Responses to 2020 Reporting Session (Taf/Tap Ru/Im) at 11.12.2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fourth Report to the Council and the European Parliament on Monitoring Development in the Rail Market
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.6.2014 COM(2014) 353 final PART 1/2 REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market {SWD(2014) 186 final} EN EN REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Fourth report on monitoring development of the rail market TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Evolution of internal market in rail services................................................................ 4 1.1. The objectives of the White Paper on Transport (2011).............................................. 4 1.2. The passenger rail market today .................................................................................. 5 1.3. Evolution of the passenger rail market......................................................................... 8 1.4. The rail freight market today........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Evolution of the rail freight market.............................................................................. 9 2. Evolution of the internal market in services to be supplied to railway undertakings 11 2.1. Stations....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Stations across the European Union........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Ownership and management...................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. Access -
Rok 2019 W Przewozach Pasażerskich I Towarowych Podsumowanie Prezesa UTK
Rok 2019 w przewozach pasażerskich i towarowych Podsumowanie Prezesa UTK dr inż. Ignacy Góra Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego Szanowni Państwo, w 2019 r. z kolei skorzystało blisko 336 milionów pasażerów, podczas gdy jeszcze w 2016 r. wartość ta nie przekraczała 300 milionów. Długość zrealizowanych przez pasażerów kolei przejazdów to łącznie ponad 22 miliardy kilometrów. Znaczna część tych podróży mogłaby się zapewne odbyć prywatnymi samochodami. Jednak samochody te nie pojawiły się na drogach, nie przejechały miliardów kilometrów – dzięki kolei podróżowanie było bezpieczniejsze i bardziej ekologicznie. Kolej pełni obecnie funkcję wykorzystywanej codziennie doskonałej komunikacji aglomeracyjnej i miejskiej oraz jest chętnie wybierana podczas dalekich podróży turystycznych czy biznesowych. W przypadku transportu towarowego przewieziono 236 milionów ton ładunków. Oznacza to spadek przetransportowanej masy o 5,5%. Jednak o ile zauważalne jest zmniejszenie się zainteresowania transportem towarów masowych, to z roku na rok rośnie masa przewozów intermodalnych. Ten rodzaj transportu ma przed sobą przyszłość i należy go rozwijać. Szczególnie, że dzięki transportowi intermodalnemu optymalnie można wykorzystać transport samochodowy, kolejowy i morski. Wyniki za 2019 r. pokazują, że kolej staje się coraz bardziej dostępna. Powstają nowoczesne dworce i perony, pociągi wracają na trasy od lat nieużywane, zwiększa się dostępność kolei dla osób z niepełnosprawnością i o graniczonej możliwości poruszania się, wykorzystywane są nowoczesne kanały dystrybucji itd. Jeszcze jest wiele do zrobienia, ale od kilku lat poprawia się jakość podróżowania i znajduje to potwierdzenie w statystykach. Z wyrazami szacunku 3 4 1. Przewozy pasażerskie Koleją w 2019 r. podróżowało 335,9 mln pasażerów. To najlepszy wynik od czasu zbierania danych przez Urząd Transportu Kolejowego. Na przejazd pociągiem zdecydowało się o ponad 25 mln osób więcej niż w 2018 r. -
Signalling on the High-Speed Railway Amsterdam–Antwerp
Computers in Railways XI 243 Towards interoperability on Northwest European railway corridors: signalling on the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp J. H. Baggen, J. M. Vleugel & J. A. A. M. Stoop Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Abstract The high-speed railway Amsterdam (The Netherlands)–Antwerp (Belgium) is nearly completed. As part of a TEN-T priority project it will connect to major metropolitan areas in Northwest Europe. In many (European) countries, high-speed railways have been built. So, at first sight, the development of this particular high-speed railway should be relatively straightforward. But the situation seems to be more complicated. To run international services full interoperability is required. However, there turned out to be compatibility problems that are mainly caused by the way decision making has taken place, in particular with respect to the choice and implementation of ERTMS, the new European railway signalling system. In this paper major technical and institutional choices, as well as the choice of system borders that have all been made by decision makers involved in the development of the high-speed railway Amsterdam–Antwerp, will be analyzed. This will make it possible to draw some lessons that might be used for future railway projects in Europe and other parts of the world. Keywords: high-speed railway, interoperability, signalling, metropolitan areas. 1 Introduction Two major new railway projects were initiated in the past decade in The Netherlands, the Betuweroute dedicated freight railway between Rotterdam seaport and the Dutch-German border and the high-speed railway between Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the Dutch-Belgian border to Antwerp (Belgium). -
Twinning Conference Presentation – 12Th December 2017
Welcome to the conference Network rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 1 Agenda 10:00 - 10:15 The value of twinning (Keir Fitch, European Commission) 10:15 – 10:30 Welcome (Lisbeth Fromling, Network Rail) 10:30 – 11:30 Group 1 presentation (Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ) 11:30 – 11:50 Break 11:50 – 12:40 Group 2 presentation (ProRail, Irish Rail and OBB) 12:40 – 13:15 Lunch 13:15 – 14:05 Group 3 presentation (Trafikverket, Adif and PLK) 14:05 – 14:35 Group 4 presentation (RFI and SNCF Reseau) 14:35 – 14:55 Learning activity based on safety culture evaluation 14:55 – 15:15 Opportunity for questions 15:15 – 15:30 Summary of event and closure 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 2 Welcome from Keir Fitch Head of Unit C4 "Rail Safety & Interoperability”, European Commission 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 3 Welcome from Lisbeth Fromling Chief Health, Safety, Quality and Environment Officer, Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 4 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Welcome to the final conference • Thank you for joining us • Today is a good day! • Purely pro-active project • All information is good • Lots to share PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 5 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning Programme Co-ordinator Participant PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 6 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture collaboration PRIME Safety Culture Sub-Group / 7 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail, CFR, Infrabel and HZ 10-Apr-18 Safety Culture Twinning conference 8 Group 1 Presentations Network Rail 10-Apr-18 Safety -
2020 Status Report on the Implementation of the TAF
Report 2020 TAF TSI Implementation Status Report ERA-REP-114 - IMPL-2020 Report 2020 TAF TSI IMPLEMENTATION STATUS REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS Drafted by Validated by Approved by Name Mickael Varga Filip Skibinski Jo De Bosschere Position Telematics Coordinator Project Officer Head of Unit Date 07/05/2021 07/05/2021 07/05/2021 Signature Signed Signed Signed Document History Version Date Comments 1st draft for the TAF TSI Implementation 0.1 11/03/2021 Cooperation Group (ICG) comments 0.2 15/04/2021 Inclusion of ICG comments 1.0 07/05/2021 Major release 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq | BP 20392 | FR-59307 Valenciennes Cedex 1 / 54 Tel. +33 (0)327 09 65 00 | era.europa.eu Contents Abbreviations...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Reference documents ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Reference legislation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Figures .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 7 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. -
TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Formats
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADA Notice For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE formats. For alternate format information, contact the Forms Management Unit TR0003 (REV 10/98) at (916) 445-1233, TTY 711, or write to Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER CA-17-2969 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE A Comparative Analysis of High Speed Rail Station Development into Destination and/or Multi-use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon February 2017 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris Ph.D. / Deike Peters, Ph.D. MTI Report 12-75 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER Mineta Transportation Institute College of Business 3762 San José State University 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER San José, CA 95192-0219 65A0499 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Final Report Division of Research, Innovation and Systems Information MS-42, PO Box 942873 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT As a burgeoning literature on high-speed rail development indicates, good station-area planning is a very important prerequisite for the eventual successful operation of a high-speed rail station; it can also trigger opportunities for economic development in the station area and the station-city. At the same time, “on the ground” experiences from international examples of high-speed rail stations can provide valuable lessons for the California high-speed rail system in general, and the San Jose Diridon station in particular. -
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211. -
Overview of Priority Rules in Operation
RNE_OverviewOfthePriorityRulesInOperation_v10 Overview of priority rules in operation Delivered by RNE Operation & After- sales WG – March 19th 2012 Approved by RNE General Assembly – May 9th 2012 Updated 04th December 2020 RailNetEurope Oelzeltgasse 3/8 AT-1030 Vienna Phone: +43 1 907 62 72 00 Fax: +43 1 907 62 72 90 [email protected] www.rne.eu RNE_OverviewOfthePriorityRulesInOperation_v10 Content 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Aim and content of the Overview ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Updates and new features ................................................................................................................. 5 2 Overview of the priority rules in operation ................................................................................................. 6 2.1 General considerations ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 IM/Network Dossiers - Content ........................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Single IM/Network Dossier .............................................................................................................. 10 2.3.1 ADIF ........................................................................................................................................ -
DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 Valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz
DB Netz AG Network Statement 2016 valid from 14 April 2015 DB Netz AG Headquarters I.NMN Version control Date Modification 12.12.2014 Amendment of Network Statement 2015 as at 12 December 2014 (Publication of the Network Statement 2016) Inclusion of detailed information in sections 1.9 ff and 4.2.5 ff due to 14.10.2015 commissioning of rail freight corridors Sandinavian-Mediterranean and North Sea-Balitc. Addition of connection to Port of Hamburg (Hohe Schaar) in section 13.12.2015 3.3.2.5 Printed by DB Netz AG Editors Principles of Network Access/Regulation (I.NMN) Theodor-Heuss-Allee 7 60486 Frankfurt am Main Picture credits Front page photo: Bildschön, Silvia Bunke Copyright: Deutsche Bahn AG Contents Version control 3 List of Annexes 7 1 GENERAL INFORMATION 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Purpose 9 1.3 Legal basis 9 1.4 Legal framework of the Network Statement 9 1.5 Structure of the Network Statement 10 1.6 Term of and amendments to the Network Statement 10 1.7 Publication and opportunity to respond 11 1.8 Contacts at DB Netz AG 11 1.9 Rail freight corridors 12 1.10 RNE and international cooperation between DB Netz AG and other RIUs 14 1.11 List of abbreviations 15 2 CONDITIONS OF ACCESS 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 General conditions of access to the railway infrastructure 16 2.3 Types of agreement 17 2.4 Regulations and additional provisions 17 2.5 Special consignments 19 2.6 Transportation of hazardous goods 19 2.7 Requirements for the rolling stock 19 2.8 Requirements for the staff of the AP or the involved RU 20 2.9 Special conditions -
The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share
The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share Bernard Aritua INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN FOCUS INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN FOCUS The Rail Freight Challenge for Emerging Economies How to Regain Modal Share Bernard Aritua © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some rights reserved 1 2 3 4 22 21 20 19 Books in this series are published to communicate the results of Bank research, analysis, and operational experience with the least possible delay. The extent of language editing varies from book to book. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpre- tations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. -
Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report
Rail Baltica Global Project Cost- Benefit Analysis Final Report 30 April 2017 x Date Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Version ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Terms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 EY work context ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Context of the CBA ............................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Key constraints and considerations of the analysis ................................................................ 6 3. Background and information about the project ....................................................................... 8 3.1 Project background and timeline ......................................................................................... 8 3.2 Brief description of the project ........................................................................................... 9 4. Methodology .................................................................................................................... -
Eco-Drivingiem Oraz OZE
Raport PODSUMOWANIE PIERWSZEGO ROKU DZIAŁAŃ CEEK KWIECIEŃ 2020 CZYM JEST CEEK…3 RADA PROGRAMOWA CEEK…4 Spis treści CEL…5 CO POZWOLI NAM OSIĄGNĄĆ CEL?...7 INICJATYWY PODJĘTE W PIERWSZYM ROKU…9 PODSUMOWANIE…18 CEEK W MEDIACH…23 PODZIĘKOWANIE…27 Czym jest CEEK ▪ W działania CEEK zaangażowani są KRAJOWI PRZEWOŹNICY, ZARZĄDCY INFRASTRUKTURY ORAZ EKSPERCI m.in. z Instytutu Kolejnictwa, Politechniki Warszawskiej, Instytutu Jagiellońskiego i Klubu Jagiellońskiego. ▪ CEEK jest partnerską inicjatywą CAŁEGO SEKTORA KOLEJOWEGO ,,Z dużymi nadziejami i zapałem przystąpiliśmy do pracy przy tworzeniu CEEK. W ciągu minionego ▪ CEEK to PRZESTRZEŃ DEDYKOWANA WYMIANIE WIEDZY I POMYSŁÓW, a także EDUKACJI roku dzieliliśmy się naszą wiedzą i doświadczeniem w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i racjonalnego gospodarowania zasobami kolei. w zakresie efektywności energetycznej i deklarujemy ▪ CEEK wspiera WYMIANĘ DOBRYCH PRAKTYK pomiędzy spółkami kolejowymi gotowość do kontynuowania rozpoczętych działań”. i dyskusję na temat najlepszych rozwiązań legislacyjnych w zakresie efektywności energetycznej. Zespół KAPE ▪ CENTRUM JEST PLATFORMĄ DO REALIZACJI PRZEDSIĘWZIĘĆ przedstawicieli branży kolejowej, ekspertów i naukowców w zakresie oszczędnego zużycia energii elektrycznej na kolei. STRONA 3 Rada Programowa CEEK Pracami CEEK kieruje Rada Programowa, składająca się z przedstawicieli przewoźników kolejowych oraz ekspertów branży kolejowej i energetycznej. Radzie Programowej przewodniczy Prezydium w składzie: ▪ Przewodniczący Janusz Malinowski - Łódzka Kolej Aglomeracyjna