Registering a Trademark Or a Service Mark in North Carolina
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Trademarks, Metatags, and Initial Interest Confusion: a Look to the Past to Re- Conceptualize the Future
173 TRADEMARKS, METATAGS, AND INITIAL INTEREST CONFUSION: A LOOK TO THE PAST TO RE- CONCEPTUALIZE THE FUTURE CHAD J. DOELLINGER* INTRODUCTION Web sites, through domain names and metatags, have created a new set of problems for trademark owners. A prominent problem is the use of one’s trademarks in the metatags of a competitor’s web site. The initial interest confusion doctrine has been used to combat this problem.1 Initial interest confusion involves infringement based on confusion that creates initial customer interest, even though no transaction takes place.2 Several important questions have currently received little atten- tion: How should initial interest confusion be defined? How should initial interest confusion be conceptualized? How much confusion is enough to justify a remedy? Who needs to be confused, when, and for how long? How should courts determine when initial interest confusion is sufficient to support a finding of trademark infringement? These issues have been glossed over in the current debate by both courts and scholars alike. While the two seminal opinions involving the initial interest confusion doctrine, Brookfield Commun., Inc. v. West Coast Ent. Corp.3 and * B.A., B.S., University of Iowa (1998); J.D., Yale Law School (2001). Mr. Doellinger is an associate with Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson, 311 S. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The author would like to thank Uli Widmaier for his assistance and insights. The views and opinions in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson. 1 See J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, vol. -
Visual Design & Branding Guidelines
Visual Design & Branding Guidelines For questions about this guide please contact: [email protected] Updated 06.03.15 Logo The Playworks logo is a key element and a valuable asset for our brand. The correct and consistent use of our logo enhances our brand recognition. Our logo consists of the Playworks mark and wordmark only. The goal of this document isn’t to stifle creativity. It’s to provide direction that will help us create materials that our audiences will come to recognize as ours. Minimum size: 1” wide VISUAL BRANDING GUIDELINES | PLAYWORKS | 2 Alternate versions Rounded square/rectangle: The logo can be rendered as a blue rounded square with the logo elements centered inside it in white. Minimum space between the edge of the shape and the wordmark should be at least x x x, where x is the height of the logotype. x = height of wordmark VISUAL BRANDING GUIDELINES | PLAYWORKS | 3 Logo white space x Give the logo room to breath and help it stand out. Never crowd the logo with other visual elements. x x The unit of measure, x, is the height of the wordmark. You must allow space one x wide around an imaginary box that fits around the logo. x x = height of wordmark VISUAL BRANDING GUIDELINES | PLAYWORKS | 4 Logo color I. PREFERRED: Bright Blue† - logomark Gray - wordmark Use this color scheme as the default choice. I. PREFERRED II. MONOTONE II. MONOTONE Bright Blue - all logo elements If you can only use one color, use the Bright Blue only. III. BLACK Black - all logo elements Use this when color option is unavailable or budget is a constraint. -
Branding Guidelines
Branding Guidelines Company: POWERHANDZ Contents: 1.0 Introduction 2.0 The Logo Design 2.1 The Logo Usage 3.0 Color Scheme 4.0 Typography 5.0 Contact Details Date: June 2014 1.0 Introduction Overview The purpose of these guidelines is to explain the use of the new brand style and to reinforce consistent application of the visual elements in all communications. This includes publications, presentations, and all other marketing materials both online and offline. Guidelines on the use of the logo are included. 1.0 Introduction Branding Guidelines - June 2014 1. Your new “identity” Your identity is the face and personality presented to the global community. It’s as important as the products and services you provide. Your identity is the total effect of your logos, products, brand names, trademarks, advertising, brochures, and presentations— everything that represents you. Because the brand cannot be compromised, we’ve created this guide to provide all the pertinent specifications you need to maintain its integrity. The guidelines set in this document are not meant to inhibit, but to improve the creative process. By following these guidelines, the materials you create will represent your company cohesively to the outside world. 1.0 Introduction Branding Guidelines - June 2014 2. 2.0 The Logo Design The company logo is an important and valued graphic element and must be used consistently and appropriately, even minor variations will undermine and compromise the image of the branding. 2.0 The Logo Design Branding Guidelines - June 2014 3. Primary vertical logo - light background Primary vertical logo - dark background 2.0 The Logo Design Branding Guidelines - June 2014 4. -
OPERAS-Design-Manual.Pdf
OPERAS | Logo Wordmark and Logo The OPERAS logo consists of a symbol logo with subline and a wordmark, which are used as a unit. The symbol consists of the opened capital letter “O” and is accentuated by a bracket, symbolizing the network/governing body. The letters are based on the font Utopia Std. The “open” letters symbolize the theme of “openness”. The OPERAS logo, depending on the use and size, can be used with or without subline minimal 6pt subline. The subline should not be smaller than 6pt. The logo can furthermore be used separately, e.g. as favicon. symbol OPERAS | Logo Wordmark and Logo The OPERAS logo can be used either with or without subline. There is a version of the logo that is completed by the ending -D (representing Design). The proportions and spacing, as well as the colour values of the logo and wordmark are not to be changed. OPERAS | Colours Red Purple OPERAS Colours The brand colours are red and purple. These colours are complemented by a pure black, which is used for the subline. A grey colour is used in the black-and-white version of the logo. Colour (printing) Colour (printing) CMYK 7/100/70/30 CMYK 50/90/0/40 Colour (web) Colour (web) sRGB 170/10/45 sRGB 105/35/ 100 Black Grey Colour (printing) Colour (printing) CMYK 0/0/0/100 CMYK 0/0/0/60 Colour (web) Colour (web) sRGB 0/0/0 sRGB 135/ 135 /135 OPERAS | Corporate Typeface Utopia Std Corporate Typeface Univers LT Pro The serif font Utopia Std and the sans serif Display font Univers LT Pro are combined for the corporate design. -
Basic Facts About Trademarks United States Patent and Trademark O Ce
Protecting Your Trademark ENHANCING YOUR RIGHTS THROUGH FEDERAL REGISTRATION Basic Facts About Trademarks United States Patent and Trademark O ce Published on February 2020 Our website resources For general information and links to Frequently trademark Asked Questions, processing timelines, the Trademark NEW [2] basics Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) , and FILERS the Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual (ID Manual)[3]. Protecting Your Trademark Trademark Information Network (TMIN) Videos[4] Enhancing Your Rights Through Federal Registration Tools TESS Search pending and registered marks using the Trademark Electronic Search System (TESS)[5]. File applications and other documents online using the TEAS Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS)[6]. Check the status of an application and view and TSDR download application and registration records using Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR)[7]. Transfer (assign) ownership of a mark to another ASSIGNMENTS entity or change the owner name and search the Assignments database[8]. Visit the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)[9] TTAB online. United States Patent and Trademark Office An Agency of the United States Department of Commerce UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BASIC FACTS ABOUT TRADEMARKS CONTENTS MEET THE USPTO ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 1 TRADEMARK, COPYRIGHT, OR PATENT �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� -
Prohibiting Product Placement and the Use of Characters in Marketing to Children by Professor Angela J. Campbell Georgetown Univ
PROHIBITING PRODUCT PLACEMENT AND THE USE OF CHARACTERS IN MARKETING TO CHILDREN BY PROFESSOR ANGELA J. CAMPBELL1 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER (DRAFT September 7, 2005) 1 Professor Campbell thanks Natalie Smith for her excellent research assistance, Russell Sullivan for pointing out examples of product placements, and David Vladeck, Dale Kunkel, Jennifer Prime, and Marvin Ammori for their helpful suggestions. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 I. Product Placements............................................................................................................. 4 A. The Practice of Product Placement......................................................................... 4 B. The Regulation of Product Placements................................................................. 11 II. Character Marketing......................................................................................................... 16 A. The Practice of Celebrity Spokes-Character Marketing ....................................... 17 B. The Regulation of Spokes-Character Marketing .................................................. 20 1. FCC Regulation of Host-Selling............................................................... 21 2. CARU Guidelines..................................................................................... 22 3. Federal Trade Commission....................................................................... 24 -
What Specsavers Taught Brand Owners and the UKIPO
WHAT SPECSAVERS TAUGHT BRAND OWNERS AND THE UKIPO Specsavers is the largest chain of retail opticians in the UK. The real interest was in the trade mark infringement case. In its shops and promotional materials it makes much use of this Specsavers had a number of community trade marks (a) in trade mark: respect of the word mark SPECSAVERS and also (b) in respect of three device marks: Shaded Logo (“the Logo in Green”) So when Asda set about re-launching its own existing optician’s business in October 2009 under this mark: Unshaded Logo The Asda Logo Wordless Logo Specsavers predictably was not best pleased. Specsavers was equally unamused by two straplines which Asda used to promote its own in-store optician’s business: “Be a real spec saver at Asda” (the First Strap Line) “Spec savings at Asda” (the Second Strap Line) It will be noted that Specsavers did not have a registration for the Logo in Green – their device in the colour green, which they Specsavers, perhaps not unsurprisingly, sued Asda for trade actually use. mark infringement and passing off. The passing off claims failed because the trial judge at first instance held that none of the marks used by Asda either alone or cumulatively effected the required misrepresentation – the use of the Asda mark was too prominent in the logos and in the strap lines to allow for any confusion. Three Ways in Which a Trade Mark Can Be Infringed The table below illustrates the three main ways in which a trade mark, UK or Community, can be infringed:. -
Logo Use Guidelines
Logo Use Guidelines Get the ocial Plone logo in various formats from http://plone.org/logo 1 About the Logo Minimum Size Projects and companies using Plone are encouraged to use the Plone The logo must always be displayed at a size large enough to read both logo on their websites, brochures, packaging, and elsewhere. You may the logo type and the registered trademark. This will vary based on the not use the logo or its likeness as a company logo or for any other resolution of the medium it is being used in - but as a general rule the commercial purpose without permission from the Plone Foundation. logo circle should be no smaller than 1 cm (3/8”) or 36 pixels in height. User groups may use the logo in their materials, as long as they don't make any prot from it and comply with usage guidelines. The Plone logo is a worldwide registered trademark of the Plone Foundation, Clear Space which is responsible for defending against any damaging or confusing It is critical to maintain an open area surrounding the Plone logo so it uses. In general, we want the logo to be used as widely as possible to remains recognizable and does not become lost in other page promote Plone and the Plone community. Derivative versions of the elements. Clear space is dened relative to the size of the logo, not as a Plone logo are generally prohibited, as they dilute Plone's brand iden- border of a set distance (such as saying “1/4 inch”.) tity. -
Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace
Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace Second Edition CHAPTER 7 UNIQUE ONLINE TRADEMARK ISSUES Howard S. Hogan Stephen W. Feingold Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton Washington, D.C. New York, NY CHAPTER 8 DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION, MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION Howard S. Hogan Stephen W. Feingold Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton Washington, D.C. New York, NY Intellectual Property Law in Cyberspace Second Edition G. Peter Albert, Jr. and American Intellectual Property Law Association CHAPTER 7 UNIQUE ONLINE TRADEMARK ISSUES CHAPTER 8 DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION, MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION American Intellectual Property Law Association A Arlington, VA Reprinted with permission For more information contact: bna.com/bnabooks or call 1-800-960-1220 Copyright © 2011 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Albert, G. Peter, 1964– Intellectual property law in cyberspace / G. Peter Albert, Jr. -- 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57018-753-7 (alk. paper) 1. Industrial property--United States. 2. Computer networks--Law and legislation--United States. 3. Internet 4. Copyright and electronic data processing--United States. I. Title. KF3095.A77 2011 346.7304’8--dc23 2011040494 All rights reserved. Photocopying any portion of this publication is strictly prohibited unless express written authorization is first obtained from BNA Books, 1231 25th St., NW, Washington, DC 20037, bna.com/bnabooks. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by BNA Books for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that $1.00 per page is paid directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923, copyright.com, Telephone: 978-750-8400, Fax: 978-646-8600. -
Vol. 93 TMR 1035
Vol. 93 TMR 1035 RECONSIDERING INITIAL INTEREST CONFUSION ON THE INTERNET By David M. Klein and Daniel C. Glazer∗ I. INTRODUCTION Courts developed the theory of initial interest confusion (or “pre-sale confusion”) to address the unauthorized use of a trademark in a manner that captures consumer attention, even though no sale is ultimately completed as a result of any initial confusion. During the last few years, the initial interest confusion doctrine has become a tool frequently used to resolve Internet- related disputes.1 Indeed, some courts have characterized initial interest confusion on the Internet as a “distinct harm, separately actionable under the Lanham Act.”2 This article considers whether the initial interest confusion doctrine is necessary in the context of the Internet. Courts typically have found actionable initial interest confusion when Internet users, seeking a trademark owner’s website, are diverted by identical or confusingly similar domain names to websites in competition with, or critical of, the trademark owner. A careful analysis of these decisions, however, leads to the conclusion that a distinct initial interest confusion theory may be unnecessary to resolve cases involving the unauthorized use of a trademark as a domain name. In fact, traditional notions of trademark infringement law and multi-factor likelihood of confusion tests may adequately address the balancing of interests required in cases where courts must define the boundaries of trademark owners’ protection against the use of their marks in the domain names of competing websites. The Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)3 and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA)4 provide additional protection against the unauthorized use of domain names that dilute famous marks or evidence a bad ∗ Mr. -
State of Rhode Island Trademark/Service Mark Guide
UDPATED 06/2019 Rhode Island Trademark/Service Mark Guide RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATE Trademark/Service Mark Guide The RI Department of State records the registration of state-level trademarks and service marks. Before you apply to register your mark with our office, be sure you can answer “yes” to the following questions: ¨ Have you completed a thorough search (including of the USPTO and other states’ trademark/service mark databases) to determine if your mark or a similar mark is already in use in Rhode Island or elsewhere? ¨ Is your mark currently being used in commerce in the State of Rhode Island? Have you sold or distributed goods or services where your mark is clearly distinguishable in connection with those goods or services? ¨ Have you ensured your mark is not: • Immoral, deceptive, or scandalous? • Disparaging or misrepresentative of a person (living or dead), institution, belief, or national symbol? • Inclusive of a flag or coat of arms of the United States of America, any state or municipality, or any foreign nation? • The name, signature, or image of any living person (unless you have written consent from that person)? • Merely descriptive of the goods or services? (e.g., “Frozen” for ice cream) • Merely geographically descriptive of the goods or services? (e.g., “Providence Club”) • A surname? Registration of a trademark or service mark does not prevent another person from registering the name as a d/b/a (doing business as) in the city or town where their business is located, nor does it prevent another person from incorporating under the same name. -
2 Logos 3 Logo Usage 4 Incorrect Logo Usage 5 Typography 6 Color Palette 7 Logo Color Guide 8 Graphic Elements
2 Logos 3 Logo Usage 4 Incorrect Logo Usage 5 Typography 6 Color Palette 7 Logo Color Guide 8 Graphic Elements 1 The NetVU logo is comprised of a customized typeface and a graphic symbol derived from the “V” of that typeface. Two “Vs” connect to create a sense of dialogue (hence the users experience) while simultaneously establishing a “platform” or springboard from which this interaction occurs (hence the user group). Positive and negative versions of all logos are available for use when a one-color application is necessary. PRIMARY LOGO The primary logo contains the graphic symbol, wordmark (acronym), title and tagline The wordmark always appears aligned and set below both the graphic symbol SECONDARY LOGO The secondary logo contains the graphic symbol, wordmark and tagline TERTIARY LOGO The tertiary logo contains the graphic symbol and wordmark ALTERNATE VERSIONS (see page 7 for color guidelines) GRAYSCALE TWO-COLOR NEGATIVE POSITIVE 2 CLEARSPACE • Maintain equal spacing around all parameters of the logo • Avoid placing type or other elements within the set boundaries • Logo usage should be set with at least 0.25” clearspace on all sides (when running at the minimum size) and 0.5” of clearspace when running at a larger scale MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS To maintain legibility in print mediums, please refer to the minimum size requirements below Primary minimum Secondary minimum Tertiary minimum 1.75” in width 1.75” in width 1.75” in width 3 Do not stretch or distort the logo. Do not rotate the logo. Do not add effects to the logo. Do not screen the logo.