1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici­ I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY. The s ystem had, in terms of equipment, routes and ser vice, remained relatively stable f or at least ten years prior to 1969; but in 1969 things began to change. The first half of the decade of the 1970's promises to foresee great changes in the Muni. The entire fleet of s treetcars, trolley coaches and diesel buses (but not cable cars) will be I replaced, and t he streetcars removed from the surface of Market Street and placed in a subway below it. The initiation of rapid trans i t service by the BAY ARE A RAPID TRA~S IT DISTRICT will probably result in the re­ orientation of Muni r outes in the Mission Corridor--the area to be served by BARTD. It was, therefore, de­ cided to publish the 1969- 1970 da t a as an historical record that would be representative of Municipal Railway operations during the decade of the 1960 1 s. I Other than attempting to depict Muni operations during the 1960 's, thi s article is not intended to be an historical work on the San Francisco Municipal Railway. For such works, we refer the reader to The White Front Cars of San Francisco by Charles A. Smallwood, and an article by one of the contributors to this effort: "San Francisco" by John H. McKane, Motor Coach m, November 1972 (published by the Motor Bus Society, Post I Office Box 527, Blackwood, NJ 0801~-~ This article attempts t o t ell the reader s omething about the Municipal Railway as it was during the 1 969-1970 fiscal year. The main sub j ects are the Muni's rout es, service and equipment, including servicing structures. To identify t he equipment, we present f i rst a r oster, and f ollow this up with descriptions of I the various paint s che me s pr evelant , and photographs of each t ype. This i s f ollowed by a listing of which locations and fac i lit ies ( called Di vi s i ons ) a nd which r out es the equipment is assigned; following this are diagrams of the Divisions and s ervi ce f acilit ies. Moving next to routes and service, a series of "Service Tables" is presented, defining each r oute in terms of a number, name, length, time, equipment type and Divi­ sion responsible for i t s oper a tion. The s er vice that was operated on each route is als o indicated in terms of "headway" (defined as t he time be t ween succed i ng vehicles in the same d irection) and the number of vehicle~ I required to operate that headway. Th i s s ervice is given f or four separate periods (morning peak, midday, evening peak and evening ) for Monday through Friday , for Sat urday and for Sunday. Service operated during the "owl" period is also listed, and samples of "operating schedules" are included. Routes are further de­ fined through a series of f our maps that show separately cable car and streetcar track layouts, .the trolley coach overhead wire ne t work, motor coach lines by divis ion, and an all-modes system map. Intricacies of in­ I dividual r outes and service are described i n text to pr esent infor mation that does not lend itself to table­ ization, Then comes a description of Muni's transfer system a nd reproductions of the transfer forms that are issued: Fina lly , t here is a t r eatise on the destinati on signs that are used to i dentify t he route and des­ tinati on of each Muni vehicle . I Ina smuch a s the Municipal Railway i s a publ icly owned agency , all of t he i nfor mati on contained herein is a ma tter of publi c i nformation . Even so , we would like to thank t he following Munic i pal Ra ilway personnel for t aking the time and t r oubl e to l ocate and pr ovide us with the mater ial and i nforma t ion required for this article: Mr. John M. Wo ods , Gener al Manager I Mr . Frank J. Scheifler, Tr anspor tati on As sistant Superintendent Mr. Maurice F. Itig , Traffic Superintendent Mr. Fred Thomas , Automotive Equipment Supervisor ABO UT THE WEST~RN TRANS IT SOCI~TY: I Readers who have ski pped ahead t o the bottom of t his page have not ed that this work was published by the West ern Tra ns it Soc iety. The Western Transit Societ y is a non-profit making organizatio~ that was e s t ablished i n 1963 (as the United Tr ansit Boosters) by a gr oup of persons who were inter e sted in public mass t r anspor tation, and in how such systems work, and generally fur theri ng the cause of mass transit. Be­ I side s monthl y meetings , occas ional field t rips and special publications s uch as thi s one , the orga nization a l so publishes a monthly news l etter cal led Wester n Transit (originally The Booster ) that publishes news of t r ansit oper ati ons i n t he Western United Sta tes . The organizati on pr ides itself on its objectiveity , and avoi dance of pol iti cal positions. The purpose I of the organization i s educational , a nd not pol itical . Membe r ship is open to any pe r son who has a sincer e inter est in public mass t r a nsportation, a nd applica­ t i ons are solicited. For membe r ship i nformation, please wr ite t o t he add res s l i sted below. I MUNICIPAL RAI LW AY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 was published WESTERN TRANSIT SOCI~TY by t he We s tern Trans i t Society as a suppl emen t t o the Januar y , 1973 issue of i ts monthl y newsletter, Bus i ness Add r ess : Western Transit. 7419 Be nn ington Ave nue I WESTERN TR ANSIT ** Januar y , 1973 ** Vo l. 11, No . 1 Pico- River a , Ca liforn i a 90660 Supplement No . 1 Ed itor --Gerald L. Squier Officers : Contributors --John H. Mc Kane --Loren B. Joplin I --John E. Pa ppas Ge neral Man ager --Frank J. LichtRnski Secr et a r y --Brian Norden Western Tr ans it Ed i tor--Edmund A. Buckley Cover Phot o --Tom Gray Founder --Gerald L. Squier 2 I I E O U I P M E N T R O S T E R The period from July, 1969 to June,1970 was one of great change for the Municipal Railway. It entered the period with a fleet whose average age was greater than any public system (and all but the smallest private company) in the state, In fact, the size and content of the fleet had remained more or less con­ stant during the preceding ten years, The reason for the stability was the refusal of the San Francisco electorate to approve any bond issue for capital improvements for the Muni, The City did acquire the use of new diesel bus and used PCC streetcar equipment in the mid- and late-1950's under negotiated lease arrange­ ments. The motor coach lease deal was effectively terminated insofar as the acquisition of additional new equipment was concerned when the lessor and manufacturer (The Mack Truck Company) stopped building buses in 1960. (It has been reported that the Muni attempted to arrange a similar lease situation with the only other major manufacturer at that time, General Motors, but that firm declined for fear of prosecution on federal anti-trust charges.) New equipment was finally acquired by means of the Municipal Railway Impr'ove­ ment Corporation, a non-profit public corporation. Although the City itself could not issue bonds for Mun i capital improvements without voter approval, it could contract with another agency to lease such equipment (such lease payment being an operating expense).
Recommended publications
  • New Buses May Be "Most Expensive"
    "Superbus" preliminary specifications New buses may be "most expensive" Out to manufacturers for review Residents in suburban areas of Indicating the increased costs of Preliminary specifications have gone seats, leg room and the feeling of Alameda and Contra Costa counties labor, materials and parts, Fresno out to American and European bus space, and comfortable temperature. who are receiving special bus ex­ Transit received an apparent low bid manufacturers for a high capacity bus All bus drivers polled liked the way tension service to BART stations may early this month from AM General offering more seats for riders while the bus handled and many felt its tur­ be riding in the most expensive Corp, of $66,895 per unit delivered, for holding down expenses and keeping ning response was superior to the 40- coaches in the urban transit industry. a standard 51-passenger bus with air fares stabilized. foot coach. Ease of steering also was Bids for 36 deluxe buses, opened this conditioning. General Motors, the only Seven transit properties are con­ mentioned, as were good acceleration, month, clearly showed how inflation other bidder, came in with $68,542 per sidering an initial joint order of ap­ braking and good curb pull-out. has hit coach manufacturers. bus delivered. The same bus a year ago proximately 160 articulated "Superbus" Nine year experiment Apparent low bidder was Flxible Co. had a unit price of $42,500. coaches for use in different areas of the AC Transit, which has experimented with a bid of $71 ,108 per bus delivered. Chicago Transit received a low bid country, with an articulated coach since 1966, General Motors, the only other bidder, on Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Outside Lands Outside Lands History from the Western Neighborhoods Project 2 Where in West S.F.? (Previously Issued As SF West History)
    OutsideSan Francisco HistoryLands from Western Neighborhoods Project Volume 14, No. 1 Jan–Mar 2018 100 Years of the Twin Peaks Tunnel I NS I DE 1 Inside the Outside Lands OUTSIDE LANDS History from the Western Neighborhoods Project 2 Where in West S.F.? (Previously issued as SF West History) January-March 2018: Volume 14, Number 1 3 OpenSFHistory Highlight John Martini remembers Fleishhacker Pool EDITOR: Woody LaBounty CONTRIBUTORS: Angus Macfarlane, John Martini, and Arnold Woods 6 Roosevelt History, Part One The Story of a Richmond District school Board of Directors 2018 by Angus Macfarlane Chelsea Sellin, President Jamie O’Keefe, Vice President Anisha Gupta, Secretary 10 Westward the Course of Empire Takes its David Gallagher, Treasurer Way–100 Years of the Twin Peaks Tunnel Richard Brandi, David Chang, Nicole Meldahl, Kyrie Whitsett, Arnold Woods by Arnold Woods Staff: Woody LaBounty, Dave Lucas 15 Thank You to Our Donors Advisory Board Those who supported us in 2017 Cammy Blackstone, Al Harris, Gretchen Hilyard, Brady Lea, Felicity O’Meara, Paul Rosenberg, Nate Tico, and Lorri Ungaretti 20 Historical Happenings The WNP Event Calendar Western Neighborhoods Project 4016 Geary Boulevard, Suite A 22 A Home for History San Francisco, CA 94118 New WNP digs at 1617 Balboa Street Tel: 415/661-1000 Email: [email protected] Website: www.outsidelands.org facebook.com/outsidelands twitter.com/outsidelandz instagram.com/westernneighborhoods/ Cover: Mayor Rolph driving the first streetcar out of the west portal of the Twin Peaks tunnel, February 3, 1918. (wnp15.174) © 2018 Western Neighborhoods Project. All rights reserved. Inside the Outside Lands Woody LaBounty estern Neighborhoods Project from the neighborhoods recon- (that’s us), the nonprofit with a nected, but just as many strangers mission to preserve and share became new friends in sharing their Wlocal history, now has a public space love of history and of the west side for exhibits, presentations, and com- of San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • Argonaut #2 2019 Cover.Indd 1 1/23/20 1:18 PM the Argonaut Journal of the San Francisco Historical Society Publisher and Editor-In-Chief Charles A
    1/23/20 1:18 PM Winter 2020 Winter Volume 30 No. 2 Volume JOURNAL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOL. 30 NO. 2 Argonaut #2_2019_cover.indd 1 THE ARGONAUT Journal of the San Francisco Historical Society PUBLISHER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Charles A. Fracchia EDITOR Lana Costantini PHOTO AND COPY EDITOR Lorri Ungaretti GRapHIC DESIGNER Romney Lange PUBLIcatIONS COMMIttEE Hudson Bell Lee Bruno Lana Costantini Charles Fracchia John Freeman Chris O’Sullivan David Parry Ken Sproul Lorri Ungaretti BOARD OF DIREctORS John Briscoe, President Tom Owens, 1st Vice President Mike Fitzgerald, 2nd Vice President Kevin Pursglove, Secretary Jack Lapidos,Treasurer Rodger Birt Edith L. Piness, Ph.D. Mary Duffy Darlene Plumtree Nolte Noah Griffin Chris O’Sullivan Richard S. E. Johns David Parry Brent Johnson Christopher Patz Robyn Lipsky Ken Sproul Bruce M. Lubarsky Paul J. Su James Marchetti John Tregenza Talbot Moore Diana Whitehead Charles A. Fracchia, Founder & President Emeritus of SFHS EXECUTIVE DIREctOR Lana Costantini The Argonaut is published by the San Francisco Historical Society, P.O. Box 420470, San Francisco, CA 94142-0470. Changes of address should be sent to the above address. Or, for more information call us at 415.537.1105. TABLE OF CONTENTS A SECOND TUNNEL FOR THE SUNSET by Vincent Ring .....................................................................................................................................6 THE LAST BASTION OF SAN FRANCISCO’S CALIFORNIOS: The Mission Dolores Settlement, 1834–1848 by Hudson Bell .....................................................................................................................................22 A TENDERLOIN DISTRIct HISTORY The Pioneers of St. Ann’s Valley: 1847–1860 by Peter M. Field ..................................................................................................................................42 Cover photo: On October 21, 1928, the Sunset Tunnel opened for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS RELEASE** Weekend Construction Begins on Sunset Tunnel Trackway Improvement Project
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 6, 2014 Contact: Paul Rose 415.601.1637 [email protected] **PRESS RELEASE** Weekend Construction Begins on Sunset Tunnel Trackway Improvement Project San Francisco—The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), which oversees all transportation in the city, including the Municipal Railway (Muni), will start construction to replace tracks and other infrastructure inside Sunset Tunnel this weekend. The Sunset Tunnel Trackway Improvement Project will upgrade the N Judah Metro Line making it safer and more reliable. Upgrades will include: Track and infrastructure replacements (between Cole Valley and Duboce Triangle) Transit Signal Priority (TSP) upgrades at nine intersections along the N Judah Line o This new technology will reduce wait time at traffic signals for Muni vehicles by holding green lights longer. Construction of two Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant platforms at Judah Street and 28th Avenue The tunnel construction is scheduled for 15 weekends between November 2014 and June 2015. Construction will commence Nov. 7-10, and continue the weekends of Nov. 14 and Nov. 21. After that, tunnel construction will take a holiday reprieve and resume in early 2015. During construction weekends, N Judah rail service will be substituted with bus shuttles between Church & Duboce and Ocean Beach. Bus substitution will start at approximately 7 p.m. on Friday and will operate during all regular service hours until approximately 2 a.m. Monday morning. The weekend N Judah Owl bus service will not be affected. The bus shuttles will follow the N Judah making regular stops except for the tunnel portion where buses will operate on Haight Street.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT MINUTES San Francisco County Transportation Authority Tuesday, November 17, 2020
    DRAFT MINUTES San Francisco County Transportation Authority Tuesday, November 17, 2020 1. Roll Call Chair Peskin called the meeting to order at 10:04 a.m. Present at Roll Call: Commissioners Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Preston, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton and Yee (10) Absent at Roll Call: Commissioner Mar (entered during Item 2) (1) 2. Chair’s Report – INFORMATION Chair Peskin reported that in addition to helping elect President-elect Biden and Vice- President-elect Harris, San Francisco voters looked favorably on transportation funding measures on November 3rd. He added that locally, San Francisco approved Proposition A, the Health and Homelessness, Parks and Streets Bond. He said that this $487.5 million general obligation bond included $41.5 million to repave and reconstruct roads, rehabilitate, and make seismic improvements to street structures and plazas and to install and renovate curb ramps. He said that there are also funds for re-building parks and open spaces, including safe pedestrian access across the city. Chair Peskin reported that regionally, voters in San Francisco along with all three Caltrain district counties, including Santa Clara and San Mateo, passed Measure RR by over 2/3 approval which is the threshold for the first-ever dedicated funding source for Caltrain. He added that the one-eighth cent sales tax for Caltrain will provide a lifeline to the railroad which is struggling with severe fare revenue loss associated with low levels of ridership during the pandemic. He shared that the funds will also help off-set SFMTA’s obligations to provide operating support, benefitting Muni. He added that the funds will provide a way to build toward Caltrain’s future as an electrified service.
    [Show full text]
  • ~:L~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY
    ~:l~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY SPRING 1990 EVIEW A PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE HISTORIANS, INC. Editorial Comment One of the most fascinating aspects of automotive history is the study of the many people who figure in the industry which grew up around the motor car. Many of these are giant figures, in terms of their reputation and lasting influ- ence on the industry: Henry Ford the elder, Alfred P. Sloan, even Preston Tucker. For every industry giant, however, there are dozens of others whose lives and work fall in the shadows, but whose contributions to society are no less vital. Texan D.J. Kava is a scholar of Hudson history, and in his travels came across an interesting figure in the persona of George W. Dunham, first chief engineer of Hudson Motor Car Company. Through a short-timer in the auto industry, by Detroit standards, Dunham was the designer behind several production cars before turning his attention to setting industry standards through the Society of Automotive Engineers. He then moved to other endeavors, and left us with the legacy of the modern spindry washing machine and the ubiquitous lawn sweeper. With Kava's treatise on Dunham's career, beginning on page 2, we return Automotive History Review to the field of biography which it championed many years ago. Jim Hockenhull (page 8) has an irrepressible sense of humor (could a Crosley connoisseur survive otherwise?), and in this vein examines why, despite a clever attempt at innova- tion, the Ohio auto maker is not remembered as the pioneer of the modern high-compression engine.
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe-Sachs Interchange
    Table of Contents Chassis Section Nova Bus 22 Binkley 1 Orion Bus 23 Bluebird School Bus 1 Oshkosh 23 Brockway School Bus 1 Page Suspension 23 Built Rite Trailer 1 Pai Corporation 23 Cascade Trailer 1 Peerles Trailer 23 Chalmers Suspension 1 Peterbilt 23 Chance Bus 1 Prevost 24 Chevrolet 1 Reyco Suspension 24 Duplex Truck 2 Ridewell Corporation 24 Dura Suspension 3 Sterling 25 East Manufacturing Trailer 3 Trailmobile Canada Corp. 25 Ford 3 Turner Quick-Lift Corporation 26 Freightliner 3 Tuthill Technologies 26 Freightliner Custom Chassis 7 Twin Coach 26 Fruehauf 8 Utility Trailer 26 General Trailer Co. 8 Volvo 27 Gillig 8 Watson & Chain Suspension 28 GMC 8 Western Star 28 Great Dane Trailer 10 Western Unit 29 Hardee Manufacturing 10 Hendrickson 11 Highway Product 12 Cab Section Holland 12 Freightliner 30 Hutchens Suspension 12 Link Cabmate Air Suspension 30 Ikarus Bus 12 Western Star 31 International 12 Isuzu 15 Kenworth 16 Lodal Refuse Haulers 18 OEM Interchange 32 Mack 18 Gabriel - SACHS Interchange 37 Marmon Motor 20 Meritor - SACHS Interchange 38 Mitsubishi – Fuso 20 Monroe - SACHS Interchange 39 Neway 20 Specification Chart 40 North American Bus Industries 22 Customer Service & Technical Hotline Back Cover Important Notice The purpose of this catalog is to furnish ZF Services, LLC customers with as complete a listing of their parts requirements as possible. All listings, applications, and interchanges have been compiled as carefully as possible with all available information however, ZF Services, LLC cannot assume any responsibility for possible errors in listings, applications, or interchanges. All references by ZF Services, LLC to the original manufacturer trade names and part numbers are for identification purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cta 2016 Historical Calendar Cta 2016 January
    cta 2016 Historical Calendar cta 2016 January Chicago Motor Coach Company (CMC) bus #434, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, was part of a fleet of buses operated by the Chicago Motor Coach Company, one of the predecessor transit companies that were eventually assimilated into the Chicago Transit Authority. The CMC originally operated buses exclusively on the various park boulevards in Chicago, and became known by the marketing slogan, “The Boulevard Route.” Later, service was expanded to operate on some regular streets not served by the Chicago Surface Lines, particularly on the fringes of the city. Chicagoans truly wanted a unified transit system, and it was for this reason that the Chicago Transit Authority was established by charter in 1945. The CMC was not one of the initial properties purchased that made up CTA’s inaugural services on October 1, 1947; however, it was bought by CTA in 1952. D E SABCDEFG: MDecember 2015 T February 2016 W T F S CTA Operations Division S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Group Days Off 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 t Alternate day off if you 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 work on this day 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 l Central offices closed 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 1New Year’s Day 2 E F G A B C D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D E F G A B C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C D E F G A B 17 18Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Ketron Inc
    DOT-TSC-U MT A -83-2 Wheelchair Lifts on U.S.Department of Transportation Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Prepared by: January 1983 Ketron Inc. H: 3 1 ~ 190 i EQUIPM ENT ENGlNEERING DEPARTMENT NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans­ portation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to th e object of this report. DOT-TSC-U tv'IT A-83-2 S.C.R. T.D. LIBRARY Wheelchair Lifts on U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transit Buses Transportation Administration Summary of U. S. Experience Prepared by: Ketron Inc. One Broadway Cambridge MA 02142 Office of Technical Assistance Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Washington DC 20590 0-7548 ~ .. PREFACE This project was conducted for the USDOT Transportati on Systems Center (TSC) and the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) by KETRON, Inc . - Cambridge Facility. The contract \vas initiated in September, 1980 betv1een TSC and Applied Resour ce Integration, Ltd. (ARI) of Boston - Contract r~o . DTRS57-80-C-00150 . In 1981 KETRON acquired ARI and t he project was continued and completed by the same project teom . The successful completion of t he project is attr ibutabl e to the cooperation of a large number of organizations and personnel representing t r ansit properties, bus manuf ac t ur Prs, lift su pp liers , and others concerned v1ith the problem of acccssi­ bil ity on public transit systems.
    [Show full text]
  • An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home the House That Busses Built
    LAMORINDA WEEKLY | An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built Published August 14th, 2013 An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built By Cathy Tyson The stately Mediterranean home on the ninth fairway of the Orinda Country Club, built in 1929, can trace its history back to one of the brothers who was a leader in the bus construction business with the Fageol Motor Company started in Oakland in 1916. Innovators Frank and Bill Fageol had a vision that began with the redesign of a tractor, and turned it into a successful business that revolutionized how buses and trucks were built. Prior to the 1906 earthquake, the Fageol brothers were in charge of sales and service at the Rambler dealership at the corner of Telegraph and 37th Street in Oakland, eventually acquiring the Rambler distributorship. Business of these new-fangled cars must have been good - a directory circa 1908 reveals that six other Fageol family members, no mention of spouses or children, had moved to Oakland from Iowa and were working at the dealership. Presumably the grandiose Orinda home was meant to house the large extended family. Fageol Motor Company was in the right place at the View of the front of the Casa del Sue§o. Photos right time to leverage growth in California; the firm Andy Scheck purchased four acres of land near Foothill Boulevard and 106th Avenue for their auto, truck and bus plant in 1917. In the early days of bus manufacturing, multi-passenger vehicles were basically stretched automobile touring cars mounted on a truck chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • CPUC 2015 Triennial Audit Report
    2015 TRIENNIAL SAFETY REVIEW OF SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (SFMTA) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 November 10, 2016 Final Report Elizaveta Malashenko, Director Safety and Enforcement Division 2015 TRIENNIAL SAFETY REVIEW OF SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (SFMTA) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) staff conducted this system safety program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting safety review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert – Program Manager Stephen Artus – Program & Project Supervisor Steve Espinal – Senior Utilities Engineer, Supervisor Jimmy Xia – Utilities Engineer – SFMTA Representative Raed Dwairi – Utilities Engineer – Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer Mike Borer –Supervisor Sherman Boyd – Signal Inspector Debbie Dziadzio –Operations Inspector Adam Freeman – Mechanical Inspector Robert Hansen – Utilities Engineer – AirTrain Representative Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer – LACMTA Representative Claudia Lam – Senior Utilities Engineer, Specialist David Leggett – Senior Utilities Engineer, Specialist John Madriaga –Track Inspector James Matus – Mechanical Inspector Kevin McDonald –Track Inspector Arun Mehta – Utilities Engineer Paul Renteria – Bridge Inspector Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer Yan Solopov – Regulatory Analyst Colleen Sullivan – Utilities Engineer Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer
    [Show full text]
  • High-Volume Brake Drum, Rotor, and Hub Catalog and Interchange
    High-Volume Brake Drum, Rotor, and Hub Catalog and Interchange For Trucks, Trailers, Buses, and Other Equipment WE MAKE OVER 2,000 DIFFERENT BRAKEDRUMS DuraBrake Co. TABLE OF CONTENTS The DuraBrake Advantage ................................................................................................3 Chart of Drum Styles .........................................................................................................4 Information Required for Drums Not Listed .....................................................................4 High-Volume Brake Drum Details .............................................................................5 - 19 Webb Interchange .....................................................................................................20 - 23 Gunite Interchange ...................................................................................................24 - 26 Rotor Details ............................................................................................................27 - 28 Terms & Conditions ...............................................................................Inside Back Cover 1 DuraBrake Co. DuraBrake makes brake drums and rotors for the following applications among others: · Truck Manufacturers o Optare o AM General o Optima Bus o Chevrolet/GMC o Orion o Dodge o Thomas Bus o Ford o Van Hool o Freightliner · Axle Manufacturers o Hino o ArvinMeritor (Rockwell) o Isuzu o Dana o Kenworth o Eaton o Lodal o Hendrickson o Mack o K-B Axle o Mitsubishi Fuso o M.A.N. o Navistar
    [Show full text]