ACP Cultural Component of Citizenship

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ACP Cultural Component of Citizenship the CULTURAL COMPONENT of CITIZENSHIP an inventory of challenges The European House for Culture on behalf of the Access to Culture Platform has been funded with the support from the European Commission. This communication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. The Access to Culture Platform is hosted at the European House for Culture. 1 the cultural component of citizenship : an inventory of challenges Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 The Cultural Component of Citizenship: an Inventory of Challenges ............... 6 Steve Austen European Citizenship and the Role of Art and Culture .................................. 10 Mary Ann DeVlieg Citizenship and Culture .................................................................................. 28 DEFINING THE CULTURAL COMPONENT OF CITIZENSHIP 37 Mathieu Kroon Gutiérrez Europe and the Challenge of Virtuous Citizenship. What is the Role of Culture? ....................................................................................................................... 38 HOW IS CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP PRACTICED? 53 Matina Magkou Geographies of Artistic Mobility for the Formation and Confirmation of European Cultural Citizenship. ...................................................................... 54 Natalia Grincheva “Canada’s Got Treasures” Constructing National Identity through Cultural Participation .................................................................................................. 79 Patricia Adkins Chiti Women in Music Uniting Strategies for Talent: Working to Change the Landscape Women in Music. ....................................................................... 100 Ana Tomás Hernández The Museum in Your Hands: Bringing Together Conversation and Social Inclusion. ..................................................................................................... 113 Chaitas Charalampos & Anastasia Kalou Cultural Hutching Nests of Citizenship: a New Role for Contemporary Museums. .................................................................................................... 143 Goran Tomka Do We Need Audience at All? Analyzing Narratives about Audience. ........ 164 Mathieu Rousselin Virtual Arts as Martial Arts: le Tunisian Exhibition in La Marsa .................. 181 2 Pier Luigi Sacco, Guido Ferilli, and Giorgio Tavano Blessi Culture 3.0: A New Perspective for the EU Active Citizenship and Social and Economic Cohesion Policy ............................................................................ 198 WHAT ARE THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF CULTURAL CITIZENSHIP? 219 Izabela Henning The Right to Culture vs the Access to Culture: the Critical View on the Chosen Examples of Law Provisions Concerning the Material Side of Culture ......... 220 A CULTURAL COALITION FOR A CITIZENS’ EUROPE 231 Patrice Meyer-Bisch Cultural Rights, Ends and Means of Democracies? The Protection and the Creation of Cultural Rights, Condition of any Citizenship ............................ 232 Raymond Weber Culture and Citizenship: which Issues for Europe? ....................................... 243 Cristina Ortega & Roberto San Salvador del Valle Key Co-creation and Co-Responsibility in the Governance of Culture .......... 256 A Cultural Coalition for a Citizens’ Europe ................................................... 260 ACCESS TO CULTURE PLATFORM 263 Colophon ...................................................................................................... 268 3 the cultural component of citizenship : an inventory of challenges 4 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 5 the cultural component of citizenship : an inventory of challenges The Cultural Component of Citizenship: an Inventory of Challenges Europe cannot be a mere political framework for the convenience of governments. It must be made clear that the purpose of European integration is primarily to enhance the quality of life for its citizens. The active involvement of citizens is unthinkable without participation that is taken seriously. A Citizens’ Europe implies participation beyond the dry confines of bureaucratic regulation and job creation programmes. It involves all the activities necessary for real social justice and dialogue. It requires the political structures to provide citizens with the mobility, freedom and resources to make the most of the opportunities of our time. We must ask ourselves, why is European citizenship not a topic of discussion in our cafes, schools, parks, museums, the places of everyday life? And the next question then is: what is the role of culture in the political integration process in Europe and what is cultural citizenship exactly? This compilation of articles is an attempt to start answering these questions. Citizenship: New Legal Windows The concept of Union Citizenship was established as a legal concept by the Treaty of Maastricht in 1992. It marked a clear break from the market logic where individuals were mostly seen as consumers. The Union Citizenship is a status conferred on all nationals of one of the Member States an additional set of rights to those attached to their own national citizenship. The individual citizen of any member-state now has, whether he wants it or not, an additional legal identity next to the existing national one. The EU became a Union of Member States and citizens. It is intended to help create amongst individual citizens a sense of belonging to the EU and having a genuine European identity, reflecting the core founding values of the EU: human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights. The Cultural Component of Citizenship Culture is made up of traditions, beliefs, and ways of life, from the most spiritual to the most material. It gives us meaning, a way of leading our lives. Human beings are creators of culture and, at the same time, culture is what makes us human. Our citizenship is, therefore, cultural. Culture shapes our common value system and at the same time helps to establish a sense of self 6 INTRODUCTION in an increasingly fast-paced and fragmented world. Culture and the arts can simultaneously strengthen social bonds, enable communication and stimulate out-of-the-box thinking across European borders in a unique and “avant- garde” way. When citizens have common cultural aims, even if the cultures themselves are different, the cross-fertilisation of ideas becomes a way for active citizens to develop a common Europe while keeping their own sense of who they are intact. To wonder what kind of citizenship we want is to wonder what kind of relationship we should establish with culture.1 Access to Culture: A Fundamental Right for All! The Working Group on Audience Participation and the Access to Culture Platform work since 2008 on these topics. The Platform recognises the primary right to cultural participation protected in Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights2 and considers artistic practice, access to cultural expression, and participation in the arts fundamental to the development of an active European citizenship. Through participation and access to arts and culture, individuals and communities not only reflect on their views on societies, imagine the world they want to live in, and elaborate individual and collective standpoints, but through the mobility of cultural and artistic expression, as well as of ideas and appreciations within Europe, people get access and benefit from the European process: Access to culture implies that all individuals have the freedom to choose between a large spectrum of available options, either as audience or as creators. The Publication The articles in this publication examine the cultural component of citizenship from a wide range of perspectives. They are the fruit of an open call sent to a wide range of actors involved in the field and can be grouped by: Defining the Cultural Component of Citizenship (Mathieu Kroon Gutiérrez), How is Cultural Citizenship Practiced? (Matina Magkou, Natalia Grincheva, Patricia Adkins Chiti, Ana Tomás Hernández, Chaitas Charalampos & Anastasia Kalou, Goran Tomka, Mathieu Rousselin), and What are the Legal Aspects of Cultural? (Izabela Henning). These articles critically develop a new understanding of the concept of citizenship, focusing on concepts, but also on concrete examples in 1 Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria d’Educacio, “Citizenship and Culture: The Cultural Reinvention of Citizenship” in Citizenship and Human Rights Education. Website. Accessed 24 September 2010. http://www.cefe.gva.es/educationforcitizenship/unid_10.html. 2 ‘Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. (Article 27 Universal Declaration of Human Rights) 7 the cultural component of citizenship : an inventory of challenges cultural life, revealing new ways of arts practice and communication with the audience. In addition, a series of texts gathered under the ‘Cultural Coalition for a Citizens’ Europe’ are included in an encompassed chapter with texts from Cristina Ortega and Roberto San Salvador del Valle, Raymond Weber, and Patrice Meyer-Bisch. These texts are the beginning of further reflection in the Coalition set up by “A Soul for Europe“. Both parts are encompassed by introductory articles by two members of the Access to Culture Platform: Steve Austen, also a contributor to the ‘Cultural Coalition to a Citizens’ Europe’,
Recommended publications
  • FILM FESTIVAL 22Nd - 29Th November 2012
    UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IN PRETORIA SERBIAN ARTS AND CULTURE SOCIETY AFRICA SERBIAN FILM FESTIVAL 22nd - 29th November 2012 NU METRO, MONTECASINO An author’s perspective of the world Film, as a sublimation of all arts, is a true medium, a universal vehicle with which the broader public is presented with a world view, as seen by the eye of the fi lmmaker. Nowadays, due to the global economic crisis, which is ironically producing technological and all sorts of other develop- ments, an increasing number of people are pushed to the margins of average standards of living, and fi lmmakers are given the chance to bring under their ‘protection’ millions of disillusioned people with their fi lmmaking capabilities. Art, throughout its history, has always praised but has also been heavily critical of its subject. Film is not just that. Film is that and so much more. Film is life itself and beyond life. Film is everything many of us dream about but never dare to say out loud. That is why people love fi lms. That is why it is eternal. It tears down boundaries and brings together cul- tures. It awakens curiosity and builds bridges from one far away coast to another. Film is a ‘great lie’ but an even greater truth. Yugoslavian, and today the Serbian fi lm industry has always been ‘in trend’. It might sound harsh but, unfortunately, this region has always provided ample ‘material’ for fi lms. Under our Balkan clouds there has been an ongoing battle about which people are older, which came and settled fi rst, who started it and who will be fi rst to leave and such battles have been and continue to be an inspiration to fi lm producers.
    [Show full text]
  • MIKI MANOJLOVIC Monografija 08.Indd
    A ko si ti? Automonografija Predraga Mikija Manojlovića Ova knjiga je posvećena Predragu Mikiju Manojloviću, laureatu nagrade Dobričin prsten za 2012. Dobitnici nagrade Dobričin prsten LJUBA TADIĆ (1980.) MIRA STUPICA (1981.) MIJA ALEKSIĆ (1982.) ZORAN RADMILOVIĆ (1983.) NEVENKA URBANOVA (1984.) RAHELA FERARI (1986.) BRANKO PLEŠA (1988.) DANILO STOJKOVIĆ (1990.) MARIJA CRNOBORI (1992.) MATA MILOŠEVIĆ (1994.) LJILJANA KRSTIĆ (1995.) PETAR KRALJ (1996.) OLIVERA MARKOVIĆ (1997.) RADE MARKOVIĆ (1998.) STEVAN ŠALAJIĆ (1999.) MIRA BANJAC (2000.) VLASTIMIR ĐUZA STOJILJKOVIĆ (2001.) STEVO ŽIGON (2002.) MIHAILO MIŠA JANKETIĆ (2003.) PETAR BANIĆEVIĆ (2004.) Automonografija dobitnika nagrade Dobričin prsten SVETLANA BOJKOVIĆ (2005.) BORA TODOROVIĆ (2006.) KSENIJA JOVANOVIĆ (2007.) PREDRAG EJDUS (2008.) 7 VOJISLAV BRAJOVIĆ (2009.) JELISAVETA SEKA SABLIĆ (2010.) RUŽICA SOKIĆ (2011.) PREDRAG MIKI MANOJLOVIĆ (2012.) JASNA ĐURIĆIĆ (2014.) SVEČANA DODELA NAGRADE DOBRIČIN PRSTEN PREDRAGU MIKIJU MANOJLOVIĆU NASLEĐE VELIKOG GLUMCA LJILJANA ĐURIĆ, predsednica Udruženja dramskih umetnika Srbije Verujem da većina vas poznaje istoriju Dobričinog prstena, ali isto tako verujem da ima i onih koji do sada ovu priču nisu čuli. Zato mi dozvolite da pročitam kratak zapis gospođe Ksenije Šukuljević Marković: Udruženje glumaca Kraljevine Jugoslavije dodelilo je zlatan prsten Dobrici Miluti- noviću, velikanu srpskog glumišta povodom četrdesete godišnjice njegovog umetničkog rada 1937. godine. Udruženje je smatralo da Dobricu Milutinovića treba izdvojiti iz plejade velikih glumaca i ovenčati nesvakidašnjom nagradom koja će se pamtiti i simbo- lizovati njegovu umetničku ličnost. Odlučilo je da prsten bude prelazni, da se dodeljuje Automonografija dobitnika nagrade Dobričin prsten najboljem glumcu i da se na taj način sačuva trajan spomen na Dobricu. Donet je i pra- vilnik po kojem je trebalo da Dobrica odredi dobitnika prstena ili da to učini odabrana tročlana komisija.
    [Show full text]
  • MIKI MANOJLOVIC Monografija 08.Indd
    A ko si ti? Automonografija Predraga Mikija Manojlovića Ova knjiga je posvećena Predragu Mikiju Manojloviću, laureatu nagrade Dobričin prsten za 2012. Dobitnici nagrade Dobričin prsten LJUBA TADIĆ (1980.) MIRA STUPICA (1981.) MIJA ALEKSIĆ (1982.) ZORAN RADMILOVIĆ (1983.) NEVENKA URBANOVA (1984.) RAHELA FERARI (1986.) BRANKO PLEŠA (1988.) DANILO STOJKOVIĆ (1990.) MARIJA CRNOBORI (1992.) MATA MILOŠEVIĆ (1994.) LJILJANA KRSTIĆ (1995.) PETAR KRALJ (1996.) OLIVERA MARKOVIĆ (1997.) RADE MARKOVIĆ (1998.) STEVAN ŠALAJIĆ (1999.) MIRA BANJAC (2000.) VLASTIMIR ĐUZA STOJILJKOVIĆ (2001.) STEVO ŽIGON (2002.) MIHAILO MIŠA JANKETIĆ (2003.) PETAR BANIĆEVIĆ (2004.) Automonografija dobitnika nagrade Dobričin prsten SVETLANA BOJKOVIĆ (2005.) BORA TODOROVIĆ (2006.) KSENIJA JOVANOVIĆ (2007.) PREDRAG EJDUS (2008.) 7 VOJISLAV BRAJOVIĆ (2009.) JELISAVETA SEKA SABLIĆ (2010.) RUŽICA SOKIĆ (2011.) PREDRAG MIKI MANOJLOVIĆ (2012.) JASNA ĐURIĆIĆ (2014.) SVEČANA DODELA NAGRADE DOBRIČIN PRSTEN PREDRAGU MIKIJU MANOJLOVIĆU NASLEĐE VELIKOG GLUMCA LJILJANA ĐURIĆ, predsednica Udruženja dramskih umetnika Srbije Verujem da većina vas poznaje istoriju Dobričinog prstena, ali isto tako verujem da ima i onih koji do sada ovu priču nisu čuli. Zato mi dozvolite da pročitam kratak zapis gospođe Ksenije Šukuljević Marković: Udruženje glumaca Kraljevine Jugoslavije dodelilo je zlatan prsten Dobrici Miluti- noviću, velikanu srpskog glumišta povodom četrdesete godišnjice njegovog umetničkog rada 1937. godine. Udruženje je smatralo da Dobricu Milutinovića treba izdvojiti iz plejade velikih glumaca i ovenčati nesvakidašnjom nagradom koja će se pamtiti i simbo- lizovati njegovu umetničku ličnost. Odlučilo je da prsten bude prelazni, da se dodeljuje Automonografija dobitnika nagrade Dobričin prsten najboljem glumcu i da se na taj način sačuva trajan spomen na Dobricu. Donet je i pra- vilnik po kojem je trebalo da Dobrica odredi dobitnika prstena ili da to učini odabrana tročlana komisija.
    [Show full text]
  • Predrag Ejdus, Dobitnik „Dobri~Inog Prstena“
    POZORI[NE NOVINE BROJ 148 DECEMBAR 2008. GODINA XVI CENA 100 DINARA Intervju: Predrag Ejdus, dobitnik „Dobri~inog prstena“ Intervju: Jasna \uri~i} Reprint „Ludus“ - Intervju: Slobodan Seleni} Tema broja: Muke s repertoarom i/ili prezaposlenost glumaca „Turneja“ kao predstava i film „Kandid ili optimizam“ - Zalogaj iluzije sa ukusom smisla Pozori{ni `ivot na scenama Srbije EX YU scena Pozori{te i mediji Potpuni nesporazum. tuma~i, da ga analizuje i da sintetizuje Na drugoj strani pri~e o medijima svoj nalaz. Dejstvo njegovog iskaza je OGLEDALO OGLEDALA stoje profesionalni gledaoci. Oni koji o odlo`eno, o njemu se mora razmi{ljati. svom do`ivljaju ili utisku imaju svedo~iti Bez obzira da li je kritika glupava, po - re~ima, posredovati, modelovati onaj deo vr{na, neznala~ka, nesenzibilna, optere - javnog mnjenja koga se ti~e ne{to vi{e od }ena zlobom, ona proizvodi efekat koji Piše Gor÷in Stojanovi¯ puke informacije da se u nekoj vi{e ili dopunjuje pozori{no delo kod onih koji manje zamra~enoj sali ili otvorenom pro - uop{te ~itaju kritike. (Pouzdanog podat - ka nema: ima li vi{e gledalaca pozori{ta ta god se mislilo, govorilo, pisalo o me|utim, verovati i u ono {to je pozori{tu storu, svejedno, izvodi neko pozori{no delo. Beslovesni foto-reporter, ba{ kao i ili ~italaca pozori{nih kritika.) Intelek - tome za{to ~ovek ima potrebu za imanentno, a to je dejstvo na ~ulno- nedostanog obrazovanja; re~ je, vi{e od novinar koji ne mora svoje mi{ljenje tualno bez ~ulnog, tako, jednako je [teatrom, uvek se sve svodi(lo) na intelektualnu aparaturu gledaoca, na navedenog, o nerazumevanju su{tine isprazno kao i u obrnutom slu~aju.
    [Show full text]
  • Predstava Prvih Sezona JDP-A Ne Bi Mogla Da Se 6 Vizuelni Identitet Jugoslovenskog Dramskog Pozorišta 1948 - 2008
    Jugoslovensko dramsko pozorište Vizuelni identitet 1948 - 2008 Muzej pozorišne umetnosti Srbije April - septembar 2008. Unutrasnja naslovna.indd 3 13.4.2008 21:30:33 Dvorana 1948.indd 2 13.4.2008 21:33:06 Dvorana 1948.indd 3 13.4.2008 21:33:07 Jovan Ćirilov Jovan Ćirilov NOVE TENDENCIJE - DA, AVANGARDNA AVANTURA - NE VIZUELNI IDENTITET JUGOSLOVENSKOG DRAMSKOG POZORIŠTA 1948-2008. U proleće 2003. godine u samoj završnici vladajućeg socrealizma, tako su umetnici JDP-a, rekonstrukcije, ili, tačnije rečeno, izgradnje nove reditelji, glumci, scenografi i kostimografi, već prvih zgrade Jugoslovenskog dramskog pozorišta, posle sezona prevazišli dogmu tadašnje zvanične estetike požara 17. oktobra 1997. godine, postavilo se u svim njegovim elementima. pitanje - da li u foaje vratiti mozaik Mila Milunovića To je za stručno oko bilo vidljivo i na arhitekturi iz 1948. godine? Oni koji su bili protiv vraćanja rekonstruisane zgrade Jugoslovenskog dramskog mozaika slavnog slikara, tvrdili su da novom JDP-u pozorišta. ne dolikuje mozaik iz doba socijalističkog realizma. Dobri poznavaoci arhitekture tvrde da je zgrada Bila je to vladajuća estetika u vreme kada je tadašnji Manježa, koju je za JDP adaptirao arhitekta Momčilo predsednik Vlade FNRJ, maršal Josip Broz Tito, Belobrk (1905-1980), u saradnji sa umetničkim godine 1947. potpisao uredbu o osnivanju ovog rukovodiocem Bojanom Stupicom (1913-1980), reprezentativnog pozorišta po ugledu na MHAT. bila na tragu međuratnog svetskog i srpskog Srećom, prevladalo je stanovište da mozaik valja modernizma. Dvojica arhitekata odlučili su se da vratiti na mesto između ulaza u parter, gde je i bio pokriju neoklasicističku fasadu arhitekte Nikolaja od osnivanja do požara 1997. godine. Iako, osim Krasnova i izmene ulaz u zgradu radikalnom gabarita, ništa nije ostalo od zgrade JDP-a iz doba intervencijom.
    [Show full text]
  • Films Projects & Talents from Serbia
    FILMS PROJECTS & TALENTS FROM SERBIA PRESENTED BY FILM CENTER SERBIA FROM SERBIA PRESENTED BY & TALENTS FILMS PROJECTS WWW.FCS.RS FILMS CANNES 2015 PROJECTS & TALENTS FROM SERBIA PRESENTED BY FILM CENTER SERBIA Including Ocial Selection CANNES 2015 CANNES 2015 TO SHOW AND STIMULATE EMOTIONS This year’s Cannes Film Festival, the most important film festival in the world, will see the screen- ing of Panama, the first feature film by Pavle Vučković. Its world premiere in the O cial Selection – Special Screenings programme will also mark the first time after 28 years that a Serbian debut feature film is included in the o cial selection of the most influential global film festival. Panama is a film authored by young people and for most of them this has been their first feature film making experience: screenwriter and co-producer Pavle Vučković, screenplay co-writer Jelena Vuksanović, producer Tatjana Žeželj-Gojković, director of photography Đorđe Arambašić, set designers Bojana Nikolić and Livija Mikić, costume designer Magdalena Klašnji, editor Bojan Kosović and young actors for which Panama was their film debut, Slaven Došo and Jovana Stojiljkovič. Others who have contributed towards the making of this film include Miloš Pjevač, Tamara Dragičević, Jelisaveta Orašanin, Nebojša Milovanović, Aleksandar Đurica, Branka Pujić, Andrija Daničić... Panama was produced mostly with financing from Serbia, with the support of partners from Slovenia and the United Kingdom. As a mostly Serbian production Panama does not increase the overall high share of co-productions in Serbian film industry, which in recent years has climbed as high as 50% The High Sun, by Dalibor Matanić, a co-production between Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia which will screened in the O cial Selection – Un Certain Regard, is a fine example of the need for coopera- tion and joint ventures into the art of moving pictures and the skill of showing and stimulating emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • Samostalni Umetnici U Raljama Zakona Laureati Dobričinog
    POZORIŠNE NOVINE ■ BROJ 200–201 ■ JANUAR–FEBRUAR 2017 ■ GODINA XXV ■ CENA 150 DINARA Intervju: MILENA DRAV Ić DUšAN KOVAčEV DUšAN Ić KA GL id STOJANOV SVETLANA BOJ Ić KOVIć Foto: Dalibor Danilović SAMOSTALNI UMETNICI U RALJAMA ZAKONA LAUREATI DOBRIčINOG PRSTENA KRATAK PREGLED VREMENA JUBILEJ NARODNOG POZORIŠTA NIš Ilustracija: Jugoslav Vlahović Hronika pozorišnih događaja, decembar 2016 – januar 2017 KIR JANJA, ELEKTRA, HIPNOZA JEDNE LJUBAVI... sti sa stanjem fakata. Svet nikad nije bio Vi- prijatelj Pingleovih, komički razigran, blen- še (posedovao više) a bio Manje (nikada živo- tavo naivan i šarmantan. Na Sceni „Raša Ana Tasić ta nije manje bilo).“ Plaović“ Narodnog pozorišta premijerno je U Kragujevcu je sredinom decembra odigrana Elektra Danila Kiša (1968), obra- premijerno odigran Sterijin Kir Janja u re- đena prema Euripidovoj tragediji, u režiji Ive Pozorišni decembar u Srbiji je počeo pre- žiji Dragane Varagić, koja je izuzetno zani- Milošević. Ona se odlučila da komad postavi mijerom Večitog mladoženje u Srpskom na- mljivo, neobično postavila ovaj komad, vizu- u univerzalnom obličju, ne posežući za nje- rodnom pozorištu, u režiji Darijana Mihajlo- elno vrlo upečatljivo, sa markantnim panto- nim značenjskim osavremenjivanjem. Kiš je vića, a u dramatizaciji Petra Grujičića koji je mimskim scenama. Igra je snažno obojena ovu tragediju posvetio Artou, imajući u vidu U agoniji, Beoart 2015 (foto: Nenad Petrović) radnju upadljivo modernizovao. Priča o pro- tragičkim crtama, a u vezi s tim rediteljka je njegovo ritualno pozorište surovosti. U pred- pasti bogate srpske trgovačke porodice Sofro- u najavi predstave otkrila: „Kir Janja je ko- stavi nema direktnih prikaza fizičkih brutal- ljudskim okolnostima ih vodi Džoni, gastar- U koprodukciji Pan teatra i Dečjeg kul- nija Kirića, zasnovana na sukobu generaci- mični lik, ali posle Egonovog i Ejdusovog Kir nosti, scene ubistava su stilizovane.
    [Show full text]
  • Festival Dani Komedije – 40 Godina @Ivorad \Or|Evi} Festival Dani Komedije-40 Godina
    @IVORAD \OR\EVI] Festival Dani komedije – 40 godina @ivorad \or|evi} Festival Dani komedije-40 godina Izdava~: Medija total Za izdava~a: Dragan Markovi} Urednik: Dobrica Mili}evi} Grafi~ki dizajn: Slobodan [teti} Tehni~ki urednik: Nemawa Obradovi} Saradnik izdava~a: Festival Dani komedije [tampa: Papir komerc Jagodina, februar 2013. Tira`: 300 primeraka Sadr`aj: Radomir Putnik: DA SE NE ZABORAVI / 173 ^etiri decenije popravqawa sveta /4 O osnivawu Dana komedije: Ro|endan 14. decembar 1972 / 2011: Statuete Jovan~a Mici} i ]uran: SVE KARIKE FESTIVALSKOG Duhovita re{ewa V. Lalickog LANCA / 11 Konkurs za savremeni komediografski Selektori, `iriji, nagrade... tekst: Nade velike, rezulatati skromni Imenik Izdava~ka delatnost: Sporadi~no i ...pozori{ta, predstave, glumci, malo rediteqi... Statueta Joakim Vuji}: Priznawe Imenik izvori{tu zdravog smeha ...festivalske uprave (hronologija promena), 2012. PRVA KARIKA prate}i programi PETE DECENIJE / 179 Selektor, repertoar, `iri, nagrade, UZDARJE / 157 pozori{ta, predstave, pisci, redite- Miodrag Petrovi} ^kaqa qi, glumci... Danilo Bata Stojkovi} Uzdarje 2012: Milena Dravi} Dejan Mija~ Dobrica Mili}evi}: Vesnik prole}a Mira Bawac Qubomir Ubavki} Pendula Muharem Pervi} Milosav Mirkovi} Nikola Simi} Olivera Markovi} Bora Todorovi} Dragoslav Lazi} Vlastimir \uza Stojiqkovi} Petar Kraq Du{an Kova~evi} [4] FESTIVAL DANI K ^etiri decenije popravqawa sveta 1. qudske sudbine. Otud se za pojam komedije naj~e{}e ve`e ideja sre}nog raspleta, za razliku od tragi~kog Festival Dani komedije, verovatno jedini festival u nas koji podr`ava, afirmi{e i razvija jedan dramski pada iz sre}e u nesre}u, a wena kritika qudskog `anr, nastao je pre ~etiri decenije kao prirodno pona{awa izaziva smeh, za razliku od saose}awa sa ro|eno ~edo smotre profesionalnih pozori{ta tragi~kim protagonistom.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcs Cannes 2014.Pdf
    CANNES 2014 FILMCULTURE As much as 2013 took o in a dramatic way – with an ocial announcement that there are no funds available for filmmaking in the state budget – it also ended with excitement of a more positive kind. Abundant sums began pouring in, as stipulated by the newly-adopted Cinema Law – from the state budget, from regional and local budgets, as well as a percentage of the fee paid to the Serbian Broadcasting Agency by all broadcasters and a percentage of the fee paid to the Serbian Agency for Electronic Communications by all telecommunications companies for the right to build, own and use public telecommunication networks. Because of these funds, Film Center Serbia was able not only to announce competitions for stimulating feature and documentary films, for screenplay and project development, as well as for support of minority coproductions, but for the first time, in September, a competition for stimulat- ing the quality, viewership, distribution and technical development of theatres – thus initiating the process that will go a long way towards solving one of the largest problems of Serbian film – revitalizing theatres, as the active space where the meaning and purpose of filmmaking is verified. Exhibitors – theatres and operators that are the beneficiaries of this financial support – in turn have an obligation to realize the Film Center Serbia program, whose aim it is to stimulate and promote local film art by screening Serbian films in cinemas and educating the young audience. Film Center Serbia received assistance with this project from a group of young enthusiasts that have created the FILMKULTURA organization.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 ESRA Congress Programme
    2017 ESRA Congress programme Shakespeare and European Theatrical Cultures: AnAtomizing Text and Stage 27 – 30 July 2017 Organisers: University of Gdańsk and Gdańsk Shakespeare Theatre I. PLENARY SPEAKERS 1. Peter Holland University of Notre Dame, USA "Forgetting Shakespeare Performance" This paper will range widely across the topic of Shakespeare and forgetting before concentrating on the ease with which performance is forgotten. Peter Holland is McMeel Family Professor in Shakespeare Studies in the Department of Film, Television and Theatre, and Associate Dean for the Arts at the University of Notre Dame. He moved there in 2002 from the UK where he was Director of the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford-upon-Avon. He is co-General Editor for a number of series, including Oxford Shakespeare Topics (Oxford University Press), Shakespeare in the Theatre (Arden Shakespeare), Great Shakespearean (Bloomsbury Academic) and the Arden Shakespeare 4th series. He is Editor of Shakespeare Survey. He was elected Chair of the International Shakespeare Association in 2017. He is currently editing King Lear for Arden 4 and writing a book on Shakespeare and Forgetting. 2. Diana E. Henderson Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA "Hard Hearts and Coronets: Anatomizing Resistance and Community with Shakespeare Now" After a year of Shakespearean commemorative celebrations, “the fierce urgency of now” has intruded upon scholarly pursuits and theatrical events in more incongruous ways. In the US, making Shakespeare our contemporary has led to death threats directed at that (seemingly) most benign of theatrical subgenres, the outdoor summer festival. In Europe, the uncertainty unleashed by the Brexit referendum challenges border crossings and collaborations, while the core issues of violence and inequity that have prompted mass migrations grow ever more grotesque; at the same time, remarkable performances and conferences provide precious, fragile occasions for considering what boundary-crossing Shakespeares can do.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright 2015 Mina Sohaj
    Copyright 2015 Mina Sohaj (IM)POSSIBILITIES OF BUILDING COMMUNITY AND NEGOTIATING BELONGING IN INSTITUTIONAL THEATRE DURING THE WARS IN CROATIA AND BOSNIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CASES FROM SARAJEVO, ZAGREB AND BELGRADE BY MINA SOHAJ DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theatre in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Valleri Robinson, Chair Associate Professor Peter A. Davis Assistant Professor Jessica Greenberg Instructor Latrelle Bright ABSTRACT This dissertation examines how and to what end institutional theatre participates in the process of building community and negotiating belonging from 1991 to 1995 during two major conflicts of the Yugoslav Succession Wars: the War in Croatia and the War in Bosnia. With a focus on institutional theatre as a public phenomenon, in a comparative study of nine cases from Belgrade, Sarajevo, and Zagreb, I aim to understand how notions of community and belonging are interpreted in each city and how mainstream cultural establishments negotiate, resist, or conform to the hegemonic political projects of belonging and community during the war years. Theatre is examined as a place for negotiating belonging in the city, particularly that of the urban educated middle class citizens, as well as a site of connection and exchange of urban experiences between Sarajevo, Belgrade, and Zagreb. The comparative study method, underpinned by performance, text, and material analysis of primary and secondary sources from Belgrade, Zagreb, and Sarajevo, affords a critical framework for examining socio-political distinctions and similarities that might lead to new insights about the relationship between theatre and war in these three places.
    [Show full text]
  • MIRJANA KARANOVIĆ Dobitnik Nagrade „Dobričin Prsten“
    POZORIŠNE NOVINE ■ BROJ 204 ■ DECEMBAR 2019 ■ GODINA XXVIII ■ CENA 150 DINARA MIRJANA KARANOVIĆ Dobitnik nagrade „Dobričin prsten“ Intervju: NEBOJŠA DUGALIĆ MIRA BANJAC NENAD JEZDIĆ JOVANA GAVRILOVIĆ MIRJANA ODAVIĆ TENA ŠTIVIČIĆ Foto: Vukica Mikača Vukica Foto: KO KOGA (I ŠTA) OVDE POTKAZUJE TESTIRANO NA LJUDIMA KULTURA U BORBI ZA BOLJI BUDŽET JESEN FESTIVALA ILI JESEN POZORIŠTA DECENIJA I PO SARADNJE DRAMATENA I NARODNOG J u POZORIŠTA BEOGRAD g o s la v V l ah PRVI RUTA FESTIVAL ov ić CRTAČKI TEATAR APSURDA JUGOSLAVA VLAHOVIĆA Povodom jubileja – stogodišnjica udruživanja dramskih umetnika POZORIŠNA UMETNOST OSVETLJAVA I PREOBRAŽAVA ŽIVOT Performansom po motivima čuvenih Šopalovića otvore- na izložba o razvoju srpskog pozorišta (Etnografski mu- zej, novembar 2019) koja pre svega ukazuje na sveproži- majući odnos teatra i života ovodom obeležavanja veka od osnivanja ni, na veliko zadovoljstvo prisutnih, program staleške organizacije dramskih umetni- je nastavljen i među izložbenim panoima unu- Pka (UDUS) upriličena je obimna temat- tar Muzeja. Zatim smo čuli odlomak iz Šekspi- ska izložba o razvoju teatra u Srba – Pozori- rovog komada Kako vam drago u izvođenju šte u vremenu svakom. Otvaranje iste upriliče- studenata prve godine glume Fakulteta dram- no je 1. novembra performansom savremenog skih umetnosti, u klasi profesora Dragana Pe- cirkusa prema motivima Putujućeg pozori- trovića, čime je izložba zvanično otvorena. Ni- šta Šopalović Ljubomira Simovića, u kojem su slučajno budući glumci recitovali o hrabro- se, ukratko, Filip Trnavac „drvenim mačem“ sti lude: „Ruho šareno dajte mi, i dajte / Pra- obračunava sa aždajom oličenoj u grotesknoj vo da zborim kako mislim, pa ću / Taj zaraže- lutki turbo-folk pevačice, metaforički pred- ni svet da pročistim / Do samog dna, ukol’ko stavljajući borbu teatra sa sveopštom nekultu- ovaj lek moj / Primao bude sa strpljenjem“ – rom u našem vremenu neukusa i rijalitija, za- na amblemu Udruženja nalazi se stilizovani pravo vremenu totalnog sunovrata svih vred- kostim arlekina, koji je jedini u stanju da kaže nosti.
    [Show full text]