DOCSLIB.ORG

Task Force 165 Military Intelligence Battalion – Building a Capability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Task Force 165 Military Intelligence Battalion – Building a Capability No. 65 SEPTEMBER 2007 Task Force 165 Military Intelligence Battalion – Building a Capability F. Patrick Filbert Task Force 165 Military Intelligence Battalion — Building a Capability by F. Patrick Filbert The Institute of Land Warfare ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY 26 AN AUSA INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE PAPER S2X Staff Counterintelligence TAREX Target Exploitation and HUMINT Element The purpose of the Institute of Land Warfare is to extend the educational work of AUSA by TE Tactical Exploitation SBE Stay-Behind Equipment sponsoring scholarly publications, to include books, monographs and essays on key defense TES/DTES Tactical Exploitation issues, as well as workshops and symposia. A work selected for publication as a Land Warfare SCI Sensitive Compartmented System/Deployable Paper represents research by the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, will contrib- Information Tactical Exploitation ute to a better understanding of a particular defense or national security issue. Publication as an System SETAF Southern European Institute of Land Warfare Paper does not indicate that the Association of the United States Task Force TF Task Force Army agrees with everything in the paper, but does suggest that the Association believes the paper will stimulate the thinking of AUSA members and others concerned about important SFOR Stabilization Force TFCICA Task Force Counter- defense issues. intelligence Control SIGACT Significant Activity Authority Land Warfare Paper No. 65, September 2007 SIGINT Signals Intelligence THT Tactical HUMINT Team Task Force 165 Military Intelligence Battalion – SIM Automated Systems Inte- TM Team Building a Capability gration Management Trojan Spirit-Lite Intelligence comunica- SIPR Secret Internet Protocol by F. Patrick Filbert tions network; not an Router acronym Major Frederic Patrick “Pat” Filbert, U.S. Army, was the Intelligence Plans Section Chief for S-JISE Secret Joint Intelligence TS-L Trojan Spirit-Lite the United States Army, Europe (USAREUR) G2 (Intelligence) and was the lead USAREUR Support Element; Intelligence Planner for the Operation Enduring Freedom 2004–2006 Intelligence Battlefield name used for the TTPs Tactics, Techniques and Secret Internet Proto- Procedures Operating System (IBOS) sourcing and Task Force 165 effort. col file server used in TUAV Tactical Unmanned Commissioned an Armor Officer and force-aligned to the Military Intelligence Corps, he received CJ2 Joint Intelligence Support Element Aerial Vehicle a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from the University of Hawaii-Manoa, is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, and the Army SOMDB Source Operations Man- U2 Type of intelligence- gathering aircraft Force Management School at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. He is currently enrolled in the American agement Database Military University for a Master’s in Intelligence. He has served in various command and staff SPARC Scalable Processor UCMJ Uniform Code of Military positions in the continental United States, Bosnia, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Korea and Germany. Architecture (Sun Justice Micro Systems Sun UIC Unit Identification Code Major Filbert is currently assigned to the Joint Unmanned Aircraft Systems Center of Excellence, SPARC computer) Creech Air Force Base, Nevada. USAREUR United States Army, Steamroller Name of a U.S. signals Europe intelligence collection system; not an VoIP Voice Over Internet This paper represents the opinions of the author and should not be taken to represent acronym Protocol the views of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, the United States government, the Institute of Land Warfare, or the Association of the United StoneGhost Name of a U.S./United VTC Video Teleconference States Army or its members. Kingdom bilateral top- secret network; not an WebTAS Web-enabled Timeline Analysis System © Copyright 2007 by acronym The Association of the United States Army SWO Staff Weather Office WNDAA Example of a Unit All rights reserved. Identification Code; SYSCON System Control not an acronym Inquiries regarding this and future Land Warfare Papers should be directed to: Direc- TACLANE Tactical Local Area Network Encryptor tor, ILW Programs, AUSA’s Institute of Land Warfare, e-mail [email protected] or telephone: (direct dial) 703-907-2627 or (toll free) 1-800-336-4570, ext. 226. TACSAT Tactical Satellite ii 25 LEP Law Enforcement NS Non-Specific Contents Personnel NTV Non-Tactical Vehicle LRS Long-Range Foreword ....................................................................................................................... v Surveillance NVG Night Vision Goggles OEF Operation Enduring Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 LRSD Long-Range Surveil- Freedom lance Detachment The Problem ................................................................................................................... 1 OIF Operation Iraqi Freedom M3 Multimedia Message Manager (automated OMT Operational Maneuver Truncated Planning .......................................................................................................... 3 message processing Team services) Unit Structure Building .................................................................................................... 6 ONS Operational Needs MA Mission Analysis Statement TF 165 MI Augmentation ............................................................................................... 6 MASINT Measurement and Ops Operations Signature Intelligence Finding Equipment ........................................................................................................ 11 OPTEMPO Operational Tempo MBITR MultiBand Inter/Intra Team Radio OSINT Open Source Intelligence Training the Force ......................................................................................................... 16 P3C-AIP MCS Maneuver Control P3C-AIP U.S. Navy Reconnais- Deployment Challenges ................................................................................................. 16 System sance Aircraft (P-3C/ ORION) with Anti- MDMP Military Decision Surface Warfare Lessons Observed and Learned .................................................................................... 18 Making Process Improvement Program Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 19 MI Military Intelligence PAX Personnel MICO MI Company PM Project Manager Endnotes ...................................................................................................................... 20 MIDB Modernized Intelligence Predator A type of unmanned Glossary ....................................................................................................................... 21 Database aerial vehicle MOS Military Occupational Prophet Battlefield Electronic Specialty Surveillance System MSC Major Subordinate PROV Provisional Command PRT-ISC Provisional Reconstruc- MTOE Modified Table of tion Team-Intelligence Organization and Support Cell Equipment PTOE Provisional Table of Organization and NARCR Narcotics Report Equipment NGA National Geospatial- Raven A type of unmanned Intelligence Agency aerial vehicle NIMA National Imagery and NIMA REMBASS Remotely Monitored Mapping Agency (old Battlefield Sensor name for NGA) System NIPRNET Non-classified Internet RWS Remote Workstation Protocol Router Network S2 Staff-level Intelligence 24 iii GSS Ground Surveillance IN Infantry System INSCOM (U.S. Army) Intelligence Guardrail Airborne SIGINT collec- and Security tion and precision tar- Command geting location system; not an acronym INTELEX Intelligence Exercise HAC HUMINT Analysis Cell IPL Integrated Priority List HARC HUMINT Analysis IPS Intelligence Processing Reporting Cell Section HDS/HDWS Human Domain IPW Interrogation of Prisoner Workstation of War HHSC Headquarters and ITRT Individual Tactical Headquarters Service Reporting Tool Company J2 Joint-level Intelligence HOC HUMINT Operations J2X Joint-level Staff Counter- Center intelligence and HQDA Headquarters, Depart- HUMINT Element ment of the Army JDISS JWICS Deployable Intel- HUMINT Human Intelligence ligence Support System I3-ISDS Integrated Imagery and Intelligence-Intelligence JIF Joint Interrogation Support Database Facility System (the GCCS-I3 JISE Joint Intelligence database) Support Element IA Individual Augmentation JMD Joint Manning Document IBOS Intelligence Battlefield JMICS JWICS Mobile Intelli- Operating System gence Communica- ID Infantry Division tions System IDC Information Dominance JMICS/C JWICS Mobile Intelli- Center gence Communica- tions System/ IDC-E Information Dominance Containerized Center-Extension JSTARS Joint Surveillance Target ILO In Lieu Of Acquisition and Recon- naissance System IMETS-L Integrated Meteorolog- ical and Environmental JTF Joint Task Force Terrain System-Lite JWICS Joint Worldwide IMINT Imagery Intelligence Intelligence Commu- nications System IM/IT Information Manage- ment/Information KFOR Kosovo Peace Technology Stabilization Force iv 23 CJ2 Combined/Joint IBOS DS Direct Support Foreword Staff DTSS Digital Topographic In early 2004, United States Army, Europe (USAREUR) was tasked to furnish a division- CJ2X Combined/Joint-level Support System Counterintelligence level Military Intelligence (MI) battalion/task force to provide intelligence support and and HUMINT Element DUIC Derivative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law and Military Operations in Kosovo: 1999-2001, Lessons Learned For
    LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS IN KOSOVO: 1999-2001 LESSONS LEARNED FOR JUDGE ADVOCATES Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) The Judge Advocate General’s School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia CENTER FOR LAW AND MILITARY OPERATIONS (CLAMO) Director COL David E. Graham Deputy Director LTC Stuart W. Risch Director, Domestic Operational Law (vacant) Director, Training & Support CPT Alton L. (Larry) Gwaltney, III Marine Representative Maj Cody M. Weston, USMC Advanced Operational Law Studies Fellows MAJ Keith E. Puls MAJ Daniel G. Jordan Automation Technician Mr. Ben R. Morgan Training Centers LTC Richard M. Whitaker Battle Command Training Program LTC James W. Herring Battle Command Training Program MAJ Phillip W. Jussell Battle Command Training Program CPT Michael L. Roberts Combat Maneuver Training Center MAJ Michael P. Ryan Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Peter R. Hayden Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Mark D. Matthews Joint Readiness Training Center SFC Michael A. Pascua Joint Readiness Training Center CPT Jonathan Howard National Training Center CPT Charles J. Kovats National Training Center Contact the Center The Center’s mission is to examine legal issues that arise during all phases of military operations and to devise training and resource strategies for addressing those issues. It seeks to fulfill this mission in five ways. First, it is the central repository within The Judge Advocate General's Corps for all-source data, information, memoranda, after-action materials and lessons learned pertaining to legal support to operations, foreign and domestic. Second, it supports judge advocates by analyzing all data and information, developing lessons learned across all military legal disciplines, and by disseminating these lessons learned and other operational information to the Army, Marine Corps, and Joint communities through publications, instruction, training, and databases accessible to operational forces, world-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afghanistan-Pakistan Wars, 2008–2009: Micro-Geographies, Conflict Diffusion, and Clusters of Violence
    The Afghanistan-Pakistan Wars, 2008–2009: Micro-geographies, Conflict Diffusion, and Clusters of Violence John O’Loughlin, Frank D. W. Witmer, and Andrew M. Linke1 Abstract: A team of political geographers analyzes over 5,000 violent events collected from media reports for the Afghanistan and Pakistan conflicts during 2008 and 2009. The violent events are geocoded to precise locations and the authors employ an exploratory spatial data analysis approach to examine the recent dynamics of the wars. By mapping the violence and examining its temporal dimensions, the authors explain its diffusion from traditional foci along the border between the two countries. While violence is still overwhelmingly concentrated in the Pashtun regions in both countries, recent policy shifts by the American and Pakistani gov- ernments in the conduct of the war are reflected in a sizeable increase in overall violence and its geographic spread to key cities. The authors identify and map the clusters (hotspots) of con- flict where the violence is significantly higher than expected and examine their shifts over the two-year period. Special attention is paid to the targeting strategy of drone missile strikes and the increase in their number and geographic extent by the Obama administration. Journal of Economic Literature, Classification Numbers: H560, H770, O180. 15 figures, 1 table, 113 ref- erences. Key words: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taliban, ­­Al- Qaeda, insurgency, Islamic terrorism, U.S. military, International Security Assistance Forces, Durand Line, Tribal Areas, Northwest Frontier Province, ACLED, NATO. merica’s “longest war” is now (August 2010) nearing its ninth anniversary. It was Alaunched in October 2001 as a “war of necessity” (Barack Obama, August 17, 2009) to remove the Taliban from power in Afghanistan, and thus remove the support of this regime for Al-Qaeda, the terrorist organization that carried out the September 2001 attacks in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Press January 2017 Blythe
    Pfc. Brandie Leon, 4th Infantry Division, holds security while on patrol in a local neighborhood to help maintain peace after recent attacks on mosques in the area, East Baghdad, Iraq, 3 March 2006. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Jason Ragucci, U.S. Army) III Corps during the Surge: A Study in Operational Art Maj. Wilson C. Blythe Jr., U.S. Army he role of Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno’s III (MNF–I) while using tactical actions within Iraq in an Corps as Multinational Corps–Iraq (MNC–I) illustrative manner. As a result, the campaign waged by has failed to receive sufficient attention from III Corps, the operational headquarters, is overlooked Tstudies of the 2007 surge in Iraq. By far the most in this key work. comprehensive account of the 2007–2008 campaign The III Corps campaign is also neglected in other is found in Michael Gordon and Lt. Gen. Bernard prominent works on the topic. In The Gamble: General Trainor’s The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama, which fo- 2006-2008, Thomas Ricks emphasizes the same levels cuses on the formulation and execution of strategy and as Gordon and Trainor. However, while Ricks plac- policy.1 It frequently moves between Washington D.C., es a greater emphasis on the role of III Corps than is U.S Central Command, and Multinational Force–Iraq found in other accounts, he fails to offer a thorough 2 13 January 2017 Army Press Online Journal 17-1 III Corps during the Surge examination of the operational campaign waged by III creating room for political progress such as the February 2 Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters
    Joint Publication 3-33 Joint Task Force Headquarters 30 July 2012 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for the formation and employment of a joint task force (JTF) headquarters to command and control joint operations. It provides guidance on the JTF headquarters’ role in planning, preparing, executing, and assessing JTF operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for US military coordination with other US Government departments and agencies during operations and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE-SCARRED and DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP in the MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial
    BATTLE-SCARRED AND DIRTY: US ARMY TACTICAL LEADERSHIP IN THE MEDITERRANEAN THEATER, 1942-1943 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Steven Thomas Barry Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Allan R. Millett, Adviser Dr. John F. Guilmartin Dr. John L. Brooke Copyright by Steven T. Barry 2011 Abstract Throughout the North African and Sicilian campaigns of World War II, the battalion leadership exercised by United States regular army officers provided the essential component that contributed to battlefield success and combat effectiveness despite deficiencies in equipment, organization, mobilization, and inadequate operational leadership. Essentially, without the regular army battalion leaders, US units could not have functioned tactically early in the war. For both Operations TORCH and HUSKY, the US Army did not possess the leadership or staffs at the corps level to consistently coordinate combined arms maneuver with air and sea power. The battalion leadership brought discipline, maturity, experience, and the ability to translate common operational guidance into tactical reality. Many US officers shared the same ―Old Army‖ skill sets in their early career. Across the Army in the 1930s, these officers developed familiarity with the systems and doctrine that would prove crucial in the combined arms operations of the Second World War. The battalion tactical leadership overcame lackluster operational and strategic guidance and other significant handicaps to execute the first Mediterranean Theater of Operations campaigns. Three sets of factors shaped this pivotal group of men. First, all of these officers were shaped by pre-war experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Muslim Male Interpreters and Translators
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses CAHSS Theses and Dissertations and Dissertations 1-1-2015 Afghan Muslim Male Interpreters and Translators: An Examination of Their deI ntity Changes and Lived Experiences During Pre and Post- Immigration to the United States During the Afghanistan War (2003-2012) Michael Tyrone Solomon Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] This document is a product of extensive research conducted at the Nova Southeastern University College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences. For more information on research and degree programs at the NSU College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, please click here. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd Part of the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Michael Tyrone Solomon. 2015. Afghan Muslim Male Interpreters and Translators: An Examination of Their Identity Changes and Lived Experiences During Pre and Post-Immigration to the United States During the Afghanistan War (2003-2012). Doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences – Department of Conflict Resolution Studies. (31) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/shss_dcar_etd/31. This Dissertation is brought to you by the CAHSS Theses and Dissertations at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Department of Conflict Resolution Studies Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AFGHAN MUSLIM MALE INTERPRETERS AND TRANSLATORS: AN EXAMINATION OF THEIR IDENTITY CHANGES AND LIVED EXPERIENCES DURING PRE- AND POST- IMMIGRATION TO THE UNITED STATES DURING THE AFGHANISTAN WAR (2003– 2012) by Michael T.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Remittance Overview and Trends Annex to Afghanistan Migration Profile
    Afghanistan Remittance Overview and Trends Annex to Afghanistan Migration Profile AFGHANISTAN REMITTANCE OVERVIEW AND TRENDS ANNEX TO AFGHANISTAN MIGRATION PROFILE Prepared for the International Organization for Migration (IOM) by Michaella Vanore Katrin Marchand CONTENTS List of Tables ...................................................................................6 List of Figures .................................................................................6 Acronyms .......................................................................................7 Foreword ........................................................................................9 Executive Summary ......................................................................11 1. Introduction .............................................................................19 2. Current Knowledge and Remittance Trends ..............................21 2.1. Measuring Remittances: Methodological Challenges ......................21 2.2. Remittances in Afghanistan: Current State of Knowledge ................25 2.2.1. Remittance Flows: Balance of Payment Statistics ....................25 2.2.2. Remittance Flows: Household Surveys .................................... 28 2.2.3. Remittance Flows: Case Studies ...............................................33 3. Remittance Infrastructure and Management Frameworks ........39 3.1. Remittance Channels ....................................................................... 39 3.1.1. Banks and Microfinance Institutions .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (Excerpt)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified December 16, 1982 East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt) Citation: “East German Ministry of State Security, 'US and NATO Military Planning on Mission of V Corps/US Army During Crises and in Wartime,' (excerpt),” December 16, 1982, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, BStU, Berlin, ZA, HVA, 19, pp. 126-359. Translated from German by Bernd Schaefer; available in original language at the Parallel History Project. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/112680 Summary: The Stasi's own preface to the V Corps/U.S. Army 1981 war plan (which recognizes that NATO's concept was defensive in nature in contrast to Warsaw Pact plans, which until 1987 indeed envisioned the mentioned "breakthrough towards the Rhine") Original Language: German Contents: English Translation MINISTRY FOR STATE SECURITY Top Secret! Berlin, 16. Dec 1982 Only for personal use! Nr. 626/82 Return is requested! Expl. 5. Bl. MY Information about Military planning of the USA and NATO for the operation of the V. Army Corps/USA in times of tension and in war Part 1 Preliminary Remarks Through reliable intelligence we received portions of the US and NATO military crisis and wartime planning for the deployment of the V Corps/USA stationed in the FRG. This intelligence concerns the secret Operations Plan 33001 (GDP – General Defense Plan) for the V Corps/USA in Europe. The plan is endorsed by the US Department of the Army and, after consultation with NATO, became part of NATO planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Style Attacks and the Threat from Lashkar-E-Taiba
    PROTECTING THE HOMELAND AGAINST MUMBAI- STYLE ATTACKS AND THE THREAT FROM LASHKAR-E-TAIBA HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 12, 2013 Serial No. 113–21 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 85–686 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas, Chairman LAMAR SMITH, Texas BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi PETER T. KING, New York LORETTA SANCHEZ, California MIKE ROGERS, Alabama SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan, Vice Chair BRIAN HIGGINS, New York PATRICK MEEHAN, Pennsylvania CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina WILLIAM R. KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania RON BARBER, Arizona JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah DONDALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi BETO O’ROURKE, Texas LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii CHRIS STEWART, Utah FILEMON VELA, Texas RICHARD HUDSON, North Carolina STEVEN A. HORSFORD, Nevada STEVE DAINES, Montana ERIC SWALWELL, California SUSAN W. BROOKS, Indiana SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania MARK SANFORD, South Carolina GREG HILL, Chief of Staff MICHAEL GEFFROY, Deputy Chief of Staff/Chief Counsel MICHAEL S. TWINCHEK, Chief Clerk I. LANIER AVANT, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON COUNTERTERRORISM AND INTELLIGENCE PETER T.
    [Show full text]
  • Requests Report
    Received Request ID Requester Name Organization Closed Date Request Description Date 12-F-0001 Vahter, Tarmo Eesti Ajalehed AS 10/3/2011 3/19/2012 All U.S. Department of Defense documents about the meeting between Estonian president Arnold Ruutel (Ruutel) and Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney on July 19, 1991. 12-F-0002 Jeung, Michelle - 10/3/2011 - Copies of correspondence from Congresswoman Shelley Berkley and/or her office from January 1, 1999 to the present. 12-F-0003 Lemmer, Thomas McKenna Long & Aldridge 10/3/2011 11/22/2011 Records relating to the regulatory history of the following provisions of the Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the former Defense Acquisition Regulation (DAR), and the former Armed Services Procurement Regulation (ASPR). 12-F-0004 Tambini, Peter Weitz Luxenberg Law 10/3/2011 12/12/2011 Documents relating to the purchase, delivery, testing, sampling, installation, Office maintenance, repair, abatement, conversion, demolition, removal of asbestos containing materials and/or equipment incorporating asbestos-containing parts within its in the Pentagon. 12-F-0005 Ravnitzky, Michael - 10/3/2011 2/9/2012 Copy of the contract statement of work, and the final report and presentation from Contract MDA9720110005 awarded to the University of New Mexico. I would prefer to receive these documents electronically if possible. 12-F-0006 Claybrook, Rick Crowell & Moring LLP 10/3/2011 12/29/2011 All interagency or other agreements with effect to use USA Staffing for human resources management. 12-F-0007 Leopold, Jason Truthout 10/4/2011 - All documents revolving around the decision that was made to administer the anti- malarial drug MEFLOQUINE (aka LARIAM) to all war on terror detainees held at the Guantanamo Bay prison facility as stated in the January 23, 2002, Infection Control Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Defense Task Force Report 2020 Cover Photo Credit: NASA Future of Defense Task Force
    draft Future of Defense Task Force Report 2020 Cover photo credit: NASA Future of Defense Task Force FUTURE OF DEFENSE TASK FORCE September 23, 2020 The Honorable Adam Smith Chairman House Armed Services Committee 2216 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 The Honorable William “Mac” Thornberry Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee 2216 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Smith and Ranking Member Thornberry: Thank you for your support in standing up the Future of Defense Task Force. We are pleased to present you with our final report. Sincerely, Seth Moulton Jim Banks Chair Chair Future of Defense Task Force Future of Defense Task Force Susan Davis Scott DesJarlais Member of Congress Member of Congress Chrissy Houlahan Paul Mitchell Member of Congress Member of Congress Elissa Slotkin Michael Waltz Member of Congress Member of Congress Future of Defense Task Force Table of Contents PROLOGUE ............................................................................................... 1 TASK FORCE MEMBERS ........................................................................ 3 FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................... 13 EVIDENCE .............................................................................................. 21 EMERGING
    [Show full text]
  • DIVS Unit 3: Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions
    Unit 3: Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions STUDENT GUIDE Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: • Describe the role and responsibilities of the Strike Team Leader and Task Force Leader • Describe the difference between a Strike Team and a Task Force • Explain the purpose of using a Strike Team or Task Force as it relates to managing resources • Explain what information the Strike Team Leader and Task Force Leader provide the Division/Group Supervisor Methodology This unit uses lecture, exercise, and discussion. Content from the Unit 3 will be tested during the Final Exam. Instructors will evaluate students’ initial understanding of the Operations Section through the facilitation of Exercise 2. The purpose of Exercise 2 is to illustrate that the Division/Group Supervisor must become a manager of multiple resources; the Supervisor must make a transition from a doer to a manager. By having groups of students compare and contrast the positions of Division/Group Supervisor, Strike Team/Task Force Leader, Incident Commander, and Operations Section Chief/Branch Director, the purpose of this exercise should be fulfilled. Page 3-2 Course E-960: Division/Group Supervisor —Student Guide May 2012 Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Time Plan A suggested time plan for this unit is shown below. More or less time may be required, based on the experience level of the group. Topic Time Lesson 30 minutes Exercise 2 30 minutes Total Time 1 hour May 2012 Course E-960: Division/Group Supervisor —Student Guide Page 3-3 Unit 3 Overview of the Strike Team and Task Force Leader Positions Topic Unit Title Slide Key Points Scope Statement Through this unit, students will gain a general understanding of the roles and responsibilities of Strike Team Leaders and Task Force Leaders.
    [Show full text]