DOCSLIB.ORG

SARAJEVSKI FILOLOŠKI SUSRETI II: ZBORNIK RADOVA (Knj. I)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SARAJEVSKI FILOLOŠKI SUSRETI II: ZBORNIK RADOVA (Knj. I) SARAJEVSKI FILOLOŠKI SUSRETI II: ZBORNIK RADOVA (knj. I) Održavanje međunarodne naučne konferencije „Sarajevski filološki susreti II“ i objavljivanje Zbornika radova finansijski su potpomogli: Federalno ministarstvo kulture i sporta Fondacija za izdavaštvo, Sarajevo Federalno ministarstvo obrazovanja i nauke Izdavač: Bosansko filološko društvo, Franje Račkog 1, Sarajevo, www.bfd.ba Za izdavača: Ismail Palić Redakcija: Munir Drkić, Sanjin Kodrić, Ismail Palić i Vahidin Preljević Međunarodna redakcija: Lada Badurina (Rijeka), Tatjana Bečanović (Nikšić), Branimir Belaj (Osijek), Robert Bońkowski (Katowice), Rajka Glušica (Nikšić), Zvonko Kovač (Zagreb), Jasmina Mojsieva-Guševa (Skoplje), Vesna Mojsova-Čepiševska (Skoplje), Aleksandar Stefanović (Pariz), Bogusław Zieliński (Poznanj) Glavni urednik: Ismail Palić Sekretari Redakcije: Azra Hodžić-Čavkić i Nehrudin Rebihić ISSN 2233-1018 Zbornik izlazi svake druge godine i donosi radove koje su autori na temelju referata izloženih na međunarodnoj naučnoj konferenciji „Sarajevski filološki susreti“ pripremili za objavljivanje. Zbornik je indeksiran u bibliografskim bazama EBSCO i CEEOL. U elektroničkom obliku Zbornik je dostupan na internetskoj stranici izdavača: www.bfd.ba ISSN 2233-1018 Zbornik radova (knjiga I) Uredili Ismail Palić i Munir Drkić Bosansko filološko društvo Sarajevo, 2014. Sadržaj Redakcijska napomena . 7 Refik BULIĆ Govor Bošnjaka Srebrenice . 9 Jelena VLAŠIĆ DUIĆ – Elenmari PLETIKOS OLOF Akustičke posebnosti akuta u čakavskom, kajkavskom i staroštokavskom govoru . 21 Aleksandar STEFANOVIĆ Kvantifikacija imenica pluralia tantum . 45 Ermina RAMADANOVIĆ Novi pogled na neke stare načine tvorbe riječi (O nekim novim tvorbenim načinima ili o starim na nov način). 68 Sanda Lucija UDIER O valentnosti imenica u hrvatskome jeziku . 97 Branimir BELAJ Nekoliko napomena o odnosu glave i modifikatora u nekim tipovima hrvatske apozicijske sintagme . 1 1 0 Mirela OMEROVIĆ Strukturni modeli nekongruentnih sintagmi s kvalitativnim značenjem u bosanskome jeziku . 1 2 9 Halid BULIĆ Upotreba vokativa u rečeničnoj strukturi . 1 4 0 Ismail PALIĆ Mogući okvir za opis epistemičkomodalnih iskaza u bosanskome jeziku . 1 5 3 Mirjana POPOVIĆ Novi pojmovnik lingvistike govora. 1 8 2 5 Amela ŠEHOVIĆ Razgovorna leksika i njena funkcija u hip-hop pjesmama . 1 9 3 Elma DURMIŠEVIĆ-CERNICA Pueritivi u bosanskome jeziku . 2 0 0 Lada BADURINA – Ivo PRANJKOVIĆ O dijalogu. 2 1 6 Nikolina PALAŠIĆ – Nada IVANETIĆ Eufemizam u službi objektivnosti – strategije vrednovanja u recenzijama znanstvenih tekstova . 2 2 7 Robert BOŃKOWSKI Percepcija bosanskog jezika u Poljskoj . 2 4 2 Munir DRKIĆ Kulturna interakcija između Orijenta, Bosne i Evrope na primjeru prijevoda Rumijeve Mesnevije na bosanski jezik . 2 5 2 Podaci o autorima . 2 6 5 6 rEdaKCIjSKa NaPOMENa U Sarajevu je 13. i 14. decembra 2012. godine održana druga redov- na međunarodna naučna konferencija „Sarajevski filološki susreti II“. Knjiga I Zbornika donosi prihvaćene radove iz oblasti lingvistike koje su autori na temelju podnesenih referata na spomenutoj konferenciji pripremili za objav- ljivanje. Redakcija Zbornika posebno se zahvaljuje autorima, recenzentima, svim učesnicima, Organizacionom odboru konferencije, sponzorima te svima koji su doprinijeli uspješnom održavanju konferencije i objavljivanju ovoga zbornika. Redakcija 7 UDK: 811.163.4*3'282 (497.6 Srebrenica) Refik BULIĆ GOvOr BOšNjaKa SrEBrENICE KLJUČNE RIJEČI: govor, Bošnjak, Srebrenica, ijekavskošćakavski dijalekt, istočnohercegovački dijalekt Govor Bošnjaka Srebrenice zanimljiv je s više aspekata. Jedan od njih je pi- tanje zamjene dugog jata, drugi je njegova aktuelnost i pitanje vitalnosti ili opstanka, s obzirom na izvršeni genocid, raseljavanje i smanjen broj izvornih govornika, treći je pitanje njegove dijalekatske pripadnosti, a sve ih objedi- njuje neistraženost ovoga govornog idioma. U literaturi o bosanskim i her- cegovačkim dijalektima postoje izvjesna neslaganja koja se tiču dijalekatske pripadnosti srebreničkoga govora. U ovome su radu predstavljene neke od najznačajnih osobina u govoru Bošnjaka Srebrenice uspoređene s osobinama ijekavskošćakavskog (istočnobosanskog) dijalekta i susjednog (jugo)istočno- bosanskoga govornog tipa istočnohercegovačkog dijalekta. Pokazano je da su ovi govori slični u nizu osobina, ali i da imaju izvjesnih diferencijalnih crta te da postojeće granice između dvaju ijekavskih bosanskohercegovačkih dijale- kata prisutne u literaturi treba uzeti s rezervom. 1. Govor Bošnjaka Srebrenice do sada nije istražen i ono što je napisano o tome, koliko je meni poznato, samo je rad o zamjeni dugog jata u tome go- voru, objavljen 2007. godine u časopisu Književni jezik.1 2. Govor Bošnjaka Srebrenice može biti zanimljiv s više aspekata. Je- dan od njih je pitanje zamjene dugog jata, drugi je njegova aktuelnost i pitanje vitalnosti ili opstanka, s obzirom na izvršeni genocid, raseljavanje i smanjen broj izvornih govornika, treći je pitanje njegove dijalekatske pripadnosti, a sve ih objedinjuje neistraženost ovoga govornog idioma. 1 V.: Bulić 2007. Dijelovi ovoga teksta koji se odnose na zamjenu dugog jata daju se na osno- vu navedenog rada. 9 Refik Bulić: Govor Bošnjaka Srebrenice 2.1. Dijalekatska slika bosanskohercegovačkog prostora po mnogim je odlikama veoma zanimljiva i značajna u izučavanju ukupnih dijalekatskih od- nosa u srednjojužnoslavenskom dijalekatskom mozaiku, pa i u širem slaven- skom prostoru. Jedna od tih zanimljivosti jeste i pojava tzv. miješanih refleksa jata, prvenstveno ekavsko-jekavskih, koji su u bosanskohercegovačkom ije- kavsko-ikavskom kompleksu neočekivani. Ekavska je zamjena dugog jata na području Bosne i Hercegovine terito- rijalno ograničena na zapadni periferni prostor ijekavskošćakavskog dijalekta oko Tešnja i Maglaja, potom na uski prostor Kladnja i Plahovića u njegovu predgrađu, a takva je zamjena jata potvrđena osamdesetih godina prošlog sto- ljeća i u govoru sarajevskih Bjelava i Rajševe kod Teslića. 2.2. Pretpostavljalo se da bi ekavsko-jekavski govor mogao biti zastu- pljen i u govoru Srebrenice. Slobodan Remetić je u svome radu O još jednom nezapaženom ekavsko-jekavskom bosanskom govoru, u kojemu piše o ekav- sko-jekavskom govoru Kladnja i Plahovića, napisao da podaci sa kojima on raspolaže “naprosto podrazumjevaju (!) situaciju sličnu plahovićkoj i u govoru bar jednog dijela srebreničkih Muslimana” (1981: 186). Eventualnu mogućnost javljanja ekavsko-jekavskih refleksa jata u go- voru Srebrenice, najvjerovatnije na osnovu spomenutog Remetićeva rada, a možda i na osnovu nekih vlastitih saznanja, iznio je i profesor Dževad Jahić u knjizi Jezik bosanskih Muslimana iz 1991. godine i u njenom ponovljenom iz- danju Bošnjački narod i njegov jezik iz 1999. godine. Govoreći u tim knjigama o ekavsko-jekavskom govoru Tešnja i Maglaja, on kaže da se isti takav govor javlja u oaznim područjima ijekavskošćakavskog dijalekta “(Kladanj, možda Srebrenica i stari sarajevski govor)” – (1991: 14; 1999: 16). U knjizi Bosanski jezik u 100 pitanja i 100 odgovora iz 1999. godine on kaže da je “tom tipu (ekavsko-jekavskom, nap. R. B.) možda pripadao i govor Srebrenice, koji je praktično zbrisan sa lica zemlje (i sa dijalektološke karte, također). Slučaj Sre- brenice u nauci bi pripadao kategoriji ‘nestalih govora’ ili ‘govornih atlantida’, koji će za sobom ipak ostaviti traga, u vidu nekih govornoizbjegličkih fra- gmenata, kao svjedoka uništenja govora formiranih vijekovima, koji nasilno iščezavaju na pragu XXI vijeka” (1999b: 78). Za razliku od eventualne mogućnosti javljanja ekavizma u govoru Sre- brenice, Jahić je u Gramatici bosanskog jezika, govoreći o ekavsko-jekavskim govorima iznio eksplicitan stav: “Isti takav refleks sačuvan je i u nekim juž- nijim govorima istočnobosanskoga dijalekta (u govoru Kladnja, Srebrenice i u starom sarajevskom govoru)” (Jahić – Halilović – Palić 2000: 41). 10 Sarajevski filološki susreti II: Zbornik radova (knj. 1) 2.3. Izneseni stavovi Dževada Jahića o “nestalim govorima i govornoj atlantidi” i različiti podaci o zamjeni jata u srebreničkom govoru te moguće novo pitanje o dijalekatskoj pripadnosti govora srebreničkih Bošnjaka dovo- ljan su poticaj za istraživanja u vezi ovim govorom i spašavanje “nestaloga govora”. Nije mi poznato da je neko do 1992. godine detaljnije istraživao govor Srebrenice kako bi se došlo do pouzdanih saznanja o zamjeni jata, ali je u Srebrenici, u čaršiji, popunjen Upitnik za ispitivanje bosansko-hercegovačkih govora. Srebrenica je bila označena kao punkt broj 73, a Upitnik je popunio prof. dr. Asim Peco u julu 1980. godine.2 Građa iz Upitnika za ispitivanje bosansko-hercegovačkih govora ne po- tvrđuje prisustvo ekavskih refleksajata u dugim slogovima u govoru Bošnjaka Srebrenice, a to ne potvrđuje ni moje terensko istraživanje. U govoru Bošnjaka Srebrenice potvrđeni su brojni primjeri dvosložnih i jednosložnih refleksa jata, ali nema primjera ekavske zamjene u dugim slo- govima.3 Očekivano je da su govori uz Drinu mogli imati izvjesnih utjecaja ekav- skoga izgovora s obzirom na moguće kontakte sa ekavskim standardom do kojih je moglo dolaziti zapošljavanjem u Srbiji ili drugim kontaktima, ali se u govoru Srebrenice takvi utjecaji ne mogu precjenjivati.4 Eventualno dose- ljavanje muslimanskog stanovništva iz srbijanskih gradova 1862. godine u Srebrenicu ne može se također uzeti kao ozbiljan argument koji bi mogao po- drazumijevati ekavske utjecaje, s obzirom na to da je u Srebrenicu, prema do- stupnim podacima, te godine doseljeno svega 55 osoba te da su bile s užičkog područja.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • At the Margins of the Habsburg Civilizing Mission 25
    i CEU Press Studies in the History of Medicine Volume XIII Series Editor:5 Marius Turda Published in the series: Svetla Baloutzova Demography and Nation Social Legislation and Population Policy in Bulgaria, 1918–1944 C Christian Promitzer · Sevasti Trubeta · Marius Turda, eds. Health, Hygiene and Eugenics in Southeastern Europe to 1945 C Francesco Cassata Building the New Man Eugenics, Racial Science and Genetics in Twentieth-Century Italy C Rachel E. Boaz In Search of “Aryan Blood” Serology in Interwar and National Socialist Germany C Richard Cleminson Catholicism, Race and Empire Eugenics in Portugal, 1900–1950 C Maria Zarimis Darwin’s Footprint Cultural Perspectives on Evolution in Greece (1880–1930s) C Tudor Georgescu The Eugenic Fortress The Transylvanian Saxon Experiment in Interwar Romania C Katherina Gardikas Landscapes of Disease Malaria in Modern Greece C Heike Karge · Friederike Kind-Kovács · Sara Bernasconi From the Midwife’s Bag to the Patient’s File Public Health in Eastern Europe C Gregory Sullivan Regenerating Japan Organicism, Modernism and National Destiny in Oka Asajirō’s Evolution and Human Life C Constantin Bărbulescu Physicians, Peasants, and Modern Medicine Imagining Rurality in Romania, 1860–1910 C Vassiliki Theodorou · Despina Karakatsani Strengthening Young Bodies, Building the Nation A Social History of Child Health and Welfare in Greece (1890–1940) C Making Muslim Women European Voluntary Associations, Gender and Islam in Post-Ottoman Bosnia and Yugoslavia (1878–1941) Fabio Giomi Central European University Press Budapest—New York iii © 2021 Fabio Giomi Published in 2021 by Central European University Press Nádor utca 9, H-1051 Budapest, Hungary Tel: +36-1-327-3138 or 327-3000 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ceupress.com An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched (KU).
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnian Muslim Reformists Between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina
    Empire, Nation, and the Islamic World: Bosnian Muslim Reformists between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Harun Buljina All rights reserved ABSTRACT Empire, Nation, and the Islamic World: Bosnian Muslim Reformists between the Habsburg and Ottoman Empires, 1901-1914 Harun Buljina This dissertation is a study of the early 20th-century Pan-Islamist reform movement in Bosnia-Herzegovina, tracing its origins and trans-imperial development with a focus on the years 1901-1914. Its central figure is the theologian and print entrepreneur Mehmed Džemaludin Čaušević (1870-1938), who returned to his Austro-Hungarian-occupied home province from extended studies in the Ottoman lands at the start of this period with an ambitious agenda of communal reform. Čaušević’s project centered on tying his native land and its Muslim inhabitants to the wider “Islamic World”—a novel geo-cultural construct he portrayed as a viable model for communal modernization. Over the subsequent decade, he and his followers founded a printing press, standardized the writing of Bosnian in a modified Arabic script, organized the country’s Ulema, and linked these initiatives together in a string of successful Arabic-script, Ulema-led, and theologically modernist print publications. By 1914, Čaušević’s supporters even brought him to a position of institutional power as Bosnia-Herzegovina’s Reis-ul-Ulema (A: raʾīs al-ʿulamāʾ), the country’s highest Islamic religious authority and a figure of regional influence between two empires.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Encode Bosnian Arabic Characters
    Proposal to encode Bosnian Arabic characters Denis Moyogo Jacquerye <[email protected]> 2019-10-03 1. Introduction The Arabic alphabet has been used to write Bosnian from the 15th to the mid 20th century. In the early 20th century Mehmed Džemaludin Čaušević extended the alphabet, adding several letters including two letters that are proposed for encoding: • ARABIC LETTER NOON WITH INVERTED SMALL V for nj [ɲ], • ARABIC LETTER HAH WITH INVERTED SMALL V BELOW for ć [tɕ]. Other additional letters, which are already encoded, were used in this orthography: ,[For c [ts ڄ ARABIC LETTER DYEH 0684 • ,[For č [tʃ چ ARABIC LETTER TCHEH 0686 • ,[was used for both dž [dʒ] and đ [dʑ ج 062C ARABIC LETTER JEEM • ,[For lj [ʎ ڵ 06B5 ARABIC LETTER LAM WITH SMALL V • ,[For [u ۆ 06C6 ARABIC LETTER OE • .[For [o ۉ 06C9 ARABIC LETTER KIRGHIZ YU • Čaušević’s alphabet was used in publications from 1908 until the 1940s. That alphabet is referred to by several names: arebica, harfovica, matufovica, matufovača, mektebica. According to Pjanić (2009), several periodicals used arebica: Tarik (1908-1911), Muallim (1910-1913), Misbah (1912-1913) and Jeni Sabah (1914); and also the last publication using Arebica was Seid Serdarević Fikh ʾulʿibādāt (1941). Those two letters are mentioned in descriptions of Bosnian Arebica such as Bourgeois (1913), Lehfeldt (2001), Gažáková (2014). In recent years, there has been interest in Čaušević’s orthography. Notably in works by Al-Zubi and Cicak-Al-Zubi, in the Šegrt Suljica comics published in the Bosnian children magazine Elif. The 062C ARABIC LETTER is used for dž [dʒ] and another letter represents đ [dʑ], for ج JEEM example Al-Zubi and Cicak-Al-Zubi use 0620 ARABIC LETTER AIN WITH and a letter ARABIC LETTER HAH WITH SMALL V ڠ THREE DOTS ABOVE BELOW, which could potentially be encoded if in use, can be found in some character charts.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Fragments Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian
    EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES AND SERBIAN, CROATIAN, SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN EIGHT FRAGMENTS LANGUAGES Pavel Krejčí PAVEL KREJČÍ PAVEL Masaryk University Brno 2018 EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES Selected South Slavonic Studies 1 Pavel Krejčí Masaryk University Brno 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this e-book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of copyright administrator which can be contacted at Masaryk University Press, Žerotínovo náměstí 9, 601 77 Brno. Scientific reviewers: Ass. Prof. Boryan Yanev, Ph.D. (Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”) Roman Madecki, Ph.D. (Masaryk University, Brno) This book was written at Masaryk University as part of the project “Slavistika mezi generacemi: doktorská dílna” number MUNI/A/0956/2017 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic in the year 2018. © 2018 Masarykova univerzita ISBN 978-80-210-8992-1 ISBN 978-80-210-8991-4 (paperback) CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 1 SOUTH SLAVONIC LANGUAGES (GENERAL OVERVIEW) ............................... 9 CHAPTER 2 SELECTED CZECH HANDBOOKS OF SERBO-CROATIAN
    [Show full text]
  • De Bella Alphabetica: L' “Ideologizzazione” Degli Alfabeti in Bulgaria E Croazia Nel Contesto Post-Imperiale E Post-Socialista
    Scuola Dottorale di Ateneo Graduate School Dottorato di ricerca in Lingue, Culture e Società moderne Ciclo XXVIII Anno di discussione 2017 DE BELLA ALPHABETICA: L' “IDEOLOGIZZAZIONE” DEGLI ALFABETI IN BULGARIA E CROAZIA NEL CONTESTO POST-IMPERIALE E POST-SOCIALISTA L-LIN 21: Slavistica Tesi di Dottorato di Giustina Selvelli, matricola 825187 Coordinatore del Dottorato Supervisore del Dottorando Prof. Alessandra Giorgi Prof. Aleksander Naumow INDICE 1. CAPITOLO INTRODUTTIVO 1.1 IL TEMA DELLA TESI 1 1.2 METODOLOGIA: LA CONSIDERAZIONE DI TESTUALITÀ DIVERSE 4 1.3 LA COLLOCAZIONE DELLA QUESTIONE IN CONTESTI MOLTEPLICI 6 1.4 IL PROBLEMA DEL CONTESTO IDEOLOGICO 9 1.5 IL LEGAME FRA SCRITTURA E MEMORIA 12 1.6 L'APPROCCIO SOCIOLINGUISTICO AI SISTEMI DI SCRITTURA 15 1.7 L'ALFABETO NELL'AUTORAPPRESENTAZIONE NAZIONALE 20 1.8 IL FATTORE “POST-IMPERIALE” NELLA QUESTIONE ALFABETICA 24 LE POLEMICHE ALFABETICHE DEGLI ANNI '20 E '30 IN BULGARIA: 2. LA VICENDA DELL'ABECEDAR (1925) FRA IDEOLOGIE ALFABETICHE E TENTATIVI DI ALFABETIZZAZIONE 2.1 QUESTIONI LEGATE ALL'ADOZIONE DI ALFABETI ALTERNATIVI 29 2.2 DINAMICHE IDENTITARIE NAZIONALI TARDO E POST-IMPERIALI 31 2.3 LA SITUAZIONE DELLA MACEDONIA EGEA 34 2.4 LA PUBBLICAZIONE DELL'ABECEDAR 40 2.5 LE OSSERVAZIONI E POLEMICHE SULLA LINGUA DELL'ABECEDAR 44 2.6 ALCUNE PARTICOLARITÀ E CURIOSITÀ RELATIVE ALLE LETTERE 47 2.7 IL “COINVOLGIMENTO” DI CIRILLO E METODIO 52 2.8 I GRECI IN BULGARIA E L'ALFABETO GRECO PER IL BULGARO 60 2.9 LE SORTI DELL'ABECEDAR DOPO IL 1925 65 3. LE RIPERCUSSIONI DEL CONTESTO INTERNAZIONALE DI “LATINIZZAZIONE” ALFABETICA SUI DIBATTITI IN BULGARIA 3.1 LE PROPOSTE DI RIFORMA ALFABETICA DEGLI ANNI '20 72 3.2 I TENTATIVI DI LATINIZZAZIONE IN UNIONE SOVIETICA 73 3.3 L'ALFABETO LATINO COME STRUMENTO “MODERNIZZATORE” NEI BALCANI 79 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Standards
    Creating Standards Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/17/19 6:48 PM Studies in Manuscript Cultures Edited by Michael Friedrich Harunaga Isaacson Jörg B. Quenzer Volume 16 Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/17/19 6:48 PM Creating Standards Interactions with Arabic Script in 12 Manuscript Cultures Edited by Dmitry Bondarev Alessandro Gori Lameen Souag Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/17/19 6:48 PM ISBN 978-3-11-063498-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-063906-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-063508-9 ISSN 2365-9696 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2019935659 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Dmitry Bondarev, Alessandro Gori, Lameen Souag, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Unauthenticated Download Date | 6/17/19 6:48 PM Contents The Editors Preface VII Transliteration of Arabic and some Arabic-based Script Graphemes used in this Volume (including Persian and Malay) IX Dmitry Bondarev Introduction: Orthographic Polyphony in Arabic Script 1 Paola Orsatti Persian Language in Arabic Script: The Formation of the Orthographic Standard and the Different Graphic Traditions of Iran in the First Centuries of
    [Show full text]
  • To Sociolinguistic Commentary
    INDEX to Sociolinguistic commentary Accentual systems Bulgaria 380-381 of čakavian and kajkavian 388 Bulgarian 387, 394 Adelung, Johann Christoph 382 Byzantine empire 380 Albanian 387 Alexander (King of Yugoslavia) 412 Catholic church 381, 383, 395, 404-405 Alphabets 380-381 and Croatian identity 401, 408 “arebica” 381 and Latin alphabet 401 “bosančica” 381 Committee for Standardization of Serbian Cyrillic 381, 419 alphabet decisions 402 Glagolitic 380-381 founding of 420 Latin 381, 419 pronunciation decisions 402 Andrić, Ivo 391, 407 response to “Slovo o srpskom jeziku” 420 Arabic 407 Constantine-Cyril 380 Aramaic 380 Constitution, 1974 (Yugoslav) 385-386, 408, Austria-Hungary 415, 418, 422 see also Habsburg empire Crnjanski, Miloš 418 and Bosnia-Herzegovina 405-406, 408 Croatian Croatia part of 384, 410 see also Declaration of Croats Vuk suspected spy for 383 alphabet use in 381, 402 avoidance of da in general 395 BCS and Catholic church 381, 395, 401, 408 defined 379, 426 characteristic vocabulary 402-403, 411, grammar of 424-425 choice of štokavian over kajkavian 384, 389- štokavian base 388 390 Belić, Aleksandar 412 Croatian Spring 385, 414 Bogomils 404 and čakavian 388, 410 Boris of Bulgaria 380-381 early grammars of 410 bosančica 381 and ijekavian 392, 411 Bosnian 404-409 and ikavian 391, 393, 411 alphabet use in 381 and kajkavian 388, 412 Bosniak 404, 408-409, 425-426 koriensko orthography 413, 415 character of 386 new Croatian 415 characteristic vocabulary 407 official state language 379, 387, 413 and ijekavian 392 preference for infinitive over da + present and ikavian 391, 393 394-395, 399-400 and Islam 407-408 preference for native vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Reformism and Revivalism in Inter-War Bosnia-Herzegovina Xavier Bougarel
    Farewell to the Ottoman Legacy? Islamic Reformism and Revivalism in Inter-War Bosnia-Herzegovina Xavier Bougarel To cite this version: Xavier Bougarel. Farewell to the Ottoman Legacy? Islamic Reformism and Revivalism in Inter-War Bosnia-Herzegovina. Nathalie Clayer / Eric Germain. Islam in Inter-War Europe, Hurst, pp.313-343, 2008. halshs-00706274 HAL Id: halshs-00706274 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00706274 Submitted on 9 Jun 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 « Farewell to the Ottoman Legacy? Islamic Reformism and Revivalism in Inter-War Bosnia-Herzegovina », in: Nathalie CLAYER / Eric GERMAIN, Islam in Inter-War Europe, London: Hurst, 2008, pp. 313- 343 Xavier Bougarel Many works dealing with the history of the Bosnian Muslim community tend to present the late Ottoman period (1804-1878), the Austro-Hungarian period (1878-1918) and the early Communist period (1945-1953) as a clash between conservative local elites and modernising external actors. Such an approach to Bosnian history can be misleading, due to the categories on which it is based (“tradition” versus “modernity”) and the role it attributes to internal and external actors. As far as the inter-war period (1918-1941) is concerned, it plays a secondary part in this approach, and is mainly dealt with by historians interested in the inter-ethnic tensions which contributed to the collapse of the first Yugoslav state in 1941.1 Bosnian society, however, experienced deep transformations within the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, renamed the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1929.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language Policy of the International Community in Bosnia-Herzegovina Since 1995
    CLINGING TO A BARBED WIRE FENCE: THE LANGUAGE POLICY OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA SINCE 1995 LOUISE ASKEW, BA (Hons), MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2011 1 ABSTRACT This study takes one aspect of the post-conflict peace-building process in Bosnia-Herzegovina since 1995 - the recognition of three official but mutually comprehensible languages - and examines the way in which the international community's approach to it has impacted on broader peace­ building goals for the country. The originality of this thesis lies in the fact that it views post-conflict peace-building in Bosnia-Herzegovina through the lens of the language issue. Taking the Dayton Peace Agreement (1995) as the starting point I look at the way in which its provisions have largely dictated the international community's approach to the language issue and created the political environment in which language operates. Further, applying the concept of societal security I explain how the language issue is used by domestic elites to frustrate attempts at reconciliation by the international community; I argue that the international community's approach, based on the equality of the three languages, only feeds into the divisive ethnic politics of present-day Bosnia-Herzegovina and ultimately undermines the security and stability of the country. I also look in detail at two very different but complimentary areas of ongoing post-conflict reform in Bosnia-Herzegovina and analyse the international community's approach to language in each: refonn of the education system and defence reform.
    [Show full text]
  • It Is Customary for Bosnians to Refer to Bosnia and Hercegovina Collectively As Bosnia
    Is there/will there be a “Bosnian” language? Aspects of the Language Question in Post-War Bosnia By Geoff Husic One may be hard pressed to select a topic that is likely to provoke more emotional responses among the people of the Balkans than language, the obvious contender, of course, being religion. The reason for such ardent reactions to language and religion is that they are at the core of the identity of the majority of the people of the Balkans and are the characteristics that accentuate the differences between a specific group and their varied but often closely related neighbors. In other words it is these two characteristics which to a great degree determine the “ethnicity” of the various Balkan peoples, or more specifically for the purposes of this paper, the Serbo-Croatian (SC) speaking nationalities of Bosnia12, namely the Muslims, Serbs, and Croats . It is axiomatic that the importance of language is rarely limited to purely linguistic concerns. Far from being only a means of communication, language often reflects social, cultural, and political realities. This has certainly been the case in the past and continues to be the case in the present in the former Yugoslavia. In this paper I will examine how language issues have been intimately intertwined with the issues of ethnicity and nationalism in the SC speaking lands of former Yugoslavia in general and in Bosnia specifically, and how these issues are playing out after the breakup of Yugoslavia. Historical Background Before we can delve into the intricacies of the Yugoslav and Bosnian language issues, we must first review some of the history of the region in question, the Balkan Peninsula, and the 1It is customary for Bosnians to refer to Bosnia and Hercegovina collectively as Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pristup Cjelovitom Tekstu Rada
    Ana Ostroški Anić Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje Ulica Republike Austrije 16, HR-10000 Zagreb [email protected] ENGLESKE ISTOVRIJEDNICE U JENI 225 1. Uvod Velik dio normiranja nazivlja kojega strukovnog područja čini uspostavljanje odnosa između postojećih istoznačnica i nalaženje odgovarajućih naziva na domaćemu jeziku koji mogu zamijeniti neodgovarajuće internacionalizme ili tuđice preuzete iz drugih jezika, posebice engleskoga kao dominantnoga svjetskog jezika profesionalne komunikacije. Premda je terminološki rad koji se primjenjuje u bazi Struna pojmovno usmjeren (ISO 704:2009), tj. cilj mu je izgradnja pojmovnoga sustava i definiranje pojmovnih odnosa u svakome nazivlju, to nikako ne znači da se u tome procesu određuju samo nazivi jednoga jezika. Dapače, jednojezični terminološki rad tada ne bi imao puno smisla niti bi bio moguć jer svako određivanje naziva na jednome jeziku nužno uključuje usporedbu tih naziva s nazivima drugoga jezika, osobito kad je riječ o tvorbi naziva za nove pojmove za koje pokušavamo pronaći istovrijednice u hrvatskome jeziku. Naziv na stranome jeziku često je polazište u definiranju pojma i uspostavljanju odnosa hrvatskih naziva i njihovih istovrijednica na drugim jezicima (Bratanić i Ostroški Anić 2015.). U svakoj su terminološkoj bazi stoga nazivi na stranome jeziku neizostavna sastavnica zato što korisnici i pretražuju terminološke baze najčešće upravo radi nalaženja prijevoda naziva na koji strani jezik ili s njega. U Struni je engleski naziv obvezna kategorija terminološke natuknice, dok su nazivi na drugim stranim jezicima neobvezni, ali poželjni. S obzirom na sveprisutnost engleskoga jezika u međunarodnoj znanstvenoj i stručnoj komunikaciji, manje su česte poteškoće u nalaženju odgovarajućih engleskih naziva za definirane pojmove nego što je određivanje hrvatskih istovrijednica novih pojmova koji se pojave u struci i koji se obično prvo imenuju engleskim nazivima.
    [Show full text]
  • Aljamiado and Oriental1 Literature in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1463-1878)
    Sabina Dizdarevič: ALJAMIADO AND ORIENTAL1 LITERATURE IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (1463-1878) »Jedna od važnijih značajki nacionalnog bića jednog naroda jest njegov jezik.« »One of the most important characteristics of nation's nationality is its language.« Muhamed Huković Aljamiado literature is a regional and national phenomena. The texts are manuscripts which utilize the Arabic or Hebrew alphabets for transcribing the vernacular language of the nation where it appeared. And it appeared among peoples who lived under Arabian or Turkish reign for long periods of time. Under that influence it was spread in Europe from the Iberian peninsula to Haemos2. It also appears among Chinese muslims and muslims in former Dutch colonies, but it is more frequent in Europe as in Albanian, Spanish, Bosnian and Bolgarian literature. Aljamiado is a literar phenomena with special aestetic, ethic and ideal characteristics. Adjusted Arabic alphabet for transcribing Slavic texts is called arebica or arabica, in which most works were written in the 17th, 18th and 19th century. It is important to mention that aljamiado literature and it's evolution in Bosnia and Herzegovina didn't end in 1878 with the ocupation by the Austro-Hungarian empire. It became more intensive after reformation of the alphabet by Mehmed Đemaludin Čaušević and the expansion of printing. Arebica dissapeared from usage when lingustic, cultural, sociologic, political and religious circumstances, which caused its appearance, dissapeared. Codex is a set of manuscripts containing texts in german, hungarian and latin written in arebica. In that certain codex the first bosnian arebic poem Hirvat türkisi by Mehmed Erdeljac3 was brought out.
    [Show full text]