Contribution of Fiscal Decentralization To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contribution of Fiscal Decentralization To Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS) Vol. 40, No. 3 (2020), pp. 1343-1356 Imperial Women: Patrons of Political Power in the Ottoman Empire (1520-1660) Fatima Ali PhD Research Scholar, Department of History & Pakistan Studies The Women University Multan-Pakistan Email: [email protected] Asmat Naz Professor, Department of History & Pakistan Studies The Women University Multan-Pakistan Email: [email protected] Abstract: The 16th and early 17th centuries were the ages of intense difficulty in the Ottoman history, when the women were seen as the sovereign, who exercised the power through the administrative network beyond the walls of the royal palace or harem. On the other side, they worked as the social instrument. They were playing their role not only in social progress, but also in social integration, solidarity, national consciousness and progressiveness through social welfare activities as the patrons of Ottoman architecture. The proposed study through deductive research approach emphasizes on the sovereignty of royal women and their role in the Ottoman harem and the politics of the empire. During women sovereign period, the age old traditions of the empire deeply affected as the rule of succession had changed, the alliances between the harem and the imperial officials were increased as well as the Sultans mainly relied on the women especially Valide Sultan and their favourites. This era can be generalized in the light of women‟s contribution as the politicians, diplomats and the socialists. It is necessary to examine the flaws of the Ottoman political system by making periodization in itself, in order to explain the stages of the setback faced by the Ottoman Empire because of women politics of power and rule behind the scene. Thus, the imperial women of the empire centralized the power system and directly influenced the reigning Sultans and the political institutions of the Ottomans. Keywords: Ottoman Empire, Women, Harem, Politics, Power I. The Ottoman Empire: An Overview The Ottoman history is a unique blend of greatness, expansions, cultures, civilization, and the heterogeneous societies. A number of powerful Ottoman Sultans ruled on Turkey and large areas of Asia, Africa and Europe for more than six centuries. It was considered the greatest empire of the world after Taimurid dynasty established by Amir Taimur (1336-1405AD). The Ottoman Empire, its system, military, people and the expansions always had fascinated the historians and researchers and highly influenced the people and regions of the Middle East, the Balkans, Central and Western Europe. The Ottoman Empire emerged in the last decade of thirteenth century after decline of Saljuks 1344 Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 40, No. 3 (1037-1194AD). The Ottoman Turks belonged to a small tribe of the mass nomadic Turk clan, who had its place to those regions which now included in Mongolia. These nomadic tribes lived in the regions of the Altai Mountains, situated in the east of Eurasian steppes and south of Yenisei River and the Lake Baikal. These tribes did not follow any organized system of administration, traditions and the laws of settlement. Lord Eversley in his book „The Turkish Empire‟ says that for a long time the Ottomans produced able rulers, who were capable to lead their armies. The Ottomans were pure Turkish in blood but very soon it had diluted because of the indulgence of non-Turkish slaves. The reason is that, the royal women (both mothers and concubines) of future Sultans belonged to different regions as they had come as slaves in the Ottoman harem. So, the political decadence of the empire had increased in the absence of charismatic and powerful Ottoman Sultans. Suraiya Faroqhi elaborated that the Ottoman Empire was a state of many people, who contained on various social groups which were openly and covertly at odds with one another. In such heterogeneous society, there were social and cultural conflicts rather than the class differences. The women in the Ottoman society had their own rights of property and social contacts. They were allowed to indulge in the socio- cultural and economic development of the empire through their business and social welfare activities. The Ottoman rulers had adopted Islamic laws and implemented them on the multi-ethnic society. They had the objectives to prepare a coalescent society under an Islamic empire, while Halil Sahillioglu presented a view on the economic and social condition of the empire from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The economy of the empire based on trade, business, revenue and amount got by the sale of slaves etc. The economic changes in Europe and Middle East also affected the economy of the Ottoman Empire. The value of coin and currency was maintained at a high level in the 15th and 16th centuries. Furthermore, the society of the empire was based on the heterogeneous communities including Christians and Muslims. The Christians and other people sold out as the slaves and they were hired in the industries as labors. Colin Imber viewed that the Ottoman Empire was not entirely Islamic and Turkish but a dynastic empire, which demanded loyalty and adherence to the Sultan by the inhabitants. It has studied the Ottomans general history as well as the system of empire, divisions of the power between subjects and the institutions in the sixteenth and mid seventeenth centuries. The Turks accommodated by the Saljuks in their boundary areas where, the Turkish nomads under the Ertoghrul got a territory as fief. After death of Ertoghrul, his son, Osman I (real founder of the empire) had acted as the fief holder of the Seljuks but later on he declared his independence with the title of Amir and decided to extend his territory on his own behalf. The Ottomans had controlled almost all areas of Asia Minor, but some regions in its north west such as Brusa, Nicaea, Nicomedia, Bosporus and the Hellespont were not in their possessions on which the Byzantine emperors ruled. However, after the decline of vast Byzantine Empire all these regions came in the hands of Muslims. By the territorial expansion, the people of different faiths mainly Christians and others too had come into the possessions of the Ottomans, who accepted Islam. The efforts of Ottoman rulers at an early age had turned the Ottoman Empire from an unimportant border territory into a great empire that included the vast areas of Balkans and Asia Minor. As a result, the new state embodied a population that had 1345 comprised not only of Turks, but a large number of people belonged to Greeks, Byzantines, Russians including slaves etc. These people accepted the suzerainty of Turks and accepted Islam as their religion. For centuries, the Ottoman Empire underwent extreme development, both in its form and in the concentration of power within the administrative apparatus. In the early age of the Ottomans, the administration and other jobs of the state were performed by the elites (boys), Turkoman leaders, Ottoman monarchs and princes treated equally by the Ottoman Sultan. The elites entered in the Ottoman services as the military men and the administrators to get power, wealth and prosperity. In the last decades of the 16thcentury, in the ruling era of Sultan Suleyman (1520-1566), the political power apparently remained in the hands of Sultan but gradually shifted to others in his household or harem. Apparently, Sultan Suleyman I was the most powerful and successful ruler of the Ottomans, when the empire got utmost enormity, economic prosperity and institutions strengthen by the written laws and sharia rules. In other words, the empire was at its zenith in the political stability, economic and territorial prosperity. However internally, the conflicts and contradictions had begun among the elites, Sultan and the palace women as well. According to the historians, it was the period when the political system of the empire dispersed because of the party politics of imperial women like mother of Sultan, legal wife, favourites and their concubines as well. The women‟s political period within the walls of the palace consisted of almost one hundred and forty years, which highly influenced the political system of the Ottoman Empire. II. The Ottoman Royal Harem In the Muslim world and their societies, the harem (the women of the house) explained as the women's quarter or living place. The harem was considered an essential part of the Muslim culture and women living places kept separately or at a distance from the men living places in the houses/palaces. It refers to prohibition, unlawfulness, veneration, sacredness and inviolability. It was considered a space, an institution and a respectable place for the family, especially for the women in the context of imperial and native harem, where it was constructed in the name of honour, comfort and the protection of women. Moreover, the construction of social, cultural and religious institutions of harem was the integral part between the will to protect and maintain the honour of women. It also elaborates the concept of patriarchal system in the Islamic world particularly in the context of the harem. Yet, in the Ottoman society, the women commonly enjoyed liberty, social rights and honour as well. This capacity and flexibility could also be seen in the political system of the Ottomans, which permitted the Ottoman royal women to enhance their capabilities and indulged in the administration of the empire. The female sovereignty, which referred to the reign of Women dominancy, had originated in the early 16th century and continued until the first half of 17th century under the reign of Sultan Muhammad and his mother Turhan Sultan. In the classical period of Ottomans, powerful women of the inner palace/harem played an active and effective role in the political and administrative life of the Ottoman Empire.
Recommended publications
  • A TRIBUTE to the KINGLY VIRTUES of SULTAN AHMED I (R
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Istanbul Sehir University Repository A TRIBUTE TO THE KINGLY VIRTUES OF SULTAN AHMED I (r. 1603- 1617): HOCAZÂDE ABDÜLAZİZ EFENDİ (d. 1618) AND HIS AHLÂK-I SULTÂN AHMEDÎ A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF İSTANBUL ŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BY SEMRA ÇÖREKÇİ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY SEPTEMBER 2012 ABSTRACT This thesis aims to offer a literary-historical analysis of Ahlâk-ı Sultân Ahmedî (Morals of Sultân Ahmed), an early seventeenth-century Ottoman treatise on ethics prepared for Sultan Ahmed I (r. 1603-1617). This work of ethics was originally written in Persian in 1494-5 under the title, Ahlâk-ı Muhsinî (Morals of Muhsin), by Hüseyin Vâiz Kâşifî, a renowned Timurid scholar and intellectual. This work of ethics was dedicated to the Timurid ruler, Hüseyin Baykara (r. 1469-1506), but the main adressee was his son Ebu‘l-Muhsin Mirza. In around 1610, Ahmed I ordered a translation of this Persian work into Ottoman Turkish, a task which was completed, with some critical additions, in 1612 by Hocazâde Abdülaziz Efendi (d. 1618), the fourth son of the famous Hoca Sadeddin Efendi (d. 1599). Overall, this thesis is an attempt to provide a critical examination of Ahlâk-ı Sultân Ahmedî particularly with respect to the question of how such a translated book on ethics was used as a tool to create as well as to legitimize a powerful image of the Ottoman sultan at a time of crisis and change in the Ottoman imperial and dynastic establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Valide Sultan
    Valide sultan Osmanlı'da (والده سلطان :Valide Sultan (Osmanlıca Sedef-i Dürr-i Hilafet olarak da bilinen, Osmanlı pa- dişahlarının saltanatları sırasında hayatta olan annelerine verilen unvandı. Abdülaziz'in annesi Pertevniyal Sultan tarafından yaptırılmış Pertevniyal Valide Sultan Camii birlikte Valide Sultan'ların etkisi tekrar azaldı, tekrar ge- leneksel görevleri olan hayır işlerine döndüler. Kadınlar saltanatı'nın başlatıcısı olan Haseki Hürrem Sultan. İlki Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Han'ın Annesi Ayşe Hafsa Sultan olmak üzere Osmanlı padişahları tahta çıktıkları zaman anneleri de Valide Sultan unvanını alarak büyük bir siyasi güce ve oldukça yüksek miktarda bir gelire sa- hip olurlardı. Valide Sultanlar bu geliri genellikle hastane, külliye, camii ve medrese inşa ettirmek için kullanırlar, bazen de fakirlere yiyecek dağıtmak, sünnet ettirmek, dü- ğün yapmak gibi hayır işleri yaparlardı. İstanbul'da Safiye Sultan tarafından yaptırılmış Yeni Camii 1 Tarihçe Osmanlı Devleti'nin son dönemlerindeki Valide Sultan- Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Han döneminde Ayşe Hafsa lardan Bezmialem Sultan ve Pertevniyal Sultan İstan- Sultan'ın padişah üzerinde etkisi çok büyük olmuştur. Zi- bul'daki birçok saray, cami, hastane ve okul inşaatlarına ra kendisi ilk Valide Sultandır. Onun dışında Valide Sul- imzalarını atmışlardır. Osmanlı Devleti'nin en son Vali- tanlar genellikle siyasete karışmazlardı. Ancak kadınlar de Sultanı II. Abdülhamid'in manevi annesi Piristû Kadın saltanatı adı verilen dönemde başlatıcısı Hürrem Sultan Efendidir. Padişahın öz annesi olmamasına rağmen padi- ve diğerleri ; Nurbanu Sultan, Safiye Sultan ve özellikle şah tarafından Valide Sultanlık unvanına getirilmiş, 1904 Kösem Sultan devlet yönetiminde söz sahibi olmuşlardır. yılındaki ölümüne kadar bu görevde kalmıştır. II. Abdül- Kösem Sultan oğlu IV. Murad tahta çıktığında 11 yaşın- hamit'ten sonraki padişahlar tahta çıktıklarında anneleri da olduğu için naiplik sıfatıyla devleti bizzat yönetmiş- ölmüş olduklarından 1904 yılında Valide Sultanlık kuru- tir.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperfect Bodies, Perfect Companions? Dwarfs and Mutes at the Ottoman Court in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries
    IMPERFECT BODIES, PERFECT COMPANIONS? DWARFS AND MUTES AT THE OTTOMAN COURT IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES by Ay şe Ezgi Dikici Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University November 2006 IMPERFECT BODIES, PERFECT COMPANIONS? DWARFS AND MUTES AT THE OTTOMAN COURT IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES Ay şe Ezgi Dikici Sabancı University APPROVED BY: Asst. Prof. Dr. Yusuf Hakan Erdem ............................................... (Thesis Supervisor) Asst. Prof. Dr. Hülya Adak …........................................... Asst. Prof. Dr. Hülya Canbakal ............................................... DATE OF APPROVAL: 15.11.2006 © Ay şe Ezgi Dikici, 2006 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT IMPERFECT BODIES, PERFECT COMPANIONS? DWARFS AND MUTES AT THE OTTOMAN COURT IN THE SIXTEENTH AND SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES Ay şe Ezgi Dikici History, MA Thesis, 2006 Thesis Supervisor: Yusuf Hakan Erdem Keywords: dwarf, mute, jester, companion, court This thesis is a preliminary study that aims to understand the roles and functions of dwarfs and mutes at the Ottoman court with the symbolic and practical dimensions. In this study, the mute and dwarf employment at the Ottoman court is considered both within the context of the world-wide practices of keeping court jesters and their common origins, and with regard to its relation to the peculiar conditions of the Ottoman court in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The question whether there existed in the Ottoman case the type of court jester who was able to criticize and mock the monarch is discussed in the thesis to display the nature of dwarfs’ and mutes’ role as the sultan’s boon companions.
    [Show full text]
  • Handan Sultan
    Handan Sultan Handan Sultan (d. 1574- ö. 12 Kasım 1605) Osman- lı padişahı Sultan III. Mehmet'in eşlerinden ve padişah Sultan I. Ahmet'in annesi, Valide Sultan'dır.[1][2][3][4] Kocası III. Mehmed'in Türbesinde yer alan Handan Sultan'ın adı yazılı olan kitabe. 1 Kimliği Handan Sultan'ın doğum yılı ve milliyeti hakkında kesin bir bilgi yoktur. Rum asıllı olduğu ve adının Helen oldu- ğu tarihî verilere dayanmayan iddialardır.[2] 1603 yılında Handan Sultan'ın oğlu I. Ahmed tarafından yaptırılan Sultan oğlu I. Ahmet 13 yaşında tahta çıkarılınca Valide Sultan Ahmet Camii iç görünümü. oldu. İki yıl boyunca oğlu adına bizzat Osmanlı Devle- ti'ni yönetti. Kendisine ''Devletlu İsmetlu Handan Vali- de Sultan Aliyyetü'ş-Şân Hazretleri'' olarak hitap edilir- Handan Sultan yaşadığı müddet boyunca oğlu Şehzade di. Ölüm yılı tartışmalı olsa da son yapılan çalışmalar ile Ahmed'in terbiyesi ile ilgilendi.[9] vakfiye belgeleri, Venedik doçe raporları incelendiğinde 1605 yılının sonlarında öldüğü belirlenmiştir.[5] 2 Haseki Sultanlık Dönemi 1.1 Hareme Girişi Handan Sultan, son incelenen Balyos Raporları'na göre 18 Nisan 1590 yılında oğlu I. Ahmed'i dünyaya getiren Boşnak asıllı ve Cerrah Mehmed Paşa'nın cariyelerinden Handan Sultan baş haseki olmaması sebebiyle şanssız bir olan bir kızdı.[6] Güzelliğinden dolayı o dönemde Mani- konumdaydı. Fakat tahtta gözü olduğu inancıyla Şehzade sa sancak beyi olan III. Mehmed'e hediye edilmiştir.Yani Mahmud aleyhinde yapılan pek çok faaliyet vardı. Şehza- kısaca Handan Sultan 1583 yılının ikinci yarısında ha- de Mahmud'un rakibi olabilecek tek erkek evlat da Şeh- [7] zade Ahmed olduğundan annesi Handan Sultan ile baba- reme girmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • FACTIONS and FAVORITES at the COURTS of SULTAN AHMED I (R. 1603-17) and HIS IMMEDIATE PREDECESSORS
    FACTIONS AND FAVORITES AT THE COURTS OF SULTAN AHMED I (r. 1603-17) AND HIS IMMEDIATE PREDECESSORS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Günhan Börekçi Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Jane Hathaway, Chair Professor Howard Crane Professor Stephen F. Dale Copyright by Günhan Börekçi 2010 All rights reserved ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the changing dynamics of power and patronage relations at the Ottoman sultan’s court in Istanbul between the 1570s and the 1610s. This was a crucial period that many scholars today consider the beginning of a long era of “crisis and transformation” in the dynastic, political, socio-economic, military and administrative structures of the early modern Ottoman Empire. The present study focuses on the politics of factionalism and favoritism at the higher echelons of the Ottoman ruling elite who were situated in and around Topkapı Palace, which served as both the sultan’s royal residence and the seat of his imperial government. It is an effort to shed light on the political problems of this period through the prism of the paramount ruling figure, the sultan, by illustrating how the Ottoman rulers of this era, namely, Murad III (r. 1574-95), Mehmed III (r. 1595-1603) and Ahmed I (r. 1603-17), repositioned themselves in practical politics vis-à-vis alternative foci of power and networks of patronage, and how they projected power in the context of a factional politics that was intertwined with the exigencies of prolonged wars and incessant military rebellions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahfiruze Hatice Sultan
    Mahfiruze hatice sultan Continue Mahfiruz SultanUbius place Of Mahfiruz Khatun is located at the height of the Golden Horn inside the Eiyupa Cemetery in Eyyup, Istanbul. 1590Diedby 1610 or c. 1620Topap Palace, Istanbul, Cemetery of the Ottoman EmpireBurial Eyup, Istanbul, Ottoman EmpireSpoly IIssueOsman II'ehzade Meh y Faraz Glorious Moon The Day Moon, or Day Moon, circa 1590, by 1610 or 1620, was the suggestor of the Ottoman sultan Ahmed I (b. 1603- ﻣﺎه ﻓﻴﺮوز ReligionIslam Mahfiruz Khatun (from persian ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮوز ﺧﺎﺗﻮن :Bayesidshezadeh HuseyinFull nameTurchi: MahfiruzEngli: MahifirozToman Turkish 17) and the mother of Sultan Osman II (b. 1618-22). According to historian Baki Tezkan, nothing is known about her except her probable name and period of death. Her court name, Mahfiruz, means Glorious Crescent in Persian. Such names were given to the women of Imperial Harem. She was the first of three women of Ahmed I and gave birth to him Osman II. With the birth of Osman II. With the birth of Osman II, the couple's first child, Ahmed became the youngest Ottoman sultan to become a father, and Osman became the first Ottoman firstborn born in the imperial capital of Istanbul. The release of Sultan Osman II (November 3, 1604, Istanbul, Topkapa Palace - killed by Janissaris, May 20, 1622, Istanbul, Topkape Palace, buried in the mausoleum of Ahmed I, Sultan Ahmed Mosque) zehzade Bayezid (November 1612 - killed by Murad IV, July 27, 1635, Constantinople, Touppa Palace, buried in the mausoleum of Ahmed I, sultan Ahmed Mosque); (November 1614, Constantinople - after 1622, Constantinople, Topkap Palace, buried in the mausoleum of Mehmed III, Mosque of Hagia Sofia).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Ottoman Harem (On Ethnicity, Religion and War)
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Iyigun, Murat Working Paper Lessons from the Ottoman Harem (on ethnicity, religion and war) IZA Discussion Papers, No. 3556 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Iyigun, Murat (2008) : Lessons from the Ottoman Harem (on ethnicity, religion and war), IZA Discussion Papers, No. 3556, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2008062558 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/34957 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu IZA DP No. 3556 Lessons from the Ottoman Harem (On Ethnicity, Religion and War) Murat Iyigun DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER June 2008 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Lessons from the Ottoman Harem (On Ethnicity, Religion and War) Murat Iyigun University of Colorado, CID, Harvard University and IZA Discussion Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Debut of Kösem Sultan's Political Career
    2015-09_Turcica40_15_Tezcan 02-07-2009 09:28 Pagina 347 Baki TEZCAN 347 THE DEBUT OF KÖSEM SULTAN’S POLITICAL CAREER For Leslie Peirce, in gratitude for her encouragement and support of my work K ösem Sultan (d. 1651) is a very well known figure of seventeenth century Ottoman history. Her political role during the reigns of his sons Murad IV (1623-40) and Ibrahim (1640-48), and the early reign of Mehmed IV (1648-87) is well attested in the sources, analyzed in con- temporary Ottoman historiography, and even fictionalized in literature.1 All sources agree that she was the favorite concubine of Ahmed I (1603- 17). Twentieth century studies tend to date the starting date of her prominence to a couple of years before the birth of Murad IV in 1612.2 A closer look at the seventeenth century sources, however, suggests that her political career started earlier, soon after the succession of Ahmed I to the Ottoman throne. The present piece will substantiate this claim and argue that Kösem Sultan should be assigned a more significant role in the politics of succession during the reign of Ahmed I. Baki TEZCAN is Assistant Professor of History and Religious Studies, University of Cali- fornia, Davis, CA 95616-8611, USA e-mail∞: [email protected]. 1 See, for instance, the many references to Kösem Sultan in Leslie P. PEIRCE, The Imperial Harem∞: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire, New York, Oxford University Press, 1993∞; as examples of fiction and fictionalized popular histories about her, one could cite Re≥at Ekrem KOÇU, Kösem Sultan, 2 vols., Istanbul, Kervan Yayınları, 1972∞; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Yüzyıl Dönümünde Bir Valide Sultan: Safiye Sultan'ın Hayatı Ve Eserleri
    T.C. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜZYIL DÖNÜMÜNDE BİR VALİDE SULTAN: SAFİYE SULTAN’IN HAYATI VE ESERLERİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Mustafa ALTUN Enstitü Anabilim Dalı : Tarih Enstitü Bilim Dalı : Osmanlı Müesseseleri ve Medeniyeti Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Arif BİLGİN AĞUSTOS – 2019 ÖNSÖZ Vâlide Safiye Sultan, 16. yüzyıl Osmanlı tarihinin en önemli şahsiyetlerinden birisidir. "Kadınlar Saltanatı" olarak adlandırılan 16. ve 17. Yüzyıllar bu alanda tam incelenememiş olup, az olan akademik literatür ise dağınık vaziyettedir. Bu çalışmamızda Valide Safiye Sultan hakkındaki mevcut akademik literatürü derleyerek ve yeni bulunan bilgileri eklemeye çalışarak Valide Safiye Sultan’ın hayatına ışık tutmaya çalıştık. Başta, büyük bir sabırla yoğun bir literatür okuma ve yazım sürecinde bana destek olan saygıdeğer danışmanım Prof. Dr. Arif BİLGİN hocama, bana çok değerli kitaplar önererek ufkumu açan Arş. Gör. Şaduman TUNCER hocama, tüm bu zorlu süreçte yanımda olup beni motive eden dostlarım Yasemin GÜNDOĞDU, Tuğba DEMİRCİ, Fatma ALTIOK, Ümmügülsüm KAYĞUSUZ, Esra TOKER’e okumalarımı yapan editör Merve KIRMAN, Dilek TUTAN ve Ezgi MARANGOZ’a eserlerinden faydalandığım bütün değerli hocalara ve son olarak maddi manevi desteklerini benden esirgemeyen ve tezimi okuyarak fikirlerini benimle paylaşan ablalarım Şehnaz ALTUN KELEŞ, Hümeyra DEMİRCİOĞLU, Zübeyda CİRİT ve Züleyha GELEÇ’e, her an yolumu aydınlatan babam İzzet ALTUN’a ve benim “Valide Sultanım” sevgili annem Zehra ALTUN‘a teşekkürü bir borç bilirim. Mustafa Altun 29.08.2019 İÇİNDEKİLER
    [Show full text]
  • Safiye Sultan
    Safiye Sultan Haseki Safiye Valide Sultan veya Melike Safiye Vâli- için aradığı kız olduğuna karar verdi ve bir servet ödeye- .doğum adı: Sofia rek kızı satın aldı صفیه سلطان :de Sultan (Osmanlıca Bellicui Baffo, d. 1548 - ö. Ocak 1619[1]), Osmanlı Padişahı III. Murad'ın eşi ve Sultan III. Mehmed'in an- nesi. Osmanlı'nın ilk Büyük Valide Sultan'ıdır (Padişahın hayatta olan babaannesine denir). 1.2 Saraya gelişi İki yıl süreyle haremde eğitim gören Sofia'nın adı, Safi- ye, yani arı, duru, saf güzellik olarak değiştirildi. On beş yaşında III. Murad'a sunulan Safiye, beline kadar uzanan sarı saçları, iri gözleri, uzun boyu, beyaz teni ve yürüyü- şüyle Murad'ı kendisine aşık etti. 1.3 Haseki Sultanlık dönemi Safiye Sultan, III. Murad tahta geçince baş kadın oldu. Büyüleyici güzelliği ve parlak zekâsı sayesinde büyük Eşi III. Murad'ın Türbesinde yer alan üzerinde Safiye Sultan'ın bir nüfuz sahibi oldu. Bu nüfuzu yeni Valide Sultan olan da buraya defnedilmiş olduğunu kanıtlayan kitabe. Nurbanu Sultan tehdit olarak gördü ve ondan kurtulmak istedi. Bu rekabetin öncüleri Mihrimah Sultan, Esmehan Sultan ve Gevherhan Sultan idi. Sultan Murad'a her gün 1 Kimliği yeni bir cariye sunuldu ve Safiye Sultan'ın düşmanları onu gözden düşürmek istediler. Ancak III. Murad'ın gözü hep en sevdiği hasekisine baktı. 1585'ten itibaren güçlü ka- Kökeni hakkında kesin bir bilgi olmamakla birlikte çe- dın düşmanları yoktu, ama halen kadın rakipleri vardı. şitli rivayetler vardır. O dönemin Venedik kaynaklarında Bunlar; Mihriban Haseki Sultan, Şahuban Haseki Sultan, Dukakin'de Rezi köyünde doğduğu ve Arnavut kökenli Nazperver Haseki Sultan, Şemşi Ruhsar Haseki Sultan, [2] olduğu belirtilir.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 VESNA MIOVIC Annals 2018.Indd
    Dubrovnik Annals 22 (2018): 95-142 95 Original paper UDC: 94(560:497.584 Dubrovnik) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21857/ydkx2cr1r9 PER FAVORE DELLA SOLTANA: POWERFUL OTTOMAN WOMEN AND RAGUSAN DIPLOMATS* VESNA MIOVIĆ ABSTRACT: This article is based mainly on the letters and instructions written by the Ragusan government to its tribute ambassadors to Istanbul. Also used are the scanty surviving letters that the ambassadors addressed to their government in Dubrovnik. Although only a few Ottoman documents touch upon this topic, the information they provide has proved invaluable for this research. Emphasis has been placed on the Ragusan business dealings with Mihrimah Sultan, famous daughter of Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent, as well as the relations of the Ragusan diplomats and the imperial harem. Keywords: Ottoman Empire, Republic of Dubrovnik, diplomacy, sultanas In 1458 Dubrovnik Republic started paying tribute to the Ottoman Empire. However, it was not until the death of Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror, who, since the conquest of Bosnia in 1463, resorted to various kinds of pressure against the Republic, aimed evidently at its full subjugation, that the Republic This article has already been published in Croatian under the following title: »Per favore della soltana: moćne osmanske žene i dubrovački diplomati«. Anali Zavoda za povijesne znanosti HAZU u Dubrovniku 56/1 (2018): pp. 147-197. Translated by Vesna Baće. * This research has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation, under the project number 5106. Vesna Miović, member of the Institute for Historical Sciences of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts. Address: Zavod za povijesne znanosti HAZU, Lapadska obala 6, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Yedi Emirler Türbesi” Lislâm Mir Ahmet Muhtar Beyefendi’Nin Ve Had›Yla Da Bilinen Türbe, ‹Nadiye Semtinde Muhsin Bey’In Sandukalar› Vard›R
    YÜZYILLAR BOYUNCA ÜSKÜDAR (‹kinci Cilt) Yazar› Mehmet Nermi Haskan . Proje Koordinatörü Veli Saylam Üsküdar Belediyesi Bilgi ‹fllem Müdürü Yay›na Haz›rl›k ve Yap›m Marmara Reklam ve Pazarlama Ltd. fiti. (212) 612 99 87-501 31 72 Redaksiyon Süleyman Nevzat Özdemir Grafik Erkan Berrak Foto¤raflar ve Tarihî Görsel Malzeme Mehmet Nermi Haskan ve Üsküdar Belediyesi Üsküdar Araflt›rmalar› Merkezi Dialar Tayyar As Katk›da Bulunanlar Gülhan Yaman - Yasemin Ufuk Yayla Hülya Çaredar - Ahmet Zahit Emre Kemal Ak›n - Sabri fiahin - Ömer Karc› Renk Ay›r›m› ve Film Sürat Görsel Sanatlar Merkezi (216) 474 08 16-17 Dijital Montaj ve Bask› As›r Matbaac›l›k Ltd. fiti. (212) 283 84 38 Cilt Sezgin Ciltevi (212) 516 11 63 ISBN Numaralar› Tak›m No: ISBN 975-97606-0-6 2. Cilt No: ISBN 975-97606-2-2 . ÜSKÜDAR BELED‹YES‹ Üsküdar Araflt›rmalar› Merkezi Yay›n No: 3 Temmuz 2001 ‹Ç‹NDEK‹LER Üsküdar Türbeleri ...................................................................................................................... 521 KEFÇE DEDE TÜRBES‹ .................................................................................................................... 583 ABACI DEDE TÜRBES‹ ................................................................................................................... 523 KORUCU BABA TÜRBES‹ ......................................................................................................... 584 ABDURRAHMAN GAZ‹ TÜRBES‹ ................................................................................ 524 KÖSTEND‹L‹ AL‹ ALÂADD‹N EFEND‹ TÜRBES‹
    [Show full text]