Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation Filling a Need for Higher Quality Mid-Size Buses The Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation facility in Gaffney, South Carolina covers a total area of 74 acres and includes 283,000 square feet under roof. More than 20,000 chassis are built annually, and more than 600 people are employed at this facility. What makes these FCCC chassis so remarkable is that they are taking the industry to new levels of quality in the area of body-on- by Larry Plachno chassis buses. FCCC. hile Freightliner Custom Chassis tomers, thus increasing this gap in bus sizes. integral coaches but also matched them in Corporation (FCCC) can claim On this side of the Atlantic, bus operators amenities. Even Australia had their remark- Wmany achievements, perhaps the saw little or no advantage in buying shorter able GM-Dennings. The United States and most important is that it has filled a need for integral coaches. The primary difference Canada needed someone to step in and fill quality mid-size buses in recent years. between a 40- and 45-foot coach is only five this gap. Since the traditional low price of Among other things, FCCC has vindicated feet of steel and glass. Hence, the selling fuel in the United States and Canada mini- me in my prediction many years ago that price difference between the two sizes was mized the incentive for shorter integral higher quality body-on-chassis buses would minimal while operating costs were virtu- coaches, it was obvious that the solution to soon become available on the United States ally the same. filling this gap was in the area of higher qual- and Canadian market. ity and more sophisticated body-on-chassis Things are different in Europe where buses. Hence, my prediction that this would One of the more interesting trends in the coach manufacturers often offer their inte- take place. Freightliner’s development of U.S. and Canadian bus industry in recent gral models in different lengths. The advan- higher quality and more sophisticated chas- decades has been the increasing gap tage to the operator is not necessarily in the sis became the key to filling this need. between the vans and small cutaway buses original purchase price but in the ongoing on the low end and the full-size integral operating cost – due in large part to the FCCC History coaches on the high end. Between World higher price of fuel in Europe. War II and the 90s, the length of most new While the Freightliner name is normally integral tour and charter coaches moved In addition, Europe had developed body- associated with on-highway trucks, the story from 35 feet to 40 feet to 45 feet. Coach man- on-chassis buses into a fine art. Jonckheere behind Freightliner Custom Chassis Cor- ufacturers typically discontinued offering built some body-on-chassis charter and tour poration involves buses from beginning to shorter lengths because there were no cus- buses that were not only difficult to tell from end. The FCCC motto, “Driven by You,” is proudly displayed at the Gaffney Hundreds of completed chassis of different types are parked at the FCCC facility. The saying is appropriate since FCCC works very closely with facility in Gaffney waiting for shipment to customers. FCCC provides their customers to provide the chassis they need. FCCC. several different chassis for a variety of applications. FCCC. National Bus Trader / September, 2009 • 15 The Fageol brothers were ahead of their Benz. In retrospect, this may have been the tion lines. Approximately 600 people are time. They founded Fageol Motors in 1916 wrong move since Consolidated Freightways employed at the facility that has the capac- in Oakland, California. In 1921, they were was a victim of deregulation and discontin- ity to produce more than 20,000 chassis each the first company in the United States to ued its carrier business on Labor Day week- year. build a bus from the ground up, instead of end of 2002 while the truck manufacturing putting a body on a truck chassis. For many business has flourished under Daimler. FCCC produces four different types of years the Fageol buses were highly regarded chassis for various bus applications. These in the bus industry. Fageol also built trucks Since its acquisition by Daimler, Freight- include the medium-duty front engine S2 which were also highly regarded. liner has had several connections with buses. chassis, the hybrid-electric MB-HEV chas- In 1989, Freightliner acquired a plant in sis, the straight-rail front engine MB chassis The Fageol brothers moved to Kent, Ohio Cleveland, North Carolina (near Statesville), and the rear engine raised-rail XB chassis. in 1927 and founded the Twin Coach Com- that previously built M.A.N. buses. Freight- In one way or another, all four of them have pany to build buses. Due to the depression, liner used the plant to build a new line of “raised the bar” on chassis quality over what the Fageol company went into receivership medium-duty trucks called the Business was available even a few years ago. in 1932. A. Peterman, a Tacoma, Washing- Class that proved to be very successful. ton plywood manufacturer and lumber S2-Series Chassis entrepreneur, purchased the Fageol factory In 1998, Freightliner acquired Thomas FCCC’s S2-Series chassis is popular for in 1938. At first Peterman built trucks for his Built Buses in High Point, North Carolina. public transportation, resort and hotel shut- own use but in 1939 he began to sell his In addition to producing all classes of school tles, local tours and many special trans- remarkable trucks to the public. They bus bodies, Thomas also manufactures for- portation needs. It is designed for medium- became known as Peterbilts. ward control chassis. duty applications with front diesel power and is the only Freightliner commercial bus Consolidated Freightways was already a More important to this story was a part- chassis to come standard with a hood in major trucking company in the late ’30s and nership with Oshkosh Truck (now Oshkosh front. The wheelbase varies from 158 to 279 used the early roads in those pre-interstate Corporation) that led to the acquisition of inches and the GVWR ranges from a low of days. One of their major problems was in find- Oshkosh Custom Chassis, which is now 19,500 pounds to a high of 33,000 pounds. ing a truck powerful enough to climb the steep Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation in grades found in the mountains of the West- Gaffney, South Carolina. At that time the A wide range of engines is available in ern states. What Consolidated Freightways facility was building chassis and chassis the S2. The standard engine is a 190 horse- did was to reconstruct Fageol trucks in their components for walk-in vans, diesel recre- power Mercedes-Benz 7.2 liter diesel but maintenance facility in Salt Lake City. These ational vehicles, conventional school buses larger 210, 230 and 250 horsepower versions trucks became known as “Freightliners.” and shuttle buses. In following years, FCCC are also available. Optional are a range of developed their impressive line of chassis Cummins 6.7 liter engines from 200 to 260 Following World War II, Consolidated for mid-size buses. horsepower. Regular equipment includes Freightways began to sell their trucks to other an Allison 2100 PTS automatic transmission companies. For many years they were sold Bus Chassis Products while upgrades are available to the 2200, through the White Motor Company. In 1974, 2500 or 3000 Allison PTS. Freightliner began selling its own trucks. The Gaffney facility is located near Inter- When deregulation arrived, Consolidated state 85 and approximately 55 miles south- Hydraulic disc brakes are standard equip- Freightways elected to concentrate on truck- west of Charlotte, North Carolina. With a ment but Meritor air brakes are optional. Stan- ing and sold its truck manufacturing busi- total area of 74 acres, the site includes 283,000 dard equipment includes a multiplex elec- ness and the Freightliner brand to Daimler- square feet under roof with three produc- trical system with an electrical drop for ADA wiring. Noteworthy features include R22.5 “big bus” tires, a 55-degree wheel cut, Among the upscale mid-size buses offered in recent years is the Apollo from Glaval Bus Corp. Built on a FCCC MB-55 chassis, the Apollo offers a significant step up from the traditional cutaway tilt/telescopic steering wheel, standard cruise styling. FCCC. control, programmable high idle, and optional high-output alternators. The Freightliner S2 chassis is typically used on upscale buses with a front hood in what is generally known as a “cutaway” design. Bus manufacturers currently using the S2 chassis are Champion Coach and Gen- eral Coach. One of the best-known buses built on the S2 chassis is the M1235 sold by ABC companies. Alternate Fuel Chassis Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation began developing alternative fuel vehicles in 2002. Their newest development in this area is the MB-HEV hybrid-electric chassis that was featured at the 2008 Bus Con convention in Chicago. It uses an internal combustion diesel engine and an electric motor driven by lithium-ion batteries. The result is an up to 40 percent improvement in fuel economy. The MB-HEV model has a Cummins ISB 6.7-liter engine and an Eaton transmission with an automated clutch. In addition to the 16 • National Bus Trader / September, 2009 The Supreme Trolley is built on an FCCC MB-55 chassis and is sold by The 3035RE from ABC Companies is built by GCA. It uses an FCCC Specialty Vehicles. The MB-55 chassis is popular for various specialized XB-R raised rail chassis and offers numerous big coach features includ- applications including trolley-themed buses.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In
    Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master's Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Christov Churchward, Jacob Herbers, Ben Picone, Drew Turro Client: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Capstone Instructor: Fred Rose Date of Oral Presentation: 5/6/2019 Approval Date of Final Paper: 1 Executive Summary State of the Market Medium-duty electric vehicles (MDEVs) are still in the early stages of adoption across the U.S. Cost- parity on the initial purchase price of these vehicles relative to their conventional counterparts is not expected until the mid-2020s. A lack of organizational experience operating and maintaining EVs and a dearth of charging infrastructure present challenges to the early deployment of all types of EVs. Furthermore, most test cases for MDEVs are in California, whose warmer climate makes it difficult to draw accurate operational comparisons to Minnesota. Despite this, manufacturers are entering the market and providing a greater variety of vehicle choices. The number of class three through six (5-13 tons) electric vehicles on the market increased by a factor of six from 2013 to 2018, going from four to 24. Utilities, recognizing customer demand for EVs, are developing specialized programs and electricity rates for their customers to keep the costs of EV charging low. Furthermore, MDEVs operate with half the fuel cost per mile versus a comparable diesel vehicle. For fleet owners able and willing to take on the
    [Show full text]
  • Consult the Reporting Issuer List
    AUTORITÉ DES MARCHÉS FINANCIERS Reporting Issuers List This list is updated at the date indicated below and takes into account all documents filed on the previous date. Defaults Various default codes are used on the list of reporting issuers. The codes appear under the heading “Defaults” and refer to the Default Nomenclature below. The AMF will make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the list. However, reporting issuers should promptly contact the AMF if they do not appear on the list of reporting issuers in Québec or if they are inadvertently identified as being in default. Last update : &[Date]2021-09-24 Default Nomenclature 1a. Failure to file the annual financial statements. 1b. Failure to file the interim financial report. Failure to file the annual or interim management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) or the annual or interim 1c. management report of fund performance (MRFP). 1d. Failure to file the Annual Information Form (AIF). Failure to file the certification of annual or interim filings required by Regulation 52-109 respecting Certification of 1e. Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (“Regulation 52-109”). 1f. Failure to file the required proxy materials or the required information circular. 1g. Failure to file the issuer profile supplement on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI). 1h. Failure to file the material change report. 1i. Failure to provide the written update after filing a confidential report of a material change. 1j. Failure to file the business acquisition report. Failure to file the annual oil and gas disclosure prescribed by Regulation 51-101 respecting Standards of Disclosure of 1k.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Orlov V. Halifax Regional Municipality (Halifax Transit), 2018 NSSC 152
    SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Orlov v. Halifax Regional Municipality (Halifax Transit), 2018 NSSC 152 Date: 20180620 Docket: Hfx No. 386163 Registry: Halifax Between: Stanislav Orlov 2018 NSSC 152 (CanLII) Plaintiff v. The Halifax Regional Municipality, a body corporate duly incorporated pursuant to the laws of Nova Scotia c.o.b. under the name of Metro Transit and Joey Williams Defendants D E C I S I O N Judge: The Honourable Justice Christa M. Brothers Heard: December 13, 14, 18, 19, and 20, 2017, in Halifax, Nova Scotia Decision: June 20, 2018 Counsel: Wayne Bacchus and Igor Yushchenko, for the plaintiff Guy Harfouche and Brandon Knill, Articled Clerk, for the defendants Page 2 Brothers J.: Overview [1] On the afternoon of May 16, 2011, the plaintiff, Mr. Orlov, boarded a Metro Transit Bus instead of walking to work at Mount Saint Vincent University (“MSVU”), where he was employed as a Librarian. It was a rainy, wet day. Metro Transit Bus No. 971 (the “bus”) stopped at 357 Bedford Highway, headed towards Halifax when the plaintiff boarded. The plaintiff was an experienced bus passenger. While holding his wallet, a bag and a transfer, the plaintiff walked 2018 NSSC 152 (CanLII) toward the back of the bus, fell, and broke his ankle (the “accident”). The sole issue for determination is liability. Damages have been agreed to by the parties. [2] What caused the plaintiff to fall? The plaintiff advanced four theories of causation: 1. The speed of the bus leaving the stop was excessive; 2. The floor of the bus was worn and caused the plaintiff to slip; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • ~:L~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY
    ~:l~~!:1\.UTOMOTIVE ISTORY SPRING 1990 EVIEW A PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY OF AUTOMOTIVE HISTORIANS, INC. Editorial Comment One of the most fascinating aspects of automotive history is the study of the many people who figure in the industry which grew up around the motor car. Many of these are giant figures, in terms of their reputation and lasting influ- ence on the industry: Henry Ford the elder, Alfred P. Sloan, even Preston Tucker. For every industry giant, however, there are dozens of others whose lives and work fall in the shadows, but whose contributions to society are no less vital. Texan D.J. Kava is a scholar of Hudson history, and in his travels came across an interesting figure in the persona of George W. Dunham, first chief engineer of Hudson Motor Car Company. Through a short-timer in the auto industry, by Detroit standards, Dunham was the designer behind several production cars before turning his attention to setting industry standards through the Society of Automotive Engineers. He then moved to other endeavors, and left us with the legacy of the modern spindry washing machine and the ubiquitous lawn sweeper. With Kava's treatise on Dunham's career, beginning on page 2, we return Automotive History Review to the field of biography which it championed many years ago. Jim Hockenhull (page 8) has an irrepressible sense of humor (could a Crosley connoisseur survive otherwise?), and in this vein examines why, despite a clever attempt at innova- tion, the Ohio auto maker is not remembered as the pioneer of the modern high-compression engine.
    [Show full text]
  • IC Bus Charging Fundamentals
    September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November.
    [Show full text]
  • Monroe-Sachs Interchange
    Table of Contents Chassis Section Nova Bus 22 Binkley 1 Orion Bus 23 Bluebird School Bus 1 Oshkosh 23 Brockway School Bus 1 Page Suspension 23 Built Rite Trailer 1 Pai Corporation 23 Cascade Trailer 1 Peerles Trailer 23 Chalmers Suspension 1 Peterbilt 23 Chance Bus 1 Prevost 24 Chevrolet 1 Reyco Suspension 24 Duplex Truck 2 Ridewell Corporation 24 Dura Suspension 3 Sterling 25 East Manufacturing Trailer 3 Trailmobile Canada Corp. 25 Ford 3 Turner Quick-Lift Corporation 26 Freightliner 3 Tuthill Technologies 26 Freightliner Custom Chassis 7 Twin Coach 26 Fruehauf 8 Utility Trailer 26 General Trailer Co. 8 Volvo 27 Gillig 8 Watson & Chain Suspension 28 GMC 8 Western Star 28 Great Dane Trailer 10 Western Unit 29 Hardee Manufacturing 10 Hendrickson 11 Highway Product 12 Cab Section Holland 12 Freightliner 30 Hutchens Suspension 12 Link Cabmate Air Suspension 30 Ikarus Bus 12 Western Star 31 International 12 Isuzu 15 Kenworth 16 Lodal Refuse Haulers 18 OEM Interchange 32 Mack 18 Gabriel - SACHS Interchange 37 Marmon Motor 20 Meritor - SACHS Interchange 38 Mitsubishi – Fuso 20 Monroe - SACHS Interchange 39 Neway 20 Specification Chart 40 North American Bus Industries 22 Customer Service & Technical Hotline Back Cover Important Notice The purpose of this catalog is to furnish ZF Services, LLC customers with as complete a listing of their parts requirements as possible. All listings, applications, and interchanges have been compiled as carefully as possible with all available information however, ZF Services, LLC cannot assume any responsibility for possible errors in listings, applications, or interchanges. All references by ZF Services, LLC to the original manufacturer trade names and part numbers are for identification purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Cta 2016 Historical Calendar Cta 2016 January
    cta 2016 Historical Calendar cta 2016 January Chicago Motor Coach Company (CMC) bus #434, manufactured by the Ford Motor Company, was part of a fleet of buses operated by the Chicago Motor Coach Company, one of the predecessor transit companies that were eventually assimilated into the Chicago Transit Authority. The CMC originally operated buses exclusively on the various park boulevards in Chicago, and became known by the marketing slogan, “The Boulevard Route.” Later, service was expanded to operate on some regular streets not served by the Chicago Surface Lines, particularly on the fringes of the city. Chicagoans truly wanted a unified transit system, and it was for this reason that the Chicago Transit Authority was established by charter in 1945. The CMC was not one of the initial properties purchased that made up CTA’s inaugural services on October 1, 1947; however, it was bought by CTA in 1952. D E SABCDEFG: MDecember 2015 T February 2016 W T F S CTA Operations Division S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Group Days Off 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 t Alternate day off if you 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 work on this day 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 l Central offices closed 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 1New Year’s Day 2 E F G A B C D 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 D E F G A B C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 C D E F G A B 17 18Martin Luther King, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home the House That Busses Built
    LAMORINDA WEEKLY | An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built Published August 14th, 2013 An Automotive Innovator's Historical Home The house that busses built By Cathy Tyson The stately Mediterranean home on the ninth fairway of the Orinda Country Club, built in 1929, can trace its history back to one of the brothers who was a leader in the bus construction business with the Fageol Motor Company started in Oakland in 1916. Innovators Frank and Bill Fageol had a vision that began with the redesign of a tractor, and turned it into a successful business that revolutionized how buses and trucks were built. Prior to the 1906 earthquake, the Fageol brothers were in charge of sales and service at the Rambler dealership at the corner of Telegraph and 37th Street in Oakland, eventually acquiring the Rambler distributorship. Business of these new-fangled cars must have been good - a directory circa 1908 reveals that six other Fageol family members, no mention of spouses or children, had moved to Oakland from Iowa and were working at the dealership. Presumably the grandiose Orinda home was meant to house the large extended family. Fageol Motor Company was in the right place at the View of the front of the Casa del Sue§o. Photos right time to leverage growth in California; the firm Andy Scheck purchased four acres of land near Foothill Boulevard and 106th Avenue for their auto, truck and bus plant in 1917. In the early days of bus manufacturing, multi-passenger vehicles were basically stretched automobile touring cars mounted on a truck chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973) Is, by Almost Any Means of Reconing, a Little Late
    MUN SURV __..___._ ........_~~ ... it if ii ':, "i I ' ~ .11; ~ ' Ii; I Ii; it ' ' I .. ,\ .~ ' ' ~ .;, l -6, l ' 'I .,__ I I . I L I ' L L L • . L I .t.lii i~ h • I • . I •I I I ' I I I I i I I I I L_ "- L L I 'I '- I I 'I I I I I I ! I I I l I '-- '- ._ I - - L_ ' q I i ! i - .L - ,-I 1 I I' ' - I I I I I I ' I I I - ' I - I I I I I ' I - - ! I j ! I - -- - , .:..._ I I I -- I I l MUNICIPAL RAILWAY SURVEY -- 1969-1970 I F O R E W O R D: The Municipal Railway Survey -- 1969-1970 is the fourth in a series of in-depth looks at the operations of various public transit systems in the Western United States (the 1967 SCRTD Survey, Pasadena City Lines I and Denver Tramway were the other three). The publication of this article at this time (January, 1973) is, by almost any means of reconing, a little late. The reason for the lack of timeliness is simply that it took the volunteer workers who prepared this article in their s pare time this long to produce it! The reader might well ask hims elf why the material herein wasn't updated and the article titled Munici­ I pal Railway Survey -- 1972-1973, The answer to this question is that the 1969-1970 fis cal year represented a sign i ficant t urning point in the history of the SAN FRANC ISCO MUNICIPAL RAILWAY.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding at the Museum of Bus Transportation
    Flooding at the Museum of Bus Transportation by Larry Plachno This photo looks over the fence into the George Sage Annex of the Museum of Bus Transportation. The date was Friday, September 9 and the waters have receded from their high point by a few feet. Buses both inside the Annex building and parked on the grounds were sitting in several feet of water. THOMAS MOZER. n early September, the Museum of Bus stored or because of restoration. These four to discuss the Annex property. At that time Transportation in Hershey, Pennsylva- buses were not affected by the flooding. they were advised that the previous all-time Inia suffered severe flooding at its George high water mark for Swatara Creek flood- Sage Memorial Annex building and storage The only facility affected was the muse- ing stood about five feet lower than the area. Approximately 22 historical buses um’s George Sage Memorial Annex. Display museum property. Hence, potential flood- located both inside the building and parked space is limited at the public museum on ing was not a huge concern. outside were engulfed by water up to their Route 39 and working on the buses at that windows or roofline. We have received location would be awkward. Hence, the None of this mattered when Tropical numerous questions from all sources. Hence, George Sage Memorial Annex serves the Storm Lee lashed through the area knock- we have assembled the following report purpose of a storage area for buses not on ing down power lines, closing roads and which was put together approximately two display as well as a location where some dropping more than 12 inches of rain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017Chicago Transit Authority a Horse Drawn Omnibus, Originally Operated by the Citizen’S Line Circa 1853, Is Displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake
    HISTORICAL CALENDAR 2017Chicago Transit Authority A horse drawn omnibus, originally operated by the Citizen’s Line circa 1853, is displayed at West Shops at Pulaski and Lake. These early transit vehicles were quite primitive, barely just a notch above stagecoaches – little more than hard, wooden bench seats were provided on either side of very sparsely appointed coaches, with no heat, light, or other amenities. It is hard to believe that, from such humble beginnings, Chicago would one day have the second largest public transit system in North America, as it does today. January 2017 S M T W T F S B C D E F G A 1 New Year’s Day 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 G A B C D E F Martin Luther 15 16 King, Jr. Day 17 18 19 20 21 F G A B C D E 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E F G ABCDEFG: December 2016 February 2017 CTA Operations S M T W T F S S M T W T F S Division 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Group Days Off 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 t Alternate day off if 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 you work on this day 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 l Central offices closed 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 Chicago streetcar #225 is outside of the 77th Street carbarn, sporting an early Chicago Transit Authority emblem but still wearing the red and cream color scheme of its predecessor company, the Chicago Surface Lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D-2 Item (Specify): 1(F)(4); 2(E)(4), 6(E)(2); 6(E)(4); 9(C)(1)
    BENEFICIARY ELIGIBLE MITIGATION ACTION CERTIFICATION Beneficiary Cherokee Nation Lead Agency Authorized to Act on Behalf of the Beneficiary: Office of the Secretary of Natural Resources (Any authorized person with delegation of such authority to direct the Trustee delivered to the Trustee pursuant to a Delegation of Authority and Certificate of Incumbency) Action Title: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Beneficiary’s Project ID: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Funding Request No. 4 (sequential) Request Type: ☐ Reimbursement X Advance (select one or ☐ Other (specify): Paymentmore) to be made to: X Beneficiary (select one or more) ☐ Other (specify): Funding Request & X Attached to this Certification Direction (Attachment A) ☐ To be Provided Separately SUMMARY Eligible Mitigation Action X Appendix D-2 item (specify): 1(f)(4); 2(e)(4), 6(e)(2); 6(e)(4); 9(c)(1) Action Type ☐ Item 10 - DERA Option (5.2.12) (specify and attach Detailed Description of Mitigation DERA Action Proposal): Item Including Community and Air Quality Benefits (5.2.2): Please see Exhibit 1 attached hereto Estimate of Anticipated NOx Reductions (5.2.3): Please see Exhibit 2 attached hereto Identification of Governmental Entity Responsible for Reviewing and Auditing Expenditures of Eligible Mitigation Action Funds to Ensure Compliance with Applicable Law (5.2.7.1): Cherokee Nation Financial Resources Describe how the Beneficiary will make documentation publicly available (5.2.7.2). Please see Exhibit 3 attached hereto Describe any cost share requirement to be placed on each NOx source proposed to be mitigated (5.2.8). Not applicable Describe how the Beneficiary complied with subparagraph 4.2.8, related to notice to U.S.
    [Show full text]