List of Councils in England by Type
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Plymouth City Council Planning Guidance
Plymouth City Council Planning Guidance Monomorphic Fabio dazzled: he plasticizing his makefasts generically and clearly. Crabbier Perry scamp some ignorers after beardless Quill frizzles succinctly. Lageniform Heywood check-in some stepper and knifes his resignations so unremittently! The way i sense checked by city council member james prom said her body was already Averley outlines planning proposals to local chief planners, Nine Manchester councils to discuss joint plan, Tendring adopts part one of local plan. Plans that join have seen by of new homes double in. She later plans for planning council members, city council website and speaking with. Connect a nest to accord this element live on most site. Three things to encounter from New Plymouth City for News. Our city council in plymouth plan process has many distinct geographical information you can receive email. CITY OF PLYMOUTH AGENDA Regular City who May 2. Urban Planning Coordinator at Plymouth City Council. AONB when considering applications that left have an yield on the AONB. The plymouth and guidance has surpassed several county councils should be removed on the coronavirus job retention scheme will also gave an area. Until the origin paramter for cms. The division helps implement the doll through tools that strew the zoning ordinance and. Hollydale golf course land to council can also gave commanding views and planning? For queries about Land Charges registers or Agricultural Credits. Intended and unintended consequences? Pcc therefore the city council and working in the activities and champions of her. Is through an update on. 7 city of plymouth Amador County. South West Joint Local Plan. -
Simultaneous Cabinet Further Transformation In
6 SIMULTANEOUS CABINET Monday 13 November 2017 FURTHER TRANSFORMATION IN EAST SUFFOLK (REP1629) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Suffolk Coastal District Council and Waveney District Council agreed in January 2017 to create a new Council for east Suffolk. This was preceded by an intensive period of public consultation in November 2016, the results of which demonstrated that the majority of residents were in favour of one district Council in east Suffolk. 2. The decision to create a new Council for east Suffolk was both ambitious and ground breaking. A “super district” Council will be formed which will be the largest in England in terms of population. The creation of a new Council follows the successful legacy of both Councils working closely together for many years. Officers of all levels of seniority are shared, a joint Business Plan has been adopted and other key policies such as the Housing Strategy are shared. The Councils already share one website under the “East Suffolk” banner and Councillors from both authorities have attended meetings of each Council’s Cabinets since 2010. Cabinet portfolios are aligned and members have shared representation on various outside bodies. 3. The creation of a new Council will be a model other authorities follow as they decide how best to grapple with the significant challenges facing local government. Councils need to be of a scale large enough to face these challenges by having a loud enough voice, a strong bargaining position, a healthy balance sheet and a resilient workforce, yet small enough to feel connected to their residents. The creation of the new Council for east Suffolk will strike that balance. -
Electoral Review of Rochdale Borough Council Submission on Council Size
Electoral Review of Rochdale__________________________________________________________ Electoral Review of Rochdale Borough Council Submission on Council Size Introduction 1. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) has informed Rochdale Borough Council of its decision to carry out an Electoral Review of the Council size (number of elected Councillors) and the number of wards and ward boundaries for the Council. 1.1 Rochdale Council has not had an electoral review since 2003. It will have been 19 years since the current boundaries were set by the time this review’s recommendations are in place. The LGBCE believes this is a reasonable interpretation of Section 56 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009. 1.2 This review began in July 2019; any changes that are made in regards to council size and ward boundaries will come into effect for the local government elections in May 2022. 1.3 Section 56 states that electoral arrangements of a principal local authority’s area should be reviewed ‘from time to time’. The LGBCE will be reviewing all Greater Manchester boroughs that haven’t had a review since the programme began in the early 2000s. 1.4 At present there are wards with electoral imbalances across the borough of Rochdale; therefore providing an unfair representation at local government elections. In two wards the size of the electorate has a variance of greater than +/- 10% in comparison to the average (Kingsway 11% and West Middleton 14%) 1.5 This document is Rochdale Borough Council’s council size submission, which provides the LGBCE with the Council’s view on the appropriate council size and supporting evidence across the following three broad areas (as stated in the LGBCE guidance on council size for local authority elected members and staff): Governance and decision making – determining the role of councillors in decision making, and how work and responsibilities are distributed across the Council. -
BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION and GROWTH Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Prospectus Local Authorities As Well As Other Key Stakeholders
BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION AND GROWTH 02 THE BERKSHIRE Berkshire Prospectus Berkshire PROSPECTUS THE OPPORTUNITIES IN THIS PROSPECTUS It is no coincidence that this prospectus for Berkshire has been released in tandem with the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Recovery and REPRESENT A CHANCE Renewal Plan. The two documents sit alongside each other, evidencing the formidable collaborative nature of how TO RESET POST COVID the LEP is working in partnership with the six Berkshire Local Authorities as well as other key stakeholders. AND MAKE BERKSHIRE This prospectus clearly identifies several key schemes and projects which, when delivered, will greatly enhance Berkshire’s appeal as a place to live and EVEN BETTER work in the years ahead. The projects highlighted in this prospectus represent unique opportunities for new investment that will appeal to a wide range of partners, locally, regionally and nationally. The LEP and Local Authorities will work alongside private and public sector colleagues to facilitate the development and successful delivery of these great opportunities. COLLABORATIVE WORKING We should highlight the constructive partnership between the Local Authorities and the LEP, who together have forged a great working relationship with One Public Estate (OPE). Established in 2013, OPE now works nationally with more than 300 councils.These projects are transforming local communities and public services right across the country. They provide technical support and funding to councils to deliver ambitious property and place-focused programmes in collaboration with central government and other public sector partners. Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Thames Valley 03 As highlighted in the Recovery and Renewal Plan, Thames Valley Berkshire is more than the sum of its parts. -
Meeting of the Council Summons and Agenda
MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 17th March 2021 SUMMONS AND AGENDA BOLTON COUNCIL ________________________________ Members of the Council are hereby summoned to attend a meeting of the Council to be held via Microsoft Teams Live Event on Wednesday next, 17 March, 2021 at 7.00 p.m. when the following business is proposed to be transacted: - 1. Minutes To approve as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Council held on 17th February, 2021. 2. Constitution (a) Motion in the name of Councillor Greenhalgh – That the quarterly report on Executive decisions made under the special urgency provisions, as circulated, be noted. (b) Motion in the name of Councillor Greenhalgh – That the amendments to the Council’s Scheme of Delegation for 2020/2021, as circulated, be approved. 3. Recommendations to Council (a) Motion in the name of Councillor Greenhalgh - (1) Agree to the establishment of joint committees and to delegate to those committees the Authority’s functions as set out in the report to the Cabinet on 8th March, 2021 regarding Clean Air (‘the Report’) at paragraph 8.5 and the terms of reference as set out in Appendix 6 to the report; (2) Agree to appoint the Executive Cabinet Member for Environmental Service Delivery to sit on both committees for purposes as set out in the Report at paragraph 8.5 with specific terms of reference as set out in Appendix 6 to the report; and (3) Agree to appoint the Executive Cabinet Member for Children’s Services as substitute for both committees for purposes as set out in the Report at paragraph 8.5 with specific terms of reference as set out in Appendix 6 to the Report. -
Add Presentation Title Here
EDRM - Why BBW Choose OpenText A solution and Partner to deliver benefits • EDRMs to meet our needs for the whole organisation and beyond – For BBW – For NTC across all retained services – Joining up processes with mutli-agency collaboration • A partner with proven expertise and Local Government reference ability – BBW have OpenText tools (training communications etc) already developed with other Councils that can accelerate implementation (and hence benefits) • A partner rated highly by independent analysts – Gartner, Forrester and others • A partner who the BBW team have used before BBW are confident that OpenText will help achieve benefits in our services and support similar levels of savings for NTC. It will also support multi agency collaboration as a potential income stream to NTC % of the 90 Fortune 500 Companies are leveraging Enterprise Information Management (EIM) from OpenText to turn vision into reality $1 20 Billion years Global of Innovation Revenue $1 5000 # EIM Billion R&D Investment # of Employees 50k 141 60 Countries Offices around the world # of Customers # Supported Customers (by Industry) Food & Beverage Financial Services Oil & Gas Pharmaceuticals Transportation Government Media Legal Manufacturing Examples of Local Government Customers London Borough of Ealing Stockport Metropolitan BC Mid Sussex District Council London Borough of Haringey Buckinghamshire County Council Cambridge City Council London Borough of Hounslow Central Bedfordshire East Hertfordshire District Council London Borough of Merton Cornwall County -
Foi 6711 Q & A
FOI’s received and answered – October 2014 FOI 6711 Q I request a list of Business Rate accounts that meet the following criteria: 1. Current overpayment/credit shown if credit balance hasn’t been carried forward 2. Accounts where a ‘write on’ has been used since 1st April 2000 to cancel an overpayment which has not since been reversed FOI 6711 A If you would like a copy of the attachment sent in response to this request please email [email protected] and quote the above reference. FOI 6712 Q Please can you provide me with the information in relation to business rates accounts in your area. (a) Addresses of all commercial properties that currently have a credit on their account above £1,000. (b) The names and addresses of the ratepayer of the property referred to in (a) if they are NOT a sole trader or individual. (c) The amount by which the account is in credit (d) The rating year that the credit arose (e) The date the information was generated. FOI 6712 A If you would like a copy of the attachment sent in response to this request please email [email protected] and quote the above reference. FOI 6713 Q Please would the Council, firstly, confirm that the department known as "Children's Social Services/Care" comply - at all times - with the Children Act 1989? Please would the Council also confirm that it uses "Risk Assessments" when complying with the Children Act 1989? Please would the Council provide me with one blank copy of all of the various Risk Assessment forms used by the Council "prior" to approaching the Courts in respect of applications -
Review of Our Performance So Far
Draft: Final. APPENDIX 6: South Gloucestershire Council Climate Emergency Declaration Review of Year One of the Climate Emergency Action Plan South Gloucestershire Council Climate Emergency University Advisory Group UWE Bristol October 2020 1 Draft: Final. Index Section Page Executive Summary 3 Introduction and Context 8 South Gloucestershire’s Climate Emergency Process 10 South Gloucestershire’s Baseline 13 South Gloucestershire’s Climate Emergency Year 1 15 Action Plan Gaps in the Content of the Year 1 Plan 19 Year on Year Reduction in Emissions Required to 20 Meet the Target Areas of Focus for the Year 2 Plan 22 Recommendations for Improving Partnership Work 24 and Increasing Area Wide Engagement on the Climate Emergency Strategic Context (Political, Environmental, Social, 29 Technical, Legal, Economic) analysis Comparison of South Gloucestershire’s Climate Action 30 with that of North Somerset, Oxford, Plymouth and Wiltshire. Fit of South Gloucestershire’s Actions with the 42 National Policy Direction Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations 46 Appendix 1. 50 Setting Climate Commitments for South Gloucestershire. Quantifying the implications of the United Nations Paris Agreement for South Gloucestershire. Tyndall Centre Method Appendix 2. Oxford City Council Climate Emergency 52 Appendix 3. Wiltshire Climate Emergency 58 Appendix 4. North Somerset Climate Emergency 60 Appendix 5. Plymouth City Council Climate 62 Emergency Appendix 6. Global Warming of 1.5°C IPCC Special 64 Report. Summary Report for Policymakers Appendix 7 A Note on Terms 64 Note: All web sites accessed in September and October 2020 2 Draft: Final. Executive Summary South Gloucestershire Council asked UWE’ University Advisory Group to review Year One of the Climate Emergency Action Plan. -
East Midlands Regional Assembly's
EAST MIDLANDS TROUBLED FAMILIES LEADS NETWORK Action Points of Meeting held at 10am, 11th October 2013, Conference Room, East Midlands Councils, Melton Mowbray In Attendance/Apologies Name Organisation Present Apology Phil Poirier DCLG Liz Perfect (LP) Derby City Council Tim Clegg Derby City Council Rob Fletcher (RF) Derbyshire County Council Judith Walker (JW) JCP/DWP Michelle Skinner Leicester City Council Andy Robinson (AR) Chair Leicestershire County Council Mags Walsh (MW) Leicestershire County Council Lynn Gibson (LG) Leicestershire SLF Programme Mark Rainey (MR) Lincolnshire County Council Alex Holloway (AH) Lincolnshire County Council Nicci Marzec (NM) Northamptonshire CC Tim O’Neill Nottingham City Council Nicky Dawson Nottingham City Council Jenny Spencer (JS) Nottinghamshire CC Helga Spry-Shute (HS-S) Rutland County Council Peter Williams (PW) EMC Kevin Thomas (KT) Working Links Pauline Grice (PG) TFEA Liz Annetts (LA) TFEA Sarah Holtham (SH) TFEA Item Subject Actions 2. Notes and Action Points of 25th June 2013 Meeting Actions Points: Action for Russ Aziz, DCLG – it was understood that claimants need to be over 18 in order for their payments to impact upon payments to other family members. Actions for AR – AR had yet to speak with Louise Casey and DCLG’s TF Unit on AR to follow up the possibility of setting up a senior level national meeting of TF leads and also to ascertain whether embargoed data could be released a day early to relevant local authorities in order to prepare a possible media response. Action for Kevin Tinsley, DCLG – Clarification was provided on the point of whether claims can be made for those that volunteer for the Work Programme as well as those that are mandated to enter it. -
![Written Evidence Submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/0523/written-evidence-submitted-by-east-sussex-county-council-asc-021-280523.webp)
Written Evidence Submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021]
Written evidence submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021] • How has Covid-19 changed the landscape for long-term funding reform of the adult social care sector? The challenges facing the adult social care market prior to the pandemic are well documented and, in many cases, have been brought into sharp focus over the last 12 months. Local Authority published rates; contract arrangements (e.g. block arrangements); commissioning approaches (e.g. strategic partners) and CCG funding agreements including Better Care Fund allocations are all key funding reform considerations which sit alongside the necessity to offer choice, personalised care and high quality, safe services. Residential and nursing care There are 306 registered care homes in East Sussex – the majority are small independently run homes, which don’t have the wrap-around organisational infrastructure enjoyed by larger / national providers. In East Sussex, Local Authority placements are made across around one-third of the residential and nursing care market. At the peak of the second wave over 100 care homes in East Sussex were closed to admissions due to Covid outbreaks. Week commencing 04/01/21 there were 853 confirmed cases of Covid19 in East Sussex care home settings. During 2021, as of the week ending 19/03/2021, East Sussex has had 2,404 deaths registered in total and 1,110 of these have been attributable to COVID-19, of which 597 have occurred in hospital and 436 have occurred in care homes (LG reform data). In the two years up to April 2019, there were 26 residential and nursing home closures in East Sussex resulting in a loss of 435 beds, across all care groups. -
IPPR | Empowering Counties: Unlocking County Devolution Deals ABOUT the AUTHORS
REPORT EMPOWERING COUNTIES UNLOCKING COUNTY DEVOLUTION DEALS Ed Cox and Jack Hunter November 2015 © IPPR 2015 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in November 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors ’ only. POSITIVE IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................3 1. Devolution unleashed .....................................................................................9 2. Why devolve to counties? ............................................................................11 2.1 Counties and their economic opportunities ................................................... -
Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent
APPENDIX 2 Energy Company Obligation: Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent On behalf of Action on Energy Cambridgeshire including: Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. Date of publication: **TBC** Version: 1.4 URL: [insert webpage SOI has been published on] 1) Introduction 1.1. Fuel poverty in England is measured using the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) indicator, which considers a household to be fuel poor if: they have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level); and were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.1 1.2. Nationally the 2015 figures for England estimate that 2.5 million households suffer from fuel poverty, 11% the total.2 Living in a cold home doubles the risk of respiratory problems in children; increases the risk of minor illnesses; exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and is associated with 3 times the level of excess winter deaths as the warmest homes.3 1.3. Action on Energy Cambridgeshire is a collective of the city and district councils that work together for mutual benefit in addressing fuel poverty. We welcome the introduction of Flexible Eligibility as part of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) as it will allow us to support additional vulnerable households under broader criteria. 1.4. Fuel Poverty is a serious concern in our county and affects over 19,000 households4 contributing to more than 800 Excess Winter Deaths on average each year.5 Although our collective actions helped reduce fuel poverty across the county by an estimated 1468 households from 2013-2015 however there is still more to be done.