DOCSLIB.ORG

Moving up a Gear: New Challenges for Housing Associations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moving up a Gear: New Challenges for Housing Associations moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations The Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank that has been set up to look at issues which flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. If you would like to know more about the Smith Institute please write to: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin The Director The Smith Institute 3rd Floor 52 Grosvenor Gardens London SW1W 0AW Telephone +44 (0)20 7823 4240 Fax +44 (0)20 7823 4823 Email [email protected] Website www.smith-institute.org.uk Registered Charity No. 1062967 2008 Designed and produced by Owen & Owen THE SMITH INSTITUTE moving up a gear: new challenges for housing associations Edited by Denise Chevin Published by the Smith Institute ISBN 1 905370 32 6 This report, like all Smith Institute monographs, represents the views of the authors and not those of the Smith Institute. © The Smith Institute 2008 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Contents Preface Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute 3 Introduction Denise Chevin, Editor of Building 5 Chapter 1: Housing policy and the role of housing associations Andy Love MP, Co-chair of the All-party Group on Homelessness & Housing Need 12 Chapter 2: New landscapes in affordable housing Peter Marsh, Deputy Chief Executive of the Housing Corporation 20 Chapter 3: Mutual respect to deliver the communities we want David Orr, Chief Executive of the National Housing Federation 28 Chapter 4: From meeting need to matching housing aspirations David Cowans, Group Chief Executive of Places for People 36 Chapter 5: Community engagement and tenant empowerment Richard Clark OBE, Chief Executive of Midland Heart 44 Chapter 6: Government reforms and incentivising housing associations Tony Shoults, former Chief Executive of the Metropolitan Housing Partnership 54 Chapter 7: The London context Tom Titherington, Group Business Development Director at the Hyde Group 64 Chapter 8: Re-regulating social housing Professor Martin Cave, Director of the Centre for Management under 74 Regulation at the University of Warwick Chapter 9: Developing new forms of funding Richard Parker, Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers 80 Chapter 10: Forming new housing partnerships for a step change in delivery Stephen Trusler, Strategy Director of Wates Living Space 88 Chapter 11: Delivering good design Richard Simmons, Chief Executive, and Dominic Church, Senior Policy Adviser, 96 at the Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment 2 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Preface Wilf Stevenson, Director, Smith Institute The Smith Institute is an independent think tank which has been set up to undertake research and education in issues that flow from the changing relationship between social values and economic imperatives. In recent years the institute has centred its work on the policy implications arising from the interactions of equality, enterprise and equity. Affordable housing is at the top of the political agenda, with the government aiming to achieve a considerable increase in the building of affordable homes over the next three years, to 70,000 a year (including a 50% rise in new social rented homes), with extra funding to promote mixed-income communities, eco-homes and greater housing choice. In addition, ministers have pledged to bring all existing social housing up to a decent standard by 2010 and to reform housing-related welfare support to tackle benefit dependency and worklessness – which is concentrated in the social rented sector. Housing associations, which are the largest social landlords and the main suppliers of new social rented and shared-ownership properties, are central to the success of this ambitious housing programme. Without their co-operation and support, the government is unlikely to meet its housing targets. The housing association sector has expanded year on year since the 1980s under the auspices of the housing stock transfer programme, and has now overtaken local councils as the largest group of social landlords. Many of the big housing associations are lead partners in major regeneration developments and most are actively engaged in neighbourhood renewal projects and “place-making” initiatives with their local council. However, the sector is far from homogenous and the size and reach of housing associations varies enormously. Although recipients of government grants and regulated by public agencies, housing associations are not creatures of central or local government. Most are independent charities with a long history of housing management and local community activity. Against the backcloth of major changes in the affordable housing market, such as the creation of the new Homes & Communities Agency, reforms to the housing subsidy system and a new social housing regulator (Oftenant), this collection of essays debate what potential opportunities and risks lie ahead for the sector. The focus is on the future roles and performance of housing associations and how the sector can adapt and grow. The authors also show how housing associations in different ways can help shape the 3 THE SMITH INSTITUTE future, not least in developing new approaches to funding affordable housing and improving partnerships with both local government and the private sector. Most importantly, this monograph demonstrates that the sector is changing and has fresh ideas about how to meet the complex housing challenges that face us all. The Smith Institute thanks Denise Chevin (editor of Building magazine) for agreeing to edit this collection of essays and gratefully acknowledges the support of the Metropolitan Housing Trust, Places for People and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP towards this publication and the associated seminar. 4 THE SMITH INSTITUTE Introduction Denise Chevin, Editor of Building This monograph on housing associations could not be more timely. Examining the role and the future of housing associations is critical now for three key reasons. First, the acute shortage of housing and the need for an urgent remedy is one of the most pressing issues on the political agenda. Gordon Brown has pledged to build 3 million new homes by 2020, including large increases in the number of affordable homes for rent and shared ownership, and as the largest provider and developer of social housing, it is essential that housing associations step up to the plate. Second, the investment and regulatory framework under which housing associations operate is set for a radical overhaul. The rules of the game by which housing associations play will change next April, when the provisions set down in the new Housing & Regeneration Bill should come into force. The Housing Corporation, which has been both the public banker and the regulator for housing associations, will be merged with English Partnerships to form the Homes & Communities Agency, and with this may come a new funding regime. Meanwhile, the regulatory role is to be taken over by a new agency – the Office for Tenants & Social Landlords (Oftenant). In addition to regulating housing associations as the Housing Corporation did, it will give a powerful new voice to housing association tenants. As Professor Martin Cave explains in his chapter, a bigger role for housing associations in the provision of community services will become enshrined in law – along with, on paper at least, the muscle to force housing associations and councils to work more effectively together. And third, the sector is going through a period of consolidation and structural change that the proposals in the Housing & Regeneration Bill will only serve to accelerate. At present, fewer than 20 housing associations together own more than a third of the total housing association stock of 2.2 million social houses, and fewer than 50 have the capacity to engage in major developments. So at one end of the spectrum there are the small local organisations with a handful of properties, whilst at the other end are the mega-landlords heading towards 100,000 homes, operating on a national basis, with divisions that produce homes for sale and private rent. This loss of homogeneity makes it increasingly difficult for the sector to speak with a single voice – the needs and priorities of the two types of organisation are so different. This divergence of the sector into the very large and the small brings its own tensions, not 5 THE SMITH INSTITUTE least the debate as to whether big necessarily means better; a point raised by Peter Marsh, deputy chief executive of the Housing Corporation. “RSLs need to be of sufficient size to achieve economies of scale,” he says; “we must avoid replacing local public monopolies with national private ones.” So while on the one hand housing associations have never had so much opportunity, the uncertainties and changes they face could not be greater. In addition to this already brimming cauldron, there is for the first time in decades the prospect of more competition for government funding from councils, who are being encouraged to build affordable homes again, as well as the private sector. And all new housing has to be built to more exacting standards of sustainability. The papers in this monograph examine this shifting policy landscape for housing associations, and in doing so raise a number of fundamental issues. Is the new regulatory framework the right one? Will it provide a barrier to delivery rather than oiling its machinery, as some of the authors suggest? Or are housing associations simply showing a characteristic allergy to regulation? Furthermore, are we heading for a two-tier sector, with the nationals doing all the development and the rest specialising in housing management? And if we are to increase greatly the volume of social housing being built, how is it going to be paid for? What comes across loud and clear in a number of the chapters is the growing mistrust, even at times antipathy that exists between the sector and the government, and the tensions this is creating. Both sides appear to want the same thing: to build more homes, to create thriving mixed communities that help to pull the poorest in society out of poverty, and to improve the services they offer their tenants and the efficiency of their organisations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration the Tunnel Is Essential to East London and Thames Gateway’S Economic Success the A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration
    The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration The tunnel is essential to East London and Thames Gateway’s economic success The A13 Riverside Tunnel Road to Regeneration Thank you for taking the trouble to find out more about the proposed A13 Riverside Tunnel. The tunnelling of a 1.3km stretch of the A13 will not only improve traffic flow along this key route, mitigating the two notorious bottlenecks at the Lodge Avenue and Renwick Road junctions, but will also transform a severely blighted area. As well as creating a new neighbourhood of over 5,000 homes called Castle Green, the tunnel will act as a catalyst for the building of another 28,300 homes in London Riverside, while creating over 1,200 jobs and unlocking significant business and commercial growth in the surrounding area. The tunnel is essential to east London and the Thames Gateway’s economic success and will stimulate growth along its route as well as easing congestion. It also signifies a new way of working in this country adapted from successful models from other European cities. A large proportion of the scheme could be self-financing, with the majority of the funding being generated by the tunnel itself, through the land value uplift and sale of the homes, the community infrastructure levy and new homes bonus. If the government also supports our proposal for stamp duty devolution in Castle Green, then this would mean further significant funding for the scheme could be secured. Cllr Darren Rodwell Cllr Roger Ramsey Leader of Barking and Dagenham Council Leader of Havering Council Road to Regeneration 03 About the A13 The A13 is one of the busiest arterial routes into the capital, connecting the county of Essex with central London.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of London's Economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017
    Working Paper 85 A description of London's economy Aaron Girardi and Joel Marsden March 2017 A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 copyright Greater London Authority March 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queens Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk Tel 020 7983 4922 Minicom 020 7983 4000 ISBN 978-1-84781-648-1 Cover photograph © London & Partners For more information about this publication, please contact: GLA Economics Tel 020 7983 4922 Email [email protected] GLA Economics provides expert advice and analysis on London’s economy and the economic issues facing the capital. Data and analysis from GLA Economics form a basis for the policy and investment decisions facing the Mayor of London and the GLA group. GLA Economics uses a wide range of information and data sourced from third party suppliers within its analysis and reports. GLA Economics cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or timeliness of this information and data. The GLA will not be liable for any losses suffered or liabilities incurred by a party as a result of that party relying in any way on the information contained in this report. A description of London's economy Working Paper 85 Contents Executive summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 2 The structure of London’s local economies .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Responses Received from English Housing Associations
    SORP responses –June 2014 English housing associations Summary of responses received from English housing associations Organisation Name Accent Group Ltd Look Ahead Care and Support Adactus Housing Group Limited Magenta Living Affinity Sutton Magna Housing Group Alliance Homes Moat Homes Limited Alpha (RSL) Limited Network Housing Group Ltd Arcon Housing Association North Devon Homes Arhag Houssing Association Notting Hill Housing Trust Asra Housing Group One Housing Group Bracknell Forest Homes Orbit Group Bromford Group Origin Housing Limited Byker Community Trust Limited Orwell Housing Association Limited Central & Cecil Housing Trust Paradigm Housing Association Ltd CHS Group Plymouth Community Homes Circle Housing Progress Housing Group City West Housing Trust Radian Housing Coastline Housing Ltd Rooftop Housing Group Limited DCH Sadeh Lok Housing Group Derby Homes Ltd SAFFRON HOUSING TRUST LTD East Thames Group Selwood Housing Eastlands Homes Partnership Limited Sentinel Housing Association Limited EMH Group Ltd shropshire housing group First Wessex Shropshire Rural Housing Association Four Housing Southern Housing Group Freebridge Community Housing Sovereign Housing Association Gateway Housing Association Spectrum Housing Group Gentoo Group Staffordshire Housing Group Great Places Housing Group SYHA Ltd GREENSQUARE GROUP LTD Thames Valley Housing Halton Housing Trust The Guinness Partnership Hanover Housing Association The Hyde Group Harrogate Families Housing Association Town & Country Housing Group Helena Partnerships Ltd Trafford
    [Show full text]
  • Structures for Development: Getting Them Right
    1 Please do not quote until published, Feb 2008 Edwards, M (2008) 'Structures for development in Thames Gateway: getting them right' in London's Turning: the prospect of Thames Gateway Eds. Phil Cohen and Mike Rustin. London, Ashgate. Details at https://www.ashgate.com/shopping/title.asp?key1=&key2=&orig=results&isbn=0%207546%207063%205 Chapter sixteen Structures for development: getting them right Michael Edwards, Bartlett School of Planning, UCL The Thames Gateway is an enormous undertaking. In many respects it resembles some of the earlier major projects of British town planning like the Milton Keynes generation of new towns or the London's Docklands development. Like them, it may come to be regarded by some as a great achievement of public policy and by others as a great disaster. The fact that positive and negative views can be taken of the same project does not (or does not merely) reflect alternative subjective perspectives: it stems from the fact that there are real conflicts in the society and thus different criteria for judging success. The Thames Gateway project poses daunting choices for those with the power to decide on the future development of South East England. Government and the Mayor of London both agree that much of the wider South East's growth should be concentrated in the Thames estuary (DCMS 2006; Mayor of London 2004). They share the intention that London will expand to the East, not to the West, and that the rationality of capitalist growth is the unquestionable way forward. This chapter explores aspects of this supposed rationality, arguing that the aspirations of 'sustainability' and 'community' cannot be achieved in the neo-liberal framework which is on offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition, Cooperation, Co-Opetition. a Conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’
    Competition, Cooperation, Co-opetition. A conceptualization of the ‘Network Brand’ Cecilia Pasquinelli Istituto di Management, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna Abstract - Place branding relies on the assumption of inter-territorial competition which seems to be the overall approach to place management. Competition involves not only cities but also provinces, nations, states, villages and supra-national regions. However, there is room for sustaining that competition is not an exhaustive key for understanding regional development and, consequently, for interpreting place marketing and branding. Within the general frame of competition, regions and local areas may seek inter- territorial cooperation in order to enrich their offer and enhance their competitiveness. In this regard, a gap in place branding and marketing literature is identified and this paper contributes to filling it, by proposing a conceptualization of the “network brand”. Assuming cooperation/co-opetition as a way to face inter-territorial competition, this research is in charge of answering to the following research questions. Firstly, to what extent network and network brand building is a pragmatic process i.e. inspired by market principles, rather than being a political process i.e. highly related to power game emerging within and among the involved territories? Secondly, to what extent the network brand is a “post-modern” brand? A secondary research was carried out by reviewing 12 inter-territorial networking experiences in Europe and US. Concerning the first research question, evidence suggests that, beyond a surface of pragmatism, there might be a political process leading to the emergence of a network brand. Moreover, there is a chance that in some cases a pragmatic approach to networking tends to turn into a political process by means of institutional spillovers, turning the network into a political arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Landlords Moving Onto the UC Landlord Portal and Becoming Trusted Partners in 2017
    Registered Social Landlords moving onto the UC Landlord Portal and becoming Trusted Partners in 2017 Landlord A2Dominion Homes Limited Accent Foundation Limited Adactus Housing Association Limited Affinity Sutton Homes Limited Aldwyck Housing Group Limited Angus Council Aster Communities B3 Living Limited Basildon District Council Bassetlaw District Council Birmingham City Council Boston Mayflower Limited bpha Limited Bracknell Forest Homes Limited Broadacres Housing Association Limited Bromford Housing Association Limited Catalyst Housing Limited Chesterfield Borough Council Circle Thirty Three Housing Trust Limited Coast and Country Housing Limited Coastline Housing Limited Community Gateway Association Limited Contour Homes Limited Cornwall Council Cottsway Housing Association Limited Cross Keys Homes Limited Curo Places Limited Devon and Cornwall Housing Limited Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council Dundee City Council East Durham Homes Limited East Thames EMH Homes (East Midlands Housing and Regeneration Limited) Family Mosaic Housing Festival Housing Limited Fife Council First Choice Homes Flagship Housing Group Limited Futures Homescape Limited Genesis Housing Association Limited Great Places Housing Association Greenfields Community Housing Gwalia Housing Group Hanover Housing Association Heart Of England Housing Association Helena Partnerships Limited Highland Council Home Group Limited Housing Solutions Limited Hyde Housing Association Limited Karbon Homes Limited Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council Knightstone Housing Association
    [Show full text]
  • Overcrowding Data 2009-10 - Quarter 4 & Baseline Return
    London Assembly Planning and Housing Committee Combined Evidence Received:.pdf version Investigation: Overcrowding in London’s Social Rented Housing Contents Organisation Evidence Reference Page Number Number London Borough of Bromley OSRH001 2 Family Mosaic OSRH002 44 East Thames Group OSRH003 46 Affinity Sutton OSRH004 50 Homes and Communities Agency (London) OSRH005 54 South-East London Region OSRH006 60 Hexagon Housing Association OSRH007 62 London Borough of Redbridge OSRH008 66 Kier Partnership Homes OSRH009 87 Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) OSRH010 95 London Borough of Richmond upon Thames OSRH011 99 Citizens Advice OSRH012 103 Notting Hill Housing OSRH013 107 National Housing Federation OSRH014 110 London Borough of Waltham Forest OSRH015 114 Peabody Trust OSRH016 147 London Borough of Croydon OSRH017 153 London Borough of Camden OSRH018 156 G15 Group OSRH019 165 North London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH020 167 City of London OSRH021 172 Genesis Group OSRH022 174 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham OSRH023 179 St George Regeneration OSRH024 188 The Hyde Group OSRH025 190 London Borough of Hounslow OSRH026 194 London Borough of Harrow OSRH027 201 East London Sub Regional Partnership OSRH028 208 London School of Economics (LSE) OSRH029 215 Developers Group OSRH030 218 Amicus Horizon OSRH031 222 CIH (Chartered Institute of Housing) London OSRH032 225 London Borough of Southwark OSRH033 232 West London Region OSRH034 283 London Councils OSRH035 286 London Borough of Merton OSRH036 291 London Borough of Brent OSRH037
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Areas.Qxd
    WOULD YOU LIVE HERE? MAKING THE GROWTH AREAS COMMUNITIES OF CHOICE JIM BENNETT WITH DAVID HETHERINGTON, MAX NATHAN AND CHRIS URWIN i ippr The Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) is the UK’s leading progressive think tank and was established in 1988. Its role is to bridge the political divide between the social democratic and liberal traditions, the intellectual divide between academia and the policy making establishment and the cultural divide between government and civil society. It is first and foremost a research institute, aiming to provide innovative and credible policy solutions. Its work, the questions its research poses and the methods it uses are driven by the belief that the journey to a good society is one that places social justice, democratic participation and economic and environmental sustainability at its core. For further information you can contact ippr’s external affairs department on [email protected], you can view our website at www.ippr.org and you can buy our books from Central Books on 0845 458 9910 or email [email protected]. Our trustees Chris Powell (Chairman) Chai Patel (Secretary) Jeremy Hardie (Treasurer) Professor Kumar Bhattacharyya Carey Oppenheim Lord Brooke Sir Michael Perry Lord Eatwell David Pitt-Watson Lord Gavron Dave Prentis Professor Anthony Giddens Lord Puttnam Lord Hollick Sir Martin Rees Jane Humphries Ed Sweeney Roger Jowell Baroness Williams Neil Kinnock Baroness Young of Old Scone Frances O’Grady © IPPR 2006 CONTENTS About the authors iv Acknowledgements iv List of abbreviations v Executive summary vi 1 Introduction 1 2 The policy context for housing growth 3 3 The Growth Areas and housing supply 6 4 The Growth Area communities 20 5 The Growth Area economies 29 6 Delivering growth: infrastructure and structures 45 7 Conclusions and recommendations 50 Appendix: Estimating the infrastructure costs of higher 56 housing growth targets References 59 About the authors Jim Bennett is a Senior Research Fellow at ippr.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Gateway South Essex Fundamental Review Of
    Thames Gateway South Essex Fundamental Review of Strategic Housing Market Assessment Review 2013 Report of Findings December 2013 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Thames Gateway South Essex SHMA 2013 – Report of Findings December 2013 Contents 1. Foreword........................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Private Rented Sector ............................................................................................................................ 6 Housing Delivery .................................................................................................................................... 6 Benefit Reform ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Population ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Older People .......................................................................................................................................... 7 London .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • London's Housing Struggles Developer&Housing Association Dec 2014
    LONDON’S HOUSING STRUGGLES 2005 - 2032 47 68 30 13 55 20 56 26 62 19 61 44 43 32 10 41 1 31 2 9 17 6 67 58 53 24 8 37 46 22 64 42 63 3 48 5 69 33 54 11 52 27 59 65 12 7 35 40 34 74 51 29 38 57 50 73 66 75 14 25 18 36 21 39 15 72 4 23 71 70 49 28 60 45 16 4 - Mardyke Estate 55 - Granville Road Estate 33 - New Era Estate 31 - Love Lane Estate 41 - Bemerton Estate 4 - Larner Road 66 - South Acton Estate 26 - Alma Road Estate 7 - Tavy Bridge estate 21 - Heathside & Lethbridge 17 - Canning Town & Custom 13 - Repton Court 29 - Wood Dene Estate 24 - Cotall Street 20 - Marlowe Road Estate 6 - Leys Estate 56 - Dollis Valley Estate 37 - Woodberry Down 32 - Wards Corner 43 - Andover Estate 70 - Deans Gardens Estate 30 - Highmead Estate 11 - Abbey Road Estates House 34 - Aylesbury Estate 8 - Goresbrook Village 58 - Cricklewood Brent Cross 71 - Green Man Lane 44 - New Avenue Estate 12 - Connaught Estate 23 - Reginald Road 19 - Carpenters Estate 35 - Heygate Estate 9 - Thames View 61 - West Hendon 72 - Allen Court 47 - Ladderswood Way 14 - Maryon Road Estate 25 - Pepys Estate 36 - Elmington Estate 10 - Gascoigne Estate 62 - Grahame Park 15 - Grove Estate 28 - Kender Estate 68 - Stonegrove & Spur 73 - Havelock Estate 74 - Rectory Park 16 - Ferrier Estate Estates 75 - Leopold Estate 53 - South Kilburn 63 - Church End area 50 - Watermeadow Court 1 - Darlington Gardens 18 - Excalibur Estate 51 - West Kensingston 2 - Chippenham Gardens 38 - Myatts Fields 64 - Chalkhill Estate 45 - Tidbury Court 42 - Westbourne area & Gibbs Green Estates 3 - Briar Road Estate
    [Show full text]
  • 2014:Layout 2 5/3/14 19:22 Page 1 Port of London Authority Handbook 2014 the Port of Tilbury London’S Link to World Trade
    PLA final cover 2014:Layout 2 5/3/14 19:22 Page 1 Port of London Authority Handbook 2014 The Port of Tilbury London’s link to world trade • Closest deepwater port to London • Serving huge South East UK market • Britain’s greenest port – a leader on environmental issues • A truly multimodal port with excellent rail and road links • Skilled workforce handling diverse commodities • Multi-million pound investments – creating jobs and growth Constantly adapting to changing demands... Please contact Port of Tilbury on: 01375 852200 | Port of Tilbury London Ltd, Leslie Ford House, Tilbury Freeport, Tilbury, Essex, RM18 7EH | www.forthports.co.uk Published in association with The Port of London Authority by Compass Publications Ltd Publisher James P Moriarty Sales Director Andy Bullen Editorial Felicity Landon Photography Andy Wallace Samuel Ashfield Ford Motor Company Nick Strugnell Gavin Parsons Rob Powell Dan Harwood Alistair Gale Book Design Pearce Marchbank Production Editor Linda Roast Cartographer Lee Ash Print Swallowtail Print The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher, the Port of London Authority, nor any other organisation associated with this publication. No liability can be accepted for inaccuraciesof any description, although the publishers would be pleased to receive amendments for possible inclusion in future editions. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying or scanning, without the prior permission of the publishers. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of the publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature. March 2014 ISSN 1353-7482 ©2014 Compass Publications Ltd COMPASS31st Edition PUBLICATIONS LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Our List of Registered Providers and Local Authorities
    Nationwide public sector eligibility list The public sector bodies to whom the use of this framework agreement is open, include without limitation: 1. Central government departments & their executive agencies: a list of such departments and executive agencies can be found at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/government-business/government-ministers- responsibilities.aspx 2. Non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs): a list of NDPBs can be found at annex A to the Public Bodies Directory 2007 published by the Cabinet Office) which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506070/An nex_-_Public_Bodies_Reform_Programme_Update_16_Dec_2015.pdf 3. All Local Authorities, (as defined in Regulation 3(2) to 3(5) inclusive of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015)) and all and any subsidiaries and joint-venture vehicles of those local authorities, including, but not limited to, all listed on this website: https://www.lgbce.org.uk/records- and-resources/local-authorities-in-england 4. All National Health Service (NHS) bodies, including, but not limited to, NHS Trusts as defined in the Regulation 2 of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 which, in turn, includes: 4.1. Acute trusts; 4.2. Trusts operating community hospitals and the provider functions of primary care trusts; 4.3. Primary care trusts; 4.4. Care trusts; 4.5. Care trusts plus; 4.6. Ambulance trusts; 4.7. Mental health trusts; 4.8. Strategic health authorities; 4.9. Special health authorities; 4.10. Community health councils; 4.11. Local health boards; 4.12. NHS foundation trusts; 4.13.
    [Show full text]