Inform the Department As Soon As Possible

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inform the Department As Soon As Possible Agenda Item * For publication Bedford Borough Council – Mayor Date of Meeting: May 2013 Report by: Councillor Sue Oliver, Lead Member and Portfolio Holder for Children’s Social Care Subject: ADOPTION GRANT 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The Department for Education published ‘An Action Plan for Adoption; Tackling Delay’ in March 2012 as a blueprint for Government intentions to accelerate the adoption process so that more children benefit from adoption and more rapidly. 1.2 Changes to adoption law and practice through publication of new regulations and statutory guidance were made during summer 2012. The changes affected the practice of the Adoption Panel and Agency Decision Making function. Further amendments were proposed as detailed in consultation which finished on 5 December 2012. These changes included radical changes to the recruitment process for adopters, implementation of ‘fostering for adoption’ and changes to the constitution of adoption panels. 1.3 In February 2013 the Department produced allocations and grant documentation for the Adoption Reform Grant for 2013/14. The allocation of the grant to Bedford Borough Council is based on the number of children placed for adoption per LA and the number of children with an adoption decision still waiting to be placed for adoption per LA. The Grant is in 2 parts and must be spent by the end of Financial Year 23013/14: Part A is a grant of £289,863 that the LA can use to drive forward adoption reform, targeting funding at the entire adoption process and the specialist support children need. Part B is a £107,520 grant that the LA is required to spend directly on adoption services. 1.4 From 1 January 2014 Bedford Borough Council will have their own Fostering and Adoption Service following the disaggregation of the existing arrangements with Central Bedfordshire Council 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Mayor is requested to consider and if satisfied agree to; • Accept the Adoption Reform Grant Part A at a value of £289,863 and Part B at a value of £107,520. *(1) 2.2 The Mayor is requested to consider and, if satisfied, agree the following expenditure from Part A; • Additional staffing to improve management oversight and the quality and speed of the Adoption process 2.3 The Mayor is requested to consider and, if satisfied, agree the following expenditure from Part B: • Additional Medical Advice to reduce delay • Family Finding Project to find Adopters • Improve Speed of Adopter Approval • Increase Social Work Capacity to assess Adopters • Admin support for Adopter applications • Sub-regional Adoption Collaborative Support 3. Reasons For Recommendations 3.1 Adoption is one of the Government’s top priorities. Ministers want to create a more effective and user-friendly adoption system. They are determined to ensure that adoption is available for children where this is in their best interests, and they want it to happen without undue delay. The Adoption Grant is intended to improve the quantity and quality of Adoption placements as well as improving the quality of systems and decisions associated with making permanency plans for children and young people. 4. Key Implications 4.1 With the disaggregation of the Fostering and Adoption service from the current service level agreement and provision with Central Bedfordshire Council this Authority will become responsible for a new ‘in house’ provision. This will entail the transfer under TUPE regulations of approximately 27.0 full time equivalent (fte) staff of whom 7.0 fte will form the Adoption service, approximately 75 foster care placements and an undetermined number as yet of potential adopters. This service will be inspected by OfSted as part of their normal inspection responsibilities. Legal Issues 4.2 The Adoption and Children Act 2002 (the Act) is the principal piece of legislation governing adoption in England and Wales. It has been in force since 30 December 2005, and has been amended by other legislation since 2002. Section 3 of the Act places a duty on local authorities to maintain an adoption service within their area, and sets out the minimum facilities that must be made available in the provision of the service. The local authority is not obliged to provide all the facilities itself but may make use of services provided by voluntary adoption agencies and adoption support agencies, or other suitable service providers who are permitted to provide the service in question. The Act implicitly authorises the receipt of grant funding to enable the Council to discharge its duties. In any event the power to receive grant is covered by the general power of competence under the Localism Act 2011. *(2) Policy Issues 4.3 Existing Council Policy is to seek appropriate permanency placements for those children and young people who would benefit whether this be via Adoption or through a Special Guardianship route. Resource Implications 4.4 There are no resource implications, all new posts detailed in Section 5 are fully funded by the Adoption Grant. Risk Implications 4.6 Failure by the Council to carry out it’s duties as an Adoption Agency could see the Council being stripped of this responsibility with a consequent loss of reputation. Environmental Implications 4.7 None Equalities Impact 4.8 The activity has no relevance to Bedford Borough Council’s duty to promote equality of opportunity, promote good relations, promote positive attitudes and eliminate unlawful discrimination. An equality impact assessment is not needed. 5. Details 5.1 The proposal for Part A builds on the successful work already done. It is designed around the need to create a strong specialist group of workers based in the LAC team but able to work across the whole service to improve the quality and delivery of plans for permanence and adoption. All posts will be recruited to via Agency staff and are fully funded by the grant. 5.2 Areas to be covered are; • To drive up the quality of training and supervision for adoption and permanence across the service additional Consultant Social Work management support to the safeguarding and LAC teams will be required. Key areas of focus will include facilitating intra-team working across the service to identify and eliminate blockages that could result in drift or delay in achieving the desired outcomes for children and work with other stakeholders including Health, Independent agencies, CBC (adoption and fostering teams) the courts etc. Additionally there is a need to improve practice, facilitate cooperation and improve communication and prepare a regular monthly report of all cases which will be presented at a monthly monitoring meeting chaired by the Head of Service for Social Work and including the Head of Service for Looked After Provision and involve a range of agencies. *(3) • In order to improve direct support to social workers in the safeguarding and LAC teams to improve their understanding of effective planning for permanence and adoption and for organising effective plans through the identification, monitoring and tracking of all cases additional senior practitioner time holding a limited case load of complex adoption cases is required. They will provide appropriate advice and support to the professional networks involved, to ensure individual children’s plans are being developed and implemented appropriately. • To improve and maintain an up to date data base of all relevant cases and for the provision of reports for senior managers additional administrator time designed to have specific responsibility for supporting the adoption and permanence specialists is required. This will support the team in ensuring the quality of reports and statements relating to Adoption and permanence are well presented and help to track plans, process adoption medicals paperwork and provide general administrative support to the social work team to improve the quality of the administrative process. • Additional Social Worker time with specific responsibility for post proceedings adoption and permanence planning. • Life Story work: There are 2 parts to this role that need to be met; the first is to ensure that life story books have been produced to a high standard for babies and younger aged children. The second is the need for direct work with older children and young people to enable them to produce their own life story books. • Specialist training: There is a need to ensure that all staff in the authority have access to specialist high quality training to improve the quality of their assessment and planning for adoption. The proposal is for up to 6 separate days of training to ensure that all staff have the opportunity to attend. • Consultant Support: There is a need for expert Consultant input to ensure that plans for the enhanced Fostering and Permanence meet Government and Ofsted regulatory standards and expectations. The Consultant will also lead on negotiations regarding how the new Permanence Team arrangements can fit with wider regional, sub regional or multi regional arrangements. It is anticipated this resource would be needed for 3 days/week for 26 weeks. 5.3 The proposal for part B of the grant is as follows; • Reducing delays in securing medical advice • Finding families for difficult to place children and reduce delays in matching children • Increasing the number of adopters and speed of approval • Recruitment of sufficient adopters to meet numbers of children to be placed 5.4 During 2013/14 further discussions are being held to consider a sub regional Adoption collaborative to ensure recruitment and support of a wide range of potential adoptive placements, this is in line with current Government thinking on regional work to improve Adoption outcomes. The balance of the funding from part A and part B will be required to support this innovation. 5.5 No alternative options to the employment of additional staff have been identified that improve Adoption performance and quality.
Recommended publications
  • Inform Key Judgements Made by Ofsted
    Agenda Item * For publication Bedford Borough Council – off Agenda approval October 2013 Report by the Portfolio Holder for Education and the Executive Director for Children’s Services, Schools and Families Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT TO IMPLEMENT THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES BILL 1. Executive Summary This report relates to implementation of the Children and Families Bill (2013) which is expected to become the Children and Families Act in September 2014. The Bill changes the statutory framework in relation to Children with Special Educational Needs (SEN). The Council will have a duty to develop and implement the new legislation for more than 700 young people with Statements of SEN in a significantly changed way. The new approach is called the Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP) often referred to as the ‘single plan.’ The Local Authority will have a duty to publish a local offer, embed joint commissioning, offer personalised budgets, develop a key worker role and develop a new statementing process. In addition, the new legislation brings together two statutory frameworks for pre and post 16 and the Borough will therefore have to extend its responsibilities to assessing and monitoring Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCP) for young people in education and training up to 25 years (Appendix A) The implementation of the single plan will inform key judgements made by Ofsted. It is critical that the council utilises this funding stream to deliver the change required. 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Mayor is requested to consider the report and, if satisfied, approve acceptance of the Grant which will provide capacity to prepare and deliver our new legal obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning
    CABINET MEMBER FOR HOUSING, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND PLANNING FEBRUARY 2011 PUBLIC REPORT Cabinet Member responsible: Councillor Peter Hiller, Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning Contact Officer: Amy Wardell, ITS Senior Officer 01733 317481 NOVATION OF THE REAL TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION MAINTENANCE AND EXPANSION CONTRACT. R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S FROM : Infrastructure Planning & Delivery Deadline date : N/A The Cabinet Member is recommended to approve: • A novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 1. ORIGIN OF REPORT 1. This report is submitted to the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning for a key decision to be made. 2. PURPOSE AND REASON FOR REPORT 2.1 The purpose of this report is to provide additional background information with regard to the request made to the Council for the novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 2.2 This report is for the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning to consider as set out at delegation number 3.7.7 (a) of Part 3, Section 3 of the delegation document. 3. TIMESCALE Is this a Major No Policy/Statutory Plan 4. RELEVANT DETAILS: 4.1 Advanced Communication and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited operated the existing contract for the maintenance and expansion of real time passenger information within the Peterborough area. 4.2 The novation is a result of the acquisition of ACIS Limited by VIX Technology Group to form VIX ACIS Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Borough Council Draft Statement of Gambling Licensing
    For publication BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL – REPORT TO THE MAYOR NOVEMBER 2015 REPORT BY THE (LICENSING ACT 2003) LICENSING COMMITTEE Subject: GAMBLING ACT 2005 – OUTCOME OF CONSULTATION ON THE CONTENT OF THE STATEMENT OF GAMBLING LICENSING PRINCIPLES 2016 – 2019 AND RECOMMENDATIONS THEREON. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The (Licensing Act 2003) Licensing Committee has followed an agreed programme for the preparation of the Council’s Statement of Gambling Licensing Principles for 2016-19 and considered the responses received from consultees. The Mayor is invited to note that the consultation stage of the preparation is now complete and is also asked to consider the responses received during the two phases of that consultation and to recommend the next Statement of Gambling Licensing Principles to Full Council. 1.2 In considering the recommendations to be made, the Mayor is required to apply the requirements of the Gambling Act 2005 and have regard to the Gambling Commission’s guidance to Councils in respect of their Statements of Gambling Licensing Principles. 1.3 The Mayor is advised that in submitting this report, the (Licensing Act 2003) Licensing Committee has itself considered the consultation responses received and the statutory requirements on the Council as Licensing Authority and unanimously endorsed the adoption of the Statement at Annex B to this report. 2. Recommendations 2.1 That, having overseen the preparation work on a revised Statement of Gambling Licensing Principles: (1) (i) That the responses received from consultees, as set out at Appendix A to this report, be received and considered by the Mayor. (ii) That, having regard to its statutory requirements, the draft revised Statement of Gambling Licensing Principles, as set out at Appendix B to this report be submitted to the Council for adoption for the period 2016-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Credit National Expansion
    Universal Credit national expansion – Tranches One and Two Following the successful roll out of Universal Credit in the north-west of England, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) can provide details of the first and second tranches of national expansion to local authorities and jobcentre areas. Universal Credit will roll out to new claims from single people, who would otherwise have been eligible for Jobseeker’s Allowance, including those with existing Housing Benefit and Working Tax Credit claims. The list below confirms the go live dates for Tranches One and Two which will begin to deliver Universal Credit between February and July 2015. The Commencement Order for Tranches One and Two of national expansion, which confirmed the areas that will be going live, can be accessed here: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/101/pdfs/uksi_20150101_en.pdf And the list of postcodes that will be going live can be accessed here – https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/402501/ universal-credit-index-of-relevant-districts.pdf This list is in alphabetical order by local authority. Tranche One: February 2015 – April 2015 Local authority Jobcentre area Go live date Ashford Borough Council Ashford JCP 13 April 2015 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Barnsley JCP 2 March 2015 Goldthorpe JCP Wombwell JCP Basildon Council Basildon JCP 16 March 2015 Bassetlaw District Council Retford JCP 23 February 2015 Worksop JCP Bedford Borough Council Bedford JCP 2 March 2015 Birmingham City Council Broad Street JCP 13 April
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Travel Plan
    Sustainable Travel Plan for the period 2011 - 2015 Road Safety www.luton.gov.uk/roadsafety Luton Borough Council Sustainable Travel Plan 2011 - 2015 August 2011 Chris Padgin Planning and Transport Highways and Street Services CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Consultation 1 3.0 Working in Partnership 2 4.0 General 3 5.0 Walking 3 6.0 Cycling 6 7.0 Public Transport (bus) 8 8.0 Public Transport (rail) 10 9.0 Motorised Travel 11 10.0 Action Plan 12 11.0 LTP Indicators 18 12.0 Monitoring and Evaluation 18 13.0 Financial Implications 19 Sustainable Travel Plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is generally acknowledged that sustainable travel is becoming more and more important. With the ever increasing population and the need to travel it is not possible to build enough roads to tackle congestion. There is also the concern about climate change. Both these have brought the need to change travel habits into more sustainable ways such as walking, cycling, use of public transport and car sharing. 1.2 Sustainable travel can offer a form of physical activity that can improve health at any stage in life, from childhood through to old age and is cost effective. Where people are inactive, encouraging people to undertake sustainable travel such as walking and cycling will help contribute to the reduction of illnesses and diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and mental health. 1.3 Everyone who lives, works or travels in Luton has a part to play in reducing congestion and carbon emissions. 1.4 The strategic direction is covered in the Local Transport Plan and this Sustainable Travel Plan covers the implementation of the Sustainable Travel Strategy (walking, cycling and public transport) to enable Luton residents and visitors to make Smarter Choices when considering their mode of travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning
    CABINET MEMBER FOR HOUSING, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND PLANNING May 2010 PUBLIC REPORT Cabinet Member(s) responsible: Councillor Hiller, Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning Contact Officer(s): Operations: Paul Phillipson Tel. 01733 Lead officer : Amy Wardell 317481 Contract for the maintenance and expansion of the real time passenger information system. R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S FROM : Deadline date : N/A Amy Wardell Team manager – passenger transport projects 01733 317481 [email protected] The Cabinet Member is recommended to: 1. Authorise the Executive Director – Operations to award the contract for the maintenance and expansion (within available resources) of the RTPI system to Advanced Communication and Information Systems Limited (ACIS). 1. ORIGIN OF REPORT 1.1 This report is submitted to the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning following a tendering process. 2. PURPOSE AND REASON FOR REPORT 2.1 The purpose of this report is to provide additional background information with regard to the maintenance and expansion of the real time passenger information system contract. 2.2 This report is for Councillor Hiller the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning to consider as set out at delegation number 3.7.1 (a) of Part 3 of the delegation document. 2.3 The attached report/background information is NOT FOR PUBLICATION in accordance with paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of Part 1 of the Local Government Act 1972 in that it contains information relating to financial and business affairs, namely the contract price submitted by the successful bidder.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Chief Executive, Planning Application Fees: The
    Simon Gallagher Director of Planning Department for Communities and Local Government Third Floor, Fry Building 2 Marsham Street London, SW1P 4DF www.communities.gov.uk Chief Executives of Local Planning Authorities in England 21 February 2017 [Via Email] Dear Chief Executive, Planning application fees: the Government’s offer ‘Fixing our broken housing market’ was published on 7 February 2017. It includes proposals for boosting local authority capacity and capability to deliver, improving the speed and quality with which planning cases are handled, while deterring unnecessary appeals. As set out paragraph 2.13 of the White Paper, developers consistently tell us that the lack of capacity and capability in planning departments is restricting their ability to get on site and build. Alongside funding, local authorities also report difficulties in recruiting and retaining planners and others with specialist skills. There may also be wider capacity and skills issues for local authorities. To boost local authority capacity and capability to deliver, paragraph 2.15 explained that the Government will increase nationally set planning fees. Local authorities will be able to increase fees from 20% from July 2017 if they commit to invest the additional fee income in their planning department. This letter invites you confirm your intention in relation to the fee increase. It is intended that the additional revenue should be retained by planning departments and that existing baseline and income assumptions will not be adjusted down as a result during this Parliament. This is an opportunity for all authorities to make improvements to their resourcing, leading to better services, improved performance, and greater capacity to deliver growth as set out in ‘Fixing our broken housing market’.
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 1617 LA Referrals
    Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Borough Council Decision No
    BEDFORD BOROUGH COUNCIL DECISION NO. 1480 RECORD OF EXECUTIVE DECISION TAKEN BY AN EXECUTIVE MEMBER This form MUST be used to record any decision taken by the Elected Mayor or an individual Executive Member (Portfolio Holder). The form must be completed and passed to the Chief Officer Legal and Democratic Services no later than NOON on the second working day after the day on which the decision is taken. No action may be taken to implement the decision(s) recorded on this form until 7 days have passed and the Chief Officer Legal and Democratic Services has confirmed the decision has not been called in. 1. Description of decision To accept the receipt of a grant from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) for the sum of £188,663.23 to support better co-ordination of existing English Language provision in Bedford Borough. 2. Date of decision 3rd August 2020 3. Reasons for decision To enable the English language co-ordination project to be undertaken. 4. Alternatives considered and rejected The alternative of not accepting was considered but rejected. 5. How decision is to be funded The project will be supported by the grant in the sum of £188,663.23 from MHCLG. 6. Conflicts of interest Name of all Executive members who were Nature of interest Did Standards Committee give a Did the Chief Executive give a dispensation for that conflict consulted AND declared a conflict of dispensation for that conflict of interest? (If of interest? (If yes, give details and the date of the interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford Borough Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment
    Bedford Borough Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Bedford Borough Council - GTAA FINAL February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman | Claire Thomas and Ciara Small enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright February 2017 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government \licence v 3.0 Contains OS data ©) Crown Copyright (2014) Opinion Research Services | Bedford Borough Council - GTAA FINAL February 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers .................................................................................. 2 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople .................................................................................... 3 Transit Requirements ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints and Enquiries Received (By Category) 2019-20
    Complaints and Enquiries Received (by Category) 2019-20 Environmental Adult Benefits Corporate and Education and Services, Public Highways and Planning and Authority Name Housing Other Total Social Care and Tax Other Services Children's Services Protection and Transport Development Regulation Adur District Council 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 2 8 Allerdale Borough Council 0 1 3 0 9 0 4 5 0 22 Amber Valley Borough Council 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 6 Arun District Council 0 1 4 0 2 1 1 10 0 19 Ashfield District Council 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6 2 11 Ashford Borough Council 0 1 0 1 1 4 1 8 1 17 Aylesbury Vale District Council 0 7 0 0 17 0 2 14 1 41 Babergh District Council 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 2 0 8 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council 11 9 2 12 6 4 1 8 1 54 Barrow-in-Furness Borough Council 0 2 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 Basildon Borough Council 0 7 3 0 9 0 10 2 2 33 Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 4 0 17 Bassetlaw District Council 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 6 0 13 Bath and North East Somerset Council 6 8 5 8 3 3 3 0 2 38 Bedford Borough Council 2 6 1 10 3 4 3 8 1 38 Birmingham City Council 40 81 23 78 179 39 83 22 16 561 Blaby District Council 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 5 Blackburn with Darwen Council 5 5 4 8 1 5 1 5 2 36 Blackpool Borough Council 9 4 2 19 5 2 1 3 0 45 Bolsover District Council 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 3 1 11 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 12 7 12 7 2 2 7 0 60 Boston Borough Council 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 8 Bournemouth Borough Council 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council 20 5 4 18 19 12 5 16 2 101 Bracknell Forest Council 4 3 3 11 3 2 5 2 1 34 Braintree
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 343 councils in England: • Metropolitan districts (36) • London boroughs (32) plus the City of London • Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly • County councils (26) • District councils (192) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croyd on 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]