV is erect
REV D HPD-10041 5-25 5.6 Spacecraft Thermal and Humidity Environments
Thermal and Spacecraft thermal and humidity environments are characterized in the Humidity following sections for three primary operational phases: Environments • Spacecraft ground processing and handling before payload fairing Overview encapsulation • Operations after payload fairing encapsulation, including integrated launch vehicle integration, transportation to the launch site, and pre- launch preparations • Liftoff, ascent and in-flight operations
Ground Process- Spacecraft thermal environments are maintained and controlled during ing and Transpor- ground processing, encapsulation, launch vehicle integration, tation Before transportation, and prelaunch preparation phases. Encapsulation During operations phases in the Payload Processing Facility, before encapsulation by the payload fairing, spacecraft thermal environments will be maintained within temperature and relative humidity ranges indicated in Table 5-9. For each phase, temperature and humidity are continuously monitored and alarmed. During propellant loading periods, temperatures are selectable and can be controlled to a variance of 1.7°C (3°F).
Table 5-9. Payload Processing Facility Thermal Environments Relative Location/Phase Temperature Humidity Air lock 18–24°C 30–60% (65–75°F) Spacecraft processing 18–24°C* 30–60% and fueling cell (65–75°F) Encapsulation cell 18–24°C* 30–60% (65–75°F) Propellant storage cells 18–24°C 30–60% (65–75°F) *Selectable by customer, within range
5-26 HPD-10041 REV D Ground Process- Following encapsulation of the spacecraft in the payload fairing, the ing and Transpor- spacecraft environment is maintained with a continuous, conditioned air tation after supply. Air is ducted to the payload fairing thermal conditioning inlet Encapsulation diffuser (Figure 5-17), and exits to the Block DM-SL cavity through vent valves on the payload structure. In addition to the nominal airflow, while the ILV is in the LP hangar, Sea Launch is capable of providing directed air for cooling the spacecraft batteries with a given flow rate and temperature set-point. Modifications to the payload accommodations are required for this non-standard option, and therefore the request for this service must be provided no later than twelve months prior to the then applicable launch schedule Air-conditioning units on the Encapsulated Payload Transportation Mechanical Equipment (EPTME), Assembly and Command Ship, and Launch Platform are dedicated to maintaining spacecraft environments within the payload fairing during processing and handling at Home Port, in the Assembly and Command Ship, and while in transit to the launch site. The Launch Platform integrated launch vehicle air-conditioning system satisfies conditioned air requirements of the payload unit, Block DM-SL, and Zenit on the launch pad during prelaunch phases. The air flow from the Launch Platform integrated launch vehicle air- conditioning system is terminated at approximately L-17 minutes (on retraction of the transporter/erector and separation of the launch vehicle umbilicals). Conditioned airflow to the payload fairing is maintained through the remainder of the countdown (and through an abort recycle operation) by way of the Launch Platform high-pressure payload fairing purge system. Table 5-10 summarizes payload unit environmental control system inlet conditions and control capabilities. All air-conditioning systems maintain positive pressure inside the payload fairing to prevent air-transported contaminants from entering the payload fairing. Air quality is maintained by providing purge air, that has been high efficiency particulate air-filtered to class 5,000 maximum, in accordance with FED-STD-209E.
REV D HPD-10041 5-27 PLF PLS vents flight vents (one-way valves) Block DM flight vents Payload structure Block DM-SL Block DM-SL vents PLF volume IC vent
Spacecraft
Zenit-2SL IC Sidewall IC diffuser Block DM thermostating thermostating inlet PLF thermostating (5500 m3/hr) (3600 m3/hr) inlet (up to 4500 m3/hr)
Note: Drawing not to scale. 265807J6-010R7 Figure 5-17. Payload Unit Air-Conditioning Venting Scheme
5-28 HPD-10041 REV D Table 5-10. Payload Unit Environmental Control—Air-Conditioning Inlet Conditions Inlet temperature Operations phase range (1) RH (2) Flowrate range Home Port processing/ 10–25°C 0–60% 9–38 kg/min transportation (50–77°F) (19.8–84 lb/min) • After PLF encapsulation in PPF • Transfer from PPF to ACS • ACS processing Launch Platform hangar 10–25°C 0–60% 18.1–90 kg/min • Transport from Home Port to launch (50–77°F) (40–198 lb/min) site • At launch site • Transfer from hangar to launch pad Prelaunch operations at launch site 10–25°C 0–60% 18.1–90 kg/min • At launch pad erection to (50–77°F) (40–198 lb/min) vertical • On launch pad to L-17 min Recycle operations • After lowering of ILV, before trans- fer into hangar Prelaunch operations at launch site 10–25°C 0–60% >18 kg/min • After L-17 min to L-0 (50–77°F) (>40 lb/min) • In event of abort, through lowering of ILV until primary air reinstated Continuous air-conditioning is maintained throughout all phases by primary and/or backup air- conditioning systems. Notes: (1) Inlet temperatures are selectable by the customer within the indicated ranges and controlled to within +2°C of setpoint. Inlet temperatures are not selectable during Home Port processing operations and on launch pad after L-17 minutes. (2) Relative humidity controlled to 30–60% if access to spacecraft in payload fairing is required.
REV D HPD-10041 5-29 Flight Phases The Sea Launch payload fairing, described in Section 2, provides protection to the spacecraft from thermal environments during prelaunch, liftoff, and ascent mission phases. Effects of ascent aerodynamic heating on the spacecraft thermal environment inside the fairing are controlled by the insulating characteristics of the fairing. Ablative coatings on external payload fairing surfaces, acoustic damping material on internal surfaces, and the low conductivity of the graphite composite/aluminum honeycomb fairing structure combine to minimize heat transfer to the spacecraft from heated external surfaces during ascent. Figure 5-18 illustrates predicted internal payload fairing surface temperatures during the ascent period. Actual flight measurements are well within the predicted values. Predicted peak temperatures of acoustic blanket inner surfaces (which comprise 62% of the payload fairing area) remain below 85°C. At the time of fairing jettison, more than 90% of the fairing inner surface area is less than 95°C, 98% is under 120°C, and 2% is in the 120 to 140°C range. Materials comprising payload fairing inner surfaces generally have surface emittances ranging from ε=0.64 for surfaces covered with acoustic damping material to ε=0.83 for non- insulated inner walls. The Sea Launch system accommodates user-specified limitations on aerodynamic heat loads during periods after payload fairing jettison as constraints on the design of the ascent trajectory and at the time of fairing jettison. Maximum 3σ dispersed free molecular heat loads are calculated for mission-unique launch azimuth, day-of-launch ascent profile, and parking orbit as part of the trajectory design. For the typical spacecraft, fairing separation will occur after the maximum 3σ dispersed free molecular heat rate falls below 1135 W/m2 (360 BTU/h ft2). Payload fairing jettison will generally occur at an altitude of approximately 118,000 m (387,000 ft) at times ranging from 190 to 240 seconds following liftoff. Delaying time of fairing jettison or raising parking orbit perigee altitude to achieve a reduction in free molecular heating will have a negative effect on launch vehicle performance. Spacecraft thermal environments for the period following payload fairing jettison until spacecraft/Block DM-SL separation comprise the combined effects of free molecular heating, incident solar heating, planet-reflected solar heating (albedo), Earth-radiated heating, radiation to space, and heat transfer with the launch vehicle by radiation or conduction. The Block DM-SL flight, as indicated in Section 3.4, is designed to accommodate preferred attitude pointing, continuous rolls, maneuvers, and orientations during coast and pre-separation phases that satisfy spacecraft thermal control, battery charging, solar exposure, and other customer-specified attitude or exposure requirements.
5-30 HPD-10041 REV D 140
Legend: Tmax < 140°C for 100% of PLF area Tmax < 120°C for 98% of PLF area 120 Tmax < 101°C for 94% of PLF area Tmax < 95°C for 90% of PLF area
100
80 Temperature, °C Temperature,
60
PLF jettison range 40
20 0 60 120 180 240 Time from liftoff, sec 265807J6-276 Figure 5-18. Maximum Internal Payload Fairing Surface Temperatures
REV D HPD-10041 5-31 5.7 Payload Unit Ascent Venting
Overview During ascent, the payload unit is vented through one-way valves in the payload structure and through vents that open approximately ten seconds after liftoff. Figure 5-19 shows the venting scheme. The payload unit cavity pressure is dependent on spacecraft displaced volume and trajectory. Figure 5-20 shows a typical payload fairing cavity pressure band for a generic trajectory. The maximum ascent depressurization rate is shown in Figure 5-21. Maximum pressure differential inside the payload fairing at payload fairing jettison will not exceed 193 Pa (0.028 psi).
PLF PLS vents (one-way valves) flight vents (open at T+10 sec) Block DM flight vents Payload structure Block Block DM-SL vents PLF volume DM-SL IC vent
Spacecraft
Zenit-2SL IC Sidewall diffuser Note: Drawing not to scale. 265807J6-011R5 Figure 5-19. Payload Unit Ascent Venting Scheme
5-32 HPD-10041 REV D
120
Predicted Internal Pressure 100 Ambient Pressure
80
60 Pressure, kPa Pressure,
40
20
0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time, sec SHG0681874-037 Figure 5-20. Payload Fairing Internal Pressure During Ascent
REV D HPD-10041 5-33
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
(kPa/Second) 1.5
1.0 Maximum Allowed Pressure Decay Rate [-dP/dt] [-dP/dt] Rate Decay Pressure Allowed Maximum
0.5
0.0 0 102030405060708090100 Absolute Pressure (kPa) SHG0681874-038 Figure 5-21. Maximum Ascent Depressurization (pressure decay rate vs. pressure)
5-34 HPD-10041 REV D 5.8 Contamination
Overview Contamination of the spacecraft by the launch vehicle is addressed in all phases of the mission. Contamination control includes the following: • Launch vehicle hardware that comes in contact with the space- craft environment has been designed, manufactured and tested to meet strict contamination control guidelines regarding materials outgassing, cleanability, particle generation, corrosion, and wear. • Integration is performed in controlled (class 100,000) cleanroom environments, including spacecraft stand-alone testing, payload accommodation preparations, and spacecraft encapsulation. • After encapsulation, the cleanliness of the spacecraft environment is ensured by the maintenance of a continuous clean-air purge to the payload fairing. • The design of the payload structure isolates the spacecraft from most on-orbit outgassing sources, such as the flight avionics hardware and the Block DM-SL. • Launch vehicle plume impingement on the spacecraft is mini- mized by physical barriers and flight design restrictions.
Contamination Processing of the payload accommodation is conducted in accordance Control with the environmental controls and operational requirements documented Documents in the Contamination Control Plan for Sea Launch Home Port Operations Through Launch Operations. The Generic Payload Contamination Analysis is a comprehensive analysis of contamination deposition on the spacecraft from all ground processing and launch vehicle sources.
Contamination Ground contamination control begins with manufacture of the payload Control During accommodation and continues through launch. The two halves of the Ground Process- payload fairing undergo final assembly at the factory, and all subsequent ing processing is performed with the fairing halves mated. This unique approach dictates that the payload fairing will receive its final comprehensive cleaning before shipment.
REV D HPD-10041 5-35 Precision Cleaning Precision cleaning of the payload fairing inner surface is performed just Process During before installation of the pre-cleaned acoustic blankets. The payload Ground Process- fairing assembly is then double-bagged and placed in a metal container ing for shipment to Home Port. The interface skirt payload structure is similarly cleaned, double-bagged, and placed in a separate container. Extensive surface sampling has shown that standard cleaning processes will achieve cleanliness levels well below the generic requirements of 11 mg/m2 (1.0 mg/ft2) molecular residue and 0.5% particulate obscuration. Cleanliness verification is performed by close visual inspection. Direct surface sampling is available as a mission option.
Flight Hardware On arrival at Home Port, the payload accommodation hardware is un- Ground Process- bagged in the Payload Processing Facility cleanroom, and a receiving ing Environment inspection is performed. The payload accommodation is inspected and re-cleaned as required to meet strict visual cleanliness criteria before the spacecraft is encapsulated. A class 100,000 cleanroom environment is provided for the spacecraft customer during processing in the Payload Processing Facility. Cleanroom garments, materials, and janitorial services are also provided. If necessary, a mission-specific annex to the Home Port control plan is generated to incorporate any unique spacecraft contamination control requirements.
Purge Air Quality After encapsulation, the payload fairing air purge defines the spacecraft During Ground environment. The purge air is high efficiency particulate air-filtered and Processing delivered at a nominal cleanliness of class 1,000 (in accordance with FED-STD-209E). Purge air is provided continuously from the time the payload unit leaves the Payload Processing Facility through liftoff. In the case of a launch abort, the purge will be maintained during recycle events and subsequent launch attempts. The purge air quality is monitored with an airborne particle counter near the payload fairing inlet. Monitoring is discontinued only when the integrated launch vehicle is hoisted from the Assembly and Command Ship to the Launch Platform, and just before the integrated launch vehicle is erected on the launch pad. Purge air quality has averaged well under class 100 for all missions to date.
5-36 HPD-10041 REV D Helium Exposure Helium concentration in the spacecraft environment is of concern to some customers. The primary source of helium in the Sea Launch system is venting and leakage during Block DM-SL insulation blanket purging before liquid oxygen tanking. The spacecraft is protected from helium exposure by a positive pressure gradient between the payload fairing and the Block DM-SL cavity, which provides a constant flow of air through the payload structure one-way vent valves. In addition to the positive pressure airflow toward the Block DM-SL, an optional gaseous nitrogen (GN2) purge can be provided at the SC interface for further protection. GN2 purge is a non-standard option available from completion of SC mate to the SCA up to removal of the transporter-erector (at L-17 minutes).
Spacecraft Access If access to the spacecraft is required on the Launch Platform, a at Sea temporary air lock may be installed around the payload fairing access door to provide a clean zone for working and to shield the payload fairing opening from debris. Purge air from the payload fairing will provide a clean air environment within the air lock. This is a non- standard option, see Appendix B for more information.
Contamination The potential for spacecraft contamination during liftoff, ascent and During Flight injection into transfer orbit is minimized by proper hardware design and flight design. Flight hardware design considerations include surface cleanability, selection of low-outgassing materials, venting design, and containment of separation system pyrotechnics. Flight design considerations include minimization of thruster plume impingement and limiting exposure to materials outgassing during separation maneuvers.
Payload Unit The payload unit is constructed from low-outgassing materials and Materials screened using the ASTM E595 outgassing test method. Small amounts Outgassing of critical materials may not meet the screening requirement but are accepted based on other factors, such as moderate flight temperature, small surface area, or short-duration use. A full list of payload accommodation nonmetallic materials is provided in the Generic Payload Contamination Analysis.
REV D HPD-10041 5-37 Spacecraft The spacecraft is isolated from the Block DM-SL by a closeout Isolation membrane and one-way vent valves in the payload structure. These vent valves open to allow purge air to flow aft through the payload structure but are spring-loaded to close during flight. This prevents any particulate or molecular contamination from the Block DM-SL cavity from entering the spacecraft volume. The wide diameter of the interface skirt also prevents any line-of-sight view to the spacecraft from external Block DM-SL surfaces during flight.
Separation System Pyrotechnic products of the payload fairing separation system and the spacecraft separation system are contained to prevent contamination of the spacecraft. The payload fairing separation system design incorporates a pressure- containment tube, which expands to break a structural aluminum flange and separate the two halves of the payload fairing. Aluminum particles generated by breaking the flange have been characterized by extensive testing and represent a minimal contamination risk. Spacecraft adapter separation systems consist of standard clampband or separation nut designs, which feature O-ring seal containment of pyrotechnic products and debris containment for frangible bolts.
Retrorocket Zenit-3SL second-stage separation is accomplished by activating four Plumes solid propellant retrorockets located at the aft end of the stage. The retrorockets are canted fifteen degrees outboard. The wide diameter of the interface skirt blocks any direct view from the retrorocket exit plane to the spacecraft and prevents any impingement of high-velocity particles on the spacecraft. The only condensable gaseous species in the retro plume is lead (Pb), which is generated by vaporization of solid Pb particles in the fuel. Extensive plume modeling predicts a deposition of less than 5 Angstroms of Pb on most outboard vertical spacecraft surfaces. Aft facing surfaces may accumulate up to 30 Angstroms of Pb. Thin film deposition tests show that 30 Angstroms of Pb will have minimal effects on most spacecraft optical, electrical, and radio frequency properties. These data are provided in the Generic Contamination Analysis Report.
5-38 HPD-10041 REV D Contamination After spacecraft separation, the Block DM-SL performs a contamination and Collision and collision avoidance maneuver (CCAM) to prevent re-contact with Avoidance the spacecraft and to minimize contamination from outgassing and Maneuver attitude control thruster plume impingement. Several flight design parameters are constrained to limit contamination, including maximum Block DM-SL tipoff angle, and minimum separation distance from the spacecraft before major CCAM events. Major events include long orbit-separation and fuel-depletion burns of the attitude control system, and kerosene fuel tank venting. A total plume impingement limit of 1.E-05 g/cm2 is verified by analysis for each mission-unique separation maneuver.
REV D HPD-10041 5-39
This page intentionally left blank.
5-40 HPD-10041 REV D
6.0 SPACECRAFT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Overview This section contains spacecraft design guides to assist the prospective customer with an initial evaluation of spacecraft compatibility with the Sea Launch system. This includes: • Mass and center-of-gravity limits • Modal frequencies • Electromagnetic compatibility • Spacecraft design verification requirements • Horizontal handling • Pressurized systems • Ordnance systems • Multiple manifests and secondary payloads
Contact Sea Contact Sea Launch if a spacecraft exceeds the design guides described Launch for Unique in the following sections or requires a unique qualification approach. Sea Requirements Launch works with each customer to achieve launch vehicle compatibility. Figure 6-1 shows the coordinate system Sea Launch uses for the Zenit- 3SL and its components.
REV D HPD-10041 6-1
+X PLU Roll
Down during powered flight, up -YPLU during horizontal launch operations
OPLU
Yaw +XUS Pitch
+Z PLU
+YPLU +Z US
+YUS OLV, OUS, OPLU ZLV, ZUS, ZPLU
OUS
YLV, YUS, YPLU +X LV VIEW A
XPLU = XUS – 4000 mm XPLU = XLV – 44652 mm YPLU = YLV = YUS ZPLU = ZLV = ZUS
OLV
+Z LV A
+YLV SHG0681874-039 Figure 6-1. Zenit-3SL Coordinate System
6-2 HPD-10041 REV D
6.1 Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits
Definitive Several verification activities must be executed to demonstrate Zenit- Compatibility 3SL compatibility with a specific spacecraft having a given mass and Requiring center of gravity. These include: Multiple • Coupled loads analysis Verification Activities • Strength and controllability analyses • Critical clearance analyses to assess volumetric constraints • Performance calculations for the specific mission • Peaking load calculations for spacecraft having a nonuniform inter- face stiffness More information on spacecraft mass is presented in Section 3.3.
Zenit-3SL The Zenit-3SL launch vehicle can structurally accommodate spacecraft Structural with a wide range of mass and center of gravity for each spacecraft Capability adapter offered by Sea Launch. Table 6-1 provides the expected spacecraft mass and center-of-gravity limits for the Zenit-3SL when the lateral load factor on the spacecraft is 2.0 g or less (see Section 5.1 for a discussion of design quasi-static load factors on spacecraft primary structure). Conservative analyses are used to construct the mass and center-of-gravity limits (Table 6-1). Spacecraft with a higher center of gravity for a given mass may be acceptable with further analysis. Definitive compatibility of a spacecraft with the Zenit-3SL system requires all verification activities outlined above. The Zenit-3SL system is currently certified to a maximum SC mass and CG of 6100 kg and 2.0 m, respectively. Additional activities above and beyond the normal mission specific verification activities are required to certify the Zenit- 3SL system when the spacecraft mass and/or CG exceeds these limits. Please contact Sea Launch for a mission-specific Zenit-3SL compatibility assessment when the spacecraft mass and/or CG exceeds the certification limits, or its mass and CG exceeds the limits in Table 6-1.
REV D HPD-10041 6-3
Table 6-1. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits Spacecraft CG, m SC mass, SCA1666 with SCA702+ (and kg SCA1194VS 0% peaking upgraded SCA1666) ≤4600 > 2.5 > 2.5 4700 2.49 2.49 > 2.5 4800 2.43 2.43 4900 2.38 2.38 2.49 5000 2.34 2.34 2.44 5100 2.29 2.29 2.39 5200 2.25 2.25 2.35 5300 2.20 2.20 2.30 5400 2.16 2.16 2.26 5500 2.12 2.12 2.22 5600 2.09 2.09 2.18 5700 2.05 2.05 2.14 5800 2.01 2.01 2.10 5900 1.98 1.98 2.07 6000 1.95 1.95 2.03 6100 1.91 1.91 2.00 6200 1.88 1.88 1.97 6300 1.85 1.85 1.94 6400 1.83 1.83 1.91 6500 1.80 1.80 1.88 6600 NA 1.77 1.85 6700 NA 1.74 1.82 6800 NA 1.72 1.79 6900 NA 1.69 1.77 7000 NA 1.67 1.74 7100 NA 1.65 1.72 7200 NA 1.62 1.69 7300 NA 1.60 1.67 Notes: ● Mass and CG limits calculated with a SC lateral load factor equal to 2.0 g. ● The Zenit-3SL system is currently certified to a maximum SC mass and CG of 6100 kg and 2.0 m, respectively. ● Improved capability generally possible using mission specific SC properties. Contact Sea Launch if SC mass or CG exceeds either the Zenit-3SL System Certification Limits or the Zenit-3SL Structural Capability Limits.
6-4 HPD-10041 REV D
Spacecraft Mass Figures 6-2 through 6-4 represent the results in table 6-1 for each of the and Center-of- spacecraft adapters offered. These figures show the expected spacecraft Gravity Limits mass and center-of-gravity limits for each of the adapters. Results are provided based upon the current Zenit-3SL structural capability as well as the current Zenit-3SL system certification limits. Definitive compatibility for any given spacecraft requires that all mission integration activities be performed. Spacecraft with mass and center-of- gravity values outside the designated acceptable region may be accept- able on further analysis. Increased Zenit-3SL structural capability can be realized with strength upgrades to the spacecraft adapters and/or the as- sociated payload support structure for the adapters (see Figure 2-7). The longitudinal center-of-gravity location of the spacecraft in figures 6-2 through 6-4 refers to the spacecraft separation plane. The separation plane for the SCA1666 and SCA702+ spacecraft adapters is at payload unit x-axis station XPLU = 2.10 m (82.7 in). Similarly, the SCA1194VS spacecraft adapter separation plane is at XPLU = 1.97 m (77.6 in). The maximum radial center-of-gravity offset (nominal plus uncertainty) from the spacecraft longitudinal centerline axis should be less than 5.0 cm (2.0 in). Radial offsets exceeding this require further analysis (e.g., radial offsets of 6.0 cm (2.4 in) have been shown to be acceptable on a case-by-case basis). Figure 6-2 provides SC mass and CG limits for the Zenit-3SL using the SCA1194VS adapter with typical load peaking at the SC interface. The SCA1194VS adapter has been qualified for SC up to 8000 kg with a CG at 2.0 m. Figure 6-3 provides SC mass and CG limits for the Zenit-3SL us- ing the SCA1666 adapter. Results are provided for 0% and 30% peaking. If the SCA1666 spacecraft adapter is upgraded to realize the full struc- tural capability of the Zenit-3SL, then higher spacecraft mass is permit- ted, and the penalty imposed on mass and center-of-gravity limits due to load peaking is eliminated. Figure 6-4 provides SC mass and CG limits for the Zenit-3SL using the SCA702+ adapter.
REV D HPD-10041 6-5
8000 Zenit-3SL Structural Capability with SCA1194VS
7000 Current Zenit-3SL System Certication Limits
6000
5000
4000 Notes: 3000 • Mass and CG limits calculated with a SC lateral load factor equal to 2.0 g. Spacecraft mass, kg • Improved capability generally possible using mission specific 2000 SC properties. Contact Sea Launch if SC mass or CG exceed either the Zenit-3SL System Certification Limits or the Zenit-3SL Structural Capability Limits. 1000
0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 SHG0681874-078 Spacecraft CG, m Figure 6-2. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA1194VS 8000
7000
6000
5000
Maximum Expected Zenit-3SL Structural Capability with upgraded SCA1666 4000 Zenit-3SL Structural Capability with SCA1666 and 0% peaking Zenit-3SL Structural Capability with SCA1666 3000 and 30% peaking Spacecraft mass, kg Current Zenit-3SL System Certification Limits
2000
Notes: 1000 • Mass and CG limits calculated with a SC lateral load factor equal to 2.0 g.
0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Spacecraft CG, m SHG0681874-079 Figure 6-3. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter
6-6 HPD-10041 REV D
8000 Zenit-3SL Structural Capability with SCA702+ 7000 Current Zeint-3SL System Certification Limits
6000
5000
4000
Spacecraft mass, kg 3000
Notes: • Mass and CG limits calculated with a SC lateral load factor 2000 equal to 2.0 g. • Improved capability generally possible using mission specific SC properties. Contact Sea Launch if SC mass or CG exceed either the Zenit-3SL System Certification Limits or the Zenit-3SL 1000 Structural Capability Limits.
0 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 Spacecraft CG, m SHG0681874-080 Figure 6-4. Expected Spacecraft Mass and Center-of-Gravity Limits With SCA702+ Spacecraft Adapter
6.2 Modal Frequencies
Frequency Limits Sea Launch can accommodate spacecraft with longitudinal and lateral fundamental frequencies below those commonly offered in the industry. As a guide, the spacecraft longitudinal fundamental frequency should be ≥20 Hz and its lateral fundamental frequency should be ≥8 Hz.
6.3 Electromagnetic Compatibility
Radiated To avoid electromagnetic interference with launch vehicle systems, Emissions at the spacecraft radiated emissions at the launch vehicle/spacecraft interface Launch Vehicle must not exceed the levels shown in Figure 6-5. Spacecraft radio frequency system characteristics will be required from the spacecraft manufacturer for integrated analysis and for the required Federal Communications Commission special temporary authority license, which is necessary for Home Port radio frequency testing.
REV D HPD-10041 6-7
160
140 140
120
100
80
60 Electric field, dBµV/m
40
20 Kvant receiver 762-776 MHz 0 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Frequency, MHz SHG0681874-040 Figure 6-5. Maximum Spacecraft Intentional Radiated Emissions at the Launch Vehicle/Spacecraft Interface
Lightning Sea Launch uses various sensors, satellite imagery, radar and Protection weather prediction systems (Figure 6-6) (e.g., weather and lightning occurrence predictions) to ensure a lightning-free launch environment. Sea Launch provides its customers with notification of lightning occurrences (e.g., lightning already having occurred within a certain distance) should they wish to de-cable their spacecraft during spacecraft processing, transit or checkout.
6-8 HPD-10041 REV D
Lightning/weather service PPF in Spacecraft transfer PLU ACS on Spacecraft transfer ILV HP in LP on Spacecraft erect and rollout Dry S/C transitto launch site Launch site 1 Global atmospheric service Off-site, real-time warning 2 Boltek lightning monitor (ACS) On-site, real-time warning 3 ACS-02, PLU transfer to ACS Procedure identifying weather/lightning constraints 4 PLU/ILV transfer RR MD readiness review includes RC-03 WX briefing 5 MP-01, task 15, PLU transfer to ACS MD checklist prior to transfer 6 XFR-01, ILV transfer Procedure identifying weather/lightning constraints 7 MP-01, task 18, ILV transfer to LP MD checklist prior to transfer 8 LP-06, PLU launch countdown Procedure identifying weather/lightning constraints 9 MP-01, task 19, ILV dry rollout and erect MD checklist prior to rollout 10 RC-03 WX briefing Procedure performing the weather briefing 11 Boltek lightning monitor (LP) On LP, real-time warning 12 Launch Readiness Review MD readiness review includes RC-03 WX briefing 13 Launch Commit Criteria Jointly agreed-to weather/lightning commit criteria 265807J6-332 Figure 6-6. Lightning and Weather Services Used to Determine or Forecast Lightning During Launch Campaign
Radio Frequency There are very few areas within the Sea Launch segments that present Hazards electromagnetic radiation hazards to personnel, ordnance or fuels. A few high-power radio frequency transmitters can produce radio frequency hazard levels in areas within the antenna’s main beams. These radio frequency hazard locations and conditions are identified in the Sea Launch EMC Control Plan. Safety personnel have identified the radio frequency hazard areas as controlled-access areas. Safety training is discussed in Section 11.
Electromagnetic In order to ensure compatibility with the Sea Launch system, the Interference/ spacecraft contractor will provide component-, subsystem- and Electromagnetic equipment-level electromagnetic interference and electromagnetic Compatibility Test compatibility qualification test plans and test reports. Report
REV D HPD-10041 6-9
6.4 Spacecraft Design Verification Requirements
Flexibility to Meet Design verification requirements for the spacecraft have been engineered Customer Needs and selected by Sea Launch to ensure mission success. These requirements are not rigid and can be modified with Sea Launch approval to meet the verification needs of a spacecraft. In addition, detailed safety design constraints on the spacecraft are contained in the Sea Launch Safety Manual.
Customizable Strength requirements acceptable to Sea Launch are set forth in the Strength following section but can be modified to meet customer needs with Sea Requirements Launch approval.
Factors of Safety Minimum yield and ultimate factors of safety for the spacecraft depend on the testing option chosen and the design heritage of the hardware. The
minimum factors of safety and test levels for several test options are set forth in Table 6-2. Note that the minimum ultimate factor of safety set forth is 1.3. However, for qualification or proof tests, an ultimate factor of safety equal to 1.25 on limit loads is acceptable for structural components having a flight heritage with Sea Launch or when a model uncertainty factor no less than 1.05 is used to determine limit load.
Table 6-2. Factors of Safety and Test Options
Factors of safety Test Test option Yield Ultimate level Test success criteria Qualification test (test of 1.0 1. 3 • 1.0 • No detrimental dedicated article to ultimate loads) deformation at 1.0 • 1.25 • No failure at 1.25 Proto-qualification test (test of 1.25 1.4 1.25 No detrimental article used subsequently for flight or deformation or system test) misalignment Qualification by analysis (test of 1.6 2.0 N/A N/A article not required) Proof test (performed on each flight 1.1 1.3 1.1 No detrimental vehicle) deformation
6-10 HPD-10041 REV D
Test-Verified The spacecraft must have positive margins of safety for yield and Model Required ultimate loads. These loads are generated from limit loads using factors for Final Coupled of safety no less than those displayed in Table 6-2. Limit loads for the Loads Analysis transient flight events are calculated by Sea Launch in a coupled loads analysis and provided to the spacecraft customer. Limit loads for the
quasi-static events are calculated using the Sea Launch quasi-static load factors for ground handling, transportation and flight. The coupled loads analysis limit loads used for verification must be generated using a test- verified model for the spacecraft. Model verification of the spacecraft can be performed by either modal survey or sine test.
Fatigue Factor of Compliance to the Sea Launch fatigue environment is demonstrated by Safety showing positive margin to the fatigue spectrum (Section 5, Table 5-1) after increasing the number of cycles at each load level by a factor of four.
Customizable Test Sea Launch requires that the spacecraft structural capability be Requirements demonstrated by the spacecraft manufacturer. The Sea Launch qualification requirements on the spacecraft are standard industry practice, but can be modified to meet specific spacecraft needs. Structural testing on the spacecraft generally depends on design heritage. Unique qualification tests can be developed by the spacecraft customer to account for design heritage. Sea Launch will work with the spacecraft customer by evaluating customer-proposed testing to support the spacecraft integration process. The following tests are accepted by Sea Launch for demonstrating structural compliance. If the qualification approach that best suits the spacecraft is not discussed here, Sea Launch will evaluate any proposed alternative to ensure spacecraft compatibility.
Modal Survey Test A coupled loads analysis will be performed with a test-verified spacecraft model before flight to verify that the maximum expected limit loads for the spacecraft and the testing performed on the spacecraft structure are in compliance with Table 6-2. Model verification of the spacecraft can be performed by either modal survey or sine test. Repeat- mission spacecraft do not require further testing.
REV D HPD-10041 6-11
Static Loads Test A spacecraft static loads and/or sine vibration test must be performed by the spacecraft manufacturer for spacecraft structure. The extent of the testing depends on the heritage of the spacecraft structure but, ultimately, spacecraft compliance to Table 6-2 must be demonstrated.
Sine Vibration The sine vibration test levels for qualification, proto-qualification, proof Testing and acceptance are presented in Table 6-3. Qualification testing is for a dedicated test article and proto-qualification testing is for the first-flight article. Proof testing is for spacecraft that have not been qualification or proto-qualification tested for first flight and must be proof tested for every flight. Once a spacecraft has been qualification or proto- qualification tested, acceptance sine testing on all future repeat spacecraft need not be performed. Acceptance testing is generally performed to demonstrate workmanship and is an option available to the spacecraft customer for minor spacecraft design changes for spacecraft that have not flown previously on Sea Launch. The extent of testing depends on the heritage of the spacecraft structure and degree of static testing but, ultimately, spacecraft compliance with Table 6-2 must be demonstrated by the spacecraft manufacturer. Notching may be used to prevent excessive loading of the spacecraft structure. However, the resulting sine vibration environment with notching should not be less than a test factor level times the equivalent sine vibration level. This is determined from coupled loads analyses provided by Sea Launch. The test factor levels depend on the test options chosen and are provided in Table 6-3.
6-12 HPD-10041 REV D
Table 6-3. Sine Vibration Test Levels and Duration
Test parameters Proto- SC axis tested Frequency Qualification qualification Proof test Acceptance range test levels levels levels levels Longitudinal 5 to 100 Hz 0.75 g 0.75 g 0.66 g 0.6 g Lateral 5 to 100 Hz 0.75 g 0.75 g 0.66 g 0.6 g Sweep rate 2 octaves/ min 4 octaves/min
Acoustic Testing Qualification of a spacecraft type is required. In place of a qualification test, a proto-qualification test may be run on the first unit. Acoustic testing to proto-qualification or acceptance levels and durations is required for every mission. The acoustic margins and duration for qualification, proto-qualification and acceptance tests are set forth in Table 6-4.
Table 6-4. Spacecraft Acoustic Margins and Test Duration Test Margin Duration, min Qualification +3 dB over acceptance 2 Proto-qualification +3 dB over acceptance 1 Acceptance Maximum expected 1 acoustic level
Shock The spacecraft should be compatible with the shock environment in Qualification Section 5.4 with a 3-dB margin. The shock environment in Section 5.4 represents the maximum expected environment with no added margin. Analysis, similarity and/or test can demonstrate qualification.
REV D HPD-10041 6-13
Adapter For the first mission of a spacecraft type, a matchmate test is required. Matchmate and The test is performed between the spacecraft and the adapter flight Fit-Check Test hardware at the spacecraft manufacturer’s facility. A shock transmission test is performed with the mated spacecraft and adapter. This test defines the shock transmission losses across the interface. Following this test, a spacecraft separation test is conducted. This test is includes firing the spacecraft separation ordnance to determine the shock levels on both sides of the spacecraft interface. Repeat missions incorporate an adapter fit check at the start of processing flow at the Sea Launch Payload Processing Facility. These tests include both electrical and mechanical mates (Figure 6-7).
265807J6-333 Figure 6-7. Electrical and Mechanical Mates
6.5 Horizontal Handling
Processing While Spacecraft systems and procedures must be compatible with operations Encapsulated that place the encapsulated spacecraft in a horizontal, cantilevered attitude for transportation and handling. Access to the spacecraft during this period of operations is through the payload fairing access doors. Door location is described in Section 7.
6-14 HPD-10041 REV D
6.6 Pressurized Systems
Design and Safety Design and verification of spacecraft flight hardware pressurized vessels, Requirements structures and components must be in accordance with recognized aerospace industry design guidelines. These pressurized systems should also be based on the Sea Launch system payload environment. The design must protect the launch system and personnel before launch and protect the launch system during flight from damage due to pressure system failure. Such criteria as operating pressures, stress levels, fracture control, burst factor, leak-before-burst factor, material selection, quality assurance, proof-pressure testing, and effects of processing and handling in the horizontal orientation should be considered. Design details are required to be included in the documentation to support regulatory agency requirements for each launch.
6.7 Ordnance Systems
Recognized Ordnance systems on board spacecraft for operation of propulsion, Standards and separation and mechanical systems must be designed in accordance with Regulations recognized standards and regulations. These systems must preclude inadvertent firing when subjected to Sea Launch–specified shock, vibration, thermal and electromagnetic environments. Ordnance devices must be classified in accordance with applicable federal and state codes and meet U.S. Government regulations for transportation and handling. Design for initiation of ordnance in the system must incorporate more than one action; no single failure may result in ordnance device activation. Use of a safe-and-arm-device is recommended; however, other techniques may be considered with adequate justification. System design and ordnance classification documentation is required to support regulatory agency requirements on the launch mission.
6.8 Multiple Manifests and Secondary Payloads
Overview Sea Launch is currently assessing the requirements necessary to offer launch services for multiple manifests and secondary payloads. These types of missions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
REV D HPD-10041 6-15
This page intentionally left blank.
6-16 HPD-10041 REV D 7.0 INTERFACES
7.1 Mechanical Interfaces
Overview Characteristics of the mechanical interfaces covered in this section include: • Payload fairing • Access doors • Spacecraft adapters
Payload Fairing Configuration for the payload fairing is illustrated in Section 2. The Sea Launch payload fairing accommodates the spacecraft static envelope, as shown in Figure 7-1. Excursions to the defined spacecraft envelope may be accommodated on a case-by-case basis. Figures 7-2, 7-3, 7-4, and 7-5 define the spacecraft envelope available below the separation plane for the 1194VS, 1666, 702+, and 937S spacecraft adapters, respectively.
ø 1300 mm (4 ft, 3 in)
ø 2500 mm (8 ft, 2 in) 2250 mm 9312 mm (7 ft, 5 in) (30 ft 7 in)
ø 3750 mm 5712 mm (12 ft, 4 in) (18 ft 9 in) 702+ – 775 mm (30.51 in) 1666 – 775 mm (30.51 in) 937S – 772 mm (30.4 in) 1194VS – 641 mm (25.24 in)
Separation Plane
Envelope inside SCA will vary Envelope Edge slightly depending on SCA interface SHG0681874-041.1 Figure 7-1. Spacecraft Static Envelope
REV D HPD-10041 7-1 Ø 3750 (147.64) 51 (2.00)
Separation Plane
541 (21.30) 642 (25.27)
653 Ø (25.73) 863 Ø (33.93) 1194 Ø (47.01) 1420 Ø (55.90) mm (in) Ø 2826 (111.25) SHG0681874-006 Figure 7-2. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA1194VS Adapter
3750 Ø (147.64) 59 (2.32) 450 Separation (17.72) Plane
615 775 (24.21) (30.51)
1120 Ø (44.09) 1374 Ø (54.17) 1666 Ø (65.59) 2322 Ø (91.41) mm 2826 (in) Ø (111.25) SHG0681874-007 Figure 7-3. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA1666 Adapter
7-2 HPD-10041 REV D Ø 3750 (147.64)
269 Separation (10.60) Plane
775 (30.5)
500 (19.69) 1521 Ø (59.9) 1815 Ø (71.44) mm 2826 (in) Ø (111.25) SHG0681874-008 Figure 7-4. Spacecraft Static Envelope SCA702+ Adapter
3750 Ø (147.6)
338 Separation (13.3) Plane
773 (30.4)
673 (26.5) 580 Ø (22.8) 724 Ø (28.5) 904 Ø (35.6) mm 1130 (in) Ø (52.36) SHG0681874-009 Figure 7-5. Spacecraft Envelope SCA937S Adapter
REV D HPD-10041 7-3 Access Doors The standard Sea Launch payload fairing provides up to two access doors, one door per fairing half, with a diameter of 610 mm (24 in). Figure 7-6 shows the zones on the fairing surface where doors may be located, as follows: • Access doors centered between station 2260.6 mm (89 in) and station 2565.4 mm (101 in) must be defined by L-8 months. • Access doors centered at higher stations must be defined by L-12 months. As an option, the payload fairing can accommodate additional access doors beyond the standard quantity of two.
7-4 HPD-10041 REV D 360 deg 180 deg
331 deg 180 deg Access door opening 209 deg 610.0 [24] diameter 360 deg Door center in this zone must be defined by L-8
Door center in this zone STA 2260.6 [89] must be defined by L-12
STA 2565.4 [101]
601, 702 separation plane STA 5969.0 [235] STA 2099.8 [82.7]
1194 separation plane Flat Pattern of 180-360 Half of Fairing STA 1967.0 [77.4] Note: Door shown in closest location to edge; dimensions in mm [in].
270 deg Zone for center of door
331 deg 209 deg
180 deg 0/360 deg
29 deg 151 deg Longitudinal separation plane
90 deg Zone for center of door Top View of Fairing 110 deg Access door opening 610.0 [24] diameter Door center in this 151 deg zone must be defined by L-12 1194 separation plane STA 1967.0 [77.4] STA 5969.0 [235] 1666, 702 separation plane Door center in this STA 2099.8 [82.7] zone must be defined by L-8 STA 3962.4 [156] STA 2565.4 [101] STA 2489.2 [98] STA 2260.6 [89]
0 deg 29 deg 131 deg 180 deg Flat Pattern of 0-180 Half of Fairing Note: Door shown in closest location to edge, dimensions in mm [in]. 0 deg 180 deg SHG0681874-081 Figure 7-6. Payload Fairing Locations for Access Doors
REV D HPD-10041 7-5 Payload Structure The 45-deg conic design of the Sea Launch payload structure maximizes and Spacecraft the height available to the spacecraft and accommodates the full range of Adapters existing and planned spacecraft adapters. The following sections define the standard spacecraft adapters currently offered. All Sea Launch spacecraft adapters incorporate flight proven spacecraft separation systems developed and manufactured by Saab Space, the industry leader in spacecraft separation systems.
SCA1666 and The SCA1666 has a diameter of 1666 mm (65.59 in) at the spacecraft SCA1666 MVS interface and uses a Marmon clamp separation system. This adapter accommodates the Boeing 601-type spacecraft. The SCA 1666 MVS accommodates the Mitsubishi Electric Company DS2000 type spacecraft. The SCA 1666 MVS incorporates a clampband soft separation system developed by Saab Space and uses the principle of the fast-acting shockless separation nut developed by Starsys Research. Six pushoff springs are used during separation to impart an initial delta velocity with respect to the launch vehicle. The spacecraft adapter also has the capability to impart spacecraft spin about an axis transverse to the launch vehicle longitudinal axis. In principle, this is achieved by limiting the stroke of adjacent springs with respect to the stroke of the opposing springs. In addition to the pushoff springs, there are two electrical disconnects and a clampband impulse that are integral to spacecraft separation dynamics. The major elements of this clampband-type adapter are shown in Figure 7-7. The SCA1666 and the SCA 1666 MVS are designed to accommodate a 6500-kg (14,330 lb) spacecraft with a center of gravity at 1.8 m (70.9 in) with 0% peaking.
7-6 HPD-10041 REV D Separation Springs Umbilical Connection
Clampband Catcher
SAS Structure
Clampband
Vent Holes
SCA—PLS Interface Bolt Cutter SHG0681874-002.1 Figure 7-7. SCA1666 Spacecraft Adapter
SCA702+ and The SCA702+ has a diameter of 1664 mm (65.51 in) at the spacecraft SCA702+GEM interface and is attached to the spacecraft using four bolts. This adapter accommodates the Boeing 702-model spacecraft. The SCA702+ is qualified to accommodate up to a 7300-kg (16,094 lb) spacecraft with a center of gravity at 1.67 m (5.47 ft) and includes the effects of spacecraft flexibility at the interface. The separation system uses four pushoff springs to impart both an initial delta velocity with respect to the launch vehicle and a spacecraft spin rate about an axis transverse to the launch vehicle longitudinal axis. In principle, this relative motion is achieved by limiting the stroke of two adjacent springs with respect to the stroke of the other two opposing springs. In addition to the pushoff springs, there are two electrical disconnects, which are integral to spacecraft separation dynamics (Figure 7-8). The SCA702+GEM is an SCA702+ with minor modifications to account for slightly different geometry at the spacecraft interface.
REV D HPD-10041 7-7 Shear Cone
Separation Spring
Umbilical Connection
Separation Nut
Vent Holes
SCA—PLS Interface SCA Structure
SHG0681874-003 Figure 7-8. SCA702+ Spacecraft Adapter
7-8 HPD-10041 REV D SCA1194VS The SCA1194VS has a diameter of 1194 mm (47 in) at the spacecraft interface and uses a Marmon clamp separation system. The SCA1194VS is designed to accommodate an 8000-kg (17,637 lb) spacecraft with a center of gravity at 2.0 m (6.6 ft) with 10% peaking. The spacecraft separation system uses from eight to fourteen pushoff springs to impart both an initial delta velocity with respect to the launch vehicle and a spacecraft spin rate about an axis transverse to the launch vehicle longitudinal axis. In principle, this relative motion is achieved by limiting the stroke of adjacent springs with respect to the stroke of the opposing springs. In addition to the pushoff springs, there are two electrical disconnects and a clampband impulse that are integral to spacecraft separation dynamics. The major elements of this clampband- type adapter are shown in Figure 7-9. The SCA1194VS (Figure 7-9) incorporates a clampband soft separation system developed by Saab Space and uses the principle of the fast-acting shockless separation nut from Starsys Research. The SCA1194VS consists of a preshaped aluminum band with titanium end fittings. The adapter uses only one band joint with a nominal clampband pre-tension of 60 kN or 40 kN, selectable by the customer. The clampband opening device is a reusable, and thus testable, system consisting of a flywheel housing and an energetically actuated pin puller. The installation of the SCA1194VS is easier and faster than the previous SCA1194 model. The SCA1194VS requires only one band joint and tensioning operation instead of two, as required with the SCA1194. Additionally, the required access zone is on only one side of the spacecraft.
REV D HPD-10041 7-9 Clampband Separation Spring
Umbilical Connection
SCA Structure
Vent Holes Clampband Opening Device SCA—PLS Interface Pin Puller
SHG0681874-004 Figure 7-9. SCA1194VS Spacecraft Adapter
SCA937S The SCA937S has a diameter of 937 mm (36.89 in) at the spacecraft interface and uses a Marmon clamp separation system. The SCA937S is designed to accommodate a 4500-kg (9,920 lb) spacecraft with a center of gravity at 1.5 m (4.9 ft). The spacecraft separation system uses four pushoff springs to impart an initial delta velocity with respect to the launch vehicle. In addition to the pushoff springs, there are two electrical disconnects and a clampband impulse that are integral to spacecraft separation dynamics. The major elements of this clampband-type adapter are shown in Figure 7-10. The SCA937S (Figure 7-10) also incorporates the clampband soft separation system developed by Saab Space and uses the principle of the fast-acting shockless separation nut from Starsys Research. This clampband opening device is a reusable, and thus testable, system consisting of a flywheel housing and energetically actuated pin puller. The SCA937S consists of a preshaped aluminum band with titanium end fittings. The adapter uses only one band joint with a nominal clampband pre-tension of 30 kN or 40 kN.
7-10 HPD-10041 REV D Umbilical Bracket
Clampband Separation Spring
Clampband Catcher
Pin Puller and Clampband Opening
Device Vent Holes GN2 Bracket SCA—PS Interface SCA Structure SHG0681874-005 Figure 7-10. SCA937S Spacecraft Adapter
7.2 Electrical Interfaces
Overview Characteristics of the electrical interfaces are covered in the following sections, including: • Hard-line link (umbilical) • Radio frequency link • External communication • In-flight interfaces • Electrical power
Spacecraft/ The launch vehicle adapter standard configuration accommodates two Adapter In-Flight SAE-AS81703 style connectors (37 pins or 61 pins). Additional required Electrical connectors can be accommodated and will be evaluated on a case-by- Disconnects case basis.
REV D HPD-10041 7-11 Hard-Line Link Spacecraft hard-line link electrical interconnections between the (Umbilical) spacecraft adapter in-flight disconnects and the spacecraft electrical ground support equipment are provided by two functionally similar but physically separate umbilical cable paths: • Interface skirt to the Payload Unit • T-0 (through the Launch Vehicle) Both umbilical paths are available for testing during integration checkout: • During transit to the launch site, only the interface skirt umbilical is available. • On the launch pad (from approximately L-24 hours to L-8 hours), both the T-0 umbilical and the high current connections of the interface skirt umbilical are available. • At approximately L-6 hours, the interface skirt umbilical is disconnected. • The T-0 umbilical remains connected until liftoff. Table 7-1 and Figure 7-11 depict umbilical configurations during spacecraft encapsulation, integrated launch vehicle integration, transit phase and on-pad operations. The voltages are referenced at the Customer Control Room DIN Panel.
7-12 HPD-10041 REV D
Available Table 7-1. Umbilical Configurations Umbilical Functions Available Umbilical Umbilical Cable Paths Functions Signal Cables Power Cables Interface Skirt Interface skirt • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V Umbilical in PPF shielded pairs Availability • Up to 94 A • 10 twisted • 14 circuits at 5 pairs A each • Up to 250 mA • 8 circuits at 3 at 50 VAC or A each 150 VDC Interface skirt in • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V ACS Room 101 shielded pairs • Up to 94 A • 10 twisted • 14 circuits at 5 pairs A each • Up to 250 mA • 8 circuits at 3 at 50 VAC or A each 150 VDC Interface skirt in • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V LP Hangar shielded pairs • Up to110 A • 10 twisted • 22 circuits at 5 pairs up to 250 A each mA at 50 VAC or 150 VDC Interface skirt Signals not • Up to 150 V on LP after available via rollout and interface skirt • Up to 110 A before L-8 hr • 22 circuits at 5 A each Interface skirt Signals not • Power not on LP L-8 hr available via available via to launch interface skirt interface skirt
REV D HPD-10041 7-13
Table 7-1. Umbilical Configurations (continued) Available Umbilical Umbilical Cable Paths Functions Signal Cables Power Cables T-0 Umbilical T-0 in PPF • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V Availability shielded pairs • Up to 58 A • 10 twisted • 17 circuits at pairs 2 A each • Up to 250 mA • 24 circuits at at 50 VAC or 1 A each 150 VDC T-0 in ACS • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V Room 101 shielded pairs • Up to 58 A • 10 twisted • 17 circuits at pairs 2 A each • Up to 250 mA • 24 circuits at at 50 VAC or 1 A each 150 VDC T-0 in LP Signals not • Power not Hangar available via available via T-0 T-0
T-0 on LP after • 10 twisted • Up to 150 V ILV rollout shielded pairs until Launch • Up to 58 A • 10 twisted • 17 circuits at pairs 2 A each • Up to 250 mA • 24 circuits at at 50 VAC or 1 A each 150 VDC
7-14 HPD-10041 REV D Encapsulation ILV Integration
SC SC ILV
IS T-0 IS T-0 umbilical umbilical umbilical umbilical
SC EGSE SC EGSE
Payload Processing Facility Assembly and Command Ship