DOCSLIB.ORG

The Feasibility of a Single-Track Vintage Trolley in the Midtown Greenway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Feasibility of a Single-Track Vintage Trolley in the Midtown Greenway THE FEASIBILITY OF A SINGLE-TRACK VINTAGE TROLLEY IN THE MIDTOWN GREENWAY By Lomarado Group March 19, 2001 Presented to the CREDITS The Midtown Greenway Coalition thanks the following neighborhoods, individuals, foundations, and corporations for assisting with and contributing to this study. Neighborhood Organizations Funding This Study Calhoun Area Residents Action Group Cedar Isles Dean Neighborhood Association Corcoran Neighborhood Organization East Calhoun Community Organization (pending) East Isles Residents Association Longfellow Community Council Lowry Hill East Neighborhood Association Lyndale Neighborhood Association Powderhorn Park Neighborhood Association Seward Neighborhood Group Individuals Funding This Study Terry & Kevin Barnes Henry Hubben Bob Olson Elizabeth Brackett and Fred Olson Scott Likely Will Owens Darryl Carter Ranki Lyders Beth Parkhill & Bob Corrick Brad & Laurie Frederiksen Marie Markoe Zinta Pone Kathy & John Hendricks Margaret McGlynn Bob Sorenson Tom Hockenberry Midtown Greenway Coalition Transit Committee Bob Corrick Ron Fergle George Puzak John DeWitt Henry Hubben John Walley Cover Photograph Assistance with Trolley Tidbits Patrick Fox Photography Russell Olson, author of Electric Railways of Minnesota Foundations and Corporations Providing General Operating and Organizational Support for the Midtown Greenway Coalition in 2000 and 2001 Elmer & Eleanor Anderson Foundation The Minneapolis Foundation Marbrook Foundation Reliant Energy Minnegasco McKnight Foundation US Bank This report is printed on 100% recycled paper. One-sided copying was necessary because double- sided copying would have required very thick paper due to the readability of pages with photos on the flip side. The binding is designed to be easily removable to facilitate recycling after the Midtown Greenway vintage trolley is completed. THE FEASIBILITY OF A SINGLE-TRACK VINTAGE TROLLEY IN THE MIDTOWN GREENWAY For another copy of this study please go to http://www.midtowngreenway.org TABLE OF CONTENTS PROLOGUE CHAPTER I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 Route and Alignment ................................................................................................................. 2 Vehicles ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Passenger Stops.......................................................................................................................... 4 Study Limitations....................................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER II: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 History....................................................................................................................................... 5 The Transit Concept................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER III: VINTAGE STREETCARS IN OTHER CITIES .................................................... 7 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 7 Summary of Conclusions........................................................................................................ 8 Detailed Observations ............................................................................................................ 8 Impact on Vehicular Traffic Flow..........................................................................................10 Impact of Overhead Wire ......................................................................................................11 Impact on Residential Areas..................................................................................................11 Impact on Commercial Real Estate........................................................................................11 Public Acceptance.................................................................................................................12 SYSTEMS IN LARGER CITIES..............................................................................................14 1. New Orleans, Louisiana.....................................................................................................14 2. Detroit, Michigan ..............................................................................................................15 3. Seattle, Washington...........................................................................................................17 4. San Francisco, California...................................................................................................18 5. San Jose, California...........................................................................................................20 6. Dallas, Texas.....................................................................................................................21 7. Portland, Oregon ...............................................................................................................22 8. Memphis, Tennessee .........................................................................................................24 SYSTEMS IN SMALLER CITIES…..…………………….……………………………………25 9. Fort Collins, Colorado .......................................................................................................25 10. Lowell, Massachusetts.....................................................................................................26 11. Galveston, Texas .............................................................................................................28 12. Fort Smith, Arkansas .......................................................................................................29 13 Tuscon, Arizona ..............................................................................................................30 14. Kenosha, Wisconsin ........................................................................................................32 Canadian Systems .....................................................................................................................33 Systems Under Construction in the United States ......................................................................33 CHAPTER IV: ROUTE ALIGNMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE............................................34 Introduction...............................................................................................................................34 Route Alignment.......................................................................................................................34 Traffic Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................37 Passenger Stops and Transit Connectivity .................................................................................37 Power Distribution System........................................................................................................40 Vehicle Storage and Maintenance Facility.................................................................................40 Future Conversion to Double Track Light Rail..........................................................................41 CHAPTER V: VEHICLE..............................................................................................................42 Summary of Available Vehicles ................................................................................................42 Design Options .........................................................................................................................42 Alternative Vehicle Sources ......................................................................................................44 Recommended Vehicle Fleet.....................................................................................................46 CHAPTER VI: CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE..............................................................................48 Summary...................................................................................................................................48 CHAPTER VII: OPERATION......................................................................................................51 SERVICE ALTERNATIVES....................................................................................................51 Routing .................................................................................................................................51 Running Time .......................................................................................................................51 Headway (Frequency of Service)...........................................................................................51 Hours of Service....................................................................................................................52 SYSTEM MANAGEMENT......................................................................................................52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.2 Pointwork Configurations in the Following Paragraphs Some of the More Maintenance Is Straightforward
    Part 2 Section 2 POINTWORK Issued February 2001 2.2 Pointwork configurations In the following paragraphs some of the more maintenance is straightforward. However, in a common pointwork configurations are shown restricted space it may be necessary to together with the accepted terminology used to superimpose one turnout upon another, which describe them. When planning track layouts the introduces additional crossings and timbering and preference is to use a combination of single may, in bullhead track, involve the use of special turnouts as these require the minimum of special chairs. chairs and timbers to construct them and 2.2.1 Single turnouts These follow the pattern described in 2.1 and are illustrated in Figure 2-9. RH Turnout LH Turnout RH Crossover LH Crossover Split or Equilateral Turnout Figure 2-9 Single turnouts 2.2.2 Tandem or double turnout This uses one set of switches immediately after form part of a continuous curve but this would another and before the crossing, which introduces require movements to be carried out at low speed. a third crossing and crowded timbering. Where (Figure 2-10 and Photo 2.2) space is particularly crowded the crossing may Figure 2-10 Tandem turnout 2-2-9 2.2.3 Three-throw turnout Photo 2.2 A double tandem turnout leading off from a double There is a nomenclature problem here slip at Stowmarket Goods Yard. as the 3-throw yields the same outcome (NRM Windwood Collection GE1005) as the double turnout. It uses a left hand and a right hand set of switches that are superimposed to divide three ways together in symmetrical form.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”
    “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover” John B. Sutcliffe, Sarah Cipkar and Geoffrey Alchin Department of Political Science, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Email: [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC. June 2019. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission. 1 “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover" Introduction On May 12, 2017 a new streetcar – the QLine – began operating in Detroit, running along a 3.3- mile (6.6-mile return) route on Woodward Avenue, one of the central north-south roads in the city. This project is one example of the return to prominence of streetcars in the (re)development of American cities. Having fallen into disuse and abandonment in hundreds of American cities during the early part of the 20th century, this form of public transit has returned in many cities including, for example, Dallas, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Portland. As streetcar services have returned to prominence, so too has the debate about their utility as a form of public transit, the function they serve in a city, and who they serve (Brown 2013; Culver 2017). These debates are evident in the case of Detroit. Proponents of the QLine – most prominently the individuals and organizations that advocated for its creation and provided the majority of the start-up capital – have praised the streetcar for acting as a spur to development, for being a forward-thinking transit system and for acting as a first step towards a comprehensive regional transit system in Metro Detroit (see M-1 Rail 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Rail Design Criteria Section 10 Operations
    METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 OPERATIONS METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.1 INTRODUCTION 1 10.2 DEFINITIONS 1 10.3 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 5 Metro Baseline 10- i Re-baseline: 06/15/10 METRO RAIL DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION 10 / OPERATIONS OPERATIONS 10.1 INTRODUCTION Transit Operations include such activities as scheduling, crew rostering, running and supervision of revenue trains and vehicles, fare collection, system security and system maintenance. This section describes the basic system wide operating and maintenance philosophies and methodologies set forth for the Metro Rail Projects, which shall be used by designer in preparation of an Operations and Maintenance Plan. An initial Operations and Maintenance Plan (OMP) is developed during the environmental phase and is based on ridership forecasts produced during this early planning phase of a project. From this initial Operations and Maintenance plan, headways are established that are to be evaluated by a rail operations simulation upon which design and operating headways can be established to confirm operational goals for light and heavy rail systems. The Operations and Maintenance Plan shall be developed in order to design effective, efficient and responsive transit system. The operations criteria and requirements established herein represent Metro’s Rail Operating Requirements / Criteria applicable to all rail projects and form the basis for the project-specific operational design decisions. They shall be utilized by designer during preparation of Operations and Maintenance Plan. Any proposed deviation to Design Criteria cited herein shall be approved by Metro, as represented by the Change Control Board, consisting of management responsible for project construction, engineering and management, as well as daily rail operations, planning, systems and vehicle maintenance with appropriate technical expertise and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • (09/2019) to AIS-052 (Rev.1): Code of Practice for Bus Body Design Approval
    Amendment No 11 (09/2019) To AIS-052 (Rev.1): Code of Practice for Bus Body Design Approval. 1.0 Page 34/99, Insert new clause 2.2.19.6 after clause 2.2.19.5 2.2.19.6 In case of buses with seating capacity exceeding 22 passengers excluding driver, requirements for Accommodation and Accessibility for Passengers of Reduced Mobility shall be as per clause 2.12 of AIS-153. PRINTED BY THE AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF INDIA P. B. NO. 832, PUNE 411 004 ON BEHALF OF AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY STANDARDS COMMITTEE UNDER CENTRAL MOTOR VEHICLES RULES - TECHNICAL STANDING COMMITTEE SET-UP BY MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS (DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT & HIGHWAYS) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 18th September 2019 Amendment No 10 (8/2019) To AIS-052 (Rev.1): Code of Practice for Bus Body Design Approval. 1.0 Page 28/99, Insert new clause 2.2.16.1.1.3.1 after clause 2.2.16.1.1.3: 2.2.16.1.1.3.1 In case of Midi and Mini buses, if the structure, design or the operational use of the vehicle make it impossible to comply with requirements as specified in clause no. 2.2.16.1.1.3, the height and width of the driver door aperture excluding handles, measured from the bus floor in the driver’s area, shall be minimum 1050 mm at its highest point and minimum 650 mm at its widest point respectively. The driver should be able to ergonomically use the door opening for easy ingress and egress.
    [Show full text]
  • Frommer's Seattle 2004
    01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page i Seattle 2004 by Karl Samson Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers 01 541277 FM.qxd 11/17/03 9:37 AM Page ii About the Author Karl Samson makes his home in the Northwest. He also covers the rest of Wash- ington for Frommer’s. In addition, Karl is the author of Frommer’s Arizona. Published by: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5744 Copyright © 2004 Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo- copying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978/750-8400, fax 978/646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for per- mission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, 317/572-3447, fax 317/572-4447, E-Mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx
    2020 No. 5, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Page 18 Credit: Metrolinx Top100 Projects 2020 One Man Changes the Face of 2020’s Top 10 Top100 Projects — 2020 f not for one individual, this year’s Top100 may have looked An annual report inserted in familiar. ReNew Canada’s I When this year’s research process began, there was little change within this year’s Top 10, as many of the nation’s January/February 2020 issue megaprojects were still in progress. Significant progress has been made on all of the projects we saw grace the Top 10 in our report last year, but completion dates extend beyond the end of the MANAGING Andrew Macklin 2019 calendar year. EDITOR [email protected] Enter Matt Clark, Metrolinx’s Chief Capital Officer, who took GROUP over the position from Peter Zuk. You see, when Zuk was in charge Todd Latham PUBLISHER of publicly expressing capital budgets, particularly in the context of the GO Expansion project, he had done so by breaking down PUBLISHER Nick Krukowski the $13.5 billion spend by corridor. That breakdown led to the full expansion represented by as many as nine projects in the content ART DIRECTOR AND Donna Endacott SENIORDESIGN of the Top100. Clark does it differently. In the quarterly reports made public ASSOCIATE following Metrolinx board meetings, the capital projects for the Simran Chattha EDITOR GO Expansion are broken down into three allotments (on corridor, off corridor, and early works). The result? Six less GO Expansion CONTENT AND MARKETING Todd Westcott projects in the Top100, but two new projects in our Top 10 MANAGER including a new number one.
    [Show full text]
  • $2.00 New from Random House This Fall
    __- - e tern Railroads and Transit , I $2.00 New From Random House this fall .... THIRTY THREE LIFE STORIES OF THE PEOPLE THAT MADE OVER THE TRAINS 150 RUN. PHOTOGRAPHS FROM THE INTRODUCTION BY STUART LEUTHNER "This is not a railroad book.It is a railroaders book. It is about the people who worked for the railroads. The engineers, brakemen, chefs, executives, the people who made it work. With a few exceptions, books dealing with the railroads have become cavalcades of iron. Page after page of locomotives, leaning into curves, in the roundhouse, at the coaling dock.You name it, it's been photographed. A typical caption: 'Rods flashing, high-drivered Pennsy K-4s No.5404 wheels the varnishas she hits her stride with the Broadway Limited near the Horseshoe Curve on an old February afternoon, 1945' .... "The railroads were one of the most important industries in this country when these people were on the job.Even into the 1950's, they were a complicated system of machinery and people stretching over the entire country. It's been an undisputed fact that without the railroads' superhuman efforts, World War" might not have been won.The railroads worked the way they did because the people worked. Worked in the true meaning of the word. There was only ...." " r----- ------------------ Bonanza Inn Bookshop -� I .. 650 Market Street •••• 11-•• Ii•• • I !I.,,-.f.jj I San Francisco 941 04 -:-g�g-::-�"'" '- I I ON TRAINS I Please send copies of The Railroaders @$1 9.95, plus BOOIS IiTROLLEYS I $1 .1 5 total shipping charge for any quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubai: CREATING the WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 Special
    THE INTERNATIONAL LIGHT RAIL MAGAZINE HEADLINES l Paris tram network reaches 65km l AnsaldoBreda enters Chinese LRT market l Edinburgh tramway to open early? DUBAI: CREATING THE WORLD’S LONGEST DRIVERLESS NETWORK INSIDE: Light Rail Awards 2012 special Olsztyn Halberstadt Poland’s first How do you new-build sustain a system tramway in with a declining over 50 years population? DECEMBER 2012 No. 900 WWW . LRTA . ORG l WWW . TRAMNEWS . NET £3.80 PESA Bydgoszcz SA 85-082 Bydgoszcz, ul. Zygmunta Augusta 11 tel. (+48)52 33 91 104 fax (+48)52 3391 114 www.pesa.pl e-mail: [email protected] Layout_Adpage.indd 1 26/10/2012 16:15 Contents The official journal of the Light Rail Transit Association 448 News 448 DECEMBER 2012 Vol. 75 No. 900 Three new lines take Paris tram network to 65km; www.tramnews.net Mendoza inaugurates light rail services; AnsaldoBreda EDITORIAL signs Chinese technology partnership; München orders Editor: Simon Johnston Siemens new Avenio low-floor tram. Tel: +44 (0)1832 281131 E-mail: [email protected] Eaglethorpe Barns, Warmington, Peterborough PE8 6TJ, UK. 454 Olsztyn: Re-adopting the tram Associate Editor: Tony Streeter Marek Ciesielski reports on the project to build Poland’s E-mail: [email protected] first all-new tramway in over 50 years. Worldwide Editor: Michael Taplin Flat 1, 10 Hope Road, Shanklin, Isle of Wight PO37 6EA, UK. 457 15 Minutes with... Gérard Glas 454 E-mail: [email protected] Tata Steel’s CEO tells TAUT how its latest products offer News Editor: John Symons a step-change reduction in long-term maintenance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Portuguese Trams Imported by Gales Creek Enterprises
    Volume 25 Issue 1 Spring 2020 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues are In This Issue up to date. 2020 dues were due Jan 1, 2020. If it has Portuguese Trams – Richard Thompson ……………..…..…………….…1 been longer than one year since you renewed, go to Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News…………………………2 Willamette Shore Trolley Update – Dave Rowe …………………..……..12 our website: oregontrolley.com and download an Donation Request ……………..…………………………………..…..……14 application by clicking: Become a Member. Portuguese Trams It has been 25 years since the OERHS departed Glenwood, yet the following story should be of interest to Imported by Gales Creek newer members because a Portuguese streetcar joined the collection at Powerland in 2006. Porto No. 210 (renumbered Enterprises (1974-1993) 201 before arrival) is not a part of the Trolley Park story, of course, but it is similar to the streetcars that were kept there. Richard Thompson Car 210 was one of a series built during 1938-45 to replace the Brill and St. Louis Car Company classics. A sense of familiarity might also come from the fact that vintage Beginning in 1974, Gales Creek Enterprises (GCE), Portuguese trams share a kinship with our beloved Council headed by Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Crest cars 503 and 506. (OERHS) co-founder Paul Class, provided at least 70 vintage streetcars to launch trolley operations in a half-dozen American cities. In the process Paul almost single-handedly started what we now call the “heritage streetcar” movement. His company imported many streetcars from Australia and Brazil, but the largest part of that pioneering effort involved trams from Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late
    MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici­ I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc
    STATE OF DOWNTOWN DENVER SEPTEMBER 2012 Downtown Denver Partnership, Inc. With support from: STATE OF 1 DOWNTOWN DENVER INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Letter .................................................1 Dear Downtown Denver Stakeholder, Key Facts ...............................................................2 Thank you for picking up a copy of the Downtown Denver Partnership’s annual State of Downtown Denver report, a fact-driven report that provides timely, Denver’s Downtown Area Plan ..............................3 objective and accurate data about Downtown Denver. This year we are proud Notable Rankings ..................................................4 to collaborate with Newmark Knight Frank Frederick Ross to bring you the most complete statistics and analysis about Downtown Denver. Office Market .................................................... 6-7 Employers & Employees ..................................... 8-9 In his 2012 State of the City address, Mayor Michael B. Hancock remarked that a vibrant downtown core is essential to the health of the city. At the 2012 Retail & Restaurants .............................................11 Rocky Mountain Urban Leadership Symposium, Governor Hickenlooper and Downtown Residents ..................................... 12-13 other leaders in the Rocky Mountain West stressed the importance of urban centers in creating strong place-based economies that attract and retain top Transportation ............................................... 14-15 talent. Downtown Denver is one
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Public Accounts
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from University of Alberta Libraries https://archive.org/details/britishcolumbiap02mini ublic Accounts Volume 2 1994-95 Province of British Columbia 3 9345 01116578 8 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY W.A.C. BENNETT LIBRARY fjj /a ublic Accounts olume 2 Financial Statements and Schedules of the Consolidated Revenue Fund For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 1995 Province of British Honourable Elizabeth Cull Columbia Minister of Finance & Corporate Relations Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data 5': s~ Co umb a v ~ str\ o' F nance a~a Corporate Relat ons. P~b c accounts—*98~88- 0 ■Vnn^al. Eacr' rec n2to3\. Eac~ . nas also a distinct vet tie. Report vea' e~as Mar. 31. Con: ~_es E': s~ Co umb a. V ~ str\ or z ~ance a~d Corporate Se a:o~s c accounts o- 3't sb Columbia. 55\ 0352-2001 S5\ ’ 1 E'-8n5~ = r-0 c accocnts—Brit sh Columb a. - sr\ of r ~a"ce and Corporate Relat o-s 3m sh Co umb a — Appropr atlors and expenditures — 5tat st as — ra s E. Revenue— British Columbia — Statistics — Periodicals. 3. Finance, Public — British Ce _~e a —Account ng — Periodicals. T tie. 354 "• 1 ~2 CP92-890! 3-\ October 31, 1995 Victoria, British Columbia Lieutenant Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The undersigned has the honour to present the Public Accounts of the Province of British Columbia for the fiscal year ended March 31,1995. ELIZABETH CULL Minister of Finance . and Corporate Relations Ministry of Finance and Corporate Relations Victoria, British Columbia October 31, 1995 The Honourable ELIZABETH CULL Minister of Finance and Corporate Relations I have the honour to submit herewith the Public Accounts of the Province of British Columbia for the fiscal year ended March 31,1995.
    [Show full text]