Guerrero's Archaeological

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guerrero's Archaeological Guerrero’s Archaeological Patrimony and Cultural Potential Gerardo Gutiérrez* l e i t n o M e i s l E y b s o t o h P Teopantecuanitlan Cuetlajuchitlan iven a random combination of factors including difficult topography, a lack Gof paved highways and certain social strife, until very recently, archaeological re - search in Guerrero was minimal. Despite the efforts of a dozen or so Mexican and foreign archaeologists who fought day to day to sal - vage and disseminate the state’s rich archaeo - logical patrimony, the lack of exploration is evi - Xochipala dent. This turns the archaeology of Guerrero into a big black box: all kinds of unproven idea s fit. Thus, the cultures that inhabited Guerrero Colima, Jalisco, Michoacán and Nayarit have have been classified as peripheral, marginal, non - begun to leave Guerrero out of this regional urban, pre-state, etc. But, actually, the state’s classification because they consider it different archaeological remains show patterns of de - from what is called the West. Unfortunately, velopment similar to the rest of Mesoamerica important museums continue to promote this and in the same time period, which means the y idea: for example, the National Anthropology are not backward, or marginal or peripheral. Museum’s Room of Western Cultures exhibits In 1948, the Mexican Anthropological So - an important collection of archaeological ob - ciety classified the state of Guerrero as part of jects from Guerrero, together with shaft tombs the cultural region called the Mexican West. from the states of Colima and Jalisco, and cave Although this erroneous notion can still be art from the northern state of Baja California! found in the literature, specialists working in This arrangement would not be particularly pro b - lematic if it were not for the fact that Gue - rrero’s archaeological material shows evidence * Archaeologist and ethno-historian. Researcher at the Center for Research and Studies in Social Anthro po - of autonomous development and a close rela - logy ( CIESAS ). tionship with the traditions of Central Mexico 70 and Oaxaca, that is, two of the most important a cursory description of their geographical-eco - cultural nuclei of Mesoamerica. lo gical context. The state today is roughly al - Guerrero has no archaeological site open to mond-shaped, with a long east-west axis and a the public comparable to Chichén-Itzá or Monte short north-south one. In general terms we can Albán not because the state has no monumen - say there are three parallel strips on the east- tal archaeological zones, but because they have west axis: each strip represents a unique eco - not been explored or opened to the public. Thus, logical area that gives the state special charac - the wealth of Guerrero must be evaluated based teristics. Travelers can observe these strips or on its potential, which is vast. Just as an exam - ecological floors when they move along the ple, we can mention some of the sites that have Mexico-Acapulco highway: once they have left been excavated and that interested travelers behind the Morelos Valley, they begin a con - may visit. I will also mention some sites that, tinual descent until they arrive at the bottom of although they have not been explored, may be the Balsas River depression, one of the coun - visited thanks to their proximity to highways and try’s most important hydrological basins where urban areas and to their having basic tourist the tumultuous river runs. The Balsas depres - services. sion has a very hot, dry climate, where rain is scarce and the only permanent source of mois - ture is the river itself. Its vegetation is a low THE ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT deciduous jungle, with an abundance of short trees and cacti adapted to the arid terrain. When We cannot understand the development of the traveler crosses the river, he/she can see pre-Hispanic Guerrero cultures without at least that a gradual ascent begins. This leads to the Teopantecuanitlan is the most important pre-classical site found until now in Guerrero. 71 peaks of the Southern Sierra Madre, the second THE ARCHAIC PERIOD (8000-1800 B.C.) ecological strip, characterized by a temperate to cold climate, with a predominance of holm oak It is still not possible to establish when the first and pine forests. The terrain here is both precip - settlers came to the state. But we can estimate itous and beautiful, with enormous mountains that bands of hunters and gatherers had estab - and crags crisscrossed by deep ravines. Conti nuing lished temporary camps in the region before on his/her way, the traveler will begin to descend agriculture and ceramics production were intro - again until he/she arrives at the warm, sunny Pa - duced, 4,000 years before Christ. Cave art, togeth - cific coast, traditionally divided between the Costa er with triangular flint projectile tips, found in Chica (“Little Coast”), from Acapulco to the south - ancient camps in the Huamuxtitlan Valley, pro - east, and the Costa Grande (“Big Coast”), from vide information about these cultures. Perhaps Acapulco to the northwest. The vegetation along the most impressive example of ancient art in the the coast is that of a medium, sub-evergreen jun - state is found at Piedra Pinta, Totomixtlahuaca, gle, but it has been almost completely cut back an archaeological site located in a rock forma tion to make way for large pastures for cattle grazing. on the south side of the Omitlán River, which These strips or ecological floors display an enor - has more than 100 geometric designs carved in mous diversity of animal and vegetable life, use - the rock. None of these designs have stylistic ful to Man, which is why from very early times parallels with later Mesoamerican iconography. trade among their inhabitants played a primor dial Near Totomix tla huaca is the Cueva del Diablo role for Guerrero’s cultural development. (Devil’s Cave) in Ocoapa, which amazingly pre - Cuetlajuchitlan testifies to the high degree of urbanization Guerrero’s pre-classical cultures achieved. 72 Xochipala’s architecture is characterized by decorative “screws” and the false Mayan vault. serves pre-ceramic cave painting with designs si m - Miguel Amuco, another stone slab also carved in ilar to those of Piedra Pinta. What is interesting the Olmec style can be seen. The Cuetlaju chitlan about this cave is that over the first drawings, archaeological site is an example of a society that new figures are painted in the pre-Hispanic Ol - existed toward the end of the pre-classical peri - mec style. This would seem to indicate that Olmec od. The Highway of the Sun (from Mexico to customs wer e imposing themselves on local art Acapulco) passes underneath it, near the Morelos in Guerrero. Pass check-point. Cuetlaju chitlan is a very well preserved site which testifies to the high degree of urbanization the Guerrero cultures achieved PRE -C LASSICAL PERIOD (1800 B.C.- A.D.300) in the pre-classical period, mainly because of the existence of an incipient rectangular pattern in Many portable objects and mural paintings, plus their streets. monumental architecture with styles similar to During this period, powerful, wealthy politi - Olmec remains from the Gulf of Mexico Coast, cal entities developed in the region’s main val - the Tehuantepec Isthmus and the Chiapas and leys: the Balsas Chilpancingo Basin; Muchitlan, Gua temala Pacific Coast, have been found in Tlapa and Huamuxtitlan. Similar political enti - Guerrero. Baby-faced figurines have been found ties emerged along the foot of the southern slope in Chilpancingo and Tlapa, and a jade plaque of the Southern Sierra Madre mountain range, depicting a man with Olmec features was found on the Small and the Large Coasts. We can infer in Olinalá. Pre-classical clay figures can also be that these early political entities formed their seen at the local museum in Azoyú. Magnificent economic niches as intermediaries in the system pre-classical cave art is found in the Juxtlahuaca, of exchange of goods between the Pacific Coast Oxtotitlan caves and, of course, in the Cueva del and Central Mexico. Diablo in Ocoapa. Teopantecuanitlan is the most important pre- classical site found until now in Guerrero; it shares THE CLASSICAL AND EPICLASSICAL PERIODS many stylistic traits with sites in Central Mexico (A.D. 300- 1100) and the Morelos Valley, like Chalcat zingo. Teo - pantecuanitlan confirms that Guerrero societies Teotihuacan-style objects, plentiful throughout reached a level of complexity that anthropolo - the state, can be used as chronological markers. gists call a chiefdom by the year 1000 B.C. In San The Malinaltepec mask is perhaps the most beau - 73 tiful Teotihuacan object found in Guerrero. For THE POST -C LASSICAL PERIOD (A.D. 1100-1522) this period, there is also iconography in monu - mental sculpture, like that at Piedra Labrada, This period is represented by the reemergence of Ometepec, Yu kivi, Metlatonoc, Texmelincan and political entities that managed to concentrate Huitzapula, the last two situated in the munici - power and reorganize the area politically. The exis - pality of Atliztac. Teotihuacan incense burners tence of metal-working and two kinds of ceram - have also been found at several sites in the Tlapa ics used for exchange, Yestla-Naranjo and Azte - Valley, particularly in Contlalco and Mezcala. ca III, are used as chronological markers for the In addition to classical-period pieces, several post-classical period. stone sculptures seem to mark the transition to The end of this period is characterized by the the epiclassical period ( A.D. 700-1000) linked domination and incorporation of local lords into to the iconography of Xochicalco and even Tula. the Aztec Empire. A large number of pictorial doc - This is the case of some slabs in Texmelincan.
Recommended publications
  • Megaliths and the Early Mezcala Urban Tradition of Mexico
    ICDIGITAL Separata 44-45/5 ALMOGAREN 44-45/2013-2014MM131 ICDIGITAL Eine PDF-Serie des Institutum Canarium herausgegeben von Hans-Joachim Ulbrich Technische Hinweise für den Leser: Die vorliegende Datei ist die digitale Version eines im Jahrbuch "Almogaren" ge- druckten Aufsatzes. Aus technischen Gründen konnte – nur bei Aufsätzen vor 1990 – der originale Zeilenfall nicht beibehalten werden. Das bedeutet, dass Zeilen- nummern hier nicht unbedingt jenen im Original entsprechen. Nach wie vor un- verändert ist jedoch der Text pro Seite, so dass Zitate von Textstellen in der ge- druckten wie in der digitalen Version identisch sind, d.h. gleiche Seitenzahlen (Pa- ginierung) aufweisen. Der im Aufsatzkopf erwähnte Erscheinungsort kann vom Sitz der Gesellschaft abweichen, wenn die Publikation nicht im Selbstverlag er- schienen ist (z.B. Vereinssitz = Hallein, Verlagsort = Graz wie bei Almogaren III). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung wurde – mit Ausnahme von Literaturzitaten – den aktuellen Regeln angepasst. Englischsprachige Keywords wurden zum Teil nach- träglich ergänzt. PDF-Dokumente des IC lassen sich mit dem kostenlosen Adobe Acrobat Reader (Version 7.0 oder höher) lesen. Für den Inhalt der Aufsätze sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. Dunkelrot gefärbter Text kennzeichnet spätere Einfügungen der Redaktion. Alle Vervielfältigungs- und Medien-Rechte dieses Beitrags liegen beim Institutum Canarium Hauslabgasse 31/6 A-1050 Wien IC-Separatas werden für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Bereich kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt. Digitale oder gedruckte Kopien von diesen PDFs herzu- stellen und gegen Gebühr zu verbreiten, ist jedoch strengstens untersagt und be- deutet eine schwerwiegende Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Weitere Informationen und Kontaktmöglichkeiten: institutum-canarium.org almogaren.org Abbildung Titelseite: Original-Umschlag des gedruckten Jahrbuches.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Guerrero En Movimiento
    ..._------------_..- TRACE Travaux et Recherches dans les Amériques du Centre TRACE est une revue consacrée aux travaux et recherches dans les Amé­ riques du Centre. Elle est publiée semestriellement par le Centre Français d'Études Mexicaines et Centraméricaines Sierra Leona 330 11000 México DF 'Zr 5405921/5405922 FAX 5405923 [email protected] Conseil de rédaction Claude Baudez, Georges Baudot, Michel Bertrand, Patricia Carot, Georges Couffignal, Olivier Dabène, Danièle Dehouve, Olivier Dollfus, Henri Favre, François-Xavier Guerra, Marc Humbert, Yvon Le Bot, Véronique Gervais, Dominique Michelet, Aurore Monod-Becquelin, Pierre Ragon et Alain Vanneph Comité de lecture Martine Dauzier, Danièle Dehouve, Roberto Diego Quintana, Esther Katz, Jean·Yves Marchal, Guilhem Olivier, Juan M. Pérez Zevallos et Charles-Édouard de Suremain Coordination de la revue Martine Dauzier Maquette de la couverture Stéphen Rostain Coordination du numéro Aline Hémond et Marguerite Bey Composition de la couverture Montage réalisé par Rodolfo Avila à partir des photos de lui-même, d'A. Hémond et Direction éditoriale de S. Villela. Joëlle Gaillac Édition du numéro Impression Concepci6n Asuar Impresi6n y DiselÏo Suiza 23 bis, colonia Portales Composition et mise en page México DF Concepci6n Asuar et Rodolfo Avila Révision des textes Le présent numéro de Trace a été coédité Concepci6n Asuar par l'a RS TOM et par le C E MCA Dessins et photos ISSN 0185-6286. Année 1998. Rodolfo Avila / 80mmaire / Indice PROLOGUE/PRÓLOGO Aline Hémond et Marguerite Bey 3 Guerrero: modelo para armar Armando Bartra 9 Espacios de poder y reproducción social en la Montaña de Guerrero Joaquín Flores y Beatriz Canabal 20 Simbolismo y ritual en la Montaña de Guerrero Samuel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter with the Plumed Serpent
    Maarten Jansen and Gabina Aurora Pérez Jiménez ENCOUNTENCOUNTEERR withwith thethe Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica Preface Encounter WITH THE plumed serpent i Mesoamerican Worlds From the Olmecs to the Danzantes GENERAL EDITORS: DAVÍD CARRASCO AND EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Apotheosis of Janaab’ Pakal: Science, History, and Religion at Classic Maya Palenque, GERARDO ALDANA Commoner Ritual and Ideology in Ancient Mesoamerica, NANCY GONLIN AND JON C. LOHSE, EDITORS Eating Landscape: Aztec and European Occupation of Tlalocan, PHILIP P. ARNOLD Empires of Time: Calendars, Clocks, and Cultures, Revised Edition, ANTHONY AVENI Encounter with the Plumed Serpent: Drama and Power in the Heart of Mesoamerica, MAARTEN JANSEN AND GABINA AURORA PÉREZ JIMÉNEZ In the Realm of Nachan Kan: Postclassic Maya Archaeology at Laguna de On, Belize, MARILYN A. MASSON Life and Death in the Templo Mayor, EDUARDO MATOS MOCTEZUMA The Madrid Codex: New Approaches to Understanding an Ancient Maya Manuscript, GABRIELLE VAIL AND ANTHONY AVENI, EDITORS Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, E. CHRISTIAN WELLS AND KARLA L. DAVIS-SALAZAR, EDITORS Mesoamerica’s Classic Heritage: Teotihuacan to the Aztecs, DAVÍD CARRASCO, LINDSAY JONES, AND SCOTT SESSIONS Mockeries and Metamorphoses of an Aztec God: Tezcatlipoca, “Lord of the Smoking Mirror,” GUILHEM OLIVIER, TRANSLATED BY MICHEL BESSON Rabinal Achi: A Fifteenth-Century Maya Dynastic Drama, ALAIN BRETON, EDITOR; TRANSLATED BY TERESA LAVENDER FAGAN AND ROBERT SCHNEIDER Representing Aztec Ritual: Performance, Text, and Image in the Work of Sahagún, ELOISE QUIÑONES KEBER, EDITOR The Social Experience of Childhood in Mesoamerica, TRACI ARDREN AND SCOTT R. HUTSON, EDITORS Stone Houses and Earth Lords: Maya Religion in the Cave Context, KEITH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoamerican Figurines: the Cholula Perspective
    Mesoamerican Figurines: The Cholula Perspective Chantelle Hug University of Calgary BA Archaeology Honours Thesis: Spring 2007 Supervisor: Dr. Geoffrey McCafferty 1 Background Geography The present day city and archaeological site of Cholula is located in the state of Puebla, Mexico. Puebla is situated in the center of the Mesoamerican culture area, making it an important area for exchange and interaction between the north and south, and the east and west (Plunket and Uruñuela 2005:90). There are several areas with which it could have easily interacted, these include; the Basin of Mexico, the Gulf Coast, the Tehuacán Valley and the Mixteca Baja (McCafferty 2000: 342), all important culture areas. It is located a mere 100 km from the site of Teotihuacán (McCafferty 2001: 281). Situated in the Puebla/ Tlaxcala valley, east of the Basin of Mexico, Cholula is located on a fertile alluvial plain (McCafferty 2000A: 342), which would have been ideal for agricultural pursuits. In the past the area would have supported harvests of maguey, chillies, and most importantly beans and maize. The area and its people enjoyed an abundance of water due to the snow-capped mountains surrounding the valley. This in turn allowed for irrigation of crops, even during the dry season (McCafferty 2001: 282). In pre-contact times there appears to have once been a marshy area that may have supported chinampa style agriculture. The marsh would have most likely attracted waterfowl (McCafferty 2000A: 342), that could then have been exploited by the local people. The site was also located on a bed of clay (Bonfil Batalla 1973 cited in McCafferty 2000A:342), which enabled ceramic production and was also used in modern brick production.
    [Show full text]
  • Substantive Degree Program Proposal
    Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Proposal for a Doctoral Program Directions: This form requires signatures of (1) the Chief Executive Officer, certifying adequacy of funding for the new program; (2) the Chief Executive Officer, acknowledging agreement to reimburse consultants’ costs; (3) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying Board of Regents approval for Coordinating Board consideration; or, if applicable, (4) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying that criteria have been met for Commissioner consideration. Additional information and instructions are available in the Guidelines for Institutions Submitting Proposals for New Doctoral Programs found on the Coordinating Board web site, www.thecb.state.tx.us/newprogramscertificates. Institution officials should also refer to Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 5.46, Criteria for New Doctoral Programs. Note: Institutions should first notify the Coordinating Board of their intent to request the proposed doctoral program before submitting a proposal. Notification may consist of a letter sent to the Assistant Commissioner of Academic Quality and Workforce, stating the title, CIP code, and degree designation of the doctoral program, and the anticipated date of submission of the proposal. Information: Contact the Division of Academic Quality and Workforce at (512) 427-6200. Administrative Information 1. Institution Name and Accountability Group: Texas State University, Doctoral University-Higher Research Activity 2. Program Name: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) major in Applied Anthropology 3. Proposed CIP Code: CIP Code: 45020100 CIP Code Title: Anthropology CIP Code Definition: A program that focuses on the systematic study of human beings, their antecedents and related primates, and their cultural behavior and institutions, in comparative perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Olmec Style Symbolism at the Formative
    THE DAWNING OF CREATION IN THE CENTRAL MEXICAN HIGHLANDS: INTERPRETING OLMEC STYLE SYMBOLISM AT THE FORMATIVE PERIOD SITES OF CHALCATZINGO, OXTOTITLÁN, AND JUXTLAHUACA by Brendan C. Stanley, B.A. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in Anthropology August 2020 Committee Members F. Kent Reilly III, Chair David A. Freidel Jim F. Garber COPYRIGHT by Brendan C. Stanley 2020 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-533, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Brendan C. Stanley, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for education or scholarly purposes only. ACKNOWLEDEGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude towards my committee members, David A. Freidel and Jim F. Garber, for their guidance and support throughout the writing process. I would especially like to thank my committee chair, long time mentor, and friend, F. Kent Reilly III, for all the support and assistance throughout the past years. This thesis would not have been possible without all your help. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Olmec Art at Dumbarton Oaks
    Pre-Columbian Art at Dumbarton Oaks, No. 2 OLMEC ART AT DUMBARTON OAKS OLMEC ART AT DUMBARTON OAKS Karl A. Taube Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2004 by Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C. Library of Congress Cataloging-in Publication Data to come To the memory of Carol Callaway, Alba Guadalupe Mastache, Linda Schele, and my sister, Marianna Taube—four who fought the good fight CONTENTS PREFACE Jeffrey Quilter ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi List of Plates xii List of Figures xiii Chronological Chart of Mesoamerica xv Maps xvi INTRODUCTION: THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF OLMEC RESEARCH 1 THE DUMBARTON OAKS COLLECTION 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY 185 APPENDIX 203 INDEX 221 Preface lmec art held a special place in the heart of Robert Woods Bliss, who built the collection now housed at Dumbarton Oaks and who, with his wife, Mildred, conveyed the gar- Odens, grounds, buildings, library, and collections to Harvard University. The first object he purchased, in 1912, was an Olmec statuette (Pl. 8); he commonly carried a carved jade in his pocket; and, during his final illness, it was an Olmec mask (Pl. 30) that he asked to be hung on the wall of his sick room. It is easy to understand Bliss’s predilection for Olmec art. With his strong preference for metals and polished stone, the Olmec jades were particularly appealing to him. Although the finest Olmec ceramics are masterpieces in their own right, he preferred to concen- trate his collecting on jades. As Karl Taube discusses in detail in this volume of Pre-Columbian Art at Dumbarton Oaks, Olmec jades are the most beautiful stones worked in Mesoamerica.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized Shell Object Production at Teopantecuanitlan Site, Guerrero, México
    Specialized Shell Object Production at Teopantecuanitlan Site, Guerrero, México Reyna Beatríz SOLÍS CIRIACO & Guadalupe MARTÍNEZ DONJUAN MUNIBE (Suplemento/Gehigarria)Suplemento - Gehigarria nº nºXX 00 XX-XX 000-000 DONOSTIA-SAN DONOSTIA-SAN SEBASTIÁN SEBASTIÁN 2010 2003 D.L. ISSN SS-XXX-201 XXXX-XXX0X Specialized Shell Object Production at Teopantecuanitlan Site, Guerrero, México Specialized Shell Object Production at Teopantecuanitlan Site, Guerrero, México KEY WORDS: Mexico, Teopantecuanitlan, shell, production, manufacture. PALABRAS CLAVES: Mexico, Teopantecuanitlan, shell, production, manufacture. GAKO-HITZAK: Mexico, Teopantecuanitlan, shell, production, manufacture. Reyna Beatríz SOLÍS CIRIACO(1) & Guadalupe MARTÍNEZ DONJUAN(2) ABSTRACT In the area of Teopantecuanitlan, located in the east-central region of Guerrero, the most ancient and abundant shell collection corresponding to the Mesoamerican formative period (1200-600 BC) has been recovered. Most of this material derives from the Pacific Ocean shores, and in less quantity from the Mexican Gulf and from rivers on the slope of the Pacific Ocean. Un-modified molluscs, pieces in process of work and finished objects have been identified. Through the use of experimental archaeology and the observation of the various modifications with optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), it was possible to deduce the techniques and tools used for its production, which should have been concentrated in one or in a few workshops controlled by the rulers of the site. RESUMEN En el sitio de Teopantecuanitlan, ubicado en la región centro-este del estado de Guerrero, se ha recuperado la colección de concha más abun- dante y antigua de Mesoamérica correspondiente al Periodo Formativo (1200-600 a.C.). Dicho material procede en su mayoría de las costas del Océano Pacífico, en menor cantidad del Golfo de México y de ríos de la vertiente del Pacífico.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoamerican Ballcourt
    Mesoamerican ballgame The Mesoamerican ballgame or Ōllamaliztli Nahuatl pronunciation: [oːlːamaˈlistɬi] in Nahuatl was a sport with ritual associations played since 1,400 B.C.[1] by the pre-Columbian peoples of Ancient Mexico and Central America. The sport had different versions in different places during the millennia, and a newer more modern version of the game, ulama, is still played in a few places by the indigenous population.[2] The rules of Ōllamaliztli are not known, but judging from its descendant, ulama, they were probably similar to racquetball,[3] where the aim is to keep the ball in play. The stone ballcourt goals (see photo to right) are a late addition to the game. In the most widespread version of the game, the players struck the ball with their hips, although some versions allowed the use of forearms, rackets, bats, or handstones. The ball was made of solid rubber and weighed as much as 4 kg (9 lbs), and sizes differed greatly over time or according to the version played. The game had important ritual aspects, and major formal ballgames were held as ritual events, often featuring human sacrifice. The sport was also played casually for recreation by children and perhaps even women.[4] Pre-Columbian ballcourts have been found throughout Mesoamerica, as far south as Nicaragua, and possibly as far north as what is now the U.S. state of Arizona.[5] These ballcourts vary considerably in size, but all have long narrow alleys with side-walls against which the balls could bounce. Origins Map showing sites where early ballcourts,
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Identity? the Responsibilities of Museums in the Representation of the Past and Present Stephanie Allen Trinity University, [email protected]
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Sociology and Anthropology Honors Theses Sociology and Anthropology Department 4-21-2010 Whose Identity? The Responsibilities of Museums in the Representation of the Past and Present Stephanie Allen Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/socanthro_honors Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Allen, Stephanie, "Whose Identity? The Responsibilities of Museums in the Representation of the Past and Present" (2010). Sociology and Anthropology Honors Theses. 2. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/socanthro_honors/2 This Thesis open access is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology and Anthropology Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology and Anthropology Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Whose Identity? The Responsibilities of Museums in the Representation of the Past and Present Stephanie Allen A DEPARTMENT HONORS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY AT TRINITY UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR GRADUATION WITH DEPARTMENTAL HONORS DATE ______ _______________________________ ________________________________ PRIMARY THESIS ADVISOR DEPARTMENT CHAIR _______________________________ SECONDARY THESIS ADVISOR _________________________________________________ ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS, CURRICULUM AND STUDENT ISSUES Student Copyright Declaration: the author has selected the following copyright provision (select only one): [√] This thesis is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which allows some noncommercial copying and distribution of the thesis, given proper attribution. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpture and Social Dynamics in Preclassic Mesoamerica Julia Guernsey Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01246-2 - Sculpture and Social Dynamics in Preclassic Mesoamerica Julia Guernsey Index More information Index Agua Escondida Monument 1, 82 Bell, Catherine, 155 Cabrera Castro, Rubén, 142 Fig. 4.33c, 82 Bell, Ellen, 52, 87, 137 Cacaxtla, 87 Aguateca, 126, 138, 168 Benson, Elizabeth, 15 Cahal Pech, 102, 103 ajaw title, associated with emanation of Benson, Larry, 7, 8 Cakchiquel Maya, 155 sound, 134 Berger, Rainer, 56 camahuiles, 80–81 Fig. 7.3b, 134 Bernal, Ignacio, 20, 54 Campbell, Lyle, 23, 30 Akkeren, Ruud van, 173 Beyer, Hermann, 13, 24, 123, 138 candeleros, 174 Alcock, Susan, 159 Bilbao, 93 Cantón Corralito, 33, 35 Alta Verapaz, 132 Monument 58, 66, 87, 99, 136, 164 Canuto, Marcello, 52, 87, 154 Alvarado, Carlos, 50, 75, 142 Fig. 4.12a, 69 Caso, Alfonso, 17, 19 Alvaro Obregón, 33, 35, 46 Bilbao/Concepción Ceiba, Tabasco figurine, 110 potbelly, 95 Monument 46, 66, 99 celts, 80 Fig. 4.49, 95 Fig. 4.11c, 69 Central Mexican figurines.See Teotihuacan sculpture of standing figure Monument 47, 66, 99 Cerro de las Mesas, 51, 162 Fig. 3.3b, 33 Fig. 4.11d, 69 Monument 5, 99 Amaroli, Paul, 85, 86, 111 Blackman Eddy, 102, 107, 169 Chahk, 47, 52, 58, 85, 173 ancestors, 13, 116, 117, 118, 144–45, 160, Bloch, Maurice, 159 Chalcatzingo, 42, 103, 107, 112–13, 117, 175, See also potbelly sculpture as Blom, Frans, 15, 17 120, 126, 173 ancestors Blomster, Jeffrey, 157, 175 figurines at, 102, 134 archaeological evidence for potbellies as, Boas, Franz, 31 issues of public vs.
    [Show full text]