DOCSLIB.ORG

Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic .......................................................................................................... 25 5. The rail freight market ............................................................................ 27 5.1. Rail freight market size .............................................................................................. 28 5.2. Market shares of freight railway undertakings ......................................................... 30 5.3. Economic performance of freight railway undertakings .......................................... 31 6. The rail passenger market ....................................................................... 33 6.1. Rail passenger market size ........................................................................................ 34 6.2. National and international passenger traffic ............................................................ 36 6.3. Share of PSO and Non-PSO ....................................................................................... 37 6.4. Market shares of passenger railway undertakings ................................................... 38 6.5. Economic performance indicators of passenger railway undertakings .................... 40 7. Competitive situation in rail passenger and freight markets..................... 43 7.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 44 7.2. Description of the competitive situation in the PSO passenger railway markets ..... 44 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 2 500 ................ 44 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 5 000 ................ 45 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 7 500 ................ 46 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 10 000 .............. 47 Description of the competitive situation in countries with de facto monopolies .................. 48 7.3. Description the competitive situation in the non-PSO passenger railway markets . 49 3 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 2 500 ................ 49 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 5 000 ................ 49 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 7 500 ................ 50 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 10 000 .............. 50 Description of the competitive situation in countries with de facto monopolies .................. 52 7.4. Description of the competitive situation in the freight railway markets .................. 52 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 2 500 ................ 52 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 5 000 ................ 53 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 7 500 ................ 55 Description of the competitive situation in countries with HHI level below 10 000 .............. 56 Description of the competitive situation in countries with de facto monopolies .................. 57 8. Barriers to entry in the rail passenger and freight markets ....................... 59 8.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 60 8.2. About barriers to market entry in Commission guidelines ....................................... 60 8.3. The concepts of timeliness and sufficiency ............................................................... 61 8.4. Additional barriers to market entry in the PSO passenger railway market .............. 62 Directly awarded PSO-contracts and protection of PSO-contracts ........................................ 62 8.5. Additional barriers to market entry in the non-PSO passenger railway market....... 63 Lack of commercially viable train paths ................................................................................. 63 High amounts of sunk costs and/or upfront costs hinder profitability of low volume entry . 64 Long delivery time for new rolling stock ................................................................................ 64 8.6. Additional barriers to market entry in the freight railway market ........................... 64 Lack of viable alternatives for service facilities ...................................................................... 64 National regulations ............................................................................................................... 65 8.7. List of identified barriers to entry in the railway markets ........................................ 66 9. Direct competition on selected lines in the passenger rail market ............ 69 9.1. Aim and methodology ............................................................................................... 70 9.2. Detail by country ....................................................................................................... 70 Austria .................................................................................................................................... 70 Czech Republic ........................................................................................................................ 72 France ..................................................................................................................................... 73 Germany ................................................................................................................................. 75 Italy ......................................................................................................................................... 77 Poland ..................................................................................................................................... 78 Romania.................................................................................................................................. 80 Sweden ................................................................................................................................... 81 United Kingdom ...................................................................................................................... 83 4 10. Key national regulatory decisions in 2018 ................................................ 85 Annex ............................................................................................................. 111 Annex 1 – PSO railway market fact sheet per country ......................................................... 112 Annex 2 – Non-PSO railway market fact sheet per country ................................................. 135 Annex 3 – Freight railway market fact sheet per country ..................................................... 157 5 List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies Country Country abbreviation Participating regulatory bodies Austria AT Schienen-Control GmbH Regulatory Body for Railway Transport and Belgium BE for Brussels Airport Operations Bulgaria BG Railway Administration Executive Agency Czech Republic CZ Transport Infrastructure Access Authority Croatia HR HAKOM Denmark DK Jernbanenaevnet Estonia EE Estonian Competition Authority Finnish Transport and Communications Finland FI Agency (Traficom) France FR Autorité de Régulation des Transports Germany DE Bundesnetzagentur Greece GR Regulatory Authority for Railways Hungary HU Rail Regulatory Body Italy IT Autorità di Regolazione dei Trasporti Kosovo* KS* Railway Regulatory Authority Latvia LV State Railway Administration Communications Regulatory Authority of Lithuania LT the Republic of Lithuania Luxembourg LU Institut Luxembourgeois de Régulation Netherlands NL Autoriteit Consument & Markt Norway NO Statens jernbanetilsyn Poland PL Urząd Transportu Kolejowego AMT - Autoridade da Mobilidade e dos Portugal PT Transportes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Climate Impacts of High-Speed Rail and Air Transportation: a Global Comparative Analysis
    The Climate Impacts of High-Speed Rail and Air Transportation: A Global Comparative Analysis by Regina Ruby Lee Clewlow B.S. Computer Science, Cornell University (2001) M.Eng. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University (2002) Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2012 © Regina R. L. Clewlow All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author ............................................................................................................................ Engineering Systems Division August 17, 2012 Certified by ........................................................................................................................................ Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by ........................................................................................................................................ Hamsa Balakrishnan Assistant Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Certified by ........................................................................................................................................ Mort D. Webster Assistant Professor of
    [Show full text]
  • (A) DB Cargo (UK) Limited Whose Registered Office Is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); And
    1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows; (a) DB Cargo (UK) Limited whose Registered Office is at Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN (“DBC”) (“The Claimant”); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN (“Network Rail”) (“The Respondent”). (c) Contact details for DB Cargo: Graham White, Access Manager South, Lakeside Business Park, Carolina Way, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, DN4 5PN. (d) Contact details for Network Rail: Duncan Lovatt & Richard Hooper, Network Rail, Wales Route. 2 DETAILS OF REFERENCE 2.1 This matter is referred to a Timetable Panel (“the Panel”) for determination in accordance with Condition D5 of the Network Code 2.2 This Dispute arises from a decision of Network Rail in respect of Network Rail variations made pursuant to Condition D3.5 of the Network Code 3 CONTENTS OF REFERENCE This Sole Reference includes: - (a) The subject matter of the dispute in Section 4; (b) A detailed explanation of the issues in dispute in Section 5; (c) In Section 6, the decision sought from the panel in respect of legal entitlement. 4 SUBJECT MATTER OF DISPUTE 4.1 This dispute arises from the Late Notice Restrictions of Use between Stoke Gifford No 2/ Caldicot and Leckwith Loop North Jn from 0200 on Saturday 19th October to 0420 on Monday 21st October 2019. Possession Reference P2019/2680990 4.2 Copied and annexed to this Reference are: • Appendix A: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (original) [Part] • Appendix B: Re-Issued request 157-W30-WA19 1 • Appendix C: DB Cargo (UK) Ltd response to 157-W30-WA19 (subsequent re-issue) [Part] • Appendix D: Decision document for Re-Issued request 157-WA30-WA19 [Part] • Appendix E: Works planned within the restriction of use.
    [Show full text]
  • Ðə Məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ
    / ðə məʊˈbɪlɪtɪ ˈkʌmpənɪ / Since 1853. Best known as Transdev. To be the mobility company is very ambitious but also very modest: to bring and build THE solution for clients, only the result counts! The commitment is to be the company that operates the best daily mobility options, in a spirit of open partnership serving communities and people, and with innovation and sustainability in mind at all times. 2 transdev.com THANK YOU TO OUR CONTRIBUTORS. Publication director: Pascale Giet. Photo credits: A. Acosta, W. Beaucardet, CDGVal, Connexxion, O. Desclos, J.-F. Deroubaix, Focke Strangmann, Fotopersbureau HCA/P. Harderwijk, P. Fournier, GettyImages/Westend61, Groupeer, T. Itty, Joel, S. van Leiden, Lizafoto/L. Simonsson, J. Locher, J. Lutt, U. Miethe, J. Minchillo, Mobike, Moovizy Saint-Etienne, Rouen Normandie Autonomous Lab, RyanJLane, Schiphol, T. Schulze, Service photographique The mobility company The mobility de Mulhouse Alsace Agglomération, SkyScans/D. Hancock, A. Oudard Tozzi, Transdev Australasia, Transdev Australia, Transdev et Lohr, Transdev North Holland, Transdev Sweden, Transdev USA, Transport de l’agglomération Nîmoise, Urbis Park, R. Wildenberg. This document is printed on FSC-certifi ed paper made from 100% recycled pulp by an Imprim’Vert-labelled professional. Partner of the Global Compact Design-production-editing: / Publication May 2019. TRANSDEV 10 Our people at the heart of Transdev’s value proposition 14 Meeting the expectations of our clients and passengers 28 Responsibility means being a local economic and social actor 32 Personalized 34 Autonomous 36 Connected 38 Electric 40 & Eco-friendly The mobility company The mobility TRANSDEV 2 Transdev ID* As an operator and global integrator of mobility, Transdev gives people the freedom to move whenever and however they choose.
    [Show full text]
  • German Rail Pass Holders Are Not Granted (“Uniform Rules Concerning the Contract Access to DB Lounges
    7 McArthurGlen Designer Outlets The German Rail Pass German Rail Pass Bonuses German Rail Pass holders are entitled to a free Fashion Pass- port (10 % discount on selected brands) plus a complimentary Are you planning a trip to Germany? Are you longing to feel the Transportation: coffee specialty in the following Designer Outlets: Hamburg atmosphere of the vibrant German cities like Berlin, Munich, 1 Köln-Düsseldorf Rheinschiffahrt AG (Neumünster), Berlin (Wustermark), Salzburg/Austria, Dresden, Cologne or Hamburg or to enjoy a walk through the (KD Rhine Line) (www.k-d.de) Roermond/Netherlands, Venice (Noventa di Piave)/Italy medieval streets of Heidelberg or Rothenburg/Tauber? Do you German Rail Pass holders are granted prefer sunbathing on the beaches of the Baltic Sea or downhill 20 % reduction on boats of the 8 Designer Outlets Wolfsburg skiing in the Bavarian Alps? Do you dream of splendid castles Köln-Düsseldorfer Rheinschiffahrt AG: German Rail Pass holders will get special Designer Coupons like Neuschwanstein or Sanssouci or are you headed on a on the river Rhine between of 10% discount for 3 shops. business trip to Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Düsseldorf? Cologne and Mainz Here is our solution for all your travel plans: A German Rail on the river Moselle between City Experiences: Pass will take you comfortably and flexibly to almost any German Koblenz and Cochem Historic Highlights of Germany* destination on our rail network. Whether day or night, our trains A free CityCard or WelcomeCard in the following cities: are on time and fast – see for yourself on one of our Intercity- 2 Lake Constance Augsburg, Erfurt, Freiburg, Koblenz, Mainz, Münster, Express trains, the famous ICE high-speed services.
    [Show full text]
  • DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 Valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz
    DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz AG Headquarters I.NMN Version control Date Modification 12.12.2014 Amendment of Network Statement 2015 as at 12 December 2014 (Publication of the Network Statement 2016) Inclusion of detailed information in sections 1.9 ff and 4.2.5 ff due to 14.10.2015 commissioning of rail freight corridors Sandinavian-Mediterranean and North Sea-Balitc. Addition of connection to Port of Hamburg (Hohe Schaar) in section 13.12.2015 3.3.2.5 Printed by DB Netz AG Editors Principles of Network Access/Regulation (I.NMN) Theodor-Heuss-Allee 7 60486 Frankfurt am Main Picture credits Front page photo: Bildschön, Silvia Bunke Copyright: Deutsche Bahn AG Contents Version control 3 List of Annexes 7 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Purpose 9 1.3 Legal basis 9 1.4 Legal framework of the Network Statement 9 1.5 Structure of the Network Statement 10 1.6 Term of and amendments to the Network Statement 10 1.7 Publication and opportunity to respond 11 1.8 Contacts at DB Netz AG 11 1.9 Rail freight corridors 12 1.10 RNE and international cooperation between DB Netz AG and other RIUs 14 1.11 List of abbreviations 15 2 CONDITIONS OF ACCESS 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 General conditions of access to the railway infrastructure 16 2.3 Types of agreement 17 2.4 Regulations and additional provisions 17 2.5 Special consignments 19 2.6 Transportation of hazardous goods 19 2.7 Requirements for the rolling stock 19 2.8 Requirements for the staff of the AP or the involved RU 20 2.9 Special conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Network Rail Response with Appendices
    Defendant’s Response to Sole Reference Ref: TTP1546 1 of 9 1 DETAILS OF PARTIES 1.1 The names and addresses of the parties to the reference are as follows:- (a) Freightliner Limited whose Registered Office is at 3rd Floor, 90 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4EZ (“Freightliner”) ("the Claimant"); and (b) Network Rail Infrastructure Limited whose Registered Office is at 1 Eversholt Street, London NW1 2DN ("Network Rail") ("the Defendant"). 1.2 Other Train and Freight Operating Companies that could be affected by the outcome of this dispute: (a) Greater Anglia (Abellio East Anglia Ltd), MTR Corporation (Crossrail) Ltd, Arriva Rail London Ltd, GB Railfreight Ltd, DB Cargo (UK) Ltd, c2c (Trenitalia c2c Ltd) 2 CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT This Response to the Claimant’s Sole Reference includes:- (a) Confirmation, or qualification, that the subject matter of the dispute is as set out by the Claimant in its Sole Reference, in the form of a summary schedule cross-referenced to the issues raised by the Claimant in the Sole Reference, identifying which the Defendant agrees with and which it disagrees with. (b) A detailed explanation of the Defendant’s arguments in support of its position on those issues where it disagrees with the Claimant’s Sole Reference, including references to documents or contractual provisions not dealt with in the Claimant’s Sole Reference. (c) Any further related issues not raised by the Claimant but which the Defendant considers fall to be determined as part of the dispute; (d) The decisions of principle sought from the Panel in respect of (i) legal entitlement, and (ii) remedies; (e) Appendices and other supporting material.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2
    Case Study : Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Co rruption Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2 Authors: Katja Geißler, Hertie School of Governance Florin Nita, Hertie School of Governance This case study was written at the Hertie School of Governanc e for students of public po licy Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 3 Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Corru ption Kontakt: Anna Peters Projektmanager Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen/Corporate Soc ial Responsibility Bertelsmann Stiftung Telefon 05241 81 -81 401 Fax 05241 81 -681 246 E-Mail anna .peters @bertelsmann.de Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 4 Inhalt Ex ecu tive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 5 Deutsche Bahn AG and its Corporate History ................................ ............................... 6 A New Manager in DB ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 7 DB’s Successful Take Off ................................ ................................ ............................. 8 How the Corruption Scandal Came all About ................................ ................................ 9 Role of Civil Society: Transparency International ................................ ........................ 11 Cooperation between Transparency International and Deutsche Bahn AG .................. 12 What is Corruption? ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio of Expertise
    Portfolio of expertise Environmental Solutions Connecting new lines, together. Drawing from our long experience as a multimodal operator, we look forward to assisting you with the construction and optimization of your mobility systems and services. Our ambition is to develop with you, in a genuine spirit of partnership, customized, safe, effective and responsible transit solutions that are adapted to your needs and constraints and closely in tune with customer expectations. The mobility of the future will be personalized, autonomous, connected and electric. This is our firm belief. Innovation is at the heart of our approach, in order to constantly improve the performance of public transportation services and make the promise of “new mobilities” a reality, for everyone. As well as uncompromising safety, which is our credo, our overriding concern is the satisfaction of our customers and the quality of their experience. Every team member in the Group engages on a daily basis to meet these challenges and implement solutions both for today and for the future...» Thierry Mallet Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Public transit, playing a key role in climate change prevention and energy mix A twofold challenge -- global and local Climate change and its impact on air quality represent a major threat to the environment and public health. During the Paris COP21 in December 2015, nearly 200 countries signed a universal agreement to cut greenhouse gases (GHG) and avoid the most dangerous effects of climate change. They committed themselves to keep rise in average global temperature below 2°C, which means a 70% GHG emissions reduction between 2010 and 2050*.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Tendering of Rail Services EUROPEAN CONFERENCE of MINISTERS of TRANSPORT (ECMT)
    Competitive EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF MINISTERS OF TRANSPORT Tendering of Rail Competitive tendering Services provides a way to introduce Competitive competition to railways whilst preserving an integrated network of services. It has been used for freight Tendering railways in some countries but is particularly attractive for passenger networks when subsidised services make competition of Rail between trains serving the same routes difficult or impossible to organise. Services Governments promote competition in railways to Competitive Tendering reduce costs, not least to the tax payer, and to improve levels of service to customers. Concessions are also designed to bring much needed private capital into the rail industry. The success of competitive tendering in achieving these outcomes depends critically on the way risks are assigned between the government and private train operators. It also depends on the transparency and durability of the regulatory framework established to protect both the public interest and the interests of concession holders, and on the incentives created by franchise agreements. This report examines experience to date from around the world in competitively tendering rail services. It seeks to draw lessons for effective design of concessions and regulation from both of the successful and less successful cases examined. The work RailServices is based on detailed examinations by leading experts of the experience of passenger rail concessions in the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands. It also
    [Show full text]
  • Heute Sollen Wieder 2.000 Tonnen Sicher Ankommen
    *OIBMU Vorwort . 7 Hinweise . 8 Marktübersicht Europa . 10 VDV-Kooperationsbörse Schienengüterverkehr . 18 Check! Einkaufsführer . 21 Marktstudie: Europäische Bahnen Albanien . 28 Belgien . 32 Bosnien und Herzegovina . 46 Bulgarien . 52 Dänemark . 62 Deutschland . 78 Estland . .552 Finnland . .570 shͲtĂŐĞŶŵĞŝƐƚĞƌ ŚƌŝƐƟĂŶĞĐŬĞƌĨƌĞƵƚƐŝĐŚ ƺďĞƌĚŝĞhŶƚĞƌƐƚƺƚnjƵŶŐ ĚƵƌĐŚĚĂƐZĂŝůtĂƚĐŚͲ Heute sollen wieder 2.000 ^LJƐƚĞŵďĞŝƐĞŝŶĞƌ ƚćŐůŝĐŚĞŶƌďĞŝƚ͘ Tonnen sicher ankommen. Mit System zu mehr Sicherheit. Räder, Bremssohlen, Überladungen u.v.m. detailliert auf Knopfdruck ĞůĞŬƚƌŽŶŝƐĐŚƺďĞƌŵŝƩĞůƚ͘DŝƚƵŶƐĞƌĞŶtĂŐŽŶͲ^ĐĂŶͲ^LJƐƚĞŵĞŶnjƵƌ &ĂŚƌnjĞƵŐĚŝĂŐŶŽƐĞǀŽŶ'ƺƚĞƌǁĂŐĞŶŬĞŝŶĞsŝƐŝŽŶ͕ƐŽŶĚĞƌŶZĞĂůŝƚćƚ͘ DŝƚĚŝĞƐĞƌŝŶŶŽǀĂƟǀĞŶ>ƂƐƵŶŐ ŚĂďĞŶǁŝƌĞŝŶƵŐĞĂƵĨĚŝĞ ^ŝĐŚĞƌŚĞŝƚŝŵ'ƺƚĞƌǀĞƌŬĞŚƌ͘ WIR HABEN EIN AUGE DARAUF www.rail-watch.com &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh *OIBMU Frankreich . 576 Griechenland . 612 Irland . 620 Italien . 626 Kroatien . 684 Lettland . 692 Litauen . 706 Luxemburg . 728 Mazedonien. 736 Montenegro. 742 Niederlande. 748 Norwegen . 780 Österreich . 790 Polen . 844 Portugal . 952 Rumänien . 958 &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh *OIBMU Schweden . .990 Schweiz . .1026 Serbien . .1082 Slowakei . .1092 Slowenien . .1116 Spanien . .1122 Tschechien. .1150 Türkei. .1202 Ungarn . .1208 Vereinigtes Königreich . .1236 Anhang Firmenindex. .1282 Personenindex . .1303 Abkürzungen . .1350 5$,/&21=(37 /ŚƌWĂƌƚŶĞƌŝŵŝƐĞŶďĂŚŶďĞƚƌŝĞď ŝůĚƵŶŐƐƚƌćŐĞƌ͘ƌďĞŝƚƐƐĐŚƵƚnj͘ĞƌĂƚƵŶŐ ǁǁǁ͘ƌĂŝůĐŽŶnjĞƉƚ͘ĚĞ͘ϬϱϬϯϭͬϵϲϬϭϳϭϯ͘ŝŶĨŽΛƌĂŝůĐŽŶnjĞƉƚ͘ĚĞ &VSPQÊJTDIF#BIOFOhh 7PSXPSU Liebe Leser, Sie halten die mittlerweile zehnte Ausgabe des
    [Show full text]
  • Eco-Drivingiem Oraz OZE
    Raport PODSUMOWANIE PIERWSZEGO ROKU DZIAŁAŃ CEEK KWIECIEŃ 2020 CZYM JEST CEEK…3 RADA PROGRAMOWA CEEK…4 Spis treści CEL…5 CO POZWOLI NAM OSIĄGNĄĆ CEL?...7 INICJATYWY PODJĘTE W PIERWSZYM ROKU…9 PODSUMOWANIE…18 CEEK W MEDIACH…23 PODZIĘKOWANIE…27 Czym jest CEEK ▪ W działania CEEK zaangażowani są KRAJOWI PRZEWOŹNICY, ZARZĄDCY INFRASTRUKTURY ORAZ EKSPERCI m.in. z Instytutu Kolejnictwa, Politechniki Warszawskiej, Instytutu Jagiellońskiego i Klubu Jagiellońskiego. ▪ CEEK jest partnerską inicjatywą CAŁEGO SEKTORA KOLEJOWEGO ,,Z dużymi nadziejami i zapałem przystąpiliśmy do pracy przy tworzeniu CEEK. W ciągu minionego ▪ CEEK to PRZESTRZEŃ DEDYKOWANA WYMIANIE WIEDZY I POMYSŁÓW, a także EDUKACJI roku dzieliliśmy się naszą wiedzą i doświadczeniem w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i racjonalnego gospodarowania zasobami kolei. w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i deklarujemy ▪ CEEK wspiera WYMIANĘ DOBRYCH PRAKTYK pomiędzy spółkami kolejowymi gotowość do kontynuowania rozpoczętych działań”. i dyskusję na temat najlepszych rozwiązań legislacyjnych w zakresie efektywności energetycznej. Zespół KAPE ▪ CENTRUM JEST PLATFORMĄ DO REALIZACJI PRZEDSIĘWZIĘĆ przedstawicieli branży kolejowej, ekspertów i naukowców w zakresie oszczędnego zużycia energii elektrycznej na kolei. STRONA 3 Rada Programowa CEEK Pracami CEEK kieruje Rada Programowa, składająca się z przedstawicieli przewoźników kolejowych oraz ekspertów branży kolejowej i energetycznej. Radzie Programowej przewodniczy Prezydium w składzie: ▪ Przewodniczący Janusz Malinowski - Łódzka Kolej Aglomeracyjna
    [Show full text]
  • Railways 04/2013
    THE DB SCHENKER RAIL CUstoMER MAGAZINE NO. 04 | 13 You can now also read railways as an app in GERMAN and ENGLISH, plus selected articles in FRENCH and POLISH, too! Bella Italia How NORDCARGO rounds off DB Schenker Rail’s European network south of the Alps. Page 8 SOUTH EAst EUrope WHITE GOODS OVERSIZED FREIGHT Bosporus-Shuttle Scandinavia in the Monumental beams to Istanbul deep freeze transported by train Page 24 Page 28 Page 36 EDITORIAL Here’s to the New Year! What a year 2013 has been! With skill and a little luck we have weathered the storms of the eurozone crisis, and with you, our customers, we have jointly mastered a whole series of challenges. I am convinced that our network and our experience will enable us to find even more intelligent and sustainable transport and logistics solutions to match your requirements in the coming year. To this end, we want to contribute with our European network, which is growing ever closer together, but also continue to develop all processes. This edition features many examples of the future! I wish you an inspiring read, a peaceful Christmas and happiness and success for 2014! Axel Marschall In the shoe business Global product Schenker Rail Tjarden/DB : Getty Oliver Images; et’s be honest: these shoes are total imports – look rather modest by com- Imports for the German shoe market, according photos not entirely suitable for keeping parison. Three out of four pairs of shoes to country of origin, in per cent, first half of 2013 L a woman’s feet warm and dry worn by people in Germany come from Total: 297 million pairs Member of the Management Board in winter.
    [Show full text]