<<

BAKER INSTITUTE STUDY

PUBLISHED BY THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF UNIVERSITY

NO. 7 JUNE 1998

IRAN AND ITS STRATEGIC ROLE IN THE PERSIAN Policy Options for the United States

On April 2, 1998, the Baker Institute held as the protest against the incarceration of the secularly a seminar on “ and Its Strategic Role oriented Tehran mayor Gholamhossein Karbaschi, in the Persian Gulf and Caspian Basin.” The reflect the potentially irreversible dynamics of change following report draws on the discussion among five panelists—, special in Iranian society. assistant to the president and senior But it would be a mistake to view this process as director for and South Asian beginning with the election of Mohammed Khatami. affairs, National Security Council; Chris Rather, the shift toward nationalism and economic Kojm, International Relations Committee, reconstruction and away from Pan-Islamism and theo- United States House of Representatives; cratic priorities as the unifying force of Iranian society Joseph LeBaron, deputy director for Northern Gulf Affairs, U.S. Department of began in the late 1980s with the death of Khomeini State; Dr. Hooshang Amirahmadi, professor, and the end of the eight-year war with . Under a Bloustein School of Public Policy, Rutgers platform initiated by then President Hashemi Raf- University, and president, American–Iranian sanjani, Iran began inching toward a more pragmatic Council, Inc.; Dr. R. K. Ramazani, professor, foreign policy that continues today. Khatami’s election University of Virginia; and Mr. Vahan is a continuation and expansion of this process. Zanoyan, president, the Finance Co. The report also contains excerpts from a speech by Stuart Eizenstat, U.S. under secretary of state for economic, business e Strengthening of Civil Society and agricultural affairs. Ambassador Eizenstat spoke at the Baker Institute on Paralleling evolution in the political realm has the Clinton administration’s international been the rise of a civil society in Iran. Civil society sanctions policy. includes nonstate actors or groups that contribute to The policy recommendations contained social and economic development or that may, in the in this report are those of the Baker course of such pursuits, bolster individual citizens Institute and may not reflect the capabilities in the political arena to protect themselves views of the seminar participants. from the arbitrary exercise of state power. In Iran, the growth of civil society has introduced a more pluralis- Introduction tic approach toward national culture and . e Iranian population became increasingly frustrated with the corruption, inflation, and unem- No single event since the eruption of the Iranian ployment experienced throughout the 1980s. Dis- revolution in 1979 has had such profound impact on satisfaction among women and the young was par- Iran’s domestic politics and foreign policy as the land- ticularly acute. Pressure is mounting for greater social slide election of Mohammed Khatami as president of freedoms. e election of Khatami not only confirms the republic in May 1997. is event and others, such this trend but demonstrates that the shift may be ac-

BAKER INSTITUTE STUDY NO. 7, JUNE 1998 celerating faster than previously understood. referendum on the policies of Khatami. A new openness is emerging in contemporary Iranian society. Public debate of social and political issues that was previously suppressed is reemerging. Pragmatism: At Home And Abroad Once-taboo subjects for public discourse are finding their way to the spotlight. In many aspects of society, pragmatism is tak- Magazines such Payam-e-Emrooz and Kiyan have ing root from decisions made by Khatami all the dedicated issues to such controversial topics as U.S.– way down to the Iranian citizen. Economic interests Iran relations and the role of the clergy in politics. are competing increasingly with religious dogma as Widely covered stories of embezzlement scandals the cornerstone of Iran’s pursuit of relations with its involving high-ranking government officials and the neighbors. rights of women are two topics now receiving unprec- Following in the footsteps of Rafsanjani and edented levels of critical coverage. former oil minister Gholamreza Aghazadeh, Khatami Between 1979 and the mid-1990s, there was has delivered more opportunities to optimize Iran’s virtually no check on government or clerical power. economic potential, offering Caspian countries the Now, decentralization of power has allowed opposi- option of using Iranian territory to reach oil and gas tion voices to seep into the cracks. Some top Iranian markets and opening up more lucrative oil and gas government officials have left their posts to join the fields offshore and inside the country to equity invest- ranks of nonstate associations. e emergence of new ment by foreign firms. is move away from econom- factions is not based on the ideological foundations ic isolationism shows all the signs of a society looking of the past, but on the need to construct independent to return to the international fold. bases of power. Iran’s foreign policy toward the Persian Gulf and Print media and journalistic professional associa- Caspian Basin is becoming more pragmatic, tions are well-developed inside Iran and are playing an and Tehran is working hard to improve relations with increasingly political role, according to Dr. Hooshang its Arab neighbors and the Muslim peoples of the Amirahmadi. Educational institutions are also multi- Caspian . plying, and popular movements and professional asso- Iran’s primary strategy is to befriend the Arab ciations are on the rise. Finally, the attitudes of youth states of the (GCC) and are changing, with an increasing number of young “dissipate the suspicions created over the last twenty Iranians demanding not only a better material life but years” while still supporting UN sanctions imposed also greater social and political freedom. “e political on Iraq, according to Ramazani. elite sensed this subterranean unrest, exhibited only With the aim of creating an atmosphere of trust at times by rallies and other expressions of frustration between Iran and the GCC states, Iranian foreign and alienation, and applied the safety valve of allow- minister Kamal Kharrazi’s first foreign travel in 1997 ing a truly free presidential election,” noted Dr. R. K. included GCC capitals, partly in anticipation of the Ramazani. meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Confer- e opening of Iranian society will by no means ence (OIC) in Tehran. proceed without opposition from hard-line politi- Iran’s focus within the GCC has been on Saudi cians. In a speech in May 1998 in the holy city of Arabia. Crown Prince Abdullah went out of his way at , for example, the commander of Iran’s Islamic the OIC summit to praise Khatami and Iran’s his- Revolution’s Guards Corps, Major General Yahya toric contributions to civilization. Tehran and Riyadh Rahim Safavi, condemned the expression of liberal have launched a process of confidence building first dissent inside Iran as “threatening Iran’s national se- signaled by an official two week state visit by Iran’s curity” and promised to “root out antirevolutionaries former president Rafsanjani to in early wherever they are.” 1997. e two nations have created a joint coopera- A key bellwether mark for future trends will be tion commission and expressed interest in promoting the parliamentary elections of 2000, which will act as private sector activities in each other’s economy and have agreed that the dispute between Iran and the over and the two change in the near future. Tumbs be settled by peaceful means. Iran has lifted • Iran, as a regional power, will continue to visa requirements for Saudis visiting Iran, and Saudi work to extend its influence in the Persian Gulf and foreign minister Sa’ud al-Faisal has invited President abroad and to seek equality in international dealings; Khatami to visit his country. A real shift in foreign its interests discourage any foreign military presence policy is reflected by Khatami’s letter to Yasir Arafat in the region. backing whatever peace settlement that the Palestin- • Iran will remain acutely aware of its influence ians and find mutually acceptable. over the . Iran’s public outreach to the GCC puts an official • Iran as an Islamic nation will want to preserve stamp on years of building economic relations. Iran’s its unique heritage and may increasingly revitalize first step in taking a more pragmatic international po- nationalistic sentiment. It will uphold its territorial in- sition came after the start of Rafsanjani’s second term tegrity and enhance its defensive capabilities. Tehran’s as president, when Iran began relying more heavily on strategic military goals will be defined by the capabili- UAE city states for trade and banking services. e ties of regional states such as , Pakistan, Iraq, and meteoric rise in activity at the Jabel Ali free trade zone Israel. in is partly associated with Iran’s desire to use • As a regional power, Iran will seek to develop it as a go-between in purchasing oil service equipment weapons of mass destruction and means of delivery. and other goods. e U.S. maintains bilateral relations with many To the north, Iran’s diplomacy has taken a decid- countries like Iran with whom its interests diverge edly pragmatic turn, evolving from full-scale Islamic on some important issues and could benefit from proselytizing in 1991 to a hard-core commercial improved relations with Iran. Iran and the U.S. have approach today. Iran and Russia are linked in a battle some major interests in common that could be tapped to lure the Caspian Region’s energy infrastructure to as a starting point. go through their respective territories. Iran is inter- Bruce Riedel told an audience at the Baker Insti- ested in the economic and political development of its tute that the U.S. government remains “interested in northern neighbors, not only because of its interests sitting down face to face with the Iranian leadership to in the stability of these neighbors, but also because discuss all issues of concern to both states.” He praised it is conceivable that the region could provide a large efforts to “strengthen the rule of law” inside Iran and market in the future for Iran’s non-oil exports, accord- added that the U.S. has no preconditions for such ing to Ramazani. dialogue. “We only insist that the dialogue be authori- tative—that is government-to-government.” Riedel noted, however, that serious issues regard- e Potential for Improved ing Iran’s policies still need to be addressed. U.S. con- U.S.–Iranian Relations cerns include: 1) Iran’s aggressive acquisition program to develop weapons of mass destruction and long As Iran develops into a more pluralistic society and an range ballistic missiles; 2) Iran’s support for terrorist increasingly pragmatic international player, a window organizations; 3) Iran’s support for violent opposition is opening for an improvement in U.S.–Iranian rela- to the peace process. “In any future dia- tions. U.S. government officials have made clear their logue with Iran, we will want to discuss these issues. willingness to enter into an authoritative government- And we will continue to discourage other countries to-government dialogue without preconditions. But from engaging with Iran as a normal partner until we such a dialogue can only proceed constructively with all see changes in Iran’s behavior.” the understanding on both sides that the strategic Riedel commended Iran’s more moderate declara- interests of Iran and the United States are likely to dif- tory policy toward the Palestinian National Authority fer in certain respects, regardless of the trends inside and the more flexible approach it took in agreeing to Iranian society. an IOC resolution supporting the Oslo peace process Certain key Iranian priorities appear unlikely to accords. He also noted that the U.S. and Iran have many shared interests such as the unrestricted flow of energy security point of view” because such shipments energy from the Persian Gulf, peace in Afghanistan, would thereby not diversify supply away from the the containment of of Iraq, and the volatile Persian Gulf. “We want Caspian energy to di- promotion and maintenance of political stability in versify world energy supplies. e United States, as a Central and the . matter of policy, strongly opposes any pipeline across e Clinton administration may have improved Iran,” Eizenstat concluded. However, consideration leeway to make overtures to Tehran given signs of of a Western route that would extend from Baku, change inside the U.S. Congress. ere is increasing Azerbaijan, through Iran to would provide interest on the part of members of Congress to travel leverage against Russia’s significant political influence to Iran, and there was a notable absence of criticism over most other available Caspian export routes. Such to President Clinton’s response to Khatami’s historic a route would still meet energy security concerns by CNN overtures. But the administration’s decision to avoiding the volatile Persian Gulf. waive sanctions against European, Russian, and Asian companies seeking to invest in the Iranian oil and gas sector was greeted with mixed reaction from Capitol Policy Recommendations Hill. e decision, taken for national security reasons, penalizes U.S. energy firms while creating advantages • e U.S. should develop a more nuanced and for foreign competitors. e U.S. maintains sanc- sophisticated approach to its relations with Iran. tions against Iran under the Iran and Libya Sanctions e U.S. administration should formulate its policy Act, commonly known as ILSA. e administration toward Iran in a coherent regional framework that waived implementation of ILSA sanctions against takes into consideration U.S. interests in the Middle Russian and European energy firms, citing such East, , , , and Russia. national interests as U.S.–Russian nonproliferation While encouraging people-to-people contacts, the cooperation and maintenance of the coalition to bring U.S. should take the initiative and actively pursue a Iraq into compliance with UN resolutions on weap- carefully orchestrated, direct dialogue with Iran. Iran’s ons of mass destruction. U.S. secretary of state Mad- national security interests in its regional setting must eleine Albright, in announcing the waivers, noted that be acknowledged as part of this process to promote a the U.S. and European Union would work together to meaningful and constructive exchange and eventual step up efforts “to prevent dual-use trans- resolution of differences. fers where there is a risk of diversion to weapons of • e administration should keep as a priority mass destruction” and “to develop better controls over and actively engage in diplomatic efforts for enhanced intangible technology transfers.” She also stated that international cooperation towards comprehensive the U.S. would remain closely engaged with Russia to nonproliferation of nuclear weapons and other weap- stem transfers of missile technology and other dual- ons of mass destruction. is will improve the pros- use . pects of dealing with Iran’s specific efforts. Congress continues to introduce new sanctions • It should be recognized that a multilateral sanc- legislation, leaving the Administration with an up- tions regime against Iran that specifically targets mili- hill struggle in devising a coherent sanctions strategy tary and dual-use technologies and equipment that towards Iran and many other nations. have a clear and specific relationship to the develop- Secretary Albright, in announcing the ILSA sanc- ment of weapons of mass destruction would be more tions waivers, made clear that the U.S. still opposes effective than the current unilateral blanket economic the construction of oil and gas pipelines from the sanctions imposed by the U.S. Congress and adminis- Caspian Basin through Iran. U.S. undersecretary of tration. state for economic, business, and agricultural affairs • e administration should work with Congres- Stuart E. Eizenstat asserted at the Baker Institute sional leaders to introduce new legislation that would that to allow U.S. companies to ship Caspian crude create clearer, more comprehensive parameters for the through Iran “makes no sense whatsoever from an use of economic sanctions as a tool of foreign policy. Such legislation should include sunset provisions that require a cost-benefit review and affirmed renewal of all specific sanctions legislation every year. Such a process will make it more difficult for special interest groups to hold ineffectual or outdated open-ended sanctions in place. • e U.S. should continue to press other nations to take appropriate steps in response to continued Iranian support for international terrorism. • e U.S. should express a willingness to con- sider construction of a major oil and gas export route from Baku through Iran to Turkey for Caspian Basin resources if a U.S. dialogue with Iran makes head- way in resolving differences. Such flexibility would conform with Washington’s desire to facilitate export routes for Caspian energy especially should Russia thwart export flows via routes under its influence. It would also signal to Tehran that the U.S. would be willing to recognize Iran’s regional economic role should progress be made on key issues. e U.S. should not support a route through Iran to the Persian Gulf. • e U.S. administration and Congress should permit U.S. energy companies to initiate discussions about investments in Iran’s oil and gas sector to be implemented only after sanctions are lifted. Such dis- cussions would reduce the clear advantage European and Russian firms now enjoy in Iran while potentially facilitating progress in a U.S.–Iranian official dialogue.

BAKER INSTITUTE STUDY NO. 7, JUNE 1998

Please view our website through for e Baker Institute Study is printed on recycled paper. further information about the Baker Institute. For other inquiries and address changes, we may be reached is publication has been made possible through the at 713-527-4683, fax 713-285-5993, or e-mail generous support of e Cullen Foundation. .

NON-PROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO. 7549 HOUSTON, TEXAS JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY-MS40 RICE UNIVERSITY P.O. BOX 1892 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77251-1892

Address Service Requested