DOCSLIB.ORG

Wykaz Aplikantów, Których Wiąże Z PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. Umowa O Przydzielenie Zdolności Przepustowej W Ramach Rozkładu Jazdy Pociągów 2018/2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wykaz Aplikantów, Których Wiąże Z PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. Umowa O Przydzielenie Zdolności Przepustowej W Ramach Rozkładu Jazdy Pociągów 2018/2019 Stan na dzień: 17 lipca 2018 r. Wykaz Aplikantów, których wiąże z PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. umowa o przydzielenie zdolności przepustowej w ramach rozkładu jazdy pociągów 2018/2019 L.p. Nazwa Aplikanta Siedziba i adres 1 Advanced World Transport a.s. Ostrava, Moravská Ostrava 702-62 Hornopolní 3314/38 2 Arriva RP Sp. z o.o. Toruń 87-100 ul. Gen. Jana Henryka Dąbrowskiego 8/24 3 BARTER S.A. Białystok 15-281 ul. Legionowa 28 4 BARTEX Sp. z o.o. Chruściel 14-526 Chruściel 4 5 Budimex Kolejnictwo S.A. Warszawa 01-040 ul. Stawki 40 6 Captrain Polska Sp. z o.o. Wrocław 50-075 ul. Krupnicza 13/103 7 CARGO Master Sp. z o.o. Toruń 87-100 ul. Jana III Sobieskiego 48-50 CARGO Przewozy Towarowe, Transport Sp. z o.o. 8 Wrocław 51-162 ul. Jana Długosza 60 Spółka komandytowa 9 CD CARGO POLAND sp. z o.o. Warszawa 00-131 ul. Grzybowska 4, lok. nr 3 10 Cemet S.A. Warszawa 01-756 ul. Przasnyska 6A 11 Centrum Logistyczne w Łosośnej Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 02-913 ul. Zielona 34, lok. 2 12 CIECH Cargo Sp. z o.o. Inowrocław 88-101 ul. Fabryczna 4 13 COLAS RAIL Polska Sp. z o.o. Gdańsk 80-103 ul. Kartuska 5 14 CTL Logistics Sp. z o.o. Sosnowiec 41-208 ul. Długa 90 15 DB Cargo Polska S.A. Zabrze 41-800 ul. Wolności 337 16 DB Cargo Spedkol Sp. z o.o. Kędzierzyn-Koźle 47-225 ul. Szkolna 15 Dolnośląskie Przedsiębiorstwo Napraw Infrastruktury 17 Wrocław 50-502 ul. Hubska 6 Komunikacyjnej "DOLKOM" Sp. z o.o. 18 Ecco Rail Sp. z o. o. Katowice 40-101 ul. Chorzowska 6 19 EUROTRANS Sp. z o.o. Małaszewicze Duże 21-540 ul. Warszawska 1c 20 Freightliner PL Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 00-633 ul. Polna 11 21 Grupa Azoty "Kolzap" Sp z o.o. Puławy 24-110 al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 13 22 HSL Polska Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 01-796 ul. Duchnicka 3 23 Inter Cargo Sp. z o.o. Katowice 40-514 ul. Ceglana 4 24 JSW Logistics Sp. z o.o. Katowice 40-282 ul. Ignacego Paderewskiego 41 25 KARPIEL Sp. z o.o. Kąty 32-862 Kąty 146 26 Kolej Bałtycka S.A. Szczecin 70-811 ul. Racławicka 3 27 Koleje Dolnośląskie S.A. Legnica 59-220 ul. Kolejowa 2 28 Koleje Małopolskie Sp. z o.o. Kraków 30-017 ul. Racławicka 56 lok. 416 29 Koleje Mazowieckie - KM Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 03-802 ul. Lubelska 26 30 Koleje Śląskie Sp. z o.o. Katowice 40-074 ul. Raciborska 58 31 Koleje Wielkopolskie Sp. z o.o. Poznań 61-897 ul. Składowa 5 1 z 3 Stan na dzień: 17 lipca 2018 r. Wykaz Aplikantów, których wiąże z PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. umowa o przydzielenie zdolności przepustowej w ramach rozkładu jazdy pociągów 2018/2019 L.p. Nazwa Aplikanta Siedziba i adres 32 Kopalnia Piasku "KOTLARNIA" S.A. Kotlarnia 47-246 ul. Dębowa 3 33 Leo Express Global a.s. Praha 3 130 00 Rehorova 908/4 34 LOTOS Kolej Sp. z o.o. Gdańsk 80-716 ul. Michałki 25 35 LTE Polska Sp. z o.o. Gdynia 81-376 ul. Wacława Sieroszewskiego 12 36 Lubelski Węgiel "Bogdanka" S.A. Bogdanka, poczta Puchaczów 21-013 brak 37 Łódzka Kolej Aglomeracyjna Sp. z o.o. Łódź 90-051 al. marsz. Józefa Piłsudskiego 12 38 MAJKOLTRANS Sp. z o.o. Wrocław 50-503 ul. Paczkowska 26 39 METRANS (Polonia) Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 00-546 ul. ks. Ignacego Skorupki 5 40 MORIS Sp. z o.o. Chorzów 41-503 ul. Wiejska 27 41 NKN Usługi Kolejowe Sp. z o.o. Szczecin 71-637 ul. Teofila Firlika 20 42 OLAVION Sp. z o.o. Wrocław 53-119 al. Wiązowa 32 43 OT RAlL Sp. z o.o. Wrocław 50-227 ul. Kleczkowska 50 44 Parowozownia Wolsztyn Wolsztyn 64-200 ul. Fabryczna 1 45 PCC Intermodal S.A. Gdynia 81-061 ul. Hutnicza 16 46 PKP CARGO S.A. Warszawa 02-021 ul. Grójecka 17 47 PKP ENERGETYKA S.A. Warszawa 00-681 ul. Hoża 63/67 48 PKP INTERCITY S.A. Warszawa 02-305 Aleje Jerozolimskie 142A 49 PKP Szybka Kolej Miejska w Trójmieście Sp. z o.o. Gdynia 81-002 ul. Morska 350 a 50 POL-MIEDŹ-TRANS Sp. z o.o. Lubin 59-301 ul. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 190 Pomorskie Przedsiębiorstwo Mechaniczno - Torowe 51 Gdańsk 80-051 ul. Sandomierska 17 Sp. z o.o. 52 PROTOR Sp. z o.o. Spółka Komandytowa Zabrze 41-800 ul. gen. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego 2 Przedsiębiorstwo Budownictwa Specjalistycznego 53 Kielce 25-650 ul. Długa 29 TRANSKOL Sp. z o.o. Przedsiębiorstwo Napraw i Utrzymania Infrastruktury 54 Kraków 30-556 ul. Prokocimska 4 Kolejowej w Krakowie Sp. z o.o. 55 Przedsiębiorstwo Robót Torowych "TORREMS" Sp. z o.o. Szczebrzeszyn 22-460 Brody Małe 30 B 56 Przedsiębiorstwo Usług Kolejowych KOLPREM Sp. z o.o. Dąbrowa Górnicza 41-308 ul. Aleja Józefa Piłsudskiego 92 57 Przewozy Regionalne Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 03-414 ul. Wileńska 14 A 58 Rail Polska Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 00-790 ul. Willowa 8/10, nr lok 11 59 Rail Time Polska Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 01-460 ul. Górczewska 124 Odrando - Wola, 60 RAILPOLONIA Sp. z o.o. Grodzisk Mazowiecki 05-825 ul. Osowiecka 47 61 STK S.A. Wrocław 53-609 ul. Fabryczna 10, Budynek B2 62 Szybka Kolej Miejska Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 02-017 Aleje Jerozolimskie 125/127 2 z 3 Stan na dzień: 17 lipca 2018 r. Wykaz Aplikantów, których wiąże z PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. umowa o przydzielenie zdolności przepustowej w ramach rozkładu jazdy pociągów 2018/2019 L.p. Nazwa Aplikanta Siedziba i adres 63 Track Tec Logistics Sp. z o. o. Warszawa 00-124 Rondo Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych 1 64 Track Tec Rail Sp. z o.o. Warszawa 00-124 Rondo Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych 1 65 Trainspeed Sp. z o.o. Bełchatów 97-400 ul. Zacisze 8 66 TRAKCJA PRKiI S.A. Warszawa 00-120 ul. Złota 59, XVIII P. 67 TRANSCHEM Sp. z o.o. Włocławek 87-810 ul. Toruńska 153 68 WISKOL Sp z o.o. Spółka komandytowa Nowiny 26-052 ul. Zakładowa 19 69 Województwo Wielkopolskie Poznań 61-714 al. Niepodległości 34 70 Zakład Inżynierii Kolejowej Sp. z o.o. Sandomierz 27-600 ul. Retmańska 11A Zakład Robót Komunikacyjnych - DOM w Poznaniu 71 Poznań 60-715 ul. Kolejowa 4 Sp. z o.o. Zakłady Produkcyjno-Naprawcze Taboru Maszyn 72 Trzebinia 32-540 ul. Słowackiego 72 i Urządzeń "TABOR" M. Dybowski Spółka Jawna 3 z 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eco-Drivingiem Oraz OZE
    Raport PODSUMOWANIE PIERWSZEGO ROKU DZIAŁAŃ CEEK KWIECIEŃ 2020 CZYM JEST CEEK…3 RADA PROGRAMOWA CEEK…4 Spis treści CEL…5 CO POZWOLI NAM OSIĄGNĄĆ CEL?...7 INICJATYWY PODJĘTE W PIERWSZYM ROKU…9 PODSUMOWANIE…18 CEEK W MEDIACH…23 PODZIĘKOWANIE…27 Czym jest CEEK ▪ W działania CEEK zaangażowani są KRAJOWI PRZEWOŹNICY, ZARZĄDCY INFRASTRUKTURY ORAZ EKSPERCI m.in. z Instytutu Kolejnictwa, Politechniki Warszawskiej, Instytutu Jagiellońskiego i Klubu Jagiellońskiego. ▪ CEEK jest partnerską inicjatywą CAŁEGO SEKTORA KOLEJOWEGO ,,Z dużymi nadziejami i zapałem przystąpiliśmy do pracy przy tworzeniu CEEK. W ciągu minionego ▪ CEEK to PRZESTRZEŃ DEDYKOWANA WYMIANIE WIEDZY I POMYSŁÓW, a także EDUKACJI roku dzieliliśmy się naszą wiedzą i doświadczeniem w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i racjonalnego gospodarowania zasobami kolei. w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i deklarujemy ▪ CEEK wspiera WYMIANĘ DOBRYCH PRAKTYK pomiędzy spółkami kolejowymi gotowość do kontynuowania rozpoczętych działań”. i dyskusję na temat najlepszych rozwiązań legislacyjnych w zakresie efektywności energetycznej. Zespół KAPE ▪ CENTRUM JEST PLATFORMĄ DO REALIZACJI PRZEDSIĘWZIĘĆ przedstawicieli branży kolejowej, ekspertów i naukowców w zakresie oszczędnego zużycia energii elektrycznej na kolei. STRONA 3 Rada Programowa CEEK Pracami CEEK kieruje Rada Programowa, składająca się z przedstawicieli przewoźników kolejowych oraz ekspertów branży kolejowej i energetycznej. Radzie Programowej przewodniczy Prezydium w składzie: ▪ Przewodniczący Janusz Malinowski - Łódzka Kolej Aglomeracyjna
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
    Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies (RICS Code) Contact : [email protected] Reference : Code Short
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/rics code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date of begin validity of end validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV NL 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy FI 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/ 0012 TRFSA Transfesa ES 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 04/10/2016 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD PL 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits FR 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA CH 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA BE 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited GB 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' RU 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways BY 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi UA 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova MD 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.md/ 0024 LG AB 'Lietuvos geležinkeliai' LT 28/09/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.litrail.lt/ 0025 LDZ Latvijas dzelzceļš LV 19/10/2004 24/11/2004 x http://www.ldz.lv/ 0026 EVR Aktsiaselts Eesti Raudtee EE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.evr.ee/ 0027 KTZ Kazakhstan Temir Zholy KZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.railway.ge/ 0028 GR Sakartvelos Rkinigza GE 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://railway.ge/ 0029 UTI Uzbekistan Temir Yullari UZ 17/05/2004 17/05/2004 x http://www.uzrailway.uz/ 0030 ZC Railways of D.P.R.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal News Transportation & Logistics What's up in Your Market
    Deal News – Transportation & Logistics What's up in your market – a focus on deals activity, January 2015 www.pwc.de Deal News Transportation & Logistics What's up in your 15. January 2015 market – a focus Research Center on deals activity Deal News – Transportation & Logistics What's up in your market – a focus on deals activity, January 2015 Air France-KLM Air France-KLM announces the successful completion of the sale of sells Amadeus 9,857,202 shares of the Spanish company Amadeus IT Holding S.A., shares representing representing approximately 2.2% of the share capital of the company. 2.2% of share The net proceeds of the transaction amounts to EUR 327m. The group capital continues to hold an exposure to 9,900,000 Amadeus shares in the framework of the hedging transaction that was announced on November 25, 2014. Amadeus IT Holding S.A. is the parent company of the Amadeus group, a leading provider of IT solutions to tourism and travel industries. The shares of Amadeus IT Holding S.A. are traded on the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia. 16.01.2015 Stock Exchange Announcement(s) Nawinia could sell Nawinia, the Russian privately held logistics services provider could up to 49% to consider the sale of up to a 49% stake to finance buys, Chairman and co- bankroll M&A – owner Rustam Yuldashev said. The company, which has zero debt, will Chairman finance acquisitions using a mix of its own and borrowed funds, but could sell up to a 49% to a fund or a strategic player to bankroll bigger deals, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Polish Railways
    Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Rail Sector Performance Case Study: Polish Railways Case Study Polish Railways 1 Introduction The Polish railway industry was devastated by the collapse of the planned economy in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Traffic volumes plummeted as traditional rail customers vanished. At the same time, Government deregulated road transport, unleashing fierce competition for the remaining traffic. This led to severe financial, market, operational and asset challenges for the railway industry. Government re- sponded with well-planned railway industry reforms, consistent with the Euro- pean Union (EU) acquis communautaire295 as it relates to railways. Although the reform put in place an appropriate industry structure, the PKP Group initially lacked the leadership needed to benefit from the reforms. It was not until 2012 with the introduction of a commercially-oriented management fully sup- ported by government policymakers that the reform began to take hold and see adequate allocation of funds, financial stability among key subsidiaries, and im- provement in customer services. This case study describes these reforms, and their impact on the structure and performance of the Polish railway sector. 2 The Situation Prior to Reforms In the early 1990s, the Soviet economic system collapsed, reducing steel and coal shipments, and driving down railway freight traffic in Poland. Polish State Rail- ways, Polskie Koleje Panstwowe’s (PKP), conducted all rail sector activities in the country, including freight and passenger rail operations. During the 1990s, PKP’s freight revenues dropped by 67 percent in real dollars (Figure 1). 295 The acquis communitaire is the accumulated body of European Union (EU) law and obligations as it has evolved since 1958 to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation for Co-Operation Between Railways (Osjd)
    ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS (OSJD) Организация сотрудничества железных дорог (ОСЖД) 铁 路 合 作 组 织 (铁 组) Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Eisenbahnen (OSShD) R E P O R T ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ORGANISATION FOR CO-OPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS FOR 2019 Members of OSJD As of 30 September 2019 The Countries and Railways - Members of OSJD Countries Railways/Authorities Republic of Azerbaijan AZD - Azerbaijani Railways CJSC Republic of Albania Islamic Republic of Afghanistan ARA - Afghanistan Railway Authority (ARA) Republic of Belarus BC - Byelorussian Railway Republic of Bulgaria BDZ - Holding “Bulgarian State Railways” Hungary MAV - CJSC “Hungarian State Railways” Socialist Republic of Vietnam VZD - Vietnamese Railway State Company Georgia GR - “Georgian Railway” JSC Islamic Republic of Iran RAI - Railway of the Islamic Republic of Iran Republic of Kazakhstan KZH - JSC “Kazakhstan Temir Zholy National Company” (Railway of Kazakhstan) People’s Republic of China KZD - State Department for Railways / China State Railway Group Со., Ltd. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ZC - Railways of the People's Democratic Republic of Korea Republic of Korea KORAIL - Korea Railroad Corporation Republic of Cuba Kyrgyz Republic KRG - “Kyrgyz Temir Zholy National Enterprise” State Company (Kyrgyz Railway) Republic of Latvia LDZ - State JSC “Latvian Railway” (Latvijas dzelzceļš) Republic of Lithuania LTG - JSC “Lithuanian Railways” (AB “Lietuvos geležinkeliai“) Republic of Moldova CFM - State Enterprise “Railway of Moldova” Mongolia
    [Show full text]
  • Business Groups & Network Industries
    Business groups & Network industries vol. 16 I n°4 I 2014 « au service de l’analyse » — since 1998 quarterly contents Business groups and network industries dossier Welcome to the Winter 2014 issue of the Network Industries Newsletter, which is dedicated to the topic of “Business Groups 3 Business groups in Network Industries - Maria in Network Industries”. Business groups are generally unders- Aluchna tood as collections of heterogeneous companies tied together by formal and informal links and are distinguished in the ma- nagement literature as a unique organisational form differing 9 Corporate Groups in Poland’s Rail Freight Industry from stand-alone companies. Business groups can be holdings, - Jana Pieriegud conglomerates or corporate groups and are particularly wides- pread in the network industries. The winter issue presents three articles discussing the functioning of business groups in the 13 Water Management Companies in Serbia: Business specific conductions of network industries. Its goal is to pre- Group or not? - Miroslav Stojsavljevic sent the theoretical framework on business groups indicating the dimensions of their functioning as well as to confront the theory with some practical illustrations and cases. This issue also intends to open a wider discussion on the role, benefits and shortcoming of business groups operating in Europe and worldwide. In the first article Maria Aluchna using the examples of four cases from Poland discusses the characteristics of business groups and indicates the potential benefits they offer to network indus- tries. The second contribution is delivered by Jana Pieriegud who analyses the evolution and organizational forms of corpo- rate groups in the rail freight sector in Poland focusing on the strategies of PKP Cargo Logistics Group and CTL Logistics Group are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article311 code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date beginof validity of end validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 01/02/2011 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV Netherlands 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0007 0008 0009 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy Finland 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/fi/ 0011 0012 TF Transfesa Spain 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 10/09/2013 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD Poland 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits France 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA Switzerland 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA Belgium 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' Russia 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways Belarus 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi Ukraine 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova Moldova 30/06/1999 30/06/1999
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE the Office of Rail Transport Data Confirm the Increase
    Warsaw, 30 April 2015 PRESS RELEASE The Office of Rail Transport data confirm the increase in PKP CARGO market share in March After three months of 2015, PKP CARGO achieved a 47.5% market share in terms of freight, an increase by 0.8 pp compared to last year and by 0.3 pp compared to the result after two months of 2015. In terms of transport performance, the share of PKP CARGO was 55.72%, increasing by 0.9 pp compared to the first two months. The total volume of goods transported by rail in March was 18.81 million tonnes, 1.17% less compared to March 2014, and the transport performance increased by 1.2% to 4.25 billion tonnes- kilometers. According to the Office of Rail Transport data, on a year-to-year basis, the market share of PKP CARGO in terms of transport performance decreased by 1.4 pp. In terms of commodity groups, the transport of ores, pyrites and containers was particularly successful for PKP CARGO in March. In terms of performance, the transport of ores increased compared to last year by 80%. As regards intermodal transport, PKP CARGO Group recorded a double-digit increase YOY, i.e. by more than 15%. Compared to March of the last year, we also recorded increase in transportation of coal and chemical products. After three months of 2015, further positions, in terms of volume transported, are occupied by: DB Schenker Rail Polska (17.73%, decrease from 19.64% last year), Lotos Kolej (5.71%, increase from 4.13%), PKP LHS (4.58%, decrease from 4.79% last year) and CTL Logistics (3.18%, increase from 3.11%).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Rail Transport Market Operations in 2017
    Report on rail transport market operations in 2017 Warsaw 2018 Mission: To provide safe and competitive conditions for rail transport services Vision: A modern and open office safeguarding the high standard of services provided on the rail transport market. Office of Rail Transport This document uses icons downloaded from www.flaticon.com created by Al. Jerozolimskie 134 Freepik 02-305 Warsaw www.utk.gov.pl NIP: 526-26-95-081 Ignacy Góra President of the Office of Rail Transport Dear Madams and Sirs, 2017 could well be named a record-breaking year for the rail sector. Positive trends were observed both in passenger and freight transport. This is confirmed by detailed market analyses carried out by the Office of Rail Transport. Over the previous year, more than 303 m passengers decided to use rail services. The last time when such high passenger volumes were recorded was 15 years before. 2017 was the year of continued rolling stock investments and improvements to the quality of passenger service. Importantly, railway undertakings and ordering entities pay greater attention to interoperability requirements. From the passengers’ perspective, this involves, for instance, making the rolling stock more accessible for those with disabilities. The results of freight transport indicate that the downward trend has been overcome. In addition to an increase in the weight of transported goods, for the first time since 2013 railway undertakings recorded a rise in operating revenues. A clear upward trend resulted in an almost 2.5-fold increase in income of the entire sector from PLN 180 m in 2016 to PLN 440 m in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of PKP CARGO Group 2018 Results
    Summary of PKP CARGO Group 2018 results 102-7 In 2018, the PKP CARGO Group posted record operating revenue, EBITDA and net result. PKP CARGO GROUP 2018 RESULTS – UNCHALLENGED LEADING POSITION PKP CARGO GROUP SHARES IN POLISH MARKET - FREIGHT TURNOVER 2014-2018 (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 PKP CARGO GROUP SHARES IN POLISH MARKET - FREIGHT VOLUME 2014-2018 (%) 50 40 30 20 10 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 FREIGHT TURNOVER ON POLISH MARKET- SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES 2015-2018 (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 Grupa PKP CARGO Lotos Kolej PKP LHS DB Cargo Polska CTL Logistics Orlen Koltrans Other operators FREIGHT VOLUME ON POLISH MARKET- SIGNIFICANT ENTITIES 2015-2018 (%) 50 40 30 20 10 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 Grupa PKP CARGO Lotos Kolej PKP LHS DB Cargo Polska CTL Logistics PUK Kolprem Orlen Koltrans Other operators FREIGHT TURNOVER BY PKP CARGO GROUP, (BN TKM) 32 31 30 29 28 27 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Cargo categories: INTERMODAL - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 5 4 3 2 1 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 AGGREGATES AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 8 6 4 2 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 LIQUID FUELS - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 1,5 1,3 1,0 0,8 0,5 0,3 0,0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 METALS AND ORES - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 2,5 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 SOLID FUELS* - FREIGHT VOLUME, (BN TKM) 15,0 12,5 10,0 7,5 5,0 2,5 0,0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 * hard coal, coke, lignite FREIGHT TRANSPORT VIA POLISH PORTS
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Report of the TAP TSI Implementation
    4th report of the TAP TSI Implementation RU/IM Telematics Joint Sector Group (JSG) January 2019 Version 1.0 Jan-Christian Arms, JSG Vice-chairman Document history Version Name Changes Date 0.1 Jan-Christian Arms Initial version 04.02.2019 0.2 Jan-Christian Arms Document ready for approval at JSG 06.02.2019 1.0 Jan-Christian Arms Approved at JSG, Document ready for publication 06.03.2019 January 2019 Page 2/32 Contents LIST OF TABLES 4 LIST OF DIAGRAMS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. BACKGROUND TO THE ASSIGNMENT 6 2. METHODOLOGY 7 General assumptions 7 Establishment of this report 7 3. PARTICIPATION IN THE 9TH REPORTING SESSION 9 Responses to the survey 9 Participation per company type 11 4. DATA BASIS FOR EVALUATION 12 5. IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING OF TAF TSI FUNCTIONS 14 Common Reference Files – Primary Location Codes (IMs) 14 Common Reference Files - Company Code (all companies) 15 Common Interface Implementation (all companies) 16 Train Running Information (IMs and RUs-P) 17 Reasons for not starting implementation of TAF/TAP TSI functions 19 Degree of implementation at European level 20 6. COMMON SECTOR TOOLS 21 7. CONCLUSION AND FINDINGS 22 ANNEX 1: MEMBERS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION REPORTING GROUP (IRG) 23 ANNEX 2: RESPONSES CONTACT LIST V9 24 ANNEX 3: RESPONSES CONTACT LIST V8 29 January 2019 Page 3/32 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Reporting periods 8 Table 2: TAF/TAP TSI functions as reported per type of company 8 LIST OF DIAGRAMS Diagram 1: Evolution of participation over time 9 Diagram 2: Evolution of response rate over time 9 Diagram 3: Number
    [Show full text]