DOCSLIB.ORG

University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between. Kathleen Chrimes deals with post-Classical Sparta in 3 Part I of her work entitled Ancient Sparta. She has attempted to ^Pierre Roussel, Sparte (Paris: E. de Boccard, Editeur, 1939), PP. 189-216. 2 Eug&ne Cavaignac, Sparte (Paris: Librairie Arth&me Fayard, 19^8), pp. 179-218. ^K.M.T. Chrimes, Ancient Sparta (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 19^9), PP« 1-55* reinterpret the history of the period in the light of the major reforms which took place at this time. Her theories, although L interesting, are generally rejected by Humfrey Michell who, unfortunately, has only one chapter^ on Hellenistic Sparta, in which he concentrates on Agis, Cleomenes, and Nabis. Hie work is important, however, for its extremely informative narrative of the reform movement in Sparta and the part in it played by these three men. The best attempt to cover, in detail, the whole of Spartan i history from its beginning through the Roman period has been made by Victor Ehrenberg in his excellent article in Pauly-Wissowa.^ i His vast knowledge of sources, both literary and epigraphic, as well as his keen intellectual probing into his subject, make his work the most important secondary source of knowledge of Hellenistic Sparta. He records the prominent events in as much detail as is possible in an encyclopedic article, and his listing and analyses of the source material for this subject are especially thorough and valuable. Of the writers of Greek history in general, mention should 7 3 be made of Karl Beloch and Georg Busolt. Beloch treats Spartan H. Michell, Sparta (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1952), pp. 315-357. 5 Ibid., chapter XI. ^Pauly-Wissowa-Kroll, Real-EncyclopSdie der klassischen Altertumswissenshaft, III A-w, 1929, especially columns l*+21-lM+5. 7 Karl J. Beloch, Griechische Geschichte (Berlin und Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1925-1927)* IV, 1 & 2. g Georg Busolt, Griechische Staatskunde, II, Vol. IV, I, 1 of Handbuch der Altertumswissenshaft, ed. by H. Swoboda (12 vols.; Munich: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1926), pp. 633-737. ill history only with respect to its relationship to the general history of the Greek world in this period, but his observations, though scattered, are scholarly and authoritative. Busolt narrates the subject in a more concise manner in the first part of the second volume of his work, entitled "Der Staat der Lakedaimonier." He tends to concentrate, however, on the period of social reform to the neglect of other more or less important events. In the field of Hellenistic history, Benedict Niese's q Geschichte der Griechischen und Makedonischen Staaterr and the articles in the Cambridge Ancient History^ are, again, as far as Sparta is concerned, brief, but sound. M. Cary, in A History of the Greek World from 323 to 1^6 B.C. is more specific in his treatment of certain areas of Spartan history, especially the area of social reform, but his narrative is more factual than inter- 12 pretive. Maurice Holleaux interprets Spartan history almost exclusively in the terms of modern socialism. The inadequacy in all these works derives from their neglect of any but the most out­ standing events and persons of the Spartan history of this period. 9 Benedict Niese, Geschichte der Griechischen und Makedonischen Staaten (3 vols.; Gotha, Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1893-1903). ^Cambridge Ancient History. See: W. W. Tarn, "Greece: 335 to 321 B.C.," VI, chap. 1^, 438-460; W. W. Tarn, "The New Hellenistic Kingdoms," VII, chap. 3» 75-108, "Macedonia and Greece," VII, chap. 6, 197-223, and "The Greek Leagues and Macedonia," VII, chap. 23, 732-768; M. Holleaux, "Rome and Macedon: Philip Against the Romans," VIII, chap. 5, 116-137» and "Rome and Macedon: The Romans Against Philip," VIII, chap. 6 , 138-198; P.V.M. Benecke, "Rome and the Hellenistic States," VIII, chap. 9» 279-305* Cary, A History of the Greek World from 323 to lA-6 B.C. (2d ed. rev.; London; Methuen & Co., Ltd., 1951)* 12 Maurice Holleaux, Rome, la Grece et les Monarchies Hellenistiques, Vol. IZk in Bibliotheque Ecoles Francaises d*Athenes et de Rome (Paris: Ancienne Librairie Fontemoing et 6ie, 1920). iv Several areas of the Hellenistic period lend themselves to specific study, and the leagues which arose at this time especially are of interest in a discussion of later Sparta. A very early work was done by Edward A. Freeman entitled A History of Federal Govern- 13 ment in Greece and Italy. Nothing done in more recent time has surpassed the quality of this book. It gives a highly detailed and scholarly account of the relationships of Sparta with both the Achaean and Aetolian Leagues. More recent works on the leagues lif are J.A.O. Larsen's two articles in Classical Philology. and his 15 book entitled Representative Government in Greek and Roman History. ^ In both his articles and his monograph, Larsen treats Sparta only incidentally. Freeman's example has also been followed in a somewhat lesser degree by F. W. Walbank in his work on Aratos of Sicyon. Walbank gives a vivid picture of Aratos, the man and the politician. He is fair in his treatment of those individuals with whom Aratos came into contact. The weakness in his discussion lies in his tendency, natural enough, to become a special pleader for Aratos, and to seek to justify, or at least excuse, all his acts. Since his scope is limited to the lifespan of Aratos, Walbank discusses , 13 E. A. Freeman, A History of Federal Government in Greece and Italy, ed. by J. B. Bury (2d ed.; London: Macmillan and Co., J.A.O. Larsen, "Representative Government in the Pan- hellenic Leagues," Reprinted from Classical Philology XX (1925) and XXI (1926). ■^J.A.O. Larsen, Representative Government in Greek and Roman History (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1955)* ^F. W. Walbank, Aratos of Sicyon (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1933)* Sparta mainly in the Cleomenic period, but he does this with all due justice to Cleomenes III* Two other works specifically concerned with the Greek * 17 leagues are Marcel du Bois* Les Ligues Etolienne et Acheenne and two articles in Klio by Heinrich Swoboda entitled "Studien l8 zu den griechischen Bunden." Both authors treat Spartan history only incidentally to their main subject, but they give the reader a clear insight into the diplomacy of the time, and Sparta played an important part in this diplomatic activity. Concerning the history of Sparta herself in the Hellenistic age, one special area is almost inevitably emphasized— the social revolution begun by Agis IV and completed by Cleomenes III. One of the best discussions of the background of the land problem in 19 Sparta is found in Le Mirage Spartiate by Francois Oilier. The author gives a precise and detailed discussion of the whole problem, dealing at length with the early period of Spartan history and with the decline in population especially among the citizen- class. Naturally, there have been several attempts made to link the social revolution in Sparta to socialism. Two such endeavors are Robert von Pbhlmann's Geschichte der sozialen Frage und des 17 * Marcel du Bois, Les Ligues Etolienne et Acheenne, XIV (Paris: Biblioth&que des Ecoles Franeaises d'Ath¥nes et de Rome, 1 8 8 5 ) . l 8 H, Swoboda, "Studien zu den griechischen Bunden, I and II," Klio, XI (1911), ^50-463; XII (1912)-, 17-50. To Francois Oilier, L£ Mirage Spartiate. II (Paris: SocietS d'Edition les Belles Lettres, 19^3)• vi 20 Socialismus in der antiken Welt, and an article in Klio by Gawril Kazarow, "Zur Geschichte der sozialen Revolution in 21 Sparta." Although all analogies between ancient and modern "socialism" are apt to be more or less forced, the attempts at analogy throw light on the nature of the social revolution in Sparta, and the characters and purposes of the leading actors in it. There is no one work, therefore, that treats the whole history of Hellenistic Sparta intimately and in detail, and from the Spartan point of view.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS of GREEK CITIES: I Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288
    ROBERT K. SHERK THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS OF GREEK CITIES: I aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 249 The Eponymous Officials of Greek Cities: I (A) Introduction The eponymous official or magistrate after whom the year was named in Greek cities or as- sociations is well known to all epigraphists under various titles: archon, prytanis, stephanepho- ros, priest, etc. Some details about them have appeared in many articles and in scattered pas- sages of scholarly books. However, not since the publication of Clemens Gnaedinger, De Graecorum magistratibus eponymis quaestiones epigraphicae selectae (Diss. Strassburg 1892) has there been a treatment of the subject as a whole, although the growth of the material in this regard has been enormous.1 What is missing, however, is an attempt to bring the material up to date in a comprehensive survey covering the whole Greek world, at least as far as possible. The present article, of which this is only the first part, will present that material in a geographically organized manner: mainland Greece and the adjacent islands, then the Aegean islands, Asia Minor and Thrace, Syria, Egypt, Cyrene, Sicily, and southern Italy. All the epi- graphic remains of that area have been examined and catalogued. General observations and conclusions will be presented after the evidence as a whole has been given. I. Earliest Examples of Eponymity The earliest form of writing appeared in Sumer and Assyria sometime within the last half of the fourth millennium BC, and from there it spread westward. Thus, it is not at all surpris- ing that the Mesopotamian civilizations also made the earliest use of assigning names or events to years in dating historical records.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese
    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through
    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip V and Perseus: the Twilight of Antigonid Macedonia Philip V of Macedonia Was a Shrewd and Effective Leader. He Proved Ev
    Philip V and Perseus: The Twilight of Antigonid Macedonia Philip V of Macedonia was a shrewd and effective leader. He proved even more adept than his predecessors at dealing with the Greek city-states, Illyrian invasions, and the other traditional concerns of his kingdom. Unfortunately for him, he was forced to deal with a completely new threat, for which he was unprepared—the rising power of Rome. Philip V and his son and successor Perseus failed in their conflicts with Rome, and ultimately allowed Macedonia to be conquered by the Romans. Since the wars they fought against Rome were recorded by Roman historians, they are known as the Macedonian Wars. Early Life and Reign of Philip V Philip V was the son of Demetrius II, who died in battle when Philip was nine years old. Since the army and nobility were hesitant to trust the kingdom to a child, they made Antigonas Doson regent, and then king. Antigonas honored Philip’s position, and when Antigonas died in 221 BC, Philip ascended smoothly to the throne at the age of seventeen. As the young king of Macedonia, Philip V was eager to prove his abilities. He defeated the Dardians in battle. When hostilities broke out between the two major leagues of Greek cities—the Achaean League and Aetolian League—he sided with Aratus and the Achaean League. Thanks to Philip’s intervention, the Achaeans achieved major victories against the Aetolians, and Aratus became one of Philip’s advisors. First Macedonian War (214–205 BC) In 219 BC, Demetrius of Pharos, the king of Illyria, fled to Philip’s court after being expelled by the Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Pembroke Bible Chapel Mark Floyd – 2010 August 22 Message No
    Daniel Pembroke Bible Chapel Mark Floyd – 2010 August 22 Message No. DAN-12 The Key to Prophetic Revelation Prophecies About The Nations (Daniel 11) SUMMARY The revelations of Chapter 11 were given to Daniel by an angel (introduced in Chapter 10) in the third year of the reign of the Persian ruler Cyrus II (~ 536 BC; 10:1; Ezra 1:1). The prophecies of verses 2-35 predict the rise and fall of several rulers of the Persian and Greek empires over a ~ 365 year period (529-164 BC). Ultimately, verses 36-45 predict the rise and fall of a future satanic ruler that will exist at Israel’s end time, just prior to the second coming of Christ to establish His kingdom on earth. Four Persian Rulers (2; 529-465 BC) this prophecy predicts the rise and fall of four Persian rulers that came after Cyrus II and Darius the Mede: o Cambyses (529-522 BC) o Smerdis (522-521 BC) o Darius Hystaspes (521-486 BC; Ezra 5-6) o Xerxes I (486-465 BC) . also known as “Ahaseurus” (Esther 1) . used his riches to lead a disastrous expedition against Greece in 480 BC Alexander the Great (3-4; 336-323 BC) conquered Persia and established the Greek empire his reign was brief, dying at age 32, and leaving no heir his kingdom was divided amongst his generals, eventually leading to four weaker rulers/kingdoms: o Cassander – Macedonia/Greece o Lysimachus – Thrace and Asia Minor (Bithynia) o Ptolemy I – Egypt, Palestine and Arabia) o Seleucus – Syria, Babylonia and east to India Pembroke Bible Chapel Mark Floyd – 2010 August 22 Message No.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian and Greek Water Cultures and Hydro-Technologies in Ancient Times
    sustainability Review Egyptian and Greek Water Cultures and Hydro-Technologies in Ancient Times Abdelkader T. Ahmed 1,2,* , Fatma El Gohary 3, Vasileios A. Tzanakakis 4 and Andreas N. Angelakis 5,6 1 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Aswan University, Aswan 81542, Egypt 2 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia 3 Water Pollution Research Department, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt; [email protected] 4 Department of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Science, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Iraklion, 71410 Crete, Greece; [email protected] 5 HAO-Demeter, Agricultural Research Institution of Crete, 71300 Iraklion, Greece; [email protected] 6 Union of Water Supply and Sewerage Enterprises, 41222 Larissa, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 October 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 Abstract: Egyptian and Greek ancient civilizations prevailed in eastern Mediterranean since prehistoric times. The Egyptian civilization is thought to have been begun in about 3150 BC until 31 BC. For the ancient Greek civilization, it started in the period of Minoan (ca. 3200 BC) up to the ending of the Hellenistic era. There are various parallels and dissimilarities between both civilizations. They co-existed during a certain timeframe (from ca. 2000 to ca. 146 BC); however, they were in two different geographic areas. Both civilizations were massive traders, subsequently, they deeply influenced the regional civilizations which have developed in that region. Various scientific and technological principles were established by both civilizations through their long histories. Water management was one of these major technologies. Accordingly, they have significantly influenced the ancient world’s hydro-technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOPOEMEN IMMODICUS and SUPERBUS and SPARTA the Decision Taken by the Achaean League in the Autumn of 192 B.G at Aegium To
    PHILOPOEMEN IMMODICUS AND SUPERBUS AND SPARTA The decision taken by the Achaean League in the autumn of 192 B.G at Aegium to wage war against the Aetolians and their allies was crucial to the Greeks and their future. Greece proper had been divided for generations among several political bodies — and, in fact, had never been united into one state. Yet all those known as Έλληνες felt the natural human desire to avoid the unnecessary violence, bloodshed, and self-destruction engendered by ceaseless competition for preeminence and hegemomy in the domestic arena. The so-called “Tragic Historians” adopted these emotions as the leitmotif of their principal efforts to delineate the deeds and omissions of the Greek leadership and populace.1 Rome’s powerful political-strategical penetration east of the Adriatic sea, into Mainland Greece, particularly during the later decades of the third century B.C, undermined the precarious balance of internal Greek politics. The embarrassment which had seized most of Greece is easily understandable. Yet the Achaeans at Aegium do not appear to have been inspired by the memory of their ancestors’ resistance to the Persians. The Achaean leaders, Philopoemen not excluded, rejected Aetolian pleas for help or, at least, non-intervention in the struggle that they had started in the name of Έλληνες for the whole of Greece. Somewhat surprisingly, the Achaean leaders hastened to declare war on the Aetolians, anticipating even the Roman crossing to Greece2. These are the bare facts available to us (Livy 35.50.2-6). However, the conventional interpretation of these occurrences derived from Polybius 3 tends to be pathetic more than historical, and consti­ tute an embellished portrait of Achaean policy and politicians of those days rather than an honest guide to the political realities of the Έλληνες and Greece proper.
    [Show full text]
  • Descent from Lucius Cornelius Scipio
    My Descendant Chart Lucius Cornelius Scipio b. ca 300 BC dp. Rome, Italy Publius Cornelius Scipio d. 211 BC, upper Baetis river, Hispania & Pomponia Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus b. 236 BC d. 3 Dec 183 BC, Liternum, Campania, Italy & Aemilia Paula Tertia b. ca 230 BC, Rome, Italy d. 163/164 BC Cornelia Scipionis Africana Major b. ca 201 BC & Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Corculum m. ca 184 BC Publius Cornelius Scipio Nasica Serapio Pontifex Maximus b. 183 BC, Pergamon, Asia Minor d. 132 BC, Pergamon, Asia Minor Cornelia Scipionis Drusus II b. 153 BC d. 89 BC & Marcus Livius Drusa d. 108 BC Livia Drusa b. ca 120 BC d. ca 92 BC & Marcus Porcius Cato d. 118 BC Marcus Porcius Cato Catonis Minor Uticensis b. 95 BC, Rome, Italy d. Apr 46 BC, Utica, Italy & Atilia Uticensis m. ca 73 BC Porcia Catonis b. 72 BC d. 42 BC & Marcus Calpurnius Bibulus b. 102 BC, Rome, Italy d. 48 BC, Corcyra (Corfu), Greece m. btw 58 and 53 BC Gaius Calpurnius Bibulus b. 55 BC d. 35 & Domitia b. 50 BC Domitia Calvina b. 35 BC, Rome, Italy & Marcus Junius Silanus b. ca 35 BC, Rome, Italy d. 35 Junia Calvina Equitus b. ca 005 BC, Rome, Italy & Gaius Sallustius Crispus Passienus Equitius b. ca 015 BC, Visellium, Italy d. ca 47, Rome, Italy Gaius Salustius b. ca 015 & Ummidia Quadratilla Quadratus b. ca 028 Gaius Ummidius Quadratus Sallustius b. ca 45 & Sertoria Sallustius b. ca 68, Rome, Italy Gaius Ummidius Quadratus Annianus Verus Fulvius b. ca 110 & Annia Cornificia Faustina b.
    [Show full text]