Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 159 / Friday, August 20, 2021 / Notices 46823

Dated: August 17, 2021. (202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–0410, list of the issues that parties raised, and Elizabeth Whiteman, respectively. to which we responded in the Issues Acting Executive Secretary. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and Decision Memorandum, follows as [FR Doc. 2021–17853 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am] an appendix to this notice. The Issues Background BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and Decision Memorandum is a public On March 19, 2021, Commerce document and is on file electronically published in the Federal Register the via Enforcement and Compliance’s DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE preliminary results of the 2018–2019 Antidumping and Countervailing Duty administrative review of the Centralized Electronic Service System Foreign-Trade Zones Board antidumping duty order on diamond (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to sawblades and parts thereof from registered users at https:// [B–06–2021] China.1 We invited interested parties to access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Foreign-Trade Zone 240—Martinsburg, comment on the Preliminary Results Memorandum can be accessed directly West Virginia; Withdrawal of and we received case briefs from the at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. Application for Reorganization Under petitioner, the Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition, and Wuhan Alternative Site Framework Final Determination of No Shipments Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd. Notice is hereby given of the (Wuhan Wanbang),2 and rebuttal briefs We preliminarily found that Bosun withdrawal of the application submitted from the petitioner and Chengdu Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Weiwang Tools by the West Virginia Economic Huifeng New Material Technology Co., Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Weihai Development Authority, grantee of Ltd. (Chengdu Huifeng).3 On June 11, Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Foreign-Trade Zone 240, requesting 2021, Commerce extended the deadline Ltd., which have been eligible for authority to reorganize the zone under for the final results by 60 days to no separate rates in previous segments of the alternative site framework. The later than September 15, 2021.4 the proceeding and are subject to this review, did not have any shipments of application was docketed on February 4, Scope of the Order 2021 (86 FR 8762, February 9, 2021). subject merchandise during the POR.7 The withdrawal was requested by the The products covered by the No party commented on the Preliminary 5 applicant due to changed antidumping duty Order are diamond Results regarding our no-shipments circumstances. The case has been closed sawblades. A full description of the determination. Therefore, for these final without prejudice. scope of the Order is contained in the results, we continue to find that these Issues and Decision Memorandum.6 companies did not have any shipments Dated: August 16, 2021. Analysis of Comments Received of subject merchandise during the POR Andrew McGilvray, and will issue appropriate instructions Executive Secretary. All issues raised in the case and to CBP based on these final results. [FR Doc. 2021–17856 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am] rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P in this review are addressed in the Changes Since the Preliminary Results Issues and Decision Memorandum. A Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results parties regarding our Preliminary Results, and for the reasons explained in International Trade Administration of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and the Issues and Decision Memorandum, Rescission of Review in Part; 2018–2019, 86 FR we did not make changes to the [A–570–900] 14873 (March 19, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. preliminary calculations of the Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades weighted-average dumping margins for From the People’s Republic of China: and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of the mandatory respondents, Chengdu Final Results of Antidumping Duty China: DSMC’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021; Huifeng and Wuhan Wanbang, and the see also Wuhan Wanbang’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Administrative Review; 2018–2019 Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s margin assigned to the separate rate Republic of China: Submission of Wuhan respondents. AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Wanbang’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021. International Trade Administration, 3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades Separate Rate for Non-Selected Department of Commerce. and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of Companies China: DSMC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 29, SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 2021; see also Chengdu Huifeng’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond In the Preliminary Results, we found (Commerce) determines that diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s that evidence provided by Chengdu sawblades and parts thereof (diamond Republic of China: Submission of Chengdu Huifeng, the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Huifeng’s Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ dated April 29, Entity,8 Wuhan Wanbang, and Zhejiang sawblades) from the People’s Republic 2021. of China (China) were sold at less than 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd., supported normal value by certain exporters Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: finding an absence of both de jure and during the period of review (POR) Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of de facto government control, and, November 1, 2018, through October 31, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– therefore, we preliminarily granted a 2019,’’ dated June 11, 2021. separate rate to each of these 2019. 5 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from DATES: Applicable August 20, 2021. the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145 7 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 14874. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (November 4, 2009) (Order). 8 The Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity is comprised Bryan Hansen or Thomas Schauer, AD/ 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and of Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacturer Co., CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: Ltd.; Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; and and Compliance, International Trade Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd. See Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the Administration, U.S. Department of 2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Memorandum). 2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913, n. 5 (June 12, 2017).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Aug 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM 20AUN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES