DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the Norwegian Centres of Excellence (SFF) Funding Scheme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Evaluation of the Norwegian Centres of Excellence (SFF) Funding Scheme Impact cases RESEARCH FOR INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY Evaluation of the Norwegian Centre of Excellence (SFF) Funding Scheme Impact cases Evaluation © The Research Council of Norway 2020 The Research Council of Norway Visiting address: Drammensveien 288 P.O.Box 564 NO-1327 Lysaker Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 Telefax: +47 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.rcn.no The report can be ordered and downloaded at www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner Graphic design cover: Melkeveien Designkontor AS Photo/illustration: Iakov Kalinin/Adobe Stock Oslo, May 2020 ISBN 978-82-12-03826-4 (PDF) 1 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1 SFF I ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 CASTL - Center for the Advanced Study of Theoretical Linguistics ......................................................... 5 1.2 CeSOS - Centre for Ships and Ocean Structures ............................................................................... 19 1.3 CMA - Centre of Mathematics for Applications ............................................................................... 32 1.4 CSCW - Centre for the Study of Civil War......................................................................................... 38 1.5 PGP - Physics of Geological Processes ............................................................................................. 53 2 SFF II .........................................................................................................................................57 2.1 CEES - Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis .................................................................. 57 2.2 CBC - Center for Biomedical Computing .......................................................................................... 71 2.3 CGB - Centre for geobiology ............................................................................................................. 78 2.4 CIR - Centre for Immune Regulation ................................................................................................ 86 2.5 CSMN - Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature............................................................................... 98 3 SFF III.......................................................................................................................................107 3.1 AMOS - Centre for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems ................................................. 107 3.2 BCSS - Birkeland Centre for Space Science..................................................................................... 124 3.3 CAGE - Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate ................................................... 131 3.4 CBD - Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics ......................................................................................... 143 3.5 CCBIO - Centre for Cancer Biomarkers .......................................................................................... 147 3.6 CEED - Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics ........................................................................... 158 3.7 CEMIR - Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research .................................................................... 174 3.8 CERAD - Centre of Excellence for Environmental Radioactivity ...................................................... 184 3.9 CISMAC - Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child health......................................... 203 3.10 CNC - Centre for Neural Computation ........................................................................................... 206 3.11 MultiLing - Center for Multilingualism in Society Across the Lifespan ............................................ 212 3.12 NORMENT - Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders .................................................................... 221 3.13 PluriCourts - Centre for the Study of the Legitimate Roles of the Judiciary in the Global Order ...... 234 4 Appendices..............................................................................................................................238 4.1 Appendix A – Templates ............................................................................................................... 238 4.2 Appendix B - Overview of the submitted impact cases .................................................................. 242 2 Introduction The Norwegian Centre of Excellence (SFF) scheme’s primary objective has been to increase the scientific impact of Norwegian research. Societal impact has not been an aim for the individual SSF. Still, the RCN expects that positive effects on society may spring from the investments in the centres over time. Acknowledging that the path from research results to societal applications may be long and unpredictable, we do not to expect impact to be found in every centre, and certainly not yet. Due to their short time of operation we have also excluded the latest generation (SFF-IV), which started in 2017, from this part of the evaluation exercise. The RCN invited current and former SFFs to submit case studies that documented some examples of either scientific or societal impact. The invitation was sent in June 2019, and RCN held a workshop in September 2019 to clarify the assignment and to let the SFFs discuss possible cases. RCN has not given feedback on the submitted cases. Societal impact The definition of, and model for, societal impact was derived from the upcoming 2021 Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the United Kingdom. In the REF, societal impact is defined as any effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment and quality of life, beyond academia. Impact includes, but is not limited to, an effect on, change or benefit to: - the activity, attitude, awareness, behaviour, capacity, opportunity, performance, policy, practice, process or understanding - of an audience, beneficiary, community, constituency, organisation or individuals - in any geographic location whether locally, regionally, nationally or internationally. Academic impacts on research or the advancement of academic knowledge is excluded, while impacts on students, teaching or other activities both within and/or beyond the SFF is included. Scientific impact The template for scientific impact was developed by the Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Higher Education (NIFU) for this evaluation following the same structure as the template for societal impact. Scientific impact was defined by NIFU as an effect on, change or benefit to the advancement of scholarly knowledge/science. It includes, but is not limited to an effect on, change or benefit to: - theories/theoretical frameworks, - scientific methods/approaches to scientific problems - the research agenda (e.g. by providing unexpected results) Scientific impact includes opening up new fields of research; enabling new kinds of analyses, and building/developing new research fields or interdisciplinary communities. The definition of scientific impact was made flexible. If the definition did not fit the field(s) of research of the SFF, the definition could be extended to include the forms of scientific impact that are/were important in the field(s) of the SFF. 3 Guidelines The RCN had the following requirements for reporting societal/scientific impact to the evaluation: - The research underpinning the impact case should be anchored within the SFF, meaning that some of the research should have been performed and reported within the centre period. - Each SFF (except from SFF IV) is invited to submit up to four impact cases, documenting either societal impact or scientific impact. If the centre chooses to submit more than two impact cases, the centre should submit cases that represent both societal impact and scientific impact. - The SFF should use the provided templates to report the impact (Appendix A). Impact cases The RCN received 62 impact cases from 23 centres of excellence (see appendix B). 32 of the case studies were scientific impact cases, and 26 were societal impact cases. 4 of the submitted cases were a combination of societal and scientific impact. 10 centres from SFF I and -II, and all the centres from SFF-III, submitted one or more case studies to the evaluation. This was an expected result, given the short deadline, and the fact that the SFF-I and - II centres are no longer active. The submission of impact cases was voluntary. SFF I-III Scientific Societal Combination Number of Number of SFFs impact cases impact cases (sci. and soc.) impact cases submitting cases SFF I 6 6 3 15 5 SFF II 8 5 0 13 5 SFF III 18 15 1 34 13 Total 30 26* 4 62 23 * Three centres sent in the same impact case to the evaluation (CMA, CBC, PGP). The case is counted as a SFF I case in this table. Amendments made by RCN The impact cases in this report will be presented in the form submitted by the participating institutions, with two exceptions: 1. Supporting materials of a private character, such as the inclusion of e-mails or personal statements, have been omitted from section 5 in the template.
Recommended publications
  • Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain by Benjamin Zenas Cannon Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Prof

    Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain by Benjamin Zenas Cannon Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Prof

    Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Ian Duncan, Chair Professor Kent Puckett Professor Andrew Shanken Spring 2014 Disappearing Walls: Literature and Architecture in Victorian Britain © 2014 By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Abstract Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Prof. Ian Duncan, Chair From Discipline and Punish and The Madwoman in the Attic to recent work on urbanism, display, and material culture, criticism has regularly cast nineteenth-century architecture not as a set of buildings but as an ideological metastructure. Seen primarily in terms of prisons, museums, and the newly gendered private home, this “grid of intelligibility” polices the boundaries not only of physical interaction but also of cultural values and modes of knowing. As my project argues, however, architecture in fact offered nineteenth-century theorists unique opportunities to broaden radically the parameters of aesthetic agency. A building is generally not built by a single person; it is almost always a corporate effort. At the same time, a building will often exist for long enough that it will decay or be repurposed. Long before literature asked “what is an author?” Victorian architecture theory asked: “who can be said to have made this?” Figures like John Ruskin, Owen Jones, and James Fergusson radicalize this question into what I call a redistribution of intention, an ethically charged recognition of the value of other makers.
  • “Norway Is a Peace Nation”

    “Norway Is a Peace Nation”

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives “Norway is a Peace Nation” Discursive Preconditions for the Norwegian Peace Engagement Policy Øystein Haga Skånland M.A.Thesis, Peace and Conflict Studies Faculty of Social Science UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 20th June, 2008 ii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Halvard Leira for his insightful feedback, suggestions, and encouraging comments. Without him keeping me on track and gently prodding me in the right direction, carrying out the analysis would undoubtedly have been an overwhelming task. I am also grateful to Iver B. Neumann, who has read through and given valuable comments on a draft in the finishing stages of the process. I would also like to thank Prof. Jeffrey T. Checkel for an excellent introduction to social constructivism in International Relations, Prof. Werner Christie Mathisen for his course on textual analysis, and Sunniva Engh for introducing me to Norwegian development aid history. You have all inspired me in the choice of perspective and object of study. Writing this thesis would not be possible without support and encouragement to overcome the many small and big challenges I have encountered. I am indebted to my fellow students, particularly Jonathan Amario and Ruben Røsler; my friends; and my parents. Last, but not least, Synnøve deserves my most heartfelt thanks for her patience and loving support. All the viewpoints presented, and all errors and inconsistencies, are solely my own responsibility. Øystein Haga Skånland Oslo, June 2008 iii Table of Content Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................
  • Gesamtheft 153

    Gesamtheft 153

    Monatliche Publikation, . herausgegeben von der 153/154 Juli/August 2003 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung VorSatz 581 Essay ULRICH BUSCH Agenda 2010 – das deutsche Programm für einen Gesellschaftsumbau 583 PDS – Wege aus der Krise THOMAS FALKNER Politik als Chance 592 MICHAEL CHRAPA Parteireform als Aufbruch? 603 STEFFEN KACHEL Zum Spannungsfeld von PDS und Parlamentarismus 609 JÖRN SCHÜTRUMPF Krisenhafte Kommunikation. Thesen 614 HEIKO HILKER Politische Kommunikation und PDS 617 ERHARD CROME PDS. Ansichten einer Krise 628 Nachhaltigkeit & Soziale Gerechtigkeit REINART BELLMANN, HUBERT LAITKO, KLAUS MEIER Generationengerechtigkeit: Die Verknüpfung ökologischer und sozialer Zielstellungen im Nachhaltigkeitskonzept 635 JOACHIM H. SPANGENBERG Soziale Nachhaltigkeit. Eine integrierte Perspektive für Deutschland 649 GÜNTHER BACHMANN Warum Nachhaltigkeit ? 662 KLAUS WARDENBACH Nachhaltigkeit und soziale Gerechtigkeit im 21. Jahrhundert. Der World Summit in Johannesburg 666 CHRISTA WICHTERICH Nachhaltigkeit und neoliberale Globalisierung aus feministischer Sicht 670 RONALD HÖHNER Der Stempel von Rio 675 GERHARD BANSE Integrative nachhaltige Entwicklung und Technikfolgenabschätzung 680 EDGAR GÖLL Nachhaltigkeitspolitik –Beispiele aus Europa 692 ELISABETH VOSS Wie nachhaltig ist die aktuelle Arbeitsmarktpolitik? 696 Ernst Bloch: Hoffnung muß gelernt werden VOLKER CAYSA Bloch – (k)ein toter Hund 698 ROGER BEHRENS Aktualisierung des Ungleichzeitigen. Anmerkungen zur Prozeßlogik einer mehrschichtigen Dialektik 707 MICHAEL BRIE Zwischen Wärmestrom und Kälteschock
  • Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain by Benjamin Zenas Cannon a Dissertation Submitted in Partia

    Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain by Benjamin Zenas Cannon a Dissertation Submitted in Partia

    Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Ian Duncan, Chair Professor Kent Puckett Professor Andrew Shanken Spring 2014 Disappearing Walls: Literature and Architecture in Victorian Britain © 2014 By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Abstract Disappearing Walls: Architecture and Literature in Victorian Britain By Benjamin Zenas Cannon Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California, Berkeley Prof. Ian Duncan, Chair From Discipline and Punish and The Madwoman in the Attic to recent work on urbanism, display, and material culture, criticism has regularly cast nineteenth-century architecture not as a set of buildings but as an ideological metastructure. Seen primarily in terms of prisons, museums, and the newly gendered private home, this “grid of intelligibility” polices the boundaries not only of physical interaction but also of cultural values and modes of knowing. As my project argues, however, architecture in fact offered nineteenth-century theorists unique opportunities to broaden radically the parameters of aesthetic agency. A building is generally not built by a single person; it is almost always a corporate effort. At the same time, a building will often exist for long enough that it will decay or be repurposed. Long before literature asked “what is an author?” Victorian architecture theory asked: “who can be said to have made this?” Figures like John Ruskin, Owen Jones, and James Fergusson radicalize this question into what I call a redistribution of intention, an ethically charged recognition of the value of other makers.
  • From the on Inal Document. What Can I Write About?

    From the on Inal Document. What Can I Write About?

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 655 CS 511 615 TITLE What Can I Write about? 7,000 Topics for High School Students. Second Edition, Revised and Updated. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-5654-1 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 153p.; Based on the original edition by David Powell (ED 204 814). AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock no. 56541-1659: $17.95, members; $23.95, nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site: http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS High Schools; *Writing (Composition); Writing Assignments; *Writing Instruction; *Writing Strategies IDENTIFIERS Genre Approach; *Writing Topics ABSTRACT Substantially updated for today's world, this second edition offers chapters on 12 different categories of writing, each of which is briefly introduced with a definition, notes on appropriate writing strategies, and suggestions for using the book to locate topics. Types of writing covered include description, comparison/contrast, process, narrative, classification/division, cause-and-effect writing, exposition, argumentation, definition, research-and-report writing, creative writing, and critical writing. Ideas in the book range from the profound to the everyday to the topical--e.g., describe a terrible beauty; write a narrative about the ultimate eccentric; classify kinds of body alterations. With hundreds of new topics, the book is intended to be a resource for teachers and students alike. (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the on inal document.
  • Michael Schumann Hoffnung PDS Reden, Aufsätze, Entwürfe 1989–2000 Rls 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Texte 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung

    Michael Schumann Hoffnung PDS Reden, Aufsätze, Entwürfe 1989–2000 Rls 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Texte 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung

    Wolfram Adolphi (Hrsg.) Michael Schumann Hoffnung PDS Reden, Aufsätze, Entwürfe 1989–2000 rls 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Texte 12 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung WOLFRAM ADOLPHI (HRSG.) Michael Schumann Hoffnung PDS Reden, Aufsätze, Entwürfe 1989-2000 Mit einem Geleitwort von Lothar Bisky Karl Dietz Verlag Berlin Herausgegeben mit Unterstützung der PDS-Fraktion im Landtag Brandenburg. Ein besonderer Dank gilt Herrn Marco Schumann, Potsdam, für seine Hilfe und Mitarbeit. Wolfram Adolphi (Hrsg.): Michael Schumann. Hoffnung PDS Reden, Aufsätze, Entwürfe 1989-2000. Mit einem Geleitwort von Lothar Bisky (Reihe: Texte/Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung; Bd. 12) Berlin: Dietz, 2004 ISBN 3-320-02948-7 © Karl Dietz Verlag Berlin GmbH 2004 Satz: Jörn Schütrumpf Umschlag, Druck und Verarbeitung: MediaService GmbH BärenDruck und Werbung Printed in Germany Inhalt LOTHAR BISKY Zum Geleit 9 WOLFRAM ADOLPHI Vorwort 11 Abschnitt 1 Zum Herkommen und zur Entwicklung der PDS Wir brechen unwiderruflich mit dem Stalinismus als System! Referat auf dem Außerordentlichen Parteitag der SED in Berlin am 16. Dezember 1989 33 Von der SED zur PDS – geht die Rechnung auf? Interview für die Tageszeitung »Neues Deutschland« vom 26. Januar 1990 57 Programmatik und politisches System Artikel für die vom PDS-Parteivorstand herausgegebene Zeitschrift »Disput«, Heft 14/1992 (2. Juliheft) 69 Souverän mit unserer politischen Biographie umgehen Referat auf dem 3. Parteitag der PDS in Berlin (19.-21. Januar 1993) 74 Der Logik des Kräfteverhältnisses stellen! Rede auf dem 12. Parteitag der DKP, Gladbeck, am 13. November 1993 90 5 Vor fünf Jahren: »Wir brechen unwiderruflich mit dem Stalinismus als System!« Reminiszenzen und aktuelle Überlegungen 94 Antikommunismus? Schlußwort auf dem Historisch-rechtspolitischen Kolloquium »KPD-Verbot oder mit Kommunisten leben? Das KPD-Verbotsurteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 17.
  • Jürgen Jahn (Berlin) Erinnerung an Bernhard Steinberger

    Jürgen Jahn (Berlin) Erinnerung an Bernhard Steinberger

    Bitte beachten Sie, dass es im Vergleich zum Buch in diesem PDF zu minimalen Abweichungen im Umbruch kommen kann. Wir bitten dies zu entschuldigen! Jürgen Jahn (Berlin) Erinnerung an Bernhard Steinberger (geb. 17. 09. 1917 in München, gest. 16. 12. 1990 in Berlin) Bernhard Steinberger kommt aus einem assimilierten jüdischen Elternhaus. Sein Vater, Dr. Max Steinberger, war Staatsanwalt am Landesgericht in München; er stirbt zwei Wochen nach der Geburt des Sohnes. Die Mutter heiratet nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg ein zweites Mal, läßt sich aber nach zehnjähriger unglücklicher Ehe in den dreißiger Jahren scheiden. Der Sohn besucht die Volksschule (1924–1928) und das Neue Realgymnasium (1928–1934) und geht – nach einem halbjährigen Volontariat in einer Autorepara- turwerkstatt – im Ertelwerk München in die Lehre als Feinmechaniker. Der Lehrling denkt an ein Ingenieurstudium; er ist ein begeisterter und geschickter Modellflugzeugbauer und möchte am liebsten Luftfahrttechniker oder Flugzeug- konstrukteur werden. Solch ein Berufswunsch erweist sich in Hitler-Deutschland rasch als Illusion: Als das Werk, das geodätische Instrumente herstellt, in die Regie der Wehrmacht übergeht und die Belegschaft vereidigt wird, muß Steinber- ger als Jude den Betrieb verlassen; immerhin erhält er ein gutes Abschlußzeugnis. So emigriert der Achtzehnjährige im Juli 1936 nach Mailand; die Mutter und die fünf Jahre jüngere Schwester folgen nach. Im November findet er eine illegale, schlecht bezahlte Anstellung als Zeichner, dann als Konstrukteur in einer Fabrik für Hausbaumaschinen; zum Oktober 1937 wechselt er in eine behördlich ge- nehmigte Stellung als Konstrukteur bei einer Firma für Straßenbaumaschinen und Traktoren, die den Unterhalt der kleinen Familie sichert. Als jedoch am 1. September 1938 auch in Italien antisemitische Gesetze erlassen werden, emigriert Steinberger in die Schweiz, die noch keinen Visumzwang eingeführt hat.
  • Germanica, 44 | 2009, « Écriture Des Identités Multiples Dans L’Allemagne Unifée » [En Ligne], Mis En Ligne Le 01 Janvier 2010, Consulté Le 06 Octobre 2020

    Germanica, 44 | 2009, « Écriture Des Identités Multiples Dans L’Allemagne Unifée » [En Ligne], Mis En Ligne Le 01 Janvier 2010, Consulté Le 06 Octobre 2020

    Germanica 44 | 2009 Écriture des identités multiples dans l’Allemagne unifiée Anne-Marie Corbin (dir.) Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/germanica/437 DOI : 10.4000/germanica.437 ISSN : 2107-0784 Éditeur Université de Lille Édition imprimée Date de publication : 1 juin 2009 ISBN : 978-2-913857-23-0 ISSN : 0984-2632 Référence électronique Anne-Marie Corbin (dir.), Germanica, 44 | 2009, « Écriture des identités multiples dans l’Allemagne unifiée » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 01 janvier 2010, consulté le 06 octobre 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/germanica/437 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/germanica.437 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 6 octobre 2020. © Tous droits réservés 1 SOMMAIRE Avant-propos Anne-Marie Corbin I. Mosaïques Wie es leuchtet. Léonce et Léna de l’unification allemande Marie-Hélène Quéval Wie es leuchtet. Léonce et Léna de l’unification allemande Marie-Hélène Quéval Fonction identitaire de l’écriture chez Jakob Hein Hélène Yèche La poésie de Bert Papenfuß vingt ans après la chute du Mur – la politisation d’une poétique Cécile Millot II. Synthèses «Schön ist es in eurem banlieu.» «Wie wärsn’ mit der Wirklichkeit?» Black Box DDR Junge (ost-)deutsche (nicht-)dramatische Schreibpositionen Stefan Tigges Der junge deutsche Film seit 1998. Innovative Impulse, Themen, Literaturadaption Volker Wehdeking Écriture et plurilinguisme : « enrôlés dans la langue, arrivés en littérature » Nicole Bary III. Témoignages Achtzehn Einhundertneun – Lichtenhagen Anne Rabe Die RAF - ein Kapitel eines deutschen Familienromans Andres Veiel Jens Sparschuh Jens Sparschuh Hermann Kant Hermann Kant Germanica, 44 | 2009 2 Compte rendu de lecture Nadja Lux, «Alptraum: Deutschland», Traumversionen und Traumvisionen vom «Dritten Reich» Freiburg i.
  • Nominated Candidates the Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award Is the World’S Largest Award for Children’S and Young Adult Literature

    Nominated Candidates the Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award Is the World’S Largest Award for Children’S and Young Adult Literature

    Nominated Candidates The Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award is the world’s largest award for children’s and young adult literature. Candidates are nominated by expert organisations world-wide. A common feature of the nomination bodies is that they have a good overview and knowledge of children’s and young adult literature in their countries or language areas. This makes the annual list of nominees a good starting-point for an overview of contemporary international children’s and young adult literature. A total of 168 candidates have been nominated for the 2010 award. Among the nominees are authors, illustrators, promoters of reading and oral storytellers, representing more than 60 countries world-wide. The winner or winners of the Astrid Lindgren Memorial Award will be announced by the expert jury at the birthplace of Astrid Lindgren in Vimmerby, Sweden, on March 24 2010, at 13.00 CET. The announcement will be broadcasted live to the Bologna Children’s Book Fair, Italy, and online at www.alma.se. For information on become a nominating body, please contact [email protected]. The 2010 Astrid Lindgren Memorial AWard Nominees Are: Adarna House The Philippines, Organisation Caravane Civique Morocco, Organisation Akal, Aytül Turkey, Author Carmi, Daniella Israel, Author Algimantas, Zurba Lithuania, Author Casalderrey, Fina Spain, Author Almond, David United Kingdom, Author Chambers, Aidan United Kingdom, Author (also with Chambers, Nancy) Alonso, Fernando Alonso Spain, Author Chambers, Aidan & Nancy United Kingdom, Promoters of reading Antonenkov,
  • Årsrapport 1999 Årsrapport «Schibsted.Com» >> Schibsted Årsrapport 1999 Norsk

    Årsrapport 1999 Årsrapport «Schibsted.Com» >> Schibsted Årsrapport 1999 Norsk

    Design: Union Design. Foto: Jan Indrehus /Design: Union Design. Foto: Jan Indrehus Scanpix. Trykk: AS. Gunnarshaug Trykkeri Schibsted årsrapport 1999Schibsted årsrapport Norsk Schibsted ASA Tel: (+47) 23 10 66 00 Investorkontakt: Mette D. Storvestre «schibsted.com» Apotekergaten 10 Fax: (+47) 23 10 66 01 Tel: (+47) 23 10 66 97 Fax: (+47) 22 33 63 49 Postboks 1178 Sentrum [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] >> >> N-0107 Oslo www.schibsted.no Investorinformasjon: www.schibsted.no/ir Årsrapport 1999 database Dette er Schibsted 6 Viktige hendelser 10 Konsernsjefen har ordet 12 Årsberetning 14 Kornsernstyret 20 INNHOLD DETTE ER SCHIBSTED For Schibsted-konsernet representerer årtusenskiftet et møte mellom selskapets Massemarkedsportaler 25 sterke tradisjoner og dets nye posisjon i Avisenes nettsatsninger 26 en medieverden i forandringens tegn. Alt midt på 90-tallet besluttet Schibsted å ta en sentral posisjon i Aftenposten 32 online-utviklingen i Skandinavia. Verdens Gang 34 Aftonbladet 36 Satsningen har vært riktig og nødvendig Svenska Dagbladet 37 for å bevare og utvikle konsernet som et Eesti Meedia 39 av de ledende medieselskaper i Norden. Schibsted Trykk 40 Scanpix 41 Schibsteds strategi er å styrke og videre- utvikle de etablerte medier, og samtidig sikre seg ny vekst og utvikling innen Metronome Film & Television 46 nye medier. Sandrew Metronome 48 TV 2 49 Kanal 2 51 Scandinavia Online 57 Bokkilden 58 Ticnet 58 Byguider 58 Hugin 59 Chr. Schibsteds Forlag 61 Bladkompaniet 61 Dine Penger 62 Dagens Medisin 63 Aksjonærinformasjon 66 Finanskalender 68 Schibsted Finans 69 Schibsted Eiendom 70 Amandus Traineeprogram 71 Stiftelsen Tinius 72 Resultat Konsern 76 Balanse Konsern 77 Kontantstrøm Konsern 78 Resultat Schibsted ASA 93 Balanse Schibsted ASA 94 Kontantstrøm ASA 95 Revisors beretning 103 Verdiregnskap 104 «schibsted.com» 108 Schibsted online-statistikk 110 Adresser 112 Konsernstruktur 114 Nøkkeltall RELEVANT (BELØP I MILL.
  • Riddu Riddu, Joik Or Rock-N-Roll ?

    Riddu Riddu, Joik Or Rock-N-Roll ?

    Riddu Riddu, joik or rock-n-roll ? A study of Riddu Riddu Festivála and its role as a cultural tool for ethnic revialization Anastassia Valerievna Leonenko Thesis submitted for the degree: Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tromsø April 2008 Riddu Riđđu, joik or rock-n-roll? A study of Riddu Riđđu Festivála and its role as a cultural tool for ethnic revitalization Anastassia Valerievna Leonenko Thesis submitted for the degree: Master of Philosophy in Indigenous Studies Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tromsø Norway April 2008 To Alexandre Descomps and our baby II Acknowledgements This master thesis is a result of the contribution of different individuals and organisations. First, I am grateful to the University of Tromsø that opened my path to an international academic milieu by admitting me to the Indigenous Master Programme where I met my classmates from all over the world, Saami professors with personal experience in the indigenous self-determination movement, and other researchers on indigenous issues. Moreover, the Centre for Sámi Studies played an active role in my educational process, by organising seminars (at Skibotn) and conferences (the Forum for Development Cooperation with Indigenous Studies), trips to Finnmark (Karasjok, Kautokeino, Alta) and to Kåfjord (Manndalen) and finally, funding my research project. My gratitude goes as well to the Norwegian State Educational Loan Fund (Lånekassen) and the Centre for Environment and Development (SEMUT) for their financial support that made this research possible. My greatest gratitude and thanks go to my supervisor Bjørn Bjerkli, Associate Professor at the Department of Social Anthropology at the Tromsø University, who devoted a great deal of his time reading and commenting on my work.
  • Cabineta Quarterly of Art and Culture Issue 28 Bones Us $12 Canada $12

    Cabineta Quarterly of Art and Culture Issue 28 Bones Us $12 Canada $12

    A QUARTERLY OF ART AND CULTURE ISSUE 28 BONES CABINET US $12 CANADA $12 UK £7 cabinet Cabinet is a non-profit 501 (c) (3) magazine published by Immaterial Incorpo- 181 Wyckoff Street rated. Our survival is dependent on support from foundations and generous Brooklyn NY 11217 USA individuals. Please consider supporting us at whatever level you can. Contribu- tel + 1 718 222 8434 tions to Cabinet are fully tax-deductible for those who pay taxes to Uncle Sam. fax + 1 718 222 3700 Donations of $25 or more will be acknowledged in the next possible issue, and email [email protected] those above $100 will be acknowledged for four consecutive issues. Checks www.cabinetmagazine.org should be made out to “Cabinet” and sent to our office address. Please mark the envelope, “See? Wishbones do work!” Winter 2007–2008, issue 28 Cabinet wishes to thank the following visionary foundations and individuals Editor-in-chief Sina Najafi for their support of our activities during 2007. Additionally, we will forever be Senior editor Jeffrey Kastner indebted to the extraordinary contribution of the Flora Family Foundation from Editor Christopher Turner 1999 to 2004; without their generous support, this publication would not exist. UK editor Brian Dillon We would also like to thank the Orphiflamme Foundation for a recent generous Managing editor Colby Chamberlain grant and David Walentas/Two Trees for their donation of an editorial office. Associate editor & graphic designer Ryo Manabe Art director Jessica Green Website directors Luke Murphy, Kristofer Widholm, Isaac Overcast, Ryan O’Toole $50,000 Editors-at-large Saul Anton, Mats Bigert, Brian Conley, Christoph Cox, The Andy Warhol Foundation for the $500 or under Jesse Lerner, Jennifer Liese, Frances Richard, Daniel Rosenberg, David Serlin, Visual Arts Monroe Denton, Hugh Raffles, James Debra Singer, Margaret Sundell, Allen S.