U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Regulations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Regulations U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Regulations Presented to the United Nations Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee By Di Reimold FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) 30 January 2018 Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration Statutory Authority 51 U. S. C. Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended) • Authorizes the FAA* to license commercial launch and reentry activities and the operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. • Directs the FAA to: • Exercise this responsibility consistent with public health and safety, safety of property, and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, and • Encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries by the private sector. * The Secretary of Transportation’s licensing authority has been delegated to the Administrator of the FAA and further assigned to the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST). Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 2 Regulations for Licensing • An entity must obtain a license: • To launch a launch vehicle from the United States; • To operate a launch site within the United States; • To reenter a reentry vehicle in the United States; or • To operate a reentry site within the United States. • A U.S. citizen or an entity organized under the laws of the United States or any State must obtain a license: • To launch a launch vehicle outside the United States; • To operate a launch site outside of the United States; • To reenter a reentry vehicle outside of the United States; or • To operate a reentry site outside of the United States. • FAA does not license launches or reentries “the Government carries out for the Government” • NASA and DOD typically carry out their own launches. • US Government has an option to choose commercial launch services Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 3 FAA License Process Overview Pre-application Consultation Evaluation Launch/Reentry Ops Environmental Review Monitoring Policy Review Payload Review Financial Responsibility Public Safety Review Safety Inspection National Airspace System (NAS) Integration FAA has 180 days to respond to a “complete enough” application for a license, 120 days for a permit 4 Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 4 Potential Regulatory Path Moratorium Expires, Routine Mission Industry Standards Commercial Space Certificates Developed Travel Assurance • Production • Airworthiness • Air Carrier • Pilot Occupant Occupant • Instruction Safety Safety • Mechanic • Dispatch • Parts Public Public Public Safety Safety Safety Current Future FAA Certification Time FAA Licensing Licensing of Human Spaceflight Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 5 U.S. Spaceports Commercial/Government/Private Active and Proposed Launch Sites Poker Flat Research ∗ Range • Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska Mid-Atlantic California Regional Spaceport Spaceport • Mojave Air and Space Port Wallops Flight Key • • Facility • FAA-Licensed Edwards AFB Spaceport Non-Federal Launch Site America • Oklahoma Spaceport U.S. Federal Launch Site Vandenberg Cecil Field ∗ Owned by University of AFB • Midland Spaceport Alaska Geophysical • Spaceport Institute White Sands ∗ ∗ • -Kennedy Space ∗ Sole Site Operator Missile Range McGregor Center • • Houston Spaceport -Cape Canaveral Blue Origin Air Force Station Launch Site SpaceX Spaceport Florida Sea Launch Platform ∗ Launch Site Equatorial Pacific Ocean (under construction) Reagan Test Site Other spaceports have been proposed for: Alabama, Colorado, Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands Georgia, and Hawaii. February 2016 Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 6 Existing and Proposed Global Spaceports Pacific Spaceport Complex Alaska (US) Sohae Poker Flat (US) Andoya (Norway) Kiruna (Sweden) (North Korea) Oklahoma Plesetsk (Russia) Front Range Spaceport (US) Vostochny Musudan-ri Spaceport Dombarovsky (Russia) (North Korea) Mojave Wallops Flight Facility; (Russia) Air and Space Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (US) Baikonur (Russia) Tanegashima Port (US) (Japan) Jiuquan Taiyuan Pacific Missile Cecil Spaceport (US) Palmachim AFB (China) Uchinoura (China) Range Facility (Israel) (Japan) Kennedy Space Center; Xichang (US) Vandenberg · Cape Canaveral AFS; (China) Naro AFB; Semnan Spaceport Florida (US) Abu Dhabi (South Korea) California (Iran) Wenchang Roosevelt Roads (Puerto Rico) (UAE) Spaceport (China) (US) Spaceport Curacao (Curacao) Satish Dhawan Space Kona Houston Guiana Space Center Center (India) Spaceport Midland Spaceport (Fr. Guiana) Spaceport Spaceport (US) America; (US) Shiloh Spaceport (US) Singapore Spaceport Reagan Test White Sands Brownsville (Singapore) Site, Missile Range (US) Kwajalein (US) Atoll (US) Woomera (Australia) New Zealand Key Spaceport Existing Orbital Spaceport (NZ) Proposed Orbital Spaceport Proposed Suborbital Spaceport Existing Suborbital Spaceport Source: FAA July 2016 Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation February 2017 | 7 FAA-Licensed and Permit Launches 1989 - 2017 275 FAA-licensed launches 1989 - 2017 (145 GEO, 106 NGSO, 24 Suborbital) 44 Permit launches 2006 – 2017 (all suborbital) Includes 58 launches for U.S. Government (NASA [ISS], NOAA, DOD, others) Source: FAA/AST January 2018 Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 8 Expanding Commercial Capabilities Virgin Galactic Sierra Nevada Corp Boeing Rocket Lab USA Blue Origin Orbital Sciences ATK SpaceX Bigelow Aerospace Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 9 FAA/AST International Goals • The 2013 National Space Transportation Policy directs the Secretary of Transportation and other appropriate agencies to: • “Advocate internationally for the adoption of United States Government safety regulations, standards, and licensing measures to enhance global interoperability and safety of international commercial space transportation activities.” • The FAA is promoting its commercial space transportation regulations for adoption by other countries—the goals of AST’s outreach are to: 1) Assist U.S. industry activity outside the United States; 2) Provide U.S. international leadership; 3) Establish international relationships; and 4) Prepare for future interoperability between countries Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 10 ICAO / UN OOSA Space Learning Group (SLG) Background and Milestones • SLG establishes Terms of Reference • SLG assessment of mid- term and long-term • Group name changes issues to: Suborbital Commercial Spaceflight International Civil • *ICAO and UNOOSA Learning Group (SCSLG) Aviation Organization establish series of aerospace symposia, • *3rd Symposium - UN and collaborate on SLG Report on Commercial Space Transportation • *1st Symposium - educational forum • Global Air Navigation Industry Symposium *2015 *2017 2018+ • State2014 letter - “Survey on *2016 Suborbital Commercial • *2nd Symposium - • Deliver “High-level Space Transportation ICAO President Operational Vision and Airspace identifies pressing Document” by Q1 or Q2 Integration” issues that need to be United Nations addressed in the near • 13th Air Navigation International Civil Office of Outer term Conference • Space Learning Group Aviation Organization Space Affairs “SLG” organized Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 11 Future Challenges, Considerations and New Markets • DOT/FAA may be a logical regulatory authority for: • New “non-traditional” commercial space activity in new markets such as: orbital habitats, on-orbit servicing, lunar surface activity, asteroid mining, circumlunar, Mars missions • U.S. Space Traffic Management • Congress passed the “U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act” in 2015 (PL 114-90) • Contains requirement for 12 reports from multiple government agencies due to Congress including 6 led by FAA. Report areas include: • Mission Authority, Orbital Traffic Management, Space Situational Awareness and Safety Data, Industry Standards, Space Resource Utilization, Transition to Safety-Focused Framework, Range Streamlining, Space Support Vehicles, and Maximum Probable Loss methodology. • New legislation, protections and authorities may be needed • Flexibility of government to support this dynamic industry • Retaining focus on safety and efficiency of ANY transport mode Federal Aviation Administration AST Commercial Space Transportation January 2018 | 12.
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear, Missile Space Digest
    1 Nuclear, MissileNuclear, Missile & Space Digest & Space Digest Volume 11, Number 18 A Fortnightly Newsletter from the Indian Pugwash Society September 30, 2019 Convenor A. India “Imran Khan Hypes Kashmir, Personally Attacks PM Modi”: Ex-US Envoy Amb. Sujan R. Chinoy Chandrayaan 2 Completes Final In-Orbit Manoeuvre Before India’s Maiden Moon Landing On 7 Sept Russia plans to set up above 20 nuclear power units in India in next 20 years “India Will Not Balk At Using Strength To Defend Itself”: Rajnath Singh Explained: Chandrayaan-2, in perspective Lander ‘tilted’ not broken, says ISRO Modi should correct Vajpayee wrong on nuclear ‘no first use’: Diplomat Jaimini Bhagwati Chandrayaan 2: Nobel laureate entrusts Indian scientists, says ‘they will Executive Council soon master the setbacks of lunar mission’ Devices onboard Chandrayaan-2 orbiter gamechangers Cdr. (Dr.) Probal K. Ghosh Chandrayaan 2: Here’s how NASA is helping ISRO in reviving Air Marshal S. G. Inamdar Vikram Lander (Retd.) Dr. Roshan Khanijo B. China Amb. R. Rajagopalan China issues white paper on nuclear safety China Focus: China issues white paper on nuclear safety, stressing int’l Dr. Rajesh Rajagopalan cooperation Shri Dinesh Kumar US ban for nuclear firm harms own interests Yadvendra China to build lab for radioactive waste disposal China’s lunar rover travels over 284 meters on moon’s far side China sends H-6K bombers to Russia for strategic drills Chinese netizens encourage India’s lunar dream despite failure Implementation phase of China-funded Egyptian
    [Show full text]
  • Nachbrenner 2021
    NACHBRENNER 2021 21.05.2021-10 Wissenswertes aus dem Bereich Militärluftfahrt und Luftkriegsführung Quelle: Ländercode: Schlüsselinformationen: Datum: Artikelname: 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis • 02 Sicherheitspolitik Schweiz und Air2030 • 07 Luft und Marineluftstreitkräfte sowie strategische und weitere luftgestützte Einsatzmittel • 16 Hubschrauber und Kipprotor-Flugzeuge • 18 Unbemannte Luftfahrzeuge (UAV) und Robotik • 21 Bewaffnung und weitere Nutzlasten • 23 Air Power • 39 Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance • 40 Cyber- und Electromagnetic Warfare • 42 Boden- und seegestützte Luftverteidigungssysteme • 44 Boden- und seegestützte Einsatzkräfte, Strategische Kampfmittel und Space Forces • 45 Geo- und Sicherheitspolitik, militärische Übungen • 48 Analysen, Studien, Reports, Fact Sheets, Infographics, Podcasts und Videos Sicherheitspolitik Schweiz und Air2030 www.proschweiz.ch Pro Schweiz Inhalt «Das Magazin für eine Das Land des Eigensinns 2 optimistische und Sicherheitspolitik – Wo stehen wir heute? 4 selbstsichere Schweiz» - Sicherheit gibt es nicht umsonst - Die Sichtweise zweier Luftwaffenoffizierinnen 10 Ausgabe Nr. 3 autonomiesuisse will Erfolgsmodell Schweiz sichern 16 Die Schweiz muss weder kuschen noch sich verstecken 18 Impressum 20 admin.ch Ernennung eines Der Bundesrat hat an seiner Sitzung vom 19. Mai 2021 Oberst i Gst Peter Bruns per 1. Juli 2021 zum 19.05.2021 Höheren Stabsoffiziers Kommandanten der Luftwaffenausbildungs- und Trainingsbrigade, unter gleichzeitiger Beförderung zum der Armee – Brigadier, ernannt. Er folgt auf Brigadier Peter Soller, den der Bundesrat am 12. März 2021 zum Kommandanten Br Peter Bruns Lehrverband Fliegerabwehr 33 ernannt hat. (Vollständige Medienmitteilung abrufbar unter: 2 https://www.admin.ch/gov/de/start/dokumentation/medienmitteilungen.msg-id-83579.html) latribune.fr Rafale, F-35, Eurofighter The Swiss Federal Council is expected to announce the choice of its future fighter aircraft by the end of June.
    [Show full text]
  • JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX
    NISSAN 5768 / APRIL 2008, VOL. 13 Green and Clean JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX NISSAN 5768 / APRIL 2008, VOL. 13 Green and Clean JCT Develops Solutions to Environmental Problems P.O.BOX 16031, JERUSALEM 91160 ISRAEL 91160 JERUSALEM 16031, P.O.BOX COMMENTARY JERUSALEM COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY PRESIDENT Shalom! opportunity to receive an excellent education Prof. Joseph S. Bodenheimer allowing them to become highly-skilled, ROSH HAYESHIVA Rabbi Z. N. Goldberg Of the many things sought after professionals. More important ROSH BEIT HAMIDRASH we are proud at JCT, for our students is the opportunity available Rabbi Natan Bar Chaim nothing is more RECTOR at the College to receive an education Prof. Joseph M. Steiner prized than our focusing on Jewish values. It is this DIRECTOR-GENERAL students. In every education towards values that has always Dr. Shimon Weiss VICE PRESIDENT FOR DEVELOPMENT issue of “Perspective” been the hallmark of JCT and it is this AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS we profile one of our students as a way of commitment to Jewish ethical values that Reuven Surkis showing who they are and of sharing their forms the foundation from which Israeli accomplishments with you. society will grow and flourish - and our EDITORS Our student body of 2,500 is a students and graduates take pride in being Rosalind Elbaum, Debbie Ross, Penina Pfeuffer microcosm of Israeli society: 21% are Olim committed to this process. DESIGN & PRODUCTION (immigrants) from the former Soviet Union, As we approach the Pesach holiday, the Studio Fisher Ethiopia, South America, North America, 60th anniversary of the State of Israel and JCT Perspective invites the submission of arti- Europe, Australia and South Africa, whilst the 40th anniversary of JCT, let us reaffirm cles and press releases from the public.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Commercial Spaceports
    The New Commercial Spaceports Derek Webber1 Spaceport Associates, Rockville, Maryland 20852,USA During the second half of the 20th Century, the first launch sites were established, mostly during the ‘fifties and ‘sixties. They were originally a product of the cold war and served military and civil government purposes. They were used for launching sounding rockets, space probes, for missile testing and injecting military, scientific, and eventually commercial satellites into orbit. Initially the sites were in either the USA or the former Soviet Union, but gradually they were introduced in other countries too. Governmental astronaut crews were also sent into orbit from these early launch sites. As the 21st Century begins, a new era is emerging where a fuller range of commercial missions will be undertaken and moreover where public space travel will become common place. This situation ushers in a new kind of launch facility, known as the commercial spaceport. I. Introduction here will be vastly different requirements for the future public space travelers, and their families and friends, T than are normally available at the traditional launch sites built fifty years ago. Indeed, the creation of this emerging kind of facility, the commercial spaceport, is in some ways a very necessary part of the creation of the new space businesses that the twenty-first century offers. It will be essential that, while the space tourism companies are becoming established in order to provide services to the new public space travelers, suitable ground based facilities will be developed in parallel to sustain and support these operations. This paper provides an insight into these commercial spaceport facilities, and their characteristics, in order to assist in both design and business planning processes.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 the GLOBAL COMMERCIAL
    MIT Japan Program Working Paper 01.10 THE GLOBAL COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY: JAPAN IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Saadia M. Pekkanen Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Middlebury College Middlebury, VT 05753 [email protected] I am grateful to Marco Caceres, Senior Analyst and Director of Space Studies, Teal Group Corporation; Mark Coleman, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency (CPIA), Johns Hopkins University; and Takashi Ishii, General Manager, Space Division, The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies (SJAC), Tokyo, for providing basic information concerning launch vehicles. I also thank Richard Samuels and Robert Pekkanen for their encouragement and comments. Finally, I thank Kartik Raj for his excellent research assistance. Financial suppport for the Japan portion of this project was provided graciously through a Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Harvard Academy of International and Area Studies. MIT Japan Program Working Paper Series 01.10 Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E38-7th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 Phone: 617-252-1483 Fax: 617-258-7432 Date of Publication: July 16, 2001 © MIT Japan Program Introduction Japan has been seriously attempting to break into the commercial space launch vehicles industry since at least the mid 1970s. Yet very little is known about this story, and about the politics and perceptions that are continuing to drive Japanese efforts despite many outright failures in the indigenization of the industry. This story, therefore, is important not just because of the widespread economic and technological merits of the space launch vehicles sector which are considerable. It is also important because it speaks directly to the ongoing debates about the Japanese developmental state and, contrary to the new wisdom in light of Japan's recession, the continuation of its high technology policy as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Launch Alternatives
    Chapter 4 Lightsats Lightsats are satellites that are light enough to be to shoot them down,’ said Dr. John Mansfield, launched by small launch vehicles such as a Scout or while Director of DARPA’s Aerospace and Strate- Pegasus, or others now in development. Military gic Technology Office.3 lightsats could be designed for wartime deployment or replenishment from survivable transportable launch- SPACECRAFT CONCEPTS ers to support theater commanders. Civil lightsats, The first lightsat developed by DARPA’s Ad- and some military ones, would not require transport- vanced Satellite Technology Program was a commu- able launchers; they could be launched by a wider nications satellite, the Global Low-Orbit Message variety of launch vehicles, including larger ones. Relay (GLOMR; see figure 4-l). Weighing only 150 The first Soviet and U.S. satellites were lightsats, lb, GLOMR was launched by the Space Shuttle on according to this definition. Explorer I, the first U.S. October 31, 1985, into a 200-mile-high orbit in- satellite, weighed only 31 lb but collected data that clined 57 by degrees. led to the discovery of the Van Allen radiation belt. DARPA has ordered nine more UHF communica- But in another sense, the first satellites were fat—as tion satellites from Defense Systems, Inc., the heavy as early launch vehicles could launch. As larger launch vehicles were developed, larger, more contractor that built the GLOMR. Seven of these, called Microsats, will weigh approximately 50 lb capable satellites were developed to ride them. each. These satellites will be launched together into Nevertheless, small satellites continue to be launched for civil and military applications that a polar orbit 400 nautical miles high by the Pegasus launch vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • 514137 Journal of Space Law 35.2.Ps
    JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW VOLUME 35, NUMBER 2 Winter 2009 1 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF LAW A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO SPACE LAW AND THE LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISING OUT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE. VOLUME 35 WINTER 2009 NUMBER 2 Editor-in-Chief Professor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, J.D. Executive Editor Jacqueline Etil Serrao, J.D., LL.M. Articles Editors Business Manager Meredith Blasingame Michelle Aten P.J. Blount Marielle Dirkx Senior Staff Assistant Chris Holly Melissa Wilson Jeanne Macksoud Doug Mains Staff Assistant Kiger Sigh Je’Lisa Hairston John Wood Founder, Dr. Stephen Gorove (1917-2001) All correspondence with reference to this publication should be directed to the JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW, P.O. Box 1848, University of Mississippi School of Law, University, Mississippi 38677; [email protected]; tel: +1.662.915.6857, or fax: +1.662.915.6921. JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW. The subscription rate for 2009 is $100 U.S. for U.S. domestic/individual; $120 U.S. for U.S. domestic/organization; $105 U.S. for non-U.S./individual; $125 U.S. for non-U.S./organization. Single issues may be ordered at $70 per issue. For non-U.S. airmail, add $20 U.S. Please see subscription page at the back of this volume. Copyright © Journal of Space Law 2009. Suggested abbreviation: J. SPACE L. ISSN: 0095-7577 JOURNAL OF SPACE LAW UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI SCHOOL OF LAW A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO SPACE LAW AND THE LEGAL PROBLEMS ARISING OUT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES IN OUTER SPACE. VOLUME 35 WINTER 2009 NUMBER 2 CONTENTS Foreword ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Launch for Small Satellites: an American/Russian Joint Venture
    I I SEA-LAUNCH FOR SMALL SATELLITES I AN AMERICAN/RUSSIAN JOINT VENTURE I by John E. Draim I Sea-Launch Investors, Inc. Fairfax. Virginia, I I Introduction I Abstract In the last half of the 1990's, there will be a This pap~r describes practical means of dramatic increase in the number of small and I. bypassing the two major impediments to the medium satellites being placed in Low Earth Orbit. commercial exploitation of space. These two Major contributors will be the Big- and Little- LEO impediments. or constraints, are the affordability. commercial communications satellite developers now I reliability. and availability of launch vehicles on the one hand. and the affordability. availability, and I flexibility of launch facilities on the other hand. As to the former, US launch vehicles are noted for their vying for the opportunity to develop satellite based technological complexity, their high cost, and their cellular phone services for vast areas not now I susceptibility to Single point failures. As to the covered by terrestrial cellular providers. Also, latter, our land launch facilities are costly, satellites will be orbited for various types of inadequate and congested. Schedule delays on one observation (landsat, oceanography, weather, ozone I launch cause delays for all succeeding launches sensors. etc.) It appears obvious that lower launch from a given launch pad. costs would also encourage an increase in the popularity of university and amateur scientific I The conversion of suitable military rockets satellites. Capitalizing on the obvious (as well as the (and specifically surplus SLBMs) into satellite launch not-so-obvious) advantages of the floating sea­ vehicles will use already paid-for assets and will launch, we can provide added flexibility with lower I minimize costs for new construction as well as cost than by merely continuing along the more rocket fuels and oxidizers.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Launch Report
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Featuring the launch results from the previous quarter and forecasts for the next two quarters. 4th Quarter 1996 U n i t e d S t a t e s D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n • F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n A s s o c i a t e A d m i n i s t r a t o r f o r C o m m e r c i a l S p a c e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT 1 4TH QUARTER REPORT Objectives This report summarizes recent and scheduled worldwide commercial, civil, and military orbital space launch events. Scheduled launches listed in this report are vehicle/payload combinations that have been identified in open sources, including industry references, company manifests, periodicals, and government documents. Note that such dates are subject to change. This report highlights commercial launch activities, classifying commercial launches as one or more of the following: • Internationally competed launch events (i.e., launch opportunities considered available in principle to competitors in the international launch services market), • Any launches licensed by the Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation of the Federal Aviation Administration under U.S.
    [Show full text]