DOCSLIB.ORG

The Origin of the Panathenaea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Origin of the Panathenaea Geschichte des griechischen Weltmodells vor AristoteIes 231 Vom frühhistorischen Weltbild aus fragt man nicht nach der wahren Größe der Gestirne, nach dem Fallen der Erde, nach einer Vielzahl von Welten. Alle diese Fragen, sowie die Theorie des Wirbels, werden erst mit der Himmelskugel sinnvoll. Anaxime­ nes und Xenophanes haben noch das alte Weltbild; erst Anaxago­ ras durchdenkt konsequent die Hypothese der Himmelskugel (§§ 4-9). Mit der Himmelskugel drängt sich allmählich der Ge­ danke auf, daß es kein absolutes Oben und Unten gibt, logische Entwicklung über Plato zum Philolaos-System und zu Aristoteles (§ 10). Während sich der schrittweise erfolgende Fortschritt vom alten Weltbild über Anaxagoras zum aristotelischen Modell im­ mer deutlicher und durch Originalstellen belegt abzeichnet, wer­ den die nur von der Doxographie überlieferten frühen Vorweg­ nahmen von Himmels- und Erdkugel immer fragwürdiger. Nach den Ergebnissen dieses Aufsatzes bleibt allein Anaximander davon übrig. Diese Lage zwingt zu einer radikalen Kritik an der Anaxi­ mander-Doxographie: Die Himmelskugel ist in Anaximander hineingelesen worden (§§ 11-2). Zwei Exkurse: Anaxagoras ist zeitlich vor Parmenides anzu­ SCL"en; Rechtfertigung der Deutung und Datierung des Philolaos­ Systt. 'S iq dieser Arbeit (§§ 13-4). Kiel Detlev Fehling THE ORIGIN OF THE PANATHENAEA I. The problem 11. Festivals of Athena resembling the Panathenaea IH. Erichthonius, Erechtheus, and the Cecropids IV. Erichthonius and the fetching of new fire V. Hephaestus and the sixth-century reform VI. The ritual innovations: torch-race, peplos, ship-wagon I. The problem The evidence for the Panathenaea - for the procession, the sacrifices, the contests, the setting of the ritual, the aspect of the worshippers and the officiants - is probably fuller than for any 232 Noel Robertson 1 other ancient festival save the Eleusinian MYsteries ). Doubt and controversy are not wanting; yet such outstanding questions as the difference between the annual and the fourth-yearly celebra­ tions, the use of the peplos, the route and destination of the ship­ wagon, the development of the administrative boards and of the program of events, are themselves a measure of the variety and 2 extent of our knowledge ). But although so many details are so well illuminated, the centre is dark. There is no understanding of the origin and significance of the festival, of its social or seasonal purpose, and there has been almost no inquiry, only wild conjec­ ture or blank indifference. It is commonly said that the festival as we know it is adven­ titious or secondary, having been created or made over for politi­ cal ends, and so preserves little or nothing of old customs and belief3). Some allow that an earlier festival on the same date was 1) It may be of interest to compare/roportions in two general works on Athenian festivals, Deubner's of 1932 an Parke's of 1977 (n. 2 below). The Panathenaea receive from Parke about the longest treatment of any festival - 17 pages, as against 17 for the Mysteries, 13 for the Anthesteria, 10 for the city Dionysia, and 5 or 6 each for the Thesmophoria, Scira, and Dipolieia; the Panathenaea also receive the lion's share of the illustrations (pis. 4-19). Deubner by contrast gave 31 pages to the Anthesteria, 22 to the Mysteries, 16 to the Dipolieia, 10 each to the Thesmophoria and the Scira, but only 4 pages to the city Dionysia and 13 to the Panathenaea. Parke's preference is for spectacle and recreation, Deubner's for the rural and primitive side of Dionysus and Demeter; both scant the religious significance of the Panathenaea. It is also true that the archaeological and epigraphic discoveries of recent years have bolstered the Panathenaea as weil as other festivals, but this increment is not reflected in Parke, who gives us no more than an enarratio of the Parthenon frieze, of the fourth-century schedule of prizes, and of the Lycurgan law about the Lesser Panathenaea, and is unaware that the first half of this law has been available since 1959 (SEG 18.13, 21.269, 25.65). 2) The main ex professo treatments are F.Dümmler, RE 2.2 (1896) 1962-1966 s. Athena; A.Mommsen, Feste der Stadt Athen (Leipsic 1898) 41-159; E.Pfuhl, De Atheniensium pompis sacris (Berlin 1900) 3-31; E.Fehrle, Die kul­ tische Keuschheit im Altertum (Giessen 1910) 179-183; P. Stengel, Die griechi­ schen Kultusaltertümec3 (Munich 1920) 221-226; L. Deubner, Attische Feste (Ber­ lin 1932) 22-35; L.Ziehen, RE 18.2.2 (1949) 457--489 s. Panathenaia 1; H. A. Thompson, AA 1961.224-231 (the games); J. A. Davison, From Ar­ chilochus to Pindar (London 1968) 28-69; A. Breiich, Paides e parthenoi (Rome 1969) 314-348; W.Burkert, Homo Necans (Berlin 1972) 173-177, cf. Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche (Stuttgart 1977) 352-354; J. D. Mikalson, AJP 97 (1976) 141-153 (the origins); H. W. Parke, Festivals of the Athenians (London 1977) 33-50. W. Fauth, KIPauly 4 (1972) 449--450 s. Panathenaia, supplies some further references. 3) Myiampling of opinion is drawn mainly from the works cited in n. 2 above, as folIows: Deubner 22-23, cf. 15-17, 35; Davison 29-34; Dümmler 1962-1963, 1965-1966; M. P. Nilsson, Griechische Feste (Leipsic 1906) 87; Mommsen 155-159; Ziehen 488--489; Mikalson 149-153; Burkert passim. The Origin of the Panathenaea 233 subsumed in the Panathenaea. Deubner postulated an aneient Hauptfest other than the Arrhephoria, Plynteria, or Chalceia, pre­ sumably addressed to "the old palaee goddess of the king of Athens", the role whieh Deubner fleetingly diseerned behind all the other funetions and festivals of Athena. Davison like many others saw the Panathenaea refleeted in a Homerie passage, 11. 2.550-551, whieh ean only refer to the Seira (more of this below); without this warrant "the earliest form of the festival" vanishes entirely, and is unknowable in any ease, if, as Davison supposed, the sixth-eentury organizers introdueed "arehaizing" rites as well as fashionable eontests. Others have earried the proeess of redue­ tion still further. Dümmler held that Solon fashioned the Panathenaea with his own hands out of elements taken from the Arrhephoria and the Plynteria. Nilsson, speaking not of Athens' Panathenaea but of similar festivals elsewhere, branded them all as late and derivative, arising from adesire to honour the goddess of the eitadel with popular rites whieh were strietly alien 10 her nature. Such eonjeetures as have been made about the original or the abiding signifieanee of the Panathenaea are very uneonvineing. Mommsen thought of a harvest festival honouring Athena as the true patron of agrieulture at Athens, later displaeed by Demeter; the harvest festival was subsequently re-interpreted and embroi­ dered as a "vietory festival" - why, he did not say. Ziehen quali­ fied Mommsen's view: the Ur-Athene, as disclosed by the studies of Wilamowitz and Nilsson, was no agrarian deity, but agrarian funetions might still be attaehed to the palaee goddess who pro­ teets both the king and his land. J. D. Mikalson has reeently suggested that the festival was onee addressed not to Athena but to Ereehtheus as a "pre-Greek" deity, a "divine ehild" represent­ ing the vegetation eycle; Ereehtheus and the Panathenaea are said to resemble Hyaeinthus and the Hyaeinthia_of Sparta. Different again is Burkert's view of the Panathenaea as a new-year's festival marking the symbolie restoration of the eivie order whieh was symbolieally dissolved by the festivals of Seirophorion, the Ar­ rhephoria, Scira, and Dipolieia; he finds that when these festivals are taken together, the full range of deities, of aetiologieal heroes and events, and even of saerifieial vietims, makes a pattern whieh refleets all the eonditions und values of eivilized life. Some eritieism of these views is needed, and will help us to understand the problem. They all invite one large objeetion in prineiple. It is generally reeognized, or should be, that ritual eom- 234 Noel Robertson es first, and gives rise to myths and to the mythical features and attributes of the gods. Public festivals are the most conspicuous kind of ritual and recur widely in much the same form; the great gods are likely to be projections of the great festivals; witness Demeter and Kore above all. The Panathenaea are Athena's pre­ mier festival in Athena's favourite city, and the ritual- the proces­ sion under arms, the equestrian contests, the scenes of combat embroidered on the peplos - exactly matches the goddess' charac­ ter. The same or similar ritual elements are found in other festivals of Athena, to be examined below. Then why suppose that the Panathenaea or these other festivals are foisted on the goddess at a late date as a political expedient? Or why suppose that the original focus of the Panathenaea was something remote {rom both the ritual business and the goddess' character, namely agriculture? Such is the objection in principle - which also dictates a better method of interpretation, as we shall see in amoment. The agrarian hypothesis does not even fit the season of the Panathenaea, amid-summer lull in the farmer's routine. In Attica the harvest came in Thargelion, roughly speaking, and was prob­ ably solemnized by the festival Calamaea of Attic inscriptions; the threshing came in Scirophorion, and was solemnized by the festi­ val Scira and the conveyance of threshed and winnowed corn from Scirum to the Acropolis, from the sacred ploughland into the hands of Athena's millers; at the end of all these labours came the labourers' reward, the hilarity of the Cronia in early Hecatom­ baeon. From this moment until the ploughing and sowing of Pyanopsion the only agricultural rites were modest offerings on behalf of the seed corn (cf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE
    Cultural Dynamics in Ionia at the End of the Second Millennium BCE: New Archaeological Perspectives and Prospects Edited e-Thesis The results, discussions and conclusions presented herein are identical to those in the printed version. This electronic version of the thesis has been edited solely to ensure conformance with copyright legislation and all excisions are noted in the text. The final, awarded and examined version is available for consultation via the University Library. Rik Vaessen PhD The University of Sheffield Department of Archaeology May 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables vi Acknowledgments vii Abstract ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Setting the stage 1 1.2. Introducing the Ionians 4 1.3. Finding Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Ionia 12 Phokaia 14 Panaztepe-Menemen 16 Smyrna-Bayraklı 17 Limantepe/Klazomenai 19 Erythrai 23 Chios: Emporio and Kato Phana 24 Teos 26 Kolophon 26 Klaros 28 Metropolis-Bademgedi ǧi Tepe 29 Ephesos (Apaša) 31 Ku şadası-Kadıkalesi 33 Samos: Heraion and Pythagorio 33 Miletos 35 The Miletos-area: Assesos and Teichiussa 38 Cine-Tepecik 38 1.4. Outline of the study 39 Chapter 2. Tracing the Ionians in modern scholarship 43 2.1. Introduction 43 2.2. Dorians and Ionians: 1750-1870 43 2.3. The Ionians between 1870 and 1939 54 2.4. The Ionians and their migration become visible … or not? (1945-present) 60 2.5. The current debate in perspective 69 2.6. Final remarks 78 Chapter 3. Theoretical and methodological considerations 79 3.1. Introduction 79 3.2. Theory: some critical remarks 79 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:23:19Z
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cork Open Research Archive Title Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The significance of archaic civilization for the modern world Author(s) Szakolczai, Árpád Publication date 2009-12 Original citation Szakolczai, A., 2009. Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World. In Center of Excellence Cultural Foundations of Integration, New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations. Konstanz, Germany 8 – 9 Dec 2009. Type of publication Conference item Rights ©2010, Árpád Szakolczai http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Item downloaded http://hdl.handle.net/10468/200 from Downloaded on 2017-02-12T05:23:19Z Szakolczai, A., 2009. Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World. In Center of Excellence Cultural Foundations of Integration, New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations. Konstanz, Germany 8 – 9 Dec 2009. CORA Cork Open Research Archive http://cora.ucc.ie 1 Golden Age, Stone Age, Iron Age, Axial Age: The Significance of Archaic Civilization for the Modern World by Arpad Szakolczai School of Philosophy and Sociology University College, Cork Paper prepared for the workshop entitled ‘New Perspectives on Archaic Civilizations’, 8- 9 December 2009, organized by the Center of Excellence ‘Cultural Foundations of Integration’, University of Konstanz. Draft version; please, do not quote without permission. 2 Introduction Concerning the theme of the conference, from the perspective of the social sciences it seems to me that there are – and indeed can only be – two quite radically different positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015)
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 31 | 2018 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2741 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2741 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 December 2018 Number of pages: 167-219 ISBN: 978-2-87562-055-2 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, “Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015)”, Kernos [Online], 31 | 2018, Online since 01 October 2020, connection on 25 January 2021. URL: http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/2741 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/kernos.2741 This text was automatically generated on 25 January 2021. Kernos Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) 1 Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2015 (EBGR 2015) Angelos Chaniotis To the memory of David Jordan 1 The 28th issue of the EBGR presents epigraphic corpora and new epigraphic finds published in 2015. I have only included a few contributions to the reading and interpretation of old finds as well as a small selection of publications that adduce inscriptions for the study of religious phenomena. I have also summarizes some publications of earlier years that had not been included in earlier issues of the EBGR (2007–2013). 2 In this issue, I summarize the content of new corpora from Athens (34), Macedonia (56. 109), Termessos (64), and Hadrianopolis (79) that mainly contain dedications, but also records of manumission through dedication to deities (56). The two most important new inscriptions are the incantations from Selinous (?), known as the ‘Getty hexameters’ and a cult regulation from Thessaly.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowers in Greek Mythology
    Flowers in Greek Mythology Everybody knows how rich and exciting Greek Mythology is. Everybody also knows how rich and exciting Greek Flora is. Find out some of the famous Greek myths flower inspired. Find out how feelings and passions were mixed together with flowers to make wonderful stories still famous in nowadays. Anemone:The name of the plant is directly linked to the well known ancient erotic myth of Adonis and Aphrodite (Venus). It has been inspired great poets like Ovidius or, much later, Shakespeare, to compose hymns dedicated to love. According to this myth, while Adonis was hunting in the forest, the ex- lover of Aphrodite, Ares, disguised himself as a wild boar and attacked Adonis causing him lethal injuries. Aphrodite heard the groans of Adonis and rushed to him, but it was too late. Aphrodite got in her arms the lifeless body of her beloved Adonis and it is said the she used nectar in order to spray the wood. The mixture of the nectar and blood sprang a beautiful flower. However, the life of this 1 beautiful flower doesn’t not last. When the wind blows, makes the buds of the plant to bloom and then drifted away. This flower is called Anemone because the wind helps the flowering and its decline. Adonis:It would be an omission if we do not mention that there is a flower named Adonis, which has medicinal properties. According to the myth, this flower is familiar to us as poppy meadows with the beautiful red colour. (Adonis blood). Iris: The flower got its name from the Greek goddess Iris, goddess of the rainbow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed As the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon
    The Parthenon Frieze: Viewed as the Panathenaic Festival Preceding the Battle of Marathon By Brian A. Sprague Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor Bau-Hwa Hsieh Western Oregon University Thursday, June 07, 2007 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Narasingha Sil Copyright © Brian A. Sprague 2007 The Parthenon frieze has been the subject of many debates and the interpretation of it leads to a number of problems: what was the subject of the frieze? What would the frieze have meant to the Athenian audience? The Parthenon scenes have been identified in many different ways: a representation of the Panathenaic festival, a mythical or historical event, or an assertion of Athenian ideology. This paper will examine the Parthenon Frieze in relation to the metopes, pediments, and statues in order to prove the validity of the suggestion that it depicts the Panathenaic festival just preceding the battle of Marathon in 490 BC. The main problems with this topic are that there are no primary sources that document what the Frieze was supposed to mean. The scenes are not specific to any one type of procession. The argument against a Panathenaic festival is that there are soldiers and chariots represented. Possibly that biggest problem with interpreting the Frieze is that part of it is missing and it could be that the piece that is missing ties everything together. The Parthenon may have been the only ancient Greek temple with an exterior sculpture that depicts any kind of religious ritual or service. Because the theme of the frieze is unique we can not turn towards other relief sculpture to help us understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend
    G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image .
    [Show full text]
  • Wonder, Space, and Place in Pausanias' Periegesis
    Axion Theas: Wonder, Space, and Place in Pausanias’ Periegesis Hellados by Jody Ellyn Cundy A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto © Copyright by Jody Ellyn Cundy 2016 Axion Theas: Wonder, Space, and Place in Pausanias’ Periegesis Hellados Jody Ellyn Cundy Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The Periegesis Hellados presents a description of the sites and sights of Roman Greece in ten carefully constructed books. These books present the fruits of author’s extensive travels and careful textual research over the course of several decades (between the 130’s and ca. AD 175-80) and compiled into a unified composite itinerary. There is no doubt that Pausanias travels through an “already written landscape,” and his travel experience is necessarily informed by and sometimes clearly motivated by his literary encounters. This project investigates Pausanias’ engagement with literary antecedents, with a particular focus on the antiquarian impulse to excerpt and compile anecdotes in thematic catalogues, which broadly resemble wonder-texts (paradoxographies). The organizing principle of these thematic catalogues contrasts with the topographical (spatial) structure of the frame narrative of the Periegesis. In part, this study aims to resolve the perceived tension between the travel account and the antiquarian mode in Pausanias’ project in order to show that they serve complementary rather than competing ends. Resolution of these competing paradigms allows in turn for a more coherent understanding of the Periegesis as unified subject. This study argues that wonder (thauma) is a unifying theme ii of Periegesis Hellados.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Echoes of the Salpinx: the Trumpet in Ancient Greek Culture
    Title Page Echoes of the salpinx: the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Carolyn Susan Bowyer. Royal Holloway, University of London. MPhil. 1 Declaration of Authorship I Carolyn Susan Bowyer hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Abstract The trumpet from the 5th century BC in ancient Greece, the salpinx, has been largely ignored in modern scholarship. My thesis begins with the origins and physical characteristics of the Greek trumpet, comparing trumpets from other ancient cultures. I then analyse the sounds made by the trumpet, and the emotions caused by these sounds, noting the growing sophistication of the language used by Greek authors. In particular, I highlight its distinctively Greek association with the human voice. I discuss the range of signals and instructions given by the trumpet on the battlefield, demonstrating a developing technical vocabulary in Greek historiography. In my final chapter, I examine the role of the trumpet in peacetime, playing its part in athletic competitions, sacrifice, ceremonies, entertainment and ritual. The thesis re-assesses and illustrates the significant and varied roles played by the trumpet in Greek culture. 3 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture Title page page 1 Declaration of Authorship page 2 Abstract page 3 Table of Contents pages
    [Show full text]
  • Book Xiii Neil Hopkinson
    OVID BOOK XIII edited by NEIL HOPKINSON Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge ab published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb22ru, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011±4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de AlarcoÂn 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in 10/12 Baskerville and New Hellenic Greek [ao] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Ovid, 43 bc±ad 17 or 18 [Metamorphoses. Liber 13] Metamorphoses. Book xiii /Ovid;editedbyNeilHopkinson. p. cm. ± (Cambridge Greek and Latin classics) Text in Latin; introduction and commentary in English. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0 521 55421 7 (hardback) isbn 0 521 55620 1 (paperback) 1. Mythology, Classical ± Poetry. 2. Metamorphosis ± Poetry. i.Hopkinson, N. ii.Title.iii. Series. pa6519.m6 a13 2000 8730.01±dc21 99-087439 isbn 0 521 55421 7 hardback isbn 0 521 55620 1 paperback CONTENTS Preface page vii Map viii±ix Introduction 1 1 Metamorphosis 1 2 Structure and themes 6 3 Lines 1±398: the Judgement of Arms 9 4 Lines 408±571: Hecuba 22 5 Lines 576±622: Memnon 27 6 Lines 632±704: Anius and his daughters 29 7 Lines 13.730±14.222: Acis, Galatea and Polyphemus; Scylla, Glaucus and Circe 34 The text and apparatus criticus 44 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict in the Peloponnese
    CONFLICT IN THE PELOPONNESE Social, Military and Intellectual Proceedings of the 2nd CSPS PG and Early Career Conference, University of Nottingham 22-24 March 2013 edited by Vasiliki BROUMA Kendell HEYDON CSPS Online Publications 4 2018 Published by the Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies (CSPS), School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. © Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies and individual authors ISBN 978-0-9576620-2-5 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the authors and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/csps TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. i THE FAMILY AS THE INTERNAL ENEMY OF THE SPARTAN STATE ........................................ 1-23 Maciej Daszuta COMMEMORATING THE WAR DEAD IN ANCIENT SPARTA THE GYMNOPAIDIAI AND THE BATTLE OF HYSIAI .............................................................. 24-39 Elena Franchi PHILOTIMIA AND PHILONIKIA AT SPARTA ......................................................................... 40-69 Michele Lucchesi SLAVERY AS A POLITICAL PROBLEM DURING THE PELOPONESSIAN WARS ..................... 70-85 Bernat Montoya Rubio TYRTAEUS: THE SPARTAN POET FROM ATHENS SHIFTING IDENTITIES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN LYCURGUS’ AGAINST LEOCRATES ................................................................................ 86-102 Eveline van Hilten-Rutten THE INFLUENCE OF THE KARNEIA ON WARFARE ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Akropolis Museum 581 a Family at the Apaturia?
    AKROPOLIS MUSEUM 581 A FAMILYAT THE APATURIA? (PLATES 1 14-116) A KROPOLIS MUSEUM 581 (P1. 114), showing an Athenian family of five offering a pig sacrificeto Athena, ranksamong the best-knownvotive reliefs of the late Archaic period.1 It is of Parian marble.2 Although it is always cited for its exquisite style, scholars hardlyever look at its content.3 Discussionshave usuallybeen confined to the possibilitythat it is one of the earliest archaisticsculptures of the Severe Style, and its dating has ranged from 510 to 480.4 The question of archaism, first raised by Dickins in 1912,5 was only recently laid to rest.6 Let us cast a fresh glance at the unique iconographyof the relief. Is it possible to guess the occasion for the dedication? Can it be associatedwith a public festival? That a family is involvedmay point to a privateevent; on the other hand, appearancesmay be misleading. The relief was excavated on the Athenian Akropolisby the Archaeological Society in 1883, between the Parthenon and the Museum, along with other fragments of sculptures destroyed during the Persian sack of the Akropolisin 480.7 The fragmentswere used as foundation material for the terracing of the rock east of the Parthenon. Its inclusion in material from the Persian sack excludes the possibilityof a date after 480, as has sometimes been suggested.8 In 1886, Stais publishedan engraving of the relief, which is now the sole 1 Payne 1936, pp. 48-49, p1. 126:1;W-H. Schuchhardtin Schrader 1939, no. 424, pp. 304-305, pl. 175; Kraus 1960, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverpage Final
    Symbols and Objects on the Sealings from Kedesh A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Paul Lesperance IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Professor Andrea Berlin August 2010 © Paul Lesperance, 2010 Acknowledgements I have benefitted greatly from the aid and support of many people and organizations during the writing of this dissertation. I would especially like to thank my advisor, Professor Andrea Berlin, for all her help and advice at all stages of the production process as well as for suggesting the topic to me in the first place. I would also like to thank all the members of my dissertation committee (Professor Susan Herbert of the University of Michigan, as well as Professors Philip Sellew and Nita Krevans of the University of Minnesota) for all their help and support. During the writing process, I benefitted greatly from a George A. Barton fellowship to the W. F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in Jerusalem in the fall of 2009. I would like to thank the fellowship committee for giving me such a wonderful and productive opportunity that helped me greatly in this endeavour as well as the staff of the Albright for their aid and support. I would also like to thank both Dr. Donald Ariel of the Israel Antiquities Authority for his aid in getting access to the material and his valuable advice in ways of looking at it and Peter Stone of the University of Cincinnati whose discussions on his work on the pottery from Kedesh helped to illuminate various curious aspects of my own.
    [Show full text]