DOCSLIB.ORG

IC Bus Charging Fundamentals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IC Bus Charging Fundamentals September 16, 2020 Introduction by Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition Grant Updates Santa Barbara County APCD SLO County APCD Central Coast Community Energy Update Electric School Bus Presentations The Lion Electric Company A-Z Bus Sales BusWest Creative Bus Sales Q&A Session • C5 is a group of local stakeholders whose mission is to expand the use of alternative fuel vehicles and fueling infrastructure in Santa Barbara and SLO Counties • Part of National Clean Cities Program • C-5.org Alternative & Renewable Fuels Fuel Economy Vehicle Trip • Biodiesel • Fuel efficient vehicles Elimination • Driving habits • Electricity • Telecommuting • Vehicle maintenance • Ridesharing • Ethanol (E85) • Biking • Hydrogen Idle Reduction • Walking • Natural gas • Technologies • Behavioral changes • Propane Alex Economou Coordinator Central Coast Clean Cities Coalition (C5) (805) 961-8894 [email protected] ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/lowincomemapfull.htm https://www.ourair.org/clean-air-grants-for-buses/ Application Internal Grant Offer Signed Internal Grant Submission Review (if eligible) Offer Review Execution After Grant Execution: Bus Post Bus Reimburse Annual Delivery Purchase Inspection Salvage ment Reports SCHOOL BUS INCENTIVES The SLO County APCD School Bus Incentive Program provides funding for replacement or retrofit of public school buses County-wide public school bus fleet numbers more than 200 Since 2001, SLO County APCD has administered $5.9 million in grants for local school districts – including 75 retrofits, 43 replacements, 3 repowers NEW E-BUS = $400K + FUNDING: APPROX. $200K FROM SLO APCD SLO COUNTY APCD AVAILABLE FUNDS AB 617 CAP Incentive funding available for projects in low- income communities; amount TBD; application period is October – November. www.slocleanair.org/community/grants/caap.php No funding currently designated specifically for school buses Additional allocation for school buses in January – approx. $250K Limited charging infrastructure funding currently available, with more to come in October and January. www.slocleanair.org SLOCAPCD Grant Website www.slocleanair.org/community/grants.php Vince Kirkhuff [email protected] 805-781-5912 Central Coast Community Energy Electric School Bus Program September 16, 2020 Dan Bertoldi Interim Director of Energy Programs 3CE Electric School Bus Program 2021-2020 • Goal to replace 11 school buses • $2.2 million in 3CE Energy Programs investment • Extending funding for Monterey Bay Region • Establish Program for communities enrolling in 2021 (SLO County cities and SB County and cities)* * Eligible school districts must be located within a 3CE’s service territory Contact Dan Bertoldi, Interim Director of Energy Programs Direct: (831) 641-7201 [email protected] 20TH MARCHSEPTEMBER2020 2020 The first commercially available electric vehicle Light bulb debuts in the US by inventor Thomas Scottish chemist Edison improves battery William Morrison performance How Long 1889 1901 Have EVs Been Around? 1899 1912 Electric cars gain EV reached it peak popularity, because popularity making up they were quiet, 30+% of all vehicles, odorless, and did not including horse and require a hand-crank to carriage. start EV disappear as crude oil hit all- Federal regulations announce first time lows thanks to Texas Moon Rover is EV known incentives for EVs 1930 1971 1990s 1968–1973 1973 Fuel prices skyrocket building new Major automakers explore EV interest in EVs prototypes to combat high fuel prices. EV battery cost drop by 50% since Tesla starts it Lotus Elite EV project. 2008 2006 2013 2008 2015 Lion Electric launches Lion Electric conventional bus goes into full production 1. Do you have a fleet? Is Electric 2. How many miles does each Right for Me? vehicle average daily? 3. How much of your fleet are you replacing? Why Aren’t EVs More Popular Today? Range (Picture of next Cost of Infrastructure gas station) Speed/Rate of charge Fear of the unknown TCO ROI Why Go Electric? ELECTRIC VS INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE (ICE) Who is ? • We build our own chassis and Purpose-Built to body • We assemble our own battery be Electric packs • More kWh available than any other OEM on the market • Composite body - no rust, no PARTS corrosion, no paint, no down time • Regenerative braking system – brakes last 3x longer ✓ Electric motor : 20 parts vs. Diesel engine : 2,000 parts • Our vehicles are not retrofitted ✓ Total body parts – Electric parts: 7,000 vs. Diesel parts: diesel, they are born to be 100% 30,000 electric • Custom-built driver information center & clusters ADVANTAGES P. 29 ⎜ 300+ employees / 2,000 indirect jobs 300+ electric vehicles in operation 2,500 electric vehicles per year More than 4 million zero-emission miles manufacturing capacity driven Maintenance / Service Experience Centers o Sacramento, o Albany, New California York o Los Angeles, o Seattle, California Washington o Phoenix, Arizona P. 31 ⎜ Charging AC LINE 2 LEVEL II (J1772) AC LINE 1 • Embedded 19.2 kW charger LEVEL III (CCS-Combo) • DC fast charging PROXY Signal PILOT Signal • Reduce the overall charging time GROUND AC LINE 2 AC LINE 1 PILOT Signal PROXY Signal GROUND All Lion’s products are DC + DC- V2G ready! P. 32 ⎜ Charge Ready Transport • https://www.sce.com/busi ness/electric-cars/Charge- Ready All-Electric school buses MODULAR BATTERY APPROACH P. 34 ⎜ SCHOOL BUSES Eddie G. Caamaño [email protected] (562) 268-6221 Claire Garcia, Grant Coordinator [email protected] 916-475-6649 9 OCTOBRE 2020 Electric & Alternative Fuel School Buses A-Z Bus Sales The Alternative Fuel Experts Since 1992 OVER OVER 20,000 200 ALT FUEL SCHOOL EVs BUSES in CA NATIONWIDE Why Electric School Buses? We are seeing more and more districts interested in purchasing EV school buses. Why? GRANT FUNDS AVAILABLE ZERO EMISSIONS Bus and Infrastructure Cleaner air for our children REDUCED MAINTENANCE COSTS VEHICLE TO GRID TECHNOLOGY Less parts = less maintenance V2G technology allows the sale of energy back into the grid TEMPERATURE CONTROL SERVICE & SUPPORT Performance in various weather conditions Extensive North American dealer channel Zero-Emissions, Viable Total Cost of Ownership Solution How did Blue Bird get started in electric? ▪ Blue Bird was a pioneer and first school bus OEM to embrace EV technology ▪ 1994 – Blue Bird developed the first battery-powered school bus ▪ 1996 – Blue Bird produced transit style electric shuttle buses for the Atlanta Summer Olympics Where is Blue Bird today? ▪ Partnered with Cummins for EV technology on Type C & Type D buses ▪ Only manufacturer to have produced and deployed electric school buses in Type A, Type C, and Type D ▪ Level 2 and DC fast charge now standard on all buses ▪ V2G now standard on all buses Miles per gallon vs miles per gallon efficiency 7 MPG 25 to 34 Eliminated engine and Increased for diesel-powered MPGe for all-electric transmission brake life school bus school bus maintenance mile range Up to 120+ before recharging Meets FMVSS & CMVSS requirements and is EPA and CARB certified EV Charging Infrastructure Infrastructure Requirements ▪ Charging of the vehicle can use the industry standard SAE J-1772 connector or a Type-1 CCS DC connector. ▪ For Level-2 charging maximum of 19.2kW you’ll need 220Volt Service and an available 100 amp circuit breaker (charger will pull about 70 amps of current). ▪ For Level-3 DC fast charging, the batteries can handle up to 60 kWh, charging the bus in 2-3 hours. ▪ V2G is now a standard feature on all Blue Bird EVs with the CCS Type-1 connector and bi-directional charging. A-Z Bus Sales is here to help with ALL infrastructure related questions! Dealer Training at YOUR Facility: ▪ Technician Training, Safety & Preventative Maintenance ▪ Driver’s Training & Best Practices Technician Certification 3 Course Levels ▪ Associate: Online – Practical & Technical Skills Foundation ▪ Advanced: Combined Online & Factory-Based Training ▪ Master: Applied Skills & Proficiency Tests by Blue Bird Thank you! www.ElectricDreamBus.com Brandon Bluhm Director of Sales A-Z Bus Sales 909.709.7004 [email protected] www.A-ZBus.com 43 THOMAS SAF® -T-LINER™ EC2 SCHOOL BUS POWERED BY PROTERRA™ ZERO EMISSIONS • 100% battery-electric with no tailpipe emissions FAST CHARGING • DC charging enables a full charge in less than 3 hours HIGH PERFORMANCE • Efficient, smart, safe drivetrain technology for optimal performance in any climate PROVEN TECHNOLOGY • Proterra batteries and drivetrains proven in more than 7,000,000 service miles on transit buses THOMAS SAF® -T-LINER™ EC2 SCHOOL BUS POWERED BY PROTERRA™ Electrification Package: • Proterra Powertrain 220 kWh energy storage system • Tranction motor • Inverter • Two speed transmission • Battery thermal management system • High voltage junction box • Proterra CCS Type 1 charge port and ESD • Powertrain and body controllers • Power steering pump • Vehicle heaters if applicable • Electric HVAC compressors if applicable • Ancillary inverters • Telematics porta/data – 1 year • Operators Manuals • Training package (2 days at Customer site) PARTNERSHIP FOR ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUSES Proterra Freightliner Custom Chassis Thomas Built Buses EV Bus Deployment know how Company (FCCC) (TBB) Advanced Battery Technology & Dealer sales and service Charging Infrastructure C2 Chassis Manufacturing network throughout the U.S. Design and Manufacturing Service expertise Gaffney, SC School Bus Design and Manufacturing Burlingame, CA and Greenville, SC High Point, NC CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY PROTERRA ©2016 46 >700
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In
    Electrifying Medium-Duty Vehicles in Minnesota Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master's Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Christov Churchward, Jacob Herbers, Ben Picone, Drew Turro Client: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Capstone Instructor: Fred Rose Date of Oral Presentation: 5/6/2019 Approval Date of Final Paper: 1 Executive Summary State of the Market Medium-duty electric vehicles (MDEVs) are still in the early stages of adoption across the U.S. Cost- parity on the initial purchase price of these vehicles relative to their conventional counterparts is not expected until the mid-2020s. A lack of organizational experience operating and maintaining EVs and a dearth of charging infrastructure present challenges to the early deployment of all types of EVs. Furthermore, most test cases for MDEVs are in California, whose warmer climate makes it difficult to draw accurate operational comparisons to Minnesota. Despite this, manufacturers are entering the market and providing a greater variety of vehicle choices. The number of class three through six (5-13 tons) electric vehicles on the market increased by a factor of six from 2013 to 2018, going from four to 24. Utilities, recognizing customer demand for EVs, are developing specialized programs and electricity rates for their customers to keep the costs of EV charging low. Furthermore, MDEVs operate with half the fuel cost per mile versus a comparable diesel vehicle. For fleet owners able and willing to take on the
    [Show full text]
  • Consult the Reporting Issuer List
    AUTORITÉ DES MARCHÉS FINANCIERS Reporting Issuers List This list is updated at the date indicated below and takes into account all documents filed on the previous date. Defaults Various default codes are used on the list of reporting issuers. The codes appear under the heading “Defaults” and refer to the Default Nomenclature below. The AMF will make every effort to ensure the accuracy of the list. However, reporting issuers should promptly contact the AMF if they do not appear on the list of reporting issuers in Québec or if they are inadvertently identified as being in default. Last update : &[Date]2021-09-24 Default Nomenclature 1a. Failure to file the annual financial statements. 1b. Failure to file the interim financial report. Failure to file the annual or interim management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) or the annual or interim 1c. management report of fund performance (MRFP). 1d. Failure to file the Annual Information Form (AIF). Failure to file the certification of annual or interim filings required by Regulation 52-109 respecting Certification of 1e. Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (“Regulation 52-109”). 1f. Failure to file the required proxy materials or the required information circular. 1g. Failure to file the issuer profile supplement on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI). 1h. Failure to file the material change report. 1i. Failure to provide the written update after filing a confidential report of a material change. 1j. Failure to file the business acquisition report. Failure to file the annual oil and gas disclosure prescribed by Regulation 51-101 respecting Standards of Disclosure of 1k.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicle List and Driver Assignments
    Effingham County Board of Education Vehicle List 6/30/2013 Vehicle List and Driver Assignments Insurance Veh# Make Year Model Cost Assigned Driver/Location Tag # Vin # Car# Book Value 940 L0163292 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15915 1HVBBACNXSH623821 151 - 941 L016393 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15916 1HVBBACN1SH623822 153 - 942 L016394 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 BB 66 15917 1HVBBACN3SH623823 152 - 944 L016396 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15918 1HVBBACN7SH623825 155 - 945 L016397 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15919 1HVBBACN9SH623826 156 - 946 L016398 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15920 1HVBBACNOSH623827 158 - 947 L016399 1994 94 INT 39,994.15 Spare BB 66 15921 1HVBBACN2SH623828 157 - 951 L020327 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 BB 66 15923 1FDXB80C1SVA75535 165 - 952 L020328 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15924 1FDXB80C3SVA75536 164 - 953 L020329 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15925 1FDXB80C5SVA75537 168 - 954 L020330 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15926 1FDXB80CXSVA79843 169 - 956 L020332 1995 95 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15928 1FDXB80C8SVA76228 166 - 962 L024118 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15963 1FDXB80C5VVA03628 176 - 963 L024119 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 66 15964 1FDXB80C7VVA03629 175 - 964 L024117 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15965 1FDXB80C3VVA03627 177 - 965 L024116 1996 96 FORD 41,995.62 Spare BB 54 15966 1FDXB80C1VVA03626 178 - 970 L028102 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16029 1HVBBABN8VH496962 181 - 971 L028103 1997 97 INT 44,597.30 Spare BB 66 16048 1HVBBABNXVH496963 182 - 973 L028105
    [Show full text]
  • BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation
    News Release For further information, please contact: Barbara Gould or Ken Kesegich Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC Marcus Thomas LLC (440) 329-9609 (888) 482-4455 [email protected] [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER National School Bus Safety Week Puts Spotlight on the Safest Form of Student Transportation ELYRIA, Ohio – Oct. 22, 2019 – The National Association for Pupil Transportation (NAPT) has its eyes on a school year free of student transportation fatalities – and advanced vehicle safety technologies are a key to reaching that goal. Bendix (Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC and Bendix Spicer Foundation Brake LLC) is proud to work with school districts and vehicle manufacturers across North America in pursuit of safer student transportation as NAPT marks National School Bus Safety Week Oct. 21-25. The theme of this year’s National School Bus Safety Week is “My School Bus – The Safest Form of Student Transportation.” The theme reflects National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) data showing that the classic yellow school bus is 70 times safer than walking, bicycling, or riding in a passenger car or light truck to and from school. “Even so, a single school bus collision is one too many,” said TJ Thomas, director of marketing and customer solutions – Controls, at Bendix, the North American leader in the development and manufacture of intelligent, integrated active safety, air management, and braking solutions for commercial vehicles. “Bendix and all its industry partners are working tirelessly to help keep student passengers safe, and to support the school bus drivers who oversee their daily travels.” -more- BENDIX EFFORTS SUPPORT MAKING SCHOOL BUSES EVEN SAFER Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Proposition Date: February 3, 2016 Cc: Board of Education, Mark Premo
    INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: DR. JIM HOFFMAN, SUPERINTENDENT FROM: MICHAEL OUIMET, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FOR BUSINESS SUBJECT: BUS REPLACEMENT PLAN/BUS PROPOSITION DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 2016 CC: BOARD OF EDUCATION, MARK PREMO I am recommending the district seek voter approval on May 17, 2016, to spend $749,044 to purchase eight (8) new transportation vehicles in alignment with the District’s bus replacement schedule. This schedule of bus replacements was recommended in the district’s transportation study completed in the Fall of 2010 by Transportation Advisory Services (TAS). Please see attached, the “Fleet” section of this report for your reference. The School Bus Proposition breaks down as follows: • $673,590: purchase of six, 65-passenger school buses @ $112,265 per bus • $100,254: for the purchase of two, 28-passenger school buses @ $50,127 per bus $773,844 ($24,800) Less: Trades of $24,800 for eight (8) buses. $749,044 Please see attached, the proposed specifications for the vehicles recommended to be purchased. TAS recommends a consistent replacement plan, requiring a bus purchase vote each year, because an annual replacement plan of the existing fleet helps the district to maintain student safety and control repair and maintenance costs on older buses. A well thought out bus replacement plan is more cost effective and enables the district to consolidate routes and adjust its fleet as needed year to year. The replacement plan will also support continuation of the District’s excellent safety record with the New York State Department of Transportation. Please find attached a current profile of the district’s bus fleet, including a projected replacement schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric School Buses Available for Purchase
    Electric School Buses Available for Purchase veic.org/electric-school-buses Type A Electric School Buses Manufacturer TransTech Lion Blue Bird Collins Body TransTech Lion MicroBird – Girardin Collins Chassis Ford E-450 Lion Ford E-450 Ford E-450 Ford eQVM approved Ford eQVM approved Powertrain TM4 / Dana Ecotuned Motiv All-Electric Powertrain Motiv All-Electric Powertrain FIAMM FIAMM Battery Manufacturer / Chemistry Lithium Ion NMC Lithium-ion Sodium Nickel Sodium Nickel Standard Battery Size / Capacity 106 kWh Up to 160 kWh 89 kWh 106 kWh (Optional Larger Batteries) Passenger Capacity Up to 24 passengers; 25 Up to 30 25 (Without Wheelchair Lift) wheelchair lift available Approximate Range Standard Battery Up to 100 miles Up to 150 miles Up to 100 miles Up to 100 miles (Optional Larger Battery) Top Speed 65 mph 65 mph 65 mph 65 mph Gradeability 17% Up to 20% 12%, likely steeper 17% Cabin Heating System All-Electric Heating Available Auxiliary Heater Available All Electric Webasto System All-Electric Heating Available J1772 208/240V Single Phase 208/240 V single phase power 19.2 J1772 208/240V Single Phase 15 Charge Systems Voltage and Power J1772 65A/240V 15 kW kW - requires 80 amps kW Vehicle-to-Grid Capability V2G Capable Optional: Bidirectional (V2G) Optional: Unidirectional flow (V1G) V2G Capable Clipper Creek (and other brands Compatible Charging Manufacturers Any brand using J1772 2x 6.6 kW Level 2 Any brand using J1772 using J1772) Estimated Charging Time 2.5 hours 2 - 4.5 hours 3.5 hours 2.5 hours (50%) Estimated Charging Time 8 hours 4-9 hours 7 hours 8 hours (0% to 100%) Approximate Price Local Dealers Provide Quote $265,000 - $335,000 Local Dealers Provide Quote Local Dealers Provide Quote Deployed in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Parts Catalog
    FLEETRITE® PARTS CATALOG 2018 FLEETRITE PARTS THE RITE SOLUTION FOR YOU Fleetrite® is the first name recognized for trusted quality in aftermarket truck and bus parts. With over 45 years of strong performance in the industry Fleetrite® parts are OEM aftermarket quality approved and are backed by a one-year nationwide parts and labor warranty. High-quality parts at a competitive price. It’s the reason why it’s always the first recommended by more than 700 International® Truck dealers. So remember, the next time you’re in the market for aftermarket, always keep the top of the line, top of mind. Ask for THE ONE that keeps your Uptime FIRST in line. ASK FOR FLEETRITE® FIRST. FLEETRITE® FIRST TABLE OF CONTENTS ACCESSORIES......................................... 1 ENGINE OVERHAUL KITS .................. 83 BACK-UP ALARMS............................. 1 WATER & FUEL PUMPS ..................... 84 SHOP TOWELS ................................ 1 FUEL INJECTORS ............................ 86 JACKS............................................ 2 RADIOS.......................................... 2 ENGINE COOLING.................................... 87 ANTENNAS...................................... 3 RADIATORS.................................... 87 SURGE TANKS................................ 91 CAB...................................................... 4 FAN DRIVES .................................. 92 HVAC COMPRESSORS....................... 4 EXPANSION VALVES .......................... 8 EXHAUST ............................................. 97 BLOWER MOTORS...........................
    [Show full text]
  • School Bus Starters & Alternators
    School Bus Starters & Alternators SCHOOL BUSES PRESENT A UNIQUE SET OF CHALLENGES. A school bus performs the majority of its workday at slow speeds. At the same time, lighting and equipment associated with safety and passenger mobility add electrical loads that must be met at these same slow speeds. TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS THAT ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES Delco Remy high output alternators are specially designed to contend with the demanding electrical loads of school bus operating routines. Add to that the fuel savings opportunity, high 14.5 V temperature ratings and proven technologies like Remote Sense and you’ve got alternators in a class by themselves. 14.0 V Remote Sense Can Reduce Battery Charge Time by 50% The Delco Remy high output alternators are equipped with Remote With Remote Sense Sense which utilizes a second wire that reads the actual voltage at the battery. This signals the alternator to boost its output to compensate for the voltage drop, ensuring 14 volts at the battery. The proper voltage at the battery forces more current into the battery bringing the battery up to a full state of charge during the school bus runs between stops. 14.0 V Designed for Extreme Temperatures & Long Life No other school bus alternator on the market today can perform like the 13.5 V Delco Remy high output alternators. Both the 28SI and 40SI models withstand extreme underhood temperature demands of up to 257°F – that’s over 25°F above the competition – and still Without Remote Sense keep running. High-Efficiency Alternators Equals 20% Fuel Savings An Operating data was collected on school bus applications in order efficient alternator on a school bus can more than pay for itself in to identify what was actually occurring over the course of the less than one year.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 35
    Transportation Energy Data Book Quick Facts Petroleum In 2015 the U.S. produced almost 13 million barrels of petroleum per day (mmbd), or almost 14% of the world’s 93.4 mmbd. The U.S. consumed 19.1 mmbd, or 21% of the world’s 92.5 mmbd in 2014. U.S. transportation petroleum use was 70% of total U.S. petroleum use in 2015. In 2015 U.S. transportation petroleum use was 107% of total U.S. petroleum production. Petroleum comprised 92% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2015. Cars and light trucks accounted for 64% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Medium trucks (Class 3‐6) accounted for 4% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Heavy trucks (Class 7‐8) and buses accounted for 19% of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014. Nonhighway modes accounted for the rest of U.S. transportation petroleum use in 2014 (12%). Energy In 2015 U.S. transportation energy use accounted for over 28% of total U.S. energy use. Cars and light trucks accounted for 59% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Medium trucks accounted for 5% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Heavy trucks accounted for 18% of U.S. transportation energy use in 2014. Light Vehicle Characteristics In 2014 there were 114 million cars and 125 million light trucks in the U.S. (239 million total light vehicles). U.S. cars: o 7,525,000 cars were sold in 2015. o In 2015 the average age of a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D-2 Item (Specify): 1(F)(4); 2(E)(4), 6(E)(2); 6(E)(4); 9(C)(1)
    BENEFICIARY ELIGIBLE MITIGATION ACTION CERTIFICATION Beneficiary Cherokee Nation Lead Agency Authorized to Act on Behalf of the Beneficiary: Office of the Secretary of Natural Resources (Any authorized person with delegation of such authority to direct the Trustee delivered to the Trustee pursuant to a Delegation of Authority and Certificate of Incumbency) Action Title: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Beneficiary’s Project ID: Cherokee Nation’s 4th Round Zero Emission Project Funding Request No. 4 (sequential) Request Type: ☐ Reimbursement X Advance (select one or ☐ Other (specify): Paymentmore) to be made to: X Beneficiary (select one or more) ☐ Other (specify): Funding Request & X Attached to this Certification Direction (Attachment A) ☐ To be Provided Separately SUMMARY Eligible Mitigation Action X Appendix D-2 item (specify): 1(f)(4); 2(e)(4), 6(e)(2); 6(e)(4); 9(c)(1) Action Type ☐ Item 10 - DERA Option (5.2.12) (specify and attach Detailed Description of Mitigation DERA Action Proposal): Item Including Community and Air Quality Benefits (5.2.2): Please see Exhibit 1 attached hereto Estimate of Anticipated NOx Reductions (5.2.3): Please see Exhibit 2 attached hereto Identification of Governmental Entity Responsible for Reviewing and Auditing Expenditures of Eligible Mitigation Action Funds to Ensure Compliance with Applicable Law (5.2.7.1): Cherokee Nation Financial Resources Describe how the Beneficiary will make documentation publicly available (5.2.7.2). Please see Exhibit 3 attached hereto Describe any cost share requirement to be placed on each NOx source proposed to be mitigated (5.2.8). Not applicable Describe how the Beneficiary complied with subparagraph 4.2.8, related to notice to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Procurement Act of 1992 6 21
    APPENDIX A STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NEW YORK STATE CONTRACTS PLEASE RETAIN THIS DOCUMENT FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. October 2019 STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Executory Clause 3 2. Non-Assignment Clause 3 3. Comptroller’s Approval 3 4. Workers’ Compensation Benefits 3 5. Non-Discrimination Requirements 3 6. Wage and Hours Provisions 3-4 7. Non-Collusive Bidding Certification 4 8. International Boycott Prohibition 4 9. Set-Off Rights 4 10. Records 4 11. Identifying Information and Privacy Notification 4 12. Equal Employment Opportunities For Minorities and Women 4-5 13. Conflicting Terms 5 14. Governing Law 5 15. Late Payment 5 16. No Arbitration 5 17. Service of Process 5 18. Prohibition on Purchase of Tropical Hardwoods 5-6 19. MacBride Fair Employment Principles 6 20. Omnibus Procurement Act of 1992 6 21. Reciprocity and Sanctions Provisions 6 22. Compliance with Breach Notification and Data Security Laws 6 23. Compliance with Consultant Disclosure Law 6 24. Procurement Lobbying 7 25. Certification of Registration to Collect Sales and Compensating Use Tax by Certain 7 State Contractors, Affiliates and Subcontractors 26. Iran Divestment Act 7 27. Admissibility of Contract 7 Page 2 October 2019 STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS APPENDIX A STANDARD CLAUSES FOR NYS CONTRACTS Contractor shall provide and maintain coverage during the life of this contract for the benefit of such employees as are required The parties to the attached contract, license, lease, amendment to be covered by the provisions of the Workers' Compensation or other agreement of any kind (hereinafter, "the contract" or Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Propane Autogas School Bus Manufacturers
    PROPANE AUTOGAS SCHOOL BUS MANUFACTURERS When schools adopt propane autogas school buses, everyone — students, parents, and educators — wins. Schools can reduce fuel and maintenance costs with propane autogas buses compared with diesel, giving them the opportunity to invest those savings where it matters most — back in the classroom. Here’s a list of propane-powered school bus manufacturers. Blue Bird Corporation www.blue-bird.com Blue Bird offers a complete line of Type A, C and D school buses in a variety of options and configurations. Since 1927, Blue Bird Corporation has continued to set industry standards with its innovative design and manufacturing capabilities. Additionally, Blue Bird provides comprehensive financial solutions through Blue Bird Capital Services. Today, Blue Bird has more than 1,500 employees, Georgia-based manufacturing facilities and an extensive network of Dealers and Parts & Service facilities throughout North America. Its global presence can be seen in more than 60 countries through sales into Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, Latin America, Europe and the Middle East. Collins Bus Corporation www.collinsbuscorp.com Headquartered in Hutchinson, Kansas, Collins Industries specializes in manufacturing Type A school buses, and also manufactures ambulances and other special-purpose vehicles. The company’s Nexbus Propane model is available only on a GM chassis. It was built in conjunction with CleanFUEL USA, which was the first company to develop liquid propane fuel injection engine systems in the United States. IC Bus www.icbus.com Each vehicle built by IC Bus is backed by the power of Navistarr, a global leader in the transportation industry with more than 175 years of experience building trucks, buses, RVs, and defense vehicle.
    [Show full text]