Flooding at the Museum of Bus Transportation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Buses May Be "Most Expensive"
"Superbus" preliminary specifications New buses may be "most expensive" Out to manufacturers for review Residents in suburban areas of Indicating the increased costs of Preliminary specifications have gone seats, leg room and the feeling of Alameda and Contra Costa counties labor, materials and parts, Fresno out to American and European bus space, and comfortable temperature. who are receiving special bus ex Transit received an apparent low bid manufacturers for a high capacity bus All bus drivers polled liked the way tension service to BART stations may early this month from AM General offering more seats for riders while the bus handled and many felt its tur be riding in the most expensive Corp, of $66,895 per unit delivered, for holding down expenses and keeping ning response was superior to the 40- coaches in the urban transit industry. a standard 51-passenger bus with air fares stabilized. foot coach. Ease of steering also was Bids for 36 deluxe buses, opened this conditioning. General Motors, the only Seven transit properties are con mentioned, as were good acceleration, month, clearly showed how inflation other bidder, came in with $68,542 per sidering an initial joint order of ap braking and good curb pull-out. has hit coach manufacturers. bus delivered. The same bus a year ago proximately 160 articulated "Superbus" Nine year experiment Apparent low bidder was Flxible Co. had a unit price of $42,500. coaches for use in different areas of the AC Transit, which has experimented with a bid of $71 ,108 per bus delivered. Chicago Transit received a low bid country, with an articulated coach since 1966, General Motors, the only other bidder, on Dec. -
~:L~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY
~:l~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY SPRING 1990 EVIEW A PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE HISTORIANS, INC. Editorial Comment One of the most fascinating aspects of automotive history is the study of the many people who figure in the industry which grew up around the motor car. Many of these are giant figures, in terms of their reputation and lasting influ- ence on the industry: Henry Ford the elder, Alfred P. Sloan, even Preston Tucker. For every industry giant, however, there are dozens of others whose lives and work fall in the shadows, but whose contributions to society are no less vital. Texan D.J. Kava is a scholar of Hudson history, and in his travels came across an interesting figure in the persona of George W. Dunham, first chief engineer of Hudson Motor Car Company. Through a short-timer in the auto industry, by Detroit standards, Dunham was the designer behind several production cars before turning his attention to setting industry standards through the Society of Automotive Engineers. He then moved to other endeavors, and left us with the legacy of the modern spindry washing machine and the ubiquitous lawn sweeper. With Kava's treatise on Dunham's career, beginning on page 2, we return Automotive History Review to the field of biography which it championed many years ago. Jim Hockenhull (page 8) has an irrepressible sense of humor (could a Crosley connoisseur survive otherwise?), and in this vein examines why, despite a clever attempt at innova- tion, the Ohio auto maker is not remembered as the pioneer of the modern high-compression engine. -
1983 Ketron Inc
DOT-TSC-U MT A -83-2 Wheelchair Lifts on U.S.Department of Transportation Transit Buses Urban Mass Transportation Administration Prepared by: January 1983 Ketron Inc. H: 3 1 ~ 190 i EQUIPM ENT ENGlNEERING DEPARTMENT NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Trans portation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to th e object of this report. DOT-TSC-U tv'IT A-83-2 S.C.R. T.D. LIBRARY Wheelchair Lifts on U.S. Department of Transportation Urban Mass Transit Buses Transportation Administration Summary of U. S. Experience Prepared by: Ketron Inc. One Broadway Cambridge MA 02142 Office of Technical Assistance Office of Bus and Paratransit Systems Washington DC 20590 0-7548 ~ .. PREFACE This project was conducted for the USDOT Transportati on Systems Center (TSC) and the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) by KETRON, Inc . - Cambridge Facility. The contract \vas initiated in September, 1980 betv1een TSC and Applied Resour ce Integration, Ltd. (ARI) of Boston - Contract r~o . DTRS57-80-C-00150 . In 1981 KETRON acquired ARI and t he project was continued and completed by the same project teom . The successful completion of t he project is attr ibutabl e to the cooperation of a large number of organizations and personnel representing t r ansit properties, bus manuf ac t ur Prs, lift su pp liers , and others concerned v1ith the problem of acccssi bil ity on public transit systems. -
An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home the House That Busses Built
LAMORINDA WEEKLY | An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built Published August 14th, 2013 An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built By Cathy Tyson The stately Mediterranean home on the ninth fairway of the Orinda Country Club, built in 1929, can trace its history back to one of the brothers who was a leader in the bus construction business with the Fageol Motor Company started in Oakland in 1916. Innovators Frank and Bill Fageol had a vision that began with the redesign of a tractor, and turned it into a successful business that revolutionized how buses and trucks were built. Prior to the 1906 earthquake, the Fageol brothers were in charge of sales and service at the Rambler dealership at the corner of Telegraph and 37th Street in Oakland, eventually acquiring the Rambler distributorship. Business of these new-fangled cars must have been good - a directory circa 1908 reveals that six other Fageol family members, no mention of spouses or children, had moved to Oakland from Iowa and were working at the dealership. Presumably the grandiose Orinda home was meant to house the large extended family. Fageol Motor Company was in the right place at the View of the front of the Casa del Sue§o. Photos right time to leverage growth in California; the firm Andy Scheck purchased four acres of land near Foothill Boulevard and 106th Avenue for their auto, truck and bus plant in 1917. In the early days of bus manufacturing, multi-passenger vehicles were basically stretched automobile touring cars mounted on a truck chassis. -
1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late
MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY. -
GENERATOR-REGULATOR CIRCUITS Two Different Methods Are Used to Connect the Generator Field Circuit to the Generator Armature
All units are Re-manufactured and carry the same guarantee as the original units. NOTE: The information contained herein is based upon data which we believe to be correct and has been obtained from sources which we regard reliable, but we assume no liability for errors or omissions therein. INTERCHANGE QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE - ORIGINAL TO OUR CODE .................................. ...................................... Pages 4 to 6 Incl. INTERCHANGE GENERATORS TO REGULATORS TO OUR CODE............................................................................................ Pages 7 to 12 Incl. APPLICATION CARS. TRUCKS. ETC. TO OUR CODE Pas 13 to-- 30 Incl. ~ IMPORTANCE OF BATTERY POLARITY Pages 31 to 33 Incl. IMPORTANT - GUARANTEE AND INSTRUCTION This Replacement Unit will give you maximum service when properly installed. Regulators are guaranteed for ninetv days against defective workmanship and materials. Regulators are bench tested and set for correct charging rate according to original factory specifications. DO NOT TAMPER WITH ADJUSTMENTS. The fact that you are replacing the old regulator indicates the possibility that some trouble may exist in the electrical system that caused the old regulator to fail. To avoid damaging the replacement regulator follow these instructions carefully. Fig. I Fig. I1 Fig. 111 f AUTOLITE DELCO-REMY I FORD I AUTOLITE DELCO-REMY FORD I BEFORE INSTALLING DO NOT REMOVE OLD REGULATOR UNTIL THESE TESTS HAVE BEEN MADE IF BATTERY IS LOW AND CHARGING RATE LOW OR NO through the regulator, then through the generator fields to CHARGE AT ALL MAKE THESE TESTS. the ground inside of the generator. 1. check battery water and general battery conditions to see if Fig. I11 will take and hold a charge. -
High-Volume Brake Drum, Rotor, and Hub Catalog and Interchange
High-Volume Brake Drum, Rotor, and Hub Catalog and Interchange For Trucks, Trailers, Buses, and Other Equipment WE MAKE OVER 2,000 DIFFERENT BRAKEDRUMS DuraBrake Co. TABLE OF CONTENTS The DuraBrake Advantage ................................................................................................3 Chart of Drum Styles .........................................................................................................4 Information Required for Drums Not Listed .....................................................................4 High-Volume Brake Drum Details .............................................................................5 - 19 Webb Interchange .....................................................................................................20 - 23 Gunite Interchange ...................................................................................................24 - 26 Rotor Details ............................................................................................................27 - 28 Terms & Conditions ...............................................................................Inside Back Cover 1 DuraBrake Co. DuraBrake makes brake drums and rotors for the following applications among others: · Truck Manufacturers o Optare o AM General o Optima Bus o Chevrolet/GMC o Orion o Dodge o Thomas Bus o Ford o Van Hool o Freightliner · Axle Manufacturers o Hino o ArvinMeritor (Rockwell) o Isuzu o Dana o Kenworth o Eaton o Lodal o Hendrickson o Mack o K-B Axle o Mitsubishi Fuso o M.A.N. o Navistar -
2017Chicago Transit Authority a Horse Drawn Omnibus, Originally Operated by the Citizen’S Line Circa 1853, Is Displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake
HISTORICAL CALENDAR 2017Chicago Transit Authority A horse drawn omnibus, originally operated by the Citizen’s Line circa 1853, is displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake. These early transit vehicles were quite primitive, barely just a notch above stagecoaches – little more than hard, wooden bench seats were provided on either side of very sparsely appointed coaches, with no heat, light, or other amenities. It is hard to believe that, from such humble beginnings, Chicago would one day have the second largest public transit system in North America, as it does today. January 2017 S M T W T F S B C D E F G A 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 G A B C D E F Martin Luther 15 16 King, Jr. Day 17 18 19 20 21 F G A B C D E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E F G ABCDEFG: December 2016 February 2017 CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Group Days Off 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t Alternate day off if 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 you work on this day 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 l Central offices closed 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 Chicago streetcar #225 is outside of the 77th Street carbarn, sporting an early Chicago Transit Authority emblem but still wearing the red and cream color scheme of its predecessor company, the Chicago Surface Lines. -
2021 Historical Calendar Cta 2021 January
cta 2021 Historical Calendar cta 2021 January Built in 1936 by the St. Louis Car Company, Chicago Surface Lines trolley bus #184 heads eastbound via Diversey to Western. Trolley bus service was first introduced in Chicago on the #76 Diversey route in 1930. Other trolley bus routes were soon added, some as extensions of existing streetcar lines and later as conversions of streetcar lines to trolley bus service. Trolley bus extensions to existing streetcar lines were an economical way to serve new neighborhoods that were established in outlying parts of the city. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat ABCDEFG: December 2020 February 2021 B C CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group Days Off 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t Alternate day off if 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 you work on this day 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 l Central offices closed 27 28 29 30 31 28 1 New Year’s Day 2 C D E F G A B 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B C D E F G A 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A B C D E F G Martin Luther King, 17 18 Jr. Day 19 20 21 22 23 G A B C D E F 24 F 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 cta 2021 February Car #1643 was an example of Chicago’s first electric streetcars. -
COLLECTIBLE AUTOMOBILE® INDEX Current Through Volume 34 Number 2, August 2017
® INDEX © PUBLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, LTD COLLECTIBLE AUTOMOBILE® INDEX Current through Volume 34 Number 2, August 2017 CONTENTS FEATURES ..................................................... 1–6 PHOTO FEATURES ............................................. 6–9 FUTURE COLLECTIBLES ...................................... 9–11 CHEAP WHEELS ............................................. 11–12 COLLECTIBLE COMMERCIAL VEHICLES ..................... 12–14 COLLECTIBLE CANADIAN VEHICLES ............................ 14 NEOCLASSICS .................................................. 14 SPECIAL ARTICLES .......................................... 14–16 STYLING STUDIES .............................................. 16 PERSONALITY PROFILES, INTERVIEWS ....................... 16–17 MUSEUM PASS ............................................... 17–18 COLLECTIBLE AUTOMOBILIA ................................... 18 REFLECTED LIGHT ............................................. 18 BOOK REVIEWS .............................................. 18–20 VIDEOS ......................................................... 20 COLLECTIBLE AUTOMOBILE® INDEX Current through Volume 34 Number 2, August 2017 FEATURES AUTHOR PG. VOL. DATE AUTHOR PG. VOL. DATE Alfa Romeo: 1954-65 Giulia Buick: 1964-72 Sportwagon and and Giulietta Ray Thursby 58 19#6 Apr 03 Oldsmobile Vista-Cruiser John Heilig 8 21#5 Feb 05 Allard: 1949-54 J2 and J2-X Dean Batchelor 28 7#6 Apr 91 Buick: 1965-66 John Heilig 26 20#6 Apr 04 Allstate: 1952-53 Richard M. Langworth 66 9#2 Aug 92 Buick: 1965-67 Gran Sport John Heilig 8 18#5 Feb 02 AMC: 1959-82 Foreign Markets Patrick Foster 58 22#1 Jun 05 Buick: 1966-70 Riviera Michael Lamm 8 9#3 Oct 92 AMC: 1965-67 Marlin John A. Conde 60 5#1 Jun 88 Buick: 1967-70 Terry V. Boyce 8 26#5 Feb 10 AMC: 1967-68 Ambassador Patrick Foster 48 20#1 Jun 03 Buick: 1968-72 GS/GSX Arch Brown 8 11#1 Jun 94 AMC: 1967-70 Rebel Patrick Foster 56 29#6 Apr 13 Buick: 1971-73 Riviera Arch Brown 8 7#2 Aug 90 AMC: 1968-70 AMX John A. -
Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality
Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same. -
Moving Under It's Own Power for the First Time In
BUS DIVISION PROGRESS REPORT April 2014 WARREN BISBEE BUS LINE # 1 MOVING UNDER IT’S OWN POWER FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 63 YEARS!!!! BIG CELEBRATION HELD APRIL 19 FOR TEST RUN OF 1928 TWIN COACH A nice crowd of about 45 gathered for the test run. Special Guests present for the occasion were Spencer and Polly Soles, son and daughter-in-law of Orin and Edna Soles who donated the bus to Old Pueblo Trolley in 1995; and John Fageol, grandson of W. B. “Bill” Fageol, and great nephew of Frank R, Fageol, designers of the bus and founders of the Twin Coach company. Posing along Hughes Street adjacent to our shop after a very successful test run. Everything went as planned with no major problems discovered with any of the mechanical systems. Backing it out of the shop for the test run. Guests watch as it comes down Hughes Street by our restoration shop. Thanks to Laura Caywood Barker for most of the event photos Video of event on youtube: http://www.y outube.com/ watch?v=A4 pyD2WhPF8 &feature=yo utu.be, thanks to Ron Dawson Listening to Gene Caywood thank the 123 individuals and firms that have worked on the bus directly or indirectly, or provided services at a reduced cost. Our special guests pose by the bus: John Fageol (left) and Spencer & Polly Soles (right). Bob Schlanger photos MOVE OF BUSES FROM 18th STREET YARD The March 2014 QUARTERLY NEWS FOR OLD PUEBLO TROLLEY reported on the successful completion of the move from our old 18th Street yard.