History, background and analyses of ■ Faber, Mient-Jan & Andrzej Kasprzyk. ■ Panossian, Razmik. ‘The irony of the conflict ‘How should the OSCE deal with the Nagorno-Karabakh: formal ■ Chorbajian, Levon (ed.) The making Nagorno Karabakh conflict?’ Helsinki institutions versus informal politics’ of Nagorno-Karabagh: from secession Monitor, vol. 14, no. 1 (2003): 1-6 Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 11, to Republic (Basingstoke/New York: ■ Gamaghelyan, Philip. ‘Intractability no. 3 (2001): 143-164 Palgrave, 2001) of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: ■ Tsalik, Svetlana. Caspian Oil Windfalls: ■ Croissant, Michael. The Armenia- a myth or reality?’ Peace & Conflict Who Will Benefit? (New York: Open Azerbaijan conflict: causes and Monitor, Special Report, July 2005. Society Institute, 2003) implications (London: Praeger, 1998) ■ International Crisis Group. ‘Nagorno- ■ Tchilingirian, Hratch. ‘Nagorno- ■ De Waal, Thomas. Black garden: Karabakh: viewing the conflict from Karabakh: transition and the elite’ Armenia and Azerbaijan through the ground’ (Tbilisi/Brussels: Europe Central Asian Survey, vol. 18, no. 4 peace and war (New York: New York Report, no. 166, 14 September 2005) (1999): 441-445 University Press, 2003) ■ International Crisis Group. ‘Nagorno- Public opinion surveys ■ Libaridian, Gerard. Modern Armenia. Karabakh: a plan for peace’ ■ Azerbaijanian Sociological People, Nation, State (New (Tbilisi/Brussels: Europe Report, Association. Armenian-Azeri Mutual Brunswick/London: Transaction no. 167, 11 October 2005) Perception Project. Country Report on Publishers, 2004) ■ Laitin, David & Ronald Suny. ‘Armenia the “Potential of Azerbaijanian and ■ Lynch, Dov. Engaging Eurasia’s and Azerbaijan: thinking a way out Armenian Peoples in Peacebuilding separatist states: unresolved conflicts of Karabakh’ Middle East Policy, vol. 7, and Post-Conflict Cooperation” Survey and de facto states (Washington, DC: no. 1 (October 1999): 145-76 in Azerbaijan (Baku: Azerbaijanian United States Institute of Peace Press, Other themes Sociological Association/American University, 2003) 2004) ■ Faber, Mient Jan & Mary Kaldor. ■ Rasizade, Alec. ‘Azerbaijan after ‘Study Group on Europe’s Security ■ Baku Press Club, Yerevan Press Club. Heidar Aliev’ Nationalities Papers, vol. Capabilities: South Caucasus Paper’ The Karabakh Conflict and Prospects 32, no. 1 (March 2004): 137-164 (London School of Economics, Centre for Settling it. The results of sociological research and media coverage of the ■ Yunusov, Arif. Islam in Azerbaijan for the Study of Global Governance, Karabakh settlement problem (Baku: (Baku: Friedrich Ebert Foundation/ draft paper, 2004) Yeni Nesil, 2004) Institute of Peace and Democracy, http://lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/Study 2004) Group/SouthCaucasusPaper.htm ■ Stepanakert Press Club, Friedrich Ebert Foundation (Berlin) and Center Peace processes ■ Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. Azerbaijan. Seven Years of Conflict of Social Technologies (Yerevan). ■ Betts, Wendy. ‘Third party mediation: in Nagorno-Karabakh (New York: Mountainous Karabakh in the mirror an obstacle to peace in Nagorno Human Rights Watch, 1994) of public opinion (Stepanakert: Karabakh’ SAIS Review, vol. 19, no. 2 Stepanakert Press Club, 2004) (1999): 161-183 ■ Human Rights Watch. Crushing Dissent. Repression, Violence and News websites ■ Caspian Studies Programme. Azerbaijan’s Elections (New York: ■ ANS: http://www.ans-dx.com ‘Negotiations on Nagorno-Karabagh: Human Rights Watch, January 2004) where do we go from here?’ (Harvard ■ Armenia Liberty: University, John F. Kennedy School of ■ Human Rights Watch. Cycle of http://www.armenialiberty.org Government, 23 April 2001) Repression: Human Rights Violations ■ ArmeniaNow.com: in Armenia (New York, Human Rights ■ http://www.armenianow.com Dehdashti, Rexane. ‘Nagorno- Watch Briefing Paper, 4 May 2004) Karabakh: A Case Study of OSCE ■ BBC Karabakh page [Russian]: Conflict Settlement’ in Michael Bothe, ■ Kaufman, Stuart. ‘Peace-Building http://news8.thdo.bbc.co.uk/hi/russia Natalino Ronzitti and Allan Rosas and Conflict Resolution in Nagorno n/in_depth/2004/karabakh/ Karabakh’, (PONARS Policy Memo (eds.) The OSCE in the maintenance ■ 164, University of Kentucky, 2000) BakuToday.net: of peace and security (The Hague, http://www.bakutoday.net London, Boston: Kluwer Law ■ Matveeva, Anna. 2002 ‘Nagorno ■ EurasiaNet: International, 1997) Karabakh: A Straightforward http://www.eurasianet.org ■ Druckman, Daniel & Terrence Lyons. Territorial Conflict’ in Paul van ■ Institute for War and Peace ‘Negotiation processes and Tongeren, Hans van de Veen & Reporting: http://www.iwpr.net postsettlement relationships: Juliette Verhoeven (eds.) Searching comparing Nagorno-Karabakh with for peace in Europe and Eurasia: ■ Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty: Mozambique’ in William Zartman & overview of conflict prevention and http://www.rferl.org peacebuilding activities (Boulder, CO: Victor Kremenyuk, Peace versus justice: Peacebuilding websites Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002) negotiating forward-and backward- ■ Consortium Initiative: ■ Article 19. Under lock and key: freedom looking outcomes (Lanham, MD: http://www.consortium-initiative.org Rowman & Littlefield, 2005) of information and the media in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia ■ South Caucasus Parliamentary (London: Article 19, 2005) Initiative: http://www.scpi.org.ge

100 Accord 17