DOCSLIB.ORG

Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greek and Roman Mythology and Heroic Legend G RE E K AN D ROMAN M YTH O LOGY AN D H E R O I C LE GEN D By E D I N P ROFES SOR H . ST U G Translated from th e German and edited b y A M D i . A D TT . L tt LI ONEL B RN E , , TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE S Y a l TUD of Greek religion needs no po ogy , and should This mus v n need no bush . all t feel who ha e looked upo the ns ns and n creatio of the art it i pired . But to purify stre gthen admiration by the higher light of knowledge is no work o f ea se . No truth is more vital than the seemi ng paradox whi c h - declares that Greek myths are not nature myths . The ape - is not further removed from the man than is the nature myth from the religious fancy of the Greeks as we meet them in s Greek is and hi tory . The myth the child of the devout lovely imagi nation o f the noble rac e that dwelt around the e e s n s s u s A ga an. Coar e fa ta ie of br ti h forefathers in their Northern homes softened beneath the southern sun into a pure and u and s godly bea ty, thus gave birth to the divine form of n Hellenic religio . M c an c u s m c an s Comparative ythology tea h uch . It hew how god s are born in the mind o f the savage and moulded c nn into his image . But it a ot reveal to us the heart of th e G n s reek as his devout thoughts tur ed towards his god . Greece sees G o d with her o wn eyes ; and if we would share the loveliness of her vision we must put away from o ur thoughts the uncouth forms which had been worn by her ’ s c o ff ber s northern forefather deities , the slough ast by god s as they grew into shapes of godline s and beauty . True it is that in regions where nature and history hindered Greek n was religion from developing its pote tial riches, that slough still often trailed by the figures of po pular faith ; but these ex c eptions point all the more effectively the lesson of e v o lu n in tio Greek religion . ’ lv TRANSLATO R S PREFACE While the plastic fancy of the Greek was actively t e modelling the uncouth and formless con c eptions of barbarous a m s R n faith into mor l and hu an personalitie , the oman went o ff c . s n n o f R c a di erent ourse The ter ly legal mi d ome, whi h looked upon the person merely as a unit in corporations ruled u by definite law, was little likely to lend h man personality to o f n s numirza. s s its conceptions divi e force , its In tead of god it worshipped deified functions ; and as the whole sphere of ’ the c ommunity s political and soc ial life was methodi c ally o ut n s u s ns and o f s mapped i to division and s bdivi io , each the e was ut s n o wn i s s p under the pre ide cy of its de fied elf, the re ult n m c c was the I digita enta, in whose mathemati al pre ision the s f R c its c legal pirit o oman religion rea hed limax . Then s n followed the inru h of foreign worships, and the ative religion died . Thus there are few more i nstr uctive studies than that of the R god s of G reece and the deities of ome . And withal it is a study which of late years has met with little general recog nitio n En n m in gla d , if we can judge by the nu ber of reason n s ably scientific books treati g of it . The pre ent translation ’ o f Professor Steuding s valuable little work has been brought o ut in the hope that the interest o f the publi c is but slumber I n but s al ing . have added nothi g a few note to the origin , I o wn and have altered little, even in parts where my judgment led me to di ssent from the learned author . A few ns and u s illustratio have been put in , the marks of the q antitie tran sferred from the text to the index . B M SS. tment Or P . (7 D epar of . Bri ti sh M u seum. C O N T ENTS Gre e k My th o lo g y BEGI I GS OF G RE EK BELI EF AN D W O RSH I P NN N , — 1 1 2 . — 1. O 1 G H STS , 3 - I I . T W O L OW : O NE HER R D P ERS HER ES , 4 , 5 m 6 . OW NATURE AND ELEMENTAL P ERS, - I . W O I 1 2 V RSH P , 7 GRE EK RELIG I ON F RO M TH E BEG INNING O F TH E H O M E RIC AGE 1 — 2 2 , 3 O DETERM I NED C I I 1 1 G DS AND LASS F ED, 3 , 4 T W O 1 —1 8 HE NETHER RLD, 5 I FT 1 L FE A ER DEATH , 5 I Y 1 2 0 ER N ES , 9 , I 2 1 HARP ES , K I O 2 2 2 AS LEP S , , 3 2 . HADES, 4 O Y I Dmri Es 2 L MP AN , g 5 1. Z I CI C : EUS AND H S R LE HERA , C R I 1 HA TES, 4 ma s s, O I H RA , 4 3 KO : ELEU e rAN my s GE, DEMETER AND RE TERI ES — 2 , 44 5 T I O O I A HENA, HEPHA ST S , PR METHEUS , HEST A , — 5 3 66 CON TENTS PAGE — I V. O LO T I K TE 6 8 1 AP L N , AR EM S , HE A , 7 — V . sATYRs 8 2 0 HERMES , THE , AND PAN , 9 O I O I C1RCLE 1 — P SE D N AND H S , 9 99 PERSONI FI CA‘I‘I ONS OF THE HEAVENLY BODI ES - - O I I 1 00 1 0 . AND THER NATURE DE T ES, 4 — I I I . O I 1 0 1 1 2 V ARES AND APHR D TE , 5 — I X . I I O o r I O Y O 1 1 1 1 8 THE REL G N D N S S , 3 — X . O o r 1 1 1 2 2 THE G DDESSES FATE , 9 H E RO IC PO ETRY TH EBEs : KADM O S 1 2 ANTi O PE 1 2 , § 3 ; , § 4 ; I OB N E , I I . O I 1 2 6 DANAo s 1 2 ARG L S ; , 7 ; 1 2 8 TANTALOS 1 2 —1 1 PERSEUS , ; , 9 3 I I I . CO I : Si SYPH OS 1 2 B O O R NTH , § 3 ; ELLER PH NTES , 1 3 3 KO I : D105 K0R01 1 1 LA N A , § 3 4 ; HELENA , § 3 5 K 1 6—1 HERA LES, 3 49 1 0—1 8 THESEUS , 5 5 M ELEAG ROS T o r KALYD ON AND THE HUN , 1 1 60 59 , — I I I . O 1 6 1 1 66 V THE ARG NAUTS, - 1 6 1 . I X . B CYC THE THE AN LE , 7 74 X . Ac HAi AN O CYCL 1 THE AND TR JAN E , 75 1 8 6 h l 1 8 ff. Ro man My t o o g y , 7 1NDETERM1NATELY CON CEIVED BEi NG s 2 11 1 8 8 LAREs MANES ; ( ) GEN , § ; (3 ) ; 1 8 1ND10 ETES 1 0 (4 ) PENATES, § 9 ; (5 ) , § 9 C CON TENTS V ~ PAG E 1 - 1. NATURE SP I R ITS AND DEITI ES AKI N To TH E SP I R ITS OF ACTI ONS 1 ) DEm Es o r I 1 1 I - O 1 2 SPR NGS 9 ; R VER G DS , 9 ; 1 2 m m 1 9 3 ; ( ) , 94. 1 1 6 O C 1 9 5 ; VESTA , § 9 ; V L ANUS , 9 7; SATU RNU s CO O 1 8 , N SUS , AND PS , 9 ; DE1T1Es o r I I Y (3 ) FERT L T FAUNUS , 1 I I B 99 ; S LVANUS , L ER , AND VERTUMNUS , 2 00 O I ; FAUNA AND FER N A , O 2 0 2 DI ANA 2 0 FL RA AND PALES, ; , 3 ; 2 0 2 0 U 1R1NU S 2 06 (4 ) MARS, 4, 5 ; Q , § I UPPI TER 2 0 - 2 1 0 mm 2 1 1 2 1 2 , 7 ; , , DE1T1Es O : O C I L F DEATH R US, MAN A , ARA , s 2 1 3 v . O I IC I O 2 1 PERS N F AT NS, 4 - v i . I I O FO I OR101N 2 1 2 1 8 DE T ES F RE GN , 5 BI BLI OGRAPH Y INDE X GREEK MYTH OLOGY li f d Be g i n nin g s o f G re ek Be e an W o rsh ip .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odyssey Glossary of Names
    GLOSSARY OF NAMES GLOSSARY OF NAMES [Note, the following is raw output from OCR software, and is otherwise unedited.] (First appearance noted by book and line number.) Achaeans (A-kee'-unz): General term used by Homer to reFer to Greeks. 2.139 Acheron (A'-ker-on): River in the Underworld, land of the dead. 10.537 Achilles (A-kil'-eez): Son of Peleus and Thetis. He is the heroic leader of the Myrmidons in the Trojan War and is slain by Paris. Odysseus consults him in the Underworld. 3.117 Aeaea (Ee-ee'-a): Island on which Circe lives. 9.34 Aegisthus (Ee-jis'-thus): Son of Thyestes and Pelopia. He seduces Clytemnestra, wife of Agamemnon, while Agamemnon is away fighting the Trojan War and helps her slay Agamemnon when he returns. Orestes avenges this action years later by murdering both Clytemnestra and Aegisthus. 1.35 GLOSSARY OF NAMES Aegyptus (Ee-jip'-tus): The Nile River. 4.511 Aeolus (Ee'-oh-lus): King of the island Aeolia and keeper of the winds. 10.2 Aeson (Ee'-son): Son oF Cretheus and Tyro; father of Jason, leader oF the Argonauts. 11.262 Aethon (Ee'-thon): One oF Odysseus' aliases used in his conversation with Penelope. 19.199 Agamemnon (A-ga-mem'-non): Son oF Atreus and Aerope; brother of Menelaus; husband oF Clytemnestra. He commands the Greek Forces in the Trojan War. He is killed by his wiFe and her lover when he returns home; his son, Orestes, avenges this murder. 1.36 Agelaus (A-je-lay'-us): One oF Penelope's suitors; son oF Damastor; killed by Odysseus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina
    The Evolution of the Roman Calendar Dwayne Meisner, University of Regina Abstract The Roman calendar was first developed as a lunar | 290 calendar, so it was difficult for the Romans to reconcile this with the natural solar year. In 45 BC, Julius Caesar reformed the calendar, creating a solar year of 365 days with leap years every four years. This article explains the process by which the Roman calendar evolved and argues that the reason February has 28 days is that Caesar did not want to interfere with religious festivals that occurred in February. Beginning as a lunar calendar, the Romans developed a lunisolar system that tried to reconcile lunar months with the solar year, with the unfortunate result that the calendar was often inaccurate by up to four months. Caesar fixed this by changing the lengths of most months, but made no change to February because of the tradition of intercalation, which the article explains, and because of festivals that were celebrated in February that were connected to the Roman New Year, which had originally been on March 1. Introduction The reason why February has 28 days in the modern calendar is that Caesar did not want to interfere with festivals that honored the dead, some of which were Past Imperfect 15 (2009) | © | ISSN 1711-053X | eISSN 1718-4487 connected to the position of the Roman New Year. In the earliest calendars of the Roman Republic, the year began on March 1, because the consuls, after whom the year was named, began their years in office on the Ides of March.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/27/2021 12:23:27PM Via Free Access 12 Chapter One
    CHAPTER ONE CONSTITUENT CONCEPTS 1. Space Since they were conceptualized as human beings, Roman gods had a place in this world, in which they moved freely. This conclusion is unavoidable, if we consider that all Roman gods could be invoked, and that invocation implied spatial proximity to the invocator.1 Apart from this, at least the major gods were conceptualized as connected to speci c locations, normally marked as such by an altar, a temple, or in some other way. These locations I will call ‘spatial foci’. They are mostly represented by archaeological remains. However, by relying on archaeology, we unduly overemphasize the spatiality of major of cial divine concepts, which were more likely than private cults to be per- manently conceptualized by speci cally marked space. The sacred landscape of Rome was complex, time-bound and noto- riously anachronistic. It was complex because its parameters were not absolute and necessarily recognizable as such. Rather, it was intrinsi- cally relative and existent only within the full semiotic system of the topography of the city. Furthermore, it was time-bound, because the city itself developed rapidly, especially during the peak of urbanization from ca. 200 B.C.–200 A.D. It was notoriously anachronistic because the semiotic system underlying it was highly conservative and did not keep pace with the actual urban development (for instance, the pomerium was still remembered, when it had long become obsolete in the imperial period in terms of urban development; and the festival of the Septimontium was still celebrated separately by the communities that had long since merged into the city of Rome).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Post-Classical Works of Art, Literature, and Music Based on Myths of the Greeks and Romans
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 112 438 CS 202 298 AUTHOR Smith, Ron TITLE A Guide to Post-Classical Works of Art, Literature, and Music Based on Myths of the Greeks and Romans. PUB DATE 75 NOTE 40p.; Prepared at Utah State University; Not available in hard copy due to marginal legibility of original document !DRS PRICE MF-$0.76 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Art; *Bibliographies; Greek Literature; Higher Education; Latin Literature; *Literature; Literature Guides; *Music; *Mythology ABSTRACT The approximately 650 works listed in this guide have as their focus the myths cf the Greeks and Romans. Titles were chosen as being (1)interesting treatments of the subject matter, (2) representative of a variety of types, styles, and time periods, and (3) available in some way. Entries are listed in one of four categories - -art, literature, music, and bibliography of secondary sources--and an introduction to the guide provides information on the use and organization of the guide.(JM) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied
    [Show full text]
  • Iliad Teacher Sample
    CONTENTS Teaching Guidelines ...................................................4 Appendix Book 1: The Anger of Achilles ...................................6 Genealogies ...............................................................57 Book 2: Before Battle ................................................8 Alternate Names in Homer’s Iliad ..............................58 Book 3: Dueling .........................................................10 The Friends and Foes of Homer’s Iliad ......................59 Book 4: From Truce to War ........................................12 Weaponry and Armor in Homer..................................61 Book 5: Diomed’s Day ...............................................14 Ship Terminology in Homer .......................................63 Book 6: Tides of War .................................................16 Character References in the Iliad ...............................65 Book 7: A Duel, a Truce, a Wall .................................18 Iliad Tests & Keys .....................................................67 Book 8: Zeus Takes Charge ........................................20 Book 9: Agamemnon’s Day ........................................22 Book 10: Spies ...........................................................24 Book 11: The Wounded ..............................................26 Book 12: Breach ........................................................28 Book 13: Tug of War ..................................................30 Book 14: Return to the Fray .......................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Folktale Types and Motifs in Greek Heroic Myth Review P.11 Morphology of the Folktale, Vladimir Propp 1928 Heroic Quest
    Mon Feb 13: Heracles/Hercules and the Greek world Ch. 15, pp. 361-397 Folktale types and motifs in Greek heroic myth review p.11 Morphology of the Folktale, Vladimir Propp 1928 Heroic quest NAME: Hera-kleos = (Gk) glory of Hera (his persecutor) >p.395 Roman name: Hercules divine heritage and birth: Alcmena +Zeus -> Heracles pp.362-5 + Amphitryo -> Iphicles Zeus impersonates Amphityron: "disguised as her husband he enjoyed the bed of Alcmena" “Alcmena, having submitted to a god and the best of mankind, in Thebes of the seven gates gave birth to a pair of twin brothers – brothers, but by no means alike in thought or in vigor of spirit. The one was by far the weaker, the other a much better man, terrible, mighty in battle, Heracles, the hero unconquered. Him she bore in submission to Cronus’ cloud-ruling son, the other, by name Iphicles, to Amphitryon, powerful lancer. Of different sires she conceived them, the one of a human father, the other of Zeus, son of Cronus, the ruler of all the gods” pseudo-Hesiod, Shield of Heracles Hera tries to block birth of twin sons (one per father) Eurystheus born on same day (Hera heard Zeus swear that a great ruler would be born that day, so she speeded up Eurystheus' birth) (Zeus threw her out of heaven when he realized what she had done) marvellous infancy: vs. Hera’s serpents Hera, Heracles and the origin of the MIlky Way Alienation: Madness of Heracles & Atonement pp.367,370 • murders wife Megara and children (agency of Hera) Euripides, Heracles verdict of Delphic oracle: must serve his cousin Eurystheus, king of Mycenae -> must perform 12 Labors (‘contests’) for Eurystheus -> immortality as reward The Twelve Labors pp.370ff.
    [Show full text]
  • Hesiod Theogony.Pdf
    Hesiod (8th or 7th c. BC, composed in Greek) The Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey, are probably slightly earlier than Hesiod’s two surviving poems, the Works and Days and the Theogony. Yet in many ways Hesiod is the more important author for the study of Greek mythology. While Homer treats cer- tain aspects of the saga of the Trojan War, he makes no attempt at treating myth more generally. He often includes short digressions and tantalizes us with hints of a broader tra- dition, but much of this remains obscure. Hesiod, by contrast, sought in his Theogony to give a connected account of the creation of the universe. For the study of myth he is im- portant precisely because his is the oldest surviving attempt to treat systematically the mythical tradition from the first gods down to the great heroes. Also unlike the legendary Homer, Hesiod is for us an historical figure and a real per- sonality. His Works and Days contains a great deal of autobiographical information, in- cluding his birthplace (Ascra in Boiotia), where his father had come from (Cyme in Asia Minor), and the name of his brother (Perses), with whom he had a dispute that was the inspiration for composing the Works and Days. His exact date cannot be determined with precision, but there is general agreement that he lived in the 8th century or perhaps the early 7th century BC. His life, therefore, was approximately contemporaneous with the beginning of alphabetic writing in the Greek world. Although we do not know whether Hesiod himself employed this new invention in composing his poems, we can be certain that it was soon used to record and pass them on.
    [Show full text]
  • HYPERBOREANS Myth and History in Celtic-Hellenic Contacts Timothy P.Bridgman HYPERBOREANS MYTH and HISTORY in CELTIC-HELLENIC CONTACTS Timothy P.Bridgman
    STUDIES IN CLASSICS Edited by Dirk Obbink & Andrew Dyck Oxford University/The University of California, Los Angeles A ROUTLEDGE SERIES STUDIES IN CLASSICS DIRK OBBINK & ANDREW DYCK, General Editors SINGULAR DEDICATIONS Founders and Innovators of Private Cults in Classical Greece Andrea Purvis EMPEDOCLES An Interpretation Simon Trépanier FOR SALVATION’S SAKE Provincial Loyalty, Personal Religion, and Epigraphic Production in the Roman and Late Antique Near East Jason Moralee APHRODITE AND EROS The Development of Greek Erotic Mythology Barbara Breitenberger A LINGUISTIC COMMENTARY ON LIVIUS ANDRONICUS Ivy Livingston RHETORIC IN CICERO’S PRO BALBO Kimberly Anne Barber AMBITIOSA MORS Suicide and the Self in Roman Thought and Literature Timothy Hill ARISTOXENUS OF TARENTUM AND THE BIRTH OF MUSICOLOGY Sophie Gibson HYPERBOREANS Myth and History in Celtic-Hellenic Contacts Timothy P.Bridgman HYPERBOREANS MYTH AND HISTORY IN CELTIC-HELLENIC CONTACTS Timothy P.Bridgman Routledge New York & London Published in 2005 by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 http://www.routledge-ny.com/ Published in Great Britain by Routledge 2 Park Square Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN http://www.routledge.co.uk/ Copyright © 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, a Division of T&F Informa. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.” All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photo copying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • 318136 Vol1.Pdf
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs The nature and development of Roman Corinth to the end of the Antonine period Thesis How to cite: Walbank, Mary Elizabeth Hoskins (1987). The nature and development of Roman Corinth to the end of the Antonine period. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 1986 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000de1f Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk THE NATURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF ROMAN CORINTH TO THE END OF THE ANTONINE PERIOD Mary Elizabeth Hoskins Walbank, B.A., M.A. Thesis submitted to the Open University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy AvrPr'lor5 1\lJt'\'\bC(: HDK' 303 . :Datrt or 6ubMlsslon; ;(0'''' October R~C, Classics, Faculty of Arts ~ata of- Aw'drc\: 7J}'v\ Januatj 19<97 October 1986 COPYRIGHT DECLARATION This thesis is an unpublished typescript and copyright is held by the author. Photocopy; ng ; sperm; tted on ly wi th the v/ri tten consent of the author. No quotation from this thesis or information derived from it may be published without the written consent of the author. i ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is two-fold: first, to examine and re-assess the material remains of Roman Corinth in the light 'of modern scholarship; secondly, to use this evidence, in combination with the literary sources, and thus to define, more clearly than has been done hitherto, both the nature of the original foundation and the way in which it developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Marlowe and Dramatic Technique
    CHRISTOPHER MARLOWE AND DRAMATIC TECHNIQUE By PRANK B. FIELER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA June, 1960 PREFACE In T.amburlaine, Part I. Christopher Marlowe took a knownhistor- ical personage who was morally despicable by the standards of the six- teenth century, and, without falsifying the historical portrait, pre- sented him in a way designed to evoke admiration in the audience. This design involved an elaborate plan of apotheosis which persists through- out the play and, in some way, affects every element of the play's structure. At the same time, he attempted to persuade the audience not to leave the theatre with an uncritical acceptance of the hero's career as an ideal to be taken as a model. The existence of such an extensive plan suggests that, in addition to his having been an iconclastic, lyrical poet of great powers, he was an eminently conscious dramatist, who in the process of composition was aware, at all times, of the inter- action between his material and his audience, and who had the necessary ability and knowledge of his craft demanded by the constant control over material and audience reaction which is exhibited in Tamburlaine, Part I. To support these assertions, the first part of this study dis- cusses the problems which the selection of Tamburlaine as the subject of a play presented to the dramatist, and it investigates the means by which he resolved these problems and achieved that particular tensive effect between exhilaration and aversion the character of Tamburlaine has upon an audience, be it Elizabethan or modern.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestal Virgins of Rome: Images of Power Melissa Huang Illinois Wesleyan University Amanda Coles, Faculty Advisor Illinois Wesleyan University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ Illinois Wesleyan University Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU John Wesley Powell Student Research 2013, 24th Annual JWP Conference Conference Apr 20th, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM Vestal Virgins of Rome: Images Of Power Melissa Huang Illinois Wesleyan University Amanda Coles, Faculty Advisor Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/jwprc Part of the History Commons Melissa Huang and Amanda Coles, Faculty Advisor, "Vestal Virgins of Rome: Images Of Power" (April 20, 2013). John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference. Paper 3. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/jwprc/2013/oralpres5/3 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by The Ames Library, the Andrew W. Mellon Center for Curricular and Faculty Development, the Office of the Provost and the Office of the President. It has been accepted for inclusion in Digital Commons @ IWU by the faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. 1 The Power of Representation: The Vestal Virgins of Rome Melissa Huang Abstract: The earliest archaeological and literary evidence suggest that the Vestal Virgins began as priestesses primarily responsible for religious fertility and purification rituals. Yet from humble beginnings, the Vestals were able to create a foothold in political life through the turbulence of the transition from Republic to Principate. In part due to the violent and perilous transition, the Vestal Virgins of Rome began to represent a sense of what it meant to be Roman.
    [Show full text]
  • Akropolis Museum 581 a Family at the Apaturia?
    AKROPOLIS MUSEUM 581 A FAMILYAT THE APATURIA? (PLATES 1 14-116) A KROPOLIS MUSEUM 581 (P1. 114), showing an Athenian family of five offering a pig sacrificeto Athena, ranksamong the best-knownvotive reliefs of the late Archaic period.1 It is of Parian marble.2 Although it is always cited for its exquisite style, scholars hardlyever look at its content.3 Discussionshave usuallybeen confined to the possibilitythat it is one of the earliest archaisticsculptures of the Severe Style, and its dating has ranged from 510 to 480.4 The question of archaism, first raised by Dickins in 1912,5 was only recently laid to rest.6 Let us cast a fresh glance at the unique iconographyof the relief. Is it possible to guess the occasion for the dedication? Can it be associatedwith a public festival? That a family is involvedmay point to a privateevent; on the other hand, appearancesmay be misleading. The relief was excavated on the Athenian Akropolisby the Archaeological Society in 1883, between the Parthenon and the Museum, along with other fragments of sculptures destroyed during the Persian sack of the Akropolisin 480.7 The fragmentswere used as foundation material for the terracing of the rock east of the Parthenon. Its inclusion in material from the Persian sack excludes the possibilityof a date after 480, as has sometimes been suggested.8 In 1886, Stais publishedan engraving of the relief, which is now the sole 1 Payne 1936, pp. 48-49, p1. 126:1;W-H. Schuchhardtin Schrader 1939, no. 424, pp. 304-305, pl. 175; Kraus 1960, p.
    [Show full text]