Cheshire West & Chester Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cheshire West & Chester Council CHESHIRE WEST & CHESTER COUNCIL: ELECTORAL REVIEW Submission to the Boundary Committee on Council Size. 1 Context 1.1 This submission sets out Cheshire West & Chester Council’s proposal on Council size. This is the first issue to be addressed in the electoral review of the area. The proposal is for a Council of 75 elected Members in Cheshire West & Chester. This proposal was made by resolution of the Council on 2 April 2009 at its first meeting after vesting day, on which it replaced former county and district councils. The three political parties represented on the Council; Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat, concurred in the making of the Council’s resolution. 1.2 The proposal has been formulated having regard to key principles of electoral review; that local government should be convenient to local people and effective. Further to these principles, the Council is of the belief that its proposal will ensure that all roles at political level can be carried out effectively, and will enable the authority to achieve its objective of being an exceptionally excellent Council. 1.3 Cheshire West & Chester is a newly created Unitary Council, delivering by direct provision or by commissioning, the full range of Local Authority services in its area. The range of its products is tremendous - from a direction sign on a footpath to the care of a vulnerable child. The Council has at its heart, the wish to serve the whole community of those who live in, work in, or otherwise visit Cheshire West and Chester. It serves a population of 329,100, the fourth largest of Unitary Local Authorities in the North West and the sixteenth largest in England. The Council covers an area of over 94,000 hectares, (360 square miles). It has a budget which, including spending on schools, is around £500m, reflecting the enormous financial investment in our communities. 1.4 The population of the area is growing, even through a time of economic downturn. Forecast growth over the period to 2023 is 4% of the present total. However, it is not just in terms of total numbers that the population is changing. In 2008, 21% of the population of the area was aged under 18, whilst 18% were aged 65 and over. In 5 years’ time, those groups will be of equal size, and in a further 5 years, up to 2018, the 65 and overs will form 23% of the population whilst under-18s will be the smaller group, 19% of the total. This relative change is reflected in the fact that the total population growth between 2008 and 2013 represents an increase in the number of electors. 1.5 Cheshire West & Chester has major towns and extensive rural tracts. Over half (53%) of the electorate live in areas which are classed urban or predominantly urban, 13% live in areas that are rural or predominantly rural. Reflecting the form of development in the area, some of which is suburban in character, 12% of electors live in areas which are best described as more urban than rural whilst 22% live in areas more rural than urban. Chester, Ellesmere Port, Northwich and Winsford are the largest urban areas, but there are smaller towns and large villages which also provide focal service points for the surrounding rural areas. The rural northern part of the Council’s area is traversed by the M56, providing a fast road route into both Manchester and Liverpool, giving rise to occupation of by commuters, whilst some residents of the southern rural parts of the Borough experience some of the conditions of rural isolation. This profile places different demands on Councillors, some of whom represent wholly urban populations, occupying densely populated areas, whilst others represent dispersed communities in extensive, sparsely populated wards. This affects particularly how they relate to local communities with different characteristics, and significantly, how electors relate to their elected representatives. 1.6 The conditions of an area are often described by reference to the Indices of Deprivation, a series of measures of social and economic characteristics including income, health, education, housing conditions and accessibility to services. These are brought together in the most commonly-reported measure, the Index of Multiple Deprivation. Data are presented by reference to local geographic areas; a jigsaw map of over 32,000 of these areas covers the whole of England. In the diagram below, the population of Cheshire West and Chester is shown by reference to a scale in which these data reporting areas are arranged from those showing the greatest deprivation to those showing the least. Population and Multiple Deprivation 350000 300000 250000 200000 150000 100000 Cumulative Population Cumulative 50000 0 1 112131415161718191 Area Rank of Multiple Deprivation (percentile) 1.7 The diagram shows that Cheshire West & Chester represents, in terms of deprivation, a reflection of England. About 50,000 Cheshire residents live in the most deprived 20% of areas in England whilst around 75,000 live in the least deprived 20%. In many national and European programmes to address deprivation, the areas which are amongst the most deprived 20% nationally are targeted. This does not, of course, mean that in the least deprived areas, there are not individuals in the community who may be experiencing severe deprivation. It means that in their work to address the needs of their constituents, Members of the Council who represent communities in deprived areas will engage with national funding mechanisms, whilst those representing deprived residents of less deprived areas will need to engage with service providers directly. The deprivation data does therefore indicate that within Cheshire West and Chester is a diversity of areas and consequently a diversity of representational issues for elected Councillors, individually and collectively, to address. 1.8 Faced with this, the Council’s vision is of Customer first, Value for Money, Best Practice and highlights the Council’s ambition to place its stakeholders at the heart of everything it does. 1.9 In order to deliver on these aims and Vision, the Council requires clear leadership and full engagement at the Political level. Critical to this will be the number of Councillors available to participate fully in all aspects of the life and work of the Council. This submission sets out proposals which argue for a Council of 75 Members, and the rationale and evidence leading to this conclusion. 2 The Case for the Council’s Proposal. 2.1 The human resource of the Council is considerable; it falls into two categories; paid employees and elected Councillors. Councillors have collective and individual tasks. It is essential for success that the Council has and retains the Councillors with a complimentary range of skill, knowledge and experience to fulfil those tasks. 2.2 Setting the council size figure at an appropriate level, will mean consequently that the collective decision-making and scrutiny workload is appropriately shared and that the number of constituents that each Councillor individually has to represent does not give rise to unmanageable caseloads. The total workload each Councillor will have, in terms of hours required to perform the role, should not be intolerable. Failure to address effectively the task of setting size may lead to fewer people wishing to stand for office and in turn may lead to candidates from less diverse backgrounds, and range of skill, knowledge and experience. Such an outcome would be likely to ill-serve the community as a whole. 2.3 The recent report of the Councillors’ Commission emphasises this point and recommends that the role of the Councillor must be compatible with full- or part- time employment and/or with care responsibilities, for example, the care of family members. This is important, for Councillors with direct experience of the circumstances with which their constituents are faced will ensure that the Council will perform better for those people. The report goes on to suggest that it must be made easier for people, including those that are busy in other fields, whether personal or professional, to serve as Councillors. The clear implication here is that Councillor workloads must be reasonable to enable people from all walks of life to stand for election. 2.4 The 2008 National Census of Local Authority Councillors published in January 2009 by the Local Government Association and IDeA reveals that on average Councillors spend 22 hours per week on Council related business. In non- Metropolitan Unitary Councils this figure was higher at 26.2 hours. For those Members who hold senior positions such as Council and Group Leaders and Members of the Cabinet, the Census confirms that Council work is a full-time occupation. Accordingly the number of Councillors has to be sufficient to allow Members capacity to discharge all of their roles effectively and to have the time to do so. This includes the capacity to engage fully with local communities, a key priority for Cheshire West & Chester Council. 2.5 This leads directly to the question, How Many Councillors Does Cheshire West & Chester Council need? 2.6 The standard approach to solving the question is to consider the number of hours which a Council requires/expects its Members to work on Council business 2.7 This depends on; the definition of the task and its demands the contribution one Councillor can make. 2.8 The Council has set itself the ambition of exceptional excellence. This places particular demands that paid employees and elected Councillors work innovatively and challenge the status quo, and do things differently. The Council’s requirement from the electoral review is that its conclusions reflect and sustain its ambition. 2.9 Cheshire West and Chester currently has 72 elected Members.
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

13 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • The London Gazette, 6Th September 1968 9713
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 6TH SEPTEMBER 1968 9713 3. West Park Street (A.141) and Park Street (A.141) A copy of the proposed Order and a map showing The east side of West Park Street (A.141) and the the length of road .to which ithe proposed Order south-east side of Park Street (A.141) from a relates may be inspected during normal office hours point 35 yards north of the northern side of the ait the office of (the Associate County Surveyor, junction of West Park Street (A.141) with Victoria County Hall, March, and 'the office of «he Clerk of Street, for a distance of 47 yards in a northerly the Council, Ely Rural District Council, Council and easterly direction. Offices, Lynn Road, Ely. Objections too the proposal together with ithe SECOND SCHEDULE grounds on which they are made must be sent in writing <to me by the 30th day of September 1968. Side of length of road in the Urban District of Chatteris Dated 5th September 1968. West Park Street (.4.141) W. Liddell Hann, Clerk of .the County Council. East side—from a point 25 yards north of the Shire Hall, northern side of its junction with Victoria Street Casttle Hill, Cambridge. for a distance of 10 yards in a northerly direction. (289) SCHEDULE 1. 2. Length of road in the Direction CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND ISLE OF ELY Parish of WUburton South to north. COUNTY COUNCIL That length of Church Lane (unclassified) which The County of Cambridgeshire and Isle of Ely extends from its westerly (Broad Street and Forehill, Ely) (Prohibition of junction with "the Wil- Waiting) (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Held on Tuesday, 7Th October, 2008 at Committee Suite 1 & 2, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach
    CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL Minutes of a meeting of the Cabinet held on Tuesday, 7th October, 2008 at Committee Suite 1 & 2, Westfields, Middlewich Road, Sandbach PRESENT Councillor W Fitzgerald (Chairman) Councillor R Domleo (Vice-Chairman) Councillors D Brickhill, D Brown, P Findlow, F Keegan, A Knowles, P Mason and B Silvester 67 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor J Macrae. 68 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Key Decision CE22 - Transforming Learning Communities: Emerging Issues from Locality Review for Alsager, Congleton, Sandbach and Holmes Chapel Councillors D Brickhill, P Findlow and P Mason declared personal interests in this item by virtue of being Members of Cheshire County Council. In accordance with the Constitution they remained in the meeting during consideration of these items. 69 PUBLIC SPEAKING TIME/OPEN SESSION In accordance with Procedure Rules Nos.11 and 35, Mr J Guy of Northwich and Mrs B Walmsley of Middlewich (members of the public) addressed the meeting on the following matters relevant to the work of the Cabinet:- Mrs B Walmsley: 1. Could the Council please tell me what impact the building of an 850,000 tonne Incinerator at Weston point in Halton will have on the waste disposal plans of the new Cheshire East authority, as Ineos Chlor who are building this plant continually assert that they will be importing waste from Cheshire? 2. Given the increase in recycling rates across Cheshire, particularly the rapid success of the recycling initiatives in Middlewich and Northwich, and the subsequent decline in waste arising, could the Council please tell how confident they are of the figures in the Cheshire Waste Local Plan which assume a growth in Muncipal Solid Waste arising of 1.5% p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandbach Archaeological Strategy
    CHESHIRE HISTORIC TOWNS SURVEY Sandbach Archaeological Strategy 2003 CHESHIRE HISTORIC TOWNS SURVEY Sanbach Archaeological Strategy 2003 Environmental Planning Cheshire County Council Backford Hall Backford Chester CH1 6PZ These reports are the copyright of Cheshire County Council and English Heritage. We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Cheshire and Chester Archives and Local Studies, Dr Chris Lewis, University of Liverpool and Mr Tim Strickland, Gifford and Partners in the preparation of these reports. The archive is held by the Cheshire County Sites and Monuments Record. The Ordnance Survey mapping within this document is provided by Cheshire County Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey, in order to fulfil its public function to make available Council held public domain information. The mapping is intended to illustrate the spatial changes that have occurred during the historical development of Cheshire towns. Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey copyright for advice where they wish to licence Ordnance Survey mapping/map data for their own use. The OS web site can be found at www.ordsvy.gov.uk Sandbach: Area of Archaeological Potential 1. Introduction 1.1 An Area of Archaeological Potential (AAP) was identified in the Congleton Borough Local Plan Deposit Draft (December 1994). The AAP has now been redefined and two Archaeological Character Zones (ACZs) have been identified within this. Each Zone is identified by its defining archaeological or historical characteristics, or Primary Characteristics. For example, in the Early Medieval Zone (Archaeological Character Zone 1), the defining characteristics include the site of an important early medieval church, potentially of Minster status, as well as the pre-Viking crosses in the Market Place and other examples of sculpture from the same period in St Mary’s churchyard.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Strategy for Change
    CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL Every Child Matters: Primary Capital Programme We believe that all children and young people have the right to be healthy, happy, and safe; to be loved, valued and respected; and to have high aspirations for their future… Primary Strategy for Change June 2008 AL595H11/07/2008E:\mgTest\Data\published\Intranet\C00000241\M00002319\AI00002605\APP2PCPEastFinal0.doc Page 1 of 29 The Local Perspective Children and young people are society’s future and our hopes and aspirations rest with them. It is paramount that we provide them with the opportunity to reach their full potential. The provision of high quality early years and primary education support helps create a solid foundation for their future lives. It is the intention that through an active partnership with parents, carers and services working together, the best possible outcomes for all children can be realised. The vision for all Children and Young People in Cheshire, agreed by the County Council and Children’s Trust is ... We believe that all children and young people have the right to be healthy, happy, and safe; to be loved, valued and respected; and to have high aspirations for their future. The realisation of this vision will be through the application of the principles underpinning Every Child Matters and through partnership working to achieve the highest standards for all. In doing so particular attention will be given to narrowing the achievement gap between communities and offering personalised and extended services to all primary aged children and their families. The proposed way of delivering this vision is set out in the Cheshire’s Children and Young People’s Plan 2008 -11, approved by the Council in May 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Arts Audit: West Cheshire and Chester: Including Districts of Chester, Ellesmere Port and Neston and Vale Royal 2008
    YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER: INCLUDING DISTRICTS OF CHESTER, ELLESMERE PORT AND NESTON AND VALE ROYAL 2008 This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts supported by Arts Council England-North West and Cheshire County Council Angela Chappell; Strategic Development Officer (Arts & Young People) Chester Performs; 55-57 Watergate Row South, Chester, CH1 2LE Email: angela@chesterperforms.com Tel: 01244 409113 Fax: 01244 401697 Website: www.chesterperforms.com 1 YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER JANUARY-SUMMER 2008 CONTENTS PAGES 1 - 2. FOREWORD PAGES 3 – 4. WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER PAGES 3 - 18. CHESTER PAGES 19 – 33. ELLESMERE PORT & NESTON PAGES 34 – 55. VALE ROYAL INTRODUCTION 2 This document details Youth arts activity and organisations in West Cheshire and Chester is presented in this document on a district-by-district basis. This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts including; a separate document also for East Cheshire, a sub-regional and county wide audit in Cheshire as well as a report analysis recommendations for youth arts for the future. This also precedes the new structure of Cheshire’s two county unitary authorities following LGR into East and West Cheshire and Chester, which will come into being in April 2009 An audit of this kind will never be fully accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date. Some data will be out-of-date or incorrect as soon as it’s printed or written, and we apologise for any errors or omissions. The youth arts audit aims to produce a snapshot of the activity that takes place in West Cheshire provided by the many arts, culture and youth organisations based in the county in the spring and summer of 2008– we hope it is a fair and balanced picture, giving a reasonable impression of the scale and scope of youth arts activities, organisations and opportunities – but it is not entirely exhaustive and does not claim to be.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands CSP Partnership Chair/Chief Exec Partnership Community Website Facebook Twitter Safety Manager Amber Valley CSP Cllr
    East Midlands CSP Partnership Chair/Chief Exec Partnership Community Website Facebook Twitter Safety Manager Amber Valley CSP Cllr. Jack Brown Sally Price www.ambervalley.gov PO Box 18 cllr.jack.brown@ambervalley.go sally.price@ambervalley. .uk Town Hall v.uk gov.uk Ripley 01773 841652 01773 841652 Derbyshire DE5 3SZ Ashfield CSP 0300 300 99 99 Ext 3000 Rebecca Whitehead www.ashfield- Council Offices r.whitehead@ashfield- dc.gov.uk Urban Road dc.gov.uk Kirkby in Ashfield 01623457349 Nottinghamshire NG17 8DA Bassetlaw, Newark and Andrew Muter Gerald Connor www.bassetlaw.gov.u Sherwood CSP andrew.muter@nsdc.gov.uk gerald.connor@bassetla k Kelham Hall 01636655200 w.gov.uk www.newark- Kelham 01909 533153 sherwooddc.gov.uk Newark Lisa Lancaster Nottinghamshire lisa.lancaster@nsdc.info NG23 5QX 01636655232 Blaby CSP Cllr Karl Coles tjn@blaby.gov.uk Council Offices cllr.coles@blaby.gov.uk 0116 275 0555 Desford Road Narborough Leicestershire - LE19 2DF Bolsover CSP Cllr. Brian Murray-Carr Jo Selby www.bolsover.gov.uk Sherwood Lodge Brian.Murray- jo.selby@bolsover.gov.u /community- Bolsover Carr@bolsover.gov.uk k safety.partnership Derbyshire 01246 242 535 01246 242217 S44 6NF Boston CSP Cllr Stephen Woodliffe Peter Hunn Municipal Buildings Stephen.woodliffe@boston.gov.u peter.hunn@boston.gov. West Street k uk Boston 07876086570 01205 314 245 Lincolnshire PE21 8QR Charnwood CSP Cllr. David Snartt Julie Robinson Council Offices Cllr.david.snartt@charnwood.go Julie.robinson@charnwo Southfield Road v.uk od.gov.uk Loughborough 01533244408 01509634590 Leicestershire LE11 2TR Chesterfield CSP Sharon Blank Joe Tomlinson www.saferderbyshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Poynton with Worth Footpath Nos 92, 93 and 94
    CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL Public Rights of Way Committee Date of Meeting: 17 March 2011 Report of: Greenspaces Manager Subject/Title: Public Inquiry to Determine Definitive Map Modification Order - Poynton with Worth Footpath Nos 92, 93 and 94 1.0 Report Summary 1.1 This report is an informative item to brief the Committee on a recent public inquiry and the outcome. 2.0 Recommendation 2.1 No decision is required by Committee. 3.0 Reasons for Recommendations 3.1 N/A 4.0 Wards Affected 4.1 Poynton 5.0 Local Ward Members 5.1 Councillor C Beard, Councillor H Murray and Councillor R West 6.0 Policy Implications including - Climate change - Health 6.1 Not Applicable 7.0 Financial Implications 7.1 Not Applicable 8.0 Legal Implications (Authorised by the Borough Solicitor) 8.1 Under section 53 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (WCA), the Council has a duty, as surveying authority, to keep the Definitive Map and Statement under continuous review. Under schedule 14 of the WCA, applications can be made to the authority submitting evidence that suggests that the Definitive Map needs to be amended. The authority must investigate and determine that evidence and decide on the outcome whether to make a Definitive Map Modification Order or not. When an order is made it is advertised and may be subject to objections. If objections are not withdrawn the Council cannot then confirm the order itself and must submit the order to the Secretary of State (Planning Inspectorate) for determination. Where a Parish/Town Council objects to an order it is policy for a local public inquiry to be held.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution
    COUNCIL CONSTITUTION Revision Date : Friday, 19 February 2021 Section Defined Terms (Pages 1 - 2) Section A - Your Council 1 A1 - An Overview of Cheshire West and Chester (Pages 3 - 10) 2 A2 - Core Objective and Principles of Decision (Pages 11 - 20) Making 3 A3 - Citizen's Rights (Pages 21 - 32) 4 A4 - Coronavirus – Annual Council and Remote (Pages 33 - 36) Meetings Section B - The Council 5 B1 - Council (Pages 37 - 44) 6 B2 - Committees (Pages 45 - 66) 7 B3 - Role of Councillors (Pages 67 - 76) 8 B4 - Council Procedure Rules (Pages 77 - 106) 9 B5 - Committee Procedure Rules (Pages 107 - 134) Section C - The Cabinet (formerly known as the Executive) 10 C1 - The Cabinet (Pages 135 - 148) 11 C2 - Role of Cabinet Members (Pages 149 - 160) 12 C3 - Cabinet Procedure Rules (Pages 161 - 184) Section D - Area and Joint Working Arrangements 13 D1 - Joint Working Arrangements (Pages 185 - 190) 14 D2 - Area Working Arrangements (Pages 191 - 196) Version Control 17 February 2021 Section E - Scrutiny 15 E1 - The Scrutiny Function (Pages 197 - 206) 16 E2 - Role of Scrutiny Members (Pages 207 - 212) 17 E3 - Scrutiny Procedure Rules (Pages 213 - 246) Section F - Officers 18 F1 - Officers (Pages 247 - 254) 19 F2 - Powers of Officers (Pages 255 - 260) 20 F3 - Officer Employment Procedure Rules (Pages 261 - 272) Section G - Appendices 21 G1A - Member Code of Conduct (Pages 273 - 282) 22 G1B - Member Planning Protocol (Pages 283 - 290) 23 G2 - Officer Code of Conduct (Pages 291 - 306) 24 G3 - Member/Officer Relations Protocol (Pages 307 - 318) 25 G4 - Finance
    [Show full text]
  • Openness & Accountability Mailing List
    Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40
    [Show full text]
  • Sandbach Archaeological Assessment
    CHESHIRE HISTORIC TOWNS SURVEY Sandbach Archaeological Assessment 2003 CHESHIRE HISTORIC TOWNS SURVEY Sandbach Archaeological Assessment 2003 Environmental Planning Cheshire County Council Backford Hall Backford Chester CH1 6PZ These reports are the copyright of Cheshire County Council and English Heritage. The Ordnance Survey mapping within this document is provided by Cheshire County Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey, in order to fulfil its public function to make available Council held public domain information. The mapping is intended to illustrate the spatial changes that have occurred during the historical development of Cheshire towns. Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey copyright for advice where they wish to licence Ordnance Survey mapping/map data for their own use. The OS web site can be found at www.ordsvy.gov.uk Front cover : J Cowley, 1744 An Improved Map of Cheshire, Containing the Borough and Market Towns, with those adjoining; also its Principal Roads and Rivers Cheshire and Chester Archives and Local Studies, PM 2/20. SANDBACH ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Vince Devine & Jo Clark 1. SUMMARY Although the manor was recorded in the Domesday Survey of 1086, very little is known about Sandbach during the early medieval period. However, the survival of elaborate pre-Viking sculpture, in the form of crosses and grave slabs, indicates that Sandbach was an important religious centre during this period. By the late 16th century the town was granted the rights to hold a market and two fairs, all of which have continued into the present century. During the 19th century, a silk and shoe industry were established, and their commercial success was a significant factor in the growth of the town.
    [Show full text]
  • (The Scheme) Established
    SECTION 1 – CHESHIRE FIRE AUTHORITY 1.1 The Cheshire Fire Service (Combination Scheme) Order 1997 (the Scheme) established Cheshire Fire Authority (the Authority) for the combined area then covered by Cheshire County Council, Halton Borough Council and Warrington Borough Council. Upon local government reorganisation in 2009 the Authority’s combined area became that covered by the borough councils of Cheshire East, Cheshire West and Chester, Halton and Warrington (the Constituent Authorities). At that time it was agreed that there should be 23 Councillors appointed to the Fire Authority. 1.2 The Scheme restricts the number of Members that may sit on the Authority (to a maximum of 25). It also requires each of the Constituent Authorities to appoint such number of representatives to be Members of the Authority as is proportionate to the number of local government electors in its area in relation to the number of such electors in each of the Constituent Authority areas. In other words the seats are allocated in proportion taking into account the electoral numbers in each of the Constituent Authority areas. The allocation is checked each year. 1.3 There are currently 23 elected Members of the Authority. At present the appointments are made in the following proportions: Cheshire East Borough Council 8 Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council 7 Halton Borough Council 3 Warrington Borough Council 5 1.4 The Authority operates a committee system rather than an executive/ cabinet model. The Authority itself makes all the key decisions. It appoints the following main committees: Policy; Performance and Overview; Governance and Constitution.
    [Show full text]