Rural Damascus Governorate: 1

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW V2 (PUBLISHED ON 30 NOVEMBER 2017)

RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE: 1. POPULATION CATEGORIES 36 3,261,246 2,495,218 1,303,622 24,761 988,180 170,217

Number of In Besieged/ Militarily In Hard-to-reach Severity Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees sub-districts encircled locations locations

melborp oN melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 melborp roniM melborp 1 848,21 6,852 091 0 0 0 Moderate problem 7 173,330 121,688 11,588 126 64,397 3,314 Major problem 8 274,135 211,456 90,010 3,102 112,689 10,283 Severe problem 11 1,407,220 1,071,283 502,026 9,731 383,964 20,954 Critical problem 7 1,336,252 1,034,252 673,182 2,695 392,573 135,666

melborp cihportsataC melborp 2 164,75 49,687 626,62 701,9 755,43 0

2. SECTOR SEVERITY RANKING BY SUB-DISTRICTHasyaa Sadad Mahin HOMS

Deir Attiyeh Qaryatein Tadmor LEBANON

An Nabk Yabroud Esal El-Ward ! Jirud

! Maloula Sarghaya ! Raheiba Rankus ! Dimas ! Az-Zabdani Al Qutayfah Madaya At Tall Sidnaya ! ! ! !Ein! ! Elfijeh! !!! ! ! RURAL DAMASCUS Duma Qudsiya Harasta#*# DAMASCUS*#*#*#*#*# Damascus*#P *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#Kafr*#*#*# Batna Markaz Darayya !!! Nashabiyeh !Jaramana*#! ! Qatana Maliha Dhameer ! !SahnayaBabella Haran Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Sabe Byar ! ! ! #Bait Jan! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh **# ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! Sasa Masaada QU Khan Arnaba Ghabagheb P Masmiyyeh Quneitra Little Sura Severity ranks As-Sanamayn No data Jasim ! Shaqa 1 - Minor problem Ariqa Nawa Izra Fiq 2 - Moderate problem Tassil Sheikh Miskine Shahba 3 - Major problem Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Mashnaf 4 - Severe problem Hrak AS-SWEIDA MzeirebKherbet Ghazala# As-SweidaP JORDAN 5 - Critical problem * Besieged locations, Sep 2017 DAR'A Mseifra JORDAN PDara ! 6 - Catastrophic problemJizeh MilitaryQarayya encircled locations, Sep 2017 Milh

3. CONFLICT INCIDENTS Number of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017)

1,000 Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion

500

- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 5102 6102 7102 HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device

1 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HIGHLIGHTS

• 160 communities were covered in Rural Damascus governorate with one or more protection issues. • 94% of covered communities reported child labor preventing school attendance as occurring, 89% reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring and 87% reported early marriage as occurring. • Domestic violence was described as a “very common” issue for one or more population groups by 21% of covered communities while sexual harassment was described as a “very common” issue for one or more population groups by 11% of covered communities. • Boys and girls are described as most affected by domestic violence with 15% of covered communities describing it as a “very common” issue for both groups. • 96% of covered communities described reliance on humanitarian assistance as a coping mechanism that was used at least "sometimes" by one or more population groups, while accessing local community support were also described as used “sometimes” (54%) by one or more population groups. • 29% of covered communities described children dropping out of school to work as a coping mechanism “commonly” used by one or more population groups and 21% mentioned early marriage as a coping mechanism “commonly” used by one or more population groups. • Movement restrictions were reported as occurring in 62% of covered communities. Out of those, 86% covered communities reported lack of identity documents, 83% mentioned screening processes and 82% identified checkpoints among reasons, while men (91%), IDPs (86%), and people without civil documentation (85%) were mentioned as the most affected groups by movement restrictions. • Needs for protection services were identified for all population groups, in particular recreational activities (64% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups), women and girls centers and care mechanisms/services for elderly persons (55% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups). • 86% of covered communities reported concerns with humanitarian assistance. Out of the total covered, 119 communities mentioned the request for documentation to access assistance as a concern, 105 indicated that the assistance delivered was not “what the community needed” and 71 mentioned discrimination/exclusion. • Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 76% indicated concerns of approaching authority, 71% reported “left behind when fleeing” or “loss” among causes while 87% reported the inability to register birth/marriage/death, 86% identified “restricted freedom of movement” and 83% mentioned “cannot register land/access transactions” among consequences. • Among documents that were described as difficult to obtain in covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, passport (76%) and travel authorization document (71%) were mentioned. • 79% of covered communities reported housing, land and property issues as occurring. Out of those, 70% mentioned “lack of documents” and 67% “disputed ownership” as HLP concerns happening “sometimes”.

4. PROTECTION ISSUES a. Occurrence of protection issues i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of those communities reporting occurrence of protection issues)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 243

160150 158 160 156 160 160 158 160 159 158 160 155 140 139 132 127 126 125 118 100 92 81 59 59 55 0

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting protection issues as occurring Child labour preventing school attendance 94%

Lack/loss of civil documents 89%

Early marriage 87%

Family separation 81%

Housing/land/property issues 79%

Domestic violence 78%

Economic exploitation 75%

Harassment 63%

Sexual harassment 58%

Sexual violence 51%

Explosive hazards* 45%

Kidnapping/Abduction 37%

Child recruitment 35%

*For explosive hazards indicator: this % applies to communities located in sub-districts where 99% of conflict incidents in the country, have taken place since January 2015.

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 2 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES b. Overview of Protection issues with frequency of occurrence i. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, using two different aggregation options across population groups

HIGHEST FREQUENCY occurrence as per one or more population groups Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

6% 13% 11% 22% 25% 19% 21% 38% 42% 55% 49% 65% 63% 29% 45% 60% 29% 53% 69% 35% 35% 65% 62% 35% 29% 49% 37% 12% 32% 20% 34% 15% 9% 14% 12% 14% 3% 20.6% 6% 3% 10.7% 6.9% 7.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2.5% 1.5% 2.6% 1.3% 3.1% 0.6% 5.1% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

AVERAGE FREQUENCY across population groups

6% 13% 11% 22% 25% 19% 21% 38% 42% 55% 49% 65% 63%

49% 73% 83% 45% 22% 65% 74% 44% 41% 59% 35% 86% 76% 36% 13% 8% 11% 9% 7% 4% 0% 1% 3% 4% 2% 1% 6.9% 4.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 2.5% 3.2% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group

Persons with disabilities

53% 45% 64% 58% 67% 72% 68% 75% 85% 84% 98% 90% 90%

32% 16% 38% 47% 8% 29% 2% 9% 9% 24% 14% 28% 33% 10% 6% 6% 4% 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 2% 3% 0% 6.3% 0% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6% 1.3% 0.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.2% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 3 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Men Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

22% 23% 16% 40% 32% 58% 68% 71% 73% 80%

43% 66% 53% 65% 64% 22% 36% 29% 15% 14% 14% 12% 26% 11% 15% 5% 2% 3% 6% 4% 3.1% 1.3% 0.8% 1.9% 0.0% 2.5% 0.6% 1.9% 1.3% 1.9% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Women

24% 26% 26% 36% 31% 43% 44% 52% 64% 76% 34%

38% 30% 49% 60% 58% 34% 47% 63% 33% 23% 12% 10% 15% 13% 9% 15% 11.9% 3% 6% 0% 6.3% 5.1% 0.6% 0.0% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 1.9% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Adolescent boys

8% 30% 32% 33% 42% 36% 58% 66% 59% 61% 63% 76% 71%

60% 40%

20% 53% 49% 29% 28% 58% 20% 52% 37% 35% 31% 14% 35% 24% 11% 5% 6% 8% 6% 3% 10.7% 3% 4% 1% 0% 7.6% 4.4% 0.0% 1.3% 1.3% 0.8% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.6% 3.2% 3.2% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 4 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Adolescent girls Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

14% 30% 31% 38% 38% 46% 40% 44% 55% 63% 62% 78% 95% 30% 46%

36% 28% 34% 55% 43% 48% 31% 54% 51% 11% 34% 35% 12% 5% 21% 11% 10% 11.9% 10% 6% 8% 0% 2% 1% 1% 8.9% 6.3% 4.5% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.8% 1.9% 0.6% 1.9% 0.0% 3.2% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents Boys

28% 36% 40% 54% 48% 64% 65% 61% 78% 73% 92% 85% 38%

19% 53% 46% 27% 36% 19% 32% 46% 31% 8% 13% 21% 11% 5% 11% 14.6% 9% 6% 6% 0% 1% 4% 4% 1% 7.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 2.5% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents Girls

28% 41% 52% 48% 57% 64% 66% 69% 71% 77% 81% 97% 37%

20% 46% 22% 34% 18% 42% 46% 27% 3% 22% 31% 18% 8% 15.2% 8% 10% 6% 6% 0% 1% 2% 6% 4% 1% 6.4% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.8% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 5 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

c. Analysis per protection issue across population groups (with frequency of occurrence) CHILD LABOUR PREVENTING SCHOOL ATTENDANCE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!!!!! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

6% 6% 8%

31% 36% 52% 67% 60% 60% 83%

55% 53%

42% 29% 28% 29%

11% 12% 11% 6% 2% 0.6% 5.0% 4.4% 1.3% 0.6% 0.0% 1.9% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with frequency) frequency) disabilities

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 6 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

CHILD RECRUITMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

65% 65% 66%

92% 95% 97% 98%

35% 32% 31%

8% 0% 3% 3% 5%0% 0% 0%3% 0%2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 7 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EARLY MARRIAGE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

13% 13% 14%

42%

45% 46% 77% 85% 90%

86%

52% 35% 34% 22% 13% 6% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 6.9% 6.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 8 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!!!!! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

25% 25% 32% 36% 32% 46% 54% 57% 72%

53% 65% 53% 49% 53% 43% 36% 34% 24% 20% 14% 14% 9% 15% 10% 9% 8% 3% 1.3% 0.6% 2.5% 1.3% 0.6% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 9 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EXPLOSIVE HAZARDS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Frequency of occurrence Jizeh Qarayya Busra Milh ! Never happens Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Sometimes Thibeen Gharyeh ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis ! Community in a sub-district that has not reported high intensity conflict in last 2 years

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

55% 55% 58% 59% 64% 63% 64% 66% 85%

37% 41% 36% 37% 33% 34% 32% 31% 14% 6% 3% 5% 3% 3% 2% 4% 2% 1% 0.8% 1.5% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 10 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

FAMILY SEPARATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

19% 19% 22% 26% 33% 38% 48% 48% 68%

65% 74% 65% 60% 58% 54% 46% 46%

28% 14% 13% 12% 8% 6% 7% 6% 6% 3% 1.3% 1.9% 0.6% 2.6% 1.9% 1.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 11 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HARASSMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

38% 38% 43% 40% 61% 65% 64% 73% 69%

49% 47% 51% 59% 26% 35% 31% 27% 33% 12% 9% 8% 4% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 12 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

21% 21% 23% 31%

63% 62% 58%

62% 64% 76% 63%

38% 35% 35%

14% 11% 2% 6% 1% 1% 3% 1.9% 1.3% 3.1% 2.5% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 13 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

KIDNAPPING i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Frequency of occurrence Busra Milh Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

63% 63% 68% 76% 76% 78% 78% 81% 90%

34% 29% 36% 23% 24% 21% 21% 18% 10% 1% 3% 3% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 14 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

LACK/LOSS OF CIVIL DOCUMENTS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Qaryatein HOMS Attiyeh! ! LEBANON Tadmor ! ! ! ! !An Nabk ! Esal Yabroud! ! El-Ward ! ! ! Jirud ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Maloula! Sarghaya! !! ! ! Rankus! ! Raheiba ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Al ! ! ! !Az-Zabdani! At Tall! !Sidnaya! ! ! ! ! Qutayfah ! ! ! Ein! ! ! ! Dimas !! ! ! !!!! ! ! !Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Duma! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qudsiya!! !!! ! DAMASCUS !! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! P !!!! ! !!!!!! ! Damascus! !! !!! ! ! ! ! !!!! !! Nashabiyeh! !! Hajar!!!! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qatana! ! ! ! ! !! Maliha!! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! !!!! ! Dhameer ! ! Aswad! ! !! ! Haran Sabe ! ! !Sahnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Babella! ! Alawameed Byar ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! Bait! ! Jan!! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh! ! ! !Sasa! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Ghabagheb P Arnaba Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Quneitra Jasim DARA Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Ariqa Izra Fiq Nawa Sheikh ! Tassil Shahba Miskine Mazraa Ash-Shajara Dael Hrak Mashnaf Mzeireb Kherbet P AS-SWEIDA Ghazala As-Sweida P Mseifra Dara JORDAN

Jizeh Qarayya Busra Milh Frequency of occurrence Esh-Sham Salkhad ! Never happens Thibeen Gharyeh ! Sometimes ! Common issue ! Very common issue ! Not covered in analysis

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

11% 11% 16% 26% 36% 38% 40% 41% 45%

69% 73% 66% 58% 49% 48% 46% 46% 47%

15% 13% 15% 15% 11% 11% 11% 10% 6% 2.5% 3.2% 3.2% 2.5% 5.1% 1.9% 1.9% 3.2% 2.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 15 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

22% 22% 24% 30% 30% 28% 28% 40% 53% 29% 34% 49% 30% 40% 38% 37%

43% 29% 32% 30% 28% 19% 20% 20% 22% 14% 15.2% 9% 11.9% 14.6% 20.6% 10.7% 6.9% 11.9% 6.3% 3.1% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

SEXUAL VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

49% 49% 52% 55% 71% 73% 71% 80% 84%

35% 34% 31% 20% 19% 18% 44% 9% 15% 8% 10% 10% 6% 4% 4% 6% 6% 4% 3.2% 5.1% 3.2% 4.5% 7.0% 1.9% 2.5% 4.5% 3.2% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

SEXUAL HARASSMENT i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

42% 42% 44% 44% 58% 61% 64% 71% 75%

35% 38% 36% 45% 29% 27% 22% 12% 16% 22% 12% 11% 8% 5% 5% 8% 6% 6% 7.6% 8.9% 7.0% 4.4% 10.7% 6.3% 1.3% 6.4% 2.5% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 16 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

5. COPING MECHANISMS i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of communities reporting use of coping mechanism (i.e. used at least “sometimes” or more)

Total number of communities in Governorate Covered in the analysis Reported as used (at least sometimes) 243

144 146 144 147 146 146 135 141 141 142 120 105 102 102 93 75

0 Begging Children dropping out of Engaging in illegal Restricting movements of Relying on humanitarian Accessing community Local/community support Early marriage school to work activities (i.e theft, women and girls assistance services (community smuggling) centres, women centres)

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence Across population groups Graph a: Taking the highest frequency of occurrence at community level

1% 1% 8% 4% 5% 18% 42% 11% 29% 62% 28% Never used 56% 48% 45% Always used Sometimes used 54% Commonly used 57% 65% Commonly used Sometimes used 44% 39% 50% Always used 34% Never used 13% 21% 29% 15% 6% 6% 5% 1% 2% 1% 3% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Graph b: Taking the average frequency of occurrence at community level

2% 1% 8% 4% 18% 12% 29% 28% 14% Never used 48% 46% Always used Sometimes used 50% 58% Commonly used

Commonly used 64% Sometimes used 59% 39% Always used 63% 27% 44% 36% Never used 20% 70% 26% 7% 6% 3% 11% 3% 1% 2% 0% 3% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 17 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence -contd By population groups

Men 1% 1% 4% 5% 11% 35% Never used 47% 48% Always used 48% 54% Sometimes used Commonly used

Commonly used 37% Sometimes used 47% 48% 58% 33% Always used Never used 4% 6% 12% 1% 1% Begging Engaging in illegal Relying on Accessing community Local/community activities (i.e theft, humanitarian services (community support smuggling) assistance centres, women centres)

Women 3% 1% 4% 10% 15% 38% 49% Never used 56% Always used 44% 47% Sometimes used 56% Commonly used

Commonly used 38% Sometimes used 52% 40% 45% 27% Always used 42% Never used 9% 14% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% Begging Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Boys 3% 1% 8% 5% 10% 13% 31% 43% Never used 48% 45% Always used 57% Sometimes used 53% Commonly used 64% Commonly used 33% Sometimes used 60% 42% 27% 43% 28% Always used 54% 8% 6% Never used 4% 10% 1% 2% 2% 0% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Relying on Accessing Local/community dropping out of illegal activities humanitarian community services support school to work (i.e theft, assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres)

Graph d: Girls 4% 2% 5% 18% 10% 15% 35% 31% 54% Never used Always used 73% 45% 56% Sometimes used 51% Commonly used

56% Commonly used 34% Sometimes used 55% 57% 38% 41% 21% 27% Always used 27% Never used 7% 12% 6% 0% 10% 5% 1% 1% 0% 2% Begging Children dropping Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing Local/community out of school to illegal activities movements of humanitarian community services support work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 18 iii. Map of top three coping mechanisms used per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Al Quasir Raqama COPING MECHANISMS USED PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin HOMS

! ! Deir Qaryatein Attiyeh ! LEBANON !

! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! !

! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! Sarghaya ! Maloula ! Raheiba ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Az-Zabdani ! ! ! Sabe ! ! Rankus ! !Al Qutayfah ! ! ! ! Byar ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! DimasEin ! ! ! Qudsiya! ! ! ! DAMASCUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! Kafr !Batna! ! Damascus ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Markaz DarayyaJaramana! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh Bait Jan ! Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Arnaba ! ! Ghabagheb QUNEITRA DARA AS-SWEIDA Quneitra Little As-Sanamayn Sura Shaqa Al-Khashniyyeh Jasim Izra Ariqa Mashnaf Coping mechanisms used (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Begging Children dropping out of school to work Early marriage Engaging in illegal activities (i.e theft, smuggling) Restricting movements of women and girls Relying on humanitarian assistance Communities where coping mechanisms used are Accessing community services (community centres, women centres) ! Covered Local/community support ! Not covered in the analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 19 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

6. MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS NO (movement restrictions are not YES reported as (movement occurring) restrictions are 60 reported as 38% occurring) 97 62%

a.Causes of movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions as occurring

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 243

156 156 155 155 156 156 155 155

79 83 79 47 26 46 27 48 0 Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of explosive Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents hazards concerned authorities

ii. Percentage of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

49% 46% 48% 69% 69% 68% 82% 82%

31% 46% 37% 22% 25% 25% 15% 16% 15% 11% 7% 1% 3% 5% 1% 4% 0.6% 3.8% 0.0% 0.6% 1.3% 0.6% 1.3% 2.5% Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents explosive hazards concerned authorities iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific causes, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Lack of identity documents 86%

Screening processes 83%

Checkpoints 82%

Rules imposed by concerned authorities 51%

Activities of armed groups 49%

General violence 48%

Presence of explosive hazards 28%

Curfews 27%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 20 iv. Map of top three causes of movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

CAUSES OF MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! LEBANON !

! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! ! ! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! Rankus !Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! Dimas ! ! ! DAMASCUS Ein Qudsiya! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sabe ! ! Kafr! ! Batna! ! !!! Damascus ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Byar ! Jaramana! ! ! ! ! ! Markaz Darayya ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bait Jan ! Ghizlaniyyeh Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! Arnaba ! QUNEITRA Ghabagheb Masmiyyeh AS-SWEIDA DARA Little Quneitra As-Sanamayn Sura Al-KhashniyyehJasim Shaqa Izra Ariqa Mashnaf

Causes of movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most General violence % communities Lack of identity documents in the sub-district) Communities where movement restrictions were Presence of explosive hazards Activities of armed groups ! Reported Rules imposed by concerned authorities Checkpoints ! NOT reported Screening processes Curfews ! Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 21 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

b. Population groups affected by movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in Syria 243

154 154 154 154 154 155 155 155 155

86 81 82 69 59 21 44 33 43 0 Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving Women moving with Boys (<18) Men People without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion alone a companion documentation

ii. Percentage of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

44% 47% 46% 55% 61% 70% 71% 77% 85%

32% 31% 45% 34% 34% 25% 25% 11% 20% 20% 13% 9% 6% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 0.6% 2.5% 9.6% 1.9% Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving alone Women moving with a Boys (<18) Men People without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion companion documentation

iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific affected population groups, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Men 91%

IDPs 86%

People without civil documentation 85%

Boys (<18) 73%

Women moving alone 63%

Girls (<18) moving alone 47%

Women moving with a companion 46%

Girls (<18) moving with a companion 35%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 22 iv. Map of top three population groups affected by movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

POPULATION GROUPS AFFECTED BY MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONSHasyaa PER SUB-DISTRICT Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! !

LEBANON ! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! !

! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! ! Rankus Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! Dimas ! ! ! Ein Qudsiya! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! Sabe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! Kafr !Batna! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! DAMASCUS Byar ! Markaz DarayyaJaramana! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh Bait Jan ! Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! Arnaba Ghabagheb QUNEITRA Masmiyyeh DARA Little Sura Quneitra As-Sanamayn AS-SWEIDA Al-Khashniyyeh Jasim Shaqa Population groups affected by movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most % communities Girls moving with a companion in the sub-district) Women moving alone Communities where movement restrictions were Women moving with a companion Men ! Reported Persons without civil documentation Boys ! NOT reported IDPs Girls moving alone ! Not covered in analysis Persons with disabilities

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 23 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

7. PROTECTION SERVICES

i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting needs of protection services (i.e. “present but insufficient” or “not present but needed")

Covered in the analysis Reported as needed Total number of communities in the Govrenorate 243

155 155 155 154 154 155 154 154 152 154 154 154 143 132 129 128 127 127 126 122 111 100 97 72

0 Services for persons Recreational activitiesProtection services for Women and girls Psychosocial support Community centres Legal services for civil Care mechanisms for Legal services for Psychosocial support Explosive hazard risk Medical treatment for with disabilities children centres services documentation elderly persons Housing, Land and for sexual/domestic education sexual/domestic Property issues violence survivors violence survivors

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups Across population groups Graph a: Taking the most severe status of needs and presence

Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed

1% 1% 11% 10% 9% 10% 8% 10% 7% 16% 17% 18% 13% 6% 6% 6% 9% 4% 17% 32% 8% 20% 17% 22% 29% 43% 37% 33% 34% 24% 43% 34% 21% 32% 34% 21% 64% 55% 49% 50% 55% 50% 46% 40% 39% 29% 33% 26%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Graph b: Taking the average status of needs and presence

1% 1% 11% 10% 9% 10% 8% 10% 13% 7% 16% 18% 18% 7% 6% 7% 9% 5% 18% 32% 8% 21% 18% 29% 32% 24% 45% 38% 37% 35% 44% 35% 21% 35% 35% 23% 55% 54% 55% 44% 45% 48% 47% 38% 38% 30% 28% 23%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education civil documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual for children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 24 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups - contd By population group

Men Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed 1% 1% 11% 9% 10% 11% 8% 18% 17% 19% 13% 9% 17% 10% 33% 12% 8% 20% 18% 24% 44% 37% 44% 33% 27% 34% 23% 36% 32% 19%

43% 27% 39% 39% 47% 30% 24% 50% 55% 47%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services for disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic elderly persons violence violence

Women 1% 1% 11% 10% 9% 10% 11% 8% 17% 18% 18% 13% 6% 7% 8% 18% 32% 9% 8% 21% 17% 29% 45% 37% 28% 25% 38% 42% 34% 21% 34% 36% 21%

25% 43% 54% 27% 39% 39% 45% 31% 52% 55% 46%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Boys Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed 1% 1% 11% 10% 10% 8% 10% 7% 16% 18% 18% 7% 8% 10% 5% 19% 33% 21% 17% 32% 46% 38% 36% 35% 44% 34% 22% 34% 33% 22%

24% 44% 29% 37% 38% 45% 31% 48% 54% 46%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence

Girls 1% 1% 11% 10% 11% 10% 8% 10% 7% 16% 19% 18% 7% 6% 9% 9% 6% 18% 33% 21% 18% 29% 34% 31% 46% 39% 36% 43% 34% 22% 34% 34% 21%

25% 43% 54% 29% 37% 38% 44% 31% 49% 53% 46%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 25 iii. Map of top three protection services needed per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting need)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as needed irrespective of presence. They are NOT indicative of the severity of need. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Al Quasir PROTECTION SERVICES NEEDED PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! LEBANON !

! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! ! Tadmor ! ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! ! ! Rankus ! Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! ! Harasta ! ! ! ! ! ! DimasEin Qudsiya! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! DAMASCUS Sabe ! Arbin! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Kafr! ! Batna! ! ! !!! ! ! ! Byar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Markaz Darayya Jaramana! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! Alawameed Dhameer ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh Bait Jan ! Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! Arnaba Ghabagheb Masmiyyeh QUNEITRA Little DARA Sura Quneitra As-Sanamayn AS-SWEIDA Al-Khashniyyeh Shaqa Jasim Ariqa Mashnaf Sheikh Izra Shahba Fiq Nawa Miskine

Protection services needed Psychosocial support services (Top 3 reported by most % communities Psychosocial support for survivors of sexual violence/domestic violence in the sub-district) Medical treatment for sexual/domestic violence survivors Community centres Protection services for children Communities where protection services are Women and girls centres ! Recreational activities Reported as needed Explosive hazard risk education ! Care mechanisms for elderly persons NOT reported as needed Legal services for civil documentation ! Services for persons with disabilities Not covered in analysis Legal services for Housing, Land and Property issues

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 26 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

8. CONCERNS/PROBLEMS DURING DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

NO (concerns with YES (concerns humanitarian with humanitarian assistance are not assistance are reported as reported as occurring) 21 , 14% occurring), 126 , 86%

i. Analysis coverage

Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting concerns regarding how humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Number of communities in the Governorate 126 reporting concerns with humanitarian assistance 121 119 115 112 114 112 105 106

44 35 17 0 Request for civil documentation to Assistance given is not what the Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Request of sexual favour/ Humanitarian assistance is not access assistance community needs exploitation in exchange for free/ Money is asked in exchange humanitarian assistance for assistance

ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence a. Across population groups (For categories which required aggregation, highest frequency was adopted)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes

53 34

39 50 33 11 41 32 15 13 10 2 2 - 1 1 2 Request for civil documentation Assistance given is not what the Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Request of sexual favour/ Humanitarian assistance is not to access assistance community needs exploitation in exchange for free/ Money is asked in humanitarian assistance exchange for assistance

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 27 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence - contd b. By population groups

Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian exchange for assistance assistance

15 13 12 12 31 23 7 - - -- 5 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 - 1 Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

Request for civil documentation to access assistance Sexual harassment

54 53 52 54 39 39 29 29 34 31 17 13 32 32 32 33 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

iii. Number of covered communities having reported discrimination as a concern reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months identifying population groups affected by discrimination

Old persons 44

Divorced women 38

Women living alone 37

Widows 35

Women head of household 31

Men living alone 27

Persons with disabilities (HA) 26

Girls head of household 23

Unaccompanied boys 22

Unaccompanied girls 21

Boys head of household 18

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 28 iv. Map of top three concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance in the last three months per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Al Quasir CONCERNS WITH DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! LEBANON !

! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! ! ! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! Sarghaya ! Maloula ! Raheiba ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Sabe ! Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! Byar ! Rankus Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! DimasEin ! ! ! ! Qudsiya! ! ! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin! ! ! ! DAMASCUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! Kafr! Batna! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jaramana! ! ! ! Markaz Darayya ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bait Jan ! Ghizlaniyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Masaada ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! Arnaba Ghabagheb QUNEITRA Masmiyyeh DARA Little Quneitra Sura As-Sanamayn AS-SWEIDA Al-Khashniyyeh Jasim Shaqa Sheikh Izra Ariqa Shahba Mashnaf Fiq Nawa Miskine

Concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Assistance given is not what the community needs Request for civil documentation to access assistance Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance Communities where concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance are ! Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance Reported ! Sexual harassment NOT reported

! Discrimination/exclusion Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 29 RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

9. CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

a. Reasons for not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific reason for not having civil documentation, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation NO (lack/loss of documentation is not reported Concerns of approaching authority 76% as occurring) 18 Left behind when fleeing 71% , 11% YES (lack/loss of Lost 71% documentatio n is reported Expired document 51% as occurring) Could not afford it 48% 140 , 89% Another family member has possession of it 42%

GoS Services not available 39%

Never had it 39%

Didn’t attempt to obtain it 38%

Counselling/legal services not available 35%

Confiscated 29% b. Type of document that is not possible to be obtained in the community i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific document that was not possible to obtain in the community, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Passport 76%

Travel authorisation document 71%

Deed/Tabou 59%

Syrian ID 56%

Disability ID 56%

Family Booklet 54%

Marriage Certificate 51%

Approval for lease agreement 45%

Birth Certificate 44%

Death Certificate 44%

Civil record (extract) 44%

Residence support document 41%

Divorce record 40% c. Impact of not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific impact of not having civil documents,out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Cannot register birth/marriage/death 87%

Restricted freedom of movement 86%

Cannot register land/access transactions 83%

Unable to access humanitarian assistance 81%

Cannot claim property 74%

Unable to access basic services 66%

Arrest 61%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 30 d. Map of top three reasons for not having civil documentation, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie chartsNOTE: theThepie mapson thetopthreeillustrate options reported thesub-district, basedin thepercentage oncommunities of reporting each option asoccurringoptionsometimes sub-districtsthefrequency/severityoccurrence. ormore. In Theyareof NOTof where chart shows indicative thepie moremeansdisplayedthanthree options it were options,that reported all thesameby percentagesub-districtscommunities. In of where chart thepie s howsmeanslessthanthree displayedit options,thatoptions wereonly reported.

Al Quasir Al Raqama REASONS FOR NOT HAVING CIVIL DOCUMENTATION PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! LEBANON !

! Esal NabkAn ! ! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! !

! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! ! Rankus Qutayfah Al ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! AtTall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! Dimas ! ! ! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! ! ! ! Sabe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! DAMASCUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Byar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! Damascus ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella ! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh Bait JanBait ! Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! QUNEITRA ! ! Khan Ghabagheb Arnaba Masmiyyeh DARA Little Quneitra Sura As-Sanamayn Al-Khashniyyeh AS-SWEIDA Sheikh Shaqa Jasim Izra Ariqa Mashnaf Fiq Miskine Shahba Reasons for not having civil documentation attemptDidn’t it obtainto (Top 3 reported by most memberAnother family hasposs it essof ion % communities in the sub-district) Expireddocument Concernsapproachingauthority of Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is Couldit notafford GoSServices notavailable ! Reported Confiscated Counselling/legal services notavailable Counselling/legal ! NOTreported Left behindwhenLeft fleeing Neverhadit ! Notcoveredanalysis in Lost

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 31 ii. Map of top three types of documents that are not possible to obtain in the community, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

TYPES OF DOCUMENTS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PER SUB-DISTRICT Hasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir HOMS Attiyeh Qaryatein ! ! LEBANON

! Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! ! ! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! ! Rankus !Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! Dimas ! ! ! Ein Qudsiya! ! ! ! ! ! RURAL ! ! ! Sabe ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! DAMASCUS Byar ! ! Kafr! ! Batna! ! !!! Damascus ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jaramana! ! ! ! ! ! Markaz Darayya ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! Dhameer ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bait Jan ! Ghizlaniyyeh

! ! ! ! ! ! Masaada ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! Arnaba Ghabagheb QUNEITRA Masmiyyeh Little DARA Sura Quneitra As-Sanamayn Al-Khashniyyeh AS-SWEIDA Shaqa

Types of documents that are not possible to obtain (Top 3 reported Divorce record Passport by most % communities Family Booklet Travel authorisation document in the sub-district) Communities where lack/loss of civil documention is Death Certificate Approval for lease agreement ! Reported Birth Certificate Disability ID Deed/Tabou ! NOT reported Civil record (extract) Syrian ID Residence support document ! Marriage Certificate Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 32 ETARONREVOG SUCSAMAD LARUR SUCSAMAD ETARONREVOG ,GNISUOH DNAL DNA YTREPORP SEUSSI

10. HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES

NO (HLP a.Concerns regarding Housing, land and property (HLP) issues are not reported as i. Percentage of communities, identifying specific HLP concerns, by frequency of occurrence, out of those occurring) , 34 , 21% reporting the occurrence of HLP issues. YES (HLP Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens issues are reported as occurring), 23% 19% 32% 30% 126 , 79% 41% 36% 36% 41% 38%

70% 56% 67% 54% 54% 56% 51% 54% 54%

10% 14% 5% 7% 9% 7% 10% 3% 5% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0% 0.9% 1.7% 0.9% 1.7% 2.6% Damage of land Looting of private Property is Disputed Rental disputes No housing Lack of Rules and Cannot or property property unlawfully ownership (landlord/tenant available documents processes on access/lost occupied by problems) housing and land access housing others not clear or because can changing afford it ii. Map of top three HLP concerns per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence) NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY CONCERNS PER SUB-DISTRICTHasyaa Sadad Mahin

! ! Deir Attiyeh Qaryatein ! ! HOMS

! LEBANON Esal An! Nabk! Yabroud ! El-Ward ! ! ! Tadmor ! Jirud !

! ! ! ! ! ! Raheiba Sarghaya Maloula Sabe ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Byar Az-Zabdani ! ! ! ! ! Rankus Al Qutayfah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madaya ! ! ! ! At Tall ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sidnaya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Duma RURAL ! Harasta! ! ! ! ! ! DimasEin ! ! ! Qudsiya! ! ! ! DAMASCUS ! ! ! ! ! ! Elfijeh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arbin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kafr! ! Batna! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Damascus ! ! ! ! Markaz Darayya ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jaramana ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dhameer ! Hajar Aswad! Maliha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Nashabiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sahnaya ! ! ! Haran ! ! ! Qatana ! ! ! ! Babella! ! ! ! ! ! Alawameed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sasa! ! ! ! ! Kisweh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ghizlaniyyeh Bait Jan ! Masaada ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! Masmiyyeh Arnaba ! ! Ghabagheb Little QUNEITRA DARA Sura As-Sanamayn Quneitra AS-SWEIDA Housing, land and property concerns (Top 3 reported No housing available by most % communities Disputed ownership in the sub-district) Rental disputes (landlord/tenant problems) Communities where HLP issues are Lack of documents Property is unlawfully occupied by others ! Reported Damage of land or property Rules and processes on housing and land not clear or changing ! NOT reported Looting of private property Cannot access/lost access housing because can afford it ! Not covered in analysis

END OF RURAL DAMASCUS GOVERNORATE ANALYSIS. CLICK HERE FOR THE 2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW V2 (NATIONAL OVERVIEW) 33