DOCSLIB.ORG

Abbi, Anvita. 2013. a Grammar of the Great Andamanese Language: an Ethnolinguistic Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abbi, Anvita. 2013. a Grammar of the Great Andamanese Language: an Ethnolinguistic Study Abbi, Anvita. 2013. A grammar of the Great Andamanese language: An ethnolinguistic study. Leiden/Boston: Brill. Adelaar, Alexander. 2011. Siraya: Retrieving the phonology, grammar and lexicon of a dormant Formosan language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Aguilera, Oscar E. 2001. Gramática de la lengua kawésqar. Temuco: Corporación de Desarrollo Indígena. Ahland, Michael B. 2012. A grammar of Northern Mao (Màwés Aas’è). Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana, from northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Alfira, David A., Timothy K. Kafi, Hassan K. kaki, Ali A. Hasan, Anjo K. Anjo, Dayan K. Jas & Sadik K. Sarukh. 2016. Caning grammar book. Khartoum: Trial Edition, Sudan Workshop Program. Alnet, Aimee J. 2009. The clause structure of the Shimaore dialect of Comorian (Bantu). Urbana: University of Illinois PhD dissertation. Anderson, Judi L. 1989. Comaltepec Chinantec syntax. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington. Andronov, Mikhail S. 2001. A grammar of the Brahui language in comparative treatment. Munich: Lincom Europa. Årsjö, Britten. 2016. Konai reference grammar. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Austin, Peter K. 1981. A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Austing, John F. & Randolph Upia. 1975. Highlights of Ömie morphology. In Tom E. Dutton (ed.), Studies in languages of central and south-east Papua, 513-598. Canberra: Australian National University. Bader, Christian. 2008. Parlons karimojong: Une langue de l’Afrique orientale. Paris: L’Harmattan. Banks, Jonathan. 2007. The verbal morphology of Santiam Kalapuya. Northwest Journal of Linguistics 1. 1-98. 1 Barbour, Julie. 2012. A grammar of Neverver. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Bearth, Thomas. 1971. L’énoncé toura (Côte d’Ivoire). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Oklahoma. Berger, Hermann. 1983. Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. Berghäll, Liisa. 2015. A grammar of Mauwake. Berlin: Language Science Press. Bernini, Giuliano & Paolo Ramat. 1996. Negative sentences in the languages of Europe: A typological approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Berry, Keith & Christine Berry. 1999. A description of Abun: A West Papuan language of Irian Jaya. Canberra: Australian National University. Bertinetto, Pier M. 2009. Ayoreo (Zamuco): A grammatical sketch. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Besnier, Niko. 2000. Tuvaluan. London/New York: Routledge. Blackings, Mairi & Nigel Fabb. 2003. A grammar of Ma’di. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Blevins, Juliette. 2001. Nhanda: An aboriginal language of Western Australia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Boas, Franz & Ella Deloria. 1941. Dakota grammar. Washington: National Academy of Sciences. Bolaños, Katherine E. 2016. A grammar of Kakua. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Bolles, David & Alejandra Bolles. 2001. A grammar of the Yucatecan Mayan language. Lancaster: Layrinthos Press. Borgman, Donald M. 1990. Sanuma. In Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 2, 15-248. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Bowern, Claire L. 2012. A grammar of Bardi. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Bowler, Margit. 2014. Conjunction and disjunction in a language witout ‘and’. In Todd Snider, Sarah D’Antonio & Mia Weigand (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th semantics and linguistic theory conference, 137-155. Ithaca: Linguistic Society of America. Briley, David. 1997. Four grammatical marking systems in Bauzi. In Karl J. Franklin (ed.), Papers in Papuan Linguistics No. 2, 1-131. Canberra: Australian National 2 University. Brown, Lea. 2001. A grammar of Nias Selatan. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD dissertation. Brown, Jason, Alex Muir, Kimberley Craig & Karika Anea. 2016. A short grammar of Urama. Canberra: Australian National University. Bruce, Les. 1988. Serialization: From syntax to lexicon. Studies in Language 12(1). 19- 49. Bunzel, Ruth L. 1938. Zuni. In Franz Boas (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages, Vol. 2, 385-514. Washington: Government Printing Office. Cáceres, Natalia. 2011. Grammaire fonctionnelle-typologique du ye’kwana: Langue caribe du Venezuela. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2 PhD dissertation. Campbell, Lyle. 1985. The Pipil language of El Salvador. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Chamoreau, Claudine. 2003. Purépecha de Jarácuaro, Michoacán. México: El Colegio de México. Chandralal, Dileep. 2010. Sinhala. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Chávez, Heinrich A. H. 1984. Skizze einer Grammatik des Amarakaeri. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen PhD dissertation. Childs, Tucker. 2011. A grammar of Mani. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Collins, Chris & Levi Namaseb. 2011. A grammatical sketch of Nǀuuki stories. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe. Collord, Thomas L. 1968. Yokuts grammar: Chukchansi. Berkeley: University of California PhD dissertation. Connell, Timothy M. 2013. A sketch grammar of Matéq: A Land Dayak language of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Canterbury: University of Canterbury MA dissertation. Cook, Dorothy M. & Linda L. Criswell. 1993. El idioma koreguaje (tucano occidental). Santafé de Bogotá: Asociación Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. Crane, Thera M., Larry M. Hyman & Simon N. Tukumu. 2011. A grammar of Nzadi: A Bantu language of Democratic Republic of Congo. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cunha de Oliveira, Christiane. 2005. The language of the Apinajé people of Central Brazil. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation. 3 Curnow, Timothy J. 1997. A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of south-western Colombia. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation. Davidson, Matthew. 2002. Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York PhD dissertation. Davies, William D. 2010. A grammar of Madurese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Davis, Henry. 2001. On negation in Salish. University of Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 6. 55-90. De Jong, Lynda J. 2009. A grammar of Sierra Popoluca (Soteapanec, a Mixe-Zoquean language). Austin: University of Texas PhD dissertation. Diouf, Jean L. 2009. Grammaire du wolof contemporain: Édition revue et complétée. Paris: L’Harmattan. Dixon, Robert M. W. 2004. The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Döhler, Christian. 2018. A grammar of Komnzo. Berlin: Language Science Press. Donohue, Mark. 1999. A grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Donohue, Mark. 2004. A grammar of the Skou language of New Guinea. Singapore: Singapore University Press. Dpal, Ldan B. 2016. Amdo Tibetan language: An introduction to normative oral Amdo. Releigh: Asian Highlands Perspectives. Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1968. Ketskij jazyk. Tomsk: Tomsk University. Dum-Tragut, Jasmine. 2009. Armenian: Modern Eastern Armenian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Dunn, Michael J. 1999. A grammar of Chukchi. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation. Eberhard, David M. 2009. Mamaindê grammar: A Northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam PhD dissertation. Edmonson, Barbara W. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Huastec (Potosino dialect). New Orleans: Tulane University PhD dissertation. Edygarova, Svetlana. 2015. Negation in Udmurt. In Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm & Beáta Wagner-Nagy (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages, 265-292. 4 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Einarsson, Stefán. 1949. Icelandic grammar, text, glossary. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. Enfield, Nick J. 2007. A grammar of Lao. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Enrico, John. 2003. Haida syntax. Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska press. Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Ernst, Urs. 1992. Esquisse grammaticale du kakɔ. Yaoundé: Société Internationale de Linguistique. Evans, Nicholas D. A grammar of Kayardild. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Everett, Daniel L. 1983. A lingua pirahã e a teoria da sintaxe: Descrição, perspectivas e teoria. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas PhD dissertation. Everett, Daniel L. & Barbara Kern. 1997. Wari’: The Pacaas Novos language of Western Brazil. London/New York: Routledge. Fabre, Alain. 2016. Estudio gramatical de la lengua nivacle (familia Mataguayo, Chaco Paraguayo). Munich: Lincom Europa. Faraclas, Nicholas G. 2005. Nigerian pidgin. London/New York: Routledge. Farr, Cynthia J. M. 1999. The interface between syntax and discourse in Korafe, a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University. Fernández, Ana V. 1998. El tehuelche: Una lengua en vías de extinción. Valdivia: Universidad Austral de Chile. Flaherty, Virginia C. 1979. Schulenburg’s Tsimshian grammar. Corvallis: Oregon State University MA dissertation. Foley, William A. 2010. Events and serial verb constructions. In Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 79-109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London/Sydney/Dover: Croom Helm. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2012. A grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Fried, Robert W. 2010. A grammar of Bao’an Tu, a Mongolic language of northwest China. Buffalo: State University of New
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developments of Affectedness Marking
    Language & Linguistics in Melanesia Vol. 31 No. 1, 2013 ISSN: 0023-1959 Journal of the Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea ISSN: 0023-1959 Vol. 31 No. 1, 2013 0 Language & Linguistics in Melanesia Vol. 31 No. 1, 2013 ISSN: 0023-1959 Towards a Papuan history of languages MARK DONOHUE Department of Linguistics, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University [email protected] 1. Introduction and overview In this paper, I raise one simple point that must be taken into account when considering the history of the ‘Papuan’ languages – namely, the scope of the term ‘Papuan’. I shall argue that ‘Papuan’ is a term that logically should include many languages that have generally been discussed as being ‘Austronesian’. While much detailed work has been carried out on a number of ‘Papuan’ language families, the fact that they are separate families, and are not believed to be related to each other (in the sense of the comparative method) any more than they are to the Austronesian languages which largely surround their region, means that they cannot be considered without reference to those Austronesian languages. I will argue that many of the Austronesian languages which surround the Papuan region (see the appendix) can only be considered to be ‘Austronesian’ in a lexical sense. Since historical linguistics puts little value on simple lexical correspondences in the absence of regular sound correspondences, and regularity of sound correspondence is lacking in the Austronesian languages close to New Guinea, we cannot consider these languages to be ‘fully’ Austronesian. We must therefore consider a Papuan history that is much more widespread than usually conceived.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics &A
    Online Appendix for Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue (2014) Some Principles of the Use of Macro-Areas Language Dynamics & Change Harald Hammarstr¨om& Mark Donohue The following document lists the languages of the world and their as- signment to the macro-areas described in the main body of the paper as well as the WALS macro-area for languages featured in the WALS 2005 edi- tion. 7160 languages are included, which represent all languages for which we had coordinates available1. Every language is given with its ISO-639-3 code (if it has one) for proper identification. The mapping between WALS languages and ISO-codes was done by using the mapping downloadable from the 2011 online WALS edition2 (because a number of errors in the mapping were corrected for the 2011 edition). 38 WALS languages are not given an ISO-code in the 2011 mapping, 36 of these have been assigned their appropri- ate iso-code based on the sources the WALS lists for the respective language. This was not possible for Tasmanian (WALS-code: tsm) because the WALS mixes data from very different Tasmanian languages and for Kualan (WALS- code: kua) because no source is given. 17 WALS-languages were assigned ISO-codes which have subsequently been retired { these have been assigned their appropriate updated ISO-code. In many cases, a WALS-language is mapped to several ISO-codes. As this has no bearing for the assignment to macro-areas, multiple mappings have been retained. 1There are another couple of hundred languages which are attested but for which our database currently lacks coordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Languages in the Persian Achamenid
    ANALYZING INTER-VOLATILITY STRUCTURE TO DETERMINE OPTIMUM HEDGING RATIO FOR THE JET PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021) FUEL The Function of Non- Iranian Languages in the Persian Achamenid Empire Hassan Kohansal Vajargah Assistant professor of the University of Guilan-Rasht -Iran Email: hkohansal7 @ yahoo.com Hassan Kohansal Vajargah: The Function of Non- Iranian Languages in the Persian Achamenid Empire -- Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 18(4). ISSN 1567-214x Keywords: The Achamenid Empire, Non-Iranian languages, Aramaic language, Elamite language, Akkedi language, Egyptian language. ABSTRACT In the Achaemenid Empire( 331-559 B.C.)there were different tribes with various cultures. Each of these tribes spoke their own language(s). They mainly included Iranian and non- Iranian languages. The process of changes in the Persian language can be divided into three periods, namely , Ancient , Middle, and Modern Persian. The Iranian languages in ancient times ( from the beginning of of the Achaemenids to the end of the Empire) included :Median,Sekaee,Avestan,and Ancient Persian. At the time of the Achaemenids ,Ancient Persian was the language spoken in Pars state and the South Western part of Iran.Documents show that this language was not used in political and state affairs. The only remnants of this language are the slates and inscriptions of the Achaemenid Kings. These works are carved on stone, mud,silver and golden slates. They can also be found on coins,seals,rings,weights and plates.The written form of this language is exclusively found in inscriptions. In fact ,this language was used to record the great and glorious achivements of the Achaemenid kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians Cynthia J. Manning The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Manning, Cynthia J., "Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5855. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t su b ­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s c o n ten ts must be a ppro ved BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ib r a r y Un iv e r s it y of Montana D a te : 1 9 8 3 AN ETHNOHISTORY OF THE KOOTENAI INDIANS By Cynthia J. Manning B.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1978 Presented in partial fu lfillm en t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Approved by: Chair, Board of Examiners Fan, Graduate Sch __________^ ^ c Z 3 ^ ^ 3 Date UMI Number: EP36656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages in Indonesia Volume 49, 2001
    ISSN 0126 2874 NUSA LINGUISTICS STUDIES OF INDONESIAN AND OTHER LANGUAGES IN INDONESIA VOLUME 49, 2001 e It lie I 1414 ' 4 0:1111111 4.11.114114" .M4 • 16700' 4 at" STUDIES IN SULAWESI LINGUISTICS PART VII Edited by Wyn D. Laidig STUDIES IN SULAWESI LINGUISTICS PART VII NUSA Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia Volume 49, 2001 EDITORS: S oenjono Dardj owidjoj o, Jakarta Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Jakarta Anton M. Mo e li on o, Jakarta Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, Yogyakarta ASSISTANT EDITOR: Yassir Nassanius ADDRESS: NUSA Pusat Ka,jian Bahasa dan Budaya Jalan Jenderal Sudirtnan 51 Ko tak Pos 2639/At Jakarta 12930, Indonesia Fax (021) 571-9560 Email: [email protected],id All rights reserved (see also information page iv) ISSh? 0126 - 2874 11 EDITORIAL The present volume is the forty seventh of the Series NUM, Swdie.s in Sulawesi Languages, Part VI. The Series focuses on works about Indonesian and other languages in Indonesia. Malaysian and the local dialects of Malay wilt be accepted, but languaga outside these regions will be considered only In so far as they are theoretically relevant to our languages. Reports from field work in the form of data analysis or texts with translation, book reviews, squibs and discussions are also accepted. Papers appearing in NUSA can be original or traiislated from languages other than English. Although our main interest is restricted to the area of Indonesia, we welcome works on general linguistics that can throw light upon problems that we might face. It is hoped that NUS, can be relevant beyond the range of typological and area specializations and at the same time also serve the cause of deoccidentaliation of general linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Undocumented Languages of Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia
    Language Documentation and Description ISSN 1740-6234 ___________________________________________ This article appears in: Language Documentation and Description, vol 17. Editor: Peter K. Austin Four undocumented languages of Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia LAURA ARNOLD Cite this article: Arnold, Laura. 2020. Four undocumented languages of Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia. In Peter K. Austin (ed.) Language Documentation and Description 17, 25-43. London: EL Publishing. Link to this article: http://www.elpublishing.org/PID/180 This electronic version first published: July 2020 __________________________________________________ This article is published under a Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC (Attribution-NonCommercial). The licence permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ______________________________________________________ EL Publishing For more EL Publishing articles and services: Website: http://www.elpublishing.org Submissions: http://www.elpublishing.org/submissions Four undocumented languages of Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia Laura Arnold University of Edinburgh Summary Salawati, Batta, Biga, and As are four undocumented Austronesian languages belonging to the Raja Ampat-South Halmahera branch of South Halmahera- West New Guinea, spoken in West Papua province, Indonesia. Salawati, Batta, and Biga are spoken in the Raja Ampat archipelago, just off the western tip of the Bird’s Head peninsula of New Guinea, and As is spoken nearby on the New Guinea mainland. All four languages are to some degree endangered, as speakers shift to Papuan Malay, the local lingua franca: Biga is the most vital of the four languages, in that children are still acquiring it, whereas As is moribund, with only a handful of speakers remaining.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Series Change Requests Report
    ISO 639-3 Change Requests Series 2007 Summary of Outcomes Joan Spanne (SIL International), ISO 639-3 Registrar, 15 January 2008 Summary of requested changes There were 258 requests considered, recommending 404 explicit changes in the code set. Ten of the requests are still pending. The 247 requests that have been decided have been fully approved, entailing 383 explicit changes in the code set. The 10 requests still pending will be reported in an addendum to this report. The 383 explicit changes can be analyzed as follows: • Retirements: 75 o 7 non-existent languages; o 3 duplicate languages (treated separately from merges of sub-varieties); o 41 merged languages; o 24 split languages, resulting in 71 new language code elements (net gain of 47). • Completely new languages: 59 newly created languages not previously associated with another language in the code set. • Updates: 178 o 151 name updates, either change to a name form or addition of a name form; o 20 denotation updates of languages into which other varieties were merged; o 3 macrolanguage group updates (one spread across two requests, as two updates); o 2 new macrolanguage groups (existing individual languages changed in scope to macrolanguages); o 1 change in language type (which will in the future be handled outside the formal review process, as this is non-normative, supplementary information). Retirements from other than split of a language code element Change Reference Retirement Request Identifier Retirement Remedy Outcome Name Reason number 2007-003 akn Amikoana Non-existent Adopted 2007-004 paj Ipeka-Tapuia Merge Merge into [kpc] Adopted 2007-006 cru Carútana Merge Merge into [bwi] Adopted 2007-009 bxt Buxinhua Duplicate Duplicate of [bgk] Bit Adopted 2007-020 gen Geman Deng Duplicate Duplicate of Miju-Mishmi [mxj] Adopted 2007-021 dat Darang Deng Duplicate Duplicate of Digaro Mishmi [mhu] Adopted 2007-024 wre Ware Non-existent Adopted 2007-033 szk Sizaki Merge Merge into Ikizu [ikz] Adopted 2007-037 ywm Wumeng Yi Merge Merge into [ywu] Wusa Yi, renamed Adopted Wumeng Nasu (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Universality of Intonational Phrases: a Cross- Linguistic Interrater Study
    Phonology 35 (2018). Supplementary materials On the universality of intonational phrases: a cross- linguistic interrater study Nikolaus P. Himmelmann Meytal Sandler Jan Strunk Volker Unterladstetter University of Cologne Supplementary materials Appendix A: Details of the instructions given to the student annotators (§2) Our written instructions regarding IPB cues, given to the annotators and explained once verbally, were as follows in the original German: Ihre Aufgabe ist es, eine Audio-Aufnahme mit der Nacherzählung eines kurzen Films in Intonationseinheiten einzuteilen, d.h. in Ab- schnitte, die durch eine kohärente Melodie/einen kohärenten Ton- höhenverlauf als eine Einheit erkennbar sind. Wissenswertes Grenzen zwischen zwei Intonationseinheiten zeichnen sich dabei in der Regel durch zwei Dinge aus: 1. eine rhythmische Unterbrechung durch eine (ggf. auch nur sehr kurze) Pause, die Dehnung des letzten Segments am Ende einer Einheit und/oder die beschleunigte Produktion am Anfang einer neuen Einheit (Anakrusis); 2. durch eine Unterbrechung im Tonhöhenverlauf/in der Melodie: einen Tonhöhensprung (nach oben oder unten) zwischen dem Ende der einen und dem Beginn der folgenden Einheit; oft zeichnet sich eine Intonationseinheit durch einen kontinuierlichen Abfall der Grundfrequenz aus, der an einer Einheitsgrenze auf die Normaltonlage des Sprechers zurückgesetzt wird (reset). Daraufhin folgt typischerweise ein erneuter Abfall der Grundfrequenz (declination). 2 N. P. Himmelmann, M. Sandler, J. Strunk and V. Unterladstetter Pausen können allerdings manchmal auch innerhalb einer Intonations- einheit auftreten, z.B. wenn der Sprecher/die Sprecherin nach dem folgenden Wort sucht oder sich korrigiert = Verzögerungspausen. Verzögerungspausen sind oft, aber nicht notwendig gefüllt (ähm etc.). Wichtig ist, dass der Tonhöhenverlauf vor und nach der Pause nahtlos aneinander anschließt, es mithin nicht zu einem Neueinsatz der Melodie kommt, sondern die vor der Pause begonnene Kontur fortgesetzt wird.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Oriental Institute Seminars Number 2
    oi.uchicago.edu i THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE SEMINARS NUMBER 2 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban oi.uchicago.edu ii oi.uchicago.edu iii MARGINS OF WRITING, ORIGINS OF CULTURES edited by SETH L. SANDERS with contributions by Seth L. Sanders, John Kelly, Gonzalo Rubio, Jacco Dieleman, Jerrold Cooper, Christopher Woods, Annick Payne, William Schniedewind, Michael Silverstein, Piotr Michalowski, Paul-Alain Beaulieu, Theo van den Hout, Paul Zimansky, Sheldon Pollock, and Peter Machinist THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ORIENTAL INSTITUTE SEMINARS • NUMBER 2 CHICAGO • ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu iv Library of Congress Control Number: 2005938897 ISBN: 1-885923-39-2 ©2006 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2006. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago Co-managing Editors Thomas A. Holland and Thomas G. Urban Series Editors’ Acknowledgments The assistance of Katie L. Johnson is acknowledged in the production of this volume. Front Cover Illustration A teacher holding class in a village on the Island of Argo, Sudan. January 1907. Photograph by James Henry Breasted. Oriental Institute photograph P B924 Printed by McNaughton & Gunn, Saline, Michigan The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Infor- mation Services — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. oi.uchicago.edu v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Word Order in Subordinate Clauses: Innovative Or Conservative? a Typology of Word Order Change
    WORD ORDER IN SUBORDINATE CLAUSES: INNOVATIVE OR CONSERVATIVE? A TYPOLOGY OF WORD ORDER CHANGE Iker Salaberri Izko Grado en Filología (Alemán) 2016/17 Iván Igartua Ugarte Departamento de Estudios Clásicos 0 WORD ORDER IN SUBORDINATE CLAUSES: INNOVATIVE OR CONSERVATIVE? A TYPOLOGY OF WORD ORDER CHANGE Abstract A recurrent claim in the literature on word order change is that subordinate clauses tend to preserve older patterns. However, even though individual cases of unrelated and typologically distinct languages have been discussed, no quantitative data has been used to support this claim. In addition, arguments have been presented that contradict the view that subordinate clauses are conservative. This work is meant to contribute to the discussion by providing a far-reaching typology of word order change. The results suggest that subordinate clauses are indeed conservative, but with nuances. Index 1. Introduction 1.1. State of the art: two contrary positions in the literature 1.1.1. Subordinate clauses are conservative 1.1.2. Subordinate clauses are innovative 1.2. Theoretical concepts 1.2.1. Word order 1.2.2. Clause 1.2.3. Subordination 1.3. Data and methodology 2. Discussion: a typology of word order change 2.1. Discussion of the individual cases 2.1.1. Africa 2.1.2. Eurasia 2.2. Results 3. Conclusions and future research References 1 1. INTRODUCTION1 1.1. State of the art: two contrary positions in the literature 1.1.1. Subordinate clauses are conservative In a considerable part of the literature on language change it has been pointed out that subordinate clauses are conservative, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Papuan Malay – a Language of the Austronesian- Papuan Contact Zone
    Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society JSEALS 14.1 (2021): 39-72 ISSN: 1836-6821, DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52479 University of Hawaiʼi Press PAPUAN MALAY – A LANGUAGE OF THE AUSTRONESIAN- PAPUAN CONTACT ZONE Angela Kluge SIL International [email protected] Abstract This paper describes the contact features that Papuan Malay, an eastern Malay variety, situated in East Nusantara, the Austronesian-Papuan contact zone, displays under the influence of Papuan languages. This selection of features builds on previous studies that describe the different contact phenomena between Austronesian and non-Austronesian languages in East Nusantara. Four typical western Austronesian features that Papuan Malay is lacking or making only limited use of are examined in more detail: (1) the lack of a morphologically marked passive voice, (2) the lack of the clusivity distinction in personal pronouns, (3) the limited use of affixation, and (4) the limited use of the numeral-noun order. Also described in more detail are six typical Papuan features that have diffused to Papuan Malay: (1) the genitive-noun order rather than the noun-genitive order to express adnominal possession, (2) serial verb constructions, (3) clause chaining, and (4) tail-head linkage, as well as (5) the limited use of clause-final conjunctions, and (6) the optional use of the alienability distinction in nouns. This paper also briefly discusses whether the investigated features are also present in other eastern Malay varieties such as Ambon Malay, Maluku Malay and Manado Malay, and whether they are inherited from Proto-Austronesian, and more specifically from Proto-Malayic. By highlighting the unique features of Papuan Malay vis-à-vis the other East Nusantara Austronesian languages and placing the regional “adaptations” of Papuan Malay in a broader diachronic perspective, this paper also informs future research on Papuan Malay.
    [Show full text]
  • [.35 **Natural Language Processing Class Here Computational Linguistics See Manual at 006.35 Vs
    006 006 006 DeweyiDecimaliClassification006 006 [.35 **Natural language processing Class here computational linguistics See Manual at 006.35 vs. 410.285 *Use notation 019 from Table 1 as modified at 004.019 400 DeweyiDecimaliClassification 400 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 [400 [400 *‡Language Class here interdisciplinary works on language and literature For literature, see 800; for rhetoric, see 808. For the language of a specific discipline or subject, see the discipline or subject, plus notation 014 from Table 1, e.g., language of science 501.4 (Option A: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, class in 410, where full instructions appear (Option B: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, place before 420 through use of a letter or other symbol. Full instructions appear under 420–490) 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 SUMMARY [401–409 Standard subdivisions and bilingualism [410 Linguistics [420 English and Old English (Anglo-Saxon) [430 German and related languages [440 French and related Romance languages [450 Italian, Dalmatian, Romanian, Rhaetian, Sardinian, Corsican [460 Spanish, Portuguese, Galician [470 Latin and related Italic languages [480 Classical Greek and related Hellenic languages [490 Other languages 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [401 *‡Philosophy and theory See Manual at 401 vs. 121.68, 149.94, 410.1 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [.3 *‡International languages Class here universal languages; general
    [Show full text]