Also Available As a PDF, with Photos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Also Available As a PDF, with Photos Quality Railroad Books and Magazines Printed by: 124 East ector Street P.O. Box 735 Conshohocken, PA 19428 (215) 825-1223 We are commercial printers specializing in railroad hobby printing. Products: Services: Customers: • Newsletters • Single & Multi-Color e NRHS Chapters • Flyers & Tickets • Small & Large Quantities • Historical Societies • Books & Booklets • Typesetting & Design • Book Publishers • Magazines • Bookbinding • Hobby Businessmen President Gerald Squier Vice-President - Executive Eli Bail Vice President-Library& Research John P. Hoschek MOlORCOACH Vice-President-Admin. & Finance Donald M. Coffin Vice-President-Education Brian Sullivan AGE Vice-President- Publications Albert E. Meier Reg. Vice -President-At Large M.R. Castellanos Reg. Vice-President-New England Robert G. Hussey Reg. Vice-President-East Donald L. Weiss VOL.XXXIX NO. I Reg. Vice -President- Midwest Jack Rh oqes Reg. Vice-President-Pacific Coast .John McKane 1987 Reg. Vice -President-Southwest Ron M a ha ff ey Reg. Vice President- Southeast Ron Van Kleek ISSN O739-ll 7X Reg. Vice-President-Canada Chris Prentice Secretary Fred McGullam Published by the Motor Bus Society. Treasurer Donald M. Coffin Vintage Coach News Murray S. Kramer Conventions & MCA Advertising StephenMGoldmann Dues are $ 25, per year. Legal Jonathan Goodman Publication Sales Donald L. Weiss $4. when sold as single copies. Directors: Tom Dorsey Charles Sullivan Bruce Korusek George M. Howe ll Michael Glikin James Penning ADDRESSFORCORRESPONDENCE Nicholas Lang Ed Buckley Harold Geissenheimer All right you mugs, MOTOR BUS SOCIETY, INC. Trustees: who forgot to renew P.O. BOX 7058 Stephen M. Goldmann Murray S. Kramer my subscription to West Trenton, New Jersey 08628 John P. Hoschek Donald M. Coffin Jeff Miller Paul Semendinger MOTOR COACH AGE Since its founding in 1948, the Society has had as its main purpose the collection and publication of information about FRONT COVER: the history and progress of the bus business in the United States and Canada. Motor Coach Age this month begins coverage of transit Its membership includes representation in Salt Lake City and vicinity. This smart looking of many phases of the industry as well Utility Coach was one of 14 used to convert the busy as students and members of the general Sandy suburban line when street paving requirements public with an interest in buses. forced track removal. --Collection of Warren Miller Page 2 Motor Coach Age SALT LAKE C ITV PART I UTAH LIGHT & TRACTION CO. Salt Lake City was laid out in 1848 by Mormon pioneers jitney competition. led by Brigham Young. The city was conceived on a grand scale, with city blocks of ten acres and streets up to By 1918 the maximum trackage of 146 miles was reached, and 132 feet wide. The latter would prove very inviting to a period of consolidation and retrenchment began. Post the automobile 75 years later. World War 1 economic conditions led the company during the 1920's to rebuild its cars to one-man configuration. Some In 1872 the city had a population of 15,000 and was ripe new car bodies were purchased and other cars extensively for public transit. The Salt Lake Railroad Company, with rebuilt. In the process cars were renumbered, and persons Brigham Young as President, was formed in that year and interested in such matters still have not been able to built a street railway equipped with bob-tail cars pul­ reconstruct exactly what happened. led by Missouri mules. The line was generally considered a great success, although cynics held that walking was In October of 1923 the company began to experiment with quicker. the motor bus. A 12-passenger White was leased, and over the next two years trials of feeder services were conduct­ The first electric car ran on August 8, 1889, when five ed at various points in the city. The earliest route of miles of electricfied track were placed in service. A which there is any record is one along South 13th East rival appeared the following year in the form of the Salt Street between East 9th South and East 21st South Streets Lake Rapid Transit Company. feeding street car route 5. Some early documents refer to a new route in the Mill Creek section; it is still unde­ This set off a period of intense competition, with clas­ termined if the line described above and the Mill Creek sic confrontations between rival construction crews. route are one and the same. Tracks were torn up and relaid, and routes were laid on parallel streets in efforts to serve the same areas. The Street numberings in Salt Lake City can be confusing. In resulting network was overbuilt - a situation that was to all but the northeast quadrant of the city, both north­ come home to roost in later years. south and east-west streets are numbered. Numbering starts from Temple Square in downtown. East-west streets lying Recognizing that the competition was not in the best in­ south of Temple Square are designated South Temple, 1st terest of the two companies, they merged to form the South, 2nd South, etc. In the southeast quadrant of the Consolidated Railway & Power Company in 1901. Several city they are prefixed with "East," and in the southwest independent short lines were also included. Extension of quadrant with "West." Thus West 2nd South would be that lines into surrounding communities some distance from the part of 2nd South lying in the southwest quadrant, and city continued. East 2nd South would be in the southeast quadrant. CR&P was merged in 1904 with the local power company to North of Temple Square lie North Temple, 1st North, 2nd form the Utah Light & Railway Company. This firm then North, etc., with the appropriate prefix. North-south passed to the control of E. H. Harriman, President of the streets follow a similar system. West of Temple Square Union Pacific Railroad, who announced his intention to are West Temple, 1st West, 2nd West, etc. East of the create a model transportation system in Salt Lake City. Square are Main, State, 2nd East, 3rd East, etc. For these streets the prefix is "North" or "South." Note that there This he preceeded to do. Eighty miles of track was re­ is no East Temple or 1st East; these are replaced with built, new cars ordered, and power facilities modernized. Main and State, respectively. These are the principal New car barns were built to provide the most up to date business streets in the downtown. In the northeast quad­ maintenance facilities. Since the city was isolated from rant a different system is used. Numbered streets run east other manufacturing centers, the shops were equipped to and west: 1st Avenue, 2nd Avenue, etc., and north-south do virtually any kind of work, including the construc­ streets are lettered: A Street, B Street, etc. First tion of new cars. The buildings still exist today, con­ Avenue and A Street are closest to Temple Square. The sys­ verted to the popular "Trolley Square," a collection of tem is further complicated by the current practice in restaurants, shops and theaters, with a number of restor­ which, for example, East 9th becomes East 900, and South ed streetcars for atmosphere. 21st become South 2100. This modernization at a relatively early date was to have The first substitution of buses for street cars was made a significant impact on later transit developments. At in 1926 when eight miles of route 25 were abandonned from this point, the power and transit operations were run as just north of the city limits to Bountiful and Centerville. a single enterprise, and it was decided to separate them. The side-of-the-road trolley had the much faster Bamberger In 1914 the transportation operations became the Utah Railroad interurbans for competition and its demise was to Light & Traction Company, and electric power facilities be expected. The replacement bus ran to Centerville, but passed to Utah Power & Light Co. by 1934 (and perhaps earlier) was cut back to Bountiful, leaving Centerville to be served by the Bamberger. At first UL&T had considerable political influence, An attempt in the bus connected with Route 22 -- Center Street trolleys 1914 by the Five-cent Street Automobile Company to estab­ at the new end of track. In 1932 Route 22 was converted lish Jitney service was nipped in the bud. A city ordin­ to bus, and the Bountiful service combined with it. By ance effective April 1, 1915 required that the autos op­ the end of 1926 the White was gone, and one 25-passenger erate on schedules over fixed routes and provide service and two 29-passenger Mack model AB buses were on hand. from 6 a .m. to midnip.ht. The .i itneys disappeared and were never to be a threat to the street cars. UL&T's financial The following year saw cutbacks of the two remaining sub­ situation was greatly aided by this early removal of the urban trolleys. The 6.4 miles of single track of Route 12 January, 1987 To Centerville UT AH LIGHT & TRACTION CO. ~ 20 N O R T H ..c:... -4" ~ ..c: 4th No, ... City ....... 9th Ave. "' Cem • .... 18 ~ ~ 19 ... ~ C/l ..c: 6th Ave. ,. 't:l . State ... ... ... z Fair "' C""I C/l Grounds ... 3rd Ave. 3 C/l .,, N. Temple fzl South Temple .... 4 c:: ... 1st So. 1st So. .... Ft. Douglas "' 5 ...l>O QJ 2nd So. 2nd So, .... OIi 6 > .,,r:: Univ. ... 11 3rd So. 7 fzl o_ ..c: of 4th So. 8 ... fzl 15 0 Utah 5th So. g .... ..c: 0 ... .,, .... C""I .... ~ .... <> ~ Mt, c:: So, QJ ..c: 7th c:: 7th So • 6 Olivet .....,, ....... .....,, i □ 5 Cem. > .... ~ 6 Indiana Ave.16 9 E.
Recommended publications
  • Monroe-Sachs Interchange
    Table of Contents Chassis Section Nova Bus 22 Binkley 1 Orion Bus 23 Bluebird School Bus 1 Oshkosh 23 Brockway School Bus 1 Page Suspension 23 Built Rite Trailer 1 Pai Corporation 23 Cascade Trailer 1 Peerles Trailer 23 Chalmers Suspension 1 Peterbilt 23 Chance Bus 1 Prevost 24 Chevrolet 1 Reyco Suspension 24 Duplex Truck 2 Ridewell Corporation 24 Dura Suspension 3 Sterling 25 East Manufacturing Trailer 3 Trailmobile Canada Corp. 25 Ford 3 Turner Quick-Lift Corporation 26 Freightliner 3 Tuthill Technologies 26 Freightliner Custom Chassis 7 Twin Coach 26 Fruehauf 8 Utility Trailer 26 General Trailer Co. 8 Volvo 27 Gillig 8 Watson & Chain Suspension 28 GMC 8 Western Star 28 Great Dane Trailer 10 Western Unit 29 Hardee Manufacturing 10 Hendrickson 11 Highway Product 12 Cab Section Holland 12 Freightliner 30 Hutchens Suspension 12 Link Cabmate Air Suspension 30 Ikarus Bus 12 Western Star 31 International 12 Isuzu 15 Kenworth 16 Lodal Refuse Haulers 18 OEM Interchange 32 Mack 18 Gabriel - SACHS Interchange 37 Marmon Motor 20 Meritor - SACHS Interchange 38 Mitsubishi – Fuso 20 Monroe - SACHS Interchange 39 Neway 20 Specification Chart 40 North American Bus Industries 22 Customer Service & Technical Hotline Back Cover Important Notice The purpose of this catalog is to furnish ZF Services, LLC customers with as complete a listing of their parts requirements as possible. All listings, applications, and interchanges have been compiled as carefully as possible with all available information however, ZF Services, LLC cannot assume any responsibility for possible errors in listings, applications, or interchanges. All references by ZF Services, LLC to the original manufacturer trade names and part numbers are for identification purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cta 2016 Historical Calendar Cta 2016 January
    cta 2016 Historical Calendar cta 2016 January Chicago Motor Coach Company (CMC) bus #434, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, was part of a fleet of buses operated by the Chicago Motor Coach Company, one of the predecessor transit companies that were eventually assimilated into the Chicago Transit Authority. The CMC originally operated buses exclusively on the various park boulevards in Chicago, and became known by the marketing slogan, “The Boulevard Route.” Later, service was expanded to operate on some regular streets not served by the Chicago Surface Lines, particularly on the fringes of the city. Chicagoans truly wanted a unified transit system, and it was for this reason that the Chicago Transit Authority was established by charter in 1945. The CMC was not one of the initial properties purchased that made up CTA’s inaugural services on October 1, 1947; however, it was bought by CTA in 1952. D E SABCDEFG: MDecember 2015 T February 2016 W T F S CTA Operations Division S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Group Days Off 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 t Alternate day off if you 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 work on this day 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 l Central offices closed 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 1New Year’s Day 2 E F G A B C D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D E F G A B C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C D E F G A B 17 18Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late
    MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici­ I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017Chicago Transit Authority a Horse Drawn Omnibus, Originally Operated by the Citizen’S Line Circa 1853, Is Displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake
    HISTORICAL CALENDAR 2017Chicago Transit Authority A horse drawn omnibus, originally operated by the Citizen’s Line circa 1853, is displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake. These early transit vehicles were quite primitive, barely just a notch above stagecoaches – little more than hard, wooden bench seats were provided on either side of very sparsely appointed coaches, with no heat, light, or other amenities. It is hard to believe that, from such humble beginnings, Chicago would one day have the second largest public transit system in North America, as it does today. January 2017 S M T W T F S B C D E F G A 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 G A B C D E F Martin Luther 15 16 King, Jr. Day 17 18 19 20 21 F G A B C D E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E F G ABCDEFG: December 2016 February 2017 CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Group Days Off 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t Alternate day off if 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 you work on this day 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 l Central offices closed 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 Chicago streetcar #225 is outside of the 77th Street carbarn, sporting an early Chicago Transit Authority emblem but still wearing the red and cream color scheme of its predecessor company, the Chicago Surface Lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Newsletter of the Omnibus Society of America, Inc
    AUGUST 1983 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. RUN#17 2 COVER VIEW CATCO NEWS This month's cover is a safety reminder Under an agreement with Midway Airlines, from the Chicago Motor Coach Co., circa Continental Air Transport has rePainted J 1924. (M. Bernero collection) MCSB's into Midway's new Metrolink (Chicago -LaGuardia) business class service paint JUNE MEETING scheme. The buses are assigned to the downtown Chicago to Midway Airport run. The On June Jrd, the regular monthly meet- buses are painted in maroon, white and gray. ing of OSA was held at Chicago's own CATCO is also now operating the Chicago Bismarck Hotel. Slides were presented Gray Line service, but with North Alnerican by just about everyone. Coverage ranged buses piloted by CATCO drivers who are also from the Milwaukee convention of the providing the commentary. Formal transfer Motor Bus Society to GM trolley coaqhes of the Gray Line franchise from North in Edmonton, canada. A fantastic time American to Continental is expected in the was had by all. tuture. UPCOMING EVENTS TRAILWAYS Our next meeting is scheduled for Oct. On June 21st, under sunny skies, Trailways 7. 198J, at the Bismarck Hotel in new Milwaukee terminal was dedicated in a downtown Chicago at 7:30pm. We are public ceremony. Locat.ed at the corner of also hoping to hold several special 12th and Wells streets. the former tire events between now and October. stay company facility offers a spacious, air- . tuned for details. conditioned waiting room and two indoor bus bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality
    Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Under It's Own Power for the First Time In
    BUS DIVISION PROGRESS REPORT April 2014 WARREN BISBEE BUS LINE # 1 MOVING UNDER IT’S OWN POWER FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 63 YEARS!!!! BIG CELEBRATION HELD APRIL 19 FOR TEST RUN OF 1928 TWIN COACH A nice crowd of about 45 gathered for the test run. Special Guests present for the occasion were Spencer and Polly Soles, son and daughter-in-law of Orin and Edna Soles who donated the bus to Old Pueblo Trolley in 1995; and John Fageol, grandson of W. B. “Bill” Fageol, and great nephew of Frank R, Fageol, designers of the bus and founders of the Twin Coach company. Posing along Hughes Street adjacent to our shop after a very successful test run. Everything went as planned with no major problems discovered with any of the mechanical systems. Backing it out of the shop for the test run. Guests watch as it comes down Hughes Street by our restoration shop. Thanks to Laura Caywood Barker for most of the event photos Video of event on youtube: http://www.y outube.com/ watch?v=A4 pyD2WhPF8 &feature=yo utu.be, thanks to Ron Dawson Listening to Gene Caywood thank the 123 individuals and firms that have worked on the bus directly or indirectly, or provided services at a reduced cost. Our special guests pose by the bus: John Fageol (left) and Spencer & Polly Soles (right). Bob Schlanger photos MOVE OF BUSES FROM 18th STREET YARD The March 2014 QUARTERLY NEWS FOR OLD PUEBLO TROLLEY reported on the successful completion of the move from our old 18th Street yard.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority the Electric Trolley Coach Played an Important
    Bus system OPx80170 Chicago Transit Authority General Operations Division Trolley Coaches in Chicago 8-29-80 BGM GMA The electric trolley coach played an important role in the moving of Chicago's millions during its 43 years of use. In 1930, the Chicago Surface Lines won a legal battle with the rival Chicago Motor Coach Company (both predecessors of CTA) to serve the rapidly developing northwest side. Seven lines, designed mainly to feed CSL's already extensive streetcar system, were initially called for. The first line, *76 Diversey, was placed in service on April 17th of that year. It replaced the Diversey streetcar line and its motor bus extenstion, continuing an additional 1-1/2 miles to the west. By mid-193l, all 7 ~ines were in operation. Following the takeover of the CSL by CTA in 1947, the use of trolley coaches on short feeder routes was de-emphasized· in favor of their use on heavy crosstown routes such as *66 Chicago, which was placed in operation in 1952. The pioneer Diversey installat~on was discontinued in 1955. Twin Coach *51 at the dedication cermony for trolley coach operation on Diversey Avenue, April 1930. The 1955-1959 period found the trolley coach network at its peak, with 16 routes and approximately 700 coaches in operation. Represented were such famous builders as ACF-Brill, Twin Coach, Pullman, St. Louis and Marmon-Herrington. The Marmon-Herrington order was the largest trolley coach order in American history, containing 349 units built during 1951 and 1952. The trolley coach fleet also contained an articulated coach built by Twin Coach in 1946 as a demonstrator and dubbed the "Queen Mary".
    [Show full text]
  • Technology of Articulated Transit Buses Transportation 6
    -MA-06-01 20-82-4 DEPARTMENT of transportation HE SC-UMTA-82-17 1 8. b .\37 JUL 1983 no. DOT- LIBRARY TSC- J :aT \- 8 ?- Technology of U.S. Department of Transportation Articulated Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Technical Assistance Prepared by: Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Transportation Systems Center Washington DC 20590 Urban Systems Division October 1982 Final Report NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse prod- 1 ucts or manufacturers . Trade or manufacturers nam&s appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. 4 v 3 A2>7 ?? 7 - c c AST* Technical Report Page V ST‘ (* Documentation 1 . Report No. 2. Government A ccession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UMTA-MA-06-0 120-82- 4. Title and Subti tie ~6. Report Date October 1982 DEPARTMENT OF I TECHNOLOGY OF ARTICULATED TRANSIT BUSES TRANSPORTATION 6. Performing Organization Code TSC/DTS-6 j JUL 1983 8 . Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) DOT-TSC-UMTA-82-17 Richard G. Gundersen | t |kh a R 9. Performing Organization Name and Address jjo. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U.S. Department of Transportation UM262/R2653 Research and Special Programs Administration 11. Contract or Grant No. Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report – March 2016
    Agenda # 9-1 May 9, 2016 Meeting To: Board of Directors From: C. Sedoryk, General Manager/CEO Subject: Monthly Report – March 2016 Attached is a summary of monthly performance statistics for the transportation, maintenance, and administration departments and a status update on progress made in pursuit of the FY 2016 Action Plan for March 2016 (Attachments 1-5). March 3 – 4, 2016 I attended a meeting of the California Transit Association Executive Committee in San Diego, CA to discuss strategic planning for the association. March 11 – 15, 2016 I attended the American Public Transit Association Legislative Conference in Washington, DC to participate in meetings of the APTA Executive Committee, the APTA Board of Directors, various committees and informational meetings. March 29, 2016 I attended the California Association for Coordinated Transportation conference in San Diego, CA where I participated on a panel presentation on local transportation sales tax measures. March 30, 2016 I met with Josh Shaw, executive director of the California Transit Association to discuss changes in State Transit Assistance allocations and other matters related to the association. Later that day I participated in a meeting of the Oversight Committee of the California Transit Indemnity Pool. Attachment #1 – Dashboard Performance Statistics Attachment #2 – Operations Dept. Report – March 2016 Attachment #3 – Facilities & Maintenance Dept. Report – March 2016 Attachment #4 – Administration Dept. Report – March 2016 Attachment #5 – FY 2016 Action Plan Status Update
    [Show full text]
  • TRP® Chassis
    Parts for Trucks, Trailers & Buses ® BUS PARTS 7 CHASSIS Proven, reliable and always innovative. TRP® offers reliable aftermarket products that are designed and tested to exceed customers’ expectations regardless of the vehicle make, model or age. FENDERS • SUSPENSION & RIDE CONTROL • WHEEL END Tested. Reliable. Guaranteed. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chassis CHASSIS FENDERS Choosing the right Poly - Half Fenders .........................................................7-5 replacement part or service for your vehicle—whether you own Poly - Full Fenders .........................................................7-6 one, or a fleet—is one of the Poly - Single Axle Fenders .............................................7-7 most important decisions you can make for your business. Super Single - Half Fenders ...........................................7-9 And, with tested TRP® parts Super Single - Full Fenders ............................................7-9 it’s an easy decision. Super Single - Quarter Fenders ...................................7-11 Regardless of the make you drive, TRP® quality Half Fenders .................................................................7-13 replacement parts are Full Fenders .................................................................7-17 engineered to fit your truck, trailer or bus. Choose the Single Axle Fenders .....................................................7-21 parts that give you the best Quarter Fenders ..........................................................7-26 value for your business. Check them
    [Show full text]
  • The Trolley Coach Development and State Of
    s.·c.R.T.D. LIBRARY THE TROLLEY COACH DEVELOPMENT a STATE OF THE ART TASK I REPORT FOR THE ELECTRIC TROLLEY BUS FEASIBILITY STUDY DOT-UT- 80037 UMTA-IT-06-0193-79-1 OCTOBER 1979 I ;· I ,_,..i:_· __;,:··, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Urban Mass Transportation Administration Office of Policy, Budget and Program Development Washington D.C. 1·, D I S C L A I M E R The work described in this report has been sponsored by the U. S. Department of Transportation, Office of Policy, Budget and Program Development. The contents of the report, however, reflect the views of Chase, Rosen & Wallace, Inc. They are fully responsible for the facts, the accuracy of the data, and the conclusions expressed herein. The contents should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official views or policy of the Department of Transportation of the United States Government. Technical ~eport Oocumentotion Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Acc~ss i on No. 3 . Rec, p ient"s Coto l<> g No. UMTA-IT-06-0193-79-1 -4 . Title and Subtitle 5 . Report Date October 1979 The Trolley Coach Development and 6. Perform ing Organi zat,on Code State of the Art '""------------------1 1--------------------------------------! 8 . Performing Organ,zation Report No. 7 . Author1 s ) John D. Wilkins, Arthur Schwartz, Tom E. Parkinson 9. Performing Orgon i zo•,on Nome and Address 10 . Work Un it No. (TRAIS) Chase, Rosen & Wallace, Inc. IT-06-0193 901 North Washington Street 11. Contract or Grant No . Alexandria, Virginia 22314 DOT-UT-80037 13.
    [Show full text]