Regular Session Board Meeting Agenda

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:30 p.m.

SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDAHO CODE SECTION 67- 2345 (1) (c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations; (No Action to be Taken)

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 5:00 p.m.

AGENDA

1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. WELCOME

3. ROLL CALL

4. REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action

5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND PERSONNEL ACTION – Self Explanatory – Action a. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – April 2, 2014 b. Special Meeting/Work Session – April 8, 2014 c. Regular Board Meeting – April 15, 2014 d. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – April 16, 2014 e. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Legal Counsel/Personnel – April 30, 2014

6. RECOGNITIONS/VISITORS/CORRESPONDENCE – Information a. Visitors and Correspondence 1) Invitation to New Horizon High School Senior Dinner 2) Invitation to Century High School Senior Brunch b. Recognitions – Information – Ms. Allen c. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. d. Public Comment on the Preparation of the 2014-15 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Budget Annually the Board invites public comment with respect to budget development for the following fiscal year. Thus, the Board Chair will solicit any public comment relative to the preparation of the 2014-15 budget at the time of the meeting. Patrons will be asked to follow Board Protocols for public comment and will need to fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. 7. REPORTS a. Student Representative Reports (3 minutes each) Page 1 of 4

1) Century High School – Duncan Thompson/Madison Morton 2) Highland High School – Emma Brinton/Hans Liu 3) Pocatello High School – Caitlin Lackey/Ethan Hatch 4) New Horizon Center – Maggie Gunn b. Recognition of Student Representatives c. Report on Education Law Institute d. Media Report – Ms. Allen e. Report on Standing Committees for 2013-2014

8. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. ICS/SBAC Update – Mr. Wegner b. Summer Professional Development Report – Mr. Wegner c. Report on Semester vs. Trimester System – Mr. Wegner d. PLATO Update – Mr. Wegner e. Continuous Improvement Plan and Assurance Pages – Mr. Wegner f. Alternate Route to Graduation Requests – Mr. Wegner g. 2013 Idaho NAEP 12th Grade Pilot Results – Mr. Wegner h. Instructional Technology Update – Mr. Wegner i. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Wegner j. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen k. 21st Century After School Program Update – Dr. Mortensen l. Idaho Food Bank Back Pack Program Report – Dr. Mortensen m. Kindergarten Registration Update – Dr. Mortensen n. 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar – Dr. Mortensen o. ISU Social Worker Intern Requests – Dr. Mortensen p. ISU Counseling Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen q. Western Governor’s University Student Teacher Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen r. Report on Elementary Final Write – Dr. Mortensen s. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Dr. Mortensen t. Pocatello High School Accreditation Required Action Follow Up Report – Mr. Devine u. Policy 8351 – Student Activity and Participation Fees and Student Fines – 1st Reading – Mr. Devine v. ISU Dual Credit Report – Year End – Mr. Devine w. Extra-Curricular Participation Fees Report – Year End – Mr. Devine x. Use of Football Helmets and Pads for Summer Camps – Mr. Devine y. Summer Camp Requests – Mr. Devine z. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine aa. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine bb. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Devine

9. BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update b. Free and Reduced Lunch Report c. Purchase and Sale Agreement of ISU/SBE Property Adjacent to Franklin Middle School d. Proposed Fee Increases for 2014-15 and Authorization of Public Hearing e. Liability Insurance Carrier f. Surplus Property Auction g. Bid Awards h. Local Maintenance of Effort i. Final Bus Ridership Counts j. Transportation Funding Cap k. Cell Tower Land Lease Proposal l. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) m. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update

Page 2 of 4

10. EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Campus/ISEE Upload/Technology Update b. Student Enrollment Information Update c. Budget Development for 2014-15 d. Insurance Carriers and Coverages for 2014-2015 e. Elementary Computer Upgrade f. Wellness Dashboard Report g. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update

11. HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report b. Approve Salary Increase for Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year c. Hire Certificated Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year d. Approve Salary Increase for Classified Staff for the 2014-15 School Year e. Delegate Authority to Superintendent to Hire Through the Summer Months f. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update

12. SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Policy 7132 – Use of Social Media – 1st Reading b. Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response – 2nd Reading c. ISBA Summer Leadership Institute d. ISBA Resolutions e. Strategic Planning Requirements f. Calendar/Schedule Superintendent’s Evaluation g. Any Other Superintendent’s Update

13. PUBLIC COMMENT – Self Explanatory a. Public Comment Pertinent to Agenda Action items Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board.

14. CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014 d. Topic: Approve ISU Counseling Intern and Western Governor’s University Student Teaching Intern Requests

15. OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve the Continuous Improvement Plan for Pocatello Community Charter School and the Assurance Pages for PCCS and the District and Direct Submission to the SDE b. Topic: Approve Alternate Routes to Graduation c. Topic: Hear on Second Reading for Adoption: Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response d. Topic: Approve Summer Camp Requests e. Topic: Approve Early Graduation Requests f. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Page 3 of 4

g. Topic: Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement Between ISU/State Board of Education and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 for the Purchase of Land Adjacent to Franklin Middle School h. Topic: Award Bids: Cafeteria Tables – Tendoy Elementary Carpeting and Tile Concrete Replacement of Sidewalks and Stairways Custodial Supplies Instructional Supplies Gasoline/Diesel Fuel Renovation – Highland High School, Building C Roof Replacement – Pocatello High School, Building 1 Parking Lot Renovation – Tyhee Elementary RFP – HVAC Direct Digital Control Energy Management System

16. NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar b. Topic: Approve ISU Social Worker Intern Request c. Topic: Approve the use of Football Helmets and Pads for Summer Camps d. Topic: Authorize a Public Hearing on Fee Increases to be Held on June 17, 2014 Following Proper Publication of Notice e. Topic: Grant Permission to Hold Surplus Property Auction f. Topic: Approve Insurance Carriers and Coverages for 2014-2015 g. Topic: Approve Upgrade of Elementary Computers h. Topic: Approve .84% Salary Increase Along with Steps and Lanes for Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year Policy Issue: Board approves salary increases. i. Topic: Hire Certificated Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year j. Topic: Approve .84% Salary Increase for Classified Staff for the 2014-15 School Year k. Topic: Delegate Authority to the Superintendent to Hire Through the Summer Months l. Topic: Hear on First Reading: Policy 8351 – Student Activity and Participation Fees and Student Fines Policy 7132 – Use of Social Media m. Topic: Adopt ISBA Resolutions and Direct Submission to the ISBA Resolution – Strategic Planning Timeline Resolution – Class Size Averages

17. ANNOUNCEMENTS

18. ADJOURN

Page 4 of 4

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:30 p.m.

SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDAHO CODE SECTION 67- 2345 (1) (c) To conduct deliberations concerning labor negotiations; (No Action to be Taken)

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center 5:00 p.m.

EXPLANATION OF AGENDA

1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

2. WELCOME

3. ROLL CALL

4. REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action

6. RECOGNITIONS/VISITORS/CORRESPONDENCE – Information a. Visitors and Correspondence 1) Invitation to New Horizon High School Senior Dinner 2) Invitation to Century High School Senior Brunch b. Recognitions – Information – Ms. Allen Recognition will be given to students and staff who demonstrate exceptional abilities or provide extraordinary service to others. c. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. d. Public Comment on the Preparation of the 2014-15 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Budget Annually the Board invites public comment with respect to budget development for the following fiscal year. Thus, the Board Chair will solicit any public comment relative to the preparation of the 2014-15 budget at the time of the meeting. Patrons will be asked to follow Board Protocols for public comment and will need to fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Page 1 of 11

7. REPORTS a. Student Representative Reports (3 minutes each) 1) Century High School – Duncan Thompson/Madison Morton 2) Highland High School – Emma Brinton/Hans Liu 3) Pocatello High School – Caitlin Lackey/Ethan Hatch 4) New Horizon Center – Maggie Gunn b. Recognition of Student Representatives Following Student Representative Reports, Chair Gebhardt and the Board will present certificates of appreciation to the student representatives and congratulate them on their graduation achievement and will thank them for their service throughout the school year. c. Report on Education Law Institute The Annual Education Law Institute was held on April 28 & 29, 2014 in Boise, ID. Ms. Gebhardt and Mr. Mattson were in attendance and will provide a brief report at the time of the meeting. d. Media Report – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen will provide a media report pertinent to School District issues over the past month and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. e. Report on Standing Committees for 2013-2014 Board members may have reports on the various committees listed below: 2013-2014 Budget Committee Jim Facer/Dave Mattson CIP Committee/Long Range Facility Planning Jim Facer/Paul Vitale Curriculum Committee Janie Gebhardt/Jackie Cranor District Leadership Committee – October 7, 2013 Paul Vitale Education Foundation (Vice Chair is Designated Representative) Jackie Cranor Head Start Jackie Cranor/Dave Mattson Insurance/Wellness Committee Paul Vitale/Jim Facer Judge Murray’s Juvenile Advisory Committee Janie Gebhardt/Dave Mattson Local Issues-Chamber of Commerce Jackie Cranor/Jim Facer PTA Regional Council Meeting No Meeting Scheduled (7:00 p.m.) Pocatello Community Charter School Liaison Janie Gebhardt/Paul Vitale Safety Committee Jim Facer/Paul Vitale Instructional Technology Committee Dave Mattson Textbook Adoption Janie Gebhardt/Jackie Cranor Key Communicators Paul Vitale/Dave Mattson Fix It Committee Jackie Cranor/Paul Vitale Valley Pride Portneuf River Project Committee Paul Vitale/Dave Mattson

8. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. ICS/SBAC Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will be in attendance to provide an update on the feedback received from principals, test proctors and students regarding SBAC testing and to provide any other ICS/SBAC updates and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. b. Summer Professional Development Report – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will be in attendance to speak to the Professional Development activities planned during the summer across the District. He will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Report on Semester vs. Trimester System – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will be in attendance to report on the outcome of the District Curriculum Committee’s work regarding the semester vs. trimester system and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. d. PLATO Update – Mr. Wegner Recently the administration learned that the state has discontinued its contract with PLATO. Districts will still receive remediation funding from the state but the administration is unaware of the amount or what impact this will have on the District’s use of PLATO for credit recovery. Mr. Wegner will speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. Page 2 of 11 e. Continuous Improvement Plan and Assurance Pages – Mr. Wegner Included in the packet are the Assurance pages for the Pocatello Community Charter School’s Continuous Improvement Plan as well as the District’s Assurance page. Mr. Wegner will speak to the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve submission of the Pocatello Community Charter School’s Continuous Improvement Plan along with the Assurance pages to the State Department of Education under Old Business. f. Alternate Route to Graduation Requests – Mr. Wegner Included in the packet is a memorandum detailing the number of students and the various reasons for completing the alternate route to graduation. Mr. Wegner will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. g. 2013 Idaho NAEP 12th Grade Pilot Results – Mr. Wegner The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) is typically administered to 4th and 8th grade students every two years. Idaho was one of 13 states to participate in a 12th grade NAEP pilot. Idaho was one of just four states in which students showed growth in average math scores compared to 2009 going from an average math score of 153 to 156. Despite the positive gains, the data shows that only 24% of Idaho’s 12th grade students are at or above proficient in math. However, Idaho’s 12th grade students continue to outpace the nation in reading but did not show significant growth compared to 2009. 41% of Idaho’s 12th grade students are at or above proficient in reading. These results mirror what Idaho has seen on the SAT results over the last two years. Mr. Wegner will be in attendance to speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. h. Instructional Technology Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will report on any instructional technology updates and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. i. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner will report on any other Curriculum updates at the time of the meeting. j. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to provide any Head Start Program update and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. k. 21st Century After School Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to provide any report on 21st Century After School Program updates and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. l. Idaho Food Bank Back Pack Program Report – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is the current Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack program report. Dr. Mortensen will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. m. Kindergarten Registration Update – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet are the current Kindergarten Registration numbers for the 2014-15 school year. Dr. Mortensen will speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. n. 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is the 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar. Dr. Mortensen will review the calendar and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to adopt the calendar under New Business. o. ISU Social Worker Intern Requests – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a request from ISU to place a Social Worker Intern at Edahow Elementary during the 2014-15 school year. This request has been reviewed by the administration and is in order. Dr. Mortensen will review the request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the request under New Business. p. ISU Counseling Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a request from ISU to place a Counseling Intern at Jefferson Elementary and Irving Middle Schools for the 2014-15 school year. This request has been reviewed by the administration and is in order. Dr. Mortensen will review the request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the request under the Consent Agenda. q. Western Governor’s University Student Teacher Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a request from the Western Governor’s University to place a student teaching intern at Lewis & Clark and Gate City Elementary Schools for the 1st and 2nd trimester of the 2014-15 school year. The administration has reviewed the request which is in order. Dr. Mortensen will review the

Page 3 of 11

request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the request under the Consent Agenda. r. Report on Elementary Final Write – Dr. Mortensen Included in the packet is a summary of the outcome of the elementary writing assignment. Dr. Mortensen will be in attendance to review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. s. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen will provide any other Elementary Education updates at the time of the meeting. t. Pocatello High School Accreditation Required Action Follow Up Report – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is a memorandum detailing the progress of the required actions for Pocatello High School following its Accreditation Review with AdvancEd. Mr. Devine will report on the progress and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. u. Policy 8351 – Student Activity and Participation Fees and Student Fines – 1st Reading – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is Policy 8351 – Student Activity and Participation Fees and Student Fines and the memorandum detailing the proposed change to the policy which was reviewed at the April Work Session. Mr. Devine will speak to the change and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to hear the Policy on first reading under New Business. v. ISU Dual Credit Report – Year End – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is the ISU Dual Credit Report with information for the 2013-14 school year. Mr. Devine will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. w. Extra-Curricular Participation Fees Report – Year End – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is the year-end Extra-Curricular Participation Fees Report for the 2013-14 school year. Mr. Devine will review the report and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. x. Use of Football Helmets and Pads for Summer Camps – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is a memorandum documenting requests received from Century, Highland and Pocatello High Schools requesting permission to use school football helmets and pads during summer football camps. This request is made annually and Mr. Devine will be in attendance to review the requests and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under New Business. y. Summer Camp Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are summer camp requests from two of the high schools. The requests have been reviewed by the administration and are in order. Mr. Devine will review the requests and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. z. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet is the Early Graduation memorandum from April and an Early Graduation memorandum for May. The memorandums list the number of early graduation requests by school and the reasons students are requesting early graduation. The early graduation requests from April were reviewed at the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting, however, the Board Action was inadvertently left off of the agenda. Mr. Devine will be in attendance to report on the requests and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the early graduation requests for April and May under Old Business. aa. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine Included in the packet are Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. The administration has reviewed the information and the requests are in order. Mr. Devine will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. bb. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine will report on any other Secondary Education updates at the time of the meeting.

9. BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update Included in the packet is the current Idaho General Fund Revenue Report with revenue information as of April and the Idaho Economic Forecast 2014 – 2017. Mr. Reed will review the information and provide any further General Fund updates at the time of the meeting. b. Free and Reduced Lunch Report Included in the packet is a current Free and Reduced Lunch report. Mr. Reed will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. Page 4 of 11

c. Purchase and Sale Agreement of ISU/SBE Property Adjacent to Franklin Middle School Included in the packet is a Purchase and Sale Agreement between ISU/State Board of Education and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No 25 for the purchase of property adjacent to Franklin Middle School. The purchase of this property was discussed at previous Board Meetings prior to any action being considered. Mr. Reed will briefly review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement under Old Business. d. Proposed Fee Increases for 2014-15 and Authorization of Public Hearing Included in the packet is a memorandum regarding the school breakfast and lunch fee increases. This information was reviewed at the April 8, 2014 Work Session and the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting. The Board will hold a public hearing on proposed fees during the June 17, 2014 Regular Board Meeting and will take action to adopt new or increased fees following the public hearing. Also included in the packet is a Resolution, Notice of Fee Increases and a timeline for fee increases. Mr. Reed will speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to authorize a Public Hearing on Fee Increases to be held on June 17, 2014 following proper publication of notice under New Business. e. Liability Insurance Carrier Included in the packet is a memorandum with information regarding the District’s new liability insurance carrier. The District has been served by the CNA Liability Insurance carrier for the last several years and will now be covered by ICRMP Liability Insurance. Mr. Reed will speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. f. Surplus Property Auction Included in the packet is a memorandum requesting permission to proceed with the auction of surplus materials. Mr. Reed will be in attendance to review the request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to grant permission to hold the surplus property auction under New Business. g. Bid Awards Included in the packet are memorandums recommending various bid awards. Mr. Reed will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to award the bids under Old Business. h. Local Maintenance of Effort Mr. Reed will be in attendance to provide an update on the District’s local maintenance of effort with respect to special education funding. He will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. i. Final Bus Ridership Counts The final bus ridership count for the 2013-14 school year was completed April 14 – 18, 2014. The count came in at 3,875 students. Bus ridership is down 140 since the February count and down 123 students from the highest count in December, 2013. Mr. Reed will speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. j. Transportation Funding Cap Included in the packet is the Transportation Funding Cap report detailing the District’s reimbursement for transportation expenses. Mr. Reed will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. k. Cell Tower Land Lease Proposal Included in the packet is a proposed lease agreement for TMO to rent a parcel of land at the Chubbuck Elementary site in order to place a new monopole to improve cell coverage in the area. Mr. Reed will review the proposal and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to consider taking action on the proposal at the June 17, 2014 Regular Board Meeting. l. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) Mr. Reed will report on any proposed building and subdivisions (new construction) at the time of the meeting. m. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update Mr. Reed will report on any other Business Operations updates at the time of the meeting

10. EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Campus/ISEE Upload/Technology Update Mr. Smart will be in attendance to report on any Campus/ISEE Upload/Technology updates and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. Page 5 of 11

b. Student Enrollment Information Update Included in the packet is current student enrollment data. Mr. Smart will be in attendance to review the enrollment data and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. c. Budget Development for 2014-15 Included in the packet are materials relative to the preparation of the 2014-15 budget. Mr. Smart will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. d. Insurance Carriers and Coverages for 2014-2015 Included in the packet is a memorandum detailing the proposed Insurance Carriers and Coverages for Medical, Dental, Vision and Life for 2014-2015. Mr. Smart will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. Carriers for medical, dental, vision and life are Regence Blue Shield, Delta Dental, Vision Services Plan (VSP) and The Hartford. The Board will be asked to approve the Insurance Carriers and Coverages under New Business. e. Elementary Computer Upgrade Included in the packet is a memorandum detailing the rationale for the request to upgrade the recently bid replacement computers for elementary labs. The cost increase for the upgrade is approximately $20,000 which will be paid for out of the School Plant Facilities Fund and is in the proposed technology budget. The request was presented to the Board at the May 13, 2014 Work Session. Mr. Smart will briefly review the request and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the elementary computer upgrade under New Business. f. Wellness Dashboard Report Included in the packet is the current Wellness Dashboard Report with information as of March. Mr. Smart will review the information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. g. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update Mr. Smart will report on any other Employee Services updates at the time of the meeting.

11. HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report Included in the packet is the monthly Human Resources report. Dr. Howell will be in attendance to review the report and answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the Human Resources Activity under the Consent Agenda. b. Approve Salary Increase for Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year The legislature authorized a 1% increase for administrative salaries for the 2014-15 school year. Because the District pays above the state allocation a 1% pass through increase from the state amounts to a .84% increase for District staff. Dr. Howell will be in attendance to speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the salary increase along with steps and lanes for administrators for the 2014-15 school year under New Business. c. Hire Certificated Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year Included in the packet is a list of certificated administrators recommended for hire for the 2014-15 school year. Dr. Howell will review the list and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to hire the certificated administrators per the attached list under New Business. d. Approve Salary Increase for Classified Staff for the 2014-15 School Year The legislature authorized a 1% increase for classified salaries for the 2014-15 school year. Because the District pays above the state allocation a 1% pass through increase from the state amounts to a .84% increase for District staff. Dr. Howell will be in attendance to speak to this information and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to approve the salary increase for classified staff for the 2014-15 school year under New Business. e. Delegate Authority to Superintendent to Hire Through the Summer Months Annually the Board delegates authority to the Superintendent to hire through the summer months to avoid holding up the hiring process as the Board meets only once a month during the summer. The responsibility will shift to the Superintendent beginning May 21, 2014 through August 31, 2014 at which time the authority will revert back to the Board. Dr. Howell will speak to this process and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to delegate authority to the Superintendent to hire through the summer months under New Business. f. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update Dr. Howell will report on any other Human Resources updates at the time of the meeting.

Page 6 of 11

12. SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Policy 7132 – Use of Social Media – 1st Reading Included in the packet is Policy 7132 – Use of Social Media. The draft policy was reviewed at the May 13, 2014 Work Session. Ms. Vagner will review the policy and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to hear the policy on first reading under New Business. b. Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response – 2nd Reading Included in the packet is Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response. The policy was heard on first reading at the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting and was posted for public input following the first reading. Input was received which is included in the packet, however, no changes were recommended. Ms. Vagner will briefly review the policy and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to hear the policy on second reading for adoption under Old Business. c. ISBA Summer Leadership Institute Included in the packet is an agenda for the ISBA Summer Leadership Institute that will be held on July 17, 2014 in Idaho Falls. Ms. Vagner will review the agenda and will solicit Board interest at the time of the meeting. d. ISBA Resolutions Included in the packet are two draft Resolutions to be submitted to the ISBA for legislative consideration. The Resolutions address issues with the Strategic Planning and Class Size legislation implemented July 1, 2014. Ms. Vagner will discuss the Resolutions and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to adopt the Resolutions and direct submission to the ISBA under New Business. e. Strategic Planning Requirements Included in the packet is a revised copy of the District’s Strategic Plan Diagram and a copy of HB521 – Strategic Planning and Training. Ms. Vagner will speak to the legislation and the District’s compliance with the Strategic Planning and Training requirements and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. f. Calendar/Schedule Superintendent’s Evaluation Included in the packet is the calendar of the Board’s Meeting Schedule and various Committee Meetings from May 19, 2014 through July 4, 2014 inclusive of the Superintendent’s Evaluation which will be conducted prior to the June 17, 2014 Regular Board Meeting. Ms. Vagner will review the calendar and will answer any questions at the time of the meeting. The Board will be asked to confirm attendance for various commitments at the time of the meeting. g. Any Other Superintendent’s Update Ms. Vagner will provide any other Superintendent’s update at the time of the meeting.

14. CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity Policy Issue: Board approves Human Resource Activity Background Information: Included in the packet is documentation of the Human Resource Activity regarding certified employees since the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve Human Resource Activity as presented. b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims Page 7 of 11

Policy Issue: Board approves all Claims. Background Information: Included in the packet are bills and invoices as of May 9, 2014 in the amount of $1,901,227.90. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the bills and invoices as of May 9, 2014 in the amount of $1,901,227.90. c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014 Policy Issue: Board acts on Financial Information. Background Information: Included in the packet is supplemental financial information for the period of April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve supplemental financial information from April 1, 2014 through April 30, 2014 as presented. d. Topic: Approve ISU Counseling Intern and Western Governor’s University Student Teaching Intern Requests Policy Issue: Board approves placement of interns in various District schools. Background Information: Included in the packet is a request from ISU to place a counseling intern at Jefferson Elementary and Irving Middle School for the 2014-15 school year and a request from the Western Governor’s University to place a student teacher intern at Lewis & Clark and Gate City Elementary Schools for the 1st and 2nd trimester of the 2014-15 school year. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the ISU counseling intern request and the Western Governor’s University student teaching intern request as presented. Board Direction/Action on Consent Agenda:

15. OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve the Continuous Improvement Plan for Pocatello Community Charter School and the Assurance Pages for PCCS and the District and Direct Submission to the SDE Policy Issues: Board approves Continuous Improvement Plans and Assurance Pages and directs submission to the State Department of Education. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Continuous Improvement Plan for Pocatello Community Charter School and the Assurance Pages for PCCS and the District and direct submission to the SDE as presented. Board Direction/Action: b. Topic: Approve Alternate Routes to Graduation Policy Issue: Board approves alternate routes to graduation. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: c. Topic: Hear on Second Reading for Adoption: Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Policy Issue: Board adopts policy. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board hear on second reading for adoption the above listed policy as presented. Board Direction/Action: d. Topic: Approve Summer Camp Requests Policy Issue: Board approves summer camp requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the summer camp requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: e. Topic: Approve Early Graduation Requests Policy Issue: Board approves early graduation requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the early graduation requests for April and May as presented. Page 8 of 11

Board Direction/Action: f. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Policy Issue: Board approves out of District/overnight field trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: g. Topic: Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement Between ISU/State Board of Education and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 for the Purchase of Land Adjacent to Franklin Middle School Policy Issue: Board approves Purchase and Sale Agreements. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement between ISU/State Board of Education and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 for the purchase of land adjacent to Franklin Middle School as presented. Board Direction/Action: h. Topic: Award Bids: Cafeteria Tables – Tendoy Elementary Carpeting and Tile Concrete Replacement of Sidewalks and Stairways Custodial Supplies Instructional Supplies Gasoline/Diesel Fuel Renovation – Highland High School, Building C Roof Replacement – Pocatello High School, Building 1 Parking Lot Renovation – Tyhee Elementary RFP – HVAC Direct Digital Control Energy Management System Policy Issue: Board awards bids. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board award the above listed bids as presented. Board Direction/Action:

16. NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar Policy Issue: Board approves calendars. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the 2014-15 Lincoln Center Calendar as presented. Board Direction/Action: b. Topic: Approve ISU Social Worker Intern Request Policy Issue: Board approves the placement of social worker interns in various District schools. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the ISU Social Worker Intern request as presented. Board Direction/Action: c. Topic: Approve the use of Football Helmets and Pads for Summer Camps Policy Issues: Board approves the use of District equipment. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the use of football helmets and pads for summer camps as presented. Board Direction/Action: d. Topic: Authorize a Public Hearing on Fee Increases to be Held on June 17, 2014 Following Proper Publication of Notice Policy Issue: Board authorizes public hearings. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Page 9 of 11

Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board authorize a Public Hearing on Fee Increases to be held June 17, 2014 to following proper publication of Notice as presented. Board Direction/Action: e. Topic: Grant Permission to Hold Surplus Property Auction Policy Issue: Board authorizes disposal of surplus property. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board grant permission to hold a surplus property auction as presented. Board Direction/Action: f. Topic: Approve Insurance Carriers and Coverages for 2014-2015 Policy Issue: Board approves insurance carriers and coverages. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the Insurance Carriers and Coverages for 2014-2015 as presented. Board Direction/Action: g. Topic: Approve Upgrade of Elementary Computers Policy Issue: Board approves upgrades to computers. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the upgrade to the elementary computers as presented. Board Direction/Action: h. Topic: Approve .84% Salary Increase Along with Steps and Lanes for Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year Policy Issue: Board approves salary increases. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the .84% salary increase along with steps and lanes for administrators for the 2014-15 school year as presented. Board Direction/Action: i. Topic: Hire Certificated Administrators for the 2014-15 School Year Policy Issue: Board hires certificated administrators. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board hire the certificated administrators for the 2014-15 school year per the attached list as presented. Board Direction/Action: j. Topic: Approve .84% Salary Increase for Classified Staff for the 2014-15 School Year Policy Issue: Board approves salary increases. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the .84% salary increase for classified staff for the 2014-15 school year as presented. Board Direction/Action: k. Topic: Delegate Authority to the Superintendent to Hire Through the Summer Months Policy Issue: Board delegates authority to hire to the Superintendent. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board delegate Authority to the Superintendent to hire through the summer months with authority automatically shifting back to the Board after August 31, 2014 as presented. Board Direction/Action: l. Topic: Hear on First Reading: Policy 8351 – Student Activity and Participation Fees and Student Fines Policy 7132 – Use of Social Media Policy Issue: Board adopts policy. Background Information: These items were previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board hear on first reading the above listed policies as presented. Board Direction/Action: m. Topic: Adopt ISBA Resolutions and Direct Submission to the ISBA Page 10 of 11

Resolution – Strategic Planning Timeline Resolution – Class Size Averages Policy Issue: Board adopts Resolutions. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommends Board adopt the above listed ISBA Resolutions and direct submission to the ISBA as presented. Board Direction/Action:

17. ANNOUNCEMENTS

18. ADJOURN

Page 11 of 11 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION To Discuss Matters as Allowed by Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To Consider the Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against a Public School Student (With Option to Take any Action Pertinent to Student Discipline in Open Session) Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 County of Bannock – State of Idaho

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:30 p.m.

BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Janie Gebhardt, Chair, Board of Trustees Jackie Cranor, Vice Chair, Board of Trustees Paul Vitale, Clerk, Board of Trustees Jim Facer, Member, Board of Trustees (Excused) Dave Mattson, Member, Board of Trustees Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

Call to Order/Executive Session – Student Discipline: Chair Gebhardt called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Vitale to adjourn to Executive Session. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Mattson, aye; Mr. Vitale, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye. The Board adjourned to Executive Session at 4:33 p.m.

Purpose: To discuss student discipline. The Board proceeded to discuss student discipline as provided in Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) to consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public school student;

OTHERS PRESENT: Student Docket No. 14-51 Student Docket No. 14-51 Grandmother Dixie Erickson, Assistant Principal, Hawthorne Middle School Kent Hobbs, Director of Student Support Services Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 5:20 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Ms. Cranor that the Board expel Student Docket No. 14-51 from attendance at the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 through the remainder of the 2013-2014 school year.

Such motion is based upon the judgment of the Board of Trustees that Student Docket No. 14-51 has: 1. Engaged in conduct in violation of the District’s Student Discipline Policy relating to physical aggression. 2. Engaged in conduct, which in the judgment of the Board, is continuously disruptive of the school’s instructional effectiveness and of the school’s discipline. 3. Engaged in conduct, which in the judgment of the Board, is detrimental to the health, welfare and safety of other pupils.

However, pursuant to the statutory discretion provided to the Board relating to the discipline of students and with consideration of the input of the District’s administration, this expulsion shall be held in

Page 1 of 3 abeyance and not put into place contingent upon Student Docket No. 14-51 meeting the following conditions: 1. The student shall return to his placement at Hawthorne Middle school. 2. Attendance shall be pursuant to an academic and behavioral contract developed in conjunction with Highland High School. The plan shall be in place for the remainder of this school year and the entirety of next school year. This contract shall be developed during a meeting with the family/legal guardians the student and the school’s administration. The final terms of the contract are at the sole discretion of the school’s administration and such terms may be modified during while attending at Highland High School. a. The Board would request that the contract include, at minimum: i. The student shall have set attendance expectations and the student shall not be absent from school with the exception of a significant or emergency situation such as a death in the family or a medically excused absence. ii. The student shall have set grade expectations with a specific minimum set per course. Should the student fall behind on coursework, the student shall be expected to use the supports in place at the school for assistance. iii. The student shall be required to immediately comply with teacher and administrative directives and shall not act in any insubordinate manner. iv. The student shall engage in fifteen (15) hours of community service outside of the school setting. Such community service shall be in addition to any community service ordered pursuant to any court, or juvenile diversion program. Proof of completion of such community service shall be provided to Ms. Erickson on or before May 19, 2014. v. The student must meet all minimum grade and attendance expectations in order to participate in extracurricular activities. vi. Consideration shall be given to the student returning to honors courses for the 2014-2015 school year so as to continue to challenge the student academically and prevent the student from becoming bored and/or disruptive in the classroom. 3. Should the student be provided any social services or health care services or be under the purview of the juvenile probation department, documentation will be entered into which permits a free flow of information between these individuals or providers and the school, only with regard to matters which impact upon the student’s education.

Should the student engage in any other infraction of District or School Discipline Policies, or fail to fulfill the reasonable terms and conditions established by the Board for continued enrollment, the student shall be brought back before the Board of Trustees for consideration of implementation of the expulsion held in abeyance or as separately determined. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board recessed at 5:24 p.m.

Return to Executive Session – Student Discipline: Following the recess, a motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Vitale to reconvene to Executive Session at 5:27 p.m. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Mattson, aye; Mr. Vitale, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye.

OTHERS PRESENT: Student Docket No. 13-16 (Not Present) Student Docket No. 14-49 (Not Present) Student Docket No. 14-50 (Not Present) Kent Hobbs, Director of Student Support Services Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 5:39 p.m. No action was taken by the Board at the time of the meeting.

Page 2 of 3 Adjourn: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Ms. Cranor to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned at 5:39 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 3 of 3 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES SPECIAL MEETING/WORK SESSION Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Board Room at the Education Service Center 1:30 p.m.

BOARD MEMBERS/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Janie Gebhardt, Chair Jim Facer, Asst. Treasurer (Excused) Jackie Cranor, Vice Chair Dave Mattson, Member Paul Vitale, Clerk Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

A Special Meeting/Work Session of the Board of Trustees of Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 was held on Tuesday, April 8, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. in the Board Room at the Education Service Center, 3115 Pole Line Road, Pocatello, Idaho, as provided in Section 33-510, Idaho Code;

Convene Work Session Chair Gebhardt Convened the Work Session at 1:28 p.m. She reviewed the agenda and the addendum and said the Special Meeting/Work Session was for the purpose of the administration discussing with the Board the following topics:

1. Convene Work Session 2. Annual Departmental Reports: Business Services; Employee Services; Human Resources; Public Information; Curriculum and Instruction 3. Emergency Levy Funds 4. New Special Education Accountability Requirements / Regional Service Centers / 2014-15 Projected Enrollment and Staffing / Title VI-B K-12 Budget 5. Draft Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response 6. Update on the Refinancing of the School District Bond 7. Food Service Update: Price Increase per Federal Regulations; Changes to Food Service Federal Nutrition Guidelines and Impact to Fundraising 8. Purchase of ISU Property Adjacent to Franklin Middle School 9. Budget Preparation for 2014-15 10. Public Comment Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. 11. Adjourn

Annual Departmental Reports Business Services Mr. Reed introduced the Business Office staff: Marcie Stone, Michele Leiby and Lisa Russell. He said the department was responsible for a $96 million budget. He said every penny that came through the District went through them. He said the District had never had a finding in its audit because of their hard work and adhering to Board policy and processes. He said accountability to the public was a crucial part of their job. He said Ms. Stone managed all of the grants and was the District’s accountant. He said she managed 40 to 60 grants ranging from $500 to $6 million. He said it was important to be exact for compliance purposes. He said the District had over 2,200 employees that were paid through the District’s Payroll department and amounted to approximately $46 million. He said over 20,000 checks were processed the previous year and there were over 19,000 vendors tracked

Page 1 of 9 on a daily basis. He said the vendor file was very large and vendors spanned the country. He said Ms. Stone was also responsible to monitor the District’s cash flow and investments. He said he appreciated the team. Ms. Gebhardt asked how long the staff had been with the District. Ms. Stone said she had been with the District for 2- 1/2 years. Ms. Leiby said she had been with the District for 15 years in various departments. Ms. Russell said she had been with the District for 7 years and was previously in the Business Office before switching to accounting. Employee Services Mr. Smart introduced the Employee Services staff: Carrie Auger and Whitney Talbot. He said they covered a variety of responsibilities. He said Whitney just joined the Payroll team the day before and was replacing Deb Black who had been in that position for over 20 years. He said Ms. Auger was out sick. He said the two of them processed payroll and made sure staff were paid every month. He said it was a rare occasion that there were any inaccuracies with payroll. He said C.B. Giles was the District’s Wellness and Insurance guru and was also the safety and liability resource. He said she was an invaluable member of the team and was very good at what she did. He said Regence BlueShield had even invited her to participate in their Round Table Discussion in Seattle, WA. He said it was a good experience for her. He said Keary Tonks also contributed to the team by handling data processing issues. He said he was also an invaluable team member. Human Resources Dr. Howell said he reported all of the changes with certificated staff during his monthly Human Resources Report but it was his staff that made it happen behind the scenes. He said the department interfaced with about 1,400 people on average per month for various issues. He said Diane Hansen had been with the District a long time and started as a high school work study student. He said she was responsible to manage the classified staff including maintenance, food service and transportation. He said a lot of employees came and went from those positions. He said she was constantly posting, advertising and orienting new staff. He said she also handled PERSI and retirement issues. He said she was instrumental in compiling policy review for classified staff. He said Laurie Ramasko also helped with compiling and tracking policy review. He said Shauna Miller managed employee insurance, facilities rentals and Cobra. He said she was very knowledgeable with retirement and Cobra issues. He said Ms. Ramasko was the newest staff member and had been with the District for almost 2 years. He said she had done a great job taking over for Nancy Cutler who had previously been with the District for 23 years. He said he appreciated the team helping her to learn the job. He said she was responsible to manage the certificated staff, administrators and coaches. He said Val Jensen was in charge of substitute teachers and managed filling and placing up to 100 substitutes on a daily basis. He said the District upgraded its calling system last year and Ms. Jensen was instrumental in getting it up and running. He said even when system didn’t work right she was quick to make personal calls and fill the positions. He said he appreciated having such a great team. He said the department was reduced by one staff member over three years ago and the team had done an exceptional job taking on the extra load. Public Information Ms. Allen introduced Shawna Sprague. She said she and Ms. Sprague were responsible to carry out the community relations and communications duties. She said Ms. Sprague also served as the District’s receptionist and provided administrative support for the department. She said hers was the first voice or face that people saw or heard when contacting the District Office. She said she took endless calls and complaints and did it all with a smile on her face. She said she and Ms. Sprague carried out the strategic goal of communicating the Vision and Mission. She said she also handled records’ requests from outside agencies. She said the department was responsible to promote a positive District image and to promote the achievements of students and staff through recognitions. She said other duties included coordinating the media, creating press releases, scheduling interviews and responding timely and accurately to public record requests while staying in compliance with FERPA regulations. She said she was responsible to coordinate and track the community engagement of the administrators and Board Members. She said she directed the activities of the Pocatello Education Foundation including fundraising events, tax reporting and compliance for an annual budget of $200,000. She said Ms. Sprague managed the purchasing process for grants each year which was an additional duty due to the downsizing of District Office staff a few years before. She said Ms. Sprague was a remarkable employee with an impeccable work ethic. She said she was productive, was rarely absent, was a quick learner and was eager to take on new challenges. She said she did not know what she would do without her. Curriculum and Instruction Mr. Wegner introduced his team: Rhonda Naftz, Cami Chopski and Kathy Luras. He said the department was responsible for development and oversight of the K-12 curriculum, state testing, District assessments, oversight of the Assessment Committee, credit recovery, professional development program, new teacher mentors, textbook adoptions, instructional technology, data analysis for School Improvement Planning and the GATE Program. He said all of those areas were managed with the few people in attendance. He said Ms. Luras handled any Page 2 of 9 curriculum issues and was the District’s Test Coordinator and had been very busy with the implementation of the SBAC field test. He said Ms. Chopski was the Testing and Assessment Specialist and was very good at what she did. He said she collected and created data analysis templates in Excel. He said she submitted all of the Star Rating and Graduation appeals to the state and stayed current with any changes to State Department of Education rule changes. He said she managed budgets, created agendas and took minutes for various committee meetings among many other things. He said the curriculum department shared 35% of the Business Office Administrative Assistant’s time. He said that person used to be Whitney Talbot who recently transferred to Payroll. He said Mr. Reed and himself would interview for the new administrative assistant position the next day. He said that position was responsible for ordering textbooks and consumables, processing professional development paperwork, setting up professional development courses and schedules and collecting verification forms for staff members. He said the Professional Technical Education department was encompassed in the curriculum department and Ms. Naftz was the PTE Coordinator. He said PTE made up the majority of the District’s elective programs at the secondary level. He said students received career readiness and exploration instruction. He said Ms. Naftz managed a $508,000 budget overall which was made up of several budgets and did an outstanding job working with the high schools. Elementary and Secondary Education Mr. Devine introduced Tara Jensen and Robin Griggs. He said he would cover Dr. Mortensen’s report. He said with just under 13,000 students, 40 administrators and 800 certificated staff there were constant issues to address. He said Ms. Jensen and Ms. Griggs did a great job of informing the Directors of any issues on a daily basis. He said there was a large contingency of parents, students and staff and handling activities, complaints and a variety of needs was a huge job. He said in addition Ms. Jensen and Ms. Griggs were responsible to assist with Student Support Services and handled scheduling and notification for student discipline. Ms. Vagner said the elementary and secondary secretaries were directly involved with maintaining compliance and reporting to the state. Mr. Devine said Ms. Jensen had been with the District for 9 years and Ms. Griggs had been with the District for 22 years and was in her first year in her current position.

Emergency Levy Funds Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was a document that detailed the use of the Emergency Levy Fund budget and the proposed use for the remaining funds. He said the recommendation was to use the remaining budget to fund SBAC test proctors in the amount of $57,600, 20 iPad minis inclusive of a charging station for the middle and high schools at $42,700 which would support the use of eBooks in the classroom, the installation of additional wifi equipment at $2,000 and an ICS printing budget at three of the high schools at $1,900 each. He said the total amount to be utilized was $108,182.96 and used up the remaining Emergency Levy Fund as was originally intended. He said the Board would be asked to consider authorizing the release of the Emergency Levy Funds at its Regular Board Meeting the following Tuesday. Ms. Cranor said she was a little disappointed that the District was not able to use the Emergency Levy Funds for any other purpose. She said the District had lots of other needs that should be looked at more closely. She said she didn’t know what other Districts were doing to fund the implementation of SBAC but it saddened her that all of the funds had to be spent for this purpose. Ms. Vagner said SBAC drove the decision making, but the additional wireless infrastructure would ultimately benefit the instructional program. She said it allowed the District to make greater strides with the implementation of technology in the schools. She said during the Accreditation Review for Century High School the only deficit identified was with regard to the integration of technology in the educational program. She said the addition to the wireless infrastructure would help to remedy that deficit and would benefit students. She said the iPad minis would provide access to electronic devices for students that did not have access to personal devices. She said the elementary schools were more technology rich than the middle and high schools and these funds helped to fill that gap. Ms. Cranor said she agreed with the implementation of technology in schools but was frustrated that the state did not fund the things it mandated like the Idaho Common Core and SBAC. She said because of the lack of funding from the state many important things got overlooked at the District level. She said she wished there was a way to diversify the allocation of funds. Mr. Wegner said the funding poised the District to be ready with the implementation of SBAC in the coming year but the a large portion of the money would go towards mobile labs in the middle and high schools which were used extensively for instruction. He said a lot of the educational resources that teachers depended on were digital based. Ms. Gebhardt said she was thankful the District was able to authorize the Emergency Levy and would not have been able to add the necessary technology otherwise. Ms. Vagner said recently Mr. Jolley reported on all of the upcoming technology needs that would also need to be addressed in the near future.

Page 3 of 9 New Special Education Accountability Requirements / Regional Service Centers / 2014-15 Projected Enrollment and Staffing / Title VI-B K-12 Budget Ms. Vagner said there were several major changes coming to Special Education accountability requirements that would go into effect as of July 1, 2014. She said Ms. Sanford would cover the enrollment changes and staffing needs for the coming school year and the impact to the school social workers. Ms. Sanford said the state changes affected the operations of the District. She said the State Systematic Improvement Plan (SSIP) and Results Driven Accountability (RDA) were mandatory changes. She said Districts were informed that changes were coming but had not been provided with the detail as to what that would look like. She said included in the packet was information from the SDE regarding the SSIP. She said it showed a three phase rollout. She said the first phase would begin on July 1, 2014 and included the removal of the Regional Consultants who had been training and supporting teachers and directors which was being replaced with Regional Service Center personnel. She said Pocatello may get a Regional Service Center that would be housed at Idaho State University but had yet to be confirmed. She said the other phases included moving to a four year cycle of monitoring. She said the District was currently on a five year cycle based on compliance which would be shifted to an outcomes model. She said in the first year the Cabinet level staff would do a self-evaluation and would develop a plan of effectiveness and ongoing monitoring in a platform similar to the WISE Tool. She said the federal government had oversight of the RDA for Districts and was part of the IDEA reauthorization. She said changing to a results driven model was first discussed in 2004. She said a statewide audit was conducted in 2011 and as a result the proposed changes were rolling out in July. She said with an outcomes based model there were various indicators that the state judged a District on and Districts were required to report specific things. She said the biggest change was the removal of Indicator 15 which was Timely Compliance. She said the state determined that timely compliance of an IEP did not determine student success, but she would recommend continuing to monitor the timely compliance of IEPs to ensure the District was staying on top of the IEP process. She said there needed to be a seamless transition between the elementary and secondary levels. She said there were three areas that had to meet specific compliance requirements including meeting the 60 day IEP implementation timeline and conducting IEPs by a student’s 3rd birthday. She said the District had done a tremendous amount of work at Head Start to ensure that it met the IEP by the 3rd birthday. She said the last area of compliance that the District had to meet with the secondary transition. She said as a result of new outcomes process the District would be held to a higher standard for students to meet the benchmark measures on the state assessments. She said schools would be placed into different support categories based on student achievement. She said there would be a Star Rating type of improvement plan for targeted or intensive support. She said there was a significant change coming to the SLD determination process. She said the current process was a discrepancy model which took a student’s achievement level and IQ score and if there was a span of 15 or more points between the two a student qualified for services. She said the new process would eliminate that determination process and would implement a new model that took a school psychologist over eight hours to complete and could end up being over 20 pages. She said the new process would eliminate the pattern of strengths and weaknesses which was a cognitive test that had been integral in identifying students that require services. She said the change would place a greater emphasis on RtI and a third prong of eligibility. She said there were some concerns with the change because most of the District’s Tier II interventions would fall under this new category and would drastically increase the number of students served by the special education department. She said the District currently utilized Mileposts to track interventions and there were over 2,200 open cases. She said that was much more than 6 people could take on. She included in the addendum was additional student enrollment data from 2006-07 to 2013-14. She said the historical data showed a large jump in 2006-07, a steady decline from 2008-09 through 2011-12 and another steady increase from 2012-13 to the current year. She said the largest groups of students served were SLD students, then speech/language, other health impaired, developmental disabilities and intellectual disabilities. She said developmental delays were generally found in students ages 3 – 9 and was heavily concentrated at the Lincoln Center. She said it was sometimes hard to detect a disability in students who were still developing, so the developmental delays was kind of a catchall. She said numbers were constantly fluctuating which caused staffing challenges. She reviewed the staffing demographics. She said a majority of the special education staff were parapros, then special education teachers. Ms. Cranor asked what type of training parapros received. Ms. Sanford said the District utilized a training model developed in Nebraska. She said Mr. Miner was responsible for administering the training. She said there was also a module for teachers to take if further training was needed. She reviewed the program changes for elementary and secondary. She said there were extended resource rooms at all of the high schools and Alameda and Irving Middle Schools. She said Alameda Middle School had taken on more students in an effort to alleviate transportation needs and to ensure students were getting the maximum benefit in the least restrictive environment. She said there were DLP classrooms at Irving and Hawthorne Middle Schools. She said the DLP classrooms served students with the most significant emotional needs. She said the District had an 18–21 year old program Page 4 of 9 housed at ISU called VOICE. She said the adjustive education program supported students with emotional impairments who learn to interact appropriately. She said one school psychologist was responsible to manage the adjustive education program. She said currently there were three DLP classrooms at the elementary that filtered into one DLP classroom at Irving and then back out to two DLP classrooms at the high school level. She reviewed a snapshot of budget. She said costs were fairly fixed but were dependent on the number of students. She said she hoped sequestered funds would be returned. She said each year a team reviewed program needs, the number of students and placement recommendations. She said the IEP Team made the final decision. She said in order to accommodate the number of students for 2014-15 a third ERR would be needed at the elementary level. She said the District would also need to add a 2nd DLP classroom at the middle school level. She said currently the school psychologists had more on their plate than they could handle. She said she recommended reassigning a social worker FTE to the middle and high schools. Ms. Gebhardt asked how many students were in the program at the middle school this year. Ms. Sanford said there were currently 8 but the following year that number would increase to 17, then to 18 and 21 in the second and third year. She said Pocatello had a reputation for serving its special education students well and other Districts were aware and were sending students to Pocatello. Ms. Gebhardt asked what affected the numbers so greatly. Ms. Sanford said it was mostly due to the rollup of the 6th grade. She said she worked closely with Head Start to make sure students were not being over-identified and to ensure proper placement. She said there could be a variety of different factors. Ms. Cranor said she knew of families that moved to the area specifically because of the District’s special education services. Ms. Sanford said the District needed to make sure it was operating in a manner that was best for students. She reviewed the current school psychologist workload. She said in most Districts school psychologists typically took on 2 to 3 schools. She said one of the District’s school psychologists had five schools. She reviewed the number of caseloads at each school and said that number had the potential to increase if Districts were required to monitor Tier II interventions. She said if the District reassigned staff as proposed all of the numbers would drop with the exception of the middle school caseloads which was at the request of one of the school psychologists who wanted to maintain the continuity of services. She said the question had been raised as to what school psychologists do and currently due to the extensive workload they mostly were only able to conduct testing. She said they were trained in 11 different areas and conducted behavioral assessments and created behavior plans. She said she used to be a social worker and was knowledgeable of the various functions of the social workers and the major difference was the clinical counseling. She said the District had to be careful to not engage in non-school related counseling. She said outside factors had an impact on students in school, but school psychologists were only supposed to counsel on school related issues. She said because the District’s social workers were paid for by Part B federal funds they had to be utilized for special education purposes and she wanted to ensure the social workers were being used effectively. She said there were only three students in the elementary adjustive education program and the remaining 50 were at the middle and high schools. She said there was a duplication of services at elementary level with Star Coaches, guidance counselors and CRWs and the elementary schools were well served. She said the middle and high schools had the greatest need. She said the proposed placement of social workers took placement requests into account but provided greater time for each of the social workers at the schools. She said social workers were not tied down to a particular school and their time was flexible. She said the current child count was 1,309 and was projected to increase to 1,358 for the 2014-158 school year. Mr. Vitale asked if the District would expect the CRWs to duplicate what the social workers did. Ms. Sanford said it would depend on the person’s education and the situation. She said in consultation with the Elementary Director it was her opinion that the needs of particular students were being met through other support staff and social workers would still be available for crisis intervention. She said changing the placement would also decrease travel time and costs. Mr. Vitale asked who would provide testing support. Ms. Sanford said it would be shared between the school psychologists and the social workers. Mr. Vitale said it seemed like the social workers would be overworked at that point. Ms. Sanford said she did not believe so with the concentration of services and the time saved on travel. She said the school psychologists were currently working until 2 in the morning. Ms. Gebhardt asked if the proposal was to move an elementary social worker FTE to the high school. Ms. Sanford said social workers would still help serve the elementary schools but the greatest need was at the high schools. Mr. Vitale asked what social workers were responsible for relative to the IEP process. Ms. Sanford said the social workers provided input but did not write the IEP. She said parapros were responsible to track and collect data and to write up the information for the IEP. She said the social workers’ role was to provide counseling for students and families and to coordinate traditional support activities. She said it was a wrap-around system.

Draft Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Ms. Vagner said the District was required to have a policy in place that addressed relationship abuse and sexual assault prevention and response per state rule. She said the policy was a result of compliance. She said a Page 5 of 9 procedure was not created as the response process was covered in other District policies and procedures. She said the policy would be brought for first reading at the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting.

Update on the Refinancing of the School District Bond Mr. Reed said the opportunity to refinance the District’s bond had been discussed during previous Board Meetings. He said the bond had recently become callable which meant they could be refinanced and depending on current interest rates could realize a savings to taxpayers in the amount of $180,000. He said there was no way to know what the savings would be until the District was able to refinance in May. He said market rates went up and down constantly. He said the savings to taxpayers was realized through a lower interest rate on the remaining bond debt. He said the District sent an application to the state noticing it of the District’s intent to refinance the bond. He said the District could apply for the refinancing using the state’s strength and rating which meant the District could qualify for a better rate. He said the District qualified for good rates on its own, but the state’s rate was better by up to 20 points. He said Zions Bank would draft a Resolution for Board consideration at the April 15, 2014 Regular Board Meeting if it decided to move forward. He said the District would review the Preliminary Official Statements from financial organizations interested in purchasing the District’s bond. He said after the Board adopted the Resolution to authorize the sale of the bond the ratings would be advertised across the nation. He said a competitive bond sale would be held on May 13, 2014 and would end May 21, 2014. He said the District would close on May 27, 2014 and funds would be placed back into the original accounts. He said the District had 2-1/2 years remaining on its current bond. He said the first time the District refinanced the bond it saved taxpayers approximately $600,000. Mr. Mattson said refinancing the bond was being a good steward to the community and he did not see any downside to moving forward. Mr. Reed said it was a positive step for the community. He said the District may need to build a new school in the near future and it was important to show the community that the District was responsible with taxpayer dollars.

Food Service Update: Price Increase per Federal Regulations; Changes to Food Service Federal Nutrition Guidelines and Impact to Fundraising Mr. Reed said included in the packet were the nutrition guidelines from the USDA. He said the requirements were part of the Healthy and Hunger Free Kids Act. He said the guidelines attached restrictions to the entire national food service program and not just school lunch. He said anything from midnight to the end of the school day excluding extra-curricular activities would have to adhere to the new guidelines. He said not all of the changes were a bad thing, but requirements were stricter and created some challenges. He said certain foods had calorie limits for school lunch, snacks, and a la carte items. He said the calorie limits were much lower than current food choices. He said the sodium, sugar and fat content was also dramatically lower. He said the biggest change was the limit on sugar. He said any item served had to contain less sugar than 35% of the weight of the food. He said the greatest impact would be to the District’s beverage contract as the new requirement would restrict the sale of any soda other than low or no sugar sodas. He said there were no soda machines in the elementary schools but were in the middle and high schools. He said for a number of years Coke had not offered sugar drinks but did offer low or no calorie soda, but Pepsi still provided both. He said all soda was required to be zero calorie and low sugar. He said flavored water had to have less than 5 calories per 8 oz. He said that would not be difficult to implement but would be more challenging with fruit juices, Gatorade and Powerade. He said all of those beverages contained more than 60 calories per 12 oz. He said either the vendors would have to change their product or they would no longer be sold in schools. He said another area that would change dramatically was the sale of cookies. He said the most popular choice was the Mrs. Good Cookies. He said the District sold approximately 144,000 Mrs. Good Cookies per year which amounted to $84,000 in food service revenue. He said the product did not meet the new standards for sugar content and the schools would have to discontinue selling them. He said schools sold over 18,000 Gatorades in a given year and the sale of both Gatorade and Snapple would no longer be permitted. He said the changes amounted to a $110,000 loss in revenue to the Food Service program. Mr. Mattson asked if the manufacturers of the products were aware of the coming changes. Mr. Reed said they were aware and some may even change their product but kids may not want to buy them anymore. Ms. Cranor asked if any of the products were made in food service. Mr. Reed said some of them. He said the market would adjust as requirements were implemented. He said almost every new product being produced anymore was low or no calorie. Ms. Gebhardt asked if there were any restrictions being placed on artificial sweeteners. Mr. Reed said not yet. He said 100% fruit juice contained more calories than those with artificial sweeteners but there was an argument to be made against the health impacts on both sides. He said even fundraisers would have to be compliant with the new changes and would no longer be allowed to sell donuts, chocolate bars or any other type of candy or sweets that did not meet the new guidelines. He said the beverage contract generated on average about $55,000 per year for the general fund which would be dramatically reduced. He said when Coke still offered full Page 6 of 9 sugar sodas the revenue generated was closer to $80,000 per year. He said the extra-curricular programs would have to face a reduction in revenue from the loss of those sales. Mr. Reed said another change coming to the food service program was the requirement regarding the price per meal that the food service program was required to charge based on the cost of food compared to the number of students that qualified for free or reduced lunch rates and the District would have to raise its prices for the coming school year in order to remain in compliance.

Purchase of ISU Property Adjacent to Franklin Middle School Ms. Vagner said during the Capital Improvement Project planning process the Board discussed the possibility of setting aside land for a future elementary school. She said the administration had identified a parcel of land adjacent to Franklin Middle School that was owned by ISU and recently met with ISU’s administration to discuss the possibility of purchasing the property. She said ISU was receptive to the proposal. She said the ISU administration would take the proposal to sell the property to the State Board of Education for approval at the State Board of Education’s April Meeting. She said the District would have a better idea of whether or not the purchase could move forward following that meeting.

Budget Preparation for 2014-15 Ms. Vagner said included in the addendum was the budget presentation. She said a few administrators attended the Post-Legislative Tour the previous week. Mr. Reed said the first spreadsheet in the packet was a preliminary analysis of the District’s revenue and expenditure picture. He said it gave a general idea of where the District’s budget would be for the 2014-15 school year. He said the District’s revenue was at $63 million and expenses were at $64 million. He said the anticipated expenditures were above current revenues. He said the administration would need to review the requested expenditures and determine what could be cut back. He said the District’s appropriated fund balance was at $800,000 which was the carryover from one-time allocation from the state that the Board agreed to utilize to offset budget shortfalls in the coming years. He reviewed the estimated cost increases. He said the administration was proposing an additional 4 FTE at the secondary level to cover positions that were not able to be filled this year. He said medical insurance premiums would increase by at least 2% and the District would have some impact from the implementation of Obama Care at an estimated $200,000. Ms. Gebhardt asked if the additional 4 FTE would cover all of the prep periods that had to be purchased last year. Ms. Vagner said it would eliminate the need for most of the preps purchased but Century High School would still need to purchase a few prep periods. She said the additional FTE was a result of the growth at Alameda Middle School by 2 classes and the need for a science teacher in the high schools and other middle school needs. Ms. Cranor asked if the budget addressed the social workers. Ms. Vagner said there was no funding available for additional staffing. Ms. Cranor asked if the restoration of sequestration money could address that issue. Ms. Vagner said it was a possibility but the District also had to be mindful of the local Maintenance of Effort requirements. Mr. Reed said the District was already extremely close to not meeting the Maintenance of Effort requirements. He said there was no flexibility with the requirement whether Districts lost millions in revenue or not. Mr. Reed said the administration also learned that its power and electricity expenses were $170,000 more than anticipated. He said other known cost increases included $15,000 for school lunch, $6,000 for crossing guards, $150,000 for Infinite Campus software maintenance, $100,000 for software support for Lightspeed and $15,000 for a software upgrade for Transportation. He said the cost increases added up to just over $1 million and did not include any additional support for supplies or textbooks. He said overall there was just over $500,000 that could be used to support programs for 2014-15. Ms. Gebhardt asked if there was any possibility of seeing a pay increase for teachers. Mr. Reed said the District was preparing the budget as status quo and any increase would be a pass-through from the state relative to salaries. He said the 1% increase from the state translated to .84% for the District because the District funded salaries at a higher level than the state. He said he was grateful that the District was not facing a reduction this year as in years past. Ms. Vagner said one thing that saved the District from having to make any reductions was the allocation of Operational Funding from the state. She said without this revenue the District would be facing a $2.2 million cut. Mr. Reed said while the District was grateful for the restoration of some of the Operational Funding from the state, it was still only half of what the District used to receive in 2007-08. He said the District was still not at a point of restoration. Mr. Smart said he heard over the weekend that Obama Care might change the threshold for full time employees from 30 hours a week to 40 per week. He said it might not happen this year but was being discussed. Ms. Vagner said the anticipated medical cost increases were still being negotiated and was not a solid number. Mr. Smart reviewed the state funding estimate. He said based on the state’s formula for salary apportionment he anticipated the District would have 591 units. He said the state base had increased by 1% for all employee groups. He said as a result, he moved all employees up on the salary schedule and created a new index. He said the index should go down based on retirements. He said the state increased the minimum salary for a starting teacher to $31,700. He said District’s portion of PERSI and benefits Page 7 of 9 was included in the calculation. He said there was a 1% difference in the District’s best 28 weeks compared to the year before which amounted to 585 support units. He said the District’s entitlement increased by $1.3 million. He said the base support was $1.9 more than the year before. He said most of the funds from the state were earmarked. Ms. Cranor asked why the state reduced the Professional Development allocation. Mr. Smart said last year the state allocated funds for differential pay and 40% of that could be used for professional development. He said this year the state was taking that money and allocating it for Leadership Premiums and professional development. He said the state was just taking the money from one line item and moving it to another. Ms. Vagner said the state allocations were tied to the Governor’s Task Force recommendations. She said the tiered licensure allocation had a $41 million price tag and the Leadership Premiums line item took $15 million from that. She said the remaining $26 million only amounted to a $1,300 increase per teacher statewide. She said the state’s allocation ate up resources from the career ladder and put it towards Leadership Premiums which was just another attempt at Pay for Performance. She said the legislature was clear that the intent was not to evenly distribute $800 to each teacher for Leadership Premiums but rather the District should only distribute a portion of the funds to staff. She said it was intended to be a selective process. Mr. Reed said it was made clear at the Post Legislative Tour that the SDE would closely monitor how Districts allocated the Leadership Premiums. Ms. Gebhardt said so much for local control. Mr. Smart said overall the District’s budget was up $3 million but $1 million had to be spent on the state’s programs. Ms. Vagner said some of the state allocations were one-time and others were meant to be ongoing. She said the District would have to determine which funds would be ongoing. Ms. Cranor asked what the state funds allocated for ISEE would be used for. Mr. Smart said Districts around the state could opt into the state’s wireless plan or could choose their own and the funds would be used to support the implementation of wireless infrastructure. He said the allocation was $21 per high school student. He said ISEE Phase 2 was either for Schoolnet or another Instructional Improvement System (IIS) with the stipulation that the IIS had to directly upload into ISEE. He said the state speakers only mentioned Mileposts one time in the presentation. He said Mileposts did not upload directly into IC so the funds could not be used to offset that cost, however, the ISEE Phase 2 funds could be used to offset technology expenses, so the District could pay for Mileposts out of technology and use the ISEE Phase 2 funds to reimburse the technology budget. Ms. Vagner said all of the new categorical funding areas and advanced opportunities had to be reported which increased the District’s ISEE reporting requirements and had to be reported in order to receive money from the state. She said another line item earmarked from the state would be used to pay $200 per year for juniors and $400 per year for seniors that took dual enrollment courses and did not include the stipulation that graduation requirements had to be met first in order to be eligible for the funds. She District’s would be required to pay the costs up front and would be reimbursed by the state. She said eligible students would have to be flagged at the start of the school year depending on the courses they enrolled in. Mr. Smart said other areas of special distribution included $2,000 for Board training and the development of a Strategic Plan. He said the National Board Certification stipend was restored at $10,000. He said it was time intensive and costly for a teacher to obtain. He said it helped secondary teachers become highly qualified but not elementary teachers. Ms. Gebhardt said the ISBA communicated that if the District posted its Strategic Plan on the website and held its annual Board training it would meet the requirement for the $2,000 reimbursement from the state. Ms. Vagner said the administration was cross-walking the legislation with the District’s Strategic Plan to make sure it aligned and met the state’s requirements. Ms. Gebhardt said she would like to see a similar requirement for legislators. Mr. Smart said he anticipated receiving 591 units for the coming school year which equated to 44.3 administrative FTE. He said the District only had 39.76 administrative FTE and were underhired by 4 administrative FTE or 10.3%. He said Districts were allowed to underhire certificated staff at 9.5% but the District had only underhired by 2.4%. He said if the District hired the additional 4 FTE for secondary it would put the District at 1.8% underhired. He said the classified staff was underhired at 5%. He said there was discussion about the newly implemented class size legislation which could impact the District’s ability to underhire at current levels. He said the administration had no idea how the state was going to determine average class size. He said the state communicated that it would not take the size of a District into consideration which could skew the numbers across the state. Mr. Reed said it would not impact the coming school year but would impact the District for 2015-16. He said if the state’s calculation of average class size created a mess there would not be time to correct things before the next school year. Ms. Vagner noted the problems this would cause for classes like band. Ms. Cranor asked how in the world the District could limit choir and band classes to 25 students. Mr. Reed said last year the Board decided to use 60% of the appropriated fund balance to balance the budget which left $817,000 to balance this year. Ms. Vagner said the District would be able to balance without any reductions this year because of that decision. She said if the state did not increase the education budget next year the District would be out of reserves to help balance in the future. Mr. Reed said there were many Districts that did not have any reserves and were underhired at the full 9.5% or more. He said the planning of the Board had put the District in the best possible position to balance without having to cut that deep. Page 8 of 9 Ms. Vagner said the administration was seeking direction from the Board to balance the budget as status quo. The Board was in agreement.

Public Comment Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. Jan Flandro – 72 Rosewood Avenue, Pocatello, ID 83204 Ms. Flandro said she was representing the PEA and social workers. She said she had concerned PEA members come to her about the restructuring of the social workers and school psychologists. She said Ms. Sanford provided a detailed report earlier on the agenda. She said she did not envy Ms. Stanford’s position or her having to make those tough decisions. She said the District was in a position to add 1 FTE in order to retain social workers at the current 3.5 FTE. She said social workers were important for many reasons. She said the school psychologists did a lot of testing already and would need to do even more next year and their time would be limited. She said social workers were more hands on and the social workers with a Master’s Degree were qualified to counsel students. She said one of the social workers went to lunch with a student because the student could not be left alone. She said they communicated with families, visited homes and made families aware of local resources available to them. She said at times there were a lot of IEPs to be done and emotionally impaired students were sent to social workers. She said both the social workers and school psychologists were extremely important and she did not want to pit them against each other. She said both groups worked together to improve a student’s environment and she was here to advocate for them. She said the hands on work, testing and analyzing data were all vital components and special education needed an additional FTE for school psychologists to help with the workload and keep the social workers where they were. She said every year students had more and more problems and more people were needed.

Adjourn: Chair Gebhardt adjourned the Special Meeting/Work Session at 3:59 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 9 of 9

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SESSION BOARD MEETING POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Education Service Center Board Room Tuesday, April 15, 2014 5:30 p.m.

BOARD MEMBERS/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Janie Gebhardt, Chair Jim Facer, Assistant Treasurer (Excused) Jackie Cranor, Vice Chair Dave Mattson, Member Paul Vitale, Clerk Mary Vagner, Superintendent

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING A Regular Session of the Board of Trustees of School District No. 25 was held in Pocatello, Idaho on the 15th day of April, 2014, as provided in Section 33-510, Idaho Code. Chair Gebhardt called the Regular meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Maddie Schei led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.

REVIEW, REVISE, AND APPROVE AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action Chair Gebhardt reviewed the agenda and the addendum. A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to approve the agenda and the addendum as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND PERSONNEL ACTION – Self Explanatory – Action a. Special Meeting/Work Session with Legislators – December 2, 2013 b. Special Meeting/Work Session – February 11, 2014 c. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Personnel – February 11, 2014 d. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – February 12, 2014 e. Regular Board Meeting – February 18, 2014 f. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – February 26, 2014 g. Special Meeting/Work Session – March 11, 2014 h. Special Meeting/Executive Session/Hearing – March 12, 2014 i. Regular Board Meeting – March 18, 2014 A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Ms. Cranor to approve the minutes as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

RECOGNITIONS/VISITORS/CORRESPONDENCE – Information a. Visitors and Correspondence 1) Idaho Power Presentation The representatives from Idaho Power were excused. b. Recognitions – Information – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen invited Maddie Schei and Tricia Harvala to the podium. She said Maddie took a special interest in bully prevention. She said when Maddie saw drama in her school she decided that instead of sitting back and doing nothing she would spread a message of kindness throughout her school. She said Maddie put up posters to remind students to stop whatever was happening that could ruin someone’s day. She said Maddie started a Kindness Club at her school and wrote a letter to the President of the United States and got a reply. She said President Barack Obama wrote back that he appreciated her efforts to start a Kindness Club and to stop bullying in her school. She said Maddie supported the District’s Belief that “A safe, supportive, caring and respectful environment is critical to student learning”. She said as a result of Maddie’s efforts, students were being kinder to each other. Ms. Harvala said Mattie came to her in November with her concerns about students that were ruining everyone’s day. She said she decided to make the posters and to write a letter to the President to spread the message of kindness. She said there were already 30 students in the 5th grade class that signed up for the Club since it was created in January. She said the Club started a campaign at Chubbuck

Page 1 of 27

Elementary that had staff writing kindness letters. She said the Club was in the process of making a music video about respect and what that meant at Chubbuck Elementary. She said Maddie had changed perceptions at the school and showed that one student can make a big difference. She said she was sad to lose Maddie in the coming school year as she would be moving onto the 6th grade, but was happy that she could make a positive difference at another school. Ms. Allen invited Amber Austin and her teacher Jennifer VanWasshenova to the podium. She said Amber attended Pocatello High School and was being recognized for her winning entry in the Idaho Art Education Association’s 2014 Youth Art Month flag design contest. She said she competed against students from all over Idaho and won 1st place. She said her artwork was designed to represent Idaho and included images of the monarch butterfly, Syringa flower, mountain bluebird, Appaloosa horse, western white pine and the Sawtooth Mountains. She said her artwork would be scanned in and enlarged to a three foot by five foot flag and flown in Washington D.C. to represent the Arts and the state of Idaho. She said it would also be flown at the Idaho Art Education Association Conference. She said in addition Amber, her mother and her teacher would receive an all-expense paid trip to New York City in the summer. She said Amber exemplified the District’s mission that each student will develop an appreciation of the arts, and to value the uniqueness of each student and the Belief that “Students learn best through active engagement in their learning with highly qualified staff” and “Parents and the community play a critical role in a student’s educational success”. Ms. VanWasshenova said Amber was a junior and had been in her art class for three years. She said Amber had a deep rooted work ethic, was driven and continued to expand her art skills on her own time from home. She said she took pointers and applied them. She said Amber’s mother helped sew the flag that was flown in Washington D.C. and again at the Idaho Art Education Association Youth Month Conference the month before. She said the artwork was also displayed on the organization’s website, www.idahoarted.org. She said she was grateful to be able to travel to New York City with Amber and her mother in the summer. Ms. Allen invited Coach Brock Gunter to the podium. She said he was named as the Idaho State Journal’s Girls’ Basketball Coach of the Year for the 2013-14 season. She said in just one season under the direction of Coach Gunter, the girls earned a berth at state and took 3rd place in the state tournament. She said Coach Gunter was well respected throughout the community. She said he had never coached a girls’ team but was able to assemble a strong coaching staff and quickly earned the trust and respect of his team and together found a way to win. She said the team won six of its last eight games. She said Coach Gunter and his team demonstrated the mission to “Foster caring relationships among students and adults through mutual trust and respect” and the Beliefs that “High expectations promote high levels of student achievement” and “Students learn best through active engagement in their learning with highly qualified staff”. She thanked Coach Gunter for creating a positive environment, for his work ethic and professionalism which led the girls’ basketball team to win 3rd at state and for being named the ISJ Girls’ Basketball Coach of the Year. Principal Cotant said it was an honor to recognize Coach Gunter that evening. He said at the beginning of season there were many challenges to overcome but he believed that Coach Gunter would be able to work with the girls to keep them moving forward and to create a strong team. He said the girls had responded and played well and Coach Gunter was instrumental in leading that charge. He congratulated Coach Gunter on the successful season and for being named the ISJ Girls’ Basketball Coach of the Year. Ms. Allen said it spoke volumes that everyone who met Coach Gunter thought the world of him. Ms. Allen invited the Century High School Percussion Ensemble to the podium and said Mr. Colin Brien could not be there that evening. She said under the leadership of Mr. Brien, the students were invited to perform at the Idaho Music Educators Conference in Nampa. She said the students were one of only eight groups to be invited to perform throughout the state. She thanked Mr. Brien for encouraging students to demonstrate the learner goal to “Exhibit appropriate interpersonal skills, self-discipline and self-confidence when working in individual, small group and large group settings” and to “Demonstrate an understanding and an appreciation of the humanities and the creative and performing arts”. She asked one of the students to speak on behalf of the group. Jacob Knievel said there were fifteen students in the Percussion Ensemble including himself, Carter Denton, Tyson Olsen and Britton Nigh who were in attendance that evening. He said the group was honored to be invited to such a prestigious event and thanked Mr. Brien for his leadership and direction. c. Public Comment on Items Not on Agenda Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board

Page 2 of 27

Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. There was no public comment on items not on the agenda at the time of the meeting. d. Public Comment on the Preparation of the 2014-15 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Budget Annually the Board invites public comment with respect to budget development for the following fiscal year. The Board Chair solicited public comment relative to the preparation of the 2014-15 budget at the time of the meeting. There was no public comment on the preparation of the 2014-15 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Budget at the time of the meeting.

REPORTS a. Student Representative Reports (3 minutes each) 1) Highland High School – Emma Brinton/Hans Liu/Hope Bailey Ms. Bailey said the Highland High School FCCLA competed in Boise last weekend. She said several students placed at the competition. She said the cheer and dance teams were the Academic State Champions. She said the dance team won at nationals. She said speech took third at state. She said the juniors would take the SAT the next day. 2) Pocatello High School – Caitlin Lackey/Ethan Hatch Ms. Lackey said the school choir took its annual trip. She said several students placed in the speech competition. She said HOSA competed. She said the Pocatello High School talent night was well attended and was a lot of fun. She said the school held its student body elections. She said she was selected as student body president for the 2014-15 school year. She said Kyle Casper was selected as Vice President and she hoped they would work well together. She said the school held a blood drive in the gym earlier that day. She said only a couple of students fainted. She said cheer tryouts were that Thursday. She said the Pocatello High School Education Foundation held a banquet and honored Major Boyd F. Henderson, Major Jerry L. Ridley and Howard D. Burnett. She said the school’s prom was that Saturday. She said the school would have its parent night for juniors the following week. She said juniors would take the SAT the next day. She said Pride Week started April 28th. She said Highest Honors would also be held that night. She said the school’s Awards Night was May 6th. She said senior finals would take place that same week and the senior assembly would take place shortly thereafter. She wished the graduating seniors the best of luck. 3) Century High School – Duncan Thompson/Madison Morton Mr. Thompson said students were starting to take the SAT. He said students were given cans of Crush soda with a note to “Crush” their finals. He said the school started SBAC testing. He said the school’s Percussion Ensemble competed in the Gem State Competition and was awarded the Superior recognition which was the highest level of recognition awarded. He said the Senior All Night Party was planned and seniors were looking forward to the event. He said the student body elections would take place April 28th. He said the school’s dance showcase was that night. He said it was their last performance of the year. He said the dance team took first at state in the military category. He said the Mr. CHS Event was coming up. He said it was similar to a beauty pageant but was manlier. He said Century High School was once again recognized as one of the top 100 schools in the nation and was one of only eight in the state of Idaho. He said the drama department was presenting “Taming of the Shrew.” He said this would be his last report and Connor Moon would replace him for the 2014-15 school year. 4) New Horizon Center – Maggie Gunn Ms. Gunn was excused. b. Media Report – Ms. Allen Ms. Allen said there were very positive stories over the last month. She said there were twenty-four print articles and ten television stories. She said most of the coverage was about schools, staff and students and the various activities and achievements. She said the statewide education issues that were covered included

Page 3 of 27

stories on the legislature and concerns regarding the SBAC. She said she recently started working with Rebecca Longpiper who was now writing features for the Idaho State Journal. She said one of her features was published that month and had great information on the schools. She said she sent Ms. Longpiper a list of educational topics to cover over the next couple of months. She said Mr. Mattson and Mr. Facer had both worked with her on recent editorials. She said next month she would work with Ms. Gebhardt on the next editorial. She said the Board had discussed covering the many District accomplishments in its year end editorial. Ms. Gebhardt said there was an article in the paper about the decorum of graduation that was really well done. c. Report on ISBA Region V Meeting Chair Gebhardt said the ISBA Region V Meeting was held on Thursday, April 10, 2014 in the Board Room. Mr. Vitale said it was well attended. He said the trainers went over the eight basic characteristics of effective School Boards. He said it was a good reminder and was nice to network with Trustees in neighboring Districts. Mr. Mattson said he appreciated the review of all of the House Bills so that everyone could be made aware of what happened during the legislative session. Ms. Gebhardt said the ISBA Trainer, Jackie Hopper, had resigned so the ISBA would have a new Board Trainer for the upcoming school year. d. Report on Standing Committees for 2013-2014 Mr. Mattson said the Key Communicators met and had a good meeting but said he would like to see more people from around the community attend the meeting. He said the meetings provided very good information for patrons. Ms. Vagner said over 100 people throughout the community were invited by email to participate and was up to them to attend. Ms. Gebhardt suggested informing more people within the District. Mr. Mattson suggested expanding the email invitation list. Ms. Vagner said she would look into it.

CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION AND SCHOOL SAFETY – Information – Mr. Wegner, Dr. Mortensen, Mr. Devine, Mr. Hobbs a. ICS/SBAC Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said it was hard to believe that end of the year activities and planning for next year were already underway. He said included in the packet was information regarding the Summer 2014 ICS Unit Refinement. He said the document listed the teachers that would participate in working on ICS curriculum refinement over the summer. He reviewed the dates that each department would be in to work on units. He said each of the teachers that participated would earn a $100 per day stipend. He said Board Members were welcome to stop by and watch the groups work. Ms. Cranor asked how teachers were identified to participate. Mr. Wegner said a lot of the teachers had been involved in TIA since it began in 2007. He said teams were kept to 4 to 5 teachers because that seemed to be the most effective group size. He said some groups had more teachers but a good working size was around 5. He said when teachers rotated in and out of the groups he relied on building principals to recommend replacements. Mr. Mattson asked if the Board would receive an invitation for the unit refinement dates. Mr. Wegner said he would send an invitation. He said the schools had begun SBAC testing. He said some of the feedback from the schools was that testing was taking longer than previously identified; some students were unaware of test tools and some students said it was harder than the ISAT but the passages were informative and they liked the interaction. He said the curriculum department developed a survey for principals to send out to students to get their impressions on the test. He said the survey did not contain any questions regarding specific test content. He said the administration would review the data and would share the results with the Board and the SDE after it was compiled. b. Partnership Schools Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said the District has enjoyed an excellent working relationship with the ISU College of Education. He said the College of Education concentrated on arranging internships in the schools and on developing teacher candidates through the Partnership Schools program. He said the program offered support in the areas of need identified by the schools. He said they also provided information on available course work to teachers in the schools. He said Syringa Elementary and Irving Middle School would rotate out and Gate City Elementary and Alameda Middle School would be added in as new Partnership Schools. He said the schools were selected by the ISU Partnership School Committee for the 2014-15 school year. c. Alternate Route to Graduation Requests – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said included in the packet was a memorandum detailing the number of students and the various reasons for completing the alternate route to graduation. He said principals had signed off on the requests and

Page 4 of 27

the appropriate paperwork was on file with the Curriculum Department. He said the Board would be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. d. Instructional Technology Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner said the past few weeks were filled with classroom training at the elementary level. He said Mr. Merica and Ms. Spall had been working with the 3rd and 5th grade teacher on PowerPoint training and on how to save and retrieve files. He said they also helped educate teachers on how to stay safe online. He said the Technology Literacy course wrapped up with last two of 30 different trainings from how to use Word, to how to blog and create online presentations. He said currently the trainings were provided partly face to face and partly online. He said the technology training specialists were considering offering fully online courses to all staff next year. He said the department was currently working with teachers to close out a variety of software applications by the end of the school year. e. Any Other Curriculum/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Wegner Mr. Wegner had no further Curriculum updates at the time of the meeting. f. Head Start Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said the Head Start Grant application that was approved by the Board at the March Regular Board Meeting was finalized and submitted by the April 1, 2014 deadline. She said the Head Start Policy Council would meet that Thursday. She said one of the Head Start program goals was family literacy and in order to meet that goal the school gathered book donations from local organizations including Kiwanis and the Head Start FRED and EMILY Programs and to-date 2,807 books had been distributed to children and their families. She said this time of year Head Start started reviewing its In Kind contributions to make sure it was meeting that requirement. She said Head Start had to have so many parent volunteer hours in order to meet the In-Kind contribution which amounted to 310 parent and community volunteers and 648 volunteer hours. She said out of 186 students in the Head Start program, 170 had family members volunteer. g. 21st Century After School Program Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said the District had annually applied for 21st Century After School Program grant for the last nine years but did not get the grant this year and had no federal funds to sustain the program. She said the committee was regrouping to review funding options to continue the program in some capacity and had some viable options. She said she hoped to have information on what any new program would look like at a future Board Meeting. She said the 5k Pocatello to Africa Walk/Run Challenge was Saturday, April 26th. She said students were training at Alameda Park. She said the After School Program awarded scholarships to 14 students to allow them to participate in the science trek at ISU’s museum. She said the student’s applied for the scholarships which were then awarded by the advisory committee. h. Idaho Food Bank Back Pack Program Report – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet was the current Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack program report. She said participation numbers were up at all of the schools except for Gate City Elementary. i. Kindergarten Registration Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet were the draft Kindergarten Registration numbers for the 2014-15 school year. She said registration was held at the elementary schools on April 10, 2014. She said registration data was compared from year to year and tracked at the District. She said currently Kindergarten registration was up by 37 students. She said almost every kindergarten seat in the District was filled this year and she anticipated a similar kindergarten enrollment in the fall. j. District Mobility Report – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet was the District #25 Mobility Report which detailed student mobility rates at each of the schools. She said it calculated and compared free and reduced lunch percentages from the previous year. She said the report tracked mobility which was critical to school success. She said SBAC testing had been moved from May 9th to April 25th because of the state’s testing window. k. Nursing Acuity Levels Report – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet was the Nursing Acuity Report for the second trimester. She said it provided a historical view of services. She said Level 1 services showed a decrease in the number of students served and Levels 2 – 4 showed an increase. She said Level 3 and Level 4 were very time intensive services requiring nursing staff to visit the student two or more times in one day. l. School Immunization Transcript – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet was a School District Immunization Transcript provided by the State Department of Education. She said the transcript compared District immunization data to state averages.

Page 5 of 27

She said the letter indicated that the information was submitted through the Department of Health & Welfare and then compiled at the SDE. She said the District’s rates for 2013-14 were up slightly over the previous year. She said 91% of students in the District were adequately immunized compared to the state rate of 83.9%. She said she attributed the District’s higher numbers to the hard work of the school secretaries in making sure that records were gathered and documented. She said it took a lot of time and effort to remind parents. She said it was a big job that kept getting bigger as more and more immunizations were added at the state level. m. ISU Administrative Intern Request – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen said included in the packet was a request from the Idaho State University to place an administrative intern, Troy Johnson, at Jefferson Elementary, Irving Middle School and Pocatello High School for the spring trimester, 2014. She said the request was reviewed by the administration and was in order. She said the Board would be asked to approve the request under the Consent Agenda. She said the number of intern hours required depended on the course requirements of the University. n. Any Other Elementary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Dr. Mortensen Dr. Mortensen had no further Elementary Education updates at the time of the meeting. o. Policy 8125 – Release Time – 2nd Reading – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was Policy 8125 – Release Time. He said the change to the policy eliminated release time for specialized educational programs as the practice was antiquated. He said the policy was posted for public input following a first reading and input was received. He said one minor change was made as a result of the input and was highlighted in yellow. He said the change was not substantive and the Board would be asked to hear the policy on second reading for adoption under Old Business. Ms. Cranor said there was a comment from a teacher asking if students taking dual enrollment courses would be affected by the change. Ms. Vagner said students took dual enrollment courses as part of their regular school schedule through PTE or college credit and were not affected by the change. Mr. Devine said a lot of those courses were taught by District teachers. p. Century High School – Most Challenging High Schools 2014 – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said Century High School had once again been selected by the Washington Post as one of America’s Most Challenging High Schools for 2014. He said the Washington Post selected schools that were identified as having done the best job persuading average students to take college-level courses and AP exams. He said only 9% of approximately 22,000 high schools managed to earn placement on the list. He said it was quite an honor. q. New Horizon Center Schedule Change – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was a memorandum detailing the proposed schedule change at the New Horizon Center for the 2014-15 school year. He said the proposal was to move from a six week block to a 12 week trimester. He said as a result of the schedule change, it would no longer be necessary for the Board to adopt a New Horizon Center Calendar as the school would adhere to the District’s calendar in the future. He said the previously adopted New Horizon High School calendar would be negated. r. Summer School Update – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was the Summer School Brochure for the middle and high schools that detailed the courses available and the duration and cost for each session. He said also included was the 2014 Summer School Calendar. He said Heidi Kessler had been selected as the Summer School Principal this year. He said he would meet with Dr. Kessler in the coming month to finalize and submit the application to the state. s. Extra-Curricular Participation Fees Report – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was the Extra-Curricular Participation Fees Report for spring sports. He said the report was self-explanatory. He said the report compared participation numbers from one year to the next and showed the changes that had taken place. t. ISU Dual Credit Report – 3rd Trimester – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet was the ISU Early College Program Dual Credit Report with data as of the third trimester. He said the number of students taking advantage of the courses was impressive. Ms. Cranor said it looked like the numbers were down. Mr. Devine said a decrease in the third trimester was normal as most of the courses were offered in the first two trimesters. u. Early Graduation Requests – Mr. Devine

Page 6 of 27

Mr. Devine said included in the packet was a memorandum listing the number of early graduation requests by school and the reasons students were requesting early graduation. He said the Board would be asked to approve the early graduation requests under Old Business. v. Summer Camp Requests – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet and the addendum were Summer Camp Requests from the various high schools. He said the requests had been reviewed by the administration and were in order. He said the Board would be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. Ms. Cranor asked if any of the camps interfered with SBAC testing. Mr. Devine said none of the camps were held during the school year. He said there were some challenges with SBAC testing for students involved in spring sports but those were being addressed on a case by case basis. Ms. Cranor said one of the camp requests had the incorrect sum of expenses. She said another camp had an assistant coach that was being paid more than the coach. Mr. Devine said it was for marching band and the assistant should not have been factored into the camp expenses as the marching band director and assistant were paid a stipend which was not collected out of the camp revenue. Ms. Gebhardt said it appeared that the expense was for two assistants. Mr. Devine said that was more than likely correct. Ms. Cranor said another camp had a higher wage for assistant coaches for football. Mr. Devine said several assistant coaches helped out during summer football camps. Ms. Cranor said she was very impressed with the coaches that donated their time to the camps without charging a fee. She said she knew that not everyone could do that but it was worth recognizing those that were able to put all of the money back into the program. Mr. Devine said a detailed reconciliation of revenues and expenses would take place after the camps were complete. w. Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said included in the packet were several Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests. He said the requests were reviewed by the administration and were in order. He said the Board would be asked to approve the requests under Old Business. Ms. Gebhardt said the choir group did not have enough chaperones. Mr. Devine said he had spoken with the principal to let her know that twice as many chaperones were needed. Ms. Gebhardt asked why the Skills USA groups were taking two different busses. Mr. Devine said there was a conflict that made it impossible for one group to go at the same time as the other. Ms. Vagner recommended that the Board approve the trip requests pending adequate chaperones for the choir trip. x. Any Other Secondary Education/PLCs/TIA/Beliefs Update – Mr. Devine Mr. Devine said he was holding a meeting with registrars, secretaries and bursars to review the type of Infinite Campus training that was needed. He said 20 high school and middle school department heads were scheduled to meet with Meg Fleischmann to go over an SBAC Final that Ms. Fleischmann created that was engaging and helping students. He said the administration was looking into implementing the final for all secondary courses. He said teachers had taken the Six Traits of Effective Teachers and were tying into other courses other than English and was having an impact on more effective writing for students. He said the graduation schedule was on the Board’s calendar. He said New Horizon High School would have a graduation dinner this year rather than a luncheon. He said the graduation behavior expectation letters were mailed to parents. He said he was working with a group called Volstar Productions to install cameras during graduation. He said they also had jumbotrons available which allowed the audience to see students, speakers and performers better from far away. He said he was hopeful it would improve the focus of students and the audience.

BUSINESS OPERATIONS (BUDGET, MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION, FOOD SERVICE) – Information – Mr. Reed a. Idaho General Fund Update Mr. Reed said included in the packet was the current Idaho General Fund Revenue Report with revenue information as of March. He said this was the end of the third quarter and the state’s revenue was up $11 million. He said it wasn’t a big month but was a positive indicator. He said overall revenue was up eight tenths of a percent. He said April and June were the biggest tax collection months for the state and the revenue picture would be clearer after June. He said the revenue picture was shifting up but was moving slowly.

Page 7 of 27 b. Free and Reduced Lunch Report Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a current Free and Reduced Lunch report. He said the percentages were at 52.6% which had remained consistent throughout the school year but was up from the year before. He said the Food Service department had done a good job reaching parents who qualified for the program. c. Food Service Loss Control Report Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a loss control report from the Food Service Department with information as of April 1, 2014. He said the balance was $13,264 which had grown from the last report. He said the growth was expected and he was hopeful the balances would remain under the $15,000 that was budgeted in the general fund. d. Permission to Operate Summer Lunch Program Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a memorandum requesting permission to operate the Summer Lunch Program which was approved annually. He said this was the food service department’s 13th consecutive year of operating the summer lunch program. He said the program provided free meals to children and their families throughout the summer and was an outstanding program. He said the average number of meals served per year was approximately 310,000. He said the program was well attended throughout the community and the District was grateful to be able to operate the program. He said the District’s program was so successful that the state had asked the food service department what it did to make the program so effective which was a great compliment to the food service staff. Mr. Mattson asked what parks were used for serving lunch. Mr. Reed said Ross Park, Alameda Park, OK Ward Park, Raymond Park the New Horizon Center and Pocatello High School. He said he would send a complete list to the Board. Ms. Cranor asked if the program would be impacted by the new nutrition guidelines. Mr. Reed said the program would be required to meet the new guidelines but would not have too much of an impact since the meals served over the summer consisted of sandwiches and fruit. He said the Board would be asked to grant permission to Operate the Summer Lunch Program under New Business. e. Bid Awards Mr. Reed said included in the packet were memorandums recommending various bid awards. He said the first bid was for asphalt removal and replacement at various schools. He said the bid was sent to 21 vendors and six participated. He said the administration recommended awarding the bid to six different vendors for various projects. He said the vendors included DePatco Inc., Klinger Asphalt, Imperial Asphalt, Mickelson Construction, Jack B. Parson Co. and Superior Asphalt. He said overall the projects came in under budget. He said the bids were very competitive. He said the next bid was for the Ellis Elementary Heat Plant replacement. He said four vendors participated and the recommendation was to award the bid to Upstream Plumbing who was the lowest responsible bidder. He said the project came in $43,000 over budget due to the change in specifications. He said the original budget was for one large boiler, but after reviewing the project the maintenance department determined that two smaller boilers would be more effective and would provide a backup if one of the boilers stopped working. He said it would also result in an energy savings throughout the year. He said due to various other projects coming in under budget, even with the increase the total projects overall were still under the original estimated budget. Mr. Mattson asked if the company was bonded. Mr. Reed said absolutely. He said it was a basic requirement that vendors had to meet in order to participate in the bidding process. Ms. Cranor said it would be nice to know which vendors were local and asked if that information could be included on the memorandum. Mr. Reed said he would include that information in the future. He said the next bid was for computer components and accessories. He said 25 vendors were invited to participate and nine participated. He said one was disqualified for not meeting the District’s specifications. He said the lowest responsible bidder was ACE computers. He said it was $110,000 under the original bid estimate. He said the next bid was for entry doors at various schools. He said the recommendation was to award the bid to two bidders for various projects. He said Quality Overhead Doors was awarded a majority of the projects and CR Clark Construction was given one major project. He said the project came in almost $20,000 under budget. He said the next bid was for the Hawthorne Middle School Entry Vestibule Remodel. He said three bidders participated and Rivers West Construction was the lowest responsible bid. He said the project was about 15% over budget. He said there was carryover in the budget to fund the project. He said the next bid was for musical equipment and supply. He said the bid included a list of various musical equipment and supplies and items were awarded to the lowest responsible bidders. He said the list of vendors and amounts were included in the memorandum. He said the next bid was for network switches. He said one of the vendors was the lowest bidder but did not meet the District’s specifications. He said the administration

Page 8 of 27

recommended awarding the bid to the second lowest bidder. He said the second lowest bid was still $61,300 under budget. He said the next bid was for resurfacing the tennis courts at Century and Highland High Schools. He said one of the vendors did not have a public works certification and was disqualified. He said the administration recommended awarding the bid to Koch’s Tennis Courts which was just $5,000 over budget. He said resurfacing the tennis courts would preserve the current tennis courts which were nearing 15 years old and if nothing was done it would ruin the whole court which would have to be completely replaced. He said once the courts were resurfaced they would look brand new. He said the next was for Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) system and accessories. He said one of the vendors did not meet the District’s specifications and the administration recommended awarding the bid to the second lowest bidder which was $22,000 under budget. He said the next two bids were for District vehicles, one for the maintenance department which was a service van, and the other for the warehouse, a one-ton diesel cargo van. He said several vendors were invited to participate and only one vendor responded. He said the administration recommended awarding the bid to Hirning GMC. He said the service van came in over $8,000 under budget and the one-ton was about $800 over budget. He said in the end the project was still well under the original estimate. He said the service van was used but was in really good shape and was reliable. He said the next bid was for the second phase of window replacement at the Lincoln Center. He said ten vendors were invited to bid and only one participated. He said the administration recommended awarding the bid to CR Clark Construction which was the same company that completed the first phase of the window project. He said the project was $3,300 under budget. He said a summary of the estimated costs compared to the actual costs for all of the projects was included in the addendum. He said overall the District was $7,000 under budget for all of the projects. He thanked Ms. Giles and Ms. Talbot who both did a remarkable job advertising bids and getting accurate information to each of the vendors. He said the Board would be asked to award the bids under Old Business. f. K-12 Enrollment and Capacity Report Mr. Reed said a revised K-12 Enrollment and Capacity Report was included in the addendum. He said it was a snapshot of the overall school capacity from September 2013 to February 2014. He said at the high school level Century High School was becoming crowded. He said Pocatello and Highland High Schools were sitting closer to 80% capacity. He said there was a mistake in the first column that affected the capacity percentage for Alameda Middle School. He said the percentage should read 75%. He said Franklin Middle School was at 92%, Hawthorne Middle School was at 82% and Irving Middle School was at 64%. He said overall capacity numbers were looking good at the elementary level. He said the boundary adjustments a couple of years ago allowed schools to operate within the recommended capacity. He said there were still capacity issues to address from year to year due to fluctuations in class size from school to school and was addressed on a case by case basis. He said overall the District had the space to provide for future growth. Ms. Cranor asked if the capacity goal had remained at 85%. Mr. Reed said yes. Ms. Cranor said there were a few elementary schools that were over that mark. Ms. Gebhardt said Syringa Elementary was not on the radar before but now numbers were high. Mr. Reed said the administration was aware that new growth was occurring in that area. He said the subdivisions to the east were growing and would cause the District to have to look at addressing overcrowding in the coming years. He said all of the other elementary schools were in good shape. He said apartments were recently built near the Home Depot and were starting to fill up which could impact Wilcox and Chubbuck Elementary Schools. He said the administration continued to monitor new growth. g. Refinance Bond Debt Mr. Reed said a revised Resolution along with the Resolution Exhibits were included in the addendum. He said the Resolution authorized the administration to proceed with refinancing the District’s bond. He said he anticipated the refinance to save taxpayers approximately $180,000. He said he had continued to monitor market rates which were currently very low which was why this option had become available. He said one option for refinancing was to go out for a public sale which was opened up across the nation and the second option was to look at a private sale which did not have the high cost of issuance. He said Zion’s Bank was providing the Board with the option to approve the refinance with a public sale or a private sale. He said the Resolution left the option open for the Board to decide. He said holding a private sale would amount to a $229,000 savings to taxpayers compared to a competitive sale at $180,000 savings. He said the cost savings was in the amount of the cost issuance. He said the administration recommended the Board approve both options and leave the decisions at the discretion of the administration. Mr. Mattson asked if there were buyers for a private sale. Mr. Reed said there were and the short time frame would make it more advantageous to

Page 9 of 27

refinance at the lower rate rather than waiting for rates to fluctuate which could happen in the timeline for a public sale. He said he believed that whichever option saved taxpayers the most money was the route the District should take. The Board agreed. He said the Board would be asked to adopt the Resolution as amended under Old Business. h. Medicaid Reimbursement Update Mr. Reed said included in the packet was a Medicaid Reimbursement history with information going back to 2002. He said Medicaid reimbursement started on an upward trend and then reached a high point in 2009. He said there were some rule changes to how Medicaid could be reimbursed after 2009 which had decreased Medicaid revenue since that time. He said that affected Districts across the state. He said this year Medicaid reimbursement should be close to about $600,000 and the administration would continue to monitor. He said Ms. Lloyd informed him of any outstanding balances on a regular basis. Ms. Cranor asked if the District had a firm that handled the Medicaid reimbursement paperwork. Mr. Reed said yes the District had used the firm’s services for the last two or three years. He said they were the experts and had done a good job. He said one of the challenges that led to the Districts using the firm’s services was how overwhelming the rule changes were and the massive amounts of paperwork involved was for one person to handle. Ms. Cranor asked if the District was still saving money after paying for their services. Mr. Reed said yes. Ms. Vagner said the rule changes affected what services the District could and could not be reimbursed for and had drastically affected the District’s Medicaid reimbursement revenue. i. Proposed Building and Subdivisions (New Construction) Mr. Reed had no report on proposed building and subdivisions (new construction) at the time of the meeting. j. Any Other Business Operations/Operational Support Update Mr. Reed had no further Business Operations updates at the time of the meeting

EMPLOYEE SERVICES – Information – Mr. Smart a. Campus/ISEE Upload/Technology Update Mr. Smart said the department was in the process of submitting its ISEE Upload and was down to 77 errors. He said he hoped to upload an error free report the following day. He said the technology department was still in the process of wrapping up the wireless infrastructure project. He said the elementary schools were anticipated to be completed by the end of the summer. He said the administration was hopeful that state resources would be available to allow the District to continue expanding the wireless infrastructure in the high schools. b. Student Enrollment Information Update Mr. Smart said included in the packet was current student enrollment data. He said compared to previous years the District’s enrollment was looking very good from October to April. He said he had not seen any negative impact on enrollment following the closing of the Heinz Plant. He said he would continue to monitor enrollment but would use the current numbers in his enrollment projections for the coming school year. c. Loss of Tax Revenue Mr. Smart said included in the packet was a notice from Bannock County informing the District of two settlements that affected property valuations and impacted the District’s tax revenue by $25,377 and $9,818. He said the administration received a phone call from the County Assessor who wanted to meet to discuss the fact that the District would receive $35,000 less in tax revenue. He said it was a manageable loss and could have been a lot worse. He said tax revenue never came in exactly as predicted. He said it affected the School Plant Facility Levy, the Bond Levy and the General Fund. d. 2014-15 Budget Development Mr. Smart said included in the packet were materials relative to the preparation of the 2014-15 budget. He said the budget was reviewed in depth at the April Work Session. He said Budget Committee met and received feedback that would be shared later that week. He said kindergarten enrollment was projected to be around 1,025 students for the 2014-15 school year. He said after reviewing enrollment projections he did not anticipate units to change drastically. He said the administration was currently in the process of finalizing general fund budget requests and would have a better idea of actual costs versus estimated budgets in the near future. He said the District anticipated receiving $1.4 million in operational money from the state this year. He said another $1 million would be allocated for specific programs like the restoration of the lottery funds for building maintenance. Ms. Gebhardt said there was a line item called ISEE Phase 2 and asked if the District would get funding from the state for ISEE. Mr. Smart said no and that he was unsure why they used

Page 10 of 27

that name for the line item. He said the funding was actually to fund an IIS System like Schoolnet or Mileposts as long as the program could upload directly into ISEE. He said Mileposts did not upload directly to ISEE, however the District could use the funding to offset technology employee costs to the classroom and the District would use those savings to pay for Mileposts. Ms. Vagner said Mileposts managed RtI plans which was the program’s main function. She said the company was expanding the program to do other things but was not an SIS system that could upload into ISEE. She said Schoolnet could not do what Mileposts did and was just a data repository. She said the law was written to provide Mileposts as an option but the law included language that the program had to be able to upload directly into ISEE which negated the original intent language. She said the legislature might have gotten confused when setting the rules. Ms. Gebhardt said she heard that the biggest complaint from Districts across the state was regarding the amount of time and effort that was spent on ISEE with no compensation. She said she had hoped the legislature was responding to the complaints and was disappointed to learn that was not the case. Mr. Smart said in addition to all of the time and effort was the fact that once Districts reported through ISEE the data ended up uploading incorrectly on the state’s end. He said the state was calculating the District’s free and reduced lunch data at a much lower number than it actually was. He said the state had the District upload its data again even though nothing had changed. He said it seemed like there were constantly issues with the state’s data. Ms. Vagner said The Office of Performance Evaluation had been directed to investigate what has been going on with Schoolnet. e. EAP Report Mr. Smart said included in the packet was the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Report from January, 2013 to December, 2013. He said the number of cases open was 109. He said 100 employees and 9 dependents were taking advantage of the program. He said it amounted to a 9.2% usage rate. He said the average number of cases per client was 2.5. He said a majority of the cases had to do with psychological and emotional concerns. He said it went to show the amount of stress that people were dealing with. He said the District started using the program one year ago and the cost of the program was money well spent. f. Wellness Dashboard Report Mr. Smart said included in the packet was the Wellness Dashboard Report for February. He said My Regence participation was at 97.3%. He said the participation levels more than met the requirements to get the 4% reduction on renewal rates. He said employees still had through July 31, 2014 to complete the program requirements. He said he anticipated the District would end up very close to the 4% renewal discount. He said the loss ratio for February was 75% which was very good. He said Lockton had been working with MyRegence on the District’s renewal rate and anticipated a 2% increase overall. He said that was about half to two-thirds lower than other Districts across the state. g. Any Other Employee Services/Operational Support Update Mr. Smart had no further Employee Services updates at the time of the meeting.

HUMAN RESOURCES – Information – Dr. Howell a. Monthly Human Resources Report Dr. Howell said included in the addendum was an amended monthly Human Resources report. He said there were a couple of administrators retiring. He said Dr. Stevens and Mr. Cotant were retiring. He said the school was planning a 50 Year Celebration retirement party for Mr. Cotant on May 13th. He said he believed a majority of Mr. Cotant’s time in education was in the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25. He said Principal Alessi and Mr. Devine were resigning. He said that left two big shoes to fill with an elementary principal and a secondary director. He said the Human Resources Department advertised across the nation using the IASA and Applitrack programs. He said the superintendent was in the process of reviewing applications. He said there were currently eleven retiring teachers for the month and eight resignations. He said also included on the report was a recommendation to pay stipends for the afterschool program STEM teachers. He said the after school teachers received one half of the stipend earlier in the year and the second half of the stipend was on the current report. He said so far there had been 27 retirements throughout the District. He said typically there were about 40 to 45 retirements in one year. He said the administration informed staff that the Board would hold a Special Meeting on May 13, 2014 to issue contracts and set pay. He said there were fifteen employees that were planning to resign. He said so far the numbers were on target based on previous years. He said the Board would be asked to approve the Human Resources Activity under the Consent Agenda.

Page 11 of 27

b. Any Other Human Resources/Operational Support Update Dr. Howell had no further Human Resources updates at the time of the meeting.

SUPERINTENDENT REPORT – Information – Mrs. Vagner a. Change in Posting Locations Ms. Vagner said the Board annually designated posting locations for Board Meeting agendas and notices. She said recently the Chubbuck City Offices changed its Friday business hours from closing at 5:00 p.m. to closing at 11:30 a.m. She said the change in office hours did not allow adequate time for posting to the Chubbuck City Offices on Friday. She said the Board would be asked to remove the Chubbuck City Offices from its designated posting locations until such a time that the Chubbuck City Offices restored its hours of operation under New Business. b. Athletic Training Services Agreement 2014-15 Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was the Athletic Training Services Agreement for the 2014-15 school year. She said Dr. Joseph and Dr. Wathne had agreed to provide athletic training services again for the coming school year and planned to increase the number of professionals that would help to provide services. She said the District was extremely grateful for the services provided by the doctors and their staff. She said the Board would be asked to approve the agreement under New Business. c. Portneuf Medical Center (PMC) Donation Agreement 2014-15 Ms. Vagner said included in the addendum was the Donation Agreement between Portneuf Medical Center and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 for the 2014-15 school year. She said the agreement continued PMC’s support for the athletic training program and continued the contributions to the Education Foundation and increased the supply budget from $10,000 to $15,000. She said the hospital also agreed to monitor the budget should the supplies begin to exceed the set amount. She said the Education Foundation was in the process of submitting a grant to the Portneuf Health Care Foundation for athletic training equipment. She said the hospital would continue to offset the cost of the Holt Arena at $20,000 and would also continue its Festival of Trees sponsorship at $10,000. She said doctors from the hospital also donated their time to provide free physicals and to attend a majority of the sporting events. She said the District was very grateful for the continued relationship with the hospital. She said the Board would be asked to approve the Agreement under New Business. d. Proposed Fee Increases/Elimination of Fees for 2014-15 Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was a memorandum regarding the school breakfast and lunch fee increases which were mandated by the federal government. She said also included was a memorandum regarding the proposal to eliminate the yearbook fee from the Board’s adopted fee schedule at the recommendation of the high school principals. She said the yearbook fee was a purchase agreement between the student and the yearbook company. She said yearbook fees could vary depending on the number of pages in the book and how many were in color compared to black and white. She said not all of the high schools used the same year book company which affected pricing. Ms. Gebhardt asked if the New Horizon Center had a yearbook. Ms. Vagner said yes but it was fairly recent. She said the Board would be asked to consider adopting the proposed fee increases and elimination of fees following the Public Hearing on fees in June. e. Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response – 1st Reading Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response. She said the policy was reviewed at the April 8, 2014 Work Session. She said the District was required to have a policy regarding this topic per state requirements. She said a Procedure was not drafted because the process was covered in other Policies. She said the Board would be asked to hear the policy on first reading under New Business. f. Jefferson Garden Club Tour Ms. Vagner said the Board and Superintendent had been invited to tour the Jefferson Elementary Gardens on May 6, 2014 at 11:45 a.m. She said invitations from the Garden Club students were at Board Places. She said Kathy Vitale would host the group on the tour and said she hoped the weather cooperated. g. Calendar Ms. Vagner said included in the packet was the calendar of the Board’s Meeting Schedule inclusive of various Committees from April 14, 2014 through June 6, 2014. She said the graduation schedule was included and the senior breakfast, luncheon and dinner information would be provided to the Board.

Page 12 of 27

h. Any Other Superintendent’s Update Ms. Vagner had no further Superintendent’s update at the time of the meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT – Self Explanatory a. Public Comment Pertinent to Agenda Action items Board Protocols for Public Comment will be followed at all Board Meetings. Patrons wishing to address the Board will fill out Form AD 2 – Request to Appear before the Board and present it to the Board Chair or Board Secretary prior to the meeting. Because of the diversity of issues, members of the Board may not respond to delegations. Instead, issues are recorded and referred to the proper staff member for follow-up. The Board is informed of these efforts by the staff member responding to concerns. Board Operating Principles #22 & 23: 22) The Board will follow the chain of command referring others to present their issues, problems, or proposals to the person who can properly and expeditiously address the issues; 23) Board members will refrain from communications which create conditions of bias should a problem or complaint become the subject matter of a hearing before the Board. There was no public comment pertinent to agenda action items at the time of the meeting.

CONSENT AGENDA – Self Explanatory – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Human Resource Activity Policy Issue: Board approves Human Resource Activity Background Information: Included in the packet was documentation of the Human Resource Activity regarding certified employees since the March 18, 2014 Regular Board Meeting. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve Human Resource Activity as presented. b. Topic: Authorize Payment of Claims Policy Issue: Board approves all Claims. Background Information: Included in the packet were bills and invoices as of April 4, 2014 in the amount of $940,838.70. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the bills and invoices as of April 4, 2014 in the amount of $940,838.70. c. Topic: Approve Supplemental Financial Information from March 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014 Policy Issue: Board acts on Financial Information. Background Information: Included in the packet was supplemental financial information for the period of March 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve supplemental financial information from March 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014 as presented. d. Topic: Approve ISU Administrative Intern Request Policy Issue: Board approves placement of interns in various District schools. Background Information: Included in the packet was a request from ISU to place an administrative intern at Jefferson Elementary, Irving Middle School and Pocatello High School for the spring trimester of the 2013- 14 school year. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the ISU administrative intern request as presented. Board Direction/Action on Consent Agenda: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Mr. Mattson to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

OLD BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Approve Alternate Routes to Graduation Policy Issue: Board approves alternate routes to graduation. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to approve the Alternate Routes to Graduation requests as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

Page 13 of 27 b. Topic: Hear on Second Reading for Adoption: Policy 8125 – Release Time Policy Issue: Board adopts policy. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board hear on second reading for adoption the above listed Policy as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Ms. Cranor to hear on second reading for adoption the above listed Policy as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. c. Topic: Approve Summer Camp Requests Policy Issue: Board approves summer camp requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the summer camp requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Ms. Cranor to approve the summer camp requests as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. d. Topic: Approve Out of District/Overnight Field Trip Requests Policy Issue: Board approves out of District/overnight field trip requests. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Mr. Vitale to approve the Out of District/Overnight Field Trip requests with the provision that the administration ensured there was an adequate number of chaperones provided for the choir trip. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. e. Topic: Award Bids: Asphalt Boilers Computers Entry Doors Hawthorne Middle School Remodel Music Equipment Network Switches and Accessories Tennis Courts UPS Equipment and Accessories Vehicles – M&O Vehicles – Warehouse Window Infill and Replacement – Lincoln Center Policy Issue: Board awards bids. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board award the above listed bids as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Mr. Vitale to award the above listed bids as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. f. Topic: Adopt Resolution to Refinance the District’s Bond Policy Issue: Board adopts Resolutions approving refinancing of District bonds. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board adopt the Resolution to refinance the District’s Bond as if read into the minutes. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Vitale to adopt: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25, BANNOCK COUNTY, IDAHO, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,275,000 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REFUNDING CERTAIN OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION SCHOOL BONDS OF THE DISTRICT; MAKING FINDINGS AND COVENANTS; DESCRIBING THE REFUNDING BONDS; PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF TAXES TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL OF AND INTEREST ON THE REFUNDING BONDS; PROVIDING FOR THE DATE, TIME, AND PLACE OF SALE OF THE

Page 14 of 27

REFUNDING BONDS; PROVIDING FOR THE USE OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE REFUNDING BONDS; ESTABLISHING COVENANTS CONCERNING MAINTENANCE OF THE TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF THE INTEREST THEREON; ESTABLISHING AN ESCROW FUND AND PROVIDING FOR THE CALL AND REDEMPTION OF THE BONDS TO BE REFUNDED; PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, School District No. 25, Bannock County, Idaho (the “District”), is a public school district created and operating under the laws of the State of Idaho; and

WHEREAS, the District now has outstanding its General Obligation School Bonds, Series 2004, in the initial aggregate principal amount of $16,490,000 (the “Series 2004 Bonds”); and

WHEREAS, the District is authorized by Chapter 11, Title 33, and Section 57-504, Idaho Code, to issue its refunding bonds to refund outstanding bonds whenever its Board of Trustees (the “Board”) determines that a saving or other beneficial public objective can be achieved thereby, and to sell its refunding bonds at a public competitive sale; and

WHEREAS, the Board has determined that a portion of the Series 2004 Bonds (the “Refunded Bonds”) can be refunded with profit and advantage and with a present value debt service saving to the District and its taxpayers and has determined to issue the refunding bonds of the District for the purpose of refunding its outstanding Refunded Bonds; and

WHEREAS, the Board now desires to provide for the issuance and sale of the refunding general obligation bonds of the District in a principal amount not to exceed $4,275,000 for the aforesaid purposes.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25, Bannock County, Idaho, as follows:

Section 1: DEFINITIONS

As used in this Bond Resolution, unless the context shall otherwise require, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Act means, collectively, Chapter 11 of Title 33 and Chapters 2, 5, and 9 of Title 57, Idaho Code, as amended.

Board means the Board of Trustees of the District.

Bond Fund means the Bond Fund established in Section 12 hereof.

Bond Counsel means Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke, Chartered, Boise, Idaho, or another attorney at law or a firm of attorneys of nationally recognized standing in matters pertaining to the tax-exempt status of interest on obligations issued by states and their political subdivisions.

Bond Registrar means Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as bond registrar, transfer agent, authenticating and paying agent for the Bonds, appointed and designated in Section 6 of this Bond Resolution.

Bond Resolution means this Resolution, adopted on April 15, 2014, authorizing the issuance and sale of the Bonds.

Bonds means the “School District No. 25 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014,” herein authorized to be issued, sold, and delivered in a principal amount not to exceed $4,275,000.

Book-Entry-Only System means the system of recordation of ownership of the Bonds on the books of DTC pursuant to Section 4 of this Bond Resolution.

Business Day means any day other than (i) a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, or (ii) a day on which the Bond Registrar is authorized by law to close.

Page 15 of 27

Cede means Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds pursuant to Section 4 hereof.

Certificated Bond(s) means a Bond or Bonds evidenced by a printed certificate in the event that the Book- Entry-Only System is discontinued.

Chairperson or Chairman means the chairperson of the Board of the District.

Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Cost of Issuance Fund means the fund created by Section 12(A)(2) of this Bond Resolution for the payment of the costs of issuance of the Bonds as provided in Section 12(E) of this Bond Resolution.

District means School District No. 25, Bannock County, Idaho, a public school district of the State of Idaho.

DTC means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, and its successors and assigns.

Escrow Agent means Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, or such other agent as may be appointed by the District, under the Escrow Agreement.

Escrow Agreement means the Escrow Deposit Agreement between the District and the Escrow Agent, as authorized in Section 12(C) hereof.

Escrow Fund means the Escrow Fund established in the Escrow Agreement.

Exchange Bond means any Exchange Bond as defined in Section 7 hereof.

Financial Advisor means Zions Bank Public Finance, Salt Lake City, Utah, as financial advisor to the District.

Fiscal Year means the fiscal year of the District, commencing on July 1 of each year.

Interest Payment Date(s) means the payment date(s) set forth in Section 3(B) of this Bond Resolution.

Official Notice of Sale means the notice of sale of the Bonds.

Participants mean those broker-dealers, banks, and other financial institutions from time to time for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository.

Principal Corporate Trust Office means the office of the Bond Registrar as may be specified by the Bond Registrar.

Record Date means in the case of each interest payment date, the Bond Registrar’s close of business on the fifteenth day next preceding such interest payment date.

Refunded Bonds means the Series 2004 Bonds maturing on May 15, 2015 through May 15, 2016, inclusive, outstanding in the principal amount of $4,275,000.

Registered Owner or Owner means the registered owner of any Bond as shown in the registration books of the District kept by the Bond Registrar for such purpose.

Regulations means the Treasury Regulations issued or proposed under Section 103, Section 148, Section 149, or Section 150 of the Code (26 CFR Part 2) or other sections of the Code relating to “arbitrage bonds” or rebate, including without limitation Sections 1.148-0 through 1.148-11 and 1.150-1 of the Treasury Regulations, to the extent applicable, and includes amendments thereto or successor provisions.

Representation Letter means the representation letter from the District to DTC, as authorized in Section 4 hereof.

Page 16 of 27

Secretary means the secretary of the District.

Series 2004 Bonds means the General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2004, of the District, dated August 5, 2004, issued in the initial aggregate principal amount of $16,490,000.

Treasurer means the treasurer of the District.

Written Certificate means an instrument in writing on behalf of the District executed by an authorized officer of the District.

Section 2: FINDINGS

The Board hereby finds, determines, and declares:

A. That the District’s Refunded Bonds can be refunded at a substantial present-value saving to the District and its taxpayers. B. That it is desirable and necessary for the benefit of the District and its taxpayers to refund the District’s Refunded Bonds for the purpose of achieving a saving and other beneficial public objectives, by the issuance of the Bonds.

Section 3: THE BONDS

A. Authorization. Fully registered general obligation bonds of the District, designated “School District No. 25 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014” (the “Bonds”), in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $4,275,000 are hereby authorized to be issued, sold, and delivered pursuant to the Act. The Bonds shall be issued in fully registered form only, without coupons. B. Description of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued in accordance with the Book-Entry-Only System described in this Section 4, shall be dated as of their date of delivery, shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit “A” which is annexed hereto, shall be issued in fully registered form in denominations of $5,000 each or integral multiples thereof, not exceeding the total amount of Bonds maturing in a single maturity (provided that no Bond shall represent more than one maturity), shall be payable semiannually until their respective dates of maturity or prior redemption.

Interest shall be computed on the basis of a twelve-month, 360-day year.

The Bonds shall be numbered separately from One (1) upwards in order of issuance with the prefix “R” preceding each number.

After execution, as hereinafter provided, the Bonds shall be authenticated by the Bond Registrar in the manner hereinafter provided. C. INTEREST ON BONDS. The Bonds shall bear interest from their date at a net effective rate of not to exceed 5.00% per annum or at any lower net effective rate as shall be stated in the successful bid proposal for the Bonds, which interest shall be payable semiannually until their respective dates of maturity. Bidders must specify the rate, or rates, of interest which Bonds herein offered for sale shall bear. Bidders must comply with the requirements set forth in the Official Notice of Sale which is annexed hereto. D. PAYMENT OF BONDS. Both the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America to the registered owners thereof whose names and addresses shall appear on the registration records of the District (the “Bond Register”), maintained by the Bond Registrar.

Principal of each Bond shall be paid to the registered owner thereof, upon presentation and surrender of such Bond by the registered owner at the principal corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar, on or after the date of maturity or prior redemption.

Payment of each installment of interest shall be made to the registered owner whose name appears on the Bond Register on the Record Date next preceding the interest payment date, and shall be paid by check or

Page 17 of 27

draft of the Bond Registrar mailed to such registered owner on the due date at the address appearing on the Bond Register, or at such other address as may be furnished in writing by such registered owner to the Bond Registrar.

Section 4: THE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY SYSTEM

A. Book-Entry-Only System; Limited Obligation of District. The Bonds shall be initially issued in the form of a separate single fully registered Bond substantially in the form of Exhibit “A” which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein by reference for each of the maturities set forth in Section 3 hereof. Each such Bond shall be manually executed by the Chairperson and manually countersigned by the Secretary, and the corporate seal of the District shall be impressed thereon. Each Bond shall also be manually authenticated by the Bond Registrar. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of each Bond shall be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC. Except as provided in Paragraph 4(C) hereof, all of the outstanding Bonds shall be registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC.

With respect to Bonds registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, the District and the Bond Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any Participant or to any person on behalf of which a Participant holds an interest in the Bonds with respect to (i) the accuracy of the records of DTC, Cede or any Participant with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any Participant or any other person, other than a Registered Owner, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any Participant or any other person, other than a Registered Owner, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, of any amount with respect to principal of or interest on the Bonds. The District and the Bond Registrar may treat and consider the person in whose name each Bond is registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar as the holder and absolute owner of such Bond for the purpose of payment of principal and interest with respect to such Bond, and for all other purposes whatsoever. The Bond Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of the respective Registered Owners, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, or their respective attorneys duly authorized in writing, as provided in Section 6 hereof, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the District’s obligations with respect to payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than a Registered Owner, as shown in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar, shall receive a Bond certificate evidencing the obligation of the District to make payments of principal and interest pursuant to this Bond Resolution. Upon delivery by DTC to the District of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede, and subject to the provisions herein with respect to Record Dates, the word “Cede” in this Bond Resolution shall refer to such new nominee of DTC; and upon receipt of such a notice the District shall promptly deliver a copy of the same to the Bond Registrar. B. Representation Letter. The Representation Letter in substantially the form annexed hereto as Exhibit “B” and by reference incorporated herein is hereby approved for use in connection with the Bonds. The District’s execution and delivery of the Representation Letter shall not in any way limit the provisions of Paragraph A of this Section 4 or in any other way impose upon the District any obligation whatsoever with respect to persons having interests in the Bonds other than the Registered Owners, as shown on the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar. In the written acceptance of each Bond Registrar referred to in Section 6 hereof, such Bond Registrar shall agree to take all action necessary for all representations of the District in the Representation Letter with respect to the Bond Registrar to at all times be complied with. C. Transfers Outside Book-Entry-Only System. In the event that (a) the District determines that DTC is incapable of discharging or is unwilling to discharge its responsibilities described herein and in the Representation Letter, (b) DTC determines to discontinue providing its service as securities depository with respect to the Bonds at any time as provided in the Representation Letter, or (c) the District determines that it is in the best interests of the beneficial owners of the Bonds that they be able to obtain Certificated Bonds or in certificated form, and an alternative book-entry system is not available or is not selected as provided in the succeeding sentence, the District shall notify DTC and direct DTC to notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Bond certificates, and the Bonds shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede, as

Page 18 of 27

nominee of DTC. At that time, the District may determine that the Bonds and shall be registered in the name of and deposited with such other depository operating a universal book-entry system, as may be acceptable to the District, or such depository’s agent or designee, and if the District does not select such alternate universal book-entry system, then the Bonds and shall no longer be restricted to being registered in the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, but may be registered in whatever name or names Registered Owners transferring or exchanging Bonds and shall designate, in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 hereof. D. Payments to Cede. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Bond Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede, as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to principal of and interest on such Bond and all notices with respect to such Bond shall be made and given, respectively, in the manner provided in the Representation Letter.

Section 5: EXECUTION OF CERTIFICATED BONDS

In the event that the Book-Entry-Only System is discontinued with respect to the Bonds, the District shall cause Certificated Bonds in certificated form to be prepared, executed, authenticated, and delivered. The Certificated Bonds shall be substantially in the form set forth as Exhibit “C” annexed hereto and by reference made a part hereof. The Certificated Bonds shall be numbered separately in the manner and with such additional designation as the Bond Registrar shall deem necessary for purposes of identification.

Certificated Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the District by the Chairperson and countersigned by the Secretary (the signatures of said Chairperson and Secretary being either manual or by facsimile) and the corporate seal of the District shall be impressed thereon or the facsimile of the corporate seal of the District shall be printed thereon. The said officials and each of them are hereby authorized and instructed to execute the Certificated Bonds in certificated form accordingly, and the use of such facsimile signatures of said Chairperson and Secretary and such facsimile of the seal of the District on the Certificated Bonds are hereby authorized, approved, and adopted as the authorized and authentic execution, countersigning, and sealing of the Certificated Bonds by said officials. The Certificated Bonds shall then be delivered to the Bond Registrar for manual authentication. Only such of the Certificated Bonds shall bear thereon a certificate of authentication, manually executed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this Bond Resolution, and such certificate of the Bond Registrar shall be conclusive evidence that the Certificated Bonds so authenticated have been duly authenticated and delivered under, and are entitled to the benefits of, this Bond Resolution and that the Registered Owner thereof is entitled to the benefits of this Bond Resolution. The certificate of authentication of the Bond Registrar on any Certificated Bond shall be deemed to have been executed by it if (a) such Certificated Bond is signed by an authorized officer of the Bond Registrar, but it shall not be necessary that the same officer sign the certificate of authentication on all of the Certificated Bonds issued hereunder or that all of the Certificated Bonds hereunder be authenticated by the same Bond Registrar, and (b) the date of registration and authentication of the Certificated Bond is inserted in the place provided therefor on the certificate of authentication.

The Chairperson and Secretary are authorized to execute, countersign, and seal from time to time, in the manner described above, Certificated Bonds (the “Exchange Bonds”) to be issued and delivered for the purpose of effecting transfers and exchanges of Bonds pursuant to Section 7 hereof. At the time of the execution, countersigning, and sealing of the Exchange Bonds by the District, the payee, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate, if applicable, shall be in blank. All Exchange Bonds shall be in the denomination of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof. Upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds pursuant to Section 7 hereof, the Bond Registrar shall cause to be inserted in appropriate Exchange Bonds the appropriate payee, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate. The Bond Registrar is hereby authorized and directed to hold the Exchange Bonds, and to complete, authenticate, and deliver the Exchange Bonds, for the purpose of effecting transfers and exchanges of Certificated Bonds; provided that any Exchange Bonds authenticated and delivered by the Bond Registrar shall bear the same series, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate as Bonds delivered to the Bond Registrar for exchange or transfer, and shall bear the name of such payee as the Registered Owner requesting an exchange or transfer shall designate; and provided further that upon the delivery of any Exchange Bonds by the Bond Registrar a like principal amount, if applicable, of Certificated Bonds submitted for transfer or exchange, and of like series and having like maturities and interest rates, if applicable, shall be canceled. The execution, countersigning, and sealing by the District and delivery to the Bond Registrar of any Exchange Bond shall constitute full and due

Page 19 of 27 authorization of such Certificated Bond containing such payee, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate, if applicable, as the Bond Registrar shall cause to be inserted, and the Bond Registrar shall thereby be authorized to authenticate and deliver such Exchange Bond in accordance with the provisions hereof.

In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on any Bond (including any Exchange Bond) shall cease to be such officer before the issuance or deliver of such Bond, such signature or such facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until such issuance of delivery, respectively.

Section 6: BOND REGISTRAR

Wells Fargo Bank National Association is hereby appointed the Bond Registrar for the Bonds. The District may remove the Bond Registrar, and any successor thereto, and appoint a successor or successors thereto. Each Bond Registrar shall signify its acceptance of the duties and obligations imposed upon it by the Bond Resolution by executing and delivering to the District a written acceptance thereof. The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which, at the respective dates of payment thereof, is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. Principal of the Bonds shall be payable when due to the Registered Owner of each Bond at the principal corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar. Payment of interest on each Bond shall be made to the person who, as of the Record Date, is the Registered Owner of the Bond and shall be made by check or draft mailed to the Registered Owner, at the address of such Registered Owner as it appears on the registration books of the District kept by the Bond Registrar, or at such other address as is furnished to the Bond Registrar in writing by such Registered Owner on or prior to the Record Date.

Section 7: TRANSFER AND EXCHANGE OF BONDS

A. Transfer of Bonds. (1) Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred, upon the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar pursuant to Paragraph C of this Section 7, by the Registered Owner, in person or by his duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of such Bond for cancellation, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument of transfer in a form approved by the Bond Registrar, duly executed. No transfer shall be effective until entered on the registration books kept by the Bond Registrar. The District and the Bond Registrar may treat and consider the Registered Owner as the absolute owner thereof for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal, if any, or redemption price thereof and interest due thereon and for all other purposes whatsoever. (2) Whenever any Bond shall be surrendered for transfer, the Bond Registrar shall authenticate and deliver a new fully registered Bond (which may be an Exchange Bond pursuant to Paragraph B of this Section 7) of the same series, designation, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate and of authorized denominations duly executed by the District, for a like aggregate principal amount or interest amount, as applicable. The Bond Registrar shall require the payment by the Registered Owner requesting such transfer of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer. With respect to each Bond, no such transfer shall be required to be made after the Record Date with respect to any Interest Payment Date to and including such Interest Payment Date. If Exchange Bonds are prepared in connection with transfers outside the book-entry registration system as provided in Section 4(C), the foregoing provisions of this Section 7 shall apply to such transfers or exchanges. B. Exchange of Bonds. Bonds may be exchanged at the principal corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar for a like aggregate principal amount of fully registered Bonds (which may be an Exchange Bond) of the same series, designation, maturity, or due date, as applicable, and interest rate of other authorized denominations or amounts, as applicable. The Bond Registrar shall require the payment by the Registered Owner requesting such exchange of any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange. With respect to each Bond, no such exchange shall be required to be made after the Record Date with respect to any Interest Payment Date to and including such interest payment date. C. Bond Registration Books. This Bond Resolution shall constitute a system of registration within the meaning and for all purposes of the Registered Public Obligations Act of Idaho, Chapter 9 of Title 57,

Page 20 of 27

Idaho Code. The Bond Registrar shall keep or cause to be kept, at its principal corporate trust office, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which shall at all times be open to inspection by the District; and, upon presentation for such purpose, the Bond Registrar shall, under such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, register or transfer or cause to be registered or transferred, on said books, Bonds as herein provided. D. List of Registered Owners. The Bond Registrar shall maintain a list of the names and addresses of the Registered Owners of all Bonds and upon any transfer shall add the name and address of the new Registered Owners and eliminate the name and address of the transferor Registered Owner. E. Duties of Bond Registrar. If requested by the Bond Registrar, the Chairperson and Secretary are authorized to execute the Bond Registrar’s standard form of agreement between the District and the Bond Registrar with respect to the compensation, obligations, and duties of the Bond Registrar hereunder which may include the following: (1) to act as bond registrar, authenticating agent, paying agent, and transfer agent as provided herein; (2) to maintain a list of Registered Owners as set forth herein and to furnish such list to the District upon request, but otherwise to keep such list confidential; (3) to give notice of redemption of Bonds as provided herein; (4) to cancel and/or destroy Bonds which have been paid at maturity or upon earlier redemption or submitted for exchange or transfer; (5) to furnish the District at least annually, if requested, an audit confirmation of Bonds paid, Bonds outstanding and payments made with respect to interest on the Bonds; and (6) to comply with all applicable provisions of the Representation Letter, as called for in Section 4(B) hereof.

Section 8: NO REDEMPTION PRIOR TO MATURITY

The Bonds are not subject to redemption prior to their stated dates of maturity.

Section 9: DEFEASANCE OF THE BONDS

In the event that money and/or government obligations, maturing or having guaranteed redemption prices at the option of the owner at such time or times and bearing interest to be earned thereon in such amounts as are sufficient (together with any resulting cash balances) to redeem and retire part or all of the Bonds in accordance with its terms, are hereafter irrevocably set aside in a special account and pledged to effect such redemption and retirement, then no further payments need be made into the Bond Fund for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds so provided for, and the Bonds and interest accrued thereon shall then cease to be entitled to any lien, benefit, or security of this Bond Resolution, except the right to receive the funds so set aside and pledged, and the Bonds and interest accrued thereon shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding hereunder.

Section 10: DATE OF SALE

None of the Bonds shall be sold at less than par and accrued interest, if any, to their date of delivery. The Bonds shall be sold at public sale on May 13, 2014 or such other date as the Board may determine. The District shall meet at 6:00 o’clock P.M. or as determined by the Board, on said date, at the regular meeting place of the District, in Dubois, Idaho, for the purpose of receiving electronic bids for the purchase of the Bonds. The bids will be publicly examined and declared at such time and place, and considered at the meeting of the District on said date. At said meeting, or no later than 24 hours after the expiration of the time specified in the Official Notice of Sale for the receipt of bids, unless such time of award is waived by the successful bidder, the Board shall accept the bid providing the lowest true interest cost to the District. Said sale shall be held, and notice thereof given, in accordance with Title 33, Chapter 11, Idaho Code. The successful bidder for the Bonds shall deliver a good faith deposit by federal funds wire transfer to the District as set forth in the Official Notice of Sale.

Section 11: NOTICE OF SALE AND SALE OF THE BONDS

The Secretary is hereby directed to execute a Notice of Sale on behalf of the District, and to call for bids for the sale of the Bonds, such bids to be received on May 13, 2014, or such other date as the Board may

Page 21 of 27 determine, all in the manner more particularly set forth in the Notice of Sale. The District’s Financial Advisor is authorized and directed to cause the Official Notice of Sale and a Preliminary Official Statement pertaining to the sale of the Bonds, upon prior approval of the District, to be distributed to such municipal bond broker-dealers, such banking institutions, and to such other persons as may be interested in purchasing the Bonds herein offered for sale.

The use of the Preliminary Official Statement by the Financial Advisor, and the actions of the District, including the certification by the Chairperson as to the “deemed finality” of the Preliminary Official Statement pursuant to SEC Rule 15c2-12 in connection with the offering of the Bonds, are hereby acknowledged, approved, and ratified.

The final Official Statement of the District for the sale of the Bonds, in substantially the form presented at this meeting, with such changes, omissions, insertions, and revisions as the Chairperson shall approve, is hereby authorized, and the Chairperson shall sign such final Official Statement and deliver such final Official Statement to the Financial Advisor for distribution to purchasers of the Bonds and other interested persons, which signature shall evidence such approval.

The Official Notice of Sale substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “F” is hereby approved for use in conjunction with the Preliminary Official Statement and the Final Official Statement.

Section 12: FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS

A. Establishment of Accounts and Funds. The following accounts and funds on the accounting records of the District are hereby created with respect to the Bonds:

(1) Bond Fund, to be held by the District. (2) Cost of Issuance Fund, to be held by the Escrow Agent. (3) Escrow Fund, to be held by the Escrow Agent. B. Delivery of Bonds; Application of Proceeds. The Treasurer is hereby instructed to make delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser and to receive payment therefor in accordance with the terms of this Bond Resolution and deposit the proceeds of sale as follows: (1) A portion of the proceeds of sale of the Bonds shall be deposited in the Cost of Issuance Fund to be used as described in Section 12(E). (2) Accrued interest on the Bonds from their date to their date of delivery, if any, shall be deposited into the Bond Fund. (3) The remaining proceeds of sale of the Bonds shall be deposited into the Escrow Fund to be used as described in Sections 12(C) and 12(D). C. Approval of Escrow Agreement; Deposits into Escrow Fund. (1) The Escrow Agreement, in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit “D” which is annexed hereto and by reference incorporated herein, with such changes, omissions, insertions, and revisions as the Chairperson shall approve, is hereby authorized, and the Chairperson and Secretary shall sign such Escrow Agreement, which signature shall evidence such approval. The Chairperson and the Secretary are, and each of them is, hereby authorized to do or perform all such acts as may be necessary or advisable to comply with the Escrow Agreement and to carry the same into effect. (2) The portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds specified in Section 12(B)(3) hereof, together with other funds of the District as shall be specified in a Written Certificate to be filed with the Escrow Agent at the time of the delivery of the Bonds, shall, simultaneously with the delivery of the Bonds be invested or reinvested as contemplated in the Act (except for any amount to be retained as cash) and the obligations in which such moneys are so invested and any remaining cash shall be deposited in trust with the Escrow Agent in accordance with the provisions of the Escrow Agreement. D. Redemption of Refunded Bonds; Pledge, Etc. of Escrow Fund. (1) The Refunded Bonds maturing after May 15, 2014, are hereby irrevocably called for redemption on August 15, 2014. Notice of such redemption shall be given as provided in the resolution authorizing the Series 2004 Bonds and in accordance with the Act. The Refunded Bonds are being redeemed at a redemption price of par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. (2) Moneys in the Escrow Fund shall be utilized exclusively for the purposes of (i) paying the interest on the Refunded Bonds on each interest payment date of the Refunded Bonds through and including

Page 22 of 27

August 15, 2014; and (ii) on August 15, 2014, paying and redeeming the principal of the Refunded Bonds; and the Escrow Fund is hereby irrevocably pledged to such purposes. (3) Moneys in the Escrow Fund shall be invested, until needed for the purposes of the Escrow Fund, in cash and Government Obligations, as permitted in the Escrow Agreement. It is hereby found and determined by the District, pursuant to Section 57-504, Idaho Code, that moneys in the Escrow Fund, together with other funds of the District pledged to the payment of the Refunded Bonds, will be sufficient to pay, when due, pursuant to stated maturity or call for redemption, the principal of and interest due and to become due on the Refunded Bonds, and provision has been made in the Escrow Fund for the refunding of the Refunded Bonds. (4) Any moneys remaining in the Escrow Fund and not needed for refunding of the Refunded Bonds shall be applied to pay any costs of issuance of the Bonds that remain unpaid, if any, and any moneys remaining thereafter may be used by the District for any lawful purpose. (5) It is hereby found and determined that, upon compliance by the District and the Escrow Agent with the foregoing provisions of this Section 12(D), adequate provision shall have been made for the payment of the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds. E. Cost of Issuance Fund. There is hereby established in the hands of the Escrow Agent a separate account designated as the “Cost of Issuance Fund.” At the time of the delivery of the Bonds the Escrow Agent shall deposit into the Cost of Issuance Fund such amount as shall be required to pay the reasonable and necessary costs of issuance of the Bonds as directed by the Written Certificate of the District. Moneys in the Cost of Issuance Fund shall be used for the payment of costs of issuance of the Bonds. Any moneys remaining in the Cost of Issuance Fund on the date of the full and final payment of all costs of issuance of the Bonds shall be transferred into the Bond Fund. F. Bond Fund. The proceeds of taxes levied without limitation as to rate or amount to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, as set forth in Section 13 of this Resolution, shall be kept by the Treasurer of the District in a special fund, which is hereby created, separate and apart from all other funds of the District which is hereby designated the “General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014, Bond Fund” (the “Bond Fund”) or such other designation as shall conform to banking requirements and good accounting practices, which Bond Fund shall be used for no other purpose than the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same fall due. Monies sufficient to make each payment of interest, or principal and interest, as the same falls due, commencing with the payment due on August 15, 2014, shall be transferred by the Treasurer to the Bond Registrar not less than fifteen days prior to each Interest Payment Date. Monies in the Bond Fund may be invested in lawful investments until needed for the purposes of the Bond Fund, and all investment earnings shall accrue to and be used solely for the purposes of the Bond Fund. The Bond Fund shall be maintained by the Treasurer until the principal of and interest on the Bonds has been paid in full.

Section 13: COVENANTS AND UNDERTAKINGS

A. Levy of Taxes. In accordance with the provisions of Sections 33-802 and 57-222, Idaho Code, as amended, there shall be levied on all taxable property in the District, in addition to all other taxes, a direct annual ad valorem tax in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Series 2014 Bonds maturing through August 15 , 2014, and (2) to meet the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same mature, and to constitute a sinking fund for the payment of the principal thereof.

Said taxes in each of said years shall be levied, assessed, certified, extended, and collected by the proper officers and at the times, all as fixed by law, and as other taxes are levied, assessed, certified, extended, and collected in, for and by the District and by the same officers thereof and are hereby appropriated for the purpose of paying any of the Bonds until the Bonds shall be fully paid.

Principal of or interest on the Bonds falling due at any time when the proceeds of said tax levy may not be available shall be paid from other funds of the District and shall be reimbursed from the proceeds of said taxes when said taxes shall have been collected. Said taxes in each of the several years shall be and are hereby certified to the Boards of County Commissioners of Bannock County as being taxes necessary to be levied on all of the taxable property in the District for the purpose of paying the principal of and the interest on the Bonds as the same become due. Said taxes when collected shall be placed in the Bond Fund and shall be used for no other purpose than for the payment of the principal of and the interest on

Page 23 of 27

the Bonds as the same become due, so long as any of the Bonds remain outstanding and unpaid, but nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the District from paying the interest on or the principal of the Bonds from any other funds in its hands and available for that purpose, or to prevent the District from levying any further or additional taxes which may be necessary to fully pay the interest on or the principal of the Bonds.

The full faith and credit and all taxable property in the District are hereby pledged for the prompt payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds as the same become due and the tax levies to that end herein provided shall be in full force and effect, and forever remain so until the indebtedness hereby incurred, principal and interest, shall have been fully paid, satisfied and discharged, except as hereinbefore provided, and any collection fees or charges made in connection with the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon are to be paid by the District. B. Arbitrage Covenant; Covenant to Maintain Tax Exemption.

(1) The Treasurer of the District and other appropriate officials of the District are each hereby authorized and directed to execute from time to time such Tax Certificates as shall be necessary to establish that the Bonds are not “arbitrage bonds” within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and the Regulations and to establish that interest on the Bonds is not and will not become subject to taxation under the Code and applicable regulations. The District covenants and certifies to and for the benefit of the Registered Owners that no use will be made of the proceeds of the issue and sale of the Bonds, or any funds or accounts of the District which may be deemed to be proceeds of the Bonds, pursuant to Section 148 of the Code and the Regulations which use, if it had been reasonably expected on the date of issuance of the Bonds, would have caused the Bonds to be classified as “arbitrage bonds” within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code. Pursuant to this covenant, the District obligates itself to comply throughout the term of the Bonds with the requirements of Section 148 of the Code and the regulations proposed or promulgated thereunder. (2) The District further covenants and agrees to and for the benefit of the Registered Owners that the District (i) will not take any action that would cause interest on the bonds to be or to become ineligible for the exclusion from gross income of the Registered Owners as provided in Section 103 of the Code, (ii) will not omit to take or cause to be taken, in timely manner, any action, which omission would cause interest on the Bonds to be or to become ineligible for the exclusion from gross income of the Registered Owners as provided in Section 103 of the Code and (iii) without limiting the generality of the foregoing, (a) will not take any action which would cause the Bonds, or any Bond, to be a “private activity bond” within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code or to fail to meet any applicable requirement of Section 149 of the Code and (b) will not omit to take or cause to be taken, in timely manner, any action, which omission would cause the Bonds, or any Bond, to be a “private activity bond” or to fail to meet any applicable requirement of Section 149 of the Code. The Chairperson, Secretary, and Treasurer of the District and other appropriate officials of the District are each hereby authorized and directed to execute from time to time such Tax Certificates as shall be necessary to establish that the Bonds are not and will not become “private activity bonds,” that all applicable requirements of Section 149 of the Code are and will be met, and that the covenants of the District contained in this Section 11 will be complied with. (3) The District covenants and certifies to and for the benefit of the Registered Owners that: (i) the District will at all times comply with the provisions of any Tax Certificate and (ii) no bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the District have been or will be sold within a period beginning 31 days prior to the sale of the Bonds and ending 31 days following the date of sale of the Bonds and (iii) that no bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the District have been or will be issued or delivered within a period beginning 31 days prior to the issuance and delivery of the Bonds and ending 31 days following the date of delivery of and payment for the Bonds. (4) A Tax Certificate, in the form acceptable to Bond Counsel is hereby authorized and approved to be delivered in connection with the initial delivery of the Bonds. The Chairperson, Secretary, or Treasurer of the District, or their duly authorized deputies, are hereby authorized to execute such Tax Certificate. Approval of said Tax Certificate by said Chairperson, Secretary, or Treasurer shall be conclusively established by their execution of the Tax Certificate in its final form.

The District hereby covenants to adopt, make, execute, and enter into (and to take such actions, if any, as may be necessary to enable it to do so) any resolution or Tax Certificate necessary to comply

Page 24 of 27

with any changes in Regulations in order to preserve the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income of the Registered Owners thereof for purposes of the federal income tax to the extent that it may lawfully do so. The District further covenants to (a) impose such limitations on the investment or use of moneys or investment related to the Bonds, (b) make such payments to the United States Treasury, (c) maintain such records, (d) perform such calculations and (e) perform such other acts as may be necessary to preserve the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income of the Registered Owners thereof for purposes of the federal income tax and which it may lawfully do.

The District hereby covenants that it will take all steps to comply with the requirements of the Code to the extent necessary to maintain the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income and alternative minimum taxable income (except to the extent of certain adjustments applicable to corporations) under present federal income tax laws.

Pursuant to these covenants, the District obligates itself to comply throughout the term of the issue of the Bonds with the requirements of Section 103 of the Code and the Regulations. C. Bonds in Registered Form. The District recognizes that Section 149(a) of the Code requires the Bonds to be issued and to remain in fully registered form in order that interest thereon is exempt from federal income taxation under laws in force at the time the Bonds are delivered. In this connection, the District agrees that it will not take any action to permit the Bonds to be issued in, or converted into, bearer form. D. Continuing Disclosure. The District will comply with the requirements of Rule 15c2-12(a)(5) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the continuing disclosure of financial information and operating data and of certain material events with respect to the Bonds, as more fully set forth in the Information Reporting Agreement which is annexed hereto as Exhibit “E.” The Corporate Trust Department of Zion’s First National Bank is hereby designated as agent of the District for purposes of Rule 15c2-12(a)(5). E. Bond Levy Subsidy. The District covenants to apply for and take all reasonable and necessary actions to become eligible, and to continue to be eligible, to receive payments from the State of Idaho under Sections 33-906 and 33-906A, Idaho Code, or any successor provision, to the extent, if any, that the District is eligible for such subsidy for the Bonds. F. Idaho State Bond Guaranty. Payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds, including Mandatory Redemption Amounts, if any, is guaranteed by the State of Idaho pursuant to the provisions of the Idaho School Bond Guaranty Act, Title 33, Chapter 53, Idaho Code (the “Guaranty Program”), and the Credit Enhancement Program established pursuant to Section 57-728, Idaho Code (the “Credit Enhancement Program”). The District covenants to comply with all applicable provisions of the Guaranty Program and the Credit Enhancement Program.

Section 14: FURTHER AUTHORITY

The Chairperson or the Vice Chairperson, the Secretary and Treasurer, and other officers of the District are, and each of them is, hereby authorized to do or perform all such acts and to execute all such certificates, documents, and other instruments as may be necessary or advisable to provide for the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Bonds and the fulfillment of the covenants and obligations of the District contained herein and therein.

Section 15: MISCELLANEOUS

A. Ratification. All proceedings, resolutions, and actions of the Board, the District, and their officers, agents, and employees taken in connection with the authorization, sale, and issuance of the Bonds are hereby in all respects ratified, confirmed, and approved. B. Severability. It is hereby declared that all parts of this Bond Resolution are severable, and if any section, paragraph, clause, or provision of this Bond Resolution shall, for any reason, be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of any such section, paragraph, clause, or provision shall not affect the remaining sections, paragraphs, clauses or provisions of this Bond Resolution.

Page 25 of 27

C. Conflict. All resolutions, orders, and regulations or parts thereof heretofore adopted or passed which are in conflict with any of the provisions of this Bond Resolution are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. D. Captions. The table of contents and captions or headings herein are for convenience of reference only and in no way define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or sections of this Bond Resolution. E. Effective Date. This Bond Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval.

The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

NEW BUSINESS – Information – Action – Ms. Vagner a. Topic: Grant Permission to Operate the Summer Lunch Program Policy Issue: Board grants permission to operate the summer lunch program. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board grant permission to operate the Summer Lunch Program as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to grant permission to operate the Summer Lunch Program as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. b. Topic: Remove Chubbuck City Offices from the Designated Posting Locations Until Such Time as the Chubbuck City Offices Restores its Office Hours Policy Issue: Board authorizes changes to designated posting locations. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board remove the Chubbuck City Offices from the designated posting locations until such time as the Chubbuck City Offices restores its office hours as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Ms. Cranor to remove the Chubbuck City Offices from the designated posting locations until such time as the Chubbuck City Offices restores its office hours as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. c. Topic: Approve the Athletic Training Services Agreement for 2014-15 Policy Issue: Board approves agreements. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the Athletic Training Services Agreement for 2014-15 as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Mr. Vitale to approve the Athletic Training Services Agreement for 2014-15 as presented. Ms. Cranor expressed her appreciation for the doctor’s commitment to students and the District. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. d. Topic: Approve the PMC Donation Agreement for 2014-15 Policy Issue: Board approves agreements. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board approve the PMC Donation Agreement for 2014-15 as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Vitale to approve the PMC Donation Agreement for 2014-15 as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. e. Topic: Hear on First Reading: Policy 8149 – Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Policy Issue: Board adopts policy. Background Information: This item was previously discussed on the agenda. Administrative Recommendation: Administration recommended Board hear on first reading the above listed Policy as presented. Board Direction/Action: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Mr. Mattson to hear on first reading the above listed Policy as presented. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative.

ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements at the time of the meeting.

Page 26 of 27

ADJOURN A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned its Regular Meeting at 7:41 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______Secretary, Board of Trustees BY:

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 27 of 27 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION To Discuss Matters as Allowed by Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To Consider the Evaluation, Dismissal or Disciplining of, or to Hear Complaints or Charges Brought Against a Public School Student (With Option to Take any Action Pertinent to Student Discipline in Open Session) Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 County of Bannock – State of Idaho

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center Wednesday, April 16, 2014 4:30 p.m.

BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Janie Gebhardt, Chair, Board of Trustees Jackie Cranor, Vice Chair, Board of Trustees Paul Vitale, Clerk, Board of Trustees (Excused) Jim Facer, Member, Board of Trustees (Excused) Dave Mattson, Member, Board of Trustees Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

Call to Order/Executive Session – Student Discipline: Chair Gebhardt called the meeting to order at 4:41 p.m. A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to adjourn to Executive Session. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Mattson, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye. The Board adjourned to Executive Session at 4:42 p.m.

OTHERS PRESENT: Student Docket No. 14-53 (Not Present) Kent Hobbs, Director of Student Support Services Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 4:43 p.m. No action was taken by the Board at the time of the meeting. The Board recessed at 4:43 p.m.

Return to Executive Session – Student Discipline: Following the recess, a motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to reconvene to Executive Session at 4:48 p.m. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Mattson, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye.

OTHERS PRESENT: Student Docket No. 14-52 Student Docket No. 14-52 Father Student Docket No. 14-52 Stepmother Student Docket No. 14-52 Aunt Student Docket No. 14-52 Friend Robert Parker, Assistant Principal, Pocatello High School Kent Hobbs, Director of Student Support Services Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Page 1 of 2

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 5:06 p.m. A motion was made by Mr. Mattson and seconded by Ms. Cranor that the Board expel Student Docket No. 14-52 from attendance at the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 through the remainder of the 2013-2014 school year.

Such motion is based upon the judgment of the Board of Trustees that Student Docket No. 14-52 has: 1. Engaged in conduct in violation of the District’s Student Discipline Policy relating to the possession of weapons and the possession of tobacco. 2. Engaged in conduct, which in the judgment of the Board, is detrimental to the health, welfare and safety of other pupils.

However, pursuant to the statutory discretion provided to the Board relating to the discipline of students and with consideration of the input of the District’s Administration, this expulsion shall be held in abeyance and not put into place contingent upon Student Docket No. 14-52 meeting the following conditions: 1. The student shall return to the student’s placement at Pocatello High School. 2. The student’s property and possessions as well as the student’s locker shall be subject to random searches. 3. The student shall complete ten (10) hours of in-school community service to be arranged with the school’s administration. Completion of such service shall be accomplished on or before May 20, 2014.

Adjourn: A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Mattson to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned at 5:09 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk

Page 2 of 2 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING/EXECUTIVE SESSION To Discuss Matters as Allowed by Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated; and IDAHO CODE 67-2345 (1) (b) To consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or agent; (With No Action to Be Taken) Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 County of Bannock – State of Idaho

Superintendent’s Office at the Education Service Center Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:00 p.m.

BOARD/SUPERINTENDENT PRESENT: Janie Gebhardt, Chair, Board of Trustees Jackie Cranor, Acting Chair/Vice Chair, Board of Trustees Paul Vitale, Clerk, Board of Trustees Jim Facer, Member, Board of Trustees Dave Mattson, Member, Board of Trustees Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

Call to Order/Executive Session – Personnel Chair Gebhardt called the meeting to order at 3:04 p.m. A motion was made by Ms. Cranor and seconded by Mr. Facer to adjourn to Executive Session. The roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative: Mr. Mattson, aye; Mr. Facer, aye; Mr. Vitale, aye; Ms. Cranor, aye; Ms. Gebhardt, aye. The Board adjourned to Executive Session at 3:04 p.m.

Purpose: To communicate with legal counsel and discuss personnel matters. The Board proceeded to discuss personnel matters as provided in Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (f) To communicate with legal counsel for the public agency to discuss the legal ramifications of and legal options for pending litigation or controversies not yet being litigated but imminently likely to be litigated; and Idaho Code, Section 67-2345 (1) (b) To consider the evaluation, dismissal or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff member or agent;

OTHERS PRESENT: Douglas Howell, Director of Human Resources Renae Johnson, Board Secretary Amy White, Legal Counsel (by phone) Brian Julian, Legal Counsel (by phone)

Return to Open Session: The Board returned to Open Session at 3:54 p.m. No Action was taken by the Board at the time of the meeting.

Adjourn: A motion was made by Mr. Vitale and seconded by Mr. Facer to adjourn. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative. The Board adjourned at 3:54 p.m.

APPROVED ON: MINUTES PREPARED BY:

______By: Secretary, Board of Trustees

______Chair

ATTESTED BY:

______Clerk Page 1 of 1

YOU ARE CORDILLY INVITED YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO THE CLASS OF 2014 TO THE CLASS OF 2014 SENIOR CELEBRATION DINNER SENIOR CELEBRATION DINNER MAY 20, 2014 MAY 20, 2014 6 – 8 P.M. 6 – 8 P.M. AT NEW HORIZON HIGH SCHOOL AT NEW HORIZON HIGH SCHOOL 955 W. ALAMEDA RD. 955 W. ALAMEDA RD.

RSVP May 14,2014 RSVP May 14,2014 237-2233 237-2233 you are cordially invited to attend a

BRCHSU ClassN of 2014CH graduation brunch thursday may 22, 2014 1115am Turner Dining hall

RSVP - Pat Francisco 220.1875

“Making iti Possible - Whatever Itt Takes”” Leap Forward,d One Step at a Time

Instructional Technology Committee Meeting March 18, 2014 1:30 – 3:30pm Minutes

Members Present: Betsy Goeltz, Jan Harwood, Joanne Huber, Jeff Jolley, Kathy Luras, Dave Mattson, Lisa McAteer, Trent Merica, Patti Mortensen, Rhonda Naftz, Krysti Neil, Pam Sanford, Cheryl Spall, Matt Taylor, Chuck Wegner Members Excused: Doug Chambers, Bob Devine, Dian Swanson, Tonya Wilkes Members Absent: None Guest Present: Shelley Allen

Saw a Teacher Kathy explained that there are SBAC training modules availlable in the Smarter Balanced Portal that can be shown to students, teachers and parents. There are also specific training modules that SBAC Test Administrators are required to view. Kathy reported that she attended the third grade Instruction CAMP and each teacher reported that they had either already viewed them or that they were aware of the SBAC training modules and planned to review them in the future. Kathy inndicated that the headphones required for SBAC testing had arrived and were in the process of being distributed to Building Test Coordinators. Headphones were purchased for schools’ wired labs; however, students arre permitted and encouraged to bring their own headphones for testing. Jeff reported that Lysol wipes would be provided to cleanse the headphones and keyboards following each student’s use. He also reported that the secure browser has been pushed out to all student computers and that Building Test Coordinators have been advised to ensure the audio works on all computers. Patti noted that she observed an elementary school utilizing the practice tests. Lisa shared that students seem to be adapting well to the universal tools. Betsy indicated that videos embedded in the SBAC practice tests are only viewable one time. Kathy explained that she thought that the videos were designed to only be viewed once as a part of the testing of listening on the SBAC test. Kathy also explained that students will not be allowed to bring water bottles into the testing environment based on a recent technology application released that allows a person to type content onto a label that could then be placed on a water bottle.

Festival of Trees Grants Report Shelley reported that the Festival of Trees Grant Committee received 91 applications. The committee was able to fund 37 grants supporting 67 classrooms. Nearly $85,000 in technology was funded. The committee used a blind ranking system whereby all personally identifiaabble information was redacted. Tie breakers were balanced among the district. Many applicants were asked to reduce the number of items requested, or to order a similar but less expensive device in order to fund as many grannt applications as possible. Trent and Cheryl recommended that all teachers who were awarded iPads receive training. All applicants agreed to attend training on the devices they were granted. Some music technollogy grants were also funded and Shelley shared some of the items that were requested in those grants including Apple TVs. Shelley indicated that grant applications were trending towards classroom sets of devices. Classroom sound systems 1 Updated 5/1/2014 were not funded by Festival of Trees grants because sound systems were funded using district Classroom Technology funds. Shelley will attend an Instructional Technology Committee meeting in the future for a recommendation regarding prioritizing technology for next year’s funds. All teachers and district staff have been made aware of the grant requests that were funded.

Northwest Council for Computer Education (NCCE) Conference Report NCCE slideshow Trent and Cheryl presented the key ideas they took away from the NCCE conference they recently attended. One main idea was about student creation. Students will be driving the technology more so than the teachers. Classroom devices do not have to be identical. Students will learn regardless of the device they are using. Cheryl shared ideas regarding having students tagging their own work and collaborative note- taking during classroom discussions. Krysti attended a session on digital citizenship where the presenter shared the idea of teaching students how to use tools safely instead of preventing students from using the tools that are available. Krysti shared some of the new applications that she learned about at the NCCE conference including WolframAphla, Piktograph and others. In addition, Krysti shared library research resources that are available which include the Library of Congress, Stanford Reading and Discover Ed. Betsy agreed with the idea of teaching students proper digital citizenship. Trent shared an example of how the use of social media can be used as an effective positive tool. Betsy recommended that the committee reflect upon the Technology Strategic Plan to be sure it continues to be current and relevant. Trent and Cheryl shared ideas that were “outside of the box.” They discussed maker spaces, 3D printers, and Minecraft. Trent and Cheryl also provided some insight regarding the use BYOD with an implementation plan. Joanne reminded the committee that teachers were busy implementing the Idaho Core Standards which may be why many teachers have not had the time to develop a plan to implement BYOD. Another area Trent and Cheryl focused on at the NCCE conference was peer coaching. Peer coaching should be more about the content and teacher knowledge of technology integration and less about the device or app. They suggested that professional development would be more effective on an as needed basis, rather than a fixed schedule. Betsy indicated that there was a peer coaching training session available. Trent and Cheryl were planning to take an online course on peer coaching. Trent shared an example of how peer coaching worked in another school district. Betsy shared an idea about awarding badges for achievement, teaching collaboration, and teaching how to ask questions.

Sylvia’s Mini Maker Show Trent and Cheryl played a video regarding a young female student who created her own channel on YouTube as an example of student learning and creativity. Betsy agreed that students could work together to create and post videos to demonstrate their learning.

14-15 Technology Professional Development Focus Trent and Cheryl displayed the professional development delivery model and the technology training delivery model which illustrate all of the subjects for which they have provided professional development trainings in the District. Trent displayed the SAMR model with the Levels of Classroom Technology Integration and Bloom’s Taxonomy. SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition) is a model for representing how computer technology might impact teaching and learning. Jan suggested adding the depth of knowledge to the model. Trent and Cheryl provided an example of the SAMR model for graphic organizers, MOODLE, and iPad Apps. Trent would like to see a plan in place for the technology that was being funded. Trent indicated that the blended model of the levels of implementation and SAMR could help with the creation of the plan. Trent and Cheryl displayed their model for future professional development which included MOODLE, file management, Inspirations, Word and other applications. in addition, there will also be ‘just-in-time’ professional development to support teachers as they implement technology in the classroom that would include three sessions. An example of just-in-time support was showcased: In the first session students would create a graphic organizer, save the created product to their personal H drive, and upload the creation via MOODLE. In the second session students 2 Updated 5/1/2014 would use their previously created graphic organizer to compose a paper using Microsoft Word. In the third session there would be continued support as needed. Trainings would be provided to teachers who requested the support on specific topics. Patti asked if there would be a request protocol. Cheryl indicated that the protocol to this point has been through word of mouth. Betsy would like the protocol for requests to be advertised to teachers so they know to ask for the support. Betsy suggested providing support topics teachers’ could request from Trent and Cheryl. Trent and Cheryl would like take a look at the curriculum units that will be refined over the summer so they know the basis for what would be taught in the classrooms. Jan suggested identifying the technology that could be utilized during the unit. Jeff asked if Trent and Cheryl taught in teams. Trent indicated that typically Cheryl and he are in different classrooms. Jeff wondered if classrooms could combine for training. Cheryl indicated that there have been some combined classrooms. A suggestion was made for Trent and Cheryl to join the cluster meetings. Patti suggested setting aside some the technology funding for grant opportunities in which teachers agreed to peer coach a teacher in their school. Chuck would like a subcommittee to reflect upon the Technology Strategic Plan and present the benchmarking to the committee during the next meeting. Chuck asked what the implication was for the building instructional technology coaches for the next school year. Patti would like to see an expectation developed for the annual teaching of digital citizenship to elementary students. This may also be a great place to award a badge to students for responsibly using the internet and technology.

Wireless Report/JFAC/14-15 Technology Funds Jeff indicated that a crew lead by Keary Tonks has been working to increase the number of access points in the schools. Additional access points have been added to the initial plan. As a result the wireless access coverage density has increased throughout the district. The crew was expected to complete the elementary and middle schools in the next few weeks. Jeff spoke with Rosemary Demond at the State Department of Education. Rosemary indicated that Joyce Popp made a presentation regarding JFAC funding. The bird’s eye view would allow funding at a rate of $21 per high school student in the 2014-15 school year. The funding would be used for wireless access. Classroom technology funding would continue at status quo of $32 per high school student. The classroom technology funds have been used to install audio systems in high school classrooms. The state also has three million dollars set aside for data pilot grants. Betsy asked about sustainability of the data pilot grants. Jeff has been developing a technology replacement plan covering computers, network equipment, access points, iPads and mobile device carts. Jeff indicated that JFAC had also proposed setting aside two million dollars to fund an alternate data warehouse program to SchoolNet statewide. This could provide funding for Mileposts. Districts would still have access to SchoolNet, but would also have funding for an alternate program. The state is also requiring that each district adopt a data privacy policy. A penalty could be assessed for not providing evidence of the data privacy policy adoption. There would be a difference between student created data and student identifiable data that would be shared.

Instructional Software Program Usage Fast ForWord Kathy displayed a usage chart for Fast ForWord. Fast ForWord has been purchased for seven locations. The District purchased six licenses. A school improvement grant was used to purchase the license for New Horizon. Of the seven licenses purchased six of the schools were using the program which constituted 85 students this month and 125 students for the year. New Horizon has unlimited licenses. The other six schools have 28 licenses. The goal for attendance is 85% or better and the goal for participation is 95% or better. The National Reference sites include Lewis & Clark, Hawthorne, and Century. These schools have additional access to a reading fluency program. $16,000 was spent annually to provide for the Fast ForWord program. Last year Hawthorne had used the program extensively and included a professional development package on the program. Kathy indicated that Hawthorne’s usage has decreased this year when compared to last year. Betsy expressed her concern regarding the limited usage and availability throughout the District.

3 Updated 5/1/2014

Next Meeting: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:30-3:30 p.m. Training Center, Ed Center

Meetings for 2013-2014 1:30-3:30 p.m. Tuesday, May 20, 2014

4 Updated 5/1/2014

“Making iti Possible - Whatever Itt Takes”” Leap Forward,d One Step at a Time

Instructional Technology Committee Meeting April 29, 2014 1:30 – 3:30pm Minutes

Members Present: Bob Devine, Betsy Goeltz, Joanne Huber, Jeff Jolley, Kathy Luras, Lisa McAteer, Trent Merica, Patti Mortensen, Rhonda Naftz, Krysti Neil, Cheryl Spall, Matt Taylor, Chuck Wegner, Members Excused: Doug Chambers, Jan Harwood, Dave Mattson, Pam Sanford, Dian Swanson, Tonya Wilkes Members Absent: None

Saw a Teacher Lisa shared that she saw a teacher at Ellis who has integrated Apple TV into the classroom. The students were excited to show Lisa the projects they created using technology and Apple TV. Students appeared to be more motivated to complete assignments.

Trent shared that he saw third grade students creating and completing assignments in MOODLE. Trent and Cheryl have been helping many third grade teachers integrate technology in their classroom. Trent suggested that during unit refinement this summer the unit developers identify areas where technology could be used. Trent and Cheryl could use this list to plan grade-level professional development.

Kathy shared that she saw a teacher at Gate City utilizing the practice performance tasks that were available to explicitly explain the tools students would neede to be successful on the SBAC.

Cheryl shared that she observed a sixth grade class working together to find multiple sources of evidence to support their claims.

Technology Strategic Plan Update/Benchmarking Kathy indicated that the Technology Strategic Plan had been reviewed and benchmarked by a subcommittee. The Technology Strategic Plan was sent to ITC committee members for their review prior to the meeting. Kathy reviewed the changes and asked for input from the committee. Kathy indicated that Cheryl had added the SAMR Model, Levels of Technology and Depth of Knowledge to the document. Bob would like Cheryl to add examples of the SAMR Model in the Technology Strategic Plan. Kathy reviewed the benchmarks that were added to the document. An appendix has been added to the end of the document that contains historical information that is still relevant, but no longer pertinent to the body of the document. The Technology Strategic Plan will be forwarded to the superintendent for inclusion with the District Strategic Plan.

Instructional Technologyg Coaches for 2014-15 Discussion Chuck indicated that currently there are two instructional technology coaches per elementary and middle school and three in each high school; one of which is the media specialist in each high school. Chuck posed the question as to whether the District should maintain this leevel of support. Trent and Cheryl used Everyslide.com to present their recommendation for instructional technology coaches for 2014-15. Trent

1 Updated 5/15/2014 reviewed items that worked with the building instructional technology coaches for the 13-14 school year which included better communication at all levels (between teachers and building instructional technology coaches, between building instructional technology coaches and the technology service center, as well as between Trent and Cheryl and the building instructional technology coaches). In addition, some teachers relied heavily on their building instructional technology coaches. Coaches were given opportunities to share information with their fellow teachers. Some coaches used subs to provide training to teachers during the school day. Coaches communicated with Trent and Cheryl regarding specific needs within their school. Secondary coaches followed through with building trainings. Some of the challenges included building instructional technology coaches still being viewed as the local help desk or fix-it technician for the school. Coaches needing more time with staff, and more time to be trained to use the applications before training the building staff. Betsy suggested Trent and Cheryl open the communication between coaches and principals by advising the coaches to proactively ask for time during the staff meetings. Another solution that could be improved would be the use of web conferencing. Lync was inconsistent. Jeff suggested planning a series of Lync meetings for the sake of troubleshooting web conferencing issues. Trent and Cheryl’s recommendations for building instructional technology coaches going forward were to: focus on the instructional technology to help change the perceptions of their positions among staff, ask principals to allow time during staff meetings for training, select and implement a different web conference tool, increase communication between the technology specialists, building instructional technology coaches and teaching staff, utilize coaches expertise in technology integration and to maintain the level of coaching support at each school. There was a consensus among the committee that positive changes have been taking place and that the positive changes would continue with sustained efforts in the areas Trent and Cheryl mentioned. Matt indicated that some teachers did not know what questions to ask because they were unaware of the technology that was available to them. Matt would like to see more information disseminated to teachers with regard to technology training that is available. Chuck asked and the committee agreed with the recommendation to maintain the level of building instructional technology coaches through the 2014-15 school year.

Classroom Technology Funds for 14-15 Chuck reported that the state legislature approved classroom technology funding again for the 2014-15 school year. High school sound systems were installed during this school year and middle school sound systems will be next on the list for classroom technology funds. Chuck stated that there may be a greater need for iPads and Apple TV for the middle school Career Exploration teachers. Chuck reported that some of the larger elementary schools have expressed a need for additional computer labs for SBAC testing. Betsy reported that her school has been able complete student testing in the time allotted for SBAC testing. Increased WiFi access points have recently become a requested item as well. Discussion ensued regarding future funding and the direction in which those funds should be spent. No decisions were made.

iPad Mini MS/HS Plan from media specialists  iPad Acceptable Use Form Kathy reported that remaining emergency levy funds were used to purchase 20 iPad minis for each middle and high school to use for student check out through the media centers. Chuck asked the district media specialists to create a proposed plan for iPad use including a plan for checkout and an acceptable use form. Krysti explained that in the proposed plan the iPads would be stored, tracked, and monitored through the media center with the use of Destiny to check the devices in and out to students. The media specialist or librarian clerk would ensure that the devices were charged and ready to use. Priority for iPad use will go to students for check out. The ITC committee will research other funding opportunities to purchase a second set of devices for teachers to check out for classroom use.

ISU iPad Initiative Update Kathy indicated that Trent and Cheryl attended the ISU iPad Initiative training on April 4th. Trent and Cheryl reported that the initiative was hosted by Dr. Kandi Turley-Ames. The emphasis was on the 4C’s, Critical Thinking, Collaboration, Communication, and Creativity. ISU’s College of Arts and Letters presented on topics including the use of iPads by the English, Art, and History departments. There were 160 devices available to these departments for use. An additional ISU staff member was hired to manage the devices and apps. The English department purchased keyboards for their students and reported the best part was reviewing writing in real time for diagnosis and intervention. They also were able to use web-

2 Updated 5/15/2014 based tools such as Socrative and Lecturetools. The Art department indicated that they “can teach students anything if they are motivated – iPads provided motivation.” The Art department used the iPad cameras for still life and perspective. The Art department also dealt with multi-user issues and used photo editing on the desktop. The History department discussed the use of Dropbox, MOODLE, and Google Earth for historical tours of Pocatello. WiFi was an issue when the iPads were used in the public environment where WiFi was not readily available.

Technology Professional Development Proposal for 14-15 Trent and Cheryl shared a new vision for Technology Professional Development courses for 2014-15. Trent explained that since technology is ever-evolving, training cannot remain stagnant or it will be in danger of becoming outdated. Trent and Cheryl presented a proposal which includes a focused four-week training for 1 credit. The four-week training would include a week of boot camp style training inclusive of 3-4 nights per week for 2-3 hours per night of intensive training on the teacher aspect, the student’s perspective, and lesson plan creation. The remaining 2-3 weeks would consist of in-classroom support. Face-to-face and online instruction as well as in-class support will be provided. Another idea included revising the Technology Literary Course to continue innovative sessions about the classroom use of Google Earth, Infographics, Google Apps, OneNote, Library of Congress, Digital Citizenship, etc. Trent and Cheryl would like to move some sessions to a 2-hour face-to-face format and move some sessions to a solely online format. A book study utilizing Enhancing the Art & Science of Teaching with Technology will also be delivered via MOODLE and Twitter.

Summer Training iPad training for Festival of Trees recipients will include mobile device management, app vetting, purchasing process, student care, appropriate use, lesson integration, and use with Apple TV. This new course will be a two-day training presented in August by Trent and Cheryl. The Promethean course will continue to be offered to Festival of Trees grant recipients, new teachers, and anyone needing a refresher. Other professional development opportunities this summer include Mileposts, MOODLE Moot, Library of Congress, and Idaho Education Association Summer Institute. The Silverback Learning Summit (Mileposts) will take place in Boise June 23-25. The Mountain MOODLE Moot will be held in Helena, Montana July 9-11. The Library of Congress (Teaching with Primary Sources) will be August 6-7 in Meridian. Registration for the Library of Congress conference is free. The Idaho Education Association Summer Institute will occur August 6-9 in Boise. This conference is free to IEA members and includes registration, lodging, travel and meals.

Read 180 – Hosting Implementation Option  Benefits  Hosting Quote  5 Steps for Hosting  Getting Started  What is a SAM Administrator Kathy reviewed the benefits Pam had established for hosting Read180. Jeff will follow up with Pam and Scholastic regarding the cost-savings for hosting the Read180 software program. This item will be rolled to the next month’s agenda.

Next Meeting: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:30-3:30 p.m. Training Center, Ed Center

Follow Up Items:

Bob would like Cheryl to add examples of the SAMR Model in the Technology Strategic Plan.

Betsy suggested Trent and Cheryl open the communication between coaches and principals by advising the coaches to proactively ask for time during the staff meetings.

Jeff suggested planning a series of Lync meetings for the sake of troubleshooting web conferencing issues. 3 Updated 5/15/2014

Matt would like to see more information disseminated to teachers with regard to technology training that is available.

Jeff will follow up with Pam and Scholastic regarding the cost-savings for hosting the Read180 software program.

4 Updated 5/15/2014

“Making iti Possible - Whatever Itt Takes”” Leap Forward,d One Step at a Time District Curriculum Committee Meeting Maya 1, 2014 8:30 – 11:30am Minutes

Members Present: Amy Belnap, Sheryl Brockett, Christian Christensen, Jackie Cranor, Bob Devine, Janie Gebhardt, Jan Harwood, Kathy Luras, Patti Mortensen, Rhonda Naftz, Sandy Nalley, Sue Pettit, Jill Pixton, Mike Roberts, Pam Sanford, Christa Santos-Smith, Chuck Wegner, Kris Wilkinson Members Excused: Lisa Delonas and Rhonda Naftz Members Absent: none

Chuck welcomed Jan Harwood to the committee as the new Director of Secondary Education.

Trimester/Semester Recommendation  Integrated vs. Traditional Math Sequence Chuck reminded the committee that some recommendations were brrought to the committee last November which included that the current trimester system would be maintained through the 2014-15 school year. If there were to be any changes to the trimester system, it would not take place prior to the 2015-16 school year. Math teachers had expressed concerns that there was not enough instructional time in the courses particularly in Algebra II. Another recommendation was to explore short-term options for the 2014-15 school year. One suggestion was to extend Geometry and Algebra II into three trimesters. If the recommendation was to transition back to semester a survey would have been completed this spring. The final recommendation from the November meeting was to bring final recommendations tto this committee by this spring. Some administrators and high school math teachers traveled to the Meridian School District to learn how they have implemented an integrated math program at the high school level. The group was invited to return to collaborate with the Meridian high school math teachers. Prior to the teachers going to Meridian they were guided to be mindful of the nottion that form follows function. The function for high school mathematics needed to be defined. Chuck asked the district curriculum committee to review the goal and purrppose of high school math as delineated in the recommendation created by the high school math teachers. Chuck explained that a meeting was scheduled among administrators, high schoool principals and math teachers to discuss the high schools’ readiness to transition to an integrated math program. Some of the concerns expressed were that there was a lack of resourcces and time. Some teachers have a tendency to fall back on teaching from the textbook. Others have not integrated the Idaho Core Standards fully in their instruction. Another concern was in regard to the amount of material to be taught and a sufficient amount of time for problem solving. Pocatello High School math teachers have investede time to investigate the Mathematics Visions Project (MVP) approach. Century High School math teachers were not as convinced that the transition would solve the challenges. The idea of initiating a pilot for the 2014-15 school year was approached. It was decided that there needed to be a plan to address the logiistics that would need to be in place prior to initiating any kind of a pilot. The District could consiider providing a traditional sequence of math instruction as well as an integrated sequence. Pocatello High School expressed readiness to 1 Updated 5/15/2014 move forward with an integrated math sequence. The Pocatello High School math department would have to work closely with the curriculum department to develop a clearly defined, articulated plan including all of the logistics for a sustained five-year pilot. The feeder schools would also need to be considered as well as a public relations plan to include the parent communication. Moving to three trimesters for Algebra II was also discussed at that same meeting, but by the time the meeting took place registration had already taken place for the 2014-15 school year. The implementation of three trimesters of Algebra II would need to take place in the 2015-16 school year to allow for proper communication to the students and parents prior to registration. The following recommendations were presented to the committee: 1. Maintain the current trimester system indefinitely 2. Transition to a three trimester Algebra II sequence (not honors Alg II) for the 2015-2016 school year to provide for greater time on task 3. During math unit refinement work this summer, incorporate MVP concepts into units 4. PHS math department and Curriculum Department develop a systemic plan for a sustained, 5 year pilot of integrated math beginning in 2015-2016 – present to the District Curriculum Committee in September 2014 a. Determine system wide implications and logistics, including feeder middle schools b. Consider the possibility of two math sequences in each school, i.e., traditional and integrated or consider having one high school maintain a traditional sequence c. Consider requiring math every year in high school with a minimum requirement of Alg. II for all students d. Revise Graduation Policy #8122 as needed; make determination as to changing required number of credits per subject area e. Determine and plan for staffing impacts f. Develop public relations plan g. Prioritize ICS funds for high school math More discussion ensued among the committee members. Chuck asked for a motion relative to the recommendations. Bob made a motion to accept the recommendation as had been proposed. The motion was seconded by Pam. The motion carried unanimously.

Update Regarding District Assessment Committee Progress  Activity5 Self-Assessment  Comprehensive Assessment Plan Chuck indicated that the District Assessment Committee completed a rubric-based self- assessment. Chuck went over the results of that self-assessment. Chuck explained the strengths and weaknesses of each action item as identified by the District Assessment Committee. Chuck then reviewed a draft of the District Comprehensive Assessment Strategic Plan which articulated a vision and mission for assessments including definitions. Jill and Sheryl asked that the assessment documents be emailed out to the high schools to be shared with staff at PLC meetings. Chuck continued to review the goals as they were delineated in the draft District Comprehensive Assessment Strategic Plan. The goals, objectives and strategies were still being developed. Members that sat on both the district curriculum and district assessment committees shared their insights. A subcommittee of the District Assessment Committee will complete the details of the plan, present it to the District Assessment Committee next fall, and then bring it back to the District Curriculum Committee for information and/or approval.

Credit for Courses Taken Prior to Grade 9 Discussion  Automatic Transcripting  Define Successful Completion  Graduation Requirement Flexibility Change in IDAPA

2 Updated 5/15/2014 Chuck reminded the committee that last year an issue was brought before this committee regarding students who take Algebra I in the middle school and that the grade achieved would automatically be placed on their high school transcripts. This resolution has been communicated to parents. During the High School Handbook Committee meeting an issue was brought up regarding “successful completion” and also the impact the grade would have on the student’s GPA in high school. Chuck illustrated some clarification that was provided by the SDE which included:

05. Middle School. A student will have met the high school content and credit area requirement for any required high school course if: a) The student completes such course with a grade of C or higher before entering grade nine (9) b) The course meets the same content standards that are required in high school c) The course is taught by a properly certificated teacher who meets the federal definition of highly qualified for the course being taught. d) The student shall be given a grade for the successful completion of that course and such grade and the number of credit hours assigned to the course shall be transferred to the student’s high school transcript. Courses taken in middle school appearing in the student’s high school transcript, pursuant to this subsection, shall count for the purpose of high school graduation. However, the student must complete the required number of credits in all high school core subjects as identified in Subsections 105.01.c. through 105.01.h. except as provided in 105.01.d.v. (11-1-13)

Discussion ensued. Chuck indicated that the current practice was that the grades would be automatically transcripted. The committee agreed to maintain the current practice with the advisement to communicate this policy to parents. Chuck agreed to work through the concerns regarding advanced opportunities. The committee asked that Chuck follow up with the private schools in the community. Sandy also asked that the State Board Rule be emailed to the registrars and counselors.

Cursive Writing Recommendation Chuck reminded the committee that with the implementation of the Idaho Core Standards there would be a keyboarding requirement for students beginning in 3rd grade. With that implementation the committee previously recommended that cursive writing no longer be taught in the district. That recommendation was reviewed and approved by the Board. The district would continue to teach manuscript handwriting in grades K-2 and followed up with a software program to support keyboarding instruction. The state then passed legislation that required school districts to teach cursive writing. The details of teaching cursive is at the discretion of individual districts. The proposed recommendation that was communicated to teachers in grades 3-5 was the following:  K-2: (no change) o Explicit instruction manuscript handwriting 15 minutes/day utilizing Zaner-Bloser  3rd Grade: o Continue manuscript practice utilizing the K-2 stroking guide posted on the district website o Keyboarding instruction 15-20 min, 4 times per week, 10 wpm at 75-85% accuracy o Give D’Nealian cursive instructional materials to your 4th grade colleagues  4th Grade: o Utilizing existing D’Nealian cursive writing materials from 3rd grade, provide minimal cursive writing instruction. This summer, unit developers will be asked to embed cursive writing instruction within ELA units, with the following emphasis: . Teach students how to write their full name in cursive; . Teach students how to read cursive writing with a focus on primary source historical documents written in cursive. o Keyboarding instruction 15-20 min / 4 times per week, 10-15 wpm at 75-85% accuracy

3 Updated 5/15/2014  5th Grade: o Keyboarding instruction 20-30 min / 4 times per week, 15-20 wpm at 75-85% accuracy

Discussion ensued. Chuck agreed to add a bullet under fourth grade to include thhe introduction to all of the letters in the alphabet in cursive. Janie made a motion to approve the recommendation with the aforementioned addition to the fourth grade. Jill seconded. The motion was unanimously approved.

AP Physsics Clarification Chuck explained that the College Board has redefined the AP Physics program. Christa explained the AP Physics I and II would each be three trimesters long. Sheryl asked that the AP Physics Clarification be sent to the registrars and counselors. The changes to these courses will be included the High School Handbook for 2015-16.

Career Exploration C/D & Intro to Computers C/D Chuck indicated that the Career Exploration course was a middle school course that previoussly was titled Technology, Life and Careers. Introduction to Computers was previously called Keyboarding. Career Exploration and Intro to Computers currently have an A and a B course in the middle schools. The middle school principals requested a C and D course be added to the Career Exploration and Intro to Computers to allow for more electives in the middle school registration process. Career Exploration teachers have developed a curriculum for all four courses, A, B, C, and D. The following purpose was also developed: Purpose: Career Exploration focuses on the skills of Technology, Life, & Careers (TLC). Students will explore career options and build skills to evaluate and achieve career goals. Students will engage in projects to develop incrreased probleem-solving, social, and communication skills. Students will also explore the variety of high school courses including honors, advanced placement (AP), dual credit, and Professional Technical Education (PTE) programs available within the School District. Chuck reviewed the big ideas that have been developed for each Career Exploration course. Sandy suggested adding a section to course D that explained how to calculate GPA and the impact of courses on the GPA. Chuck explained that there was no textbook for the Career Exploration course. To date, much of the consumable resources have been provided by the building budgets. Sheryl made a motion to approve adding C and D courses to the Career Exploration and Intro to Computer curriculum. The motion was seconded by Sue and was unanimously approved.

Chuck thanked Patti, Bob, and Mike for their participation on the district curriculum committee and wished them well on their future endeavors. Chuck also advised that Lori Craney would be joining the committee next year as the new Director of Elementary Education.

Next Meeting: May 15, 2014 8:30-11:30 a.m. Training Center, Ed Center

4 Updated 5/15/2014

2013-2014 Assurance Form Cover Sheet

Please submit one cover sheet per LEA, along with one set of completed assurance pages that will apply to all school(s) listed. Copy and submit an additional coversheet if needed to accommodate a larger number of schools. District Contact Person for Plan(s): Name: Telephone: Position: Email:

Name and Number of LEA

Name of School(s) Required to Submit AMO Continuous Improvement (SMART Goals) Date Approved by LEA

Name of School(s) Required to submit Continuous Improvement Plan Date Approved by LEA

Name of School(s) Required to submit Rapid Improvement Plan Date Approved by LEA

Name of School(s) Required to submit Turnaround School Plan Date Approved by LEA

IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Reauthorized in 2001

2013-2014 Improvement Planning and Implementation Statement of Assurance The Local Educational Agency (LEA) hereby declares that it has abided by all the planning and implementation requirements of district and school improvement. By providing the signatures below, the LEA assures the Idaho Department of Education that:

☐ Schools with 4 and 5 star ratings that did not meet their AMO’s for two consecutive years have submitted AMO Continuous Improvement Plans to the district for approval.

☐ The School-level Improvement, Continuous, Rapid and Turnaround Plans (listed on attached 2013-2014 Assurance Form Cover Sheet) have been subject to a documented, meaningful, and thorough district-level review process prior to providing LEA approval and are being submitted in their final form for state verification.

☐ The District has partnered, as applicable, with any schools in Turnaround Planning to ensure a successful plan for alternative governance and will hold the school accountable accordingly.

☐ The District Improvement Plan was developed by a district leadership team and accurately represents the goals of the Superintendent and Board of Trustees.

Legal Name and Address of Local Education Agency (LEA):

To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in these plans are true and correct. The governing body of the applicant has duly authorized these plans, and the applicant will comply with the above assurances.

Print Name of Superintendent or Authorized Representative:

Signature of Superintendent or Authorized Representative: Date:

Print Name of Board of Trustees Chair:

Signature of Board of Trustees Chair: Date:

IDAHO STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Reauthorized in 2001

☐ Schools with 4 and 5 star ratings that did not meet their AMO’s for two consecutive years have submitted AMO Continuous Improvement Plans to the district for approval.

☐ The District has partnered, as applicable, with any schools in Turnaround Planning to ensure a successful plan for alternative governance and will hold the school accountable accordingly.

☐ The District Improvement Plan was developed by a district leadership team and accurately represents the goals of the Superintendent and Board of Trustees.

Legal Name and Address of Local Education Agency (LEA):

Print Name of Superintendent or Authorized Representative:

Signature of Superintendent or Authorized Representative: Date:

Print Name of Board of Trustees Chair:

Signature of Board of Trustees Chair: Date:

Curriculum Department

memo

Date: May 20, 2014 To: Mary Vagner, Superintendent From: Chuck Wegner, Director of Curriculum RE: Class of 2014 Alternate Route to Graduation – BOARD ACTION REQUESTED

The following students have completed the Alternate Route to Graduation in place of the ISAT requirement for graduation. The school administrators have signed off that the students have completed the Alternate Route and the appropriate verification forms for each student are filed in the Curriculum Department. I request that the Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation application for:

1 student at Century High School in Math and Language 1 student at Century High School in Reading and Math 1 student at Highland High School in Reading 4 students at Highland High School in Math 2 students at Highland High School in Language 1 student at Pocatello High School in Reading, Math and Language 1 student at Pocatello High School in Reading and Language 3 students at Pocatello High School in Math 3 students at Pocatello High School in Math and Language 5 students at Pocatello High School in Language 1 student at New Horizon High School in Math

A few students are still working on the Alternate Route to Graduation, but are on track to finish by the end of the school year. I request the Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation application, pending successful completion, for:

1 student at Highland High School in Math and Language 1 student at Highland High School in Math 3 students at Pocatello High School in Reading, Math and Language 1 student at Pocatello High School in Language 1 student at New Horizon High School in Math

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25

Curriculum Department

memo

Date: May 20, 2014 To: Mary Vagner, Superintendent From: Chuck Wegner, Director of Curriculum RE: Class of 2016 Alternate Route to Graduation – BOARD ACTION REQUESTED

Students from this year’s sophomore class (Class of 2016) were required to pass the 9th Grade ISAT last spring at a 10th grade proficiency level. Students who did not pass were placed on the 2016 Alternate Route to Graduation in lieu of passing the ISAT. High School students from all four high schools have completed the Alternate Route to Graduation and the school administration has verified that 256 students have completed the requirement. The corresponding forms for these students are on file in the Curriculum Department. I request that the Board approve the Alternate Route to Graduation applications for these students.

1 student from Century High School (all others were approved January 21, 2014) 119 students from Highland High School 111 students from Pocatello High School 25 students from New Horizon High School

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25

Idaho Food Bank – Back Pack Program 13-14 Amber - 233-8811 (2501) 2012-2013 School 05-14 04-14 03-14 02-14 01-14 12-13 11-13 10-13 09-13 9-12 5-13 Chubbuck Elem. 20 18 15 20 5 0 7 3 11 8 12 Edahow Elem. 10 8 10 9 3 4 5 0 6 0 0 Ellis Elem. 6 9 9 8 18 20 15 13 10 7 13 Gate City Elem. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Greenacres Elem. 18 17 20 18 12 15 4 8 3 4 10 Indian Hills Elem. 37 35 37 32 30 31 28 30 23 18 26 Jefferson Elem. 34 38 35 34 38 40 39 34 29 23 31 Lewis & Clark Elem. 35 33 35 35 38 40 25 27 0 25 29 Syringa Elem. 30 32 28 32 55 64 22 28 28 15 30 Tendoy Elem. 10 10 9 8 6 0 7 5 3 9 16 Tyhee Elem. 32 30 30 30 20 20 20 24 15 21 26 Washington Elem. 16 15 12 13 8 0 10 9 5 8 13 Wilcox Elem. 20 23 29 22 25 27 24 25 20 13 18

Franklin MS 7 7 5 7 3 0 5 0 3 7 12 Hawthorne MS 5 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 Irving MS 4 3 0 8 5 7 5 4 5 6 8 New Horizons Center 7 5 6 0 8 7 8 6 4 7 0 Alameda MS 9 8 8 10 15 24 8 0 9

TOTALS 300 297 294 292 289 299 232 216 174 177 244

School Contact Person: Chubbuck – Tricia Harvela (counselor) Lewis & Clark – Jill Robertson (CRW) Franklin – Bill Gilbert (counselor) Edahow – Tonianne Wood (counselor) Lincoln – Berta Hadley Hawthorne – Tonya Burch (aide) Ellis – Susan Grayson (STAR coach) Syringa – Kim Jackman (CRW) Irving – Chrys Robertson (counselor) Gate City – Deanne Dye (principal) Tendoy – Paula Miller (CRW) Century – Andy Paules (school psych) Greenacres – Lydia McInelly (behavior tech) Tyhee – Courtney Kent (CRW) Poky – Vickie Powers (social worker) Indian Hills – Patty Fonnesbeck (counselor) Washington – Paula Miller (CRW) Highland – Roger Holyoak (counselor) Jefferson – Allison Huerta (CRW) Wilcox – Lisa Mecham (CRW) New Horizons – Daniella Merzlock (couns) Alameda MS – Steve Erlandson (counselor) POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25

KINDERGARTEN REGISTRATION COUNT

2014-2015

May 9, 2014

Schools 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 Chubbuck 97 92 77 106 87 80 99 93 Edahow 54 56 56 50 56 48 52 50 Ellis 58 72 79 102 96 79 76 69 Gate City 69 57 72 70 58 54 64 71 Greenacres 47 54 68 64 74 65 54 50 Indian Hills 49 76 63 61 58 57 85 70 Jefferson 47 58 53 67 62 54 65 57 Lewis & Clark 53 53 55 78 61 70 69 77 Syringa 67 81 65 84 82 88 72 77 Tendoy 48 59 46 57 53 50 34 40 Tyhee 46 41 49 51 52 44 63 54 Washington 38 41 40 63 53 43 26 26 Wilcox 60 55 63 91 58 83 65 70 Totals 733 795 786 944 850 815 824 804

2014-2015 Lincoln Early Intervention Program Calendar

August-14 12 Elementary Registration 2 Professional Development - District February-15 SMTWT FS 21 Staff Orientation 9 Infant Toddler Meetings S M T W T F S 1222&25 Work Days - schedule registration 16 President's Day - NO SCHOOL 1234567 3456789 appointments and set-up classrooms 19 End 2nd Trimester - Progress Reports 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 26-29 Preschool Registration 20 Record Day - NO SCHOOL 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 EIP Referral Meetings 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

September-14 1 Labor Day - NO SCHOOL 2 EIP Referral Meetings March-15 SMTWT FS 2-3 Professional Development 9 Infant Toddler Meetings S M T W T F S 123456 4-5 File Review & SPED Planning 16 EIP Referral Meetings 1234567 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 9-10 First Day of Preschool 23-27 Spring Break - NO SCHOOL 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 8 EIP Referral Meetings 30 EIP Referral Meetings 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 15 Infant Toddler Meetings 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 22 Screening #1 29 30 31 29 EIP Referral Meetings

October-14 3 Professional Development - District 6 EIP Referral Meetings April-15 SMTWT FS 6 EIP Referral Meetings 9 Kindergarten Registration SMTWT FS 1234 13 Infant Toddler Meetings 13 Infant Toddler Meetings 1234 567891011 20 EIP Referral Meetings 20 EIP Referral Meetings 567891011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 27 EIP Referral Meetings 27 EIP Referral Meetings 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30

November-14 3 EIP Referral Meetings 4 EIP Referral Meetings May-15 SMTWT FS 10 Infant Toddler Meetings 11 Infant Toddler Meetings S M T W T F S 1 12 End of 1st Trimester - Progress Reports 18 EIP Referral Meetings 1 2 2345678 14 Record Day - NO SCHOOL 20 Last Day of School - Progress Reports 3456789 9 101112131415 17 Screening #2 21 Record Day - Graduation Day 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 EIP Referral Meetings 22 1/2 Day Teacher Checkout 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 25 Record Day - SPED 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 30 26-28 Thanksgiving Holiday - NO SCHOOL 31

December-14 1 EIP Referral Meetings June-15 SMTWT FS 8 Infant Toddler Meetings S M T W T F S 123456 15 EIP Referral Meetings 123456 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 22-31 Winter Break - NO SCHOOL 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30

January-15 1-2 Winter Break - NO SCHOOL * KEY July-15 SMTWT FS 5 EIP Referral Meetings No school for students or staff S M T W T F S 123 12 Infant Toddler Meetings Professional Development - NO SCHOOL 1234 45678910 19 Martin Luther King Holiday - NO SCHOOLRecord Day - NO SCHOOL 567891011 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 26 Screening #3 EIP Screening 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Infant Toddler Meetings 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 No school for students on Mondays 26 27 28 29 30 31

May 20, 2014

The following student has been jointly assigned by Idaho State University and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 as recorded in the minutes of the District Board of Trustees on May 20, 2014, to serve as a social worker intern during the 2014-15 school year. The student, while serving as an intern under the supervision of a social worker, shall be accorded the same liability insurance coverage by the School District served as that accorded a social worker in the same District and shall comply with all rules and regulations of the School District or public institution while acting as such practicing social worker, (Section 33-1201, Idaho Code.)

______Superintendent Date Coordinator of Field Experiences Date

Name of Intern Subject/Grade Coop. Social Worker. Date Placement

Joseph Gonzales Social Worker Channelle Foltz 8/2014 Edahow Elem.

May 20, 2014

The following student has been jointly assigned by Idaho State University and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 as recorded in the minutes of the District Board of Trustees on May 20, 2014, to serve as a counseling intern during the 2014-15 school year. The student, while serving as an intern under the supervision of a certified counselor, shall be accorded the same liability insurance coverage by the School District served as that accorded a certified counselor in the same District and shall comply with all rules and regulations of the School District or public institution while acting as such practicing counselor, (Section 33-1201, Idaho Code.)

______Superintendent Date Coordinator of Field Experiences Date

Name of Intern Subject/Grade Coop. Counselor. Date Placement

Jeff Smith Counseling Elem. Ann Lewis 8/2014 Jefferson Elem.

“ “ Counseling Sec. Carol Hill 8/2014 Irving MS

May 20, 2014

The following student has been jointly assigned by the Western Governors University and the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 as recorded in the minutes of the District Board of Trustees on May 20, 2014, to serve as a student teacher intern during the 1st and 2nd trimester of the 2014-15 school year. The student, while serving as an intern under the supervision of a certified teacher, shall be accorded the same liability insurance coverage by the School District served as that accorded a certified teacher in the same District and shall comply with all rules and regulations of the School District or public institution while acting as such practicing teacher, (Section 33-1201, Idaho Code.)

______Superintendent Date Coordinator of Field Experiences Date

Name of Intern Subject/Grade Coop. Teacher Date Placement

Kady Remer 4th grade Megan Bullock 9/2014 Lewis & Clark Elem.

“ “ K-5 Resource Teri Churba 10/2014 Gate City Elem. Room POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 ELEMENTARY PROGRESS DATA 2013‐2014

Benchmark for Fall ‐ % Proficient End of Year Goal End of Year Results K12345 K12345 K12345 Chubbuck 1000826402570505040936386618177 Edahow 6 2 63 15 0 17 65 70 65 70 65 65 100 77 100 72 65.45 70 Ellis 0 0 468 2060656550 65696565808268 Gate City 0300164 52525204525958744696558 Greenacres 0 0 0 17 0 0 70 70 34 50 40 70 100* 100* 42.3 64 80 70 Indian Hills 100831 605075805065777785.8 91 59 71 Jefferson 040088 60306525502560*50*65*20*50*25% Lewis & Clark 10 1 0 3 11 70 50 60 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Syringa 0 0 1 153 15655040665075847871705879 Tendoy 007404 5045503325308567886976.6 69 Tyhee 0 0 4 4 50 50 60* 40* 24 24 90 94 96 71 30 65 Washington 0 0 6 35 1 1 70* 80* 80* 70* 85* 85* 78 80 86 85 88 92 Wilcox 000008 6530*50*50*50*508810091.25 85 80.5 58

Lincoln EIP 98% of students maintained or showed growth as measured by the early childhood outcome readings. Their goal was 80%

*indicates students will increase writing performance by one level.

MEMORANDUM

To: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent From: Bob Devine, Director of Secondary Education Date: May 20, 2014 RE: Pocatello High School Accreditation Required Action Follow Up Report

Pocatello Highh School Accreditation Required Action Follow Up Report

During the accreditation process, Pocatello High School was given one “required action” to complete before the next accreditation process occurs. This required action centered on training in the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data. Additionally the accreditation team recommended that Pocatello High School should focus on improving the school’s image. As a result the staff collaborated and developed three main goals:

Goal 1: All professional and support staff are trained in the evaluation, interpretation, and use of data. Goal 2: Create a new Mission and Vision Statement for Pocatello Hiigh School Goal 3: Increase Public Awareness of the Positive Accomplishments of Pocatello High School

All three goals were addressed this school year to varying degrees. Progress toward each goal is as follows:

Goal 1: All professional as well as some support staff members were trained in the evaluation and interpretation of data by the Idaho Core Coach and department heads. At the beginning of 2nd trimester, every teacher gave students a compare and contrast writing task. Upon completion of the task, teachers and para-educators collaboratively scored each student's writing. The data was collected and then collaboratively evaluated within Professional Learning Communities. Most PLC groups also worked together to interpret the instructional implications and to formulate plans to address the learning needs of studennts. This activity spanned several months and was a good way to ease teachers into the task of using data to drive instruction. Activvities similar to this one will be planned and orchestrated each year.

Goal 2: Through collaboration with parents, students, and staff members, Pocatello High School created a new Mission Statement – Honoring the Past; Creating the Future. Grraphics have been created to accompany this new statement and are in the process of being displayed around the school.

Page 1 of 2

Goal 3: Three major projects were tackled this year as part of an effort to increase awareness of the positive accomplishments of Pocatello High School:

1) “Meet Us Mondays” were established which entailed calendaring 5 Mondays throughout the school year where parents and community members were invited into the building. Teachers were available for parent conferences, and the building was also available for the general public to “tour.” These events were somewhat successful. Some Mondays there were little to no visitors, and other Mondays there were up to 30 visitors. We will re-evaluate the effectiveness of this project and determine if the practice will be continued next year.

2) A new Pocatello High School website has been built and is nearly ready to “go live.” The website showcases the best of Pocatello High School.

3) A Pocatello High School handbook has been designed and will be sent to print in the immediate future. The handbook is a guide for students about life at Pocatello High School. It provides specific information about the school including course offerings, programs, advanced opportunities and student life. The handbook will be distributed to all students at the beginning of the 2014-15 school year.

Page 2 of 2 STUDENTS 8000 POLICY 8351 Page (1)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

DATES (Adopted/Revised) GUIDE WORDS Adopted - August, 1973 Revised - January, 1970 Revised - September 1976 Revised - August, 1977 Revised - July, 1979 Revised - July, 1980 Activity Fees Revised - January, 1987 Fees Revised - August, 1995 Participation Fees Revised - February, 2005 Student Fees Revised - July, 2009 Student Fines Revised - August, 2009 Revised - September, 2010 Revised – June, 2012 Revised – July, 2013 Revised – September, 2013 Revised – May, 2014

The Board of Trustees of the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 is committed to providing opportunities for student growth and development through active participation in school activities and engaging in active learning in the classroom. Depending on the classroom experience or activity some of these opportunities are fee dependent, with some fees being required and others being optional.

Student activity fees are paid at the time of registration. Participation fees are paid timely to actively participate in an IHSAA affiliated sport or activity.

Required activity fees include the following for high school students: Accounting Classes Stagecraft Fee Agriculture Classes Teen Living A & B Art Classes (CHS/HHS/PHS) Student Body Activity Fee Art Classes (NHHS) Freshman Class Dues Automotive Classes Sophomore Class Dues Culinary Arts Classes Junior Class Dues Senior Class Dues EMT Classes Advanced Choir (if in choir) Fish & Wildlife Science Helmet Reconditioning and Replacement Food/Nutrition Classes (CHS/HHS/PHS) Fee (if in football) Food/Nutrition Classes (NHHS) Choir Robe Cleaning (if in choir) Health Occupation Classes Picture Fees Hospitality Classes Band Uniform Cleaning (if in band) Nursing Assistant Program Instrument Maintenance (if District Pharmacy Technician Classes provides instrument) Pottery Classes Locker Fees Science Elective Classes Graduation Fee Sports Medicine Classes Teen Parent Lab Fee

Optional activity fees include the following for high school students: Student Body Activity Card Retake Yearbook Parking

Required activity fees include the following for middle school students: Student Body Activity Fee Band Uniform Cleaning (if in band) STUDENTS 8000 POLICY 8351 Page (2)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

Choir Robe Cleaning (if in choir)

Optional activity fees include the following for middle school students: Yearbook

Required participation fees for high school students include, but are not limited to, the following: Band (Performing)* Drama Band (Marching)* Football Baseball Golf Basketball Softball Cheerleading Soccer Choir (Performing)* Tennis Cross Country Track and Field Dance / Drill Team Volleyball Debate / Speech Wrestling

*Beyond the classroom requirements

Required participation fees for middle school students include, but are not limited to, the following: Basketball Track and Field Cheerleading Volleyball Cross Country Wrestling

Required participation fees for elementary school students include the following: Field Trip Fee Pre-School - Montessori

Musical Instruments: In order to provide variety of instrumentation, limited numbers of special types of instruments will be made available to students enrolled in the various music programs through the District Music Department. This fee is payable at the time the student receives the instrument.

Further, the Board of Trustees values the care of school resources and expects students to exercise respect for school property. Should school property be abused or damaged, fees will be assessed from the parties responsible. All fees shall be paid within the trimester or semester in which the breech of school property occurred. Fees going unpaid may result in the District pursuing whatever legal remedy may be available in order to collect.

Some fees may be refunded on a prorated basis, taking into consideration days attended and reason for leaving. Some fees are non-refundable including, but not limited to, those fees paid by students who leave the program due to disciplinary reasons or fees paid for special travel or events.

Damaged or Lost Book Fines: Students are fined for damaging or losing books and for late return of books to the media center.

Illegal Parking Fines: Students who park illegally on school property are fined. STUDENTS 8000 POLICY 8351 Page (3)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

Damage to School Property: Students who damage school property shall be held accountable for restitution and shall be fined the cost of repair.

The District may require, as a condition of graduation, issuance of a diploma or certificate, or issuance of a transcript, that all indebtedness incurred by a student be satisfied. In addition, all books or other instructional material, uniforms, equipment, or other District property be returned.

The Board of Trustees is required by Idaho Code to hold a public hearing if any fees are increased five percent (5%) beyond the amount of the fee last collected. Further, it is required by Idaho Code to hold a public hearing prior to imposing any new fee. To do so, the District must advertise once each week for two (2) weeks preceding for the purpose of hearing public comments regarding the proposed fee increases or new fees.

The Superintendent is directed to establish procedure which maintains a record of the adopted fees as set by the Board of Trustees.

STUDENTS 8000 PROCEDURE 8351 Page (1)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

DATES (Adopted/Revised) GUIDE WORDS Adopted - August, 1973 Revised - January, 1970 Revised - September 1976 Revised - August, 1977 Revised - July, 1979 Activity Fees Revised - July, 1980 Fees Revised - January, 1987 Participation Fees Revised - August, 1995 Student Fees Revised - February, 2005 Student Fines Revised - July, 2009

Revised - July, 2010 Revised – June, 2012 Revised – June, 2013 Revised – September, 2013 Revised – May, 2014

Student activity fees shall be paid at the time of registration. Participation fees are paid timely to actively participate in an IHSAA affiliated sport or activity. Fees are uniform and consistent between high schools and middle schools.

Required activity fees include the following for high school students: Per Trimester Fees Accounting Classes $10.00 Agriculture Classes $10.00 Art Classes (CHS/HHS/PHS) $10.00 Automotive Classes (Each level) $10.00 Culinary Arts – 1st Trimester (Includes chef coat & safety $64.00 certification) Culinary Arts – 2nd and 3rd Trimester $15.00 Food/Nutrition Classes (CHS/HHS/PHS) $15.00 Hospitality Classes $15.00 Pottery Classes $10.00 Science Elective Classes $10.00 Teen Living A $15.00 Teen Living B $15.00 Teen Parent Lab $25.00 Per Block Fees Art Classes (NHHS) $5.00 Food/Nutrition Classes (NHHS) $10.00 Annual Fees EMT Classes $150.00 Fish & Wildlife Science Classes $49.25 Health Occupation Classes $20.00 Nursing Assistant Program $88.00 Pharmacy Technician Classes $250.00 Sports Medicine Classes $60.00 Stagecraft Fee $10.00 Student Body Activity Fee $50.00 Freshman Class Dues $2.00 Sophomore Class Dues $2.00 Junior Class Dues $4.00 Senior Class Dues $6.00 Advanced Choir $20.00 Choir Robe Cleaning $15.00 Picture Fees (Freshman, Sophomore, Junior) $2.00 Picture Fees (Senior) $15.00 STUDENTS 8000 PROCEDURE 8351 Page (2)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

Band Uniform Cleaning – Marching Band $15.00 Band Uniform Cleaning – Performing Band $15.00 Instrument Maintenance (if District provides instrument) $75.00 Locker Fees $2.00 Holt Arena Graduation Fee $4.00 Helmet Reconditioning and Replacement Fee (if in football) $50.00

Optional activity fees include the following for high school students: Annual Student Body Activity Card Retake $5.00 Yearbook (before winter break) $55.00 Yearbook (after winter break) $70.00 Parking $10.00

Required activity fees include the following for middle school students: Annual Student Body Activity Fee $15.00 Choir Robe Cleaning (if in Choir) $7.00 Band Uniform Cleaning (if in Band) $7.00

Optional activity fees include the following for middle school students: Annual Yearbook $20.00

*Beyond the classroom requirements The fee for participating in the first activity is $105.00, the second activity is $90.00 and the third activity is $75.00. Other fees may be assessed for uniforms and supplemental items. Scholarships are available for those students in need. Inquiries are to be made to the Athletic Director, located at each secondary school.

Required participation fees for middle school students include, but are not limited to, the following: Basketball Track and Field Cheerleading Volleyball Cross Country Wrestling

The fee for participation in activities is $45.00 for each activity. Scholarships are available for those students in need. Inquiries are to be made to the Athletic Director, located at each secondary school.

Required participation fees for elementary school students include the following: Field Trip Fee $10.00/Annually Pre-School - Montessori $180.00/Monthly

STUDENTS 8000 PROCEDURE 8351 Page (3)

STUDENT ACTIVITY AND PARTICIPATION FEES AND STUDENT FINES

Musical Instruments: In order to provide variety of instrumentation, limited numbers of special types of instruments will be made available to students enrolled in the various music programs through the District Music Department. The maintenance fee for the instrument is payable at the time the student receives the instrument.

Damaged or Lost Book Fines: Students are fined for damaging or losing books and for late return of books to the media center. Fees are driven by the cost of the materials.

Illegal Parking Fines: Students who park illegally on school property are fined $5.00 for each violation.

Damage to School Property: Students who damage school property shall be held accountable for restitution and shall be fined the cost of repair. All restitution shall be remitted through the Business Office for appropriate accounting through the Damage/Loss procedure.

In addition to the fees and fines specified above, other fees and fines may be assessed of students from time to time.

Early College Program 921 South 8th Avenue, Stop 8057 • Pocatello, Idaho 83209‐8057

2014 Trimester 3 and Year End Totals Dual Credit Report to League of Schools Enrollment School Courses Tri 3 Duplicated Course Type 2013‐2014 Total (course underlined) Unduplicated Aberdeen HS PE 2243 Elective 10 students in 30 credit hours American Falls HS ENGL 1101 Objective Courses 72 students in 330 ENGL 1110 credit hours HIST 1111 HIST 1112 MATH 1153 POLS 1101 Bear Lake HS COMM 1101 Objective Courses 50 students in 264 ENGL 1101 credit hours ENGL 1110 MATH 1153 Century HS CE 1120 60 students in 191 Objective Courses, 216 students in HIST 1111 credit hours except CE 1120, PE 1052 credit hours HIST 1112 22337 & PE 2243 – MATH 1153 electives MATH 1170 PE 2237 PE 2243 POLS 1101 POLS 2202 SPAN 1101 SPAN 1102 THEA 2221 Grace HS MATH 1153 Objective Courses 18 students in 72 Math 1170 credit hours Highlland HS BIOL 1101/Lab 77 students in 243 Objective Courses, 203 students in BIOL 1102/Lab credit hours PE 2243 – elective 1511 credit hours CHEM 1111/Lab COMM 1101 ENGL 1101 ENGL 1110 HIST 1111 HIST 1112 MATH 1153 MATH 1170 PE 2243 POLS 1101 POLS 2202 SPAN 1101 SPAN 1102

Malad HS BIOL 1101/Lab Objective Courses 43 students in 391 BIOL 1102/Lab credit hours ENGL 1101 ENGL 1110 HIST 1111 HIST 1112 MUSC 1100 Marsh Valley HS BIOL 1101/Lab Objective Courses 27 students in 200 BIOL 1102/Lab credit hours Pocatello HS BIOL 1101/Lab 29 students in 87 Objective Courses 103 students in 608 BIOL 1102/Lab credit hours credit hours COMM 1101 ENGL 1101 ENGL 1110 GERM 1101 HIST 1111 HIST 1112 PE 2243 PHYS 1152 PHSY 1153 POLS 1101 Preston HS CFS 1120 Objective Courses 68 students in 453 ENGL 1101 except CFS 1120 – credit hours ENGL 1110 elective HIST 1111 HIST 1112 POLS 1101 Snake River HS BIOL 1101 18 students in 54 Objective Courses 69 students in 464 BIOL 1102 credit hours except PE 2243 – credit hours ENGL 1101 elective ENGL 1110 PE 2243 SPAN 1101 SPAN 1102 West Side HS MATH 1153 Objective Courses 17 students in 58 MATH 1170 credit hours

Total Trimester 3 for Region V (course in red) 184 students in 575 credit hours Total Enrollment Region V (2013‐2014 Year) 896 students in 5,433 credit hours Total Enrollment for All Regions (2013‐2014 Year) 2,081 students in 12,544 credit hours (13 students at Sophomore status, 2 students at Junior status)

Total Scholarships Awarded 2013‐2014:

College Access Challenge Grant $86,105 Pocatello Chamber Scholarship $4,940 ISU Credit Union Scholarship $2,000 IF College Pathways $2,385 Total $95,430

Chelsie Rauh

Submitted April 21, 2014 Alameda Middle School Participation Fees Comparison Updated 5‐14‐14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Fees Not Sch/Pmt Sch/Pmt Fall Activities Fees Paid Paid Plan Fees Paid Plan Fee Collected Cheer n/a n/a n/a 13 0 $585.00 Volleyball n/a n/a n/a 28 0 $1,260.00 Cross Country n/a n/a n/a 19 0 $855.00 Subtotal n/a n/a n/a 60 0 $2,700.00

Winter Activities Boys Basketball n/a n/a n/a 27 0 $1,215.00 Girls Basketball n/a n/a n/a 34 0 $1,530.00 Wrestling n/a n/a n/a 62 0 $2,790.00 Subtotal n/a n/a n/a 123 0 $5,535.00

Spring Activities Track n/a n/a n/a 129 0 $5,805.00 Subtotal n/a n/a n/a 129 0 $5,805.00

Total of all activities n/a n/a n/a 312 0 $14,040.00

Franklin Middle School Participation Fees Comparison Updated 5‐14‐14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Fees Not Sch/Pmt Sch/Pmt Fall Activities Fees Paid Paid Plan Fees Paid Plan Fee Collected Cheer 16 0 0 16 0 $720.00 Volleyball 28 0 0 28 0 $1,260.00 Cross Country 52 0 0 60 0 $2,700.00 Subtotal 96 0 0 104 0 $4,680.00

Winter Activities Boys Basketball 30 0 0 33 0 $1,485.00 Girls Basketball 30 0 0 25 0 $1,125.00 Wrestling 56 0 0 38 0 $1,710.00 Subtotal 116 0 0 96 0 $4,320.00

Spring Activities Track 183 1 0 187 0 $8,415.00 Subtotal 183 1 0 187 0 $8,415.00

Total of all activities 395 1 0 387 0 $17,415.00 Hawthorne Middle School Participation Fees Comparison Updated 5‐14‐14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Fees Not Sch/Pmt Sch/Pmt Fall Activities Fees Paid Paid Plan Fees Paid Plan Fee Collected Cheer 17 0 0 16 1 $720.00 Volleyball 30 0 0 28 0 $1,260.00 Cross Country 33 0 0 45 0 $2,025.00 Subtotal 80 0 0 89 1 $4,005.00

Winter Activities Boys Basketball 21 0 0 30 0 $1,350.00 Girls Basketball 30 0 0 30 0 $1,350.00 Wrestling 62 0 0 57 0 $2,565.00 Subtotal 113 0 0 117 0 $5,265.00

Spring Activities Track 118 0 0 122 0 $5,490.00 Subtotal 118 0 0 122 0 $5,490.00

Total of all activities 311 0 0 328 1 $14,760.00

Irving Middle School Participation Fees Comparison Updated 5‐14‐14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Fees Not Sch/Pmt Sch/Pmt Fall Activities Fees Paid Paid Plan Fees Paid Plan Fee Collected Cheer 17 0 0 11 0 $495.00 Volleyball 30 0 0 26 0 $1,170.00 Cross Country 45 0 0 52 0 $2,300.00 Subtotal 92 0 0 89 0 $3,965.00

Winter Activities Boys Basketball 29 0 0 26 0 $1,170.00 Girls Basketball 30 0 0 23 0 $1,035.00 Wrestling 50 0 0 43 0 $1,935.00 Subtotal 109 0 0 89 0 $4,005.00

Spring Activities Track 102 1 0 120 0 $5,400.00 Subtotal 102 1 0 120 0 $5,400.00

Total of all activities 303 1 0 298 0 $13,505.00 Century High School Participation Comparison UPDATED 5/14/14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Fall Activity Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Sch/Pmt Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees Band 89 1 4 96 8 $9,680.00 $400.00 Cheer 18 0 2 16 0 $1,680.00 $0.00 Choir 57 7 3 95 10 $9,273.00 $702.00 Dance/Drill 19 0 1 20 0 $2,100.00 $0.00 Boys Soccer 31 0 0 33 3 $3,327.00 $138.00 Girls Soccer 31 0 0 33 1 $3,420.00 $45.00 Football 111 0 4 124 9 $12,235.00 $785.00 Volleyball 31 0 0 34 0 $3,570.00 $0.00 Cross Country 44 1 0 40 1 $4,095.00 $105.00 Sub Total 431 9 14 491 32 $49,380.00 $2,175.00

2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Sch/Pmt. Winter Activities Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees GIRL'S BASKETBALL 23 3 2 31 2 $2,595.00 $195.00 BOY'S BASKETBALL 26 8 4 39 5 $3,227.00 $283.00 WRESTLING 9 3 2 18 2 $1,460.00 $160.00 Sub Total 58 14 8 88 9 $7,192.00 $728.00

Spring Activities GIRL'S SOFTBALL 23 7 0 33 7 $2,340.00 $630.00 BOY'S BASEBALL 34 3 2 34 11 $2,070.00 $990.00 TRACK 34 30 2 47 22 $2,250.00 $1,980.00 TENNIS 37 0 0 29 3 $2,340.00 $270.00 GOLF 15 1 0 15 8 $630.00 $720.00 Sub Total 143 41 4 158 51 $9,630.00 $4,590.00

Total of all Activities 632 64 26 737 92 $66,202.00 $7,493.00 Highland High School Participation Comparison UPDATED 5/14/14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Fall Activity Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Sch/Pmt Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees Band 77 17 0 96 10 $9,030.00 $1,050.00 Cheer 28 1 0 28 0 $2,940.00 $0.00 Choir 87 36 0 43 6 $3,885.00 $630.00 Dance/Drill 15 1 0 15 0 $1,575.00 $0.00 Boys Soccer 41 4 0 42 3 $4,095.00 $315.00 Girls Soccer 29 6 0 34 0 $3,570.00 $0.00 Football 123 18 0 139 12 $13,335.00 $1,260.00 Volleyball 28 1 0 29 0 $3,040.00 $0.00 Cross Country 29 10 0 48 0 $5,040.00 $0.00 Sub Total 457 94 0 474 31 $46,510.00 $3,255.00

2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Sch/Pmt. Winter Activities Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees GIRL'S BASKETBALL 33 0 2 35 2 $2,970.00 $210.00 BOY'S BASKETBALL 36 1 5 48 6 $3,780.00 $540.00 WRESTLING 40 0 6 46 6 $3,600.00 $540.00 Sub Total 109 1 13 129 14 $10,350.00 $1,290.00

Spring Activities GIRL'S SOFTBALL 14 10 0 25 0 $1,875.00 $0.00 BOY'S BASEBALL 13 20 0 35 3 $2,625.00 $270.00 TRACK 27 45 0 89 59 $6,675.00 $2,475.00 TENNIS 16 23 0 65 51 $4,875.00 $1,440.00 GOLF 12 18 0 24 4 $1,800.00 $390.00 Sub Total 82 116 0 238 117 $17,850.00 $4,575.00

Total of all Activities 648 211 13 841 162 $74,710.00 $9,120.00 Pocatello High School Participation Comparison UPDATED 5/14/14 2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Fall Activity Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Sch/Pmt Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees Band 42 9 1 43 10 $3,465.00 $1,050.00 Cheer 15 2 0 18 3 $1,575.00 $315.00 Choir 23 12 0 32 3 $3,045.00 $315.00 Dance/Drill 13 0 0 17 0 $1,785.00 $0.00 Boys Soccer 15 1 2 25 4 $2,205.00 $420.00 Girls Soccer 15 5 3 22 2 $2,100.00 $210.00 Football 107 9 5 118 21 $10,185.00 $2,205.00 Volleyball 29 0 0 26 0 $2,730.00 $0.00 Cross Country 33 3 1 38 4 $3,570.00 $420.00 Sub Total 292 41 12 339 47 $30,660.00 $4,935.00

2012‐2013 2013‐2014 Sch/Pmt Total Sch/Pmt. Winter Activities Fees Paid Fees Not Paid Plan Participants Plan Fee Collected Outstanding Fees GIRL'S BASKETBALL 33 0 1 31 7 $2,610.00 $630.00 BOY'S BASKETBALL 23 0 5 38 10 $2,520.00 $900.00 WRESTLING 27 0 3 38 12 $2,340.00 $1,080.00 Sub Total 83 0 9 107 29 $7,470.00 $2,610.00

Spring Activities GIRL'S SOFTBALL 10 0 13 24 4 $2,077.00 $293.00 BOY'S BASEBALL 22 0 9 30 8 $1,935.00 $725.00 TRACK 14 0 42 45 22 $2,160.00 $1,950.00 TENNIS 12 0 8 23 10 $1,245.00 $930.00 GOLF 6 0 13 14 4 $900.00 $360.00 Sub Total 64 0 85 136 48 $8,317.00 $12,575.00

Total of all Activities 439 41 106 582 124 $46,447.00 $20,120.00

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Robert F. Devine, Director of Secondary Education

DATE: May 20, 2014

SUBJECT: Use of Football Helmets and Pads for Summer Cammps

Century High School Mr. Stephen Anderson, the Athletic Director at Century High School has submitted a request for the use of football helmets and pads for the Weber State University Varsity Football Team Camp scheduled June 9 – 12, 2014 per IHSAA guideline 17-2-6.

Highland High School Mr. Travis Bell, the Athletic Director at Highland High School has submitted a reqquest for the use of football helmets and pads for the Varsity and JV Football Camp scheduled July 14 – 16, 2014 per IHSAA guideline17-2-6.

Pocatello High School Mr. Robert Parker, the Athletic Director at Pocatello High School has submitted a request for the use of football helmets and pads for the PHS Freshman and JV Football Camp scheduled June 16 – 19, 2014 and for the PHS Varsity Football Camp scheduled June 23 – 26, 2014 per IHSAA guideline 17-2-6.

Recommendation: Administration recommends Board approve the use of high school football helmets and pads for summer camps as requested.

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent FROM: Bob Devine, Director of Secondary Education RE: Early Graduation Request DATE: May 20, 2014

In order to support student success in current and future education plans, the Board of Trustees has adopted Policy and Procedure 8124 – Early Graduation.

The following early graduation request is being submitted for a junior who will be graduating pending completion of the 2014 Summer School Session and BYU correspondence courses.

Name of High School Number of Early Graduation Requests

Highland High School 1 TOTAL 1

The reason for the early graduation request includes the following:

 To attend college this fall (1)

All applications have been submitted in accordance with Board policy and procedure and all applicants have met all requirements. I am recommending Board approval of the early graduation requests.

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent FROM: Bob Devine, Director of Secondary Education RE: Early Graduation Requests DATE: April 15, 2014

In order to support student success in current and future education plans, the Board of Trustees has adopted Policy and Procedure 8124, Early Graduation.

The following early graduation requests are being submitted for juniors who will be graduating after the completion of the 2014 Summer School Session.

Name of High School Number of Early Graduation Requests

Century High School 3 TOTAL 3

The reasons for these early graduation requests include the following:

 To work full-time and attend college (2)  To attend college this fall (1)

All applications have been submitted in accordance with Board policy and procedure and all applicants have met all requirements. I am recommending Board approval of all submissions.

Idaho General Fund Revenue Report

C.L. “Butch” Otter, Governor DIVISION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Jani Revier, Administrator Executive Office of the Governor

MAY 2014 VOLUME XXXVI NO. 11

daho General Fund revenue receipts for $284.3 million, which is $11.5 million were $9.3 million above the predicted IApril 2014 were $431.1 million. This below the forecasted $295.7 million. April $23.4 million. Refunds were virtually on amount is $18.6 million lower than the refunds were $5.9 million higher-than- target, coming in about $0.2 million under $449.6 million that was predicted for the expected, $79.3 million compared to $73.3 its forecast. Fiscal year-to-date corporate month. The total receipts for FY 2014 million. However, these misses actually income tax collections are $148.8 million, through April are $2,352.8 million, which brought the FY 2014 fiscal year-to-date which is $8.4 million (-5.4%) below the is $3.9 million below the projected receipts to within $0.2 million of the projected amount. $2,356.7 million. forecasted $1,168.4 million. his month’s sales tax contribution to early all of this month’s shortfall iling collections jumped by 25.0% in Tthe General Fund of $96.4 million was Nwas in the individual income tax FApril 2013 from the previous April. a 3.6% increase over April 2013. April category that came in $22.4 million This surge was partially fueled by filers 2014’s sales tax receipts were also $0.9 (-7.1%) below expectations. Corporate shifting CY 2013 income into CY 2012 in million above the $95.5 million expected income tax collections also came in under anticipation of higher federal income tax for the month. This month’s collections expectations. It was $43.4 million, which rates for CY 2013. (It should be noted that bring the fiscal year-to-date sales tax is $2.3 million (-5.1%) short of the CY 2012 income taxes are not due until receipts to $950.4 million, which is 3.3% forecasted $45.7 million. Miscellaneous FY 2013.) We did not expect another higher than the same period of FY 2013 revenue beat its forecast by $5.3 million. sharp filing collections increase this April and $3.5 million (-0.4%) below the The remaining General Fund revenue because another federal income tax forecast. sources were much closer to their increase was not anticipated. To the predicted amounts. Sales tax receipts of contrary, it was predicted filing collections pril miscellaneous revenue was $96.4 million were $0.9 million (1.0%) would decline $17.9 million from April A forecast to be a negative $12.4 above the $95.5 million projected for the 2013. The actual year-over-year decline million because the Treasurer was month. Product taxes were even closer to was $29.4 million. However, the higher- expected to set aside the total Tax their mark; they were just $0.1 million than-predicted filing collections in Anticipation Note payment this month. (-2.2%) shy of the expected $3.2 million. February and March helped the April 2014 Instead, the payment was spread over fiscal year-to-date filing collections to March and April. This is the main reason pril’s individual income tax results decrease just $21.5 million compared to miscellaneous revenue was $5.3 million Awere hampered by lower-than- the same period last year. more than expected. The other major forecasted withholding collections and contributor to this month’s surplus was filing payments and higher-than-predicted orporate income tax filing collections revenue from other sources that was $1.6 refunds. Withholding payments of $91.9 Cof $12.1 million were $11.7 million million more than forecast. On a fiscal million were $5.1 million below the under the forecast of $23.8 million. April year-to-date basis, miscellaneous revenue expected amount. Filing collections were 2014 estimated payments of $32.7 million is $8.4 million above its projection.

Idaho General Fund Revenue FY 2014 Monthly Actual and Predicted Net Collections

$500

$450

$400 January 2014 Forecast August 2013 Forecast $350

$300 Predicted Actual

$250

$ Millions$ $200

$150

$100

$50

$0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June

Prepared by Derek E. Santos, Chief Economist and Nathaniel L. Clayville, Economist. Idaho Division of Financial Management  304 North 8th Street  PO Box 83720  Boise, Idaho 83720-0032  208-334-3900 Idaho General Fund Collections for April 2014

MONTHLY ACTUAL AND PREDICTED COLLECTIONS FOR APRIL Actual Actual Actual Predicted Forecast Performance FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 (Actual versus Predicted) Individual Income Tax ($000) $280,280.3 $337,405.2 $295,200.9 $317,613.6 Difference ($22,412.7) Percent Change from Previous Year 9.0% 20.4% ‐12.5% ‐5.9% Percent ‐7.1%

Corporate Income Tax ($000) $37,262.1 $58,025.8 $43,394.0 $45,730.3 Difference ($2,336.3) Percent Change from Previous Year ‐5.2% 55.7% ‐25.2% ‐21.2% Percent ‐5.1%

Sales Tax ($000) $85,283.8 $93,109.5 $96,433.5 $95,490.4 Difference $943.1 Percent Change from Previous Year 6.7% 9.2% 3.6% 2.6% Percent 1.0%

Product Tax ($000) $3,245.7 $3,670.6 $3,120.8 $3,191.1 Difference ($70.3) Percent Change from Previous Year 0.5% 13.1% ‐15.0% ‐13.1% Percent ‐2.2%

Miscellaneous Revenue ($000) ($3,818.4) ($8,355.0) ($7,061.8) ($12,377.4) Difference $5,315.6 Percent Change from Previous Year ‐51.2% ‐118.8% 15.5% ‐48.1% Percent 42.9%

Total ($000) $402,253.5 $483,856.0 $431,087.5 $449,648.0 Difference ($18,560.5) Percent Change from Previous Year 6.7% 20.3% ‐10.9% ‐7.1% Percent ‐4.1%

FISCAL YEAR‐TO‐DATE ACTUAL AND PREDICTED COLLECTIONS THROUGH APRIL Actual Actual Actual Predicted Forecast Performance FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2014 (Actual versus Predicted) Individual Income Tax ($000) $1,079,192.9 $1,142,931.6 $1,168,200.7 $1,168,445.3 Difference ($244.6) Percent Change from Previous Year 5.6% 5.9% 2.2% 2.2% Percent 0.0%

Corporate Income Tax ($000) $145,222.0 $161,963.2 $148,807.9 $157,235.1 Difference ($8,427.2) Percent Change from Previous Year 7.1% 11.5% ‐8.1% ‐2.9% Percent ‐5.4%

Sales Tax ($000) $857,794.5 $920,265.4 $950,415.6 $953,913.1 Difference ($3,497.6) Percent Change from Previous Year 5.7% 7.3% 3.3% 3.7% Percent ‐0.4%

Product Tax ($000) $36,452.9 $42,106.8 $37,334.6 $37,465.1 Difference ($130.5) Percent Change from Previous Year 0.8% 15.5% ‐11.3% ‐11.0% Percent ‐0.3%

Miscellaneous Revenue ($000) $56,047.7 $52,506.7 $48,041.1 $39,645.6 Difference $8,395.5 Percent Change from Previous Year 6.6% ‐6.3% ‐8.5% ‐24.5% Percent 21.2%

Total ($000) $2,174,710.0 $2,319,773.7 $2,352,799.8 $2,356,704.2 Difference ($3,904.4) Percent Change from Previous Year 5.7% 6.7% 1.4% 1.6% Percent ‐0.2%

Costs associated with this publication are available from the Division of Financial Management in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code. 05-14/01200-180-4001

Idaho Economic Forecast

C.L. “Butch” Otter, Governor DIVISION OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Jani Revier, Administrator Executive Office of the Governor

APRIL 2014 VOLUME XXXVI NO. 2

ISSN 8756-1840

 Forecast 2014-2017  Career Changes Decline During Recessions  Alternative Forecasts

Revised Idaho Total Nonfarm Employment January 2014 vs. April 2014 740,000

720,000 January 2014 Forecast 700,000

680,000 April 2014 Forecast

660,000

640,000

620,000 720,218 710,876 699,368 600,000 692,673 678,056 672,874 656,023 580,000 653,350 639,364 639,132 622,169 622,143 610,656 560,000 610,460

540,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 This page left blank intentionally.

IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST 2014-2017

State of Idaho C.L. “BUTCH” OTTER Governor

Costs associated with this publication are available from the Division of Financial Management in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code.

04-14/010200-180-4001 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction ...... 2

Executive Summary ...... 5

Idaho and US Forecast Summary Tables ...... 6

Forecast Description:

National ...... 8

Idaho ...... 14

Forecasts Comparison ...... 20

Alternative Forecasts ...... 22

Feature Article

Career Changes Decline during Recessions ...... 25

Forecast Detail ...... 31

Annual Forecast ...... 32

Quarterly Forecast ...... 46

Appendix ...... 61

IHS Economics US Macroeconomic Model ...... 62

Idaho Economic Model ...... 64

Equations ...... 66

Endogenous Variables ...... 70

Exogenous Variables ...... 72

1 INTRODUCTION

The national forecast presented in this publication is the April 2014 IHS Economics baseline forecast of the US economy. The previous Idaho Economic Forecast is based on the November 2013 IHS Economics baseline national forecast.

The historical and forecasted total nonfarm employment in Idaho is presented on the cover of the April 2014 Idaho Economic Forecast. The chart compares data from January’s Idaho Economic Forecast along with the current forecast data. A combination of cold winter weather in the US, poor US exports in the first quarter, and revisions to historical data have reshaped the forecast downward in 2014 through 2017. Payrolls are still expected to grow in the Gem State, but at a marginally lower rate than was previously expected. In the April 2014 Idaho Economic Forecast total Idaho nonfarm payrolls are expected to grow at an average annual rate of 2.7% from 2013 through 2017, versus the annual average rate of 3.0% that was forecast in January over the same period of time.

FEATURE

This forecast’s feature article explores how the rates of workers changing occupations or industries fluctuate with the business cycle. There are two major camps on this subject. First, some believe many of the jobs created during the economic boom in the real estate, construction, and finance sectors that were lost following the Great Recession will not return. As a result former workers in these industries must seek work in other fields. Second, others believe unemployment during the recession was spread across a wider range of industries. And these jobs will return as the economy picks up. As such, and contrary to the first view, the labor market will not see an increase in workers changing careers. This article sheds more light on these competing views. It uses historical data to calculate the rates with which workers changed industries or occupations. It then compares how these rates fluctuate during recessions, recoveries, and booms.

THE FORECAST

Alternative assumptions concerning future movements of key economic variables can lead to major variations in national and/or regional outlooks. IHS Economics examines the effects of different economic scenarios, including the potential impacts of recessions, higher inflation, and future Federal Reserve Board decisions. Alternative Idaho economic forecasts were developed under different policy and growth scenarios at the national level. These forecasts are included in this report.

Historical and forecast data for Idaho and the US are presented in the tables in the middle section of this report. Detail is provided for every year from 2000 through 2017 and for every quarter from 2011 through 2016. The solution of the Idaho Economic Model (IEM) for this forecast begins with the first quarter of 2014.

Descriptions of the IHS Economics’ US Macroeconomic Model and the IEM are provided in the Appendix. Equations of the IEM and variable definitions are listed in the last pages of this publication.

2 CHANGES

The Idaho Department of Labor provides monthly historical employment data that are seasonally adjusted and converted to quarterly frequencies by the Idaho Division of Financial Management (DFM). The current set contains nonfarm employment through the fourth quarter of 2013. These data show that employment in the first half of last year was higher than previously reported, but it was lower in the second half of the year. Specifically, there were about 2,000 more jobs in the first quarter and 1,000 more jobs in the second quarter. However, there were about 700 fewer jobs in the third quarter and 1,400 fewer jobs in the fourth quarter.

The Idaho quarterly personal income estimates contained in this report were released by the US Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) on March 25, 2014. The estimates for the first three quarters of 2013 are from those that were published on December 19, 2013. The next round of personal income estimates is scheduled to be released on June 24, 2014.

Readers with any questions should contact Nathaniel L. Clayville at (208) 334-3900 or at [email protected].

Idaho Division of Financial Management Economic Analysis Bureau 304 N. 8th St. Derek E. Santos, Chief Economist P.O. Box 83720 Nathaniel L. Clayville, Economist Boise, ID 83720-0032 (208) 334-3900

3 This page left blank intentionally. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Idaho’s economy continues to grow and recover, but growth in employment, housing starts, and wages are expected to be slightly less robust than previously anticipated. Specific details about the differences between the data in this forecast and the previous forecast can be found in the comparative section of this forecast. Even at this reduced rate, Idaho’s housing, employment, and wages are predicted to grow in each year of the forecast. One important driver of growth in the state’s recovery has been the housing market, which was amongst the worst impacted in the country during the previous recession. New home construction not only fuels construction employment, but also retail and service jobs. Housing starts are expected to grow at a relatively high rate of 22.8% in 2014 and 23.4% in 2015. As the key economic metrics improve in Idaho, so have wages and income. Real personal income is expected to grow at an average annual pace of 3.7% through 2017. The economic recovery has been solidified by a continuing restoration of Idaho’s labor market in recent years. Total private employment is expected to grow in each year of the forecast. Government employment, which consists of state and local government and federal government, is forecast to hover around its current level. The recovery will likely progress on a less aggressive path than previously forecast, but will probably be more supportable in the long term. Total nonfarm employment in the state is anticipated to grow by 2.2% in 2014, 3.0% in 2015, 2.9% in 2016, and 2.6% in 2017.

In the first quarter of 2014 the US economy saw decelerated growth as cold winter weather dampened spending and investments. The impacts of this deceleration reverberated through the national economy, reshaping the near-term outlooks for retail sales, housing, and employment over the next few years. As winter storms pummeled the Northeast in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014, many consumers delayed purchases of major durable goods. The first quarter drag was also evident in the housing market these past few months. Sales of new and existing homes both tempered in the first quarter of 2014. This decrease was partially to do with the severe winter, but was also magnified by year-over-year growth in home prices that has made home ownership an unaffordability issue as many individuals cannot qualify for the higher loan-to-value mortgages while credit remains tight. The US housing market is expected to pick up additional steam through the forecast period, advancing new and existing home sales as well as new starts on residential and nonresidential structures. Moderate economic activity in the first quarter also had some impact on the labor markets, cooling the forecast for employment gains slightly in 2014. Downward movement in the unemployment rate in the US is beginning to slow, but only because the growth in the labor force is expanding. This is a positive sign, and has helped to increase the forecast for employment growth in the US in both 2015 and 2016. As the employment outlook continues to improve, other key pieces of the US economy should show more enriched progression. Real gross domestic product is expected to grow 2.4% in 2014, 3.0% in 2015, 3.4% in 2016, and 3.2% in 2017.

5 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APRIL 2014

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

U.S. GDP (BILLIONS) Current $ 14,480 14,720 14,418 14,958 15,534 16,245 16,800 17,511 18,352 19,270 20,210 % Ch 4.5% 1.7% -2.1% 3.7% 3.8% 4.6% 3.4% 4.2% 4.8% 5.0% 4.9% 2009 Chain-Weighted 14,877 14,834 14,418 14,779 15,052 15,471 15,761 16,135 16,612 17,173 17,718 % Ch 1.8% -0.3% -2.8% 2.5% 1.8% 2.8% 1.9% 2.4% 3.0% 3.4% 3.2%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 49,726 50,320 49,165 50,385 52,954 55,022 57,041 58,824 61,727 65,061 68,676 % Ch 5.7% 1.2% -2.3% 2.5% 5.1% 3.9% 3.7% 3.1% 4.9% 5.4% 5.6% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 48,184 48,543 47,842 48,849 50,694 52,665 54,550 56,798 59,828 63,209 66,844 % Ch 4.8% 0.7% -1.4% 2.1% 3.8% 3.9% 3.6% 4.1% 5.3% 5.7% 5.7% U.S. (Billions) 11,996 12,431 12,082 12,435 13,191 13,744 14,135 14,650 15,403 16,237 17,139 % Ch 5.3% 3.6% -2.8% 2.9% 6.1% 4.2% 2.8% 3.6% 5.1% 5.4% 5.6%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 51,211 50,291 49,167 49,563 50,875 51,901 53,203 54,136 56,027 58,204 60,434 % Ch 3.2% -1.8% -2.2% 0.8% 2.6% 2.0% 2.5% 1.8% 3.5% 3.9% 3.8% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 49,623 48,514 47,845 48,052 48,704 49,678 50,880 52,271 54,303 56,547 58,822 % Ch 2.2% -2.2% -1.4% 0.4% 1.4% 2.0% 2.4% 2.7% 3.9% 4.1% 4.0% U.S. (Billions) 12,354 12,423 12,082 12,232 12,673 12,964 13,184 13,482 13,980 14,526 15,082 % Ch 2.7% 0.6% -2.7% 1.2% 3.6% 2.3% 1.7% 2.3% 3.7% 3.9% 3.8%

HOUSING STARTS Idaho 14,348 7,981 5,733 5,200 4,570 7,153 9,124 10,934 13,293 14,871 15,549 % Ch -26.5% -44.4% -28.2% -9.3% -12.1% 56.5% 27.6% 19.8% 21.6% 11.9% 4.6% U.S. (Millions) 1.342 0.900 0.554 0.586 0.612 0.783 0.929 1.045 1.389 1.582 1.603 % Ch -25.9% -32.9% -38.4% 5.7% 4.5% 28.0% 18.6% 12.5% 32.9% 13.9% 1.4%

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 656,220 648,917 609,982 603,637 610,656 622,143 639,364 653,350 672,874 692,673 710,876 % Ch 2.7% -1.1% -6.0% -1.0% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8% 2.2% 3.0% 2.9% 2.6% U.S. (Thousands) 137,935 137,170 131,220 130,272 131,849 134,098 136,363 138,509 141,136 144,148 146,784 % Ch 1.1% -0.6% -4.3% -0.7% 1.2% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES Federal Funds 5.0% 1.9% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 2.2% 3.8% Bank Prime 8.1% 5.1% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 5.2% 6.8% Existing Home Mortgage 6.5% 6.2% 5.1% 4.9% 4.7% 3.8% 4.0% 4.8% 5.3% 6.1% 6.9%

INFLATION GDP Price Deflator 2.7% 1.9% 0.8% 1.2% 2.0% 1.7% 1.4% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7% Personal Cons Deflator 2.5% 3.1% -0.1% 1.7% 2.4% 1.8% 1.1% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7% Consumer Price Index 2.9% 3.8% -0.3% 1.6% 3.1% 2.1% 1.5% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1.9%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

6 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APRIL 2014

2013 2014 2015 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

U.S. GDP (BILLIONS) Current $ 16,535 16,661 16,913 17,090 17,194 17,405 17,625 17,818 18,024 18,230 18,466 18,689 % Ch 2.8% 3.1% 6.2% 4.2% 2.5% 5.0% 5.1% 4.5% 4.7% 4.7% 5.3% 4.9% 2009 Chain-Weighted 15,584 15,680 15,839 15,942 15,977 16,084 16,188 16,292 16,407 16,535 16,680 16,826 % Ch 1.1% 2.5% 4.1% 2.6% 0.9% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.9% 3.1% 3.6% 3.5%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 56,062 56,996 57,588 57,516 57,951 58,479 59,130 59,736 60,579 61,281 62,099 62,951 % Ch -1.5% 6.8% 4.2% -0.5% 3.1% 3.7% 4.5% 4.2% 5.8% 4.7% 5.4% 5.6% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 53,501 54,506 55,038 55,154 55,866 56,431 57,127 57,768 58,694 59,398 60,198 61,022 % Ch -2.9% 7.7% 4.0% 0.8% 5.3% 4.1% 5.0% 4.6% 6.6% 4.9% 5.5% 5.6% U.S. (Billions) 13,926 14,086 14,225 14,304 14,399 14,558 14,740 14,900 15,130 15,311 15,490 15,679 % Ch -4.1% 4.7% 4.0% 2.2% 2.7% 4.5% 5.1% 4.4% 6.3% 4.9% 4.8% 5.0%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 52,439 53,329 53,627 53,418 53,652 53,971 54,290 54,630 55,243 55,747 56,267 56,853 % Ch -2.6% 7.0% 2.3% -1.5% 1.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 4.6% 3.7% 3.8% 4.2% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 50,043 50,998 51,252 51,225 51,722 52,081 52,450 52,831 53,524 54,034 54,544 55,112 % Ch -3.9% 7.9% 2.0% -0.2% 3.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 5.4% 3.9% 3.8% 4.2% U.S. (Billions) 13,026 13,180 13,247 13,285 13,331 13,436 13,534 13,627 13,797 13,928 14,035 14,161 % Ch -5.1% 4.8% 2.1% 1.2% 1.4% 3.2% 2.9% 2.8% 5.1% 3.9% 3.1% 3.6%

HOUSING STARTS Idaho 8,318 8,799 8,810 10,569 10,017 10,432 11,334 11,955 12,624 13,162 13,593 13,794 % Ch 35.1% 25.3% 0.5% 107.1% -19.3% 17.6% 39.4% 23.8% 24.3% 18.2% 13.8% 6.0% U.S. (Millions) 0.957 0.869 0.882 1.008 0.925 1.003 1.079 1.175 1.235 1.354 1.460 1.508 % Ch 30.1% -32.2% 6.4% 70.3% -29.1% 38.1% 33.9% 40.9% 21.9% 44.3% 35.3% 13.9%

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 635,037 639,520 639,837 643,063 646,814 650,993 655,657 659,938 665,065 670,316 675,462 680,654 % Ch 4.3% 2.9% 0.2% 2.0% 2.4% 2.6% 2.9% 2.6% 3.1% 3.2% 3.1% 3.1% U.S. (Thousands) 135,495 136,085 136,623 137,248 137,702 138,207 138,786 139,343 140,006 140,758 141,508 142,272 % Ch 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.8% 1.3% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% 1.9% 2.2% 2.1% 2.2%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES Federal Funds 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.9% Bank Prime 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.9% Existing Home Mortgage 3.6% 3.6% 4.4% 4.4% 4.5% 4.7% 5.0% 5.2% 5.2% 5.3% 5.3% 5.6%

INFLATION GDP Price Deflator 1.3% 0.6% 2.0% 1.6% 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.6% 1.3% Personal Cons Deflator 1.1% -0.1% 1.9% 1.1% 1.3% 1.3% 2.1% 1.6% 1.2% 1.0% 1.6% 1.3% Consumer Price Index 1.2% 0.4% 2.2% 1.1% 1.7% 2.2% 2.9% 2.0% 1.1% 0.8% 1.7% 1.1%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

7 NATIONAL FORECAST DESCRIPTION

The Forecast Period is the First Quarter of 2014 through the Fourth Quarter of 2017

As winter storms pummeled the Northeast in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014, many consumers delayed purchases of major durable goods. Sales of new light-vehicles declined over this period, but are already beginning to bounce back. Light vehicle sales reached an annual rate of 16.3 million units in March, up from a rate of 15.3 million units in February. This sales bounce not only speaks to the impacts of the cold weather, but also to the underlying strength of the US economy.

The first quarter drag was also evident in the housing market these past few months. Sales of new and existing homes have both tempered in the first quarter of 2014. This decrease was partially to do with the severe winter, but was also magnified by year-over-year growth in home prices that has made home ownership an unaffordability issue as many individuals cannot qualify for the higher loan-to-value mortgages while credit remains tight. These conditions will have the lingering effect of softening the forecast slope, which should put the US housing sector on a more sustainable trajectory. The US housing market is expected to pick up additional steam through the forecast period, advancing new and existing home sales as well as new starts on residential and nonresidential structures.

Moderate economic activity in the first quarter also had some impact on the labor markets, cooling the forecast for employment gains slightly in 2014. In spite of a lower-than-anticipated job rally in the first quarter of 2014, most of the employment indicators have still been positive. Total private payrolls broke through the prerecession peak in March of 2014, but when the government sector is included there is still a gap of roughly 400,000 jobs. Downward movement in the unemployment rate in the US is beginning to slow, but only because the growth in the labor force is expanding. This is a positive sign, and has helped to increase the forecast for employment growth in the US in both 2015 and 2016.

As the employment outlook continues to improve, other key pieces of the US economy should show more enriched progression. Higher levels of employment should increase total personal income in the US, elevating retail sales in turn. Pent-up demand for durable goods from austere consumer spending during the deep recession and slow recovery should fade, making way for higher levels of spending on big-ticket items, such as cars and trucks. Home affordability will likely continue to be an issue as mortgage rates and home prices are expected to continue to rise, but tight credit conditions should ease some over time, giving more consumers access to the housing market. Real gross domestic product is expected to grow 2.4% in 2014, 3.0% in 2015, 3.4% in 2016, and 3.2% in 2017.

8 SELECTED NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATORS

Consumer Spending: Unseasonably cold weather in most of the country led to a US Real Consumption and minor retreat in retail sales during the end of Disposable Personal Income Growth

the fourth quarter of 2013 and the beginning 5% of the first quarter of 2014. The effects of the cold winter have since diminished, 4% which is present in the Bloomberg Income Consumer Comfort Index, which tracks 3% perceptions on the current state of the economy and personal finances. After a 2% small decline earlier in the year, the index ticked up in March as consumers expected 1% Consumption continued improvement in economic conditions. Fortunately, the extended winter 0% did not derail US consumption, which grew at an anticipated annual rate of 1.9% in the -1% first quarter of 2014 (down from a rate of -2% 3.3% in the fourth quarter of 2013). Growth 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 in durable goods sales was held back 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: IHS Economics slightly by a decrease in sales of new and used automobiles, down 14.4% and 22.3% respectively. These losses were partially offset by a 19.5% annualized increase in new light truck sales. Overall, durable goods sales decreased at an anticipated rate of 2.6% in the first quarter of 2014. Nondurable goods sales reacted much in the same way, decreasing at a rate of 0.1% in the first quarter of 2014. Consumer spending on services was the bright spot for the quarter, increasing at a rate of 3.4%. Cold weather enticed many consumers to turn the heat up, increasing sales of natural gas at an annualized rate of 293.5%, growing total utility spending at a rate of 26.1% in the first quarter of 2014. All spending on services was expected to have grown at a rate of 3.4% in the first quarter, just below the 3.5% growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2013. Total consumer spending is anticipated to have risen at a rate of 1.9% in the first quarter and is expected to grow 2.4% over all of 2014, followed by 3.0% in 2015, 3.3% in 2016, and 3.2% in 2017.

Housing: While the US housing market continues to recover, a slight deceleration is expected due to rapidly increasing prices. Total housing starts slowed from a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 1.0 million units in the fourth quarter of 2013 to an estimated 925,000 units in the first quarter of 2014. The recent slowdown can be attributed to the severe winter and affordability issues, but is expected to begin to rebound in the second quarter of 2014 and continue to grow over the forecast period. By 2017 housing starts are expected to be north of 1.6 million units per year. Existing home sales were impacted similarly, decelerating from a rate of 4.9 million units per year in the fourth quarter of 2013 to 4.6 million units per year in the first quarter of 2014. A small retreat in the growth rate of home sales is not surprising, as home prices continue to grow rapidly. The Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Purchase- Only Index of home prices increased by 7.7% in 2013, the largest annual increase since 2005. The Purchase-Only Index is based on more than six million repeat sales transactions on the same single- family properties, and uses only the actual purchase price of homes, eliminating homes listed at appraisal values. Thus, the Purchase-Only Index eliminates bias by only including the prices of homes that have sold. Purchase prices are expected to grow another 7.2% in 2014 before prices begin to slow in 2015, with anticipated price growth of 1.6% in that year. Prices are forecast to have another small

9 increase of 0.8% in 2016 and 1.7% in US Housing Starts 2017. The cool down in price growth in 2.5 the outer years can be partially attributed to the expected increase in mortgage rates. Conventional 30-year fixed 2.0 mortgage rates averaged roughly 3.7% Multiple-Units at the bottom of the market in 2012, but 1.5 are expected to grow throughout the forecast period, eclipsing 6.5% by 2017. This is expected to have a cooling 1.0

Million Starts impact on the sales of existing homes. Existing home sales are forecast to 0.5 decline from 5.1 million units in 2013 to roughly 5.0 million units in 2014. Sales Single-Units are then expected to grow to nearly 5.7 0.0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 million units in 2015 before easing back 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 down over the next two years, finally Source: IHS Economics settling at about 5.4 million units in 2017. Total housing starts are expected to have exceeded 900,000 in 2013 and are anticipated to grow to 1.0 million in 2014, 1.4 million in 2015, and 1.6 million in both 2016 and 2017.

Monetary Policy: With positive indicators from the labor market and improvement in business fixed investments, the Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) met last December and began scaling back its monthly purchases of mortgage-backed securities and long-term Treasury securities. In September of 2012 the Federal Reserve announced a program in which mortgage-backed securities would be purchased at a rate of $40 billion each month until the labor market improved. In December of 2012 this program was expanded to include an additional $45 billion of long-term Treasury securities. With inflation holding firmly below the set goal of 2%, and the unemployment rate well below 7%, the committee saw enough strength in the US economy to taper down its monthly purchases. By Selected US Interest Rates 9% February of 2014 the committee had Federal Funds Rate decreased the monthly purchases to $30 8% Prime Rate billion on mortgage-backed securities and Mortgage Rate - Existing Homes $35 billion in long-term Treasury 7% securities. The committee plans on further 6% lowering purchases to $25 billion and $30 billion per month, respectively, beginning 5% in April and then reevaluating further 4% decreases at each committee meeting moving forward. The Federal Reserve 3% also uses the federal funds rate as a tool to 2% control the short-term interest rates. The federal funds rate is the interest rate at 1% which depository institutions lend reserve 0% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 balances to other depository institutions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 overnight. In an attempt to spur economic Source: IHS Economics activity during the recession the Federal

10 Reserve began to lower their target federal funds rate in 2007. By December of 2008 the Federal Reserve had a target of 0.0% to 0.25% for the federal funds rate. The FOMC has suggested that the rate will remain in this range as long as long-term inflation remains below 2.0% and until the national unemployment rate falls below 6.5%. These conditions are expected to be met somewhere near the end of 2014. The federal funds rate is expected to have averaged 0.11% in 2013, and is expected to dip down to 0.8% in 2014 before it begins to grow again. The FOMC is then expected to target a higher rate, edging the federal funds rate up to roughly 0.35% in 2015, 2.15% in 2016, and 3.83% in 2017.

Inflation: The Great Recession of 2007-2009 and its subsequent recovery have been times of relatively low inflation, which should remain at low levels for years to come. Consumer inflation is traditionally measured by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The CPI grew at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 1.1% in the fourth quarter of 2013 and is expected to have increased to a rate of 1.7% in the first quarter of 2014. When the more volatile food and energy components are removed from this measure, the price level only grew at a rate of 1.5% in the first quarter. Because businesses usually pass along any cost increases to consumers, producer prices, which are measured by the Producer Price Index (PPI), can be a good indicator of future consumer prices. Producer prices grew at a rate of 0.7% in the fourth quarter of 2013, followed by an anticipated rate of 3.8% in the first quarter of 2014, or 2.7% when food and energy is excluded. One of the biggest expenses for nearly any business is the cost of employees. These costs, which include wages, salaries, and benefits, grew at a US Consumer Price Inflation rate of 2.0% in the fourth quarter of 2013 and likely accelerated to a rate of 2.7% in 4% the first quarter of 2014. Employment costs increased by 1.9% for all of 2013, 3% and are expected to increase by 2.3% in 2014, 2.6% in 2015, 2.8% in 2016, and 2.9% in 2017. This should only have a 2% minimal impact on producer prices, which grew by 1.2% in 2013, and is expected to grow by only 1.9% in 2014, 0.1% in 1% 2015, 0.7% in 2016, and 1.5% in 2017. The increase in employment costs is 0% expected to be at least partially offset by a continued decrease in energy prices. The relatively low producer prices should -1% assist in curbing consumer price level 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 increases, with moderate growth of 1.8% Source: IHS Economics expected in 2014, followed by 1.6% in 2015, 1.5% in 2016, and 1.9% in 2017.

Employment: The US job market continued to firm in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of this year, but growth has not been as strong as previously expected. Nonfarm payroll employment advanced at a rate of 1.8% in the fourth quarter of 2013, followed by a sluggish 1.3% anticipated rate in the first quarter of 2014. The anticipated first quarter employment growth deceleration is largely due to a slowdown in certain service employment categories, such as information, which is expected to have decreased at a rate of 4.3% in the first quarter of 2014. Other industries also started the year with disappointing job growth. For example, retail trade employment grew at a clip of 0.5% in the first quarter of 2014, following a fourth quarter growth rate of 2.7%. Fortunately, other industries grew fast

11 enough to keep overall employment growth in positive territory. Construction US Civilian Unemployment Rate 12% employment continued to grow at a strong rate of 4.5%. Employment services employment has been a consistent growth 10% category since 2009 and continued to surge Measured Rate forward at an anticipated rate of 7.7% in 8% the first quarter of this year. Manufacturing Full-Employment Rate employment continued to gain ground in 6% the first quarter, albeit at a sluggish pace. Wood product manufacturing employment 4% grew at a clip of 4.3%, followed by food manufacturing employment (3.5%), and 2% machinery manufacturing employment (2.2%). Total nonfarm payrolls ended 2013 0% 1.7% above 2012 levels and are expected 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 to grow another 1.6% in 2014, followed by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: IHS Economics 1.9% in 2015, 2.1% in 2016, and 1.8% in 2017.

Business Investment: As the US economy continues to stabilize, nonresidential fixed business investment should return to sustainable levels. Real US business investment is expected to have grown at a rate of 4.1% in the first quarter of 2014, down slightly from the 5.7% growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2013. Many of the business investment components slowed in the first quarter, including investment in equipment, which slowed to an estimated rate of 0.1% in the first quarter from a rate of 10.9% in the previous quarter. This deceleration in equipment investments is largely due to a decrease in business spending on computers and peripherals at an annualized rate of 36.0% in the first quarter of 2014. The volatile aircraft investment component was also a drag, decreasing at a rate of 63.8% in the same quarter. Although, it should be noted that this quarterly decline in aircraft sales followed a growth rate of 311.1% in the fourth quarter of Real US Business Investment Growth 2013, so it may be more of a return to the trend than a real decrease. Investment in 8% intellectual property was up in the first quarter, growing at a rate of 5.4% versus 4% 4.0% in the previous quarter. The strongest growth came from business 0% investments in nonresidential structures, which grew at an expected rate of 10.8% -4% in the first quarter of 2014. Most of the growth in structures was concentrated in

-8% manufacturing structures, which was forecast to have grown at an annualized rate of 35.4% in the first quarter. Total -12% nonresidential fixed investment is expected to continue to grow over the -16% 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 forecast period, ending 2014 with annual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Source: IHS Economics growth of 5.5%, followed by 6.5% in 2015, 6.8% in 2016, and 6.1% in 2017.

12 Government: Since fall of 2013 the government sector has been relatively quiet. After two weeks of a partial federal government shutdown and the debate over raising the nation’s debt ceiling, matters on Capitol Hill have been somewhat less charged. More focus has been shifted to health care policy as the Medicaid expansion began on January 1, 2014, under the Affordable Care Act. This expansion could boost Medicaid enrollment an additional 12 million by 2015, and cost state governments more than $30 billion per year. The political saber-rattling drowned out an important improvement to the nation’s fiscal health; the federal fiscal deficit has decreased over the last year. In March of 2014 the federal government ran a deficit of $413 billion, down from $600 billion by the same point in FY 2013. Increases came from additional corporate income tax receipts on higher taxable profit and a larger-than- expected distribution to the Treasury from the Federal Reserve’s expanded bond portfolio. There was also a boost in individual and social insurance receipts that came about as a result of the expiration of the temporary payroll tax exemption and the increase in the top income brackets and the capital gains tax that occurred as part of the fiscal deal last year. On its current trajectory the unified federal budget deficit is expected to be $627.9 billion in FY 2014, $599.3 billion in FY 2015, $541.5 billion in FY 2016, and $578.1 billion in FY 2017.

International: The trade deficit for real US net exports expanded to an anticipated seasonally adjusted annualized rate of $393.9 billion per year in the first quarter of 2014, from a rate of $382.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013. The deficit increase can be attributed to a decrease in US exports at a forecasted rate of 2.3% in the first quarter of this year. Exports of foods, feeds, and beverages experienced the greatest reduction, decreasing at a clip of 22.6% in that quarter. Close behind was aircraft, which slowed exports at a rate of 21.5%. On the other hand, exports of computers, peripherals, and parts grew at an annualized rate of 30.3% in the first quarter of 2014. Exports of services was another bright spot, growing at a rate of 9.6% in the first quarter of this year. It was boosted by tourism, which had a 14.1% growth rate in the first quarter. US imports shrunk at a rate of 0.2%, led by a decrease in imports of aircraft, which contracted at a rate of 27.7% in that quarter. The US also imported fewer computers, peripherals, and parts, decreasing imports of these goods by an annualized 22.4%. Last year’s real net export deficit was $412.3 billion. It is expected to be $405.2 billion in 2014, $484.9 billion in 2015, $521.2 billion in 2016, and $506.0 billion in 2017.

13 IDAHO FORECAST DESCRIPTION

The Forecast Period is the First Quarter of 2014 through the Fourth Quarter of 2017

The state’s economy continues to grow and recover, but growth in employment, housing starts, and wages are expected to be slightly less robust than previously anticipated. Specific details about the differences between the data in this forecast and the previous forecast can be found in the comparative section of this forecast. Even at this reduced rate, Idaho’s housing, employment, and wages are predicted to grow in each year of the forecast.

One important driver of growth in the state’s recovery has been the housing market, which was amongst the worst impacted in the country during the previous recession. The housing-starts slide that started in 2006 persisted through 2011. However, housing starts have more than doubled since that year. New home construction is an important driver of growth in the Gem State. It fuels not only construction employment, but also retail and service jobs. Housing starts are expected to grow at a relatively high rate of 22.8% in 2014 and 23.4% in 2015. These rates are consistent with the recovering housing sector, but are not sustainable over the long run. Housing starts growth is then expected to slow to 12.4% in 2016 and 5.5% in 2017.

Economic recovery has been solidified by a continuing restoration of Idaho’s labor market in recent years. Idaho nonfarm payrolls decreased by more than 50,000 jobs between 2007 and 2011, but improvements in nearly all sectors have put the state back on track to reach prerecession levels again sometime in 2015. Total private employment is expected to grow in each year of the forecast. Government employment, which consists of state and local government and federal government, is forecast to hover around its current level. Total nonfarm employment in the state is anticipated to grow by 2.2% in 2014, 3.0% in 2015, 2.9% in 2016, and 2.6% in 2017.

As the key economic metrics improve in Idaho, so have wages and income. Real personal income grew at an average annual rate of 4.5% between 2004 and 2007, but then had decreases in 2008 and 2009, which is the only time that Idaho faced two straight years of real personal income declines, based on records dating back through 1969. Since 2009 it has grown in each year, but at a more subdued average rate of 2.4%, which has been characteristic of the slow recovery. Fortunately, the recovery is beginning to find some traction and real personal income is expected to grow at an accelerated average annual pace of 3.7% through 2017. Idaho’s average annual wage is also expected to expand, growing by an estimated 2.4% in 2014, followed by 2.9% in 2015, 2016, and 2017.

In summary, Idaho’s economic forecast looks bright, and is finally showing signs of the kind of recovery that the state has been waiting on since the Great Recession’s official end in 2009. The recovery will likely progress on a less aggressive path than previously forecast, but will probably be more supportable in the long term. Future growth is not likely to reach prerecession levels again in the foreseeable future, but is a welcome improvement to its soft performance over the last several years.

14 SELECTED IDAHO ECONOMIC INDICATORS

Computer and Electronics Manufacturing: Idaho’s computer and Idaho Computer and Electronic Products electronics manufacturing sector lacks Employment

some of the vigor that it sustained through 20,000 much of the 1990s and 2000s, though it has repositioned itself on a course that could be much more sustainable moving 16,000 forward. Idaho’s transformation to a technology hub in the 1990s was largely 12,000 due to strong growth in a few key companies. Between the largest computer and electronics manufacturers, Micron 8,000 Technology and Hewlett-Packard, and a few smaller companies, Idaho’s employment in the sector had grown to 4,000 roughly 10,000 jobs by 1991, and employment continued increasing to 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 almost 20,000 jobs over the next ten years. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 However, this sector was hit hard with the high-tech bubble burst and the recession in 2001. Following the recession employment shrank by about 9.0% in both 2002 and 2003. Payrolls then expanded by 3.0% in 2006, but decreased by 2.7% in 2007 and another 11.8% in 2008. The following year was also difficult, with payrolls shrinking by 22.5%, under pressures from a global recession and the collapse in memory prices. Employment losses persisted through 2010, and computer and electronics manufacturing payrolls bottomed out at roughly 10,600 jobs, which is nearly the same level as two decades earlier. Computer and electronics manufacturing jobs grew with the recovering economy in 2011 and 2012, but layoffs at Hewlett-Packard contributed to a payroll decrease of 2.7% in 2013. A shift from domestic manufacturing of computer parts to overseas manufacturing that has occurred over the last couple of decades has largely altered the make-up of Idaho’s computer and electronics manufacturing sector. Idaho manufacturers have repositioned focus on other aspects of the computer and electronics business, such as research and development, engineering, and business development. Fortunately, these disciplines tend to be more resilient to the swings of the business cycle, which should help to stabilize employment in this sector moving forward. Of course, the future will bring other challenges. One of the biggest challenges will be attracting employees with an adequate background in the science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. As Idaho computer and electronics manufacturers continue to shift from production to research, employment in the sector is expected to stay in between 11,200 and 11,800 jobs through 2017.

Construction: Idaho’s construction sector employment was among the fastest growing job sectors in the state’s economy over the last decade, but it was also among the hardest hit during the recession. Idaho construction employment grew at an average annual rate of 9.4% between 2003 and 2007, as commercial and residential construction was booming in the state. Signs of a market correction came in 2006 as residential housing starts declined by16.5%, the first decrease in nearly a decade. Even with a sharp decrease in new housing starts, construction employment growth persisted until 2008, when housing starts decreased by 44.4%, finally tipping the scale and driving employment in the sector down by 14.4% in the same year. Decreases in housing starts and construction employment endured through 2011 before the effects of the recession began to wear off. Idaho housing starts had decreased from 23,408 units in 2005 to 4,570 units in 2011, while employment dropped from 52,592 jobs in 2007 to

15 30,343 jobs in 2011. By 2012 there was Idaho Construction Employment renewed activity in the market as and Housing Starts housing starts rose by 56.5% to a level 24 of 7,153 units. Employment also grew 50,000 that year, but by a more modest rate of Starts 20 3.5%. The recovery was solidified in Housing Starts (1,000) Starts Housing 40,000 2013 with an additional 27.6% increase 16 in housing starts to 9,124 units and 30,000 7.8% in construction employment. 12 Growth has been evident on the

Employment 20,000 8 commercial side of the market, as well, Employment with a number of large-scale projects 10,000 4 underway across the state. Employment in the Idaho’s construction sector is 0 0 expected to grow by 5.1% in 2014, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 followed by 7.0% in 2015, 5.5% in 2016, and 3.9% in 2017. Total employment in the sector is anticipated to be at a level of 41,749 jobs in 2017, which is still more than 10,000 jobs below the 2007 peak of 52,592 jobs. Housing starts are also expected to continue to grow over the forecast period, reaching 15,549 units in 2017.

Logging and Wood Products: The logging and wood products sector in Idaho is relatively small, with roughly 1% of the state’s nonfarm employment, but accounts for a significant portion of the employment in some of Idaho’s rural counties. In fact, the large amount of federal land in Idaho makes this industry the largest basic industry in northern Idaho. The US Forest Service manages just over two-thirds of Idaho’s forest lands, while the Bureau of Land Management and other federal agencies administer another 5%. In 2010 timber harvested from federal lands in Idaho produced about 125 million board feet of lumber. This sector’s employment is constantly subject to pressures from factors such as the reduced supply of logs from federal sources and technology advances that increase efficiency in production processes. Demand factors are another issue that shapes this sector’s prospects. The construction slump in the US and subsequent recession from 2007-2009 had a negative impact on the logging and wood product sector in Idaho. Employment in the sector stood at just over 10,000 in 2006, but fell to less than 6,000 before the national housing industry bottomed out in 2011. Idaho Wood Product Employment However, the state’s logging and wood and US Housing Starts processing industry has prospered with 12,000 Starts increased demands of the recovering 2.0 10,000 housing market. Industry employment (Million) Starts Housing in Idaho is expected to grow 11.5% in 1.6 2014, 14.7% in 2015, and 7.9% in 8,000 2016 before it corrects itself down by 1.2 6,000 2.7% in 2017, leveling off at 9,675

Employment 0.8 jobs. Even with the strong demand for 4,000 lumber in the US, the number of Employment logging and wood product 2,000 0.4 manufacturing jobs in Idaho is not expected to return to prerecession 0 0.0 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 levels in the near term. 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

16 Government: The economic downturn and slower-than-expected recovery have impacted several of the factors that contribute to employment in the government sector, namely population and personal income growth. Most state and local government growth typically occurs as the demands of an increasing population require more public services. Most of the fluctuation in population growth occurs in net migration, which is equal to the number of individuals migrating into Idaho minus the number of individuals migrating out of Idaho. During the early 2000s net migration was relatively high, reaching as much as 25,725 in 2006. By 2011 net migration nearly bottomed out, with a net gain of only a few hundred individuals. This meant less demand for expanding government services. The poor economy also meant softening tax collections. Fortunately, total nonfarm employment began to grow again in 2011, and net migration followed suit in 2012. In that same year state and local government employment rose 0.1%. After two years of recovery, state and local government employment in Idaho Government Employment Idaho is forecast to decrease by 0.8% in 2014 and 0.2% in 2015 before leveling off Federal 120,000 in 2016 and growing by 0.6% in 2017. Federal government employment has 100,000 struggled under the weight of fiscal policy constraints. In addition to the decline in 80,000 taxable income that the federal government Administration dealt with during the recession, attempts at 60,000 deficit reduction have further extended the decline in employment. Federal 40,000 government employment in Idaho has declined the last two years and is expected 20,000 to decline by another 0.7% in 2014 before Education growing by a tepid 0.1% in 2015. Federal 0 government employment in the Gem State 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 is then expected to begin to decrease by 0.2% in 2016 and 2017.

Food Processing: With about a quarter of all manufacturing jobs in Idaho, food processing is the largest manufacturing category by number of employees in the state. As a major producer of several agricultural commodities, Idaho is increasingly becoming a top choice for food processing. Idaho Food Processing Employment

According to Idaho’s Department of 20,000 Agriculture, in 2012 Idaho produced about 143.2 million hundred weight of potatoes, or about 31% of the potatoes produced in 16,000 all of the US. Also in 2012, Idaho’s

580,000 dairy cows produced 13.6 billion 12,000 pounds of milk, or about 7% of total US milk production. Idaho also produced 24% of the nation’s barley, 18% of the sugar 8,000 beets, and 20% of the fresh plums. It is the access to agricultural inputs such as these 4,000 that have played a role in enticing several food manufacturers to relocate or expand in Idaho in recent years. Among these 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 companies are Agro Farma’s Chobani, Inc.; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

17 Sorrento Lactalis Inc.; Frulact Group; Clif Bar; and Glanbia Foods, Inc. More recently a number of meat processing companies have announced openings and expansions in the state. Dale T. Smith and Sons Meat Packing Company plans to relocate from Draper, Utah, to the Magic Valley, where it plans on creating 100 jobs within the first year and up to 100 additional jobs in their second year of operation. Additionally, New Valley Natural is planning an expansion of their meat processing operations into Shelley, Idaho, later in 2014 where they plan on hiring up to 250 employees in the short-term, with plans on increasing to as much as 400 jobs in the long-term. Unfortunately, some local food processing companies have announced layoffs. The J.R. Simplot Company and Heinz are both shutting plants. These closures contribute to this sector’s anticipated 3.0% employment decline in 2014. However, an influx of business relocations and expansions in 2015 should increase employment by 2.9%. Food processing employment is then expected to grow by 2.8% in 2016 and 1.6% in 2017.

Nongoods Producing: The nongoods-producing sector is the state’s largest employer. It alone accounts for about 85% of all nonfarm jobs in Idaho. It can be subdivided into two major components: services and trade. Roughly 60% of nongoods-producing jobs in Idaho are service jobs in industries such as information, financial activities, transportation, professional business services, private education, and health care. Idaho’s service sector has grown in all but one of the last ten years. Its strength comes from some of its more resilient sectors, such as private education and health care, which was the only employment sector in Idaho to be largely unaffected by the recession. In fact, employment in health care and private education has grown by at least 2% in each year for the last 20 years. Idaho Nonfarm Employment The other portion of Idaho’s nongoods- 800,000 producing sector is the trade component, which can be further divided into retail 700,000 trade and wholesale trade. Retail trade is 600,000 the larger of the two, with employment just under 80,000 jobs in 2013. Wholesale 500,000 trade employment was just under 28,000 Nongoods-Producing 400,000 jobs. Trade employment in Idaho is anticipated to grow 2.7% in 2014, 2.8% in 300,000 2015, and 3.1% in both 2016 and 2017. Service employment is expected to fare 200,000 even better with expected growth of 3.0% 100,000 in 2014, 3.6% in 2015 and 2016, and 3.4% Goods-Producing in 2017. Total nongoods-producing 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 employment is forecast to grow by 2.1% in 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2014, 2.6% in 2015, 2.8% in 2016, and 2.7% in 2017.

Other Manufacturing Sectors: According to the US Small Business Administration, 57.7% of Idaho's total private-sector employment in 2010 was with companies that have 500 or fewer employees. Idaho’s other manufacturing sector is made up of many of these businesses that either do not easily fit into one defined employment sector or are too small to capture individually. Idaho’s other manufacturing sector took relatively large employment losses during the recession, but it has been recovering with growth rates that are among the highest in the state’s economy. Other durable manufacturing businesses shed over a quarter of their workforce between 2007 and 2010 but have grown at an average annual rate of 3.7% between 2010 and 2013. Other durable manufacturing employment is expected to have grown by 3.2% in 2013, and it is forecast to grow 2.3% in 2014, 3.6% in 2015, 4.2% in 2016, and 3.1% in 2017. Similarly, Idaho’s other nondurable manufacturing payrolls tell a similar story. Fairly strong growth in

18 the mid-2000s was derailed in 2008, when employment fell by 0.4%. Payrolls declined another 6.8% in 2009 before recovery began to set in in 2010. Since 2010 other nondurable manufacturing employment has grown at an average annual rate of 5.2%, with estimated employment gains of nearly 12% in 2013 alone. Other nondurable manufacturing employment is forecast to grow 1.1% in 2014, 1.6% in 2015, and 1.9% in 2016 and 2017.

Mining: The national economic downturn mixed with safety concerns and volatile Idaho Mining Employment prices of metals that are mined in Idaho 3,200 has made for an unstable mining sector in the Gem State over the past few years. 2,800 Silver prices in the US exceeded $45 per 2,400 ounce in April of 2011, but have since declined to less than $20 per ounce. This 2,000 three-year devaluation has put many Idaho 1,600 silver mining operations in a position of scaling back operations. Last year the 1,200 Galena Mine near Wallace, Idaho, laid off 126 employees in response to retreating 800 silver prices. Falling molybdenum prices 400 also threaten to add to the payroll cuts in the mining sector. Thompson Creek Mine 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 near Challis, Idaho, laid off roughly 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 workers in 2013 as molybdenum prices continued to lose ground. The mine nearly issued a new round of layoffs earlier in 2014, but an uptick in molybdenum prices led to a sudden shift in direction as the mine announced a possible expansion. Fluctuations in the market are expected to lead to a decrease in mining employment in Idaho of 2.6% in 2014, but should turn around in 2015 with payroll growth of 1.6%. Job gains are expected to persist through the remainder of the forecast period, at a rate of 2.5% in 2016 and 3.6% in 2017.

19 FORECASTS COMPARISON

Idaho has a dynamic economy whose growth is influenced by a myriad of local, national, and international factors. Therefore, changes to the projected values of such diverse variables as oil prices, interest rates, and national housing starts can have an effect at the state level. In order to account for the effects of such changes on the state's economy, each issue of the Idaho Economic Forecast uses IHS Economics most recent forecast of the US economy. Additional data, such as company-specific expansions and/or contractions are also considered.

This section’s comparison table shows how the outlooks for several key Idaho and national economic series have changed from the January 2014 to the April 2014 Idaho Economic Forecast. The January 2014 Idaho Economic Forecast is based on IHS Economics' November 2013 baseline US macroeconomic forecast and the April 2014 Idaho Economic Forecast is driven by IHS Economics' April 2014 baseline forecast.

The outlook for the current forecast differs little from the previous. In most years of the forecast, nominal output, one of the most cited measures of the economy’s health, is just 0.4% higher in 2014 than in the previous forecast. Adjusting this indicator for inflation reduces the gap to about 0.1%. As the accompanying table shows, interest rates in the current forecast are very similar to their predecessors. The summary national economic indicator that has changed the most is real national personal income. It is 1.0% lower in 2014 than was previously reported. It is down 0.5% in 2015. Because this metric is already adjusted for inflation this decrease in real personal income is a direct result of lower nominal personal income. Inflation expectations would not be substantial, as they are relatively unchanged for those two years. Total nonfarm employment in the US has been revised upward for the past few years and is expected to grow at a slightly faster pace moving forward than was previously forecast. This is entirely due to stronger growth in the nongoods-producing component of the US job market, which has been revised up by 0.4% in 2014, more than enough to offset a downward revision of 0.1% for US goods-producing employment in the same year.

While the US had a number of upward revisions this forecast, Idaho had a number of revisions that show growth may be somewhat less pronounced than previously forecast, though still present. Real personal income in the Gem State is 0.5% lower in this forecast for 2014, which gradually builds to a difference of 0.9% by 2017. This equates to a difference of just over $550 million in 2017. Total nonfarm employment in the state is also anticipated to grow at a more moderate rate, causing payrolls to be 0.4% lower in 2014 of this forecast versus the previous forecast. Both of the major employment sectors, goods producing and nongoods producing, have a slightly lower outlook this forecast. The forecast for goods- producing payrolls is 0.8% lower in 2014 of this forecast, while nongoods-producing payrolls are 0.3% lower in the same year. It is important to note that these declines take a small portion of the growth factor out of the previous forecast, but real personal income and total nonfarm employment are both expected to see year-over-year growth in each year of the current forecast, just at a more subdued rate.

20 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST FORECASTS COMPARISON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN APRIL 2014 vs. JANUARY 2014 FORECASTS

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

U.S. GDP (BILLIONS) Current $ 00004575625060 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 2009 Chain-Weighted 00003319-71228 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 0000420-232 -542 -735 -1,010 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% -0.4% -0.9% -1.1% -1.4% U.S. (Billions) 00002-134 -91 -70 -55 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.9% -0.6% -0.4% -0.3%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 0000380-257 -433 -412 -557 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% -0.5% -0.8% -0.7% -0.9% U.S. (Billions) 0000-1-134 -68 -2 33 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.0% -0.5% 0.0% 0.2%

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho -104 315 196 -25 232 -2,672 -5,182 -6,695 -9,342 % Difference 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.4% -0.8% -1.0% -1.3% U.S. (Thousands) 361 361 349 361 448 422 596 950 1,287 % Difference 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.7% 0.9%

GOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho -177 207 -537 -42 232 -805 -2,128 -2,029 -2,316 % Difference -0.2% 0.2% -0.6% 0.0% 0.2% -0.8% -2.0% -1.8% -2.0% U.S. (Thousands) 3 2 -1 6 40 -27 -70 -28 73 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% -0.1% -0.4% -0.1% 0.3%

NONGOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 73 107 733 17 1 -1,868 -3,054 -4,666 -7,025 % Difference 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% -0.3% -0.5% -0.8% -1.2% U.S. (Thousands) 358 360 350 356 408 450 666 978 1,214 % Difference 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.8% 1.0%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES Federal Funds Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bank Prime Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Existing Home Mortgage Rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%

INFLATION GDP Price Deflator 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.033 0.338 0.415 0.211 0.157 Personal Cons Deflator 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.023 0.087 -0.115 -0.468 -0.618 Consumer Price Index 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.007 -0.004 -0.005

Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

21 ALTERNATIVE FORECASTS

IHS Economics has assigned a 60% probability of occurrence to its April 2014 baseline macroeconomic scenario, which is unchanged from the previous forecast. The probabilities of the two alternative scenarios also remain unchanged from their respective November 2013 counterparts as well, with both having a 20% likelihood of occurring.

The major features of the Baseline Scenario include:

 Real GDP expands 2.4% in 2014, 3.0% in 2015, 3.4% in 2016, and 3.2% in 2017.  US nonfarm employment increases about 2.0% annually through 2017.  The US civilian unemployment rate falls from 6.5% in 2014 to 5.3% in 2017.  Annual consumer inflation remains under 2.0% through 2017.  The unified federal budget deficit shrinks from $628 billion in 2014 to $542 billion in 2016, but it then expands to $578 billion in 2017.  The current account deficit rises from $321 billion in 2014 to $462 billion in 2017.  Housing starts grow from just over 1.0 million units in 2013 to just over 1.6 million units in 2017.

PESSIMISTIC SCENARIO

In this scenario economic growth stalls as domestic and international issues decrease exports. China’s banking sector hits full crisis mode while, simultaneously, friction in Eastern Europe boils over. The combined impact results in a slowdown in US exports. Meanwhile, in the US, the reverberation of global turmoil sparks a contraction in federal government spending of up to 10% in the first half of 2014. The US economy begins to show signs of stress, which damages confidence in the private sector and leads to a plunge in stock prices. The decline in the stock market leads to even weaker confidence, which contributes to a slowdown in consumer spending in 2014. US businesses go on the defensive and expansions and other nonresidential fixed investment growth slows down. Businesses begin to cut payrolls once again, putting upward pressure on the unemployment rate, which rises to 7.3% again by the end of 2014. Real output grows at a lethargic 1.0% in 2014, 1.3% in 2015, 2.6% in 2016, and 2.3% in 2017.

Idaho’s economy is not immune to the turmoil in the US and the rest of the world. The double squeeze from weak domestic sales and slow exports leads to a decrease in nonfarm payroll growth, which grows at a rate of 1.9% in 2014, versus 2.2% in the Baseline Scenario. Decreased employment growth depress wages for Idaho employees and profits for Idaho businesses, and limit the ability for real personal income to grow in the Gem State. Real personal income only advances 1.3% in 2014, versus 1.8% in the Baseline Scenario. By 2017, Idaho total nonfarm employment has grown to roughly 690,000, more than 20,000 less than is anticipated in the Baseline Scenario.

22 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST BASELINE AND ALTERNATIVE FORECASTS APRIL 2014

BASELINE OPTIMISTIC PESSIMISTIC 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

U.S. GDP (BILLIONS) Current $ 16,800 17,511 18,352 19,270 20,210 16,800 17,714 18,844 19,875 20,941 16,800 17,226 17,730 18,528 19,380 % Ch 3.4% 4.2% 4.8% 5.0% 4.9% 3.4% 5.4% 6.4% 5.5% 5.4% 3.4% 2.5% 2.9% 4.5% 4.6% 2009 Chain-Weighted 15,761 16,135 16,612 17,173 17,718 15,761 16,277 16,958 17,618 18,282 15,761 15,922 16,135 16,548 16,933 % Ch 1.9% 2.4% 3.0% 3.4% 3.2% 1.9% 3.3% 4.2% 3.9% 3.8% 1.9% 1.0% 1.3% 2.6% 2.3%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 57,041 58,824 61,727 65,061 68,676 57,041 59,097 62,724 66,751 70,851 57,041 58,395 60,701 63,364 66,162 % Ch 3.7% 3.1% 4.9% 5.4% 5.6% 3.7% 3.6% 6.1% 6.4% 6.1% 3.7% 2.4% 3.9% 4.4% 4.4% U.S. (Billions) 14,135 14,650 15,403 16,237 17,139 14,135 14,770 15,815 16,810 17,780 14,135 14,494 14,996 15,667 16,467 % Ch 2.8% 3.6% 5.1% 5.4% 5.6% 2.8% 4.5% 7.1% 6.3% 5.8% 2.8% 2.5% 3.5% 4.5% 5.1%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 53,203 54,136 56,027 58,204 60,434 53,203 54,091 56,560 59,656 62,493 53,203 53,879 55,187 56,416 57,584 % Ch 2.5% 1.8% 3.5% 3.9% 3.8% 2.5% 1.7% 4.6% 5.5% 4.8% 2.5% 1.3% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% U.S. (Billions) 13,184 13,482 13,980 14,526 15,082 13,184 13,518 14,261 15,023 15,682 13,184 13,373 13,634 13,949 14,332 % Ch 1.7% 2.3% 3.7% 3.9% 3.8% 1.7% 2.5% 5.5% 5.3% 4.4% 1.7% 1.4% 2.0% 2.3% 2.7%

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 639,364 653,350 672,874 692,673 710,876 639,364 653,759 675,751 699,653 724,511 639,364 651,646 666,623 680,418 689,946 % Ch 2.8% 2.2% 3.0% 2.9% 2.6% 2.8% 2.3% 3.4% 3.5% 3.6% 2.8% 1.9% 2.3% 2.1% 1.4% U.S. (Thousands) 136,363 138,509 141,136 144,148 146,784 136,363 138,955 143,175 146,960 150,174 136,363 138,127 139,546 141,536 143,494 % Ch 1.7% 1.6% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8% 1.7% 1.9% 3.0% 2.6% 2.2% 1.7% 1.3% 1.0% 1.4% 1.4%

GOODS-PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 97,651 100,077 105,144 109,296 111,573 97,651 100,435 105,607 107,986 110,938 97,651 99,582 103,560 107,670 109,243 % Ch 5.8% 2.5% 5.1% 3.9% 2.1% 5.8% 2.9% 5.1% 2.3% 2.7% 5.8% 2.0% 4.0% 4.0% 1.5% U.S. (Thousands) 18,702 19,135 19,881 20,738 21,348 18,702 19,284 20,305 21,252 21,934 18,702 19,017 19,331 19,911 20,445 % Ch 1.5% 2.3% 3.9% 4.3% 2.9% 1.5% 3.1% 5.3% 4.7% 3.2% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7% 3.0% 2.7%

NONGOODS-PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 541,714 553,274 567,730 583,377 599,303 541,714 553,323 570,145 591,667 613,573 541,714 552,064 563,064 572,748 580,703 % Ch 2.2% 2.1% 2.6% 2.8% 2.7% 2.2% 2.1% 3.0% 3.8% 3.7% 2.2% 1.9% 2.0% 1.7% 1.4% U.S. (Thousands) 117,661 119,374 121,255 123,409 125,436 117,661 119,671 122,870 125,708 128,240 117,661 119,110 120,215 121,624 123,048 % Ch 1.7% 1.5% 1.6% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 2.7% 2.3% 2.0% 1.7% 1.2% 0.9% 1.2% 1.2%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES Federal Funds 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 2.2% 3.8% 0.1% 0.3% 2.0% 3.9% 4.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% Bank Prime 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 5.2% 6.8% 3.3% 3.5% 5.4% 6.9% 7.0% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.5% Existing Home Mortgage 4.0% 4.8% 5.3% 6.1% 6.9% 4.0% 5.0% 6.6% 7.0% 7.0% 4.0% 4.9% 5.2% 6.1% 6.9%

INFLATION GDP Price Deflator 1.4% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7% 1.4% 2.2% 2.1% 1.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.6% 1.6% 1.9% 2.2% Personal Cons Deflator 1.1% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7% 1.1% 1.9% 1.5% 0.9% 1.3% 1.1% 1.1% 1.5% 2.1% 2.3% Consumer Price Index 1.5% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1.9% 1.5% 2.5% 1.8% 0.8% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.7% 2.3% 2.5%

Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

OPTIMISTIC SCENARIO

In the Optimistic Scenario recovery reignites after colder-than-expected winter weather took the edge off of the recovery in the fourth quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014. The warmer weather in the US helps to heat up economic activity, which produces a jump in productivity. The acceleration of the recovery boosts consumer confidence and a bullish equity market reforms. The stock market rises 8.6% higher than in the Baseline Scenario. With consumer confidence at relatively high levels, retail sales and business investment accelerate, also encouraging resurgence in wages and employment. By mid-2014 the labor market is consistently adding about 200,000 jobs per month and the unemployment rate falls below the 6.5% threshold in the second quarter of 2014. Wage and employment growth assist in increasing home affordability in the US, and single-family housing starts ramp up to a 736,000 annual pace in the second quarter, versus 672,000 in the Baseline Scenario. International matters remain stable and even improve in the European Union, where the central bank is able to increase its monetary base and evade deflation. The improved foreign sector helps increase the demand for US exports. Real GDP growth in the US expands at a rate of 3.3% in 2014, 4.2% in 2015, 3.9% in 2016, and 3.8% in 2017.

Benefiting from more robust economic recoveries in the US and Europe, the Idaho economy picks up speed over the next few years. With an increase in US consumer spending and foreign exports, Idaho’s total nonfarm employment grows to 724,500 jobs by 2017, nearly 14,000 more than in the Baseline Scenario. Interestingly, all of the additional growth comes from an increase in Idaho’s nongoods- producing sector. The goods-producing sector in Idaho actually grows at a slower rate here than in the Baseline Scenario. Higher mortgage rates in this scenario dampen housing starts that, in turn, lower the prospects for local construction employment. Higher interest rates also lower the state’s manufacturing employment forecast. Despite this softness, additional total nonfarm employment in the state is still net positive in this scenario, which helps to drive real personal income up at a faster rate. Adjusted for inflation, personal income should grow at a rate of 1.7% in 2014, 4.6% in 2015, 5.5% in 2016, and 4.8% in 2017.

24 Career Changes Decline during Recessions Carlos Carrillo-Tudela1 Bart Hobijn Ludo Visschers

During the Great Recession the unemployment rate began rising substantially, climbing to 10% in the aftermath before falling slowly to slightly under 7% in recent months. Debate about the main causes underlying this slow job market recovery has resulted in two very distinct views.

One view is that many of the jobs created during the boom in real estate, construction, and finance were subsequently lost in the recession and will not come back as the economy recovers. As a consequence, much of the labor market recovery reflects workers changing careers. That is, workers previously in construction, real estate, and finance-related industries and in occupations where jobs were plentiful before the recession must change to jobs in other sectors and positions where job growth is currently concentrated.

The second view is that rising unemployment resulted from a more broad-based shortfall in demand and economic activity that affected workers across a whole set of industries and occupations. Contrary to the first view, the labor market recovery need not be accompanied by an increase in workers changing careers. Instead, overall job creation will replenish the jobs lost during the downturn.

In this Economic Letter, we shed more light on these two competing views. To do so, we analyze the rates at which unemployed and employed workers switch careers. We first measure the fraction of workers that changed jobs and were hired into a different industry or occupation. We then compare how these rates of career change among both unemployed and employed workers fluctuate during recessions, recoveries, and booms.

Hires from different industries and occupations We use the Current Population Survey (CPS), the monthly survey that is the basis for U.S. unemployment statistics, to calculate the rate at which people change careers. Career changes include workers who change industries, such as an accountant moving from a job in a bank to one in a construction company, as well as workers who change occupations, such as an accountant who becomes a construction worker.

We separate career changes into two types depending on a worker’s employment status immediately before being hired. The first type is based on hires out of unemployment, which consists of people who were unemployed in the month before being hired into a new job. We use survey information about a worker’s industry and occupation immediately before and after an unemployment spell to determine how many workers changed careers out of unemployment.

The second type is based on job-to-job hires, which consists of people who reported being employed in the month before being hired into a new job. Comparing industries and occupations across the two consecutive jobs allows us to determine whether a worker changed careers without an intervening spell

1This article originally appeared in the Number 2014-09; March 31, 2014 FRBSF Economic Letter. Opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

25 of unemployment. Our second measure begins in 1994, the year the CPS began collecting this information.

The level of detail we use to distinguish industries and occupations also affects our measure of career change. For example, at the broadest, most aggregate level, a worker who switches from being a travel agent to working as a cashier at a supermarket does not switch occupations because both are part of “sales and related occupations.” However, at a more detailed, disaggregated level, where we distinguish between sales representatives and retail sales workers, this would be classified as an occupation switch and thus a career change. To show that the patterns we find in the data are not specific to the level of detail, we present our results at the most aggregated, or major, and the most disaggregated, or code, levels.

Hires out of unemployment Figure 1 shows the fraction of hires out of unemployment that change industries (panel A) and occupations, (panel B). The shaded areas depict recessions. Because industry and occupation definitions and classification systems have changed over time, data are not continuous for the period we study, as shown by the vertical dashed lines in 1983, 1992, and 2003. Two other dashed lines in 1985 and 1995 show periods when we cannot link CPS respondents across surveys.

The more detailed our industry and occupation categories are, the more career changes we identify. This is why the line showing changes in industry and occupation groups at the major level lies below that showing the most detailed code level in both panels. Though the levels of industry and occupational mobility vary with the level of detail, the fluctuations in mobility over the business cycle are remarkably similar for both levels. These patterns for occupational switches also appear in data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation (see Carillo-Tudela and Visschers 2013).

The common cyclical pattern between these series clearly shows that the fraction of unemployed people who change careers upon getting rehired declines during recessions. All the recessions in our sample follow this pattern, from those in the early 1980s to the Great Recession that started in 2007. Likewise, the figures show that career changes increase when the labor market is strong, as at the end of the 1980s and the 1990s.

26 The fact that the rate of career change for unemployed workers declines during recessions seems counterintuitive, but there are several possible explanations for this phenomenon. These explanations can be divided into two broad categories. The first focuses on why those unemployed during recessions are less likely to pursue a change in career. For example, Carrillo-Tudela and Visschers (2013) consider aggregate unemployment fluctuations based on unemployed workers’ decisions to change occupations. They argue that in recessions, two factors reduce the incentives for unemployed people to change careers. One, though their job opportunities in their old careers might have dried up during the recession, it is also harder to find jobs in the alternate careers that they consider pursuing. And two, workers take into account that they may be less likely to start a particularly successful career path during a recession, which further reduces their incentives to change careers.

The second category emphasizes that employers become more picky in their hiring decisions during recessions (see, for example, Sedláček 2014). As a result, firms hire workers with more relevant job experience during recessions than they do during expansions. Hence, a higher fraction of hires would have been previously employed in similar industries and occupations.

There is one major caveat concerning our measurement of career change. We do not observe whether the unemployed who do not get hired during the sample period end up making a career change. Further, we do not know the career choices of those unemployed who give up looking for a job and drop out of the labor force. Still, the evidence in Figure 1 strongly indicates that a smaller fraction of the unemployed change careers during recessions than during upswings.

Our observations suggest that recessions involve a smaller degree of structural reallocation across different job markets, which forces some unemployed workers to change careers, than expansions. Instead, increases in unemployment during recessions mainly reflect a broad-based drop in the demand for labor rather than an increase in labor market frictions due to the need for workers to switch careers. Consequently, labor market recoveries appear to largely involve unemployed workers finding jobs similar to those they previously held.

At this point, it is important to distinguish between the fraction of hires out of unemployment and the total number of hires out of unemployment. Because more people are unemployed during recessions, the actual number of hires out of unemployment increases (BLS 2013), as does the number of unemployed people who end up changing careers. This might tempt one to conclude that, while the rate of career switches declines, the total amount of career changes increases during recessions. This interpretation, however, ignores career switchers who move directly from job to job without an intervening spell of unemployment, which we discuss in the next section.

Including job-to-job hires In Figure 2 we combine the data for hires that come from unemployment and those that come directly from another job. The figure shows the fraction of those hires that changed industry (panel A), or occupation (panel B). Though less pronounced, these data show the same cyclical pattern as in Figure 1. That is, they show career changes are more prevalent among those who start a new job during expansions rather than during recessions. Overall, this is consistent with the occupational mobility patterns in research by Moscarini and Vella (2008) and evidence on industry mobility from Murphy and Topel (1987). Interestingly, in the Great Recession, there is a clear drop in the fraction of hires that were previously employed in a different industry (panel A), while the fraction of hires that changes occupations (panel B) appears to drop only slightly.

27 For this combined measure of hires, the rate versus level distinction turns out to be unimportant. During recessions, the decrease in the number of job-to-job hires is greater than the increase in the hires out of unemployment. The net result is that the total number of hires declines in recessions. Consequently, both the rate at which new hires change careers and the number of new hires that change careers decline. Overall then, the extent of career changes declines during recessions, including during the Great Recession.

Conclusion A prominent view in economics associates recessions with times when productive resources are reallocated to new and better uses. The increase in unemployment during these downturns is often thought to reflect, at least in part, this reallocation. Intuitively, this view also implies that proportionally more workers, especially among the unemployed, would switch careers to find work in different industries and occupations during recessions. If this were the case, a larger proportion of hires during recessions should have been previously employed in a different sector or occupation. However, our data suggest otherwise. The fraction of hires during recessions instead reflects a drop in the rate of career changes. Our findings point to a broad-based decline in the demand for labor as the main driver of run-ups and persistence in the unemployment rate, including during and after the Great Recession of 2007-09.

References Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2013. “Research Series on Labor Force Status Flows from the Current Population Survey.” http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_flows.htm

Carrillo-Tudela, Carlos, and Ludo Visschers. 2013. “Unemployment and Endogenous Reallocation over the Business Cycle.” CESifo working paper 4079.

Moscarini, Giuseppe, and Francis G. Vella. 2008. “Occupational Mobility and the Business Cycle.” NBER Working Paper 13819.

28 Murphy, Kevin M., and Robert H. Topel. 1987. “The Evolution of Unemployment in the United States: 1968–1985.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2, pp. 11–58.

Sedláček, Petr. 2014. “Match Efficiency and Firms’ Hiring Standards.” Journal of Monetary Economics, forthcoming.

29 This page left blank intentionally. IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST

April 2014

FORECAST DETAIL

Annual Forecast 2000–2017 ...... Page 32

Quarterly Forecast 2011–2016 ...... Page 46

Reporting Conventions

Units of measurement are presented in the individual reports.

The percentage change numbers given in the annual reports are simple period-to-period percent changes. Since the periods are years, they are thus simple annual changes. The percentage changes given in the quarterly report are period-to-period changes at compound annual rates, following standard practice. A large change in a given quarter can seem to be exaggerated since the calculation assumes the change is compounded over an entire year.

Data Sources

National forecast data is provided by IHS Economics, as well as the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI). Historical data for the models are obtained from the following agencies: Bureau of the Census (demographic), Bureau of Economic Analysis (income), Bureau of Labor Statistics (employment), Federal Reserve Board of Governors (production), and US Department of Agriculture (farm).

Idaho historical data is obtained from the Department of Labor (employment and hourly earnings), Bureau of Vital Statistics (births and deaths), Division of Financial Management (migration), and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (income).

The Idaho average annual wage is calculated by the Division of Financial Management from Bureau of Economic Analysis and Idaho Department of Labor data. Because of the different methodology used and data available, this figure may not match those published by other sources.

31 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

DEMOGRAPHICS

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

POPULATION Idaho (Thousands) 1,298.9 1,319.2 1,340.7 1,365.1 1,392.1 1,426.9 1,466.3 1,502.2 1,530.9 % Ch 1.8% 1.6% 1.6% 1.8% 2.0% 2.5% 2.8% 2.4% 1.9% National (Millions) 282.790 285.684 288.436 291.116 293.758 296.460 299.282 302.227 304.948 % Ch 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9%

BIRTHS Idaho (Thousands) 20.304 20.684 21.002 21.735 22.526 23.069 24.150 25.053 25.122 % Ch 2.0% 1.9% 1.5% 3.5% 3.6% 2.4% 4.7% 3.7% 0.3% National (Thousands) 4,069 4,060 4,087 4,116 4,151 4,192 4,232 4,280 4,324 % Ch 1.0% -0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.0%

DEATHS Idaho (Thousands) 9.538 9.811 9.935 10.308 10.020 10.413 10.471 10.742 10.938 % Ch 0.5% 2.9% 1.3% 3.8% -2.8% 3.9% 0.6% 2.6% 1.8% National (Thousands) 2,409 2,474 2,466 2,457 2,450 2,446 2,472 2,496 2,522 % Ch 0.2% 2.7% -0.3% -0.4% -0.3% -0.2% 1.1% 1.0% 1.0%

NET MIGRATION Idaho (Thousands) 12.463 9.396 10.377 13.016 14.450 22.198 25.725 21.611 14.503

HOUSING HOUSING STARTS Idaho 11,500 12,207 13,231 16,396 18,678 23,408 19,534 14,348 7,981 % Ch 11.0% 6.1% 8.4% 23.9% 13.9% 25.3% -16.5% -26.5% -44.4% National (Millions) 1.573 1.601 1.710 1.854 1.950 2.073 1.812 1.342 0.900 % Ch -4.5% 1.8% 6.8% 8.4% 5.2% 6.3% -12.6% -25.9% -32.9%

SINGLE UNITS Idaho 10,338 10,379 11,144 13,865 16,168 20,938 17,522 12,016 7,134 % Ch 12.5% 0.4% 7.4% 24.4% 16.6% 29.5% -16.3% -31.4% -40.6% National (Millions) 1.232 1.272 1.363 1.505 1.604 1.719 1.474 1.036 0.616 % Ch -5.7% 3.2% 7.2% 10.4% 6.6% 7.1% -14.3% -29.7% -40.5%

MULTIPLE UNITS Idaho 1,163 1,829 2,087 2,531 2,510 2,469 2,012 2,332 847 % Ch -0.8% 57.3% 14.1% 21.3% -0.8% -1.6% -18.5% 15.9% -63.7% National (Millions) 0.341 0.330 0.347 0.349 0.345 0.354 0.338 0.306 0.284 % Ch 0.1% -3.5% 5.3% 0.5% -1.0% 2.6% -4.5% -9.5% -7.3%

HOUSING STOCK Idaho (Thousands) 421.8 432.7 443.6 457.6 473.8 494.4 514.8 529.3 537.9 % Ch 2.4% 2.6% 2.5% 3.2% 3.5% 4.3% 4.1% 2.8% 1.6%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

32 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

DEMOGRAPHICS

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

POPULATION Idaho (Thousands) 1,550.5 1,572.4 1,583.3 1,595.7 1,612.5 1,635.6 1,659.7 1,685.4 1,711.7 % Ch 1.3% 1.4% 0.7% 0.8% 1.1% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.6% National (Millions) 307.580 310.064 312.324 314.581 317.008 319.464 321.937 324.424 326.925 % Ch 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

BIRTHS Idaho (Thousands) 23.607 23.240 22.475 22.978 24.002 24.467 24.951 25.488 26.043 % Ch -6.0% -1.6% -3.3% 2.2% 4.5% 1.9% 2.0% 2.2% 2.2% National (Thousands) 4,368 4,409 4,438 4,464 4,489 4,508 4,526 4,542 4,561 % Ch 1.0% 0.9% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4%

DEATHS Idaho (Thousands) 11.078 11.300 11.900 12.111 12.324 12.484 12.651 12.828 13.008 % Ch 1.3% 2.0% 5.3% 1.8% 1.8% 1.3% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% National (Thousands) 2,547 2,570 2,589 2,611 2,634 2,658 2,685 2,709 2,736 % Ch 1.0% 0.9% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9% 1.0%

NET MIGRATION Idaho (Thousands) 7.037 9.987 0.342 1.508 5.088 11.168 11.780 13.079 13.277

HOUSING HOUSING STARTS Idaho 5,733 5,200 4,570 7,153 9,124 10,934 13,293 14,871 15,549 % Ch -28.2% -9.3% -12.1% 56.5% 27.6% 19.8% 21.6% 11.9% 4.6% National (Millions) 0.554 0.586 0.612 0.783 0.929 1.045 1.389 1.582 1.603 % Ch -38.4% 5.7% 4.5% 28.0% 18.6% 12.5% 32.9% 13.9% 1.4%

SINGLE UNITS Idaho 4,949 4,658 3,964 6,041 7,757 9,523 11,749 13,205 13,928 % Ch -30.6% -5.9% -14.9% 52.4% 28.4% 22.8% 23.4% 12.4% 5.5% National (Millions) 0.442 0.471 0.434 0.537 0.621 0.701 0.964 1.124 1.140 % Ch -28.2% 6.6% -7.9% 23.5% 15.7% 12.9% 37.5% 16.6% 1.4%

MULTIPLE UNITS Idaho 783 543 606 1,112 1,367 1,411 1,544 1,666 1,622 % Ch -7.6% -30.7% 11.7% 83.5% 22.9% 3.2% 9.5% 7.9% -2.6% National (Millions) 0.112 0.114 0.178 0.247 0.308 0.344 0.425 0.458 0.463 % Ch -60.7% 2.2% 55.7% 38.9% 24.9% 11.7% 23.5% 7.7% 1.2%

HOUSING STOCK Idaho (Thousands) 542.3 546.4 549.2 553.7 560.4 568.9 579.7 592.2 605.9 % Ch 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 1.2% 1.5% 1.9% 2.2% 2.3%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

33 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

OUTPUT, INCOME, & WAGES

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

U.S. GROSS DOM. PRODUCT (Billions) Current Dollars 10,290 10,625 10,980 11,512 12,277 13,095 13,858 14,480 14,720 % Ch 6.5% 3.3% 3.3% 4.8% 6.6% 6.7% 5.8% 4.5% 1.7% 2009 Chain-Weighted 12,565 12,684 12,910 13,270 13,774 14,236 14,615 14,877 14,834 % Ch 4.1% 0.9% 1.8% 2.8% 3.8% 3.4% 2.7% 1.8% -0.3%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 32,076 34,389 35,479 36,928 40,308 42,808 47,025 49,726 50,320 % Ch 8.1% 7.2% 3.2% 4.1% 9.2% 6.2% 9.8% 5.7% 1.2% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 31,089 33,291 34,404 36,088 38,970 41,641 45,979 48,184 48,543 % Ch 8.3% 7.1% 3.3% 4.9% 8.0% 6.9% 10.4% 4.8% 0.7% National (Billions) 8,633 8,987 9,150 9,488 10,049 10,610 11,390 11,996 12,431 % Ch 8.1% 4.1% 1.8% 3.7% 5.9% 5.6% 7.3% 5.3% 3.6%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 38,585 40,586 41,314 42,166 44,932 46,395 49,640 51,211 50,291 % Ch 5.4% 5.2% 1.8% 2.1% 6.6% 3.3% 7.0% 3.2% -1.8% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 37,398 39,290 40,064 41,207 43,439 45,129 48,536 49,623 48,514 % Ch 5.7% 5.1% 2.0% 2.9% 5.4% 3.9% 7.5% 2.2% -2.2% National (Billions) 10,384 10,607 10,655 10,833 11,202 11,499 12,023 12,354 12,423 % Ch 5.5% 2.1% 0.5% 1.7% 3.4% 2.7% 4.6% 2.7% 0.6%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - CURR $ Idaho 24,693 26,068 26,463 27,050 28,954 29,998 32,068 33,101 32,870 % Ch 6.1% 5.6% 1.5% 2.2% 7.0% 3.6% 6.9% 3.2% -0.7% National 30,526 31,458 31,721 32,589 34,208 35,788 38,056 39,690 40,763 % Ch 7.0% 3.1% 0.8% 2.7% 5.0% 4.6% 6.3% 4.3% 2.7%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - 2009 $ Idaho 29,705 30,766 30,816 30,888 32,276 32,513 33,853 34,092 32,851 % Ch 3.6% 3.6% 0.2% 0.2% 4.5% 0.7% 4.1% 0.7% -3.6% National 36,720 37,127 36,940 37,213 38,132 38,789 40,173 40,876 40,739 % Ch 4.4% 1.1% -0.5% 0.7% 2.5% 1.7% 3.6% 1.7% -0.3%

AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGE Idaho 28,834 28,923 29,546 30,290 31,520 32,469 34,328 35,247 35,558 % Ch 6.3% 0.3% 2.2% 2.5% 4.1% 3.0% 5.7% 2.7% 0.9% National 36,550 37,511 38,249 39,433 41,164 42,483 44,413 46,370 47,628 % Ch 6.0% 2.6% 2.0% 3.1% 4.4% 3.2% 4.5% 4.4% 2.7%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

34 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

OUTPUT, INCOME, & WAGES

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

U.S. GROSS DOM. PRODUCT (Billions) Current Dollars 14,418 14,958 15,534 16,245 16,800 17,511 18,352 19,270 20,210 % Ch -2.1% 3.7% 3.8% 4.6% 3.4% 4.2% 4.8% 5.0% 4.9% 2009 Chain-Weighted 14,418 14,779 15,052 15,471 15,761 16,135 16,612 17,173 17,718 % Ch -2.8% 2.5% 1.8% 2.8% 1.9% 2.4% 3.0% 3.4% 3.2%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 49,165 50,385 52,954 55,022 57,041 58,824 61,727 65,061 68,676 % Ch -2.3% 2.5% 5.1% 3.9% 3.7% 3.1% 4.9% 5.4% 5.6% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 47,842 48,849 50,694 52,665 54,550 56,798 59,828 63,209 66,844 % Ch -1.4% 2.1% 3.8% 3.9% 3.6% 4.1% 5.3% 5.7% 5.7% National (Billions) 12,082 12,435 13,191 13,744 14,135 14,650 15,403 16,237 17,139 % Ch -2.8% 2.9% 6.1% 4.2% 2.8% 3.6% 5.1% 5.4% 5.6%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 49,167 49,563 50,875 51,901 53,203 54,136 56,027 58,204 60,434 % Ch -2.2% 0.8% 2.6% 2.0% 2.5% 1.8% 3.5% 3.9% 3.8% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 47,845 48,052 48,704 49,678 50,880 52,271 54,303 56,547 58,822 % Ch -1.4% 0.4% 1.4% 2.0% 2.4% 2.7% 3.9% 4.1% 4.0% National (Billions) 12,082 12,232 12,673 12,964 13,184 13,482 13,980 14,526 15,082 % Ch -2.7% 1.2% 3.6% 2.3% 1.7% 2.3% 3.7% 3.9% 3.8%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - CURR $ Idaho 31,710 32,043 33,444 34,481 35,374 35,963 37,190 38,600 40,118 % Ch -3.5% 1.0% 4.4% 3.1% 2.6% 1.7% 3.4% 3.8% 3.9% National 39,281 40,104 42,235 43,688 44,589 45,856 47,842 50,047 52,423 % Ch -3.6% 2.1% 5.3% 3.4% 2.1% 2.8% 4.3% 4.6% 4.7%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - 2009 $ Idaho 31,712 31,520 32,132 32,525 32,995 33,098 33,757 34,533 35,305 % Ch -3.5% -0.6% 1.9% 1.2% 1.4% 0.3% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% National 39,283 39,450 40,578 41,210 41,589 42,201 43,425 44,773 46,133 % Ch -3.6% 0.4% 2.9% 1.6% 0.9% 1.5% 2.9% 3.1% 3.0%

AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGE Idaho 35,822 36,582 37,176 37,516 38,137 39,051 40,196 41,359 42,575 % Ch 0.7% 2.1% 1.6% 0.9% 1.7% 2.4% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% National 47,652 48,954 50,351 51,652 52,346 53,451 55,166 56,898 58,715 % Ch 0.1% 2.7% 2.9% 2.6% 1.3% 2.1% 3.2% 3.1% 3.2%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

35 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

PERSONAL INCOME--CURRENT $$

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

WAGE AND SALARY PAYMENTS Idaho (Millions) 16,651 16,998 17,449 17,991 19,246 20,656 22,716 24,013 23,957 % Ch 10.3% 2.1% 2.7% 3.1% 7.0% 7.3% 10.0% 5.7% -0.2% National (Billions) 4,826 4,954 4,996 5,139 5,423 5,693 6,058 6,396 6,533 % Ch 8.3% 2.7% 0.8% 2.8% 5.5% 5.0% 6.4% 5.6% 2.1%

FARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 614 719 643 450 908 667 551 949 1,206 % Ch -5.5% 17.2% -10.6% -29.9% 101.5% -26.5% -17.4% 72.2% 27.2% National (Billions) 31 32 20 38 50 46 36 38 47 % Ch 12.0% 1.9% -37.9% 91.0% 32.7% -8.1% -22.4% 6.0% 23.3%

NONFARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 3,246 3,724 3,944 4,069 4,374 4,527 5,063 4,587 3,938 % Ch 3.0% 14.7% 5.9% 3.2% 7.5% 3.5% 11.8% -9.4% -14.2% National (Billions) 726 805 851 862 912 933 1,018 941 979 % Ch 8.0% 10.8% 5.8% 1.3% 5.8% 2.3% 9.1% -7.5% 4.1%

DIVIDENDS, RENT & INTEREST Idaho (Millions) 6,070 6,655 6,663 7,158 7,929 8,513 9,518 10,294 10,416 % Ch 6.4% 9.6% 0.1% 7.4% 10.8% 7.4% 11.8% 8.2% 1.2% National (Billions) 1,641 1,649 1,608 1,658 1,759 1,905 2,146 2,356 2,429 % Ch 8.5% 0.5% -2.5% 3.2% 6.1% 8.3% 12.7% 9.8% 3.1%

OTHER LABOR INCOME Idaho (Millions) 3,667 4,034 4,224 4,486 4,863 5,260 5,854 6,119 6,170 % Ch 8.6% 10.0% 4.7% 6.2% 8.4% 8.2% 11.3% 4.5% 0.8% National (Billions) 686 734 779 844 909 967 998 1,041 1,075 % Ch 9.0% 7.1% 6.2% 8.3% 7.7% 6.4% 3.2% 4.4% 3.2%

GOVT. TRANSFERS TO INDIV. Idaho (Millions) 4,122 4,615 4,999 5,315 5,694 6,152 6,681 7,253 8,067 % Ch 8.5% 12.0% 8.3% 6.3% 7.1% 8.0% 8.6% 8.6% 11.2% National (Billions) 1,083 1,188 1,280 1,343 1,417 1,512 1,610 1,723 1,884 % Ch 6.0% 9.7% 7.8% 4.9% 5.5% 6.7% 6.5% 7.0% 9.4%

CONTRIB. FOR SOCIAL INSUR. Idaho (Millions) 2,819 2,894 2,978 3,100 3,309 3,588 3,999 4,184 4,199 % Ch 8.7% 2.6% 2.9% 4.1% 6.8% 8.4% 11.4% 4.6% 0.3% National (Billions) 706 733 752 779 829 873 923 961 988 % Ch 6.7% 3.9% 2.5% 3.7% 6.4% 5.3% 5.6% 4.2% 2.8%

RESIDENCE ADJUSTMENT Idaho (Millions) 525 539 536 558 603 622 639 696 764 % Ch 4.5% 2.6% -0.5% 4.2% 8.0% 3.1% 2.8% 8.9% 9.8%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

36 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

PERSONAL INCOME--CURRENT $$

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

WAGE AND SALARY PAYMENTS Idaho (Millions) 22,815 22,966 23,564 24,148 25,206 26,341 27,879 29,492 31,128 % Ch -4.8% 0.7% 2.6% 2.5% 4.4% 4.5% 5.8% 5.8% 5.5% National (Billions) 6,252 6,378 6,639 6,927 7,138 7,404 7,786 8,202 8,619 % Ch -4.3% 2.0% 4.1% 4.3% 3.1% 3.7% 5.2% 5.3% 5.1%

FARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 693 984 1,704 1,852 1,972 1,533 1,408 1,355 1,327 % Ch -42.6% 42.1% 73.2% 8.7% 6.5% -22.2% -8.2% -3.8% -2.1% National (Billions) 35 46 73 75 128 103 105 105 105 % Ch -24.5% 29.7% 57.7% 3.9% 69.4% -19.5% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0%

NONFARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 4,568 4,659 4,578 4,847 5,204 5,535 5,865 6,196 6,452 % Ch 16.0% 2.0% -1.7% 5.9% 7.4% 6.3% 6.0% 5.7% 4.1% National (Billions) 938 987 1,083 1,150 1,221 1,297 1,374 1,452 1,512 % Ch -4.3% 5.2% 9.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.2% 5.9% 5.6% 4.2%

DIVIDENDS, RENT & INTEREST Idaho (Millions) 9,158 9,038 9,944 10,567 10,976 11,408 11,972 12,705 13,778 % Ch -12.1% -1.3% 10.0% 6.3% 3.9% 3.9% 4.9% 6.1% 8.4% National (Billions) 2,145 2,142 2,369 2,500 2,588 2,690 2,855 3,041 3,314 % Ch -11.7% -0.1% 10.6% 5.5% 3.5% 3.9% 6.1% 6.5% 9.0%

OTHER LABOR INCOME Idaho (Millions) 5,993 6,205 6,104 6,206 6,448 6,641 6,926 7,292 7,678 % Ch -2.9% 3.5% -1.6% 1.7% 3.9% 3.0% 4.3% 5.3% 5.3% National (Billions) 1,077 1,120 1,145 1,171 1,191 1,217 1,262 1,328 1,405 % Ch 0.2% 4.0% 2.2% 2.2% 1.7% 2.2% 3.7% 5.3% 5.7%

GOVT. TRANSFERS TO INDIV. Idaho (Millions) 9,282 9,996 10,042 10,346 10,850 11,112 11,685 12,326 12,889 % Ch 15.1% 7.7% 0.5% 3.0% 4.9% 2.4% 5.2% 5.5% 4.6% National (Billions) 2,140 2,277 2,307 2,358 2,444 2,537 2,661 2,796 2,911 % Ch 13.6% 6.4% 1.3% 2.2% 3.6% 3.8% 4.9% 5.1% 4.1%

CONTRIB. FOR SOCIAL INSUR. Idaho (Millions) 4,111 4,303 3,917 3,990 4,685 4,849 5,150 5,490 5,803 % Ch -2.1% 4.7% -9.0% 1.9% 17.4% 3.5% 6.2% 6.6% 5.7% National (Billions) 964 984 918 951 1,106 1,147 1,224 1,307 1,382 % Ch -2.4% 2.0% -6.7% 3.5% 16.3% 3.7% 6.6% 6.8% 5.7%

RESIDENCE ADJUSTMENT Idaho (Millions) 767 839 933 1,045 1,069 1,103 1,143 1,185 1,228 % Ch 0.4% 9.3% 11.2% 12.0% 2.3% 3.2% 3.6% 3.6% 3.6%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

37 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 558,580 568,032 568,045 572,546 588,054 611,681 638,836 656,220 648,917 % Ch 3.8% 1.7% 0.0% 0.8% 2.7% 4.0% 4.4% 2.7% -1.1% National (Thousands) 132,030 132,080 130,628 130,315 131,732 133,997 136,403 137,935 137,170 % Ch 2.2% 0.0% -1.1% -0.2% 1.1% 1.7% 1.8% 1.1% -0.6%

GOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 111,883 110,225 105,030 102,384 105,446 112,317 122,253 123,319 112,243 % Ch 2.9% -1.5% -4.7% -2.5% 3.0% 6.5% 8.8% 0.9% -9.0% National (Thousands) 24,652 23,873 22,555 21,816 21,878 22,186 22,530 22,228 21,332 % Ch 0.8% -3.2% -5.5% -3.3% 0.3% 1.4% 1.5% -1.3% -4.0%

MANUFACTURING Idaho 73,032 70,392 66,804 63,860 63,675 65,030 67,836 68,062 64,468 % Ch 2.6% -3.6% -5.1% -4.4% -0.3% 2.1% 4.3% 0.3% -5.3% National (Thousands) 17,344 16,514 15,327 14,578 14,382 14,291 14,221 13,938 13,460 % Ch -0.3% -4.8% -7.2% -4.9% -1.3% -0.6% -0.5% -2.0% -3.4%

DURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 47,406 45,098 42,320 39,947 40,544 42,103 44,602 44,201 39,869 % Ch 3.7% -4.9% -6.2% -5.6% 1.5% 3.8% 5.9% -0.9% -9.8% National (Thousands) 10,958 10,409 9,555 9,033 8,992 9,020 9,046 8,867 8,520 % Ch 0.4% -5.0% -8.2% -5.5% -0.4% 0.3% 0.3% -2.0% -3.9%

LOGGING & WOOD PRODUCTS Idaho 11,567 9,849 9,553 9,046 9,294 9,617 10,036 9,586 8,066 % Ch 0.8% -14.9% -3.0% -5.3% 2.7% 3.5% 4.3% -4.5% -15.9% National (Thousands) 694 650 628 609 619 626 625 577 514 % Ch -1.3% -6.4% -3.4% -3.0% 1.7% 1.1% -0.2% -7.7% -10.9%

METAL FABRICATION Idaho 4,030 3,876 3,636 3,537 3,636 3,905 4,376 4,659 4,677 % Ch 2.2% -3.8% -6.2% -2.7% 2.8% 7.4% 12.1% 6.5% 0.4% National (Thousands) 1,753 1,677 1,549 1,479 1,497 1,522 1,553 1,562 1,527 % Ch 1.4% -4.4% -7.6% -4.5% 1.2% 1.7% 2.0% 0.6% -2.2%

MACHINERY Idaho 3,305 3,055 2,832 2,632 2,569 2,605 2,864 2,992 3,133 % Ch 8.7% -7.5% -7.3% -7.0% -2.4% 1.4% 9.9% 4.5% 4.7% National (Thousands) 1,457 1,370 1,232 1,152 1,145 1,164 1,183 1,187 1,187 % Ch -0.8% -5.9% -10.1% -6.5% -0.6% 1.7% 1.6% 0.3% 0.0%

COMPUTER & ELECTRONICS Idaho 19,454 19,656 17,933 16,297 16,286 16,181 16,663 16,216 14,305 % Ch 5.7% 1.0% -8.8% -9.1% -0.1% -0.6% 3.0% -2.7% -11.8% National (Thousands) 1,820 1,749 1,507 1,355 1,323 1,316 1,307 1,272 1,244 % Ch 2.2% -3.9% -13.8% -10.1% -2.4% -0.5% -0.7% -2.7% -2.2%

OTHER DURABLES Idaho 9,050 8,663 8,366 8,435 8,759 9,794 10,663 10,749 9,689 % Ch 2.5% -4.3% -3.4% 0.8% 3.8% 11.8% 8.9% 0.8% -9.9% National (Thousands) 5,233 4,964 4,640 4,438 4,409 4,391 4,378 4,269 4,046 % Ch 0.0% -5.1% -6.5% -4.3% -0.7% -0.4% -0.3% -2.5% -5.2%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

38 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 609,982 603,637 610,656 622,143 639,364 653,350 672,874 692,673 710,876 % Ch -6.0% -1.0% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8% 2.2% 3.0% 2.9% 2.6% National (Thousands) 131,220 130,272 131,849 134,098 136,363 138,509 141,136 144,148 146,784 % Ch -4.3% -0.7% 1.2% 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8%

GOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 92,396 88,002 88,943 92,290 97,651 100,077 105,144 109,296 111,573 % Ch -17.7% -4.8% 1.1% 3.8% 5.8% 2.5% 5.1% 3.9% 2.1% National (Thousands) 18,559 17,752 18,046 18,419 18,702 19,135 19,881 20,738 21,348 % Ch -13.0% -4.3% 1.7% 2.1% 1.5% 2.3% 3.9% 4.3% 2.9%

MANUFACTURING Idaho 55,833 54,417 56,019 58,191 61,224 61,975 64,522 66,509 67,108 % Ch -13.4% -2.5% 2.9% 3.9% 5.2% 1.2% 4.1% 3.1% 0.9% National (Thousands) 11,898 11,578 11,775 11,977 12,057 12,236 12,474 12,649 12,759 % Ch -11.6% -2.7% 1.7% 1.7% 0.7% 1.5% 1.9% 1.4% 0.9%

DURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 32,207 31,141 32,680 34,224 35,944 37,165 39,215 40,653 40,885 % Ch -19.2% -3.3% 4.9% 4.7% 5.0% 3.4% 5.5% 3.7% 0.6% National (Thousands) 7,335 7,114 7,321 7,521 7,595 7,749 7,993 8,173 8,273 % Ch -13.9% -3.0% 2.9% 2.7% 1.0% 2.0% 3.2% 2.2% 1.2%

LOGGING & WOOD PRODUCTS Idaho 5,904 5,792 6,200 6,524 7,212 8,038 9,218 9,947 9,675 % Ch -26.8% -1.9% 7.1% 5.2% 10.5% 11.5% 14.7% 7.9% -2.7% National (Thousands) 411 392 386 390 405 430 493 547 566 % Ch -20.1% -4.6% -1.6% 1.1% 3.8% 6.3% 14.7% 10.9% 3.5%

METAL FABRICATION Idaho 4,377 4,443 4,594 4,860 5,407 5,646 5,850 6,112 6,339 % Ch -6.4% 1.5% 3.4% 5.8% 11.2% 4.4% 3.6% 4.5% 3.7% National (Thousands) 1,312 1,282 1,348 1,409 1,432 1,467 1,529 1,588 1,623 % Ch -14.1% -2.3% 5.1% 4.6% 1.6% 2.4% 4.2% 3.9% 2.2%

MACHINERY Idaho 2,715 2,472 2,576 2,714 2,890 2,949 3,013 3,089 3,134 % Ch -13.3% -9.0% 4.2% 5.3% 6.5% 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 1.5% National (Thousands) 1,029 996 1,055 1,098 1,104 1,126 1,158 1,185 1,206 % Ch -13.3% -3.2% 5.9% 4.1% 0.6% 2.0% 2.9% 2.3% 1.7%

COMPUTER & ELECTRONICS Idaho 11,098 10,574 11,191 11,625 11,303 11,260 11,533 11,488 11,420 % Ch -22.4% -4.7% 5.8% 3.9% -2.8% -0.4% 2.4% -0.4% -0.6% National (Thousands) 1,137 1,094 1,103 1,089 1,068 1,075 1,085 1,076 1,086 % Ch -8.6% -3.7% 0.8% -1.3% -1.9% 0.7% 0.9% -0.9% 1.0%

OTHER DURABLES Idaho 8,113 7,860 8,119 8,502 9,133 9,273 9,601 10,017 10,316 % Ch -16.3% -3.1% 3.3% 4.7% 7.4% 1.5% 3.5% 4.3% 3.0% National (Thousands) 3,446 3,349 3,429 3,534 3,586 3,651 3,728 3,777 3,792 % Ch -14.8% -2.8% 2.4% 3.1% 1.5% 1.8% 2.1% 1.3% 0.4%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

39 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

MANUFACTURING (continued) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 NONDURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 25,625 25,294 24,484 23,912 23,131 22,927 23,234 23,861 24,599 % Ch 0.4% -1.3% -3.2% -2.3% -3.3% -0.9% 1.3% 2.7% 3.1% National (Thousands) 6,387 6,105 5,773 5,546 5,390 5,271 5,175 5,070 4,941 % Ch -1.6% -4.4% -5.4% -3.9% -2.8% -2.2% -1.8% -2.0% -2.6%

FOOD PROCESSING Idaho 16,660 16,521 16,354 15,900 14,999 14,714 14,700 15,093 15,835 % Ch -0.3% -0.8% -1.0% -2.8% -5.7% -1.9% -0.1% 2.7% 4.9% National (Thousands) 1,553 1,550 1,525 1,517 1,494 1,478 1,479 1,484 1,480 % Ch 0.2% -0.2% -1.6% -0.5% -1.5% -1.1% 0.1% 0.3% -0.2%

PRINTING Idaho 2,339 2,225 2,033 2,030 1,921 1,899 1,907 1,891 1,807 % Ch 4.7% -4.9% -8.6% -0.1% -5.3% -1.2% 0.4% -0.8% -4.4% National (Thousands) 807 768 707 680 663 646 634 622 594 % Ch -1.0% -4.8% -8.0% -3.7% -2.6% -2.5% -1.9% -1.9% -4.5%

CHEMICALS Idaho 2,336 2,324 1,926 1,832 1,878 1,938 2,117 2,267 2,367 % Ch 1.0% -0.5% -17.1% -4.9% 2.6% 3.2% 9.2% 7.1% 4.4% National (Thousands) 980 959 927 906 887 872 866 861 847 % Ch -0.2% -2.2% -3.3% -2.3% -2.1% -1.7% -0.7% -0.6% -1.7%

OTHER NONDURABLES Idaho 4,290 4,224 4,172 4,151 4,332 4,376 4,511 4,609 4,590 % Ch 0.7% -1.5% -1.2% -0.5% 4.4% 1.0% 3.1% 2.2% -0.4% National (Thousands) 3,046 2,827 2,614 2,442 2,346 2,275 2,195 2,104 2,020 % Ch -3.1% -7.2% -7.5% -6.6% -3.9% -3.0% -3.5% -4.2% -4.0%

MINING Idaho 2,347 1,973 1,759 1,785 1,931 2,160 2,372 2,665 2,767 % Ch -5.5% -15.9% -10.9% 1.5% 8.2% 11.8% 9.8% 12.3% 3.8% National (Thousands) 520 532 512 503 523 562 620 663 709 % Ch 0.5% 2.4% -3.8% -1.9% 4.0% 7.5% 10.3% 7.0% 6.9%

CONSTRUCTION Idaho 36,504 37,860 36,468 36,739 39,840 45,128 52,045 52,592 45,008 % Ch 4.2% 3.7% -3.7% 0.7% 8.4% 13.3% 15.3% 1.1% -14.4% National (Thousands) 6,788 6,827 6,715 6,736 6,973 7,333 7,690 7,627 7,162 % Ch 3.7% 0.6% -1.6% 0.3% 3.5% 5.2% 4.9% -0.8% -6.1%

NONGOODS PRODUCING Idaho 446,697 457,807 463,014 470,162 482,608 499,363 516,583 532,901 536,674 % Ch 4.0% 2.5% 1.1% 1.5% 2.6% 3.5% 3.4% 3.2% 0.7% National (Thousands) 107,377 108,207 108,073 108,499 109,853 111,810 113,873 115,706 115,838 % Ch 2.5% 0.8% -0.1% 0.4% 1.2% 1.8% 1.8% 1.6% 0.1%

SERVICES Idaho 238,281 249,577 253,630 260,020 269,015 280,741 292,713 304,461 307,041 % Ch 4.7% 4.7% 1.6% 2.5% 3.5% 4.4% 4.3% 4.0% 0.8% National (Thousands) 65,375 66,073 65,883 66,393 67,514 68,963 70,638 71,955 72,107 % Ch 2.8% 1.1% -0.3% 0.8% 1.7% 2.1% 2.4% 1.9% 0.2%

INFORMATION Idaho 9,859 9,596 9,156 9,181 9,935 11,072 10,592 10,913 11,028 % Ch 6.3% -2.7% -4.6% 0.3% 8.2% 11.4% -4.3% 3.0% 1.1% National (Thousands) 3,630 3,629 3,394 3,189 3,117 3,061 3,038 3,032 2,983 % Ch 6.2% 0.0% -6.5% -6.1% -2.2% -1.8% -0.8% -0.2% -1.6%

FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES Idaho 25,161 25,013 25,824 26,945 27,937 29,653 31,744 32,529 31,658 % Ch -0.6% -0.6% 3.2% 4.3% 3.7% 6.1% 7.1% 2.5% -2.7% National (Thousands) 7,784 7,901 7,956 8,077 8,105 8,197 8,366 8,347 8,204 % Ch 0.4% 1.5% 0.7% 1.5% 0.3% 1.1% 2.1% -0.2% -1.7%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

40 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

MANUFACTURING (continued) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 NONDURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 23,626 23,276 23,339 23,967 25,279 24,810 25,307 25,857 26,223 % Ch -4.0% -1.5% 0.3% 2.7% 5.5% -1.9% 2.0% 2.2% 1.4% National (Thousands) 4,563 4,464 4,453 4,457 4,462 4,487 4,481 4,477 4,486 % Ch -7.6% -2.2% -0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% -0.1% -0.1% 0.2%

FOOD PROCESSING Idaho 15,641 15,441 15,353 15,657 16,384 15,889 16,355 16,807 17,073 % Ch -1.2% -1.3% -0.6% 2.0% 4.6% -3.0% 2.9% 2.8% 1.6% National (Thousands) 1,457 1,451 1,459 1,469 1,472 1,497 1,512 1,531 1,551 % Ch -1.6% -0.4% 0.5% 0.7% 0.3% 1.7% 1.0% 1.2% 1.3%

PRINTING Idaho 1,433 1,283 1,233 1,209 1,209 1,178 1,138 1,130 1,108 % Ch -20.7% -10.5% -3.9% -2.0% 0.0% -2.6% -3.4% -0.7% -2.0% National (Thousands) 522 488 472 462 448 441 428 413 402 % Ch -12.2% -6.5% -3.3% -2.1% -2.9% -1.7% -2.8% -3.7% -2.5%

CHEMICALS Idaho 2,275 2,200 2,376 2,542 2,598 2,601 2,587 2,592 2,613 % Ch -3.9% -3.3% 8.0% 7.0% 2.2% 0.1% -0.5% 0.2% 0.8% National (Thousands) 804 786 783 783 793 800 804 807 812 % Ch -5.1% -2.2% -0.4% 0.0% 1.2% 1.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.6%

OTHER NONDURABLES Idaho 4,276 4,352 4,378 4,560 5,089 5,142 5,227 5,328 5,430 % Ch -6.8% 1.8% 0.6% 4.2% 11.6% 1.1% 1.6% 1.9% 1.9% National (Thousands) 1,781 1,740 1,740 1,743 1,749 1,749 1,736 1,726 1,721 % Ch -11.8% -2.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% -0.7% -0.6% -0.3%

MINING Idaho 2,163 2,295 2,581 2,695 2,585 2,518 2,558 2,622 2,716 % Ch -21.8% 6.1% 12.5% 4.4% -4.1% -2.6% 1.6% 2.5% 3.6% National (Thousands) 643 655 739 797 815 852 874 873 882 % Ch -9.3% 1.8% 12.9% 7.8% 2.3% 4.5% 2.6% -0.1% 1.1%

CONSTRUCTION Idaho 34,399 31,290 30,343 31,404 33,842 35,583 38,064 40,165 41,749 % Ch -23.6% -9.0% -3.0% 3.5% 7.8% 5.1% 7.0% 5.5% 3.9% National (Thousands) 6,017 5,519 5,532 5,645 5,829 6,048 6,533 7,216 7,706 % Ch -16.0% -8.3% 0.2% 2.1% 3.3% 3.7% 8.0% 10.5% 6.8%

NONGOODS PRODUCING Idaho 517,587 515,635 521,713 529,853 541,714 553,274 567,730 583,377 599,303 % Ch -3.6% -0.4% 1.2% 1.6% 2.2% 2.1% 2.6% 2.8% 2.7% National (Thousands) 112,661 112,520 113,803 115,679 117,661 119,374 121,255 123,409 125,436 % Ch -2.7% -0.1% 1.1% 1.6% 1.7% 1.5% 1.6% 1.8% 1.6%

SERVICES Idaho 295,835 296,244 302,672 307,679 316,136 325,777 337,348 349,424 361,163 % Ch -3.6% 0.1% 2.2% 1.7% 2.7% 3.0% 3.6% 3.6% 3.4% National (Thousands) 70,001 70,134 71,498 73,257 74,983 76,402 78,041 79,873 81,483 % Ch -2.9% 0.2% 1.9% 2.5% 2.4% 1.9% 2.1% 2.3% 2.0%

INFORMATION Idaho 10,012 9,627 9,467 9,367 9,363 9,419 9,445 9,639 9,891 % Ch -9.2% -3.8% -1.7% -1.1% 0.0% 0.6% 0.3% 2.1% 2.6% National (Thousands) 2,804 2,708 2,674 2,676 2,685 2,661 2,665 2,726 2,795 % Ch -6.0% -3.4% -1.2% 0.1% 0.3% -0.9% 0.2% 2.3% 2.5%

FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES Idaho 29,620 29,165 29,865 30,323 31,277 31,757 32,276 33,019 33,815 % Ch -6.4% -1.5% 2.4% 1.5% 3.1% 1.5% 1.6% 2.3% 2.4% National (Thousands) 7,838 7,696 7,697 7,783 7,879 7,946 8,009 8,020 7,985 % Ch -4.5% -1.8% 0.0% 1.1% 1.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.1% -0.4%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

41 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

SERVICES (Continued) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 TRANS., WAREHOUSING, UTILITIES Idaho 19,410 19,157 18,677 18,764 18,947 19,294 20,242 21,031 21,722 % Ch 2.1% -1.3% -2.5% 0.5% 1.0% 1.8% 4.9% 3.9% 3.3% National (Thousands) 5,013 4,973 4,820 4,761 4,814 4,917 5,017 5,095 5,067 % Ch 2.2% -0.8% -3.1% -1.2% 1.1% 2.1% 2.0% 1.5% -0.6%

PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS Idaho 60,626 67,654 69,017 70,004 73,138 76,899 81,346 83,191 80,541 % Ch 10.6% 11.6% 2.0% 1.4% 4.5% 5.1% 5.8% 2.3% -3.2% National (Thousands) 16,672 16,480 15,975 15,985 16,388 16,952 17,572 17,947 17,741 % Ch 4.5% -1.1% -3.1% 0.1% 2.5% 3.4% 3.7% 2.1% -1.2%

EDUCATION & HEALTH Idaho 53,017 56,956 59,809 62,552 65,220 67,996 70,119 74,072 77,737 % Ch 4.8% 7.4% 5.0% 4.6% 4.3% 4.3% 3.1% 5.6% 4.9% National (Thousands) 15,249 15,800 16,380 16,806 17,188 17,629 18,098 18,613 19,157 % Ch 2.1% 3.6% 3.7% 2.6% 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8% 2.9%

LEISURE & HOSPITALITY Idaho 52,565 53,058 53,281 54,405 55,566 57,347 59,651 63,257 63,200 % Ch 2.1% 0.9% 0.4% 2.1% 2.1% 3.2% 4.0% 6.0% -0.1% National (Thousands) 11,860 12,032 11,986 12,175 12,492 12,813 13,109 13,428 13,441 % Ch 2.7% 1.5% -0.4% 1.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.3% 2.4% 0.1%

OTHER SERVICES Idaho 17,643 18,143 17,867 18,168 18,272 18,479 19,021 19,469 21,155 % Ch 2.9% 2.8% -1.5% 1.7% 0.6% 1.1% 2.9% 2.4% 8.7% National (Thousands) 5,168 5,258 5,372 5,401 5,409 5,395 5,438 5,493 5,515 % Ch 1.6% 1.7% 2.2% 0.5% 0.2% -0.3% 0.8% 1.0% 0.4%

TRADE Idaho 100,169 98,088 97,343 97,120 99,131 103,675 107,465 111,651 110,452 % Ch 3.6% -2.1% -0.8% -0.2% 2.1% 4.6% 3.7% 3.9% -1.1% National (Thousands) 21,212 21,013 20,681 20,525 20,722 21,043 21,260 21,532 21,228 % Ch 1.7% -0.9% -1.6% -0.8% 1.0% 1.5% 1.0% 1.3% -1.4%

RETAIL TRADE Idaho 74,456 72,622 72,397 72,625 73,725 76,801 80,514 83,552 82,613 % Ch 4.3% -2.5% -0.3% 0.3% 1.5% 4.2% 4.8% 3.8% -1.1% National (Thousands) 15,279 15,240 15,027 14,917 15,060 15,281 15,356 15,516 15,285 % Ch 2.1% -0.3% -1.4% -0.7% 1.0% 1.5% 0.5% 1.0% -1.5%

WHOLESALE TRADE Idaho 25,713 25,466 24,946 24,496 25,406 26,875 26,951 28,099 27,839 % Ch 1.6% -1.0% -2.0% -1.8% 3.7% 5.8% 0.3% 4.3% -0.9% National (Thousands) 5,933 5,773 5,653 5,608 5,661 5,762 5,904 6,016 5,943 % Ch 0.7% -2.7% -2.1% -0.8% 0.9% 1.8% 2.5% 1.9% -1.2%

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 94,745 96,862 98,488 99,397 101,147 101,864 103,526 103,970 105,980 % Ch 2.7% 2.2% 1.7% 0.9% 1.8% 0.7% 1.6% 0.4% 1.9% National (Thousands) 17,139 17,542 17,925 18,357 18,744 18,820 18,887 19,073 19,742 % Ch 1.7% 2.4% 2.2% 2.4% 2.1% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 1.3%

EDUCATION Idaho 47,989 49,024 49,656 49,909 50,815 51,304 52,648 53,015 53,604 % Ch 2.7% 2.2% 1.3% 0.5% 1.8% 1.0% 2.6% 0.7% 1.1%

NONEDUCATION Idaho 46,756 47,838 48,832 49,488 50,332 50,560 50,878 50,954 52,376 % Ch 2.7% 2.3% 2.1% 1.3% 1.7% 0.5% 0.6% 0.1% 2.8%

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 13,502 13,281 13,552 13,625 13,316 13,084 12,879 12,819 13,200 % Ch 5.2% -1.6% 2.0% 0.5% -2.3% -1.7% -1.6% -0.5% 3.0% National (Thousands) 2,865 2,763 2,766 2,760 2,731 2,732 2,733 2,735 2,761 % Ch 3.4% -3.6% 0.1% -0.2% -1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.9%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

42 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

SERVICES (Continued) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TRANS., WAREHOUSING, UTILITIES Idaho 20,689 20,687 21,181 21,506 21,571 21,894 22,527 23,115 23,724 % Ch -4.8% 0.0% 2.4% 1.5% 0.3% 1.5% 2.9% 2.6% 2.6% National (Thousands) 4,797 4,745 4,856 4,968 5,044 5,143 5,279 5,462 5,645 % Ch -5.3% -1.1% 2.3% 2.3% 1.5% 2.0% 2.7% 3.5% 3.3%

PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS Idaho 74,676 73,949 75,152 75,451 77,578 81,102 85,839 90,451 94,557 % Ch -7.3% -1.0% 1.6% 0.4% 2.8% 4.5% 5.8% 5.4% 4.5% National (Thousands) 16,574 16,723 17,330 17,933 18,566 19,299 20,217 21,080 21,738 % Ch -6.6% 0.9% 3.6% 3.5% 3.5% 3.9% 4.8% 4.3% 3.1%

EDUCATION & HEALTH Idaho 81,002 83,828 86,545 88,351 91,062 94,269 97,715 101,297 105,057 % Ch 4.2% 3.5% 3.2% 2.1% 3.1% 3.5% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7% National (Thousands) 19,548 19,888 20,231 20,696 21,100 21,343 21,710 22,316 22,818 % Ch 2.0% 1.7% 1.7% 2.3% 2.0% 1.1% 1.7% 2.8% 2.3%

LEISURE & HOSPITALITY Idaho 58,663 57,942 59,287 61,161 63,217 64,795 66,622 68,336 69,880 % Ch -7.2% -1.2% 2.3% 3.2% 3.4% 2.5% 2.8% 2.6% 2.3% National (Thousands) 13,074 13,043 13,351 13,772 14,245 14,536 14,741 14,868 15,070 % Ch -2.7% -0.2% 2.4% 3.2% 3.4% 2.0% 1.4% 0.9% 1.4%

OTHER SERVICES Idaho 21,174 21,047 21,177 21,520 22,068 22,540 22,926 23,568 24,239 % Ch 0.1% -0.6% 0.6% 1.6% 2.5% 2.1% 1.7% 2.8% 2.8% National (Thousands) 5,366 5,331 5,361 5,430 5,465 5,476 5,419 5,402 5,431 % Ch -2.7% -0.7% 0.6% 1.3% 0.6% 0.2% -1.0% -0.3% 0.5%

TRADE Idaho 102,267 100,831 101,876 104,932 107,731 110,586 113,642 117,188 120,818 % Ch -7.4% -1.4% 1.0% 3.0% 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 3.1% 3.1% National (Thousands) 20,108 19,896 20,212 20,503 20,820 21,156 21,329 21,503 21,700 % Ch -5.3% -1.1% 1.6% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9%

RETAIL TRADE Idaho 76,281 74,832 75,193 77,116 79,007 81,266 83,601 86,325 89,117 % Ch -7.7% -1.9% 0.5% 2.6% 2.5% 2.9% 2.9% 3.3% 3.2% National (Thousands) 14,522 14,444 14,669 14,836 15,072 15,281 15,343 15,374 15,425 % Ch -5.0% -0.5% 1.6% 1.1% 1.6% 1.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.3%

WHOLESALE TRADE Idaho 25,986 25,999 26,682 27,816 28,723 29,320 30,041 30,863 31,702 % Ch -6.7% 0.0% 2.6% 4.2% 3.3% 2.1% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% National (Thousands) 5,586 5,452 5,543 5,667 5,748 5,875 5,986 6,129 6,275 % Ch -6.0% -2.4% 1.7% 2.2% 1.4% 2.2% 1.9% 2.4% 2.4%

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 105,988 104,868 104,507 104,597 105,496 104,652 104,466 104,517 105,102 % Ch 0.0% -1.1% -0.3% 0.1% 0.9% -0.8% -0.2% 0.0% 0.6% National (Thousands) 19,722 19,514 19,233 19,096 19,093 19,111 19,206 19,396 19,646 % Ch -0.1% -1.1% -1.4% -0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 1.0% 1.3%

EDUCATION Idaho 54,613 53,918 53,999 53,962 54,502 54,186 54,582 54,927 55,434 % Ch 1.9% -1.3% 0.1% -0.1% 1.0% -0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.9%

NONEDUCATION Idaho 51,375 50,949 50,508 50,635 50,995 50,466 49,883 49,590 49,667 % Ch -1.9% -0.8% -0.9% 0.3% 0.7% -1.0% -1.2% -0.6% 0.2%

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 13,496 13,693 12,657 12,645 12,351 12,260 12,274 12,247 12,221 % Ch 2.2% 1.5% -7.6% -0.1% -2.3% -0.7% 0.1% -0.2% -0.2% National (Thousands) 2,831 2,976 2,860 2,822 2,766 2,706 2,680 2,636 2,608 % Ch 2.5% 5.2% -3.9% -1.3% -2.0% -2.2% -1.0% -1.6% -1.1%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

43 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

MISCELLANEOUS

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

SELECTED CHAIN-WEIGHTED DEFL.

Gross Domestic Product 81.894 83.767 85.055 86.754 89.130 91.989 94.817 97.338 99.208 % Ch 2.3% 2.3% 1.5% 2.0% 2.7% 3.2% 3.1% 2.7% 1.9%

Consumption Expenditures 83.128 84.732 85.872 87.573 89.703 92.260 94.729 97.099 100.063 % Ch 2.5% 1.9% 1.3% 2.0% 2.4% 2.9% 2.7% 2.5% 3.1%

Durable Goods 120.339 117.982 115.035 110.885 108.752 107.669 105.916 103.764 101.758 % Ch -1.8% -2.0% -2.5% -3.6% -1.9% -1.0% -1.6% -2.0% -1.9%

Nondurable Goods 82.651 83.529 83.538 85.264 88.214 91.592 94.438 97.214 102.653 % Ch 4.3% 1.1% 0.0% 2.1% 3.5% 3.8% 3.1% 2.9% 5.6%

Services 77.497 79.872 81.964 84.531 87.056 89.930 92.974 95.977 98.943 % Ch 2.8% 3.1% 2.6% 3.1% 3.0% 3.3% 3.4% 3.2% 3.1%

Consumer Price Index (1982-84=1.000) 1.722 1.770 1.799 1.840 1.889 1.953 2.016 2.073 2.153 % Ch 3.4% 2.8% 1.6% 2.3% 2.7% 3.4% 3.2% 2.9% 3.8%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES

Federal Funds 6.2% 3.9% 1.7% 1.1% 1.3% 3.2% 5.0% 5.0% 1.9%

NY Fed Discount 5.7% 3.4% 1.2% 2.1% 2.3% 4.2% 6.0% 5.9% 2.4%

Prime 9.2% 6.9% 4.7% 4.1% 4.3% 6.2% 8.0% 8.1% 5.1%

Existing Home Mortgage 8.0% 7.0% 6.5% 5.7% 5.7% 5.9% 6.6% 6.5% 6.2%

U.S. Govt. 3-Month Bills 5.8% 3.4% 1.6% 1.0% 1.4% 3.1% 4.7% 4.4% 1.4%

U.S. Govt. 6-Month Bills 5.9% 3.3% 1.7% 1.1% 1.6% 3.4% 4.8% 4.4% 1.6%

U.S. Govt. 5-Year Notes 6.2% 4.6% 3.8% 3.0% 3.4% 4.0% 4.7% 4.4% 2.8%

U.S. Govt. 10-Year Notes 6.0% 5.0% 4.6% 4.0% 4.3% 4.3% 4.8% 4.6% 3.7%

EXCHANGE RATES (2009=1.000)

Major Currency Trading Partners 1.295 1.365 1.360 1.192 1.097 1.073 1.047 0.980 0.928 % Ch 3.7% 5.4% -0.3% -12.4% -8.0% -2.2% -2.4% -6.4% -5.3%

Other Important Trading Partners 1.284 1.305 1.339 1.318 1.258 1.182 1.122 1.038 0.940 % Ch -3.2% 1.7% 2.6% -1.6% -4.5% -6.0% -5.1% -7.5% -9.5%

SELECTED US PRODUCTION INDICES

Wood Products 99.3 93.1 96.6 96.6 99.2 105.9 106.9 100.0 85.4 % Ch -1.3% -6.3% 3.8% 0.0% 2.7% 6.8% 0.9% -6.4% -14.6%

Computers & Electronic Products 53.6 54.4 53.0 60.3 68.3 77.0 87.4 100.0 108.1 % Ch 30.8% 1.4% -2.6% 13.8% 13.3% 12.7% 13.5% 14.4% 8.1%

Food 92.7 92.8 95.0 95.6 95.6 98.6 99.5 100.0 98.8 % Ch 1.7% 0.0% 2.4% 0.7% 0.0% 3.1% 0.9% 0.5% -1.2%

Agricultural Chemicals 96.9 89.2 92.1 96.3 100.4 104.2 108.6 100.0 86.5 % Ch -5.4% -7.9% 3.2% 4.5% 4.3% 3.8% 4.3% -7.9% -13.5%

Metal Ore Mining 117.3 106.3 97.4 92.9 94.9 100.5 102.5 100.0 103.0 % Ch -0.6% -9.3% -8.4% -4.6% 2.2% 5.9% 2.1% -2.5% 3.0%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

44 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST ANNUAL DETAIL APRIL 2014

MISCELLANEOUS

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

SELECTED CHAIN-WEIGHTED DEFL.

Gross Domestic Product 100.000 101.215 103.203 105.008 106.486 108.520 110.472 112.207 114.064 % Ch 0.8% 1.2% 2.0% 1.7% 1.4% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7%

Consumption Expenditures 100.000 101.654 104.086 106.009 107.211 108.657 110.169 111.777 113.632 % Ch -0.1% 1.7% 2.4% 1.8% 1.1% 1.3% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7%

Durable Goods 100.000 98.622 97.650 96.468 94.725 92.676 91.502 90.601 89.684 % Ch -1.7% -1.4% -1.0% -1.2% -1.8% -2.2% -1.3% -1.0% -1.0%

Nondurable Goods 100.000 103.085 109.128 111.765 111.994 112.449 112.533 113.745 115.508 % Ch -2.6% 3.1% 5.9% 2.4% 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 1.1% 1.6%

Services 100.000 101.663 103.463 105.689 107.751 110.188 112.692 114.930 117.379 % Ch 1.1% 1.7% 1.8% 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.0% 2.1%

Consumer Price Index (1982-84=100) 2.146 2.181 2.249 2.296 2.330 2.372 2.410 2.446 2.492 % Ch -0.3% 1.6% 3.1% 2.1% 1.5% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1.9%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES

Federal Funds 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 2.2% 3.8%

NY Fed Discount 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% 3.0% 4.8%

Prime 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 5.2% 6.8%

Existing Home Mortgage 5.1% 4.9% 4.7% 3.8% 4.0% 4.8% 5.3% 6.1% 6.9%

U.S. Govt. 3-Month Bills 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 2.2% 3.6%

U.S. Govt. 6-Month Bills 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 2.4% 3.8%

U.S. Govt. 5-Year Notes 2.2% 1.9% 1.5% 0.8% 1.2% 1.7% 1.9% 3.2% 4.3%

U.S. Govt. 10-Year Notes 3.3% 3.2% 2.8% 1.8% 2.4% 2.9% 3.3% 3.9% 4.5%

EXCHANGE RATES (2009=1.000)

Major Currency Trading Partners 1.000 0.996 0.918 0.953 0.997 1.026 1.032 1.020 1.017 % Ch 7.8% -0.4% -7.8% 3.8% 4.7% 2.9% 0.6% -1.1% -0.3%

Other Important Trading Partners 1.000 0.948 0.870 0.864 0.856 0.865 0.838 0.807 0.782 % Ch 6.4% -5.2% -8.3% -0.6% -0.9% 1.0% -3.2% -3.7% -3.1%

SELECTED US PRODUCTION INDICES

Wood Products 65.3 67.6 68.4 71.6 78.1 82.2 93.0 99.9 101.3 % Ch -23.6% 3.6% 1.2% 4.7% 9.0% 5.4% 13.1% 7.5% 1.4%

Computers & Electronic Products 97.0 111.3 122.0 135.0 144.6 155.0 169.3 184.2 198.5 % Ch -10.3% 14.8% 9.6% 10.6% 7.1% 7.2% 9.3% 8.8% 7.8%

Food 98.2 98.6 98.5 102.8 104.4 106.6 109.1 111.7 114.4 % Ch -0.6% 0.4% -0.1% 4.4% 1.6% 2.1% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4%

Agricultural Chemicals 91.0 94.9 89.3 91.9 99.1 101.7 104.1 110.5 123.2 % Ch 5.2% 4.3% -6.0% 3.0% 7.8% 2.6% 2.3% 6.2% 11.4%

Metal Ore Mining 90.4 96.4 98.4 98.9 99.2 98.8 100.8 103.2 103.8 % Ch -12.2% 6.6% 2.1% 0.5% 0.3% -0.3% 2.0% 2.3% 0.6%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

45 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

DEMOGRAPHICS

2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

POPULATION Idaho (Thousands) 1,579.1 1,581.8 1,584.6 1,587.8 1,591.2 1,594.1 1,597.0 1,600.5 1,604.1 1,609.2 1,615.0 1,621.5 % Ch 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 1.3% 1.5% 1.6% National (Millions) 311.439 312.009 312.649 313.198 313.698 314.268 314.875 315.483 316.092 316.702 317.313 317.926 % Ch 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

BIRTHS Idaho (Thousands) 22.900 22.600 22.300 22.100 22.355 22.754 23.180 23.623 23.804 23.946 24.060 24.197 % Ch -6.7% -5.1% -5.2% -3.5% 4.7% 7.3% 7.7% 7.9% 3.1% 2.4% 1.9% 2.3% National (Thousands) 4,427 4,434 4,442 4,449 4,454 4,461 4,467 4,474 4,480 4,486 4,492 4,497 % Ch 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%

DEATHS Idaho (Thousands) 11.600 11.700 12.000 12.300 12.116 12.087 12.108 12.133 12.265 12.301 12.342 12.386 % Ch 4.5% 3.5% 10.7% 10.4% -5.9% -1.0% 0.7% 0.8% 4.4% 1.2% 1.3% 1.5% National (Thousands) 2,581 2,586 2,592 2,597 2,603 2,608 2,614 2,620 2,626 2,631 2,637 2,643 % Ch 0.5% 0.8% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9%

NET MIGRATION Idaho (Thousands) 0.514 -0.587 0.034 1.405 1.804 1.596 1.412 1.219 1.382 3.515 6.259 9.196

HOUSING HOUSING STARTS Idaho 4,017 4,101 4,899 5,262 6,216 7,137 7,543 7,715 8,318 8,799 8,810 10,569 % Ch -48.3% 8.7% 103.6% 33.1% 94.7% 73.9% 24.8% 9.4% 35.1% 25.3% 0.5% 107.1% National (Millions) 0.582 0.574 0.619 0.672 0.714 0.741 0.781 0.896 0.957 0.869 0.882 1.008 % Ch 32.9% -5.4% 35.2% 38.3% 27.9% 15.6% 23.8% 73.2% 30.1% -32.2% 6.4% 70.3%

SINGLE UNITS Idaho 3,563 3,591 4,062 4,639 5,425 5,753 6,372 6,612 7,280 7,788 7,792 8,169 % Ch -22.5% 3.2% 63.7% 70.1% 87.0% 26.5% 50.5% 15.9% 47.0% 31.0% 0.2% 20.8% National (Millions) 0.417 0.421 0.424 0.475 0.486 0.517 0.547 0.597 0.630 0.598 0.596 0.661 % Ch -19.3% 4.6% 2.6% 58.0% 9.3% 27.7% 25.3% 42.2% 23.8% -18.5% -1.8% 51.3%

MULTIPLE UNITS Idaho 454 510 837 623 790 1,384 1,171 1,103 1,038 1,012 1,018 2,400 % Ch -94.5% 60.2% 623.5% -69.4% 159.5% 840.4% -48.8% -21.2% -21.6% -9.8% 2.7% 2983.6% National (Millions) 0.166 0.153 0.195 0.196 0.228 0.224 0.235 0.299 0.328 0.270 0.287 0.347 % Ch 578.0% -27.3% 165.7% 2.1% 82.9% -7.4% 20.5% 164.7% 43.6% -53.7% 26.4% 115.5%

HOUSING STOCK Idaho (Thousands) 548.1 548.7 549.5 550.4 551.6 552.9 554.4 555.9 557.6 559.4 561.2 563.4 % Ch 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.6%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

46 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

DEMOGRAPHICS

2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

POPULATION Idaho (Thousands) 1,627.0 1,632.6 1,638.5 1,644.4 1,650.4 1,656.5 1,662.8 1,669.1 1,675.6 1,682.1 1,688.7 1,695.3 % Ch 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% 1.6% National (Millions) 318.540 319.156 319.772 320.389 321.007 321.626 322.246 322.867 323.489 324.112 324.736 325.360 % Ch 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

BIRTHS Idaho (Thousands) 24.300 24.406 24.522 24.641 24.761 24.885 25.013 25.143 25.279 25.417 25.558 25.697 % Ch 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% National (Thousands) 4,501 4,505 4,510 4,515 4,520 4,524 4,529 4,533 4,536 4,540 4,544 4,548 % Ch 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4%

DEATHS Idaho (Thousands) 12.424 12.463 12.504 12.545 12.587 12.629 12.672 12.715 12.760 12.805 12.850 12.896 % Ch 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% 1.4% National (Thousands) 2,649 2,655 2,661 2,668 2,675 2,682 2,688 2,694 2,699 2,706 2,712 2,719 % Ch 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0%

NET MIGRATION Idaho (Thousands) 11.067 11.425 11.421 10.760 11.219 11.697 11.971 12.235 12.619 12.969 13.259 13.469

HOUSING HOUSING STARTS Idaho 10,017 10,432 11,334 11,955 12,624 13,162 13,593 13,794 14,106 14,508 15,115 15,754 % Ch -19.3% 17.6% 39.4% 23.8% 24.3% 18.2% 13.8% 6.0% 9.4% 11.9% 17.8% 18.0% National (Millions) 0.925 1.003 1.079 1.175 1.235 1.354 1.460 1.508 1.546 1.568 1.600 1.614 % Ch -29.1% 38.1% 33.9% 40.9% 21.9% 44.3% 35.3% 13.9% 10.3% 5.9% 8.5% 3.6%

SINGLE UNITS Idaho 8,587 9,153 9,895 10,459 11,100 11,583 12,016 12,297 12,549 12,950 13,400 13,922 % Ch 22.1% 29.1% 36.6% 24.8% 26.9% 18.6% 15.8% 9.7% 8.4% 13.4% 14.6% 16.5% National (Millions) 0.595 0.672 0.741 0.797 0.846 0.939 1.020 1.052 1.083 1.111 1.144 1.159 % Ch -34.3% 63.2% 47.5% 34.2% 26.6% 51.7% 39.5% 13.2% 12.2% 11.0% 12.4% 5.0%

MULTIPLE UNITS Idaho 1,430 1,278 1,439 1,496 1,524 1,579 1,578 1,497 1,557 1,559 1,715 1,832 % Ch -87.4% -36.1% 60.5% 16.9% 7.6% 15.2% -0.3% -19.0% 17.3% 0.3% 46.6% 30.1% National (Millions) 0.330 0.330 0.338 0.378 0.389 0.415 0.440 0.456 0.463 0.456 0.456 0.456 % Ch -18.3% 0.2% 9.2% 56.4% 12.6% 29.3% 26.1% 15.6% 6.1% -5.5% -0.6% 0.1%

HOUSING STOCK Idaho (Thousands) 565.5 567.6 570.1 572.6 575.3 578.2 581.2 584.2 587.3 590.4 593.8 597.3 % Ch 1.5% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.2% 2.3% 2.4%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

47 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

OUTPUT, INCOME, & WAGES

2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 U.S. GROSS DOM. PRODUCT (Billions) Current Dollars 15,243 15,462 15,612 15,819 16,042 16,160 16,356 16,420 16,535 16,661 16,913 17,090 % Ch 0.3% 5.9% 3.9% 5.4% 5.8% 3.0% 4.9% 1.6% 2.8% 3.1% 6.2% 4.2% 2009 Chain-Weighted 14,894 15,011 15,062 15,242 15,382 15,428 15,534 15,540 15,584 15,680 15,839 15,942 % Ch -1.3% 3.2% 1.4% 4.9% 3.7% 1.2% 2.8% 0.1% 1.1% 2.5% 4.1% 2.6%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 52,423 52,715 53,423 53,254 54,254 54,791 54,769 56,275 56,062 56,996 57,588 57,516 % Ch 8.1% 2.2% 5.5% -1.3% 7.7% 4.0% -0.2% 11.5% -1.5% 6.8% 4.2% -0.5% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 50,206 50,527 51,112 50,929 51,916 52,461 52,390 53,891 53,501 54,506 55,038 55,154 % Ch 4.1% 2.6% 4.7% -1.4% 8.0% 4.3% -0.5% 12.0% -2.9% 7.7% 4.0% 0.8% National (Billions) 13,030 13,149 13,284 13,303 13,549 13,652 13,702 14,073 13,926 14,086 14,225 14,304 % Ch 11.9% 3.7% 4.2% 0.6% 7.6% 3.1% 1.5% 11.3% -4.1% 4.7% 4.0% 2.2%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 50,898 50,718 51,108 50,776 51,440 51,811 51,575 52,779 52,439 53,329 53,627 53,418 % Ch 4.9% -1.4% 3.1% -2.6% 5.3% 2.9% -1.8% 9.7% -2.6% 7.0% 2.3% -1.5% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 48,746 48,613 48,897 48,559 49,223 49,609 49,335 50,544 50,043 50,998 51,252 51,225 % Ch 1.1% -1.1% 2.4% -2.7% 5.6% 3.2% -2.2% 10.2% -3.9% 7.9% 2.0% -0.2% National (Billions) 12,651 12,650 12,708 12,684 12,846 12,910 12,903 13,199 13,026 13,180 13,247 13,285 % Ch 8.6% 0.0% 1.8% -0.7% 5.2% 2.0% -0.2% 9.5% -5.1% 4.8% 2.1% 1.2%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - CURR $ Idaho 33,198 33,326 33,714 33,539 34,097 34,372 34,294 35,160 34,949 35,419 35,658 35,470 % Ch 7.4% 1.6% 4.7% -2.1% 6.8% 3.3% -0.9% 10.5% -2.4% 5.5% 2.7% -2.1% National 41,838 42,141 42,487 42,475 43,190 43,440 43,514 44,608 44,056 44,478 44,830 44,991 % Ch 11.1% 2.9% 3.3% -0.1% 6.9% 2.3% 0.7% 10.4% -4.9% 3.9% 3.2% 1.4%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - 2009 $ Idaho 32,232 32,064 32,254 31,978 32,328 32,503 32,294 32,976 32,691 33,140 33,205 32,943 % Ch 4.3% -2.1% 2.4% -3.4% 4.5% 2.2% -2.5% 8.7% -3.4% 5.6% 0.8% -3.1% National 40,621 40,545 40,646 40,499 40,950 41,078 40,977 41,838 41,209 41,615 41,747 41,786 % Ch 7.9% -0.7% 1.0% -1.4% 4.5% 1.3% -1.0% 8.7% -5.9% 4.0% 1.3% 0.4%

AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGE Idaho 37,125 37,237 37,290 37,052 37,359 37,481 37,480 37,744 37,595 38,084 38,417 38,454 % Ch 1.5% 1.2% 0.6% -2.5% 3.4% 1.3% 0.0% 2.9% -1.6% 5.3% 3.5% 0.4% National 50,212 50,290 50,705 50,197 51,283 51,350 51,426 52,550 51,961 52,303 52,427 52,692 % Ch 5.1% 0.6% 3.3% -4.0% 8.9% 0.5% 0.6% 9.0% -4.4% 2.7% 1.0% 2.0%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

48 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

OUTPUT, INCOME, & WAGES

2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 U.S. GROSS DOM. PRODUCT (Billions) Current Dollars 17,194 17,405 17,625 17,818 18,024 18,230 18,466 18,689 18,920 19,145 19,382 19,633 % Ch 2.5% 5.0% 5.1% 4.5% 4.7% 4.7% 5.3% 4.9% 5.0% 4.8% 5.1% 5.3% 2009 Chain-Weighted 15,977 16,084 16,188 16,292 16,407 16,535 16,680 16,826 16,957 17,097 17,244 17,394 % Ch 0.9% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% 2.9% 3.1% 3.6% 3.5% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.5%

PERSONAL INCOME - CURR $ Idaho (Millions) 57,951 58,479 59,130 59,736 60,579 61,281 62,099 62,951 63,851 64,631 65,444 66,320 % Ch 3.1% 3.7% 4.5% 4.2% 5.8% 4.7% 5.4% 5.6% 5.8% 5.0% 5.1% 5.5% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 55,866 56,431 57,127 57,768 58,694 59,398 60,198 61,022 61,988 62,787 63,587 64,476 % Ch 5.3% 4.1% 5.0% 4.6% 6.6% 4.9% 5.5% 5.6% 6.5% 5.3% 5.2% 5.7% National (Billions) 14,399 14,558 14,740 14,900 15,130 15,311 15,490 15,679 15,930 16,130 16,334 16,554 % Ch 2.7% 4.5% 5.1% 4.4% 6.3% 4.9% 4.8% 5.0% 6.5% 5.1% 5.1% 5.5%

PERSONAL INCOME - 2009 $ Idaho (Millions) 53,652 53,971 54,290 54,630 55,243 55,747 56,267 56,853 57,436 57,940 58,453 58,988 % Ch 1.8% 2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 4.6% 3.7% 3.8% 4.2% 4.2% 3.6% 3.6% 3.7% Idaho Nonfarm (Millions) 51,722 52,081 52,450 52,831 53,524 54,034 54,544 55,112 55,760 56,286 56,795 57,348 % Ch 3.9% 2.8% 2.9% 2.9% 5.4% 3.9% 3.8% 4.2% 4.8% 3.8% 3.7% 4.0% National (Billions) 13,331 13,436 13,534 13,627 13,797 13,928 14,035 14,161 14,329 14,460 14,589 14,724 % Ch 1.4% 3.2% 2.9% 2.8% 5.1% 3.9% 3.1% 3.6% 4.9% 3.7% 3.6% 3.8%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - CURR $ Idaho 35,618 35,820 36,089 36,327 36,705 36,993 37,346 37,716 38,107 38,422 38,753 39,119 % Ch 1.7% 2.3% 3.0% 2.7% 4.2% 3.2% 3.9% 4.0% 4.2% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% National 45,204 45,615 46,096 46,507 47,133 47,605 48,069 48,562 49,243 49,767 50,299 50,880 % Ch 1.9% 3.7% 4.3% 3.6% 5.5% 4.1% 4.0% 4.2% 5.7% 4.3% 4.3% 4.7%

PER CAPITA PERS INC - 2009 $ Idaho 32,975 33,059 33,134 33,222 33,472 33,653 33,839 34,063 34,279 34,444 34,613 34,794 % Ch 0.4% 1.0% 0.9% 1.1% 3.0% 2.2% 2.2% 2.7% 2.6% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% National 41,851 42,098 42,323 42,532 42,981 43,306 43,555 43,859 44,296 44,615 44,926 45,255 % Ch 0.6% 2.4% 2.1% 2.0% 4.3% 3.1% 2.3% 2.8% 4.0% 2.9% 2.8% 3.0%

AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGE Idaho 38,733 38,917 39,141 39,415 39,706 39,967 40,365 40,747 40,944 41,208 41,489 41,797 % Ch 2.9% 1.9% 2.3% 2.8% 3.0% 2.7% 4.0% 3.8% 1.9% 2.6% 2.8% 3.0% National 52,833 53,221 53,666 54,083 54,511 54,943 55,386 55,823 56,279 56,680 57,099 57,532 % Ch 1.1% 3.0% 3.4% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.2% 3.3% 2.9% 3.0% 3.1%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

49 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

PERSONAL INCOME -- CURR $$

2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

WAGE AND SALARY PAYMENTS Idaho (Millions) 23,366 23,524 23,708 23,659 23,882 24,023 24,159 24,528 24,692 25,179 25,406 25,547 % Ch 2.1% 2.7% 3.2% -0.8% 3.8% 2.4% 2.3% 6.3% 2.7% 8.1% 3.7% 2.2% National (Billions) 6,578 6,621 6,698 6,658 6,842 6,874 6,905 7,087 7,040 7,118 7,163 7,232 % Ch 6.3% 2.7% 4.7% -2.4% 11.5% 1.8% 1.8% 11.0% -2.6% 4.5% 2.6% 3.9%

FARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 1,657 1,632 1,757 1,770 1,835 1,825 1,872 1,876 2,049 1,974 2,029 1,836 % Ch 297.7% -5.9% 34.3% 3.0% 15.4% -2.2% 10.8% 0.9% 42.2% -13.8% 11.6% -32.9% National (Billions) 72 68 74 77 75 77 75 75 137 129 132 113 % Ch 229.9% -21.5% 45.2% 16.0% -11.4% 13.5% -8.5% -4.2% 1043.6% -21.4% 8.6% -46.0%

NONFARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 4,496 4,545 4,619 4,651 4,783 4,826 4,828 4,951 5,088 5,184 5,237 5,309 % Ch -6.0% 4.4% 6.7% 2.8% 11.8% 3.7% 0.1% 10.6% 11.5% 7.8% 4.1% 5.7% National (Billions) 1,045 1,073 1,101 1,111 1,140 1,141 1,145 1,173 1,198 1,213 1,229 1,246 % Ch 16.4% 11.3% 10.9% 3.6% 10.7% 0.4% 1.4% 10.3% 8.7% 5.1% 5.6% 5.5%

DIVIDENDS, RENT & INTEREST Idaho (Millions) 9,710 9,896 10,019 10,152 10,241 10,429 10,454 11,145 10,618 10,948 11,158 11,179 % Ch 17.5% 7.9% 5.1% 5.4% 3.5% 7.6% 0.9% 29.2% -17.6% 13.0% 7.9% 0.7% National (Billions) 2,309 2,359 2,389 2,419 2,434 2,473 2,474 2,618 2,511 2,582 2,627 2,633 % Ch 18.7% 8.9% 5.2% 5.0% 2.5% 6.6% 0.1% 25.5% -15.4% 11.8% 7.3% 0.9%

OTHER LABOR INCOME Idaho (Millions) 6,140 6,101 6,087 6,090 6,138 6,173 6,245 6,269 6,354 6,420 6,494 6,525 % Ch -3.7% -2.5% -0.9% 0.2% 3.2% 2.3% 4.8% 1.5% 5.5% 4.2% 4.7% 1.9% National (Billions) 1,138 1,142 1,147 1,154 1,162 1,169 1,174 1,177 1,182 1,188 1,193 1,200 % Ch 1.1% 1.3% 1.9% 2.5% 2.7% 2.4% 1.7% 0.9% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8% 2.3%

GOVT. TRANSFERS TO INDIV. Idaho (Millions) 10,067 10,008 10,211 9,883 10,290 10,451 10,159 10,484 10,802 10,911 10,909 10,778 % Ch -11.3% -2.3% 8.3% -12.2% 17.5% 6.4% -10.7% 13.4% 12.7% 4.1% -0.1% -4.7% National (Billions) 2,310 2,309 2,301 2,309 2,329 2,352 2,364 2,388 2,426 2,431 2,458 2,462 % Ch 0.8% -0.1% -1.5% 1.4% 3.5% 4.1% 2.1% 4.1% 6.5% 0.8% 4.5% 0.7%

CONTRIB. FOR SOCIAL INSUR. Idaho (Millions) 3,934 3,916 3,916 3,902 3,945 3,973 3,994 4,046 4,594 4,683 4,721 4,742 % Ch -31.4% -1.8% 0.0% -1.4% 4.5% 2.8% 2.2% 5.3% 66.2% 8.0% 3.3% 1.8% National (Billions) 913 916 925 919 943 945 947 968 1,094 1,103 1,109 1,119 % Ch -28.4% 1.7% 3.7% -2.4% 10.6% 1.1% 1.0% 8.9% 63.0% 3.6% 2.1% 3.5%

RESIDENCE ADJUSTMENT Idaho (Millions) 921 924 938 950 1,031 1,037 1,046 1,067 1,053 1,063 1,076 1,084 % Ch 34.6% 1.5% 6.2% 5.3% 38.5% 2.5% 3.3% 8.5% -5.3% 3.8% 5.0% 2.9%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

50 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

PERSONAL INCOME -- CURR $$

2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

WAGE AND SALARY PAYMENTS Idaho (Millions) 25,880 26,159 26,488 26,837 27,236 27,619 28,094 28,566 28,914 29,292 29,677 30,084 % Ch 5.3% 4.4% 5.1% 5.4% 6.1% 5.7% 7.1% 6.9% 5.0% 5.3% 5.4% 5.6% National (Billions) 7,275 7,356 7,448 7,536 7,632 7,734 7,838 7,942 8,048 8,149 8,252 8,360 % Ch 2.4% 4.5% 5.1% 4.8% 5.2% 5.4% 5.5% 5.4% 5.4% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3%

FARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 1,587 1,556 1,512 1,478 1,395 1,393 1,410 1,436 1,369 1,349 1,359 1,344 % Ch -44.2% -7.7% -10.7% -8.7% -20.7% -0.6% 4.9% 7.8% -17.4% -5.6% 2.9% -4.4% National (Billions) 105 103 102 101 102 104 105 107 105 104 105 105 % Ch -26.1% -5.2% -5.4% -2.0% 4.0% 6.7% 5.3% 7.7% -8.0% -3.4% 3.8% -2.3%

NONFARM PROPRIETORS INCOME Idaho (Millions) 5,390 5,507 5,585 5,657 5,726 5,826 5,911 5,995 6,078 6,173 6,233 6,302 % Ch 6.3% 9.0% 5.7% 5.2% 5.0% 7.2% 5.9% 5.8% 5.7% 6.4% 3.9% 4.5% National (Billions) 1,264 1,291 1,308 1,325 1,342 1,365 1,385 1,404 1,424 1,446 1,460 1,477 % Ch 6.2% 8.8% 5.4% 5.3% 5.1% 7.1% 5.9% 5.8% 5.6% 6.3% 4.0% 4.6%

DIVIDENDS, RENT & INTEREST Idaho (Millions) 11,232 11,294 11,490 11,615 11,785 11,913 12,026 12,164 12,358 12,572 12,808 13,083 % Ch 1.9% 2.2% 7.1% 4.4% 6.0% 4.4% 3.9% 4.7% 6.5% 7.1% 7.7% 8.9% National (Billions) 2,628 2,662 2,716 2,753 2,804 2,839 2,870 2,907 2,955 3,008 3,066 3,134 % Ch -0.8% 5.3% 8.3% 5.5% 7.7% 5.1% 4.4% 5.3% 6.7% 7.4% 7.9% 9.2%

OTHER LABOR INCOME Idaho (Millions) 6,573 6,607 6,662 6,723 6,800 6,862 6,966 7,076 7,162 7,246 7,333 7,426 % Ch 3.0% 2.1% 3.4% 3.7% 4.6% 3.7% 6.2% 6.4% 5.0% 4.8% 4.9% 5.2% National (Billions) 1,206 1,210 1,220 1,230 1,242 1,253 1,268 1,284 1,302 1,319 1,337 1,356 % Ch 2.2% 1.1% 3.6% 3.3% 3.9% 3.6% 4.8% 5.3% 5.5% 5.5% 5.6% 5.8%

GOVT. TRANSFERS TO INDIV. Idaho (Millions) 10,981 11,079 11,156 11,231 11,565 11,643 11,722 11,808 12,199 12,279 12,364 12,460 % Ch 7.7% 3.6% 2.8% 2.7% 12.4% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 13.9% 2.6% 2.8% 3.1% National (Billions) 2,508 2,530 2,547 2,563 2,637 2,653 2,669 2,687 2,771 2,787 2,803 2,822 % Ch 7.7% 3.6% 2.7% 2.6% 12.0% 2.5% 2.5% 2.7% 13.2% 2.3% 2.4% 2.7%

CONTRIB. FOR SOCIAL INSUR. Idaho (Millions) 4,782 4,821 4,870 4,921 5,054 5,111 5,180 5,256 5,400 5,460 5,519 5,579 % Ch 3.5% 3.3% 4.1% 4.3% 11.2% 4.6% 5.5% 6.0% 11.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.4% National (Billions) 1,128 1,140 1,154 1,167 1,201 1,216 1,230 1,247 1,285 1,299 1,313 1,330 % Ch 3.5% 4.3% 5.0% 4.7% 12.1% 4.9% 4.8% 5.5% 12.8% 4.5% 4.4% 5.1%

RESIDENCE ADJUSTMENT Idaho (Millions) 1,089 1,100 1,108 1,116 1,126 1,136 1,149 1,162 1,170 1,180 1,190 1,200 % Ch 2.1% 4.0% 2.8% 3.1% 3.7% 3.5% 4.7% 4.6% 2.9% 3.3% 3.3% 3.6%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

51 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 605,995 608,610 612,708 615,310 617,733 619,433 622,998 628,410 635,037 639,520 639,837 643,063 % Ch 0.6% 1.7% 2.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.1% 2.3% 3.5% 4.3% 2.9% 0.2% 2.0% National (Thousands) 130,998 131,657 132,097 132,643 133,420 133,856 134,265 134,854 135,495 136,085 136,623 137,248 % Ch 1.1% 2.0% 1.3% 1.7% 2.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.8% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.8%

GOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 87,663 88,491 89,041 90,577 91,409 91,739 92,406 93,606 96,712 97,960 97,690 98,241 % Ch -1.5% 3.8% 2.5% 7.1% 3.7% 1.5% 2.9% 5.3% 13.9% 5.3% -1.1% 2.3% National (Thousands) 17,849 18,003 18,133 18,198 18,336 18,400 18,451 18,490 18,637 18,675 18,698 18,797 % Ch 1.1% 3.5% 2.9% 1.4% 3.1% 1.4% 1.1% 0.9% 3.2% 0.8% 0.5% 2.1%

MANUFACTURING Idaho 55,747 55,821 55,955 56,552 57,249 57,999 58,482 59,035 60,564 61,504 61,425 61,401 % Ch 4.9% 0.5% 1.0% 4.3% 5.0% 5.3% 3.4% 3.8% 10.8% 6.4% -0.5% -0.2% National (Thousands) 11,699 11,761 11,810 11,829 11,916 11,978 12,010 12,006 12,049 12,048 12,041 12,091 % Ch 2.6% 2.1% 1.7% 0.7% 3.0% 2.1% 1.1% -0.1% 1.4% 0.0% -0.2% 1.7%

DURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 32,228 32,455 32,804 33,232 33,723 34,186 34,398 34,590 35,467 36,027 36,062 36,221 % Ch 9.0% 2.8% 4.4% 5.3% 6.0% 5.6% 2.5% 2.2% 10.5% 6.5% 0.4% 1.8% National (Thousands) 7,240 7,303 7,353 7,390 7,470 7,521 7,547 7,544 7,576 7,584 7,591 7,629 % Ch 4.1% 3.6% 2.8% 2.0% 4.4% 2.7% 1.4% -0.1% 1.7% 0.5% 0.3% 2.0%

LOGGING & WOOD PRODUCTS Idaho 6,238 6,059 6,218 6,286 6,279 6,496 6,622 6,697 7,036 7,307 7,115 7,389 % Ch 22.8% -11.0% 10.9% 4.4% -0.4% 14.5% 8.0% 4.6% 21.8% 16.3% -10.1% 16.3% National (Thousands) 389 386 383 384 387 388 389 395 399 402 405 412 % Ch 2.7% -2.7% -3.4% 1.0% 3.3% 1.1% 1.2% 5.8% 4.4% 2.9% 3.3% 6.7%

METAL FABRICATION Idaho 4,600 4,605 4,580 4,590 4,795 4,795 4,786 5,064 5,191 5,455 5,455 5,525 % Ch 1.5% 0.4% -2.2% 0.9% 19.1% 0.0% -0.7% 25.3% 10.4% 22.0% 0.0% 5.2% National (Thousands) 1,322 1,344 1,357 1,368 1,394 1,410 1,416 1,418 1,424 1,428 1,432 1,444 % Ch 5.6% 6.8% 4.0% 3.4% 7.8% 4.6% 1.7% 0.5% 1.6% 1.4% 1.2% 3.1%

MACHINERY Idaho 2,539 2,572 2,566 2,627 2,665 2,692 2,754 2,743 2,811 2,878 2,929 2,942 % Ch 7.8% 5.3% -0.9% 9.8% 6.0% 4.1% 9.5% -1.6% 10.3% 9.9% 7.3% 1.8% National (Thousands) 1,033 1,050 1,063 1,076 1,090 1,101 1,102 1,099 1,104 1,104 1,104 1,106 % Ch 7.3% 6.6% 5.3% 4.7% 5.5% 4.2% 0.1% -0.9% 1.7% -0.1% 0.0% 0.9%

COMPUTER & ELECTRONICS Idaho 10,927 11,097 11,326 11,414 11,630 11,699 11,622 11,550 11,362 11,298 11,389 11,163 % Ch 8.2% 6.4% 8.5% 3.1% 7.8% 2.4% -2.6% -2.5% -6.4% -2.2% 3.3% -7.7% National (Thousands) 1,102 1,104 1,106 1,102 1,099 1,095 1,085 1,077 1,072 1,069 1,067 1,062 % Ch 2.1% 0.7% 0.8% -1.5% -1.2% -1.3% -3.6% -3.0% -1.9% -0.8% -0.8% -1.8%

OTHER DURABLES Idaho 7,924 8,122 8,114 8,316 8,354 8,504 8,614 8,535 9,067 9,089 9,174 9,202 % Ch 4.9% 10.3% -0.4% 10.3% 1.8% 7.4% 5.3% -3.6% 27.3% 1.0% 3.8% 1.2% National (Thousands) 3,394 3,420 3,444 3,460 3,500 3,526 3,555 3,556 3,578 3,581 3,582 3,605 % Ch 3.3% 3.1% 2.8% 1.8% 4.8% 3.0% 3.3% 0.1% 2.5% 0.4% 0.1% 2.5%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

52 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

TOTAL NONFARM EMPLOYMENT Idaho 646,814 650,993 655,657 659,938 665,065 670,316 675,462 680,654 685,715 690,462 694,988 699,529 % Ch 2.4% 2.6% 2.9% 2.6% 3.1% 3.2% 3.1% 3.1% 3.0% 2.8% 2.6% 2.6% National (Thousands) 137,702 138,207 138,786 139,343 140,006 140,758 141,508 142,272 142,996 143,766 144,526 145,303 % Ch 1.3% 1.5% 1.7% 1.6% 1.9% 2.2% 2.1% 2.2% 2.0% 2.2% 2.1% 2.2%

GOODS PRODUCING SECTOR Idaho 98,860 99,462 100,445 101,539 103,030 104,470 105,944 107,132 108,155 108,934 109,674 110,421 % Ch 2.5% 2.5% 4.0% 4.4% 6.0% 5.7% 5.8% 4.6% 3.9% 2.9% 2.7% 2.8% National (Thousands) 18,901 18,987 19,246 19,407 19,577 19,759 19,977 20,209 20,437 20,638 20,847 21,032 % Ch 2.2% 1.8% 5.6% 3.4% 3.6% 3.8% 4.5% 4.7% 4.6% 4.0% 4.1% 3.6%

MANUFACTURING Idaho 61,574 61,676 62,074 62,576 63,399 64,153 64,955 65,582 66,112 66,408 66,650 66,867 % Ch 1.1% 0.7% 2.6% 3.3% 5.4% 4.8% 5.1% 3.9% 3.3% 1.8% 1.5% 1.3% National (Thousands) 12,123 12,153 12,312 12,355 12,413 12,449 12,491 12,542 12,595 12,629 12,670 12,703 % Ch 1.1% 1.0% 5.3% 1.4% 1.9% 1.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.7% 1.1% 1.3% 1.0%

DURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 36,567 36,857 37,381 37,857 38,383 38,926 39,557 39,994 40,412 40,608 40,731 40,859 % Ch 3.9% 3.2% 5.8% 5.2% 5.7% 5.8% 6.6% 4.5% 4.2% 1.9% 1.2% 1.3% National (Thousands) 7,641 7,665 7,819 7,869 7,926 7,964 8,016 8,066 8,117 8,150 8,194 8,229 % Ch 0.6% 1.3% 8.3% 2.6% 2.9% 1.9% 2.6% 2.5% 2.6% 1.6% 2.2% 1.7%

LOGGING & WOOD PRODUCTS Idaho 7,620 7,910 8,167 8,454 8,747 9,054 9,390 9,680 9,903 9,952 9,978 9,957 % Ch 13.1% 16.1% 13.7% 14.8% 14.6% 14.8% 15.6% 13.0% 9.5% 2.0% 1.0% -0.8% National (Thousands) 416 418 434 452 469 484 502 518 532 543 552 560 % Ch 3.8% 2.4% 16.1% 17.3% 15.5% 14.1% 15.4% 13.3% 11.5% 8.5% 7.0% 5.4%

METAL FABRICATION Idaho 5,595 5,626 5,659 5,703 5,757 5,817 5,879 5,947 6,015 6,081 6,146 6,207 % Ch 5.1% 2.3% 2.4% 3.1% 3.9% 4.2% 4.4% 4.7% 4.6% 4.5% 4.3% 4.0% National (Thousands) 1,446 1,447 1,478 1,496 1,512 1,521 1,533 1,549 1,565 1,579 1,597 1,611 % Ch 0.7% 0.3% 8.8% 4.9% 4.3% 2.5% 3.3% 4.3% 4.2% 3.6% 4.5% 3.7%

MACHINERY Idaho 2,933 2,936 2,952 2,976 2,987 3,003 3,022 3,041 3,060 3,079 3,098 3,116 % Ch -1.2% 0.4% 2.2% 3.3% 1.5% 2.1% 2.5% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.5% 2.3% National (Thousands) 1,112 1,116 1,134 1,141 1,150 1,155 1,162 1,168 1,175 1,181 1,189 1,196 % Ch 2.2% 1.4% 6.7% 2.5% 2.9% 1.8% 2.5% 2.1% 2.5% 2.0% 2.8% 2.4%

COMPUTER & ELECTRONICS Idaho 11,159 11,250 11,284 11,348 11,443 11,512 11,618 11,557 11,551 11,514 11,444 11,442 % Ch -0.2% 3.3% 1.2% 2.3% 3.4% 2.4% 3.7% -2.1% -0.2% -1.3% -2.4% -0.1% National (Thousands) 1,058 1,057 1,096 1,089 1,090 1,087 1,083 1,081 1,078 1,075 1,073 1,075 % Ch -1.7% -0.4% 15.6% -2.4% 0.2% -1.0% -1.3% -0.8% -0.9% -1.3% -0.6% 0.7%

OTHER DURABLES Idaho 9,260 9,136 9,319 9,377 9,449 9,539 9,648 9,769 9,883 9,981 10,065 10,138 % Ch 2.6% -5.3% 8.3% 2.5% 3.1% 3.9% 4.6% 5.1% 4.8% 4.0% 3.4% 2.9% National (Thousands) 3,608 3,627 3,677 3,690 3,707 3,717 3,735 3,750 3,767 3,772 3,783 3,787 % Ch 0.4% 2.0% 5.7% 1.5% 1.8% 1.2% 1.9% 1.6% 1.8% 0.6% 1.2% 0.5%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

53 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

MANUFACTURING (continued) 2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

NONDURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 23,519 23,367 23,151 23,320 23,526 23,813 24,084 24,446 25,097 25,477 25,363 25,180 % Ch -0.5% -2.6% -3.6% 3.0% 3.6% 5.0% 4.6% 6.1% 11.1% 6.2% -1.8% -2.9% National (Thousands) 4,459 4,458 4,457 4,440 4,445 4,458 4,463 4,461 4,473 4,463 4,450 4,462 % Ch 0.2% -0.1% -0.1% -1.5% 0.5% 1.1% 0.5% -0.2% 1.1% -0.9% -1.2% 1.1%

FOOD PROCESSING Idaho 15,606 15,412 15,138 15,254 15,394 15,536 15,704 15,993 16,196 16,578 16,488 16,275 % Ch 1.0% -4.9% -6.9% 3.1% 3.7% 3.7% 4.4% 7.6% 5.2% 9.8% -2.1% -5.1% National (Thousands) 1,462 1,461 1,458 1,453 1,459 1,468 1,476 1,471 1,473 1,473 1,466 1,477 % Ch 3.1% -0.4% -0.8% -1.2% 1.7% 2.4% 2.2% -1.5% 0.7% -0.1% -1.8% 3.0%

PRINTING Idaho 1,222 1,224 1,228 1,257 1,224 1,221 1,196 1,193 1,225 1,220 1,197 1,195 % Ch -11.1% 0.6% 1.5% 9.9% -10.2% -0.8% -8.1% -1.0% 11.2% -1.7% -7.3% -0.7% National (Thousands) 476 473 472 467 465 464 461 457 455 449 445 443 % Ch -4.8% -2.8% -1.0% -4.0% -1.4% -0.6% -2.9% -3.7% -1.2% -5.1% -3.9% -1.4%

CHEMICALS Idaho 2,301 2,376 2,385 2,441 2,498 2,510 2,585 2,575 2,563 2,577 2,619 2,632 % Ch 18.8% 13.6% 1.6% 9.6% 9.7% 1.9% 12.6% -1.6% -1.9% 2.2% 6.7% 2.0% National (Thousands) 782 783 785 783 783 782 783 786 791 793 792 794 % Ch -1.0% 0.8% 1.0% -1.3% 0.2% -0.7% 0.8% 1.4% 2.8% 1.0% -0.6% 0.7%

OTHER NONDURABLES Idaho 4,390 4,355 4,400 4,368 4,411 4,547 4,598 4,684 5,113 5,103 5,059 5,079 % Ch -11.0% -3.2% 4.2% -2.9% 4.0% 12.9% 4.6% 7.7% 42.0% -0.8% -3.4% 1.6% National (Thousands) 1,739 1,741 1,742 1,737 1,738 1,743 1,743 1,748 1,753 1,748 1,747 1,748 % Ch -0.3% 0.4% 0.4% -1.3% 0.2% 1.3% -0.1% 1.2% 1.1% -1.2% -0.3% 0.3%

MINING Idaho 2,482 2,492 2,603 2,749 2,807 2,723 2,667 2,583 2,654 2,627 2,516 2,542 % Ch 12.2% 1.7% 19.1% 24.4% 8.7% -11.5% -7.9% -12.0% 11.4% -4.0% -15.8% 4.1% National (Thousands) 693 729 758 777 795 801 797 794 806 808 819 827 % Ch 4.7% 22.4% 16.9% 10.3% 9.6% 3.2% -2.0% -1.7% 6.4% 1.2% 5.1% 4.4%

CONSTRUCTION Idaho 29,435 30,178 30,482 31,275 31,353 31,017 31,257 31,988 33,495 33,828 33,749 34,298 % Ch -13.1% 10.5% 4.1% 10.8% 1.0% -4.2% 3.1% 9.7% 20.2% 4.0% -0.9% 6.7% National (Thousands) 5,457 5,513 5,565 5,592 5,625 5,621 5,643 5,691 5,782 5,819 5,838 5,879 % Ch -2.5% 4.2% 3.8% 2.0% 2.4% -0.3% 1.6% 3.4% 6.5% 2.6% 1.4% 2.8%

NONGOODS PRODUCING Idaho 518,332 520,119 523,667 524,733 526,323 527,694 530,591 534,803 538,324 541,561 542,147 544,822 % Ch 0.9% 1.4% 2.8% 0.8% 1.2% 1.0% 2.2% 3.2% 2.7% 2.4% 0.4% 2.0% National (Thousands) 113,149 113,654 113,964 114,445 115,083 115,455 115,813 116,363 116,858 117,410 117,926 118,451 % Ch 1.1% 1.8% 1.1% 1.7% 2.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.9% 1.7% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8%

SERVICES Idaho 300,529 301,804 303,977 304,379 305,415 306,629 308,184 310,488 313,070 316,000 316,562 318,911 % Ch 1.9% 1.7% 2.9% 0.5% 1.4% 1.6% 2.0% 3.0% 3.4% 3.8% 0.7% 3.0% National (Thousands) 70,881 71,313 71,666 72,132 72,702 73,044 73,401 73,881 74,325 74,817 75,199 75,593 % Ch 1.5% 2.5% 2.0% 2.6% 3.2% 1.9% 2.0% 2.6% 2.4% 2.7% 2.1% 2.1%

INFORMATION Idaho 9,391 9,546 9,475 9,456 9,462 9,339 9,345 9,321 9,230 9,435 9,379 9,408 % Ch -4.0% 6.8% -2.9% -0.8% 0.3% -5.1% 0.3% -1.0% -3.9% 9.2% -2.4% 1.2% National (Thousands) 2,675 2,679 2,662 2,679 2,674 2,677 2,677 2,676 2,686 2,686 2,683 2,684 % Ch -2.2% 0.6% -2.5% 2.5% -0.8% 0.5% 0.0% -0.2% 1.6% 0.0% -0.5% 0.1%

FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES Idaho 29,638 29,689 30,039 30,094 29,982 30,288 30,394 30,629 31,035 31,219 31,378 31,475 % Ch 4.3% 0.7% 4.8% 0.7% -1.5% 4.1% 1.4% 3.1% 5.4% 2.4% 2.1% 1.2% National (Thousands) 7,678 7,689 7,698 7,722 7,746 7,775 7,791 7,818 7,845 7,873 7,898 7,901 % Ch -0.3% 0.6% 0.5% 1.3% 1.3% 1.5% 0.8% 1.4% 1.4% 1.5% 1.3% 0.2%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

54 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

MANUFACTURING (continued) 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

NONDURABLE MANUFACTURING Idaho 25,008 24,818 24,694 24,719 25,016 25,227 25,398 25,587 25,700 25,800 25,920 26,008 % Ch -2.7% -3.0% -2.0% 0.4% 4.9% 3.4% 2.7% 3.0% 1.8% 1.6% 1.9% 1.4% National (Thousands) 4,482 4,488 4,492 4,486 4,487 4,485 4,476 4,476 4,478 4,479 4,476 4,474 % Ch 1.8% 0.6% 0.4% -0.6% 0.1% -0.2% -0.9% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% -0.2% -0.2%

FOOD PROCESSING Idaho 16,100 15,892 15,768 15,794 16,081 16,285 16,445 16,609 16,687 16,766 16,857 16,919 % Ch -4.2% -5.1% -3.1% 0.7% 7.5% 5.2% 4.0% 4.1% 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 1.5% National (Thousands) 1,490 1,497 1,501 1,500 1,506 1,511 1,513 1,519 1,524 1,530 1,533 1,537 % Ch 3.5% 1.9% 1.2% -0.3% 1.6% 1.2% 0.5% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 1.0% 0.8%

PRINTING Idaho 1,189 1,191 1,175 1,156 1,150 1,140 1,131 1,131 1,137 1,128 1,128 1,127 % Ch -1.9% 0.6% -5.3% -6.1% -2.3% -3.4% -3.0% 0.1% 1.9% -3.0% 0.1% -0.5% National (Thousands) 443 443 440 437 435 431 426 422 418 415 411 407 % Ch -0.6% 0.1% -2.7% -2.7% -1.8% -3.5% -4.6% -3.6% -3.5% -3.5% -3.6% -3.5%

CHEMICALS Idaho 2,613 2,606 2,597 2,590 2,589 2,587 2,586 2,588 2,588 2,591 2,593 2,595 % Ch -2.9% -1.0% -1.4% -1.0% -0.2% -0.3% -0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% National (Thousands) 797 798 803 803 804 805 804 804 806 807 807 808 % Ch 1.7% 0.8% 2.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.1% -0.2% 0.0% 1.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3%

OTHER NONDURABLES Idaho 5,106 5,130 5,155 5,178 5,196 5,216 5,236 5,260 5,288 5,315 5,342 5,367 % Ch 2.2% 1.8% 2.0% 1.8% 1.4% 1.5% 1.6% 1.8% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 1.9% National (Thousands) 1,753 1,750 1,748 1,745 1,742 1,739 1,733 1,731 1,729 1,727 1,725 1,722 % Ch 1.0% -0.6% -0.4% -0.7% -0.8% -0.7% -1.3% -0.5% -0.4% -0.4% -0.6% -0.6%

MINING Idaho 2,509 2,516 2,526 2,521 2,536 2,552 2,566 2,580 2,596 2,613 2,630 2,647 % Ch -5.0% 1.2% 1.6% -0.8% 2.4% 2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.5% 2.7% 2.6% 2.6% National (Thousands) 835 848 860 865 872 879 873 871 871 872 874 875 % Ch 3.6% 6.5% 5.8% 2.4% 3.4% 3.1% -3.0% -0.8% 0.1% 0.6% 0.6% 0.7%

CONSTRUCTION Idaho 34,777 35,270 35,844 36,442 37,095 37,765 38,424 38,970 39,447 39,913 40,393 40,906 % Ch 5.7% 5.8% 6.7% 6.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.2% 5.8% 5.0% 4.8% 4.9% 5.2% National (Thousands) 5,944 5,985 6,075 6,187 6,291 6,431 6,613 6,796 6,971 7,137 7,303 7,454 % Ch 4.5% 2.8% 6.1% 7.6% 6.9% 9.2% 11.8% 11.5% 10.6% 9.9% 9.6% 8.5%

NONGOODS PRODUCING Idaho 547,954 551,531 555,212 558,399 562,035 565,845 569,518 573,522 577,559 581,528 585,314 589,108 % Ch 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.3% 2.6% 2.7% 2.6% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 2.6% 2.6% National (Thousands) 118,801 119,220 119,540 119,936 120,429 120,998 121,531 122,064 122,559 123,128 123,679 124,271 % Ch 1.2% 1.4% 1.1% 1.3% 1.7% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8% 1.6% 1.9% 1.8% 1.9%

SERVICES Idaho 321,427 324,261 327,345 330,076 332,903 335,956 338,713 341,822 345,043 348,081 350,892 353,682 % Ch 3.2% 3.6% 3.9% 3.4% 3.5% 3.7% 3.3% 3.7% 3.8% 3.6% 3.3% 3.2% National (Thousands) 75,887 76,270 76,565 76,887 77,325 77,804 78,284 78,749 79,173 79,636 80,094 80,591 % Ch 1.6% 2.0% 1.6% 1.7% 2.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.5%

INFORMATION Idaho 9,361 9,446 9,459 9,411 9,410 9,423 9,450 9,495 9,540 9,607 9,673 9,734 % Ch -2.0% 3.7% 0.6% -2.0% 0.0% 0.6% 1.2% 1.9% 1.9% 2.8% 2.7% 2.6% National (Thousands) 2,655 2,650 2,668 2,669 2,638 2,636 2,688 2,698 2,690 2,717 2,742 2,756 % Ch -4.3% -0.6% 2.7% 0.2% -4.6% -0.4% 8.2% 1.5% -1.2% 4.0% 3.7% 2.1%

FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES Idaho 31,599 31,701 31,821 31,908 32,046 32,240 32,297 32,522 32,748 32,933 33,104 33,294 % Ch 1.6% 1.3% 1.5% 1.1% 1.7% 2.5% 0.7% 2.8% 2.8% 2.3% 2.1% 2.3% National (Thousands) 7,908 7,945 7,960 7,971 7,998 8,013 8,012 8,012 8,018 8,027 8,020 8,015 % Ch 0.4% 1.9% 0.8% 0.5% 1.4% 0.8% -0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% -0.4% -0.3%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

55 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

SERVICES (Continued) 2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TRANS., WAREHOUSING, UTILITIES Idaho 20,980 21,149 21,313 21,281 21,441 21,406 21,541 21,638 21,671 21,584 21,474 21,554 % Ch 0.9% 3.2% 3.1% -0.6% 3.0% -0.7% 2.5% 1.8% 0.6% -1.6% -2.0% 1.5% National (Thousands) 4,811 4,850 4,871 4,891 4,931 4,951 4,981 5,010 5,025 5,029 5,038 5,085 % Ch 2.0% 3.3% 1.8% 1.7% 3.3% 1.6% 2.4% 2.3% 1.3% 0.3% 0.7% 3.7%

PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS Idaho 75,456 74,759 75,382 75,009 75,119 75,156 75,495 76,034 76,662 77,476 77,602 78,573 % Ch 3.5% -3.6% 3.4% -2.0% 0.6% 0.2% 1.8% 2.9% 3.3% 4.3% 0.7% 5.1% National (Thousands) 17,116 17,272 17,381 17,549 17,745 17,870 17,992 18,125 18,289 18,505 18,661 18,807 % Ch 4.1% 3.7% 2.6% 3.9% 4.5% 2.8% 2.8% 3.0% 3.7% 4.8% 3.4% 3.2%

EDUCATION & HEALTH Idaho 85,947 86,490 86,689 87,052 87,548 88,043 88,595 89,217 89,947 90,779 91,408 92,114 % Ch 4.3% 2.6% 0.9% 1.7% 2.3% 2.3% 2.5% 2.8% 3.3% 3.7% 2.8% 3.1% National (Thousands) 20,073 20,172 20,287 20,392 20,545 20,645 20,720 20,875 20,953 21,064 21,154 21,230 % Ch 1.0% 2.0% 2.3% 2.1% 3.0% 2.0% 1.5% 3.0% 1.5% 2.1% 1.7% 1.5%

LEISURE & HOSPITALITY Idaho 58,300 59,062 59,827 59,958 60,457 60,966 61,263 61,958 62,833 63,533 63,049 63,453 % Ch -0.7% 5.3% 5.3% 0.9% 3.4% 3.4% 2.0% 4.6% 5.8% 4.5% -3.0% 2.6% National (Thousands) 13,197 13,305 13,395 13,506 13,645 13,705 13,806 13,930 14,073 14,197 14,298 14,411 % Ch 1.8% 3.3% 2.7% 3.4% 4.2% 1.8% 3.0% 3.7% 4.2% 3.6% 2.9% 3.2%

OTHER SERVICES Idaho 20,817 21,109 21,253 21,529 21,406 21,431 21,552 21,692 21,691 21,975 22,273 22,334 % Ch -4.8% 5.7% 2.8% 5.3% -2.3% 0.5% 2.3% 2.6% 0.0% 5.4% 5.5% 1.1% National (Thousands) 5,331 5,348 5,371 5,392 5,416 5,421 5,435 5,447 5,454 5,461 5,468 5,476 % Ch -1.2% 1.2% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7% 0.4% 1.0% 0.9% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%

TRADE Idaho 100,657 101,288 102,289 103,269 104,240 104,465 105,093 105,929 106,535 107,498 108,198 108,691 % Ch -0.6% 2.5% 4.0% 3.9% 3.8% 0.9% 2.4% 3.2% 2.3% 3.7% 2.6% 1.8% National (Thousands) 20,050 20,184 20,273 20,341 20,441 20,490 20,491 20,591 20,663 20,734 20,877 21,003 % Ch 1.9% 2.7% 1.8% 1.3% 2.0% 0.9% 0.0% 2.0% 1.4% 1.4% 2.8% 2.4%

RETAIL TRADE Idaho 74,462 74,766 75,444 76,102 76,787 76,756 77,167 77,753 77,894 78,865 79,451 79,819 % Ch -0.9% 1.6% 3.7% 3.5% 3.7% -0.2% 2.2% 3.1% 0.7% 5.1% 3.0% 1.9% National (Thousands) 14,553 14,651 14,720 14,752 14,810 14,825 14,813 14,898 14,947 15,003 15,118 15,220 % Ch 1.8% 2.7% 1.9% 0.9% 1.6% 0.4% -0.3% 2.3% 1.3% 1.5% 3.1% 2.7%

WHOLESALE TRADE Idaho 26,194 26,523 26,846 27,167 27,452 27,708 27,926 28,176 28,641 28,633 28,747 28,872 % Ch 0.1% 5.1% 5.0% 4.9% 4.3% 3.8% 3.2% 3.6% 6.8% -0.1% 1.6% 1.8% National (Thousands) 5,497 5,533 5,553 5,588 5,631 5,665 5,679 5,693 5,716 5,731 5,760 5,784 % Ch 2.0% 2.6% 1.5% 2.6% 3.1% 2.4% 1.0% 1.0% 1.7% 1.0% 2.0% 1.7%

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 104,493 104,444 104,716 104,375 103,978 104,099 104,752 105,561 106,099 105,773 105,102 105,011 % Ch 0.7% -0.2% 1.0% -1.3% -1.5% 0.5% 2.5% 3.1% 2.1% -1.2% -2.5% -0.3% National (Thousands) 19,343 19,289 19,173 19,129 19,111 19,096 19,104 19,074 19,067 19,084 19,100 19,119 % Ch -1.5% -1.1% -2.4% -0.9% -0.4% -0.3% 0.2% -0.6% -0.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4%

EDUCATION Idaho 54,285 53,906 54,090 53,714 53,425 53,511 54,097 54,817 55,036 54,795 54,121 54,055 % Ch 2.5% -2.8% 1.4% -2.8% -2.1% 0.7% 4.4% 5.4% 1.6% -1.7% -4.8% -0.5%

NONEDUCATION Idaho 50,208 50,537 50,626 50,661 50,553 50,588 50,655 50,744 51,064 50,978 50,981 50,956 % Ch -1.1% 2.6% 0.7% 0.3% -0.8% 0.3% 0.5% 0.7% 2.5% -0.7% 0.0% -0.2%

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 12,653 12,583 12,684 12,709 12,690 12,502 12,562 12,826 12,619 12,290 12,285 12,210 % Ch -8.3% -2.2% 3.2% 0.8% -0.6% -5.8% 1.9% 8.7% -6.3% -10.0% -0.2% -2.4% National (Thousands) 2,875 2,868 2,853 2,844 2,829 2,825 2,817 2,817 2,803 2,775 2,750 2,736 % Ch 1.1% -1.0% -2.1% -1.3% -2.1% -0.5% -1.1% 0.0% -2.0% -3.8% -3.6% -2.0%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

56 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

EMPLOYMENT

SERVICES (Continued) 2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TRANS., WAREHOUSING, UTILITIES Idaho 21,657 21,786 22,010 22,125 22,320 22,451 22,594 22,742 22,889 23,038 23,190 23,341 % Ch 1.9% 2.4% 4.2% 2.1% 3.6% 2.4% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.7% 2.6% National (Thousands) 5,111 5,124 5,149 5,187 5,225 5,257 5,295 5,340 5,386 5,440 5,488 5,535 % Ch 2.1% 1.1% 1.9% 3.0% 2.9% 2.5% 2.9% 3.4% 3.6% 4.1% 3.5% 3.5%

PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS Idaho 79,553 80,484 81,615 82,756 83,936 85,283 86,460 87,676 88,899 90,009 90,969 91,927 % Ch 5.1% 4.8% 5.7% 5.7% 5.8% 6.6% 5.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.1% 4.3% 4.3% National (Thousands) 18,960 19,160 19,447 19,627 19,834 20,086 20,344 20,605 20,786 20,956 21,177 21,399 % Ch 3.3% 4.3% 6.1% 3.7% 4.3% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 3.6% 3.3% 4.3% 4.3%

EDUCATION & HEALTH Idaho 92,932 93,797 94,770 95,579 96,414 97,301 98,140 99,004 99,910 100,841 101,764 102,673 % Ch 3.6% 3.8% 4.2% 3.5% 3.5% 3.7% 3.5% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 3.7% 3.6% National (Thousands) 21,281 21,364 21,349 21,376 21,488 21,651 21,783 21,920 22,081 22,270 22,384 22,528 % Ch 1.0% 1.6% -0.3% 0.5% 2.1% 3.1% 2.5% 2.5% 3.0% 3.5% 2.1% 2.6%

LEISURE & HOSPITALITY Idaho 63,892 64,495 65,102 65,690 66,058 66,413 66,784 67,231 67,740 68,168 68,540 68,896 % Ch 2.8% 3.8% 3.8% 3.7% 2.3% 2.2% 2.3% 2.7% 3.1% 2.6% 2.2% 2.1% National (Thousands) 14,484 14,535 14,520 14,605 14,701 14,737 14,753 14,774 14,813 14,824 14,882 14,952 % Ch 2.0% 1.4% -0.4% 2.4% 2.6% 1.0% 0.4% 0.6% 1.1% 0.3% 1.6% 1.9%

OTHER SERVICES Idaho 22,434 22,552 22,568 22,608 22,718 22,844 22,989 23,153 23,317 23,484 23,652 23,818 % Ch 1.8% 2.1% 0.3% 0.7% 2.0% 2.2% 2.6% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.8% National (Thousands) 5,488 5,491 5,472 5,452 5,442 5,424 5,409 5,400 5,398 5,401 5,402 5,406 % Ch 0.9% 0.2% -1.4% -1.5% -0.7% -1.3% -1.1% -0.7% -0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3%

TRADE Idaho 109,444 110,299 110,959 111,641 112,362 113,184 114,065 114,956 115,832 116,735 117,645 118,539 % Ch 2.8% 3.2% 2.4% 2.5% 2.6% 3.0% 3.2% 3.2% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.1% National (Thousands) 21,071 21,141 21,178 21,234 21,262 21,321 21,353 21,378 21,427 21,487 21,532 21,567 % Ch 1.3% 1.3% 0.7% 1.1% 0.5% 1.1% 0.6% 0.5% 0.9% 1.1% 0.8% 0.7%

RETAIL TRADE Idaho 80,394 81,050 81,551 82,070 82,619 83,249 83,926 84,610 85,283 85,977 86,677 87,364 % Ch 2.9% 3.3% 2.5% 2.6% 2.7% 3.1% 3.3% 3.3% 3.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3.2% National (Thousands) 15,240 15,274 15,290 15,321 15,323 15,351 15,352 15,345 15,361 15,376 15,381 15,378 % Ch 0.5% 0.9% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% -0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% -0.1%

WHOLESALE TRADE Idaho 29,050 29,249 29,408 29,572 29,743 29,935 30,140 30,346 30,549 30,758 30,968 31,175 % Ch 2.5% 2.8% 2.2% 2.2% 2.3% 2.6% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7% National (Thousands) 5,831 5,867 5,888 5,913 5,939 5,970 6,001 6,034 6,066 6,111 6,151 6,189 % Ch 3.3% 2.5% 1.4% 1.7% 1.8% 2.0% 2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 3.0% 2.6% 2.5%

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 104,848 104,712 104,637 104,410 104,481 104,428 104,472 104,482 104,421 104,459 104,536 104,654 % Ch -0.6% -0.5% -0.3% -0.9% 0.3% -0.2% 0.2% 0.0% -0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% National (Thousands) 19,126 19,104 19,096 19,117 19,147 19,190 19,222 19,267 19,310 19,365 19,422 19,488 % Ch 0.1% -0.5% -0.2% 0.4% 0.6% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2% 1.2% 1.4%

EDUCATION Idaho 54,131 54,157 54,203 54,252 54,414 54,522 54,636 54,758 54,780 54,871 54,973 55,084 % Ch 0.6% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 1.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.9% 0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8%

NONEDUCATION Idaho 50,717 50,555 50,434 50,157 50,067 49,906 49,837 49,724 49,641 49,588 49,562 49,571 % Ch -1.9% -1.3% -1.0% -2.2% -0.7% -1.3% -0.6% -0.9% -0.7% -0.4% -0.2% 0.1%

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Idaho 12,235 12,259 12,271 12,273 12,288 12,278 12,267 12,262 12,263 12,252 12,241 12,233 % Ch 0.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.1% 0.5% -0.3% -0.3% -0.2% 0.1% -0.4% -0.4% -0.3% National (Thousands) 2,717 2,706 2,702 2,698 2,695 2,683 2,672 2,669 2,650 2,640 2,631 2,625 % Ch -2.7% -1.6% -0.7% -0.5% -0.5% -1.7% -1.7% -0.3% -2.9% -1.5% -1.4% -0.9%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

57 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

MISCELLANEOUS

2011 2012 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

SELECTED CHAIN-WEIGHTED DEFL.

Gross Domestic Product 102.354 103.024 103.651 103.782 104.296 104.751 105.345 105.640 105.994 106.165 106.685 107.099 % Ch 1.6% 2.6% 2.5% 0.5% 2.0% 1.8% 2.3% 1.1% 1.3% 0.6% 2.0% 1.6%

Consumption Expenditures 102.996 103.938 104.529 104.880 105.471 105.750 106.193 106.622 106.909 106.878 107.387 107.671 % Ch 3.0% 3.7% 2.3% 1.3% 2.3% 1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 1.1% -0.1% 1.9% 1.1%

Durable Goods 97.606 97.947 97.797 97.248 97.087 96.791 96.246 95.746 95.487 95.016 94.456 93.941 % Ch -0.8% 1.4% -0.6% -2.2% -0.7% -1.2% -2.2% -2.1% -1.1% -2.0% -2.3% -2.2%

Nondurable Goods 106.833 109.050 110.138 110.491 111.448 111.127 111.964 112.522 112.264 111.126 112.362 112.224 % Ch 9.3% 8.6% 4.1% 1.3% 3.5% -1.1% 3.0% 2.0% -0.9% -4.0% 4.5% -0.5%

Services 102.596 103.217 103.768 104.271 104.872 105.450 105.939 106.493 107.060 107.477 107.946 108.522 % Ch 1.5% 2.4% 2.2% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 2.1% 1.6% 1.8% 2.2%

Consumer Price Index 2.220 2.247 2.261 2.270 2.282 2.290 2.299 2.313 2.320 2.322 2.335 2.341 % Ch 4.2% 5.0% 2.6% 1.6% 2.1% 1.4% 1.7% 2.4% 1.2% 0.4% 2.2% 1.1%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES

Federal Funds 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%

NY Fed Discount 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8%

Prime 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3%

Existing Home Mortgage 4.9% 4.9% 4.6% 4.3% 4.2% 3.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.6% 3.6% 4.4% 4.4%

U.S. Govt. 3-Month Bills 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

U.S. Govt. 6-Month Bills 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%

U.S. Govt. 5-Year Notes 2.1% 1.9% 1.2% 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.5% 1.4%

U.S. Govt. 10-Year Notes 3.5% 3.2% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 2.7% 2.7%

EXCHANGE RATES (2009=1.000)

Major Currency Trading Partners 0.939 0.902 0.899 0.931 0.939 0.956 0.962 0.954 0.978 1.004 1.007 1.000 % Ch -8.3% -14.9% -1.3% 14.8% 3.5% 7.6% 2.4% -3.4% 10.8% 11.1% 0.9% -2.7%

Other Important Trading Partners 0.889 0.858 0.854 0.878 0.857 0.873 0.870 0.857 0.850 0.851 0.865 0.859 % Ch -10.9% -13.2% -1.8% 11.5% -8.9% 7.5% -1.2% -5.9% -3.1% 0.5% 6.3% -2.6%

SELECTED US PRODUCTION INDICES

Wood Products 68.5 68.3 68.0 68.8 70.1 71.3 71.0 74.1 76.9 76.4 78.3 80.6 % Ch 2.4% -1.1% -1.5% 4.3% 8.3% 6.7% -1.9% 19.2% 15.9% -2.7% 10.2% 12.5%

Computers & Electronic Products 120.4 120.4 122.7 124.5 129.0 133.8 136.5 140.6 141.6 143.8 145.5 147.3 % Ch 13.0% 0.1% 7.9% 6.1% 15.2% 15.5% 8.4% 12.7% 2.7% 6.6% 4.8% 4.9%

Food 98.0 98.3 98.2 99.3 101.0 102.2 104.7 103.4 104.0 104.2 104.3 105.2 % Ch -3.3% 1.0% -0.4% 4.6% 7.2% 4.8% 9.8% -4.7% 2.5% 0.7% 0.4% 3.2%

Agricultural Chemicals 89.3 88.2 89.1 90.6 90.8 91.2 92.7 93.0 96.0 97.9 99.7 102.7 % Ch -3.9% -5.1% 4.5% 6.6% 1.2% 1.8% 6.6% 1.4% 13.7% 8.1% 7.4% 12.6%

Metal Ore Mining 99.2 102.2 96.7 95.6 98.5 96.6 97.2 103.3 99.7 97.9 100.0 99.0 % Ch 12.6% 12.3% -19.7% -4.7% 12.8% -7.3% 2.4% 27.9% -13.3% -7.1% 9.0% -4.0%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

58 IDAHO ECONOMIC FORECAST QUARTERLY DETAIL APRIL 2014

MISCELLANEOUS

2014 2015 2016 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

SELECTED CHAIN-WEIGHTED DEFL.

Gross Domestic Product 107.620 108.213 108.876 109.370 109.856 110.256 110.702 111.074 111.578 111.979 112.402 112.871 % Ch 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.6% 1.3% 1.8% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7%

Consumption Expenditures 108.012 108.353 108.916 109.346 109.660 109.927 110.365 110.725 111.169 111.549 111.960 112.429 % Ch 1.3% 1.3% 2.1% 1.6% 1.2% 1.0% 1.6% 1.3% 1.6% 1.4% 1.5% 1.7%

Durable Goods 93.342 92.756 92.460 92.146 91.869 91.608 91.372 91.159 90.947 90.718 90.484 90.256 % Ch -2.5% -2.5% -1.3% -1.4% -1.2% -1.1% -1.0% -0.9% -0.9% -1.0% -1.0% -1.0%

Nondurable Goods 112.433 112.079 112.538 112.745 112.457 112.218 112.671 112.787 113.301 113.525 113.825 114.328 % Ch 0.7% -1.3% 1.6% 0.7% -1.0% -0.8% 1.6% 0.4% 1.8% 0.8% 1.1% 1.8%

Services 109.087 109.831 110.594 111.240 111.868 112.405 112.970 113.525 114.076 114.631 115.208 115.807 % Ch 2.1% 2.8% 2.8% 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.1%

Consumer Price Index 2.352 2.364 2.381 2.393 2.400 2.404 2.415 2.421 2.432 2.441 2.450 2.462 % Ch 1.7% 2.2% 2.9% 2.0% 1.1% 0.8% 1.7% 1.1% 1.8% 1.4% 1.6% 1.9%

SELECTED INTEREST RATES

Federal Funds 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.9% 1.4% 1.9% 2.4% 3.0%

NY Fed Discount 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 1.4% 1.9% 2.6% 3.4% 4.0%

Prime 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.9% 4.4% 4.9% 5.4% 6.0%

Existing Home Mortgage 4.5% 4.7% 5.0% 5.2% 5.2% 5.3% 5.3% 5.6% 5.8% 6.0% 6.2% 6.4%

U.S. Govt. 3-Month Bills 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 1.0% 1.4% 1.9% 2.4% 2.9%

U.S. Govt. 6-Month Bills 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6% 1.1% 1.6% 2.2% 2.7% 3.1%

U.S. Govt. 5-Year Notes 1.6% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% 2.6% 3.0% 3.4% 3.8%

U.S. Govt. 10-Year Notes 2.8% 2.8% 3.0% 3.1% 3.2% 3.2% 3.3% 3.5% 3.7% 3.8% 4.0% 4.1%

EXCHANGE RATES (2009=1.000)

Major Currency Trading Partners 1.017 1.022 1.030 1.034 1.039 1.035 1.028 1.025 1.021 1.020 1.020 1.020 % Ch 7.0% 2.2% 3.1% 1.6% 1.7% -1.3% -2.6% -1.5% -1.4% -0.6% 0.2% -0.1%

Other Important Trading Partners 0.870 0.870 0.865 0.856 0.850 0.842 0.833 0.825 0.818 0.810 0.803 0.797 % Ch 5.3% -0.2% -2.2% -3.9% -2.7% -3.9% -4.0% -3.8% -3.4% -4.0% -3.1% -3.2%

SELECTED US PRODUCTION INDICES

Wood Products 78.1 81.1 83.6 86.2 89.0 91.9 94.5 96.6 98.2 99.6 100.6 101.4 % Ch -12.0% 16.5% 12.5% 13.1% 13.6% 13.7% 12.1% 9.1% 6.7% 5.9% 4.0% 3.3%

Computers & Electronic Products 150.1 153.3 156.6 159.9 163.6 167.4 171.3 175.1 178.8 182.4 186.0 189.6 % Ch 7.7% 8.9% 8.9% 8.6% 9.6% 9.7% 9.6% 9.1% 8.7% 8.3% 8.1% 7.9%

Food 105.7 106.3 106.9 107.5 108.1 108.8 109.4 110.1 110.7 111.4 112.0 112.7 % Ch 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 2.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3%

Agricultural Chemicals 99.2 101.8 102.7 103.1 103.4 103.6 104.0 105.2 106.8 108.8 111.5 115.0 % Ch -13.0% 11.0% 3.5% 1.7% 1.0% 0.8% 1.8% 4.5% 6.2% 7.8% 10.4% 13.1%

Metal Ore Mining 99.4 98.4 98.5 99.0 99.7 100.4 101.2 102.0 102.6 103.1 103.4 103.6 % Ch 1.6% -3.8% 0.3% 1.9% 2.9% 3.0% 3.2% 2.9% 2.5% 2.2% 1.0% 0.8%

National Variables Forecast by IHS Economics Forecast Begins the FIRST Quarter of 2014

59 This page left blank intentionally. APPENDIX

IHS Economics Macro Model ...... Page 62

Idaho Economic Model ...... Page 64

Equations ...... Page 66

Endogenous Variables ...... Page 70

Exogenous Variables ...... Page 72

61 THE IHS ECONOMICS’ US MACROECONOMIC MODEL

IHS Economics’ Macroeconomic Model is a multiple-equation model of the US economy. Consisting of over 1,200 equations, the model is solved iteratively to generate the results of different policy and forecast scenarios. The model incorporates the best insights of many theoretical schools of thought to depict the economic decision processes and interactions of households, businesses, and governments.

The IHS Economics model is divided into the following eight major sectors:

I Private Domestic Spending II Production and Income III Taxes IV International Transactions V Financial VI Inflation VII Supply VIII Expectations

I. Private Domestic Spending. Major aggregate demand components include consumption, investment, and government. Consumer purchases are divided among three categories: durable goods, nondurable goods, and services. In nearly all cases, real expenditures are influenced by real income and the relative price of consumer goods. Durable and semidurable goods are also sensitive to household net worth, current finance costs, and consumer sentiment.

IHS Economics divides investment into two general categories: fixed investment and inventories. The former is driven by utilization rates, capital stock, relative prices, financial market conditions, financial balance sheet conditions, and government policies. Inventory investment is heavily influenced by such factors as past and present sales levels, vendor performance, and utilization rates.

The government sector is divided into federal government and state and local government. Most of the federal expenditure side is exogenous. Federal receipts are endogenous and divided into personal taxes, corporate taxes, indirect business taxes, and contributions for social insurance. State and local sector receipts depend primarily on federal grants and various tax rates and bases. State and local government spending is driven by legal requirements (i.e., balanced budgets), the level of federal grants (due to the matching requirements of many programs), population growth, and trend increases in personal income.

II. Production and Income. The industrial production sector includes 74 standard industrial classifications. Production is a function of various cyclical and trend variables and a generated output term, i.e., the input-output (I-O) relationship between the producing industry and both intermediate industries and final demand. The cyclical and trend variables correct for changes in I-O coefficients that are implied by the changing relationship between buyers and sellers.

Pre-tax income categories include private and government wages, corporate profits, interest rate, and entrepreneurial returns. Each of these categories, except corporate profits, is determined by some combination of wages, prices, interest rates, debt levels, capacity utilization rate, and unemployment rate. Corporate profits are calculated as the residual of total national income less the nonprofit components of income mentioned above.

III. Taxes. The model tracks personal, corporate, payroll, and excise taxes separately. Tax revenues are simultaneously forecast as the product of the rate and the associated pre-tax income components. The model automatically adjusts the effective average personal tax rate for variations in inflation and income per household, and the effective average corporate rate for credits earned on equipment, utility structures, and R&D. State taxes are fully endogenous, except for corporate profits and social insurance tax rates.

IV. International. The international sector can either add or divert strength from the central flow of domestic income and spending. Imports’ ability to capture varying shares of domestic demand depends on the prices of foreign output, the US exchange rate, and competing domestic prices. Exports’ portion of domestic spending depends on similar variables and the level of world gross domestic product. The exchange rate itself responds to international differences in inflation, interest rates, trade deficits, and capital flows between the US and its competitors. Investment income flows are also explicitly modeled.

V. Financial. The IHS Economics model includes a highly detailed financial sector. Several short- and long-term interest rates are covered in this model, and they are the key output of this sector. The short-term rates depend upon the balance between the demand and supply of reserves in the banking system. The supply of reserves is the primary exogenous monetary policy lever within the model, reflecting the Federal Reserve’s open market purchases or sales of Treasury securities. Longer-term interest rates are driven by shorter-term rates as well as factors affecting the slope of the yield curve. These factors include inflation expectations, government borrowing requirements, and corporate finance needs.

VI. Inflation. Inflation is modeled as a controlled, interactive process involving wages, prices, and market conditions. The principal domestic cost influences are labor compensation, nonfarm productivity, and foreign input costs that later are driven by the exchange rate, the price of oil, and foreign wholesale price inflation. This set of cost influences drives each of the industry-specific producer price indexes, in combination with a demand pressure indicator and appropriately weighted composites of the other producer price indexes.

VII. Supply. In this model, aggregate supply (or potential GNP), is estimated by a Cobb-Douglas production function that combines factor input growth and improvements to total factor productivity. Factor input equals a weighted average of labor, business fixed capital, and energy. Factor supplies are defined by estimates of the full employment labor force, the full employment capital stock net of pollution abatement equipment, the domestic production of petroleum and natural gas, and the stock of infrastructure. Total factor productivity depends upon the stock of research and development capital and trend technological change.

VIII. Expectations. Expectations impact several expenditure categories in the model, but the principal nuance relates to the entire spectrum of interest rates. Shifts in price expectations or the expected government capital needs influences are captured directly in this model through price expectations and budget deficit terms. The former impacts all interest rates and the latter impacts intermediate- and long-term rates. On the expenditure side, inflationary expectations impact consumption via consumer sentiment, while growth expectations affect business investment.

63 THE IDAHO ECONOMIC MODEL

The Idaho Economic Model (IEM) is an income and employment based model of Idaho's economy. The Model consists of a simultaneous system of linear regression equations, which are estimated using quarterly data. The primary exogenous variables are obtained from the IHS Economics’ US Macroeconomic Model. Endogenous variables are forecast at the statewide level of aggregation.

The focal point of the IEM is Idaho personal income, which is given by the identity:

personal income = wage and salary payments + other labor income + farm proprietors' income + nonfarm proprietors' income + property income + transfer payments - contributions for social insurance + residence adjustment.

With the exception of farm proprietors' income and wage and salary payments, each of the components of personal income is estimated stochastically by a single equation. Farm proprietors' income and wage and salary payments each comprise submodels containing a system of stochastic equations and identities.

The farm proprietor sector is estimated using a highly-aggregated submodel consisting of equations for crop marketing receipts, livestock marketing receipts, production expenses, inventory changes, imputed rent income, corporate farm income, and government payments to farmers. Farm proprietors' income includes inventory changes and imputed rent, but this component is netted out of the tax base.

At the heart of the IEM is the wage and salary sector, which includes stochastic employment equations for 23 North American Industry Classification System employment categories. Conceptually, the employment equations are divided into basic and domestic activities. The basic employment equations are specified primarily as functions of national demand and supply variables. Domestic employment equations are specified primarily as functions of state-specific demand variables. Average annual wages are estimated for several broad employment categories and are combined with employment to arrive at aggregate wage and salary payments.

The demographic component of the model is used to forecast components of population change and housing starts. Resident population, births, and deaths are modeled stochastically. Net migration is calculated residually from the estimates for those variables. Housing starts are divided into single and multiple units. Each equation is functionally related to economic and population variables.

The output of the IEM (i.e., the forecast values of the endogenous variables) is determined by the parameters of the equations and the values of exogenous variables over the forecast period. The values of equation parameters are determined by the historic values of both the exogenous and endogenous variables. IEM equation parameters are estimated using the technique of ordinary least squares. Model equations are occasionally respecified in response to the dynamic nature of the Idaho and national economies. Parameter values for a particular equation (given the same specification) may change as a result of revisions in the historic data or a change in the time interval of the estimation. In general, parameter values should remain relatively constant over time, with changes reflecting changing structural relationships.

While the equation parameters are determined by structural relationships and remain relatively fixed, the forecast period exogenous variable values are more volatile determinants of the forecast values of endogenous variables. They are more often subject to change as expectations regarding future economic

64 behavior change, and they are more likely to give rise to debate over appropriate values. As mentioned above, the forecast period values of exogenous variables are primarily obtained from IHS Economics’ US macroeconomic model.

Since the output of the IEM depends in large part upon the output of the IHS Economics model, an understanding of the IHS Economics model, its input assumptions, and its output is useful in evaluating the results of the IEM's forecast. The assumptions and output of the IHS Economics model are discussed in the National Forecast section.

65 IDAHO ECONOMIC MODEL

EEA_ID = EEA_ID_GOODS + EEA_ID_NONGOODS

EEA_ID_2100 = 3259.411 + 18.107*@MOVAV(ID0IP2122_2123(-1),4) - 2251.438*JECIWSP/WPI10 - 1233.660*@MOVAV(JEXCHOITPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_2300 = -16369.000 + 283.968*ID0HSPRS1_A + 243.401*ID0HSPRS1_A(-1) + 202.834*ID0HSPRS1_A(-2) + 162.267*ID0HSPRS1_A(-3) + 121.700*ID0HSPRS1_A(-4) + 81.134*ID0HSPRS1_A(-5) + 40.567*ID0HSPRS1_A(-6) + 0.144*EEA_ID_44_45 + 0.123*EEA_ID_44_45(-1) + 0.103*EEA_ID_44_45(-2) + 0.082*EEA_ID_44_45(-3) + 0.062*EEA_ID_44_45(-4) + 0.041*EEA_ID_44_45(-5) + 0.021*EEA_ID_44_45(-6)

EEA_ID_3110 = 24798.382 + 374.912*@MOVAV(IPSG311(-1),4) - 626.728*@MOVAV((IPSG311/EMN311),6) - 4311.193*@MOVAV(JEXCHOITPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_3230 = 1402.396 + 27.305*@MOVAV(IPSG323,4) - 12.146*@MOVAV((IPSG323/EMN323),8) - 336.893*@MOVAV(JEXCHMTPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_3250 = 4262.633 + 6.191*@MOVAV(IPSG3253(-1),8) – 1920.391*DUM951ON - 648.391*@MOVAV(JEXCHMTPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_3320 = 1642.543 + 33.573*@MOVAV(IPSG332,2) + 10.103*@TREND - 1706.989*@MOVAV(JEXCHOITPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_3330 = 9186.524 + 0.093*@MOVAV(IPSG3332,8)*@TREND - 32.692*@TREND - 2388.720*@MOVAV(JEXCHOITPREAL(-1),4)

EEA_ID_3340 = 15923.913 + 238.384*@MOVAV(IPSG334,4) - 31.767*DUM991ON*IPSG334 - 285.020*@MOVAV(IPSG334,8)/@MOVAV(EMD334,8)

EEA_ID_4200 = 6712.502 + 0.258*EEA_ID_44_45

EEA_ID_44_45 = 47482.323 + 204.193*@MOVAV(YPADJ_ID,4)/@MOVAV(JPC,4) – 434.691*@TREND

EEA_ID_48_49_22 = -4807.007 + 0.671*@MOVAV(EEA_ID_4200,2) + 5047.151*@MOVAV(ID0NPT(-1),8)

EEA_ID_5100 = -11055.481 + 84.549*@MOVAV(IPSG51111,4) + 103.428*@TREND - 2631.975*@MOVAV(JEXCHMTPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_52_53 = 9607.477 – 4844.201*DUM981ON + 1.709*@MOVAV(SP500,4) + 44.171*YPADJ_ID/JPC + 126.445*@MOVAV(ID0HSPR(-1),4)

66 EEA_ID_54_55_56 = -7552.461 + 1.751*@MOVAV(ID0YP(-1),4)

EEA_ID_61_62 = -49706.354 + 70527.203*@MOVAV(ID0NPT,4) + 0.434*@MOVAV(ID0YP$(-1),2)

EEA_ID_71_72 = -2005.660 + 1.491*@MOVAV((ID0YP/ID0NPT),4) + 83.345*@TREND

EEA_ID_8100 = 5266.830 + 30.649*@MOVAV(YPADJ_ID,4)/@MOVAV(JPC,4) + 1214.612*DUM931964

EEA_ID_DMANU = EEA_ID_WOOD + EEA_ID_3320 + EEA_ID_3330 + EEA_ID_3340 + EEA_ID_MFDNEC

EEA_ID_GOODS = EEA_ID_MANU + EEA_ID_2300 + EEA_ID_2100

EEA_ID_GV = EEA_ID_GVSL + EEA_ID_GVF

EEA_ID_GVF = 10209.559 + 87.221*GFOCWSS - 0.418*GFOCWSS*@TREND + 594.541*DUMCENSUS

EEA_ID_GVSL = EEA_ID_GVSLAD + EEA_ID_ GVSLED

EEA_ID_GVSLAD = 8154.706 + 12481.868*@MOVAV(ID0NPT,4) + 0.635*@MOVAV(ID0YPTXB(-4),4) + 4111.074*DUM911062

EEA_ID_GVSLED = -2608.401 + 143193.305*ID0NPT*((N-N16A)/N) - 0.018*DUM071ON*ID0YPTXB + 0.261*ID0YPTXB

EEA_ID_MANU = EEA_ID_DMANU + EEA_ID_NMANU

EEA_ID_MFDNEC = -3574.840 + 77.510*@MOVAV(IPSG339,2) + 37.501*@MOVAV(IPSG337,2) + 42.187*@MOVAV(IPSG335,2) – 1984.883*@MOVAV(JEXCHMTPREAL(-1),2)

EEA_ID_MFNNEC = 1270.421 + 19.035*@MOVAV(IPSG322,2) – 426.188*@MOVAV(JEXCHMTPREAL(-1),2) + 11.723*@TREND

EEA_ID_NMANU = EEA_ID_3110 + EEA_ID_3230 + EEA_ID_3250 + EEA_ID_MFNNEC

EEA_ID_NONGOODS = EEA_ID_SV + EEA_ID_4200 + EEA_ID_44_45 + EEA_ID_GV

EEA_ID_SV = EEA_ID_48_49_22 + EEA_ID_5100 + EEA_ID_52_53 + EEA_ID_54_55_56 + EEA_ID_61_62 + EEA_ID_71_72 + EEA_ID_8100

EEA_ID_WOOD = 21877.173 + 94.658*@MOVAV(IPSG321,2) - 11488.116*JECIWSP/WPI08 - 23.230*IPSG321/EMD321 – 4933.158*@MOVAV(JEXCHOITPREAL(-1),2) - 37.543*@TREND

ID0AHEMF = -2.656 + 11.948*EEA_ID_DMANU(-1)/EEA_ID_MANU(-1)*@MOVAV(JECIWSP(-1),4) + 32.967*EEA_ID_NMANU(-1)/EEA_ID_MANU(-1)*@MOVAV(JECIWSP(-1),4) 67

ID0CRCROP = 156169.815 + 0.013*CRCROP + 2649.749*@TREND

ID0CRLVSTK = -2044314.959 + 0.030*CRCATCVS + 0.054*CRDAIRY + 14630.837*@TREND

ID0EXFP = -533622.424 + 1378543.187*WPI01 + 15696.500*@TREND + 0.004*EXPUS$

ID0HSPR = ID0HSPRS1_A + ID0HSPRS2A_A

ID0HSPRS1_A = -438.164 - 0.952*(RMMTGEXIST(-1)-@MOVAV(RMMTGEXIST(-1),4)) + 436.409*ID0KHU1/ID0KHU1(-4) + 0.018*@TREND*@MOVAV(ID0NPT(-1),4)

ID0HSPRS2A_A = 16.679 + 37782.713*(@MOVAV(ID0NPT(-1),4)-@MOVAV(ID0NPT(-5),4))/ID0KHU1 - 1.094*RMMTGEXIST - 0.073*@TREND

ID0KHU = ID0KHU1 + ID0KHU2A

ID0KHU1 = ((0.997)^0.25) * ID0KHU1(-1) + ID0HSPRS1_A/4

ID0KHU2A = ((0.997)^0.25) * ID0KHU2A(-1) + ID0HSPRS2A_A/4

ID0NB = -7.357 + 32.373*ID0NPT - 0.114*@TREND

ID0ND = 0.858 + 6.357*ID0NPT + 0.003*@TREND

ID0NMG = (ID0NPT - ID0NPT(-4)) - (ID0NB - ID0ND)/1000

ID0NPT = 0.428 + 0.0000002*@MOVAV(EEA_ID,4) + 0.006*@TREND

ID0WBB$ = ID0WBBMF$ + ID0WBBOTH$ + ID0WBBCC$ + ID0WBBF$ + ID0WBBMIL$

ID0WBBCC$ = (ID0WRWCC$ * EEA_ID_2300)/1000000

ID0WBBF$ = -144.115 + 339.245*WPI02

ID0WBBMF$ = (ID0WRWMF$ * EEA_ID_MANU)/1000000

ID0WBBMIL$ = 17.277 + 303.926*(ID0NPT/N)*GFMLCWSS

ID0WBBOTH$ = ID0WRWOTH$ * (EEA_ID – EEA_ID_2300 - EEA_ID_MANU)/1000000

ID0WRWCC$ = 9925.738 + 1462.224*ID0AHEMF

ID0WRWMF$ = 2990.481 + 2316.453*ID0AHEMF 68

ID0WRWOTH$ = 6553.845 + 1424.236*ID0AHEMF

ID0YDIR$ = -199.635 + 1.070*(YPAINT+ZADIV+YPRENTADJ)*@MOVAV(ID0YP$(-1),4)/@MOVAV(YP(-1),4)

ID0YFC$ = -7013.961 + 0.919*ID0YFC$(-1) + 253.870*@TREND

ID0YINV_R$ = 2724.480+ 0.665*ID0YINV_R$(-1) + 634.158*@TREND

ID0YP = ID0YP$/JPC*100

ID0YP$ = ID0WBB$ + ID0YSUP$ + ID0YDIR$ + ID0YPRNF$ + ID0YPRF$ + ID0YTR$ + ID0YRA$ – ID0YSI$

ID0YP$PC = ID0YP$/ID0NPT

ID0YPNF = ID0YPNF$/JPC*100

ID0YPNF$ = ID0YP$ - ID0YPRF$ - ID0WBBF$

ID0YPNFPC = ID0YPNF$/JPC*100/ID0NPT

ID0YPPC = ID0YP/ID0NPT

ID0YPRF$ = 38.438 + 0.300*(ID0CRCROP+ID0CRLVSTK+ID0YTRF$+ID0YINV_R$-ID0YFC$-ID0EXFP)/1000 + 4.000*@TREND

ID0YPRNF$ = 52.425 + 4.533*YPPROPADJNF

ID0YPTXB = (ID0YP$ - ID0YSI$ - ID0YTR$)/JPC*100

ID0YRA$ = -109.185 + 0.038*ID0WBB$

ID0YSI$ = -23.402 + 1.176*TXSIDOM*ID0WBB$/YPCOMPWSD

ID0YSUP$ = 81.316 + 1.520*YPCOMPSUPPAI*(ID0WBB$/YPCOMPWSD)

ID0YTR$ = -70.065 + 875.852*(YPTRFGF+YPTRFGSL)*(ID0NPT/N)

ID0YTRF$ = 24979.567 + 0.010*TRF$

IDWAGE = (ID0WBB$ - ID0WBBF$ - ID0WBBMIL$)/EEA_ID * 1000000

YPADJ_ID = ID0YPNF$ + @MOVAV(ID0YPRF$,4) + @MOVAV(ID0WBBF$,4)

69 ENDOGENOUS VARIABLES

EEA_ID Employment on nonagricultural payrolls, total EEA_ID_2100 Employment in mining EEA_ID_2300 Employment in construction EEA_ID_3110 Employment in food processing EEA_ID_3230 Employment in printing EEA_ID_3250 Employment in chemicals EEA_ID_3320 Employment in fabricated metal products EEA_ID_3330 Employment in machinery EEA_ID_3340 Employment in computers and electronic products EEA_ID_4200 Employment in wholesale trade EEA_ID_44_45 Employment in retail trade EEA_ID_48_49_22 Employment transportation, warehousing, and utilities EEA_ID_5100 Employment in information EEA_ID_52_53 Employment in finance, insurance, and real estate EEA_ID_54_55_56 Employment in professional, scientific, and technical services EEA_ID_61_62 Employment in health care and educational services EEA_ID_71_72 Employment in leisure and hospitality EEA_ID_8100 Employment in other services EEA_ID_DMANU Employment in durable goods manufacturing EEA_ID_GOODS Employment in goods producing EEA_ID_GV Employment in government EEA_ID_GVF Employment in federal government EEA_ID_GVSL Employment in state and local government EEA_ID_GVSLAD Employment in state and local government, administration EEA_ID_GVSLED Employment in state and local government, education EEA_ID_MANU Employment in manufacturing EEA_ID_MFDNEC Employment in other durable manufacturing EEA_ID_MFNNEC Employment in other nondurable manufacturing EEA_ID_NMANU Employment in nondurable manufacturing EEA_ID_NONGOODS Employment in nongoods producing EEA_ID_SV Employment in services EEA_ID_WOOD Employment in wood products and logging ID0AHEMF Average hourly earnings in manufacturing ID0CRCROP Cash receipts, crops ID0CRLVSTK Cash receipts, livestock ID0EXFP Farm production expenses ID0HSPR Housing starts, total ID0HSPRS1_A Housing starts, single units ID0HSPRS2A_A Housing starts, multiple units ID0KHU Housing stock, total ID0KHU1 Housing stock, single units ID0KHU2A Housing stock, multiple units ID0NB Number of births ID0ND Number of deaths ID0NMG Net in-migration of persons ID0NPT Resident population ID0WBB$ Wage and salary disbursements

70 ID0WBBCC$ Wage and salary disbursements, construction ID0WBBF$ Wage and salary disbursements, farm ID0WBBMF$ Wage and salary disbursements, manufacturing ID0WBBMIL$ Wage and salary disbursements, military ID0WBBOTH$ Wage and salary disbursements, except farm, manufacturing, military, and construction ID0WRWCC$ Average annual wage, construction ID0WRWMF$ Average annual wage, manufacturing ID0WRWOTH$ Average annual wage, except farm, manufacturing, military, and construction ID0YDIR$ Dividend, interest, and rent income ID0YFC$ Corporate farm income ID0YINV_R$ Farm inventory value changes, imputed rent, and income ID0YP Total real personal income, 2005 dollars ID0YP$ Total personal income ID0YP$PC Per capita personal income ID0YPNF Nonfarm personal income, 2005 dollars ID0YPNF$ Nonfarm personal income ID0YPNFPC Per capita nonfarm income, 2005 dollars ID0YPPC Real per capita personal income, 2005 dollars ID0YPRF$ Net farm proprietors' income ID0YPRNF$ Nonfarm proprietors' income ID0YPTXB Tax base, 2005 dollars ID0YRA$ Residence adjustment, personal income ID0YSI$ Contributions for social insurance ID0YSUP$ Other labor income ID0YTR$ Transfer payments to individuals ID0YTRF$ Government payments to Idaho farmers IDWAGE Idaho average annual wage YPADJ_ID Adjusted total personal income

71 EXOGENOUS VARIABLES

CNCSR Personal consumption expenditures, clothing and shoes, 2005 dollars, chain weighted CNOOR Personal consumption expenditures, other nondurable goods, 2005 dollars, chain weighted CRCATCVS Cash receipts, US cattle and calves CRCROP Cash receipts, US crops CRDAIRY Cash receipts, US dairy

DUM071ON These are dummy variables used in regression DUM911062 equations for the purpose of capturing the impacts DUM931964 of discrete economic or noneconomic event such as DUM951ON strikes, plant opening, or closures, unusual weather DUM981ON conditions, etc. DUMCENSUS TREND

EG91 Employment in federal government EMD321 Employment in wood products EMD334 Employment in computer and electronic products EMN311 Employment in food manufacturing EMN323 Employment in printing and related support activities EXPUS$ Agricultural production expenses, US GFMLCWSS Federal government defense personnel outlays GFOR Real federal nondefense purchases of goods and services GFR Real federal purchases of goods and services ID0IP2122_2123 Industrial production index, metal and nonmetal ore mining, 2007=100.0 IPSG311 Industrial production index, food, 2007=100.0 IPSG321 Industrial production index, wood products, 2007=100.0 IPSG322 Industrial production index, paper, 2007=100.0 IPSG323 Industrial production index, printing, 2007=100.0 IPSG3253 Industrial production index, agricultural chemicals, 2007=100.0 IPSG332 Industrial production index, fabricated metal products, 2007=100.0 IPSG3332 Industrial production index, industrial machinery, 2007=100.0 IPSG334 Industrial production index, computer and electronic products, 2007=100.0 IPSG337 Industrial production index, furniture and related products, 2007=100.0 IPSG339 Industrial production index, miscellaneous manufacturers, 2007=100.0 IPSG51111 Industrial production index, newspaper publishing, 2007=100.0 JECIWSP Employment cost index—private sector wages and salaries, December 2005=1.00 JEXCHMTPREAL Real US trade-weighted exchange rate with major currency trading partners, 2005=1.00 JEXCHMOITPREAL Real US trade-weighted exchange rate with other important trading partners, 2005=1.00 JPC Implicit price deflator, personal consumption, 2005=100.0, chain weighted N Population, US N16A Population, US, aged 16 and older

72 RMMTGEXIST Effective conventional mortgage rate, existing homes, combined lenders SP500 Standard & Poor’s 500 index of common stocks TRF$ Government payments to US farms TXSIEC Personal contributions for social insurance, US WPI01 Producer price index, farm products, 1982=1.0 WPI02 Producer price index, processed foods and feeds, 1982=1.0 WPI08 Producer price index, lumber and wood products, 1982=1.0 WPI10 Producer price index, metals and metal products, 1982=1.0 YP Personal income YPAINT Personal interest income YPCOMPSUPPAI Other labor income, US YPCOMPWSD Wage and salary disbursements YPPROPADJNF Nonfarm proprietors' income (with inventory valuation and capital Consumption adjustments) YPRENTADJ Rental income of persons with capital consumption adjustment YPTRFGF Federal transfer payments to individuals YPTRFGSL State and local transfer payments to individuals ZADIV Dividends

73 School District 25 - School Food Service Eligibility Percentages - April 2014

Eligible Eligible Total Free Reduced Paid School Enrollment Students % Students % Students % Alameda Middle School 619 305 49.27% 75 12.12% 239 38.61% Century High School 1,186 349 29.43% 78 6.58% 759 64.00% Chubbuck Elementary School 541 180 33.27% 64 11.83% 297 54.90% Edahow Elementary School 303 84 27.72% 21 6.93% 198 65.35% Ellis Elementary School 510 238 46.67% 72 14.12% 200 39.22% Franklin Middle School 741 234 31.58% 46 6.21% 461 62.21% Gate City Elementary School 452 117 25.88% 35 7.74% 300 66.37% Greenacres Elementary School 345 193 55.94% 32 9.28% 120 34.78% Hawthorne Middle School 740 305 41.22% 92 12.43% 343 46.35% Highland High School 1,384 336 24.28% 106 7.66% 942 68.06% Indian Hills Elementary School 590 260 44.07% 63 10.68% 267 45.25% Irving Middle School 558 290 51.97% 44 7.89% 224 40.14% Pocatello Juvenile Detention Center 20 8 40.00% 0 0.00% 12 60.00% Jefferson Elementary School 435 314 72.18% 39 8.97% 82 18.85% Kinport Middle School 26 21 80.77% 3 11.54% 2 7.69% Lewis & Clark Elementary School 564 349 61.88% 76 13.48% 139 24.65% Lincoln ECC 159 86 54.09% 12 7.55% 61 38.36% Lincoln ECC Headstart 69 69 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% New Horizon High School 159 116 72.96% 13 8.18% 30 18.87% Pocatello High School 1,045 469 44.88% 76 7.27% 500 47.85% Syringa Elementary School 532 267 50.19% 42 7.89% 223 41.92% Tendoy Elementary School 300 154 51.33% 36 12.00% 110 36.67% Tyhee Elementary School 518 230 44.40% 47 9.07% 241 46.53% Washington Elementary School 280 170 60.71% 19 6.79% 91 32.50% Wilcox Elementary School 578 349 60.38% 72 12.46% 157 27.16%

TOTAL DISTRICT WIDE 12,654 5,493 43.41% 1,163 9.19% 5,998 47.40% PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

This Purchase and Sale Agreement (“Agreement”) is made by and between POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 25 (“Buyer”) and IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY (“Seller”). IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. SALE OF PROPERTY: Seller shall sell and Buyer shall purchase, upon the terms and conditions of this Agreement, all of Seller’s right, title and interest in and to the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference (hereafter the “Property”): 2. PURCHASE PRICE: The total purchase price to be paid by Buyer to Seller for the Property shall be ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($135,500.00) (“Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price shall be paid to Seller by Buyer in cash or other immediately available funds at Closing. 3. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW: Buyer may inspect and conduct its due diligence review of the Property at Buyer’s sole cost for a period of twenty-one (21) days after the date this Agreement is signed by both parties (“Due Diligence Review”). The Due Diligence Review may include inspections of the Property, surveys, appraisals, records and reports relating to the Property, Buyer’s review of matters disclosed in Seller’s Residential Real Property Disclosures, and all matters disclosed in the commitment for the Title Insurance Policy. Buyer and Seller shall cooperate in scheduling inspections and Seller shall provide reasonable access to the Property to Buyer. Buyer shall be deemed to have approved its Due Diligence Review unless Buyer notifies Seller in writing prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Review that Buyer disapproves of the Due Diligence Review. If Buyer timely notifies Seller of its disapproval of the Due Diligence Review, this Agreement shall terminate. 4. TITLE: Except as otherwise provided herein, Seller has or will have as of Closing, fee simple title to the Property, or will have authority from the party with fee simple title to the Property to sell such Property, free and clear of all mortgages and deeds of trust but subject to matters of record in the records of Bannock County, Idaho, matters that a correct survey would disclose, and easements or claims of easement not shown by the public records. Title to the Property is to be conveyed to Buyer by warranty deed and is to be insurable. Ownership of Parcel 1 of the Property is held in the name of Idaho State College. Idaho Code 33-3011 provides that wherever the name Idaho State College shall appear in any statute, such statute hereby is amended to read Idaho State University. Ownership of Parcel 2 of the Property is held in the name of the Idaho State Board of Education. The Idaho State Board of Education has authorized Seller to sell the Property as provided in the attached Exhibit B. 5. TITLE INSURANCE: Prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Review, Seller will provide Buyer a standard form commitment for an owner=s title insurance policy (“Title Insurance Policy”) from First American Title Insurance Company located at 2240 East Center Street, Pocatello, Idaho 83201, insuring title to the Property in a policy amount equal to the Purchase Price. 6. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS: Taxes and assessments against the Property for 2014 shall be pro-rated between Seller and Buyer as of the date of Closing, and thereafter shall be the sole responsibility of Buyer. 7. BUYER’S CONTINGENCIES: Closing of this Agreement is contingent upon satisfaction of the following conditions unless waived by Buyer in writing:

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT - 1 7.1 Buyer obtaining acceptable financing and/or cash in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. 7.2 Buyer, in the exercise of its sole discretion, approving its Due Diligence Review prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Review as set forth in this Agreement. 7.3 At Closing, Seller delivering a duly executed, acknowledged and recordable warranty deed conveying the Property to Buyer as required under this Agreement. 7.4 Full performance of all of Seller’s covenants contained in this Agreement. If any of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied at (or if applicable, prior to) Closing, Buyer may terminate this Agreement by delivering written notice thereof to Seller. 8. SELLER'S CONTINGENCIES: Closing of this Agreement is contingent upon satisfaction of the following conditions unless waived by Seller in writing: 8.1 Buyer timely performing all of their obligations under this Agreement. 8.2 Seller’s receipt of the Purchase Price at Closing. 8.3 Full performance of all of Buyer’s covenants contained in this Agreement. If any of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied at (or if applicable, prior to) Closing, Seller may terminate this Agreement by delivering written notice thereof to Buyer. 9. CLOSING: Closing shall occur at the office of First American Title Company located at 2240 East Center Street, Pocatello, Idaho 83201 (“Escrow Holder”) at such time as the parties may mutually agree but in no event later than ______, 2014 (“Closing”). Closing may occur after ______, 2014 only if both parties agree in writing. On or prior to Closing, the following shall occur: 9.1 Documents of Conveyance. Seller shall furnish to the Escrow Holder a warranty deed conveying title to the Property to Buyer as set forth in this Agreement. 9.2 Funds for Purchase. Buyer shall deliver to Seller the Purchase Price in cash or other immediately available funds. 9.3 Closing Costs/Escrow Fees. Buyer shall be responsible for paying all closing fees and costs as required under Idaho Code 58-334. Buyer and Seller shall each be responsible for their own respective attorney fees, if any. 10. RISK OF LOSS: Seller shall bear the risk of loss to the Property until Closing. 11. SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS: Seller hereby warrants, represents and covenants to Buyer that: 11.1 Seller has not received or relied on any statement or representation of Buyer which is not herein expressed. 11.2 This Agreement constitutes the legal, valid, and binding obligation of Seller, enforceable against Seller in accordance with its terms. 11.3 All taxes required to be paid by Seller with respect to the Property have been fully paid or will be fully paid on or prior to Closing. 11.4 No labor has been performed or materials supplied to or for the Property, the cost of which has not been fully paid or will not be fully paid on or prior to Closing. The foregoing covenants, representations and warranties of Seller shall be remade as of Closing and shall survive Closing.

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT - 2 12. BUYER'S REPRESENTATIONS: Buyer hereby warrants, represents and covenants to Seller that: 12.1 Buyer has not received or relied on any statement or representation of Seller which is not herein expressed. 12.2 This Agreement constitutes the legal, valid, and binding obligation of Buyer, enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its terms. The foregoing covenants, representations and warranties of Buyer shall be remade as of Closing and shall survive Closing. 13. PROPERTY CONDITION: Except as otherwise specifically stated in this Agreement, Seller hereby disclaims any warranty, guaranty, or representation, oral or written, past, present, or future of, as to, or concerning the Property. Buyer acknowledges that Buyer has had sufficient opportunity to inspect the Property and that Buyer is relying solely on its own investigation and due diligence of the Property. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that it is purchasing the Property in its present condition “AS IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS” and Seller has no obligation to construct or repair any improvements to the Property. 14. NO BROKERS: Buyer and Seller each covenant to the other that the covenanting party has not entered into any agreement or incurred any obligation which might result in the obligation of the other party to pay a sales or brokerage commission, realtor’s fee, finder=s fee, or referral fee with respect to the sale of the Property. 15. DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY: If prior to Closing, the Property is damaged or destroyed by fire or other causes, Buyer may terminate this Agreement by giving Seller written notice. 16. NOTICES: Any notices and communications between the parties for the purpose of complying with or enforcing the terms of this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered to the other party either personally or by certified mail, return-receipt requested at the addresses set forth on the first page of this Agreement. Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt, unless the recipient ignores or refuses to sign for the certified letter, in which event notice shall be deemed to have been completed upon attempted delivery by the postal service. 17. TIME OF ESSENCE: Time is of the essence for all obligations under this Agreement. 18. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND PERMITTED ASSIGNS: This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties. Neither party may assign this Agreement without first obtaining the written consent of the other party. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all previous oral or written agreements between the parties concerning the subject matters of this Agreement. 20. MERGER: The provisions of this Agreement shall survive any termination of this Agreement or Closing and shall not merge into any deed delivered and accepted upon Closing of the transaction contemplated herein. 21. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS: Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in the event either party is required to retain the services of an attorney in order to enforce the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any litigation arising therefrom shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and costs.

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT - 3 22. GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. Any changes to this Agreement must be made in writing and signed by Seller and Buyer. 23. COUNTERPARTS: This Agreement may be executed by the parties in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. A faxed copy of a party’s signature shall have the same effect as an original signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Agreement effective as of ______, 2014.

BUYER:

______Date

SELLER:

______Date

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT - 4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description

Parcel 1:

Parcel Number RPCPP087105

Tr SE1/4SE1/4 Tax 55 S25-T6S-R34E 8.68 Acres

Parcel 2:

Parcel Number RPCPP108806

Tr E1/2NE1/4 Tax 270 S 36-T6S-R34E 4.20 Acres

EXHIBIT B Please see attached Idaho State Board of Education motion

School District 25 Food Service Memo

To: Bart Reed From: Tom Wilson CC: Date: 5/8/2014 Re: Proposed Meal Price Increase for 2014-2015 School Year

It is proposed that School Food Service be allowed to raise the lunch and breakfast meal prices by $.10 each for full paid students for the 2014-2015 school year as well as Adult prices for meals as indicated below.

Current Meal Price Proposed Meal Price

Full Paid Elementary Lunch $2.00 $2.10

Full Paid Secondary Lunch $2.10 $2.20

Full Paid Breakfast $1.60 $1.70

The following price increase for Adults does not require Board approval:

Adult Lunch $3.12 + tax = $3.31 $3.30 + tax = $3.50

Adult Breakfast $1.94 + tax = $2.06 $2.12 + tax = $2.25

This increase is being requested for the following reasons:

 First and foremost, the USDA is mandating a price increase to help meet the requirements in section 205 of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. The PLE (Paid Lunch Equity) Tool has been provided to School Food Authorities to help calculate their paid lunch price increase to meet these requirements. After using the PLE Tool for our School Food Service Program, it has been determined that the maximum cap increase allowed would be $.10 which will accommodate the gradual increase necessary to reach the required price as defined by USDA Regulation.

 The increase would ensure sufficient funds are provided to the nonprofit school food service account for lunches served to students not eligible for free or reduced price meals.

 USDA financial standards encourage that a three month operating expense be maintained in all local Food Service operations. This increase would ensure that the proper balance between revenue and expense is sustained at the appropriate level.

1 RESOLUTION

WHEREAS on May 20, 2014 the Board of Trustees of Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25, Bannock County held discussion during its regular Board of Trustees Meeting to consider the merits of increasing current fees and introducing new fees.

WHEREAS motion was duly made by Trustee ______and seconded by Trustee ______authorizing a hearing to take place after proper publication of notice as required by Idaho Code 63-1311A.

WHEREAS in accordance with Idaho Code 63-1311A, a notice of hearing was duly published once each week for the two weeks preceding the week during which the hearing required was held. This notice was published in the Idaho State Journal on June 3 and June 10, 2013. A copy of the notice is attached and by this reference becomes a part hereof.

WHEREAS in accordance with Idaho Code 63-1311A a public hearing was held on June 17, 2014. Upon motion was duly made by Trustee ______and seconded by Trustee ______the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25, Bannock County, Board of Trustees approved increasing current annual fees and the two new fees as listed on the attached notice.

FURTHER, the Board of Trustees of Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25, Bannock County, appoints the Director of Business Operations, Bart J. Reed, as the duly authorized representative in this connection to act as the agent for said Board to make sure that the fee increase is incorporated into the fee schedule for the 2014-2015 school year.

IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED this 17th day of June, 2014 and executed under official seal approving above-described fee increase.

(Seal) ______Signature - Board Chairman

______Signature - Board Clerk

POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25

NOTICE OF FEE INCREASE

Pocatello / Chubbuck School District No. 25 has proposed to increase current fees and introduce new fees by an amount that exceeds one hundred five percent (105%) of the fees collected the previous year. The following schedule is an estimate of what this change may mean to a user:

Percent Source of Fees Frequency Previous Rate Proposed Rate Increase Full Paid Elementary Lunch Meal 2.00 2.10 5.0% Full Paid Secondary Lunch Meal 2.10 2.20 4.8% Full Paid Breakfast Meal 1.60 1.70 6.3% Adult Lunch Meal 3.31 3.50 5.7% Adult Breakfast Meal 2.06 2.25 9.2%

All concerned citizens are invited to attend a public hearing on the proposed fees to be held on June 17, 2014 at 5:30 PM in the School District No. 25 Administration Office, Education Services Center Board Room, 3115 Pole Line Road, Pocatello, Idaho.

Posted and Published: June 3, 2014 and June 10, 2014

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Bannock Count y, Idaho

TIMELINE FOR FEE INCREASE

Person(s)/Group Date Action Responsible Board Meeting / Discuss Superintendent/Directors May 20, 2014 increase and communicate intent to hold a public hearing Advertisement to Idaho State Business Services Coordinator May 27, 2014 Journal First Advertisement Post / Idaho State Journal; June 3, 2014 Publish Administrative Assistant to Superintendent – Posting June 10, 2014 Second Advertisement Idaho State Journal Board Packet – Info Administrative Assistant to June 13, 2014 Superintendent Public Hearing / Board Director(s) June 17, 2014 Meeting Adopt Resolution to Increase Board of Trustees; Chair; June 17, 2014 Fees (Copy to Business Clerk and Administrative Services Coordinator for files) Assistant to Superintendent

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner Board of Trustees

FROM: Bart J. Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

SUBJECT: Change in Liability and Property Insurance Carrier

Allan Ranstrom, Senior Vice President for Moreton & Company who has provided property and liability coverage for the District met to announce there would be a change in the District’s liability carrier. After months of negotiation Moreton & Company will separate from CNA Insurance Company and will partnership with ICRMP Insurance Company.

Attached is an email indicating several factors and reasons Moreton & Company believe this new partnership will help contain costs while also enhancing the present insurance coverage. CNA will continue to handle present claims already submitted during the transition. New business will shift to ICRMP beginning July1, 2014.

Additional information is provided regarding specific coverage.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: PERMISSION TO HOLD SURPLUS PROPERTY AUCTION

Permission from the Board is requested to proceed with the auction of surplus materials. The auction generates income, while disposing of vehicles, equipment and materials that are deemed obsolete.

The proposed date for this event is Saturday, July 12, 2014, and will be conducted by Prime Time Auctions, 3400 South 5th Avenue.

Board Action Requested: Motion to approve holding the auction on July 12, 2014 at Prime Time Auctions.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: CAFETERIA TABLES - Tendoy Elementary

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for Cafeteria Tables. Fourteen vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from three vendors as shown. The lowest responsible bid is highlighted.

Vendor Bid Award Amount Caxton Printers, Ltd., Caldwell, ID $25,865.00 School Specialty, Inc., Smithfield, UT $24,241.00 William Peterson & Associates, SLC, UT $24,109.19

Board Action Requested: Motion to award bid to William Peterson & Associates in the amount of $24,109.19 for cafeteria tables at Tendoy Elementary. This amount represents the lowest responsible bid for the project, and is within the budget for the 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Project Program.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: BID FOR CARPETING AND TILE AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for carpeting and tile at various locations. Nine vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from two vendors as shown below.

Vendor Project No. 1 Project No. 2 Project No. 3 Project No. 4 Project No.5 Bid Award HHS AMS IMS Syringa Tendoy TOTAL Wall 2 Wall Pocatello, ID $7,843.00 $872.00 $2,727.00 $39,881.00 $44,721.00 $96,044.00 Carpets Plus Color Tile Pocatello, ID $6,944.07 $789.99 $2,601.36 $42,060.45 $39,179.72 $91,575.59

Board Action Requested: Motion to award Carpets Plus Color Tile in the amount of $91,575.59. This represents the lowest responsible bid. The total bid award is approximately $55,230 under the estimated 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program Budget of $146,806.00. POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: BID FOR CONCRETE REPLACEMENT OF SIDEWALKS AND STAIRWAYS AT VARIOUS SCHOOLS

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for concrete replacement of sidewalks and stairways at various schools. Twelve vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from three vendors as shown below. The lowest responsible bid for each project is highlighted.

Absolute Cornerstone Dykman Project Project Location Concrete Concrete Construction No. Salmon, ID Pocatello, ID Pocatello, ID $6,866.00 1 Century $8,736.00 $5,709.00 $3,700.00 2 Irving $6,433.00 $6,200.00 $800.00 3 Tendoy $1,150.00 $950.00 $7,600.00 4 Edahow $12,684.00 $9,488.00 $22,720.00 5 Gate City $19,810.00 $13,678.00 $2,354.00 6 Lewis & Clark $4,400.00 $4,500.00 $7,100.00 7 Chubbuck $5,060.00 $4,320.00 $14,454.00 Total Awarded Amount $23,707.00

Board Action Requested: Motion to award bid to Absolute Concrete for Projects 2, 3, 4, and 6 in the total amount of $14,454.00 and award Dykman Construction Projects 1, 5 and 7 in the total amount of $23,707.00. The total bid award is approximately $37,560 under the estimated 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program Budget of $75,721.00.

S:\gilescb\Bidding\Bids\14-15 Bids\Concrete\Board Recommend - Concrete 14-15.doc POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: CUSTODIAL SUPPLY

On April 17, 2014 we opened bids for custodial supplies. This bid included specifications for ninety-six (96) different products in a variety of quantities. Forty-five (45) vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from nine (9) vendors.

Vendor Bid Award Amount Hanson: Pocatello, ID $40,532.56 Waxie: Idaho Falls, ID $19,477.85 All American Poly: Piscataway, NJ $4,342.58 Gem State: Pocatello, ID $15,900.72 Pyramid, Tampa, FL $4,342.58 D&S Electric: Chubbuck, ID $10,186.56 TOTAL $105,201.27

Note: There were four (4) vendors who submitted bids which were not awarded items based on their pricing.

Board Action Requested: Motion to approve awarding the bid to the above list of vendors for a total bid award of $105,201.27. These bids are the lowest responsible bids that meet our specifications and sample review.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLY BID

On April 17, 2014 we opened bids for instructional supplies. This bid included specifications for various instructional supply catalog products in a variety of quantities. Fifty-three vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from sixteen (9) vendors.

Vendor Bid Award Amount Caxtons: Caldwell, ID $5,223.84 Standard Stationery: Wheeling, IL $11,175.56 West Coast Paper Supply: Boise, ID $33,019.30 Discount School Supply: Monterey, CA $6,043.80 Pyramid: Tampa, FL $10,822.49 Elgin: Chico, CA $3,891.15 School Specialty: Smithfield, UT $7,089.86 S&S Worldwide: Colchester, CT $980.88 National Art: Rahway, NJ $2,306.16 TOTAL $80,553.04

Board Action Requested: Motion to approve awarding the bid to the above list of vendors for a total bid award of $80,553.04. These bids are the lowest responsible bids that meet our specifications and sample review. POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

SUBJECT: GASOLINE / DIESEL FUEL BID

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for gasoline and diesel fuel for the 2014-2015 school year. The new purchase contract is scheduled to begin July 1, 2014 and continue through June 30, 2015. Six vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from two vendors. The lowest responsible bid is highlighted. The date used for pricing is April 22, 2014.

GASOLINE BID

Price Non-Lead Fixed Profit Vendor Gasoline Margin Total Lynch Oil $2.8917 -.03 $2.8617 Burley, ID Petroleum Traders $2.8155 .0594 $2.8749 Fort Wayne, IN

* = Fixed Profit Margin

DIESEL FUEL BID

Red-Dyed Red-Dyed Vendor Ultra-Low Fixed Total Ultra-Low Fixed Profit Sulfur Diesel Profit Sulfur Winter Margin Total #2 Margin* Blend Fuel Lynch Oil $3.4170 -.03 $3.3870 $3.4470 -.03 $3.4170 Burley, ID Petroleum Traders $3.3393 .0644 $3.4037 $3.3393 .0894 $3.4287 Fort Wayne, IN

Board Action Requested: Motion to approve Lynch Oil for non-lead gasoline and diesel fuel. POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: RENOVATION – Highland High School Bldg C

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for Renovation at Highland High School, Building C. Four vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from three vendors as shown. The lowest responsible bid is highlighted.

Vendor Bid Award Amount C.R. Clark Construction $461,800.00 Shelley, ID J & S Construction $387,550.00 Rigby, ID Rivers West Construction $454,275.00 Idaho Falls, ID

Board Action Requested: Motion to award bid to J & S Construction in the amount of $387,550.00 for Renovation at Highland High School, Bldg C. This amount represents the lowest responsible bid for the project. This is approximately $52,350 over the estimated budget of $335,200 of the 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program. However, there will be sufficient funds to cover the project as other projects have come in under budget.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: ROOF REPLACEMENT – Pocatello High School Bldg No. 1

On April 24, 2014, we opened bids for roof replacement / roof repair at PHS Bldg No. 1. Three vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from three vendors as shown below. The lowest responsible bid for each project is highlighted.

Modern Roofing Robison Roofing Smith Roofing Pocatello, ID Blackfoot, ID Rigby, ID Bldg No. 1 - PHS $65,159.00 $61,000.00 $84,000.00

Board Action Required: Motion to award bid to Robison Roofing in the amount of $61,000.00. This represents the lowest responsible bid for the project. The total bid award is approximately $49,000 under the estimated 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program Budget of $110,000.

S:\gilescb\Bidding\Bids\14-15 Bids\Roofing - PHS\Board Recommend - Roofing PHS.doc POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 25 Bannock County

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: PARKING LOT RENOVATION – Tyhee Elementary

On April 24, 2014 we opened bids for Parking Lot Renovation at Tyhee Elementary. Five vendors were invited to bid. We received bids from three vendors as shown. The lowest responsible bid is highlighted.

Vendor Bid Award Amount DePATCO, Inc. $356,883.00 St Anthony, ID Mickelsen Construction $416,781.00 Blackfoot, ID Suprior Asphalt $488,850.00 Pocatello, ID

Board Action Requested: Motion to award bid to DePATCO, Inc. in the amount of $356,883.00. This amount represents the lowest responsible bid for the project. The total bid award is approximately $72,596 under the estimated 2014-2015 Capital Improvement Program Budget of $450,000.

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent Board of Trustees

FROM: Bart J. Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

SUBJECT: Request for Proposal – HVAC Direct Digital Control Energy Management System

On April 24, 2014 the District received proposals from ATS Inland NW and from Clima-Tech for the above referenced control systems. The District is familiar with both companies which specialize on HVAC control systems in this area and throughout Idaho. The Maintenance & Operations Department met on several occasions with both companies to ensure each understood the scope of the work and intent of the proposal put out for bid.

The criteria for evaluation of the proposals included: 1) qualifications have been met by the respondent; 2) scope of the work and services; 3) completeness of proposal; 4) documentation regarding compliance; 5) references; and 6) cost of proposed services. Each proposal met these requirements in the fullest and had references from several large school districts in Idaho. The District would feel comfortable working with either company which submitted their proposal.

The total price for HVAC controls for the 10 schools listed in the proposal was as follows:

Vendor Proposal Amount Clima-Tech $392,013 ATS Inland NW $405,866

Based upon the excellent qualifications of both proposals, we recommend the Board award the RFP to Clima-Tech. Additionally, three of our existing schools (Pocatello High School, Century High School, New Horizon Center) already are controlled under the Clima-Tech system. This recommendation would bring 13 of our existing 21 schools under the same HVAC control system.

This control system project will allow greater efficiencies in energy savings, provide better scheduling capabilities and replace many old controllers and system parts which are currently obsolete and no longer available.

Board Action Requested: Motion to award RFP to Clima-Tech in the amount of $392,013 for HVAC Direct Digital Control Energy Management System. Pupil Transportation Funding Formula Capped at Legislatively Mandated Percent of State Average Cost Per Mile and Cost Per Rider Fiscal Year 2013 Data - Approved Costs Reimbursed in Fiscal Year 2014 (Tenth Capped Year)

Set percentage cap to apply to statewide average 103% Riders per Mile 1.6

Revised: 5/2/2014 Preliminary Cost Per Mile Cost Per Rider Statewide Averages before cap $3.63 $816

Statewide Averages after cap $3.74 $840

Total Savings From Cap $1,090,510 Capped Reimb. Actual Reimb. Savings Following Appeals & State Board Action $955,693 $73,343,518 $74,434,028 0.5889 #REF! Dist # District Name District Funding Percent of Total 100% Total 100% Total 100% Total 100% In-Lieu Costs FY13 or FY14 Total Adjusted Reimbursable Riders Cost Per Mile Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per District Cap Capped Amount Capped Capped Capped Total Amount Funding Cap % Hardship Most With Waiver - With Waiver - With Waiver - Total Amount Block Grant Prior Year Audit Charter Charter Advance Final Payment Amount Final Payment Amount with Capped - Reimbursement Reimbursable Reimbursable Reimbursable Reimbursable SDE Program Reimbursable Costs Miles Rider Mile as a % Rider as a Above Appropriate Reimbursed for Eligible Amount Amount Reimbursement Reimbursed Penalty Bus Run Advantageous Capped Amount Capped Capped Reimbursed @ Adjustments Advance Reimbursed with $7.5 Million Proportional Reimbursement Loss Subsequent Costs Eligible at Costs Eligible at Contract Costs Costs Assessment (Less In-Lieu and of State % of State Both State Percentage 50% Costs @ Approp % Reimbursed for Reimbursed for @ Appropriate Prior to Cap Waived Waived Cap Appropriate Reimbursed for Amount Amount Statewide Avg Reimbursed FY13 for FY14 Move to Discretionary Reduced By: to Cap Impact (See 50% 85% Eligible at District- Fees Paid in SDE Fee) Average Average Average Eligible 85% Eligible Percentages Percentage Eligible 50% Reimbursed for Reimbursed for Reimb% with with FY12 for Funding (IC 33-1006 (8)) Columns X & Y) Run Rate 50-85% FY13 Measures Costs @ Contract Costs (plus assessment Costs @ Approp Eligible 85% Eligible Hardship Waiver FY13 (after Approp % @ Approp % fee and in-lieu) % Costs @ Contract Costs (plus assessment adjustment for Approp % @ Approp % fee and in-lieu) hold-back in prior year)

001 BOISE INDEPENDENT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $6,598,070 $6,598,070 $9,247 $0 $6,588,823 1,834,314 5,925 $3.59 $1,112 99% 136% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,885,603 $3,885,603 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $3,885,603 $1,825,465 $0 $0 $0 $5,711,068.00 $5,135,546.00 002 MERIDIAN JOINT DISTRICT $357,937 6.3% $8,686,419 $1,555,187 $0 $10,241,606 $0 $43,737 $10,197,869 2,498,515 11,345 $4.08 $899 112% 110% TRUE 0.9364 $4,066,982 $1,240,200 $0 $5,307,182 $5,665,119 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $5,307,182 $3,341,669 $0 $0 $0 $8,648,851.00 $7,777,279.00 003 KUNA JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $866,012 $366,297 $0 $1,232,309 $10,721 $5,041 $1,216,547 329,776 1,686 $3.69 $722 102% 88% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $744,358 $744,358 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $744,358 $377,133 $0 $0 $0 $1,121,491.00 $1,008,475.00 011 MEADOWS VALLEY DISTRICT $23,110 43.3% $0 $0 $90,686 $90,686 $0 $286 $90,400 13,721 29 $6.59 $3,117 182% 382% TRUE 0.5659 $0 $0 $30,295 $30,295 $53,405 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $30,295 $19,716 $1 $0 $0 $50,012.00 $44,972.00 013 COUNCIL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $40,070 $17,437 $0 $57,507 $5,296 $279 $51,932 17,169 61 $3.02 $851 83% 104% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $34,856 $34,856 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $34,856 $15,468 $0 $0 $0 $50,324.00 $45,253.00 021 MARSH VALLEY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $280,002 $168,123 $0 $448,125 $6,068 $2,025 $440,032 145,434 652 $3.03 $675 83% 83% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $282,906 $282,906 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $282,906 $81,857 $6 $0 $0 $364,769.00 $328,011.00 025 POCATELLO DISTRICT $0 0.0% $2,061,346 $558,737 $0 $2,620,083 $0 $10,774 $2,609,309 701,659 5,467 $3.72 $477 102% 58% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,505,599 $1,505,599 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,505,599 $658,556 $0 $0 $0 $2,164,155.00 $1,946,066.00 033 BEAR LAKE COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $352,520 $138,036 $0 $490,556 $12,217 $1,910 $476,429 154,447 475 $3.08 $1,003 85% 123% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $293,591 $293,591 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $293,591 $110,430 $5 $0 $0 $404,026.00 $363,312.00 041 ST MARIES JOINT DISTRICT $11,945 2.8% $528,218 $190,273 $0 $718,491 $2,747 $2,739 $713,005 185,375 325 $3.85 $2,194 106% 269% TRUE 0.9717 $256,675 $157,221 $0 $413,896 $425,841 TRUE 0.030 1.0000 $264,110 $161,732 $0 $425,841 $134,472 $7 $0 $0 $560,320.00 $503,856.00 044 PLUMMER-WORLEY JOINT DISTRICT $13,404 7.1% $214,934 $96,172 $0 $311,106 $4,518 $1,226 $305,362 75,719 156 $4.03 $1,957 111% 240% TRUE 0.9279 $99,882 $75,927 $0 $175,809 $189,213 TRUE 0.080 1.0000 $107,467 $81,746 $0 $189,213 $77,507 $2 $0 $0 $266,722.00 $239,844.00 052 SNAKE RIVER DISTRICT $0 0.0% $393,891 $177,596 $0 $571,487 $0 $2,594 $568,893 209,069 874 $2.72 $651 75% 80% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $347,903 $347,903 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $347,903 $157,346 $0 $0 $0 $505,249.00 $454,333.00 055 BLACKFOOT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $1,627,989 $1,627,989 $0 $6,348 $1,621,641 547,108 2,143 $2.96 $757 82% 93% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $958,723 $958,723 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $958,723 $387,400 $0 $0 $0 $1,346,123.00 $1,210,470.00 058 ABERDEEN DISTRICT $0 0.0% $184,951 $80,726 $0 $265,677 $18,655 $1,393 $245,629 91,352 313 $2.69 $785 74% 96% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $161,093 $161,093 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $161,093 $66,558 $0 $0 $0 $227,651.00 $204,710.00 059 FIRTH DISTRICT $0 0.0% $136,715 $90,187 $0 $226,902 $0 $1,077 $225,825 72,206 410 $3.13 $551 86% 68% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $145,017 $145,017 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $145,017 $58,672 $3 $0 $0 $203,692.00 $183,166.00 060 SHELLEY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $326,803 $157,604 $0 $484,407 $0 $1,965 $482,442 137,168 1,018 $3.52 $474 97% 58% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $297,365 $297,365 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $297,365 $119,616 $6 $0 $0 $416,987.00 $374,967.00 061 BLAINE COUNTY DISTRICT $132,855 15.3% $1,120,006 $364,732 $0 $1,484,738 $24,663 $5,190 $1,454,885 328,578 1,060 $4.43 $1,373 122% 168% TRUE 0.8443 $474,731 $262,439 $0 $737,170 $870,025 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $737,170 $299,924 $15 $0 $0 $1,037,109.00 $932,598.00 071 GARDEN VALLEY DISTRICT $45,415 32.0% $0 $0 $241,164 $241,164 $4,236 $941 $235,987 42,480 89 $5.56 $2,652 153% 325% TRUE 0.6732 $0 $0 $96,606 $96,606 $142,021 TRUE 0.400 0.9346 $0 $0 $132,933 $132,933 $51,776 $433 $0 $0 $185,142.00 $166,528.00 072 BASIN SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $133,231 $28,027 $0 $161,258 $3,524 $772 $156,962 53,752 190 $2.92 $826 80% 101% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $90,439 $90,439 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $90,439 $52,216 $1 $0 $0 $142,656.00 $128,280.00 073 HORSESHOE BEND SCHOOL DISTRICT $1,516 2.8% $59,881 $28,180 $0 $88,061 $0 $389 $87,672 18,684 101 $4.69 $868 129% 106% TRUE 0.9717 $29,094 $23,284 $0 $52,378 $53,894 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $52,378 $19,222 $1 $0 $0 $71,601.00 $64,386.00 083 WEST BONNER COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $388,840 $146,467 $0 $535,307 $8,720 $2,222 $524,365 193,288 559 $2.71 $938 75% 115% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $318,917 $318,917 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $318,917 $113,502 $3 $0 $0 $432,422.00 $388,846.00 084 LAKE PEND OREILLE DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,337,995 $409,487 $0 $1,747,482 $24,416 $0 $1,723,066 513,833 1,070 $3.35 $1,610 92% 197% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,017,062 $1,017,062 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,017,062 $323,898 $19 $0 $0 $1,340,979.00 $1,205,846.00 091 IDAHO FALLS DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,956,224 $591,275 $0 $2,547,499 $0 $9,900 $2,537,599 531,111 3,617 $4.78 $702 132% 86% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,480,696 $1,480,696 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,480,696 $668,046 $28 $0 $0 $2,148,770.00 $1,932,235.00 092 SWAN VALLEY ELEMENTARY DIST $0 0.0% $79,846 $23,871 $0 $103,717 $0 $390 $103,327 37,592 53 $2.75 $1,950 76% 239% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $60,213 $60,213 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $60,213 $23,519 $0 $0 $0 $83,732.00 $75,294.00 093 BONNEVILLE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,801,712 $474,567 $0 $2,276,279 $4,547 $0 $2,271,732 612,766 4,515 $3.71 $503 102% 62% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,304,238 $1,304,238 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,304,238 $682,789 $27 $0 $0 $1,987,054.00 $1,786,815.00 101 BOUNDARY COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $423,459 $172,242 $0 $595,701 $22,360 $0 $573,341 160,640 761 $3.57 $753 98% 92% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $358,136 $358,136 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $358,136 $147,024 $6 $0 $0 $505,166.00 $454,259.00 111 BUTTE COUNTY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $137,525 $70,757 $0 $208,282 $0 $1,112 $207,170 66,219 149 $3.13 $1,390 86% 170% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $128,906 $128,906 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $128,906 $50,914 $0 $0 $0 $179,820.00 $161,699.00 121 CAMAS COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $65,241 $24,965 $0 $90,206 $0 $357 $89,849 41,625 48 $2.16 $1,872 60% 229% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $53,841 $53,841 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $53,841 $18,933 $1 $0 $0 $72,775.00 $65,441.00 131 NAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT $92,217 2.8% $0 $0 $5,554,120 $5,554,120 $0 $20,853 $5,533,267 984,041 6,368 $5.62 $869 155% 106% TRUE 0.9717 $0 $0 $3,178,604 $3,178,604 $3,270,821 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $3,178,604 $1,274,378 $59 $0 $0 $4,453,041.00 $4,004,300.00 132 CALDWELL DISTRICT $30,165 1.9% $0 $0 $2,706,282 $2,706,282 $0 $10,275 $2,696,007 458,048 3,144 $5.89 $858 162% 105% TRUE 0.981 $0 $0 $1,563,564 $1,563,564 $1,593,729 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,563,564 $633,897 $30 $0 $0 $2,197,491.00 $1,976,046.00 133 WILDER DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $141,807 $141,807 $0 $584 $141,223 34,106 188 $4.14 $751 114% 92% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $83,510 $83,510 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $83,510 $35,915 $0 $0 $0 $119,425.00 $107,390.00 134 MIDDLETON DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $1,169,078 $1,169,078 $0 $4,363 $1,164,715 245,123 1,447 $4.75 $805 131% 99% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $688,470 $688,470 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $688,470 $308,780 $13 $0 $0 $997,263.00 $896,767.00 135 NOTUS DISTRICT $0 0.0% $94,964 $44,212 $0 $139,176 $0 $546 $138,630 52,766 177 $2.63 $783 72% 96% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $85,062 $85,062 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $85,062 $27,637 $1 $0 $0 $112,700.00 $101,343.00 136 MELBA JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $150,950 $98,222 $0 $249,172 $2,866 $1,181 $245,125 72,444 317 $3.38 $773 93% 95% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $158,964 $158,964 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $158,964 $73,822 $0 $0 $0 $232,786.00 $209,327.00 137 PARMA DISTRICT $0 0.0% $340,087 $135,887 $0 $475,974 $0 $2,023 $473,951 132,596 451 $3.57 $1,051 98% 129% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $285,548 $285,548 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $285,548 $113,310 $5 $0 $0 $398,863.00 $358,669.00 139 VALLIVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $3,158,030 $3,158,030 $0 $12,898 $3,145,132 796,573 4,263 $3.95 $738 109% 90% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,859,764 $1,859,764 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,859,764 $792,778 $37 $0 $0 $2,652,579.00 $2,385,274.00 148 GRACE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $140,573 $65,297 $0 $205,870 $0 $0 $205,870 809,580 220 $0.25 $936 7% 115% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $125,789 $125,789 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $125,789 $43,977 $0 $0 $0 $169,766.00 $152,658.00 149 NORTH GEM DISTRICT $0 0.0% $39,901 $63,137 $0 $103,038 $0 $396 $102,642 28,090 91 $3.65 $1,128 101% 138% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $73,617 $73,617 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $73,617 $14,669 $1 $0 $0 $88,287.00 $79,390.00 150 SODA SPRINGS JOINT DISTRICT $13,193 7.2% $184,972 $107,284 $0 $292,256 $37,172 $1,174 $253,910 56,742 279 $4.47 $910 123% 112% TRUE 0.9196 $86,544 $83,940 $0 $170,484 $183,677 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $170,484 $64,568 $0 $0 $0 $235,052.00 $211,365.00 151 CASSIA COUNTY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,172,034 $434,880 $0 $1,606,914 $67,237 $6,355 $1,533,322 513,783 2,165 $2.98 $708 82% 87% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $955,665 $955,665 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $955,665 $340,895 $17 $0 $0 $1,296,577.00 $1,165,919.00 161 CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $40,863 $22,938 $0 $63,801 $0 $339 $63,462 23,357 73 $2.72 $869 75% 106% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $39,929 $39,929 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $39,929 $22,312 $0 $0 $0 $62,241.00 $55,969.00 171 OROFINO JOINT DISTRICT $16,117 4.6% $401,178 $179,514 $0 $580,692 $5,967 $2,443 $572,282 145,627 523 $3.93 $1,094 108% 134% TRUE 0.9537 $191,441 $145,618 $0 $337,059 $353,176 TRUE 0.050 1.0000 $200,590 $152,587 $0 $353,176 $124,110 $6 $0 $0 $477,292.00 $429,194.00 181 CHALLIS JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $184,224 $75,094 $0 $259,318 $6,363 $1,111 $251,844 73,363 133 $3.43 $1,894 94% 232% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $155,942 $155,942 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $155,942 $64,525 $0 $0 $0 $220,467.00 $198,250.00 182 MACKAY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $95,560 $65,783 $0 $161,343 $0 $729 $160,614 55,595 83 $2.89 $1,935 80% 237% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $103,696 $103,696 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $103,696 $37,718 $0 $0 $0 $141,414.00 $127,163.00 192 GLENNS FERRY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $176,476 $71,593 $0 $248,069 $14,609 $904 $232,556 67,812 266 $3.43 $874 94% 107% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $149,092 $149,092 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $149,092 $42,292 $0 $0 $0 $191,384.00 $172,098.00 193 MOUNTAIN HOME DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $1,114,652 $1,114,652 $5,346 $4,619 $1,104,687 301,809 1,067 $3.66 $1,035 101% 127% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $656,419 $656,419 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $656,419 $282,571 $0 $0 $0 $938,990.00 $844,365.00 201 PRESTON JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $265,294 $250,402 $0 $515,696 $6,680 $2,071 $506,945 116,440 1,095 $4.35 $463 120% 57% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $345,489 $345,489 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $345,489 $118,203 $0 $0 $0 $463,692.00 $416,964.00 202 WEST SIDE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $125,944 $101,127 $0 $227,071 $433 $860 $225,778 61,174 349 $3.69 $647 102% 79% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $148,930 $148,930 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $148,930 $42,115 $0 $0 $0 $191,045.00 $171,793.00 215 FREMONT COUNTY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $428,499 $218,441 $0 $646,940 $16,945 $3,041 $626,954 190,397 888 $3.29 $706 91% 87% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $399,925 $399,925 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $399,925 $178,145 $9 $0 $0 $578,079.00 $519,825.00 221 EMMETT INDEPENDENT DIST $0 0.0% $922,157 $260,495 $0 $1,182,652 $20,715 $0 $1,161,937 316,374 1,419 $3.67 $819 101% 100% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $682,500 $682,500 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $682,500 $266,339 $13 $0 $0 $948,852.00 $853,235.00 231 GOODING JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $393,776 $393,776 $0 $1,458 $392,318 77,992 506 $5.03 $775 139% 95% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $231,895 $231,895 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $231,895 $92,651 $4 $0 $0 $324,550.00 $291,844.00 232 WENDELL DISTRICT $42,450 17.5% $248,900 $138,769 $0 $387,669 $0 $1,431 $386,238 85,184 359 $4.53 $1,076 125% 132% TRUE 0.824 $102,547 $97,407 $0 $199,954 $242,404 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $199,954 $101,186 $0 $0 $0 $301,140.00 $270,793.00 233 HAGERMAN JOINT DISTRICT $10,205 14.8% $0 $0 $116,840 $116,840 $0 $380 $116,460 26,479 104 $4.40 $1,120 121% 137% TRUE 0.8512 $0 $0 $58,602 $58,602 $68,807 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $58,602 $19,710 $1 $0 $0 $78,313.00 $70,421.00 234 BLISS JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $55,391 $18,628 $0 $74,019 $0 $0 $74,019 24,584 81 $3.01 $914 83% 112% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $43,530 $43,530 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $43,530 $16,504 $1 $0 $0 $60,035.00 $53,985.00 242 COTTONWOOD JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $103,999 $67,106 $0 $171,105 $61 $0 $171,044 65,506 197 $2.61 $868 72% 106% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $109,040 $109,040 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $109,040 $31,748 $2 $0 $0 $140,790.00 $126,602.00 243 SALMON RIVER JOINT SCHOOL DIST $0 0.0% $34,925 $23,855 $0 $58,780 $774 $297 $57,709 22,070 59 $2.61 $978 72% 120% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $37,740 $37,740 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $37,740 $19,425 $0 $0 $0 $57,165.00 $51,404.00 244 MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $500,341 $219,013 $0 $719,354 $27,644 $2,641 $689,069 201,636 420 $3.42 $1,641 94% 201% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $436,332 $436,332 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $436,332 $159,902 $2,520 $0 $0 $598,754.00 $538,670.00 251 JEFFERSON COUNTY JT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,071,918 $454,622 $0 $1,526,540 $1,049 $0 $1,525,491 486,724 3,056 $3.13 $499 86% 61% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $922,388 $922,388 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $922,388 $490,912 $0 $0 $0 $1,413,300.00 $1,270,877.00 252 RIRIE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $114,561 $66,738 $0 $181,299 $0 $871 $180,428 42,328 312 $4.26 $578 117% 71% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $114,008 $114,008 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $114,008 $51,242 $2 $0 $0 $165,252.00 $148,599.00 253 WEST JEFFERSON DISTRICT $0 0.0% $238,774 $78,813 $0 $317,587 $0 $0 $317,587 136,920 381 $2.32 $834 64% 102% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $186,378 $186,378 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $186,378 $98,422 $0 $0 $0 $284,800.00 $256,100.00 261 JEROME JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $984,959 $984,959 $4,960 $3,679 $976,320 311,179 1,560 $3.14 $626 87% 77% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $580,042 $580,042 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $580,042 $219,109 $11 $0 $0 $799,162.00 $718,629.00 262 VALLEY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $310,765 $310,765 $3,473 $1,430 $305,862 89,332 315 $3.42 $971 94% 119% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $183,010 $183,010 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $183,010 $82,519 $3 $0 $0 $265,532.00 $238,774.00 271 COEUR D'ALENE DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,764,281 $354,824 $0 $2,119,105 $20,112 $8,728 $2,090,265 546,577 2,676 $3.82 $781 105% 96% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,183,741 $1,183,741 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,183,741 $583,019 $24 $0 $0 $1,766,784.00 $1,588,742.00 272 LAKELAND DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,205,206 $386,207 $0 $1,591,413 $2,088 $5,713 $1,583,612 592,952 1,461 $2.67 $1,084 74% 133% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $930,879 $930,879 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $930,879 $322,769 $0 $0 $0 $1,253,648.00 $1,127,314.00 273 POST FALLS DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,094,577 $315,696 $0 $1,410,273 $1,323 $5,566 $1,403,384 334,462 2,290 $4.20 $613 116% 75% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $815,631 $815,631 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $815,631 $342,017 $0 $0 $0 $1,157,648.00 $1,040,988.00 274 KOOTENAI DISTRICT $0 0.0% $139,072 $76,293 $0 $215,365 $1,094 $719 $213,552 66,065 146 $3.23 $1,463 89% 179% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $134,385 $134,385 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $134,385 $35,118 $2 $0 $0 $169,505.00 $152,424.00 281 MOSCOW DISTRICT $46,602 11.2% $422,105 $243,317 $0 $665,422 $0 $2,533 $662,889 129,609 699 $5.11 $948 141% 116% TRUE 0.8879 $187,394 $183,876 $0 $371,270 $417,872 TRUE 0.130 1.0000 $211,053 $206,819 $0 $417,872 $128,888 $7 $0 $0 $546,767.00 $491,668.00 282 GENESEE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $109,290 $60,433 $0 $169,723 $0 $653 $169,070 48,670 88 $3.47 $1,921 96% 235% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $106,013 $106,013 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $106,013 $31,280 $0 $0 $0 $137,293.00 $123,458.00 283 KENDRICK JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $94,363 $76,617 $0 $170,980 $1,049 $645 $169,286 53,774 108 $3.15 $1,567 87% 192% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $112,306 $112,306 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $112,306 $30,064 $2 $0 $0 $142,372.00 $128,025.00 285 POTLATCH DISTRICT $0 0.0% $146,643 $118,597 $0 $265,240 $1,261 $1,034 $262,945 73,938 242 $3.56 $1,087 98% 133% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $174,129 $174,129 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $174,129 $49,006 $0 $0 $0 $223,135.00 $200,649.00 287 TROY SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $78,042 $26,949 $0 $104,991 $0 $619 $104,372 33,902 121 $3.08 $863 85% 106% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $61,928 $61,928 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $61,928 $33,412 $2 $0 $0 $95,342.00 $85,734.00 288 WHITEPINE JT SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $166,149 $56,612 $0 $222,761 $0 $923 $221,838 73,507 125 $3.02 $1,775 83% 218% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $131,195 $131,195 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $131,195 $38,354 $0 $0 $0 $169,549.00 $152,463.00 291 SALMON DISTRICT $16,818 10.3% $169,195 $92,506 $0 $261,701 $870 $1,819 $259,012 62,073 277 $4.17 $935 115% 115% TRUE 0.8957 $75,820 $70,590 $0 $146,410 $163,228 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $146,410 $36,850 $2 $0 $0 $183,262.00 $164,794.00 292 SOUTH LEMHI DISTRICT $0 0.0% $45,944 $11,973 $0 $57,917 $7,068 $299 $50,550 16,039 28 $3.15 $1,805 87% 221% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $33,149 $33,149 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $33,149 $21,712 $1 $0 $0 $54,862.00 $49,333.00 302 NEZPERCE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $64,125 $36,814 $0 $100,939 $0 $479 $100,460 37,675 34 $2.67 $2,955 74% 362% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $63,355 $63,355 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $63,355 $21,641 $1 $0 $0 $84,997.00 $76,432.00 304 KAMIAH JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $116,962 $58,615 $0 $175,577 $5,214 $589 $169,774 45,766 194 $3.71 $875 102% 107% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $108,304 $108,304 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $108,304 $34,001 $2 $0 $0 $142,307.00 $127,966.00 305 HIGHLAND JOINT DISTRICT $10,422 7.1% $1,177 $959 $245,440 $247,576 $1,177 $959 $245,440 60,718 78 $4.04 $3,147 111% 386% TRUE 0.9279 $589 $815 $134,118 $135,522 $145,944 TRUE 0.080 1.0000 $589 $815 $144,540 $145,944 $55,475 $617 $0 $0 $202,036.00 $181,738.00 312 SHOSHONE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $85,334 $67,221 $0 $152,555 $0 $724 $151,831 38,151 260 $3.98 $584 110% 72% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $99,805 $99,805 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $99,805 $31,845 $0 $0 $0 $131,650.00 $118,383.00 314 DIETRICH DISTRICT $9,946 13.4% $51,306 $57,100 $0 $108,406 $0 $282 $108,124 24,985 77 $4.33 $1,404 119% 172% TRUE 0.8655 $22,203 $42,039 $0 $64,242 $74,188 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $64,242 $19,041 $0 $0 $0 $83,283.00 $74,890.00 316 RICHFIELD DISTRICT $0 0.0% $43,876 $10,846 $0 $54,722 $0 $239 $54,483 23,283 86 $2.34 $634 64% 78% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $31,157 $31,157 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $31,157 $10,697 $0 $0 $0 $41,854.00 $37,636.00 321 MADISON DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,096,896 $253,080 $0 $1,349,976 $1,642 $6,112 $1,342,222 365,450 2,648 $3.67 $507 101% 62% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $763,566 $763,566 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $763,566 $337,924 $16 $0 $0 $1,101,506.00 $990,505.00 322 SUGAR-SALEM JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $262,411 $130,150 $0 $392,561 $0 $1,512 $391,049 104,515 709 $3.74 $552 103% 68% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $241,834 $241,834 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $241,834 $91,629 $4 $0 $0 $333,467.00 $299,863.00 331 MINIDOKA COUNTY JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $1,194,424 $367,095 $0 $1,561,519 $0 $5,753 $1,555,766 591,657 1,881 $2.63 $827 72% 101% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $909,243 $909,243 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $909,243 $381,853 $0 $0 $0 $1,291,096.00 $1,160,988.00 340 LEWISTON INDEPENDENT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $791,043 $358,173 $0 $1,149,216 $602 $5,207 $1,143,407 299,621 1,610 $3.82 $710 105% 87% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $699,969 $699,969 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $699,969 $319,877 $0 $0 $0 $1,019,846.00 $917,073.00 341 LAPWAI DISTRICT $0 0.0% $115,672 $74,067 $0 $189,739 $573 $828 $188,338 50,292 113 $3.74 $1,667 103% 204% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $120,793 $120,793 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $120,793 $36,498 $0 $0 $0 $157,291.00 $141,440.00 342 CULDESAC JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $37,287 $21,926 $0 $59,213 $5,529 $286 $53,398 15,762 21 $3.39 $2,543 93% 312% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $37,281 $37,281 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $37,281 $18,800 $0 $0 $0 $56,081.00 $50,430.00 351 ONEIDA COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $127,019 $106,021 $0 $233,040 $1,585 $1,017 $230,438 102,062 380 $2.26 $606 62% 74% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $153,628 $153,628 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $153,628 $52,434 $3 $0 $0 $206,065.00 $185,299.00 363 MARSING JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $189,415 $53,713 $0 $243,128 $0 $0 $243,128 62,596 389 $3.88 $625 107% 77% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $140,364 $140,364 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $140,364 $84,528 $4,190 $0 $0 $229,082.00 $206,419.00 365 BRUNEAU-GRAND VIEW JOINT DIST $0 0.0% $122,523 $35,336 $0 $157,859 $31,016 $1,040 $125,803 66,066 134 $1.90 $939 52% 115% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $91,298 $91,298 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $91,298 $53,298 $1 $0 $0 $144,597.00 $130,026.00 370 HOMEDALE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $272,355 $130,797 $0 $403,152 $0 $0 $403,152 103,336 556 $3.90 $725 107% 89% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $247,355 $247,355 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $247,355 $88,183 $5 $0 $0 $335,543.00 $301,730.00 371 PAYETTE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $221,979 $122,068 $0 $344,047 $0 $1,463 $342,584 78,912 597 $4.34 $574 120% 70% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $214,748 $214,748 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $214,748 $78,307 $0 $0 $0 $293,055.00 $263,523.00 372 NEW PLYMOUTH DISTRICT $0 0.0% $187,910 $66,249 $0 $254,159 $0 $1,110 $253,049 63,758 378 $3.97 $669 109% 82% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $150,267 $150,267 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $150,267 $67,954 $3 $0 $0 $218,224.00 $196,233.00 373 FRUITLAND DISTRICT $0 0.0% $256,577 $93,692 $0 $350,269 $0 $1,363 $348,906 88,634 623 $3.94 $560 109% 69% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $207,927 $207,927 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $207,927 $77,081 $4 $0 $0 $285,012.00 $256,291.00 381 AMERICAN FALLS JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $319,679 $158,831 $80,775 $559,285 $0 $2,571 $556,714 187,559 419 $2.97 $1,329 82% 163% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $342,414 $342,414 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $342,414 $125,517 $7 $0 $0 $467,938.00 $420,783.00 382 ROCKLAND DISTRICT $0 0.0% $26,387 $28,779 $0 $55,166 $0 $184 $54,982 22,972 76 $2.39 $723 66% 89% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $37,656 $37,656 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $37,656 $9,315 $0 $0 $0 $46,971.00 $42,238.00 383 ARBON ELEMENTARY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $34,249 $16,563 $0 $50,812 $0 $197 $50,615 18,598 17 $2.72 $2,977 75% 365% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $31,204 $31,204 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $31,204 $18,940 $0 $0 $0 $50,144.00 $45,091.00 391 KELLOGG JOINT DISTRICT $57,308 11.9% $500,593 $270,420 $0 $771,013 $2,787 $0 $768,226 181,050 663 $4.24 $1,159 117% 142% TRUE 0.8803 $220,503 $202,343 $0 $422,846 $480,154 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $422,846 $153,778 $0 $0 $0 $576,624.00 $518,516.00 392 MULLAN DISTRICT $0 0.0% $10,450 $7,148 $0 $17,598 $0 $76 $17,522 5,476 23 $3.20 $762 88% 93% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $11,301 $11,301 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $11,301 $4,783 $0 $0 $0 $16,084.00 $14,463.00 393 WALLACE DISTRICT $0 0.0% $213,937 $84,186 $0 $298,123 $0 $1,318 $296,805 87,874 328 $3.38 $905 93% 111% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $178,527 $178,527 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $178,527 $70,254 $4 $0 $0 $248,785.00 $223,715.00 394 AVERY SCHOOL DISTRICT $0 0.0% $84,440 $10,769 $0 $95,209 $7,921 $365 $86,923 32,107 17 $2.71 $5,113 75% 627% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $51,374 $51,374 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $51,374 $39,818 $1 $0 $0 $91,193.00 $82,003.00 401 TETON COUNTY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $439,384 $208,380 $0 $647,764 $790 $2,500 $644,474 179,043 764 $3.60 $844 99% 103% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $396,815 $396,815 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $396,815 $146,629 $0 $0 $0 $543,444.00 $488,679.00 411 TWIN FALLS DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $1,429,792 $1,429,792 $0 $5,529 $1,424,263 337,502 1,805 $4.22 $789 116% 97% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $842,005 $842,005 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $842,005 $345,441 $16 $0 $0 $1,187,462.00 $1,067,799.00 412 BUHL JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $314,348 $314,348 $0 $1,208 $313,140 86,654 399 $3.61 $785 99% 96% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $185,120 $185,120 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $185,120 $73,843 $2 $0 $0 $258,965.00 $232,868.00 413 FILER DISTRICT $0 0.0% $0 $0 $419,881 $419,881 $0 $2,000 $417,881 168,446 463 $2.48 $903 68% 111% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $247,268 $247,268 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $247,268 $136,276 $6 $0 $0 $383,550.00 $344,899.00 414 KIMBERLY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $203,894 $92,168 $0 $296,062 $16,172 $1,280 $278,610 62,143 457 $4.48 $610 123% 75% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $180,290 $180,290 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $180,290 $81,837 $4 $0 $0 $262,131.00 $235,716.00 415 HANSEN DISTRICT $0 0.0% $77,740 $46,897 $0 $124,637 $0 $386 $124,251 50,165 140 $2.48 $888 68% 109% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $78,732 $78,732 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $78,732 $17,612 $0 $0 $0 $96,344.00 $86,635.00 417 CASTLEFORD DISTRICT $0 0.0% $69,785 $59,837 $0 $129,622 $2,070 $686 $126,866 46,507 146 $2.73 $869 75% 106% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $85,754 $85,754 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $85,754 $40,371 $2 $0 $0 $126,127.00 $113,417.00 418 MURTAUGH JOINT DISTRICT $805 1.0% $88,517 $47,126 $0 $135,643 $0 $561 $135,082 35,755 145 $3.78 $932 104% 114% TRUE 0.9904 $43,834 $39,677 $0 $83,511 $84,316 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $83,511 $29,142 $523 $0 $0 $113,176.00 $101,824.00 421 MC CALL-DONNELLY DISTRICT $133,719 30.2% $0 $0 $750,717 $750,717 $1,740 $2,298 $746,679 138,792 343 $5.38 $2,177 148% 267% TRUE 0.6959 $0 $0 $308,378 $308,378 $442,097 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $308,378 $161,779 $7 $0 $0 $470,164.00 $422,785.00 422 CASCADE DISTRICT $0 0.0% $47,987 $28,651 $0 $76,638 $2,591 $335 $73,712 25,455 57 $2.90 $1,293 80% 158% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $48,347 $48,347 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $48,347 $15,033 $1 $0 $0 $63,381.00 $56,994.00 431 WEISER DISTRICT $0 0.0% $230,322 $118,828 $0 $349,150 $0 $1,459 $347,691 97,793 592 $3.56 $587 98% 72% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $216,165 $216,165 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $216,165 $82,503 $1 $0 $0 $298,669.00 $268,571.00 432 CAMBRIDGE JOINT DISTRICT $0 0.0% $42,746 $13,523 $0 $56,269 $5,574 $241 $50,454 20,990 36 $2.40 $1,402 66% 172% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $32,868 $32,868 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $32,868 $11,766 $0 $0 $0 $44,634.00 $40,136.00 433 MIDVALE DISTRICT $0 0.0% $50,453 $11,213 $0 $61,666 $0 $291 $61,375 26,503 34 $2.32 $1,805 64% 221% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $34,758 $34,758 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $34,758 $17,419 $0 $0 $0 $52,177.00 $46,919.00 451 VICTORY CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $159,014 $159,014 $0 $542 $158,472 40,120 236 $3.95 $671 109% 82% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $93,643 $93,643 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $93,643 $27,364 $0 $115,862 $88,294 $93,439.00 $84,023.00 455 COMPASS CHARTER SCHOOL $5,772 5.5% $0 $0 $178,219 $178,219 $0 $0 $178,219 44,856 174 $3.97 $1,024 109% 125% TRUE 0.945 $0 $0 $99,181 $99,181 $104,953 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $99,181 $46,928 $0 $147,590 $105,462 $103,981.00 $93,503.00 456 FALCON RIDGE CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $158,493 $158,493 $0 $0 $158,493 36,120 190 $4.39 $834 121% 102% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $93,337 $93,337 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $93,337 $40,363 $0 $134,719 $91,903 $90,884.00 $81,725.00 458 LIBERTY CHARTER $0 0.0% $0 $0 $153,210 $153,210 $0 $771 $152,439 38,592 184 $3.95 $828 109% 101% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $90,225 $90,225 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $90,225 $46,591 $1 $0 $0 $136,817.00 $123,030.00 461 TAYLORS CROSSING CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $106,864 $106,864 $0 $0 $106,864 44,234 170 $2.42 $629 67% 77% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $62,932 $62,932 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $62,932 $46,360 $0 $90,834 $64,118 $82,576.00 $74,255.00 462 XAVIER CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $140,336 $140,336 $0 $557 $139,779 39,823 210 $3.51 $666 97% 82% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $82,644 $82,644 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $82,644 $27,777 $1 $119,425 $87,000 $77,997.00 $70,137.00 463 VISION CHARTER SCHOOL $18,589 15.5% $0 $0 $203,517 $203,517 $0 $787 $202,730 45,788 190 $4.43 $1,067 122% 131% TRUE 0.8443 $0 $0 $101,262 $101,262 $119,851 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $101,262 $77,863 $1 $150,620 $150,293 $178,799.00 $160,781.00 464 WHITE PINE CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $107,313 $107,313 $0 $363 $106,950 21,740 127 $4.92 $842 136% 103% TRUE 1 $0 $0 $63,197 $63,197 $63,197 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $63,197 $20,045 $1 $0 $0 $83,243.00 $74,854.00 465 NORTH VALLEY ACADEMY $0 0.0% $0 $0 $104,287 $104,287 $0 $538 $103,749 40,824 84 $2.54 $1,235 70% 151% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $61,415 $61,415 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $61,415 $19,895 $0 $89,554 $62,708 $54,464.00 $48,975.00 467 Wings Charter Middle School $0 0.0% $0 $0 $90,298 $90,298 $0 $421 $89,877 27,654 71 $3.25 $1,266 90% 155% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $53,176 $53,176 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $53,176 $11,349 $0 $69,063 $46,971 $42,433.00 $38,157.00 468 Idaho Science & Technology Charter $0 0.0% $121,352 $22,777 $0 $144,129 $0 $433 $143,696 68,989 250 $2.08 $575 57% 70% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $80,036 $80,036 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $80,036 $60,400 $0 $114,860 $90,269 $115,845.00 $104,171.00 474 Monticello Montessori Charter School $0 0.0% $0 $0 $48,192 $48,192 $0 $329 $47,863 10,794 87 $4.43 $550 122% 67% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $28,380 $28,380 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $28,380 $24,154 -$3 $40,684 $29,105 $40,952.00 $36,825.00 478 Legacy Charter School District $0 0.0% $0 $0 $82,338 $82,338 $0 $369 $81,969 14,366 128 $5.71 $640 157% 78% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $48,489 $48,489 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $48,489 $28,589 $1 $70,695 $53,308 $59,692.00 $53,677.00 479 Heritage Academy District $0 0.0% $0 $0 $78,839 $78,839 $0 $380 $78,459 22,906 93 $3.43 $844 94% 103% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $46,428 $46,428 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $46,428 $29,320 $0 $68,298 $46,980 $54,430.00 $48,945.00 481 Heritage Community Charter District $0 0.0% $0 $0 $175,926 $175,926 $0 $0 $175,926 37,498 230 $4.69 $765 129% 94% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $103,603 $103,603 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $103,603 $53,654 $0 $151,871 $131,917 $137,303.00 $123,467.00 559 THOMAS JEFFERSON CHARTER $0 0.0% $0 $0 $213,132 $213,132 $0 $901 $212,231 66,641 226 $3.18 $939 88% 115% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $125,513 $125,513 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $125,513 $52,489 $1 $179,350 $126,510 $125,163.00 $112,550.00 749 UPPER CARMEN PUBLIC CHARTER $0 0.0% $26,977 $15,355 $0 $42,332 $132 $122 $42,078 8,833 79 $4.76 $533 131% 65% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $26,541 $26,541 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $26,541 $7,331 $0 $0 $0 $33,872.00 $30,459.00 779 FORREST M. BIRD CHARTER $0 0.0% $0 $0 $151,093 $151,093 $3,015 $0 $148,078 66,120 88 $2.24 $1,683 62% 206% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $88,979 $88,979 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $88,979 $25,080 $0 $148,928 $105,125 $70,256.00 $63,176.00 783 North Star Charter School $0 0.0% $0 $0 $407,025 $407,025 $0 $0 $407,025 122,396 475 $3.33 $857 92% 105% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $239,697 $239,697 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $239,697 $65,636 $0 $345,742 $244,053 $203,644.00 $183,122.00 795 IDAHO ARTS CHARTER SCHOOL $0 0.0% $0 $0 $252,831 $252,831 $0 $1,028 $251,803 58,454 330 $4.31 $763 119% 94% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $148,892 $148,892 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $148,892 $71,339 $0 $218,777 $151,877 $153,331.00 $137,879.00 Totals $1,090,510 2.1% $41,970,376 $14,298,192 $30,260,098 $86,528,666 $509,224 $280,859 $85,738,583 23,642,313 105,022 $49,868,336 $50,958,846 $50,003,153 $22,048,052 $8,762 $2,256,872 $1,675,893 $71,478,988.00 $64,276,708.00

$74,424,606.00 $7,500,002.00 Districts not part of FY13 state totals, but subject to Funding Cap (In-Lieu Only, Virtual, Field Trip Only) Dist # District Name District Funding Percent of Total 100% Total 100% Total 100% Total 100% In-Lieu Costs FY13 or FY14 Total Adjusted Reimbursable Riders Cost Per Mile Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per District Cap Capped Amount Capped Capped Capped Total Amount Funding Cap % Hardship Most With Waiver - With Waiver - With Waiver - Total Amount Block Grant Prior Year Audit Charter Charter Advance Final Payment Amount Final Payment Amount with Capped - Reimbursement Reimbursable Reimbursable Reimbursable Reimbursable SDE Program Reimbursable Costs Miles Rider Mile as a % Rider as a Above Appropriate Reimbursed for Eligible Amount Amount Reimbursement Reimbursed Penalty Bus Run Advantageous Capped Amount Capped Capped Reimbursed @ (Estimated from Adjustments Advance Reimbursed with $7.5 Million Cut (IC 33-1006 Reimbursement Loss Subsequent Costs Eligible at Costs Eligible at Contract Costs Costs Assessment (Less In-Lieu and of State % of State Both State Percentage 50% Costs @ Approp % Reimbursed for Reimbursed for @ Appropriate Prior to Cap Waived Waived Cap Appropriate Reimbursed for Amount Amount Statewide Avg prior year) Reimbursed FY13 for FY14 (8)) Reduced By: to Cap Impact (See 50% 85% Eligible at District- Fees Paid in SDE Fee) Average Average Average Eligible 85% Eligible Percentages Percentage Eligible 50% Reimbursed for Reimbursed for Reimb% with with FY12 for Columns X & Y) Run Rate 50-85% FY13 Measures Costs @ Contract Costs (plus assessment Costs @ Approp Eligible 85% Eligible Hardship Waiver FY13 (after Approp % @ Approp % fee and in-lieu) % Costs @ Contract Costs (plus assessment adjustment for Approp % @ Approp % fee and in-lieu) hold-back in prior year)

191 PRAIRIE ELEMENTARY DISTRICT $0 0.0% $2,550 $3 $0 $2,553 $2,550 $3 $0 0 0 $0.00 $0 0% 0% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,278 $1,278 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,278 $343 $660 $0 $0 $2,281.00 $2,118.00 364 PLEASANT VALLEY ELEM DIST $0 0.0% $1,404 $15 $0 $1,419 $1,404 $15 $0 0 0 $0.00 $0 0% 0% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $715 $715 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $715 $1,791 $0 $0 $0 $2,506.00 $2,253.00 416 THREE CREEK JT ELEM DISTRICT $0 0.0% $5,332 $44 $0 $5,376 $5,332 $44 $0 0 0 $0.00 $0 0% 0% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,703 $2,703 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $2,703 $2,921 $0 $0 $0 $5,624.00 $5,057.00 452 IDAHO VIRTUAL ACADEMY $0 0.0% $0 $1,736,938 $0 $1,736,938 $0 $0 $1,736,938 0 3,025 $0.00 $574 0% 70% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,476,397 $1,476,397 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $1,476,397 $0 $0 $0 $1,057,800 $2,534,197.00 $2,278,818.00 457 INSPIRE VIRTUAL CHARTER $0 0.0% $0 $413,638 $0 $413,638 $0 $0 $413,638 0 691 $0.00 $599 0% 73% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $351,592 $351,592 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $351,592 $0 $0 $351,563 $259,811 $259,840.00 $233,655.00 483 Chief Tahgee Elementary Academy District $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0 0% 0% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,200 $79,200.00 $71,219.00 484 Odyssey Charter District $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0.00 $0 0% 0% FALSE 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $71,392 $71,392.00 $64,198.00 Totals $0 0.0% $9,286 $2,150,638 $0 $2,159,924 $9,286 $62 $2,150,576 0 3,716 $1,832,685 $1,832,685 $1,832,685 $5,055 $660 $351,563 $1,468,203 $2,955,040.00 $2,657,318.00 SITE LEASE TRANSMITTAL

Site Number: SL02167A Date Turned In: ______Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake Site Acquisition Coordinator: ROCKY SCHUTJER

Attached please find: Market Information 3 Landlord-signed leases Market Entity Name: T-Mobile West LLC 1 Landlord-signed/notarized memorandums Type of Entity: limited liability company Owner Authorization Agreement Market address: 12920 SE 38th Street Landlord-signed W-9 Bellevue, WA 98006 Authorization to sign lease (if applicable) Director Name: Danny Bazerman Director Title: Area Director Engineering & Operations

NOTE: Enter a space (“ ”) into any fields which do not apply Landlord Information Landlord Name: Pocatello/Chubbuck School 2nd Landlord Landlord Entity: District No. 25 Name (i.e. individual, corporation, LLC, etc.) Additional Mailing Address (if any):  Mailing Address: Mailing Address: 3115 Poleline Road Phone Number: Pocatello, Idaho 83201-6119 Phone Number: Fax Number: 208.232.3563 Fax Number

Site Information Option Terms Site Address: 600 West Chastain Option Amount: $1,500.00 = one thousand five hundred dollars Pocatello, Idaho 83202 Option Term: twelve (12) months Square Footage: square feet Option Renewal $1,500.00 = one thousand five hundred dollars Amt: Parcel Number: Option Renewal twelve (12) months Term:

Lease Terms Payee Name: Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Rent Amount: $1,500.00 = one thousand five hundred dollars Rent Frequency: Monthly Rent Increase: 103% = one hundred three percent Lease Term: five (5) years Renewal Terms: five (5) additional five-year terms Cancel Terms: sixty (60) days prior Insurance: One Million ($1,000,000.00)

Instructions: The preamble and section 12 and signature blocks and Addendum and exhibits and MOL are unprotected. Be sure to check these carefully and format properly – make corrections. BE CAREFUL!

Comments (no non-standard terms)

Approved by:

Real Estate Manager Date General Manager/Director Date

Legal Department Date Vice President (if applicable) Date

SITE LEASE WITH OPTION

THIS SITE LEASE WITH OPTION (this “Lease”) is by and between Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 , a (“Landlord”) and T- Mobile West LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tenant”).

1. Option to Lease.

(a) In consideration of the payment of one thousand five hundred and no/100 dollars ($1,500.00) (the “Option Fee”) by Tenant to Landlord, Landlord hereby grants to Tenant an option to lease a portion of the real property described in the attached Exhibit A (the “Property”), on the terms and conditions set forth herein (the “Option”). The Option shall be for an initial term of twelve (12) months, commencing on the Effective Date (as defined below) (the “Option Period”). The Option Period may be extended by Tenant for an additional twelve (12) months upon written notice to Landlord and payment of the sum of one thousand five hundred and no/100 dollars ($1,500.00) (“Additional Option Fee”) at any time prior to the end of the Option Period.

(b) During the Option Period and any extension thereof, and during the Initial Term and any Renewal Term (as those terms are defined below) of this Lease, Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in obtaining, at Tenant’s expense, all licenses and permits or authorizations required for Tenant’s use of the Premises (as defined below) from all applicable government and/or regulatory entities (including, without limitation, zoning and land use authorities, and the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) (“Governmental Approvals”), including all land use and zoning permit applications, and Landlord agrees to cooperate with and to allow Tenant, at no cost to Landlord, to obtain a title report, zoning approvals and variances, land-use permits. Landlord expressly grants to Tenant a right of access to the Property to perform any surveys, soil tests, and other engineering procedures or environmental investigations (“Tests”) on the Property deemed necessary or appropriate by Tenant to evaluate the suitability of the Property for the uses contemplated under this Lease. During the Option Period and any extension thereof, and during the Initial Term or any Renewal Term of this Lease, Landlord agrees that it will not interfere with Tenant’s efforts to secure other licenses and permits or authorizations that relate to other property. During the Option Period and any extension thereof, Tenant may exercise the Option by so notifying Landlord in writing, at Landlord’s address in accordance with Section 12 hereof.

(c) If Tenant exercises the Option, then Landlord hereby leases to Tenant that portion of the Property sufficient for placement of the Antenna Facilities (as defined below), together with all necessary space and easements for access and utilities, as generally described and depicted in the attached Exhibit B (collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Premises”). The Premises, located at 600 West Chastain, Pocatello, Idaho 83202, comprises approximately square feet.

2. Term. The initial term of this Lease shall be five (5) years commencing on the date of exercise of the Option (the “Commencement Date”), and terminating at midnight on the last day of the initial term (the “Initial Term”).

3. Renewal. Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for five (5) additional and successive five-year terms (each a "Renewal Term") on the same terms and conditions as set forth herein. This Lease shall automatically renew for each successive Renewal Term unless Tenant notifies Landlord, in writing, of Tenant's intention not to renew this Lease, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term. If Tenant shall remain in possession of the Premises at the expiration of this Lease or any Renewal Term without a written agreement, such tenancy shall be deemed a month-to-month tenancy under the same terms and conditions of this Lease.

4. Rent.

(a) From and after the Commencement Date, Tenant shall pay Landlord or designee, as rent, one thousand five hundred and no/100 dollars ($1,500.00) per month (“Rent”). The first payment of Rent shall be due within twenty (20) days following the Commencement Date and shall be prorated based on the days remaining in the month following the Commencement Date, and thereafter Rent will be payable monthly in advance by the fifth day of each month to Landlord at the address specified in Section 12 below. If this Lease is terminated for any reason (other than a default by Tenant) at a time other than on the last day of a month, Rent shall be prorated as of the date of termination and all prepaid Rent shall be immediately refunded to Tenant. Landlord, its successors, assigns and/or designee, if any, will submit to Tenant any documents required by Tenant in connection with the payment of Rent, including, without limitation, an IRS Form W-9.

(b) During the Initial Term and any Renewal Terms, monthly Rent shall be adjusted, effective on the first day of each year of the Initial or Renewal Term, and on each such subsequent anniversary thereof, to an amount equal to one hundred three percent (103%) of the monthly Rent in effect immediately prior to the adjustment date.

5. Permitted Use. The Premises may be used by Tenant for the transmission and reception of radio communication signals and for the construction, installation, operation, maintenance, repair, removal or replacement of related facilities, including, without limitation, tower and base, antennas, microwave dishes, equipment shelters and/or cabinets and related activities.

6. Interference. Tenant shall not use the Premises in any way which interferes with the use of the Property by Landlord or lessees or licensees of Landlord with rights in the Property prior in time to Tenant’s (subject to Tenant’s rights under this Lease, including, without limitation, non-interference). Similarly, Landlord shall not use, nor shall Landlord permit its lessees, licensees, employees, invitees or agents to use, any portion of the Property in any way which interferes with the operations of Tenant. Such interference shall be deemed a material breach by the interfering party, who shall, upon written notice from the other, be responsible for terminating said interference. In the event any such interference does not cease promptly, the parties acknowledge that continuing interference may cause irreparable injury and, therefore, the injured party shall 1 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have at law or in equity, to bring a court action to enjoin such interference or to terminate this Lease immediately upon written notice.

7. Improvements; Utilities; Access.

(a) Tenant shall have the right, at its expense, to erect and maintain on the Premises improvements, personal property and facilities necessary to operate its communications system, including, without limitation, radio transmitting and receiving antennas, microwave dishes, tower and base, equipment shelters and/or cabinets and related cables and utility lines and a location based system, as such location based system may be required by any county, state or federal agency/department, including, without limitation, additional antenna(s), coaxial cable, base units and other associated equipment (collectively, the “Antenna Facilities”). Tenant shall have the right to alter, replace, expand, enhance and upgrade the Antenna Facilities at any time during the term of this Lease. Tenant shall cause all construction to occur lien-free and in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances. Landlord acknowledges that it shall neither interfere with any aspects of construction nor attempt to direct construction personnel as to the location of or method of installation of the Antenna Facilities and the Easements (as defined below). The Antenna Facilities shall remain the exclusive property of Tenant and shall not be considered fixtures. Tenant shall have the right to remove the Antenna Facilities at any time during and upon the expiration or termination of this Lease.

(b) Tenant, at its expense, may use any and all appropriate means of restricting access to the Antenna Facilities, including, without limitation, the construction of a fence.

(c) Tenant shall, at Tenant’s expense, keep and maintain the Antenna Facilities now or hereafter located on the Property in commercially reasonable condition and repair during the term of this Lease, normal wear and tear and casualty excepted. Upon termination or expiration of this Lease, the Premises shall be returned to Landlord in good, usable condition, normal wear and tear and casualty excepted.

(d) Tenant shall have the right to install utilities, at Tenant’s expense, and to improve the present utilities on the Property (including, but not limited to, the installation of emergency power generators). Landlord agrees to use reasonable efforts in assisting Tenant to acquire necessary utility service. Tenant shall, wherever practicable, install separate meters for utilities used on the Property by Tenant. In the event separate meters are not installed, Tenant shall pay the periodic charges for all utilities attributable to Tenant’s use, at the rate charged by the servicing utility. Landlord shall diligently correct any variation, interruption or failure of utility service.

(e) As partial consideration for Rent paid under this Lease, Landlord hereby grants Tenant easements on, under and across the Property for ingress, egress, utilities and access (including access for the purposes described in Section 1) to the Premises adequate to install and maintain utilities, including, but not limited to, the installation of power and telephone service cable, and to service the Premises and the Antenna Facilities at all times during the Initial Term of this Lease and any Renewal Term (collectively, the “Easements”). The Easements provided hereunder shall have the same term as this Lease.

(f) Tenant shall have 24-hours-a-day, 7-days-a-week access to the Premises at all times during the Initial Term of this Lease and any Renewal Term, at no charge to Tenant.

(g) Landlord shall maintain and repair all access roadways from the nearest public roadway to the Premises in a manner sufficient to allow vehicular and pedestrian access at all times, at its sole expense, except for any damage to such roadways caused by Tenant.

8. Termination. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Lease may be terminated, without any penalty or further liability as follows:

(a) upon thirty (30) days’ written notice by Landlord if Tenant fails to cure a default for payment of amounts due under this Lease within such thirty (30) day period;

(b) immediately upon written notice by Tenant if Tenant notifies Landlord of any unacceptable results of any Tests prior to Tenant’s installation of the Antenna Facilities on the Premises, or if Tenant does not obtain, maintain, or otherwise forfeits or cancels any license (including, without limitation, an FCC license), permit or any Governmental Approval necessary to the installation and/or operation of the Antenna Facilities or Tenant’s business;

(c) upon thirty (30) days’ written notice by Tenant if Tenant determines that the Property or the Antenna Facilities are inappropriate or unnecessary for Tenant’s operations for economic or technological reasons;

(d) immediately upon written notice by Tenant if the Premises or the Antenna Facilities are destroyed or damaged so as in Tenant’s reasonable judgment to substantially and adversely affect the effective use of the Antenna Facilities. In such event, all rights and obligations of the parties shall cease as of the date of the damage or destruction, and Tenant shall be entitled to the reimbursement of any Rent prepaid by Tenant. If Tenant elects to continue this Lease, then all Rent shall abate until the Premises and/or the Antenna Facilities are restored to the condition existing immediately prior to such damage or destruction; or

(e) at the time title to the Property transfers to a condemning authority pursuant to a taking of all or a portion of the Property sufficient in Tenant’s determination to render the Premises unsuitable for Tenant’s use. Landlord and Tenant shall each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards with respect to such taking. Sale of all or part of the Property to a purchaser with the power of eminent domain in the face of the exercise of the power shall be treated as a taking by condemnation.

2 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake 9. Default and Right to Cure. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary and without waiving any other rights granted to it at law or in equity, each party shall have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate this Lease on written notice pursuant to Section 12 hereof, to take effect immediately, if the other party fails to perform any covenant or commits a material breach of this Lease and fails to diligently pursue a cure thereof to its completion after thirty (30) days’ written notice specifying such failure of performance or default.

10. Taxes. Landlord shall pay when due all real property taxes for the Property, including the Premises. In the event that Landlord fails to pay any such real property taxes or other fees and assessments, Tenant shall have the right, but not the obligation, to pay such owed amounts and deduct them from Rent amounts due under this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall pay any personal property tax, real property tax or any other tax or fee which is directly attributable to the presence or installation of Tenant’s Antenna Facilities, only for so long as this Lease remains in effect. If Landlord receives notice of any personal property or real property tax assessment against Landlord, which may affect Tenant and is directly attributable to Tenant’s installation, Landlord shall provide timely notice of the assessment to Tenant sufficient to allow Tenant to consent to or challenge such assessment, whether in a Court, administrative proceeding, or other venue, on behalf of Landlord and/or Tenant. Further, Landlord shall provide to Tenant any and all documentation associated with the assessment and shall execute any and all documents reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent of this Section 10. In the event real property taxes are assessed against Landlord or Tenant for the Premises or the Property, Tenant shall have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate this Lease without further liability after thirty (30) days’ written notice to Landlord, provided Tenant pays any real property taxes assessed as provided herein.

11. Insurance and Subrogation and Indemnification.

(a) Tenant will maintain Commercial General Liability Insurance in amounts of One Million and no/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and Two Million and no/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00) aggregate. Tenant may satisfy this requirement by obtaining the appropriate endorsement to any master policy of liability insurance Tenant may maintain.

(b) Landlord and Tenant hereby mutually release each other (and their successors or assigns) from liability and waive all right of recovery against the other for any loss or damage covered by their respective first party property insurance policies for all perils insured thereunder. In the event of such insured loss, neither party’s insurance company shall have a subrogated claim against the other.

(c) Subject to the property insurance waivers set forth in subsection 11(b), Landlord and Tenant each agree to indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all claims, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, to the extent caused by or arising out of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct in the operations or activities on the Property by the indemnifying party or the employees, agents, contractors, licensees, tenants and/or subtenants of the indemnifying party, or a breach of any obligation of the indemnifying party under this Lease. The indemnifying party’s obligations under this section are contingent upon its receiving prompt written notice of any event giving rise to an obligation to indemnify the other party and the indemnified party’s granting it the right to control the defense and settlement of the same.

(d) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Lease, the parties hereby confirm that the provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease.

(e) Tenant shall not be responsible to Landlord, or any third-party, for any claims, costs or damages (including, fines and penalties) attributable to any pre-existing violations of applicable codes, statutes or other regulations governing the Property.

12. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications shall be in writing and are effective three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. mail, certified and postage paid, or upon receipt if personally delivered or sent by next-business-day delivery via a nationally recognized overnight courier to the addresses set forth below. Landlord or Tenant may from time to time designate any other address for this purpose by providing written notice to the other party.

If to Tenant, to: If to Landlord, to: T-Mobile USA, Inc. Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 12920 SE 38th Street 3115 Poleline Road Bellevue, WA 98006 Pocatello, Idaho 83201-6119 Attn: PCS Lease Administrator And with a copy to: With a copy to: Attn: Legal Dept.

And with a copy to: T-Mobile West LLC Send Rent payments to: 12920 SE 38th Street Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Bellevue, WA 98006 3115 Poleline Road Attn: Lease Administration Manager Pocatello, Idaho 83201-6119

With a copy to: Attn: Legal Dept.

3 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake 13. Quiet Enjoyment, Title and Authority. As of the Effective Date and at all times during the Initial Term and any Renewal Terms of this Lease, Landlord covenants and warrants to Tenant that (i) Landlord has full right, power and authority to execute and perform this Lease; (ii) Landlord has good and unencumbered fee title to the Property free and clear of any liens or mortgages, except those heretofore disclosed in writing to Tenant and which will not interfere with Tenant’s rights to or use of the Premises; (iii) execution and performance of this Lease will not violate any laws, ordinances, covenants, or the provisions of any mortgage, lease, or other agreement binding on Landlord; and (iv) Tenant’s quiet enjoyment of the Premises or any part thereof shall not be disturbed as long as Tenant is not in default beyond any applicable grace or cure period.

14. Environmental Laws. Landlord represents that it has no knowledge of any substance, chemical or waste (collectively, “Hazardous Substance”) on the Property that is identified as hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any applicable federal, state or local law or regulation. Landlord and Tenant shall not introduce or use any Hazardous Substance on the Property in violation of any applicable law. Landlord shall be responsible for, and shall promptly conduct any investigation and remediation as required by any applicable environmental laws, all spills or other releases of any Hazardous Substance not caused solely by Tenant, that have occurred or which may occur on the Property. Each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other from and against any and all administrative and judicial actions and rulings, claims, causes of action, demands and liability (collectively, “Claims”) including, but not limited to, damages, costs, expenses, assessments, penalties, fines, losses, judgments and reasonable attorney fees that the indemnitee may suffer or incur due to the existence of any Hazardous Substances on the Property or the migration of any Hazardous Substance to other properties or the release of any Hazardous Substance into the environment (collectively, “Actions”), that relate to or arise from the indemnitor’s activities on the Property. Landlord agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Tenant harmless from Claims resulting from Actions on the Property not caused by Landlord or Tenant prior to and during the Initial Term and any Renewal Term. The indemnifications in this section specifically include, without limitation, costs incurred in connection with any investigation of site conditions or any cleanup, remedial, removal or restoration work required by any governmental authority. This Section 14 shall survive the termination or expiration of this Lease.

15. Assignment and Subleasing. Tenant shall have the right to assign or otherwise transfer this Lease and the Easements (as defined above) granted herein upon written notice to Landlord. Upon such assignment, Tenant shall be relieved of all liabilities and obligations hereunder and Landlord shall look solely to the assignee for performance under this Lease and all obligations hereunder. Tenant may sublease the Premises, upon written notice to Landlord.

Landlord shall have the right to assign or otherwise transfer this Lease and the Easements granted herein, upon written notice to Tenant except for the following; any assignment or transfer of this Lease which is separate and distinct from a transfer of Landlord’s entire right, title and interest in the Property, shall require the prior written consent of Tenant which may be withheld in Tenant’s sole discretion. Upon Tenant’s receipt of (i) an executed deed or assignment and (ii) an IRS Form W-9 from assignee, and subject to Tenant’s consent, if required, Landlord shall be relieved of all liabilities and obligations hereunder and Tenant shall look solely to the assignee for performance under this Lease and all obligations hereunder.

Additionally, notwithstanding anything to the contrary above, Landlord or Tenant may, upon notice to the other, grant a security interest in this Lease (and as regards the Tenant, inthe Antenna Facilities), and may collaterally assign this Lease (and as regards the Tenant, in the Antenna Facilities) to any mortgagees or holders of security interests, including their successors or assigns (collectively “Secured Parties”). In such event, Landlord or Tenant, as the case may be, shall execute such consent to leasehold financing as may reasonably be required by Secured Parties.

16. Successors and Assigns. This Lease and the Easements granted herein shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors, personal representatives and assigns.

17. Waiver of Landlord’s Lien. Landlord hereby waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning the Antenna Facilities or any portion thereof, which shall be deemed personal property for the purposes of this Lease, whether or not the same is deemed real or personal property under applicable laws, and Landlord gives Tenant and Secured Parties the right to remove all or any portion of the same from time to time, whether before or after a default under this Lease, in Tenant’s and/or Secured Party’s sole discretion and without Landlord’s consent.

18. Miscellaneous.

(a) The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to reimbursement from the other party of its reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs, including appeals, if any.

(b) This Lease constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and supersedes all offers, negotiations and other agreements with respect to the subject matter and property covered by this Lease. Any amendments to this Lease must be in writing and executed by both parties.

(c) Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in executing any documents necessary to protect Tenant’s rights in or use of the Premises. A Memorandum of Lease in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C may be recorded in place of this Lease by Tenant.

(d) In the event the Property is encumbered by a mortgage or deed of trust, Landlord agrees, upon request of Tenant, to obtain and furnish to Tenant a non-disturbance and attornment agreement for each such mortgage or deed of trust, in a form reasonably acceptable to Tenant.

(e) Tenant may obtain title insurance on its interest in the Premises. Landlord agrees to execute such documents as the title company may require in connection therewith.

4 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake

(f) This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which the Property is located, without regard to the conflicts of law principles of such state.

(g) If any term of this Lease is found to be void or invalid, the remaining terms of this Lease shall continue in full force and effect. Any questions of particular interpretation shall not be interpreted against the drafter, but rather in accordance with the fair meaning thereof. No provision of this Lease will be deemed waived by either party unless expressly waived in writing by the waiving party. No waiver shall be implied by delay or any other act or omission of either party. No waiver by either party of any provision of this Lease shall be deemed a waiver of such provision with respect to any subsequent matter relating to such provision.

(h) The persons who have executed this Lease represent and warrant that they are duly authorized to execute this Lease in their individual or representative capacities as indicated.

(i) This Lease may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute a single instrument.

(j) All Exhibits referred to herein and any Addenda are incorporated herein for all purposes. The parties understand and acknowledge that Exhibits A and B may be attached to this Lease and the Memorandum of Lease, in preliminary form. Accordingly, the parties agree that upon the preparation of final, more complete exhibits, Exhibits A and/or B, as the case may be, may be replaced by Tenant with such final, more complete exhibit(s).

(k) If either party is represented by any broker or any other leasing agent, such party is responsible for all commission fee or other payment to such agent, and agrees to indemnify and hold the other party harmless from all claims by such broker or anyone claiming through such broker.

The effective date of this Lease is the date of execution by the last party to sign (the “Effective Date”).

LANDLORD: Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25

By: Printed Name: Title: Date:

TENANT: T-Mobile West LLC

By: Printed Name: Danny Bazerman Title: Area Director Engineering & Operations Date:

T-Mobile Legal Approval

5 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake EXHIBIT A Legal Description

The Property is legally described as follows:

6 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake EXHIBIT B

The location of the Premises within the Property (together with access and utilities) is more particularly described and depicted as follows:

7 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake

EXHIBIT C

Memorandum of Lease

8 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake MEMORANDUM OF LEASE Assessor’s Parcel Number: Between Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 (“Landlord”) and T-Mobile West LLC (“Tenant”)

A Site Lease with Option (the “Lease”) by and between Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 , a (“Landlord”) and T-Mobile West LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tenant”) was made regarding a portion of the following property:

See Attached Exhibit “A” incorporated herein for all purposes

The Option is for a term of twelve (12) months after the Effective Date of the Lease (as defined under the Lease), with up to one additional twelve (12) month renewal (“Optional Period”).

The Lease is for a term of five (5) years and will commence on the date as set forth in the Lease (the “Commencement Date”). Tenant shall have the right to extend this Lease for five (5) additional and successive five-year terms.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have respectively executed this memorandum effective as of the date of the last party to sign.

LANDLORD: Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25

By: Printed Name: Title: Date:

TENANT: T-Mobile West LLC

By: Printed Name: Danny Bazerman Title: Area Director Engineering & Operations Date:

Printed Name:

[Notary block for Landlord]

[Landlord Notary block for a Corporation, Partnership ,or Limited Liability Company]

STATE OF ______) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______)

This instrument was acknowledged before me on ______by ______, [title] ______of ______a ______[type of entity], on behalf of said ______[name of entity].

Dated: ______

Notary Public Print Name My commission expires

(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)

[Landlord Notary block for an Individual]

STATE OF ______) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______)

This instrument was acknowledged before me on ______by ______.

Dated: ______

Notary Public Print Name My commission expires

(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)

[Notary block for Tenant]

STATE OF ______) ) ss. COUNTY OF ______)

I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Danny Bazerman is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Area Director Engineering & Operations of T-Mobile West LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.

Dated: ______

Notary Public Print Name My commission expires

(Use this space for notary stamp/seal)

Memorandum of Lease Exhibit A Legal Description

The Property is legally described as follows:

ADDENDUM TO SITE LEASE WITH OPTION [Additional Terms]

In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Addendum and this Lease, the terms of the Addendum shall govern and control. All capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as in this Lease.

LANDLORD: Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25

By: Printed Name: Title: Date:

TENANT: T-Mobile West LLC

By: Printed Name: Danny Bazerman Title: Area Director Engineering & Operations Date:

Addendum to Site Lease With Option – Page 1 Site Number: SL02167A Site Lease - version 9.21.07 Site Name: Chubbuck Elementary Market: Salt Lake SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 - MEMBERSHIP 7-May-14

SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 K-5 -K Sp. Ed TOTAL

CHUBBUCK 25 26 24 25 5 25 26 25 4 25 24 24 21 28 28 28 4 29 29 29 2 29 29 27 541 436 541 EDAHOW 24 24 26 26 25 26 25 25 27 28 25 23 304 256 304 ELLIS 25 25 24 25 21 19 18 22 21 20 22 22 27 28 27 29 28 28 24 26 25 506 407 506 GATE CITY 25 24 26 24 26 25 26 25 26 24 25 25 27 26 27 22 24 23 450 375 450 GREENACRES 14 13 13 13 1 2 10 9 11 9 3 2 16 18 16 3 2 25 26 1 1 27 26 4 2 23 23 1 5 319 263 319 INDIAN HILLS 25 26 26 27 23 24 21 22 22 21 21 22 25 26 24 25 23 23 23 23 27 27 27 28 581 477 581 JEFFERSON 27 27 26 25 24 24 18 19 19 20 26 26 26 21 19 22 23 19 21 432 352 432 LEWIS & CLARK 25 25 25 25 22 25 25 19 24 23 22 23 24 25 25 26 25 26 23 26 27 25 25 560 460 560 SYRINGA 23 25 23 23 23 24 22 23 22 24 22 23 26 26 26 25 23 22 23 24 28 25 525 431 525 TENDOY 23 23 24 20 27 26 3 25 22 1 23 24 3 20 21 20 305 259 305 TYHEE 24 23 23 16 21 21 21 14 22 23 20 8 8 27 26 26 14 22 23 23 11 24 24 23 14 501 415 501 WASHINGTON 25 26 25 26 26 26 21 19 21 22 21 19 277 226 277 WILCOX 25 26 25 25 6 24 23 24 23 3 23 23 22 22 2 24 23 24 23 6 22 23 24 21 20 20 21 20 567 460 567 ISU K-1 12 10 22 10 22 TOTAL 1063 980 988 1010 927 922 5890 4827 0 5890

GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8

ALAMEDA 197 234 183 614 614 FRANKLIN 243 233 262 738 738 HAWTHORNE 246 256 232 734 734 IRVING 189 182 174 545 545 KINPORT 7 13 20 20 0 00

TOTAL 875 912 864 2651 0 2651

GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11 GRADE 12 CENTURY HIGH 296 300 301 286 1183 1183 HIGHLAND HIGH 380 359 324 318 Teen Parent Total (6th - 12th) 1381 1381 POCATELLO HIGH 263 290 232 248 New Horizons (9th - 12th) 1033 1033 NEW HORIZONS 18 31 56 34 139 139 00 KEY Linc. = LINCOLN SP. GRANT 3, 4 & 5 YRS. TOTAL 957 980 913 886 MT = MONTESSORI TUITION 3 & 4 YEAR OLDS 3736 3736 HDS = HEAD START PROGRAM ELEMENTARY 5890 May 2013 = 5821 JR. HIGH 2651 HIGH SCHOOL 3736 MT HD Linc. TOTAL MEMBERSHIP 12277 104 186 = 12567 TOTAL MEMBERSHIP W/SPECIAL PROGRAMS POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 DISTRICT ENROLLMENT INFORMATION FOR 2012-2013 / 2013-2014

Schools 09-2013 10-2013 11-2013 12-2013 01-2014 02-2014 03-2014 04-2014 05-2014 06-2014

Elementary Schools 5981 5934 5902 5894 5921 5912 5899 5894 5890 Middle Schools 2718 2698 2681 2668 2665 2666 2671 2667 2651 High School 3934 3835 3817 3800 3782 3781 3765 3751 2736

TOTALS 12633 12467 12400 12362 12368 12359 12335 12312 11277 0

Schools 09-2012 10-2012 11-2012 12-2012 01-2013 02-2013 03-2013 04-2013 05-2013 06-2013

Elementary Schools 6225 6221 6239 6219 6203 6193 6179 6176 6183 6176 Middle Schools 2347 2331 2324 2309 2304 2298 2297 2299 2294 2297 High School 2850 3817 3798 3797 3783 3772 3749 3735 3727 3719

TOTALS 11422 12369 12361 12325 12290 12263 12225 12210 12204 12192

14000 Elementary Schools 12000 Middle Schools 10000 High School 8000 TOTALS 6000 Elementary Schools 4000 Middle Schools 2000 High School 0 TOTALS 12345678910 POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2013-2014

Elementary Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Chubbuck Elementary 547 539 533 530 534 540 541 540 541 Edahow Elementary 313 311 309 306 306 308 305 303 304 Ellis Elementary 512 514 510 513 517 511 509 508 506 Gate City Elementary 461 458 448 447 448 450 452 450 450 Greenacres Elementary 340 342 342 337 348 351 343 341 341 Indian Hills Elementary 595 588 592 587 583 579 579 581 581 Jefferson Elementary 436 434 428 429 432 430 430 431 432 Lewis & Clark Elementary 582 584 572 566 568 563 562 560 560 Syringa Elementary 537 524 530 532 533 529 521 525 525 Tendoy Elementary 304 295 297 296 300 308 304 305 305 Tyhee Elementary 529 516 511 503 501 504 507 505 501 Washington Elementary 267 276 278 233 284 281 281 277 277 Wilcox Elementary 558 553 552 458 567 558 565 568 567

TOTALS 5981 5934 5902 5737 5921 5912 5899 5894 5890 0

Chubbuck 700 Edahow 600 Ellis 500 Gate City Greenacres 400 Indian Hills 300 Jefferson 200 Lewis & Clark Syringa 100 Tendoy 0 Tyhee 12345678910 Washington Wilcox POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 MIDDLE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2013-2014

Middle Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Alameda Middle School 645 642 640 631 632 628 622 620 614

Franklin Middle School 748 745 744 742 738 738 740 737 738

Hawthorne Middle School 749 747 734 733 731 734 734 734 734

Irving Middle School 559 547 545 541 542 543 558 554 545 Kinport 17 17 18 21 22 23 22 22 20

TOTALS 2718 2698 2681 2668 2665 2666 2676 2667 2651 0

800 Alameda Middle School 700 600 Franklin Middle 500 School 400 Hawthorne Middle 300 School 200 Irving Middle 100 School 0 12345678910Kinport POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT #25 HIGH SCHOOL ENROLLMENT INFORMATION 2013-2014

High Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Century High School 1222 1219 1213 1211 1207 1200 1191 1187 1183

Highland High School 1452 1423 1412 1396 1390 1390 1385 1385 1381

Pocatello High School 1133 1078 1063 1048 1042 1042 1046 1042 1033 New Horizons/Teen Parent 127 115 129 145 143 149 143 137 139

TOTALS 3934 3835 3817 3800 3782 3781 3765 3751 3736 0

1600 1400 1200 Century 1000 Highland 800 Pocatello 600 400 New Horizons 200 0 12345678910 CHARTER / PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 2013-2014

Schools September October November December January February March April May June

Grace Lutheran School 284 286 282 280 284 281 276 270 267 Holy Spirit Catholic School 162 158 155 159 164 162 160 163 161 Calvary Chapel Christian School 52 50 50 46 51 51 47 47 50 Chief Taghee 23 88 86 81 85 83 85 88 85 Pocatello Community Charter School 358 354 357 358 354 350 352 349 345 The Academy (ARC) 273 268 262 257 274 273 270 267 262

TOTALS 1152 1204 1192 1181 1212 1200 1190 1184 1170 0

400 350

300 Grace Lutheran

250 Holy Spirit

200 Calvary Chapel 150 Pocatello Community Charter 100 The Academy (ARC) 50 0 12345678910 Revenue Account Listing 05/16/2014 Page 1

Fund: 100

Account Number Account Description FY 2013 Actual FY 2014 FY 2015 5.100.4.4111.100.000.00.000 TAXES GENERAL M & O LEVY 0 0 0 5.100.4.4112.200.000.00.000 TAXES SUPPLEMENTAL LEVY 7,547,229 8,500,000 8,500,000 5.100.4.4113.300.000.00.000 TAXES EMERGENCY LEVY 2,458 441,354 0 5.100.4.4114.400.000.00.000 TAXES TORT LEVY 197,350 200,784 206,000 5.100.4.4119.900.000.00.000 TAXES - OTHER 0 486 2,415 5.100.4.4130.000.000.00.000 TAXES DEL PENALTY/INT 134,419 100,000 110,000 5.100.4.4140.000.000.00.000 TUITION 0 0 0 5.100.4.4140.010.000.00.000 TUITION - MONTESSORI 21,357 21,000 21,000 5.100.4.4140.020.000.00.000 TUITION - SUMMER SCHOOL 9,362 7,000 20,000 5.100.4.4140.040.000.00.000 STRINGS REVENUE 7,710 8,000 7,500 5.100.4.4140.050.000.00.000 IDLA TUITION 950 4,000 4,000 5.100.4.4150.000.000.00.000 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 33,350 40,000 30,000 5.100.4.4174.410.000.00.000 MUSIC INSTRUMENT MAINT. 3,403 2,500 4,000 5.100.4.4179.900.000.00.000 PARTICIPATION FEE REVENUE 275,787 250,000 250,000 5.100.4.4191.100.000.00.000 RENTALS 18,776 20,000 20,000 5.100.4.4193.300.000.00.000 TRANSPORTATION FEES 286,931 325,000 325,000 5.100.4.4199.900.000.00.000 OTHER LOCAL REVENUE 20,477 222,000 20,000 5.100.4.4199.900.122.00.000 SEC VENDING MACHINE REV 0 0 0 5.100.4.4199.955.000.00.000 PREMIUM DIFFERENTIAL 0 62,291 55,000 5.100.4.4199.990.000.00.000 OVERHEAD REVENUE 0 0 0 5.100.4.4199.995.000.00.000 PURCHASE PRICE VARIANCE 0 0 0

Total Local Funding 8,559,557 10,204,415 9,574,915 5.100.4.4311.100.000.00.000 BASE SUPPORT 42,395,715 43,724,012 45,615,558 5.100.4.4311.110.000.00.000 STATE LOTTERY REVENUE 0 0 0 5.100.4.4312.200.000.00.000 TRANSPORTATION SUPPORT 1,639,159 1,750,000 1,750,000 5.100.4.4314.400.000.00.000 TUITION EQUIVALENCY REVENU 40,525 85,000 80,000 5.100.4.4318.800.000.00.000 BENEFIT APPORTIONMENT 5,583,394 6,055,985 6,167,315 5.100.4.4319.900.000.00.000 OTHER STATE SUPPORT 2,525,181 480,515 1,588,779 5.100.4.4329.900.000.00.000 REVENUE OTHER STATE 79,363 1,035,750 65,000 5.100.4.4380.000.000.00.000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 8,954 6,500 6,500

Total State Funding 52,272,291 53,137,762 55,273,152 5.100.4.4420.000.000.00.000 E-RATE 0 0 47,000 5.100.4.4450.000.000.00.000 INDIRECT COSTS 189,815 190,000 190,000 5.100.4.4459.900.000.00.000 MEDICAID REVENUE 979,389 675,000 525,000

Total Federal Funding 1,169,204 865,000 762,000 5.100.4.4600.000.000.00.000 TRANSFERS - INTERFUND 0 0 0

Total Interfund Transfers 0 0 0

Total Current Funding 62,001,052 64,207,177 65,610,067

5.100.4.7000.000.000.00.000 ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANC 0 5,439,006 5,171,718

Beginning Balance Total 0 5,439,006 5,171,718

Fund Total: 62,001,052 69,646,183 70,781,785 Budget Expenditure Object Summary - FY 2015 05/16/2014 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND USING APPROVED BUDGETS

Object / Description FY14 Adjusted Proposed Approved $ Change % Change Count 111 Superintendent and Assistant S 124,663 125,710 125,910 1,247 1.00 1 112 Directors 179,456 180,964 171,594 -7,862 -4.38 2 113 Supervisors and Coordinators 494,357 503,787 507,341 12,984 2.63 8 114 Principals 2,225,229 2,258,973 2,262,558 37,329 1.68 2 115 Ancillary Professional 1,020,260 1,051,911 1,053,580 33,320 3.27 1 116 Teachers 27,275,671 27,917,207 27,963,202 687,531 2.52 10 117 Media Specialists 135,843 138,796 139,016 3,173 2.34 2 118 Counselors 1,220,520 1,248,037 1,250,018 29,498 2.42 2 131 Saturday School Teachers 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00 1 132 Teachers Lunch Duty 20,000 20,000 20,000 0 0.00 1 133 Stipends and Extra Days - Regu 46,146 48,128 48,128 1,982 4.30 4 134 Curriculum Development Stipend 236,444 136,962 136,962 -99,482 -42.07 3 135 Other Special Programs 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 0.00 2 137 District Early Retirement Gran 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 138 State-Paid Salary 427,043 558,306 558,306 131,263 30.74 7 151 Clerical Personnel 2,306,152 2,306,971 2,318,932 12,780 0.55 18 152 Instructional Assistants 1,386,714 1,435,182 1,437,386 50,672 3.65 9 153 Custodians 1,029,046 1,028,309 1,029,862 816 0.08 2 154 Maintenance Personnel 1,082,297 1,052,472 1,054,143 -28,154 -2.60 4 155 Grounds Personnel 110,348 111,251 111,427 1,079 0.98 1 156 Warehouse Personnel 68,026 59,284 59,366 -8,660 -12.73 1 157 Bus Drivers 963,349 937,009 938,496 -24,853 -2.58 1 158 Mechanics 148,615 149,831 150,062 1,447 0.97 1 162 Bus Attendants 66,275 82,905 83,036 16,761 25.29 1 163 Nurses 34,584 34,980 35,036 452 1.31 1 164 Social Workers 44,236 44,608 44,678 442 1.00 1 165 Music Assistants 46,000 46,000 46,000 0 0.00 2 166 Advanced Placement Readers 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 181 Clerical Substitutes 9,500 15,000 15,000 5,500 57.89 2 182 Substitute Instructional Assis 32,000 32,000 32,000 0 0.00 2 183 Substitute Custodians 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 0.00 1 186 Substitute Teachers 585,670 605,595 605,595 19,925 3.40 5 187 Substitute and Trainee Bus Dri 189,200 187,361 187,361 -1,839 -0.97 1 199 Personal Leave Reimbursement 140,732 184,074 184,074 43,342 30.80 35

100 SALARIES 41,798,376 42,651,613 42,719,069 920,693 2.20 136

210 PERSI 4,572,042 4,661,388 4,668,885 96,843 2.12 119 220 Social Security Tax 3,075,885 3,134,890 3,139,849 63,964 2.08 120 230 Life Insurance 112,778 113,471 113,471 693 0.61 54 240 Medical Insurance 5,674,586 6,027,001 6,027,001 352,415 6.21 56 250 Employee Assistance Plan 24,313 25,247 25,247 934 3.84 54 260 Dental Insurance 347,153 366,824 366,824 19,671 5.67 54 270 Worker's Compensation Insuranc 421,768 446,377 447,060 25,292 6.00 123 280 Retirement Sick Leave Benefits 517,893 528,182 529,032 11,139 2.15 120 290 Vision Insurance 67,408 67,822 67,822 414 0.61 54 Budget Expenditure Object Summary - FY 2015 05/16/2014 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND USING APPROVED BUDGETS

Object / Description FY14 Adjusted Proposed Approved $ Change % Change Count 295 Physicals 13,374 14,961 14,961 1,587 11.87 3 296 Other Employee Benefits 13,588 13,588 13,588 0 0.00 1 297 COBRA Fees 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00 1

200 FRINGE BENEFITS 14,842,788 15,401,751 15,415,740 572,952 3.86 759

310 Other Professional and Technic 949,063 957,800 957,800 8,737 0.92 14 311 Legal Services 35,000 35,000 35,000 0 0.00 1 312 Audit Services 35,500 35,500 35,500 0 0.00 1 313 Publishing and Advertising 23,275 27,650 27,650 4,375 18.80 4 315 Elections 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 317 Health Services (Contracted) 252,291 252,300 252,300 9 0.00 2 318 Testing Program 8,786 8,786 8,786 0 0.00 2 319 Consultants 15,500 15,500 15,500 0 0.00 4 320 ISAT Remediation 83,873 40,891 40,891 -42,982 -51.25 1 321 Facility Rentals 21,500 35,500 35,500 14,000 65.12 4 325 Repair and Maintenance (Contra 178,048 152,655 152,655 -25,393 -14.26 11 328 Building Repairs (Contracted) 40,000 40,000 40,000 0 0.00 1 331 Electricity Utilities 751,253 1,030,653 1,030,653 279,400 37.19 29 332 Gas Utilities 360,800 293,100 293,100 -67,700 -18.76 25 336 Water 609,800 574,800 574,800 -35,000 -5.74 27 337 Land Fill Fee 3,000 3,000 3,000 0 0.00 1 345 Transportation Services (Contr 500 500 500 0 0.00 1 351 Telephone - Voice 65,000 65,000 65,000 0 0.00 3 352 Postage 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0.00 1 353 Telephone - Repair 3,500 4,000 4,000 500 14.29 1 354 Telephone / Cable - Data 65,000 75,000 75,000 10,000 15.38 1 355 Telephone - Cellular 2,500 2,000 2,000 -500 -20.00 1 361 Computer Service Expenses 394,940 702,500 702,500 307,560 77.88 2 371 Tuition 6,250 7,000 7,000 750 12.00 2 381 In-District Travel Allowance 28,570 24,650 24,650 -3,920 -13.72 18 382 Out-District Travel Allowance 17,450 11,464 11,464 -5,986 -34.30 19 384 Administrative Staff Developme 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 385 Student Activity Travel 366,000 366,000 366,000 0 0.00 1 386 Crossing Guard Support 32,500 38,500 38,500 6,000 18.46 1 387 Resource Officer Support 29,000 29,000 29,000 0 0.00 2 391 Professional Dues and Fees 22,100 22,100 22,100 0 0.00 3 392 Student Activity Support 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 393 Indirect Costs 0 0 0 0 0.00 3 396 Inservice Training 131,342 304,046 304,046 172,704 131.49 17 399 Purchased Duty Lunches 8,000 5,000 5,000 -3,000 -37.50 1

300 PURCHASED SERVICES 4,590,341 5,209,895 5,209,895 619,554 13.50 208

410 General Supplies 646,328 609,709 610,909 -35,419 -5.48 253 413 Curriculum Development Supplie 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00 1 415 One-Time Supplies 0 0 0 0 0.00 2 Budget Expenditure Object Summary - FY 2015 05/16/2014 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND USING APPROVED BUDGETS

Object / Description FY14 Adjusted Proposed Approved $ Change % Change Count 416 Printing 48,125 22,785 22,785 -25,340 -52.65 22 417 Testing Supplies 22,796 45,456 45,456 22,660 99.40 1 418 Custodial Supplies 211,400 214,900 214,900 3,500 1.66 26 419 Warehouse Supplies 3,000 3,500 3,500 500 16.67 2 420 Transportation Supplies 6,000 6,000 21,000 15,000 250.00 2 421 Motor Fuel 509,950 509,950 509,950 0 0.00 4 423 Grease and Lubricants 12,300 12,300 12,300 0 0.00 1 425 Laundry 920 920 920 0 0.00 1 428 Repairs Parts and Supplies 140,300 146,900 146,900 6,600 4.70 5 429 Tires 25,030 25,030 25,030 0 0.00 1 430 Library Books 113,426 103,489 103,489 -9,937 -8.76 44 440 Textbooks 566,242 1,728,337 1,228,337 662,095 116.93 9 471 Building Repairs (Non-Contract 150,000 150,000 150,000 0 0.00 1 481 Equipment Repair (Non-Contract 39,100 39,100 39,100 0 0.00 4 493 Professional Books and Journal 800 800 800 0 0.00 7

400 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,497,717 3,621,176 3,137,376 639,659 25.61 386

510 Site Purchases 0 0 0 0 0.00 1 550 Equipment 336,098 22,765 22,765 -313,333 -93.23 27

500 CAPITAL OBJECTS 336,098 22,765 22,765 -313,333 -93.23 28

690 Other Debt Services 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0.00 1

600 DEBT RETIREMENT 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0.00 1

711 Property Insurance 181,335 182,000 182,000 665 0.37 1 712 Liability Insurance 181,295 186,734 186,734 5,439 3.00 1 714 Transportation Insurance 28,748 28,748 28,748 0 0.00 2 715 Surety Insurance 767 800 800 33 4.30 1 730 Judgements 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00 1

700 INSURANCE AND 394,145 400,282 400,282 6,137 1.56 6

810 Transfers to Other Funds 105,500 100,000 100,000 -5,500 -5.21 1 850 Contingency Reserve 631,195 0 656,101 24,906 3.95 1 852 Unappropriated Fund Balance 2,524,779 0 2,624,403 99,624 3.95 1 854 Reserve for Inventory / Prepai 400,000 400,000 400,000 0 0.00 1 855 Appropriated Fund Balance 1,510,244 0 0 -1,510,244 -100.00 1 858 Reserves for Misc. State Funds 0 0 0 0 0.00 1

800 TRANSFERS AND RESERVES 5,171,718 500,000 3,780,504 -1,391,214 -26.90 6

GRAND TOTAL 69,646,183 67,822,482 70,700,631 1,054,448 1.51 1530

Report Filter: FUND = MFUNDFILTER (100)

Projected Cost Increases for the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 FY 2012 through FY 2018 Description: Estimated Increase:

FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Pay for Performance $ - $ 30,000 PERSI (Cumulative Phase In over three years: $248,800) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 70,800 $ 141,600 $ 248,800 Loss of Education Jobs Act Funds (FY2012 for FY 2013) $ 1,300,000 $ - $ - Wages Increases $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Insurances:  Medical Heath Insurance/Obama Care (7%; 13.1% , 1%, 2% and $500,000 for ObamaCare) $ 330,000 $ 646,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ -  VEBA Trust $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ -  Dental Insurance (3% rate increase) 1% = $3,002 $ 18,012 $ 19,500 $ 10,337 $ - $ -  Affordability Component (Only applies to full time employees - District already pays Medical) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Utilities  Water / Gas / Electric $ 50,000 $ - $ 91,400 $ 176,700 $ - $ - Fuel - District Vehicles and Bussing Transportation (same) $ 18,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - High School Media Clerks $ 20,000 $ - $ - 6 FTE (1 @ Ellis-3rd Grade; 1 @ FMS-6th Grade; 1 @ HMS-6th Grade; 1 @ CHS-Math/Science; $ 300,000 $ - $ - 1 @ HHS-Math/Science; 1 @ PHS-Math/Science) Buy 18 Prep Periods for Algebra II c ARRA Position Push-Ins $ 297,000 $ - $ - Salary Movement Restoration HB1184 (.89% of certificated payroll) $ 266,000 $ - $ - One Day Restored to Calendar $ - $ 225,000 $ - $ - Worker's Compensation Estimated increase based on FY2011 payrol $ 46,755 $ 48,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - (Includes: Professional staff, Administrative and Classified Staff (Food Service, Transportation, Maintenance & Operations, and all other) $ - $ - Food Service Loss Control $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ - Military Leaves $ 61,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TQ Budget Reductions 2011-12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Chamber Dues ($2,500 in 2012 - will increase to $4,000-$4,100max) $ 1,600 $ - $ - Crossing Guards $ - $ 2,000 $ - $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ - Alameda Middle School $ - $ - $ 597,783 $ - $ - Curriculum Materials (Alameda Middle School) $ 60,000 $ - $ - Varsity Contract (Alameda Middle School) $ 42,000 $ - $ - Varsity Contract Increase $ 30,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - Student Support Services (Mr. Hobbs) $ - $ - $ - Truancy Court $ - $ 15,000 $ 3,000 $ - $ - CRWs $ - $ 3,000 $ - $ - Communications Upgrade (Loss of $160,000 to School Plant Fund and $80,000 savings to GF) $ - $ - Wide-Area Network Services (Internet) (Could be offset by 70% e-rate reimbursement) $ - $ 16,800 $ 120,000 $ - $ - Contingency Shifts = TBD TBD TBD $ - $ - (Inclusive of: Common Core Standards; Infinite Campus; Enrollment Shifts) $ - $ - APECS Upgrade - TBA $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Infinite Campus:  Maintenance $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ -  Online Registration ($15,000 for first year, $7,500 every year thereafter) $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 Mileposts Renewal $ - $ - $ - $ 13,000 $ - $ - Student Integration Software - Transportation $ - $ - $ - $ 15,000 $ - $ - Technology Support - Lightspeed $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - Extra-Curricular Activities $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - OK Ward Softball Field Maintenance - (Beginning in 2017-18 = $3,000 per year) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Textbook Needs  Elementary Consumables $ 250,000 $ 95,000 $ - $ -  Essential K-12 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ - Subtotal: $ 1,487,167 $ 3,028,900 $ 1,201,520 $ 596,700 $ 78,300 $ 149,100 $ 256,300

5/16/2014 Projected Cost Increases for the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25 FY 2012 through FY 2018 Catch Up on Textbook Adoptions:  Science K-12 = $805,000 $ 805,000 $ 805,000 $ 805,000 $ - $ - (Elementary = $420,000 (2000) ; Grades 7-8 = $140,000 (2006) ( Grades 9-12 = $245,000)(2002-2008)  6-12 Reading/Language Arts (2001-2005) $ 1,070,600 $ 1,070,600 $ - $ -  K-5 Reading/Language Arts (2005) $ 1,043,000 $ 1,043,000 $ - $ -  Humanities = $118,000 (1993-2005) $ - $ 118,000 $ 118,000 $ 118,000 $ - $ -  Elementary Health = $420,000 (2000) $ - $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ - $ -  Elementary Social Studies = $420,000 (1997) $ - $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ 420,000 $ - $ -  Secondary Social Studies = $324,000 (2003-2006) $ - $ 324,000 $ 324,000 $ 324,000 $ - $ -  Common Core Standards: Language Arts & Math = TBD TBD $ - $ -  SBAC Support/Proctors $ - $ 57,596 $ - $ -  Read Naturally TBD $ - $ -  Fast Forword TBD $ - $ -

Estimated Textbook Adoption Total: $ 805,000 $ 1,282,000 $ 4,200,600 $ 4,258,196 $ - $ - $ -

Grand Total with Textbook Adoptions: $ 2,292,167 $ 4,310,900 $ 5,402,120 $ 4,854,896 $ 78,300 $ 149,100 $ 256,300

NOTE: Loss of revenue from PMC assessed value adjustment = $236,000

5/16/2014

POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25

Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent; and Board of Trustees

FROM: Carl Smart, Director of Employee Services

DATE: May 20, 2014

RE: INSURANCE BENEFITS RECOMMENDATION

MEDICAL It is recommended that we renew our medical insurance policy with Regence Blue Shield with a 4.6% increase, keep all benefits the same (i.e., deductible, co-insurance), and maintain a 3-tier structure with prescriptions. Please note that the original increase was 8.6%, but we met the 4.0% premium reduction with our employee’s participation in www.myRegence.com to make the final renewal a 4.6% increase.

DENTAL It is recommended that we renew our dental insurance policy with Delta Dental of Idaho – no changes with a 6.0% increase.

VISION: We are in the second year of a two year rate guarantee – no changes.

LIFE: We are in the second year of a two year rate guarantee – no changes.

We respectfully request the Board accept the above recommendations which were approved by the District’s Wellness/Insurance Committee at the April 21, 2014 meeting.

Board Action Requested: Motion to approve the recommendations contained herein as approved by the District’s Wellness/Insurance Committee.

POCATELLO / CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County Pocatello, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent FROM: Jeff Jolley, Technology Coordinator DATE: May 15, 2014 SUBJECT: Elementary Computer Replacement Upgrade

At the April Board Meeting, the School Board approved a bid from Ace Computer for 1,000 computers to replace existing teacher and student computers throughout the District. The bid consisted of two configurations: one configuration to be used for teacher computers, and the other with a less powerful processor to be used for student computers. As the Board is aware, the bid came in more than $100,000 under budget.

Thus, I am proposing that the District take advantage of the savings by ordering the more powerful configuration for all of the teacher and student computers that were purchase under the bid contract. As the District relies more heavily on computers to deliver multimedia‐rich educational content and assessments to students, it is clear that the District would benefit from higher‐performing machines. The higher‐performing machines would have more memory and processing power.

The increase in cost over the approved bid is $55.55 per machine, or $23,331.00 for all 420 student computers that will be ordered, leaving the total project approximately $76,000 under budget.

Monthly Wellness Dashboard March 2014 Information

Participation Rates: Target Levels MyRegence.com March 2014 = 1194 – 100.7% 75/80/85/90% GHA Completion March 2014 = 960 – 80.9% 65/70/75/80% Programs March 2014 = 627 – 52.8% 60/65/70/75% Biometric Screen March 2014 = 742 – 62.6% 60/65/70/75%

(Note: Each target level corresponds to renewal premium credits of 1 to 4 %. For instance, if we reach 80% myRegence.com, 70% GHA Completion, 65% Program, and 65 Biometrics, the target levels would equal a 2% premium savings. Total will be the lowest target met in all areas. Contract runs from September 1 through August 31.)

Enrollment (Enrollment): March 2014 Employee: 1164 Spouse: 95 Dependent: 409 Cobra: 3 Cobra Spouse: 1 Cobra Dependent: 1 Retiree: 142 Retiree Spouse: 14 Retiree Dependent: 6

MEDICAL: Loss Ratio: 75% month 76% average Goal is 80%

Claim Cost Overview: $3,124,487.04 – 79.50% - medical cost 807,810.42 – 20.50% - pharmacy cost 93.66 – 0.00% - vision cost $3,932,391.12 – 100.00% - total cost

High Claimant (includes Rx): $1,537,222.53

Rx Costs: March 2014 Total number of prescriptions filled: 1897 Overview: 84.2% Generic; 15.8% Brand Top Rx Claims by Plan Paid: Enbrel-$2,538.85, Humira Pen - $2,514.63; Xyrem - $9,439.08 Enbrel SureClick - $2,539.76, Nutropin AQ - $5,983.20;Avonex - $4,529.58

DENTAL: Loss Ratio: 92.9% month; 91.01% average Goal is 85%

VISION: Loss Ratio: 82% month; 96.14% average Goal is 90%

Customized Rewards: 2009-2010 = 2%; 2010- 2011= 3%; 2011-2012 = 4%; 2012-2013 = 4%

05/15/2014

HUMAN RESOURCCES REPORT BOARD MEETING May 20, 2014

NAME POSITION/LOCATION EFFECTIVE DATE

Assignment – Administration

Jan Harwoodo 1.0 FTE 07/01/2014 Director of Secondary Education Education Center

Lori Craney 1.0 FTE 07/01/2014 Director of Elementary Education Education Center

Lisa Delonas 1.0 FTE 08/01/2014 Principal Pocatello High School

Stuart Johnson 1.0 FTE 08/08/2014 Principal Tyhee Elementary

Rebecca Bullock 1.0 FTE 08/08/2014 Principal Syringa Elementary

Retirement – Administration

Evelyn Robinson 1.0 FTE 05/30/2014 Lewis and Clark Elementary Principal

Resignation – Administration

Michael Roberts 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Highland High School Assistant Principal

Pamela Sanford 1.0 FTE 06/30/2014 Director of Special Services Education Center

Retirement – Teacher

Randall Bybee 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 6th/7th/8th PE/SHAPE Franklin Middle School

Lori Christensen 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Special Education Chubbuck Elementary

Marty Coburn 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Title I Indian Hills Elementary

Resignation – Teacher

Kimberly Kunz 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Edahow Elementary 2nd Grade

Deon Mace 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Highland High School Special Education

Julie Morris 1.0 FTE Ellis Elementary Special Education

Ethan Goodreau 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Alameda Middle School 6th Grade/ELA/Health

Amy Lilya 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Franklin Middle School English

Brenda McCashland 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Head Start Head Start Teacher

Teresa Nichols 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Resource Room

Mark Rodel 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Ellis Elementary Counselor

Cynthia Sears 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Education Center Psychologist

Angela Stevens 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Highland High School Speech/Debate

Todd VanOrden 1.0 FTE 01/30/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Counselor

Dan VanWasshenova 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Highland High School Math/Science

Shawn Voyles 1.0 FTE 05/23/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Math/Science

Leave of Absence

Jennifer Hayes 1.0 FTE 05/23/2011 Franklin Middle School Band Teacher

New Hires

Stacey Pearson 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Washington Elementary 4th Grade Teacher

Cynthia Lund 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Chubbuck Elementary 4th Grade Teacher

LuKrena Schoonover 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Edahow Elementary 2nd Grade Teacher

Peggy Walsh 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Lewis and Clark 1st Grade Teacher

Audrey Eldredge 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Syringa Elementary 4th Grade Teacher

Stacy Moffit 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Tyhee Elementary 3rd Grade Teacher

Amanda Nielson 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Tyhee Elementary 4th Grade Teacher

Rachel Kirkham 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Wilcox Elementary 2nd Grade

Yvette Troy 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Greenacres Elementary 2nd Grade

Michele Rogers 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Indian Hills Elementary 5th Grade

Sharla Dobson 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Edahow Elementary 1st Grade

Ellen Laggis 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Jefferson Elementary 5th Grade

Tamara Palmer 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Lewis and Clark Elementary 5th Grade

Rebecca Hoge 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Gate City Elementary Counselor

Brandon Broadhead 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 New Horizon Center Social Studies

Amie Byelich 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Art Teacher

Jesse Rose 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Highland High School Math and Physical Science

Kerrie McNulty 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Indian Hills Elementary Special Education

Emily Charaska 0.5 FTE 08/21/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Science

Casey Oliver 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Education Center School Psychologist

Annie Otterstein 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Pocatello High School Mathematics

Jerome Powell 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Highland High School Special Education

Christy Osterhout 0.5 FTE 08/21/2014 Tyhee Elementary SLP

George Yarno 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Highland High School Science

Katie Cooper 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Highland High School Special Education

George Asboe 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Pocatello High School Social Studies

John Stirewalt 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Pocatello High School Mathematics

Chloe Troester-Solbrig 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Pocatello High School Social Studies

Thaddeus Ferrin 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Hawthorne Middle School Band

Mimi Argyle 1.0 FTE 08/21/2014 Alameda Middle School Science

Recommend to Pay Stipends to:

Title IIA – Teacher Quality Funds:

 EXAMINING MATH COACHES (EMC) PROJECT (See attached memorandum)

Teacher Quality Federal Grant:

 PRINCIPAL MENTORS (See attached memorandum) Curriculum Department

memo

Date: May 20, 2014 To: Douglas Howell, Director of Human Resources From: Chuck Wegner, Director of Curriculum RE: Examining Math Coaches (EMC) Math Project Stipends – BOARD ACTION REQUESTED

EMC Project Background Information: The purpose of the Examining Math Coaches (EMC) Project was to conduct a five-year research study investigating the types and depths of knowledge needed by effective instructional coaches in K- 8 mathematics classrooms. This partnership-driven project, with funding by The National Science Foundation, included researchers at Montana State University at Bozeman, RMC Research Corporation in Denver, and the University of Idaho.

Eight District #25 staff members have completed the five-year project and met the following criteria:  Maintained their current teaching position for five years.  Participated in at least eight mathematics coaching sessions per school year, four of which were in the area of number sense and operations.  Followed the coaching model consisting of a 15-minute pre-observation conference; classroom observation; 30-minute post-observation conference per observation.  Completed a group of three online assessments twice in the first year and once each year thereafter.  Participated in classroom observations twice in the first year and at least once per year in subsequent years by the research staff.

As part of an incentive to participate in the study as a professional development opportunity, the following teachers successfully completed all aspects outlined above and will be paid a stipend of $1000:  Mary Lynn Spiker, Wilcox Elementary  Janelle Arvas, Tendoy Elementary  Toni Wright, Indian Hills Elementary  Susan Chandler, Indian Hills Elementary  Marci Reddish, Indian Hills Elementary  Carol Hicks, Indian Hills Elementary  E’Laine Khang, Jefferson Elementary  Jodi Carlson, Edahow Elementary

I request that the Board approve the EMC Math Project stipends as listed above to be paid from the Title-IIA Teacher Quality funds.

Pocatello/Chubbuck School District #25

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Doug Howell, Director of Human Resources

FROM: Chuck Wegner, Director of Curriculum

DATE: April 29, 2014

SUBJECT: Stipend in Excess of $500 – BOARD ACTION REQUESTED

I am seeking Board approval to pay the principals below for serving as mentors to new administrators. This is in accordance with Board Policy #7126. I recommend that the Board approve these requests.

Teacher Quality Federal Grant:

PRINCIPAL MENTORS  Sue Pettit – $500  Lisa Delonas – $500  Sheryl Brockett – $500  Jim Denton – $500

CERTIFICATED ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF First, Middle Last STEPHEN B. ANDERSON KEITH D. BARNES TED T. BELL SHERYL A. BROCKETT LORI A. CRANEY LISA E. DELONAS DEANNE DYE DIXIE G. ERICKSON HELEN GOELTZ MARY J. HARWOOD KENT D. HOBBS DOUGLAS M. HOWELL JUSTIN JOLLEY KIT K. KANEKOA HEIDI L. KESSLER KATHLEEN LURAS BRENDA L. MINER STEVEN R. MORTON AMY M. MYERS RHONDA J. NAFTZ JANICE I. NELSON TINA H. ORME ROBERT E. PARKER SUSAN A. PETTIT DAVID D. ROSS DIAN SWANSON PATRICIA G. TIEDE PATRICK T. VEREECKEN BRADLEY K. WALLACE ANTHONY J. WATSON F C. WEGNER TONYA M. WILKES PERSONNEL 7000 Policy 7132 Page (1)

USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

DATES (Adopted/Revised) GUIDE WORDS Social Media Internet Forums Weblogs Adopted – June, 2014 Social Blogs Microblogging Social Networks

The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Board of Trustees respects the need for staff to communicate with students and colleagues using various means of communications. The District likewise respects that school personnel are entitled to a private life. In furtherance of these interests, the Board of Trustees provides guidance to the District’s personnel who chose to engage in social media and electronic communications to improve awareness of the employee engaging in conduct which could result in negative consequences to employment and licensure status. For the purpose of this policy, social media communications is defined to include, but may not necessarily be limited to the interaction among people in which they create, share or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks, including group internet-based applications that allow the creation and exchange of user- generated content. Social media communications may occur in many different forms including use of cell phones, magazines, internet forums, weblogs, social blogs, microblogging, wikis, and social networks to name a few.

Public school employees are generally held to a higher moral standard than the public at large. They are expected to be role models for students. They are expected to conduct themselves within enumerated legal and ethical boundaries and are expected to demonstrate sound professional judgment. The Idaho Code of Ethics for Idaho Professional Educators does not yet have a specific ban prohibiting or limiting social media or electronic contacts with students. However, several principles indicate limited prohibitions on certain types of communications with students.

In addition to the Code of Ethics and the Idaho Student Data Accessibility, Transparency and Accountability Act of 2014, an educator must keep in mind that federal regulations including but not limited to those found in the Family and Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA), the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the American Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) play a significant role in what can and cannot be publicly or privately shared by an educator. The “Free Speech” rights of public school employees are more limited in this regard. School employees can speak out as citizens on “matters of public concern” and may also speak out if their speech does not disrupt the workplace. However, free speech that involves purely personal or private things, speech that disturbs the workplace or speech that is in violation of the above privacy limitations is not generally protected under the First Amendment.

It is for the above reasons that the Board cautions its employees from communicating with students through social media or electronic communications. The Board further cautions employees from discussing confidential student and colleague issues through the use of social media/electronic communications or engaging in postings/communications that will negatively portray the employee and/or the District.

PERSONNEL 7000 Policy 7132 Page (2)

USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

If a district employee seeks to use social media or electronic methods to communicate with students, such individuals are recommended and advised of the following whether using privately owned devices or District owned devices:  If using the District’s computer equipment, network, servers, or email address, recognize that the communication is likely a public record which may have to be produced upon request to any member of the public or the press.  If using the District’s computer equipment, avoid leaving the equipment open and unattended for others to view.  Block private content and maintain closed, private settings on personal social network sites to aid in preventing purely private discussions from becoming public.  Ask a colleague or administrator to review the appropriateness of a website designed for a class or designed for the purpose of student interactions; obtain feedback from colleagues, administration and parents and review the employee’s posting rules with participants.  In social media or electronic communications with students, address only school related issues and copy any student correspondence to parents, and/or the school’s administration.  Maintain all conversations with students and parents as professional, whether on social media, through use of other electronic means or personally.  Refrain from “friending” or “following” any student or parent of a student on private social media sites and explain to any students or parents about applicable provisions of the Code of Ethics and privacy laws which might impact a decision to not “friend” or “follow”.  Refrain from any harassment, intimidation, bullying, sexual comments, illegal actions, mention of use of alcohol or drugs or other such similar postings or electronic communications that are inappropriate for student viewing and depict oneself, the district, a district student or employee negatively If an employee becomes aware of any colleague whose social media use or electronic communications are in violation of the Code of Ethics, the employee has an ethical obligation to report such violation to the Professional Standards Commission. Failure to report a known violation of the Code of Ethics is itself a violation of the Code and could result in certification consequences.  It is recommended that an employee report to administration any known inappropriate posts by students on a school employee’s social media site. This will allow the administration to attempt to stop inappropriate student postings.  Refrain from posting negative comments, criticism or confidential information about any student, parent or colleague, even in a general sense such that would allow individuals to figure out who is being discussed.  Adhere to District policies, the Code of Ethics and applicable state and federal regulations.

PERSONNEL 7000 Policy 7132 Page (3)

USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

When using social media for personal postings and comments on the sites of others, even when a student may not be “friended” or directly included in the communication, be advised that an employee has very limited control over what occurs with these postings. Often times such private postings and electronic communications become “public” and could cause an employee embarrassment or could cause unintended certification/licensure issues and unattended employment consequences. Inappropriate postings on social media sights could lead to discipline, up to and including termination and could lead to a certificated employee’s suspension or loss of a teaching credential.

STUDENTS 8000 Policy 8149 Page (1)

RELATIONSHIP ABUSE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT PREVENTION AND RESPONSE

DATES (Adopted/Revised) GUIDE WORDS Relationship Abuse Sexual Assault Adopted – May, 2014 Students Prevention Response

The Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Board of Trustees believes that a safe, supportive, caring and respectful environment is critical to student learning. In doing so, the Board of Trustees endeavors to take steps to prevent and/or respond to known instances of relationship abuse and sexual assault. Such conduct by students, or third parties, is strictly prohibited and shall not be tolerated on District property, or at any District sponsored activity, regardless of location including, but not limited to buildings, grounds, vehicles, and the location of any District sponsored activity.

Relationship abuse includes the intentional use of physical, sexual, verbal or emotional abuse of violence by a person to harm, threaten, intimidate, or control another person in a current or past dating relationship. Sexual assault includes sexual violence, sexual abuse, sexual stalking and rape.

Students whose behavior is found to be in violation of this policy will be subject to discipline, up to and including expulsion. Third parties whose behavior is found to be in violation of this policy shall be subject to appropriate sanctions as determined and imposed by the Superintendent or Board of Trustees.

Students or third parties may also be referred to law enforcement officials. Should the District have reason to believe that a child under the age of eighteen (18) years of age has been abused, abandoned, or neglected or has been subjected to conditions which would reasonably result in abuse, abandonment, or neglect, the school shall follow appropriate reporting requirements pursuant to the Child Protective Act.

Existing Board of Trustees’ policies and procedures address various prohibited conduct, reporting and investigative procedures, prevention and response procedures. Students are noticed as to expected behaviors in the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District.

Legal References: I.C. Title 16 Chapter 16 Child Protective Act

I.D.A.P.A. 08.02.03.160 Safe Environment & Discipline

Renae Johnson

From: Mary Vagner Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:33 AM To: Kaylin White Cc: Renae Johnson Subject: RE: Policy 8149

Kaylin:

Thank you for your input. We have to be careful about listing referrals to community support agencies in policy as it can be interpreted that the district would pay for outside services.

Mary Vagner

From: Kaylin White Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:45 PM To: Renae Johnson Subject: Policy 8149

I am glad to see this policy added to the manual. It is very important.

Have you considered adding a statement of possible referral to community support agencies, such as Family Services Alliance, who specialize in domestic violence services and prevention?

Kaylin White Parent & Community Engagement Manager Pocatello/Chubbuck SD#25 Head Start Lincoln Early Childhood Center 330 Oakwood Drive, Pocatello, ID 83204 Ph(208)233‐6606 fax (208)232‐4906 www.pochs.org

Volunteers are the only human beings on the face of the earth who reflect this nation's compassion, unselfish caring, patience, and just plain love for one another. - Erma Brombeck

The information contained in his email may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. All persons are advised that they may face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this information with unauthorized individuals. If you received this email in error, please reply to the sender that you have received this information in error.

1 AGENDA ISBA SUMMER LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE

1:00PM WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS

1:30PM GENERAL SESSION // LOOKING TOWARDS THE FUTURE Discover the connections between the State Department of Education (SDE) and your local School Board. Looking to the future, we will have a new State Superintendent of Public Instruction. What do we hope their vision is for the education of our children? How will they administer basic education programs? What education reforms do they envision and why? How will they support the implementation of the Governor’s Task Force recommendations? We will have an organized discussion and follow up with questions from the audience. Find out what the future holds in Idaho Education!

2:30PM BREAK // REFRESHMENTS & NETWORKING

3:00PM WORKSHOP BREAKOUT SESSION The Value of the Strategic Plan Staying the Course

How does a board use the Strategic Plan in their day to day work? This The day-to-day work of the board can easily be workshop will show examples of how the Strategic Plan drives the work of derailed when negative conflict, media, or community/ the board and ensures that local governance keeps the focus on student stakeholder involvement become part of the Board’s achievement. We will look at what the meeting agenda would look like reality. This workshop will explore how to manage these when it is tied to the Strategic Plan, what data the Board should be looking areas to ensure the Board is able to keep their work at each meeting because of the Strategic Plan, and how to set policy for focused on the Mission and Vision of the district and not the district to ensure the Strategic Plan is directing the work of the district. get side tracked by these components of community life.

4:30PM ROUNDTABLE // IGNITE BEST PRACTICES

The Ignite Best Practices session provides fast-paced presentations by local schools boards. Focused on the six Professional Standards for School Boards, the Ignite Best Practices session shares effective strategies and models in place with Idaho School Districts. The Ignite Best Practices session will also provide time for participants to digest information, ask questions, and talk about how they will implement one or more of these strategies within their district.

5:30PM WRAP UP SESSION// QUESTIONS & ANSWERS An opportunity to get your questions answered, the training clarified, and hear from each other what the pressing issues of board work are going to be this coming year.

3 locations. 3 days.

Trustee Award 1 CALDWELL | JULY 16 |1PM-6PM of BOARDSMANSHIP Caldwell School District Office 25 1502 Fillmore Street, Caldwell POINTS 2 IDAHO FALLS | JULY 17 |1PM-6PM Compass Academy 955 Garfield Street, Idaho Falls For attending the Summer Leadership Institute, you earn 25 points towards the Trustee Award of 3 COEUR D’ALENE | JULY 24 | 1PM-6PM Boardsmanship. To learn more, contact ISBA about Midtown Meeting Center 1505 N. 5th St., Coeur d’Alene the Master of Boardsmanship Program.

ISBA Contact Information Registration form & Agenda Phone: (208) 854-1476 | Toll Free: (866) 799-4722 | Fax: (208) 854-1480 are available at www.idsba.org/SLI Email: [email protected] or [email protected]

ISBA Resolution Class Size Averages

WHEREAS, the Idaho state legislature has chosen to collect class size data across the state and determine an average class number for the various grade levels and subject areas;

WHEREAS, this average class size number could be a limiting factor in a district’s ability to understaff;

WHEREAS, this averaging raises questions of equity of comparison of like and unlike size districts and schools;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Idaho School Board Association work with the Idaho legislature to amend current legislation to consider a more equitable means of calculating class size for districts that includes comparing like size districts and schools to each other.

Statement of Purpose When comparing districts across the state, equity of comparison should be considered. Thus, the Idaho School Board Association should advocate to the legislature to implement a system of equity.

Submitted by the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 ISBA Resolution Strategic Planning Timeline

WHEREAS, the Idaho State Legislature set forth legislation requiring school districts to develop and maintain a strategic plan;

WHEREAS, the timelines set forth in the legislation are cumbersome for 2015 and beyond;

WHEREAS, the strategic plan is to focus on improving student performance;

WHEREAS, final student performance data is not released annually until the end of July, which does not allow adequate time to process that information with respect to a strategic plan;

WHEREAS, the legislation requires that the strategic plan must be reviewed and updated annually no later than August 1 beginning in 2015-16, which is difficult to do because of the timeline of release of performance data;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Idaho School Board Association work with the legislature to amend current legislation and extend the timeline for annual review and update to an October 1 deadline.

Statement of Purpose School boards across the state need adequate time to receive and analyze data in which to develop strategic plans. The current timeline set forth in legislation is limiting this ability for analysis and use in developing strategic plans.

Submitted by the Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Pocatello/Chubbuck School District No. 25 Maximizing Learning for All Students Through Rigor, Relevancy, and Relationships Whatever It Takes!

Strategic Plan Diagram

Developing and sustaining high performing schools for all PreK- 12 students to graduate career and college ready without

remediation Support School District Vision, Math Mission, Beliefs and Learning Goals District and School Reading/ Improvement Language Arts ICS Planning 21st Century Skills implementation/refinement and through Understanding by Science Technological Design (UbD) framework Literacy Social Studies SIOP Social /Emotional Development Health Cultural Humanities Perspectives ICS Instructional Shifts PE

Professional Technical

UbD Unit Implementation

Professional Response to Classroom Grading Standards Based Learning Assessments TIA Intervention Walkthroughs - Practices Student Reporting Communitites Administrators and Peer Teachers

Academic Behavioral Research BasedOngoing ProfessionalDevelopment Progress Monitoring

Revised 5/13/2014 LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-second Legislature Second Regular Session - 2014

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

HOUSE BILL NO. 521

BY EDUCATION COMMITTEE

1 AN ACT 2 RELATING TO EDUCATION; AMENDING CHAPTER 3, TITLE 33, IDAHO CODE, BY THE AD- 3 DITION OF A NEW SECTION 33-320, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR A STRATEGIC 4 PLAN, TO ESTABLISH PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A PLAN, TO 5 PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE PLAN, TO PROVIDE A DATE FOR ADOPTION 6 OF THE PLAN, TO PROVIDE FOR MONITORING PROGRESS AND USE IN EVALUATIONS, 7 TO PROVIDE THAT THE PLAN BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, TO PROVIDE FOR DIS- 8 TRIBUTION OF MONEYS AND TO PROVIDE FOR RULES.

9 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Idaho:

10 SECTION 1. That Chapter 3, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is 11 hereby amended by the addition thereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and des- 12 ignated as Section 33-320, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:

13 33-320. STRATEGIC PLANNING AND TRAINING. (1) Each school district and 14 public charter school in Idaho shall develop and maintain a strategic plan 15 that focuses on improving the student performance of the district or public 16 charter school. 17 (2) (a) The board of trustees and the superintendent shall collaborate 18 on the plan and engage students, parents, educators and the community as 19 appropriate. The board of directors and the administrator of a public 20 charter school shall collaborate on the plan and engage students, par- 21 ents, educators and the community as appropriate. 22 (b) The strategic plan shall: 23 (i) Be data driven, specifically in student outcomes, and shall 24 include, but not be limited to, analyses of demographic data, stu- 25 dent achievement and growth data, graduation rates, and college 26 and career readiness; 27 (ii) Set clear and measurable targets based on student outcomes; 28 (iii) Include a clearly developed and articulated vision and mis- 29 sion; and 30 (iv) Include key indicators for monitoring performance. 31 (c) For the 2014-2015 school year, the strategic plan shall be adopted 32 on or before September 1. The strategic plan must be reviewed and up- 33 dated annually no later than August 1 every year thereafter. 34 (d) The board of trustees or the board of directors shall continuously 35 monitor progress toward the goals by utilizing relevant data to measure 36 growth. The progress shall be included in evaluations of the district 37 superintendent or administrator of a public charter school. 38 (3) The strategic plan must be made available to the public and shall be 39 posted on the school district or charter school website. 40 (4) Of the moneys appropriated in the public schools educational sup- 41 port program, up to two thousand dollars ($2,000) shall be distributed to 42 each school district and public charter school to be expended for train- 2

1 ing purposes for district superintendents and boards of trustees, public 2 charter school administrators and boards of directors. Funds shall be 3 distributed on a reimbursement basis based on a process prescribed by the 4 superintendent of public instruction. Qualified training shall include 5 training for strategic planning, finance, superintendent evaluations, pub- 6 lic charter administrator evaluations, ethics and governance. 7 (5) The state board of education shall be granted rulemaking author- 8 ity to establish appropriate procedures, qualifications and guidelines for 9 qualified training providers and shall prepare a list of qualified training 10 providers within the state of Idaho. May 19, 2014 Monday 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM Wellness/Insurance Committee Meeting -- Conference Room Jim Facer Paul Vitale

May 20, 2014 Tuesday 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Judge Murray's Juvenile Justice Committee -- Region VI Juvenile Facility Janie Gebhardt Dave Mattson

1:30 PM - 3:30 PM Instructional Technology Committee -- Training Center Dave Mattson

5:00 PM - 5:30 PM Executive Session - Negotiations -- Superintendent's Office

5:30 PM - 8:30 PM Regular Board Meeting -- Board Room

6:00 PM - 7:00 PM NHHS Graduation Dinner -- New Horizon Center

May 21, 2014 Wednesday 6:00 PM - 7:00 PM New Horizon High School Graduation -- Holt Arena

May 22, 2014 Thursday 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM PHS Graduation Breakfast -- ISU Sub

9:30 AM - 10:30 AM HHS Graduation Breakfast -- HHS Cafeteria

Renae Johnson 1 5/16/2014 10:53 AM May 22, 2014 Continued Thursday 11:15 AM - 12:00 PM CHS Graduation Breakfast -- ISU Turner/Garrison Dining Room

12:00 PM - 2:00 PM PHS Graduation -- Holt Arena

3:00 PM - 5:00 PM HHS Graduation -- Holt Arena

6:00 PM - 8:00 PM CHS Graduation -- Holt Arena

May 26, 2014 Monday All Day Memorial Day -- United States

May 27, 2014 Tuesday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement May 27 – 30, 2014 ELA K-5 – Board Room ELA 6-8 – Conference Room ELA 9-12 – Training Center Speech – Computer Lab World History and Civilization – Small Conference Room

May 29, 2014 Media Specialists – Floating

Renae Johnson 2 5/16/2014 10:53 AM May 28, 2014 Wednesday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement Please See Above

4:30 PM - 7:30 PM Student Discipline Hearings -- Superintendent's Office Moved due to last day of school!

May 29, 2014 Thursday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement Please See Above

May 30, 2014 Friday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement Please See Above

June 09, 2014 Monday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Math K-5 – Board Room Math 6-8 – Conference Room

Training Center Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

June 10, 2014 Tuesday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

Renae Johnson 3 5/16/2014 10:53 AM June 11, 2014 Wednesday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

June 12, 2014 Thursday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

June 13, 2014 Friday 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM Local Issues Committee -- Perkins Jackie Cranor Jim Facer

June 14, 2014 Saturday All Day Flag Day -- United States

June 15, 2014 Sunday All Day Father's Day -- United States

June 16, 2014 Monday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Geography – Small Conference Room

Board Room US History I A/B US History II A/B Government Economics 6th Grade Science Life Science Earth Science

Renae Johnson 4 5/16/2014 10:53 AM June 16, 2014 Continued Monday Physical Science Biology

Health – Conference Room

Intro to Computers – Training Center

Accelerated Math – Computer Lab

June 17, 2014 Tuesday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Judge Murray's Juvenile Justice Committee -- Region VI Juvenile Facility Janie Gebhardt Dave Mattson

4:30 PM - 5:30 PM Executive Session - Superintendent's Evaluation -- Superintendent's Office

5:30 PM - 8:30 PM Regular Board Meeting -- Board Room

June 18, 2014 Wednesday All Day 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

June 19, 2014 Thursday 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM 2014 ICS Unit Refinement -- See Below Please See Above

Renae Johnson 5 5/16/2014 10:53 AM July 04, 2014 Friday All Day Independence Day -- United States

Renae Johnson 6 5/16/2014 10:53 AM SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 161 of 162 BILL LIST 05/09/2014 Report Code: BAP_BILLLIST BATCH QUEUE ID 51332 1:09:37 PM

Grand Totals by Fund Fund Description Amount 420 SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 473,835.46 100 GENERAL FUND 823,392.42 274 HEAD START 17,710.13 278 HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT 4,268.31 243 STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND 35,980.93 251 TITLE I-A BASIC 57,228.99 257 IDEA PART B 58,510.26 273 TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 13,641.04 258 IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 191.09 263 CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL 48,143.68 271 TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 20,454.15 242 SPECIAL GRANTS FUND 3,453.72 241 DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND 297.86 610 PRINT SHOP FUND 3,533.31 276 HEAD START TRAINING GRANT 2,565.86 245 STATE TECHNOLOGY FUND 70.00 290 CHILD NUTRITION 337,950.69 Grand Total 1,901,227.90 APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

______BOARD CHAIR DATE

______BOARD CLERK POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Bannock County, Idaho

MEMORANDUM

TO: Mary M. Vagner, Superintendent

FROM: Bart J. Reed, Director of Business Operations

DATE: May 20, 2014

SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION – APRIL 2014

Reporting Period

 April 1, 2014 to April 30, 2014. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the year completed.

General Fund Comments

 Eighty percent (80%) of budgeted revenues have been received as of April 30, 2014. The majority of revenue collections have come from the state base support distribution and property taxes.

 Seventy-six percent (76%) of budgeted expenditures have been spent as of April 30, 2014.

Cash Balance Report

 Key Bank represents the balances as if all budgeted expenditures cleared the bank. Actual cash balance on April 30, 2014 for Key Bank was $495,113.93.

 Investment Pool rates increased from 0.0918 percent in March 2014 to 1.0230 percent in April 2014.

Other

 Year end reversing entries will be made in June in preparation for the year end closing of the financial statements. (last year)

 Planning and estimates are underway regarding the Fiscal Year 2014 General Fund Budget. The Board will be asked to approve and adopt the 2014 Budget during the June 17, 2014 meeting. (last year)

POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 BANNOCK COUNTY Statement of Cash Balances For the Period Ending March 31, 2014 Beginning Cash CASH FUND # Fund Description Balance Revenues Expenditures BALANCE

100 GENERAL FUND 22,803,670.58 268,487.01 (5,145,402.29) 17,926,755.30 220 FEDERAL FOREST 80,193.74 0.00 0.00 80,193.74 241 DRIVER EDUCATION 12,068.11 (76.80) (5,234.24) 6,757.07 242 SPECIAL GRANTS 54,851.36 (3,033.96) (1,429.88) 50,387.52 243 PROF-TECH EDUCATION 419,743.95 0.00 (29,919.15) 389,824.80 245 STATE TECHNOLOGY (185,824.00) 0.00 (5,962.18) (191,786.18) 246 SDFS STATE TOBACCO TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 251 TITLE I-A BASIC (196,904.29) 196,150.36 (200,338.05) (201,091.98) 251 School Improvement-Kinport Academy (5,160.93) 5,160.93 (4,306.23) (4,306.23) 257 IDEA PART B SCHOOL AGE (213,810.96) 213,326.63 (230,243.78) (230,728.11) 258 IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL (6,601.19) 6,510.08 (5,286.11) (5,377.22) 263 PERKINS III PROF-TECH (22,487.66) (309.00) (16,177.89) (38,974.55) 271 TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY (24,197.31) 24,601.11 (28,461.82) (28,058.02) 273 TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC (35,074.84) 32,799.32 (42,221.81) (44,497.33) 274 HEAD START REGULAR (34,521.69) 99,488.87 (95,818.14) (30,850.96) 276 HEAD START TRAINING (857.25) 884.15 (541.90) (515.00) 278 HEAD START TANF (11,911.69) 11,759.72 (5,198.58) (5,350.55) 290 CHILD NUTRITION 708,275.78 452,673.12 (415,906.27) 745,042.63 310 BOND & INTEREST 2,048,171.14 33,661.45 0.00 2,081,832.59 420 SCHOOL PLANT 1,488,820.06 67,458.82 (47,151.09) 1,509,127.79 610 PRINT SHOP 86,394.12 5,411.25 (4,981.62) 86,823.75 710 VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 478,406.64 43.61 0.00 478,450.25 900 PETTY CASH 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 27,453,243.67 1,414,996.67 (6,284,581.03) 22,583,659.31 REVOLVING FUND 10,000.00 KEY BANK CURRENT EXPENSE 2,301,469.65 PROOF 0.00 KEY BANK PAYROLL (2,677,167.81) MEDICAID MATCH ESCROW ACCOUNT 80,245.02 KEY BANK SCHOOL LUNCH 745,042.63 IRELAND BANK VEBA TRUST CHECKING 159.30 GENERAL IDAHO STATE POOL (1286) 21,631,667.31 BOND CONSTRUCTION POOL (2002) 13,952.26 VEBA INSURANCE TRUST FUND (2392) 478,290.95 TOTAL 22,583,659.31

5/14/2014 POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 OF 2 EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION 05/05/2014 GENERAL FUND 01:07:42 PM

FOR APRIL, 2014 YEAR COMPLETED - 83%

FUNCTIONDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 5110 KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 5120ELEMENTARY PROGRAM 18,612,471.00 18,586,777.00 1,606,502.63 15,222,873.63 124,092.12 3,239,811.25 82.57% 5150SECONDARY PROGRAM 16,336,796.00 15,689,047.00 1,287,795.84 12,842,786.74 21,681.65 2,824,578.61 82.00% 5170ALTERNATE SCHOOL 1,097,214.00 1,012,517.00 200,122.11 953,124.94 487.24 58,904.82 94.18% 5190 VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL PROGRAM0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 5210SPECIAL EDUCATION 4,853,748.00 5,155,876.00 296,014.08 3,912,002.31 0.00 1,243,873.69 75.87% 5220PRESCHOOL HANDICAPPED 223,838.00 221,037.00 18,662.51 182,619.88 0.00 38,417.12 82.62% 5240GIFTED & TALENTED PROGRAM 145,535.00 145,535.00 11,767.88 118,747.25 0.00 26,787.75 81.59% 5310INTERSCHOLASTIC PROGRAM 366,000.00 366,000.00 56,975.64 297,815.62 0.00 68,184.38 81.37% 5320SCHOOL ACTIVITY PROGRAM 737,339.00 738,139.00 57,567.36 614,602.33 1,173.36 122,363.31 83.42% 5410SUMMER SCHOOL PROGRAM 80,290.00 80,290.00 0.00 68,257.21 0.00 12,032.79 85.01% 5420COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM 18,043.00 18,043.00 426.06 4,240.89 0.00 13,802.11 23.50% 6110ATTENDENCE GUIDANCE & HEALTH P 2,266,273.00 2,185,113.00 177,216.64 1,831,548.24 1,161.00 352,403.76 83.87% 6160ANCILLARY SERVICE PROGRAM 1,564,692.00 1,503,293.00 124,554.94 1,247,020.25 0.00 256,272.75 82.95% 6210INSTRUCTIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROG 913,922.00 1,504,447.00 74,359.62 982,611.20 32,721.00 489,114.80 67.49% 6220EDUCATIONAL MEDIA SERVICES PRO 830,347.00 784,656.00 68,518.57 650,944.68 12,987.73 120,723.59 84.61% 6230INSTRUCTION-RELATED TECHNOLOGY 1,007,495.00 1,315,285.00 76,215.64 1,212,218.54 1,174.04 101,892.42 92.25% 6310BOARD OF EDUCATION PROGRAM 28,100.00 27,100.00 272.18 20,444.26 0.00 6,655.74 75.44% 6320CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM 927,814.00 935,972.00 55,616.07 802,542.97 790.00 132,639.03 85.83% 6410SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM 3,894,187.00 3,956,012.00 325,756.27 3,260,772.13 1,706.10 693,533.77 82.47% 6510BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 506,536.00 509,903.00 40,502.72 427,974.58 1,534.43 80,393.99 84.23% 6550CENTRAL SERVICES PROGRAM 111,315.00 114,234.00 -9,883.36 81,269.53 302.86 32,661.61 71.41% 6560ADMINISTRATIVE TECHNOLOGY SERV 264,950.00 268,561.00 16,744.83 213,740.91 694.95 54,125.14 79.85% 6610BUILDING OPERATION SERVICES PR 4,546,060.00 4,578,112.00 367,197.25 3,852,815.18 0.00 725,296.82 84.16% 6630 MAINTENANCE - NON-STUDENT OCCUPIED3,600.00 3,600.00 318.18 2,676.86 0.00 923.14 74.36% 6640MAINTENANCE - STUDENT OCCUPIED 1,489,041.00 1,466,427.00 111,994.86 1,228,839.12 6,843.56 230,744.32 84.26% 6650GROUND MAINTENANCE SERVICES PR 198,985.00 202,011.00 20,316.31 166,570.51 0.00 35,440.49 82.46% 6670SECURITY SERVICES PROGRAM 203,346.00 193,192.00 16,692.39 133,128.26 0.00 60,063.74 68.91% 6810PUPIL TO SCHOOL PROGRAM 2,847,296.00 2,846,557.00 231,346.06 2,186,296.04 39,102.86 621,158.10 78.18% 6840NON-REIMB. TRANSPORTATION 41,729.00 41,729.00 1,261.35 36,595.31 0.00 5,133.69 87.70% 6910OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 10,000.00 10,000.00 944.90 6,830.55 0.00 3,169.45 68.31% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 OF 2 EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION 05/05/2014 GENERAL FUND 01:07:42 PM

7100 CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAM0.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00% 7200 PARENT ACTIVITIES0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 8100 CAPITAL ASSETS - STUDENT-OCCUPIED0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 9200FUND TRANSFER PROGRAM 105,500.00 105,500.00 12,129.62 96,989.17 0.00 8,510.83 91.93% 9500CONTINGENCY RESERVE EXPENSE PR 4,369,704.00 5,066,218.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,066,218.00 0.00% TOTALS: 68,602,166.0069,646,183.00 5,247,909.15 52,658,899.09 246,452.90 16,740,831.01 75.96% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 REVENUES BY FUNCTION 05/05/2014 GENERAL FUND 01:07:26 PM

FOR APRIL, 2014 YEAR COMPLETED - 83%

FUNCTIONDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD

REVENUE FROM LOCAL SOURCES 411PROPERTY TAXES 8,701,270.00 9,142,624.00 252,427.41 8,165,741.67 0.00 976,882.33 89.32% 413PENALTY & INTEREST ON DELINQ TAXES 100,000.00100,000.00 5,957.19 106,414.93 0.00 -6,414.93 106.41% 414TUITION 40,000.00 40,000.00 5,635.00 44,605.54 0.00 -4,605.54 111.51% 415EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS 40,000.00 40,000.00 1,158.28 11,981.87 0.00 28,018.13 29.95% 417STUDENT BODY ACTIVITIES 252,500.00 252,500.00 0.00 228,738.00 0.00 23,762.00 90.59% 419OTHER LOCAL REVENUE 567,000.00 629,291.00 34,723.71 229,595.49 0.00 399,695.51 36.48% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM LOCAL SOURCES9,700,770.00 10,204,415.00 299,901.59 8,787,077.50 0.00 1,417,337.50 86.11%

REVENUE FROM STATE SOURCES 431SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAMS 52,482,788.00 52,095,512.00 0.00 45,378,543.62 0.00 6,716,968.38 87.11% 432RESTRICTED STATE SUPPORT 64,908.00 1,035,750.00 0.00 993,137.84 0.00 42,612.16 95.89% 438 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES6,500.00 6,500.00 2,238.50 8,954.00 0.00 -2,454.00 137.75% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM STATE SOURCES52,554,196.00 53,137,762.00 2,238.50 46,380,635.46 0.00 6,757,126.54 87.28%

REVENUE FROM FEDERAL SOURCES 442 UNRESTCTD GRANTS-INDIRECT FROM0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 445RESTRICTED GRANTS - INDIRECT 865,000.00 865,000.00 367.78 463,826.24 0.00 401,173.76 53.62% TOTALS: REVENUE FROM FEDERAL SOURCES865,000.00 865,000.00 367.78 463,826.24 0.00 401,173.76 53.62%

INTERFUND TRANSFERS 460 INTERFUND TRANSFERS0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% TOTALS: INTERFUND TRANSFERS0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%

ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE 700ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE 5,482,200.00 5,439,006.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,439,006.00 0.00% TOTALS: ESTIMATED BEGINNING BALANCE5,482,200.00 5,439,006.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,439,006.00 0.00% TOTALS: GENERAL FUND68,602,166.00 69,646,183.00 302,507.87 55,631,539.20 0.00 14,014,643.80 79.88% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 EXPENDITURES BY FUND 05/05/2014 01:08:00 PM

FOR APRIL, 2014 YEAR COMPLETED - 83%

FUNDDESCRIPTION BUDGET ADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT AMOUNT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 100GENERAL FUND 68,602,166.00 69,646,183.00 5,247,909.15 52,658,899.09 246,452.90 16,740,831.01 75.96% 220FEDERAL FOREST FUND 114,827.00 114,827.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114,827.00 0.00% 241DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND 69,420.00 88,114.00 4,694.38 62,935.36 0.00 25,178.64 71.42% 242SPECIAL GRANTS FUND 60,047.00 91,396.00 4,043.37 37,454.32 1,499.39 52,442.29 42.62% 243STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND 329,550.00 319,805.00 43,860.60 194,859.30 14,934.66 110,011.04 65.60% 245STATE TECHNOLOGY FUND 336,850.00 534,942.00 6,311.89 497,342.23 26,496.48 11,103.29 97.92% 251TITLE I-A BASIC 2,708,090.00 3,150,218.00 214,576.60 2,110,046.48 70,060.30 970,111.22 69.20% 257IDEA PART B 3,599,024.00 3,599,024.00 212,771.52 2,105,165.34 2,548.14 1,491,310.52 58.56% 258IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 148,035.00 120,764.00 5,640.32 72,961.66 459.98 47,342.36 60.80% 263CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL 150,500.00 170,792.00 18,975.05 75,690.89 35,889.36 59,211.75 65.33% 271TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 579,327.00 605,300.00 32,101.84 369,971.47 7,847.87 227,480.66 62.42% 273TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 430,929.00 444,649.00 39,698.42 295,357.26 2,335.80 146,955.94 66.95% 274HEAD START 1,234,166.00 1,234,166.00 110,572.51 934,868.08 8,361.18 290,936.74 76.43% 276HEAD START TRAINING GRANT 21,178.00 21,178.00 2,940.38 10,299.01 3,102.00 7,776.99 63.28% 278HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT 93,504.00 93,504.00 9,604.39 58,280.94 128.91 35,094.15 62.47% 290CHILD NUTRITION 6,047,541.00 6,047,541.00 530,523.26 4,337,539.41 169,333.19 1,540,668.40 74.52% 310BOND INTEREST & REDEMP. FUND 4,938,710.00 4,938,710.00 750.00 2,235,000.00 0.00 2,703,710.00 45.25% 420SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 6,014,820.00 6,206,483.00 158,491.31 3,074,856.92 1,258,562.02 1,873,064.06 69.82% 610PRINT SHOP FUND 113,696.00 113,696.00 7,398.99 83,961.98 24.50 29,709.52 73.87% 710VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 480,230.00 480,230.00 0.00 760.00 0.00 479,470.00 0.16% TOTALS: 96,072,610.0098,021,522.00 6,650,863.98 69,216,249.74 1,848,036.68 26,957,235.58 72.50% POCATELLO/CHUBBUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 Page: 1 REVENUE BY FUND 05/05/2014 01:08:16 PM

FOR APRIL, 2014 YEAR COMPLETED - 83%

FUNDDESCRIPTION BUDGET AMOUNTADJUSTED CURRENT YTD ACTIVITY REQUISITION / UNENCUMBERED PERCENT BUDGET ACTIVITY ENCUMBRANCE BALANCE ENCMBRD 100GENERAL FUND 68,602,166.00 69,646,183.00 302,507.87 55,631,539.20 0.00 14,014,643.80 79.88% 220FEDERAL FOREST FUND 114,827.00 114,827.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114,827.00 0.00% 241DRIVER'S EDUCATION FUND 69,420.00 88,114.00 0.00 45,745.00 0.00 42,369.00 51.92% 242SPECIAL GRANTS FUND 60,047.00 91,396.00 6,654.46 30,262.62 0.00 61,133.38 33.11% 243STATE PROF-TECH ED FUND 329,550.00 319,805.00 0.00 376,421.00 0.00 -56,616.00 117.70% 245STATE TECHNOLOGY FUND 336,850.00 534,942.00 0.00 173,280.50 0.00 361,661.50 32.39% 251TITLE I-A BASIC 2,708,090.00 3,150,218.00 205,398.21 2,206,752.57 0.00 943,465.43 70.05% 257IDEA PART B 3,599,024.00 3,599,024.00 230,728.11 2,126,352.75 0.00 1,472,671.25 59.08% 258IDEA PART B PRESCHOOL 148,035.00 120,764.00 5,398.19 81,821.43 0.00 38,942.57 67.75% 263CARL PERKINS PROFESSIONAL-TECHNICAL 150,500.00 170,792.00 0.00 156,627.43 0.00 14,164.57 91.71% 271TITLE II-A TEACHER QUALITY 579,327.00 605,300.00 28,058.02 429,519.57 0.00 175,780.43 70.96% 273TITLE IV 21ST CENTURY CLC 430,929.00 444,649.00 44,497.33 349,774.48 0.00 94,874.52 78.66% 274HEAD START 1,234,166.00 1,234,166.00 109,516.45 1,047,626.41 0.00 186,539.59 84.89% 276HEAD START TRAINING GRANT 21,178.00 21,178.00 2,940.38 11,912.97 0.00 9,265.03 56.25% 278HEAD START T.A.N.F. GRANT 93,504.00 93,504.00 5,350.55 76,929.26 0.00 16,574.74 82.27% 290CHILD NUTRITION 6,047,541.00 6,047,541.00 440,940.31 3,844,002.82 0.00 2,203,538.18 63.56% 310BOND INTEREST & REDEMP. FUND 4,938,710.00 4,938,710.00 -89,737.10 2,389,685.45 0.00 2,549,024.55 48.39% 420SCHOOL PLANT FACILITY FUND 6,014,820.00 6,206,483.00 -55,648.41 4,447,997.37 0.00 1,758,485.63 71.67% 610PRINT SHOP FUND 113,696.00 113,696.00 11,709.08 99,110.96 0.00 14,585.04 87.17% 710VEBA INSURANCE TRUST 480,230.00 480,230.00 37.29 390.93 0.00 479,839.07 0.08% TOTALS: 96,072,610.0098,021,522.00 1,248,350.74 73,525,752.72 0.00 24,495,769.28 75.01%