JBV Annual Report 2003.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JBV Annual Report 2003.Indd ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 0 3 Railway in Norway 150 years, 1854–2004 Contents Director General’s review ........................................... 3 What is Jernbaneverket? ............................................ 4 Organisational structure ............................................ 5 Safety .............................................................................. 6 Finance and efficiency ................................................ 10 Operations Maintenance Capital expenditure – rail network development State Accounts for 2003 Human resources ......................................................... 16 Personnel and working environment Competitiveness .......................................................... 18 The Norwegian railway network Key figures for the national rail network Traffic volumes on the national rail network Punctuality .................................................................... 22 Environmental protection .......................................... 24 International activities ................................................ 26 Cover: Historic photographs: Norsk Jernbanemuseum. Photo: Rune Fossum Photo: Rune Fossum, Øystein Grue, Arvid Larsen/Jernbaneverket. www.jernbaneverket.no Director General’s review Director General Steinar Killi An efficient, modern National Rail railways pays off. Europe as a whole is open to traffic in 2005 and will be the Administration is essential if we are to investing in rail, as are our neighbouring first step towards a modern and efficient turn our vision of increased rail traf- countries. I would strongly advise that suburban rail system for the Oslo region. fic into reality. In 2003 we introduced we in Norway declare a ten-year period Our priorities in other parts of the important organisational changes, and of investment in rail, with annual capital country have included increasing the our project to establish a lean, modern expenditure rising by NOK 1 billion and loading gauge in tunnels. As a result, the organisation has dominated the daily life targeted at those areas where rail enjoys entire mainline network was cleared for of most employees over the past year. the strongest competitive advantages. piggyback traffic during 2003, and piggy- One way or another, everyone is directly That will enable rail to regain its effec- back services have already proved very or indirectly affected by this process, tiveness as an efficient, environmentally successful on the Oslo–Bergen route. but our determination to make it work friendly mode of transport. Freight traffic was deregulated with has been a strong motivating force. Safety is a key word on the railway. effect from 15 March 2003. A number The results of all this work will become Every minute of every day, round the of freight operators are now running increasingly apparent over the years clock, safety is our top priority. 2003 services in Norway, and demand for rail ahead. The aim is to get more railway for was one of the best years on record for freight is growing. This is very encourag- our money. rail safety in Norway. The government’s ing. It will be interesting to see whether The battle for rail funding is an ongo- go-ahead for installation of the GSM-R passenger services follow the same trend ing process. In 2003, Norway’s four gov- radio system on the Nordland, Røros when they are opened up to competi- ernment agencies in the transport sector and Rauma lines will further enhance tion in the near future. – Kystverket (coastal shipping), Avinor safety. However, it is vital that GSM-R At 31 December 2003, Jernbaneverket (civil aviation), Statens Vegvesen (roads) coverage is not confined to these lines, had 3 444 employees, 92 fewer than at and Jernbaneverket (rail) – agreed on but extended to the entire Norwegian the previous year-end. I should like to a common platform for their submis- rail network over the years ahead. Safety thank them all for their hard work in the sions to government regarding the is something we have to create – and course of the year. National Transport Plan 2006–15. The recreate every single day. proposals were based on the budgetary The railway continues to account framework set by the government. The for the largest onshore construction government’s draft National Transport project in Norway, with substantial capi- Plan, presented in March, will go before tal expenditure and construction work Steinar Killi the Norwegian Parliament in June 2004. now under way between Sandvika and For Jernbaneverket’s part, we have made Asker. Jernbaneverket has accelerated it clear that it is time for Norwegian rail- the project and reduced costs through ways to change track. Our socioeconomic efficient use of resources and working calculations have shown that building methods. The new line is scheduled to 3 What is Jernbaneverket? Jernbaneverket reports to the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The Ministry monitors the activities of Jernbaneverket through regular departmental meetings and periodic reports from Jernbaneverket. The Director General is the chief executive of Jernbaneverket. Jernbaneverket is responsible for: The national rail network, with its sta- These objectives are intended to pro- ■ Developing and operating a rail net- tions and terminals, is a vital part of the vide direction for the internal manage- work that meets the requirements of infrastructure of society. Development ment of the business. Each core area has society and the market in terms of and operation of the network is there- a separate chapter in this Annual Report. safety and quality (punctuality, train fore a socioeconomic task, which has to frequency, public information, etc.) be viewed in the same context as other ■ Railway stations and terminals, includ- socioeconomic activities. ing public spaces, information facili- Jernbaneverket aims to help the coun- ties, access, car parks and other public try achieve its transport policy objectives facilities necessary for users of rail and to promote rail as a safe, competitive services form of transport, forming part of an ■ Entering into track access agreements integrated network. with train operators running services In 2001, Jernbaneverket drew up on the national rail network strategies and principal objectives for ■ Scheduling and allocation of train the following six core areas: paths to operators ■ Managing train traffic on the rail network ■ Studies and planning in the rail sector ������ ��������������� ����������� ���������� ����������� ����� �������� ��������� ������ ���������� 4 Organisational structure Since 2002, Jernbaneverket has been systematically working to turn itself into a more efficient and effective railway administration. In short, the objective has been to regions instead of the previous four. The ■ Train control, dispatching, and control develop a structure that: new regional headquarters are located in of traction current ■ Increases Jernbaneverket’s presence Oslo, Bergen and Trondheim. The regions ■ Passenger information systems on the ground play the role of owner in running, main- ■ Monitoring punctuality ■ Reduces the costs of administrative taining and managing the national rail and technical support functions by network. Jernbaneverket Operations BaneEnergi, Jernbaneverket’s electric- 25% over three years (formerly Railway Production) forms part ity supplier, has been part of the Traffic ■ Ensures that know-how within the of the Infrastructure Division and since Division since the new structure took organisation is better utilised 1 January 2004 has comprised three effect on 1 May 2003. ■ Ensures that Jernbaneverket presents operational units, one for each region. The Directorate is responsible for itself as a single entity to customers, The Infrastructure Division also includes formulating overall strategy and users, staff and other interested parties Infrastructure Construction, which acts monitoring the performance of the as developer for railway construction organisation. Operational tasks and The process has taken place in stages, projects, from the detailed planning technical and administrative support in close cooperation with staff organisa- stage through to completion of the functions are being transferred to the tions. With effect from 1 May 2003, the new infrastructure. The project services line organisations and/or a new Shared Directorate (formerly known as the Head department is part of Infrastructure Administrative Services unit based in Office) was reorganised, and two line Construction, providing technical sup- Hamar. organisations/divisions were set up: port to all parts of Jernbaneverket in BaneService provides rail-related the Infrastructure Division (Infrastructure respect of planning, project develop- contracting services using specialised Management) and the Traffic Division ment and project management. equipment and heavy machinery, and is (Traffic Management). The Traffic Division comprises four an arm’s-length business with an internal The Infrastructure Division is responsi- traffic areas, based in Oslo, Drammen, board appointed by Jernbaneverket. ble for coordinating all activities relating Bergen and Trondheim, and is respon- The Norwegian Railway Museum, to infrastructure operations, mainte- sible for traffic management on the rail part of the marketing and communica- nance and construction. Since 1 January network. Its main tasks are as follows: tions department, is in charge of his- 2004, the division has comprised three torical documentation and promoting Norwegian railway history.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Short Term Precipitation in Norway 1967-2010
    no. 15/2011 Climate ANALYSIS OF SHORT TERM PRECIPITATION IN NORWAY 1967-2010 Jostein Mamen, Rasmus Benestad and Jan Erik Haugen Photo: Einar Egeland . Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Observation of short term precipitation in Norway . 4 1.2 Types of stations . 4 1.2.1 Tipping bucket rain gauge stations . 4 1.2.2 Weight pluviometer stations . 4 2 Rainfall rate statistics from tipping bucket rain gauge data 5 2.1 Maximum recorded 1 minute values . 5 2.2 Seasonal variations . 8 3 Rainfall rate statistics from weight pluviometer data 10 3.1 Maximum recorded 1 hour values . 10 3.2 Seasonal variations . 12 3.3 Conversion method from 1 hour to 1 minute precipitation . 12 4 Rainfall rate maps 13 4.1 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.001 % of the time . 13 4.2 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 16 4.2.1 Monthly values . 19 4.3 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.1 % of the time . 19 4.4 Rainfall intensity exceeded 0.5 % of the time . 22 5 Rainfall rate trends from tipping bucket data and return periods 24 5.1 Rainfall rate trends . 24 5.1.1 Trends of maximum annual 1-minute intensity . 24 5.1.2 Trends of intensity exceeded 0.01 % of the time . 24 5.2 Return periods . 24 6 Methods used to derive rainfall intensity data from long term historical data set 26 7 Appendix - list of stations 33 3 1 Introduction In telecommunication heavy precipitation can lead to outage. [1], [4]. Met.no is therefore asked to analyze short term precipitation in Norway, down to one minute's time resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Descriptions
    STATE-OWNED COMPANIES Company descriptions The following section contains descriptions of companies with state ownership. The Swe- dish Government Offices are responsible for the company descriptions and the assess- ments. The figures are based on data reported to the Government Offices by the compan- ies. In some cases, the information may differ from the company’s annual report due to the application of different accounting principles or different key ratio calculations. DEFINITIONS Return on equity Net profit/loss as a percentage of average shareholders’ equity. Return on total assets Profit/loss after financial items with the reinstatement of financial expen- ses as a percentage of average total assets. Return on capital employed Profit/loss after financial items plus financial expenses as a percen- tage of average capital employed. Return on operating capital Operating profit/loss as a percentage of average operating capital. Net indebtedness Current and long-term interest-bearing liabilities and interest-bearing provi- sions less interest-bearing current assets and fixed assets. Equity/assets ratio Shareholders’ equity including minority as a percentage of the balance sheet total. Average number of employees Recalculated as yearly employees. Dividend For 2001, dividends refer to the proposed dividend. For 2000, dividends refer to the actual dividend paid. Total assets Balance sheet total. Capital employed Balance sheet total less non-interest bearing liabilities. Operating capital Balance sheet total less non-interest bearing liabilities and interest-bearing assets. Industry-specific key ratios Property companies Yield = operating surplus divided by average book value of properties. Finance companies Income/expense ratio including loan losses = total operating income divided by total operating expenses Capital adequacy ratio = capital base divided by risk-weighted amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Solutions for Zero Emission Railways. Case Study
    Possible Solutions For Zero Emission Railways MOZEES Workshop - 22nd – 23rd October: CIENS, Oslo – Forum Dag Aarsland, Senior Advisor Possible Solutions for Zero Emission Railways MANDAT Forprosjekt NULLFIB- NULLutslippsløsninger For Ikke-elektrifiserte Baner Non-electrified lines • 1395 km (approx. 1/3rd) of total 4150 km is non- electrified. • Estimated cost for electrification for Nordlandsbanen would be = 1- 1,3 Billion €. Other lines (Meråker line and Trondheim- Stjørdal) will be electrified. • Diesel consumption for all lines per year is approx. 16 mill/litre • Fuel consumption for a Cargo-train for example, Trondheim-Bodø is approx. 8000 litres (roundtrip). Freight train passing mountain Saltfjellet on the Nordland line. Considering four alternatives Transition from fossil-based to zero-carbon for passenger-trains, freight-trains and on-track- machines. Study of: • Hydrogen • Biogas • Biodiesel • Battery Deadline for the feasibility study is end of 2019. Bodø, terminus of the Nordland line Hydrogen operation – assessment by the end of 2019 • The Norwegian Government Transport Committee has requested the Railway Directorate to investigate the possibility of a test project with hydrogen operation of railway vehicles. • The directorate shall before end of 2019 assess the cost and feasibility of a pilot project. Alstom hydrogen powered train Feasibility study of battery operation • Feasibility study of battery-operation for Nordlandsbanen (Trondheim – Bodø). • Length 728km, 162 tunnels, 256 bridges, challenging operation conditions. • Including the line from Rana mines to Mo I Rana. Snow clearing on tracks on the mountain Saltfjellet on the Nordland line Contributors Electrification Is it possible in a cost-effective way only to electrify sections of the line? Horisontal profile – Nordland line What do the train manufacturers think? Consepts for passenger train with locomotive and coaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manual
    PRODUCT MANUAL The Sami of Finnmark. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life/visitnorway.com. Norwegian Travel Workshop 2014 Alta, 31 March-3 April Sorrisniva Igloo Hotel, Alta. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life AS/visitnorway.com INDEX - NORWEGIAN SUPPLIERS Stand Page ACTIVITY COMPANIES ARCTIC GUIDE SERVICE AS 40 9 ARCTIC WHALE TOURS 57 10 BARENTS-SAFARI - H.HATLE AS 21 14 NEW! DESTINASJON 71° NORD AS 13 34 FLÅM GUIDESERVICE AS - FJORDSAFARI 200 65 NEW! GAPAHUKEN DRIFT AS 23 70 GEIRANGER FJORDSERVICE AS 239 73 NEW! GLØD EXPLORER AS 7 75 NEW! HOLMEN HUSKY 8 87 JOSTEDALSBREEN & STRYN ADVENTURE 205-206 98 KIRKENES SNOWHOTEL AS 19-20 101 NEW! KONGSHUS JAKT OG FISKECAMP 11 104 LYNGSFJORD ADVENTURE 39 112 NORTHERN LIGHTS HUSKY 6 128 PASVIKTURIST AS 22 136 NEW! PÆSKATUN 4 138 SCAN ADVENTURE 38 149 NEW! SEIL NORGE AS (SAILNORWAY LTD.) 95 152 NEW! SEILAND HOUSE 5 153 SKISTAR NORGE 150 156 SORRISNIVA AS 9-10 160 NEW! STRANDA SKI RESORT 244 168 TROMSØ LAPLAND 73 177 NEW! TROMSØ SAFARI AS 48 178 TROMSØ VILLMARKSSENTER AS 75 179 TRYSILGUIDENE AS 152 180 TURGLEDER AS / ENGHOLM HUSKY 12 183 TYSFJORD TURISTSENTER AS 96 184 WHALESAFARI LTD 54 209 WILD NORWAY 161 211 ATTRACTIONS NEW! ALTA MUSEUM - WORLD HERITAGE ROCK ART 2 5 NEW! ATLANTERHAVSPARKEN 266 11 DALSNIBBA VIEWPOINT 1,500 M.A.S.L 240 32 DESTINATION BRIKSDAL 210 39 FLØIBANEN AS 224 64 FLÅMSBANA - THE FLÅM RAILWAY 229-230 67 HARDANGERVIDDA NATURE CENTRE EIDFJORD 212 82 I Stand Page HURTIGRUTEN 27-28 96 LOFOTR VIKING MUSEUM 64 110 MAIHAUGEN/NORWEGIAN OLYMPIC MUSEUM 190 113 NATIONAL PILGRIM CENTRE 163 120 NEW! NORDKAPPHALLEN 15 123 NORWEGIAN FJORD CENTRE 242 126 NEW! NORSK FOLKEMUSEUM 140 127 NORWEGIAN GLACIER MUSEUM 204 131 STIFTELSEN ALNES FYR 265 164 CARRIERS ACP RAIL INTERNATIONAL 251 2 ARCTIC BUSS LOFOTEN 56 8 AVIS RENT A CAR 103 13 BUSSRING AS 47 24 COLOR LINE 107-108 28 COMINOR AS 29 29 FJORD LINE AS 263-264 59 FJORD1 AS 262 62 NEW! H.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Government-Owned Airport Operator and Air Navigation Services Provider Avinor Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable
    Research Update: Norwegian Government-Owned Airport Operator And Air Navigation Services Provider Avinor Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable Primary Credit Analyst: Izabela Listowska, Frankfurt (49) 69-33-999-127; [email protected] Secondary Contact: Olli Rouhiainen, London (44) 20-7176-3769; [email protected] Table Of Contents Overview Rating Action Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research Ratings List WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT JULY 4, 2013 1 Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without S&P’s permission. See 0548209U | Linx User Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page. Research Update: Norwegian Government-Owned Airport Operator And Air Navigation Services Provider Avinor Rated 'AA-'; Outlook Stable Overview • We believe Avinor AS, the Norway-based airport network operator and air navigation services provider fully owned by the Norwegian state, has a "very high" likelihood of extraordinary government support in the event of financial distress. • We assess Avinor's stand-alone credit profile at 'bbb+', based on the group's "strong" business risk profile and "significant" financial risk profile. • We are assigning our 'AA-' long-term rating and our 'A-1+' short-term rating to Avinor. • The stable outlook reflects our view that the likelihood of government support will remain "very high" and that the group will be able to maintain its rating-commensurate credit measures in the medium term amid weaker economic conditions and accelerated capital spending. Rating Action On July 4, 2013, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'AA-' long-term corporate credit rating and its 'A-1+' short-term corporate credit rating to the Norwegian government-owned airport network operator and air navigation services provider Avinor AS.
    [Show full text]
  • Oceedings Pr
    A New Environmental Deal for Airport Regions PR O CEEDINGS 11 June 2014 1 A New Environmental Deal for Airport Regions December 2015 4 Edited by ARC, Airport Regions Conference Conference organised by Akershus County Council Airport Regions Conference The New Environmental Deal for Airport Regions Proceedings of Conference, 11 June 2014 ©2015 ARC Airport Regions Conference and Akershus County Council. All Printed with the supoport of rights reserved. This document may be freely reviewed and abstracted provided due ac- knowledgement is made to the source. A New Environmental Deal for Airport Regions About the Airport Regions Conference The Airport Regions Conference (ARC) is an association of regional and local authorities across Europe with an international airport situated within or near its territory. The ARC brings together a wide range of expertise at the interface of air transport and local and regional policies. A common concern is to balance the economic benefits generated by the airports against their environmental impact, notably the effect on the quality of life of local residents. The members exchange best practices through ARC network and reflect together on policy challenges ahead. As such the ARC also serves as a platform to express members interests to the European Institutions. We were delighted to be hosted for our annual general meeting in Oslo Akershus, and we want to share with you the knowledge harvested on that occasion. Sergi Alegre Calero – ARC president – Vice Mayor El Prat de Llobregat About Akershus County Council Oslo Airport is to further enhance its reputation as one of the world’s greenest airports by opening a hydrogen station for vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for Development of Transport Corridors for Further Studies
    Joint Barents Transport Plan Proposals for development of transport corridors for further studies September 2013 Front page photos: Kjetil Iversen, Rune N. Larsen and Sindre Skrede/NRK Table of Contents Table Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Background 12 1.2 Objectives and members of the Expert Group 13 1.3 Mandate and tasks 14 1.4 Scope 14 1.5 Methodology 2 Transport objectives 15 2.1 National objectives 15 2.2 Expert Group’s objective 16 3 Key studies, work and projects of strategic importance 17 3.1 Multilateral agreements and forums for cooperation 17 3.2 Multilateral projects 18 3.4 National plans and studies 21 4 Barents Region – demography, climate and main industries 23 4.1 Area and population 23 4.2 Climate and environment 24 4.3 Overview of resources and key industries 25 4.4 Ores and minerals 25 4.5 Metal industry 27 4.6 Seafood industry 28 4.7 Forest industry 30 4.8 Petroleum industry 32 4.9 Tourism industry 35 4.10 Overall transport flows 37 4.11 Transport hubs 38 5 Main border-crossing corridors in the Barents Region 40 5.1 Corridor: “The Bothnian Corridor”: Oulu – Haparanda/Tornio - Umeå 44 5.2 Corridor: Luleå – Narvik 49 5.3 Corridor: Vorkuta – Syktyvkar – Kotlas – Arkhangelsk - Vartius – Oulu 54 5.4 Corridor: “The Northern Maritime Corridor”: Arkhangelsk – Murmansk – The European Cont. 57 5.5 Corridor: “The Motorway of the Baltic Sea”: Luleå/Kemi/Oulu – The European Continent 65 5.6 Corridor: Petrozavodsk – Murmansk – Kirkenes 68 5.7 Corridor: Kemi – Salla – Kandalaksha 72 5.8 Corridor: Kemi – Rovaniemi – Kirkenes 76
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland, Norway & Faroes
    Port Handbook Chapter A - The Baltic Chapter B - United Kingdom & Ireland Chapter C - Atlantic Europe Chapter D - Iceland, Norway & Faroes Chapter E - Associated Members Copyright 2021 Cruise Europe Word of the chairman Matching cruise industry growth and cruise port capacities Cruise Europe and its more than 100 member ports between Gibraltar in the South, Kirkenes in the North and Lulea in the Baltic still has the potential for growth. Only 75% of the potential cruise ports along the Atlantic coast are members; also one has to include the potential of the cruise ports in Greenland and the area east of the North Cape. The tourist organisations of the ports, the regions, the countries can help as members to make Cruise Europe stronger in marketing the destination Northern Europe to the cruise lines. The aim for Cruise Europe is to match the ongoing growth of the cruise industry in offering better infrastructure in the member ports, which means more cruise terminals, or to point out the diversity of the many destinations and attractions in Northern Europe. Cruise Europe has to open a dialogue with the cruise lines with the intention to spread the growing number of cruise ships and the even bigger cruise passenger capacities over more ports, over more cruise areas, over more countries. The success of the Baltic is also possible in the areas of West Europe, of UK & Ireland and of Norway and Iceland. Cruise lines have to be convinced that all four cruise areas in Northern Europe have equal attractions and many Captain Michael McCarthy good ports to host the growing cruise fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Punktlighetsrapport 2007
    Punktlighetsrapport / Punctuality Report 2007 1 Innhold / Contens Forord / Introduction 3 Punktlighet / Punctuality 4 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 6 Lokaltog / Suburban 6 Flytoget / Gardermoen 10 Mellomdistanse / Regional 10 Strekningsvis punktlighet / Punctuality by line 12 Persontrafikk langdistanse / Long-distance passenger 12 Utlandstog / Cross-border 13 Godstrafikk / Freight 14 Punktlighet i togtrafikken / Train punctuality 1999–2007 16 Forsinkelsestimer / Hours lost to delays 2007 17 Forsinkelsesårsaker totalt / Overall causes of delays 17 Sporkapasitet / Track capacity 18 Flaskehalser / Bottlenecks 18 Kapasitetsforbedringer 2007 / Capacity enhancements in 2007 20 Eksempler på beregnet tidstap ved saktekjøringer / Examples on time lost owing to speed restrictions 21 Krav til oppetid / Uptime requirements 22 Trafikkutvikling / Traffic changes 25 Persontrafikken / Passenger services 25 Godstrafikken / Freight 26 2 Forord / Introduction Jernbaneverkets andel av forsinkelser i togtrafikken, inklu- Jernbaneverket’s rate of train delays and cancellations is sive innstillinger (kanselleringer) defineres som ”oppetid”. described as the infrastructure’s “uptime”. To meet the target For å tilfredsstille behovet for oppetid mht punktlighet, for uptime in punctuality terms, which should be close to som bør være nær 100 %, er det stilt krav til de forhold som 100%, we apply requirements in respect of the following påvirker dette; contributory factors: – tidstap på grunn av saktekjøringer. – Time lost owing to speed restrictions – forsinkelsestimer og innstillinger av tog som skyldes – Delays and service cancellations owing to infrastructure forhold i infrastrukturen. conditions – høy tilgjengelighet og lav feilfrekvens i anleggene til – High levels of availability and low failure rates in Jernbane- Jernbaneverkets. verket’s infrastructure Dette er viktige bidrag til god punktlighet og regularitet. These factors play a major part in good timekeeping and service reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 År På Veien Presentasjon Av Arne Johans Bussreiser
    2021 2010 30 år på veien Presentasjon av Arne Johans Bussreiser Velkommen til reiseåret 2021 Følg oss på Facebook I fjorårets katalog skrev jeg at dette blir et spennende reiseår. Det slo til for fullt, fredag 12. mars. Etter sightseeingen i Arne Johans Bussreiser har egen facebook side. Har et forbed- Paris begynte vi å få informasjon om kansellerte seilinger ringspotensiale på oppdateringer men prøver så godt jeg kan. med Color Line og stengte grenser inn til Danmark. Etter en Hjemmesiden www.arnejohans.no jobbes det med hele tiden lang etappe fra Paris kom vi hjem til et ny hverdag. 14 dager sådan skal være ajour stort sett hele tiden. Så er planen å sende ut med bare avbestillinger. April og mai måned uten noe å gjøre. et nyhetsbrev på mail 1 gang i måneden til de vi har mailadresse Men heldigvis kom alle hjem fra Spania i god behold både på. Så hvis du ønsker dette og er usikker på om vi har din fly passasjerer og bussreisende. Så jeg måtte ta noen grep mailadresse så kan du sende adressen din på [email protected] og legge om reiseprogrammet noe. Så fra 3. juni har vi kjørt turer rundt i Norges land. En stor takk til alle som har vært med og sørget for at Arne Johans Bussreiser har kommet seg Arne Johans Turistbusser gjennom sitt 30 driftsår. I skrivende stund så er smittesituasjonen stigende igjen. Så Arne Johans Turistbusser et personlig firma med base i Sande i jeg ser at det ikke kommer til å bli noen turer til Spania i 2021 Vestfold.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    Annual Report 2004 1 Contents Time for trains 3 What is Jernbaneverket? 4 Organisational structure 5 Safety 6 Finance and efficiency 10 Operations 10 Maintenance 11 Capital expenditure – rail network development 12 State Accounts for 2004 14 Human resources 16 Personnel and working environment 16 JBV Ressurs 16 Competitiveness 18 Train companies operating on the national rail network 18 Infrastructure capacity – Jernbaneverket’s core product 18 Operating parameters 19 Key figures for the national rail network 21 Traffic volumes on the national rail network 23 Punctuality 24 Environmental protection 26 International activities 28 Contact details 30 www.jernbaneverket.no 2 Cover: Jernbaneverket’s celebrations to mark 150 years of Norwegian railways. Photo: Øystein Grue Time for trains The past year marked the 150th anniversary of the railways in Norway and proved a worthy celebration. Punctuality has never been better, rail traffic is growing, and in summer 2004 the Norwegian Parliament took the historic decision to invest NOK 26.4 billion in developing a competitive rail network over the ten years from 2006 to 2015. In other words, the anniversary year not only provided the opportunity for a nostalgic look back, but also confirmed that the railways will continue to play a central role in the years ahead. In line with Parliament’s decision, value our good working relationship with autumn 2005. This brings us one step clo- Jernbaneverket has drawn up an action the trade unions. The railway has a culture ser to our goal of an efficient, modern rail programme which, if implemented, will and a historic legacy which need to be network in the Oslo region.
    [Show full text]