DOCSLIB.ORG

Vi.Some Fresh Evidence from the Second Text

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vi.Some Fresh Evidence from the Second Text 75 V1.-SOME FRESH EVIIIENCE FROM THE SECOND TEXT OF LAYAMON ON THE POSSESSIVES IN 38 AND HIS. BY F. J. FURNIVALL,ESQ. IN Serjt. Manning’s “Inquiry into the Character and Origin of the Possessive Augment in English and in Cognate Dialects,” extracts from which were read at a late meeting of our Society, the writcr states at p. 22 : “A simplification was effected in the Anglo-Saxon genitive singular, . by reducing the varying singular genitives of all nouns to the most usual of the genitive forms, namely to that ending in es.” I do not believe this statement as to all nouns, though I do not propose to try and disprove it at present, inasmuch as its maker has not attempted to prove it. He has only stated it. Mr. Xanning next says, “ Another etep taken in the same direction, whilst throwing off all case-terminations of nouns, was to leave the relations existing between the noun dominant and the satellite in the case of possessive nouns, to be inferred from the simple expedient of juxta- posit ion. ” “ The progress of alteration in the language between these two periods, mill be shown by copious extracts exhibited in tww tables. Of these the first will show the gradual declen- sion of the Anglo-Saxon genitive case-termination and the substitution of the pronoun ‘ his,’ where the genitive had been used in a possessive sense.” ‘‘ These interesting documents appear to be of the greatest importance with reference to the present inquiry, inasmuch as in them is laid bare the gradual decline of thc Anglo- Saxon genitive, followed by the employment of two separate instruments, exercising different functions, and invested with distinct power. Upon the gradual abandonment of the Anglo- Saxon inflected genitive, our ancestors did not return to the 76 LAYAMON’S POSSESSIVES IN ‘ ES ’ AND ‘ HIS,’ original mode of constructing a genitive for nouns, namely, that by adopting the genitive form of the personal pronoun. They called up the Scandinavian ‘of’ where the existence merely of some general relation was meant to be indicated. But when the special relat.ion of possessor and t,hing possessed wits to be presented, resort was had to one of two distinct courses.” ‘< 8 7. Possessive Genitive by Juxta-position. The earlier of these appears to have becn, simple juxta- position, in which thc satellite or thing possessed, was placed immcdiately after the dominant noun, without any inflection or other change of form, either in the noun dominant or in the satellite, and without the aid of any preposition.” . I‘ The possessive genitive by juxta-position, did not remain long in favour. Our continental neighbours, abandoning all distinct ions between possessive und non-possessive genitives, fell hck upon the preposition de, the range of which became and continues to be co-extensive with that of the ancient in- flexional genitives, objective as well as subjcctive. Our island ancestors, on the contrury, clung firmly to the impor- tant distinction which they have handed down to us. They were not long content to trust to bare juxta-position for the development of tlic possessive character of a dominant noun. But instead of imitating the Romanesquc nations, by huddling possessive and non-possessive together,-plucing them under the spell of one undistinguishing prepositional genitive,-they availed thcmselres of the powerful agency of a reflex adjective possessivc pronoun, to endow our language with a peculiar cha- racter of perspicuity, the advantage-the almost incalculable advantage-of which, our countrymen, where they have not denied its existence, have been c;low to appreciate. It would seem to be impossible to assign any precise date to thc intro- duction of a system which it required the lupse of a century to establish. Fortunately the two versions of Layamon’s Brut furnish us with the means of fixing within certain limits the period of the alteration. In the earlier of these 9Y F. J. FURNIVALL, ESQ. 77 versions I have been able to discover only two instances of this application of the possessive pronoun his,” as a substi- tute for the Anglo-Saxon inflected possessive genitive ; whereas it will be seen that during an interval which can scarcely have reached a century, nearly all the Anglo-Saxon possessiue inflezional genitives of the earlier dlS. became the pronominal possessives of the latter version.” The propositions laid down in the foregoing extracts, therefore, are- I. That the varying singular genitives of all nouns were reduced to es. IT. That this es was then abandoned, in favour of of for the expression of a general relation ; and for, 1. juxta-posi- tion, 2. the substitution of the pronoun his for es, when the special relation of possession was to be indicated. 111. That this substitution of his for es took place in the interval ah. 1200 to ab. 1300, and is shown by the two texts of Lajamon, in the second of which nearly all the A. S. pos- sessives in es of the earlier one” had become his-es, or in the words of p. 34-“The following results may be gathered from the foregoing table. That in the interval between the two versions, which may be assumed to comprise the greater part of the thirteenth century, the genitive in s, when used in a possessive sense, mas superseded by the pronoun ‘his.’ ” Whatever other members of the Society may think, I for one must demur to the correctness of these statements, if put forward (as they seem to be) as intending to em- brace the whole of English nouns ; but my concern is not at present with these first statements, it is with the third, the fact or non-fact of the conversion of nearly all the possessives in es of one MS. into those with /ti.$ in another ; the fact or non-fact of the possessive es-es of the 1st text of Lajamon being superseded by his-es in the 2nd. The most superficial examination of the tests will prove to any one that Serjt. Manning’s statement is incorrect, and a more careful search will show that so far from nearly all the possessive es-es having been converted into his-es, not one- 78 LAYAMON’S POSSESSIVES IN ‘RS’ AND ‘HIS, third of them, or thereabouts, has been so converted.’ Mr. Manning has since the reading of this paper explained to the Society the cause of his over statement of the facts which form the foundation of his argument, but as his paper is still circulating in the Society’s Transactions without correc- tion, and I have myself received letters from members com- mcnting on the remarkable fact (so-called) of the entire change above-mentioned, I conceive that the correct evidence of thc Lajamon text on this point should be laid before the Society and the public, and I therefore give the following list of unchanged possessive es-es in the second test of Lalamon. List of 226 (and more) Possessives in es or s, from the second text of Lapmons Brut (ed. Madden, 1847). VOL. I. F~BBTTEXT, nb. 1200 A.D. SECONDTEXT, nb. 1300 AD. PACE LISE he we8 Lcouena‘Ses sone. 1, 3 hct was I.rucais3 aone (Leuca’s son). hir lifcs ende. 10, 2.1 hirc liues ende (her life’s end).* his lifes endc. 11, 14 his lilies hrmdc. *4 Lnuinc sue. 11, 17 T,nuines3 sone. pis child hefda his cames 11, 22 jis child afclc his hcmee name nome. (his iinclc’s name). * Lauine mawe. 12, 4 Lauincs3 mop. a1 he to-drof jcs kingcs 24, 10 a1 hc to-drof pe kinges here liore. (army). 8 pcs kingcs folc. 27, 22 jis kinges folk. jcs kinges bro5c.r. 29, 20 pis kingee brobcr. * In these ca6ey the second text has put on an 8 or es to the forms of the first text. 1 I SUPPOW Mr. Manning to have produced thcm all or nearly all ; and thnt the sclio1;m whose opinion bas hcen taken on tlic list nftcrmcntioiied are right in their judgment that thc gcnitives therein given are possessive, 2 I iissumc that rcadcrs will udinit that a life does possess a beginning and nu end. 3 Compare Serjt. Manning’s, “the mutilation of hi8 ill the forms of is, ya, 8, hnd not, at the period of the later rcrsion, cnme into wnernl usc.” I believe that i.9 and ys are dialectal variations of the AS. and hr7y English es, just 88 the plurnls ia and ys are of tlie A.S. nu nnd Jhrly English m. BY F. J. 'FURXIVALL, ESQ. 79 FIESTTEXT, ab. 1200 A.D. SECOSDTEST, ab. 1300 A.D. PACIP. LINE pas kinges ferde. 31, 6 pis kinges ferde (army). pes kinges broker. 31, 18 pea kinges broker. 12 to telde pas kinges. 34, 14 to pis kinges Bldes (tents). to telde pres kinges. 35, 4 to pis khges telde. to swa lase mannes 45, 10 to 60 lope mannee bi-hofe. bihoue. je hunties6 i Jm kinges 61, 10 3e hontep in pis kingee parc. frive. 16 hcwes his awene stiwarzrd. 63, 6 pat was kinges stiward. to hirede jes kinges. 63, 20 to pis kinges ferde (king's army). k igmp of onnes monncs 67, 2 and igrop of one mme8 hond. honde. boten pes anes name pa 77, 1-2 bate pes ones name pat hire ahe heorc alre lauerd wes louerd was (the name of the one). 20 Godes wiser-saka. 77, 5 Godee wiper-sake (God's adver- sary). Al Albanakes folc. 92, 3 A1 Albanaekea folk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE KINGS and QUEENS of BRITAIN, PART I (From Geoffrey of Monmouth’S Historia Regum Britanniae, Tr
    THE KINGS AND QUEENS OF BRITAIN, PART I (from Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia Regum Britanniae, tr. Lewis Thorpe) See also Bill Cooper’s extended version (incorporating details given by Nennius’s history and old Welsh texts, and adding hypothesised dates for each monarch, as explained here). See also the various parallel versions of the Arthurian section. Aeneas │ Ascanius │ Silvius = Lavinia’s niece │ Corineus (in Cornwall) Brutus = Ignoge, dtr of Pandrasus │ ┌─────────────┴─┬───────────────┐ Gwendolen = Locrinus Kamber (in Wales) Albanactus (in Scotland) │ └Habren, by Estrildis Maddan ┌──┴──┐ Mempricius Malin │ Ebraucus │ 30 dtrs and 20 sons incl. Brutus Greenshield └Leil └Rud Hud Hudibras └Bladud │ Leir ┌────────────────┴┬──────────────┐ Goneril Regan Cordelia = Maglaurus of Albany = Henwinus of Cornwall = Aganippus of the Franks │ │ Marganus Cunedagius │ Rivallo ┌──┴──┐ Gurgustius (anon) │ │ Sisillius Jago │ Kimarcus │ Gorboduc = Judon ┌──┴──┐ Ferrex Porrex Cloten of Cornwall┐ Dunvallo Molmutius = Tonuuenna ┌──┴──┐ Belinus Brennius = dtr of Elsingius of Norway Gurguit Barbtruc┘ = dtr of Segnius of the Allobroges └Guithelin = Marcia Sisillius┘ ┌┴────┐ Kinarius Danius = Tanguesteaia Morvidus┘ ┌──────┬────┴─┬──────┬──────┐ Gorbonianus Archgallo Elidurus Ingenius Peredurus │ ┌──┴──┐ │ │ │ (anon) Marganus Enniaunus │ Idvallo Runo Gerennus Catellus┘ Millus┘ Porrex┘ Cherin┘ ┌─────┴─┬───────┐ Fulgenius Edadus Andragius Eliud┘ Cledaucus┘ Clotenus┘ Gurgintius┘ Merianus┘ Bledudo┘ Cap┘ Oenus┘ Sisillius┘ ┌──┴──┐ Bledgabred Archmail └Redon └Redechius
    [Show full text]
  • Pagan Beliefs in <I>The Serpent's Tooth</I>
    Volume 26 Number 1 Article 13 10-15-2007 Pagan Beliefs in The Serpent's Tooth Joe R. Christopher (emeritus) Tarleton State University, TX Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Christopher, Joe R. (2007) "Pagan Beliefs in The Serpent's Tooth," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 26 : No. 1 , Article 13. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol26/iss1/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract An examination of the pagan belief structure in The Serpent’s Tooth, Diana Paxson’s retelling of King Lear. Discusses her use of source material in Shakespeare, Geoffrey of Monmouth, and early pagan religious beliefs. Additional Keywords Monmouth, Geoffer Mythlore y. Historia Regum Britanniae; Paganism in fantasy; Paxson, Diana.
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to Including King Leir
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 1 Legendary Kings INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which show these. These include British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth, Historia Regum Britanniae, a Variant Version. Edited
    THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA PUBLICATION No. 57 GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH VARIANT VERSION OF HIS HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH HISTORIA REGUM BRITANNIAE A VARIANT VERSION EDITED FROM MANUSCRIPTS BY JACOB HAMMER HUNTER COLLEGE THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA CAMBRIDGE 38, MASSACHUSETTS 1951 The publication of this book was made possible by grants of funds to the Academy from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation, the Institute for Advanced Study, and an Anonymous Donor COPYRIGHT BY THE MEDIAEVAL ACADEMY OF AMERICA 1951 Printed in U.S.A. TO E. A. LOWE AND THE MEMORY OF ERNST RIESS PREFACE In 1927 Professor Chambers wrote: Critical work on the manuscripts (of Geoffrey of Monmouth) is still in its infancy, and in these circumstances speculation as to the original form of the Historia and any revision which it may have undergone can only be tentative.1 Two years later, in 1929, two editions of Geoffrey appeared,2 which constitute a real advance over the older, uncritical editions. The present edition which offers the first critical text of a Variant Version of the Historia, based on manuscripts that hitherto passed under the name of Geoffrey, is only another step in this advance. It represents the first fruits of an investigation undertaken many years ago and is preliminary to a critical edition of the Historia, based on all manuscripts known to scholars, the larger portion of which (135 in actual numbers) has already been col- lated. A task of this scope could not have been undertaken without outside assistance. It was thanks to the generous grants (and publication sub- vention) from the John Simon Guggenheim Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies that it was possible to visit the various libraries of Europe and collect the material necessary for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    NOTES Introduction 1 . Siân Echard, Arthurian Narrative in the Latin Tradition , Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 36 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 ), p. 14; Helen Cooper, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004 ), pp. 26–27; Anne F. Sutton and Livia Visser-Fuchs, “The Dark Dragon of the Normans: A Creation of Geoffrey of Monmouth, Stephen of Rouen, and Merlin Silvester,” Quondam et Futurus: A Journal of Arthurian Interpretations 2.2 ( 1992 ): 2 [1–19]. 2 . Julia Briggs discusses the Vortiger and Uther Pendragon plays per- formed by Philip Henslowe’s company as well as William Rowley’s The Birth of Merlin and Thomas Middleton’s Hengist , “New Times and Old Stories: Middleton’s Hengist ,” Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century , ed. Donald Scragg and Carole Weinberg, Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England 29 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 ), pp. 108–9 [107–21]. 3 . For evidence supporting a late 1138 date for Geoffrey’s HRB , see Wright, introduction to HRB Bern , p. xvi [ix-lix] and John Gillingham, “The Context and Purposes of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s History of the Kings of Britain ,” Anglo-Norman Studies 13 (1991 ): 100 n5 [99–118]. 4 . Clarke, introduction to VM , p. vii [vii-50]; Echard, Arthurian Narrative , p. 218. 5 . Lee Patterson, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987 ), pp. 160, 201, 170, and 187; Virgil, Aeneid in Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid I-VI , trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Places, Kings, and Poetry: the Shaping of Breta Sögur for the Norse Corpus
    Hugvísindasvið Places, Kings, and Poetry: The Shaping of Breta sögur for the Norse Corpus Ritgerð til MA-prófs í 2012 Ryder Patzuk-Russell September 2012 Háskoli Íslands Íslensku- og menningardeild Medieval Icelandic Studies Places, Kings, and Poetry: The Shaping of Breta sögur for the Norse Corpus Ritgerð til MA-prófs í Íslensku- og menningardeild Ryder Patzuk-Russell Kt.: 250284-3819 Leiðbeinandi: Svanhildur Óskarsdóttir September 2012 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................2 Introduction.............................................................................................................................3 Texts and Manuscripts.................................................................................................4 Chapter One: Place and Genealogy.........................................................................................8 Genealogical Additions: Aeneas and the Anglo-Saxon Kings....................................9 Geography: Scandinavia, the Atlantic Isles, and Caithness......................................16 Geography and Haukr: Alreksstaðir and Hǫrðaland.................................................20 Conclusion: The Scandinavian Narrator....................................................................24 Chapter Two: Pagans and Christians.....................................................................................27 Interpretatio Germania...............................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Translation of Female Kingship 1
    NOTES Introduction Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Translation of Female Kingship 1 . For Henry of Huntingdon’s account of how he discovered the existence of Geoffrey’s history, see his EWB 1.558–59, a text which also appears in Robert of Torigni, Chronica , in Chronicles of the Reigns of Stephen, Henry II and Richard I , ed. R. Howlett, 4 vols. (London: Longman & Company, 1884–89), 4:65–75. Editor and translator of the Vita Merlini Basil Clarke dates the poem to about 1150, introduction to Geoffrey of Monmouth, Vita Merlini / Life of Merlin , ed. with introduction, facing translation, tex- tual commentary, name notes index and translations of the Lailoken tales by Basil Clarke (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1973), p. vii [vii–50]. 2 . Fiona Tolhurst, Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend , Studies in Arthurian and Courtly Cultures (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). 3 . J. S. P. Tatlock, “Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Motives for Writing his Historia ,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 79.4 (1938): 695 and 701 [695–703]. 4 . J. S. P. Tatlock, The Legendary History of Britain: Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae and Its Early Vernacular Versions (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1950), pp. 286–88. 5 . Antonia Gransden, Historical Writing in England c. 550 to c. 1307 (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974), pp. 206 and 208. 6 . Martin B. Shichtman and Laurie A. Finke, “Profiting from the Past: History as Symbolic Capital in the Historia regum Britanniae ,” Arthurian Literature 12 (1993): 22 [1–35], republished as Chapter 2 of King Arthur and the Myth of History (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2004), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Text in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia Regum Brittaniae
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Masters Theses Graduate Research and Creative Practice 12-21-2016 Reading Vice: The hrC istian Text in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia regum Brittaniae Nancy S. Bell Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Bell, Nancy S., "Reading Vice: The hrC istian Text in Geoffrey of Monmouth's Historia regum Brittaniae" (2016). Masters Theses. 829. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/829 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research and Creative Practice at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reading Vice: The Christian Text in Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Brittanniae Nancy S. Bell A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in English Department of English December 2016 Dedication To Jim: Thanks for your love, support, ideas, and discussions and for believing in me. To Aislinn, Caitrin, Eamon, and Treasa: Thanks for your love and support. You made it easier to keep going. And thanks to all the friends and associates who told me that I could do this. 3 Abstract Geoffrey of Monmouth claimed his purpose for writing Historia regum Britanniae was to record a history of the British kings and their great deeds. On the surface, his book is indeed a chronicle detailing the reigns of several important kings and glossing over many more.
    [Show full text]
  • OBINUS, Fictitious Archbishop of London. He Appears Fourth in a List Attributed to Jocelin of Furness, Succeeding Cadar and Succ
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY OBINUS, fictitious archbishop of London. He appears fourth in a list attributed to Jocelin of Furness, succeeding Cadar and succeeded by Conan (John Stow, The Chronicles of England, 1580, p.56). OCTAVIUS, Duke of the Gewissei. See Eudaf Hen. ODGAR ab AEDD. (Legendary). Odgar ab Aedd, king of Ireland, appears in the tale of ‘Culhwch and Olwen’. He accompanied Arthur to the west of Ireland in the search for Gwrgi Seferi, the purpose of which is never explained (RM 134). Later Arthur dispatched a message to Odgar to seek the cauldron of Diwrnach Wyddel, his overseer. Odgar, king of Ireland, besought Diwrnach to give it, but he would not (RM 135). Odgar was the only person who could pluck from the head of Ysgithyrwyn, Chief Boar, the tusk which Ysbaddaden Pencawr required in order to shave himself for the wedding of Culhwch and Olwen (WM 452, RM 122). However it was actually ‘Cadw’ [Caw] of Prydyn who ‘took’ the tusk (RM 135). Odgar was brother of Gwitard, son of Aedd king of Ireland. On the name see Patrick Sims-Williams in BBCS 29 pp.605-6 (1982). ODIAR the Frank. (Legendary). He is mentioned as Odyar franc in the romance of ‘Geraint and Enid’ as the steward of Arthur's Court (WM 412, RM 265). See further CO(2) p.227. ODWYN ap TEITHWALCH. (1040) He is mentioned in the genealogies as a descendant of Ceredig ap Cunedda, and the father of Morfydd the mother of Gwaithfoed of Ceredigion (PP §45). Here the spelling is Odwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliana Sylvestre Da Silva Cesila Si La Geste Ne Ment
    Juliana Sylvestre da Silva Cesila Si la geste ne ment : historicidade e ficcionalidade nas narrativas arturianas medievais. Orientadora: Profª. Dra. Yara Frateschi Vieira Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem Unicamp 2011 1 Juliana Sylvestre da Silva Cesila Si la geste ne ment : historicidade e ficcionalidade nas narrativas arturianas medievais. Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Teoria e História Literária do Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) como um dos requisitos para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Teoria e História Literária na área de Literatura Portuguesa. Orientadora: Profª. Dra. Yara Frateschi Vieira Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem Unicamp 2011 3 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca do IEL - Unicamp Cesila, Juliana Sylvestre da Silva. Si la geste ne ment : historicidade e ficcionalidade nas narrativas arturianas medievais / Juliana Sylvestre da Silva Cesila. -- Campinas, C337s SP : [s.n.], 2011. Orientador : Yara Frateschi Vieira. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem. 1. Idade média. 2. Idade média - Historiografia. 3. Arthur, Rei - Ficção. 4. Literatura medieval. I. Vieira, Yara Frateschi. II. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem. III. Título. tjj/iel Título em inglês: Si la geste ne ment: historicity and fictionality in medieval Arthurian narratives. Palavras-chave em inglês (Keywords): Middle Ages; Middle Ages - historiography; King Arthur - fiction; Medieval Literature. Área de concentração: História e Historiografia Literária. Titulação: Doutor em Teoria e História Literária. Banca examinadora: Profa. Dra. Yara Frateschi Vieira (orientadora), Profa. Dra. Lênia Márcia de Medeiros Mongelli, Prof. Dr. Alexandre Soares Carneiro, Prof. Dr. Raul Cesar Gouveia Fernandes e Profa.
    [Show full text]
  • A Welsh Classical Dictionary
    A WELSH CLASSICAL DICTIONARY CONMOR. According to Pierre Le Baud (d.1515) Comorus was Count of Léon (Histoire de Bretagne, 1638, p.65). He is also called Count of Poher with its centre at Carhaix (Nora K.Chadwick, Early Brittany, pp.221-2). In the Life of St.Hernin we are told that the saint settled as a hermit in Duault, near Carhaix, where he died and was buried. Conmor, Count of Poher, being impressed by a miracle, ordered a chapel to be erected over the saint's grave (LBS II.465 s.n. Ernin, and LBS III.282 s.n.Hoiernin). According to the seventh century Life of St.Samson (§53, where he is un-named) Conmor was an unjust and unprincipled stranger who had caused Ionas, the hereditary ruler [of Domnonée] to be put to death, so that all the country was in distress. Iudual, the son of Ionas, had been delivered into captivity. In the Life of St.Leonore we are told that Conmor seized power and married the widow of the dead king [Ionas] (wrongly called Righuel, see Riwal). Conmor suspected that his wife was plotting his death for the sake of her son's advancement. When she knew of his suspicions she sent Iudual to take sanctuary with St.Leonore. But hearing of Conmor's approach, Leonore sent Iudual off by sea and when Conmor arrived and demanded the surrender of Iudual, Leonore was able to tell him that he had already left and gone to sea to seek refuge with Childebert [king of Paris 511 - 558].
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey of Monmouth's Classical and Biblical Inheritance
    Chapter 2 Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Classical and Biblical Inheritance Paul Russell 1 In the Beginning The “very old book in the British tongue” brought to Geoffrey by Walter has always been the natural starting point for any discussion of Geoffrey and his sources for the De gestis Britonum.1 But the sentence which follows mention of the book (apart from its reference to translation (transferre)) has attracted relatively somewhat less attention: Though I have never gathered showy words from the gardens of others, I was persuaded by [Walter’s] request to translate the book into Latin in a rustic style [lit. stilus], reliant on my own reed pipe.2 But this is arguably even more revealing of his sources than the preceding sen- tence with its much discussed “very old book” and references to the works of Gildas and Bede. The crucial phrase, which could be taken as Geoffrey’s nod toward the modesty topos, is agresti tamen stilo propriisque calamis, “in a rustic 1 DGB, Prologus 2.9–10: “… quendam Britannici sermonis librum uestustissimum …” Translations of the DGB are normally Wright’s unless it was felt necessary to vary it; for other texts, translations are my own unless otherwise indicated. To a large extent the following discussion focuses in the DGB, which provides many more complex examples to consider, but some cases where Geoffrey draws on classical sources in the VM are also discussed. His debt to biblical sources in the latter is less easy to pin down; for a discussion of some of the theological aspects of the VM, see Barry Lewis’s chapter in this volume (pp.
    [Show full text]