DOCSLIB.ORG

Prospectus of Issue of Securities) Issue) of Securities) Minutes № 71 FSFM of Russia Dated “ 01 ” November 20 08 (Name of the Registering Authority)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Approved “ 30 ” October 20 08 Registered “ ” 20 The State Registration Number 1 - 0 1 - 6 5 0 1 8 - D - - - - - by the Board of Directors of JSC FGC UES (indicate the authority of the issuer that approved the (indicate the State registration number assigned to the issue (the additional Prospectus of issue of securities) issue) of securities) Minutes № 71 FSFM of Russia Dated “ 01 ” November 20 08 (Name of the registering authority) (Position and signature of an authorized person of the registering authority) Seal of the registering authority PROSPECTUS OF ISSUE OF SECURITIES Open Joint Stock Company “Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System” (full name of the company) ordinary registered uncertified stock (class, category (type), form of securities and their other identification characteristics) in the amount of 146,500,000,000 (one hundred forty six billion and five hundred million) shares with nominal value of RUR 0.50 (fifty kopeks) each (nominal value (if available) and number of securities, for bonds and option of an issuer, maturity terms should be specified as well) www.fsk-ees.ru (Web-site used by an issuer for disclosures) Information contained in the present prospectus of issue of securities is subject to disclosure in accordance with the Russian Federation laws on securities. THE REGISTERING AUTHORITY MAY NOT IN ANY WAY BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACTUALITY OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE PRESENT PROSPECTUS, AND REGISTRATION OF THE SAID CIRCULAR MAY NOT BE HELD A DECLARATION OF ANY ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE SECURITIES ISSUED. This is to confirm the credibility of 2005, 2006 and 2007 financial (accounting) statements of the issuer and compliance of the issuer’s procedure of accounting with the legislation of the Russian Federation. Other information about financial position of the issuer contained in sections III, IV, V and VIII of the present prospectus was reviewed for its compliance in all material aspects with information of the audited 2005, 2006 and 2007 financial (accounting) statements. The full trade name of the auditor: Closed joint stock company “PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit”. Director Closed joint stock company “PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit” acting on the basis of the Power of attorney P-07079-1008-zao dated 17.10.2008 ___________ Franc-J. Kazer Date «____» ________________ 2008 stamp here Chairman of the Management Board JSC FGC UES _____________ A.N. Rappoport Date «____» ________________ 2008 Chief accountant JSC FGC UES _____________ V.V. Schukin Date «____» ________________ 2008 stamp here This is to confirm that for the purposes of setting prices of securities offered by the company the appraiser will define their market value and prepare the appropriate report on appraisal. Appraiser: Kushlyanskiy Oleg Aleksandrovich, who concluded employment contract with CJSC ENPI Consult ______________ O.A. Kushlyanskiy Date «____» ________________ 2008 Appraiser: Esina Galina Anatolievna, who concluded employment contract with CJSC ENPI Consult ______________ G.A. Esina Date «____» ________________ 2008 Appraiser: Sarkisyan Akop Gurgenovich, who concluded employment contract with LLC Ernst and Young – Valuation consulting ______________ A.G. Sarkisyan Date «____» ________________ 2008 Appraiser: Sorokin Nikolay Vasilieevich, who concluded employment contract with LLC Ernst and Young – Valuation consulting ______________ N.V. Sorokin Date «____» ________________ 2008 Table of content INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................8 I. SUMMARY INFORMATION ABOUT PERSONS FORMING MANAGEMENT BODIES OF THE ISSUER, INFORMATION ABOUT BANK ACCOUNTS, ABOUT THE AUDITOR, THE APPRAISER AND THE FINANCIAL ADVISER OF THE ISSUER AS WELL AS ABOUT OTHER PERSONS WHO SIGNED THE PROSPECTUS.................................................................................................................10 1.1. PERSONS FORMING MANAGEMENT BODIES OF THE ISSUER ........................................10 1.2. INFORMATION ABOUT BANK ACCOUNTS OF THE ISSUER.............................................12 1.3. INFORMATION ABOUT THE AUDITOR (AUDITOR) OF THE ISSUER ..............................13 1.4. INFORMATION ABOUT APPRAISER OF THE ISSUER.........................................................15 1.5. INFORMATION ABOUT ADVISERS OF THE ISSUER...........................................................15 1.6. INFORMATION ABOUT OTHER PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THE PROSPECTUS ON ISSUE OF SECURITIES ........................................................................................................17 II. SUMMARY INFORMATION ABOUT VOLUME, TERMS, PROCEDURE AND CONDITIONS OF PLACEMENT OF EVERY CLASS, CATEGORY (TYPE) OF THE SECURITIES ISSUED ..........................................................................................18 2.1. CLASS, CATEGORY (TYPE) AND FORM OF SECURITIES ISSUED ...................................18 2.2. NOMINAL VALUE OF EACH CLASS, CATEGORY (TYPE), SERIES OF THE SECURITIES ISSUED ..................................................................................................................18 2.3. PLANNED VOLUME OF THE ISSUE IN MONETARY TERMS AND THE AMOUNT OF SECURITIES ISSUED THAT ARE PLANNED FOR PLACEMENT ........................................18 2.4. OFFERING PRICE (PROCEDURE OF DETERMINING PRICE) OF SECURITIES ISSUED.18 2.5. PROCEDURE AND TERMS OF THE OFFERING OF SECURITIES ISSUED ........................18 2.6. PROCEDURE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT OF THE ISSUED SECURITIES OFFERED......20 2.7. PROCEDURE AND TERMS OF CONCLUDING CONTRACTS IN THE COURSE OF THE ISSUED SECURITIES OFFERING..............................................................................................34 2.8. CIRCLE OF POTENTIAL BUYERS OF THE ISSUED SECURITIES OFFERED....................37 2.9. PROCEDURE OF DISCLOSING INFORMATION ABOUT OFFERING AND RESULTS OF THE OFFERING OF THE ISSUED SECURITIES ......................................................................37 III. BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC POSITION OF THE ISSUER ...................................................................................................................44 3.1. FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE ISSUER ......................................44 3.2. MARKET CAPITALIZATION OF THE ISSUER .......................................................................45 3.3. OBLIGATIONS OF THE ISSUER ...............................................................................................45 3.3.1. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE.................................................................................................................................45 3.3.2. CREDIT HISTORY OF THE ISSUER...........................................................................................................46 3.3.3. LIABILITIES OF THE ISSUER RESULTING FROM GUARANTEES PROVIDED TO THIRD PARTIES .47 3.3.4. OTHER LIABILITIES OF THE ISSUER.......................................................................................................47 3.4. PURPOSES OF THE ISSUE AND PLANS FOR USING FUNDS RESULTING FROM THE ISSUING SECURITIES OFFERING............................................................................................47 3.5. RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITION OF THE ISSUING SECURITIES OFFERED ..............47 3.5.1. INDUSTRY RISKS.........................................................................................................................................48 3.5.2. SOVEREIGN AND REGIONAL RISKS.........................................................................................................49 3.5.3. FINANCIAL RISKS .......................................................................................................................................50 3.5.4. LEGAL RISKS...............................................................................................................................................52 3.5.5. RISKS RELATED TO THE ISSUER OPERATIONS.....................................................................................54 3.5.6. BANK EXPOSURE .......................................................................................................................................54 IV. DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE ISSUER ...............................................55 4.1. HISTORY OF ESTABLISHING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ISSUER .............................55 4.1.1. FULL TRADE NAME OF THE ISSUER.......................................................................................................55 4.1.2. INFORMATION ABOUT THE STATE REGISTRATION OF THE ISSUER.................................................55 4.1.3. INFORMATION ABOUT ESTABLISHING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ISSUER................................55 4.1.4. CONTACT INFORMATION .........................................................................................................................56 4.1.5. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER...................................................................................................56 4.1.6. BRANCHES AND REPRESENTATION OFFICES OF THE ISSUER..........................................................57 4.2. CORE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY OF THE ISSUER ...........................................................................61 4.2.1. INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION OF THE ISSUER........................................................................................61 4.2.2. CORE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY OF THE ISSUER........................................................................................61
Recommended publications
  • St. Petersburg Summer Handbook

    St. Petersburg Summer Handbook

    Global Education Office Reves Center for International Studies The College of William & Mary PHOTO COURTESY OF SASHA PROKHOROV ST. PETERSBURG SUMMER HANDBOOK Table of Contents St. Petersburg ............................................................................................ 2 Handy Information .................................................................................... 2 Overview, Dates, and Money .................................................................... 2 Visa Information and Budgeting ............................................................... 2 Packing .................................................................................................... 10 Traveling to St. Petersburg ........................................................................ 2 Coursework ............................................................................................... 2 Excursions & Activities .............................................................................. 2 Housing and Meals .................................................................................... 2 Communication ......................................................................................... 2 Health & Safety ......................................................................................... 2 Travel & Country Information ................................................................. 21 St. Petersburg ............................................................................................ 2 For Fun: Light Reading
  • English / French

    English / French

    World Heritage 36 COM WHC-12/36.COM/INF.2 Paris, 20 July/ juillet 2012 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirty-sixth session Trente-sixième session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 24 June – 6 July 2012 Saint-Pétersbourg, Fédération de Russie 24 juin – 6 juillet 2012 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS Contents I. STATES MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE/ ETATS MEMBRES DU COMITÉ ................................................ 5 ALGERIA/ ALGÉRIE .......................................................................................................................................... 5 CAMBODIA/ CAMBODGE ................................................................................................................................. 5 COLOMBIA/ COLOMBIE ................................................................................................................................... 6 ESTONIA/ ESTONIE .......................................................................................................................................... 7 ETHIOPIA/ ETHIOPIE ....................................................................................................................................... 8 FRANCE
  • Future of the Obvodny Canal—The Main Line of the Saint

    Future of the Obvodny Canal—The Main Line of the Saint

    Architecture and Engineering Volume 2 Issue 4 FUTURE OF THE OBVODNY CANAL — THE MAIN LINE OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG GREY BELT Leonid Lavrov 1, Fedor Perov 2, Raffaele Gambassi 3 1,2 Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Vtoraja Krasnoarmejskaja ul. 4, St. Petersburg, Russia 3 Via Salceto 87, Poggibonsi,Siena, Italy 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected] Abstract The study looks at the issues of the development of territories in the Obvodny Canal area. These issues, which are of great interest as related to the planned transformation of the Grey Belt, become more aggravated due to the increase in traffic load after the Western High-Speed Diameter (WHSD) opening. A significant decrease in the housing quality and cost of apartments facing embankments is observed, which can be explained by an extremely high level of noise and contamination with exhaust gases. Options for the improvement of environmental conditions, based on the conversion of territories allocated for the canal water area, are proposed. It is being noted that the Obvodny Canal has lost its functional purpose and can be converted as dozens of (nowadays former) canals in the historic center of Saint Petersburg. Keywords Grey Belt, Saint Petersburg transport infrastructure, Obvodny Canal, ecology of living environment. Introduction The canal was abandoned and for a long time it served The Obvodny Canal was constructed in 1803–1835. as a waste canal for local enterprises and residential In 1766, a drainage ditch was dug from the Ligovsky Ca- blocks. In the 1960s, a proposal to fill up the canal was nal to the Ekateringofka River; the western part of the Ob- debated.
  • Report of JSC Atomenergomash

    Report of JSC Atomenergomash

    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH 2016 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT ar2016.aem-group.ru JSC Atomenergomash provides access to the integrated interactive version of the annual report for 2016 for its stakeholders. This product allows easy information presentation of the main annual results of the Company, as well as the access to additional data, which was not included in the print version in a analysis-friendly format. i – Links to online version GRI – GRI indicators Approved by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the Chief Executive Officer on May 19, 2017 Chief Executive Officer Andrey Nikipelov JSC ATOMENERGOMASH THE COMPANY IN BRIEF Contents 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................................4 THE COMPANY IN BRIEF ..............................................................................................................................6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ...................................................................................................................66 2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................8 6.1. Ecological management ................................................................................................................................................................................................66 6.2. Emissions and Wastes .....................................................................................................................................................................................................70
  • Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM for 2009

    Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM for 2009

    Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM FOR 2009 Safety Effi ciency Responsibility Safety Effi ciency Responsibility JSC Concern Rosenergoatom Annual report for 2009 Content I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Preamble 7 1.1. On the Annual Report 7 2. Statements of top management of Rosenergoatom 8 2.1. Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosenergoatom 8 2.2. Statement of the General Director of Rosenergoatom 9 3. General information on Rosenergoatom 10 4. Key corporate events in 2009 11 5. Mission of Rosenergoatom 13 6. Management 13 6.1. Management structure 13 6.2. Management methods and corporate policy 24 II. CORE BUSINESS 7. Strategy 29 7.1. Positions of Rosenergoatom within the industry 29 7.2. Strategy of Rosenergoatom 30 7.3. Rosenergoatom’s medium-term development objectives and tasks (2009–2011) 30 7.4. Key performance indicators of Rosenergoatom 31 7.5. Key risks associated with Rosenergoatom’s operations 31 8. Rosenergoatom. Facts and fi gures 32 8.1. Generating capacities of Rosenergoatom 34 8.2. Electricity generation at Russian NPPs 44 8.3. Maintenance and repairs 45 8.4. Lifetime extension of NPP units 46 8.5. Production growth program 46 8.6. Construction of new power units 47 9. Priority areas of operations of Rosenergoatom 49 9.1. Production and marketing activities of Rosenergoatom 49 9.2. Investments 50 9.3. Innovation and competitive growth 50 III. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 10. Safety 53 10.1. Safety indicators 53 10.2. Ensuring nuclear and radiation safety and non-proliferation of nuclear materials 55 4 JSC Concern Rosenergoatom 10.3.
  • a Leading Energy Company in the Nordic Area

    a Leading Energy Company in the Nordic Area

    - a leading energy company in the Nordic area Presentation for investors September 2007 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. 2 • Fortum today • European power markets • Russia • Financials / outlook • Supplementary material 3 Fortum's strategy Fortum focuses on the Nordic and Baltic Rim markets as a platform for profitable growth Become the leading Become the power and heat energy supplier company of choice Benchmark business performance 4 Presence in focus market areas Nordic Generation 53.2 TWh Electricity sales 60.2 TWh Distribution cust. 1.6 mill. Electricity cust. 1.3 mill. NW Russia Heat sales 20.1 TWh (in associated companies) Power generation ~6 TWh Heat production ~7 TWh Baltic countries Heat sales 1.0 TWh Poland Distribution cust. 23,000 Heat sales 3.6 TWh Electricity sales 8 GWh 2006 numbers 5 Fortum Business structure Fortum Markets Fortum's comparable Large operating profit in 2006 NordicNordic customers EUR 1,437 million Fortum wholesalewholesale Small Power marketmarket customers Generation Nord Pool and Markets 0% bilateral Other retail companies Deregulated Distribution 17% Regulated Transmission Power and system Fortum Heat 17% Generation services Distribution 66% 6 Strong financial position ROE (%) EPS, cont. (EUR) Total assets (EUR billion) 20 1.50 1.42 20.0 16.8 17.5 17.3 1.22 18 15.1
  • Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Russian Museums Visit More Than 80 Million Visitors, 1/3 of Who Are Visitors Under 18

    Moscow 4 There are more than 3000 museums (and about 72 000 museum workers) in Russian Moscow region 92 Federation, not including school and company museums. Every year Russian museums visit more than 80 million visitors, 1/3 of who are visitors under 18 There are about 650 individual and institutional members in ICOM Russia. During two last St. Petersburg 117 years ICOM Russia membership was rapidly increasing more than 20% (or about 100 new members) a year Northwestern region 160 You will find the information aboutICOM Russia members in this book. All members (individual and institutional) are divided in two big groups – Museums which are institutional members of ICOM or are represented by individual members and Organizations. All the museums in this book are distributed by regional principle. Organizations are structured in profile groups Central region 192 Volga river region 224 Many thanks to all the museums who offered their help and assistance in the making of this collection South of Russia 258 Special thanks to Urals 270 Museum creation and consulting Culture heritage security in Russia with 3M(tm)Novec(tm)1230 Siberia and Far East 284 © ICOM Russia, 2012 Organizations 322 © K. Novokhatko, A. Gnedovsky, N. Kazantseva, O. Guzewska – compiling, translation, editing, 2012 [email protected] www.icom.org.ru © Leo Tolstoy museum-estate “Yasnaya Polyana”, design, 2012 Moscow MOSCOW A. N. SCRiAbiN MEMORiAl Capital of Russia. Major political, economic, cultural, scientific, religious, financial, educational, and transportation center of Russia and the continent MUSEUM Highlights: First reference to Moscow dates from 1147 when Moscow was already a pretty big town.
  • Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres

    Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres

    SECRETARIAT / SECRÉTARIAT SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITÉ DES MINISTRES Contact: Zoë Bryanston-Cross Tel: 03.90.21.59.62 Date: 07/05/2021 DH-DD(2021)474 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1406th meeting (June 2021) (DH) Communication from NGOs (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD- Info) (27/04/2021) in the case of Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818/09). Information made available under Rule 9.2 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1406e réunion (juin 2021) (DH) Communication d'ONG (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD-Info) (27/04/2021) dans l’affaire Lashmankin et autres c. Fédération de Russie (requête n° 57818/09) [anglais uniquement] Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 9.2 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l'exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. DH-DD(2021)474: Rule 9.2 Communication from an NGO in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia. Document distributed under the sole responsibility of its author, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers.
  • BYRONISM in LERMONTOV's a HERO of OUR TIME by ALAN HARWOOD CAMERON B.A., U N I V E R S I T Y O F C a L G a R Y , 1968 M.A

    BYRONISM in LERMONTOV's a HERO of OUR TIME by ALAN HARWOOD CAMERON B.A., U N I V E R S I T Y O F C a L G a R Y , 1968 M.A

    BYRONISM IN LERMONTOV'S A HERO OF OUR TIME by ALAN HARWOOD CAMERON B.A., University of Calgary, 1968 M.A., University of British Columbia, 1970 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department SLAVONIC STUDIES We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1974 In presenting this thesis in par ial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date Afr, I l0} I f7f ABSTRACT Although Mikhail Lermontov is commonly known as the "Russian Byron," up to this point no examination of the Byronic features of A Hero of Our Time, (Geroy nashego vremeni)3 has been made. This study presents the view that, while the novel is much more than a simple expression of Byronism, understanding the basic Byronic traits and Lermontov1s own modification of them is essential for a true comprehension of the novel. Each of the first five chapters is devoted to a scrutiny of the separate tales that make up A Hero of Our Time. The basic Byronic motifs of storms, poses and exotic settings are examined in each part with commentary on some Lermontovian variations on them.
  • Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

    Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences

    ISSN: 0975-8585 Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Development The Methods For Assessing The Effectiveness Of Business In The Region. Oksana Viktorovna Takhumova1*, Elenа Sergeevna Mezentseva2, Alla Aleksandrovna Mirokhina3, Inna Viktorovna Kushnareva4, and Anna Anatolievna Gorbachevа4. 1Kuban State Agrarian University named after I.T. Trubilin, 13 Kalinina str., Krasnodar 350044, Russia. 2North-Caucasus Federal University, Pushkin street, 1, Stavropol 355009, Russia. 3MIREA - Russian Technological University, branch in Stavropol, Kulakova Avenue, 8, Stavropol 355000, Russia. 4Don State Technical University, Institute of Service and Entrepreneurship (branch), Shevchenko str., 147, Rostov Region, Shakhty 346500, Russia. ABSTRACT The dynamism of the business sector, the emergence of new forms of entrepreneurship determine the search for new methodological approaches, allowing for a comprehensive assessment based on a variety of criteria that characterize various areas of business. A system of indicators has been developed, including an assessment of the structure, openness, conditions, and possibilities of functioning, price parameters, the scale and type of market, which made it possible to carry out a comprehensive analysis of the development of entrepreneurship in the consumer segment and to identify areas for further development. The paper substantiates the methodology for assessing the conduct of commercial activities based on indicators of efficiency levels. The results used two criteria for the optimal functioning of trade and costs - elements of the labor process. On the basis of the selected parameters, an integrating indicator of business performance in the region was obtained, which can also be used to evaluate the result of a single commercial enterprise. To determine the level of development of the supporting complex, a classification was made of the objects of the servicing system under investigation, as a result of which three groups with relevant characteristics were identified.
  • Conference Program

    Conference Program

    NAL C O IO N T F A E R Eighteenth International Conference N E R N E C T E “Crimea 2011” N I « » C 1 R 1 I M E A 20 The “Crimea 2011” Conference is held within the framework of IFLA-2011 projects Libraries and Information Resources in the Modern World of Science, Culture, Education, and Business 2011 Topic: Libraries in the Second Decade of the Information Century: Developing Technologies and Enhancing Cooperation Conference Program SUDAK (Main Program) Koktebel and Simferopol (Guest Sessions) Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine June 4–12, 2011 2 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZING COMMITTEE CHAIR Yakov Shrayberg, Director General, Russian National Public Library for Science and Technol- ogy; President, International Association of Users and Developers of Electronic Libraries and New Information Technologies (ELNIT International Association), Moscow, Russia DEPUTY CHAIRS Ekaterina Genieva, Director General, M.I. Rudomino All-Russian State Library for Foreign Literature, Moscow, Russia Tatyana Manilova, Deputy Director, Division of Cultural Heritage and Fine Arts; Head, Library and Archive Department, Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia Maurice Freedman, Publisher, Consultant, ex-President, American Library Association (2002- 2003); Acting Director, Purchase Public Library, Mount Kisco, NY, USA Larisa Nikiforenko, Deputy Director, Division of Art and Regional Policy; Head, Department of Library Activity Analysis and Forecast, Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine MEMBERS Ramazan Abdulatipov, Chairman,
  • Nuclear Power Industry

    Nuclear Power Industry

    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 20161 1 The brochure data are valid as of April 26, 2017. JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 2016 The pilot fast neutron reactor After a long interruption, JSC Atomenergomash with primary sodium CEFR the nuclear industry equipment reinforces the key 3,668 developed under the order manufacture was resumed at business areas – nuclear from Chinese Nuclear Power “Atommash” plant. In particular, power industry, gas and Corporation. The developer the activities were commenced petrochemical industry, of the reactor plant was for the manufacture of the main shipbuilding and general 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS OJSC Afrikantov OKBM, the equipment of the reactor island industry. steam generator developer of the Power units 1 and 2 of was OJSC OKB GIDROPRESS. Belarusian NPP. THE HISTORY OF JSC ATOMENERGOMASH, THE mechanical ENGINEERING DIVISION OF ROSATOM STATE CORPORATION (THE «DIVISION») STARTED FROM TWO 2,947 OJSC Atomenergomash The complete cycle of steam COMPANIES. TODAY THE DIVISION IS ONE OF THE LEADING mechanical ENGINEERING COMPANIES IN RUSSIA. IT COMPRISES OVER 20 LEADING ENGINEERING manufactured a core catcher generators manufacture was at the Atommash plant in mastered – from semi-products JSC TsKBM completed the BUREAUS, MAJOR MACHINE BUILDERS, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS. THE DIVISION IS INVOLVED IN THE KEY PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED BY ROSATOM, WIDENS unprecedentedly short time (PJSC Energomashspetsstal) to test of the new MCP design – and supplied it to the Baltic body manufacture (OJSC PZM), single-shaft configuration 2,414 Labor productivity per employee, thousand rubles THE COMPETENCES AND ACTIVELY MASTERS NEW MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGIES. 2,397 NPP. assembly of in-vessel components with water cooling of motor and shipment to client and bearing assemblies that (OJSC ZiO-Podolsk).