REPORT 2D Session SENATE 104–33 "!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REPORT 2D Session SENATE 104–33 104TH CONGRESS EXEC. REPORT 2d Session SENATE 104±33 "! THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION SEPTEMBER 11, 1996.ÐOrdered to be printed Mr. HELMS, from the Committee on Foreign Relations, submitted the following REPORT together with MAJORITY and MINORITY VIEWS [To accompany Treaty Doc. 103±21] The Committee on Foreign Relations, to which was referred the Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production, Stock- piling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, opened for signature and signed by the United States at Paris on January 13, 1993, including the following documents, which are in- tegral parts thereof: the Annex on Chemicals; the Annex on Imple- mentation and Verification; and the Annex on the Protection of Confidential Information, having considered the same, reports fa- vorably thereon and recommends that the Senate give its advice and consent to ratification thereof subject to 7 conditions and 11 declarations as set forth in this report and the accompanying reso- lution of ratification. CONTENTS Page I. Purpose ........................................................................................................... 2 II. Treaty Terms .................................................................................................. 2 III. Treaty Obligations ......................................................................................... 7 IV. Background .................................................................................................... 12 V. Committee Action .......................................................................................... 17 VI. Resolution of Ratification .............................................................................. 19 VII. Article-by-Article Analysis ............................................................................ 32 VIII. Majority Views ............................................................................................... 162 IX. Minority Views ............................................................................................... 241 27±027 2 I. PURPOSE The purpose of the Convention on the Prohibition of Develop- ment, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction (The Chemical Weapons Convention or ``CWC'') is to create a global ban on the use, development, produc- tion, acquisition, stockpiling, or transfer of chemical weapons. The Convention seeks to reinforce the international norm against the use of chemical weapons by reaffirming and building upon the prin- ciples, objectives, and obligations assumed under two other inter- national agreements: (1) the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare; and (2) the 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their De- struction, or the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). The United States has been engaged in negotiations for the elimination of weapons for chemical and biological warfare for more than 70 years. The Geneva Protocol and the BWC are the two basic treaties now in force. Most countries, including the United States, are parties to both. The Geneva Protocol of 1925 prohibits the use in war by a Party against another Party of chemical and biological weapons, but places no restriction on production or possession of such weapons. In addition, reservations attached to the Protocol by many countries, including the United States, preserve the right to use chemical weapons in retaliation. The Biological Weapons Con- vention, on the other hand, outlaws the development, production, stockpiling, acquisition, or retention of biological and toxin weapons and provides for their destruction. (Toxins are considered both chemical and biological weapons in that they are biologically de- rived but act in a chemical manner. Thus, toxins are also covered by the Chemical Weapons Convention.) However, the BWC does not contain verification provisions. The administration is currently working with other nations to expand the BWC drawing upon the verification regime contained in the CWC. As noted, the CWC goes beyond both the 1925 Geneva Protocol and the BWC by prohibiting any use of chemical weapons in warÐ including retaliatory useÐas well as military preparations for the use of chemical weapons, and by establishing a verification regime to monitor compliance with the Convention. The CWC requires member states to declare all of their existing chemical weapons and chemical weapons storage and production facilities, requires their indigenous commercial chemical industries to declare their produc- tion activities and to allow an international inspectorate to exam- ine those declarations and to have access to both military and com- mercial facilities, and to completely eliminate all of their chemical weapons within 10 years of the Convention's entry into force. The goals of the CWC are to eliminate the possession of chemical weap- ons, to reverse chemical weapons proliferation, and to preclude any future use of these weapons. II. TREATY TERMS The Chemical Weapons Convention consists of the main Treaty text and three annexes, together with two documents, formally 3 transmitted to the Senate by the President on November 23, 1993, for the Senate's advice and consent to ratification. The CWC is a treaty with a preamble and 24 Articles with an unlimited duration, and three annexes as follows: the Annex on Chemicals; the Annex on Implementation and Verification (the ``Verifica- tion Annex''); and the Annex on the Protection of Confidential Information (the ``Confidentiality Annex''). The President also transmitted documents associated with, but not integral parts of, the Annexes or the Chemical Weapons Con- vention. These documents embody legally binding commitments re- garding the establishment of the Preparatory Commission for the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and on privileges, immunities, practical arrangements, and commitments undertaken with respect to the hosting of the Preparatory Commis- sion. These documents are relevant to the consideration of the CWC by the Senate. No new U.S. security assurances or guaran- tees are associated with any of these documents. A. THE TREATY TEXT Article I contains the principal obligations undertaken by coun- tries that become parties to the Convention. Parties are prohibited from: (a) Developing, producing, otherwise acquiring, stockpiling or retaining chemical weapons or transferring them, directly or indirectly, to anyone; (b) Using chemical weapons under any circumstances, in- cluding retaliatory use; (c) Engaging in any military preparations to use chemical weapons or assisting, encouraging, or inducing anyone to en- gage in any activity prohibited by the CWC; and (d) Using riot control agents as a ``method of warfare.'' Article II provides the definitions used in the Articles and An- nexes and the criteria used to determine what is included within the scope of the Convention's controls. The definition of ``chemical weapons'' is specifically broad to encompass all known, unknown and future toxic chemicals, so that novel, as well as traditional chemical agents, will be prohibited in types and quantities that cannot be justified for permitted purposes. Article II also defines what is meant by the phrase ``purposes not prohibited under this Convention.'' (Additional definitions are found in paragraph 1 of Article X, Part I of the Verification Annex, and paragraph 12 of Part IV(A) of the Verification Annex.) Article III requires all States Parties to declare whether or not they possess chemical weapons, including old and/or abandoned chemical weapons, chemical weapons production facilities and fa- cilities or establishments that have been designed, constructed or used primarily for chemical weapons since January 1, 1946. States Parties are also required to report any chemical weapons on its ter- ritory that are owned and possessed by another State and located in any place under the jurisdiction or control of another State. Arti- cle III also requires States to declare any shipments, direct or indi- 4 rect, of any chemical weapons, or chemical weapons production equipment, to or from its territory since January 1, 1946. Article IV describes the obligations of States Parties regarding destruction of chemical weapons, including the scope of the obliga- tion, verification procedures, destruction, reporting of destruction activities, safety and environmental standards for destruction, bi- lateral and multilateral verification arrangements and costs of ver- ification and destruction. Article IV also specifies that duplication of bilateral verification activities should be avoided, provided that the bilateral efforts are consistent with the Convention's provisions and that the States Parties involved keep the Organization fully in- formed of their verification activities. This provision was added to limit the duplicative cost of verification in instances in which States are already planning bilateral destruction and verification activities, namely between the United States and the Russian Fed- eration. Article V describes the obligation by States Parties to destroy chemical weapons production facilities. This article specifies that each State Party immediately cease all production of chemical weapons and that all chemical weapon production facilities must be closed within 90 days of the Convention's
Recommended publications
  • Theoretical Study of Sarin Adsorption On
    Chemical Physics Letters 738 (2020) 136816 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chemical Physics Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cplett Research paper Theoretical study of sarin adsorption on (12,0) boron nitride nanotube doped with silicon atoms T ⁎ ⁎ Jeziel Rodrigues dos Santosa, , Elson Longo da Silvab, Osmair Vital de Oliveirac, , José Divino dos Santosa a Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Campus Anápolis, CEP: 75.132-903 GO, Brazil b INCTMN, LIEC, Departamento de Química da Universidade Federal de São Carlos, CEP: 13.565-905 São Carlos, SP, Brazil c Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo, Campus Catanduva, CEP: 15.808-305 Catanduva, SP, Brazil HIGHLIGHTS • DFT method was used to study the adsorption of nerve agent sarin by BNNT. • Electronic properties of pristine BNNT are improved by Si impurity atoms. • The adsorption of sarin by Si-doped BNNT is highest favorable than the pure BNNT. • Si-doped BNNT can be a new gas sensor for sarin gas detection and its derivatives. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Sarin gas is one of the most lethal nerve agent used in chemical warfare, which its detection is import to prevent Nerve agent sarin a chemical attack and to identify a contamination area. Herein, density functional theory was used to investigate Gas sensor the (12,0) boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) and Si–doped BNNT as possible candidates to sarin detection. The Si- Boron nitride nanotube atoms doped improve the electronic properties of nanotubes by altering the electrostatic potential, HOMO and DFT LUMO energies. Based in the adsorption energies and the conductivity increased to ~33 and 350%, respectively, for Si- and 2Si-BNNT imply that they can be used for sarin detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) Schedule 1 Chemicals
    LC Paper No. CB(1)1722/01-02(01) Description of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) Schedule 1 Chemicals Item Name Nature of the Chemical Scope of Application Examples of Common Usage A Toxic chemicals (1) O-Alkyl (≤C10, incl. cycloalkyl) alkyl (Me, Nerve agent No industrial, medical, Not applicable (N.A.) Et, n-Pr or i-Pr) phosphonofluoridates, e.g. pharmaceutical or scientific Sarin and Soman. application has been reported. (2) O-Alkyl (≤C10, incl. cycloalkyl) N,N-dialkyl Nerve agent No industrial, medical, N.A. (Me, Et, n-Pr or i-Pr) - pharmaceutical or scientific phosphoramidocyanidate, e.g. Tabun. application has been reported. (3) O-Alkyl (H or ≤C10, incl. cycloalkyl) S- Nerve agent No industrial, medical, N.A. 2-dialkyl (Me, Et, n-Pr or i-Pr) pharmaceutical or scientific aminoethyl alkyl (Me, Et, n-Pr or application has been reported. i-Pr)- phosphonothiolates and corresponding alkylated or protonated salts e.g. VX. (4) Sulfur mustards : Vesicants No industrial, medical, N.A. pharmaceutical or scientific 2-Chloroethylchloromethylsulfide application has been reported. Bis(2-chloroethyl)sulfide Bis(2-chloroethylthio)methane 1,2-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)ethane 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-propane 1,4-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-butane 1,5-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-pentane Bis(2-chloroethylthiomethyl)ether Bis(2-chloroethylthioethyl)ether Page 1 of 3 Item Name Nature of the Chemical Scope of Application Examples of Common Usage (5) Lewisites : Vesicants No industrial, medical, N.A. pharmaceutical or scientific Lewisite 1 : 2-Chlorovinyldichloroarsine application has been reported. Lewisite 2 : Bis(2-chlorovinyl)chloroarsine Lewisite 3 : Tris(2-chlorovinyl)arsine (6) Nitrogen mustards : Vesicants The chemical has medical Only HN2 has been reported to application.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Science for Diplomats" Annex on Chemicals
    ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS "THE SCIENCE FOR DIPLOMATS" ANNEX ON CHEMICALS A user friendly and scientifically annotated version of the Chemical Weapons Convention Annex on Chemicals OPCW THE “SCIENCE FOR DIPLOMATS” ANNEX ON CHEMICALS A user friendly and scientifically annotated version of the Chemical Weapons Convention Annex on Chemicals1 CONTENTS A. GUIDELINES FOR SCHEDULES OF CHEMICALS B. VISUALISING AND READING MOLECULAR STRUCTURES C. SCHEDULES OF CHEMICALS D. RIOT CONTROL AGENTS 1 An official version of the Annex on Chemicals can be obtained from the OPCW public website, www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/annexes/annex-chemicals/annex-chemicals. Version 3.0 – 10 March 2019 A. GUIDELINES FOR SCHEDULES OF CHEMICALS Guidelines for Schedule 1 1. The following criteria shall be taken into account in considering whether a toxic chemical or precursor should be included in Schedule 1: (a) It has been developed, produced, stockpiled or used as a chemical weapon as defined in Article II; (b) It poses otherwise a high risk to the object and purpose of this Convention by virtue of its high potential for use in activities prohibited under this Convention because one or more of the following conditions are met: (i) It possesses a chemical structure closely related to that of other toxic chemicals listed in Schedule 1, and has, or can be expected to have, comparable properties; (ii) It possesses such lethal or incapacitating toxicity as well as other properties that would enable it to be used as a chemical weapon; (iii) It may be used as a precursor in the final single technological stage of production of a toxic chemical listed in Schedule 1, regardless of whether this stage takes place in facilities, in munitions or elsewhere; (c) It has little or no use for purposes not prohibited under this Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Applications of Novel
    DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF NOVEL SOLVENT-MINIMIZED TECHNIQUES IN THE DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND THEIR DEGRADATION PRODUCTS LEE HOI SIM NANCY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2008 DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF NOVEL SOLVENT-MINIMIZED TECHNIQUES IN THE DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS AND THEIR DEGRADATION PRODUCTS LEE HOI SIM NANCY (M.Sc.), NUS A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My most sincere gratitude goes to my bosses at DSO National Laboratories, Ms. Sng Mui Tiang, Dr. Lee Fook Kay and Assoc. Prof. Lionel Lee Kim Hock, who gave me the opportunity to pursue a part-time higher degree and provided me with much encouragement and support throughout the course of my study. I had the privilege of working under the expert guidance of Prof. Lee Hian Kee and Dr. Chanbasha Basheer of the Department of Chemistry at the National University of Singapore and would like to thank them for this enriching learning experience as well as their friendship over the years. I sincerely appreciate the help and support from everyone at the Defense Medical and Environmental Research Institute, DSO National Laboratories, especially from the Organic Synthesis Group for providing the analytes used in the study and all users of the GC MSD for sharing the use of the instrument. Even though people come and go, the memories of the exciting times especially during the Proficiency Tests, with Dr. Ang Kiam Wee, Ms. Chan Shu Cheng, Mr. Leonard Chay Yew Leong, Dr. Alex Chin Piao, Dr. Chua Guan Leong, Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Revised May 2016 UMKC CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This document constitutes the Chemical Management Plan (CMP) for the University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC). It was developed by the Environmental Health and Safety Department (EHS), to ensure the safe and proper use of hazardous and non- hazardous chemicals and to comply with applicable governmental regulations addressing the disposal of these chemicals. In addition, it was developed to foster waste minimization, and to provide the faculty and the staff with a management program to reduce the potential for accidents involving hazardous chemicals and/or wastes. Elements of the CMP include: a. a procedure for identifying potential or actual hazardous chemicals or wastes b. a procedure for periodic reexamination of those hazardous chemicals or wastes identified by the procedure in (a.) above as well as a systematic method for identification and evaluation of any new potential or actual hazardous chemicals or wastes c. procedures for labeling, and inventorying hazardous chemicals or wastes d. a procedure for identification and training of personnel directly responsible for ensuring that (a.), (b.), and (c.) are implemented e. a procedure for monitoring, recording, and reporting compliance with the CMP f. a procedure by which information generated by the CMP is provided to the persons performing waste analyses Each element is addressed as part of the complete CMP in the following paragraphs. 4 Table of Contents 1 Definitions 7 2 Identification
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholinesterase: the “Hub” for Neurodegenerative Diseases And
    Review biomolecules Acetylcholinesterase: The “Hub” for NeurodegenerativeReview Diseases and Chemical Weapons Acetylcholinesterase: The “Hub” for Convention Neurodegenerative Diseases and Chemical WeaponsSamir F. de A. Cavalcante Convention 1,2,3,*, Alessandro B. C. Simas 2,*, Marcos C. Barcellos 1, Victor G. M. de Oliveira 1, Roberto B. Sousa 1, Paulo A. de M. Cabral 1 and Kamil Kuča 3,*and Tanos C. C. França 3,4,* Samir F. de A. Cavalcante 1,2,3,* , Alessandro B. C. Simas 2,*, Marcos C. Barcellos 1, Victor1 Institute G. M. ofde Chemical, Oliveira Biological,1, Roberto Radiological B. Sousa and1, Paulo Nuclear A. Defense de M. Cabral (IDQBRN),1, Kamil Brazilian Kuˇca Army3,* and TanosTechnological C. C. França Center3,4,* (CTEx), Avenida das Américas 28705, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil; [email protected] (M.C.B.); [email protected] (V.G.M.d.O.); [email protected] 1 Institute of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (IDQBRN), Brazilian Army (R.B.S.); [email protected] (P.A.d.M.C.) Technological Center (CTEx), Avenida das Américas 28705, Rio de Janeiro 23020-470, Brazil; 2 [email protected] Mors Institute of Research (M.C.B.); on Natural [email protected] Products (IPPN), Federal (V.G.M.d.O.); University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), CCS,[email protected] Bloco H, Rio de Janeiro (R.B.S.); 21941-902, [email protected] Brazil (P.A.d.M.C.) 32 DepartmentWalter Mors of Institute Chemistry, of Research Faculty of on Science, Natural Un Productsiversity (IPPN),
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Homeland Security (Dhs) Appendix a Chemicals of Interest (Coi)
    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) APPENDIX A CHEMICALS OF INTEREST (COI) Acetaldehyde Bromine trifluoride Acetone Cyanohydrin, stabilized Bromothrifluorethylene Acetyl bromide 1,3-Butadiene Acetyl chloride Butane Acetyl iodide Butene Acetylene 1-Butene Acrolein 2-Butene Acrylonitrile 2-Butene-cis Acrylyl chloride 2-Butene-trans Allyl alcohol Butyltrichlorosilane Allylamine Calcium hydrosulfite Allyltrichlorosilane, stabilized Calcium phosphide Aluminum (powder) Carbon disulfide Aluminum Bromide, anhydrous Carbon oxysulfide Aluminum Chloride, anhydrous Carbonyl fluoride Aluminum phosphide Carbonyl sulfide Ammonia (anhydrous) Chlorine Ammonia (conc 20% or greater) Chlorine dioxide Ammonium nitrate, note #1 Chlorine monoxide Ammonium nitrate, note #2 Chlorine pentafluoride Ammonium perchlorate Chlorine trifluoride Ammonium picrate Chloroacetyl chloride Amyltrichlorosilane 2-Chloroethylchloro-methylsulfide Antimony pentafluoride Chloroform Arsenic trichloride Chloromethyl ether Arsine Chloromethyl methyl ether Barium azide 1-Chloropropylene 1,4-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-butane 2-Chloropropylene Bis(2-chloroethylthio) methane Chlorosarin Bis(2-chloroethylthiomethyl)ether Chlorosoman 1,5-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-pentane Chlorosulfonic acid 1,3-Bis(2-chloroethylthio)-n-propane Chromium oxychloride Boron tribromide Crotonaldehyde Boron trichloride Crotonaldehyde, (E)- Boron trifluoride Cyanogen Boron trifluoride compound with methyl Cyanogen chloride ether (1:1) Cyclohexylamine Bromine Cyclohexyltrichlorosilane Bromine chloride Cyclopropane
    [Show full text]
  • Export Control Handbook for Chemicals
    Export Control Handbook for Chemicals -Dual-use control list -Common Military List -Explosives precursors -Syria restrictive list -Psychotropics and narcotics precursors ARNES-NOVAU, X 2019 EUR 29879 This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Xavier Arnés-Novau Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332-785421 Filippo Sevini Joint Research Centre, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy [email protected] Tel.: +39 0332-786793 EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC 117839 EUR 29879 Print ISBN 978-92-76-11971-5 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2760/844026 PDF ISBN 978-92-76-11970-8 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/339232 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 © European Atomic Energy Community, 2019 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse.
    [Show full text]
  • CSAT Top-Screen Questions OMB PRA # 1670-0007 Expires: 5/31/2011
    CSAT Top-Screen Questions January 2009 Version 2.8 CSAT Top-Screen Questions OMB PRA # 1670-0007 Expires: 5/31/2011 Change Log .........................................................................................................3 CVI Authorizing Statements...............................................................................4 General ................................................................................................................6 Facility Description.................................................................................................................... 7 Facility Regulatory Mandates ................................................................................................... 7 EPA RMP Facility Identifier....................................................................................................... 9 Refinery Capacity....................................................................................................................... 9 Refinery Market Share ............................................................................................................. 10 Airport Fuels Supplier ............................................................................................................. 11 Military Installation Supplier................................................................................................... 11 Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Capacity................................................................................... 12 Liquefied Natural Gas Exclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Weapons Technology Section 4—Chemical Weapons Technology
    SECTION IV CHEMICAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY SECTION 4—CHEMICAL WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY Scope Highlights 4.1 Chemical Material Production ........................................................II-4-8 4.2 Dissemination, Dispersion, and Weapons Testing ..........................II-4-22 • Chemical weapons (CW) are relatively inexpensive to produce. 4.3 Detection, Warning, and Identification...........................................II-4-27 • CW can affect opposing forces without damaging infrastructure. 4.4 Chemical Defense Systems ............................................................II-4-34 • CW can be psychologically devastating. • Blister agents create casualties requiring attention and inhibiting BACKGROUND force efficiency. • Defensive measures can be taken to negate the effect of CW. Chemical weapons are defined as weapons using the toxic properties of chemi- • Donning of protective gear reduces combat efficiency of troops. cal substances rather than their explosive properties to produce physical or physiologi- • Key to employment is dissemination and dispersion of agents. cal effects on an enemy. Although instances of what might be styled as chemical weapons date to antiquity, much of the lore of chemical weapons as viewed today has • CW are highly susceptible to environmental effects (temperature, its origins in World War I. During that conflict “gas” (actually an aerosol or vapor) winds). was used effectively on numerous occasions by both sides to alter the outcome of • Offensive use of CW complicates command and control and battles. A significant number of battlefield casualties were sustained. The Geneva logistics problems. Protocol, prohibiting use of chemical weapons in warfare, was signed in 1925. Sev- eral nations, the United States included, signed with a reservation forswearing only the first use of the weapons and reserved the right to retaliate in kind if chemical weapons were used against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Nerve Agent- and Pesticide-Protein Bioadducts As Reference Materials for Retrospective Verification of Exposure
    University of Fribourg / Faculty of Science and Medicine / Department of Chemistry Synthesis of Nerve Agent- and Pesticide-Protein Bioadducts as Reference Materials for Retrospective Verification of Exposure Andreas Bielmann Cholinesterase inhibiting organophosphorus compounds are highly toxic and are used as pesticides or nerve agents. As most chemical warfare agents, nerve agents are prohibited by the Chemical Weapons Convention. To enforce the Convention, the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons maintains a network of laboratories, which are designated to analyse samples after alleged incidents involving chemical warfare agents. The gold standard for the retrospective verification of exposure to nerve agents in biomedical samples is the LC-MS analysis of a specific nonapeptide with the sequence FGES*AGAAS obtained after pepsin digestion of butyrylcholinesterase. Organophosphorus inhibitors will leave a specific marker on the serine indicated by *. Reference materials for this analysis are often produced by spiking of blood with agents. However, this method only gives reference peptides of inadequate purity. For the development of analytical methods and for quantitative analysis highly pure synthetic peptides are required. In this work, the synthesis of phosphylated peptides via a building block approach was investigated. Synthesis protocols were established and the limitations of the method were investigated. Phosphylated amino acid precursors and the resulting peptides have some intrinsic labilities, therefore an optimized SPPS protocol was developed to overcome them. Using this protocol, two pathways to synthesize the aged-nonapeptide adduct were investigated and compared. Further, the bioadducts of the nerve agents sarin, cyclosarin, VX, CVX and RVX, as well as the methyl methylphosphono- and isopropyl isopropylphosphono nonapeptides were synthesized to determine the scope of the method.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Document: the Biological and Chemical Warfare Threat, January 1997
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) document: The Biological and Chemical Warfare Threat, January 1997 Requested date: 01-July-2015 Released date: 02-December-2015 Posted date: 04-January-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Central Intelligence Agency Washington,• D.C. 20505 2 December 2015 Reference: F-2015-02095 This is a final response to your 1July2015 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for "a copy of the following six CIA documents: 1.
    [Show full text]