DOCSLIB.ORG

Q2 1617 LA Referrals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Q2 1617 LA Referrals Referrals to Local Authority Adoption Agencies from First4Adoption by region Q2 July-September 2016 Yorkshire & The Humber LA Adoption Agencies North East LA Adoption Agencies Durham County Council 13 North Yorkshire County Council* 30 1 Northumberland County Council 8 Barnsley Adoption Fostering Unit 11 South Tyneside Council 8 Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council 11 2 North Tyneside Council 5 Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council 10 Redcar Cleveland Borough Council 5 Hull City Council 10 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Middlesbrough Council 3 East Riding Of Yorkshire Council 9 City Of Sunderland 2 Cumbria County Council 7 Gateshead Council 2 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council 6 1 Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 2 0 3.5 7 10.5 14 Leeds City Council 6 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Hartlepool Borough Council 4 North Lincolnshire Adoption Service 4 1 City Of York Council 3 North East Lincolnshire Adoption Service 3 1 Darlington Borough Council 2 Kirklees Metropolitan Council 2 1 Sheffield Metropolitan City Council 2 Wakefield Metropolitan District Council 2 * Denotes agencies with more than one office entry on the agency finder 0 10 20 30 40 North West LA Adoption Agencies Liverpool City Council 30 Cheshire West And Chester County Council 16 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council 11 1 Manchester City Council 9 WWISH 9 Lancashire County Council 8 Oldham Council 8 1 Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council 8 2 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Wirral Adoption Team 8 Salford City Council 7 3 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council 5 2 Halton Borough Council 5 Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 5 Blackburn With Darwen 4 Blackpool Borough Council 4 Cheshire East Council 3 Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council 3 Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council 2 1 0 7.5 15 22.5 30 West Midlands LA Adoption Agencies East Midlands LA Adoption Agencies Leicester City Council 15 Staffordshire Adoption Service* 21 Leicestershire & Rutland 10 Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council 15 Northamptonshire County Council 8 1 Warwickshire County Council 11 Derbyshire County Council 7 Wolverhampton City Council 10 Nottinghamshire County Council 7 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council 9 2 Derby City Council 4 Nottingham City Council 2 Dudley Adoption Service 7 Web Referrals Phone Referrals 0 4 8 12 16 Herefordshire 7 Coventry City Council 5 Shropshire County Council 5 Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council 4 Stoke On Trent City Council 4 Worcestershire County Council 3 1 0 7.5 15 22.5 30 London LA Adoption Agencies East of England LA Adoption Agencies Bromley London Borough Council 19 1 Suffolk Adoption Agency 32 3 Kingston Upon Thames 18 1 Wandsworth London Borough Council 14 1 Essex County Council Adoption Agency 29 Ealing Adoption Team 10 2 Norfolk County Council 28 3 London Borough Of Enfield 9 3 London Borough Of Tower Hamlets 9 Lincolnshire County Council 19 Havering London Borough Council 8 1 Peterborough City Council 16 1 London Borough Of Sutton 8 1 London Borough Of Hillingdon 7 Hertfordshire County Council 14 Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council 7 Milton Keynes Council 8 Royal Borough Of Greenwich 7 Web Referrals Phone Referrals London Borough Of Camden 6 2 Central Bedfordshire Council 6 London Borough Of Islington 6 Bedford Borough Council 4 2 Merton London Borough Council 6 Bexley Council 5 1 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Luton Borough Council 3 1 London Borough Of Croydon 5 0 10 20 30 40 London Borough Of Hammersmith Fulham 5 1 London Borough Of Lewisham 5 1 Royal Borough Of Windsor Maidenhead 5 2 Waltham Forest London Borough Council 5 2 London Borough Of Lambeth 4 1 London Borough Of Newham 4 1 London Borough Redbridge 4 3 Royal Borough Of Kensington And Chelsea 4 2 Barking Dagenham Council 3 1 Brent London Borough Council 3 Hounslow London Borough Council 3 2 London Borough Of Southwark 3 Barnet Council 2 1 London Borough Harrow 2 London Borough Of Hackney 1 London Borough of Haringey 1 1 City Of Westminster 3 0 5 10 15 20 South West LA Adoption Agencies South East LA Adoption Agencies Surrey County Council 38 1 Gloucestershire County Council Adoption Team 22 Hampshire County Council 25 1 Plymouth City Council 21 Kent County Council 19 Brighton And Hove City Council 12 Bristol City Council 13 Slough Borough Council 12 1 Devon County Council* 12 West Berkshire Council 10 West Sussex County Council* 10 Cornwall County Council 11 East Sussex County Council 8 1 Medway Council Adoption Team 8 1 Swindon Borough Council 10 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Oxfordshire County Council 6 Web Referrals Phone Referrals Bath & North East Somerset 9 1 Reading Borough Council 6 Portsmouth City Council 5 1 Dorset County Council 7 Southampton City Council 5 1 Borough Of Poole 4 North Somerset District Council 7 Buckinghamshire County Council 4 2 Torbay Council 4 Bournemouth Borough Council 3 Bracknell 3 2 Somerset County Council 3 Isle Of Wight Council 3 Wiltshire County Council 3 Southend On Sea Borough Council 2 Thurrock Borough Council 2 South Gloucestershire Council 2 1 Wokingham District Council 1 2 0 7.5 15 22.5 30 0 10 20 30 40.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham County Council Plan 2020-23
    Durham County Council Council Plan 2020-2023 Executive Summary County Durham is a dynamic place, used to overcoming challenges and reinventing itself. Recently, the council and partners agreed a vision for County Durham for 2035 following extensive consultation with our residents. Over 30,000 responses helped shape a vision that people recognise. This is to create more and better jobs, help people live long and independent lives and support communities to be well connected and supportive of each other. Our purpose holds to deliver on these ambitions against a context of COVID-19. This plan sets out how we will achieve this. We want to create more and better jobs by supporting businesses emerging from lockdown back to stability and help to rebuild our economy. We are developing a pipeline of projects and investment plans; our roadmap to help stimulate economic recovery. We will create major employment sites across the county, cementing our position as a premier place in the region to do business. Employability support programmes will be developed to help people back into employment or to start their own business. As young people return to our schools and colleges, we will ensure that they receive a good education and training to equip them with the skills they need to access opportunities of today and the future. We will help our tourism and hospitality sector to recover as a great visitor destination with a cultural offer which will help stimulate the local economy. We want our residents to live long and independent lives and remain in good health for many years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • 13/2136C Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-On
    Application No: 13/2136C Location: Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-on-Trent, ST7 3EQ Proposal: Outline application for demolition of house, garage, barns and outbuildings, removal of hardstanding and construction of housing development Applicant: Northwest Heritage Expiry Date: 27-Aug-2013 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve with conditions MAIN ISSUES • Principle of Development • Sustainability • Character and Appearance • Landscape Impact • Ecology • Highway Safety and Traffic Generation. • Affordable Housing • Drainage and Flooding • Open Space • Residential Amenity • Other Considerations REFERRAL The application has been referred to the Southern Planning Committee because the site area is just over 0.5 hectares in size and is therefore a small scale major development. 1. SITE DESCRIPTION This application relates to the former Rectory Farm situated to the northwest of Church Lawton and to the east of the Town of Alsager. The site lies wholly within the Infill Boundary Line for Lawton Gate, which is a small settlement washed over by Green Belt. The site accommodates the main rectory farm dormer bungalow, a detached dormer ancillary outbuilding and some detached barns / stables towards. To the north and the east, the site is bound by field and paddocks. Beyond the northern boundary of the site, the levels drop away significantly where the curtilage of Rectory Farm ceases. The land slopes downwards towards a brook beyond which there is the Trent and Mersey Canal which occupies an elevated position relative to the northern end of the site. The site can be viewed from the adjacent canal towpath. There are residential properties further to the east and residential properties bounding the southern boundary of the site which form part of the Lawton Gate settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Bi-Weekly Bristol Statistics Update Tuesday 20 October 2020
    COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update Tuesday 20 October 2020 We aim to publish a COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update twice a week, on Tuesday and Friday afternoons. This may be delayed until the following day, depending on when data is made available. These numbers and rates do change daily but were accurate when published on the date stated on the report. Summary Bristol's rate of 211.7 new cases per 100,000 population in the last 7 days (up to the 16th October) is considerably higher than for the previous 7 days (135.9 per 100,000). The reported rate represents 981 positive cases reported for Bristol over the past 7 days within a population of over 463,000 people. The trend is very clearly moving upwards both locally and nationally and the Bristol rate remains above England rate of 170.8 per 100,000 and is now ranked 46th among 149 English local authorities. Bristol is a Tier 1 area in the new national assessment system. This means we must continue to adhere to national instructions and guidelines. We are closely monitoring any changes and are considering the situation carefully. The regional R number remains at the same level as last week: a range of 1.3 – 1.6 reflecting the rise in cases locally and nationally. The range of R is above 1 indicating the epidemic is increasing. The majority of the increase in new cases are in younger age groups, and reflect schools returning and universities opening. However, we are also seeing a rise cases in working age adults .
    [Show full text]
  • Duty to Co-Operate Statement of Common Ground
    CEC – Site Allocations and Development Policies – Duty to Co-operate Statement of Common Ground CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL SITE ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DUTY TO CO-OPERATE STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND Appendix 2: List of Signatories (as at April 2021) 1.1 Alongside the Revised Draft SADPD, its Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment, a DTC SOCG was published in October 2020 (as document ED 51) for consideration by, in particular, relevant DTC organisations who were then invited to sign it, prior to it being submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration by the appointed Inspector at examination. Section 5 of the DTC statement common ground noted that signatures would be requested, and that section completed during consultation on the revised publication draft SADPD. 1.2 Individual letters were sent on the 2nd November 2020 to DTC organisations to request that they confirm their agreement to the content of the DTC Draft Statement of Common Ground [ED 51], namely that: - - there are no strategic cross boundary issues that flow from the policies and proposals set out in the SADPD. - There is ongoing engagement with other local authorities related to existing memoranda of understanding put in place to support the Local Plan Strategy. 1.3 The following signatures have been received (original versions available on request): - • Cheshire West and Chester Council; • Warrington Borough Council; • Trafford Council; • Greater Manchester Combined Authority; • Manchester City Council; • Peak District National Park Authority; • High Peak Borough Council; • Derbyshire County Council; • Staffordshire Moorlands Council; • Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council; • Staffordshire County Council; • Stoke on Trent City Council; • Shropshire Council; • Environment Agency; • Historic England; • Natural England; • Homes England; • NHS Clinical Commissioning; • Highways England; • Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Inform Key Judgements Made by Ofsted
    Agenda Item * For publication Bedford Borough Council – off Agenda approval October 2013 Report by the Portfolio Holder for Education and the Executive Director for Children’s Services, Schools and Families Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT TO IMPLEMENT THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES BILL 1. Executive Summary This report relates to implementation of the Children and Families Bill (2013) which is expected to become the Children and Families Act in September 2014. The Bill changes the statutory framework in relation to Children with Special Educational Needs (SEN). The Council will have a duty to develop and implement the new legislation for more than 700 young people with Statements of SEN in a significantly changed way. The new approach is called the Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP) often referred to as the ‘single plan.’ The Local Authority will have a duty to publish a local offer, embed joint commissioning, offer personalised budgets, develop a key worker role and develop a new statementing process. In addition, the new legislation brings together two statutory frameworks for pre and post 16 and the Borough will therefore have to extend its responsibilities to assessing and monitoring Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCP) for young people in education and training up to 25 years (Appendix A) The implementation of the single plan will inform key judgements made by Ofsted. It is critical that the council utilises this funding stream to deliver the change required. 2. Recommendations 2.1 The Mayor is requested to consider the report and, if satisfied, approve acceptance of the Grant which will provide capacity to prepare and deliver our new legal obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning
    CABINET MEMBER FOR HOUSING, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND PLANNING FEBRUARY 2011 PUBLIC REPORT Cabinet Member responsible: Councillor Peter Hiller, Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning Contact Officer: Amy Wardell, ITS Senior Officer 01733 317481 NOVATION OF THE REAL TIME PASSENGER INFORMATION MAINTENANCE AND EXPANSION CONTRACT. R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S FROM : Infrastructure Planning & Delivery Deadline date : N/A The Cabinet Member is recommended to approve: • A novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 1. ORIGIN OF REPORT 1. This report is submitted to the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning for a key decision to be made. 2. PURPOSE AND REASON FOR REPORT 2.1 The purpose of this report is to provide additional background information with regard to the request made to the Council for the novation of the existing real time passenger information expansion and maintenance contract from Advance Communications and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited to VIX ACIS Limited. 2.2 This report is for the Cabinet Member for Housing, Neighbourhoods and Planning to consider as set out at delegation number 3.7.7 (a) of Part 3, Section 3 of the delegation document. 3. TIMESCALE Is this a Major No Policy/Statutory Plan 4. RELEVANT DETAILS: 4.1 Advanced Communication and Information Systems (ACIS) Limited operated the existing contract for the maintenance and expansion of real time passenger information within the Peterborough area. 4.2 The novation is a result of the acquisition of ACIS Limited by VIX Technology Group to form VIX ACIS Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire and Warrington
    Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 08/12/2020 14:00
    Public Document Pack Agenda Council Time and Date 2.00 pm on Tuesday, 8th December, 2020 Place This meeting will be held remotely. The meeting can be viewed live by pasting this link into your browser: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gSCLeLs5lc&feature=youtu.be 1. Apologies 2. Minutes of the Meeting held on 20 October 2020 (Pages 5 - 12) 3. Exclusion of the Press and Public To consider whether to exclude the press and public for the item of private business for the reasons shown in the report. 4. Correspondence and Announcements of the Lord Mayor 5. Petitions 6. Declarations of Interest Matters Left for Determination by the City Council/Recommendations for the City Council It is anticipated that the following matters will be referred as Recommendations. The reports are attached. The relevant Recommendations will be circulated separately 7. Audit and Procurement Committee Annual Report 2019-20 (Pages 13 - 18) From the Audit and Procurement Committee, 30 November 2020 8. Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme - CCC Public Building Energy Efficiency Retrofit (Pages 19 - 30) From the Cabinet, 1 December 2020 9. Review of Local Plan (Pages 31 - 40) From the Cabinet, 1 December 2020 Page 1 10. Surrender of Lease on Premises in Upper Precinct, Coventry (Pages 41 - 50) From the Cabinet, 1 December 2020 Items for Consideration 11. Recommendation of Ethics Committee Following Code of Conduct Hearing (Pages 51 - 60) Report of the Director of Law and Governance 12. Review of Members' Allowances Scheme (Pages 61 - 74) Report of the Director of Law and Governance 13. Adoption of Definitions of Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia (Pages 75 - 84) Report of the Director of Law and Governance 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More Or Allocation System Year from to Less?) Source References
    Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More or Allocation System Year From To Less?) Source References (1) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila and Tayfun Sonmez. 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach." American Economic Review , 101(1): 399‐410. (2) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin Roth and Tayfun Sonmez. 2005. "The Boston Public Schools Match." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96: 368‐371. (3) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sonmez. 2006. "Changing the Boston Mechanism: Strategy‐proofness as Equal Access." NBER Working Paper 11965. (4) Cook, Gareth. 2003. "School Assignment Flaws Detailed: Two economists study problem, offer relief." Boston Boston Public Schools (K, 6, 9) 2005 Boston GS Less A,B,E Globe, September 12. (5) BPS. 2002‐2010. "Introducing the Boston Public Schools." (1) Rossi, Rosalind. 2009. "8th Graders' Shot at Elite High Schools Better." Chicago Sun‐Times, November 12. (2) CPS, 2009. "Post Consent Decree Assignment Plan." Office of Academic Enhancement, November 11. (3) Chicago Public Schools. 2009. "New Admissions Process: Frequently Asked Questions." (describes the advice 4 4 Chicago Selective High Schools 2009 Boston SD Less A,B,C for re‐ranking schools). (1) CPS. 2010. "Guidelines for Magnet and Selective Enrollment Admissions for the 2011‐2012 School Year." November 29. (2) Joseph, Abigayil and Katie Ellis, 2010. "Refinements to 2011‐2012 Selective Enrollment and Magnet School Admission Policy." November 4. (3) CPS, 2011. "Application to Selective Enrollment High 4 6 2010 SD SD Less A,B,C Schools." Available at www.cpsoae.org, Last accessed December 28, 2011. (1) Ajayi, Kehinde.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Regional Assembly's
    EAST MIDLANDS TROUBLED FAMILIES LEADS NETWORK Action Points of Meeting held at 10am, 11th October 2013, Conference Room, East Midlands Councils, Melton Mowbray In Attendance/Apologies Name Organisation Present Apology Phil Poirier DCLG Liz Perfect (LP) Derby City Council Tim Clegg Derby City Council Rob Fletcher (RF) Derbyshire County Council Judith Walker (JW) JCP/DWP Michelle Skinner Leicester City Council Andy Robinson (AR) Chair Leicestershire County Council Mags Walsh (MW) Leicestershire County Council Lynn Gibson (LG) Leicestershire SLF Programme Mark Rainey (MR) Lincolnshire County Council Alex Holloway (AH) Lincolnshire County Council Nicci Marzec (NM) Northamptonshire CC Tim O’Neill Nottingham City Council Nicky Dawson Nottingham City Council Jenny Spencer (JS) Nottinghamshire CC Helga Spry-Shute (HS-S) Rutland County Council Peter Williams (PW) EMC Kevin Thomas (KT) Working Links Pauline Grice (PG) TFEA Liz Annetts (LA) TFEA Sarah Holtham (SH) TFEA Item Subject Actions 2. Notes and Action Points of 25th June 2013 Meeting Actions Points: Action for Russ Aziz, DCLG – it was understood that claimants need to be over 18 in order for their payments to impact upon payments to other family members. Actions for AR – AR had yet to speak with Louise Casey and DCLG’s TF Unit on AR to follow up the possibility of setting up a senior level national meeting of TF leads and also to ascertain whether embargoed data could be released a day early to relevant local authorities in order to prepare a possible media response. Action for Kevin Tinsley, DCLG – Clarification was provided on the point of whether claims can be made for those that volunteer for the Work Programme as well as those that are mandated to enter it.
    [Show full text]