Warren-Bisbee Bus Line #8 DRAFT NRHP Nomination Form Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Warren-Bisbee Bus Line #8 DRAFT NRHP Nomination Form Download NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8, 1938 Yellow Coach Model 1204, Serial 234 Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Storage Location: Old Pueblo Trolley, 250 East 36th Street City or town: Tucson State: Arizona County: Pima Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide _x_local Applicable National Register Criteria: _ x _A ___B _x_C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 Pima, AZ Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 Pima, AZ Name of Property County and State ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: x Public – Local Public – State Public – Federal Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 Pima, AZ Name of Property County and State Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) District Site Structure x Object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing _______1_____ _____________ buildings _____________ _____________ sites _____________ _____________ structures _____________ _____________ objects ________1____ ______________ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _________ ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions TRANSPORTATION: road-related (vehicular) Current Functions TRANSPORTATION: road-related (vehicular) Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 Pima, AZ Name of Property County and State __________________________________________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification MODERN MOVEMENT: Streamline Moderne Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: other: METAL, SYNTHETICS Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph The Warren-Bisbee Bus Line #8 is a meticulously restored 1938 Yellow Coach (General Motors) Model 1204, Serial 234. The innovative technical features of the low price range lightweight 24 passage passenger bus include a flat front and first of its class to have a rear engine. The front door is located forward of the front wheel, while the steering axel is pushed back. The majority of mechanical parts are restored from the original #8 or the physically damaged and salvaged sister bus #7. The bus is outstanding example of American industrial design with art deco / streamline features and paint details throughout. All of the original features and details have been preserved and restored. The interior of the bus features green upholstery and chrome detailing. The bus is one of only two known surviving examples of this innovative and technically progressive bus. Restored by Old Pueblo Torrey the bus is housed in Tucson, Arizona two hours from Bisbee. The Bus is fully operational and used for special events, tours and historic interpretation. ______________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description The Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 is classified by the National Register Bulletin: How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation as a STRUCTURE: The term "structure" is used to distinguish from buildings those functional constructions made usually for purposes other than creating human shelter. The Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 is owned by Old Pueblo Trolley, Inc. a not-for-profit museum dedicated to the preservation and presentation of historic streetcars, buses and railroads of Arizona. In 1996, Old Pueblo Trolley was awarded a $17,172 State of Arizona Heritage Fund grant to restore bus # 8. The grant required the structure be eligible for listing on the Arizona Section 7 page 5 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Warren-Bisbee Bus Line # 8 Pima, AZ Name of Property County and State State Register of Historic places. Additionally, the grant required funds to be matched by donations and volunteer hours. It was followed by a second grant in the amount of $23,562 in 1999. Once both those grants were expended, restoration continued through the generous donations of Old Pueblo Trolley members and local businesses. Restoration work started in January of 1997, was interrupted for one year between grants, and was completed in the first part of 2007. The original 1938 promotional brochure detailed the “modern” features of the bus: The new 24 passenger lightweight Yellow, with engine mounted transversely in the rear, has those modern passenger car features herefore available only in large coaches. Requiring but a small capital investment, weighing approximately 7,500 ponds, this coach will render the low-cost service necessary to bolster “thin revenue lines.” It will definitely appeal to new rider, with its many comfort features. Compare this coach with all other coaches in, or near, the low price field. See for yourself how much more passenger appeal and performance you can have for less money. It is the ONLY coach with rear engine mounting priced so low. There is a perfect weight balance, possibly only with rear engine mounting. A completely unobstructed interior, with a minimum headboard of 77 inches, attracts riders. Entrance door ahead of front axel facilitates curb loading. A center exit door, vacuum operated, permits a faster circulating load. A narrow body width, with short turning radius, permits higher scheduled speed, with greater maneuverability and less accident hazard, with passenger safety being assured with powerful 438 square inch hydraulic breaks. It is a big coach in performance and rider appeal, yet light in weight, economical to operate, and attractively priced. Exterior At the time of its introduction in July 1938, due to its rear engine, the Yellow Coach model 1204 presented a different appearance than most of the buses being built by other bus manufacturers. The movement of the engine to the rear meant the elimination of the radiator grill from the front of the bus and the introduction of compartments on the bus rear for access to radiator, drive train
Recommended publications
  • Monroe-Sachs Interchange
    Table of Contents Chassis Section Nova Bus 22 Binkley 1 Orion Bus 23 Bluebird School Bus 1 Oshkosh 23 Brockway School Bus 1 Page Suspension 23 Built Rite Trailer 1 Pai Corporation 23 Cascade Trailer 1 Peerles Trailer 23 Chalmers Suspension 1 Peterbilt 23 Chance Bus 1 Prevost 24 Chevrolet 1 Reyco Suspension 24 Duplex Truck 2 Ridewell Corporation 24 Dura Suspension 3 Sterling 25 East Manufacturing Trailer 3 Trailmobile Canada Corp. 25 Ford 3 Turner Quick-Lift Corporation 26 Freightliner 3 Tuthill Technologies 26 Freightliner Custom Chassis 7 Twin Coach 26 Fruehauf 8 Utility Trailer 26 General Trailer Co. 8 Volvo 27 Gillig 8 Watson & Chain Suspension 28 GMC 8 Western Star 28 Great Dane Trailer 10 Western Unit 29 Hardee Manufacturing 10 Hendrickson 11 Highway Product 12 Cab Section Holland 12 Freightliner 30 Hutchens Suspension 12 Link Cabmate Air Suspension 30 Ikarus Bus 12 Western Star 31 International 12 Isuzu 15 Kenworth 16 Lodal Refuse Haulers 18 OEM Interchange 32 Mack 18 Gabriel - SACHS Interchange 37 Marmon Motor 20 Meritor - SACHS Interchange 38 Mitsubishi – Fuso 20 Monroe - SACHS Interchange 39 Neway 20 Specification Chart 40 North American Bus Industries 22 Customer Service & Technical Hotline Back Cover Important Notice The purpose of this catalog is to furnish ZF Services, LLC customers with as complete a listing of their parts requirements as possible. All listings, applications, and interchanges have been compiled as carefully as possible with all available information however, ZF Services, LLC cannot assume any responsibility for possible errors in listings, applications, or interchanges. All references by ZF Services, LLC to the original manufacturer trade names and part numbers are for identification purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cta 2016 Historical Calendar Cta 2016 January
    cta 2016 Historical Calendar cta 2016 January Chicago Motor Coach Company (CMC) bus #434, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, was part of a fleet of buses operated by the Chicago Motor Coach Company, one of the predecessor transit companies that were eventually assimilated into the Chicago Transit Authority. The CMC originally operated buses exclusively on the various park boulevards in Chicago, and became known by the marketing slogan, “The Boulevard Route.” Later, service was expanded to operate on some regular streets not served by the Chicago Surface Lines, particularly on the fringes of the city. Chicagoans truly wanted a unified transit system, and it was for this reason that the Chicago Transit Authority was established by charter in 1945. The CMC was not one of the initial properties purchased that made up CTA’s inaugural services on October 1, 1947; however, it was bought by CTA in 1952. D E SABCDEFG: MDecember 2015 T February 2016 W T F S CTA Operations Division S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Group Days Off 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 t Alternate day off if you 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 work on this day 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 l Central offices closed 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 1New Year’s Day 2 E F G A B C D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D E F G A B C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C D E F G A B 17 18Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • $2.00 New from Random House This Fall
    __- - e tern Railroads and Transit , I $2.00 New From Random House this fall .... THIRTY THREE LIFE STORIES OF THE PEOPLE THAT MADE OVER THE TRAINS 150 RUN. PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THE INTRODUCTION BY STUART LEUTHNER "This is not a railroad book.It is a railroaders book. It is about the people who worked for the railroads. The engineers, brakemen, chefs, executives, the people who made it work. With a few exceptions, books dealing with the railroads have become cavalcades of iron. Page after page of locomotives, leaning into curves, in the roundhouse, at the coaling dock.You name it, it's been photographed. A typical caption: 'Rods flashing, high-drivered Pennsy K-4s No.5404 wheels the varnishas she hits her stride with the Broadway Limited near the Horseshoe Curve on an old February afternoon, 1945' .... "The railroads were one of the most important industries in this country when these people were on the job.Even into the 1950's, they were a complicated system of machinery and people stretching over the entire country. It's been an undisputed fact that without the railroads' superhuman efforts, World War" might not have been won.The railroads worked the way they did because the people worked. Worked in the true meaning of the word. There was only ...." " r----- ------------------ Bonanza Inn Bookshop -� I .. 650 Market Street •••• 11-•• Ii•• • I !I.,,-.f.jj I San Francisco 941 04 -:-g�g-::-�"'" '- I I ON TRAINS I Please send copies of The Railroaders @$1 9.95, plus BOOIS IiTROLLEYS I $1 .1 5 total shipping charge for any quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Trams Imported by Gales Creek Enterprises
    Volume 25 Issue 1 Spring 2020 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues are In This Issue up to date. 2020 dues were due Jan 1, 2020. If it has Portuguese Trams – Richard Thompson ……………..…..…………….…1 been longer than one year since you renewed, go to Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News…………………………2 Willamette Shore Trolley Update – Dave Rowe …………………..……..12 our website: oregontrolley.com and download an Donation Request ……………..…………………………………..…..……14 application by clicking: Become a Member. Portuguese Trams It has been 25 years since the OERHS departed Glenwood, yet the following story should be of interest to Imported by Gales Creek newer members because a Portuguese streetcar joined the collection at Powerland in 2006. Porto No. 210 (renumbered Enterprises (1974-1993) 201 before arrival) is not a part of the Trolley Park story, of course, but it is similar to the streetcars that were kept there. Richard Thompson Car 210 was one of a series built during 1938-45 to replace the Brill and St. Louis Car Company classics. A sense of familiarity might also come from the fact that vintage Beginning in 1974, Gales Creek Enterprises (GCE), Portuguese trams share a kinship with our beloved Council headed by Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Crest cars 503 and 506. (OERHS) co-founder Paul Class, provided at least 70 vintage streetcars to launch trolley operations in a half-dozen American cities. In the process Paul almost single-handedly started what we now call the “heritage streetcar” movement. His company imported many streetcars from Australia and Brazil, but the largest part of that pioneering effort involved trams from Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late
    MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici­ I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Operators • Marketing Strategies for Ridership and Maximising Revenue • LRT Solutions for Mid-Size Towns
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE www.lrta.org www.tautonline.com FEBRUARY 2015 NO. 926 NEW TRAMWAYS: CHINA EMBRACES LIGHT RAIL Houston: Two new lines for 2015 and more to come Atlanta Streetcar launches service Paris opens T6 and T8 tramlines Honolulu metro begins tracklaying ISSN 1460-8324 UK devolution San Diego 02 £4.25 Will regional powers Siemens and partners benefit light rail? set new World Record 9 771460 832043 2015 INTEGRATION AND GLOBALISATION Topics and panel debates include: Funding models and financial considerations for LRT projects • Improving light rail's appeal and visibility • Low Impact Light Rail • Harnessing local suppliers • Making light rail procurement more economical • Utilities replacement and renewal • EMC approvals and standards • Off-wire and energy recovery systems • How can regional devolution benefit UK LRT? • Light rail safety and security • Optimising light rail and traffic interfaces • Track replacement & renewal – Issues and lessons learned • Removing obsolescence: Modernising the UK's second-generation systems • Revenue protection strategies • Big data: Opportunities for transport operators • Marketing strategies for ridership and maximising revenue • LRT solutions for mid-size towns Do you have a topic you’d like to share with a forum of 300 senior decision-makers? We are still welcoming abstracts for consideration until 12 January 2015. June 17-18, 2015: Nottingham, UK Book now via www.tautonline.com SUPPORTED BY 72 CONTENTS The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association FEBRUARY 2015 Vol. 78 No. 926 www.tramnews.net EDITORIAL 52 EDITOR Simon Johnston Tel: +44 (0)1733 367601 E-mail: [email protected] 13 Orton Enterprise Centre, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, UK ASSOCIATE EDITOR Tony Streeter E-mail: [email protected] WORLDWIDE EDITOR Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin in MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J
    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 9 September, 2020 The Bulletin IN MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J. MADDEN, 1947-2020 Published by the Electric Railroaders’ by Jeff Erlitz Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeff Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ron Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2020 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Public Service of New Jer- sey double-truck motor cars 2282 and 2235 on Main Avenue & Glendale Street in Nutley, New Jersey on February 11, 1936. Unknown photographer William J (Bill) Madden during a station stop on the Canadian at Thunder Bay, Ontario, July 24, 1977. Jeff Erlitz photograph With deep sadness, I must pass along the around 1970, initially on Saturday mornings In This Issue: news that William Madden passed away on and then on Monday evenings. Like most of Assorted Wednesday, August 12, at the age of 73 due us, he could be found collating, stamping Travels from to complications from COVID-19. envelopes, and bagging sacks of mail for Bill, as everyone knew him, joined the Elec- both the New York Division Bulletin and Na- the First Half of tric Railroaders’ Association on February 21, tional’s Headlights. When the ERA began 2020…Page 18 1964 and was member number 3062. He offering Life memberships, Bill was one of probably started volunteering at headquar- the few members who took up that offer.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017Chicago Transit Authority a Horse Drawn Omnibus, Originally Operated by the Citizen’S Line Circa 1853, Is Displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake
    HISTORICAL CALENDAR 2017Chicago Transit Authority A horse drawn omnibus, originally operated by the Citizen’s Line circa 1853, is displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake. These early transit vehicles were quite primitive, barely just a notch above stagecoaches – little more than hard, wooden bench seats were provided on either side of very sparsely appointed coaches, with no heat, light, or other amenities. It is hard to believe that, from such humble beginnings, Chicago would one day have the second largest public transit system in North America, as it does today. January 2017 S M T W T F S B C D E F G A 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 G A B C D E F Martin Luther 15 16 King, Jr. Day 17 18 19 20 21 F G A B C D E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E F G ABCDEFG: December 2016 February 2017 CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Group Days Off 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t Alternate day off if 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 you work on this day 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 l Central offices closed 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 Chicago streetcar #225 is outside of the 77th Street carbarn, sporting an early Chicago Transit Authority emblem but still wearing the red and cream color scheme of its predecessor company, the Chicago Surface Lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint International Light Rail Conference
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH Number E-C145 July 2010 Joint International Light Rail Conference Growth and Renewal April 19–21, 2009 Los Angeles, California Cosponsored by Transportation Research Board American Public Transportation Association TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OFFICERS Chair: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Arlington Vice Chair: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore Division Chair for NRC Oversight: C. Michael Walton, Ernest H. Cockrell Centennial Chair in Engineering, University of Texas, Austin Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010–2011 TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COUNCIL Chair: Robert C. Johns, Associate Administrator and Director, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts Technical Activities Director: Mark R. Norman, Transportation Research Board Jeannie G. Beckett, Director of Operations, Port of Tacoma, Washington, Marine Group Chair Cindy J. Burbank, National Planning and Environment Practice Leader, PB, Washington, D.C., Policy and Organization Group Chair Ronald R. Knipling, Principal, safetyforthelonghaul.com, Arlington, Virginia, System Users Group Chair Edward V. A. Kussy, Partner, Nossaman, LLP, Washington, D.C., Legal Resources Group Chair Peter B. Mandle, Director, Jacobs Consultancy, Inc., Burlingame, California, Aviation Group Chair Mary Lou Ralls, Principal, Ralls Newman, LLC, Austin, Texas, Design and Construction Group Chair Daniel L. Roth, Managing Director, Ernst & Young Orenda Corporate Finance, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Rail Group Chair Steven Silkunas, Director of Business Development, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Public Transportation Group Chair Peter F. Swan, Assistant Professor of Logistics and Operations Management, Pennsylvania State, Harrisburg, Middletown, Pennsylvania, Freight Systems Group Chair Katherine F.
    [Show full text]
  • Bring Back the Streetcars : a Conservative Vision of Tomorrow's
    Bring Back the Streetcars! A Conservative Vision of Tomorrow's Urban Transportation by Paul M. Weyrich and William S. Lind .... Free~• Foundation This study of public transportation by the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation was underwritten by the private sector Business Members of the American Public Transportation Association. The views expressed are those of the authors. Public Transportation Partnership for Tomorrow Washington, DC June 2002 BRING BACK THE STREETCARS! A Conservative Vision of Tomorrow’s Urban Transportation A Study Prepared by the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation By Paul M. Weyrich and William S. Lind The Free Congress Foundation 717 Second Street Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-3000 June 2002 Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction: What’s Right with This Picture? 3 Bring Back the Streetcars! 6 The Context: Restoring Our Cities and Building New Towns 6 What Is a Streetcar? 9 Vintage and Heritage Streetcars 12 Who Else Is Doing It? 13 What Does It Cost? 18 Three Case Studies: 21 Dallas, Texas 21 Memphis, Tennessee 24 Portland, Oregon 28 Conclusion 32 Appendices: 34 Appendix I: Getting Started 34 Appendix II: The Gomaco Trolley Company 37 Appendix III: Resources 39 Notes 40 E xecutive Summary For more than half a century, the context in which public transport operated was suburbanization. But recently, that has begun to change. Urban downtowns are reviving, and new towns are being built to traditional patterns. Not only can streetcars serve these non- suburban areas, they need streetcars in order to flourish. Streetcars – which we define as rail transit vehicles designed for local transportation, powered by electricity received from an overhead wire – differ from both buses and Light Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Newsletter of the Omnibus Society of America, Inc
    AUGUST 1983 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. RUN#17 2 COVER VIEW CATCO NEWS This month's cover is a safety reminder Under an agreement with Midway Airlines, from the Chicago Motor Coach Co., circa Continental Air Transport has rePainted J 1924. (M. Bernero collection) MCSB's into Midway's new Metrolink (Chicago -LaGuardia) business class service paint JUNE MEETING scheme. The buses are assigned to the downtown Chicago to Midway Airport run. The On June Jrd, the regular monthly meet- buses are painted in maroon, white and gray. ing of OSA was held at Chicago's own CATCO is also now operating the Chicago Bismarck Hotel. Slides were presented Gray Line service, but with North Alnerican by just about everyone. Coverage ranged buses piloted by CATCO drivers who are also from the Milwaukee convention of the providing the commentary. Formal transfer Motor Bus Society to GM trolley coaqhes of the Gray Line franchise from North in Edmonton, canada. A fantastic time American to Continental is expected in the was had by all. tuture. UPCOMING EVENTS TRAILWAYS Our next meeting is scheduled for Oct. On June 21st, under sunny skies, Trailways 7. 198J, at the Bismarck Hotel in new Milwaukee terminal was dedicated in a downtown Chicago at 7:30pm. We are public ceremony. Locat.ed at the corner of also hoping to hold several special 12th and Wells streets. the former tire events between now and October. stay company facility offers a spacious, air- . tuned for details. conditioned waiting room and two indoor bus bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality
    Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same.
    [Show full text]