Page 1 of 3 POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:30 p.m.

SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION/PERSONNEL To Discuss in Accordance with Idaho Code Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To consider the evaluation, dismissal, or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or agent; (No Action to be Taken) 5:00 P.M.

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center

AGENDA

1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. WELCOME

3. ROLL CALL

4. REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Self Explanatory – Action a. Special Meeting/Work Session/Retreat – September 21, 2011 b. Special Meeting/Work Session – October 11, 2011 c. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Personnel – October 18, 2011 d. Regular Board Meeting – October 18, 2011 e. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – November 2, 2011

6. RECOGNITIONS/VISITORS/CORRESPONDENCE – Information a. Visitors and Correspondence 1) Introduction of Sergeant Ralph Daniels, SRO Supervisor b. Recognitions - Information - Ms. Allen 1) Teacher of the Year – Angie Lawless 2) Syringa Kindergarten Teachers 3) High School Athletic and Academic State Champions c. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles No. 22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board.

7. REPORTS – Information a. Student Representative Reports (3 minutes each) 1) Alameda Center – Talisha Lowry 2) Century High School – Kolton Jackman/Ariane Drake 3) Highland High School – Tina Xu/Aaron Eskelson 4) Pocatello High School – Hannah Stinson/Ricardo Chavarria

Page 1 of 3

b. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Festival of Trees Update – Ms. Allen c. Media Report – Ms. Allen d. Report on ISBA Annual Convention – Mr. Rash & Ms. Gebhardt e. Report on Standing Committees for 2011-2012

8. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. 2011-12 Special Education (Title VI B) Budget – Mr. Weiche b. Revised Alternate Route to Graduation – Mr. Wegner c. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Wegner d. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen e. 21st Century After School Program Update – Dr. Mortensen f. Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program Update – Dr. Mortensen g. Elementary Parent Teacher Conferences Update – Dr. Mortensen h. District Mobility Report – Dr. Mortensen i. 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar – Dr. Mortensen j. BYU-I Student Teacher Interns Request – Dr. Mortensen k. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Dr. Mortensen l. Pocatello High School Grading Policy Proposal – Mr. Devine m. Secondary Parent Teacher Conferences Update – Mr. Devine n. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine o. 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules and Travel – Mr. Devine p. Camp Requests – Mr. Devine q. Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine r. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Request – Mr. Devine s. Previously Approved Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine t. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Devine

9. BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update b. Review of Stocks Building/Alameda Center Timeline c. Beverage Contract d. PCCS Fiscal Audit e. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) f. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update

10. EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Campus/ISEE Upload Update b. Student Enrollment Information Update/2012-13 Enrollment Projections c. Budget and Wellness/Insurance Committee Updates d. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update

11. HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report b. Students Come First Committee Report c. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update

12. SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Superintendent’s Forum Report b. Dual Credit Scholarship Luncheon Update c. Legislative Meeting Agenda – December 5, 2011 d. Any Other Superintendent’s Update e. Calendar

Page 2 of 3

13. PUBLIC COMMENT – Self Explanatory a. Public Comment Pertinent to Agenda Action items Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles No. 22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board.

14. CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011 d. Topic: Approve BYU-I Student Teacher Interns Request

15. OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Revised Alternate Route to Graduation Plan b. Topic: Approve Early Graduation Requests c. Topic: Approve Camp Requests d. Topic: Approve Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests e. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests

16. NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules and Travel b. Topic: Adopt 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar

17. ANNOUNCEMENTS

18. ADJOURN

Page 3 of 3 POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, November 15, 2011 5:30 p.m.

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center

EXPLANATION OF AGENDA

1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. WELCOME

3. ROLL CALL

4. REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action

Page 1 of 8

b. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Festival of Trees Update – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen will be in attendance to provide an update on the progress of the Festival of Trees including the acquisition of sponsors, volunteers and event scheduling and to answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Media Report – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen will be in attendance to provide a report on the media coverage for education for the past month and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. d. Report on ISBA Annual Convention – Mr. Rash & Ms. Gebhardt Mr. Rash and Ms. Gebhardt will be in attendance to report on the outcome of the ISBA Annual Convention in Coeur d’ Alene held November 9 – 11, 2011. e. Report on Standing Committees for 2011-2012 Several Standing Committees convene periodically throughout the school year. Various Board members may have reports. The committees are listed as follows: 2011-2012 Budget Committee John Sargent/Jackie Cranor CIP Committee Frank Rash Curriculum Committee Janie Gebhardt/Jackie Cranor District Leadership Council Nate Murphy/John Sargent Education Foundation (Vice Chair is Designated Representative) John Sargent Head Start Jackie Cranor Insurance/Wellness Committee Frank Rash Insurance Representation Selection N/A Judge Murray’s Juvenile Advisory Committee Janie Gebhardt/Nate Murphy Local Issues-Chamber of Commerce John Sargent Long Range Facility Planning Frank Rash PTA Regional Council Meetings Board Rotation (Meetings are at 7:00 p.m.) December 8, 2011 Board Room Nate Murphy May 5, 2012 Wilkes Funeral Home Pocatello Community Charter School Liaison Janie Gebhardt/John Sargent Safe and Drug Free Schools Advisory Committee N/A Safety Committee Jackie Cranor Instructional Technology Committee Nate Murphy Textbook Adoption Janie Gebhardt/Jackie Cranor Renovation of Stocks Building, Relocation of Alternative Frank Rash/Janie Gebhardt Programs, Modification of Alameda Center and Opening of 4th Middle School Key Communicators John Sargent

8. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. 2011-12 Special Education (Title VI B) Budget – Mr. Weiche Included in the packet is the 2011-12 Special Education budget along with the 2010-11 for comparison purposes. Mr. Weiche will be in attendance to review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. b. Revised Alternate Route to Graduation – Mr. Wegner Included in the packet is a revised Alternate Route to Graduation. The changes to the plan were reviewed at the November 8, 2011 Work Session and Mr. Wegner will be in attendance to briefly review the changes and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will report on any other Curriculum updates at the time of the meeting.

Page 2 of 8 d. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a Head Start document regarding compliance with the “Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act”. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the document and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. e. 21st Century After School Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to provide any 21st Century After School Program update and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. f. Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet are Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program numbers for September and October, 2011. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the report and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. g. Elementary Parent Teacher Conferences Update – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is elementary Parent Teacher Conference data from October 20, 2011. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to report on the data and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. h. District Mobility Report – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is the District #25 Mobility Report. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the data and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. i. 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is the proposed 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the calendar and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to consider adopting the calendar under New Business. j. BYU-I Student Teacher Interns Request – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a memorandum listing BYU-I Student Teacher Interns requesting access to various District schools. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the request under the Consent Agenda. k. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen will report on any other Elementary Education updates at the time of the meeting. l. Pocatello High School Grading Policy Proposal – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is a proposal from Pocatello High School to implement an Incomplete Grading Policy including the guidelines and rationale for implementation. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the proposal and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. m. Secondary Parent Teacher Conferences Update – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is secondary Parent Teacher Conference data from October 20, 2011 & November 2, 2011. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to report on the data and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. n. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is a memorandum listing the number of early graduation requests by school and the reasons students are requesting early graduation. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to report on the requests and answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the early graduation requests under New Business. o. 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules and Travel – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are the 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules for all three high schools. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the schedules and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the 2011-2012 Fall Athletic Schedules inclusive of travel under New Business. p. Camp Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are two volleyball camp requests for Highland High School. Mr. Devine will review the requests and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. q. Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the requests and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business.

Page 3 of 8 r. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Request – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. These requests are routine and Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. s. Previously Approved Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are field trip requests that were approved at the October 18, 2011 Regular Board Meeting with the additional information requested by the Board. One request is from Highland High School for the Frank Church Statewide Economic Summit Competition in Boise. The additional information includes lodging accommodations and the itinerary. Four of the requests are the Pocatello High School wrestling team. The additional information includes itineraries for each of the competitions. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. t. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Devine Mr. Devine will report on any other Secondary Education updates at the time of the meeting.

9. BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update Included in the packet is the current Idaho General Fund Revenue Report with revenue information as of October. Mr. Reed will review the information and provide any further General Fund updates at the time of the meeting. b. Review of Stocks Building/Alameda Center Timeline Included in the packet is a current timeline for the Stocks Building/Alameda Center projects. Mr. Reed will be in attendance to review the timeline and report on the status the projects and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Beverage Contract Mr. Reed will be in attendance to speak to the upcoming renewal of the District’s beverage contract and the RFP process and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. d. PCCS Fiscal Audit Included in the packet is the PCCS Fiscal Audit Report for year ending June 30, 2011. The FY2010 Fiscal Audit was mistakenly included in the November 8, 2011 Work Session packet and the corrected report is being included in this packet for informational purposes. Mr. Reed will briefly review the FY2011 report and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. e. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) Mr. Reed will report on any proposed building and subdivisions (new construction) at the time of the meeting. f. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update Mr. Reed will report on any other Business Operations updates at the time of the meeting.

10. EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Campus/ISEE Upload Update Mr. Smart will be in attendance to provide any report on Campus/ISEE Upload information and to answer any questions at the time of the meeting. b. Student Enrollment Information Update/2012-13 Enrollment Projections Included in the packet is current student enrollment data and enrollment projections for 2012-13. Mr. Smart will be in attendance to review the information and answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Budget and Wellness/Insurance Committee Updates Mr. Smart will be in attendance to provide any Budget and Wellness/Insurance Committee updates and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. d. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update Mr. Smart will report on any other Employee Services updates at the time of the meeting.

11. HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report

Page 4 of 8 Included in the packet is the monthly Human Resources report. Dr. Howell will be in attendance to review the report and answer any questions at the time of the meeting. b. Students Come First Committee Report Dr. Howell will be in attendance to report on the current work of the Students Come First Committee and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update Dr. Howell will report on any other Human Resources updates at the time of the meeting.

12. SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Superintendent’s Forum Report Ms. Vagner will be in attendance to provide an update on the Superintendent’s Forum held October 27, 2011 and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. b. Dual Credit Scholarship Luncheon Update The Chamber of Commerce Dual Credit Scholarship Luncheon is scheduled for November 16, 2011. Ms. Vagner will be in attendance to confirm Board attendance and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Legislative Meeting Agenda – December 5, 2011 Included in the packet is the draft Legislative Meeting Agenda. Ms. Vagner will review the agenda and solicit input into the agenda at the time of the meeting. d. Any Other Superintendent’s Update Ms. Vagner will provide any other Superintendent’s update at the time of the meeting. e. Calendar Sunday, November 13 – Saturday, November 19, 2011 American Education Week

Tuesday, November 15, 2011 Regular Board Meeting Board Room at the Education Service Center 5:30 p.m.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Chamber Dual Enrollment Scholarship Luncheon Red Lion Inn 12:00 p.m.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Student Discipline Hearings Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 4:30 p.m.

Thursday, November 24 – Friday, November 25, 2011 Thanksgiving Holiday – No School

Festival of Trees Schedule: At the Stephens Performing Arts Center Tuesday, November 29, 2011 Gala Grand Opening Social and Dinner Social – 6:00 p.m. Dinner – 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, November 30, 2011 Employee Appreciation Event 5:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m. Thursday, December 1, 2011 Sponsor, Donor and Festival Volunteer Appreciation Breakfast 7:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.

Page 5 of 8 Monday, December 5, 2011 Board Work Session with Legislators Board Room 4:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011 Trustee School Visits 9:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Syringa Elementary – Mr. Sargent/Ms. Cranor/Ms. Vagner Greenacres Elementary – Ms. Gebhardt/Mr. Rash/Ms. Mortensen Jefferson Elementary – Mr. Murphy/Mr. Devine

Wednesday, December 7, 2011 Student Discipline Hearings Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 4:30 p.m.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011 Work Session Board Room 8:30 a.m.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011 Regular Board Meeting Board Room 5:30 p.m.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011 Student Discipline Hearings Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 4:30 p.m.

Thursday, December 22 – Monday, January 2, 2011 Winter Break – No School

14. CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity Policy Issue: Board approves Human Resource Activity Background Information: Included in the packet is documentation of the Human Resource Activity regarding certified employees since the October 18, 2011 Regular Board Meeting. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve Human Resource Activity as presented. b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims Policy Issue: Board approves all Claims.

Page 6 of 8 Background Information: Included in the packet are bills and invoices as of November 4, 2011 in the amount of $1,800,563.53. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the bills and invoices as of November 4, 2011 in the amount of $1,800,563.53. c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011 Policy Issue: Board acts on Financial Information. Background Information: Included in the packet is supplemental financial information for the period of October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve supplemental financial information from October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011. d. Topic: Approve BYU-I Student Teacher Interns Request Policy Issues: Board approves student teacher intern access in District schools. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the BYU-I student teacher intern requests as presented. Board Direction/Action on Consent Agenda:

15. OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Revised Alternate Route to Graduation Plan Policy Issue: Board approves alternate routes to graduation. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the revised Alternate Route to Graduation Plan as presented. Board Direction/Action: b. Topic: Approve Early Graduation Requests Policy Issue: Board approves Early Graduation requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Early Graduation requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: c. Topic: Approve Camp Requests Policy Issue: Board approves camp requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the camp requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: d. Topic: Approve Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Policy Issue: Board approves preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: e. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Policy Issue: Board approves Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action:

16. NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules and Travel Policy Issue: Board approves athletic and travel schedules. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the 2011-2012 Winter Athletic Schedules and associated travel as presented. Board Direction/Action:

Page 7 of 8 b. Topic: Adopt 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar Policy Issue: Board adopts calendars. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administration Recommendation: Administration recommends Board adopt the 2012-2013 School District #25 Calendar as presented. Board Direction/Action:

17. ANNOUNCEMENTS

18. ADJOURN

Page 8 of 8 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF A BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT

Board Room at the Education Center Wednesday, September 21, 2011 4:30 p.m. – 8:30 p.m.

BOARD MEMBERS/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Frank Rash, Chair Janie Gebhardt, Member John Sargent, Vice Chair (Excused at 7:39 p.m.) Nate Murphy, Member Jackie Cranor, Clerk Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

OTHERS PRESENT: Liz Killpack Renae Johnson

Purpose: To frame discussion based on the District’s Vision/Mission/Beliefs/Learner Goals Statement; discuss evidence of Board Beliefs identified for behavioral emphasis; Review Board of Trustees Operating Principles; Conduct Board self-evaluation; Review Roles and Responsibilities for Board of Trustees, and Superintendent; and Brainstorm Challenges for the Next Three Years.

Welcome and statement of purpose Chair Rash welcomed everyone at 4:59 p.m. and said the purpose of the Special Meeting/Work Session was a Board/Superintendent Retreat. He said the group would discuss the direction of the District, the Beliefs, Operating Principles and conduct the Board self-evaluation. He turned the meeting over to Liz Killpack.

Warm up activity Ms. Killpack asked the Board members and Superintendent to take one end of a rope that was set up in a star. She said no one could let go of the rope during the exercise. She asked the team to create a knot in one minute. She asked the team what the activity had to do with teamwork. Ms. Gebhardt said it could represent a team getting tangled up by not working together. Ms. Vagner said the fact that each member had to hold on represented that the team was tied together. Ms. Killpack asked the team to untie the knot in one minute. She asked the team if anyone thought they could untie the knot by themselves. They all said no. Ms. Gebhardt said the team had to step back, look at the big picture and discuss how to get out of the tangle. Ms. Killpack said the exercise symbolized the work the team would do that night in reviewing goals and conducting the Board self-evaluation.

District Vision, Mission, Beliefs, Learner Goals drives the work of the Board Ms. Killpack reviewed the Vision/Mission/Learner Goals document. She said Board members have a specific focus and reason for existing. Ms. Gebhardt said the Board was supposed to deliberate to ensure the District operated in a way that was best for all students and staff. Ms. Killpack asked the Board to review the goals. Ms. Cranor said it was important for a Board to believe in the goals that were selected. Mr. Sargent said it was important to speak up if there was a goal a member did not believe in. Ms. Killpack said the Board provided direction to the Superintendent who drove the bus. Ms. Killpack asked the Board to review the Beliefs and talk about what it hoped to accomplish. Ms. Vagner asked the Board to review the Actualization of Beliefs from 2010- 11 and provide any changes. She asked the Board to identify the Beliefs it would focus on for the 2011-12 school year. Ms. Gebhardt asked that the development and adoption of a Strategic Plan be added to the actualization. Ms. Gebhardt said the increase in graduation rates was evidence of the Belief and asked that it be added to the Actualization. Ms. Cranor said Tyhee Elementary turning around achievement through community involvement in the attendance program was evidence and asked that it be added. Ms. Gebhardt said community involvement in Festival of Trees actualized that the community plays a vital role. Mr. Sargent said Judge Murray’s program actualized that parents play a vital role. Ms. Vagner said the actualization would be expanded to include increased graduation rates, behavior is institutional and not staff dependent, Festival of Trees and Judge Murray’s meetings play a vital role in a student’s educational success. She said the changes would be brought for review at the October 11, 2011 Work Session and would be added to the benchmarking document. Ms. Killpack asked the

Page 1 of 4 Board to select the Beliefs that it would focus on for 2011-12. Mr. Sargent said he would like to keep the current Beliefs to avoid shifting focus too much. Ms. Gebhardt said she would like to add something that showed the Board supported teachers in helping students. Ms. Vagner said the programs implemented supported the Belief that “students learn in different ways and at different rates”. The Board agreed.

Review Board of Trustees Operating Principles Ms. Killpack said this District had the largest Operating Principles document she had seen and had used it as an example for other Boards. She reviewed the Operating Principles. Ms. Cranor said she knew it was not the Board’s position to get into a debate during public comment at a Board meeting, but felt patrons were owed some type of response either after the meeting or in a letter. Ms. Vagner offered that she could respond on a selective basis if the Board would allow some discretion. The Board discussed the pros and cons of public discussion. The Board agreed to allow discretion to the Superintendent to respond to selected comment. Ms. Killpack reviewed principles #1 - #6 and the Board was okay with all of them. Ms. Killpack reviewed #7 and asked Mr. Rash if he was comfortable being the spokesperson for the Board. Mr. Rash said if he was asked about a meeting that he had not attended could he talk to another Board member that had attended before responding. Ms. Vagner said yes. She said a trustee could not respond to a topic that had not been previously discussed by the Board. Ms. Killpack said even if a Trustee clarified that the response was individual and not on behalf of the Board the perception was that the Trustee was responding on behalf of the Board. Mr. Sargent said he appreciated that anything that went to the press from the Board was reviewed by all five members for input before being printed. Ms. Killpack reviewed principles #8 – #14. No changes were recommended. Ms. Killpack reviewed #15. Ms. Gebhardt said that all decisions should be deliberated in accordance with the Open Meeting Law and felt this had been violated by the Board. She said there was a phone call the night before the election to discuss nominations and those types of phone calls were a violation of the Open Meeting Law. She said Board Members could not discuss items that would be on an agenda outside of the meeting. She said at the time Board elections took place she felt thrown under the bus and was very upset. Mr. Rash, Mr. Sargent, Ms. Cranor and Mr. Murphy all said there was not any conversation between Board members regarding nominations. Ms. Gebhardt said she felt like her time served on the Board did not matter to the others and felt some discussion regarding criteria should have taken place. She said her sense was that communication and trust had been broken. Ms. Cranor said time served on a Board should not dictate the position a Trustee holds. Ms. Gebhardt said she agreed that it should not be the sole criteria but some discussion of criteria should take place and longevity should hold some value. Ms. Cranor said one of the factors in her nomination was who would have the most time to dedicate to meetings. Ms. Gebhardt said Board Members shouldn’t come to a decision on his/her own and assume that everyone else agreed. She said questions of bias had been raised about the nominations. She said whether or not that was true, there was a perception of bias because of the lack of discussion. Mr. Murphy said he was completely unaware of how elections were supposed to be handled and did not know that any discussion was necessary. Ms. Cranor said she had no idea where the perception of bias had come from as she did not even know what religion the other Board Members were. Ms. Gebhardt said there was religious bias in the schools and there was a public perception that the bias existed on the Board as well. Ms. Cranor said it was a public assumption and other Board Members should not assume the same just because it was out in the public. Mr. Sargent asked if it would be appropriate for the Board to have public discussion on nominations at the time of the elections. Ms. Killpack said it was best to discuss nominations at the time of the meeting. Mr. Sargent noted that if someone was opposed to a nomination he/she should have spoken up at the meeting. He said in the past discussion had taken place regarding Ms. Donnelly continuing as Chair outside of the meeting and had always been done that way. He said he did not understand why it was a problem this year. He said he agreed with changing the process for the future but did not think it was fair to claim any decision was made because of religious bias. Ms. Killpack said it was important to create a process where everyone felt respected and heard. She said the Board should identify qualifications for a Board officer prior to the election and discuss them at the meeting. Ms. Vagner suggested two Board members volunteer to create a committee that would outline a process for the selection of officers. Mr. Sargent and Ms. Gebhardt agreed to volunteer for the committee. Ms. Gebhardt suggested adding language to operating principle #15 to include deliberating on the election of officers. Ms. Vagner noted that casual conversations between Board members were okay, but discussion regarding items that could come up on an agenda should not take place. Ms. Gebhardt said Board members should be very careful in avoiding violation of the Open Meeting Law inclusive of telephone conversations. Ms. Killpack suggested a better way to handle questions or discussion was to call the Superintendent to communicate with the Board as a whole so every member gets the same information. She said phone conversations between individual Board members could vary greatly. Ms. Killpack said it was important to avoid conversations that might communicate how a Board member intended to vote. She said it was critical that

Page 2 of 4 Board members never go into a meeting with their minds already made up. Mr. Sargent said he believed the Board did a good job with discussing agenda items in the open and even changed the decision on pay reductions due to the discussion. Ms. Killpack reviewed operating principle #16 and said it was crucial for Board members to support a vote once the decision was made. Ms. Cranor said she’d had a previous experience where two Board members would not speak to her after a vote did not go their way and did not appreciate that. Ms. Killpack said sometimes a cool down period was needed which was okay as long as the decision was supported in the end. She said she believed the Board did very well with operating principle #17 which was being practiced that night during the retreat. Ms. Killpack said the Board had discussed some concerns with operating principle #19 in talking about deliberating in an open, safe and supportive environment. Mr. Sargent said it appeared the Board needed to do a better job with that. Ms. Killpack said this Board had a unique meeting environment with meetings being televised which was not always comfortable. Ms. Vagner agreed it could be very difficult to interview candidates with the television crew present. Ms. Killpack said it made sense to have a process and qualification previously outlined which was critical. Ms. Gebhardt emphasized the need to deliberate publicly so there was not a perception that the Board made decisions without any discussion. Ms. Killpack said the Board did a good job with operating principles #20 – #22. She said with operating principle #23 it was very important to understand what it meant to not create a perception of bias. She reviewed operating principles #24 – #26. She reviewed operating principal #27. Mr. Sargent said during most committee meetings he felt it was appropriate to be a silent observer. Ms. Gebhardt said she never brought up anything during a committee meeting that hadn’t been discussed as a Board. Ms. Cranor said she usually spoke up if there was a safety issue. Ms. Killpack reviewed operating principles #28 – #33. The Board recommended no changes and did not have any concerns with the operating principles. Ms. Killpack said sometimes a Board member chose to abstain from voting because he/she did not have enough information. Mr. Sargent said in the past the Board had tabled an action item if further information was needed. Ms. Cranor asked if it was okay to abstain from voting during an expulsion hearing. Ms. Killpack said it was not good practice to abstain from voting as Board members are elected officials and are elected to vote on issues. Ms. Vagner said the public viewed Board members as advocates for children and not politicians and making decisions was a part of that. Ms. Vagner said the only conflict of interest for a Board member was financial. Ms. Killpack said if a conflict of interest arises the Board member should be excused before the discussion, not just for the vote. Ms. Vagner said the Operating Principles would be expanded to include deliberation before the election of officers and would be brought for Board consideration at the October 13, 2011 Work Session. She said the administration would work with Mr. Sargent and Ms. Gebhardt to create a protocol for the election of officers which would be brought for Board consideration at the December Work Session and reviewed in June before the July Reorganization Meeting. She said she would respond to public comment on a case by case basis and would create signage for public comment forms at Board meetings. Ms. Killpack handed out cards with pictures on them to each Board member. She asked them to choose a picture and describe how it related to the Board’s work. She said she chose a picture of an owl because it represented her love of learning. Ms. Cranor chose a picture of a scale because it represented the Board balancing both sides of an issue before making a decision. Mr. Murphy chose a picture of scissors because it represented some of the cutting the Board would have to do over the next few years. Mr. Rash said he chose a picture of some lazy looking guys sitting on the world because it reminded him that if you were lazy you would not get far in this job. He said Board members had to lean on each other and not the world in order to be viewed as someone people could trust. Ms. Gebhardt said she chose a picture of an eyeball because it represented being able to see ahead and to see the big picture. Mr. Sargent said he chose a picture of a rabbit in a hat because it made him think of a magician and said he sometimes felt like people expected a Board member to be that magician. He said he also chose a picture of an ear because it represented the Board listening to each other, the public, students and parents. Ms. Vagner said she chose a picture of a bull’s-eye because it represented the leader of the District staying focused on the Vision and Mission. She said she also chose a picture of comedy/tragedy masks because it represented the District coping with the comedy and tragedy of the legislature and the State Department of Education while maintaining a balance between the two and keeping the focus on the Vision and Mission which guided the direction of the District.

Items from the July ISBA Leadership Institute (New Board Member Training) that may not have been covered under another topic Ms. Killpack said Board meeting minutes typically only required the agenda, the motion and the vote. She said it was helpful to have more information when referring back to the minutes for a record of what happened. Ms. Vagner said she submitted the question to legal counsel and agreed with Amy White that more detail is preferable

Page 3 of 4 when the Board needs to defend a position or what was said. Ms. Cranor asked if the length of recognitions could be shortened. Ms. Vagner said it could. Ms. Cranor said she liked the idea of keeping a call log and tracking the follow up. Ms. Killpack asked what was being done to address the Students Come First legislation. Ms. Vagner said a committee had been pulled together to start working on pay for performance issues and would tackle parent input into teacher evaluations next. She said the input would be brought to the Board at the October Work Session. She said Amy White in conjunction with the ISBA developed a Students Come First timeline that documents each deadline and requirement for the Students Come First legislation. She said the administration would work through the timeline to determine what should be focused on first. She said the Board and administration would review the timeline with legislators in December. She said the next thing to focus on would be online courses. Ms. Cranor asked what process was in place to fund the components of the SCF legislation. Ms. Killpack said a process for funding would probably come as a resolution.

Brainstorm Challenges for 2011-12 through 2013-14 Ms. Cranor said a big challenge for the District would be implementing pay for performance. She said the District advocated working as a team and pay for performance had the opposite effect. Ms. Gebhardt said upcoming levies would be a challenge because the community was maxed out but the need was still there. She said there was anxiety in the community about the 6th grade move. She said another challenge was dealing with online courses, larger classrooms and fewer teachers. Ms. Cranor said funding for ADA would be a challenge. Ms. Vagner said the implementation of the Common Core State Standards and the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium would be a challenge. Ms. Cranor said not knowing what was going to happen from one year to the next was very challenging.

Conduct Board Self-Evaluation Ms. Killpack said a good way to go through the evaluation was to celebrate successes and identify areas that needed improvement. Ms. Cranor said she ranked question #7 as a 3 because she didn’t feel the Board had many speaking opportunities. Ms. Gebhardt said the Board participated where it was able and appropriate such as levy meetings. Ms. Vagner noted that in a larger community speaking opportunities were more formalized and was usually part of committee work. She said had an expectation for every administrator to be involved in the community. Ms. Cranor said she ranked #8 as a 3. She said the Board was not very involved with the PTA. Ms. Vagner said the PTA was involved with Key Communicators. Mr. Murphy said he ranked section D – Finance at 3 across the board. He said he realized this was due to the State Department of Education and the legislature but still wished the Board was able to do more in that area. Ms. Gebhardt said the Board did the best it could with what was given. Ms. Killpack noted that this District did a good job at paying salaries to market than most other Districts in the state. Ms. Cranor said she ranked question F. #4 low because she did not know what process was in place for managing conflicts between the Board and Superintendent. Ms. Vagner said this was brought this up two years ago and the process is the Board and Superintendent annual evaluations. Ms. Cranor said she would change her rating because she remembered the discussion. Ms. Vagner said she believed the Board functioned well together as the District would not operate at this level if that was not the case. Ms. Killpack said that as a facilitator she agreed that this Board worked very well together and was committed and hard working.

Adjourn as the Discussion Reached Closure Chair Rash adjourned the Special Meeting/Work Session/Retreat at 8:26 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______Secretary, Board of Trustees BY:

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 4 of 4 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Tuesday, October 11, 2011 Board Room at the Education Service Center 8:30 a.m.

BOARD MEMBERS/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Frank Rash, Chair Janie Gebhardt, Member (Excused) John Sargent, Vice Chair Nate Murphy, Member Jackie Cranor, Clerk Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

A Special Meeting/Work Session of the Board of Trustees of Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 was held on Tuesday, October 11, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the Education Service Center, 3115 Pole Line Road, Pocatello, Idaho, as provided in Section 33-510, Idaho Code;

Welcome, Call to Order, and Statement of Purpose: Chair Rash welcomed everyone and called the meeting to order at 9:55 a.m. He reviewed the agenda and said the Special Meeting was held for the purpose of a Work Session for the administration to discuss with the Board the following topics outlined in the agenda.

1. Convene Meeting 2. 2010-11 SRO Services & Staffing Update 3. Status of Parental Input into Teacher Evaluations (SCF Legislation) 4. Students Come First Legislation Timeline 5. Benchmarking PLCs, RtI, TIA, Beliefs, Cultural Perspectives, Second Step/Virtues 2010-11 & Benchmarking 2011-12 6. Alternate Route to Graduation Plan 7. TIA Idaho Strategic Plan 8. Report on Ability to Maintain Current Curriculum Cycle 9. Overview of Mileposts Program 10. ISBA Resolutions and Bylaws for Delegate Assembly 11. Amended 2011-12 School Board Meeting Schedule 12. Follow Up from the Board/Superintendent Retreat 13. Public Comment Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. 14. Adjourn

2010-11 SRO Services & Staffing Update Mr. Hobbs introduced Sergeant Canfield, the SRO supervisor and said he would retire soon. Sergeant Canfield said SRO calls had increased by about 50 calls per year over the past couple of years. He said calls from the elementary schools had also increased. He said a lot of the calls were for truancies. He said SROs had placed an emphasis on decreasing truancy by catching it early. He said 81 truancy citations were issued from January to now with a lot of warnings. He said SROs worked with principals to figure out why students were truant and to emphasize the importance of attendance with parents. He said truancy court had made a big impact on decreasing truancies and the students involved tended to have good attendance afterwards. He said Judge Murray often said a student’s first crime was truancy which led to other crimes. Ms. Cranor asked who covered the elementary schools. Sergeant Canfield said each SRO was assigned a secondary school and he usually covered the elementary

Page 1 of 6 schools but if he was not available one of the SROs from a secondary school would be called. He said the SROs were good about following up on issues especially with bullying. He said when bullying occurred SROs would follow up with the victim and the family to make sure the bullying had stopped. He said as people realized police were following up on those issues, some of the continued behaviors decreased. He said every SRO rated job satisfaction very high working in the schools. He said each one of them had a soft spot for troubled kids and wanted to help point them in the right direction. He said SROs did a lot to prevent crimes from taking place and students felt more comfortable reporting things to SROs than to the police department. Mr. Sargent said he had seen how students felt safer and more comfortable with the SROs presence in school. The Board thanked Sergeant Canfield for his hard work and dedication and asked him to communicate their appreciation to the SROs.

Status of Parental Input into Teacher Evaluations (SCF Legislation) Dr. Howell said a committee was formed to work through the Students Come First Legislation. He said the original name of the committee was the Pay for Performance Committee which was changed to the Students Come First Committee as the committee would cover multiple aspects of the Students Come First legislation. He said the benchmark chosen for Pay for Performance was the ISAT. He said the committee discussed parent input into teacher evaluations. He said the District was required to have a process in place by February 1, 2012. He said the updated parent input forms were included in the packet for teachers, certificated staff, and school nurses. He said the forms were reviewed with the Instructional Directors and K-12 Administrators before coming to the committee. He said there were five areas of focus on the teacher and certificated staff parent input forms: safety; communication; instruction; assessment; and expectations. He said the committee recommended changing the verbiage on the form from “I have observed” to “I believe”. He said the areas of focus for school nurses and school psychologists were: communication; skills; and assessment. Ms. Cranor asked if the forms were ready to be sent out. Dr. Howell said the forms had not been finalized. Ms. Vagner noted the change in verbiage to a belief statement was a better direction because as students get older parents tend to be less involved in observation and they trust the teachers and administrators to do their work. Ms. Cranor asked if the parent input would go into the teacher’s personnel file. Dr. Howell said it would. He said the committee discussed having teachers select five parents and then have five more parents selected at random. He said Mr. Smart developed a process for the random selection of parents. Mr. Sargent asked if there was a parent or PTA member on the committee. Dr. Howell said there was no parent representative on the committee. Mr. Sargent said if the discussion involved parent input, having a parent on the committee would be wise. Ms. Vagner said the Key Communicators Committee had parent and PTA representation and the materials could be brought to that group. Dr. Howell said the Formative – Part 1, Section A of the teacher evaluation form addressed the Charlotte Danielson’s Model. He said the teacher could select a component and choose his/her professional goals. He said Section B addressed the teacher’s growth goals based on an End of Course Assessment or the ISAT. He said he anticipated the evaluation forms being completed by October 30, 2011. He said Section E addressed parent input with an option for the teacher and administrator to comment. He said the administration would develop a one page report on parent input that would be attached to the evaluation form. He said if no feedback was received nothing would be attached. He said with this process parent input would become part of a teacher’s evaluation and personnel file. He said the Summative – Part II of the evaluation was a compilation of all the areas for teacher evaluation from the Charlotte Danielson model with a rating system of unsatisfactory, basic and proficient. He said the final forms would be presented to the Board for consideration of approval at the October 18, 2011 Regular Board Meeting. Ms. Vagner said a letter would be sent to parents inviting them to take the survey in Infinite Campus by the end of the calendar year in time for principals to conference with staff and submit results to the District by the February 1st deadline. She said at first the State Department of Education was not aware the process had to be completed this year and recently communicated that it did. Ms. Cranor asked if the parent input forms had to be signed. Ms. Vagner said yes and that unsigned surveys would not be accepted. Ms. Cranor said she appreciated that and liked the section allowing teachers and administrators to comment on input.

Students Come First Legislation Timeline Ms. Vagner said the Students Come First implementation timeline was developed by Amy White with input from herself and the ISBA. She said a good portion of the implementation responsibility fell to Dr. Howell’s area. She said the next step would be to revise Policies. She said the SCF Committee would work through the timeline together. She said the timeline was carried out over a three year period to show the upcoming workload. She said she would review the timeline with the PEA President the following week. She said the document benchmarked the work that Districts were required to complete.

Page 2 of 6 Benchmarking PLCs, RtI, TIA, Beliefs, Cultural Perspectives, Second Step/Virtues 2010-11 & Benchmarking 2011-12 Ms. Vagner said Ms. Cranor asked about the District’s benchmarking document at the last Work Session. She reviewed Century High School’s benchmarking that evidenced the work being done by the school and departments. She said Principal Brockett documented evidences on a monthly basis. She said the school reviewed the norms for PLCs which was a guiding principle for expected behaviors. She said Smart Goals were set and an evaluation of the End of Course data was completed by PLC teams. She said midterm grade data was analyzed and utilized to make instructional decisions. She said Century’s new stretch included effective grading practices. She reviewed the November benchmarking of RtI which evidenced interventions that were put in place including the school’s Lunch Academy. She said TIA continued to be an area of focus as to what kids should know and how that is assessed. She said the actualization of Beliefs was clear throughout the document. She said Cultural Perspectives was benchmarked three times per year and is impacting the work of the schools. She said in December Century documented the work of Friends of Rachel to evidence students reaching out to all new students to include them in activities. She said Virtues were benchmarked three times per year. Ms. Cranor said she appreciated the benchmarking of Cultural Perspectives to show what schools are doing to counteract hate, bias and bullying. Ms. Vagner said Lewis & Clark Elementary has stretched benchmarking one step further by including grade level teams in the process. She said this helped to clearly show accountability. She said the document showed the depth of work being done at all schools and the District was making great strides in student achievement and building capacity with staff. Ms. Vagner said she prepared a summary of the benchmarking that was shared with the administration at the opening of the school year. She reviewed the Superintendent and Board benchmarking. She said the operational departments would be more involved for the coming school year.

Alternate Route to Graduation Plan Mr. Wegner said the District received notification from the State Department of Education in the spring that the legislature revised the Alternate Route to Graduation requirements which included providing an alternate route to all students by their junior year. He said this year the District was required to provide an alternate route to graduation for seniors who could not pass the ISAT. He said the District was now required to make this available to juniors. He said the District previously relied on PLATO and would now have to include multiple measures. He said a committee was convened that included Instructional Directors, counselors and an alternate route teacher to consider all options and various multiple measures to be included in the plan. He said with the input of the committee, revisions were made to the plan which would be presented to the Board for consideration at the October 18, 2011 Regular Board Meeting. He said a copy of the plan was included in the packet. He said some of the changes included adding guidelines for the class of 2013 and every class thereafter. He said students that were on target for graduation but did not pass the ISAT were candidates. He said this would be available to junior students starting this year. He said language was removed that specified the alternate route would be taken in the fall because some students did not pass the retest and may be enrolled to take the alternate route in the spring. Ms. Cranor said she was worried about students not having the opportunity to take an elective credit. Mr. Wegner said the alternate route did not dictate any particular course and was to demonstrate competencies. He said students were still able to take an elective credit that would count towards graduation requirements. He said students were awarded points on various aspects of the alternate route and had to earn a minimum of 300 points. He said 250 points were awarded for passing the PLATO alternate route. He said 90% of the measure had to be academic based which PLATO was. He said students taking PLATO were awarded points for levels of improvement to give them credit for areas they passed. He said the committee wanted to place an emphasis on attendance so points were awarded for the student’s attendance rate. He said a new form was created to track students taking the alternate route. He said the forms were submitted to the curriculum department and were maintained there and a list was sent to the Board for approval. He said a new form was created to track the number of points a student earned. He said the final Alternate Route to Graduation plan would be brought to the Board at the October 18, 2011 Regular Board Meeting for approval and submitted to the state by October 30, 2011.

TIA Idaho Strategic Plan Mr. Wegner said during the work of the TIA Advisory Committee it became apparent that a formal plan for the advancement of TIA statewide should be developed. He said included in the packet was a draft TIA Idaho Strategic Plan, 2011-2016. He said the vision and mission was for all Districts to develop and maintain effective schools. He said included in the plan was an effective schools best practices flowchart modified to cover a broader statewide focus. He said the League of Schools was the decision making body. He said next in line was the Advisory Board which included Regions 4, 5 & 6. He said there was a proposal to create advisory boards in

Page 3 of 6 western and northern Idaho. He said the TIA framework included training, engagement, implementation, monitoring, supervising and maintaining. He said there was a process in place for Districts to get involved in TIA and for an organization to become an affiliate. He said southwest Idaho had its first TIA working conference and the document clarifies how TIA would be implemented over a five year period. He said all regions in the state were required to implement the Common Core State Standards by 2016 and a process to do so was being developed through TIA. He said TIA teams worked to cross-walk all documents to align with the statewide TIA plan and the Common Core State Standards. He said the plan was not set in stone but articulated the work and how TIA could move forward on a statewide basis. He said the last part of the plan provided tools and direction for Districts interested in becoming involved in TIA. Ms. Vagner said the plan would be brought to the Superintendents Forum and hoped superintendents would endorse the plan. She said TIA had been shaped to work for southeast Idaho. She said the uniform process was developed to protect the integrity of the work. Ms. Cranor said the document would be an invaluable tool in implementing the Common Core State Standards.

Report on Ability to Maintain Current Curriculum Cycle Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was the state’s textbook adoption timeline. He said the District would have implemented social studies and sociology last year if it had textbook funding from the state. He said this year the District was supposed to adopt science textbooks which it would be unable to do. He said elementary textbooks were very old and up until this year the District had purchased replacements through a used textbook vendor but were not available anymore. He said it was getting more difficult to replace old texts. Ms. Cranor said it concerned her greatly that kids were being taught from severely outdated textbooks. Mr. Wegner said teachers were very resourceful and were always finding ways to keep the curriculum current and TIA was a good resource for them. He said part of the state’s technology implementation plan led him to believe the state may fund digital textbooks down the road, possibly in preparation for the implementation of the Common Core State Standards. Mr. Murphy asked why the Alameda Center was using textbooks from 1994 when the other middle schools had textbooks from 2000+. Ms. Vagner said the administration would research the answer and get back to the Board.

Overview of Mileposts Program Dr. Mortensen said the Mileposts program was created with input from teachers and the developers worked to understand the needs of the users. She reviewed the Mileposts demonstration site. She said the actual site would list all schools in the District but the demo site had only one example school. She said information was uploaded daily from Infinite Campus and automatically updated in Mileposts. She said the District had a highly mobile population which made tracking critical to student success. She said the program was called Mileposts because it tracked District benchmarks that delineated what students were supposed to know at certain levels and if a student did not meet the benchmark then a “Mileposts” plan was implemented. She said teachers only had access to their student data. She said the District administration had access to all students and could search by school or by grade. She reviewed sample 5th grade data showing how to pull ISAT scores and assessments. She said under the reports tab there was demographic data, student services, academic plans, performance indicators, educational supports and benchmarks. She reviewed a sample academic plan that showed remediation and the amount of time spent on programs. She reviewed a Tier II math group plan and how it could be progress monitored to show the outcome of the plan. Mr. Sargent said it was unbelievable to have all that information all in one place so as soon as a student walked through a teacher’s door the teacher would know what level the student was at without having to spend weeks learning each student. She said staff had to develop a plan but once they were in place it they were easy to track and pull up the history. She said once a Mileposts plan was created it involved the student, parents and teacher to set expectations and monitor progress. She said the District had completed its intervention list and customized Mileposts with the Tier 1, 2 & 3 interventions specific to the District. She said the District was able to implement a large number of interventions through the use of ARRA funds. She reviewed the process for creating a new plan. She said the teacher would choose to add an intervention and could select remediation, determine the number of hours, choose from a list of available interventions and choose a strategy. She said Mileposts was working to add customized District templates but currently the District had to use Mileposts templates and customize to fit the needs. Ms. Vagner said Mileposts moves the District to a digital support system that tracked a child longitudinally. She said Mileposts served over 100,000 of Idaho’s students. She said Regions 2 & 4 were Mileposts Districts and Region 5 was nearly all supported by Mileposts. She said the state was pushing Schoolnet which only warehoused data and did not progress monitor or allow for interventions and was funded by the Albertson’s grant for two years. She said Schoolnet did not offer the services the District needed to build plans. She said the District was able to buy into Mileposts at only $5 per student for life compared to a greater cost per

Page 4 of 6 student for Schoolnet. Ms. Cranor asked what Albertson’s affiliation with Schoolnet was. Ms. Vagner said she was not sure.

ISBA Resolutions and Bylaws for Delegate Assembly Ms. Vagner said the Board was responsible to provide voting direction for the delegate assembly. She said Resolution No. 1 was to reinstate the 99% protection rule. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said Resolution No. 2 was to continue funding for drivers education in Idaho. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 3 was to renew Idaho Code 33-10044H which allowed retired teachers and administrators to be employed by a District. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 4 was to add one additional election date in either February or April to give Districts flexibility. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 5 was to reduce the supermajority requirement for bond levies. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 6 restored funding lost in Senate Bills 1108, 1110 and 1184, (Students Come First). The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 7 proposed a dedicated, ongoing additional revenue source to fund Pay for Performance. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 8 was to include classified staff in the state’s Pay for Performance program. Ms. Cranor asked why classified staff wasn’t included in the original program. Ms. Vagner said the state did not consider this employee group a priority. She said the Board could direct an amendment to include this group, however the state did not have the resources to fund the program in the first place and would most likely be a waste of time. Ms. Cranor agreed the funding was not there, but would like the point brought up at the delegate assembly. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said the Resolution No. 9 was to fund field trips. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 10 was to fund extra-curricular travel. She said the ISBA Executive Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. She said the state did not fund extra-curricular activities and never had. The Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said Resolution No. 11 was to repeal the liability insurance notification requirement. She said the ISBA informed Districts that not one single school employee purchased additional insurance across the state. Ms. Cranor said the requirement was ridiculous and an excessive amount of paperwork and a waste of school personnel time. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said Resolution No. 12 was to improve upon House Bill 201 to address communication with Districts and the retention of employees. The Board recommended a “do pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 13 directed that preschool students should be taught in English. Ms. Cranor said she did not like the law dictating such specifics. Mr. Murphy said he was opposed to the Resolution. The Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said Resolution No. 14 directed that Idaho should rank #1 in the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium. She said she did not believe it was the prevue of the ISBA or the legislature to direct the state’s rankings. The Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 15 directed the state’s ranking to be 35th or better in the nation for students going on to post-secondary education. The Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. She said Resolution No. 16 was to increase the number of dual credit/advanced placement courses offered by School Districts. The Board recommended a “do not pass” vote. Ms. Vagner said that covered the Resolutions submitted to the ISBA and all the Bylaw changes were clean up changes. Ms. Cranor noted the Blackfoot School District was listed in both Regions 5 & 6 in the Bylaws and Blackfoot had opted out of Region 5 and suggested the ISBA amend the error. Ms. Vagner said she would bring the change to the ISBA.

Amended 2011-12 School Board Meeting Schedule Ms. Vagner said when the School Board Meeting Schedule was created the District calendar had a 2 week Winter Break which had been changed to 1-1/2 weeks and the amendment corrected the School Board’s Meeting Schedule to hold the Work Session and Regular Meeting on the 2nd and 3rd Tuesday in December and added a Student Discipline Hearing to the 3rd Wednesday.

Follow Up from the Board/Superintendent Retreat Ms. Vagner said included in the packet were the Board Operating Principles with a change that was directed at the September 21, 2011 Board/Superintendent Retreat to include deliberation when electing officers. She said if the Board agreed with the change it would be brought to the Board at the October 18, 2011 Regular Meeting for consideration. Mr. Sargent asked if that was the only change. Ms. Vagner said yes. She said the 2010-11 Actualization of Board Beliefs was modified per the direction of the Board at the Board/Superintendent retreat. She said if the Board agreed with the changes it would be brought for approval at the October 18, 2011 Regular Meeting. She said one addition was made to the Board Beliefs selected for Actualization for 2011-12. The Board agreed with all of the changes. Ms. Vagner said Mr. Sargent and Ms. Gebhardt would work on protocols for

Page 5 of 6 deliberation when selecting officers. She said public comment forms and agendas were made more visible to the public and the Board gave the administration the flexibility to respond to public comment with a copy to the board.

Public Comment Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. There was no public comment at the time of the meeting.

Adjourn Chair Rash adjourned the Work Session at 11:44 a.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______Secretary, Board of Trustees BY:

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 6 of 6 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION To Discuss Matters as Allowed by Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To Consider the Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against a Public Officer, Employee, Staff Member or Agent (No Action to be Taken) Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 County of Bannock – State of Idaho

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 4:15 p.m. Tuesday, October 18, 2011

BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Frank Rash, Chair, Board of Trustees (Excused) John Sargent, Vice Chair, Board of Trustees (Excused) Jackie Cranor, Acting Chair, Board of Trustees Janie Gebhardt, Member, Board of Trustees Nate Murphy, Member, Board of Trustees Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

Call to Order/Executive Session – Staff Member Discipline Hearing: Acting Chair Cranor called the meeting to order at 4:25 p.m. A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to adjourn to Executive Session. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Murphy, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye. The Board adjourned to Executive Session at 4:26 p.m.

Purpose: To discuss staff member discipline. The Board proceeded to discuss staff member discipline as provided in Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) to consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or agent;

OTHERS PRESENT: Renae Johnson, Board Secretary

Return to Open Session The Board returned to Open Session at 4:45 p.m. No action was taken by the Board at the time of the meeting.

Adjourn: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned at 4:46 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 1 of 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING AND SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION ORIENTATION FOR STUDENT REPRESENATATIVES TO THE BOARD POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, October 18, 2011 5:30 p.m.

BOARD MEMBERS/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Frank Rash, Chair Janie Gebhardt, Assistant Treasurer John Sargent, Vice Chair (Excused) Nate Murphy, Member Jackie Cranor, Clerk Mary Vagner, Superintendent

CALL TO ORDER/SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION/ORIENTATION FOR STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES TO THE BOARD Chair Rash called the Special Meeting/Work Session to order at 5:05 p.m. He said the purpose of the Special Meeting was for an orientation for student representatives to the Board. The Board, administration and student representatives introduced themselves. Ms. Vagner said the Board had student liaisons for six years. She said student reports were to be kept to three minutes or less. She said students were asked to meet with principals to discuss the content of the report prior to the meeting. She said students were welcome to stay for the entire meeting but were free to leave at any time after their reports. She said students were encouraged to speak to the Board on any agenda item that interested them and there were two places on the agenda for public comment. She said occasionally there were committees that needed student representation and student representatives would be asked first. She said Board materials could be located on the District website and were always posted on Friday before the meeting. She said if student representatives had questions he/she could contact the principal, any Board member, Ms. Johnson or herself. She advised the student representatives to familiarize themselves with the work of the Board, consult with the student body when critical to decision making and to communicate to the Board what the student body was thinking relative to Board decisions. She said student input on Policies that directly affected student was a critical part of the process. She said student representatives were asked to attend all Regular meetings and have a backup if he/she was unable to attend and to inform the principal. She said the role of a student representative and the role of the Board were very different. She said Board members were elected by the public to vote on issues. She said student representatives were not elected and could not vote on issues but could provide input. She said Board member contact information was included on the back of the agenda. Ms. Cranor asked that all student representatives stay until each student was done with his/her report before excusing themselves. She said she had not seen other School Boards have student representatives and appreciated them being here. Ms. Gebhardt said student participation was an important part of understanding how decisions were made that affect students. Mr. Rash said if a student representative wished to address a controversial issue to run it by the principal before sharing it at the Board Meetings as it may not be the appropriate setting to address the issue. Mr. Chavarria asked if the Board laptops were given to them by the District. Ms. Vagner said the laptops were distributed to Board members when the Board meetings went paperless. She said once a new Board member was elected the laptop was passed on. Ms. Vagner said this was a leadership development opportunity for the student representatives. She said there was a measure of competition in reporting as the pride of each school comes out which was healthy and welcome. Ms. Vagner noted that Mr. Sargent was excused but would be in attendance at future meetings. Ms. Cranor said Board members made mistakes too and told the representatives not to be afraid of making a mistake. Chair Rash adjourned the Work Session at 5:22 p.m.

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING A Regular Session of the Board of Trustees of School District No. 25 was held in Pocatello, Idaho on the 18th day of October, 2011, as provided in Section 33-510, Idaho Code. Chair Rash called the Regular meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Kolton Jackman led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action Chair Rash reviewed the agenda and the addendum to the agenda. A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to approve the agenda and addendum as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

Page 1 of 13

APPROVAL OF MINUTES – Self Explanatory – Action a. Special Meeting/Work Session – September 7, 2011 b. Special Meeting/Work Session – September 13, 2011 c. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Personnel – September 20, 2011 d. Regular Board Meeting – September 20, 2011 e. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearings – September 28, 2011 f. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Personnel/Hearing – October 5 – 7, 2011 A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to approve the minutes as corrected. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

NOTE: The following minutes will be approved at the November 15, 2011 Regular Board Meeting: a. Special Meeting/Work Session/Retreat – September 21, 2011

RECOGNITIONS/VISITORS/CORRESPONDENCE – Information a. Visitors and Correspondence 1) Thank you card from Mr. & Mrs. Adona Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was a card from Mr. & Ms. Adona thanking the Board for its condolences relative to the loss of his mother. b. Recognitions - Information - Ms. Allen 1) Pocatello Teacher Credit Union Presentation to Century, Highland and Pocatello High Schools for National Merit Scholarship Semifinalists 2) Tyhee Faculty & Staff Ms. Allen asked the National Merit Scholarship semifinalists to come to the podium. She said the program was an academic competition that began in 1955. She said students qualified for the program based on their scores on the preliminary SAT screening. She said over 1.5 million entries were received. She said two students at Highland High School qualified for the program and were invited to be referred to two colleges at no cost. She said the students were among 50,000 of the highest scoring students out of 1.5 million. She said four students from Century High School and one from Pocatello High School were semifinalists and had the opportunity to continue to compete for scholarships. She said 90% would attain finalist status and half of those would be awarded scholarships which represented less than 1%. Ms. Allen asked Principal Jim Denton and the Tyhee staff to come to the podium. She said Tyhee Elementary was being recognized for receiving the Idaho Distinguished School Award. She said the staff was high quality and highly motivated. She said the top 5% of schools that achieved AYP for two consecutive years were given the award. She said the school implemented various programs to promote positive changes in attendance and achievement. She said since implementation 90% of students scored proficient or advanced on the ISAT. She said interventions in math and reading had been successful. She Tyhee created a culture where children felt safe, wanted and expectations were clear. Mr. Denton said the school was overwhelmed by the recognition but was very deserving. He said the staff worked hard to ensure all students were provided the best opportunity for success. He said the bar had been raised and the school would continue to meet expectations. He thanked the Board for the honor and recognition. Ms. Allen invited Melanie Delashmutt from the Pocatello Teachers Credit Union to the podium. Ms. Delashmutt asked representatives from Pocatello, Century and Highland High Schools to join her. She said each year the Pocatello Teachers Credit Union hosted the John McCarthy Golf Tournament which raised funds for student activities. She said this year $4,500 was raised and $1,500 would be donated to each of the high schools. She said funds for Century and Highland High Schools went to the YEA athletic fund to help pay for travel to state competitions. She said every dollar received was deposited to an interest bearing account. She said Pocatello High School’s activity fund was fully funded so the school was being presented with a $1,500 check and was encouraged to use the funds for student activities. c. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles No. 22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications

Page 2 of 13 which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. There was no public comment on items not on the agenda at the time of the meeting.

REPORTS – Information a. Student Representative Reports (3 minutes each) 1) Alameda Center – Talisha Lowry Ms. Lowry said she was the student representative for New Horizon High School. She said the school was holding elections for student body officers. She said the student body had been asked to help in the process of renaming the high school when it was relocated. She said the school had two new clubs, the Idaho Drug Free Youth chapter and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Alliance which were in the process of recruiting members. She said the school would hold an assembly to recognize students for attendance and grades and had 20 new students this block. 2) Century High School – Kolton Jackman/Ariane Drake Mr. Jackman said band took first place in two competitions. He said girls soccer took 1st place in Districts and qualified for state. He said Century High School had a TV show called the Century Diamonds that highlighted students actualizing the Virtues. He said the school was selected as a 4A School of Excellence. He said over 200 students took the P-SAT to prepare for college. 3) Highland High School – Tina Xu/Aaron Eskelson Ms. Xu said students participated in the Black & Blue Bowl assembly to highlight the football team and introduce the “Ram Man”. She said students were preparing for freshman elections which would take place that Friday and had 18 candidates. She said the student body was hosting a pizza social for new students. She said the school was planning an assembly for Red Ribbon Week to create awareness about the dangers of alcohol and drug abuse. She said the school would have a Trick or Treat event to raise funds for UNICEF. She said the school would hold a blood drive in November. She said the Honor Society had its annual induction for new members and had nearly 100 inductees and required a 3.6 GPA or higher. She said the football team was currently undefeated and had won an academic championship. She said the cross country team took first place at a meet the week before. She said the softball team took third place at state. She said boys soccer took second place at Districts and girls soccer was going to state. She said the school was preparing for winter sports. She said orchestra played at the ISU Youth Symphony and were traveling to compete in St. George, UT. She said the debate team had a scrimmage with Pocatello High School and was preparing for the Whitman tournament. She said the drama department was working on a winter musical. She said the school’s graduation fair would be held on Wednesday. 4) Pocatello High School – Hannah Stinson/Ricardo Chavarria Ms. Stinson said opening day went well with lots of school spirit and freshmen involvement was high. She said the school held a blood drive during Homecoming week and collected a total of 93 pints. She said the school had an all school lunch day for every student. She said the Pokey Priders hosted the annual potato bar to raise money for athletics. She said students participated in a Black & Blue Bowl assembly to get everyone excited for the event. She said the drama department was working on the fall play, “Leading Ladies”. She said boys and girls soccer did pretty well. She said the District Volleyball tournaments were taking place that week. She said the Honor Society was holding its inductions that week and the school was preparing for Red Ribbon Week through IDFY. b. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Festival of Trees Update – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen said planning and preparation for the festival were going well. She said committee chairs met on a weekly basis up until the event. She said there were 17 committees in all that covered everything from operations to auctions, teas, Santa’s workshop, displays, volunteers, gift shop, trees and wreaths, model trains and employee appreciation. She said each committee had anywhere from 2 – 30 people. She said hundreds of volunteers were involved in the event to organize, set up or monitor an activity. She said set up was scheduled for November 26th and 27th with the grand opening on November 29th and employee appreciation night on November 30th. She invited the Board to attend both events. She showed the Board a prototype of the poster to advertise the event. c. Media Report – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen said there had been twenty five articles that covered student and teacher accomplishments and awards so far this year. She said the Regular Board Meetings were recorded and rebroadcast throughout the month. She said she appreciated the partnership the District had with the media. d. Report on Standing Committees for 2011-2012 Mr. Rash solicited a volunteer for the Regional PTA meeting in December. Mr. Murphy volunteered. Mr. Murphy said the District Leadership Team Committee met and was a good way to involve the community in District activities.

Page 3 of 13 He said he attended the Instructional Technology Committee and discussed whether the District should continue with Promethean or switch to Dell Whiteboards. Ms. Gebhardt said she attended Judge Murray’s Committee and appreciated the community collaboration in working together for students. e. District 25 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 Mr. Reed said the administration began work on the annual financial report in June and didn’t stop until September. He said the District was on a fiscal calendar ending June 30th. He said the state required Districts to have an independent audit and publish the financial record on its website. He said the Board would be asked to accept the report and to certify the financial condition which would be published in the Idaho State Journal within 120 days of the end of fiscal year. He said the report was divided into four sections: introduction; financial; statistical; and single audit. He said the introduction contained general highlights and information. He said the District submitted information to the GFOA and the ASBA and had been doing so for years. He said the District had received the award for financial excellence from both organizations for 20 consecutive years and was the only District in the state to receive both awards. He said one of the highlights was the District’s revenue coming in over budget at $1.4 million which was good. He said this was mainly due to one-time funds distributed by the state to maintain the 2006 levels of funding as part of a federal mandate. He said there were some savings on salaries and supplies this year and the District spent less on utilities and ISAT remediation. He said $155,000 was leftover from the money set aside for the implementation of Infinite Campus. He said the District stayed within its budget and did not have any major unforeseen expenditures. He said the unreserved balance had been renamed to the “unassigned” balance. He said the unassigned fund balance was at $5.3 million. He said the dollar amount may sound like a lot but only covered 31 days of operations. He said as a general rule fund balances should represent no less than two months of operations or 5% and the District was right at 5% which aligned with national recommendations. He said the state changed requirements for how certain funds could be used. He said there were five categories: restricted which was used for specific purposes; non-spendable which was inventory and prepaid items; committed which was set aside for 2012- 13; assigned which could be used at the discretion of the Board and had been designated for the implementation of Infinite Campus; and unassigned which was at $5.3 million. He said the statistical section of the report covered financial trends, revenue and debt capacity and operating expenditures. He said District revenue came from federal support, state support, local support and property taxes. He said property values had increased and the tax rate had gone down due to growth. He reviewed the District’s actual and projected enrollment over a ten year period. He said enrollment stabilized over a number of years and had recently begun to rise and had nearly 13,000 enrolled. He said one trend the District was seeing was increased student enrollment and decreased staff due the implementation of the Students Come First legislation. He said another trend was less experienced teachers as experienced teachers retired and were replaced with inexperienced ones. He said the District was grateful to the community for its support of education. Mr. Clark said a lot of hours went into the report and was reviewed by two entities that approve and grade the reports. He said the District received a good interest rate on any borrowing if it had a clean audit. He said when conducting a government audit the auditors were required to look at internal controls, compliance with state and federal law and financial statements and expenditures. He said the District had several grants over the $300,000 threshold. He said ARRA grants had special audit requirements to ensure the funds accomplished the goals of the Act. He said the audit on internal controls and compliance identified any material errors or fraudulent abuse. He said the tests were designed to identify problem areas. He said there were no findings with the District’s internal controls and the administration did a good job. He said there were no findings related to compliance with grant terms, following contracts, or any violations of local or internal laws. He said there were no compliance issues with any federal funds. He said the opinion of the auditor was that the District complied with all respects that could have a direct material affect. He said overall the District maintained good internal controls and was in compliance with state and federal laws. f. Certification of Annual Statement of Financial Condition Mr. Reed said the Board would be asked to certify the Annual Statement of Financial Condition under New Business.

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. Alternate Route to Graduation Plan – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said the Alternate Route to Graduation plan was presented at the October 11, 2011 Work Session and satisfied the state requirement for multiple measures. He said students had to receive 300 points to pass the alternate route and points were earned through attendance and improvement in reading, math and language arts. He said one page identified juniors that were enrolled in an elective course. He said the Board would be asked to consider adopting the plan under Old Business and would be submitted to the state by October 31, 2011.

Page 4 of 13 b. National Student Clearinghouse Report – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was an email from the state notifying Districts of the requirement to provide a list of students that were enrolled in 12th grade for the 2004 -05 school year. He said the state had contracted with the National Student Clearinghouse to collect data for the “Go On” campaign. He said the administration prepared the 12th grade data for 2004 – 2011 and would submit the files to the state when further instructions on submitting a secure transmission were received. He said the National Student Clearinghouse collected enrollment and degree data on 93% of college students which allowed Districts to track students that enrolled in postsecondary education and showed the persistence and graduation rates for those students. c. Students Come First Technology Implementation and Funding – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was a memorandum regarding the implementation of classroom technology funds. He said the IEN would equip high schools with wireless capabilities and the state would provide one to one mobile computing devices. He said the memorandum listed various technology that could be implemented in a classroom K-12. He said the total amount allocated to the District for technology was $400,000 which would be received over the next five years through the reduction of staff and reallocation of funds. Ms. Cranor asked if funds had been received for the 2011-12 school year. Mr. Wegner said yes. He said Districts had to submit a technology plan to the state by December 15, 2011. He said the Instructional Technology Committee would work through the details of the plan. He said the District had developed a Technology Strategic Plan including the vision and mission for technology which would help with the development of the plan for the state. He said final details would be brought to the Board prior to the submission to the state. d. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner had no further Curriculum updates at the time of the meeting. e. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Mr. Wegner said included in the packet were Head Start materials from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He said Head Start was required to provide the information to the Board to meet federal compliance guidelines. He said section 642 of the report outlined the structure of program governance and sharing the information with the Board was part of the responsibility. He reviewed the statutory degree requirements that went into effect in 2011 and said the District was in compliance. He said there was early childhood and financial strategy information to help low income families improve stability in the document. He said there was a community engagement section that outlined the approach and outcomes. He said data was used at the federal, regional and local levels to ensure compliance, monitoring and planning. f. 21st Century After School/Summer Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Mr. Wegner had no 21st Century After School Program updates at the time of the meeting. g. Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Mr. Wegner said no Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program information was received at the time of the meeting. h. University of South Dakota Administrative Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was a memorandum listing an administrative intern request for a graduate student from the University of South Dakota to work with the principal at Edahow Elementary between September 26 and October 23. He said Dr. Mortensen had given preliminary approval and was requesting Board approval under the Consent Agenda. i. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Dr. Mortensen Mr. Wegner had no further Elementary Education updates at the time of the meeting. j. 2011 Summer Camp Reconciliation Report – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was a memorandum detailing the 2011 Summer Camp Reconciliation. He said the administration was in the process of restructuring the process to ensure accountability and would train people in the new process. He said a couple of the reconciliation reports lacked accuracy in the numbers reported and was being addressed by the administration. k. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was a memorandum listing the number of early graduation requests by school and the reasons students are requesting early graduation. He said counselors and principals reviewed the requests and recommended approval. He said the Board would be asked to approve the list under Old Business. l. Camp/Clinic Request – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was a camp/clinic request for Century High School for a Cheer Clinic. He said the District decided to include camps/clinic during the regular school year as a fundraising opportunity for schools. He said the Board would be asked to approve the request under New Business.

Page 5 of 13 m. Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet were preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests for Hawthorne Middle School, Highland High School and Pocatello High School. She asked why the Pocatello High School’s wrestling team was staying overnight for tournaments held in Idaho Falls and Burley as they were not very far. Mr. Devine said tournaments went late into the night and started very early in the morning and traveling back late at night only to turn around and travel back in the morning put teams at a competitive disadvantage. Mr. Rash noted that it could be a safety issue with people traveling on little sleep. Ms. Cranor said she wanted to make sure the details of the trips were submitted to the Board as they were received. Mr. Devine said he would make sure the information was given to the Board. He said the Board would be asked to approve the preliminary requests under Old Business. n. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Request – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet were Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests for Century and Highland High Schools. He said two more requests were included in the addendum. Ms. Gebhardt said the FCCLS State Leadership trip to Boise had only one chaperone listed. She said having only one adult on a trip that far out of town was a safety concern. Mr. Devine said usually groups from other schools combined as so few kids qualified for the trip but he would look into the issue and get back to the Board. o. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update - Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said secondary educators had a very successful professional development day on effective grading practices. He said he had not seen this level of enthusiasm or debate on an issue in quite a while. He said the impacts were far reaching. He said parent teacher conferences would take place that Thursday and said parents had been asking teachers if the District would implement a “no incompletes” policy. Ms. Cranor asked if the District had solicited the Retired Teachers Association to help with students that were behind. Mr. Devine said the association was approached and minimal feedback was received. He said the administration would continue to pursue the option. Ms. Cranor suggested leaving a signup sheet at one of the monthly meetings. Mr. Devine said it was a good idea and would provide a signup sheet to the association.

BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update Mr. Reed said included in the packet was the current Idaho General Fund Revenue Report with data as of September. He said the state was $100,000 above the forecast for the month. He said overall the state was down $9.2 million below projections. He said the administration would continue to monitor any changes. b. Review of Stocks Building/Alameda Center Timeline Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a current timeline for the Stocks Building/Alameda Center projects. He said a good portion of the projects had been completed. He said several Board members participated in a tour of the Stocks Building last week and saw that most of the walls were up. He said since then the construction crew had poured concrete and was finishing up the exterior walls. He said the installation of the HVAC was almost complete and the electrical and plumbing were moving along. He said the preliminary Boundary Committee would convene to review the logistics and bring recommendations to the Board. He said he anticipated having a recommendation for Board approval in March with public input by May. He said the maintenance department would be extremely busy over the summer moving equipment out of Alameda into the Stocks Building and making final improvements to the Alameda Center before bringing it on as a fourth middle school. Ms. Gebhardt noted that she and Mr. Rash were a part of the initial Stocks/Alameda committee and asked if they would be included on the Boundary Committee. Ms. Vagner said yes. c. Internal Audit – Student Activity Funds Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a memorandum detailing the outcome of the internal audit on High School Student Activity Funds. He said from time to time the administration performed internal audits for high schools and middle schools. He said the administration usually visited around three schools per year to ensure schools were following Board Policy. He said he visited with the bursars and principals from three of the high schools. He said the meetings went well and included a review of the revenues and expenditures of the activity funds. He said millions of dollars came in and went through the accounts. He said all schools had balanced and reconciled statements which were neatly organized. He said all schools used the purchase order system for ordering equipment. He said purchasing had to be approved by the administrator. He said all funds were to be used solely for student activities. He said the administration would work to improve the process for employees receiving stipends to ensure they were paid through the payroll department. He said schools were not banks and were discouraged from cashing checks. He said the administration was developing a process to ensure greater accountability for fundraising.

Page 6 of 13 d. K-12 Enrollment and Capacity Report Mr. Reed said included in the packet was the K-12 enrollment and general building capacity data for FY 2012. He said Century High School was up 112 students and Pocatello High School was up 60 students. He said Hawthorne Middle School was down 100 students and Irving Middle School was up 27 students. He said some of the higher enrolments included the K-2 class at ISU, Lewis & Clark Elementary, Syringa Elementary and Washington Elementary. Ms. Cranor asked why Hawthorne Middle School was down so many students. Mr. Reed said it was possible that the number of 8th graders leaving the school outnumbered the 6th graders coming in. e. Annual Request for Permission to Bid 2012 CIP Related Projects Mr. Reed said the administration annually requested permission from the Board to bid the upcoming CIP related projects. He said this process provided time for bid planning and preparation to save on costs. He said the request was routine and projects were listed in the memorandum. He said the Board would be asked to approve the CIP projects under New Business. f. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) Mr. Reed had no report on proposed building and subdivisions (new construction) at the time of the meeting. g. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update Mr. Reed said the District was currently at $359,000 in energy savings which equaled about 46% but noted that the District had not made it through the heating season yet.

EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Infinite Campus/ISEE Upload Update Mr. Smart said the October ISEE data was uploaded to the state on time. He said the data upload included staffing information which had been done in IBEDS in the past and was a critical upload for calculating salary apportionment. He said after the state processed the data the administration would have a better idea of where the District’s ADA would be. He said the administration was hopeful that data from the state would be more refined this year. b. Student Enrollment Information Update Mr. Smart said included in the packet was the current student enrollment data. He said enrollment was up about 200 students from the previous year. He said total membership was at 12,530 students. He said retention rates had not been as consistent this year and projections would be scaled back on the growth model due to lower retention levels. c. Budget and Wellness/Insurance Committee Updates Mr. Smart said the Wellness/Insurance Committee did not meet this month. He said he was in the process of determining who would remain on the committee and was working to replace the two members that left. He said he needed to replace one principal and one classified employee. He said once the new membership was finalized he would set a meeting date. d. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update Mr. Smart had no further Employee Services updates at the time of the meeting.

HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report Dr. Howell said included in the packet was the monthly Human Resources report. He said there were recommendations for hire that were previously approved on a conditional basis pending a background check and the administration was recommending permanent hire. He said there were recommended contract changes and sixteen stipend requests for professional development instructors. b. Students Come First Committee Report 1) Parent/Guardian Input Forms for Teacher Evaluation; Certified Specialists; Nurses and School Psychologists 2) Teacher Evaluation – Formative Part I and Summative Part II Forms Dr. Howell said included in the packet were revised parent/guardian input forms and the revised teacher evaluation forms were included in the addendum. He said the forms were reviewed at the October 11, 2011 Work Session but had a few changes. He said one of the parent input forms was new and was tailored for School Psychologists. He said the committee recommended changing the language on the teacher evaluation forms from “I know” to “I believe” and was reflected on the rest of the forms. He said the language “not observed” was changed to “no opinion” which was reflected on all forms. He said the committee recommended creating a form specific to school psychologists because their interaction with parents was different from the other employee groups. He said another change was suggested by a school psychologist to remove the word “monitors” on the form since school psychologists did not monitor students. He said another change to the teacher evaluation form was to change the option of selecting “parent input not attached” to “no parent input received”.

Page 7 of 13 c. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update Dr. Howell had no further Human Resources updates at the time of the meeting.

SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Policy 8116 – Part Day Enrollment-Attendance of Students & Policy 8130 – Attendance of Students – 2nd Reading Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was Policy 8116 – Part Day Enrollment-Attendance of Students & Policy 8130 – Attendance of Students along with input received relative to the proposed changes. She said the Policy changes included the minimum number of minutes a student had to be enrolled for part-time and full-time attendance. She said Idaho Code established the authority of Boards to set enrollment parameters which the Board had done for funding purposes. She said funding information was very slow coming from the state and the District lost units during the previous school year by having dually enrolled students who did not meet the required number of minutes for funding. She said at that time the Board directed the administration to prevent further losses by changing Policy language to direct a minimum number of minutes. She said charter schools put stipulations on enrollment by requiring a minimum number of courses and directing that public schools agree to waive any ADA reimbursement from the state. She said the District was not able to educate children without receiving funding for their attendance. Ms. Cranor said after reading through some of the comments she wondered if the Board could hold off on making any changes since ADA funding for dually enrolled students would not be an issue next year after fractional ADA was addressed by the legislature. She asked if the administration knew how many students would be affected by the policy changes. Ms. Vagner said the administration was only aware of about six students but noted that many students complied with enrolling for the minimum number of minutes that might not have otherwise. She said what she did know was that last year the District lost 6 to 7 units in part by not meeting the minimum number of minutes to receive ADA funding which equated to about $400,000. Ms. Gebhardt said one issue for her was parents that chose to homeschool their children but wanted all the benefit of a public school education even if it was at the cost of the District losing funding. She said it seemed the music programs were the most affected. Ms. Vagner said orchestra and band were the two greatest programs affected. She said the Board would be asked to hear the Policy on second reading for adoption under Old Business. b. Policy 7164 – Salary Schedule – 2nd Reading for Deletion Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was Policy 7164 – Salary Schedule. She said various input was received communicating concerns that the intent was to remove the salary schedule completely. She said the concerns were addressed and no further comment was received. She said the salary schedule never should have been Policy. She said the Board would be asked to hear the Policy on second reading for deletion under Old Business. c. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board of Trustees Operating Principles Ms. Vagner said included in the packet were the Board of Trustees Operating Principles that included the changes made following the September 21, 2011 Board/Superintendent Retreat. She said after reviewing the proposed changes at the October 11, 2011Work Session, Mr. Sargent raised the concern that the change was too narrow and suggested expanding the change to read “and will deliberate on various items on the agenda” rather than “deliberate on the election of officers”. She said the administration offered two options for Board consideration, the first read: “and will deliberate on various items on the agenda”; and the second read: “and will deliberate on various items on the agenda inclusive of the election of officers”. She said Mr. Sargent could not be at the meeting that night but asked the administration to communicate that he was interested in limiting the language to “and will deliberate on various items on the agenda”. Ms. Cranor said she liked the second option. d. Beliefs Selected for Actualization for 2011-12 Ms. Vagner said included in the packet were the Beliefs selected by the Board for Actualization for 2011-12 at the September 21, 2011 Board/Superintendent Retreat and reviewed at the October 11, 2011 Work Session. She said the Belief “Students learn in different ways and at different rates” was added per the direction of the Board at the Board/Superintendent Retreat. e. Amended 2011-2012 School Board Meeting Schedule Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was the amended 2011-12 School Board Meeting Schedule which was reviewed at the October 11, 2011 Work Session. She said the December meetings were changed to include the 2nd and 3rd Tuesdays as winter break was only a week and a half this year instead of two. f. Superintendent’s Forum – October 27, 2011 Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was the Superintendent’s Forum agenda scheduled for October 27, 2011. She said Lisa Carter would present the implementation of the Common Core State Standards into the TIA document and would discuss how to approach that. She said the group would also discuss the statewide rollout of TIA. She said the

Page 8 of 13 topics outlined for discussion with legislators in December were the Common Core State Standards, blended and online learning and Students Come First legislation. She said Snow White, the educational leader for Dell Computers was asked to help Regions 4, 5 & 6 walk through the technology implementation plan as required by the state. She invited the Board to attend the Forum. g. ISBA Conference – November 9 – 11, 2011 Ms. Vagner said the ISBA Annual Convention was scheduled for November 9 – 11, 2011. She said Mr. Rash, Ms. Gebhardt and she would attend the convention in Coeur d’ Alene and Mr. Rash and Ms. Gebhardt were the voting delegates and would communicate to them the direction from the October 11, 2011 Work Session. h. 2011-2012 Work Session Topics Ms. Vagner said included in the packet were the anticipated 2011-2012 Work Session Topics. She said the outlined topics were used as a guide to keep track of what was coming. She said the topics were aligned with the Strategic Plan and upcoming legislative issues and Students Come First legislation was imbedded in the discussion. i. Any Other Superintendent’s Update Ms. Vagner said Sergeant Canfield was retiring effective tomorrow and the administration did not know who would replace him. She said the Police Department would assign someone to his duties in the near future. She said he would be greatly missed. She said the student body would be involved in the process of naming the Stocks Building which would be on the November Work Session agenda. She said she was working on the legislative meeting agenda which was scheduled for Monday, December 5, 2011 and anticipated having the agenda ready for Board review at the November 8, 2011 Work Session. She said Common Core State Standards and Student Come First legislation would be important discussions to have with legislators. j. Calendar Ms. Vagner reviewed the calendar. She said no student discipline hearings were scheduled for October 19, 2011. She said there were hearings scheduled for November 2, 2011 and would need a quorum. She said American Education Week was November 17 – 19, 2011 and District staff would be recognized during the Festival of Trees but would be notified and invited to the event during American Education Week.

PUBLIC COMMENT – Self Explanatory a. Public Comment Pertinent to Agenda Action items Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Board Operating Principles No. 22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. Mr. Rash said the forms for public comment were all relative to the same topic and noted that patrons would have 5 minutes unless comments became repetitive in which case they would be limited to two minutes. Roberta Dixon – 457 Wildwood Lane, Pocatello, ID 83201 Ms. Dixon said she was concerned with the Policy changes for many reasons. She said six children affected by the policies did not have a big enough financial impact on the District to implement the changes. She said her children were denied access to soccer and orchestra even after the activities fees were paid. She said neither of the programs were at capacity. She said as a taxpayer her children should have access to those programs without argument. She said the administration pointed out more than once that the past school year was a good fiscal year. She said the law stated that she had the right to enroll her student in any school as long as precedent was given to public school students. She said she called all three high schools and was told her son could not play soccer. She asked how one more student in soccer and orchestra could possibly affect the fiscal year. She said the District was twisting the law to be vindictive to homeschoolers. She said she did want the best of both worlds and felt it was her right as a taxpayer to have both. She said she believed the policy changes were a waste of time on something that would be null and void next year. Landon Webb – RR6 Box 36C, Pocatello, ID 83202 Mr. Webb thanked the Board for allowing him to speak and echoed the previous comments. He said he didn’t know what ADA was or what had changed from previous years but being that it would not be an issue next year he proposed adding language to sunset the changes at the end of the school year. He said Idaho Code clearly stated a parent’s right to enroll their child in any public institution without stipulation. He said funding for that child was the job of the State Department of Education and if there was a problem it was incumbent upon them to correct it. He said there was no provision for a minimum number of minutes in the law. He said he was not aware of any other Districts

Page 9 of 13 taking this type of action. He said most home school students had a full schedule already and requiring them to take additional classes cut into their curriculum. He said most received a quality education and if the Policy was changed to mandate minimum attendance it could be detrimental to the quality of their education. He said the concern for a student’s wellbeing should be the utmost concern of all adults. Beth Huston – 732 Homestead Road, Chubbuck, ID 83202 Ms. Huston said she home schooled four boys and asked the Board to vote no on the adoption of the Policy changes. She said Idaho Code stated a parent had the right to dually enroll their child. She said there was a provision in the law that stated a Board could adopt procedures pursuant to enrollment but the proposed change was not procedural and was a violation of Idaho Code. She said she understood and respected the budget concerns but asked the Board to hold off on any changes until the issue was resolved next year. Heather Sandy – 1711 Bachelor Circle, Pocatello, ID 83201 Ms. Sandy she and her husband were both products of parents in the education system and chose to send their children to private school because of the District’s previous administration. She said she paid taxes which went to public education and not her children’s private education. She said her children also needed specialized attention which they could not get in public school. She said she and her husband were pleased to learn Idaho was a “free to choose” state with dual enrollment opportunities only to learn this year that her children could not sign up for orchestra because of the proposed changes. She said she also just learned that the changes would apply to middle school students which had not been the case a few weeks ago. She said her children were enrolled in an online charter so there was no money to share but should be a problem for the Board to figure out, not her. She said her child had to take additional credit at no benefit to the District just to take one extra-curricular class. She said students were being used as a way to stick it to the state. She said she contacted Superintendent Luna who told her that her student could not be denied enrollment and yet she was being told by the District’s administration that her student could not be enrolled. She said Superintendent Luna also said the funding issue would be resolved next year and asked why the Board would deny children enrichment opportunities when the District would get the money next year. She said the change affected scholarships and futures for these students. She said it was irresponsible and was not doing “whatever it takes” for kids. She asked the Board to abolish the policy and maintain the status quo which had worked in the past.

CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity Policy Issue: Board approves Human Resource Activity Background Information: Included in the packet was documentation of the Human Resource Activity regarding certified employees since the September 20, 2011 Regular Board Meeting. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve Human Resource Activity as presented. b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims Policy Issue: Board approves all Claims. Background Information: Included in the packet were bills and invoices as of October 13, 2011in the amount of $581,699.80. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the bills and invoices as of October 13, 2011in the amount of $581,699.80. c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011 Policy Issue: Board acts on Financial Information. Background Information: Included in the packet was supplemental financial information for the period of September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve supplemental financial information from September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011. d. Topic: Approve University of South Dakota Administrative Intern Request Policy Issues: Board approves administrative intern access in District schools. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the University of South Dakota Administrative Intern request as presented. Board Direction/Action on Consent Agenda: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests

Page 10 of 13 Policy Issue: Board approves preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Ms. Cranor to approve the Preliminary Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests with additional information forthcoming. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. b. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Policy Issue: Board approves Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Murphy and seconded by Ms. Cranor to approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. c. Topic: Hear on Second Reading for Adoption: Policy 8116 – Part Day Enrollment-Attendance of Students Policy 8130 – Attendance of Students Policy Issue: Board adopts policy. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board hear on second reading for adoption the above listed policies as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to hear on second reading for adoption the above listed Policies as presented. Ms. Cranor said some good points were made and realized it could cost the District as much as $400,000 but the negative impacts to children concerned her. Mr. Murphy said it concerned him as well but the Board was not denying enrollment or being vindictive; it was only setting parameters for enrollment. Mr. Rash, Ms. Gebhardt and Mr. Murphy voted in the affirmative. Ms. Cranor was opposed. d. Topic: Hear on Second Reading for Deletion: Policy 7164 – Salary Schedule Policy Issue: Board deletes policy. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board hear on second reading for deletion the above listed policy as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Ms. Cranor to hear on second reading for deletion the above listed Policy as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. e. Topic: Approve Alternate Route to Graduation Plan Policy Issue: Board approves alternate route to graduation plans. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation Plan as presented and direct the administration to submit the plan to the state by October 30, 2011. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to approve the Alternate Route to Graduation Plan as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. f. Topic: Affirm Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board of Trustees Operating Principles Policy Issue: Board annually affirms the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board of Trustees Operating Principles. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board affirm the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board of Trustees Operating Principles as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to affirm the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board of Trustees Operating Principles as amended. Ms. Gebhardt said she believed the work of the Board was deliberative and the inclusion of the matter of election of officers was critical. Ms. Cranor said she agreed with the combination of both changes. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. g. Topic: Affirm Board Beliefs Selected for Actualization for 2011-12 Policy Issue: Board annually affirms Beliefs for actualization. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board affirm Board Beliefs for Actualization for 2011-12 as presented.

Page 11 of 13 Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Murphy and seconded by Ms. Cranor to affirm the Board Beliefs selected for Actualization for 2011-12 as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. h. Topic: Adopt Amended 2011-2012 School Board Meeting Schedule Policy Issue: Board adopts calendars and schedules. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board adopt the amended 2011-2012 School Board Meeting Schedule as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to adopt the amended 2011-12 School Board Meeting Schedule as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Mrs. Vagner a. Topic: Accept District # 25 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2011 Policy Issue: Board acts on financial information. Background Information: This topic was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board accept the District #25 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2011 as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to accept the District #25 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. b. Topic: Certify the Annual Financial Condition Statement Policy Issue: Board acts on financial information. Background Information: This topic was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board certify the Annual Financial Condition Statement as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to certify the Annual Financial Condition Statement as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. c. Topic: Approve Early Graduation Requests Policy Issue: Board approves Early Graduation requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Early Graduation requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Ms. Cranor to approve the Early Graduation requests as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. d. Topic: Approve Camp/Clinic Request Policy Issue: Board approves camp requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the camp/clinic request as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Murphy and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to approve the Camp/Clinic request as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. e. Topic: Authorize Permission to Bid 2012 CIP Related Projects Policy Issue: Board authorizes permission to bid. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board authorize Permission to Bid 2012 CIP Related Projects as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Mr. Murphy to authorize permission to bid 2012 CIP related projects as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. f. Topic: Approve Students Come First Parent/Guardian Input Forms for Teacher Evaluations; Certified Specialists; Nurses and School Psychologists and the Teacher Evaluation – Formative Part I and Summative Part II Forms Policy Issue: Board approves parent input and teacher evaluation forms. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Students Come First Parent/Guardian Input Forms for Teacher Evaluations; Certificated Specialists; Nurses and School Psychologists and the Teacher Evaluation – Formative Part I and Summative Part II Forms as revised and presented.

Page 12 of 13 Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Ms. Gebhardt to approve the Students Come First Parent/Guardian Input Forms for Teacher Evaluations; Certified Specialists; Nurses and School Psychologists and the Teacher Evaluation – Formative Part I and Summative Part II Forms with the removal of the word “monitor” on the School Psychologist form. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements at the time of the meeting.

ADJOURN A motion was made by Ms. Gebhardt and seconded by Ms. Cranor to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned its Regular Meeting at 8:14 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______Secretary, Board of Trustees BY:

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 13 of 13 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION To Discuss Matters as Allowed by Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To Consider the Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against a Public School Student (With option to take any action pertinent to Student Discipline Hearing in Open Session) Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 County of Bannock – State of Idaho

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 5:15 p.m. Wednesday, November 2, 2011

BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Frank Rash, Chair, Board of Trustees John Sargent, Vice Chair, Board of Trustees Jackie Cranor, Clerk, Board of Trustees Janie Gebhardt, Member, Board of Trustees (Excused) Nate Murphy, Member, Board of Trustees Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

Call to Order/Executive Session – Student Expulsion Hearing: Chair Rash called the meeting to order at 5:19 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Sargent and seconded by Ms. Cranor to adjourn to Executive Session. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Murphy, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Mr. Sargent, aye; Mr. Rash, aye. The Board adjourned to Executive Session at 5:21 p.m.

Purpose: To discuss student discipline. The Board proceeded to discuss student discipline as provided in Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) to consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public school student.

OTHERS PRESENT: Student Docket No. 12-05 Student Docket No. 12-05 Mother Kent Hobbs, Director of Student Support Services Keith Barnes, Principal, Alameda Center Officer Cardenas, School Resource Officer, Alameda Center Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Return to Open Session The Board returned to Open Session at 5:27. Chair Rash recessed the meeting at 5:28 p.m.

Return to Executive Session – Student Expulsion Hearing: Following the recess, a motion was made by Mr. Sargent and seconded by Ms. Cranor to reconvene to Executive Session at 5:32 p.m. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Murphy, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Mr. Sargent, aye; Mr. Rash, aye.

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 6:26 p.m. A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Sargent that the Board expel Student Docket No. 12-05 from attendance at the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 through the second trimester of the 2011-2012 school year. Such motion is based upon the judgment of the Board of Trustees that Student Docket No. 12-05 has:

Page 1 of 2 1. Engaged in conduct which demonstrates that the student’s presence at school is continuously disruptive of the school’s discipline. 2. Engaged in conduct which demonstrates the student’s presence is continuously disruptive of the institutional effectiveness of the school. 3. Engaged in conduct which violated District Policy No. 8210, Student Discipline, regarding unacceptable/disorderly student conduct and interactions including but not limited to swearing/inappropriate language, racial slurs, threats of violence and extreme defiance to school personnel.

Prior to the commencement of the third trimester of the 2011-2012 school year, the student and/or the parent/legal guardian of the student shall be responsible for contacting and communicating with the District to schedule a Board Reinstatement Hearing to allow the Board to consider reinstatement for the remainder of the 2011-2012 school year and what conditions, if any, the Board will impose if reinstatement is permitted.

Should the student seek to complete any on-line or correspondence type courses during the period of expulsion, the District’s Administrative or Counseling personnel will participate in a meeting with the parent of the student to review educational options, what courses are needed for the student to progress towards graduation and what courses could be transferred to the District and transcripted towards promotion.

During the reinstatement hearing the student and the parent/legal guardian of the student shall be prepared to discuss the activities of the student during the period of expulsion as well as what actions have been taken to assure that this conduct and violation of District policies will not occur in the future should re-enrollment be permitted. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

Adjourn: A motion was made by Mr. Sargent and seconded by Ms. Cranor to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned at 6:29 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 2 of 2

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 District Leadership Team Meeting October 3, 2011 Minutes

Members Present: Shelley Allen, Krista Campos, Lori Craney, Bob Devine, Jan Flandro, Merilee Green, Kathy Luras, Patti Mortensen, Shane Moulton, Nate Murphy, Sandy Nalley, Sue Pettit, Cory Phelps, John Sargent, Carl Smart, Jedd Thomas, Chuck Wegner, Mary Vagner, and Sharie Bradley

Members Excused: Jody Nelson Members Absent: Jackie Brower, Jean Hancock, Stephen Preston, Dian Swanson

Welcome & Introductions Mary began the meeting with introductions of the members in the room and announcing the members who were not present.

Review of District Strategic Plan, 2009-2014

. Overview of Vision/Mission/Beliefs/Learner Goals, Board of Trustees Strategic Goals & Operating Principles Mary explained that the Strategic Plan is a living, working document. Each year it is updated. The new items are highlighted in yellow. Mary defined the seven Correlates of Effective Schools on which the Strategic Plan is built and explained the vision and mission of School District #25. Mary read the Belief statement and explained how the Correlates of Effective Schools are woven in to the Beliefs of the District. Mary went on to read the six strategic goals of the District. The Board of Trustees has set expectations of itself that sets the norm and standard for the District. The Board of Trustees Operating Principles are embedded in the Strategic Plan.

. Community Relations & Communication Shelley Allen explained her role and how she engages with the community. She makes the community aware of the accomplishments of the District. Shelley explained the community relations department’s three major goals that are embedded in the Strategic Plan. Shelley shared that a recent survey was conducted stating parents would like to know more about why the District makes certain decisions. Shelley advised the group to go online to look at the Strategic Plan.

. School Safety Mary stated the three major areas of school safety and said the emergency operations plan is updated annually. Mary explained the use of ShoutPoint as a communication tool to get the proper messages out to parents as quickly as possible. Mary said CPR training is provided as a way of keeping our staff up to date on emergency services. Mary continued by affirming the student behavior interventions that are in place to keep all students safe in schools. Mary then explained that just as the student behavior is developed so is that of the professional staff. Courses are available to help the staff learn how to work with students with behavioral concerns. There are also various drills that are administered at the schools. The schools provide more than just fire drills. They also conduct several varying levels of lock down drills.

. Curriculum & Instruction:  District/School Improvement Planning / TIA / Curriculum Renewal / HS/MS Redesign Chuck Wegner began with District and School Improvement Planning by defining the WISE Tool. Chuck explained the waiver the state is processing with the federal government to waive the requirements of No Child Left Behind. Idaho will now be held to the standards of the new growth model. Chuck discussed the Total Instructional Alignment work that has been taking place during the summer months at ISU. The Common Core State Standards were a major focus of the TIA working conference this past summer. The state standards will now be common across a majority of the states. The District is working on implementing the Common Core State Standards ahead of our state department’s timeline for implementation. Chuck showed the cycle of renewal for textbook purchases and explained the District's inability to purchase new texts based on lack of available funding.  Response to Intervention (RtI) / PLC’s / Classroom Walkthroughs Patti began by discussing the use of ARRA funds to purchase intervention programs. Patti spoke to the Tier II and III programs and that the emphasis has been in math for the past few years. There are universal screenings in place for the elementary grade levels to help identify student placement in math. Patti continued to explain the writing training that took place last year and is continuing this year. Patti mentioned the implementation of the Mileposts program. Mileposts is a technology repository for student information to keep all of the individual intervention information in one place. Bob said the secondary level is working to catch up with the elementary level in regard to interventions and how the use of Mileposts will be a great tool for tracking student information. Bob also mentioned professional development that is taking place regarding effective grading practices. The student is not allowed to opt out of learning which is a part of the Strategic Plan. Teachers are calling and communicating with parents when assignments are not turned in. Bob explained how the District is using common assessments to help teachers help students. Bob also illustrated the effective grading principles that are being used in the schools. Bob mentioned classroom walkthroughs and how important student engagement is at the secondary level. Patti mentioned the time teacher teams have during Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) that provides the opportunity to work together.  SIOP / Building Capacity in Staff / Social/Emotional Curriculum / Technology Literacy Kathy provided the definition of SIOP (Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol) and how SIOP is being implemented as the instructional framework in the District. Kathy explained the use of LEP Grant funds to provide software and an iTouch to principals to monitor the implementation of SIOP in their buildings. Chuck explained the High School and Middle School Redesign portion of the Strategic Plan. The state is requiring students to take online classes. The class of 2016 will be required to take two credits online one of which must be asynchronous and one of which may be blended. Asynchronous is where the student can log on anytime that is convenient for them to complete the course. The District is beginning to plan for implementation for online courses. Chuck continued to explain the use of the IEN to facilitate the online courses. Kathy continued by illustrating the professional development courses that are available to the District staff. Kathy explained the Social/Emotional curriculum. The buildings are benchmarking themselves so they can continue to embed social/emotional learning into the curriculum. Kathy discussed the strategic direction for technology literacy. The District has positioned itself well for requesting funding from the state for technology.

. Staff Wellness/Employee Services Carl discussed how the District has developed a robust wellness plan to get the employees involved in their own health. The District is trying to reduce costs by encouraging the wellness of all employees. Carl discussed the District’s need to do more with fewer staff. The District will try to create relationships that will grant us flexibility in our budgets this year, but also in the future. Employee Services is trying to foster the relationships to keep employees working and at the same wages each year, rather than reducing pay during these difficult financial times.

. Human Resources, Business Services Mary explained the new requirement from the state for parental input in teacher evaluations. Teacher input will be solicited and a plan that is being developed will be presented to the Instructional Directors. Human Resources is working on developing Administrator evaluations. Job descriptions for classified personnel have yet to be updated. Human Resources will have to work with the reduction of underfunding of staff positions of nine percent next year. Human Resources is maintaining very tight controls on hiring staff. The federal government has had a very interested role in highly qualified staff. Mary discussed the capital improvement plan and the District’s need for reopening the Alameda Center as a middle school. The District likes to keep the buildings at 85% capacity. Century High School is already over 85%. Boundary redesign is also a part of the Strategic Plan. The District is continuing to bus the student athletes to events, albeit funded 40% by the parents of those athletes. Teacher skills continue to be sharpened. Mary explained the fiscal reductions the district may be facing next year. There is another charter school opening next September. This could take another 300 students from the elementary schools. The District has achieved and hopes to continue to maintain the level of staff salaries at the level they have been for the last couple years.

. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and ISAT Data Mary announced all of our elementary schools made AYP, as did Century High School. The District has increased high school graduation rates by almost ten percent over the last five years. Mary announced that Tyhee Elementary School has been named by the state as a Distinguished School. Kathy said AYP data is available on the District’s website. Kathy illustrated the middle and high school’s performance. Kathy continued to show the group the ISAT data available in the PowerPoint posted online. Kathy pointed out that in most content areas and grade levels the District average is above the state average.

Mary indicated that the District has almost a 50% free and reduced lunch population. Mary then explained the strategic plan framework. The students that leave the District will leave college and career ready. Mary reinforced the District’s strategic goals. The District’s Strategic Plan is research based. Mary said the District staff is accountable for its work and accountable to the taxpayers.

Questions and Answers Jedd commented that the District has progressed well in spite of the financial constraints placed on the District. Jedd said he is confident in what the District is doing. Jedd asked if Shelley would share this information with the Chamber of Commerce Education Committee. Jedd has four children who attended schools in the District and personally feels the District has served his family well.

Wrap Up and Adjourn Mary thanked the group for coming and for their time commitment to the District.

District Curriculum Committee Meeting October 21, 2011 Minutes

Members Present: Toni Betty, Sheryl Brockett, Camille Clark, Bob Devine, Julian Duffey, Janie Gebhardt, Heidi Kessler, Anne LoPiccalo, Kathy Luras, Shane Moulton, Sandy Nalley, Sue Pettit, Chuck Wegner, Kris Wilkinson

Members Excused: Jackie Cranor, Patti Mortensen Members Absent: Sue Stahlecker, Shelli Jones, Kevin Weiche, Lisa Delonas

Chuck Wegner welcomed everyone to the meeting and turned the time over to Bob Devine.

ACT vs. SAT Bob Devine reviewed a comparison sheet of the ACT vs. SAT. The state opted to go with the SAT because it had more free options and aligned better with the Common Core State Standards. He said test style made a big difference in the success of a student and statistically students did better on straightforward tests that did not have trick questions. SAT questions increase in difficulty as you move through the test rather than randomly like the ACT. He read an article on the ACT being more suited for students who had trouble focusing for long periods of time. Janie said she remembered having a break in the middle of the test. Bob said it is still hard for students to maintain focus even with a break. He said he believed the District needed an SAT prep course that could be an asynchronous online course to prepare kids for the test. Kids will not do it on their own. The state is mandating online courses and this might as well be one of them. Janie said she had concerns with teaching to the test. Bob said the course would mainly focus on the skills. SAT focuses on vocabulary and ACT focuses on grammar. Anne said that worries her since a lot of the vocabulary was not commonly used in this area. Bob said special accommodations can be requested and out of 50,000 students that requested accommodations last year, 80% were approved. The student just has to be able to prove they were receiving previous accommodations through the school. Julian asked that requests for accommodations be submitted 6 weeks prior to the testing date to allow time for review and approval. Bob said he would work with Kathy to follow up on the logistics. Chuck said the big push from the state for Common Core and the SAT was to encourage college readiness. Teachers are worried this will eventually be tied to pay for performance. Heidi said it is the teacher’s responsibility to prepare students for college. Chuck said we have made strides through the implementation of Freshman Seminar. Bob said he believed that comprehensive inventories that gave kids feedback were a better solution. He said when kids know what they want to do college becomes more of a reality for them. Sheryl said Century’s goal was to get every junior to take it which sent a positive message. She said the school pushed it from registration and thereafter. Shane asked how much time the District spent discussing test taking strategies. Bob said none. Heidi and Kris said they did. Bob said it was hit and miss which reiterated his belief that we need an online asynchronous course to prepare. Shane said strategy should be the biggest focus on passing tests not necessarily the content. Bob asked if everyone felt it would be valuable for teachers to review the SAT as a group. Everyone agreed it would.

Khan Academy Bob said the Khan Academy is a website that has tutorials for almost every subject. He reviewed one tutorial on simple algebra equations. Sheryl asked if there was someone that could tie the tutorials to the curriculum so we know which lessons to assign or inform parents about. Bob said yes and he would also like to look into a program that teachers could use to create their own tutorials. Shane said Khan had been doing this for years. He said Thinkfinity had the same type of resources. Anne said she checked the website to see how current it was and was impressed with the up-to-date information.

Middle School Summer School Grades Sue said they would like to offer pass/fail grades in summer school for middle school students. It’s hard to use A, B, C grades with PLATO. Bob said it would simplify things greatly and supported the change. Sue said middle school PLATO is not course specific. Toni said typically a 70% passing grade was required with a pass/fail system because if students got a lower score than that it meant they did not understand the content. PLATO requires an 80% to achieve mastery. Students do not take end of course assessments since the middle school PLATO program is not course specific. Chuck asked if the PLATO requirement of 70% of the modules at 80% mastery could be applied to middle school summer school. Patrick and Tonya are the most knowledgeable of PLATO and would be the best to answer this question. Bob said we would involve them in deciding what the best route for transitioning to a pass/fail system would be. A motion was made by Sue to move to a pass/fail system for middle school credit recovery with the formation of a sub-committee to develop specific criteria. Shane seconded. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

PTE Course Applications Anne said the program manager over technology education eliminated all of the current technology education classes and developed new ones specific to engineering design. Dennis Hauser is currently teaching the first course. The second course is Technological Design. Dennis will take training in the summer for the next two courses. The third course will be a two- trimester course and the fourth course will be yearlong. The proposal is to turn the cabinetry lab into a technology lab. Funds have been requested from the state to convert to this program, but Anne did not have an answer as to whether or not the request would be approved. Chuck asked when we would know about the funding. Anne said in the next couple of weeks. PTE currently has a lot of supplies and materials to use for the new courses that could be used to start the program even if we do not get the funding. Non-funding would only become problematic two years down the road. Perkins funding had been cut the last two years in a row, so these funds cannot be utilized now. In the future if funding improves, Perkin’s money could be used. Anne believes the program has good chance of being approved for funding. Chuck asked who would teach Freshman Seminar since Dennis would no longer teach the course. Anne said the Freshman Seminar teacher did not have to be certified so they could use anyone they wanted. Bob asked how this would affect Dennis teaching at New Horizons High School. Anne said it would not until the third part of the course which was yearlong. Sue Pettit said we would know at the next meeting whether or not funding was approved and would also have a chance to make sure Don Cotant is aware he would lose his Freshman Seminar teacher. Bob said he did not see how it would work for Dennis to teach at both Pocatello High School and New Horizon with the yearlong course. Chuck suggested the topic be tabled until Don and Dennis could be here for the discussion. Sheryl said she was under the impression that once the committee approved a course it was at the principal’s discretion to choose to continue the course or not. She said this whole conversation could be a moot point by the third year. A motion was made by Bob to table the discussion until Don and Dennis were present at the November 9, 2011 meeting. Sue seconded. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

The meeting adjourned at 9:42 a.m.

Next Meeting: November 9, 2011 8:30-11:30 a.m. Training Center, Ed Center

November 1, 2011

Ms. Mary Vagner, Superintendent Pocatello District 025

Dear Ms. Vagner,

Your district’s 2011-2012 IDEA Part B and Preschool Application has been approved.

The following information applies to these awards:

IDEA Part B School Age (Section 611) Authority: PL 108-446 IDEA Program Title: Special Education – Grants to States CFDA Number 84.027A Award Number H027A110088 Period of Availability July 1, 2011 – September 30, 2013 IDEA Part B Preschool (Section 619) Authority: PL 108-446 IDEA Program Title: Special Education – Preschool Grants CFDA Number 84.173A Award Number H173A110030 Period of Availability July 1, 2011 – September 30, 2013

The approved budget amounts, as submitted in the application, are listed below:

District/LEA # 025 POCATELLO DISTRICT IDEA Part B School Age allocation $2,422,732.00 IDEA Preschool Allocation $124,873.00

The Maintenance of Effort Worksheet and Assurance form that your district submitted as part of the application, indicated that the district met the IDEA Maintenance of Effort compliance requirement by expending from general M&O funds, for the purpose of providing special education and related services to children with disabilities, an amount equal to or greater than the amount expended in fiscal year 2009, either in total or per- pupil. The determination was made after considering any allowable reductions and exceptions under the IDEA regulations at 34 CFR §300.204 and §300.205.

Please take note of the following regarding the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) determination:

 This is a preliminary examination of your district’s MOE, including any reduction in MOE. The final determination of MOE compliance will be based on the analysis of your district’s annual IFARMS financial reports submitted to Public School Finance. Once the data from 2010-11 have been compiled, they will be compared to the amounts submitted on the MOE Assurance form with the application. If there is a

discrepancy between those two amounts that indicates a maintenance of effort reduction from FY 2010 to FY 2011 that was not accounted for with the application, the district will be required to provide additional information regarding that discrepancy and could be required to repay, from non-federal funds, the net amount of that reduction.

 The amounts budgeted for special education expenditures from the general fund for FY 2012 meet the MOE eligibility requirement, either in total or per-pupil. These FY 2012 general fund expenditures will be examined in the fall of 2012 after the annual IFARMS financial reports for that fiscal year are submitted to School Finance. The actual expenditures for that year may not be less than the FY 2011 actual expenditures as reported on the current annual financial report less allowable MOE reductions and exceptions. If a district has reduced its MOE by an amount in excess of allowable reductions, it may be required to repay that excess amount to the U.S. Department of Education from non-federal funds.

All payments on the above awards are by reimbursement only for the allowable costs indicated on the budgets that your district submitted and are herein approved. Reimbursement requests may be made on the SDE website at https://www.sde.idaho.gov/portal/Funding/.

If you have any questions, or if I can be of assistance in any way, please contact me at 332-6916 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,

Lester Wyer Funding and Accountability Coordinator Division of Federal Programs Special Education cc: Kevin Weiche Bart Reed

SPECIAL SERVICES BUDGET

Budget FY 2010 - 2011 FY 2011 - 2012 Title VI-B - School Age Allotment $2,460,959.00 $2,422,732.00 Carryover $711,319.00 $1,159,199.00 Total $3,172,278.00 $3,581,931.00

Salaries - Teachers & Aides $1,351,041.00 $1,965,000.00 Benefits - Teachers & Aides $832,541.00 $850,250.00 Purchased Services $7,000.00 Supplies $221,219.00 $145,250.00 Capital Objects $125,548.00 $31,150.00 Salaries - Related Services $80,790.00 $84,325.00 Benefits - Related Services $28,637.00 $19,250.00 Purchased Services - Related Services $317,400.00 $285,550.00 Supplies - Related Services $750.00 Capital Objects - Related Services $1,500.00 Professional Development $35,000.00 $52,712.00 Coordinated Early Intervening Services $90,495.00 $0.00 Indirect Costs $6,200.00 $60,814.00 Adjustment Amount $17,917.00 $0.00 Totals $3,172,278.00 $3,581,931.00

Title VI-B - Preschool $124,434.00 $124,873.00 Carryover $65,130.00 $49,685.00 Total $189,564.00 $174,558.00

Salaries - Teachers & Aides $41,836.00 $47,000.00 Benefits - Teachers & Aides $25,568.00 $26,650.00 Purchased Services $10,186.00 Supplies $16,228.00 $11,503.00 Capital Objects $13,000.00 $2,450.00 Salaries - Related Services $50,331.00 $51,250.00 Benefits - Related Services $15,704.00 $16,100.00 Purchased Services $19,000.00 $6,200.00 Supplies $0.00 $0.00 Capital Objects $0.00 $0.00 Professional Development $5,000.00 $0.00 Indirect Costs $2,897.00 $3,219.00 Total $189,564.00 $174,558.00

Page: 1 Date: 11/3/2011 Title VI-B - Charter School $76,596.00 $68,508.00 Carryover $6,811.00 $0.00 Totals $83,407.00 $68,508.00

General Fund $6,069,347.00 $6,237,139.00 Special Education Program $4,474,769.00 $457,030.00 Special Education Preschool Program $153,727.00 $145,946.00 Support Services Program $1,440,851.00 $1,516,163.00 Total $6,069,347.00 $6,237,139.00

ARRA $69,963.00 $0.00

Notes: Total ARRA 2009-2011 Preschool $104,459.00 Total ARRA 2009-2011 School Age $2,385,102.00

School Age decrease of $38,227, or -1.6%

Page: 2 Date: 11/3/2011

Alternate Route to Graduation

Revised October 2011

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Alternate Route to Graduation

Introduction

The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District’s aim is for all students to demonstrate proficiency on the Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT) in reading, language usage, and mathematics. In the event students do not pass one or more of the ISAT content areas, a locally developed, board approved alternate route to graduation will be provided. This will give students an opportunity to demonstrate competency in another manner.

Guidelines: Class of 2013 and Beyond

I. By the fall trimester of the student's junior year, high school counselors shall provide notice of the board approved alternate route to graduation plan to all students who have not achieved a proficient or advanced score on the Grade 10 ISAT.

I.II. Students who are on target for graduation and who are below the ISAT proficiency level in the fall of their junior senior year are candidates to pursue a board approved alternate route to graduation.

II.III. The high school counselors will identify eligible students.

III.IV. A meeting will be held with the student, parent, counselor, and school administrator to decide the alternate route which best fits the student’s needs.

IV.V. The “Alternate Route to Graduation” Form A will be completed and signed at this meeting, and a student portfolio will be established to warehouse all necessary documentation.

V.VI. Teachers will send the PLATO Graphic Summary Report to parents every 3 weeks to inform them of the student’s progress.

VI.VII. Upon successful completion of the designated alternate route to graduation, the administration will petition the Board of Trustees to accept the Alternate Route to Graduation in lieu of proficiency on the ISAT.

Revised September October 2011 1 Alternate Route to Graduation Identification & Procedures

1. Students must be identified by the high school counselors.

2. Students (Class of 2013 and beyond) who are below the ISAT proficiency level in the fall of their junior senior year are candidates to pursue the Alternate Graduation Route.

3. Identified students will be enrolled in a course for elective credit during the fall of their junior senior year.

4. The Alternate Graduation Route will include multiple measures of student achievement, earning a minimum of 300 points based on the following rubric/point system:

PLATO Alternate Route: ISAT Growth: Attendance:

Points awarded for passing Points awarded based on an Points awarded during the 70% of the assigned modules increase of Scale Score points trimester(s) in which the at 80% mastery: from the previous exam to the student is enrolled in the current exam: Alternate Route to Graduation Course):

250 points 4 Scale Score = 100 points 90-100% = 30 points 3 Scale Score = 75 points 80-89% = 20 points 2 Scale Score = 60 points 70-79% = 10 points 1 Scale Score = 50 points 0-69% = 0 points

Points awarded for passing the Reading, Language Usage, or Math ISAT:

ISAT Reading = 50 points ISAT Language Usage = 50 points ISAT Math = 50 points

300 Points Needed to Fulfill Alternate Route to Graduation Requirements

2 Revised October 2011

5. At the beginning of the trimester, the teacher and student will review the ISAT results (*) and determine which strands, if any, can be banked (document on Verification Signature Page Form C). Strands may be banked if a student’s score is 55% or higher. *All ISAT results from the time the student started banking tests (usually spring of 10th grade) may be used. If a student banks all of the strands, he/she does not need to complete any coursework, the teacher just needs to fill out and submit the paperwork (see #9) and award the points available for the PLATO Alternate Route.

6. The teacher and student must establish a portfolio including the items listed on the “Student Portfolio Checklist.”

7. Each student must pass 70% of the PLATO modules at 80% mastery. The student and teacher will track daily progress on the Student Assignment Sheet Form B as the student progresses.

8. Each week, the student will print a detailed PLATO Activity Comprehensive Report from the student menu for the teacher. Teachers and students will conference weekly to monitor progress. Reports will be kept in the Student Portfolio.

9. Teachers will send the PLATO Graphic Summary Report to parents every 3 weeks to inform them of the student’s progress.

10. The teacher must verify the students’ successful completion of the strand by signing the Verification Signature Page Form C and award points earned by the student based on the rubric above.

11. The teacher must verify the student has earned 300 points by signing the Rubric of Alternate Route to Graduation Points Verification Form D.

12. When the student has completed the Alternate Route, the school administration / counseling office submits the Alternate Route to Graduation Form A, Verification Signature Page Form C, and the Rubric of Alternate Route to Graduation Points Verification Form D to the Curriculum Department before the May school board meeting. District administration will petition the Board of Trustees to approve the student’s Alternate Route to Graduation in lieu of the ISAT.

3 Revised October 2011

PLATO Alternate Route to Graduation Student Portfolio Checklist

Student Portfolio must be maintained by the School Do not give to Student

Items Included in Portfolio:

 Alternate Route to Graduation Form A

 Student Assignment Sheet Form B Students will track/document their scores as they complete PLATO modules.

 PLATO Activity Comprehensive Report PLATO document printed weekly to be placed in Student Portfolio to show progress.

 Completed Verification Signature Page Form C Teacher ensures 70% of the modules were completed at 80% mastery for each ISAT strand. This form must be placed in Student Portfolio. Teacher signs off on each strand.

 Completed Rubric of Alternate Route to Graduation Points Verification Form D. Teacher signs off to ensure student has a minimum of 300 points.

NOTE: Upon completion of the Alternate Route to Graduation, forward Form A, Form C, and Form D to the Curriculum Department.

4 Revised September 2011 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Alternate Route to Graduation - Form A

Name of Student: Student ID:

School: Date:

If a student has not demonstrated proficiency on the Idaho Standards Achievement Test, the student must fulfill the Alternate Route to Graduation, as approved by the School District No. 25 Board of Trustees, and earn a minimum of 300 points as identified on the Rubric of Alternate Route to Graduation Points Verification Form D.

Please indicate the date ISAT Passed/Not Passed:

ISAT Reading Passed Not Passed Scale Score: Initiate Alternate Route

ISAT Language Passed Not Passed Scale Score: Initiate Alternate Route

ISAT Math Passed Not Passed Scale Score: Initiate Alternate Route

Signatures:

Counselor Student Parent

Administrator Teacher Teacher

NOTE: Upon completion of the Alternate Route to Graduation, forward Form A, Form C, and Form D to the Curriculum Department.

Revised September 2011 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Reading Process 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Reading Process 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Using Prefix Clues to Find Word Meanings Using Prefix Clues to Find Word Meanings: Tutorial Using Prefix Clues to Find Word Meanings: Application Using Prefix Clues to Find Word Meanings: Test Using Prefix Clues to Find Word Meanings: Homework Building Your Vocabulary Building Your Vocabulary: Tutorial 1 Building Your Vocabulary: Tutorial 2 Building Your Vocabulary: Vocabulary Builder Building Your Vocabulary: Test Building Your History Vocabulary Building Your History Vocabulary: Tutorial Building Your History Vocabulary: Vocabulary Builder Building Your History Vocabulary: Test

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Standard 2: Comprehension/Interpretation Which Reference Do You Need? Which Reference Do You Need?: Tutorial Which Reference Do You Need?: Application Which Reference Do You Need?: Mastery Test Monitoring Your Comprehension of Expository Text Monitoring Your Comprehension of Expository Text: Problem Solving Activity* Monitoring Your Comprehension of Literature Monitoring Your Comprehension of Literature: Problem Solving Activity* Monitoring Your Comprehension of More Expository Text Monitoring Your Comprehension of More Expository Text: Problem Solving Activity* A Strategy for Reading Literature A Strategy for Reading Literature: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Literature: Problem Solving Activity A Strategy for Reading Literature: Test A Strategy for Reading Social Sciences A Strategy for Reading Social Sciences: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Social Sciences: Problem Solving Activity A Strategy for Reading Social Sciences: Test A Strategy for Reading Business Letters A Strategy for Reading Business Letters: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Business Letters: Application A Strategy for Reading Business Letters: Mastery Test

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised October 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING Alternate Graduation-Standard 2 - Comprehension/Interpretation 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check A Strategy for Reading Directions A Strategy for Reading Directions: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Directions: Application A Strategy for Reading Directions: Mastery Test A Strategy for Reading Reports A Strategy for Reading Reports: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Reports: Application A Strategy for Reading Reports: Mastery Test Understanding Literature Understanding Literature: Tutorial Understanding Literature: Application Understanding Literature: Mastery Test

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised October 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Reading Process 70% modules = 6/8

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Alternate Graduation: Reading Standard 1: Reading Process Working With Order (ERS) Working With Order (ERS): Tutorial Working With Order (ERS): Application Working With Order (ERS): Test Using What You Know to Read Information Using What You Know to Read Information: Tutorial Using What You Know to Read Information: Application Using What You Know to Read Information: Test Using What You Know to Read Information: Homework Locating What's Important in Literature Locating What's Important in Literature: Tutorial Locating What's Important in Literature: Application Locating What's Important in Literature: Test Locating What's Important in Literature: Homework Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Tutorial Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Application Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Test Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Homework Negative Prefixes Negative Prefixes (ERS): Tutorial Negative Prefixes (ERS): Test Prefixes (ERS) Prefixes (ERS): Tutorial Prefixes (ERS): Test Choosing Borrow/Lend, Bring/Take, and All Ready/Already Choosing Borrow/Lend, Bring/Take, and All Ready/Already: Tutorial Choosing Borrow/Lend, Bring/Take, and All Ready/Already: Application Choosing Borrow/Lend, Bring/Take, and All Ready/Already: Mastery Test Choosing Amount/Number, Capital/Capitol, and Imply/Infer Choosing Amount/Number, Capital/Capitol, and Imply/Infer: Tutorial Choosing Amount/Number, Capital/Capitol, and Imply/Infer: Application Choosing Amount/Number, Capital/Capitol, and Imply/Infer: Mastery Test *Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 2 - Comprehension/Interpretation 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Standard 2: Comprehension/Interpretation Going Deeper with Your Research Going Deeper with Your Research: Tutorial 1 Going Deeper with Your Research: Tutorial 2 Going Deeper with Your Research: Tutorial 3 *Going Deeper with Your Research: Off-line Activity Evaluating Information Evaluating Information: Tutorial 1 Evaluating Information: Tutorial 2 Evaluating Information: Tutorial 3 *Evaluating Information: Off-line Activity Tracking Your Understanding of Stories *Tracking Your Understanding of Stories: Problem Solving Activity Tracking Your Understanding of More Information *Tracking Your Understanding of More Information: Problem Solving Activity Outlining Outlining: Tutorial 1 Outlining: Tutorial 2 Outlining: Tutorial 3 *Outlining: Off-line Activity Taking Notes Taking Notes: Tutorial 1 Taking Notes: Tutorial 2 Taking Notes: Tutorial 3 *Taking Notes: Off-line Activity Action Plan Action Plan: Tutorial Action Plan: Application Action Plan: Mastery Test

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B READING - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 2 - Comprehension/Interpretation 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Tutorial Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Application Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Test Using Prior Knowledge to Read Literature: Homework Following Steps in a Sequence Following Steps in a Sequence: Tutorial Following Steps in a Sequence: Application Following Steps in a Sequence: Mastery Test A Strategy for Reading Directions A Strategy for Reading Directions: Tutorial A Strategy for Reading Directions: Application A Strategy for Reading Directions: Mastery Test

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Number & Operation 70% modules = 11/15

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Additive Inverse of an Integer (Alg1.2) Additive Inverse of an Integer (Alg1.2): Tutorial Additive Inverse of an Integer (Alg1.2): Application Additive Inverse of an Integer (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Additive Inverse of an Integer (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2) Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Tutorial Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Application Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Equations with Absolute Values (Alg1.2) Equations with Absolute Values (Alg1.2): Tutorial Equations with Absolute Values (Alg1.2): Application Equations with Absolute Values (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Equations with Absolute Values (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Review: Equations and Inequalities (Alg1.2) Review: Equations and Inequalities (Alg1.2): Tutorial Review: Equations and Inequalities (Alg1.2): Application Review: Equations and Inequalities (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Review: Equations and Inequalities (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Square Roots of Perfect Squares (Alg 1.1) Square Roots of Perfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Square Roots of Perfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Application Square Roots of Perfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Square Roots of Perfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Square Roots of Imperfect Squares (Alg 1.1) Square Roots of Imperfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Square Roots of Imperfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Application Square Roots of Imperfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Square Roots of Imperfect Squares (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Number & Operation 70% modules = 11/15

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Prime and Composite Numbers Prime and Composite Numbers: Tutorial Prime and Composite Numbers: Application Prime and Composite Numbers: Mastery Test Prime and Composite Numbers: Offline Activity Working w/ Common Denominators and Least Common Denominators Working w/ Common Denominators and Least Common Denom: Tutorial Working w/ Common Denominators and Least Common Denom: Application Working w/ Common Denominators and Least Common Denom: Mastery Test Working w/ Common Denominators and Least Common Denom: Offline Activity Order of Operations (Alg 1.1) Order of Operations (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Order of Operations (Alg 1.1): Application Order of Operations (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Order of Operations (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Quotient of Fractions (Alg 1.2) Quotient of Fractions (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Quotient of Fractions (Alg 1.2): Application Quotient of Fractions (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Quotient of Fractions (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Product of Fractions (Alg. 1.2) Product of Fractions (Alg. 1.2): Tutorial Product of Fractions (Alg. 1.2): Application Product of Fractions (Alg. 1.2): Mastery Test Product of Fractions (Alg. 1.2): Offline Activity Expressions in 2 or More Variables (Alg 1.1) Expressions in 2 or More Variables (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Expressions in 2 or More Variables (Alg 1.1): Application Expressions in 2 or More Variables (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Expressions in 2 or More Variables (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Estimation by Clustering (Alg 1.1) Estimation by Clustering (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Estimation by Clustering (Alg 1.1): Application Estimation by Clustering (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Estimation by Clustering (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Estimation Basics (Alg 1.1) Estimation Basics (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Estimation Basics (Alg 1.1): Application Estimation Basics (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Estimation Basics (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Mental Math w/ Whole Numbers and Decimals (Alg 1.1) Mental Math w/ Whole Numbers and Decimals (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Mental Math w/ Whole Numbers and Decimals (Alg 1.1): Application Mental Math w/ Whole Numbers and Decimals (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Mental Math w/ Whole Numbers and Decimals (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Calculating the Volume of a Rectangular Prism Calculating the Volume of a Rectangular Prism: Tutorial Calculating the Volume of a Rectangular Prism: Practice Calculating the Volume of a Rectangular Prism: Mastery Test Calculating the Volume of a Rectangular Prism: Offline Activity Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Tutorial Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Practice Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Mastery Test Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Offline Activity Calculating the Area of Triangles Calculating the Area of Triangles: Tutorial Calculating the Area of Triangles: Practice Calculating the Area of Triangles: Mastery Test Calculating the Area of Triangles: Offline Activity Planning a Park: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving Planning a Park: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving* Introduction to Circles Introduction to Circles: Tutorial Introduction to Circles: Practice Introduction to Circles: Mastery Test Introduction to Circles: Offline Activity Scaling and Proportion, Part 1 (Alg. 1.1) Scaling and Proportion, Part 1 (Alg. 1.1): Tutorial Scaling and Proportion, Part 1 (Alg. 1.1): Application Scaling and Proportion, Part 1 (Alg. 1.1): Mastery Test Scaling and Proportion, Part 1 (Alg. 1.1): Offline Activity Scaling and Proportion, Part 2 (Alg. 1.1) Scaling and Proportion, Part 2 (Alg. 1.1): Tutorial Scaling and Proportion, Part 2 (Alg. 1.1): Application Scaling and Proportion, Part 2 (Alg. 1.1): Mastery Test Scaling and Proportion, Part 2 (Alg. 1.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 2 - Concepts and Principles of Measurement 70% modules = 10/13

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Running a Race: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving Running a Race: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving* Relating Fractions, Decimals, and Percents Relating Fractions, Decimals, and Percents: Tutorial Relating Fractions, Decimals, and Percents: Practice Relating Fractions, Decimals, and Percents: Mastery Test Relating Fractions, Decimals, and Percents: Off-line Activity Equivalent Ratios Equivalent Ratios: Tutorial Equivalent Ratios: Practice Equivalent Ratios: Mastery Test Equivalent Ratios: Off-line Activity Relating Decimals, Fractions, and Mixed Numbers Relating Decimals, Fractions, and Mixed Numbers: Tutorial Relating Decimals, Fractions, and Mixed Numbers: Practice Relating Decimals, Fractions, and Mixed Numbers: Mastery Test Relating Decimals, Fractions, and Mixed Numbers: Off-line Activity Finding Equivalent Fractions Finding Equivalent Fractions: Tutorial Finding Equivalent Fractions: Practice Finding Equivalent Fractions: Mastery Test Finding Equivalent Fractions: Off-line Activity Shelf Space: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving Shelf Space: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving*

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 3 - Concepts and language of Algebra & Functions 70% modules = 14/20

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 3 - Concepts and language of Algebra & Functions 70% modules = 14/20

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 3 (Alg1.2) Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 3 (Alg1.2): Tutorial Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 3 (Alg1.2): Application Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 3 (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 3 (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1) Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Application Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Solving Problems with Systems of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1) Solving Problems with Systems of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Solving Problems with Systems of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Application Solving Problems with Systems of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Solving Problems with Systems of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Solving and Graphing Systems of Equations (Alg 1.1) Solving and Graphing Systems of Equations (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Solving and Graphing Systems of Equations (Alg 1.1): Application Solving and Graphing Systems of Equations (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Solving and Graphing Systems of Equations (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Functions (Alg 1.1) Functions (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Functions (Alg 1.1): Application Functions (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Functions (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Describing Functions with Equations, Tables, and Graphs (Alg 1.1) Describing Functions with Equations, Tables, and Graphs (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Describing Functions with Equations, Tables, and Graphs (Alg 1.1): Application Describing Functions with Equations, Tables, and Graphs (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Describing Functions with Equations, Tables, and Graphs (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Building Boats: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving Building Boats: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving*

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 3 - Concepts and language of Algebra & Functions 70% modules = 14/20

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Domain Values of Composite Functions (Alg 2.2) Domain Values of Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Tutorial Domain Values of Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Application Domain Values of Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Mastery Test Domain Values of Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Offline Activity Composite Functions (Alg 2.2) Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Tutorial Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Application Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Mastery Test Composite Functions (Alg 2.2): Offline Activity Interpreting Graphs to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1) Interpreting Graphs to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Interpreting Graphs to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Application Interpreting Graphs to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Interpreting Graphs to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Using Linear Equations to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1) Using Linear Equations to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1) Tutorial Using Linear Equations to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Application Using Linear Equations to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Mastery test Using Linear Equations to Solve Problems (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Graphing Linear Equations in 2 Variables (Alg 1.1) Graphing Linear Equations in 2 Variables (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Graphing Linear Equations in 2 Variables (Alg 1.1): Aplication Graphing Linear Equations in 2 Variables (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Graphing Linear Equations in 2 Variables (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Linear Equations in 1 Variable Solving by Inspection (Alg 1.1) Linear Equations in 1 Variable Solving by Inspection (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Linear Equations in 1 Variable Solving by Inspection (Alg 1.1): Application Linear Equations in 1 Variable Solving by Inspection (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Linear Equations in 1 Variable Solving by Inspection (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Patterns and Sequences (Alg 1.1) Patterns and Sequences (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Patterns and Sequences (Alg 1.1): Application Patterns and Sequences (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Patterns and Sequences (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 4 - Reading Concepts and Principles of Geometry 70% modules = 13/18

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Exploring Congruent Figures Exploring Congruent Figures: Tutorial Exploring Congruent Figures: Practice Exploring Congruent Figures: Mastery Test Exploring Congruent Figures: Off-line Activity Exploring Similar Figures Exploring Similar Figures: Tutorial Exploring Similar Figures: Practice Exploring Similar Figures: Mastery Test Exploring Similar Figures: Off-line Activity Understanding Ratio Understanding Ratio: Tutorial Understanding Ratio: Practice Understanding Ratio: Mastery Test Understanding Ratio: Off-line Activity The Pythagorean Theorem 1 The Pythagorean Theorem 1: Tutorial The Pythagorean Theorem 1: Application The Pythagorean Theorem 1: Mastery Test Using Geometry Using Geometry: Tutorial Using Geometry: Application Using Geometry: Mastery Tests Using Geometry: Mastery Test 1 Using Geometry: Mastery Test 2 Using Geometry: Mastery Test 3 Using Geometry: Mastery Test 4 Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1) Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Application Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 4 - Reading Concepts and Principles of Geometry 70% modules = 13/18

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check The Coordinate Plane (Alg 2.1) The Coordinate Plane (Alg 2.1): Tutorial The Coordinate Plane (Alg 2.1): Application The Coordinate Plane (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test The Coordinate Plane (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity Charts and Graphs for Quality Charts and Graphs for Quality: Tutorial Charts and Graphs for Quality: Application Charts and Graphs for Quality: Mastery Test Interpreting Scatter Diagrams Interpreting Scatter Diagrams: Tutorial Interpreting Scatter Diagrams: Application Interpreting Scatter Diagrams: Mastery Test Understanding Scatter Diagrams Understanding Scatter Diagrams: Tutorial Understanding Scatter Diagrams: Application Understanding Scatter Diagrams: Mastery Test Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1) Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Application Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Mastery test Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Car Rental: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving Car Rental: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving* Ordered Pairs as Solutions of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1) Ordered Pairs as Solutions of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Ordered Pairs as Solutions of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Application Ordered Pairs as Solutions of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Ordered Pairs as Solutions of Linear Equations (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 4 - Reading Concepts and Principles of Geometry 70% modules = 13/18

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Determining the Truth Value of a Statement (Alg 1.1) Determining the Truth Value of a Statement (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Determining the Truth Value of a Statement (Alg 1.1): Application Determining the Truth Value of a Statement (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Determining the Truth Value of a Statement (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Equations, Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1) Equations, Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Equations, Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Application Equations, Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Equations, Graphs, Slopes, and y-Intercepts (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1) The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Tutorial The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Application The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity Postulates and Theorems Postulates and Theorems: Tutorial Postulates and Theorems: Application Postulates and Theorems: Mastery Test Finding the Slope and y-Intercept from an Equation (Alg 2.1) Finding the Slope and y-Intercept from an Equation (Alg 2.1): Tutorial Finding the Slope and y-Intercept from an Equation (Alg 2.1): Application Finding the Slope and y-Intercept from an Equation (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test Finding the Slope and y-Intercept from an Equation (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 5 - Data Analysis, Probability and Statistics 70% modules = 10/14

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Planning a Playground: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving Planning a Playground: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving* Statistics for Quality: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving Statistics for Quality: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving* Growing Lilies: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving Growing Lilies: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving* Making the Grade: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving Making the Grade: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving* Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1) Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Application Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Solving Problems with Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1) Solving Problems with Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Solving Problems with Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Application Solving Problems with Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Solving Problems with Mean, Median, and Mode (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Saving the Birds: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving Saving the Birds: Advanced Algebra: Math Problem Solving* Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1) Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Tutorial Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Application Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): offline Activity Determining the Probability of an Event (Alg2.1) Determining the Probability of an Event (Alg2.1): Tutorial Determining the Probability of an Event (Alg2.1): Application Determining the Probability of an Event (Alg2.1): Mastery Test Determining the Probability of an Event (Alg2.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH Alternate Graduation-Standard 5 - Data Analysis, Probability and Statistics 70% modules = 10/14

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Review: Probability (Alg2.1) Review: Probability (Alg2.1): Tutorial Review: Probability (Alg2.1): Application Review: Probability (Alg2.1): Mastery Test Review: Probability (Alg2.1): Offline Activity Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beg. Algebra: Math Problem Solving Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beg. Algebra: Math Problem Solving* Basic Statistics Basic Statistics: Tutorial Basic Statistics: Application Basic Statistics: Mastery Test Interpreting Histograms Interpreting Histograms: Tutorial Interpreting Histograms: Application Interpreting Histograms: Mastery Test Reading Histograms Reading Histograms: Tutorial Reading Histograms: Application Reading Histograms: Mastery Test

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised August 2009 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Number & Operation 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check The Additive Inverse of Integers (Alg1.1) The Additive Inverse of Integers (Alg1.1): Tutorial The Additive Inverse of Integers (Alg1.1): Application The Additive Inverse of Integers (Alg1.1): Mastery Test The Additive Inverse of Integers (Alg1.1): Offline Activity Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2) Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Tutorial Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Application Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Mastery Test Absolute Value of a Number (Alg1.2): Offline Activity Exponents: Exponential Form (Alg1.1) Exponents: Exponential Form (Alg1.1): Tutorial Exponents: Exponential Form (Alg1.1): Application Exponents: Exponential Form (Alg1.1): Mastery Test Exponents: Exponential Form (Alg1.1): Offline Activity Integer Exponents and the Product Rule (Alg 1.2) Integer Exponents and the Product Rule (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Integer Exponents and the Product Rule (Alg 1.2): Application Integer Exponents and the Product Rule (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Integer Exponents and the Product Rule (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Square Roots of Integers (Alg 1.2) Square Roots of Integers (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Square Roots of Integers (Alg 1.2): Application Square Roots of Integers (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Square Roots of Integers (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Finding the Missing Number in Multiplication Finding the Missing Number in Multiplication: Tutorial Finding the Missing Number in Multiplication: Practice Finding the Missing Number in Multiplication: Mastery Test Finding the Missing Number in Multiplication: Off-Line Activity

Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 1 - Number & Operation 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Identifying Multiples Identifying Multiples: Tutorial Identifying Multiples: Practice Identifying Multiples: Mastery Test Identifying Multiples: Off-Line Activity Adding Fractions (Alg 1.2) Adding Fractions (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Adding Fractions (Alg 1.2): Application Adding Fractions (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Adding Fractions (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Building a Highway: Math Fundamentals: Math Problem Solving *Building a Highway: Math Fundamentals: Math Problem Solving Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Introduction to Circles Introduction to Circles: Tutorial Introduction to Circles: Practice Introduction to Circles: Mastery Test Introduction to Circles: Off-Line Activity Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Tutorial Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Practice Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Mastery Test Calculating the Area of Rectangles and Squares: Off-Line Activity Calculating the Area of Triangles Calculating the Area of Triangles: Tutorial Calculating the Area of Triangles: Practice Calculating the Area of Triangles: Mastery Test Calculating the Area of Triangles: Off-Line Activity Understanding Ratio Understanding Ratio: Tutorial Understanding Ratio: Practice Understanding Ratio: Mastery Test Understanding Ratio: Off-Line Activity Understanding Proportion Understanding Proportion: Tutorial Understanding Proportion: Practice Understanding Proportion: Mastery Test Understanding Proportion: Off-Line Activity Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving Finding Equivalent Fractions Finding Equivalent Fractions: Tutorial Finding Equivalent Fractions: Practice Finding Equivalent Fractions: Mastery Test Finding Equivalent Fractions: Off-Line Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 2 - Concepts and Principles of Measurement 70% modules = 7/10

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Understanding Decimals: Tenths Understanding Decimals: Tenths: Tutorial Understanding Decimals: Tenths: Practice Understanding Decimals: Tenths: Mastery Test Understanding Decimals: Tenths: Off-Line Activity Solving Measurement Story Problems Solving Measurement Story Problems: Tutorial Solving Measurement Story Problems: Practice Solving Measurement Story Problems: Mastery Test Solving Measurement Story Problems: Off-Line Activity Planning a Park: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving *Planning a Park: Geometry and Measurement: Math Problem Solving

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 3 - Concepts and language of Algebra & Functions 70% modules = 8/11

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Expressions in 1 Variable (Alg 1.1) Expressions in 1 Variable (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Expressions in 1 Variable (Alg 1.1): Application Expressions in 1 Variable (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Expressions in 1 Variable (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Value of a Polynomial (Alg 1.2) Value of a Polynomial (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Value of a Polynomial (Alg 1.2): Application Value of a Polynomial (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Value of a Polynomial (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 1 (Alg 1.2) Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 1 Tutorial (Alg 1.2) Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 1 (Alg 1.2): Application Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 1 (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 1 (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 2 (Alg 1.2) Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 2 (Alg 1.2): Tutorial Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 2 (Alg 1.2): Application Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 2 (Alg 1.2): Mastery Test Linear Inequalities in 1 Variable, Part 2 (Alg 1.2): Offline Activity Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1) Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Application Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Linear Patterns (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Video Rental: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Video Rental: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving Defining a Function with Its Rule (Alg 2.2) Defining a Function with Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Tutorial Defining a Function with Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Application Defining a Function with Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Mastery Test Defining a Function with Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Offline Activity Finding Values of a Function Using Its Rule (Alg 2.2) Finding Values of a Function Using Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Tutorial Finding Values of a Function Using Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Application Finding Values of a Function Using Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Mastery Test Finding Values of a Function Using Its Rule (Alg 2.2): Offline Activity *Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Revised April 2010 Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 3 - Concepts and language of Algebra & Functions 70% modules = 8/11

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving / Plan for a Fishing Trip: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Plan for a Fishing Trip: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving / Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving / Bean Counting: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Bean Counting: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 4 - Concepts and Principles of Geometry 70% modules = 8/11

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Exploring Congruent Figures Exploring Congruent Figures: Tutorial Exploring Congruent Figures: Practice Exploring Congruent Figures: Mastery Test Exploring Congruent Figures: Off-Line Activity Exploring Similar Figures Exploring Similar Figures: Tutorial Exploring Similar Figures: Practice Exploring Similar Figures: Mastery Test Exploring Similar Figures: Off-Line Activity Understanding Ratio Understanding Ratio: Tutorial Understanding Ratio: Practice Understanding Ratio: Mastery Test Understanding Ratio: Off-Line Activity Understanding Proportion Understanding Proportion: Tutorial Understanding Proportion: Practice Understanding Proportion: Mastery Test Understanding Proportion: Off-Line Activity Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1) Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Application Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Off-Line Activity Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1) Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Tutorial Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Application Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Mastery Test Identifying Points on a Coordinate Plane (Alg 1.1): Offline Activity Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 4 - Concepts and Principles of Geometry 70% modules = 8/11

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving / Video Rental: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Video Rental: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving / Running a Race: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Running a Race: Intermediate Algebra: Math Problem Solving Slope of a Line from 2 Points (Alg 2.1) Slope of a Line from 2 Points (Alg 2.1): Tutorial Slope of a Line from 2 Points (Alg 2.1): Application Slope of a Line from 2 Points (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test Slope of a Line from 2 Points (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1) The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Tutorial The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Application The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test The y-Intercept of a Line (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B MATH - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation-Standard 5 - Data Analysis, Probability and Statistics 70% modules = 6/8

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Data Skills: Math Problem Solving / Planning a Playground: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving *Planning a Playground: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving Data Skills: Math Problem Solving / Growing Lilies: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving *Growing Lilies: Data Skills: Math Problem Solving Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving *Tunnel Through Bald Mountain: Beginning Algebra: Math Problem Solving Making the Grade: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving *Making the Grade: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1) Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Tutorial Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Application Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Mastery Test Multiplication Principle of Counting (Alg 2.1): Offline Activity Probability/Stats H Range, median, mode & mean Find probability & outcomes Probability/Stats I Range, median, mode & mean Find probability & outcomes Statistics for Quality: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving *Statistics for Quality: Probability and Statistics: Math Problem Solving

*Prob Solv Activity: Stu. must show completion of module. Verify that adequate amount of time was spent completing module. Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised April 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B LANGUAGE Alternate Graduation - Language 10 - Standard 3 - Writing Process 70% modules = 12/17

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check The Topic Sentence The Topic Sentence: Tutorial The Topic Sentence: Application The Topic Sentence: Mastery Test Requesting Action Requesting Action: Tutorial Requesting Action: Application Requesting Action: Mastery Test Starting with Your Purpose Starting with Your Purpose: Tutorial Starting with Your Purpose: Application Starting with Your Purpose: Mastery Test Giving Enough Detail Giving Enough Detail: Tutorial Giving Enough Detail: Application Giving Enough Detail: Mastery Test From Ideas to Sentences From Ideas to Sentences: Tutorial Working with the Topic Working with the Topic: Tutorial Organizing Ideas Organizing Ideas:Tutorial Organizing Ideas:Application Organizing Ideas:Mastery Test Writing Up Ideas Writing Up Ideas: Tutorial Writing Up Ideas: Application Writing Up Ideas: Mastery Test The Writing Process The Writing Process: Tutorial Getting Started Getting Started: Tutorial Getting Started: Application Getting Started: Mastery Test Organizing Steps into a Path Organizing Steps into a Path: Tutorial Organizing Steps into a Path: Application Organizing Steps into a Path: Mastery Test Organizing Actions into Steps Organizing Actions into Steps: Tutorial Organizing Actions into Steps: Application

Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised September 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B LANGUAGE Alternate Graduation - Language 10 - Standard 3 - Writing Process 70% modules = 12/17

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Organizing Actions into Steps: Mastery Test Explaining the Path Explaining the Path: Tutorial Explaining the Path: Application Explaining the Path: Mastery Test Order of Sentences in Paragraphs Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Tutorial Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Application Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Mastery Test Awkward Sentence Structure Awkward Sentence Structure: Tutorial Awkward Sentence Structure: Application Awkward Sentence Structure: Mastery Test Effective Writing Effective Writing: Tutorial Effective Writing: Application Effective Writing: Mastery Test Transitional Devices in Paragraphs Transitional Devices in Paragraphs: Tutorial Transitional Devices in Paragraphs: Application Transitional Devices in Paragraphs: Mastery Test

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Standard 5: Writing Components Effective Writing Effective Writing: Tutorial Effective Writing: Application Effective Writing: Mastery Test The Writing Process The Writing Process: Tutorial Capital Letters Capital Letters: Tutorial Capital Letters: Application Capital Letters: Mastery Test Titles and Capital Letters Titles and Capital Letters: Tutorial Titles and Capital Letters: Application Titles and Capital Letters: Mastery Test

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Proper Nouns and Capitals Proper Nouns and Capitals: Tutorial Proper Nouns and Capitals: Application Proper Nouns and Capitals: Mastery Test Using Capitals With Names Using Capitals With Names: Tutorial Using Capitals With Names: Application Using Capitals With Names: Mastery Test Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Tutorial Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Application Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Mastery Test Capitalizing Names of Places and Events Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Tutorial Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Application Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Mastery Test Quotation Marks Quotation Marks: Tutorial Quotation Marks: Application Quotation Marks: Mastery Test Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Tutorial Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Application Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Mastery Test Using Commas in Dates and Places Using Commas in Dates and Places: Tutorial Using Commas in Dates and Places: Application Using Commas in Dates and Places: Mastery Test Capitalizing Titles of People Capitalizing Titles of People: Tutorial Capitalizing Titles of People: Application Capitalizing Titles of People: Mastery Test

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Tutorial Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Application Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Mastery Test The Basics of Punctuation The Basics of Punctuation: Tutorial The Basics of Punctuation: Application The Basics of Punctuation: Mastery Test Using Capital Letters with Split Quotations Using Capital Letters with Split Quotations: Tutorial Using Capital Letters with Split Quotations: Application Using Capital Letters with Split Quotations: Mastery Test Knowing When to Capitalize Modifiers Knowing When to Capitalize Modifiers: Tutorial Knowing When to Capitalize Modifiers: Application Knowing When to Capitalize Modifiers: Mastery Test Using Commas with Linking Words like "Because" Using Commas with Linking Words like "Because": Tutorial Using Commas with Linking Words like "Because": Application Using Commas with Linking Words like "Because": Mastery Test Commas 1 Commas 1: Tutorial Commas 1: Drill Commas 1: Mastery Test Punctuation - End Marks Punctuation - End Marks: Tutorial Punctuation - End Marks: Application Punctuation - End Marks: Mastery Test Commas 2 Commas 2: Tutorial Commas 2: Application Commas 2: Mastery Test Tenses of Irregular Verbs (ERS) Tenses of Irregular Verbs: Tutorial Tenses of Irregular Verbs: Test Pronouns (ERS) Pronouns: Tutorial Pronouns: Test Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have" Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Tutorial Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Application Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Mastery Test

Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised September 2010 Student Assignment Sheet Form B LANGUAGE - Form for students requiring Audio Accommodation on IEP Alternate Graduation - Language 10 with Audio - Standard 3 - Writing Process 70% modules = 8/12

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check The Topic Sentence The Topic Sentence: Tutorial The Topic Sentence: Application The Topic Sentence: Mastery Test Getting Started Getting Started: Tutorial Getting Started: Application Getting Started: Mastery Test Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have" Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Tutorial Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Application Adding Missing Forms of "Be" and "Have": Mastery Test Summarizing What You Read-Great Lakes Summarizing What You Read-Carpathian Mountains Order of Sentences in Paragraphs Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Tutorial Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Application Order of Sentences in Paragraphs: Mastery Test Awkward Sentence Structure Awkward Sentence Structure: Tutorial Awkward Sentence Structure: Application Awkward Sentence Structure: Mastery Test Effective Writing Effective Writing: Tutorial Effective Writing: Application Effective Writing: Mastery Test Separating Run-ons Joined by Transitions Separating Run-ons Joined by Transitions: Tutorial Separating Run-ons Joined by Transitions: Application Separating Run-ons Joined by Transitions: Mastery Test Giving Enough Detail Giving Enough Detail: Tutorial Giving Enough Detail: Application Giving Enough Detail: Mastery Test Organizing Ideas Organizing Ideas: Tutorial Organizing Ideas: Application Organizing Ideas: Mastery Test Writing Up Ideas Writing Up Ideas: Tutorial Writing Up Ideas: Application Writing Up Ideas: Mastery Test

Learner Name: ______

Instructor: ______

% Date Teacher Correct Check Matching Separated Verbs and Subjects Matching Separated Verbs and Subjects: Tutorial Matching Separated Verbs and Subjects: Application Matching Separated Verbs and Subjects: Mastery Test Capitalizing Names of Places and Events Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Tutorial Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Application Capitalizing Names of Places and Events: Mastery Test Matching Verbs with Subjects Matching Verbs with Subjects: Tutorial Matching Verbs with Subjects: Application Matching Verbs with Subjects: Mastery Test Matching Irregular Verbs with Subjects Matching Irregular Verbs with Subjects: Tutorial Matching Irregular Verbs with Subjects: Application Matching Irregular Verbs with Subjects: Mastery Test Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Tutorial Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Application Putting Quotation Marks around Quotations: Mastery Test Capitalizing Titles of People Capitalizing Titles of People: Tutorial Capitalizing Titles of People: Application Capitalizing Titles of People: Mastery Test Capitalizing Words in Quotations Capitalizing Words in Quotations: Tutorial Capitalizing Words in Quotations: Application Capitalizing Words in Quotations: Mastery Test Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Tutorial Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Application Using Quotation Marks with Titles of Short Works: Mastery Test Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Tutorial Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Application Capitalizing Proper Nouns and Modifiers: Mastery Test Using Singular Verbs with Subjects that Look Plural Using Singular Verbs with Subjects that Look Plural: Tutorial Using Singular Verbs with Subjects that Look Plural: Application Using Singular Verbs with Subjects that Look Plural: Mastery Test Knowing When to Use -ly Modifiers Knowing When to Use -ly Modifiers: Tutorial Knowing When to Use -ly Modifiers: Application Knowing When to Use -ly Modifiers: Mastery Test Using the Subjunctive Verb Form "Were" Using the Subjunctive Verb Form "Were": Tutorial Using the Subjunctive Verb Form "Were": Application Using the Subjunctive Verb Form "Were": Mastery Test Matching Verbs with Indefinite Pronouns Matching Verbs with Indefinite Pronouns: Tutorial Matching Verbs with Indefinite Pronouns: Application Matching Verbs with Indefinite Pronouns: Mastery Test

Off-line Activity: Score activity using assign rubric. Stu. must show 80% mastery of rubric components. Revised September 2010

PLATO Alternate Route to Graduation Verification Signature Page Form C

Reading Student Name Date of Date of Completion of ISAT Strand ISAT 70% of the Modules % Correct Teacher Signature Report at 80% Mastery Reading Process 7/10 modules Comprehension/Interpretation 7/10 modules

Math Student Name Date of Date of Completion of ISAT Strand ISAT 70% of the Modules Teacher Signature % Correct Report at 80% Mastery Number and Operation 11/15 modules Concepts and Principles of Measurement 10/13 modules Concepts and Language of Algebra and Functions 14/20 modules

Concepts and Principals of Geometry 13/18 modules Data Analysis, Probability, and Statistics 10/14 modules

Language Student Name Date of Date of Completion of ISAT Strand ISAT 70% of the Modules Teacher Signature % Correct Report at 80% Mastery Writing Process 12/17 modules Writing Components 16/23

NOTE: Upon completion of the Alternate Route to Graduation, forward Form A, Form C, and Form D to the Curriculum Department. Revised September 2011 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Rubric of Alternate Route to Graduation Points Verification Form D

Name of Student: Student ID:

School: Date:

The Alternate Route to Graduation will include multiple measures of student achievement, requiring a student to earn a minimum of 300 points based on the following rubric/point system. Check points earned below: PLATO Alternate Route: ISAT Growth: Attendance:

Points awarded for passing Points awarded based on an increase of Scale Score points from the previous exam to the Points awarded during 70% of the assigned modules current exam: the trimester(s) in at 80% mastery: which the student is enrolled in the Alternate 4 Scale Score = 100 points Route to Graduation 3 Scale Score = 75 points Course): 250 points 2 Scale Score = 60 points 1 Scale Score = 50 points 90-100% = 30 points 80-89% = 20 points 70-79% = 10 Points awarded for passing the Reading, Language Usage, or Math ISAT: points 0-69% = 0 ISAT Reading = 50 points points ISAT Language Usage = 50 points ISAT Math = 50 points

TOTAL POINTS EARNED: 300 Points Needed to Fulfill Alternate Route to Graduation Requirements

Teacher Signature Date

NOTE: Upon completion of the Alternate Route to Graduation, forward Form A, Form C, and Form D to the Curriculum Department.

Revised September 2011 Login | Registration

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ACF 1. Log No. ACF-PI-HS-11-04 2. Issuance Date: 11/08/2011 Administration for Children and Families 3. Originating Office: Office of Head Start 4. Key Words: School Readiness Requirements

PROGRAM INSTRUCTION

TO: Head Start and Early Head Start Grantees and Delegate Agencies

SUBJECT: School Readiness in Programs Serving Preschool Children

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this Program Instruction (PI) is to emphasize requirements contained in the Improving Head Start for School Readiness Act (the Act) that agencies “… shall establish…program goals for improving school readiness of children participating in a program…including school readiness goals that are aligned with the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework [recently revised as The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework], State early learning standards as appropriate, and requirements and expectations of the schools the children will be attending.” (Head Start Act, section 641A(g)(2)(A))

INSTRUCTION:

The following is intended to provide recommendations about how grantees can comply with the Act’s school readiness requirements. School readiness goals are the expectations that children’s statuses and progression across domains of language and literacy, cognition and general knowledge, approaches towards learning, physical well-being and motor development, and social and emotional development will improve children’s readiness for kindergarten.

Section 641A(g)(2)(A) of the Act requires that each agency establish program goals for improving the school readiness of children participating in its program that align with the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework (formerly The Head Start Child Outcomes Framework), State early learning standards, and the requirements and expectations of the schools, to the extent that they apply to the ages of children participating in the program.

The Office of Head Start believes that it is important that the goals:

 are appropriate for the ages of children participating in the program;

 address, at a minimum, the domains of language and literacy, cognition and general knowledge, physical well-being and motor development, social and emotional development, and approaches toward learning; and

 are established in consultation with parents of children participating in the program. It is expected that this consultation could take a variety of forms, from surveying individual parents about goals for their own children, to talking to policy groups about child outcomes and appropriate program goals for school readiness.

Additionally, and importantly, each agency should be able to demonstrate the steps taken to achieve the school readiness goals described under Section 641A(g)(2) of the Head Start Act as demonstrated by:

 aggregating and analyzing assessment data at multiple points in a year*, and using that data in combination with other program data to determine progress toward meeting the established goals; to inform parents and the community of results; and to direct continuous program improvements related to curriculum, teaching, and instructional strategies, professional development, program design, and other program decisions; and

*The Office of Head Start recommends that agencies aggregate and analyze assessment data at least three times during the year (to provide baseline, midpoint, and year end progress); or, for programs operating 90 days or less, two times during the program.

 analyzing individual, ongoing, child-level assessment data from a variety of sources for all children birth to age 5 participating in the program, and using that data in combination with input from parents and families to determine each child’s status and progress with regard to, at a minimum, language and literacy, cognition and general knowledge, approaches toward learning, physical well-being and motor development, and social and emotional development, and to individualize the experiences, teaching, and services to best support each child.

Attached you will find a description of four critical steps which programs can use to assess their own status with regard to school readiness goals. The Office of Head Start and its training and technical assistance partners will continue to provide direction, guidance, and resources that support fulfilling our promise to make sure our children and families are ready for school and beyond.

Please direct any questions on this Program Instruction to:

Amanda Bryans Education and Comprehensive Services Division Director Office of Head Start (202) 205-9380

Thank you for your work on behalf of children and families.

/ Yvette Sanchez Fuentes /

Yvette Sanchez Fuentes Director Office of Head Start

Attachment:

School Readiness Action Steps

1. Adopt and align established Office of Head Start (OHS) preschool child goals from the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework, establishing clear school readiness goals across domains (language and literacy, cognition and general knowledge, approaches toward learning, physical well- being and motor development, and social and emotional development:

 Become familiar with the specific goals in the Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework (formerly the Head Start Child Outcomes Framework), State early learning standards, and Local Education Agency (LEA) expectations;  Compare OHS child outcome goals with the LEA expectations, and State Early Learning Goals;  Communicate with relevant partners;  Determine if and how program curriculum-targeted skills and knowledge address (align with) established goals;  Determine if and how ongoing child assessment tools and procedures address (align with) established goals.

2. Create and implement a plan of action for achieving the established school readiness goals:

 Improve quality of teacher-child interactions;  Implement evidence-based teaching practices;  Implement and assess your evidence-based curriculum;  Increase engagement, communication, and inclusion of parents and families to support children’s school readiness;  Provide effective professional development so all staff understand how they support school readiness;  Implement effective transitions and increase continuity through kindergarten and the primary grades.

3. Assess child progress on an ongoing basis and aggregate and analyze data at multiple times throughout the year:

 Take advantage of mid-point aggregation and analysis so that the program has opportunities to make changes that can make meaningful school readiness differences for currently enrolled children. The Office of Head Start believes it is important for programs to aggregate and analyze data at least three times per year, or two times for programs operating less than 90 days. Collect data that can be aggregated at the program level.  Aggregate and analyze child assessment data at multiple points across the year and demonstrate program-level child progress using norms or criterion references.  Maintain the use of information from ongoing child assessment to inform teachers and parents how best to individualize for each child’s continued development and learning, assessing child progress on an ongoing basis across domains.

4. Examine data for patterns of progress for groups of children in order to revise, or develop and implement plans for program improvement:

 Program improvements may include professional development adjustments, including specificity, intensity, frequency, and type of training; improving communication and engagement with families; intensifying curriculum supports or implementation; or other similarly responsive efforts based on the analysis of program data.  Examine the patterns of progress and outcomes (achieved goals) for groups of children served by the program. For example, this may include: o by age o by rates of attendance o by program settings and/or options o by language groups o by child, family, or community risk factors

Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program 11-12

2010-2011 School 10-11 09-11 9-10 5-11 Chubbuck Elem. 60 30 0 40 Edahow Elem. 6 1 12 0 Ellis Elem. 59 32 32 61 Gate City Elem. 0 0 0 0 Greenacres Elem. 80 86 72 111 Indian Hills Elem. 111 52 27 124 Jefferson Elem. 139 94 68 133 Lewis & Clark Elem. 103 35 60 110 Syringa Elem. 45 49 53 70 Tendoy Elem. 26 3 14 34 Tyhee Elem. 119 72 35 115 Washington Elem. 52 21 14 32 Wilcox Elem. 52 17 28 71

Franklin MS 26 0 32 43 Hawthorne MS 60 38 0 23 Irving MS 34 24 26 30 Alameda Center 55 30 20 69

Century HS 16 15 5 12 Highland HS 12 0 0 5 Pocatello HS 16 11 10 0

TOTALS 1071 610 508 1083

School Contact Person:

Chubbuck – Nancy Noorda (counselor) Lewis & Clark – Jill Robertson (CRW) Franklin – Bill Gilbert (counselor) Edahow – Tonianne Wood (counselor) Lincoln – Berta Hadley Hawthorne – Dani Anthony (aide) Ellis – Susan Grayson (STAR coach) Syringa – Kim Jackman (CRW) Irving – Chrys Robertson (counselor) Gate City – Tendoy – Paula Miller (CRW) Century – Andy Paules (behavior tech) Greenacres – Lydia McInelly (behavior tech) Tyhee – Courtney Kent (CRW) Poky – Vickie Powers (social worker) Indian Hills – Patty Fonnesbeck (counselor) Washington – Paula Miller (CRW) Highland – Roger Holyoak (counselor) Jefferson – Allison Huerta (CRW) Wilcox – Lisa Mecham (CRW

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25

Elementary Parent Teacher Conferences

October 20, 2011

SCHOOL STRUCTURE of Conferences Parent Attendance % Chubbuck Scheduled Conferences 4‐8 p.m. 91% Additional Conferences by appt. as requested by parents Edahow Student Led/Open House for Attendance was approximately grades 2-6 from 3:30-6:30. 93% Conferences by appointment from 6:30-7:30 grades 2-6. 2-6 Kindergarten and 1st. grade completed conferences by appointment with parents from 3:30-7:30 and used additional after school time on the non PLC Monday at 100% attendance. Ellis Individual Conferences were Attendance was 90% between held from 4‐6 and open house open house and individual was available from 6‐8. conferences. Gate City Open House: 3‐5 p.m. K: 91%, 1st: 90%, 2nd: 92%, Scheduled Conferences: 5‐7 p.m. 3rd: 81%, 4th: 89%, 5th: 84%, 6th: 68%; Total Building: 85% Greenacres Scheduled individual 97% attendance conferences 2:45‐8:00 10/24 1:45‐4:00 Indian Hills Scheduled individual 94% attendance conferences: 3‐5 p.m. Scheduled block of students (4‐6 students at a time): 5‐7 p.m. Jefferson Scheduled Conference 78% of students had a parent Appointments 4:00‐8:00 p.m. represented at Parent/Teacher (Open House for Kindergarten) Conferences. 100% of parents were contacted via phone, letter, or email. Lewis and Clark Open House 3:00 to 4:30 Open House – 95% Individual Conferences 4:30‐7:00 Individual Conference – 100%

Lincoln Individual conferences by apt. 94% 3:30 – 7:00

Syringa Open House 1.5 hours (some 86% from 3:30‐5:00 or 6:00‐7:30) 2.5 hours individual Tendoy Scheduled Appointments 4:00 to Attendance that evening was 6:00 p.m. 77%. Follow‐up by phone with Open House (Student Lead most of those parents who were confernces) 6:00‐8:00 not in attendance. Tyhee Scheduled Conferences 4‐8 96% Additional Conferences by appointment the following week Washington Scheduled Conferences 4‐5 70% attendance Open house from 6‐8 Additional conferences held by appointment the following week Wilcox Scheduled Conferences by 70% appointment from 4‐7 and open house from 7‐8

MOBILITY PRECENTAGE - SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 2011-2012 1st Period

s t n e 12 11 d 2 1 - - u 1 1 1 0 - - 1 1 St 1 0 1 d d 1 e e d 12 11 e d h h - - c c l c c u u l le e 1 0 o l g n n 1 1 d d r u e e o u h h r ta L L R R En n c c E en d d n n d d ly c e e u u n n r c c L L a a t s ts e u u u n n P e e e e e o e d d e e e e u d y e e r r r r m s t R F F F l e n u i R F l s t il l l l l l l o ti in n S b r ss l ta ta ta ta ta ta n o a o l o o o o o o o School E L G C A M T T T T T T Chubbuck Elementary 586 2 14 584 600 0.97 3% 31.87% 32.89% 11.80% 17.65% 43.68% 50.53% Edahow Elementary 350 8 4 342 354 0.97 3% 32.95% 32.40% 7.39% 4.19% 40.34% 36.59%

Ellis Elementary 548 12 9 536 557 0.96 4% 44.16% 40.34% 11.68% 11.82% 55.84% 52.16% Gate City Elementary 517 6 8 511 525 0.97 3% 14.67% 16.67% 9.07% 5.49% 23.75% 22.16% Greenacres Elementary 454 6 15 448 469 0.96 4% 48.05% 44.02% 8.23% 8.85% 56.28% 52.87% Indian Hills Elementary 640 18 24 622 664 0.94 6% 45.75% 41.52% 7.26% 6.21% 53.01% 47.73% Jefferson Elementary 450 21 13 429 463 0.93 7% 66.44% 68.65% 15.66% 11.21% 82.10% 79.86% Lewis & Clark Elementary 585 12 20 573 605 0.95 5% 57.60% 55.39% 11.99% 7.19% 69.59% 62.58% Syringa Elementary 479 26 18 453 497 0.91 9% 50.82% 49.45% 7.17% 4.60% 57.99% 54.05% Tendoy Elementary 352 4 13 348 365 0.95 5% 57.26% 58.07% 10.34% 5.47% 67.60% 63.54% Tyhee Elementary 477 12 2 465 479 0.97 3% 43.46% 42.34% 12.31% 10.92% 55.77% 53.26% Washington Elementary 329 20 28 309 357 0.87 13% 71.80% 66.23% 6.10% 3.57% 77.91% 69.81% Wilcox Elementary 531 13 28 518 559 0.93 7% 58.63% 61.03% 11.69% 6.27% 70.32% 67.30%

Franklin Middle School 824 31 11 793 835 0.95 5% 35.71% 30.93% 8.08% 5.83% 43.79% 36.76% Hawthorne Middle School 774 13 17 761 791 0.96 4% 41.84% 40.76% 12.50% 7.51% 54.34% 48.28% Irving Middle School 681 20 28 661 709 0.93 7% 52.88% 50.79% 10.95% 8.18% 63.83% 58.97% Kinport Academy 21 8 5 13 26 0.50 50% 95.65% 80.00% 4.35% 12.00% 100.00% 92.00%

Century High School 1209 28 23 1181 1232 0.96 4% 31.02% 27.97% 7.34% 4.04% 38.37% 32.01% Highland High School 1306 23 13 1283 1319 0.97 3% 23.18% 21.79% 8.05% 5.73% 31.23% 27.52% Pocatello High School 1126 30 25 1096 1151 0.95 5% 39.06% 34.87% 9.07% 7.14% 48.13% 42.01% New Horizons High School 131 10 29 121 160 0.76 24% 70.14% 77.70% 7.64% 4.73% 77.78% 82.43% 2012-2013 School District 25 Calendar Proposed 11/8/11

August-12 14 Elementary Registration 4 1 HR Early Release PLC February-13 SMTWT FS 27 Staff Orientation 11 1 HR Early Release S M T W T F S 1234 28 Preparation Day 18 President's Day - No School 12 567891011 29 Prof Development 25 1 HR Early Release PLC 3456789 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 30 First day of school 1-12 27 End 2nd Trimester / 4th 6 wks (elem) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 K-orientation T-TH 28 Record Day - No School 14 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 K - orientation W-F 24 25 26 27 28

September-12 3 Labor Day - No School 1 Professional Development - No School March-13 SMTWT FS 10 1 HR Early Release PLC 4 1 HR Early Release S M T W T F S 1 17 1 HR Early Release 11 1 HR Early Release PLC 1 2 2345678 24 1 HR Early Release PLC 18 1 HR Early Release 3456789 9 101112131415 25-29 Spring Break - No School 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 31

October-12 1 1 HR Early Release 1 1 HR Early Release PLC April-13 SMTWT FS 4 Professional Development - No School 4 Kindergarten Registration S M T W T F S 123456 5 No School 8 1 HR Early Release 123456 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 1 HR Early Release PLC 15 1 HR Early Release PLC 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 Midterm - 1st Trimester - 1st 6wks (elem) 17 Midterm 3rd Trimester / 5th 6 wks (elem) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 15 1 HR Early Release 22 1 HR Early Release 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 22 1 HR Early Release PLC 29 1 HR Early Release PLC 28 29 30 29 1 HR Early Release

November-12 5 1 HR Early Release PLC 6 1 HR Early Release May-13 SMTWT FS 12 1 HR Early Release 13 1 HR Early Release PLC S M T W T F S 123 19 1 HR Early Release PLC 20 1 HR Early Release 1234 45678910 20 End of 1st Trimester-2nd 6 wks (elem) 24 Last Day of School - NHHS Graduation 567891011 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 Record Day - No School 27 Memorial Day 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22-23 Thanksgiving Holiday - No School 28 Record Day - Graduation Day 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 26 1 HR Early Release CHS - HHS - PHS 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 Check Out - .5

December-12 3 1 HR Early Release PLC June-13 SMTWT FS 10 1 HR Early Release SMTWT FS 1 17 1 HR Early Release - PLC 12 2345678 24-31 Winter Break - No School 3456789 9 101112131415 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 31

January-13 1-4 Winter Break - No School * KEY July-13 SMTWT FS 7 1 HR Early Release No School/Prof. Dev/Record Day SMTWT FS 12345 14 1 HR Early Release PLC Early Release PLC 1234567 6789101112 16 Midterm 2nd Trimester - 3rd 6 wks (elem) Midterm - End of Trimester 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 Martin Luther Kg. Jr Holiday - No School 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 1 HR Early Release First/Last Day of School 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 1st Tri- 56 days 2nd Tri- 56 days 3rd Tri- 55 days 32 ER

November 15, 2011

The following student has been jointly assigned by the Brigham Young University of Idaho and Pocatello/Chubbuck School District 25 as recorded in the minutes of the District Board of Trustees on November 15, 2011, to serve as student teaching interns during the periods of Fall semester. The student(s), while serving as interns under the supervision of a certified teacher, shall be accorded the same liability insurance coverage by the school district served as that accorded a certified teacher in the same district and shall comply with all rules and regulations of the school district or public institution while acting as such practice teacher, (Section 33-1201, Idaho Code.)

______Superintendent Date Coordinator of Field Experiences Date

Name of Intern Subject/Grade Coop. Teacher Date Placement Kyle Buttars Grade 1, 2 or 3 Indian Hills Alexandra Sandoval Grades 1, 2 or 3 Indian Hills Hollie Wells Grades 4 or 5 Indian Hills Pocatello High School Proposed Incomplete Grade Policy

Preventative Measures: As a school, PHS has made a commitment to student academic achievement. A grading policy has been drafted which allow students additional time to complete assignments as well as opportunities to re‐do assessments and assignments with low scores. (Please refer to attached policy) In addition to this policy, after school tutoring is available until 5:00 every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday for all core subjects. Teachers are also available before school, during lunch, and after school by appointment. Students are reminded of the assignments/assessments they are missing at least weekly. Weekly attempts are made to notify parents if their student is missing assignments/ assessments. Students will be notified one week before the trimester ends that they are still missing assignments/assessments and a contract stating the student is aware of the grading policy will be signed and parents will be notified.

Definition of an Incomplete: A grade of Incomplete will be given to any student who is missing any assessment or assignment(s) necessary to accurately assess student learning and determine a grade. Students with missing assignments/ assessments will be given the grade of Incomplete at the end of the trimester. The student will be given one week to complete and turn in the missing assignments/assessments and receive a grade for the class.

Impact on Purposefulness of Assignments: Teachers are actively engaged in on‐ going analysis of their assignments. Factors such as the quantity of practice needed to demonstrate readiness for assessment as well as the quality of each assignment is being considered. Departments are working together to ensure consistency within the department and to develop common assessments as appropriate.

Effects on Grading Practices: Discussions centered on the importance of maintaining accurate records and updating grade books in a timely manner have been held. Teachers are cognizant of the importance of delineating between students’ abilities to demonstrate their learning rather than their compliance as a basis for the student’s grade. Teachers are striving to provide timely and specific feedback which students can use to improve their performance on a redo and on future assignments.

PHS Grading Policy 2011‐2012

The letter “M” will be entered in Infinite Campus for assignments that have not been completed or turned in.

**Missing assignments will be accepted for one week after the end of the trimester (by default) extenuating circumstances may result in an individual contract extending that time frame.

Tests can be retaken for a higher score one time for grades 70 and above. Retakes must be scheduled with the teacher during non‐ instructional time.

Tests can be retaken for a higher score multiple times for grades 69 and below until the student reaches a 70 or higher.

The previous practice of dropping a student’s lowest test score is abolished. In its place is the retake policy.

Teachers reserve the right to require students to demonstrate evidence of comprehension before retaking a test.

Teachers reserve the right to return incomplete, sloppy, or unsatisfactory work to be redone by the student.

Grade book codes:

M = missing (0) T = turned in but not graded E = exempt

No cells should be left blank

**This information is for teachers – only to be shared with students on an individual basis as necessary at the end of a trimester.

Parent Teacher Conferences Attendance Report October 20, 2011 & November 2, 2011

School % Parent Grade Levels holding Student-led Attendance conferences Century 14% 9-12

Highland 12% 9-12

Pocatello 24% 9-12

Franklin 35% 6-8

Hawthorne 24% 6-8

Irving 31% 6-8

NHHS / Kinport 31% 7-12

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent FROM: Bob Devine, Director of Secondary Education RE: Early Graduation Requests DATE: November 9, 2011

In order to support student success in current and future education plans, the Board of Trustees has adopted Policy and Procedure 8124, Early Graduation.

The following early graduation requests have been submitted:

Name of High School Number of Early Graduation Requests

Highland High School 10 Pocatello High School 22 TOTAL 32

The reasons for these early graduation requests include the following:

 To work to help support family (2)  To work full-time (2)  To work and attend college (15)  To attend college (8)  To move to another state (3)  Health issues (1)  Military (1)

All applications have been submitted in accordance with Board policy and procedure and all applicants have met all requirements. I am recommending Board approval of all submissions.

Century High School Boys Varsity Wrestling Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Boys Varsity Wrestling Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Oct 11 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Thu Oct 13 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Tue Oct 18 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Thu Oct 20 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Tue Oct 25 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Thu Oct 27 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Tue Nov 1 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Thu Nov 3 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Tue Nov 8 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Thu Nov 10 3:45PM Practice Wrestling/Dance Room Wed Dec 7 5:00PM @ Wood River High School Fri Dec 9 3:00PM @ North Fremont Tournament Sat Dec 10 TBA @ No Fremont Tournament Wed Dec 14 5:00PM @ Highland, Century, Preston @ Preston Fri Dec 16 3:00PM @ Malad Tournament Sat Dec 17 TBA @ Malad Tournament Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 6 5:00PM @ Century, Hillcrest, Bonneville @ Bonneville Tue Jan 10 6:00PM @ Tri Meet @ Soda Springs H.S. Fri Jan 13 3:00PM @ Madison Invite Sat Jan 14 TBA @ Madison Invite Thu Jan 19 5:00PM vs. Tri Meet Fri Jan 20 3:00PM @ Tiger Grizz Invite Sat Jan 21 TBA @ Tiger Grizz Invite Tue Jan 24 5:00PM @ Quad Meet @ Burley Fri Jan 27 5:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Small Gym Wed Feb 1 5:00PM @ Tri Meet @ Pocatello High Fri Feb 3 3:00PM @ Fleischmann Tournament at Pocatello High Sat Feb 4 TBA @ Fleischmann Tournament at Pocatello High Fri Feb 17 TBA @ District Tournament Thu Feb 23 TBA @ Depart for State Tournament at the Nampa Center Fri Feb 24 TBA @ State Tournament at the Nampa Center Sat Feb 25 TBA @ State Tournament at the Nampa Center

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Wrestli... 10/25/2011 Century High School Boys Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Boys Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 29 6:00PM vs. Rigby High School Wed Nov 30 TBA @ Hillcrest High School Tue Dec 6 6:00PM @ Burley High School Thu Dec 8 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 14 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Fri Dec 16 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Dec 21 6:00PM vs. Burley High School Fri Dec 23 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 6 6:00PM vs. Preston High School Tue Jan 10 6:00PM @ Rigby High School Sat Jan 14 6:00PM vs. Highland High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 20 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Wed Jan 25 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School Fri Jan 27 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 28 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Highland High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Century High School Boys Junior Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Boys Junior Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 29 6:00PM vs. Rigby High School Wed Nov 30 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Tue Dec 6 6:00PM @ Burley High School Thu Dec 8 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 14 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Fri Dec 16 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Dec 21 6:00PM vs. Burley High School Fri Dec 23 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 6 6:00PM vs. Preston High School Tue Jan 10 6:00PM @ Rigby High School Sat Jan 14 6:00PM vs. Highland High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 20 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Wed Jan 25 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School Fri Jan 27 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 28 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Highland High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Century High School Boys Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Boys Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Mon Oct 17 6:30AM Practice Small Gym Tue Oct 18 6:30PM Practice Small Gym Thu Oct 20 6:30PM Practice Small Gym Fri Oct 21 6:30AM Practice Large Gym Mon Oct 24 6:30PM Practice Small Gym Tue Oct 25 6:30PM Practice Large/Small Gym Fri Oct 28 6:30AM Practice Large Gym Tue Nov 1 6:00PM Practice Large/Small Gym Thu Nov 3 6:00PM Practice Large/Small Gym Mon Nov 7 6:30AM Practice Small Gym Tue Nov 8 6:00PM Practice Large/Small Gym Tue Nov 29 7:30PM vs. Rigby High School Wed Nov 30 7:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Tue Dec 6 7:30PM @ Burley High School Thu Dec 8 7:30PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 14 7:30PM @ Blackfoot High School Fri Dec 16 7:30PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Dec 21 7:30PM vs. Burley High School Fri Dec 23 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 4 7:30PM vs. Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 6 7:30PM vs. Preston High School Tue Jan 10 7:30PM @ Rigby High School Sat Jan 14 7:30PM vs. Highland High School Wed Jan 18 7:30PM @ Twin Falls High School Fri Jan 20 7:30PM @ Pocatello High School Wed Jan 25 7:30PM vs. Blackfoot High School Fri Jan 27 7:30PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 28 7:30PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Feb 3 7:30PM @ Highland High School Wed Feb 8 7:30PM vs. Pocatello High School Fri Feb 10 7:30PM @ Idaho Falls High School Tue Feb 14 7:00PM @ District Tournament Thu Feb 16 7:00PM @ District Tournament Sat Feb 18 7:00PM @ District Tournament Tue Feb 21 7:00PM @ District Tournament Wed Feb 29 TBA @ Depart for State Tournament at Borah H.S. Thu Mar 1 TBA @ State Tournament at Borah H.S. Fri Mar 2 TBA @ State Tournament at Borah H.S. Sat Mar 3 TBA @ State Tournament at Borah H.S.

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Century High School Girls Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Girls Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM vs. Rigby High School Sat Nov 12 6:00PM @ Minico High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Nov 18 6:00PM vs. Burley High School Tue Nov 22 6:00PM @ Highland High School Tue Nov 29 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Dec 1 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 7 6:00PM @ Rigby High School Tue Dec 13 6:00PM vs. Minico High School Sat Dec 17 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Dec 20 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Thu Dec 22 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Sat Jan 7 TBA @ Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Preston High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM vs. Highland High School Thu Jan 19 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Tue Jan 24 6:00PM vs. Preston High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Burley High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Century High School Girls Junior Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Girls Junior Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM vs. Rigby High School Sat Nov 12 6:00PM @ Minico High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Nov 18 6:00PM vs. Burley High School Tue Nov 22 6:00PM @ Highland High School Tue Nov 29 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Dec 1 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 7 6:00PM @ Rigby High School Tue Dec 13 6:00PM vs. Minico High School Sat Dec 17 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Dec 20 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Thu Dec 22 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Sat Jan 7 2:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Preston High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM vs. Highland High School Thu Jan 19 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Tue Jan 24 6:00PM vs. Preston High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Burley High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Century High School Girls Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Century High School

Girls Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Mon Oct 10 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Wed Oct 12 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Mon Oct 17 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Wed Oct 19 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Mon Oct 24 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Wed Oct 26 7:30PM Practice Large Gym Fri Nov 11 7:30PM vs. Rigby High School Sat Nov 12 7:30PM @ Minico High School Wed Nov 16 7:30PM @ Bonneville High School Fri Nov 18 7:30PM vs. Burley High School Tue Nov 22 7:30PM @ Highland High School Tue Nov 29 7:30PM @ Skyline High School Thu Dec 1 7:30PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Dec 7 7:30PM @ Rigby High School Tue Dec 13 7:30PM vs. Minico High School Sat Dec 17 7:30PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Dec 20 7:30PM vs. Skyline High School Thu Dec 22 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School Tue Jan 3 7:30PM vs. Bonneville High School Sat Jan 7 3:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Wed Jan 11 7:30PM @ Idaho Falls High School Fri Jan 13 7:30PM @ Preston High School Tue Jan 17 7:30PM vs. Highland High School Thu Jan 19 7:30PM @ Pocatello High School Tue Jan 24 7:30PM vs. Preston High School Thu Jan 26 7:30PM @ Burley High School Tue Jan 31 7:00PM @ District Tournament Thu Feb 2 7:00PM @ District Tournament Sat Feb 4 7:00PM @ District Tournament Tue Feb 7 7:00PM @ District Tournament Wed Feb 15 TBA @ Depart for State Tournament at Timberline H.S. Thu Feb 16 TBA @ State Tournament at Timberline H.S. Fri Feb 17 TBA @ State Tournament at Timberline H.S. Sat Feb 18 TBA @ State Tournament at Timberline H.S.

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Century-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basketb... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Boys Junior Varsity Wrestling Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Boys Junior Varsity Wrestling Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Wed Dec 14 6:00PM @ Century/ Poky/ Preston Wed Dec 21 6:00PM @ Hillcrest / Bonneville Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Tue Jan 10 5:00PM vs. Minco/ Twin Falls Fri Jan 20 6:00PM @ Tiger/Grizz Sat Jan 21 TBA @ Tiger/Grizz Thu Jan 26 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Wed Feb 1 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Fleischmann Tournament Sat Feb 4 TBA @ Fleischmann Tournament Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Jerome/Burley Sat Feb 11 TBA @ Jerome/Burley Burley

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Wrestl... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Boys Varsity Wrestling Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Boys Varsity Wrestling Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Wed Dec 7 6:00PM vs. Grace/Soda JV ONLY Thu Dec 8 6:00PM vs. American Falls/Snake River @ Highland Fri Dec 9 6:00PM @ Marsh Valley JV ONLY Sat Dec 10 TBA @ Marsh Valley JV ONLY Wed Dec 14 5:00PM @ Century, Preston Preston Wed Dec 14 6:00PM @ Poky/ Century/ Preston Fri Dec 16 5:00PM @ Bear Cat Invite Varsity & JV Twin Falls Sat Dec 17 5:00PM @ Bear Cat Invite Varsity & JV Twin Falls Wed Dec 21 6:00PM @ Hillcrest / Bonneville Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Fri Jan 6 6:00PM @ Sky View (Logan) Varsity & JV Logan Sat Jan 7 TBA @ Sky View (Logan) Varsity & JV Logan Tue Jan 10 6:00PM vs. Minico/ Twin Falls Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ American Falls Dahlke Tourn. JV ONLY Sat Jan 14 TBA @ American Falls Dahlke Tourn. JV ONLY Fri Jan 20 6:00PM @ Tiger/Grizz Sat Jan 21 TBA @ Tiger/Grizz Thu Jan 26 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Fri Jan 27 6:00PM @ Varsity (Minico) JV (Burley) Minico High School Wed Feb 1 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Fleischmann Tournament Sat Feb 4 TBA @ Fleischmann Tournament Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Jerome/Burley Sat Feb 11 TBA @ Jerome/Burley Thu Feb 16 TBA vs. Regional Fri Feb 24 TBA @ State Wrestling @ ISU Sat Feb 25 TBA @ State Wrestling @ ISU

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Wrestl... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Boys Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Boys Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Wed Nov 30 6:00PM @ Madison Fri Dec 2 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Tue Dec 6 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School Sat Dec 10 6:00PM vs. Madison Fri Dec 16 4:00PM vs. Sky View High School Wed Dec 21 3:30PM vs. Pocatello High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Sky View High School Fri Jan 6 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 12 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 14 6:00PM @ Century High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Wed Jan 25 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Fri Jan 27 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Wed Feb 1 4:30PM @ Pocatello High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM vs. Century High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Boys Junior Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Boys Junior Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Wed Nov 30 6:00PM @ Madison Fri Dec 2 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Tue Dec 6 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School Sat Dec 10 6:00PM vs. Madison Fri Dec 16 9:00AM @ Utah Tournament Sat Dec 17 8:00AM @ Utah Tournament Wed Dec 21 5:15PM vs. Pocatello High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Sky View High School Fri Jan 6 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 12 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 14 6:00PM @ Century High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Wed Jan 25 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Fri Jan 27 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Wed Feb 1 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Fri Feb 3 6:00PM vs. Century High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Boys Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Boys Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Mon Nov 21 6:00PM vs. Jamboree Wed Nov 30 7:30PM @ Madison Fri Dec 2 7:30PM @ Bonneville High School Tue Dec 6 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School Thu Dec 8 7:30PM @ Twin Falls High School Sat Dec 10 7:30PM vs. Madison Thu Dec 15 6:45PM @ Utah Tournament Fri Dec 16 TBA @ Utah Tournament Sat Dec 17 TBA @ Utah Tournament Wed Dec 21 7:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Wed Jan 4 7:00PM @ Sky View High School Fri Jan 6 7:30PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 12 7:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 14 7:30PM @ Century High School Wed Jan 18 7:30PM @ Idaho Falls High School Wed Jan 25 7:30PM vs. Bonneville High School Fri Jan 27 7:30PM vs. Skyline High School Wed Feb 1 7:30PM @ Pocatello High School Fri Feb 3 7:30PM vs. Century High School Wed Feb 8 7:30PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Fri Feb 10 7:30PM vs. Twin Falls High School Tue Feb 14 TBA vs. District Tue Feb 14 TBA vs. District Thu Feb 16 TBA vs. District Sat Feb 18 TBA vs. District Wed Feb 22 TBA vs. District Thu Feb 23 TBA vs. District Sat Feb 25 TBA vs. District Fri Mar 2 TBA vs. State

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Girls Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Girls Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Madison Fri Nov 18 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Tue Nov 22 6:00PM vs. Century High School Wed Nov 30 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Thu Dec 1 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Dec 7 6:00PM vs. Madison Thu Dec 8 TBA vs. Bear River Tournament Fri Dec 9 TBA vs. Bear River Tournament Sat Dec 10 TBA vs. Bear River Tournament Tue Dec 13 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Thu Dec 15 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM @ Century High School Tue Jan 24 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Girls Junior Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Girls Junior Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM @ Bonneville High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Madison Fri Nov 18 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Tue Nov 22 6:00PM vs. Century High School Wed Nov 30 6:00PM @ Pocatello High School Thu Dec 1 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Dec 7 6:00PM vs. Madison Thu Dec 8 TBA vs. Bear River Tourn. @ Garland, UT Fri Dec 9 TBA vs. Bear River Tourn. @ Garland, UT Sat Dec 10 TBA vs. Bear River Tournament @Garland, UT Tue Dec 13 6:00PM @ Idaho Falls High School Thu Dec 15 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Twin Falls High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM @ Century High School Tue Jan 24 6:00PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Twin Falls High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Highland High School Girls Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Highland High School

Girls Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Wed Nov 9 TBA vs. Jamboree Fri Nov 11 7:30PM @ Bonneville High School Wed Nov 16 7:30PM @ Madison Fri Nov 18 7:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Tue Nov 22 7:30PM vs. Century High School Wed Nov 30 7:30PM @ Pocatello High School Thu Dec 1 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School Wed Dec 7 7:30PM vs. Madison Thu Dec 8 TBA vs. Bear River Tourn. @ Garland, UT Fri Dec 9 TBA vs. Bear River Tourn. @ Garland, UT Sat Dec 10 TBA vs. Bear River Tourn. @ Garland, UT Tue Dec 13 7:30PM @ Idaho Falls High School Thu Dec 15 7:30PM vs. Skyline High School Sat Dec 17 TBA @ Arizona Nike Tournament Sun Dec 18 TBA vs. Arizona Nike Tournament Mon Dec 19 TBA vs. Arizona Nike Tournament Tue Dec 20 TBA vs. Arizona Nike Tournament Tue Jan 3 7:30PM vs. Twin Falls High School Sat Jan 7 7:30PM vs. Bonneville High School Wed Jan 11 7:30PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 13 7:30PM vs. Pocatello High School Tue Jan 17 7:30PM @ Century High School Tue Jan 24 7:30PM vs. Idaho Falls High School Thu Jan 26 7:30PM @ Twin Falls High School Mon Jan 30 TBA vs. District

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Highland-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Boys JV Wrestling Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Boys JV Wrestling Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ American Falls/Snake River @ Highland Fri Dec 9 TBA @ Marsh Valley Invitational Sat Dec 10 TBA @ Marsh Valley Invitational Thu Dec 15 TBA @ High Country Conference Wed Dec 21 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest/Bonneville/Highland "Pit" Wed Jan 4 6:00PM vs. Highland High School "Pit" Tue Jan 10 6:00PM @ Pocatello, Idaho Falls @ Skyline Fri Jan 13 TBA @ Richardson Memorial @ Box Elder HS Sat Jan 14 TBA @ Richardson Memorial @ Box Elder Tue Jan 17 TBA @ Pocatello/Minico/Buhl @ Minico Fri Jan 27 3:00PM @ Burley Invitational Sat Jan 28 9:00AM @ Burley Invitational Wed Feb 8 6:00PM @ Preston High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Burley/ Jerome/Highland @ Burley

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Wrestl... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Boys Varsity Wrestling Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Boys Varsity Wrestling Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ American Falls/Snake River @ Highland Fri Dec 16 TBA @ High Country Conference @ Bonneville Sat Dec 17 TBA @ High Country Conference @ Bonneville Wed Dec 21 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest/Bonneville/Highland "Pit" Wed Dec 21 7:00PM vs. Bonneville High School "Pit" Wed Jan 4 6:00PM vs. Highland High School "Pit" Tue Jan 10 6:00PM @ Pocatello, Idaho Falls @ Skyline Fri Jan 13 TBA @ Richardson Memorial @ Box Elder HS Sat Jan 14 TBA @ Richardson Memorial @ Box Elder HS Tue Jan 17 5:00PM @ Pocatello/Buhl/Minico @ Minico Fri Jan 20 TBA @ Tiger/Grizz Sat Jan 21 TBA @ Tiger/Grizz Fri Jan 27 3:00PM @ Minico Invite Sat Jan 28 9:00AM @ Minico Invite Wed Feb 1 5:00PM vs. Blackfoot/Century "Pit" Fri Feb 3 TBA vs. Fleischmann Tournament "Pit" Fri Feb 3 6:00PM vs. Fleischmann Tournament "Palace" Sat Feb 4 TBA vs. Fleischmann Tournament "Pit" Sat Feb 4 TBA vs. Fleischmann Tournament "Palace" Wed Feb 8 6:00PM @ Preston High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM @ Burley/ Jerome/Highland @ Burley Fri Feb 24 TBA vs. State Tournament Sat Feb 25 TBA vs. State Tournament

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Wrestl... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Boys Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Boys Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 29 6:00PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Pit" Fri Dec 2 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Pit" Tue Dec 6 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School "Pit" Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ Madison High School Sat Dec 10 6:00PM @ Burley High School Wed Dec 14 6:00PM vs. Minico High School "Pit" Wed Dec 21 6:00PM @ Highland High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM @ Minico High School Tue Jan 10 6:00PM vs. Preston High School "Pit" Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 20 6:00PM vs. Century High School "Pit" Fri Jan 27 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Pit" Sat Jan 28 6:00PM vs. Madison High School "Pit" Wed Feb 1 4:30PM vs. Highland High School "Palace" Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Feb 4 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM @ Century High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM vs. Burley High School "Pit"

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Boys JV Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Boys JV Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 29 6:00PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Palace" Fri Dec 2 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Palace" Tue Dec 6 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School "Palace" Thu Dec 8 6:00PM @ Madison High School Sat Dec 10 6:00PM @ Burley High School Wed Dec 14 6:00PM vs. Minico High School "Palace" Wed Dec 21 6:00PM @ Highland High School Wed Jan 4 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM @ Minico High School Tue Jan 10 6:00PM vs. Preston High School "Palace" Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Wed Jan 18 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 20 6:00PM vs. Century High School "Palace" Fri Jan 27 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Palace" Sat Jan 28 6:00PM vs. Madison High School "Palace" Wed Feb 1 6:00PM vs. Highland High School "Palace" Fri Feb 3 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Feb 4 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Feb 8 6:00PM @ Century High School Fri Feb 10 6:00PM vs. Burley High School "Palace"

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Boys Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Boys Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 29 7:30PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Palace" Fri Dec 2 7:30PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Palace" Tue Dec 6 7:30PM vs. Skyline High School "Palace" Thu Dec 8 7:30PM @ Madison High School Sat Dec 10 7:30PM @ Burley High School Wed Dec 14 7:30PM vs. Minico High School "Palace" Wed Dec 21 7:30PM @ Highland High School Wed Jan 4 7:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Sat Jan 7 7:30PM @ Minico High School Tue Jan 10 7:30PM vs. Preston High School "Palace" Fri Jan 13 7:30PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Wed Jan 18 7:30PM @ Skyline High School Fri Jan 20 7:30PM vs. Century High School "Palace" Fri Jan 27 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Palace" Sat Jan 28 7:30PM vs. Madison High School "Palace" Wed Feb 1 7:30PM vs. Highland High School "Palace" Fri Feb 3 7:30PM @ Preston High School Sat Feb 4 7:30PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Feb 8 7:30PM @ Century High School Fri Feb 10 7:30PM vs. Burley High School "Palace" Tue Feb 14 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Feb 16 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Sat Feb 18 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Tue Feb 21 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Feb 23 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Mar 1 TBA vs. OPEN DATE Fri Mar 2 TBA vs. OPEN DATE Sat Mar 3 TBA vs. OPEN DATE

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Girls Freshman Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Girls Freshman Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Burley High School Fri Nov 18 6:00PM vs. Madison High School "Pit" Tue Nov 22 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School "Pit" Tue Nov 29 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Wed Nov 30 6:00PM vs. Highland High School "Pit" Sat Dec 3 6:00PM vs. Burley High School "Pit" Fri Dec 9 6:00PM vs. Minico High School "Pit" Thu Dec 15 6:00PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Thu Dec 15 6:00PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Sat Dec 17 6:00PM @ Century High School Thu Dec 22 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Pit" Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Pit" Thu Jan 5 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Pit" Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Madison High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Highland High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM vs. Preston High School "Pit" Thu Jan 19 6:00PM vs. Century High School "Pit" Tue Jan 24 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Minico High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Girls JV Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Girls JV Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Fri Nov 11 6:00PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Nov 16 6:00PM @ Burley High School Fri Nov 18 6:00PM vs. Madison High School "Palace" Tue Nov 22 6:00PM vs. Skyline High School "Palace" Tue Nov 29 6:00PM @ Hillcrest High School Wed Nov 30 6:00PM vs. Highland High School "Palace" Sat Dec 3 6:00PM vs. Burley High School "Palace" Fri Dec 9 6:00PM vs. Minico High School "Palace" Thu Dec 15 6:00PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Sat Dec 17 6:00PM @ Century High School Thu Dec 22 6:00PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Palace" Tue Jan 3 6:00PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Palace" Thu Jan 5 6:00PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 7 6:00PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Palace" Wed Jan 11 6:00PM @ Madison High School Fri Jan 13 6:00PM @ Highland High School Tue Jan 17 6:00PM vs. Preston High School "Palace" Thu Jan 19 6:00PM vs. Century High School "Palace" Tue Jan 24 6:00PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 26 6:00PM @ Minico High School

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011 Pocatello High School Girls Varsity Basketball Printed Season Schedule Page 1 of 1

Pocatello High School

Girls Varsity Basketball Season Schedule

Day Date Time Opponent Facility Tue Nov 8 TBA vs. Snake River High School "Palace" Fri Nov 11 7:30PM @ Blackfoot High School Wed Nov 16 7:30PM @ Burley High School Fri Nov 18 7:30PM vs. Madison High School "Palace" Tue Nov 22 7:30PM vs. Skyline High School "Palace" Tue Nov 29 7:30PM @ Hillcrest High School Wed Nov 30 7:30PM vs. Highland High School "Palace" Sat Dec 3 7:30PM vs. Burley High School "Palace" Fri Dec 9 7:30PM vs. Minico High School "Palace" Thu Dec 15 7:30PM @ Canyon Ridge High School Sat Dec 17 7:30PM @ Century High School Thu Dec 22 7:30PM vs. Blackfoot High School "Palace" Tue Jan 3 7:30PM vs. Hillcrest High School "Palace" Thu Jan 5 7:30PM @ Preston High School Sat Jan 7 7:30PM vs. Canyon Ridge High School "Palace" Wed Jan 11 7:30PM @ Madison High School Fri Jan 13 7:30PM @ Highland High School Tue Jan 17 7:30PM vs. Preston High School "Palace" Thu Jan 19 7:30PM vs. Century High School "Palace" Tue Jan 24 7:30PM @ Skyline High School Thu Jan 26 7:30PM @ Minico High School Tue Jan 31 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Feb 2 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Sat Feb 4 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Tue Feb 7 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Feb 9 7:00PM vs. OPEN DATE Thu Feb 16 TBA vs. OPEN DATE Fri Feb 17 TBA vs. OPEN DATE Sat Feb 18 TBA vs. OPEN DATE

http://www.highschoolsports.net/print/season/Pocatello-High-School-Pocatello-ID/Basket... 10/25/2011

Idaho General Fund

Idaho Division of Financial Management Revenue Report Executive Office of the Governor

C.L. “Butch” Otter, Governor Wayne L. Hammon, Administrator Derek E. Santos, Chief Economist NOVEMBER 2011 VOLUME XXXIV NO. 5

daho’s General Fund grew by $209.9 September instead of the usual two. These was expected to increase 6.3% to $92.9 Imillion in October 2011, which is $1.6 withholding taxes were paid in October. million this year from October 2010’s $87.4 million (0.7%) less than the $211.4 million Filing collections of $16.8 million were $0.1 million. Instead, it advanced just 1.6% to that had been predicted for the month. This million more than the $16.7 million that $88.8 million. The sales tax has not met any month’s shortage was caused by the sales was anticipated. Part of the combined of its monthly targets this fiscal year. The tax that came in $4.1 million below its surplus from these two revenue sources cumulative impact of these shortfalls is target. This shortfall was partially offset by were offset by refunds that came in $0.5 sales tax through October is $14.0 million the remaining revenue categories that all million higher than expected. Individual (3.7%) below its forecast, $362.1 million came in above their predicted amounts. income tax collections for FY 2012 through compared to the predicted $376.1 million. Individual income tax collections of $105.0 October are $381.0 million, which is $1.9 The consistent under performance, along million topped its forecast by $1.0 million. million (0.5%) below the forecast of $382.9 with the recent downward revision to At $10.4 million, corporate income tax million. Idaho’s economic outlook suggest the collections exceeded expectations by $0.8 FY 2012 sales tax forecast is likely to be million. Product taxes were $3.3 million, orporate income tax collections came lowered in the next round of estimates that which was $0.1 million above the projected Cin above its forecast for the third will be published in January 2012. amount. Miscellaneous revenue of $2.4 consecutive month in October. The largest million surpassed its forecast by $0.7 contributor to this month’s surplus is iscellaneous revenue has come in million. On a fiscal year-to-date basis, quarterly payments. It advanced $6.9 M above target in three of the four General Fund collections are $842.3 million, million, which is $0.8 million more than had months of this fiscal year. October’s strong which is $10.8 million (1.3%) below the been expected. The other corporate showing reflects better-than-expected forecasted amount of $853.1 million. income tax revenue component, filing treasurer’s interest earnings. In addition, collections, did not do as well. Its the General Fund received significant ndividual income tax collections collections of $4.7 million were $0.1 million contributions from both the Attorney Iexceeded its forecast for the second short of the month’s $4.8 million target. General’s Office and the Department of month in a row in October 2011. This However, the corporate income tax Environmental Quality. On a fiscal year-to- revenue source benefited from withholding bottom line was helped by refunds that date basis, miscellaneous revenue is collections of $96.8 million that were were $1.1 million lower than anticipated— $31.4 million, which is $2.5 million ahead of $1.4 million higher than the predicted $1.2 million versus $2.3 million. Total fiscal the forecasted amount. Product taxes amount of $95.4 million. This month marks year-to-date corporate income tax continue to track its projections well; it is the first time this fiscal year that collections are $50.6 million, which exceeds just $0.1 million higher than its forecast withholding collections have beat their the forecast by $2.6 million (5.3%). through October of the current fiscal year. monthly targets. It should be noted that October’s results were boosted by state he sales tax grew in October, but not employees having had three paydays in Tnearly as strong as was forecasted. It

Idaho General Fund Revenue FY 2012 Monthly Actual and Predicted Net Collections

$450

$400

August 2011 Forecast Predicted Actual $350

$300

$250

$200 $ Millions$

$150

$100

$50

$0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Idaho Division of Financial Management  304 North 8th Street  PO Box 83720  Boise, Idaho 83720-0032  208-334-3900 Idaho General Fund Collections for October 2011

MONTHLY ACTUAL AND PREDICTED COLLECTIONS FOR OCTOBER Actual Actual Actual Predicted Forecast Performance FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 (Actual versus Predicted) Individual Income Tax ($000) $91,081.6 $99,156.4 $105,008.7 $104,010.1 Difference $998.6 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐7.0% 8.9% 5.9% 4.9% Percent 1.0%

Corporate Income Tax ($000) $6,810.8 $7,080.3 $10,335.5 $9,547.5 Difference $788.1 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐21.3% 4.0% 46.0% 34.8% Percent 8.3%

Sales Tax ($000) $83,283.0 $87,406.2 $88,795.4 $92,896.0 Difference ($4,100.6) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐10.9% 5.0% 1.6% 6.3% Percent ‐4.4%

Product Tax ($000) $3,213.2 $3,382.7 $3,318.7 $3,265.7 Difference $53.0 Percent Change from Previous Year 38.6% 5.3% ‐1.9% ‐3.5% Percent 1.6%

Miscellaneous Revenue ($000) $1,546.7 $3,910.0 $2,408.4 $1,724.8 Difference $683.6 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐32.7% 152.8% ‐38.4% ‐55.9% Percent 39.6%

Total ($000) $185,935.4 $200,935.6 $209,866.7 $211,444.0 Difference ($1,577.3) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐9.2% 8.1% 4.4% 5.2% Percent ‐0.7%

FISCAL YEAR‐TO‐DATE ACTUAL AND PREDICTED COLLECTIONS THROUGH OCTOBER Actual Actual Actual Predicted Forecast Performance FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2012 FY 2012 (Actual versus Predicted) Individual Income Tax ($000) $353,926.9 $362,656.7 $380,992.7 $382,857.1 Difference ($1,864.4) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐5.3% 2.5% 5.1% 5.6% Percent ‐0.5%

Corporate Income Tax ($000) $30,248.1 $39,606.2 $50,647.4 $48,083.3 Difference $2,564.2 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐36.3% 30.9% 27.9% 21.4% Percent 5.3%

Sales Tax ($000) $344,313.9 $347,968.9 $362,064.6 $376,053.6 Difference ($13,989.0) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐12.7% 1.1% 4.1% 8.1% Percent ‐3.7%

Product Tax ($000) $15,240.3 $16,921.6 $17,250.4 $17,186.0 Difference $64.4 Percent Change from Previous Year 38.4% 11.0% 1.9% 1.6% Percent 0.4%

Miscellaneous Revenue ($000) $32,100.0 $32,754.3 $31,368.1 $28,889.5 Difference $2,478.5 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐0.1% 2.0% ‐4.2% ‐11.8% Percent 8.6%

Total ($000) $775,829.4 $799,907.8 $842,323.2 $853,069.4 Difference ($10,746.2) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐9.7% 3.1% 5.3% 6.6% Percent ‐1.3%

Costs associated with this publication are available from the Idaho Division of Financial Management in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code. 11-11/01200-180-4001

Pocatello / Chubbuck SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

TIME LINE FOR STOCKS BUILDING last updated: October 12, 2011

June 2010 Prepare RFP for architectural services

August 2010 Solicit local architects for RFPs Bid on enclosing storage area

September 2010 Selection Committee review RFP & recommend architect Request City of Pocatello for Land Use Exemption Board of Trustees to review finalists & approve architect

October 2010 Stripe parking lot for additional bus parking Enclose storage area

Begin preliminary design, plans, and estimated costs Work w/ Alternative School Planning Committee to incorporate design & functionality of school

Oct – Nov 2010 Prepare CIP budget reflecting Stocks Building project

December 2010 Finalize plan design & layout for school Remove interior walls and tile

Jan – Mar 15, 2011 Construction Document Development for Stocks/New Alternative School

February 2011 Design HVAC – Alameda Bid HVAC Project – Alameda Phase I

Mar 15 – Apr 1, 2011 Submit Documents for State and City Review for Stocks/New Alternative School

April 2011 Alternative School Planning Committee-Programmatic recommendations to Board

Apr 1 – Apr 15, 2011 Modify Construction Documents with review comments for Stocks/New Alternative School

Apr 22 – May 15, 2011 Bid Stocks/New Alternative School Project – Open Bids May 10, 2011

May 17, 2011 Bid for Alternative School rejected for exceeding budget

May 18 – June 30, 2011 Reengineer HVAC and modify design plan, schedule district demolition to reduce project scope to fall within budget of $3.5 million

June 2011 Start Construction on HVAC Project Alameda Phase I

July 12, 2011 2nd Bid Opening Stocks/New Alternative School Project

July 19, 2011 Recommendation to Board of Trustees for approval of Stocks/New Alternative School

July 20 – July 28, 2011 Contract Negotiation and issue notice to proceed on Stocks/New Alternative School

August 1, 2011 Start Construction on Stocks/New Alternative School

August 2011 Complete HVAC Project Alameda Phase I

October 2011 *Boundary Planning Committee-elementary & middle school Boundary study

March 2012 *Boundary Planning Committee initial recommendations to Board during Board Workshop

April 2012 *Order furniture & equipment for new Alternative School *Seek public input on boundary recommendations

May 2012 *Complete Construction of new Alternative School

May 2012 *Finish furnishings & equipment in school for Fall start of school *Begin moving and packing for relocation from Alameda to New Alternate School *Boundary Planning Committee considers public input

June 2012 *Begin construction & remodel of Alameda Middle School *Boundary Planning Committee makes final recommendations to Board *Complete Stocks/New Alternative School Construction

June – Aug 2012 *Owner Occupy Stocks/New Alternative School *Relocation of Alternative Programs to new location

July 2012 *Board Adopts new boundaries

September 2012 *Planning for transitioning students and staff to new boundaries and facility May 2013 *Prepare for packing and moves to the Middle Schools

June 2013 *Alameda Phase II – complete

August 2013 *Open Alameda Middle School

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 - MEMBERSHIP 3-Nov-11

SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 GRADE 6 K-6 -K Sp. Ed TOTAL

CHUBBUCK 24 21 22 22 25 15 29 30 25 25 24 24 26 27 27 26 24 24 24 24 27 27 27 27 596 507 596 EDAHOW 25 26 21 23 27 27 23 25 23 25 23 22 28 28 346 295 346 ELLIS 26 26 26 25 25 26 26 26 23 23 25 25 25 25 27 27 26 28 28 28 29 545 442 545 GATE CITY 23 22 21 26 26 25 24 23 25 24 25 25 27 27 28 23 23 24 27 26 25 519 453 519 GREENACRES 13 13 15 14 6 11 12 12 10 5 13 12 14 14 13 14 13 14 12 17 30 30 1 30 30 1 20 20 2 411 350 411 INDIAN HILLS 23 22 22 23 26 26 23 26 23 24 23 23 27 27 26 27 26 26 25 27 28 27 24 24 24 23 645 555 645 JEFFERSON 26 26 26 26 24 26 26 25 27 24 25 23 23 24 23 22 24 22 442 364 442 LEWIS & CLARK 26 24 24 23 26 27 26 26 30 30 29 30 28 27 24 20 23 28 28 28 22 21 23 593 496 593 SYRINGA 24 24 24 24 24 26 24 26 22 22 21 24 25 25 21 22 23 22 24 23 470 374 470 TENDOY 26 26 24 25 25 26 26 3 22 23 24 2 21 21 1 30 30 4 2 361 309 361 TYHEE 23 23 21 8 5 19 17 21 20 8 6 20 22 22 8 8 20 20 21 9 8 23 23 23 15 21 21 20 9 484 404 484 WASHINGTON 26 25 26 27 22 25 24 26 24 25 19 18 24 22 333 282 333 WILCOX 26 25 26 26 20 20 23 22 19 6 27 26 25 3 25 24 26 4 4 23 24 22 7 29 29 29 2 542 439 542 ISU K-2 13 15 10 9 47 19 47 TOTAL 1045 1102 974 995 900 933 385 6334 5289 0 6334

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8 00 FRANKLIN 121 326 348 795 795 HAWTHORNE 252 262 260 774 774 IRVING 139 266 283 688 688 KINPORT 1 8 9 18 18 00 0 00

TOTAL 513 862 900 2275 0 2275

GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11 GRADE 12 CENTURY HIGH 336 316 293 324 1269 1269 HIGHLAND HIGH 367 334 334 267 Teen Parent Total (6th - 12th) 1302 1302 POCATELLO HIGH 270 285 285 322 New Horizons (9th - 12th) 1162 1162 NEW HORIZONS 24 34 49 42 149 149 00 KEY Linc. = LINCOLN SP. GRANT 3, 4 & 5 YRS. TOTAL 997 969 961 955 MT = MONTESSORI TUITION 3 & 4 YEAR OLDS 3882 3882 HDS = HEAD START PROGRAM ELEMENTARY 6334 JR. HIGH 2275 HIGH SCHOOL 3882 MT HD Linc. TOTAL MEMBERSHIP 12491 28 186 109 = 12814 TOTAL MEMBERSHIP W/SPECIAL PROGRAMS POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 DISTRICT ENROLLMENT INFORMATION FOR 2010-11 / 2011-2012

Schools 09-2009 10-2011 11-2011 12-2011 01-2012 02-2012 03-2012 04-2012 05-2012 06-2012

Elementary Schools 6361 6354 6334 Middle Schools 2306 2283 2275 High School 3889 3898 3882

TOTALS 12556 12535 12491 0000000

Schools 09-2010 10-2010 11-2010 12-2010 01-2011 02-2011 03-2011 04-2011 05-2011 06-2011

Elementary Schools 6292 6056 6050 6064 6057 6034 6032 6052 6059 6049 Middle Schools 2374 2292 2282 2296 2297 2307 2315 2319 2316 2223 High School 3757 3649 3660 3656 3643 3626 3618 3608 3597 3589

TOTALS 12423 11997 11992 12016 11997 11967 11965 11979 11972 11861

14000 12000 Elementary Schools Middle Schools 10000 High School 8000 TOTALS 6000 Elementary Schools 4000 Middle Schools 2000 High School 0 TOTALS 12345678910 POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2011-2012

Elementary Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Chubbuck Elementary 596 600 596 Edahow Elementary 355 353 346 Ellis Elementary 549 546 545 Gate City Elementary 524 523 519 Greenacres Elementary 458 458 458 Indian Hills Elementary 655 649 645 Jefferson Elementary 448 442 442 Lewis & Clark Elementary 598 594 593 Syringa Elementary 481 475 470 Tendoy Elementary 355 359 361 Tyhee Elementary 484 488 484 Washington Elementary 334 334 333 Wilcox Elementary 524 534 542

TOTALS 6361 6355 6334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

700 Chubbuck Edahow 600 Ellis 500 Gate City Greenacres 400 Indian Hills 300 Jefferson 200 Lewis & Clark Syringa 100 Tendoy 0 Tyhee 12345678910 Washington Wilcox POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2011-2012

Middle Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Franklin Middle School 808 797 795 Hawthorne Middle School 779 779 774 Irving Middle School 700 685 688 Kinport 19 22 18

TOTALS 2306 2283 2275 0000000

900 800 700 600 Franklin 500 Hawthorne 400 Irving 300 Kinport 200 100 0 12345678910 POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2011-2012

High Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Century High School 1244 1276 1269 Highland High School 1319 1313 1302 Pocatello High School 1178 1175 1162 New Horizons/Teen Parent 148 134 149

TOTALS 3889 3898 3882 0000000

1400 1200 1000 Century 800 Highland 600 Pocatello 400 New Horizons 200 0 12345678910 CHARTER / PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 2011-2012

Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Grace Lutheran School 306 304 300 Holy Spirit Catholic School 151 152 152 Calvary Chapel Christian School 57 57 60 Pocatello Community Charter School 358 363 360 The Academy (ARC) 279 271 273

TOTALS 1151 1147 1145 0000000

400 350

300 Grace Lutheran 250 Holy Spirit 200 Calvary Chapel 150 Pocatello Community Charter 100 The Academy (ARC) 50 0 12345678910 Student Enrollment Projections September 30 Data For District Planning

Weighted Average of FY 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 Retention Rates

Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17

K 930 890 866 909 931 964 937 931 1,015 954 1,019 996 1,150 1,071 1,025 1,000 1,025 1,050 1,050 1 952 895 908 897 895 922 944 951 921 1,004 946 1,014 1,006 1,110 1,057 1,012 987 1,012 1,037 2 955 920 851 884 861 884 899 947 918 912 983 927 1,014 976 1,090 1,038 993 969 993 3 986 917 902 890 835 868 865 883 918 893 921 965 918 990 961 1,074 1,022 978 955 4 927 966 929 892 854 847 859 866 861 900 870 911 956 897 973 945 1,056 1,005 961 5 954 922 951 914 853 814 832 849 843 854 900 858 928 928 889 965 937 1,047 996 6 937 941 904 945 864 872 804 842 807 848 872 900 841 901 914 875 950 922 1,030 7 951 972 962 947 956 882 884 820 830 854 882 896 903 860 919 932 892 969 940 8 980 914 942 957 919 959 877 853 812 831 863 881 912 904 866 926 939 898 976 9 1,070 1,017 941 983 986 1,002 1,008 957 936 898 940 976 975 992 1,000 959 1,025 1,039 994 10 1,094 1,026 984 911 950 979 996 995 935 928 899 917 950 971 978 986 945 1,011 1,024 11 1,080 1,045 1,016 987 901 896 924 924 931 913 880 872 908 968 965 971 979 939 1,004 12 1,032 1,023 1,015 953 911 904 865 889 867 878 932 884 893 967 1,003 1,000 1,006 1,014 973

K 930 890 866 909 931 964 937 931 1,015 954 1,019 996 1,150 1,071 1,025 1,000 1,025 1,050 1,050 1-3 2,893 2,732 2,661 2,671 2,591 2,674 2,708 2,781 2,757 2,809 2,850 2,906 2,938 3,076 3,108 3,124 3,002 2,959 2,985 4-6 2,818 2,829 2,784 2,751 2,571 2,533 2,495 2,557 2,511 2,602 2,642 2,669 2,725 2,726 2,776 2,785 2,943 2,974 2,987 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 6,641 6,451 6,311 6,331 6,093 6,171 6,140 6,269 6,283 6,365 6,511 6,571 6,813 6,873 6,909 6,909 6,970 6,983 7,022

7-8 1,931 1,886 1,904 1,904 1,875 1,841 1,761 1,673 1,642 1,685 1,745 1,777 1,815 1,764 1,785 1,858 1,831 1,867 1,916 9-12 4,276 4,111 3,956 3,834 3,748 3,781 3,793 3,765 3,669 3,617 3,651 3,649 3,726 3,898 3,946 3,916 3,955 4,003 3,995 TOTAL SECONDARY 6,207 5,997 5,860 5,738 5,623 5,622 5,554 5,438 5,311 5,302 5,396 5,426 5,541 5,662 5,731 5,774 5,786 5,870 5,911

TOTAL 12,848 12,448 12,171 12,069 11,716 11,793 11,694 11,707 11,594 11,667 11,907 11,997 12,354 12,535 12,640 12,683 12,756 12,853 12,933

FY 2012 Retention Rates

Actual Enrollment Projected Enrollment Grade 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17

K 930 890 866 909 931 964 937 931 1,015 954 1,019 996 1,150 1,071 1,025 1,000 1,025 1,050 1,050 1 952 895 908 897 895 922 944 951 921 1,004 946 1,014 1,006 1,110 1,059 999 974 999 1,024 2 955 920 851 884 861 884 899 947 918 912 983 927 1,014 976 1,099 1,057 1,012 987 1,012 3 986 917 902 890 835 868 865 883 918 893 921 965 918 990 949 1,080 1,028 984 961 4 927 966 929 892 854 847 859 866 861 900 870 911 956 897 971 936 1,047 996 953 5 954 922 951 914 853 814 832 849 843 854 900 858 928 928 890 974 946 1,057 1,006 6 937 941 904 945 864 872 804 842 807 848 872 900 841 901 934 887 964 935 1,045 7 951 972 962 947 956 882 884 820 830 854 882 896 903 860 953 968 927 1,007 977 8 980 914 942 957 919 959 877 853 812 831 863 881 912 904 861 921 934 893 970 9 1,070 1,017 941 983 986 1,002 1,008 957 936 898 940 976 975 992 1,000 951 1,016 1,031 986 10 1,094 1,026 984 911 950 979 996 995 935 928 899 917 950 971 984 995 954 1,020 1,034 11 1,080 1,045 1,016 987 901 896 924 924 931 913 880 872 908 968 948 957 965 926 990 12 1,032 1,023 1,015 953 911 904 865 889 867 878 932 884 893 967 913 935 941 949 910

K 930 890 866 909 931 964 937 931 1,015 954 1,019 996 1,150 1,071 1,025 1,000 1,025 1,050 1,050 1-3 2,893 2,732 2,661 2,671 2,591 2,674 2,708 2,781 2,757 2,809 2,850 2,906 2,938 3,076 3,108 3,136 3,015 2,970 2,997 4-6 2,818 2,829 2,784 2,751 2,571 2,533 2,495 2,557 2,511 2,602 2,642 2,669 2,725 2,726 2,794 2,797 2,956 2,988 3,004 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 6,641 6,451 6,311 6,331 6,093 6,171 6,140 6,269 6,283 6,365 6,511 6,571 6,813 6,873 6,927 6,934 6,996 7,008 7,050

7-8 1,931 1,886 1,904 1,904 1,875 1,841 1,761 1,673 1,642 1,685 1,745 1,777 1,815 1,764 1,815 1,889 1,861 1,899 1,947 9-12 4,276 4,111 3,956 3,834 3,748 3,781 3,793 3,765 3,669 3,617 3,651 3,649 3,726 3,898 3,844 3,838 3,876 3,925 3,919 TOTAL SECONDARY 6,207 5,997 5,860 5,738 5,623 5,622 5,554 5,438 5,311 5,302 5,396 5,426 5,541 5,662 5,659 5,727 5,737 5,824 5,867

TOTAL 12,848 12,448 12,171 12,069 11,716 11,793 11,694 11,707 11,594 11,667 11,907 11,997 12,354 12,535 12,586 12,660 12,733 12,832 12,917

These numbers do NOT reflect these student groups: Head Start, Montessori 3 and 4 year olds, Lincoln Special Grant

Updated 10/13/2011 HUMAN RESOURCES REPORT BOARD MEETING November 15, 2011

New Teachers

Name Position/Location Effective Date Darcy Barnes .50 FTE 10-17-11 Special Education Pocatello High

Michele Petrie 1.0 FTE 10-17-11 Interventionist Jefferson Elementary

Ann Shawn Ruth 1.0 FTE 10-10-11 English Century High

Recommend to Pay Stipends to:

Teacher Quality (TQ) Federal Grant

Beginning K-12 Moodle: Cheryl Spall – $1,000

Love & Logic: Marci Bartu – $1,000

SIOP I: Gretchen Anderson – $1,000

CHAMPS 2: Tedra Balls – $1,000

Cultural Perspectives: Pam Peck – $500 Candida Franscella – $500 Jim Robinson – $500

Title I Professional Development

SIOP I: Heidi Kessler – $1,000 POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Doug Howell, Director of Human Resources

FROM: Chuck Wegner, Director of Curriculum

DATE: November 15, 2011

SUBJECT: Stipend in Excess of $500 – BOARD ACTION REQUESTED

I am seeking Board approval to pay instructors for the various classes listed below. This is in accordance with Board Policy #7126. I recommend that the Board approve this request.

Teacher Quality Federal Grant:

BEGINNING K-12 MOODLE (October 13 – December 8, 2011) Cheryl Spall $1,000

NINE ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR THE LOVE & LOGIC CLASSROOM (October 24 – December 19, 2011) Marci Bartu $1,000

SIOP I (November 5 – December 3, 2011) Gretchen Anderson $1,000

CHAMPS 2 (November 8 – December 20, 2011) Tedra Balls $1,000

CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES (November 9 – December 21, 2011) Pam Peck, Candida Franscella, Jim Robinson $500 each

Title I Professional Development:

SIOP I at Lewis & Clark (October 14 – 15, 2011) Heidi Kessler $1,000

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 Board Work Session with Legislators

Monday, December 5, 2011 4:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. Board Room at the Education Service Center 3115 Pole Line Road Pocatello, ID 83201

1. WELCOME AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

2. INTRODUCTION

3. PREPARATION TO IMPLEMENT COMMON CORE STANDARDS AND SMART CONSORTIUM ASSESSMENT  What is Common Core  How are districts preparing to implement the new standards  What is the time line for the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium  What will districts need to be able to implement both  What funding is needed for these implementations  Roll out of Common Core State Standards for 2013-14 in English, Language Arts and Math  Implement SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium for 2014-15

4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENTS COME FIRST LEGISLATION AND COMMON CORE STANDARDS  Status of the Association  Teacher Negotiations and Contract Timeline  Pay for Performance for teachers and building administrators/plan and impact of selective payment  Pay for Performance for non-building administrators – 5% of total available compensation based on student achievement for 2013/changes to 10% in 2015 and to 15% in 2019  Pay for Performance components – leadership and hard to fill positions  Solicitation of personnel files from other districts/sending of personnel files to other districts/reviewing files coming from other districts/inquiring of the state department of education as to the status of a person’s certification  Parent input into teacher evaluations and building administrators evaluations  Student growth component in teacher evaluations, building and non-building administrators evaluations  Liability insurance notification and retention of proof of notification  State payment for dual credit courses for students who have completed graduation requirements (with the exception of a math class in the senior year and the senior project) before the commencement of the senior year  Technology enhancements to the classroom for teachers’ use  Technology enhancements to the classroom for students’ use/logistics  One to one mobile computing devices for high school students/logistics  Asynchronous on-line courses/logistics/fractional ADA  Blended model of on-line courses without direct teacher contact/logistics/fractional ADA  Development of technology integration plans – due December 15

Revised: 11/9/11 Page 1 of 2

 Understaffing at 7% in 2012, 9% in 2013 and 11% in 2014 and every year thereafter vs. number of online courses and technology investment from salaries and benefit apportionment  Budget preparation for 2012-13 at 4.05% reduction in salaries and benefits apportionment with unknown impact of JFAC and 2012 legislature  Administer the SAT/ACUPLACER  Operational site for posting fiscal transactions  Public records’ request changes

Current Other Impacts  ISEE demands/functionality/logistics  Schoolnet operability/cost  Students Come First’s impact to workloads of already reduced and furloughed district office personnel  Roll out of Common Core State Standards for 2013-14 in English, Language Arts and Math  Implementation of SMARTER Balanced Consortium assessment for 2014-15

5. WHERE ARE THE RESOURCES COMING FROM TO SUPPORT COMMON CORE AND SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM IMPLEMENTATION, SCHOOLNET, ISEE

6. HOW WILL SCHOOL DISTRICTS MANAGE THE MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES WITH LESS STAFF AND THE ASYNCHRONOUS ON-LINE COURSE

7. WILL DISTRICTS BE FORCED TO ADD MORE ON-LINE COURSES BECAUSE OF THE LOSS OF STAFF DUE TO ON-GOING REDUCTION IN SALARY AND BENEFIT APPORTIONMENT

8. IMPACTS OF CHANGES WITH RESPECT TO SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT  Number of plans to be developed  Sanctions

9. ELIMINATION OF CHARTER SCHOOL CAP AND LOSS OF PROTECTION

10. FUTURE OF PRE-K-12 PUBLIC EDUCATION IN IDAHO  Funding – resource scarcity  Statutory changes  Technological changes  Staffing impacts  PERSI retirement system

11. ISBA RESOLUTIONS

12. COMMUNICATION WITH LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION THROUGHOUT THE SESSION

13. TRUSTEE/LEGISLATORS’ COMMENTS

14. SUMMARIZE

15. ADJOURN

Revised: 11/9/11 Page 2 of 2 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 128 of 129 BILL LIST 11/04/2011 Report Code: BAP_BILLLIST BATCH QUEUE ID 25357 10:07:11 AM

Grand Totals by Fund Fund Description Amount 100 GENERAL FUND 560,994.62 420 SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 782,575.93 243 STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND 24,581.57 271 TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 25,802.81 257 IDEA PART B 59,201.77 246 SDFS STATE TOBACCO TAX 1,814.62 263 CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL 1,227.76 251 TITLE I-A BASIC 8,060.46 273 TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 3,693.63 274 HEAD START 5,008.58 278 HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT 282.26 241 DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND 160.95 610 PRINT SHOP FUND 11,248.32 276 HEAD START TRAINING GRANT 361.60 242 SPECIAL GRANTS FUND 948.22 258 IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 2,005.56 290 CHILD NUTRITION 312,567.87 Grand Total 1,800,536.53

APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

______BOARD CHAIR DATE

______BOARD CLERK DATE POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart J. Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: November 15, 2011

SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION – OCTOBER 2011

Reporting Period

 October 1 to October 31, 2011. Thirty-three percent (33%) of the year completed.

General Fund Comments

 Fifty-three percent (53%) of budgeted revenues have been received as of October 31, 2011. The majority of revenue collections have come from the state base support distribution and property taxes.

 Thirty-one percent (31%) of budgeted expenditures have been spent as of October 31, 2011.

Cash Balance Report

 Key Bank represents the balances as if all budgeted expenditures cleared the bank. Actual cash balance on October 31, 2011 for Key Bank was $658,179.

 Investment Pool rates were not available at the time of printing for Board Meeting.

Other

 An additional allocation of $31,857 was received for the Jobs Education Act funds.

 All Federal and State grant funds have been submitted for reimbursement.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 BANNOCK COUNTY Statement of Cash Balances For the Period Ending October 31, 2011 Beginning Cash CASH FUND # Fund Description Balance Revenues Expenditures BALANCE

100 GENERAL FUND 30,623,968.39 414,891.67 (5,209,811.26) 25,829,048.80 220 FEDERAL FOREST 133,562.23 0.00 0.00 133,562.23 241 DRIVER EDUCATION 33,127.30 (153.59) (3,952.82) 29,020.89 242 SPECIAL GRANTS 36,293.88 1,177.03 (948.22) 36,522.69 243 PROF-TECH EDUCATION 179,805.83 (1,402.28) (35,227.95) 143,175.60 246 SDFS STATE TOBACCO TAX 17,209.40 (4.02) (986.89) 16,218.49 250 ARRA TITLE I-A BASIC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 251 TITLE I-A BASIC (205,564.54) 206,936.38 (207,915.75) (206,543.91) 256 ARRA IDEA PART B SCHOOL AGE (0.00) 0.00 0.00 (0.00) 257 IDEA PART B SCHOOL AGE (179,400.52) 178,037.55 (229,066.89) (230,429.86) 258 IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL (17,781.89) 17,668.69 (13,173.75) (13,286.95) 259 ARRA IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 263 PERKINS III PROF-TECH (15,258.44) 0.00 (12,276.08) (27,534.52) 271 TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY (153,672.82) 151,465.32 (44,562.91) (46,770.41) 273 TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC (7,130.76) 4,854.83 (25,071.11) (27,347.04) 274 HEAD START REGULAR (28,256.14) 90,568.60 (99,617.81) (37,305.35) 276 HEAD START TRAINING (1,332.00) 1,693.60 (361.60) 0.00 278 HEAD START TANF (4,599.65) (527.83) (6,284.31) (11,411.79) 290 CHILD NUTRITION 684,150.22 506,986.91 (455,157.24) 735,979.89 310 BOND & INTEREST 448,160.06 4,639.92 0.00 452,799.98 420 SCHOOL PLANT 537,489.45 9,119.36 (785,920.79) (239,311.98) 610 PRINT SHOP 28,665.08 13,532.97 (13,418.42) 28,779.63 710 VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 713,893.32 187.93 (61,658.82) 652,422.43 900 PETTY CASH 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 32,833,328.40 1,599,673.04 (7,205,412.62) 27,227,588.82 REVOLVING FUND 10,000.00 KEY BANK CURRENT EXPENSE 2,157,968.21 PROOF 0.00 KEY BANK PAYROLL (2,716,272.90) MEDICAID MATCH ESCROW ACCOUNT 19,278.47 KEY BANK SCHOOL LUNCH 727,390.83 IRELAND BANK VEBA TRUST CHECKING (61,230.70) GENERAL IDAHO STATE POOL (1286) 26,362,908.80 BOND CONSTRUCTION POOL (2002) 13,892.98 VEBA INSURANCE TRUST FUND (2392) 713,653.13 TOTAL 27,227,588.82

11/9/2011 POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 REVENUES BY FUNCTION 11/03/2011 GENERAL FUND 08:44:59 AM

FOR OCTOBER, 2011 YEAR COMPLETED - 33%

FUNCTIONDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD REVENUE FROM LOCAL SOURCES 411 PROPERTY TAXES7,693,923.00 7,693,923.00 12,067.12 2,302,811.99 0.00 5,391,111.01 29.93% 413 PENALTY & INTEREST ON DELINQ TAXES95,000.00 95,000.00 3,183.57 33,744.47 0.00 61,255.53 35.52% 414 TUITION 70,500.0070,500.00 11,243.00 22,901.00 0.00 47,599.00 32.48% 415 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS50,000.00 50,000.00 4,088.47 9,645.04 0.00 40,354.96 19.29% 417 STUDENT BODY ACTIVITIES228,000.00 228,000.00 53,575.00 59,253.94 0.00 168,746.06 25.99% 419 OTHER LOCAL REVENUE242,000.00 242,000.00 40,061.00 62,690.72 0.00 179,309.28 25.91% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM LOCAL SOURCES8,379,423.00 8,379,423.00 124,218.16 2,491,047.16 0.00 5,888,375.84 29.73%

REVENUE FROM STATE SOURCES 431SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAMS 50,572,266.00 50,582,759.00 187,947.50 32,785,924.51 0.00 17,796,834.49 64.82% 432 RESTRICTED STATE SUPPORT65,000.00 64,908.00 5,315.18 5,315.18 0.00 59,592.82 8.19% 438 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES0.00 0.00 2,238.50 4,477.00 0.00 -4,477.00 0.00% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM STATE SOURCES50,637,266.00 50,647,667.00 195,501.18 32,795,716.69 0.00 17,851,950.31 64.75%

REVENUE FROM FEDERAL SOURCES 442 UNRESTCTD GRANTS-INDIRECT FROM0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 445 RESTRICTED GRANTS - INDIRECT1,875,000.00 1,875,000.00 50,256.32 488,418.38 0.00 1,386,581.62 26.05% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM FEDERAL SOURCES1,875,000.00 1,875,000.00 50,256.32 488,418.38 0.00 1,386,581.62 26.05%

INTERFUND TRANSFERS 460 INTERFUND TRANSFERS0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTALS: INTERFUND TRANSFERS0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%

ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE 700 ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE6,200,000.00 6,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,200,000.00 0.00% TOTALS: ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE6,200,000.00 6,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,200,000.00 0.00% TOTALS: GENERAL FUND67,091,689.00 67,102,090.00 369,975.66 35,775,182.23 0.00 31,326,907.77 53.31% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION 11/03/2011 GENERAL FUND 09:11:52 AM

FOR OCTOBER, 2011 YEAR COMPLETED - 33%

FUNCTIONDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 5110 KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM6,000.00 6,000.00 660.00 1,320.00 0.00 4,680.00 22.00% 5120ELEMENTARY PROGRAM 17,894,248.00 18,164,845.00 1,532,280.99 5,816,609.56 42,590.83 12,305,644.61 32.26% 5150SECONDARY PROGRAM 15,499,442.00 15,503,555.00 1,305,837.36 5,052,229.28 20,950.12 10,430,375.60 32.72% 5170ALTERNATE SCHOOL 1,055,284.00 1,051,508.00 81,353.38 327,826.99 980.35 722,700.66 31.27% 5190 VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL PROGRAM2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00% 5210SPECIAL EDUCATION 4,503,530.00 4,503,530.00 352,325.75 1,379,205.67 0.00 3,124,324.33 30.62% 5220PRESCHOOL HANDICAPPED 154,946.00 154,946.00 14,003.40 52,968.65 0.00 101,977.35 34.19% 5240GIFTED & TALENTED PROGRAM 132,714.00 132,714.00 11,253.50 43,778.76 535.30 88,399.94 33.39% 5310INTERSCHOLASTIC PROGRAM 300,000.00 300,000.00 30,233.24 47,485.62 3,052.00 249,462.38 16.85% 5320SCHOOL ACTIVITY PROGRAM 690,912.00 691,027.00 81,513.53 230,887.59 279.93 459,859.48 33.45% 5410 SUMMER SCHOOL PROGRAM71,905.00 71,905.00 691.84 102,396.97 0.00 -30,491.97 142.41% 5420 COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM17,899.00 17,899.00 1,253.52 4,306.42 0.00 13,592.58 24.06% 6110ATTENDENCE GUIDANCE & HEALTH P 2,223,138.00 2,227,937.00 181,116.23 747,183.41 105.00 1,480,648.59 33.54% 6160ANCILLARY SERVICE PROGRAM 1,516,163.00 1,516,163.00 121,972.90 490,923.34 0.00 1,025,239.66 32.38% 6210INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROG 982,720.00 982,024.00 69,632.66 304,066.13 5,544.44 672,413.43 31.53% 6220EDUCATIONAL MEDIA SERVICES PRO 787,264.00 790,468.00 59,342.51 306,269.86 9,471.29 474,726.85 39.94% 6230INSTRUCTION-RELATED TECHNOLOGY 700,428.00 700,428.00 48,454.80 291,847.19 3,113.49 405,467.32 42.11% 6310 BOARD OF EDUCATION PROGRAM28,100.00 28,100.00 1,058.48 15,037.97 0.00 13,062.03 53.52% 6320CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM 962,606.00 962,606.00 53,146.36 392,908.84 4,402.11 565,295.05 41.27% 6410SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM 3,874,656.00 3,874,254.00 301,064.79 1,234,179.30 1,050.20 2,639,024.50 31.88% 6510BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 544,764.00 544,764.00 95,365.10 212,691.29 30.00 332,042.71 39.05% 6550CENTRAL SERVICES PROGRAM 122,657.00 122,657.00 9,699.26 37,992.16 0.00 84,664.84 30.97% 6560ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNOLOGY SERV 276,778.00 276,778.00 16,692.99 65,222.38 403.40 211,152.22 23.71% 6610BUILDING OPERATION SERVICES PR 4,615,868.00 4,615,868.00 355,171.69 1,477,687.50 0.00 3,138,180.50 32.01% 6630 MAINTENANCE - NON-STUDENT OCCUPIED3,600.00 3,600.00 425.86 921.11 0.00 2,678.89 25.59% 6640MAINTENANCE - STUDENT OCCUPIED 1,507,772.00 1,507,772.00 128,442.45 482,886.81 231.00 1,024,654.19 32.04% 6650GROUND MAINTENANCE SERVICES PR 209,106.00 209,106.00 14,013.46 60,369.08 0.00 148,736.92 28.87% 6810PUPIL TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 2,427,276.00 2,427,276.00 250,599.57 675,064.36 98,255.64 1,653,956.00 31.86% 6820 PUPIL ACTIVITY TRANSPORTATION69,336.00 69,336.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69,336.00 0.00% 6840 NON-REIMB. TRANSPORTATION42,650.00 42,650.00 787.81 31,790.43 0.00 10,859.57 74.54% 6910OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 734,898.00 475,129.00 46,377.87 383,145.92 0.00 91,983.08 80.64% 9200FUND TRANSFER PROGRAM 107,900.00 107,900.00 9,594.46 23,207.95 0.00 84,692.05 21.51% 9500CONTINGENCY RESERVE EXPENSE PR 5,024,629.00 5,016,845.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,016,845.00 0.00% TOTALS: 67,091,689.0067,102,090.00 5,174,365.76 20,292,410.54 190,995.10 46,618,684.36 30.53% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 REVENUE BY FUND 11/03/2011 08:44:53 AM

FOR OCTOBER, 2011 YEAR COMPLETED - 33%

FUNDDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 100GENERAL FUND 67,091,689.00 67,102,090.00 369,975.66 35,775,182.23 0.00 31,326,907.77 53.31% 220FEDERAL FOREST FUND 133,563.00 133,563.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133,563.00 0.00% 241 DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND67,340.00 67,340.00 0.00 43,633.00 0.00 23,707.00 64.80% 242 SPECIAL GRANTS FUND54,335.00 62,312.00 1,177.03 7,528.62 0.00 54,783.38 12.08% 243 STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND0.00 480,990.00 0.00 72,094.90 0.00 408,895.10 14.99% 246 SDFS STATE TOBACCO TAX25,000.00 24,856.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,856.00 0.00% 250 ARRA TITLE I-A BASIC0.00 48,164.00 0.00 411,550.85 0.00 -363,386.85 854.48% 251TITLE I-A BASIC 3,092,390.00 3,092,390.00 208,262.43 804,981.71 0.00 2,287,408.29 26.03% 256 ARRA IDEA PART B0.00 60,513.00 0.00 379,578.84 0.00 -319,065.84 627.27% 257IDEA PART B 2,460,959.00 2,460,959.00 179,400.52 614,397.67 0.00 1,846,561.33 24.97% 258IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 163,217.00 163,217.00 17,781.89 52,998.58 0.00 110,218.42 32.47% 259 ARRA IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL0.00 5,451.00 0.00 17,745.03 0.00 -12,294.03 325.54% 263CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL 160,033.00 160,033.00 0.00 180,579.63 0.00 -20,546.63 112.84% 271TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 1,700,398.00 1,028,949.00 153,672.82 386,210.15 0.00 642,738.85 37.53% 273TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 328,532.00 328,532.00 7,130.76 82,704.29 0.00 245,827.71 25.17% 274HEAD START 1,226,844.00 1,226,844.00 98,271.37 429,092.49 0.00 797,751.51 34.98% 276 HEAD START TRAINING GRANT21,050.00 21,050.00 1,638.70 9,149.83 0.00 11,900.17 43.47% 278 HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT93,504.00 93,504.00 0.00 42,014.35 0.00 51,489.65 44.93% 290CHILD NUTRITION 5,307,350.00 5,307,350.00 501,845.41 1,111,344.69 0.00 4,196,005.31 20.94% 310BOND INTEREST & REDEMP. FUND 4,535,680.00 4,535,680.00 4,639.92 905,949.73 0.00 3,629,730.27 19.97% 420SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 6,146,530.00 6,146,530.00 8,014.36 1,566,221.37 0.00 4,580,308.63 25.48% 610PRINT SHOP FUND 113,656.00 113,656.00 15,632.49 44,071.57 0.00 69,584.43 38.78% 710VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 830,689.00 830,689.00 187.93 535.54 0.00 830,153.46 0.06% TOTALS: 93,552,759.0093,494,662.00 1,567,631.29 42,937,565.07 0.00 50,557,096.93 45.93% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 EXPENDITURES BY FUND 11/03/2011 08:44:48 AM

FOR OCTOBER, 2011 YEAR COMPLETED - 33%

FUNDDESCRIPTION BUDGET AMOUNTADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 100GENERAL FUND 67,091,689.00 67,102,090.00 5,174,365.76 20,292,410.54 190,995.10 46,618,684.36 30.53% 220FEDERAL FOREST FUND 133,563.00 133,563.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133,563.00 0.00% 241DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND 67,340.00 67,340.00 4,106.41 34,047.74 0.00 33,292.26 50.56% 242SPECIAL GRANTS FUND 54,335.00 62,312.00 948.22 1,151.09 300.00 60,860.91 2.33% 243STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND 0.00 480,990.00 36,630.23 101,379.00 29,970.78 349,640.22 27.31% 246SDFS STATE TOBACCO TAX 25,000.00 24,856.00 990.91 8,641.86 1,534.19 14,679.95 40.94% 250ARRA TITLE I-A BASIC 0.00 48,164.00 0.00 116,522.27 0.00 -68,358.27 241.93% 251TITLE I-A BASIC 3,092,390.00 3,092,390.00 209,241.80 729,677.99 3,253.32 2,359,458.69 23.70% 256ARRA IDEA PART B 0.00 60,513.00 0.00 60,672.63 0.00 -159.63 100.26% 257IDEA PART B 2,460,959.00 2,460,959.00 230,429.86 649,684.38 7,317.83 1,803,956.79 26.70% 258IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 163,217.00 163,217.00 13,286.95 52,879.90 122.28 110,214.82 32.47% 259ARRA IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 0.00 5,451.00 0.00 6,296.62 0.00 -845.62 115.51% 263CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL- 160,033.00 160,033.00 12,276.08 57,078.63 39.99 102,914.38 35.69% 271TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 1,700,398.00 1,028,949.00 46,770.41 241,931.71 24,845.98 762,171.31 25.93% 273TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 328,532.00 328,532.00 27,347.04 55,782.34 4,611.70 268,137.96 18.38% 274HEAD START 1,226,844.00 1,226,844.00 107,320.58 333,411.07 10,437.48 882,995.45 28.03% 276HEAD START TRAINING GRANT 21,050.00 21,050.00 306.70 9,149.83 449.00 11,451.17 45.60% 278HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT 93,504.00 93,504.00 6,812.14 23,276.95 33.69 70,193.36 24.93% 290CHILD NUTRITION 5,307,350.00 5,307,350.00 450,015.74 1,395,974.41 608,556.61 3,302,818.98 37.77% 310BOND INTEREST & REDEMP. FUND 4,535,680.00 4,535,680.00 0.00 1,988,950.00 0.00 2,546,730.00 43.85% 420SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 6,146,530.00 6,146,530.00 784,815.79 2,233,523.86 2,455,980.74 1,457,025.40 76.30% 610PRINT SHOP FUND 113,656.00 113,656.00 15,517.94 43,529.05 309.18 69,817.77 38.57% 710VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 830,689.00 830,689.00 61,658.82 175,650.00 0.00 655,039.00 21.15% TOTALS: 93,552,759.0093,494,662.00 7,182,841.38 28,611,621.87 3,338,757.87 61,544,282.26 34.17%