How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México ISSN: 2007-736X El Colegio de México A.C. Armstrong, Grant The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México, vol. 4, no. 2, 2017, July-December, pp. 137-212 El Colegio de México A.C. Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=525954564004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative ISSN: 2007–736X Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp. 137–212. ARTÍCULO The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya La sintaxis de la predicación no verbal en maya yucateco Grant Armstrong University of Wisconsin-Madison, Estados Unidos [email protected] Original recibido: 2016/07/13 Dictamen enviado al autor: 2016/11/11 Aceptado: 2017/05/03 Abstract The objective of this paper is to fill a void in the formal syntactic literature on Mayan languages by proposing a syntactic structure for clauses with non-verbal predicates in Yucatec Maya. The paper attempts to integrate the rich descriptions of non-verbal predicate constructions found in more functionally-oriented ac- counts (Lehmann 2002 [1998]; Verhoeven 2007; Vapnarsky 2013) with insights from the generative literature on argument licensing and clause structure in Mayan languages (Coon 2016 for an overview) as well as small clauses (Citko 2011 for an overview). I conclude that non-verbal sentences in Yucatec are ma- trix small clauses embedded under an Infl node, which is the locus for finiteness/ stative aspect rather than tense morphology. This simple structure, coupled with independently motivated operations that have been proposed for small clauses and argument licensing/word order in Mayan languages, is able to account for a range of properties of these sentences that improves upon previous accounts developed in Armstrong (2010), Pye (2011) and Coon (2014). Key words: non-verbal predicates, small clauses, Yucatec Maya Cómo citar: Armstrong, Grant. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2). pp. 137–212. 138 Armstrong, G. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya Resumen El objetivo de este trabajo es contribuir a los estudios de sintaxis formal de las lenguas mayas mediante un análisis de las cláusulas con un predicado no verbal del maya yucateco. El trabajo pretende integrar las detalladas descripciones de las construcciones de predicado no verbal que se encuentran en la literatura de orientación funcional (Lehmann 2002 [1998]; Verhoeven 2007; Vapnars- ky 2013) con las recientes propuestas generativistas sobre la legitimación de argumentos y la estructura oracional de las lenguas mayas (véase Coon 2016) y las llamadas cláusulas mínimas (del inglés “small clause”, véase Citko 2011). Se concluye que las oraciones no verbales en maya yucateco son cláusulas mí- nimas incrustadas bajo una proyección Flex (=Infl), que sirve como el núcleo de finitud/aspecto estativo en vez de flexión de tiempo. Se argumenta que esta estructura sencilla y una serie de operaciones morfosintácticas previamente pro- puestas para explicar ciertos aspectos de las cláusulas mínimas y la legitimación de argumentos/orden de palabras en las lenguas mayas permiten dar cuenta de una gama de propiedades de las oraciones no verbales, lo cual representa una mejora con respecto a los análisis previos de Armstrong (2010), Pye (2011) y Coon (2014). Palabras clave: predicados no verbales, cláusulas mínimas, maya yucateco 1. INTRODUCTION Yucatec Maya (Yucatec) and other Mayan languages have fully-fledged sentences that consist only of a non-verbal predicate and a bound mor- pheme that cross-references the argument of that predicate, labeled Set B in the Mayanist literature. In Yucatec, the Set B morpheme attaches to the right edge of the predicate as in (1). Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp. 137–212. Armstrong, G. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya 139 (1) a. Koolnáal-en b. Muk’a’an-ech farmer-B1SG strong-BSG ‘I am a farmer’ ‘You are strong’ The objective of this paper is to present a step-by-step argument in favor of analyzing sentences like (1) as in (2). (2) a. Basic configuration [InflP Infl[-dyn], [u], [EPP] [SC [NP koolnáal] [DP -en] ] ] b. Agreement [InflP Infl[-dyn], [u], [EPP] [SC [NP koolnáal] [DP -en] ] ] c. Cliticization [InflP Infl[-dyn], [u], [EPP] [SC [NP koolnáal-en] [DP -en] ] ] d. EPP-driven movement to spec, InflP [InflP [NP koolnáal-en] Infl[-dyn], [u], [EPP] [SC [NP koolnáal-en] [DP -en] ] ] The main claims made are as follows. All non-verbal predicate sen- tences in Yucatec are generated in a basic configuration that consists of a small clause constituent, which establishes the subject-predicate relationship, and an Infl head that acts as the locus of finiteness and stative aspect (specified as [-dyn] since it is in opposition with dynamic Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp. 137–212. 140 Armstrong, G. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya or eventive aspect and mood markers). The Infl[-dyn] head is endowed with uninterpretable features that drive the syntactic derivation in three steps: (i) agreement, (ii) cliticization and (iii) EPP-driven movement. First, a [u ] feature on Infl[-dyn] must be valued and eliminated by the interpretable phi-features of the subject (2b). This agreement relation is also the source of abstract case (absolutive here) for the subject. If the subject is a bound Set B morpheme as in (1), agreement is followed by cliticization. As shown in (2c), the subject cliticizes to the right of the predicate. Finally, Infl[-dyn] has an EPP feature that requires phonological content in its specifier. Since the subject is cliticized to the predicate in (2), the entire complex moves as a unit to spec, InflP. The rest of the paper motivates each of these steps. §2 presents an empirical and theoretical background of hierarchical structure, mor- pheme ordering and argument licensing in verbs and other categories so as to give a more complete picture of the main descriptive properties of Yucatec and how these have been analyzed theoretically. It is a some- what lengthy background section, but it makes for a clearer picture of how verbal and non-verbal predication structures are connected in the language. §3 gives an overview of the main descriptive properties of non-verbal predicates and discusses the shortcomings of previous anal- yses. At the end of the section, I demonstrate how the proposal in (2) improves upon these previous analyses. §4 presents detailed derivations of non-verbal sentences with much more complexity than those in (1), showing how the basic mechanism in (2), when combined with oth- er independently motivated operations, accounts for many heretofore unanalyzed properties of these sentences. §5 concludes. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp. 137–212. Armstrong, G. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya 141 2. BACKGROUND The main objective of this section is to outline a working theory of morpheme ordering and argument licensing in Yucatec by looking first at verb phrases and then at the internal structure of phrases headed by other categories. This will serve not only to provide a background on the basic morpho-syntax of the language but also frame the issues that non-verbal predicates raise both empirically and theoretically, which are outlined in §3. 2.1. Te syntax of the verbal template or complex Yucatec is a null subject and object language in which a verbal template or complex may instantiate a fully-fledged clause that lacks overt lex- ical arguments.1 Such clauses consist of an aspect/mood (AM) marker followed by the verb. The verb itself is composed of three main parts: a root and transitivity marker (verb stem), a suffix known as “status” in the Mayanist literature (Kaufman 1990), which will be explained in more detail below, and a set of morphemes that cross-reference verbal 1 See Blair 1964; Bricker 1981; Lehmann 1993; 2002 [1998]; Bricker et. al. 1998; Boh- nemeyer 2002; Lois & Vapnarsky 2003; Briceño Chel 2006; Verhoeven 2007 for detailed des- criptions of YM clause structure, among other phenomena. The descriptions in this section are based primarily on the observations in these works and not on original observations or data. For details on information structure, relative clauses, word order of full DP arguments, and different types of embedding see Durbin & Ojeda 1978; Bohnemeyer 2002; Briceño Chel 2002; Gutiérrez Bravo & Monforte 2010; Gutiérrez Bravo 2015a; 2015b; Verhoeven & Skopeteas 2015. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp. 137–212. 142 Armstrong, G. 2017. The syntax of non-verbal predication in Yucatec Maya arguments, labeled Set A and Set B, respectively. The examples in (3–5) provide illustrations of these basic components of Yucatec clause struc- ture using a transitive and intransitive verb in the three main inflection- al patterns. (3) Incompletive/indicative pattern. a. Táan in líi’-s-ik-ech PROG A1SG raise-CAUS-TR.INC-BSG ‘I’m lifting you up’ b. Táan in wen-el PROG A1SG sleep-INTR.INC ‘I am sleeping’ (4) Completive pattern. a. T-in líi’-s-aj-ech CP-A1SG raise-CAUS-TR.CP-BSG ‘I lifted you up’ b. J wen-Ø-ech CP sleep-INTR.CP-BSG ‘You slept’ Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 4(2), jul–dic 2017, pp.