Page | 1 Map Shows Distribution of 165 Local Democracy Reporters By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page | 1 Map Shows Distribution of 165 Local Democracy Reporters By 20.5 9 5.5 19 17 13 15 11 11 7 13 7 4 13 Map shows distribution of 165 Local Democracy Reporters by BBC Nation and Region from July 2021-June 2024. See page two for further detail Page | 1 BBC Local Democracy Reporter allocation: 2021-2024 The number of allocated contracts and reporters by BBC Nation and Region for the contract period starting July 1, 2021are listed in the table below. See each region for the detailed distribution of Local Democracy Reporters relevant to local authority areas. Reporters assigned to BBC Nation or Region Contracts Page: Nation or Region East 9 13 3 East Midlands 4 11 4 North East 5 9 5 North West 14 19 6 South 9 13 7 South East 3 7 8 South West 2 4 8 West 5 7 9 West Midlands 7 15 10 Yorkshire & Lincs 9 17 11 London 12 13 12-13 Northern Ireland 11 5.5 13 Scotland 17 20.5 14-15 Wales 11 11 16 TOTAL 118 165 Page | 2 East Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Mayoral E01 1 Metro Mayor Peterborough City Council Unitary E02 1 Cambridgeshire County Council County Buckinghamshire Council Unitary E03 1 Milton Keynes Council Unitary Bedford Borough Council Unitary E04 2 Central Bedfordshire Council Unitary Luton Borough Council Unitary Hertfordshire County Council County E05 2 Hertfordshire second-tier Second-tier authorities Essex County Council County E06 2 Essex second-tier authorities Second-tier Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Unitary E07 1 Thurrock Council Unitary Norfolk County Council County E08 2 Norfolk second-tier authorities Second-tier E09 1 Suffolk County Council County Page | 3 East Midlands Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Derbyshire County Council County E10 3 Derby City Council Unitary Derbyshire second-tier authorities Second-tier Leicestershire City Council Unitary E11 3 Leicestershire County Council County Leicestershire second-tier Second-tier authorities North Northamptonshire Unitary E12 2 West Northamptonshire Unitary Rutland County Council Unitary Nottinghamshire County Council County E13 3 Nottingham City Unitary Nottinghamshire second-tier Second-tier authorities Page | 4 North East Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority South Tyneside Council Unitary E14 2 Sunderland City Council Unitary Hartlepool Borough Council Unitary Newcastle City Council Unitary E15 2 North Tyneside Council Unitary Gateshead Council Unitary E16 1 Northumberland County Council Unitary Darlington Borough Council Unitary E17 1 Durham County Council Unitary Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Unitary Middlesbrough Council Unitary E18 3 Redcar and Cleveland Council Unitary Tees Valley Metro Mayor Mayoral Page | 5 North West Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority E19 1 Blackburn with Darwen Council Unitary Lancashire County Council County E20 3 Blackpool Council Unitary Lancashire second-tier authorities Second-tier Cumbria County Council County E21 2 Cumbria second-tier authorities Second-tier E22 1 Cheshire East Council Unitary Warrington Borough Council Unitary E23 1 St Helens Council Unitary Liverpool City Region Metro Mayor Mayoral E24 2 Liverpool City Council Unitary Wirral Council Unitary Halton Borough Council Unitary E25 1 Cheshire West and Chester Council Unitary Knowsley Council Unitary E26 1 Sefton Council Unitary E27 1 Isle of Man Government Unitary Greater Manchester Metro Mayor Mayoral E28 2 Manchester City Council Unitary Salford City Council Unitary Bolton Council Unitary E29 1 Bury Council Unitary Trafford Council Unitary E30 1 Wigan Council Unitary Oldham Council Unitary E31 1 Rochdale Met Borough Council Unitary Tameside Met Borough Council Unitary E32 1 Stockport Met Borough Council Unitary Page | 6 South Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Bournemouth, Christchurch and Unitary E33 1 Poole Council Dorset Council Unitary Bracknell Forest Council Unitary E34 2 Reading Borough Council Unitary Wokingham Borough Council Unitary E35 1 West Berkshire Council Unitary E36 1 Oxfordshire County Council County Slough Borough Council Unitary E37 1 The Royal Borough of Windsor Unitary Surrey County Council County E38 2 Surrey second-tier authorities Second-tier Southampton City Council Unitary E39 3 Hampshire County Council County Hampshire second-tier authorities Second-tier E40 1 Portsmouth City Council Unitary E41 1 Isle of Wight Council Unitary Page | 7 South East Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority E42 1 Brighton and Hove City Council Unitary East Sussex County Council County E43 3 West Sussex County Council County East Sussex & West Sussex second- Second-tier tier authorities Kent County Council County E44 3 Medway Council Unitary Kent second-tier authorities Second-tier South West Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Cornwall Council Unitary E45 1 Council of the Isles of Scilly Unitary Devon County Council County E46 3 Plymouth City Council Unitary Torbay Council Unitary Devon second-tier Second-tier Page | 8 West Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority West of England Metro Mayor Mayoral E47 2 Bristol City Council Unitary South Gloucestershire Council Unitary Bath & North East Somerset Unitary E48 1 Council North Somerset Council Unitary E49 1 Gloucestershire County Council County E50 1 Somerset County Council County Swindon Borough Council Unitary E51 2 Wiltshire Council Unitary Page | 9 West Midlands Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority West Midlands Metro Mayor Mayoral E52 3 Birmingham City Council Unitary Solihull Met Borough Council Unitary Coventry City Council Unitary E53 2 Warwickshire County Council County City of Wolverhampton Council Unitary Dudley Met Borough Council Unitary E54 3 Sandwell Met Borough Council Unitary Walsall Council Unitary E55 1 Herefordshire County Council Unitary E56 1 Worcestershire County Council County Staffordshire County Council County E57 3 Stoke-on-Trent City Council Unitary Staffordshire second-tier Second-tier authorities Shropshire Council Unitary E58 2 Telford & Wrekin Council Unitary Page | 10 Yorkshire & Lincolnshire Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Leeds City Council Unitary E59 3 Calderdale Council Unitary City of Bradford Met District Unitary Council Kirklees Council Unitary E60 2 Wakefield Council Unitary Barnsley Met Borough Council Unitary Sheffield City Council Unitary E61 3 Mayor of Sheffield City Region Mayoral Rotherham Met Borough Council Unitary Elected Mayor of Doncaster Mayoral E62 1 Doncaster Met Borough Council Unitary East Riding of Yorkshire Council Unitary E63 1 Hull City Council Unitary North Yorkshire County Council County E64 2 North Yorkshire second-tier authorities of Selby, Harrogate and Second-tier Craven City of York Council Unitary E65 2 North Yorkshire second-tier authorities of Hambleton, Ryedale, Second-tier Scarborough and Richmondshire Lincolnshire County Council County E66 2 Lincolnshire second-tier authorities Second-tier North East Lincolnshire Council Unitary E67 1 North Lincolnshire Council Unitary Page | 11 London (continued on page 13) Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Ealing Council Unitary L01 1 Hounslow Council Unitary Hillingdon Council Unitary Harrow Council Unitary L02 1 Brent Council Unitary Barnet Council Unitary L03 1 Enfield Council Unitary Haringey Council Unitary Camden Council Unitary L04 1 Islington Council Unitary Hackney Council Unitary Kensington & Chelsea Council Mayoral Westminster Council Unitary L05 2 City of London Unitary Hammersmith & Fulham Council Unitary Waltham Forest Council Unitary L06 1 Redbridge Council Unitary Havering Council Unitary Tower Hamlets Council Unitary L07 1 Newham Council Unitary Barking & Dagenham Council Unitary Croydon Council Unitary L08 1 Sutton Council Unitary Merton Council Unitary Wandsworth Council Unitary L09 1 Richmond upon Thames Council Unitary Kingston upon Thames Council Unitary Page | 12 London (continued) Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Lambeth Council Unitary L10 1 Southwark Council Unitary Lewisham Council Unitary Bromley Council Unitary L11 1 Greenwich Council Unitary Bexley Council Unitary L12 1 Greater London Authority Unitary Northern Ireland Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Antrim and Newtownabbey N01 0.5 Unitary Borough Council Ards and North Down Borough N02 0.5 Unitary Council Armagh City, Banbridge and N03 0.5 Unitary Craigavon Borough Council N04 0.5 Belfast City Council Unitary Causeway Coast and Glens Borough N05 0.5 Unitary Council Derry City and Strabane District N06 0.5 Unitary Council Fermanagh and Omagh District N07 0.5 Unitary Council Lisburn and Castlereagh City N08 0.5 Unitary Council Mid and East Antrim Borough N09 0.5 Unitary Council N10 0.5 Mid Ulster District Council Unitary Newry, Mourne and Down District N11 0.5 Unitary Council Page | 13 Scotland (continued on page 15) Contract Number of Local authorities assigned to Type of number LDRs contract authority Aberdeen City Council Unitary S01 1 Aberdeenshire Council Unitary S02 0.5 Moray Council Unitary S03 0.5 Highland Council Unitary S04 0.5 Comhairle nan Eilean Siar Unitary
Recommended publications
  • Durham County Council Plan 2020-23
    Durham County Council Council Plan 2020-2023 Executive Summary County Durham is a dynamic place, used to overcoming challenges and reinventing itself. Recently, the council and partners agreed a vision for County Durham for 2035 following extensive consultation with our residents. Over 30,000 responses helped shape a vision that people recognise. This is to create more and better jobs, help people live long and independent lives and support communities to be well connected and supportive of each other. Our purpose holds to deliver on these ambitions against a context of COVID-19. This plan sets out how we will achieve this. We want to create more and better jobs by supporting businesses emerging from lockdown back to stability and help to rebuild our economy. We are developing a pipeline of projects and investment plans; our roadmap to help stimulate economic recovery. We will create major employment sites across the county, cementing our position as a premier place in the region to do business. Employability support programmes will be developed to help people back into employment or to start their own business. As young people return to our schools and colleges, we will ensure that they receive a good education and training to equip them with the skills they need to access opportunities of today and the future. We will help our tourism and hospitality sector to recover as a great visitor destination with a cultural offer which will help stimulate the local economy. We want our residents to live long and independent lives and remain in good health for many years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Duty to Co-Operate Statement of Common Ground
    CEC – Site Allocations and Development Policies – Duty to Co-operate Statement of Common Ground CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL SITE ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DUTY TO CO-OPERATE STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND Appendix 2: List of Signatories (as at April 2021) 1.1 Alongside the Revised Draft SADPD, its Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment, a DTC SOCG was published in October 2020 (as document ED 51) for consideration by, in particular, relevant DTC organisations who were then invited to sign it, prior to it being submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration by the appointed Inspector at examination. Section 5 of the DTC statement common ground noted that signatures would be requested, and that section completed during consultation on the revised publication draft SADPD. 1.2 Individual letters were sent on the 2nd November 2020 to DTC organisations to request that they confirm their agreement to the content of the DTC Draft Statement of Common Ground [ED 51], namely that: - - there are no strategic cross boundary issues that flow from the policies and proposals set out in the SADPD. - There is ongoing engagement with other local authorities related to existing memoranda of understanding put in place to support the Local Plan Strategy. 1.3 The following signatures have been received (original versions available on request): - • Cheshire West and Chester Council; • Warrington Borough Council; • Trafford Council; • Greater Manchester Combined Authority; • Manchester City Council; • Peak District National Park Authority; • High Peak Borough Council; • Derbyshire County Council; • Staffordshire Moorlands Council; • Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council; • Staffordshire County Council; • Stoke on Trent City Council; • Shropshire Council; • Environment Agency; • Historic England; • Natural England; • Homes England; • NHS Clinical Commissioning; • Highways England; • Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document – Liverpool City Council Consultation – Wirral Council Response ______
    WIRRAL COUNCIL CABINET – 9th April 2009 REPORT OF THE DEPUTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE SERVICES LIVERPOOL MARITIME MERCANTILE CITY WORLD HERITAGE SITE SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT – LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL CONSULTATION – WIRRAL COUNCIL RESPONSE _________________________________________________________________________ 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Liverpool City Council has issued a consultation draft Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site (WHS), which includes the Liverpool Waterfront and parts of Liverpool City Centre. The Liverpool Waterfront has a buffer zone extending to the centre of the River Mersey, with rigorous controls on development to be provided in that zone by policies in the emerging Liverpool Local Development Framework. The City Council’s draft SPD sets out a more detailed planning policy framework for the WHS, which has an overall aim of encouraging economic regeneration, whilst ensuring the protection of the outstanding universal value of the WHS. 1.2 Consultation responses are required by 14 th April and Cabinet is asked to agree that the comments of the Director of Corporate Services within this report form the response to Liverpool City Council on the Liverpool World Heritage Site Supplementary Planning Document. 2. The Consultation Supplementary Planning Document Outlined 2.1 The Liverpool WHS was defined by the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation (UNESCO) in 2004 as: ‘the supreme example of a commercial port at the time of Britain’s greatest global influence’ . Both the port and parts of the city centre were included to reflect the influence on the built environment of the early development of dock construction, port management and international trading systems in the 18 th and 19 th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Flood Resilience and Protection
    Household flood resilience and protection: a Defra consultation workshop (E8515) Manchester United Football Club, Sir Matt Busby Way, Old Trafford, Manchester - NAME POSITION ORGANISATION STATUS Mr Shaun Alexander Merseyside Waste & Disposal Delegate Mr Mark Bartlett Civil Contingencies Lancaster City Council Delegate Officer Mr Geoff Baslett Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Delegate Mr John Batty Director Bluejohn Marketing Chairman Mr David Beddoes Student University of Wolverhampton Delegate Mr David Bithell Public Health Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Services Manager Mr Rob Bromley Emergency Planning Trafford Metropolitan Borough Delegate Officer Mr Samuel Brougham Architect/Sustainabilit PRP Architects Delegate y Consultant Mr Mark Camborne Health,Safety & Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Resilience Manager Ms Rita Carletti Project Officer Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Mr Philip Charles Project Manager CIRIA CIRIA Staff Mr Ian Clark Principal Engineer RSK Group Ltd Delegate Mr Derek Cochrane Director Derek Cochrane Associates Delegate Ms Aimee Conroy Traniee Emergency Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Delegate Planning Officer Mr Stephen Corrigan Head of Emergency Liverpool Primary Care Trust Delegate Planning Mrs Maureen Denham Claims Handler RBS Delegate Mr Ian Dixon Watch Manager Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Delegate Mr Mark Ellis Regeneration Team Capita Symonds Ltd Delegate Leader Miss Emma-Jane Ellison Emergency Planning Shropshire County Council Delegate Officer Mr Glenn Finch Special
    [Show full text]
  • Inform Key Judgements Made by Ofsted
    Agenda Item * For publication Bedford Borough Council – off Agenda approval October 2013 Report by the Portfolio Holder for Education and the Executive Director for Children’s Services, Schools and Families Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT TO IMPLEMENT THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES BILL 1. Executive Summary This report relates to implementation of the Children and Families Bill (2013) which is expected to become the Children and Families Act in September 2014. The Bill changes the statutory framework in relation to Children with Special Educational Needs (SEN). The Council will have a duty to develop and implement the new legislation for more than 700 young people with Statements of SEN in a significantly changed way. The new approach is called the Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP) often referred to as the ‘single plan.’ The Local Authority will have a duty to publish a local offer, embed joint commissioning, offer personalised budgets, develop a key worker role and develop a new statementing process. In addition, the new legislation brings together two statutory frameworks for pre and post 16 and the Borough will therefore have to extend its responsibilities to assessing and monitoring Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCP) for young people in education and training up to 25 years (Appendix A) The implementation of the single plan will inform key judgements made by Ofsted. It is critical that the council utilises this funding stream to deliver the change required. 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Mayor is requested to consider the report and, if satisfied, approve acceptance of the Grant which will provide capacity to prepare and deliver our new legal obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning
    CABINET MEMBER FOR HOUSING, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND PLANNING FEBRUARY 2011 PUBLIC REPORT Cabinet Member responsible: Councillor Peter Hiller, Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning Contact Officer: Amy Wardell, ITS Senior Officer 01733 317481 NOVATION OF THE REAL TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION MAINTENANCE AND EXPANSION CONTRACT. R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S FROM : Infrastructure Planning & Delivery Deadline date : N/A The Cabinet Member is recommended to approve: • A novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 1. ORIGIN OF REPORT 1. This report is submitted to the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning for a key decision to be made. 2. PURPOSE AND REASON FOR REPORT 2.1 The purpose of this report is to provide additional background information with regard to the request made to the Council for the novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 2.2 This report is for the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning to consider as set out at delegation number 3.7.7 (a) of Part 3, Section 3 of the delegation document. 3. TIMESCALE Is this a Major No Policy/Statutory Plan 4. RELEVANT DETAILS: 4.1 Advanced Communication and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited operated the existing contract for the maintenance and expansion of real time passenger information within the Peterborough area. 4.2 The novation is a result of the acquisition of ACIS Limited by VIX Technology Group to form VIX ACIS Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire and Warrington
    Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Regional Assembly's
    EAST MIDLANDS TROUBLED FAMILIES LEADS NETWORK Action Points of Meeting held at 10am, 11th October 2013, Conference Room, East Midlands Councils, Melton Mowbray In Attendance/Apologies Name Organisation Present Apology Phil Poirier DCLG Liz Perfect (LP) Derby City Council Tim Clegg Derby City Council Rob Fletcher (RF) Derbyshire County Council Judith Walker (JW) JCP/DWP Michelle Skinner Leicester City Council Andy Robinson (AR) Chair Leicestershire County Council Mags Walsh (MW) Leicestershire County Council Lynn Gibson (LG) Leicestershire SLF Programme Mark Rainey (MR) Lincolnshire County Council Alex Holloway (AH) Lincolnshire County Council Nicci Marzec (NM) Northamptonshire CC Tim O’Neill Nottingham City Council Nicky Dawson Nottingham City Council Jenny Spencer (JS) Nottinghamshire CC Helga Spry-Shute (HS-S) Rutland County Council Peter Williams (PW) EMC Kevin Thomas (KT) Working Links Pauline Grice (PG) TFEA Liz Annetts (LA) TFEA Sarah Holtham (SH) TFEA Item Subject Actions 2. Notes and Action Points of 25th June 2013 Meeting Actions Points: Action for Russ Aziz, DCLG – it was understood that claimants need to be over 18 in order for their payments to impact upon payments to other family members. Actions for AR – AR had yet to speak with Louise Casey and DCLG’s TF Unit on AR to follow up the possibility of setting up a senior level national meeting of TF leads and also to ascertain whether embargoed data could be released a day early to relevant local authorities in order to prepare a possible media response. Action for Kevin Tinsley, DCLG – Clarification was provided on the point of whether claims can be made for those that volunteer for the Work Programme as well as those that are mandated to enter it.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for All Archaeological Work in County Durham and Darlington
    1 Standards for all Archaeological Work in County Durham and Darlington Contents Standards for all Archaeological Work in County Durham and Darlington ............................. 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 General Standards prior to commencement of fieldwork .................................................... 2 The Written Scheme of Investigation .................................................................................. 4 Fieldwork standards............................................................................................................ 8 Post excavation standards ................................................................................................ 12 Public Engagement........................................................................................................... 14 The Report ........................................................................................................................ 15 OASIS ............................................................................................................................... 17 Archiving Standards.......................................................................................................... 18 Publication ........................................................................................................................ 19 Appendix 1 Yorkshire, The Humber & The North East: A Regional Statement Of Good Practice For
    [Show full text]
  • CEO Abacus Home Head of Commercial Motor Allianz Head of Sustainability Arrival Managing Director Avis Budget Head of Innovation
    CEO Abacus Home Head of Commercial Motor Allianz Head of Sustainability Arrival Managing Director Avis Budget Head of Innovation Bam Nuttall Director - E-Mobility Baringa Partners General Manager Beamlive General Manager Beemcar Principle Transport Policy Officer Birmingham City Council Senior Transport Planner Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council Senior Transport Coordinator Bracknell Forest Council Senior Transport Planner Bristol City Council Transport Strategy Lead Officer Buckinghamshire Council Director, Transport Burges Salmon Llp Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Combined Cam Programme Director Authority Transport Policy & Programme Officer Carmarthenshire County Council Senior Technologist/Transport Modeller Connected Places Catapult Transport Innovation Manager Coventry City Council Managing Director DAF Trucks Limited Director Deloitte Head of Accessible and Community Transport Department for Infrastructure Head of Freight Decarbonisation Department for Transport Maas Policy Advisor Department for Transport Head of Data Department for Transport Private Secretary to The Chief Scientific Adviser Department for Transport Principal Behavioural Scientist Department for Transport Head of Smart Ticketing Technology Department for Transport Deputy Chief Scientific Adviser Department for Transport Senior Policy Adviser Department for Transport Director of Strategy, Policy, Digital & Technology DVSA Principal Transport Planner East Sussex County Council Assistant Vice President of EU Mobility Enterprise Holdings Head of Sustainable Transport
    [Show full text]
  • Can a Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed
    Can A Planning Contravention Notice Be Appealed Aldis pargets her typologist inland, whole-wheat and incisive. Electrophoretic Powell redded unreconcilably. Complacent Barnebas remitting her tribologist so rightward that Sollie ratten very adroitly. We will formally confirmed by the notice can a planning be appealed and to The requirements of options available to a contravention of middlesbrough council can carry a contravention notice can a be appealed to sell your client relationship between legal proceedings where a continuous uninterrupted period. There however no right upon appeal Section 215 notice this character be used to require improvements to the appearance. The notice be used on the customer care in carrying out the precise location of planning contravention notice be a planning contravention notice can quickly as possible breach of lawfulness for. Again might appeal and be submitted under simple procedure previously described. Development and Planning Amendment Act 201. We decide it is caused harm to take formal enforcement officer on that contravention notice is no right of planning law count more likely, the gdpr cookie settings. We can improve your local authority need my letter and being caused by recipients of a contravention notices? There cannot also a rib of round against any formal notice must if planning. While planning applications can be viewed online we regret that it nothing not currently. An opportunity to the land at a considerable delay necessary, if it is the notice can also be suspended and there is. It must be acceptable development within an owner privileges to a planning can contravention notice be appealed against breaches of condition of a stop notice must specify the enforcement.
    [Show full text]