DOCSLIB.ORG

Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee Combined Evidence Received:.pdf version Investigation: Overcrowding in London’s Social Rented Housing Contents Organisation Evidence Reference Page Number Number London Borough of Bromley OSRH001 2 Family Mosaic OSRH002 44 East Thames Group OSRH003 46 Affinity Sutton OSRH004 50 Homes and Communities Agency (London) OSRH005 54 South-East London Region OSRH006 60 Hexagon Housing Association OSRH007 62 London Borough of Redbridge OSRH008 66 Kier Partnership Homes OSRH009 87 Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) OSRH010 95 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames OSRH011 99 Citizens Advice OSRH012 103 Notting Hill Housing OSRH013 107 National Housing Federation OSRH014 110 London Borough of Waltham Forest OSRH015 114 Peabody Trust OSRH016 147 London Borough of Croydon OSRH017 153 London Borough of Camden OSRH018 156 G15 Group OSRH019 165 North London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH020 167 City of London OSRH021 172 Genesis Group OSRH022 174 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham OSRH023 179 St George Regeneration OSRH024 188 The Hyde Group OSRH025 190 London Borough of Hounslow OSRH026 194 London Borough of Harrow OSRH027 201 East London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH028 208 London School of Economics (LSE) OSRH029 215 Developers Group OSRH030 218 Amicus Horizon OSRH031 222 CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) London OSRH032 225 London Borough of Southwark OSRH033 232 West London Region OSRH034 283 London Councils OSRH035 286 London Borough of Merton OSRH036 291 London Borough of Brent OSRH037 296 Greater London Authority: Housing Unit OSRH038 353 Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames OSRH039 364 London Borough of Croydon OSRH040 367 Places for People OSRH041 373 Shepherds Bush Housing Association OSRH042 381 1 1 Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return From: Gibson, David [[email protected]] Sent: 20 August 2010 16:23 To: Michael Walker Subject: FW: Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return -london Borough of Bromley OSRH001 Attachments: Overcrowding Monitoring Form 2009-10.xls; Tackling Overcrowding Pathfinder Programme - London Borough of Bromley; final draft Overcrowding strategy 20082010; RE: Overcrowding and under occupation report. Michel. Further to the letter from Andrew Boff dated 21 July Here is some info that I think will be useful for you To get to the report follow the link and it’s Allocs & waiting lists – overcrowding – CLG stats 30/6/10. Our report only shows data for applicants in Bands A and B - i.e. those overcrowding by 2 or more bedrooms. In terms of the questions on the second page of the letter. 1. Well it is undeniable that, at a simple level, more larger homes will help tackle overcrowding. However, in times of tight public finance (and, in reality, at any time) we should be looking to make best use of the assets available as a primary action. I.e. getting underoccupiers to down size. As social housing is becoming more like a form of welfare benefit then, like other WBs, when it is no longer needed then entitlement should cease. Perhaps not removing their security of tenure but not of the specific property they are in. Furthermore, recent changes to HB will put pressure on households seeking to rent privately in larger properties thus increasing need to make better use of what we have got - and proposals to reduce HB for social housing underoccupiers will actually make more people downsize and so the effects of this need to be factored in to any decisions about how much more new larger housing is needed. In fact more smaller units meeting the particular needs of older social housing underoccupiers might actually be needed and thereby create the amount of larger units that are needed. 2. Obstacles are grant rates, grant availability and developers not wanting this type of housing on mixed tenure developments - usually because of their views of the type of households and children who occupy such housing. 3. Mayor’s target needs to be reconsidered in light of any plans to reduce HB for social housing underoccupiers as per point 1 above. In any event, a target is all very well but it takes time to have any effect given that there will be a large number of planning permissions in the pipeline for schemes not including this level of larger units. 4. Answer is same as in 1 above. Why not build good homes attractive to underoccupiers and fund practical help for them to move. Appendix questions - - Economics - would need a lot more grant to entice developers with existing planning permissions and land holdings all put together based on a lot more smaller units - to then switch to having less units which would equate to less profit as less units to sell. Would create unviable schemes. - Budget reductions implications - quite simply would result in less larger unit supply - unless the underoccupation HB rules end up with a lot of underoccupiers moving. - Mayor can seek to increase grant rate - would require a reduction in total unit target. Mayor could also fund incentives to help people move. - Mayor needs to consider the effects of HB changes on social housing underoccupiers. - Regional Planning policy could require a minimum percentage of larger units but takes time to develop the policy and does not overcome all the sites in the pipeline 2 Regards David Gibson Assistant Director (Housing & Residential Services) Tel 020 8313 4794 Fax 020 8313 4620 emails ; [email protected] www.bromley.gov.uk ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient the E-mail and any files have been transmitted to you in error and any copying, distribution or other use of the information contained in them is strictly prohibited. file:///J|/...1_LB%20Bromley/OSRH001_FW%20Overcrowding%20Data%202009-10%20-%20Quarter%204%20%20Baseline%20Return.htm[13/09/2010 12:08:26] Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return Nothing in this E-mail message amounts to a contractual or other legal commitment on the part of the Government unless confirmed by a communication signed on behalf of the Secretary of State. The Department's computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. Correspondents should note that all communications from Department for Communities and Local Government may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for lawful purposes. *********************************************************************************** The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. ---- London Borough of Bromley E-Mail Disclaimer ---- For information about Bromley Council visit our web site www.bromley.gov.uk The information contained in this message (including any attachments) is confidential in that it is intended solely for the use of the recipient, the use of the information by disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. The London Borough of Bromley monitors the content of emails sent and received via its network for the purposes of ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures. ---- End of Disclaimer ---- This message has been scanned for viruses. Click here to report this email as spam. 3 file:///J|/...1_LB%20Bromley/OSRH001_FW%20Overcrowding%20Data%202009-10%20-%20Quarter%204%20%20Baseline%20Return.htm[13/09/2010 12:08:26] Grant 2007/08 Overcrowding Data Monitoring Report Local Authority: London Borough of Submitted by: Date: 01/04/10 Bromley Contact Number: Please read the attached explanatory notes before completing this form. The numbering of the notes accords with the question numbers used in the form (shown in column A). When complete, please return this form by email to: [email protected] A. Baseline Figures as at 01/04/09 Overcrowded households on waiting lists / all tenures 1. Overcrowded households from all tenures on both LA On LA On RSL and RSL waiting lists wanting to be re-housed as on waiting waiting Total on 01/04/09 list lists 01/04/09 No. of households recorded as Question 1 overcrowded by the Bedrooom Total Standard 319 0 0 total overcrowded 119 1 bed Of these households how many of whom severely o/crowded 27 Question 1a are currently living in each size total overcrowded 115 of accommodation? 2 bed of whom severely o/crowded 43 total overcrowded 76 3 bed of whom severely o/crowded 25 total overcrowded 9 4+ bed of whom severely o/crowded 4 Of these households, how many are existing social tenants seeking a Question 1b transfer? 230 ……. of whom, the number that are severely overcrowded 86 …….and how many are new applicants from Private Rented Sector 83 Question 1c seeking social housing? from Owner Occupation 7 Check total (1b+1c) 319 0 0 if cell is red it's if cell is red it's if cell is red it's If any of these because the because the because the cells are red check total check total check total please correct differs from differs from differs from as appropriate the total in the total in the total in E12 F12 G12 Under-occupied households on waiting list and wanting to downsize 2. Under-occupied social renters on both LA and RSL On LA On RSL waiting lists wanting to be re-housed as on 01/04/09 waiting waiting Total on list lists 01/04/09 No. of households recorded as under- Question 2 Total occupied by the Bedroom Standard 35 0 0 Of these households how many are 3 bedrooms 29 currently living in each size of Question 2a 4 bedrooms 5 accommodation? 5+ bedrooms 1 4 Grant 2007/08 Overcrowding Data Monitoring Report B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Area Plan Proposal for London Has Been Developed and in This Booklet You Will Find Information on the Changes Proposed for London
    Post Office Ltd Network Change Programme Area Plan Proposal London 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Proposed Local Area Plan 3. The Role of Postwatch 4. List of Post Office® branches proposed for closure 5. List of Post Office® branches proposed to remain in the Network • Frequently Asked Questions Leaflet • Map of the Local Area Plan • Branch Access Reports - information on proposed closing branches and details of alternative branches in the Area 3 4 1. Introduction The Government has recognised that fewer people are using Post Office® branches, partly because traditional services, including benefit payments and other services are now available in other ways, such as online or directly through banks. It has concluded that the overall size and shape of the network of Post Office® branches (“the Network”) needs to change. In May 2007, following a national public consultation, the Government announced a range of proposed measures to modernise and reshape the Network and put it on a more stable footing for the future. A copy of the Government’s response to the national public consultation (“the Response Document”) can be obtained at www.dti.gov.uk/consultations/page36024.html. Post Office Ltd has now put in place a Network Change Programme (“the Programme”) to implement the measures proposed by the Government. The Programme will involve the compulsory compensated closure of up to 2,500 Post Office® branches (out of a current Network of 14,300 branches), with the introduction of about 500 service points known as “Outreaches” to mitigate the impact of the proposed closures. Compensation will be paid to those subpostmasters whose branches are compulsorily closed under the Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex F –List of Consultees
    ANNEX F –LIST OF CONSULTEES Local highway authorities Leicester City Council Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Leicestershire County Council Bath & NE Somerset Council Lincolnshire County Council Bedfordshire County Council Liverpool City Council Birmingham City Council Local Government Association Blackburn & Darwen London Borough of Barking & Dagenham Blackpool Borough Council London Borough of Barnet Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Bexley Borough of Poole London Borough of Brent Bournemouth Borough Council London Borough of Bromley Bracknell Forest Borough Council London Borough of Camden Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Croydon Brighton and Hove City Council London Borough of Ealing Bristol City Council London Borough of Enfield Buckinghamshire County Council London Borough of Greenwich Bury Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hackney Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council London Borough of Hammersmith and Cambridgeshire County Council Fulham Cheshire County Council London Borough of Haringey City of York Council London Borough of Harrow Cornwall County Council London Borough of Havering Corporation of London London Borough of Hillingdon County of Herefordshire District Council London Borough of Hounslow Coventry City Council London Borough of Islington Cumbria County Council London Borough of Lambeth Cumbria Highways London Borough of Lewisham Darlington Borough Council London Borough of Merton Derby City Council London Borough of Newham Derbyshire County Council London
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Responses Received from English Housing Associations
    SORP responses –June 2014 English housing associations Summary of responses received from English housing associations Organisation Name Accent Group Ltd Look Ahead Care and Support Adactus Housing Group Limited Magenta Living Affinity Sutton Magna Housing Group Alliance Homes Moat Homes Limited Alpha (RSL) Limited Network Housing Group Ltd Arcon Housing Association North Devon Homes Arhag Houssing Association Notting Hill Housing Trust Asra Housing Group One Housing Group Bracknell Forest Homes Orbit Group Bromford Group Origin Housing Limited Byker Community Trust Limited Orwell Housing Association Limited Central & Cecil Housing Trust Paradigm Housing Association Ltd CHS Group Plymouth Community Homes Circle Housing Progress Housing Group City West Housing Trust Radian Housing Coastline Housing Ltd Rooftop Housing Group Limited DCH Sadeh Lok Housing Group Derby Homes Ltd SAFFRON HOUSING TRUST LTD East Thames Group Selwood Housing Eastlands Homes Partnership Limited Sentinel Housing Association Limited EMH Group Ltd shropshire housing group First Wessex Shropshire Rural Housing Association Four Housing Southern Housing Group Freebridge Community Housing Sovereign Housing Association Gateway Housing Association Spectrum Housing Group Gentoo Group Staffordshire Housing Group Great Places Housing Group SYHA Ltd GREENSQUARE GROUP LTD Thames Valley Housing Halton Housing Trust The Guinness Partnership Hanover Housing Association The Hyde Group Harrogate Families Housing Association Town & Country Housing Group Helena Partnerships Ltd Trafford
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B the North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny
    APPENDIX B The North West London Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference 1. Membership Membership of the Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) is one nominated voting member from each participating council, plus one other nominated member to whom the vote can be transferred (on the basis of that member being an elected member of the council they are representing). Alternatively, a Borough can nominate one voting member only. A substitute member can be nominated by the Borough. The vote can also be transferred to the substitute member where he or she is an elected member of the council and the voting member is unavailable. The JHOSC consists of the following authorities: London Borough of Brent London Borough of Ealing London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham London Borough of Harrow London Borough of Hounslow Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea London Borough of Richmond City of Westminster 2. Quorum The committee will require at least six members in attendance to be quorate. 3. Chair and Vice Chair The JHOSC will elect its own chair and vice chair. Elections will take place on an annual basis each May, or as soon as practical thereafter, such as to allow for any annual changes to the committee’s membership. The Chair and Vice Chair shall not be members of the same authority or the same political party. 4. Duration It is important the JHOSC operates on the basis of being able to contribute to the effective scrutiny of cross-borough health issues. The JHOSC should provide a forum for cross borough engagement and consultation between its member local authorities, and health service commissioners and providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrow Industrial Stories the Local Economy on the Central Industrial Estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories
    markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities Harrow Industrial Stories The local economy on the central industrial estates of the London Borough of Harrow Harrow Industrial Stories Study and report by markoandplacemakers designconsultancyforlivablecities www.markoandplacemakers.com Copyright © Marko and Placemakers and Francis Moss August 2013 Commissioned by Harrow Council Supported by the Mayor’s Outer London Fund Marko and Placemakers Team Francis Moss, Igor Marko, Alejandro Sajgalik, Giulia Toscani, Denizer Ibrahim, Minh Toan Research The data and business profiles in this report are based on observation and information given by individual employees or owners of businesses during visits to Harrow’s central industrial estates in 2013. They are not official statements or data about the businesses. Photographs © Francis Moss Photographs were taken with the permission of the subjects to be included in this report and a potential exhibition. Kodak Archive Photographs © The British Library Board Bird’s-eye photographs © Microsoft Corporation Maps based on Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and database rights 2013 Ordnance Survey 100019206 Thanks to London Borough of Harrow Mark Billington, Andy Stubbs, David Sklair Greater London Authority Matt Murphy, Tina Jadav, Adam Towle, Mark Brearley Report best viewed as double page spread and printed double sided 2 Harrow Industrial Stories Contents Introduction 4 Context 5 Methodology 7 Categories 8 Overview 10 Estate breakdown 12 Location 14 Suppliers and Customers 15 Employees 16 Size 18 Age 20 Health 21 Estates A1-A4 22 Estates A1-A4 Profiles 24 Estate B1 26 Estate B1 Profiles 28 Estate B2 30 Estate B2 Profile 32 Estates C1-C6 34 Estates C1-C6 Profiles 36 Estates D1-D3 40 Estates D1-D3 Profiles 42 Estates E1-F1 44 Estates E1-F1 Profiles 46 Estates F2-F5 52 Estates F2-F5 Profiles 54 Estate G1 56 Estate G1 Profiles 58 Conclusion 60 Recommendations 62 Business Support 63 3 Harrow Industrial Stories Introduction London’s high streets have been the focus of a lot of recent attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Information To
    BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. About EACH 1.1 Organisational Profile EACH is a voluntary sector organisation with over 26 years’ experience of providing specialist counselling and support services to individuals and family members affected by alcohol and drug misuse, domestic violence and mental health concerns. We operate across West London with centres in Brent, Ealing and Hounslow as well as providing services through outreach based satellites in Hillingdon, Harrow, Kingston- upon-Thames, Richmond, Wandsworth and Merton as part of the London Councils Violence against Women and Girls consortium. EACH’s IPS project has extended our reach into Barnet, Hammersmith and Fulham. EACH provides a range of community based services, with a long history of developing specialist services to meet the needs of Black and Minority Ethnic communities who experience cultural and linguistic barriers to mainstream services. EACH is a company limited by guarantee with charitable status. Established in 1991, the organisation is recognised both locally and nationally for the innovative work it has pioneered in delivering alcohol and mental health services, primarily, in Asian communities in West London. 1.2 EACH’s Reach EACH currently has presence in the boroughs below, along with London boroughs of Richmond upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames, Wandsworth and Merton. The new IPS project will further extend EACH’s reach into Barnet and Hammersmith and Fulham. London Borough of Brent Brent is located in North-west London and is a borough that is culturally diverse with a significant ethnic population of approximately 57%. Information on the borough can be found on the www.brent.gov.uk website.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving up a Gear: New Challenges for Housing Associations
    moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank that has been set up to look at issues which flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. If you would like to know more about the Smith Institute please write to: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin The Director The Smith Institute 3rd Floor 52 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0AW Telephone +44 (0)20 7823 4240 Fax +44 (0)20 7823 4823 Email [email protected] Website www.smith-institute.org.uk Registered Charity No. 1062967 2008 Designed and produced by Owen & Owen THE SMITH INSTITUTE moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin Published by the Smith Institute ISBN 1 905370 32 6 This report, like all Smith Institute monographs, represents the views of the authors and not those of the Smith Institute. © The Smith Institute 2008 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Preface Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute 3 Introduction Denise Chevin, Editor of Building 5 Chapter 1: Housing policy and the role of housing associations Andy Love MP, Co-chair of the All-party Group on Homelessness & Housing Need 12 Chapter 2: New landscapes in affordable housing Peter Marsh, Deputy Chief Executive of the Housing Corporation 20 Chapter 3: Mutual respect to deliver the communities we want David Orr, Chief Executive of the National Housing Federation 28 Chapter 4: From meeting need to matching housing aspirations David Cowans,
    [Show full text]
  • London's Housing Struggles Developer&Housing Association Dec 2014
    LONDON’S HOUSING STRUGGLES 2005 - 2032 47 68 30 13 55 20 56 26 62 19 61 44 43 32 10 41 1 31 2 9 17 6 67 58 53 24 8 37 46 22 64 42 63 3 48 5 69 33 54 11 52 27 59 65 12 7 35 40 34 74 51 29 38 57 50 73 66 75 14 25 18 36 21 39 15 72 4 23 71 70 49 28 60 45 16 4 - Mardyke Estate 55 - Granville Road Estate 33 - New Era Estate 31 - Love Lane Estate 41 - Bemerton Estate 4 - Larner Road 66 - South Acton Estate 26 - Alma Road Estate 7 - Tavy Bridge estate 21 - Heathside & Lethbridge 17 - Canning Town & Custom 13 - Repton Court 29 - Wood Dene Estate 24 - Cotall Street 20 - Marlowe Road Estate 6 - Leys Estate 56 - Dollis Valley Estate 37 - Woodberry Down 32 - Wards Corner 43 - Andover Estate 70 - Deans Gardens Estate 30 - Highmead Estate 11 - Abbey Road Estates House 34 - Aylesbury Estate 8 - Goresbrook Village 58 - Cricklewood Brent Cross 71 - Green Man Lane 44 - New Avenue Estate 12 - Connaught Estate 23 - Reginald Road 19 - Carpenters Estate 35 - Heygate Estate 9 - Thames View 61 - West Hendon 72 - Allen Court 47 - Ladderswood Way 14 - Maryon Road Estate 25 - Pepys Estate 36 - Elmington Estate 10 - Gascoigne Estate 62 - Grahame Park 15 - Grove Estate 28 - Kender Estate 68 - Stonegrove & Spur 73 - Havelock Estate 74 - Rectory Park 16 - Ferrier Estate Estates 75 - Leopold Estate 53 - South Kilburn 63 - Church End area 50 - Watermeadow Court 1 - Darlington Gardens 18 - Excalibur Estate 51 - West Kensingston 2 - Chippenham Gardens 38 - Myatts Fields 64 - Chalkhill Estate 45 - Tidbury Court 42 - Westbourne area & Gibbs Green Estates 3 - Briar Road Estate
    [Show full text]
  • This Chart Shows the Ethnicity Profile of Ethnic Minority Groups in NWLH
    Profile of Children and Young people accessing Paediatric Speech and Language Therapy services -September 2014 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Harrow’s Overall Population The 2011 National Census indicates that Harrow’s population is one of the most diverse nationally, with 69.1% of residents coming from minority ethnic groups, with the largest group being of Indian ethnicity. The borough also has the largest concentration of Sri Lankan Tamils in the UK as well as having the highest density of Gujarati Hindus in the UK. Harrow is also ranked 8th nationally for linguistic diversity in the Greater London Authority’s Linguistic Diversity Index. At least 88 different languages are “spoken” in Harrow, including three categories of sign language. According to the GLA School Role Projection Service, the increased migration into the borough is projected to continue rising over the next few years. 1.2 Philosophy of our Service The speech and language therapy service at North West London Hospitals NHS Trust provides therapy services to children and young people with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN) 0-18 years in a variety of settings working in partnership with colleagues in health, education, social care others and the voluntary sector to promote a comprehensive service to all children and families taking account of cultural and ethnic background. 2.0 Scope of Audit This audit aims to provide data about the population of children and young people in the London Borough of Harrow who were accessing speech and language therapy service in August 2014. It interrogates some of the most salient data sets for CYP with SLCN e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Our List of Registered Providers and Local Authorities
    Nationwide public sector eligibility list The public sector bodies to whom the use of this framework agreement is open, include without limitation: 1. Central government departments & their executive agencies: a list of such departments and executive agencies can be found at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/government-business/government-ministers- responsibilities.aspx 2. Non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs): a list of NDPBs can be found at annex A to the Public Bodies Directory 2007 published by the Cabinet Office) which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506070/An nex_-_Public_Bodies_Reform_Programme_Update_16_Dec_2015.pdf 3. All Local Authorities, (as defined in Regulation 3(2) to 3(5) inclusive of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015)) and all and any subsidiaries and joint-venture vehicles of those local authorities, including, but not limited to, all listed on this website: https://www.lgbce.org.uk/records- and-resources/local-authorities-in-england 4. All National Health Service (NHS) bodies, including, but not limited to, NHS Trusts as defined in the Regulation 2 of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 which, in turn, includes: 4.1. Acute trusts; 4.2. Trusts operating community hospitals and the provider functions of primary care trusts; 4.3. Primary care trusts; 4.4. Care trusts; 4.5. Care trusts plus; 4.6. Ambulance trusts; 4.7. Mental health trusts; 4.8. Strategic health authorities; 4.9. Special health authorities; 4.10. Community health councils; 4.11. Local health boards; 4.12. NHS foundation trusts; 4.13.
    [Show full text]
  • From Gatekeepers to Gateway Constructors
    Critical Perspectives on Accounting xxx (xxxx) xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Critical Perspectives on Accounting journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cpa From gatekeepers to gateway constructors: Credit rating agencies and the financialisation of housing associations ⇑ Stewart Smyth a, , Ian Cole b, Desiree Fields c a Sheffield University Management School, UK b Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research (CRESR), Sheffield Hallam University, UK c Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, US article info abstract Article history: This paper uses the twin metaphors of ‘gatekeeper’ and ‘gateway constructor’ as devices to Received 7 September 2017 explore the role of Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) as intermediaries between global Revised 10 July 2019 corporate finance and specific institutions – housing associations in England. The Accepted 11 July 2019 analysis utilises a financialisation framing, whereby the practices, logics and Available online xxxx measurements of finance capital, increasingly permeate government, institutional and household behaviour and discourse. This paper examines how housing associations have Keywords: increasingly resorted to corporate bond finance, partly in response to reductions in Financialisation government funding, and in the process engaged with CRAs. Social housing Credit rating agencies Surprisingly little research has been undertaken on the role and function of CRAs, and Corporate bonds their impact on the organisations they rate. The case of housing associations (HAs) is of particular interest, given their historical social mission to build and manage properties to meet housing need, rather than operate as commercial private landlords conversant with market-based rationales. A case study of the large London-based HAs draws on a narrative and financial analysis of annual reports, supplemented by semi-structured interviews with senior HA finance officers to explore how CRA methodologies have been internalised and have contributed to changes in strategic and operational activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Organization A2dominion Housing Group Ltd Aberdeen Standard
    Social Housing Annual Conference Thursday 9th November 200 Aldersgate, London EC1A 4HD. Sample delegate list (1 November 2017) T: +44 (0)207 772 8337 E: [email protected] Organization Job Title A2Dominion Housing Group Ltd Group Chief Exec Aberdeen Standard Investments Sales Director - Liquidity Solutions Aberdeen Standard Investments Institutional Business Development Manager Aberdeen Standard Investments Investment director, credit Accent Group Chief Executive Accent Group Executive Director of Finance & Corporate Services Al Bawardi Critchlow Managing Partner Aldwyck Housing Group Group Director of Finance Aldwyck Housing Group Group Chief Executive Aldwyck Housing Group Group chief executive Allen & Overy LLP Senior Associate Allen & Overy LLP Associate Allen & Overy LLP Consultant Altair Partner Altair Director Altair Director Altair Consultant Anchor Trust Financial Director Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP Partner Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP Partner Arawak Walton Housing Association Finance Director Arawak Walton Housing Association Deputy CEO and Executive Director, Resources ARK Consultancy Senior Consultant Assured Guaranty Director Aster Group Group chief executive Baily Garner LLP Partner Barclays Head of Social Housing, Barclays Barclays Relationship Director, Barclays Barclays Director, Barclays Barclays Director, Barclays PLC Bartra Capital Property CEO Black Country Housing Group Board Member BOARD Sector Lead – Commercial Property and Construction BOARD Business Development Manager Bond Woodhouse Managing
    [Show full text]