Fpga Hardware
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
L2: FPGA HARDWARE 18-545: ADVANCED DIGITAL DESIGN PROJECT FALL 2011 BILL NACE Administrivia Team assignments are done Lab 1 is due Monday Project Proposals happen on Monday Reading Assignment #1 due today 13/14 students got it in to Blackboard on time David's attempt didn't get saved (?) Submit a PDF, don't fill in the web form 18-545: FALL 2011 2 Game Plan Overview Why use FPGAs? FPGA Internals Caveat: I will use Xilinx specific terminology since that’s the FPGA company you will be using. Beware that other companies use different terms 18-545: FALL 2011 3 FPGA Overview Field Programmable Gate Array Array of generic logic gates Gates where logic function can be programmed Programmable interconnection between gates Fielded systems can be programmed i.e. post-fabrication Xilinx Virtex-5 FPGA 18-545: FALL 2011 5 Design Platform Virtex-5 Development System Xilinx XC5VLX110T FPGA 17280 slices of CLB goodness 256MB DDR2 (SODIMM) DVI Video port VGA port is for input 10/100/1000 Ethernet port Audio Codec (AC97) USB2 port 16x2 LCD, RS-232 Compact Flash card slot Expansion connectors 18-545: FALL 2011 6 Game Plan Overview Why use FPGAs? FPGA Internals 18-545: FALL 2011 7 Why use FPGAs? System designers have a Goldilocks problem Off-the-shelf parts are not efficient enough Custom ASICs cost too much Need a “just right” solution ASIC Design Difficult to design Large and complex Issues in advanced processes Interconnect delay Device leakage Power density constraints Expensive to design / fabricate Mask set costs Non-recurring engineering costs Need a high-volume, high-profit market to justify costs! Energy Efficiency (MOPS/mW) Area Efficiency (MOPS/mm2) 10000 1000 Microprocessors 100 10 1 0.1 DSPs ASICs 0.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Efficiency View An efficiency gap exists between ASICs and CPUs N. Zhang, et. al, “The Cost of Flexibility in Systems on a Chip Design for Signal Processing Applications” Decreasing FPGA unit cost pushing crossover point to the right ASIC solution has a lower total cost ASIC Trend Additional ASIC costs: •Increasing NRE charge •58% are late to market -- FPGA solution has impacts total volumes shipped a lower total cost •ASIC cycle longer than some DevelopmentCost+ Device Cost market windows •Over 50% need to be respun FPGA Trend Total Units (Courtesy Xilinx, Inc.) Economic View FPGAs: High package costs ($300+), low NRE costs ASICs: Low package costs (pennies), high NRE costs ($600K+) FPGA Advantages Faster than CPU solution Lower power than CPU solution (usually) Low NRE costs Off-the-shelf part designed by FPGA vendor You are sharing NRE costs with all other customers Fast design time Low time-to-market Fast re-design / re-fabrication time Easy to correct an error, to add functionality, in response to spec change Can even change product after deployment 18-545: FALL 2011 12 FPGA Disadvantages High per-part costs Good for low to middle volume applications High volume applications should consider ASICs Perhaps use FPGA for prototyping Lower performance than ASIC Higher power than ASIC More specialized design skills than CPU 18-545: FALL 2011 13 Example uses of FPGAs Rapid Prototyping Emulation of ASIC design Design exploration Verification Shipping product Networking Military Reconfigurable Computing Game Plan Overview Why use FPGAs? FPGA Internals 18-545: FALL 2011 15 FPGA Breakdown 3 Basic components Configurable Logic Blocks General purpose interconnect I/O Blocks Advanced components Hard macros CPUs Block RAM Multipliers Specialized components VIRTEX-II PRO XILINX XC3020 I/O BLOCK CLB (64 TOTAL) (64 TOTAL) GENERAL PURPOSE IOBS HAVE DIRECT INTERCONNECT ACCESS TO ADJACENT CLBS SWITCH MATRIX (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) ROUTING EVEN MORE ZOOMED IN VIEW ZOOMED IN VIEW OF THE CLB MATRIX OF THE FPGA SPECIFIC INGRESS AND EGRESS CONNECTION OPTIONS (BLACK DOTS) ARE AVAILABLE (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) ROUTING: THE SWITCH MATRIX EACH MATRIX HAS 5 CONNECTIONS PER SIDE (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) ROUTING: THE SWITCH MATRIX EACH MATRIX HAS 5 CONNECTIONS PER SIDE ONLY CERTAIN CONNECTION PATTERNS ARE POSSIBLE (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) Hierarchical Routing Spartan-2 and more recent have different length connections between switch matrices Local roads, limited access roads, interstate highways Routes across entire chip don’t burn lots of short connections 18-545: FALL 2011 21 Detailed Routing (Spartan 2) Configurable Logic Blocks CLBs get more and more stuff crammed in them over time XC3K family had LUT (5 variable input, 2 FF values, 2 outputs), 2 FFs, clock enable, FF reset (direct / global) and 9 muxes ~51 bits of configuration SRAM per CLB (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) Look Up Table . Direct implementation of logic truth table using a memory ♦Data inputs = memory address Another View of LUTs . Can view LUT as 16:1 mux . Inputs are mux select . Config sets mux data inputs . Logically same as 16x1 memory . Can compact logic if you can route inputs to mux data inputs 5-Input Functions . Slice can implement any function of 5 inputs . Logic function is partitioned between two LUTs . F5 multiplexer selects LUT 5-Input Functions (cont.) LUT OUT LUT Fast Carry Logic COUT YB G4 Y S G3 Look-Up D Q G2 O Carry G1 Table & CK Control Logic EC R F5IN BY SR XB X S F4 D Q F3 Look-Up Carry F2 Table O F1 & CK Control Logic EC R CIN CLK CE SLICE Look Up Table Additional Functionality . Can be configured as: ♦Shift register (16 regs) ♦Small memory (16 bits) • “Distributed RAM” . Some other FPGAs use muxes instead of memories to implement the core combinational logic Spartan-2 CLB Spartan-2 has 2 LUTs (4 input each) feeding a 3rd LUT, 2 FFs (with Preset/Reset, Enable, posedge or negedge clocks) and 16 muxes 12 inputs (plus clock), 4 outputs 18-545: FALL 2011 (COURTESY XILINX,30 INC.) Spartan-3 CLBs are composed of 4 slices Organized as 2 pairs, one of which is optimized for memory access Each slice has 2 FFs and 2 LUTs (COURTESY XILINX, INC.) FPGA Families extend Architecture ❏Devices are built, with more capability, but around the same basic architecture ❏Some additional capabilities ◆ Low voltage versions ◆ Faster clock rates ◆ Different packaging options (Courtesy Xilinx, Inc.) The need for more stuff ❏CompEs cannot design on logic, routing, I/O alone ❏Extreme case from early 90s ◆ 16 port ATM switch, designed on a single board FPGAs (XC3Ks) FIFO memory chips ◆ Design is limited by I/O to memory chips--bring them on-chip 33 Other “Stuff” ❏Clock managers ◆ Global clock buffering, distribution ◆ DCM: eliminate skew, phase shifts, multiply or divide clock ❏Memory ◆ Block RAM ◆ Distributed RAM (repurposed LUTs) ❏Shift Registers ❏Dedicated Multiplexers ❏Carry Look-Ahead Generators ❏I/O Blocks ◆ SelectIO supports 18 standards (single, differential, various voltage levels, ....) ❏Embedded Multipliers 34 Hard Macros . Hard macros ♦Block RAMs ♦Multipliers ♦CPUs . Firm macros ♦HDL ♦Placed ♦Routed . Soft macros ♦HDL Block RAMs . Distributed RAM ♦Use LUTs as memories ♦Low density ♦Poor performance . Block RAM ♦Large-ish dedicated memory blocks • Xilinx BRAMs = 18Kb ♦Some configurability • Dual-port • Data width / depth • FIFO, CAM, etc. Multipliers 18x18 signed 2’s-complement multiplier . Two 18b inputs . One 36b output . 18b enough for many DSP applications . Can gang multiple units together for wider data . Faster and lower power than multiplier from CLBs CPUs – PowerPC 405 XC2VP30 has 2 Embedded PowerPC 405 cores . Embedded L1 I and D caches . No FPU CPU Connectivity: PLB and OPB IBM Core Connect . Processor Local Bus (PLB) . On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB) . Device Control Register bus (DCR) CPU Connectivity: PLB and OPB (cont.) CPU Connectivity: OCM On-Chip Memory controller . CPU block RAM . 2 OCMs – I and D . Direct, fast interface . Can use dual-port BRAMs for producer-consumer link to FPGA fabric CPU Links A lot more details on the embedded CPU . http://www.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ppc_ref_guide.pdf . http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug018.pdf . http://www-3.ibm.com/chips/techlib/techlib.nsf/productfamilies/ CoreConnect_Bus_Architecture 18-545: FALL 2011 42 Configuration Storage WL Lots of configuration bits LUTs, routing, I/O configuration Xilinx XC2VP30 has >11Mb Configuration storage technologies bit bit_b Volatile 6T SRAM cell SRAM cells Non-volatile FLASH, EEPROM Anti-fuse Actel anti-fuse Configuration How to load (scan) configuration bits (bitstream) Connect all configuration registers into single long shift register Serially clock in configuration bits Most designs use standard scan interface (JTAG) developed for test Bitstream source Non-volatile memory On-board FLASH, EEPROM, serial memory External media (CF card) Attached workstation Can encrypt bitstream to conceal configuration 18-545: FALL 2011 44 Major FPGA Vendors SRAM-based FPGAs Xilinx Share over 60% of the market Altera Atmel Lattice Semiconductor Flash & antifuse FPGAs Actel Corp. Quick Logic Corp. Lattice Semiconductor Xilinx (system-in-a-package solution) 18-545: FALL 2011 45 FPGA Information Links Virtex-II Pro Datasheet http://direct.xilinx.com/bvdocs/publications/ds083.pdf Virtex-II Pro User’s Guide www.xilinx.com/bvdocs/userguides/ug012.pdf XUP Board Guide www.xilinx.com/univ/XUPV2P/Documentation/ XUPV2P_User_Guide.pdf 18-545: FALL 2011 46.