DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex F –List of Consultees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex F –List of Consultees ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London Borough of Redbridge Derbyshire Dale District Council London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Devon County Council London Borough of Southwark Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Sutton Dorset County Council London Borough of Tower Hamlets Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Waltham Forest Durham County Council London Borough of Wandsworth East Riding of Yorkshire Council London Borough of Westminster East Sussex County Council Luton Borough Council Essex County Council Manchester City Council Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council Medway Council Gloucestershire County Council Middlesbrough Council Halton Borough Council Milton Keynes Council Hampshire County Council Newcastle upon Tyne City Council Hartlepool Borough Council Norfolk County Council Herefordshire Council North East Lincolnshire Council Hertfordshire County Council North Lincolnshire Council Isle of Wight Council North Somerset Council Kent County Council North Tyneside Borough Council Kent Highway Services North Yorkshire County Council Kingston upon Hull Council Northamptonshire County Council Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council Northumberland County Council Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council Nottingham City Council Lancashire County Council Nottinghamshire County Council Leeds City Council Oldham Borough Council Leicester City Council Oxfordshire County Council - F1 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Oxfordshire County Council Stockton on Tees Borough Council Peterborough City Council Stoke on Trent City Council Plymouth City Council Suffolk County Council Portsmouth City Council Sunderland City Council Reading Borough Council Surrey County Council Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Swindon Borough Council Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Rotherham Borough Council Telford and Wrekin Council Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea Thurrock Borough Council Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames Torbay Council Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council Rutland County Council Transport for London Salford City Council Wakefield City Council Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Sefton Council Warrington Borough Council Sheffield City Council Warwickshire County Council Shropshire County Council West Berkshire District Council Slough Borough Council West Sussex County Council Solihull Borough Council Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Somerset County Council Wiltshire County Council South Gloucestershire Council Wirral Metropolitan Borough South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Wokingham District Council Council Wolverhampton Borough Council Southampton City Council Worcestershire County Council Southend on Sea Borough Council St Helens Council Staffordshire County Council Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - F2 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Utility Companies Representative bodies ElectraLink Ltd National Joint Utilities Group Water UK Energy Networks Association Energetics UK (was Global Utility Society of British Gas Industries Connections Ltd) UKWIR Energy and Utility Skills Limited Energy Data Company Limited Advantica Technologies Limited Airwave O2 Ltd Energy Networks Association Albion Water Ltd Anglian Water Services Atlas Internet(UK) Limited (part of Timico) Essex and Suffolk Water Bord Gais Eireann Farice hf Bournemouth and West Hampshire Water Plc Fibernet Group Plc Bristol Water Plc British Energy Plc FLAG Telecom Ireland Limited British Water Folkestone and Dover Water Services Ltd BT Openreach Cable and Wireless Fujitsu Services Limited Cambridge Water Plc Carphone Warehouse/Onetel Fulcrum Connections Gamma Telecom CE-Electric UK Central Networks Gaz de France ESS Centrica plc Cityspace Ltd Gazprom Marketing & Trading Ltd Contract National Gas Ltd Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Corona Energy Limited Crown Energy Limited Good Energy Limited Dee Valley Water Plc Distrigaz NV Hartlepool Water Plc Dwr Cymru (Welsh Water) E.ON UK Plc Easynet Group PLC Highlands and Islands Enterprise Hutchison Network Services UK Ltd Economy Gas Limited HydroWingas Limited Ecotricity i-21 Limited Inexus Group EDF Energy Networks Limited International Power Plc Eircom (UK) Limited Internet Central Ltd - F3 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Interoute Pipex Communications Plc KDDI Europe Ltd Portsmouth Water Limited Kingston Communications Premier Fuels Laing Energy Ltd Lancaster University Network Services Ltd Reach Europe Ltd Level 3 Communications Redstone Mid Kent Water Plc Regent Gas Limited MLL Telecom Ltd Monal Utilities Limited Rocom Network Services Ltd National Grid Scottish and Southern Energy Plc Neos Networks Sempra Energy Europe Limited NetServices Plc Severn Trent Water Ltd Shell Gas Direct Limited NewNet Plc South East Water Plc Northern Electric Distribution Limited South Staffordshire Water Plc Northern Ireland Electricity Plc South West Water Plc Southern Electric Plc Northumbrian Water Southern Gas Networks NYNAS UK AB O2 Southern Water Ltd S P Power Systems Statoil (UK) Limited O2 (UK) Limited Statoil Gas Trading Limited Opera Telecom Ltd Surf Telecoms Limited Opus Energy Limited Orange Personal Communications Services Ltd - F4 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Sutton and East Surrey Water Plc United Utilities Plc Utilita Electricity Limited SWALEC Team Group of Companies UK ltd Utilita Gas Limited Technical Solution Brecks Ltd Telecom New Zealand (UK) Licences Limited Viatel TeliaSonera International Carrier UK Ltd Virgin Media Vitae Energy Limited Telstra (UK) Ltd Tendring Hundred Water Services Ltd Thames Water Utilities Ltd Vitol Gas Ltd UK Vodafone Limited Three Valleys Water Plc Vtesse Networks Limited Thus VTL (UK) Ltd Thus Plc Wales and West Utilities Ltd Tiscali Water UK T-Mobile (UK) Limited Wessex Water Services Ltd Torch Communications Ltd Western Power Distribution Total Gas and Power Limited WightCable North TradeLink Solutions Ltd Wilton Energy Limited (SembCorp utilities (UK) Ltd) Trafigura Energy Limited Yorkshire Water Services Ltd UK Broadband GTC-UK UKCTA Northern Gas Networks - F5 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES CONTRACTORS Alfred McAlpine Amey plc Ashtead Plant Hire Atkins Atkins Balfour Beatty Balfour Beatty Utility Infrastructure Services Carillion Clancy Docwra Colas Edmund Nuttall Enterprise (Highway Services) Fitzpatrick Fitzpatrick Halcrow Highways Term Maintenance Association Jacobs Babtie May Gurney Ltd Morgan Est Morrison Mott MacDonald Mouchel Group Ringway Scott Wilson Skanska UK URS Corporation Ltd (Computer Consultancy) WSP Group Plc (Civil Engineer) - F6 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Government Audit Commission Government Office for the West Midlands - Better Regulation Executive - BERR CE Government Office for the West Midlands - Department of Energy and Climate Change T (DECC) Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber - CE Highways Agency HM Treasury DCLG - fire Home Office DCLG - LGF HSE DEFRA (Water Supply and Regulation HSE - Gas & Pipelines Unit Division) Department for Communities and Local Government Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Local Government Information House Committee DIUS Ofcom DRDNI Office of Fair Trading Enterprise Directorate Ofgem Environment Agency Ofwat Government Office for East of England Olympic Delivery Authority Government Office for London - RD Road Works Policy Co-ordinator Scottish Government Office for the East Midlands - T Executive Scottish Executive Government Office for the North East - CE Technology Strategy Board Government Office for the North West - RD Welsh Assembly Government Government Office for the South East - TM Government Office for the South West - F7 - ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Other organisations AA Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Adshel Committee ASLEC Electrical Contractors Association Associated British Ports Association for Consultancy and Energy Networks Association Engineering Association for Geographic Information Energy Watch Engenica Association of Chief Police
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cheshire West & Chester Council
    CHESHIRE WEST & CHESTER COUNCIL: ELECTORAL REVIEW Submission to the Boundary Committee on Council Size. 1 Context 1.1 This submission sets out Cheshire West & Chester Council’s proposal on Council size. This is the first issue to be addressed in the electoral review of the area. The proposal is for a Council of 75 elected Members in Cheshire West & Chester. This proposal was made by resolution of the Council on 2 April 2009 at its first meeting after vesting day, on which it replaced former county and district councils. The three political parties represented on the Council; Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat, concurred in the making of the Council’s resolution. 1.2 The proposal has been formulated having regard to key principles of electoral review; that local government should be convenient to local people and effective. Further to these principles, the Council is of the belief that its proposal will ensure that all roles at political level can be carried out effectively, and will enable the authority to achieve its objective of being an exceptionally excellent Council. 1.3 Cheshire West & Chester is a newly created Unitary Council, delivering by direct provision or by commissioning, the full range of Local Authority services in its area. The range of its products is tremendous - from a direction sign on a footpath to the care of a vulnerable child. The Council has at its heart, the wish to serve the whole community of those who live in, work in, or otherwise visit Cheshire West and Chester. It serves a population of 329,100, the fourth largest of Unitary Local Authorities in the North West and the sixteenth largest in England.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 6Th September 1968 9713
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 6TH SEPTEMBER 1968 9713 3. West Park Street (A.141) and Park Street (A.141) A copy of the proposed Order and a map showing The east side of West Park Street (A.141) and the the length of road .to which ithe proposed Order south-east side of Park Street (A.141) from a relates may be inspected during normal office hours point 35 yards north of the northern side of the ait the office of (the Associate County Surveyor, junction of West Park Street (A.141) with Victoria County Hall, March, and 'the office of «he Clerk of Street, for a distance of 47 yards in a northerly the Council, Ely Rural District Council, Council and easterly direction. Offices, Lynn Road, Ely. Objections too the proposal together with ithe SECOND SCHEDULE grounds on which they are made must be sent in writing <to me by the 30th day of September 1968. Side of length of road in the Urban District of Chatteris Dated 5th September 1968. West Park Street (.4.141) W. Liddell Hann, Clerk of .the County Council. East side—from a point 25 yards north of the Shire Hall, northern side of its junction with Victoria Street Casttle Hill, Cambridge. for a distance of 10 yards in a northerly direction. (289) SCHEDULE 1. 2. Length of road in the Direction CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND ISLE OF ELY Parish of WUburton South to north. COUNTY COUNCIL That length of Church Lane (unclassified) which The County of Cambridgeshire and Isle of Ely extends from its westerly (Broad Street and Forehill, Ely) (Prohibition of junction with "the Wil- Waiting) (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for the South East – Consent for Submission of Proposal to Government
    CABINET 7 APRIL 2020 TRANSPORT FOR THE SOUTH EAST – CONSENT FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL TO GOVERNMENT Portfolio Holder: Councillor Phil Filmer, Portfolio Holder for Front Line Services Report from: Richard Hicks, Director of Place and Deputy Chief Executive Author: Michael Edwards, Head of Integrated Transport Summary This report seeks Cabinet support for the creation of a Sub-National Transport Body for the South East, confirmation of Medway’s position as a constituent authority, and consent for the submission of a Proposal to Government for statutory status. 1. Budget and Policy Framework 1.1 Medway Council does not have a stated policy position on Sub-National Transport Bodies. It is possible, however, to align the principles behind its creation with the Council’s priority of maximising regeneration and economic growth. 2. Background 2.1 Transport for the South East (TfSE) formed as a shadow Sub-National Transport Body (STB) in June 2017, and brings together sixteen local transport authorities: Bracknell Forest, Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, Hampshire, Isle of Wight, Medway, Kent, Portsmouth, Reading, Slough, Southampton, Surrey, West Berkshire, West Sussex, Windsor and Maidenhead and Wokingham. The Shadow Partnership Board also includes arrangements for involving five Local Enterprise Partnerships in its governance process, along with two National Park Authorities, forty-four Boroughs and Districts in East Sussex, Hampshire, Kent, Surrey and West Sussex, and representatives from the transport industry. 2.2 TfSE’s aim, as set out in its vision statement, is to grow the South East’s economy by delivering a safe, sustainable, and integrated transport system that makes the South East area more productive and competitive, improves the quality of life for all residents, and protects and enhances its natural and built environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Held on Tuesday, 7Th October, 2008 at Committee Suite 1 & 2, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach
    CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL Minutes of a meeting of the Cabinet held on Tuesday, 7th October, 2008 at Committee Suite 1 & 2, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach PRESENT Councillor W Fitzgerald (Chairman) Councillor R Domleo (Vice-Chairman) Councillors D Brickhill, D Brown, P Findlow, F Keegan, A Knowles, P Mason and B Silvester 67 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor J Macrae. 68 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Key Decision CE22 - Transforming Learning Communities: Emerging Issues from Locality Review for Alsager, Congleton, Sandbach and Holmes Chapel Councillors D Brickhill, P Findlow and P Mason declared personal interests in this item by virtue of being Members of Cheshire County Council. In accordance with the Constitution they remained in the meeting during consideration of these items. 69 PUBLIC SPEAKING TIME/OPEN SESSION In accordance with Procedure Rules Nos.11 and 35, Mr J Guy of Northwich and Mrs B Walmsley of Middlewich (members of the public) addressed the meeting on the following matters relevant to the work of the Cabinet:- Mrs B Walmsley: 1. Could the Council please tell me what impact the building of an 850,000 tonne Incinerator at Weston point in Halton will have on the waste disposal plans of the new Cheshire East authority, as Ineos Chlor who are building this plant continually assert that they will be importing waste from Cheshire? 2. Given the increase in recycling rates across Cheshire, particularly the rapid success of the recycling initiatives in Middlewich and Northwich, and the subsequent decline in waste arising, could the Council please tell how confident they are of the figures in the Cheshire Waste Local Plan which assume a growth in Muncipal Solid Waste arising of 1.5% p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Regional Assembly's
    EAST MIDLANDS TROUBLED FAMILIES LEADS NETWORK Action Points of Meeting held at 10am, 11th October 2013, Conference Room, East Midlands Councils, Melton Mowbray In Attendance/Apologies Name Organisation Present Apology Phil Poirier DCLG Liz Perfect (LP) Derby City Council Tim Clegg Derby City Council Rob Fletcher (RF) Derbyshire County Council Judith Walker (JW) JCP/DWP Michelle Skinner Leicester City Council Andy Robinson (AR) Chair Leicestershire County Council Mags Walsh (MW) Leicestershire County Council Lynn Gibson (LG) Leicestershire SLF Programme Mark Rainey (MR) Lincolnshire County Council Alex Holloway (AH) Lincolnshire County Council Nicci Marzec (NM) Northamptonshire CC Tim O’Neill Nottingham City Council Nicky Dawson Nottingham City Council Jenny Spencer (JS) Nottinghamshire CC Helga Spry-Shute (HS-S) Rutland County Council Peter Williams (PW) EMC Kevin Thomas (KT) Working Links Pauline Grice (PG) TFEA Liz Annetts (LA) TFEA Sarah Holtham (SH) TFEA Item Subject Actions 2. Notes and Action Points of 25th June 2013 Meeting Actions Points: Action for Russ Aziz, DCLG – it was understood that claimants need to be over 18 in order for their payments to impact upon payments to other family members. Actions for AR – AR had yet to speak with Louise Casey and DCLG’s TF Unit on AR to follow up the possibility of setting up a senior level national meeting of TF leads and also to ascertain whether embargoed data could be released a day early to relevant local authorities in order to prepare a possible media response. Action for Kevin Tinsley, DCLG – Clarification was provided on the point of whether claims can be made for those that volunteer for the Work Programme as well as those that are mandated to enter it.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough City Council & Cambridgeshire County Council
    Peterborough City Council & Cambridgeshire County Council & Rutland County Council FOOD AND FEED LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE PLAN 2018 - 2021 1 INDEX Page Introduction 5 1. Aims and objectives of the Food and Feed Law Enforcement Service Plan 5 1.1 Aims and Objectives 1.2 The Local Picture - Contribution to Council's Strategic Priorities 2. Background 6 2.1 Area Profile - Peterborough, Cambridgeshire and Rutland 2.2 Organisational Structure 3. Food 8 3.1 Scope of the food safety and food standards function across Peterborough, Cambridgeshire and Rutland 3.2 Sampling 3.3 Demands on Environmental Health Food Service in Peterborough and Rutland 3.4 Food Hygiene Rating Scheme 3.5 Control and investigation of food poisoning outbreaks and cases of food related infectious diseases 3.6 Food complaints 3.7 Food safety incidents 3.8 Interventions 4. Feed 12 4.1 Feed premises profiles 4.2 Feed sampling 4.3 Funded inspection numbers 4.4 Feed complaints 4.5 Interventions at feed business operators 5. Enforcement Policy 13 2 6. Public Analyst 14 7. Advice to Businesses 14 8. Primary Authority Scheme 14 9. Liaison with other organisations 14 10. Promotional work and communications 15 11. Resources 16 11.1 Peterborough City Council Food Safety Team 11.2 Rutland County Council Food Safety Team 11.3 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Trading Standards Team 12. Performance 18 13. Staff Development Plan 18 13.1 Food Standards 13.2 Food Safety 13.3 Feed 14. Quality Assessment 19 14.1 Quality assessment and internal monitoring 14.2 Service Database 15. Review 20 15.1 Review against Service Plan including variations 15.2 Service development and areas for improvement 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Herefordshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Green Infrastructure Strategy Herefordshire Local Development Framework February 2010 This page is deliberately left blank CONTENTS Preface PART 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 What is Green Infrastructure? 3 1.3 Aims & Objectives of the Strategy 3 1.4 Report Structure 5 2.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN CONTEXT 2.1 Origins & Demand for the Strategy 7 2.2 Policy Background & Relationship to Other Plans 7 2.2.1 National Policy 8 2.2.6 Regional Policy 10 2.2.7 Local Policy 10 2.2.8 Biodiversity Action Plan 11 2.2.9 Sustainable Community Strategy 11 2.3 Methodology 11 2.3.1 Identification of Assets 11 2.3.5 Assessment of Deficiencies & Needs 12 2.3.7 Strategic Geographic Tiers – Definition & Distribution 13 2.3.11 Sensitivity & Opportunity 16 2.3.13 Guiding Policies 16 2.3.14 Realising Green Infrastructure – the Delivery Mechanism 17 3.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS – ISSUES & OPPORTUNITIES 3.1 General 19 3.2 Strategic Geographic Tiers 21 3.3 Natural Systems - Geology 23 - Hydrology 29 - Topography 35 -Biodiversity 41 3.4 Human Influences - Land Use 49 -Access & Movement 55 - Archaeology, Historical & Cultural 63 - Landscape Character 71 - Designated & Accessible Open Space 81 3.5 Natural Resources Summary 91 3.6 Human Influences Summary 91 PART 2 4.0 THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK 4.1 General 93 4.2 A Vision for Green Infrastructure in Herefordshire 94 4.3 The Green Infrastructure Framework 95 4.3.1 Deficiencies & Needs 95 4.3.6 Strategic Tiers 98 4.3.7 County Vision 100 4.3.8 County Strategic Corridors 100 4.3.9 County Strategic Areas
    [Show full text]
  • Area Plan Proposal for London Has Been Developed and in This Booklet You Will Find Information on the Changes Proposed for London
    Post Office Ltd Network Change Programme Area Plan Proposal London 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Proposed Local Area Plan 3. The Role of Postwatch 4. List of Post Office® branches proposed for closure 5. List of Post Office® branches proposed to remain in the Network • Frequently Asked Questions Leaflet • Map of the Local Area Plan • Branch Access Reports - information on proposed closing branches and details of alternative branches in the Area 3 4 1. Introduction The Government has recognised that fewer people are using Post Office® branches, partly because traditional services, including benefit payments and other services are now available in other ways, such as online or directly through banks. It has concluded that the overall size and shape of the network of Post Office® branches (“the Network”) needs to change. In May 2007, following a national public consultation, the Government announced a range of proposed measures to modernise and reshape the Network and put it on a more stable footing for the future. A copy of the Government’s response to the national public consultation (“the Response Document”) can be obtained at www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/page36024.html. Post Office Ltd has now put in place a Network Change Programme (“the Programme”) to implement the measures proposed by the Government. The Programme will involve the compulsory compensated closure of up to 2,500 Post Office® branches (out of a current Network of 14,300 branches), with the introduction of about 500 service points known as “Outreaches” to mitigate the impact of the proposed closures. Compensation will be paid to those subpostmasters whose branches are compulsorily closed under the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Engagement Plan Southport Town Deal
    Community Engagement Plan Southport Town Deal June 2020 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Town Deals 2 3. Engagement Plan and Programme 5 4. Next steps 11 Appendix 1: Towns Fund Prospectus 1 1. Introduction 1.1 This Community Engagement Plan has been produced to support the emerging Southport Town Investment Plan. Its purpose is to outline the key engagement activities that have been undertaken to date with stakeholders, including elected members and representatives of the local community, and to detail the planned engagement and consultation prior to finalisation of the Southport Town Investment Plan. 1.2 This document is structured to provide: • An introduction to Town Deals and Town Investment Plans • Details of the engagement activities carried out to date and the proposed Engagement Plan and Programme • The proposed next steps 1.3 This Community Engagement Plan has been informed by information set out in the ‘Towns Fund Prospectus’ published by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) in November 2019. The Prospectus is included as Appendix 1 to this document. 1.4 The Community Engagement Plan has been produced by Turley on behalf of Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC). It will be published by SMBC to ensure transparency over the engagement process to inform preparation of the Southport Town Investment Plan. 1 2. Town Deals 2.1 In November 2019 the Local Government Secretary invited 101 towns, including Southport, to develop proposals for a Town Deal with the Government, each one potentially receiving up to £25 million investment from the national £3.6 billion Towns Fund. 2.2 While Government has entered into a number of ‘City Deals’ to stimulate growth in large urban areas, smaller towns have been overlooked by that process and not always benefitted from economic growth even where located in close proximity to more prosperous areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Its Integrated Coastal Zone Management The
    Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vol. 1 475 The ‘Sefton Coast Partnership’: an overview of its integrated coastal zone management A. T. Worsley1, G. Lymbery2, C. A. Booth3, P. Wisse2 & V. J. C. Holden1 1Natural, Geographical and Applied Sciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, U.K. 2Coastal Defence Unit, Ainsdale Discovery Centre Complex, Southport, Merseyside, U.K. 3Environmental and Analytical Sciences Division, Research Institute in Advanced Technologies (RIATec), The University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, U.K. Abstract The Sefton Coast Partnership (SCP), based in Sefton, Merseyside, UK, is set within the context of and reported as an example of Integrated Coastal Zone Management. It has developed out of a well-established and successful Management Scheme and, since its inception, attempted with varying success to develop a ‘working partnership’ which has sustainable management at its heart and which is responsible for conservation and the needs of the local community. The history, function and structure of the SCP are described together with the problems that emerged as the partnership developed. Keywords: ICZM, partnership, sustainable management, Sefton. 1 Introduction The coastal zone is hugely significant in terms of sustainable management since this is where human activities affect and are inseparable from marine and terrestrial processes and environments both in developed countries and the Third World. Integrated management therefore requires a holistic, geographic approach and, in order to be successful, action at the local and regional level which is supported by the national government. This paper introduces the Sefton Coast Partnership as an example of Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) in WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol 84, © 2005 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) 476 Sustainable Development and Planning II, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings
    Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings A joint authority training course designed for all councillors and council officers who experience challenging and disruptive behaviour from members of the public and colleagues, which could lead to conflict or breach of the Code of conduct in situations such as: • Council and Town and Parish Meetings • Neighbourhood Partnerships • Committees, Sub-committees & Panels • Area Boards • Public meetings & Forums • Scrutiny Meetings Course Dates (all courses will run from 9.30am to 4.45pm) 21 st September in South Gloucestershire at Council Offices, Poole Court, Yate BS37 5PT 8th October in Wiltshire at Committee Room 2, Browfort, Devizes. 12 th October in Bristol at Bristol City Council House BS1 5TR For further information on the facilitators please see web site: www.cmstraining.net Booking details [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 07789205920 South Gloucestershire Council 01454 863084 [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 0117 9222097 Bristol City Council [email protected] Democratic Services Officer 01225 713597 Wiltshire Council Course Contents Recognising & Assessing Risk: Key strategies for assessing where conflict and disruption could escalate, particularly when discussing emotive or difficult situations. Looking at assessing risk in rapidly changing situations and making appropriate choices. Understanding Aggression: Understanding of the causes of aggressive and challenging behaviour & identify early physical and emotional stages. Defusing & Resolving Conflict: Identifying what works and does not work when communicating in volatile situations and the six key elements of defusing conflict and dealing with disruption. This incorporates a simple four stage resolution model. Law Relating to Conflict: The legal and Code of Conduct context relating to conflict situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Public Health Report
    Choosing Health in Medway The Annual Report of the Director of Public Health 2004 Medway Teaching Primary Care Trust As Chair of Medway Teaching Primary Care Trust I welcome the first Annual Health Report of our Director of Public Health, Dr Anita Sims. As part of our National Health Service, Medway PCT has two major objectives:- - to improve the health of the people of Medway, and - to reduce health inequalities in our communities If we are to achieve these objectives we need a base from which to start and an effective plan of action. This Annual Report forms the foundation on which this process is based and Dr Sims, as a member of Medway PCT’s Board, will be instrumental in guiding the continuing development of our health policies by helping us ensure that priorities are determined by reference to it. Healthy communities can only be achieved by consensus and with people and organisations working together effectively. We have achieved significant success already in this, particularly in terms of our integrated working with Medway Council. I am delighted with the support of Medway Council and the commitment of staff to this process in both organisations and look forward to the continuing development of these arrangements which are so crucial to the well-being of our community. Eddie Anderson Chairman Medway PCT I am very pleased to have the opportunity to contribute to the first Annual Health Report of the Director of Public Health since 1991. The importance of health, a feeling of well-being and an active, healthy lifestyle cannot be underestimated.
    [Show full text]