Aboriginal-Business-Sample.Pdf (Pdf, 997.08
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AboBus 05:Layout 1 2/11/09 12:02 PM Page 161 Practical 5 Partnerships On September 24, 2002, the Purnu and Aboriginal Stockman locomotives ran for the first time on the almost-complete railway line from Alice Springs through Tennant Creek. The historic event marked the final leg in a journey that began over a century before. The midday sun beat down on the crowd of 150-plus people waiting for the locomotives’ “naming ceremony” to begin. Children ran about while off in the distance, under the pathetic shade of two Toyota Troop Carriers, a group of Warumungu men applied ocher to their sweat-drenched bodies. Inside one of the ADrail temporary offices, a group of Warumungu women sat waiting to apply ocher to their chests. I ducked in and said hello to the ladies. “Namikili, you got the Crisco?” they asked when I entered. “No,” I said, “but I just saw Francine pull up—maybe she has some.” The women needed the oil to moisten their skin and act as an adhesive for the ocher they would soon apply. Just as I turned to look for Francine, in she walked with the white plastic bag from the Food Barn and in it two bottles of vegetable oil—the generic Black and Gold, not Crisco. Outside some ADrail workers hosed down the dusty dance area and set up chairs for the singers on the platform directly in front of the dancing ground. The food set out by the railway company had already been plowed through, but I managed to find a bottle of water and some watermelon for my elder son. I heard some people complaining that there wasn’t enough to eat. Others said they should have waited until after the ceremony because now the dancers were missing out on their feed. But I saw L.G. walk into 161 AboBus 05:Layout 1 2/11/09 12:02 PM Page 162 Figure 5.1. Warumungu men dance at the naming ceremony for the Purnu locomotive in Tennant Creek. the caravan where the women were getting ready carrying two heaping plates of food and a bag of Cokes and lemonade. Some performers were eat- ing. With the women just about ready, Francine gave the sign to the CLC mob from Alice Springs, who in turn gave the thumbs-up to the ADrail management to start the festivities. Duncan Beggs, an ADrail community-relations manager, stepped to the microphone to welcome the crowd. After a quick itinerary of the afternoon’s scheduled events and a plea to keep kids away from the trains, the crowd was ready for the men’s dance. It was 12:30 and hot when the young men began. They entered the dance area to the low-pitched tones of three singers and the crackle of six boomerangs clapping in unison. The steel railway tracks shone behind them as their bare feet pushed the red dirt forward while the green branches fashioned around their ankles jostled together. They stared solemnly toward the three elder men seated on the platform calling them with their songs. As the first song series came to an end, high- pitched voices called out from behind the singers. (Figure 5.1) I looked over to see that the hecklers were the grandmothers of the young men, several of the elder women who would be singing next. Through gen- tle chides and jokes, the women pointed out the shortcomings of the 162 Aboriginal Business AboBus 05:Layout 1 2/11/09 12:02 PM Page 163 dancers—one moved too slowly, another missed a cue from the singers. By making these critiques, they claimed their own power and prestige as women, elders, and bosses for their country. The young men looked on stone-faced as the women corrected them. Each clap of the boomerangs drew the dancers closer to the singers. Together they retraced the tracks of their ancestors and recognized a new set of tracks that would cross with their ancestral ones. When the young men finished, they walked back across the hot ground to the Toyotas for a rest. As the elder men left the stage, Dianne Nampin, a Warumungu woman and CLC executive-committee member, took the microphone. Nampin welcomed the crowd and spoke directly to the elders in the front row, addressing them in Warumungu. She thanked them for their presence and acknowledged their ownership of the country over which these locomotives would travel. Then, shifting her glance to the largely Aboriginal crowd and switching to English, she said that it was appropriate for one of the locomotives to have the name Purnu because it means “carrier.” Linking the traditional connotation of the term to the future, she went on to say that “maybe later on in the years it may be carry- ing people around; that’s why we call it Purnu. But I’m really happy with that name and so are the elders.” In Nampin’s speech she used the term purnu to refer not just to the locomotive but also to the tracks that will carry the trains, their cargo, and the passengers.1 The 1,420 kilometers of track between Alice Springs and Darwin is a recognizable conduit for trains, travelers, and new types of translocal ven- tures. It is also, as Nampin emphasized, part of Warumungu country, and as such the railroad officials had an obligation to engage with traditional own- ers about its use. Nampin was not the only one to recognize the types of linkages and businesses that could accompany the construction of the rail- way. ADrail’s Duncan Beggs continued where Nampin left off: I think Purnu is quite an appropriate name because the railway is young at the moment, and it’s up to ADrail to bring it on to construc- tion so it can begin operating and carrying the train into the future. It is my hope and the hope of all people associated with the railway that other projects will flow, mining projects and that sort of thing will flow on from the railway being constructed. And that will bring other oppor- tunities for people up and down the railway in the future. So it is very much appreciated that we are here today to unveil the names on these locomotives. Beggs’s speech was full of hope. With a depressed regional economy, he is certainly not alone in his optimism directed at the new transit system. Practical Partnerships 163 AboBus 05:Layout 1 2/11/09 12:02 PM Page 164 Mining, tourism, and other industries may all flow from this venture. The rail- way is seen as a beginning: for large-scale business ventures, regional oppor- tunities, and Aboriginal–non-Aboriginal partnerships in and out of town. In this chapter I follow the construction of the railway line to see what this new set of tracks can tell us about the formation and implementation of translocal and transnational alliances, the dynamic mixture of town and Aboriginal politics, and the necessity of integrating traditional practices and performances into the fabric and process of joint business ventures. How are Aboriginal relations with and obligations to country merged with a corpo- rate emphasis on laying tracks and turning a profit? What are the contours of these partnerships that allow for coexisting business plans? Can these practical partnerships refocus the national debate about Aboriginal issues? Beginning in 2001 the construction of the railway line coincided with a floundering national view of reconciliation and an antagonistic notion of “practical reconciliation,” put forth by Prime Minister Howard. His now infamous stubbornness to apologize to Aboriginal people nationally for the Stolen Generation marred reconciliation politics and diverted attention from the work toward reconciliation that had been achieved under both legisla- ted compromise and shifting industry and popular notions of Aboriginal histories (Goot and Rowse 2007:130). Although there was scant agreement nationally about what “reconciliation” should mean, politically the Howard government focused on practical reconciliation as a way to get around an emphasis on present social justice, historical injustice, and the link between the two (Tickner 2001). The foil to Howard’s practical reconciliation—which meant “real out- comes” for Aboriginal Australians in term of jobs, education, and health care—was “symbolic reconciliation,” the public acknowledgment and inte- gration of Aboriginal difference into a rights-based agenda of land rights, civil rights, and social justice (Altman 2004a; Goot and Rowse 2007; Rowse 2006). In this strategic separation the economic partnership between Aboriginal groups and railway corporations denotes the practical—neces- sary—work of Aboriginal development aimed at profit-making and eco- nomic investment, while the locomotive-naming ceremony is the symbolic—unnecessary—performance of settler guilt and a whitewashed Aboriginal culture that promotes acceptance but not “real” results. What this forced opposition misses is the link between the obligations borne out of seemingly “symbolic” acts and the necessary social actions embedded in “practical” policies. That is, the naming ceremony and the inclusion of Aboriginal names and people in the business of the railroad invites a new set of obligations and relationships that could bring together and ultimately change the parameters of corporate business, as well as Aboriginal politics. 164 Aboriginal Business AboBus 05:Layout 1 2/11/09 12:02 PM Page 165 The symbolic/practical divide forces an unnecessary choice and ignores the protocols that define Aboriginal modes of relation formed in ceremonies and through contracts. Aboriginal business—as ritual work and caring for country (in its many forms)—follows procedures that are rooted in Aborig- inal “law” and are dynamic enough to change over time.